DOCSLIB.ORG

Biological Technical Report For

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Biological Technical Report For BIOLOGICAL TECHNICAL REPORT FOR NAKASE PROPERTY PROJECT LOCATED IN THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST, ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared For: Toll Brothers, Inc. 725 West Town & Country Road Suite 200 Orange, California 92868 Contact: Peter H. Kim, P. E. Phone: (714) 347-1300 Fax: (714) 835-9685 Prepared By: Glenn Lukos Associates, Inc. 29 Orchard Lake Forest, California 92630 Phone: (949) 837-0404, ext. 22 Report Preparers: Zack West and Tricia Campbell March 5, 2019 i TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background and Scope of Work .......................................................................... 1 1.2 Project Location ................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Project Description ............................................................................................... 2 1.4 Existing Conditions .............................................................................................. 2 2.0 METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................... 2 2.1 Summary of Surveys ............................................................................................ 3 2.2 Botanical Resources ............................................................................................. 4 2.2.1 Literature Search ........................................................................................... 5 2.2.2 Vegetation Mapping ...................................................................................... 5 2.2.3 Special-Status Plant Species and Habitats Evaluated for the Project Site .... 5 2.2.4 Botanical Surveys ......................................................................................... 5 2.3 Wildlife Resources ............................................................................................... 6 2.3.1 General Surveys ............................................................................................ 6 2.3.2 Special-Status Animal Species Reviewed .................................................... 7 2.3.2 Habitat Assessment for Special Status Animal Species ............................... 7 2.3.3 Focused Surveys for Special-Status Animals Species .................................. 7 2.4 Jurisdictional Delineation ................................................................................... 10 3.0 REGULATORY SETTING ........................................................................... 10 3.1 State and/or Federally Listed Plants or Animals ................................................ 11 3.1.1 State of California Endangered Species Act ............................................... 11 3.1.2 Federal Endangered Species Act ................................................................ 11 3.1.3 State and Federal Take Authorizations for Listed Species ......................... 12 3.2 California Environmental Quality Act ............................................................... 12 3.2.1 CEQA Guidelines Section 15380 ............................................................... 12 3.2.2 Special-Status Plants, Wildlife and Vegetation Communities Evaluated Under CEQA ....................................................................................... 13 3.3 Jurisdictional Waters .......................................................................................... 15 3.3.1 Army Corps of Engineers ........................................................................... 15 3.3.2 Regional Water Quality Control Board ...................................................... 19 3.4 California Department of Fish and Wildlife ...................................................... 20 ii 3.5 Central/Coastal Natural Communities Conservation Program/Habitat Conservation Plan .......................................................................................... 20 4.0 RESULTS ...................................................................................................... 21 4.1 Existing Conditions ........................................................................................... 21 4.2 Vegetation .......................................................................................................... 21 4.2.1 Maritime Succulent Scrub/Southern Cactus Scrub (Coastal Sage Scrub) .. 22 4.2.2 Southern Black Willow Forest .................................................................... 22 4.2.3 Active Agriculture ...................................................................................... 22 4.2.4 Bare Ground/Developed ............................................................................. 23 4.2 Wildlife ............................................................................................................... 23 4.3 Special-Status Vegetation Communities (Habitats) ........................................... 23 4.4 Special-Status Plants .......................................................................................... 24 4.4.1 Special-Status Plants Detected at the Project Site ...................................... 32 4.5 Special-Status Animals ...................................................................................... 32 4.5.1 Special-Status Wildlife Species Observed within the Project Site ............. 38 4.5.2 Special-Status Wildlife Species not Observed but with a Potential to Occur at the Project Site ................................................................................ 38 4.5.3 Critical Habitat ............................................................................................ 38 4.6 Raptor Use .......................................................................................................... 39 4.7 Nesting Birds ...................................................................................................... 39 4.8 Soil Mapping ...................................................................................................... 39 4.9 Jurisdictional Delineation ................................................................................... 39 4.10 Wildlife Migration/Nurseries ............................................................................. 40 5.0 IMPACT ANALYSIS .................................................................................... 41 5.1 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) ................................................. 41 5.1.1 Thresholds of Significance ......................................................................... 41 5.1.2 Criteria for Determining Significance Pursuant to CEQA ......................... 42 5.2 Impacts to Native Vegetation ............................................................................. 43 5.3 Impacts to Special-Status Plants ........................................................................ 43 5.4 Impacts to Special-Status Animals ..................................................................... 43 5.5 Impacts to Critical Habitat ................................................................................. 44 5.6 Impacts to Nesting Birds .................................................................................... 44 5.7 Impacts to Jurisdictional Waters ........................................................................ 45 5.8 Wildlife Migration/Nurseries ............................................................................. 46 iii 5.9 Indirect Impacts to Biological Resources ........................................................... 46 5.10 Cumulative Impacts to Biological Resources .................................................... 47 6.0 MITIGATION/AVOIDANCE MEASURES ................................................. 49 6.1 Burrowing Owl ................................................................................................... 49 6.2 Native Nesting Birds .......................................................................................... 49 6.3 Bats ..................................................................................................................... 49 6.4 Serrano Creek ..................................................................................................... 50 6.5 Jurisdictional Waters .......................................................................................... 52 6.6 Level of Significance after Mitigation ............................................................... 53 8.0 CERTIFICATION .......................................................................................... 56 TABLES Table 2-1. Summary of Biological Surveys for the Project Site ..........................................4 Table 2-2. Summary of Burrowing Owl Surveys ................................................................7 Table 2-3. Summary of Coastal California Gnatcatcher Surveys ........................................8 Table 2-4. Summary of Least Bell’s Vireo Surveys ............................................................9 Table 2-5. Summary of Southwestern Willow Flycatcher Surveys .....................................9 Table 3-1. CNPS Ranks 1, 2, 3, and 4 and Threat Code Extensions .................................14 Table 4-1. Summary of Vegetation/Land Use Types for the Project Site .........................22 Table 4-2. Summary of CNDDB Query – Special Status Habitats ...................................23 Table 4-3. Special-Status Plants Evaluated for the Project Site ........................................24
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Genetic Structure of Species' Geographic
    THE GENETIC STRUCTURE OF SPECIES’ GEOGRAPHIC RANGES: AN EVALUATION USING THE COSTAL DUNE ENDEMIC CAMISSONIOPSIS CHEIRANTHIFOLIA (ONAGRACEAE) By Adriana López Villalobos A thesis submitted to the Department of Biology in conformity with the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario Canada June 2017 Copyright © Adriana López-Villalobos, 2017 ABSTRACT The development of molecular techniques has spurred thousands of population genetic studies on a wide variety of plant and animal species. Particularly important, but still relatively rare, are studies that properly test for geographic variation in genetic structure across species’ ranges. This thesis investigates the effects of population density, mating system variation, distance between populations and hybridization on the genetic diversity, differentiation and structure across the range of Camissoniopsis cheiranthifolia (Onagraceae). By combining a transplant experiment with microsatellites, I also provide an empirical test of one of the most poorly resolved questions in evolutionary biology: Why do species exhibit limits to their distributions? I developed 24 species-specific nuclear microsatellites loci (nSSR) and used 13 of these and six variable chloroplast microsatellites (cpSSR) to investigate the genetic consequences of the transition from outcrossing to selfing in C. cheiranthifolia. As predicted, small-flowered, selfing populations had lower nSSR diversity (but not cpSSR) than large-flowered, outcrossing populations but they were not more differentiated. The reduction in diversity was greater than the expected from selfing alone, but could not be accounted for by indirect effects of selfing on population density. Five parapatric nSSR clusters and three groups of cpSSR haplotypes usually (but not always) differed in mating system, suggesting that selfing may often initiate ecogeographic isolation.
    [Show full text]
  • Updated Biological Inventory Report for the Rancho Malibu Religious Memorial Project, 4000 Malibu Canyon Road, City of Malibu, California
    November 18, 2015 Project Number 15-02065 Jake Jesson Assistant Project Manager Green Acres, LLC 22837 Pacific Coast Highway #775 Malibu, California 90265 Via Email: [email protected] Subject: Updated Biological Inventory Report for the Rancho Malibu Religious Memorial Project, 4000 Malibu Canyon Road, City of Malibu, California This letter report updates the previous findings of the Biological Inventory Report (BIR) for the Rancho Malibu Religious Memorial Project due to a change in the project scope and grading plan. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was first prepared for this site (CBA, 1997) and certified by the City of Malibu City Council (March 23, 1998) along with conditions of approval contained in Conditional Use Permit No. 96-005. A BIR was prepared for the project site by Rincon Consultants, Inc. (Rincon) in May 2007 for plans to build a 146 room luxury hotel. An updated report was prepared in September 2011 (Rincon) as part of a Coastal Development Permit (CDP) application and Site Plan Review. In February of 2012, Rincon conducted a native tree assessment. In 2011 a reconnaissance survey and BIR update was prepared by Rincon to support the applicant’s plans to change the project from the development of a luxury hotel to a religious memorial and cemetery. This BIR (October 2015) documents the changes in potential impacts to special-status biological resources as they relate to the revised scope and grading plan for the proposed religious memorial and cemetery. PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION The project site is located in the central portion of the City of Malibu, immediately north of Pacific Coast Highway between Malibu Canyon Road and Civic Center Way at 4000 Malibu Canyon Road.
    [Show full text]
  • Flat-Rosetted, 1−Several-Stemmed at Base, When Mature Large
    Eulobus californicus Torrey & A. Gray, MUSTARD EVENING PRIMROSE. Annual, taprooted, flat-rosetted, 1−several-stemmed at base, when mature large specimens branched at most nodes, basal branches spreading and others ascending, erect, (20–)40–180 cm tall; shoots with basal leaves and cauline leaves, during early development sparsely short-strigose and with scattered, short, finely stalked, colorless glandular hairs, becoming ± glabrescent. Stems: cylindric, to 20 mm diameter at base, green, breaking easily, becoming conspicuously glaucous and aging purplish red at base with some darker dots or bumps, on old specimens with peeling periderm (exfoliating) exposing satiny surface; solid, with wide, colorless pith. Leaves: helically alternate, pinnately lobed with 6−13 lateral lobes per edge (basal leaves) and simple and unlobed (upper cauline leaves), petiolate, without stipules; petiole subcylindric to flattened or channeled on upper side, to 40 mm long (rosette leaves) decreasing to 1.5 mm (the uppermost cauline leaves), mostly glabrous except white short-strigose in channel, with inconspicuous glandular hairs when very young; blade narrowly oblanceolate or elliptic to narrowly lanceolate, 100–200+ × 25– 42(–65) mm (basal and lower cauline leaves) to 40 × 6 mm (the uppermost cauline leaves), the lobes opposite or alternate, irregular and cut, 4–24 mm long, the longest lobes ± spreading with associated sinuses nearly to midrib, lobes commonly shorter and narrower on basal portion of basal leaves, dentate to short-dentate on margins (including sinuses) and becoming dark reddish purple, acute to narrowly acute at tip, pinnately veined with principal veins sunken on upper surface and raised on lower surface, midrib purplish pink, upper surface developing purple spots, white short-strigose or sparsely so or appearing glabrous, lower surface pale green and glabrate.
    [Show full text]
  • Baccharis Malibuensis (Asteraceae): a New Species from the Santa Monica Mountains, California R
    Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 14 | Issue 3 Article 32 1995 Baccharis Malibuensis (Asteraceae): A New Species from the Santa Monica Mountains, California R. Mitchell Beauchamp Pacific Southwest Biological Services, Inc. James Henrickson California State University, Los Angeles Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Beauchamp, R. Mitchell and Henrickson, James (1995) "Baccharis Malibuensis (Asteraceae): A New Species from the Santa Monica Mountains, California," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 14: Iss. 3, Article 32. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol14/iss3/32 Aliso, 14(3), pp. 197-203 © 1996, by The Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, Claremont, CA 91711-3157 BACCHARIS MALIBUENSIS (ASTERACEAE): A NEW SPECIES FROM THE SANTA MONICA MOUNTAINS, CALIFORNIA R. MITCHEL BEAUCHAMP Pacific Southwest Biological Services, Inc. P.O. Box 985 National City, California 91951 AND JAMES HENRICKSON Department of Biology California State University Los Angeles, California 90032 ABSTRACT Baccharis malibuensis is described from the Malibu Lake region of the Santa Monica Mountains, Los Angeles County, California. It is closely related to Baccharis plummerae subsp. plummerae but differs in having narrow, subentire, typically conduplicate, sparsely villous to mostly glabrous leaves with glands occurring in depressions on the adaxial surface, more cylindrical inflorescences, and a distribution in open chaparral vegetation. The new taxon shares some characteristics with B. plum­ merae subsp. glabrata of northwestern San Luis Obispo County, e.g., smaller leaves, reduced vestiture, and occurrence in scrub habitat, but the two taxa appear to have developed independently from B.
    [Show full text]
  • The Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants of California, Second Edition Supplement II December 2014
    The Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants of California, Second Edition Supplement II December 2014 In the pages that follow are treatments that have been revised since the publication of the Jepson eFlora, Revision 1 (July 2013). The information in these revisions is intended to supersede that in the second edition of The Jepson Manual (2012). The revised treatments, as well as errata and other small changes not noted here, are included in the Jepson eFlora (http://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/IJM.html). For a list of errata and small changes in treatments that are not included here, please see: http://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/JM12_errata.html Citation for the entire Jepson eFlora: Jepson Flora Project (eds.) [year] Jepson eFlora, http://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/IJM.html [accessed on month, day, year] Citation for an individual treatment in this supplement: [Author of taxon treatment] 2014. [Taxon name], Revision 2, in Jepson Flora Project (eds.) Jepson eFlora, [URL for treatment]. Accessed on [month, day, year]. Copyright © 2014 Regents of the University of California Supplement II, Page 1 Summary of changes made in Revision 2 of the Jepson eFlora, December 2014 PTERIDACEAE *Pteridaceae key to genera: All of the CA members of Cheilanthes transferred to Myriopteris *Cheilanthes: Cheilanthes clevelandii D. C. Eaton changed to Myriopteris clevelandii (D. C. Eaton) Grusz & Windham, as native Cheilanthes cooperae D. C. Eaton changed to Myriopteris cooperae (D. C. Eaton) Grusz & Windham, as native Cheilanthes covillei Maxon changed to Myriopteris covillei (Maxon) Á. Löve & D. Löve, as native Cheilanthes feei T. Moore changed to Myriopteris gracilis Fée, as native Cheilanthes gracillima D.
    [Show full text]
  • Vestured Pits in Wood of Onagraceae: Correlations with Ecology, Habit, and Phylogeny1
    VESTURED PITS IN WOOD OF Sherwin Carlquist2 and Peter H. Raven3 ONAGRACEAE: CORRELATIONS WITH ECOLOGY, HABIT, AND PHYLOGENY1 ABSTRACT All Onagraceae for which data are available have vestured pits on vessel-to-vessel pit pairs. Vestures may also be present in some species on the vessel side of vessel-to-ray pit pairs. Herbaceous Onagraceae do not have fewer vestures, although woods with lower density (Circaea L. and Oenothera L.) have fewer vestures. Some Onagraceae from drier areas tend to have smaller vessel pits, and on that account may have fewer vestures (Epilobium L. and Megacorax S. Gonz´alez & W. L. Wagner). Pit apertures as seen on the lumen side of vessel walls are elliptical, occasionally oval, throughout the family. Vestures are predominantly attached to pit aperture margins. As seen from the outer surfaces of vessels, vestures may extend across the pit cavities. Vestures are usually absent or smaller on the distal portions of pit borders (except for Ludwigia L., which grows consistently in wet areas). Distinctive vesture patterns were observed in the several species of Lopezia Cav. and in Xylonagra Donn. Sm. & Rose. Vestures spread onto the lumen-facing vessel walls of Ludwigia octovalvis (Jacq.) P. H. Raven. Although the genera are presented here in the sequence of a recent molecular phylogeny of Onagraceae, ecology and growth forms are more important than evolutionary relationships with respect to abundance, degree of grouping, and morphology of vestured pits. Designation of vesture types is not warranted based on the distribution of named types in Onagraceae and descriptive adjectives seem more useful, although more data on vesturing in the family are needed before patterns of diversity and their extent can be fully ascertained.
    [Show full text]
  • Ventura County Plant Species of Local Concern
    Checklist of Ventura County Rare Plants (Twenty-second Edition) CNPS, Rare Plant Program David L. Magney Checklist of Ventura County Rare Plants1 By David L. Magney California Native Plant Society, Rare Plant Program, Locally Rare Project Updated 4 January 2017 Ventura County is located in southern California, USA, along the east edge of the Pacific Ocean. The coastal portion occurs along the south and southwestern quarter of the County. Ventura County is bounded by Santa Barbara County on the west, Kern County on the north, Los Angeles County on the east, and the Pacific Ocean generally on the south (Figure 1, General Location Map of Ventura County). Ventura County extends north to 34.9014ºN latitude at the northwest corner of the County. The County extends westward at Rincon Creek to 119.47991ºW longitude, and eastward to 118.63233ºW longitude at the west end of the San Fernando Valley just north of Chatsworth Reservoir. The mainland portion of the County reaches southward to 34.04567ºN latitude between Solromar and Sequit Point west of Malibu. When including Anacapa and San Nicolas Islands, the southernmost extent of the County occurs at 33.21ºN latitude and the westernmost extent at 119.58ºW longitude, on the south side and west sides of San Nicolas Island, respectively. Ventura County occupies 480,996 hectares [ha] (1,188,562 acres [ac]) or 4,810 square kilometers [sq. km] (1,857 sq. miles [mi]), which includes Anacapa and San Nicolas Islands. The mainland portion of the county is 474,852 ha (1,173,380 ac), or 4,748 sq.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Gulf, Queensland
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION on the TIWI ISLANDS, NORTHERN TERRITORY: Part 1. Environments and Plants
    BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION ON THE TIWI ISLANDS, NORTHERN TERRITORY: Part 1. Environments and plants Report prepared by John Woinarski, Kym Brennan, Ian Cowie, Raelee Kerrigan and Craig Hempel. Darwin, August 2003 Cover photo: Tall forests dominated by Darwin stringybark Eucalyptus tetrodonta, Darwin woollybutt E. miniata and Melville Island Bloodwood Corymbia nesophila are the principal landscape element across the Tiwi islands (photo: Craig Hempel). i SUMMARY The Tiwi Islands comprise two of Australia’s largest offshore islands - Bathurst (with an area of 1693 km 2) and Melville (5788 km 2) Islands. These are Aboriginal lands lying about 20 km to the north of Darwin, Northern Territory. The islands are of generally low relief with relatively simple geological patterning. They have the highest rainfall in the Northern Territory (to about 2000 mm annual average rainfall in the far north-west of Melville and north of Bathurst). The human population of about 2000 people lives mainly in the three towns of Nguiu, Milakapati and Pirlangimpi. Tall forests dominated by Eucalyptus miniata, E. tetrodonta, and Corymbia nesophila cover about 75% of the island area. These include the best developed eucalypt forests in the Northern Territory. The Tiwi Islands also include nearly 1300 rainforest patches, with floristic composition in many of these patches distinct from that of the Northern Territory mainland. Although the total extent of rainforest on the Tiwi Islands is small (around 160 km 2 ), at an NT level this makes up an unusually high proportion of the landscape and comprises between 6 and 15% of the total NT rainforest extent. The Tiwi Islands also include nearly 200 km 2 of “treeless plains”, a vegetation type largely restricted to these islands.
    [Show full text]
  • Cop16 Prop. 57
    Original language: English CoP16 Prop. 57 CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA ____________________ Sixteenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties Bangkok (Thailand), 3-14 March 2013 CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSALS FOR AMENDMENT OF APPENDICES I AND II A. Proposal Delist Dudleya stolonifera and Dudleya traskiae from Appendix II. B. Proponent United States of America*. C. Supporting statement 1. Taxonomy 1.1 Class: Magnoliopsida 1.2 Order: Saxifragales 1.3 Family: Crassulaceae 1.4 Genus and species, including author and year: a) Dudleya stolonifera Moran 1950 b) Dudleya traskiae (Rose) Moran 1942 1.5 Scientific synonyms: b) Stylophyllum traskiae Rose; Echeveria traskiae (Rose) A. Berger 1.6 Common names: English: a) Laguna Beach live-forever; Laguna Beach dudleya b) Santa Barbara Island live-forever; Santa Barbara Island dudleya French: Spanish: 1.7 Code numbers: None 2. Overview At the fourth meeting of the Conference of the Parties to CITES (CoP4; Gaborone, 1983), the United States of America proposed Dudleya stolonifera and Dudleya traskiae to be included in Appendix I (CoP4 Prop. 138 and Prop. 139), which were adopted by the Parties. At the ninth meeting of the Plants Committee (PC9; Darwin, 1999), the two species were reviewed under the Periodic Review of the Appendices, and were subsequently recommended for transfer from Appendix I to Appendix II. Dudleya stolonifera and D. traskiae were transferred to Appendix II at CoP11 (Gigiri, 2000) and CoP12 (Santiago, 2002), respectively. The species are the only Dudleya species listed in the CITES Appendices. * The geographical designations employed in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the CITES Secretariat or the United Nations Environment Programme concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Character Description of Toolibin Lake, Western Australia
    ECOLOGICAL CHARACTER DESCRIPTION OF TOOLIBIN LAKE, WESTERN AUSTRALIA January 2006 Prepared for Department of Conservation and Land Management Prepared by Gary McMahon Ecosystem Solutions Pty Ltd PO Box 685 Dunsborough WA 6281 Ph: 08 9759 1960 Fax: 08 9759 1920 Limitations Statement This report has been exclusively drafted for the DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION & LAND MANAGEMENT. No express or implied warranties are made by Ecosystem Solutions Pty Ltd regarding the findings and data contained in this report. No new research or field studies were conducted. All of the information details included in this report are based upon the research provided and obtained at the time Ecosystem Solutions Pty Ltd conducted its analysis. In undertaking this work the authors have made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information used. Any conclusions drawn or recommendations made in the report are done in good faith and the consultants take no responsibility for how this information and the report are used subsequently by others. Please note that the contents in this report may not be directly applicable towards another organisation’s needs or any other specific land area requiring management strategies. Ecosystem Solutions Pty Ltd accepts no liability whatsoever for a third party’s use of, or reliance upon, this specific report. Disclaimer The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Australian Government or the Minister for the Environment, or the Administrative Authority for Ramsar in Australia. While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure the contents of this publication are factually correct, the Commonwealth does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the contents, and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of, or reliance on, the contents of this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 153 / Wednesday, August 9, 1995 / Proposed Rules 40549
    Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 153 / Wednesday, August 9, 1995 / Proposed Rules 40549 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, By the Commission, Chairman Morgan, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DC 20423. Vice Chairman Owen, Commissioners Simmons and McDonald. Background FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vernon A. Williams, Acanthomintha ilicifolia (San Diego Beryl Gordon, (202) 927±5610. [TDD for Secretary. thornmint), Dudleya stolonifera (Laguna the hearing impaired: (202) 927±5721.] [FR Doc. 95±19512 Filed 8±8±95; 8:45 am] Beach liveforever), Monardella linoides ssp. viminea. (willowy monardella), and SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For a more BILLING CODE 7035±01±P detailed discussion of the current Hemizonia conjugens (Otay tarweed) statutes and regulations, the issues occur in San Diego and Orange Counties raised by the petition, and the in southwestern California. In addition, information that is needed to go DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR populations of three of these taxa (A. forward, see the Commission's separate ilicifolia, H. conjugens, and M. linoides decision in this proceeding issued Fish and Wildlife Service ssp. viminea) extend into extreme northern Baja California, Mexico. These today. To obtain a copy of the full 50 CFR Part 17 decision, write to, call, or pick up in species occur in coastal sage scrub or in a mosaic of sage scrub, chaparral, person from: Office of the Secretary, RIN 1018±AD 38 Room 2215, Interstate Commerce riparian scrub, and grassland habitats. Coastal sage scrub is a community Commission, 1201 Constitution Avenue,
    [Show full text]