2021 FTIP Checklist

2021 FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Federal Fiscal Years 2020/21 – 2023/24 Adopted Per Resolution 20-21 February 17, 2021

StanCOG 2021 Federal Transportation Improvement Program Table of Contents

Executive Summary ...... 1 Resumen Ejecutivo ...... 2 Introduction ...... 3 Details of the Stanislaus Region ...... 3 About the Stanislaus Council of Governments ...... 4 The StanCOG Policy Board ...... 4 Overview of the 2021 Federal Transportation Program ...... 5 FTIP Importance to the Stanislaus Region ...... 5 The FTIP is How Projects in the RTP/SCS are Implemented ...... 5 FTIP Contributors ...... 5 Federal Government/United States Department of Transportation ...... 6 State Government/Caltrans ...... 6 Regional Government/Stanislaus Council of Governments ...... 6 Local Governments and Transit Operators ...... 7 The People of the Stanislaus Region ...... 8 FTIP Requirements...... 8 Federal Planning Factors and Goals ...... 9 Performance-Based Planning ...... 10 Congestion Management Process ...... 10 Programmed Projects and Fiscal Constraint ...... 11 The State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) & Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) ...... 12 Air Quality Conformity...... 12 Regionally Significant Projects...... 13 Urbanized Areas and Federal-Aid Eligible Roadways ...... 13 The Annual List of Federal Obligated Projects ...... 13 Environmental Justice & Title VI Communities ...... 14 System Preservation, Operations and Maintenance ...... 14 FTIP Development and Management ...... 15 FTIP Development ...... 15 Amendments & Modifications ...... 15 FTIP Programming Approach ...... 17 Consultation and Coordination ...... 17 Planning Coordination with the Eight San Joaquin Valley Council of Governments ...... 18 Expanded Consultation ...... 18 FHWA and FTA Performance Measures ...... 18 StanCOG’s Approach to Performance-Based Planning and Programming ...... 22 Safety Performance Management (PM1)...... 22 Transit Operators’ Safety Plans ...... 24 Asset Management Performance Measures (PM2)...... 28 Transit Asset Management ...... 30 System Performance (PM3) ...... 35 FTIP Funding ...... 39 Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ) ...... 39 Surface Transportation Block Grant (STBG) ...... 40 Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) ...... 40 Active Transportation Program (ATP) ...... 40 Highway Bridge Program (HBP) ...... 41 State Highway Operations & Protection Program (SHOPP) ...... 41 FTA 5307 – Transit/Urbanized Area Formula Grants ...... 41 FTA 5310 – Transit/Enhanced Mobility of Seniors & Individuals with Disabilities ...... 41 FTA 5311 – Transit/Non-Urbanized Area Formula Grants ...... 41 FTA 5337 – Transit/State of Good Repair Grants ...... 42 FTA 5339 – Transit/Grants for Buses and Bus Facilities Formula Program ...... 42 Measure L – Stanislaus Regions’ Self-Help Tax to Support Transportation Investments ...... 42 FTIP Project Selection Process ...... 42 StanCOG’s CMAQ Apportionment Methodology ...... 43 StanCOG’s STBG Apportionment Methodology ...... 44 Expedited Project Selection Procedures (EPSP)...... 45

Appendices Project Listings for the 2021 Federal Transportation Improvement Program ...... A 2021 Fiscal Constraint ...... B Congestion Mitigation Air Quality Back-up Lists ...... C Surface Transportation Block Grant Program Back-up List ...... D 2020 State Transportation Improvement Program Project List ...... E Active Transportation Program Back-up List ...... F Highway Bridge Program Back-up List ...... G Highway Safety Improvement Program Back-up List ...... H State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOPP) – Back-up List ...... I Exempt Categories and Grouped Classifications ...... J Authority Delegation to StanCOG Executive Director to Approve Administrative Modifications ...... K Public Engagement - Notice/Proof of Publication ...... L StanCOG Responses to Comments Received During Public Review Period & Hearing...... M Regionally Significant Project Listings for Possible Federal Environmental Action during the “TIP” Period ...... N Air Quality Conformity Analysis ...... O Environmental Justice Analysis ...... P 2018 RTP Policies and Performance Measures ...... Q 2021 FTIP Checklist ...... R StanCOG Board Resolution Adopting 2021 FTIP ...... S

List of Figures and Tables

Figure 1 – Integration of the CMP with StanCOG’s RTP & FTIP ...... 11

Table 1 – Safety Performance Measures & Targets ...... 23 Table 2 – MAX Safety Performance Targets ...... 25 Table 3 – StaRT Safety Performance Targets ...... 25 Table 4 – Turlock Transit Safety Performance Targets ...... 26 Table 5 – Pavement Condition Criteria for NHS Roadways ...... 28 Table 6 – Bridge Condition Criteria ...... 29 Table 7 – Asset Management Performance Measures & Targets ...... 30 Table 8 – Asset Management Measures & Targets for Transit Agencies ...... 32 Table 9 – System Performance Measures & Targets ...... 37 Table 10 – Estimated CMAQ Apportionment for the Stanislaus Region ...... 39 Table 11 – Estimated STBG Apportionment for the Stanislaus Region ...... 40 Table 12 – StanCOG’s CMAQ Allocation Methodology ...... 43 Table 13 – Example of StanCOG’s Formula Allocation of STBG ...... 45 Table 14 – StanCOG’s Expedited Project Selection Procedures ...... 46 Executive Summary

The Stanislaus Council of Government's (StanCOG) 2021 Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) is a region wide, multi-year, intermodal program of transportation projects within the Stanislaus region. StanCOG is the federally-mandated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) and state-recognized Regional Transportation Planning Agency (RTPA) for the region. StanCOG's planning boundaries encompass the cities of Ceres, Hughson, Modesto, Newman, Oakdale, Patterson, Riverbank, Turlock, Waterford and the County of Stanislaus. The 2021 FTIP programs the region's projects over the next four federal fiscal years (2020/21 through 2023/24) and is a comprehensive list of transportation projects that receive federal funds, require a federal action, or are regionally significant. The purpose of the FTIP is to ensure that federal transportation funding continues to flow into the Stanislaus region as a result of complying with federal regulations pertaining to programming.

A regionally significant project is a "transportation project that is on a facility which serves regional transportation needs (such as access to and from the area outside of the region, major activity centers in the region, major planned developments such as new retail malls, sports complexes, etc., or transportation terminals as well as most terminals themselves) and would normally be included in the modeling of a metropolitan area's transportation network, including, at a minimum all principal arterial highways and all Fixed Guideway transit facilities that offer an alternative to regional highway travel." The FTIP lists the near-term transportation projects, programs, and investment priorities of the region’s surface transportation system along with locally and state-funded projects that are regionally significant.

The FTIP is updated every two years and must be financially constrained by Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) and include sufficient financial information to demonstrate that projects can be funded as programmed. Only projects with funds that are "reasonably expected to be available" may be programmed in the FTIP. Additionally, the Stanislaus Region is in an air quality non-attainment area. Therefore, all projects must be in conformity with State Implementation Plans (SIPs) for air quality before they can be programmed. The FTIP may be amended during its life cycle to reflect changes in projects scopes, schedules, costs and priorities, as well as to add or delete projects.

The 2021 FTIP has been developed with the assistance of municipal and elected officials and importantly, through a public participation process that has provided opportunities and time for public review and comment on the program of projects. Participation in the FTIP’s preparation has been sought from all transportation system users, including those traditionally underserved by existing transportation systems, such as low-income and minority households, who may face challenges accessing employment and other services.

STANCOG 2021 FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1

Resumen Ejecutivo

El Programa Federal de Mejoramiento al Transporte (FTIP, por sus siglas en inglés) 2021 del Consejo de Gobiernos de Stanislaus (StanCOG, por sus siglas en inglés) es un plan de proyectos de transporte que abarca toda la región, varios años y diversidad de modos de transporte, dentro de la jurisdicción de StanCOG. Bajo ley federal el StanCOG es la Organización Metropolitana de Planificación (MPO, por sus siglas en inglés) y —bajo ley estatal— la Agencia Regional de Planificación de Transporte (RTPA, por sus siglas en inglés) para la región de Stanislaus. Los límites de planificación del StanCOG cubren las ciudades de Ceres, Hughson, Modesto, Newman, Oakdale, Patterson, Riverbank, Turlock, Waterford y el Condado Stanislaus. El FTIP 2021 programa los proyectos de la región por los próximos cuatro años fiscales federales (FFY) (2020/21 through 2023/24) y es una lista integral de todos los proyectos de transporte que perciben fondos federales o dependen de decisiones federales, o son de relevancia regional. El propósito del FTIP es garantizar que el financiamiento federal del transporte continúe llegando a la región de Stanislaus como resultado del cumplimiento de las normativas federales respecto de la programación.

Un proyecto de trascendencia regional se define como “un proyecto de transporte (que no es un proyecto exento) que se halla en una infraestructura que suple necesidades de transporte regionales (como un acceso a o desde fuera de la región, un centro de importante actividad dentro de la región, urbanismos de gran escala como nuevas galerías comerciales, complejos deportivos, etc., o terminales de locomoción colectiva, como asimismo la mayoría de los terminales de transporte) y que normalmente forman parte en un modelo de una red vial y de transporte metropolitano de un área y que incluyen, como mínimo, todos los ejes carreteros de importancia y todas las vías exclusivas al transporte masivo que brindan una alternativa al traslado vial regional”.

Las listas del FTIP enumeran prioridades de proyectos, programas e inversiones —al corto plazo— en el sistema de transporte terrestre de la región, junto a proyectos de trascendencia regional, y financiados estatal o localmente.

El FTIP se actualiza cada dos años, y debe controlar su financiación por Año Fiscal Federal (FFY, por sus siglas en inglés) e incluir suficiente información económica para demostrar que los proyectos se pueden financiar como se ha planeado. Sólo los proyectos con fondos “con expectativas razonables de disponibilidad” se pueden programar dentro del FTIP. Además, como la Región Stanislaus es un área que sobrepasa los niveles de contaminación del aire, todos los proyectos deben cumplir con el Plan Estatal de Implementación (SIP, por sus siglas en inglés) — impacto en la calidad del aire— antes que puedan ser programados. Puede que el FTIP se enmiende durante su ciclo de vida para reflejar cambios en la proyección, plazos, costos y prioridades de los proyectos, como también agregar o eliminar proyectos.

El FTIP del 2021 ha sido desarrollado con la asistencia de autoridades electas y municipales y, digno de nota, a través de un proceso de participación pública que ha brindado opciones tanto para la inspección como para el comentario público sobre la programación de proyectos. En la preparación del FTIP se ha buscado el aporte y opinión de todos los usuarios del sistema de transporte, incluyendo a aquellos tradicionalmente marginados por la presente infraestructura de transporte, como son los hogares de minorías o de bajos recursos, y puede enfrenten dificultades para llegar a su empleo u otros servicios.

STANCOG 2021 FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2

Introduction

The Stanislaus Region’s transportation network is multimodal and enables our movement to get to work, recreate, move goods, provide services, bicycle or walk safely. This includes facilities from high-volume highways down to our local streets, regional trails to local sidewalks, from planned commuter rail link to San Jose to our bus transit systems crisscrossing our communities. Each aspect of our transportation network faces opportunities and challenges that must be strategically addressed with careful planning and investment. The 2021 Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) is our region’s near-term strategy to make improvements to our transportation network. The TIP was developed to be consistent with the Stanislaus Region’s 2018 Regional Transportation Plan / Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS). The RTP/SCS identifies goals and objectives for our region.

How do we in the Stanislaus Region prioritize investments that provide the greatest positive impact to achieve our goals and objectives? The next section of this document, Overview of the 2021 FTIP, breaks down the fundamentals of an FTIP in a question and answer format that details the “who, what, when, where, why, and how’s” of transportation investments for the Stanislaus Region’s transportation network. Following the Overview, the document will present the following: FTIP Requirements, Programming Approach, and the details on how the FTIP has been determined to be in Air Quality Conformity, a key requirement of this document. Finally, a series of appendices provide additional information that support the investments programmed in this FTIP.

Details of the Region Stanislaus County is the fourth largest County in the San Joaquin Valley. The total area encompasses approximately 1,521 square miles, larger than the State of Rhode Island. There are nine incorporated cities within Stanislaus County: Ceres, Hughson, Modesto, Newman, Oakdale, Patterson, Riverbank, Turlock, and Waterford. The County contains two federally recognized urbanized areas known as the Modesto-Ceres Urbanized Area and the Turlock Urbanized Area. Stanislaus County's total population is approximately 557,709 according California Department of Finance’s 2020 population estimate.

STANCOG 2021 FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 3

About the Stanislaus Council of Governments StanCOG is the Stanislaus Region's Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), Regional Transportation Planning Authority (RTPA), and Local Transportation Authority (LTA). Its membership is comprised of the nine incorporated cities and the County of Stanislaus. The agency is governed by a policy board consisting of representatives from each of StanCOG’s ten Member Agencies and an ex-officio Caltrans delegate. StanCOG is responsible for the coordination and allocation of federal and state funds to transportation and transit projects throughout the Stanislaus Region. StanCOG is designed to be the central link between local governments within Stanislaus County. StanCOG serves to facilitate intergovernmental communication to gain a comprehensive understanding of local needs and priority transportation projects. From this collaborative effort, StanCOG coordinates transportation planning and funding resources to a variety of transportation projects that address regional and local transportation needs and objectives. StanCOG's Mission is: "To provide planning coordination that enhances the quality of life in the Stanislaus Region by working with local governments, state and federal agencies and the public to create real solutions to regional transportation issues"

The StanCOG Policy Board The Policy Board is StanCOG's governing body. It is composed of 16 representatives from each member jurisdiction, and a Caltrans ex-officio delegate. The Policy Board’s purpose is to guide policy making decisions through a collaborative and cooperative process to include interests and resources from each local jurisdiction. The Board establishes the direction and policies for transportation improvement projects proposed and planned. The Management and Finance Committee, which is composed of the chief administrative official of each member agency, and assisted by a Technical Advisory Committee, provides technical recommendations to the Policy Board regarding current and proposed projects and policies. The Policy Board utilizes these resources to formulate a comprehensive outlook to guide StanCOG’s policies and planning activities. For more information please see the “FTIP Contributors” section of this FTIP.

STANCOG 2021 FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 4

Overview of the 2021 FTIP FTIP importance to the Stanislaus Region The FTIP is How Projects in the RTP/SCS are Implemented Each transportation project included in the FTIP must be consistent with the adopted long-range plan for an MPO. The RTP/SCS is developed through a collaborative process and updated every four years. It is the region’s blueprint for future transportation improvements and investments based on specific goals, objectives, and actions defined by StanCOG, the community and its elected officials. The long-range plan for the Stanislaus Region is the 2018 RTP/SCS and guides programming for current and future FTIPs until the long-range plan is updated again. Regionally significant and non-exempt projects in the FTIP must be included in the RTP/SCS, the air quality conformity, and be fiscally constrained.

Pursuant to Senate Bill 375 (SB 375), the Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act of 2008, each MPO must prepare an enhanced land use element called a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) as part of the RTP. The SCS sets forth a vision for the region’s anticipated growth, considering the transportation, housing, environmental, and economic needs of the region. The SCS is a proposed plan by which the region will meet its greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction targets established by the California Air Resources Board (CARB).

The 2018 RTP/SCS represents a new approach to regional transportation planning, one that goes beyond singularly addressing transportation needs. The 2018 RTP/SCS strengthens the link between land use and transportation planning, recognizing the significant connection between these two areas and its impact on the Region’s quality of life. It presents a strategy to accommodate the significant expected growth in the region while promoting economic vitality, providing more housing and transportation choices, promoting healthy living and improving communities, which are connected by an efficient and well-maintained transportation network.

All projects identified in the 2021 FTIP and Air Quality Conformity Analysis can be cross- referenced to projects in the 2018 RTP/SCS. StanCOG has developed a project referencing system which originates in the 2018 RTP/SCS Appendix K and each jurisdiction has been provided a code for each project in the RTP. For example, the City of Ceres is identified by a “C” and then the project numbering begins at 01; thus, the first project in the RTP for Ceres is C01. This project reference is then applied to the same project identified in both the FTIP and AQCA. Implementation of this reference system creates a more fluid system of project identification for everyone working with these documents.

FTIP Contributors One of the most important things to understand about an FTIP is those who are involved in the development of the FTIP: partners from the federal, state, regional, and local government entities plus, and most importantly, the public at-large. Described on the following pages is a brief summary of each level of government and the public process.

STANCOG 2021 FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 5

Federal Government/United State Department of Transportation The federal government, specifically the United States Department of Transportation (USDOT), assists local and regional governments identify and prioritize transportation investments through the federally mandated metropolitan planning process. This metropolitan planning process has been in statute since the 1960s with the creation of Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs). It stresses that planning be comprehensive, continuing, and cooperative. The Stanislaus Council of Governments is the MPO for the Stanislaus Region. Within USDOT, there are two administrative departments that are critical partners in the metropolitan planning process: The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA).

USDOT and any recipient of federal transportation funds, such as Stanislaus Region communities and transit operators, receive direction from transportation authorization bills passed by Congress and signed by the President. In 2015, Congress passed the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act and it was signed by President Barack Obama. This Act built upon prior authorization bills, but most importantly, continued the performance-based planning requirements that were legislated in the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21) Act from 2012 (this is discussed in greater detail in the section called “StanCOG’s Approach to Performance-Based Planning”).

State Government/Caltrans The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) is a critical partner in making improvements to the Stanislaus Region’s transportation network. First, Caltrans receives all the federal aid from FHWA and are the stewards of all funds principally intended for roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian projects (federal aid from FTA is administered differently with a direct relationship with local/regional transit operators). Caltrans distributes the federal aid according to federal and state regulations, through competitive grant programs or by formula to California’s MPOs, Regional Transportation Planning Agencies (RTPAs) and/or County Transportation Commissions. StanCOG, as the MPO for the Stanislaus Region, works in close partnership with Caltrans and the RTPAs and County Transportation Commissions through various interagency forums (e.g., Interagency Consultation Group, California Federal Programming Group, or the San Joaquin Valley Regional Planning Agencies Policy Council) to understand and discuss important transportation issues across the state. These interagency forums work to share best practices, and relay important information pertaining to regulations and procedures MPOs must follow.

Second, Caltrans owns the interstate route (I-5) through the Stanislaus Region, and many other critical corridors like SR-99, SR-120, SR-132, etc., that link our communities to the state and national transportation system. Caltrans, through its own processes with the approval of the California State Transportation Agency (STA) and the California Transportation Commission (CTC), identifies and prioritizes investments for the transportation assets they own. Any investment proposed by Caltrans that uses federal aid or is regionally significant under air quality conformity regulations (see the section of this FTIP called “Air Quality Conformity” for more information), must be programmed by reference into this FTIP.

Regional Government/Stanislaus Council of Governments StanCOG is the MPO for the Stanislaus Region and was originally established in 1971. StanCOG provides a forum that enables the people and leaders of the Stanislaus Region to address regional

STANCOG 2021 FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 6

issues related to transportation. StanCOG is responsible for all regional and multimodal transportation planning. There are some core planning documents the MPO must develop and adopt: a Metropolitan Transportation Plan updated every four years (known as the 2018 Regional Transportation Plan / Sustainable Communities Strategy), this Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) updated biennially, and an Overall Work Program identifying all planning activities and updated annually. The Stanislaus Region is a diverse and dynamic place whose complexities are reflected in the regional transportation system including agricultural routes, shared-use paths, local streets, principal arterials, bus routes, passenger rail, and the freight spines of the Central Valley, I-5 and SR 99. These factors combine to make the role of MPO for the Stanislaus Region exciting and challenging. StanCOG is governed by a sixteen-member Policy Board, including:

• (5) Five Stanislaus County elected officials • (3) Three City of Modesto elected officials • (1) City of Ceres elected official • (1) City of Hughson elected official • (1) City of Newman elected official • (1) City of Oakdale elected official • (1) City of Patterson elected official • (1) City of Riverbank elected official • (1) City of Turlock elected official • (1) City of Waterford elected official • (1) Caltrans ex-officio delegate

The business of the Policy Board is assisted with a committee framework that provides the staff of StanCOG input on the FTIP before it is considered by the Policy Board. StanCOG committees are: • Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory Committee • Citizens Advisory Committee • Executive Committee • Management & Finance Committee • Social Services Transportation Advisory Committee • Technical Advisory Committee

Local Governments and Transit Operators Local governments and transit operators throughout the Stanislaus Region implement projects through construction on municipal or county owned roadways, or operating transit service to link residents to their destinations. There are ten local governments in the Stanislaus Region and three transit operators. The local governments and transit operators apply to the MPO for the federal funds from FHWA and FTA made available through this FTIP. Each federal funding source requires matching funds (see more in the section titled: FTIP Funding). Many of the projects are funded 90%, 88.53% or 50% by FHWA or FTA (depending on the funding source) with the remaining project cost paid for by a local government or transit operator. However, it is up to the local governments and transit operators to apply for those federal funds. The local governments

STANCOG 2021 FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 7

and transit operators make applications for funding in this FTIP based on local needs as determined by local officials.

The People of the Stanislaus Region Ultimately, the Stanislaus Region’s transportation network serves to benefit its residents, businesses, and visitors. In order to prioritize investments to enhance the transportation network, the needs of Stanislaus’ residents, businesses, and visitors must be considered and balanced with the needs of the system demonstrated through asset, congestion, and safety management. Input from the public is crucial to the transportation planning process. StanCOG’s Public Participation Plan (PPP) was adopted in 2020 and serves as the guiding document on how the MPO will engage the public to hear their ideas, concerns, and needs to advance solutions for the diverse needs of Stanislaus’ present and future transportation system. Most importantly, a balance of priorities and investments are sought in the metropolitan planning process among all residents, businesses, member agencies, or stakeholders.

When a planning process is undertaken, StanCOG may rely on its existing committees or form ad- hoc Project Implementation Plan Teams that are specific to a single project or issue. These forums provide a venue to seek input and deliberate the issues, data, analysis, and ultimately make recommendations to the Policy Board for their consideration. Draft plans are made available for public review and comment according to the 2020 PPP. At the conclusion of a public comment period, all public comments are shared within the final document with the MPOs response. The public notice of involvement activities and time established for public review on the FTIP satisfies public involvement regulations including FTA’s Sections 5307 and 5339 Program of Projects (POP) requirements per FTA Circular 9030.1 E.

The MPO is required to provide all interested parties with an opportunity to comment on the proposed TIP. This is accomplished by publishing the TIP to the StanCOG website and by holding a formal public hearing as required by the 2020 PPP. When conducting the public hearing for the TIP, the MPO ensures that the hearing is accessible to minority, low-income, or Low-English Proficient individuals and to individuals who may have a disability. This is according to StanCOG’s adopted Title VI and Limited English Proficiency Plan adopted in 2020. All meetings involved in this process are open to the public, and the public is provided with the opportunity to comment during the public comment period of a StanCOG public meeting. In addition, multiple methods of communication are utilized in the planning processes of the MPO including: email, postal mail, social media (Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Stanislaus-Council-of- Governments-385045511667369/), the website (stancog.org), public notices in local newspapers (English and Spanish publications), and public meeting notices at local libraries.

FTIP Requirements A Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP), is a short-range program of projects FHWA and FTA for the improvement of the Stanislaus Region’s transportation network. These

STANCOG 2021 FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 8

funds are used for highway, transit, and non-motorized investments (see more in the section titled: FTIP Funding). The FTIP is formally updated every two years and includes projects undertaken by member agencies, transit operators, and Caltrans. The FTIP must be responsive to, and aligned with, the MPO’s air quality conforming long-range plan, the 2018 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS). The FTIP also represents the near-term investments, or first four years, of the RTP/SCS which must, by federal law, look at least twenty years into the future. FHWA and FTA and California planning regulations guide the preparation and development of FTIPs throughout the state.

Federal Planning Factors and Goals

The FTIP must support the ten (10) federal planning factors of the FAST Act presented below: • Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, and efficiency • Increase the safety of the transportation system for motorized and non-motorized users • Increase the security of the transportation system for motorized and non-motorized users • Increase accessibility and mobility of people and freight • Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistency between transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns • Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight • Promote efficient system management and operation • Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system • Improve the resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of surface transportation • Enhance travel and tourism

The FTIP must also consider the seven (7) national planning goals from the FAST Act presented below: • To achieve a significant reduction in traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads • To maintain the highway infrastructure asset system in a state of good repair • To achieve a significant reduction in congestion on the National Highway System • To improve the efficiency of the surface transportation system • Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistency between transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns • To enhance the performance of the transportation system while protecting and enhancing the natural environment • To reduce project costs, promote jobs and the economy, and expedite the movement of people and goods by accelerating project completion through eliminating delays in the project development and delivery process, including reducing regulatory burdens and improving agencies’ work practices

STANCOG 2021 FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 9

Performance-Based Planning The transportation authorization bill passed in 2012, known as MAP-21, required that state DOTs and MPOs measure performance on certain metrics and establish targets to show progress on accomplishing those targets. These requirements were reinforced in the FAST Act. This is known as Performance-based Planning and has been a significant change for the FTIP, here in the Stanislaus Region and for other MPOs throughout the United States. Details on required measures, targets and reporting is provided in the StanCOG’s Approach to Performance-Based Planning section of this TIP.

Congestion Management Process California has required a Congestion Management Process (CMP) since 1990 (California Government Code 65089) and in 1991 the federal government required the same for MPOs in Transportation Management Areas (TMAs) (23 CFR 450.320 and CFR 500.109), metropolitan regions over 200,000 residents, with the passage of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) transportation authorization legislation. In 2020, StanCOG updated its CMP and associated goals and objectives. The top five goals and objectives: 1) Improve mobility for people and freight, 2) Operate the regional transportation system safely and efficiently, 3) Preserve and enhance environmental quality, 4) Support the economic and community vitality of the region, and 5) Promote equity and accessibility for system users.

The CMP functions as a filter for project selection, programming and performance monitoring of projects for the RTP and FTIP in selecting capacity increasing projects for single occupancy vehicles. Please see Figure 1 - Integration of the CMP with StanCOG's RTP & FTIP. The CMP has been developed to improve multi-modal mobility and avoid travel deficiencies. One means to this end is the evaluation of multi-modal system performance for the movement of people and goods. The performance measures of the CMP support mobility, air quality, land use, and economic objectives, and are used to determine whether projects are to be included in the RTP and FTIP. The CMP is thus a performance-based program which is consistent with and assists in the implementation of the RTP’s goals, and objectives, and establishes the provisions for the first four years of programmed projects in the FTIP.

STANCOG 2021 FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 10

Figure 1 - Integration of the CMP with StanCOG's RTP & FTIP

Programmed Projects and Fiscal Constraint A FTIP must demonstrate that the projects programmed with federal aid do not exceed a reasonable estimate of funds available to make the improvements the projects seek to accomplish. This is known as fiscal constraint and is a determination that the federal funds available to the Stanislaus Region are not “overdrawn” and that the funds required to match the federal aid are in fact available. Each project must provide an estimate of cost and specify the funding sources that are reasonably expected to pay for the construction or implementation of the project. Further, funding must be available to adequately operate and maintain current network of federal aid roadways and transit. Federal funds must be constrained for each year of the FTIP made available to Stanislaus

STANCOG 2021 FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 11

Region. FHWA and FTA funds are allocated annually to the Stanislaus Region and those allocations must be managed before the funds expire per state timely use of fund policies identified by AB1012. To explore the program of projects please refer to the section of this FTIP titled: Appendix A. To understand fiscal constrain please refer to the section of this FTIP titled: Appendix B.

The State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) & Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) The STIP is a five-year statewide programming document which is updated and adopted every two years opposite the adoption of this FTIP. The STIP displays funding commitments for transportation projects including improvements to rail facilities, mass transportation, local roads, and the state highway system operations. Funding apportioned to the Stanislaus Region by the California Transportation Commission (CTC) is illustrated in the section of this FTIP titled: Appendix E. The 2021 FTIP is consistent with the County Share information provided within the STIP Fund Estimate and the federal fund estimates resulting from the passage of FAST Act. StanCOG’s portion of the STIP is known as the RTIP which is also prepared by StanCOG. It is the programming document that identifies the major state highway and regionally significant transportation projects and programs receiving Regional Improvement Program (RIP) and Interregional Improvement Program (IIP) funds in accordance with STIP Guidelines established by the CTC.

Air Quality Conformity Currently, the San Joaquin Valley (or portions thereof) is designated as nonattainment with respect to Federal air quality standards for ozone, and particulate matter under 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5); and has a maintenance plan for particulate matter under 10 microns in diameter (PM-10). Therefore, transportation plans and programs for the non-attainment areas for the Stanislaus Region must satisfy the requirements of the federal transportation conformity rule (40 CFR 51).

The FTIP is developed with air quality in mind, in order to meet the goals and requirements of the Clean Air Act (40 CFR part 93, subpart A). The FTIP demonstrates air quality conformity with the State Implementation Plans (SIPs) developed by the California Air Resources Board in order to reduce pollutants that are subject to regulation by the Clean Air Act and its amendments. The SIP lays out “budgets” for pollutants and attribute a portion of those pollutants to transportation due to the emissions from on-road vehicles, and includes required Transportation Control Measures that the FTIP must implement.

Each project contained within the TIP must be evaluated for its impact on those pollutants. Some projects are considered “Exempt” as they do not propose to add capacity to the transportation network, and other projects are considered “Non-Exempt” and must be evaluated for their impact on air quality budgets. Projects must go through interagency and public consultation to satisfy the Air Quality Conformity Analysis (AQCA) and more on this can be found in the “Consultation and Coordination” section. Full details on the AQCA are available in Appendix O of this FTIP.

STANCOG 2021 FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 12

Regionally Significant Projects The FTIP is required to contain all regionally significant projects requiring an action by FHWA or FTA regardless of funding source. A “federal action” may include approval of the air quality conformity determination and/or approval of National Environmental Policy Act review. In addition, projects may also have to be reviewed under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). A regionally significant project is any transportation project that is on a facility which serves regional transportation needs and would normally be included in the travel demand model of the region’s transportation network, no matter what the funding source is. Also included on a list of regional significant projects are all multimodal surface transportation projects that have been funded at least in part with federal dollars. This includes public highways and streets, and bicycle and pedestrian walkways. All these projects are identified in the FTIP’s list of projects. For each project or project phase, descriptions including work type, termini, length, total cost, amount of federal funds, and responsible agency is required. The project tables in the FTIP provides this information for each project. For a list of regionally significant projects please see the section of this FTIP titled: Appendix N.

Occasionally, the regionally significant project list may need to be amended. Included in this 2021 FTIP update is a formal RTP Amendment to the Faith Home Road project that reduces the project scope from a “4-Lane Expressway” to a “2-Lane Expressway”. The Summary of Changes to the regionally significant project list is included in Appendix N.

Urbanized Areas and Federal-Aid Eligible Roadways The funding of proposed projects in the FTIP must consider the location of project before it is programmed. First, some federal funding sources, such as Surface Transportation Block Grant or FTA 5307 funds allocated to the Stanislaus Region may only be programmed within its urbanized area, and second, must be along a federal aid roadway or transit route. To determine if a project is on the federal aid network, project sponsors must consult the roadway classification maps. Each MPO, in partnership with their state DOT and FHWA, will classify the roads within their region. All road classifications, except for roads classified as rural minor collectors and local roads, are eligible for federal funds. For more information on Stanislaus Region roadway classifications please visit StanCOG’s Appendix X of the 2018 RTP/SCS. There are a limited number of exceptions to these rules if: 1) a project makes improvements on bridges called “off-system bridges”, 2) a project is within one mile of an elementary or middle school to enable safer routes to school for children, 3) a project is proposed on a designated Critical Urban or Rural Freight Corridor that is off- network, and/or, 4) a project proposes to build sidewalk improvements using FTA 5307 funds off of the federal aid network if they are within ¼ of a mile of a transit route (it is important to note that this is not a current practice of Stanislaus Region transit operators to use 5307 funds in this manner as there are other funding sources available to build sidewalks).

The Annual List of Federal Obligated Projects StanCOG must publish an Annual Listing of Federal Obligation Projects within 90 days of the close of the federal fiscal year each year. This list of obligated projects must include all projects obligated by member agencies, transit operators, or Caltrans in the Stanislaus Region in the prior

STANCOG 2021 FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 13

federal fiscal year. The list must include details on each project and the amount of obligated federal funds. The report is an important document as it demonstrates how much federal aid the Stanislaus Region was able to leverage in the prior federal fiscal year. The report may be found on StanCOG’s website at http://stancog.org/ftip-amendments.shtm at the bottom of the webpage.

Environmental Justice + Title VI Communities Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 states that “no person in the United States shall, on the basis of race, color, or national origin be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subject to discrimination under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance.” In 1994, President Clinton issued Executive Order 12898 to augment Title VI by directing all federal agencies to identify and address disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects of their policies, programs and activities on minority and low- income populations. The Executive Order and the U.S. Department of Transportation identify three fundamental principles of Environmental Justice (EJ) in transportation planning. These principles are: • To avoid, minimize, or mitigate disproportionately high and adverse human health and environmental effects, including social and economic effects, on minority populations and low-income populations; • To ensure the full and fair participation by all potentially affected communities in the transportation decision-making process; and • To prevent the denial of, reduction in, or significant delay in the receipt of benefits by minority and low-income populations.

StanCOG follows these principles by ensuring that minority and low-income populations are included in the transportation planning process and ensuring that they may benefit equally from the transportation system without experiencing a disproportionate share of its burdens. StanCOG also ensures that there is equity in the distribution of potential benefits and burdens resulting from the proposed transportation investments identified in the 2018 RTP/SCS and FTIP. As the projects identified in this FTIP are consistent with and derived from the 2018 RTP/SCS, please see Appendix P for the EJ analysis that has been prepared to address these requirements. Title VI information and complaint procedures are referenced on the back of the front cover of this FTIP or at http://stancog.org/title-vi.shtm.

System Preservation, Operations and Maintenance The safe and efficient management, operation, and preservation of the current transportation system are of paramount importance to StanCOG and a requirement to receive federal funds for projects in this FTIP. StanCOG works with local member agencies and prioritizes the programming of system enhancing projects. Additionally, we work with Caltrans in programming the SHOPP and Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS). We also assist our local transit operators to secure funding for transit capital projects from non-federal sources.

StanCOG prioritizes operation and maintenance projects (improvements to the existing system) prior to capacity increasing projects, which simply add to the size of the transportation system, requiring more maintenance in the long-term. StanCOG strongly believes that in a historically underfunded area such as the San Joaquin Valley, the benefit of each dollar spent on transportation

STANCOG 2021 FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 14 should be maximized, reflected as a primary effort of the 2018 RTP/SCS and thus the 2021 FTIP. This ensures that the Region selects the projects that bring the highest level of benefit to the system. The California Statewide Local Streets and Roads Needs Assessment is a bi-annual report that details the conditions of the streets and roads in the State. The report ranks road conditions using a Pavement Condition Index (PCI) with values of zero (failed condition) to 100 (good to excellent condition). The most recent 2018 statewide needs study identified a funding shortfall of $52 billion for local streets and roads over the next 10 years, a reduction of $19.3 billion since the 2016 report due to the passage of SB1 which provided a substantial new source of revenue to support California’s transportation system. Sources such as the region’s Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STBGP), Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ), and the use of toll credits help with the funding gap in the Stanislaus Region. STBGP and CMAQ funding apportionments, later described in this FTIP document, are programmed to system preservation, operation, improvement, and maintenance projects. Local Measure L funds have also helped Stanislaus Region member agencies achieve higher condition ratings for their local streets and roads. By 2042, it is estimated that the funds directed to member agencies by Measure L will provide: • Approximately $480 million exclusively for repair and maintenance of streets and roads and not new infrastructure or for other modes of transportation • Almost $100 million for traffic management • More than $13 million for the operations of transit

FTIP Development and Management FTIP Development Stanislaus Region member agencies receive funds from FHWA through Caltrans and transit operators directly from FTA to improve the Region’s transportation network, and the FTIP must include those funds in a program of projects that spans at least a four-year period and updated every four years. In California, FTIPs are formally updated every two years. The development of the FTIP generally begins in the spring of even years, adopted by the Policy Board in late summer or early fall, and is approved by Caltrans, FHWA, and FTA by December of the same year. This FTIP is off cycle from the general schedule due to changes in federal environmental regulations that delayed the typical cycle. The Air Quality Conformity analysis is completed concurrently with the FTIP and is published for public comment so that both documents can be reviewed together. Please see the section of this FTIP titled: Appendix O.

Amendments + Modifications

The MPO officially adopts a new FTIP every two years as a practice required by California government code, though only federally required once every four years. However, the FTIP is a “living” plan that is responsive to the needs of member agencies and transit operators as new and better information comes to light in the project development process. Therefore, the FTIP must be changed from time to time and 23 CFR 450.104 defines two types of revisions to the FTIP: Administrative Modifications and Amendments. A modification is a less formal change to the FTIP that is undertaken by staff and approved by the Executive Director through delegated authority from Caltrans. An amendment to the FTIP is formally adopted by the Policy Board and must consider the requirements of public participation, verify that the project does not impact the

STANCOG 2021 FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 15

air quality conformity determination, and redetermine fiscal constraint. There are five types of modifications and amendments: • Type 1 Administrative Modification: Administrative modifications include minor changes to project cost, schedule, or funding sources. FHWA, FTA, and Caltrans agreed on California specific administrative modification procedures on December 18, 2019 which require no other action once the StanCOG Executive Director has approved an Administrative Modification. For more information please see Appendix K. • Type 2 Formal Amendment – Funding Changes: This is an Amendment that makes a funding change that is greater than what is allowed as an Administrative Modification (greater than 50% or $20 million). The projects in a Type 2 revision do not change in design concept or scope and the conformity analysis years as assumed for the regional emissions analysis of the currently conforming RTP/SCS and FTIP remain unaltered. Type 2 amendments will be publicly noticed in the regional English and Spanish newspapers and posted on the StanCOG website at least 7 days prior to action and distributed to local agency partners through StanCOG standing committees. Approval is required by the StanCOG Policy Board, Caltrans, and FHWA/FTA. • Type 3 Formal Amendment –Exempt Projects: This is an Amendment that significantly revises, adds, or deletes an exempt or non-regionally significant project or project phases to/from the FTIP. Type 3 amendments will be publicly noticed in the regional English and Spanish newspapers and posted on the StanCOG website at least 7 days prior to action and distributed to local agency partners through StanCOG standing committees. Approval is required by the StanCOG Policy Board, Caltrans, and FHWA/FTA. • Type 4 Formal Amendment – Conformity Determination that Relies on a Previous Regional Emissions Analysis: This type of amendment is used when adding a regionally significant project to the FTIP when the project itself has already been appropriately accounted for in the regional emissions analysis. In this case, the federal approving agencies can use a previous analysis of the project’s impact on air quality for approval purposes. Type 4 amendments may be accompanied by an RTP/SCS amendment to maintain consistency. The FTIP amendment and RTP/SCS amendment follow the same public process. Approval is required by the StanCOG Policy Board, Caltrans, and FHWA/FTA. The procedure for public notification of a Type 4 formal amendment is as follows: o Legally noticed 20-day public comment period o Legally noticed public hearing o Posting of amendment information on the StanCOG website during the public comment period o Publishing amendment information as part of the following publicly available StanCOG agendas: TAC, MFC, CAC, and StanCOG Policy Board o Consideration and response to public comments received during comment period

• Type 5 Formal Amendment – Conformity Determination and New Regional Emissions Analysis: A Type 5 amendment is the highest and most formal level of amendment and primarily involves adding or deleting new projects that must be modeled for their air quality impact and be consistent with the RTP/SCS. Type 5 amendments require an Air Quality Conformity Analysis that demonstrates that all projects programmed do not exceed air quality budgets in a new regional emissions analysis. This type of amendment is also

STANCOG 2021 FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 16

used when a non-exempt, regionally significant project makes a change to either the design concept or scope or conformity analysis completion year which is not consistent with the existing regional emissions analysis. The FTIP amendment, Air Quality Conformity Document, and RTP Amendment follow the same public process. Approval is required by the StanCOG Policy Board, Caltrans, and FHWA. The procedure for public notification of a Type 5 formal amendment is as follows: o Legally noticed 30-day public comment period o Legally noticed public hearing o Posting of amendment information on the StanCOG website during the public comment period o Publishing amendment information as part of the following publicly available StanCOG agendas: TAC, MFC, CAC, and StanCOG Policy Board o Consideration and response to public comments received during comment period

FTIP Programming Approach Consultation and Coordination The development of the FTIP embodies and embraces StanCOG’s comprehensive, cooperative, and continuing planning process. This is known by regional planners as the “3C process” and is carried out through active consultation with other entities responsible for economic development, land use, and environmental planning activities that may impact the transportation network, or where the transportation network may impact their planning activities. For example, state and local planned growth, economic development, environmental protection, land use management, conservation and historic preservation, airport operations, transit planning, and freight interests. In addition, coordination with other levels of government must be executed with entities such as federally recognized Native American Tribal governments, federal land management agencies and local project sponsors.

Crucial decisions on support or funding of a transportation program or project in the region are made in the development of the RTP/SCS. In contrast, the FTIP defines project budgets, schedules and phasing for those programs and projects that are already part of the RTP/SCS. The FTIP does not provide any additional information regarding environmental impacts beyond those found in the program level environmental analysis prepared for the RTP/SCS. Further environmental review occurs through the project delivery agency or jurisdiction with a project specific environmental impact report.

Starting at the RTP/SCS development stage, StanCOG staff concurrently consults with appropriate agencies regarding the FTIP. StanCOG consults extensively with many agencies in the preparation of the RTP/SCS. For the FTIP, this consultation includes:

• Communication of the schedule of upcoming amendments and FTIP adoption; • Special workshops such as project reviews; • Coordination with agencies for review of preliminary draft documents to agencies before releasing draft documents for public review; and • Presentations on the Draft Formal Amendments to the Standing Committees and the Policy Board.

STANCOG 2021 FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 17

Planning Coordination with the Eight San Joaquin Valley Council of Governments The San Joaquin Valley consists of Stanislaus, San Joaquin, Merced, Madera, Fresno, Tulare, Kings and Kern Counties. These eight counties share an air quality basin that currently does not meet the air quality standards set forth in the Federal Clean Air Act or the California Clean Air Act. The eight Valley transportation planning agencies and the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District have entered a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to ensure a coordinated transportation/air quality planning approach. The MOU defines a cooperative process designed to achieve compliance with the air quality conformity provisions of the newest federal transportation legislation, known as FAST Act. A second MOU exists between the eight agencies to ensure a coordinated, cooperative planning process on issues of mutual concern. Mutual planning/programming efforts between the 8-Valley COGs include cooperative efforts in the creation of this FTIP, the 2018 RTP and the Air Quality Conformity Assessment.

Expanded Consultation The FAST Act requires MPO’s and states to consult, “as appropriate,” with federal, state, and local agencies responsible for land use management, natural resources, environmental protection, conservation, and historic preservation. The RTP, FTIP and all other plans and programs (including amendments) are subject to interagency consultation (IAC) and the Intergovernmental Review Process (IRP), which affords all the target agencies of this planning element with an opportunity to participate in the development of all plans and programs. StanCOG also has an extensive contact list of members representing these agencies, and routinely gives these agencies a “reasonable opportunity” to consult and comment on the various plans and programs published by StanCOG. StanCOG does not accept any responsibility for agencies that choose not to participate in these consultations.

FHWA and FTA Performance Measures Background Federal rules require that the Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) “be designed such that once implemented, it makes progress toward achieving the performance targets established under § 450.306(d).” Also, the FTIP “shall include, to the maximum extent practicable, a description of the anticipated effect of the FTIP toward achieving the performance targets identified in the metropolitan transportation plan, linking investment priorities to those performance targets.” (23 CFR § 450.326 (c, d))

The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21, 2012) established new requirements for metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) to coordinate with transit providers, set performance targets, and integrate those performance targets and performance plans into their planning documents by certain dates. The most recent federal transportation act, Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act of 2016 (FAST Act), carries forward the Performance Based Planning.

STANCOG 2021 FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 18

Beginning in 2018, federal rules required that state departments of transportation and MPOs implement federal performance measures. In response, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA) worked with state and regional agencies to identify performance measures that meet the requirements.

In California, Caltrans is directly responsible for submitting performance targets and periodic progress reports to federal agencies on an annual basis. MPOs are required to establish targets for the same performance measures on all public roads in the MPO planning area within 180 days after the state establishes each target. MPOs may elect to support the statewide targets, establish numerical targets specific to their region, or use a combination of both approaches. Furthermore, each MPO must incorporate these short-range targets into their planning and programming processes, including long-range plan and FTIP.

FHWA Performance Measures The federal performance measures under FHWA are categorized into three performance management (PM) groups. PM 1: Safety PM 2: Transportation Asset Management PM 3: System Reliability, Freight, Congestion, and Air Quality

FTA Performance Measures In addition to the three PM groups, the FTA has established performance measures and reporting requirements for transit asset management (TAM) and transit safety. Performance metrics for TAM focus on the maintenance of our regional transit system in a state of good repair. Transit safety performance monitoring is focused on assessment of the number of transit incidents resulting in fatalities or serious injuries and transit system reliability.

Transit Asset Management Plan

FTA issued the TAM Final Rule (49 CFR §625 et seq.), effective October 1, 2016, to implement MAP-21’s asset management provisions. This final rule mandates a National TAM System, defines ‘State of Good Repair’ (SGR), and requires transit providers to develop TAM plans. The Metropolitan Transportation Planning Final Rule (23 CFR §450.206) outlines the timelines and processes by which states, MPOs, and transit providers must coordinate in target setting.

Transit assets to be monitored under this provision include: 1. Non-revenue support equipment and maintenance vehicles 2. Revenue vehicles (rolling stock) 3. Rail infrastructure including tracks, and signals, and guidance systems; and 4. Transit facilities including stations, parking structures, and administrative offices. Transit safety performance monitoring is focused on assessment of the number of transit incidents resulting in fatalities or serious injuries and transit system reliability.

STANCOG 2021 FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 19

Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan On July 19, 2018, the FTA published the Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan (PTASP) Final Rule (49 CFR §673.15) regulating how Chapter 53 grantees would have to implement federally mandated safety standards. The rule’s effective date is July 19, 2019, and the compliance date is July 20, 2020. Considering the extraordinary operational challenges presented by the COVID-19 public health emergency, FTA issued a Notice of Enforcement Discretion effectively extending the PTASP compliance deadline from July 20, 2020, to December 31, 2020. A second Notice of Enforcement Discretion was issued on December 14, 2020 with the PTASP compliance deadline further extended out to July 21, 2021.

The final rule specifically requires transit agencies employing federal funds to develop a safety plan and annually self-certify compliance with that plan. The National Public Transportation Safety Plan identifies four performance measures that must be included in the transit agency safety plans: fatalities, injuries, safety events, and system reliability. Each transit agency must make its safety performance targets available to MPOs to assist in the planning process, and coordinate, to the maximum extent practicable, with the MPO in selecting regional safety targets.

The MPO’s initial transit safety targets are set within 180 days of receipt of the safety performance targets from the transit agencies. The MPO then revisits its targets based on the schedule for preparation of its system performance report that is part of StanCOG’s FTIP. The first FTIP update or amendment to be approved on or after July 20, 2021, is required to include the MPO’s transit safety targets. See FTA’s COVID-19 FAQs page for more information about the Notice.

Performance Management Areas

Each of the federal performance management focus areas include an associated set of metrics for which statewide and regional targets must be set. The specific performance measures for each include:

Transportation System Safety (PM 1) • Number of motor vehicle collision fatalities • Rate of motor vehicle collision fatalities per 100 million VMT • Number of motor vehicle collision serious injuries • Rate of motor vehicle collision serious injuries per 100 million VMT • Number of non-motorized fatalities and serious injuries

National Highway System Pavement and Bridge Condition (PM 2) • Percentage of Interstate System pavement in ‘good’ condition • Percentage of non-interstate NHS pavement in ‘good’ condition • Percentage of Interstate System pavement in ‘poor’ condition • Percentage of non-interstate NHS pavement in ‘poor’ condition • Percentage of NHS bridges in ‘good’ condition • Percentage of NHS bridges in ‘poor’ condition

STANCOG 2021 FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 20

National Highway System (NHS) Performance (PM 3) • Percent of interstate system mileage reporting reliable person-mile travel times • Percent of non-interstate NHS mileage reporting reliable person-mile travel times

Freight Movement (PM 3) • Percent of interstate system mileage reporting reliable truck travel times

CMAQ Program (PM 3) • Annual hours of peak-hour excessive delay per capita • Total emissions reduction by criteria pollutant (PM10, PM2.5, Ozone, CO) • Non-Single Occupancy Vehicle mode share

Transit Asset Management (TAM) • Equipment: Share of non-revenue vehicles that meet or exceed useful life benchmark • Rolling Stock: Share of revenue vehicles that meet or exceed useful life benchmark • Infrastructure: Share of track segments with performance restrictions • Facilities: Share of transit assets with condition rating below 3.0 on FTA Transit Economic Requirements Model (TERM) scale

Transit Safety Performance Targets • Number of transit-related fatalities • Number of transit-related fatalities per 100 thousand vehicle revenue miles (VRM) • Number of transit-related injuries • Number of transit-related injuries per 100 thousand VRM • Number of transit system safety events • Number of transit system safety events per 100 thousand VRM • Transit system reliability

PM1 PM3 PM2 Safety Perfomance System Perfomance and Bridge and Pavement Management Freight Movement

Transit Asset Management Transit Safety (TAM)

STANCOG 2021 FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 21

StanCOG’s Approach to Performance-Based Planning and Programming Safety Performance Management (PM1) Safety was the first national performance goal area for which states and MPOs were required to set performance targets. The Safety Performance Measures Final Rule supports the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) as it establishes safety performance management requirements for the purpose of carrying out the HSIP and assesses fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads. The Safety Performance Management Final Rule establishes five performance measures: 1. Number of Fatalities 2. Rate of Fatalities per 100 million Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) 3. Number of Serious Injuries 4. Rate of Serious Injuries per 100 million VMT 5. Number of Non-motorized Fatalities and Non-motorized Serious Injuries

PM1 also establishes the process for State Departments of Transportation (DOTs) and Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) to establish and report their safety targets, and the process that FHWA will use to assess whether Caltrans has met or made significant progress toward meeting those targets. PM1 also establishes a common national definition for serious injuries. Caltrans is required to establish safety targets for each of the five measures identified above and is required to report updated targets to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) by August 31st of each year. MPOs must establish their own targets or elect to support the State’s targets within 180 days after the State targets have been reported to FHWA.

Caltrans is considered to have met or made significant progress toward meeting their safety targets when at least 4 of the 5 targets are met or the outcome for the performance measure is better than the baseline performance the year prior to the target year. If FHWA determines Caltrans has either not met or made significant progress toward meeting its performance targets, Caltrans will be required to use obligation authority equal to the baseline year HSIP apportionment for safety projects.

Caltrans has adopted goals consistent with the Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) and Caltrans’ Strategic Management Plan (SMP) to move California closer to zero deaths.

StanCOG Support for Caltrans’ 2020 Safety Performance Targets On December 12, 2017, StanCOG staff held a Planning and Programming Working Group (PPWG) workshop to present the new requirements and state and county level safety data to solicit input from our local member agencies regarding the two MPO target setting options: to support the Caltrans’ 2018 Safety Performance Targets or to establish MPO Specific Targets. On January 17, 2018, the StanCOG Policy Board unanimously voted to support the California Department of Transportation 2018 Safety Performance Targets. StanCOG again supported Caltrans’ 2019 and 2020 safety targets when they were reassessed and adopted. The State’s 2020 targets are presented in Table 1 - Safety Performance Measures & Targets” on the following page:

STANCOG 2021 FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 22

Table 1 - Safety Performance Measures & Targets

5-Year Rolling Average Performance Data Percent Reduction Targets Targets Measures Source 2018 2019 2020 2018 2019 2020 Total Number of motor vehicle FARS2 3590.8 3445.4 3518 7.69% 3% 3.03% collision fatalities Rate of motor vehicle collision FARS & 1.029 0.995 1.023 7.69% 3% 3.03% fatalities (per HPMS3 100 million VMT) Total number of motor vehicle SWITRS4 12,823.4 12,688.10 13,740.4 1.50% 1.50% 1.50% collision serious injuries Rate of motor vehicle collision SWITRS serious 3.831 3.661 3.994 1.50% 1.50% 1.50% & HPMS injuries (per 100 million VMT) 3.03% Total number 3% FOR FOR of non- Fatalities Fatalities motorized FARS & 4271.1 3949.8 4147.4 10% and 1.5% and 1.5% fatalities and SWITRS for for serious Serious Serious injuries Injuries Injuries Source: 2018, 2019, and 2020 Caltrans and Office of Traffic Safety (OTS)

Additionally, you may find more information performance measures in Appendix G of the 2018 RTP/SCS.

STANCOG 2021 FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 23

Highlights of Safety Projects in the Stanislaus Region

City of Patterson

9th Street Improvements Project: $907,000 ATP Cycle 3 award. The project realigned the intersection of Heartland Ranch/9th Street and Ward Avenue, which also included constructing a sidewalk along the west side of 9th Street between Ward Avenue and Las Palmas Avenues. The alignment provided a safer intersection for pedestrians and students in the nearby neighborhood.

Stanislaus County

Airport Neighborhood Active Transportation Connectivity and Safety Project: $4,926,000 ATP Cycle 4 award. The project will improve the Airport Neighborhood by adding 11,000 linear feet of sidewalks and 22 new crosswalks. It will also include a proposed bike route down Empire Avenue from Yosemite Boulevard to Legion Park just past Orville Wright Elementary School, and a separated bike lane on Tioga Road that will connect with an existing bike lane on Hillside and Tioga.

StanCOG’s Support for Transit Operators’ Safety Plans One additional feature of transit performance-based planning will be focused upon safety. The federal rule for Public Transportation Agency Safety Plans was finalized on July 19, 2018 and certain transit operators will have to comply with the rule. It is understood however that transit operators have been provided an extension to this due date as a result of COVID-19. All transit operators within the Stanislaus Region that receive FTA 5307 funds will be required to comply with the rule.

The Modesto City Council adopted Modesto Area Express’ (MAX) safety targets on April 14, 2020 and StanCOG’s Policy Board adopted the targets on September 16, 2020. The MAX safety targets have been updated to reflect fatalities, injuries, safety events, and system reliability rates by vehicle revenue miles (VRM) as the form of measurement and resubmitted to StanCOG for adoption. Stanislaus County submitted their targets on November 23, 2020 for Stanislaus Regional Transit (StaRT). Both MAX and StaRT’s safety targets will be presented to the StanCOG Policy Board on January 20, 2021 for adoption. The StanCOG Policy Board shall accept these targets or set new targets within 180 days of receiving the transit operator’s safety plans.

STANCOG 2021 FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 24

Table 2 - MAX Safety Performance Targets

Annual Safety Performance Targets based on safety performance measures established under the National Public Transportation Safety Plan Safety System Mode of Fatalities Injuries Safety Fatalities Injuries Events Reliability Service Rate* Rate* Events Rate* Rate*

Rail Transit N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Bus Transit <1 <.053 <10 <.53 <19 <1.02 1.6

ADA/ Para <1 <.56 <1 <.56 <7 <3.95 6.6 transit Vans/Autos (Other N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A specify) *Per 100 thousand VRM

Table 3 – StaRT Performance Targets

Rail Transit N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Bus Transit 0 0 1 0.126 19 2.403 2.4

ADA/ Para 0 0 0 0 4 1.71 1.28 transit Vans/Autos (Other N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A specify) *Per 100 Thousand VRM

The City of Turlock submitted their safety targets for Turlock Transit on December 3, 2020, however, StanCOG staff has requested their targets be revised to reflect VRM as the form of measurement for their rates. Turlock Transit will submit the revised targets by February 2021. Table 4 below represents the measurement rate based on monthly reporting, however, this will be updated to VRM by the July 21, 2021 deadline.

STANCOG 2021 FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 25

Table 4 – Turlock Transit

Rail Transit N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

0.33 per 0.58 per 1.2 MF per Bus Transit 0 0 4 7 month month 100K miles ADA/ Para 0.17 per 0.25 per 5.5 MF per 0 0 2 3 transit month month 100K miles Vans/Autos (Other N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A specify) *Per Month 1Major Failures (MF) per 100 thousand miles

Highlights of Transit Safety Projects in the Stanislaus Region

Stanislaus County

Stanislaus Regional Transit (StaRT): New bus stop turnout on the same side of the senior center/skate park/public swimming pool in the City of Patterson so that riders do not have to cross the street to board a bus. The turnout provided will bring the bus off the roadway on a curved street to increase passenger safety. Local Transportation Funds (LTF) were used to fund this project.

City of Modesto

Modesto Transit Center Improvements: Funding for this project includes FTA 5307 and local funds. The project will upgrade the Transit Center building with a new video surveillance system along with other cosmetic improvements to refresh the building for public transit users. The project includes opening the interior space which will also improve safety and security inside the building.

Safety in StanCOG’s Planning & Programming Safety is a national transportation performance goal area and is a priority for StanCOG and its member agencies and transit operators. For this reason, StanCOG has and will continue to invest in programs and projects to reduce fatalities and injuries on all transit and public roads. StanCOG will accomplish this through continued coordination with our planning partners and member agencies, as well as through, crash data analysis, identification of strategies to address safety needs, programming investments, and performance management and monitoring. StanCOG actively

STANCOG 2021 FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 26 seeks opportunities to promote safety in the region through new endeavors, such as StanCOG's Regional Bicyclist and Pedestrian Safety and Education Campaign and participates in project level planning efforts as a sponsor and project development team member on roadway improvement projects, environmental analyses, feasibility studies and other regional planning efforts.

Many of the projects programmed in the FTIP improve safety. For some, safety is the primary aim, and for others, safety may be a component. Summary of Safety Programs and Projects Funding in % of Funding Number Total Project the 4-Year in the 4-Year of Cost Element Element Projects Safety Projects1 $134,975,110 $22,662,400 17% 9 Other Projects2 (Not Primarily for Safety) $38,783,396 $14,011,319 36% 13 Total $173,758,506 $36,673,719 21% 22 1 Source: ATP, HSIP, SHOPP Collision Reduction, Local Funds 2 Source: SHOPP Mandates, CMAQ Bike and Pedestrian Projects, Local Funds

StanCOG has three funding programs dedicated to improving safety. 1. Active Transportation Program (ATP) 2. Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) 3. State Highway Operations and Protection Program (SHOPP) Collision Reduction

ATP The ATP funds bicycle and/or pedestrian projects. Since people are more vulnerable while walking or biking as compared to traveling in a vehicle, any project that helps them do so is likely to yield safety benefits. The ATP further emphasizes safety by allotting points for projects applications that promise to reduce the rate or number of pedestrian and bicyclist fatalities and injuries.

HSIP The HSIP directly addresses safety. The program’s stated purpose is to “achieve a significant reduction in traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads, including non-State-owned public roads and roads on tribal land.” Successful project applications promise to reduce fatalities and injuries. The program is designed to focus local efforts on locations/corridors with the greatest safety needs and countermeasures with lower costs.

SHOPP Collision Reduction The SHOPP is the State Highway System’s “fix-it-first” program that funds repairs and preservation, emergency repairs, safety improvements, and some highway operational improvements on the State Highway System (SHS). All SHOPP projects are limited to capital improvements that do not add capacity (no new highway lanes) to the SHS, though some new auxiliary lanes are eligible for SHOPP funding.

STANCOG 2021 FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 27

The Collision Reduction category is one of eight categories that make up the SHOPP, with the intention to reduce the number or severity of collisions; within this category are two programs: 1. 201.010 - Safety Improvements: reactive approach based on analysis of collision history 2. 201.015 - Collision Severity Reduction: proactive approach targeted to reduce the potential for traffic collisions based on past performance of roadway characteristics

Asset Management Performance Measures (PM2) The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) published PM2 effective as of May 20, 2017, establishing performance measures for DOTs to use in managing pavement and bridge performance on the National Highway System (NHS). The rule requires Caltrans to establish targets, regardless of ownership, for the full extent of the Interstate and non-Interstate NHS. Statewide 2- and 4-year targets for the non-Interstate NHS and 4-year targets for the Interstate NHS were first required to be established by May 20, 2018. Targets may be adjusted at the Mid-Performance Period Progress Report on October 1, 2020.

Caltrans’ targets should be determined from asset management analyses and procedures and reflect investment strategies that work toward achieving a state of good repair over the life cycle of assets at minimum practicable cost. If for 3 consecutive years more than 10.0% of Caltrans’ NHS bridges’ total deck area is classified as Structurally Deficient, Caltrans must obligate and set aside National Highway Performance Program (NHPP) funds for eligible projects on bridges on the NHS. Deck area of all border bridges counts toward both Caltrans’ totals.

The Final Rule establishes the Pavement Performance Measures as follows. 1. % of Interstate pavements in Good condition 2. % of Interstate pavements in Poor condition 3. % of non-Interstate NHS pavements in Good condition 4. % of non-Interstate NHS pavements in Poor condition

Table 5 - Pavement Condition Criteria for NHS Roadways presents the pavement condition criteria for rating a pavement as good, fair or poor, based on four metrics: International Roughness Index (IRI), Cracking, Rutting and Faulting. If all metrics receive a rating of good, then the pavement condition is good. If two or more metrics are determined to be poor, then the pavement is in poor condition.

Table 5 - Pavement Condition Criteria for NHS Roadways

Parameter Good Fair Poor IRI1 (in/mi) <95 95 - 170 >170 5-10 (CRCP2) >10 (CRCP2) Cracking <5 5-15 (JPCP3) >15 (JPCP3) (%) 5-20 (AP4) >20 (AP4) Rutting5 (in) <0.2 0.2 - 0.4 Faulting6 (in) <0.1 0.1 - 0.15 1International Roughness Index; 2Continuously Reinforced Concrete Pavement; 3Jointed Plain Concrete Pavement; 4Asphalt Pavement; 5Rutting is applicable to asphalt pavement only; 6Faulting is applicable to jointed plain concrete only

STANCOG 2021 FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 28

The Final Rule also establishes the Bridge Performance Measures as: 1. % of NHS bridges by deck area classified as in Good condition 2. % of NHS bridges by deck area classified as in Poor condition

Table 6 - Bridge Condition Criteria Asset Classification Lowest NBI Condition Rating 9 Good 8 7 6 Fair 5 4 3 Poor 2 1 0

If FHWA determines that Caltrans’ Interstate pavement condition falls below the minimum level for the most recent year, Caltrans must obligate a portion of National Highway Performance Program (NHPP) and transfer a portion of Surface Transportation Block Grant (STBG) funds to address Interstate pavement condition. If for 3 consecutive years more than 10.0% of Caltrans’ NHS bridges’ total deck area is classified as Structurally Deficient, Caltrans must obligate and set aside National Highway Performance Program (NHPP) funds for eligible projects on bridges on the NHS.

StanCOG Support for Caltrans’ Asset Management Performance Targets StanCOG staff requested information regarding expected future conditions of locally owned NHS pavements and bridges from local agencies in Stanislaus County to provide Caltrans with information regarding NHS pavements and bridges. The input received from the local agencies included 2-year and 4-year data on expected conditions. This information was then used by Caltrans to develop both 2-year and 4-year statewide targets for NHS pavements and bridges. Staff recommends supporting the statewide targets. Caltrans notified StanCOG of their PM2 targets on May 21, 2018. At StanCOG’s Policy Board Meeting on November 14, 2018, StanCOG affirmed its support for Caltrans’ targets by motion. The State’s targets on the following page are presented in Table 7 - Asset Management Performance Measures & Targets.

STANCOG 2021 FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 29

Table 7 - Asset Management Performance Measures & Targets PM2: NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM PAVEMENT AND BRIDGE CONDITION 2-Year NHS Targets 4-Year NHS Targets Performance Measure (1/1/2018- (1/1/2020- 12/31/2019)* 12/31/2021)* Percentage of Interstate System pavement in ‘Good’ condition 45.1% 44.5% Percentage of non-interstate NHS pavement in ‘Good’ condition 28.2% 29.9% Percentage of Interstate System pavement in ‘Poor’ condition 3.5% 3.8% Percentage of non-interstate NHS pavement in ‘Poor’ condition 7.3% 7.2% Percentage of NHS bridges in ‘Good’ condition 69.1% 70.5% Percentage of NHS bridges in ‘Poor’ condition 4.6% 4.4% *Caltrans Statewide Targets. StanCOG supports these targets.

Transit Asset Management One of the major focus areas of performance-based planning for transit, as required by the Federal Transit Administration (49 CFR §625), is transit asset management (TAM). TAM is the strategic and systematic practice of procuring, operating, inspecting, maintaining, rehabilitating and replacing transit capital assets to manage their performance, risks, and costs over their life cycles to provide safe, cost-effective, and reliable public transportation. TAM uses transit asset conditions to guide how to manage capital assets and prioritize funding to improve or maintain a state of good repair (SGR).

The FTIP includes funding from multiple FTA sources for projects that support TAM. Examples of these projects include rural and urban capital assistance programs; rolling stock acquisition, maintenance, and overhauls; bus fleet rehabilitation and replacement; track and rail yard maintenance and improvements; and maintenance of passenger facilities. For the Stanislaus Region, key projects that address Transit Asset Management are:

Modesto Area Express

• Preventative Maintenance: $6.2 million in FTA 5307 Funds in the four years of the FTIP. • Bus Purchase for Replacement: $19 million in FTA 5339 Funds in the four years of the FTIP.

STANCOG 2021 FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 30

Transit Asset Management Performance

The table below provides the type of category and description for the transit asset management performance measures.

Transit Asset Management Performance Measures

Asset Category Performance Measurement Asset Class Examples

Rolling Stock - (revenue Percentage of revenue vehicles 40-foot bus, 60-foot bus, service vehicles) (Age) within a particular asset class that vans, automobiles, have met or exceeded useful life locomotives, rail vehicles benchmark (ULB).

Equipment – (non-revenue) Percentage of vehicles that have Cranes, prime movers, service vehicles (Age) met or exceeded their ULB. vehicle lifts, tow trucks, vans, automobiles Infrastructure-rail fixed- Percentage of track segments, Signal or relay house, guideway track, signals, and signal, and systems with interlockings, catenary, systems (Condition) performance restrictions. mechanical, electrical and IT systems Stations/Facilities Percentage of facilities within an Stations, depots, (Condition) asset class, rated below 3 on the administration, parking Transit Economic Requirements garages, terminals, shelters Model scale.

In the Stanislaus Region, there are three adopted TAM plans; the Modesto Area Express (MAX) dated December 4, 2019, Stanislaus Area Regional Transit (START) August 2018, and Turlock Transit January 1, 2020. Per FTA guidance, transit providers are responsible for state of good repair performance targets. The TAM plans feature those targets and a prioritization of funding by the transit operators for the federal funds in this FTIP.

The TAM targets below were produced collaboratively with regional transit agencies based on their agency TAM plans and local targets. In developing the targets, StanCOG reviewed and considered the transit operators’ TAM plans (including identified goals, objectives, measures, and targets), thereby incorporating them into the metropolitan planning process.

StanCOG will continue to work with the region’s transit operators to seek ways to improve the methodology, data collection and analysis for future RTP updates, and to continue engaging in a regional discussion about transit state of good repair and the need for additional funding.

STANCOG 2021 FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 31

Table 8 – Asset Management Measures & Targets for Transit Agencies

Rolling Stock Equipment Facilities Infrastructure Stanislaus Region (Percent of (Percent of (Percent of (Percent of Transit Agencies revenue vehicles non-revenue facilities track segments > ULB) vehicles < TERM with >ULB) scale 3) restrictions) Modesto Area Fixed Route: 30% 25% 50% N/A Express (MAX) Dial A Ride: 17% Stanislaus Regional 0% 0% 0% N/A Transit (StaRT) *

Turlock Transit * 0% 0% 0% N/A

*StaRT and Turlock Transit Rolling Stock includes: Fixed Route and Dial A Ride

The transit provider must also submit an annual data report to the National Transit Database (NTD) that reflects the SGR performance targets for the following year and condition information for the provider's system and submit an annual narrative report to the NTD that provides a description of any change in the condition of the transit system from the previous year and describe the progress made during the year to meet the performance targets set in the previous reporting year (49 CFR§625.55).

The TAM Final Rule also requires that, in the future, the FTIP describe the anticipated effect toward achieving the TAM targets set in the RTP, linking investment priorities to those targets (23 CFR 450.326(d)).

There are 6 projects in the 2021 FTIP with $27,644,000 million in FTA funds (FTA 5307 and 5339 combined), $1,711,000 million in local funds, and $2,400,000 million in CMAQ funds that support the maintenance or replacement of transit assets.

Asset Management in StanCOG’s Planning & Programming Asset management for transit state of good repair and pavement and bridge conditions is a priority for StanCOG and its member agencies. For this reason, StanCOG has and will continue to invest in programs and projects to improve conditions of transit state of good repair and pavement and bridges. StanCOG will accomplish this through continued coordination with our planning partners, member agencies and transit operators. An example of this coordination will be pavement condition assessments through the Regional Pavement Management Program programmed in the 2020/21 Overall Work Program.

STANCOG 2021 FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 32

Summary of Asset Management Projects Funding in the Category # of Projects $ Total 4- Year Element PM 2 Projects 27 $81,380,520 $471,378,216 Source: Highway Bridge Program, SHOPP Bridge Preservation, SHOPP Roadway Preservation, and Local Funds

StanCOG’s 2021 FTIP also programs Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STBGP) funds for projects that support road preservation in the Stanislaus Region. The funding table below provides a summary of STBGP funds that support road preservation.

Summary of Rehabilitation and Maintenance Projects # of Funding in the Category $ Total Projects 4- Year Element Rehabilitation and Maintenance 16 $9,972,486 $62,758,403 Source: STGBP and Local Funds

The following are funding sources and programs included in the FTIP that help fund asset management and bridge preservation projects.

Local Funds Cities and counties spend billions each year to maintain local roads and bridges. They derive their funding from a myriad of sources. In a survey of California jurisdictions, for local funds alone, there are more than a hundred different sources of taxes and fees report to be spent on pavement. Some examples of local funding sources include:

• Local sales taxes • Development impact fees • General funds • Traffic impact fees • Parcel/property taxes • Capital Improvement Program (CIP) reserves/capital funds

Local Funds tend to pay for non-regionally significant road maintenance, safety, and bridge projects. Even so, some of the PM 2 projects in the FTIP owe their funding to Local Funds. State Funds Highway Users Tax Account (HUTA) The Highway Users Tax Account (HUTA), more commonly known as the state gas tax, is still the single largest funding source for cities and counties.

STANCOG 2021 FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 33

Senate Bill 1 Senate Bill 1 (SB 1), increased several taxes and fees to raise more than $5 billion annually in new transportation revenues. Moreover, SB 1 provides for inflationary adjustments, so that purchasing power does not diminish as it has in the past. SB 1 prioritizes funding towards maintenance, rehabilitation, and safety improvements on state highways, local streets and roads, and bridges and to improve the state’s trade corridors, transit, and active transportation facilities.

Many SB 1 funds are not captured in the FTIP because that document focuses on federally funded and regionally significant projects, while SB 1 is a non-federal fund that tends to pay for non- regionally significant road maintenance, safety, and bridge projects. Even so, some of the PM 2 projects in the FTIP owe their funding to SB 1.

Federal Highway Bridge Program The Highway Bridge Program (HBP) provides federal aid to local agencies to replace and rehabilitate deficient, locally owned, public highway bridges. The HBP is intended to remove structural deficiencies from existing local highway bridges to keep the traveling public safe. The HBP provides about $288 million annually for bridge projects. Off-system bridges are usually funded at 100% HBP, while on system bridges are funded at 88.53% HBP. An exception to the federal participating rate is “high-cost” bridges, in which sponsors enter into agreements with Caltrans Local Assistance and agree on a federal participating rate which may not equal 100% or 88.53%.

State Highway Operations and Protection Program The State Highway Operations and Protection Program (SHOPP) is described above under PM 1. Two of the eight categories of the SHOPP that address PM 2 are Bridge Preservation and Roadway Preservation.

Although the SHOPP is a program, it is often thought of as a fund source as well. The FTIP lists the fund source for most SHOPP projects as “SHOPP Advance Construction.” Caltrans blends funds from HUTA, SB 1, and federal highway funds into SHOPP, and “SHOPP Advance Construction” is a placeholder for what could be federal or state funds.

SHOPP Bridge Preservation SHOPP Bridge Preservation category includes following programs: • 201.110 – Bridge Rehabilitation and Replacement • 201.111 – Bridge Scour Mitigation • 201.112 – Bridge Rail Replacement and Upgrade • 201.113 – Bridge Seismic Restoration • 201.119 – Capital Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program • 201.322 – Transportation Permit Requirements for Bridges

The 2020 SHOPP has 156 Bridge Preservation projects totaling $2,371,000,000. The SHOPP does not have a reservation for Bridge Preservation.

STANCOG 2021 FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 34

SHOPP Roadway Preservation SHOPP Roadway Preservation category includes following programs: • 201.120 – Roadway Rehabilitation • 201.121 – Pavement Preservation • 201.122 – Pavement Rehabilitation • 201.150 – Roadway Protective Betterments • 201.151 – Drainage System Restoration • 201.170 – Signs and Lighting Rehabilitation

The 2020 SHOPP has 265 Roadway Preservation projects totaling $5,505,000,000. The SHOPP does not have a reservation for Roadway Preservation.

System Performance (PM3) A final rule adopted by FHWA on January 18, 2017, establishes performance measures that DOTs and MPOs will use to report the performance of the Interstate and non-Interstate National Highway System (NHS) to carry out the National Highway Performance Program (NHPP); freight movement on the Interstate system to carry out the National Highway Freight Program (NHFP); and traffic congestion and on-road mobile source emissions for the purpose of carrying out the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ). The final rule, effective as of May 20, 2017, establishes six performance measures:

1. Percent of reliable person-miles traveled on the Interstate 2. Percent of reliable person-miles traveled on the non-Interstate NHS 3. Percentage of Interstate system mileage providing for reliable truck travel time - Truck Travel Time Reliability Index 4. Total emissions reductions by applicable pollutants under the CMAQ program 5. Annual hours of peak hour excessive delay per capita (not applicable for StanCOG until the second performance period) 6. Percent of non-single occupancy vehicle travel which includes travel avoided by telecommuting (not applicable for StanCOG until the second performance period)

Caltrans had to establish targets for PM3 by May 20, 2018, and report targets to FHWA by October 1, 2018 in the Baseline Performance Period Report. StanCOG had an option to either support the relevant Caltrans targets or establish their own targets within 180 days of the State establishing their targets. StanCOG has participated in numerous workshops, technical advisory group meetings and webinars hosted by Caltrans since late 2017.

STANCOG 2021 FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 35

StanCOG Support for Caltrans’ System Performance Targets StanCOG staff worked in coordination with Caltrans during the development of the 2018 PM3 target setting effort. A Technical Advisory Group (TAG) was formed and consisted of members from MPOs and Caltrans that met and discussed performance management through in- person/webcast workshops in 2017 and 2018. The information provided during these meetings was used to collaboratively establish targets for six of the performance measures. Caltrans notified StanCOG of their PM3 targets on May 20, 2018. At StanCOG’s Policy Board Meeting on November 14, 2018, StanCOG affirmed its support for Caltrans’ targets by motion. The State’s targets are presented in Table 9 - System Performance Measures & Targets” on the following page.

STANCOG 2021 FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 36

Table 9 - System Performance Measures & Targets 2017 2-year 4-year Performance Measure Baseline Target Target Data PM3 – National Highway System Percent of reliable person-miles traveled 65.1% 64.6% 65.6% (+1%) on the Interstate1 (+0.5%) Percent of reliable person-miles traveled 73.0% N/A 74.0% (+1%) on the non-Interstate NHS1 PM3 – Freight Movement Percentage of Interstate system mileage providing reliable truck travel time 1.69 1.68 (-0.01) 1.67 (-0.02) (Truck Travel Time Reliability Index)1 PM3 – CMAQ Program Annual hours of peak hour excessive N/A N/A N/A delay per capita* Total Emissions Reductions by 2017 2-Year 4-Year Applicable Pollutants under the CMAQ Baseline Target Target Program2 Data 961.35 970.87 VOC (kg/day) 951.83 (+1%) (+2%) 6,931.90 7,000.54 CO (kg/day) 6,863.26 (+1%) (+2%) 1,770.89 1,788.43 NOx (kg/day) 1,753.36 (+1%) (+2%) 2,455.52 2,479.93 PM10 (kg/day) 2,431.21 (+1%) (+2%) 913.29 922.34 PM2.5 (kg/day) 904.25 (+1%) (+2%) *Annual hours of peak hour excessive delay per capita - N/A, Stanislaus population <1M Data provided by Caltrans Department of Planning and Modal Program, May 2018, from the sources listed below. 1 Source: NPMRDS Analytics Tool (https://npmrds.ritis.org/analytics/) 2 Source: CMAQ Public Access System (https://fhwaapps.fhwa.dot.gov/cmaq_pub/)

System Performance in StanCOG’s Planning & Programming System performance conditions is a priority for StanCOG and its member agencies. For this reason, StanCOG has and will continue to invest in programs and projects to improve congestion, reliability, freight movements, and air quality. StanCOG will accomplish this through continued coordination with our planning partners and member agencies, as well as through, the newly adopted 2020 Congestion Management Process.

STANCOG 2021 FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 37

Summary of System Performance Projects # of Category $ in 4 years $ Total projects Non-Interstate 9 $190,794,441 $285,548,399 Interstate N/A N/A N/A Truck Travel Time Projects N/A N/A N/A CMAQ Projects 30 $18,592,157 $91,601,976 PM 3 Total 39 $209,386,598 $377,150,375 Source: SHOPP Mobility, SB1 TCEP, RIP, CMAQ, Measure L, Local Funds

Truck Travel

Investments are being made in the Stanislaus Region to maintain and modernize the multimodal transportation system. These improvements for enhancing safety and network efficiency, improving travel time reliability and reducing traffic congestion are, in some cases, focused on specific users (e.g. commuters); however, they also provide significant mobility benefits to the full range of road users, including commercial truck drivers. Other investments for enhancing safety and increasing accessibility and mobility are more specific to truck freight operations/goods movement.

The following are funding sources and programs that help fund Non-Interstate and Interstate:

SHOPP Mobility The SHOPP Mobility category include following programs: • 201.310 – Operational Improvements • 201.315 – Transportation Management Systems • 201.321 – Weigh Stations & Weigh-In-Motion Facilities

The 2020 SHOPP has 91 Mobility projects programmed totaling $1,440,000,000. The SHOPP does not have a reservation for Mobility.

SB1 Trade Corridor Enhancement Program (Including National Highway Freight Program)

The purpose of the Senate Bill 1 (SB 1) Trade Corridor Enhancement Program (TCEP) is to provide funding for infrastructure improvements on federally designated Trade Corridors of National and Regional Significance, on California's portion of the National Highway Freight Network, as identified in California Freight Mobility Plan, and along other corridors that have a high volume of freight movement. The Trade Corridor Enhancement Program will also support the goals of the National Highway Freight Program, the California Freight Mobility Plan, and the guiding principles in the California Sustainable Freight Action Plan.

STANCOG 2021 FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 38

This statewide, competitive program will provide approximately $300 million per year in state funding and approximately $515 million in National Highway Freight Program funds if the federal program continues under the next federal transportation act.

Eligible applicants apply for program funds through the nomination of projects. All projects nominated must be identified in a currently adopted regional transportation plan. The Commission is required to evaluate and select submitted applications based on the following criteria:

• Freight System Factors – Throughput, Velocity, and Reliability • Transportation System Factors – Safety, Congestion Reduction/Mitigation, Key Transportation Bottleneck Relief, Multi-Modal Strategy, Interregional Benefits, and Advanced Technology • Community Impact Factors – Air Quality Impact, Community Impact Mitigation, and Economic/Jobs Growth • The overall need, benefits, and cost of the project • Project Readiness – ability to complete the project in a timely manner • Demonstration of the required 30% matching funds • The leveraging and coordination of funds from multiple sources • Jointly nominated and/or jointly funded

Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ) CMAQ program is to fund transportation projects or programs that will contribute to attainment or maintenance of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ozone, carbon monoxide (CO), and particulate matter (both PM10 and PM2.5).

FTIP Funding Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ) CMAQ provides a flexible funding source for transportation projects and programs to help meet the requirements of the Clean Air Act. Funding is available to reduce congestion and improve air quality for areas that do not meet standards for ozone, carbon monoxide, or particulate matter. Projects or programs must demonstrate an air quality benefit at a reasonable cost effectiveness rating. Projects awarded with CMAQ require a 11.47% match by the project sponsor for all project phases. For information on how StanCOG selects projects funding with CMAQ please see the section titled: FTIP Project Selection Process.

Table 10 - Estimated CMAQ Apportionment for the Stanislaus Region

FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23 FY 2023/24 $7,161,237 $7,202,372 $7,200,092 $7,197,765 For more information please see: Appendix B

STANCOG 2021 FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 39

Surface Transportation Block Grant (STBG) STBG provides flexible funding for projects to preserve and improve the conditions and performance on any federal-aid highway and bridge projects on any federal-aid eligible public road, pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure, and transit capital projects, including intercity bus terminals. Projects awarded with STBG require a 11.47% match by the project sponsor for all project phases. All projects must be on the federal-aid network, except for multi-use off-road trails, but those not allow motorized transportation, including electric scooters. For information on how StanCOG selects projects funding with STBG please see the section titled: FTIP Project Selection Process. Table 11 - Estimated STBG Apportionment for Stanislaus Region

FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23 FY 2023/24 $7,306,743 $7,352,935 $7,350,747 $7,348,515 For more information please see: Appendix B

Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) HSIP provides funding to achieve a significant reduction in traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads. The HSIP requires a data-driven, strategic approach to improving highway safety on all public roads that focuses on performance. Projects must also be consistent with the Caltrans’ Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP). Projects awarded with HSIP typically require a 10% match by the project sponsor for all project phases. Projects are selected at the statewide level and Caltrans informs member agencies which projects have been awarded. For detailed project information please see Appendix H.

Active Transportation Program (ATP) ATP was created by the State of California to encourage increased use of active modes of transportation, such as biking and walking, as well as to ensure compliance with the federal transportation authorization. The goals of the ATP are to: • Increase the proportion of trips accomplished by biking and walking, • Increase the safety and mobility of nonmotorized users, • Advance the active transportation efforts of regional agencies to achieve greenhouse gas reduction goals, • Enhance public health, • Ensure that disadvantaged communities fully share in the benefits of the program, and • Provide a broad spectrum of projects to benefit many types of active transportation users.

The ATP is funded from the Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA) Transportation Alternative and HSIP funding sources, in addition to the State Highway Account. Projects are selected at the statewide level and CTC informs member agencies which projects have been awarded. Projects not selected at the statewide level will be awarded through funds apportioned to the MPO based on scores received from the CTC. Available funding for distribution from the

STANCOG 2021 FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 40

MPO for Cycle 5 is provided in Appendix B. For detailed project information of current programmed projects, please see Appendix F.

Highway Bridge Program (HBP) HBP assists Caltrans and member agencies in replacing or rehabilitating public highway bridges over waterways, other topographical barriers, other highways, or railroads when Caltrans and the Federal Highway Administration determine that a bridge is significantly important and is unsafe because of structural deficiencies, physical deterioration, or functional obsolescence. Eligible bridge projects include replacement, rehabilitation, painting, scour countermeasure, bridge approach barrier and railing replacement, low water crossing replacement, and ferry service replacement. Projects are selected at the statewide level and Caltrans informs member agencies which projects have been awarded. For detailed project information please see Appendix G.

State Highway Operations & Protection Program (SHOPP) SHOPP is a four-year program of projects selected by the CTC. Project eligibility requires that projects have the intent to reduce collisions, restore major damage, preserve bridges, roadways and roadsides, enhance mobility and provide for the preservation of other transportation facilities related to the state highway system. Funding is provided via the State Transportation Improvement Program Fund Estimate (Fund Estimate) and provides programming capacity for Capital Outlay and Capital Outlay Support. Projects are selected at the statewide level and Caltrans informs member agencies which projects have been awarded. For detailed project information please see Appendix I.

Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Programs 5307 – Transit/Urbanized Area Formula Grants FTA Section 5307 provides formula funding to public transit systems in Urbanized Areas (UZA) with a population of 50,000 or more. These funds are made available for transit capital and operating assistance and for transportation related planning. Projects awarded with 5307 funds for capital require a 20% match by the project sponsor. For operations there is a 50% match required and operational funds are limited based on UZA population and number of vehicles operated. For vehicle-related equipment attributable to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Clean Air Act, the match may be 10%. For detailed project information please see Appendix A. 5310 – Transit / Enhanced Mobility of Seniors & Individuals with Disabilities FTA Section 5310 provides formula funding for the purpose of assisting private nonprofit groups in meeting transportation needs of the elderly and persons with disabilities. Use of the funds must be consistent with the Coordinated Human Services Transportation Plan. Projects awarded with 5310 funds for capital purposes require a 20% match by the project sponsor. For operations there is a 50% match required by the project sponsor. For detailed project information please see Appendix A. 5311 – Transit / Non-urbanized Area Formula Grants FTA Section 5311 formula grants for rural areas provides capital, planning, and operating assistance for states to support public transportation in rural areas with populations of less than

STANCOG 2021 FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 41

50,000, where many residents often rely on public transit to reach their destinations. The program also provides funding for state and national training and technical assistance through the Rural Transportation Assistance Program. Projects are selected at the statewide level and Caltrans informs transit operators which projects have been awarded. For detailed project information please see Appendix A. 5337 – Transit / State of Good Repair Grants FTA Section 5337 provides capital assistance for maintenance, replacement, and rehabilitation projects of existing high-intensity fixed guideway and motorbus systems to maintain a state of good repair (SGR). Additionally, SGR grants are eligible for developing and implementing Transit Asset Management plans. Projects awarded with 5337 funds require a 20% match by the project sponsor. For detailed project information please see Appendix A. 5339 – Transit / Grants for Buses and Bus Facilities Formula Program FTA Section 5339 provides funding to states transit agencies through a statutory formula to replace, rehabilitate and purchase buses and related equipment and to construct bus-related facilities. Projects awarded with 5339 funds require a 20% match by the project sponsor. Additionally, the Federal share may exceed 80 percent for certain projects related to the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Clean Air Act (CAA), and certain bicycle projects. For detailed project information please see Appendix A.

Measure L – Stanislaus Region’s Self-Help Tax to Support Transportation Investments Measure L was passed by county voters on November 8, 2016. The measure provides for the implementation of an Expenditure Plan, as approved and adopted by county voters, which will result in countywide local street and road improvements, arterial street widening, signalization, bicyclist, pedestrian, and driver safety, regional projects, and transit improvements. These needed improvements are funded by a ½ cent retail transactions and use tax established for a 25-year period. Tax collection started on April 1, 2017 and to date has exceed initial revenue estimates. The regional tax will expire on March 31, 2042 and it is conservatively estimated that $960 million dollars will be generated for transportation investments throughout Stanislaus County.

FTIP Project Selection Process The Stanislaus Region relies on funding from federal, state, and local revenue sources to support its transportation improvement projects prioritized in the FTIP. Over the life of the RTP/SCS, federal funds represent approximately 41% of the revenues for system improvement strategies. Only projects listed in the Regional Transportation Plan’s financially constrained list are eligible to be selected for funding in the FTIP. In line with federal Year of Expenditure (YOE) requirements, outlined in the FAST Act, StanCOG has escalated all project costs to the year of completion. YOE ensures that total project costs are assumed (including inflation). The intent of this requirement is to ensure that the project list is as realistic as possible. For example, a project that costs $1 million today will likely cost more in 2024. Therefore, StanCOG adds a uniform inflation rate of (3%) to all projects to estimate the true project cost at the year of completion.

STANCOG 2021 FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 42

The projects listed in the 2019 FTIP are selected based on criteria established by the 2018 RTP and funding availability. StanCOG prepares the RTP in cooperation with its member agencies, transit operators, state and federal agencies.

StanCOG’s CMAQ Apportionment Methodology At the November 20, 2019 StanCOG Policy Board, the methodology for allocating CMAQ funds in the Stanislaus Region was adopted by Board Resolution #19-22 (found at http://stancog.org/pdf/policy-board/agendas/2019/pb-agenda-11-20-2019.pdf, Page 95). The methodology employs a competitive application process for local member agencies and transit operators to compete for available CMAQ funds. The resolution continues to affirm actions taken dating back to 2011, when the eight San Joaquin Valley (SJV) MPOs adopted policies for distributing at least 20% of the CMAQ funds to projects that meet a cost-effectiveness threshold for emission reductions. The policies establish that prior to allocation of CMAQ funds with each new Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) project funding would occur based on cost-effectiveness. Cost-effectiveness is expressed as dollars spent per pound of pollutant reduced (ROG + NOx + PM2.5 + PM10). The cost-effectiveness threshold for the 2019 FTIP was recommended to be maintained at $45 per pound ($90,000/ton). The threshold is based on CMAQ dollars only, not total project cost.

In advance of the Policy Board adopting Resolution #19-22, a Planning Programming Working Group (PPWG) workshop was held on September 13, 2019 to solicit input from representatives of StanCOG’s member agencies on the CMAQ distribution methodology used in past cycles. StanCOG staff presented various scenarios to local member agencies on how the CMAQ distribution methodology might be updated. A follow up meeting was held on October 2, 2019 to present an updated CMAQ distribution methodology based on input received. The following distribution methodology developed by StanCOG staff and the PPWG is the adopted method by StanCOG’s Policy Board.

Table 12 - StanCOG's CMAQ Allocation Methodology Category Funding Breakdown Rideshare Apportionment $400,000 for FFY 2020/21 (off the top) $405,000 for FFY 2021/22 Small/Medium Size Agencies 25% of CMAQ Balance after Rideshare (Hughson, Newman, Oakdale, Patterson, Apportionment Riverbank, Waterford) ($500,000 Project Cap) Large Agencies & Transit 75% of CMAQ Balance after Rideshare (Ceres, Modesto, Turlock, Stanislaus Apportionment County) ($1,200,000 Project Cap) Projects are ranked from most to least cost effective, using the $45 per pound cost- effectiveness threshold, until funding is depleted. Funding breakdowns for future federal fiscal years will be determined by future Policy Board action.

The Stanislaus region has three rideshare programs. The programs are highly cost-effective and meet all CMAQ eligibility requirements. All three programs in the Stanislaus region can be fully funded programs “off the top” as the rideshare programs are also mandated Transportation Control

STANCOG 2021 FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 43

Measures identified for the purpose of reducing emissions or concentrations of air pollutants from transportation sources. CMAQ applicants are encouraged to increase their local match contribution and reduce the amount of CMAQ funding requested per project applied for in order to: 1) Meet the goals of the recommended CMAQ expenditure threshold of $45 per pound of emissions reduction, 2) Improve the cost-effectiveness ranking of a project in their respective category, and 3) Allow for additional CMAQ projects to be funded in each cycle.

The local match can consist of Measure L Local Streets and Roads funds or other local agency funds. After receiving applications, StanCOG staff reviews and ranks applications from most to least cost effective, using the $45 per pound cost-effectiveness threshold until funding is depleted. The list of projects is then assembled and presented to the Policy Board for their consideration and approval. The projects are then programmed into the FTIP by amendment.

StanCOG’s STBG Apportionment Methodology At the November 20, 2019 StanCOG Policy Board, the methodology for allocating STBG funds in the Stanislaus Region was adopted by Board Resolution #19-23 continuing past practices of the eight prior allocations including the ninth in early 2020.

The following distribution methodology is employed: 1. A 70/30 weighted allocation formula methodology is employed for all local member agencies to determine their formula share of STBG: • 70% by the proportion of total population • 30% by the proportion of road miles eligible for federal aid funding

2. Agencies that would receive less than $175,000 in an annual apportionment, based on the formula, are guaranteed a minimum of $175,000 annually (referred to as the floor amount). The funds for this minimum amount are deducted from the regional apportionment estimate prior to calculating the remaining apportionments.

A Planning Programming Working Group (PPWG) workshop was held on September 13, 2019 to solicit input on the distribution methodology used in past eight STBG funding cycles. It was requested that StanCOG explore the potential or feasibility of increasing the floor to allow agencies that receive the floor amount to deliver a more substantial project. In a follow up meeting on October 2, 2019 with the PPWG, StanCOG staff presented distribution methodologies that would increase the minimum floor amount from $100,000 to $175,000. StanCOG also receives an allocation of STBGP funding on an annual basis for implementation of a Planning, Programming, and Management Program used for daily project and program administration. StanCOG will be allocated $150,000 in funding which is deducted from the annual apportionment prior to the funds being distributed to local jurisdictions. Local member agencies then advise StanCOG of the projects they would like to advance into the FTIP using their share of STBG funds and StanCOG programs them via an amendment.

STANCOG 2021 FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 44

Table 13 - Example of StanCOG's Formula Allocation of STBG STBG Example Regional Apportionment $7,309,810 Amount needed for qualifying member agencies to receive floor $525,000 StanCOG Planning & Project Delivery $150,000 Available for Call for Projects $6,634,810

Federal-Aid Percentage of Share of Population Centerline Agency STBG STBG (2019) 70%1 Road Miles Funding Funds 30%2 StanCOG N/A N/A N/A $150,000 Newman 11,738 19 Floor Amount $175,000 Waterford 9,051 6 Floor Amount $175,000 Hughson 7,954 9 Floor Amount $175,000 Stanislaus County 118,046 473 31.84% $2,112,398 (unincorporated) Modesto 215,201 181 34.65% $2,298,879 Turlock 74,471 97 13.18% $874,236 Ceres 49,510 41 7.95% $527,673 Oakdale 23,807 33 4.27% $283,113 Riverbank 25,318 22 4.09% $271,276 Patterson 23,764 26 4.03% $267,236 Totals 530,117 873 100.00% $6,634,810 1 Source: Department of Finance Population Estimates 2 Source: 2012 Pavement Management Program Update

Expedited Project Selection Procedures (EPSP) Federal regulations (23 CFR §450.332) allow for the advancement or delay of projects within the active four-year program schedule planning element of the FTIP subject to procedures agreed upon by cooperating parties. This document certifies that StanCOG as the MPO, and the Regional Transportation Planning Agency (RTPA), has in place a formal Expedited Project Selection Process (EPSP) agreed upon by all the Region’s partners. StanCOG and Caltrans have implemented an EPSP for its FTIP, as required by the federal regulations. Projects from the first four years of the 2021 FTIP have been selected using the approved project selection procedures. An outline of these procedures is identified in the “EPSP Selection Process” table on the next page.

STANCOG 2021 FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 45

Table 14 - StanCOG's Expedited Project Selection Procedures

Consulted / Selecting Selection Region Project Type Cooperating Agency Procedure Agency Projects funded with Title 23 and Federal Transit Act funds-except: State and MPO Consultation NHS, HBP, IM, HM and FLHP StanCOG funded projects

Projects on the Highway Railroad Grade Separation, NHS, StanCOG and projects funded State Cooperation MPO under the HBP, HM and IM Programs, SHOPP, HSIP, SRTS

Projects funded with Federal Lands Highway Program (FLHP) Selected in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 204 funds

STANCOG 2021 FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 46

Appendix A

Project Listings for the 2021 Federal Transportation Improvement Program Stanislaus Council of Governments 2021 Federal Transportation Improvement Program Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Program (Non-transit)

Route Description Change Description Postmile Program Schedule PIN (Construction costs escalated per Caltrans percentage) Project Comments Dist-EA Fund Total Escalated Cost Funding Summary (Current & Prior Years) AQ Prior Years Four Year Element Lead Status Phase 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 24/25 25/26 Local State Federal

Purchase Alternative Fuel Vehicle One CNG Street PE Carry Over Sweeper w/CNG Aux (Using Toll Credits) RW ******** DFTIP Version 1 - 09/22/2020******** STANCOG ******** Version 1 - 07/16/2020 ******** Const 420,000 New Project - Using Toll Credits CMAQ 4.01 $ 420,000 Prior Stanislaus County DFTIP Amend 0.00 21400000719 Total 420,000 Current 420,000

Grouped Projects for Intersection Channelization: PE Carry Over Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 RW ******** Version 1 - 09/03/20 ******** VA01 Exempt Table 3 Categories - Intersection Project data transfered from 2018 FTIP. Channelization Projects. (Using Toll Credits) Const 12,175,669 250,250 426,470 ******** Version 31 - 06/24/2020 ******** CMAQ/CITY/STPL ******** Version 30 - 03/29/2019 ******** 1.07 $ 12,852,389 Prior 2,536,298 9,639,371 Various Agencies DFTIP Amend 0.00 21400000565 Total 12,175,669 250,250 426,470 Current 195,618 481,102

Grouped Projects for Bicycle & Pedestrian Facilities - PE Carry Over Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 RW ******** Version 1 - 09/03/20 ******** VA03 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories (Motorized & Project data transfered from 2018 FTIP. Non-Motorized) (Using Toll Credits) Const 12,443,077 5,410,374 1,517,670 ******** Version 28 - 06/24/2020 ******** CMAQ/CITY/BTA/STPL ******** Version 27 - 04/20/2020 ******** 3.02 $ 19,371,121 Prior 949,922 884,936 10,608,219 Various Agencies DFTIP Amend 0.00 21400000567 Total 12,443,077 5,410,374 1,517,670 Current 4,143,560 2,784,484

Grouped Projects for Intersection Signalization PE Carry Over projects consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt RW ******** DFTIP Version 1 - 09/22/2020******** STANCOG Table 3 category (Using Toll Credits) ******** Version 34 - 07/16/2020 ******** Const 38,451,452 643,098 2,822,123 ******** Version 33 - 04/20/2020 ******** CMAQ/CITY/SHOPPAC/STPL ******** Version 32 - 07/02/2019 ******** 5.02 $ 41,916,673 Prior 16,002,687 22,448,765 Various Agencies DFTIP Amend 0.00 21400000594 Total 38,451,452 643,098 2,822,123 Current 553,900 2,911,321

Grouped Projects for Traffic Control Devices and PE Carry Over Operating Assistance other than Signalization: RW ******** DFTIP Version 1 - 09/22/2020******** ITS0001 Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 ******** Version 7 - 07/16/2020 ******** Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Traffic Const 5,491,901 1,555,047 ******** DFTIP Version 1 - 05/29/2018******** CMAQ/CITY ******** Version 4 - 03/09/2018 ******** 1.07 $ 7,046,948 Prior 427,379 5,064,522 Various Agencies DFTIP Amend 0.00 21400000678 Total 5,491,901 1,555,047 Current 111,720 1,443,327

Grouped Projects for Ride-Sharing and Van-Pooling PE Carry Over projects are consistent with 40 CFR part 93.126 RW ******** DFTIP Version 1 - 09/22/2020******** STANCOG Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Continuation ******** Version 1 - 07/16/2020 ******** of ride-sharing and van-pooling promotion activities at Const 1,383,458 592,198 Using Toll Credits CMAQ 3.01 $ 1,975,656 Prior Various Agencies DFTIP Amend 0.00 21400000720 Total 1,383,458 592,198 Current 1,975,656

Page 1 of 15 Stanislaus Council of Governments 2021 Federal Transportation Improvement Program Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Program (Transit Projects)

Purchase 8 New Buses for fixed route transit service (2 PE Carry Over in FY 18/19 and 2 in FY 19/20, 2 40ft Diesel Buses in RW ******** Version 1 - 09/03/20 ******** STANCOG FY 20/21, and 2 40 ft. Diesel Buses in FY 21/22). Project data transfered from 2018 FTIP. (Using Toll Credits) Const 2,400,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 RTP M71 CMAQ ******** Version 4 - 06/29/2020 ******** 2.10 $ 4,800,000 Prior 2,400,000 Modesto, City of DFTIP Amend 0.00 21400000706 Total 2,400,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 Current 2,400,000

Transit Fare Subsidy Program (TFS) StaRT/MAX PE 95,000 Carry Over Employee Ride Program RW ******** Version 1 - 09/03/20 ******** 04STA048C Project data transfered from 2018 FTIP. Const 890,000 RTP #S99 CMAQ/LTF ******** DFTIP Version 1 - 05/29/2018******** 4.01 $ 985,000 Prior 102,012 882,988 Stanislaus County DFTIP Amend 0.00 21400000254 Total 985,000 Current

Page 2 of 15 Stanislaus Council of Governments 2021 Federal Transportation Improvement Program Federal Transit Administration Section 5307 Program

Bus Stop Rehab and Renovation PE Carry Over RW ******** Version 1 - 09/03/20 ******** M157 2018 RTP #M67 Const 4,782,000 240,000 240,000 240,000 240,000 Project data transfered from 2018 FTIP. 5307/CITY ******** Version 1 - 05/14/18 ******** 2.08 $ 5,742,000 Prior 882,000 3,900,000 Modesto, City of DFTIP Amend 0.00 21400000362 Total 4,782,000 240,000 240,000 240,000 240,000 Current 160,000 800,000

Purchase 7 Diesel Fixed Route Heavy Duty Transit PE Carry Over Buses (45 passenger Buses) each Federal Fiscal RW ******** Version 1 - 09/03/20 ******** M158 Year. Buses need to be purchased every year for Project data transfered from 2018 FTIP. replacement and growth. Const 6,360,000 720,000 720,000 720,000 RTP M71 5307/CITY ******** Version 9 - 10/03/2019 ******** 2.11 $ 8,520,000 Prior 1,060,000 5,300,000 Modesto, City of DFTIP Amend 0.00 21400000363 Total 6,360,000 720,000 720,000 720,000 Current 360,000 1,800,000

Preventative Maintenance on transit vehicles and transit PE Carry Over facilities. RW ******** Version 1 - 09/03/20 ******** M160 2018 RTP #M70 Const 6,540,000 1,860,000 1,860,000 1,860,000 1,860,000 Project data transfered from 2018 FTIP. 5307/CITY ******** Version 9 - 10/03/2019 ******** 2.03 $ 13,980,000 Prior 1,090,000 5,450,000 Modesto, City of DFTIP Amend 0.00 21400000367 Total 6,540,000 1,860,000 1,860,000 1,860,000 1,860,000 Current 1,240,000 6,200,000

Capital Cost of Contracting for Stanislaus County - PE Carry Over Provide capital funding for Stanislaus Countys fixed RW ******** Version 1 - 09/03/20 ******** FTA53071 route and demand response services (Toll Credits) 2018 RTP #M68 Const 5,280,349 820,000 820,000 820,000 820,000 Project data transfered from 2018 FTIP. 5307 ******** Version 1 - 05/14/18 ******** 2.04 $ 8,560,349 Prior 5,280,349 Modesto, City of DFTIP Amend 0.00 21400000667 Total 5,280,349 820,000 820,000 820,000 820,000 Current 3,280,000

Transit Planning - Short and Long Term PE Carry Over RW ******** Version 1 - 09/03/20 ******** FTA53071 Project data transfered from 2018 FTIP. Const 792,000 600,000 ******** Version 1 - 05/14/18 ******** CITY/5307 Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. 2.01 $ 1,392,000 Prior 132,000 660,000 Modesto, City of DFTIP Amend 0.00 21400000698 Total 792,000 600,000 Current 100,000 500,000

Operating Assistance PE Carry Over RW ******** Version 1 - 09/03/20 ******** STANCOG 2018 RTP #M65 Const 6,500,190 6,600,000 6,700,000 6,700,000 6,700,000 Project data transfered from 2018 FTIP. 5307/TDA ******** Version 1 - 10/03/2019 ******** 2.01 $ 33,200,190 Prior 3,250,095 3,250,095 Modesto, City of DFTIP Amend 0.00 21400000713 Total 6,500,190 6,600,000 6,700,000 6,700,000 6,700,000 Current 13,350,000 13,350,000

Page 3 of 15 Stanislaus Council of Governments 2021 Federal Transportation Improvement Program Federal Transit Administration Section 5307 Program

Turlock Transit Operating Assistance PE 20,665,000 3,420,000 3,500,000 Carry Over RW ******** Version 1 - 09/03/20 ******** 06STA023M 2018 RTP #T54 Const Project data transfered from 2018 FTIP. 5307/CITY ******** Version 13 - 07/03/2019 ******** 2.01 $ 27,585,000 Prior 9,332,500 11,332,500 Turlock, City of DFTIP Amend 0.00 21400000372 Total 20,665,000 3,420,000 3,500,000 Current 3,460,000 3,460,000

Preventative Maintenance for transit vehicles and PE 275,000 275,000 280,000 Carry Over transit facilities. RW ******** Version 1 - 09/03/20 ******** F5307001 2018 RTP #T52 Const Project data transfered from 2018 FTIP. CITY/5307 ******** Version 7 - 07/24/2019 ******** 2.03 $ 830,000 Prior 55,000 220,000 Turlock, City of DFTIP Amend 0.00 21400000628 Total 275,000 275,000 280,000 Current 111,000 444,000

Acquire transit support equipment, tools and PE 3,810,000 20,000 20,000 Carry Over technology for transit facilities and transit vehicles. RW ******** Version 1 - 09/03/20 ******** F5307002 (Using Toll Credits) 2018 RTP #T53 Const Project data transfered from 2018 FTIP. 5307/CITY/PTMISEA ******** Version 1 - 05/14/18 ******** 2.05 $ 3,850,000 Prior 2,110,000 650,000 1,050,000 Turlock, City of DFTIP Amend 0.00 21400000629 Total 3,810,000 20,000 20,000 Current 40,000

Transit Operations Facility (Design, Right of Way, and PE 350,000 Carry Over construction of Transit Operations Facility for parking RW 400,000 ******** Version 1 - 09/03/20 ******** STANCOG and fueling on S. Walnut Road in the City of Turlock) 2018 RTP T49 Const 6,000,000

5307/STA-1B/CITY Breakdown of SGR Funds: 0.00 $ 6,750,000 Prior Turlock, City of DFTIP Amend 0.00 21400000711 Total 350,000 6,400,000 Current 1,211,301 418,699 5,120,000

Page 4 of 15 Stanislaus Council of Governments 2021 Federal Transportation Improvement Program Federal Transit Administration Section 5309 Program

Purchase Buses for Replacement (8 total, 2 per FY PE Carry Over from 20/21 through 23/24 - 35 and 40 FT Diesel or RW ******** Version 1 - 09/03/20 ******** 53391 Zero Emissions Bus) (Using Toll Credits) Using Toll Credits Const 3,480,000 800,000 800,000 800,000 800,000 Project data transfered from 2018 FTIP. 5339/CITY ******** Version 1 - 05/14/18 ******** 2.10 $ 6,680,000 Prior 580,000 2,900,000 Modesto, City of DFTIP Amend 0.00 21400000699 Total 3,480,000 800,000 800,000 800,000 800,000 Current 3,200,000

Bus Purchase for Replacement - 16 total, 4 per FY PE Carry Over from 20/21 through 23/24 (35 Ft and 40 FT Diesel or RW ******** Version 1 - 09/03/20 ******** 53392 Zero Emissions Bus) (Using Toll Credits) Using Toll Credits Const 16,680,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 Project data transfered from 2018 FTIP. 5339/CITY ******** Version 1 - 05/14/18 ******** 2.10 $ 32,680,000 Prior 2,780,000 13,900,000 Modesto, City of DFTIP Amend 0.00 21400000701 Total 16,680,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 Current 16,000,000

Bus Rapid Transit Improvements and Purchase of 3 PE Carry Over buses - 40 ft Diesel or Zero Emission Bus (Using Toll RW ******** Version 1 - 09/03/20 ******** 53393 Credits) Using Toll Credits Const 6,000,000 5,000,000 2018 RTP #M76 5339/CITY Project data transfered from 2018 FTIP. 2.01 $ 11,000,000 Prior 1,000,000 5,000,000 Modesto, City of DFTIP Amend 0.00 21400000702 Total 6,000,000 5,000,000 Current 5,000,000

Page 5 of 15 Stanislaus Council of Governments 2021 Federal Transportation Improvement Program Federal Transit Administration Section 5310 Program

Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Stockton - PE Carry Over Operating Assistance(Using Toll Credits) RW ******** Version 1 - 09/03/20 ******** STANCOG Project data transfered from 2018 FTIP. Const 79,040 ******** Version 1 - 02/25/2020 ******** 5310 Using Toll Credits 2.01 $ 79,040 Prior Various Agencies DFTIP Amend 0.00 21400000714 Total 79,040 Current 79,040

Howard Training Center - Two Large Gas Buses, 16 PE Carry Over ambulatory, 2 wheelchairs (Service Expansion) (Using RW ******** Version 1 - 09/03/20 ******** STANCOG Toll Credits) Project data transfered from 2018 FTIP. Const 129,920 ******** Version 2 - 06/29/2020 ******** 5310 Updated description to include type and size of buses 2.10 $ 129,920 Prior Various Agencies DFTIP Amend 0.00 21400000715 Total 129,920 Current 129,920

United Cerebral Palsy (UCP) of Stanislaus - Four PE Carry Over Small Gas Buses - 8 ambulatory passengers and 2 RW ******** Version 1 - 09/03/20 ******** STANCOG wheelchairs (Service Expansion) (Using Toll Credits) Project data transfered from 2018 FTIP. Const 227,840 ******** Version 2 - 06/29/2020 ******** 5310 Updated description to include size and type of buses 2.10 $ 227,840 Prior Various Agencies DFTIP Amend 0.00 21400000716 Total 227,840 Current 227,840

Page 6 of 15 Stanislaus Council of Governments 2021 Federal Transportation Improvement Program Federal Transit Administration Section 5311 Program

Operating Assistance - Intercity Transit PE 2,831,205 Carry Over RW ******** Version 1 - 09/03/20 ******** 06STA027M 2018 RTP #S97 Const 23,204,526 3,667,971 Project data transfered from 2018 FTIP. 5311/LTF ******** Version 10 - 12/15/2018 ******** 2.01 $ 29,703,702 Prior 19,698,405 6,337,326 Stanislaus County DFTIP Amend 0.00 21400000376 Total 26,035,731 3,667,971 Current 3,667,971

Page 7 of 15 Stanislaus Council of Governments 2021 Federal Transportation Improvement Program Highway Bridge Program

Replace 7th Street 2-Lane Bridge with 4-Lane Bridge PE 6,817,044 Carry Over over Tuolumne River, South Tuolumne Blvd RW 4,294,000 3,801,478 3,984,000 ******** Version 1 - 09/03/20 ******** 08STA006 Project data transfered from 2018 FTIP. Const 39,103,400 34,618,240 RTP #S29 HBRR-S/CO/LF-AC ******** Version 15 - 04/20/2020 ******** 1.03 $ 92,618,162 Prior 5,075,915 6,035,129 Stanislaus County DFTIP Amend 0.00 21400000418 Total 11,111,044 3,801,478 43,087,400 34,618,240 Current 1,140,647 41,946,753

Grouped Projects for Bridge Rehabilitation and PE Carry Over Reconstruction - HBP Program; Projects are RW ******** Version 1 - 09/03/20 ******** STANCOG consistent with 40 CFR Par 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 Project data transfered from 2018 FTIP. categories. Widening narrow pavements or Const 87,963,462 16,861,560 8,464,601 11,103,188 1,675,001 81,846,190 ******** Version 26 - 04/20/2020 ******** HBRR-S/LTF/LBSRA/LF-AC Updated per HBP Backup-List 03/31/20 from 1.06 $ 207,914,002 Prior 29,722,689 1,045,835 57,194,938 Various Agencies DFTIP Amend 0.00 21400000447 Total 87,963,462 16,861,560 8,464,601 11,103,188 1,675,001 81,846,190 Current -18,726,536 2,686,962 113,136,884

Page 8 of 15 Stanislaus Council of Governments 2021 Federal Transportation Improvement Program Minors Program

Grouped Projects for Safety Improvements, Shoulder PE Carry Over Improvements, Pavement resurfacing and/or RW ******** Version 1 - 09/03/20 ******** MINOR01 rehabilitation - Minor Program: Projects are consistent Project data transfered from 2018 FTIP. with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 Const 9,179,000 ******** Version 5 - 10/03/2019 ******** SHOPPAC Updated per Caltrans State Minor Program Update 1.03 $ 9,179,000 Prior 9,179,000 Various Agencies DFTIP Amend 0.00 21400000668 Total 9,179,000 Current

Page 9 of 15 Stanislaus Council of Governments 2021 Federal Transportation Improvement Program Regional Surface Transportation Program

Highway 33 & Inyo Avenue: Resurface/Reconstruction PE 50,000 Carry Over and Installation of underground conduits for RW ******** Version 1 - 09/03/20 ******** RSTP1501 intersection control and coordination systems (Using RTP #N05 Toll Credits) Const 1,097,500 Project data transfered from 2018 FTIP. STPL/HIP ******** Version 6 - 10/03/2019 ******** 1.10 $ 1,147,500 Prior 50,000 Newman, City of DFTIP Amend 0.00 21400000663 Total 50,000 1,097,500 Current 1,097,500

Implementation of a planning, programming and PE 98,870 Carry Over monitoring system in accord with 23 USC Section 303 RW ******** Version 1 - 09/03/20 ******** 05STA002R (Using Toll Credits) Using Toll Credits Const 729,966 150,000 150,000 Project data transfered from 2018 FTIP. STPL/LTF ******** Version 11 - 06/22/2020 ******** 4.01 $ 1,128,836 Prior 108,836 720,000 Stanislaus Council DFTIP Amend 0.00 21400000303 Total 828,836 150,000 150,000 of Governments Current 300,000

Faith Home Rd from Hatch Rd to Garner Rd; PE 1,600,000 Carry Over Construct new 2-lane Expressway. (Using Toll Credits RW 2,000,000 ******** Version 1 - 09/03/20 ******** RSTPSC01 - PE Phase) Project data transfered from 2018 FTIP. Const 35,000,000 33,100,000 RTP #S103 STPL/CO ******** Version 1 - 05/14/18 ******** 0.00 $ 71,700,000 Prior 977,500 622,500 Stanislaus County DFTIP Amend 0.00 21400000695 Total 1,600,000 2,000,000 35,000,000 33,100,000 Current 70,100,000

Grouped Projects for pavement resurfacing and/or PE Carry Over rehabilitation: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part RW ******** Version 1 - 09/03/20 ******** VA02 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 Categories - Project data transfered from 2018 FTIP. Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation (Using Toll Const 52,785,917 5,208,701 4,266,285 ******** Version 38 - 04/20/2020 ******** STPL/CITY ******** Version 37 - 11/04/2019 ******** 1.10 $ 62,260,903 Prior 4,203,180 48,582,737 Various Agencies DFTIP Amend 0.00 21400000566 Total 52,785,917 5,208,701 4,266,285 Current 1,793,235 7,681,751

Page 10 of 15 Stanislaus Council of Governments 2021 Federal Transportation Improvement Program Regionally Significant Locally Funded Projects

99 SR99/Service Rd/Mitchell Rd Interchange Project (On PE 13,500,000 Carry Over R9.5/R11.4 SR99 in Stanislaus County I and near Ceres from 0.7 RW 500,000 ******** Version 1 - 09/03/20 ******** STANCOG mile south of Mitchell Road Undercrossing to 0.1 mile RTP #C23 10-1A690 north of Pine Street Overcrossing) Const 83,000,000 Project data transfered from 2018 FTIP. CITY ******** Version 1 - 05/30/2018 ******** 0.00 $ 97,000,000 Prior 14,000,000 Ceres, City of DFTIP Amend 0.00 21400000707 Total 14,000,000 83,000,000 Current 83,000,000

SR 99 at Briggsmore/Carpenter Road. Reconstruct to PE 549,000 2,298,879 2,297,953 Carry Over 8 Lane Interchange RW ******** DFTIP Version 1 - 09/22/2020******** STANCOG (Project is currently in the PID and PAED phase only. RTP#M84 ROW Phase estimated for January 2024; CON Phase, Const ******** Version 1 - 07/07/2020 ******** STPL/MEA 0.00 $ 5,145,832 Prior 549,000 Modesto, City of DFTIP Amend 0.00 21400000717 Total 549,000 2,298,879 2,297,953 Current 4,596,832

SR99 at Standiford/Beckwith Road. Reconstruct to 8 PE 1,598,000 2,500,000 Carry Over Lane Interchange RW ******** DFTIP Version 1 - 09/22/2020******** STANCOG (Project is currently in the PID and PAED phase only. RTP #M85 ROW Phase estimated for January 2024; CON Phase, Const ******** Version 1 - 07/07/2020 ******** MEA/CITY 0.00 $ 4,098,000 Prior 1,598,000 Modesto, City of DFTIP Amend 0.00 21400000718 Total 1,598,000 2,500,000 Current 2,500,000

North County Corridor: from Tully Road to State PE 5,000,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 Carry Over Route-120/108. Construct 2-6 Lanes Expressway. RW 22,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 ******** Version 1 - 09/03/20 ******** NCC01 Project data transfered from 2018 FTIP. Const RTP #S102 CO/BUILD ******** Version 4 - 05/15/2019 ******** 0.00 $ 37,000,000 Prior 7,000,000 20,000,000 Stanislaus County DFTIP Amend 0.00 21400000694 Total 27,000,000 4,500,000 4,500,000 1,000,000 Current 10,000,000

SR132 Dakota Avenue to Gates Road. Construct 4-lane PE 10,000 Carry Over divided expressway or freeway (Using Toll Credits) RW ******** Version 1 - 09/03/20 ******** STANCOG Federalizing project creates NEPA nexus Const Project data transfered from 2018 FTIP. STPL RTP #S101 0.00 $ 10,000 Prior Stanislaus County DFTIP Amend 0.00 21400000712 Total 10,000 Current 10,000

Page 11 of 15 Stanislaus Council of Governments 2021 Federal Transportation Improvement Program Safe Routes to Schools

Grouped Projects for bicycle and pedestrian facilities PE Carry Over funded with Active Transportation Program (ATP) RW ******** Version 1 - 09/03/20 ******** ATP01 funding. Scope: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Project data transfered from 2018 FTIP. Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Const 11,044,000 10,931,000 365,000 2,402,000 ******** Version 11 - 05/07/2019 ******** ATP/LTF/MEA/ATP-SB1 Programmed ATP Cycle 4 Statewide and MPO 3.02 $ 24,742,000 Prior 1,771,000 64,000 9,209,000 Various Agencies DFTIP Amend 0.00 21400000672 Total 11,044,000 10,931,000 365,000 2,402,000 Current 1,410,000 5,565,000 6,723,000

Page 12 of 15 Stanislaus Council of Governments 2021 Federal Transportation Improvement Program Safety

Grouped Projects for Safety Improvements - HSIP PE Carry Over Program; Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part RW ******** Version 1 - 09/03/20 ******** HSIP01 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Tables 3 categories Project data transfered from 2018 FTIP. Const 16,893,810 336,700 Updated per Caltrans HSIP Backup List 12/15/20 HSIP/LTF ******** Version 17 - 12/14/2018 ******** 1.06 $ 17,230,510 Prior 1,582,489 15,311,321 Various Agencies DFTIP Amend 0.00 21400000456 Total 16,893,810 336,700 Current 115,400 221,300

Page 13 of 15 Stanislaus Council of Governments 2021 Federal Transportation Improvement Program State Highway Operations and Protection Program

Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Par 93.126 PE Carry Over Exempt Table 2 categories - Pavement resurfacing RW ******** Version 1 - 09/03/20 ******** 07STA003 and/or rehabilitation, Emergency relief (23 U.S.C. 125), Project data transfered from 2018 FTIP. Widening narrow pavements or reconstructing bridges Const 201,913,000 8,431,000 ******** Version 17 - 06/03/2019 ******** SHOPPAC Updated per Caltrans 1.04 $ 210,344,000 Prior 201,913,000 Caltrans DFTIP Amend 0.00 21400000380 Total 201,913,000 8,431,000 Current 8,431,000

Projects consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt PE Carry Over Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Railroad/highway RW ******** Version 1 - 09/03/20 ******** STANCOG crossing, Safer non-Federal-aid system roads, Project data transfered from 2018 FTIP. Shoulder improvments, traffic control devices and Const 82,201,000 1,501,000 1,925,000 5,173,000 ******** Version 1 - 05/14/18 ******** SHOPPAC Project data transfered from 2016 FTIP. 1.06 $ 90,800,000 Prior 82,201,000 Caltrans DFTIP Amend 0.00 21400000651 Total 82,201,000 1,501,000 1,925,000 5,173,000 Current 8,599,000

Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Par 93.126 PE Carry Over Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - RW ******** Version 1 - 09/03/20 ******** SHP201401 Railroad/highway crossing, Safer non-Federal-aid Project data transfered from 2018 FTIP. system roads, Shoulder improvements, traffic control Const 12,329,000 416,000 4,548,000 1,752,000 ******** Version 10 - 06/22/2020 ******** SHOPPAC Updated per Caltrans adopted 2020 SHOPP 5-13-20 0.00 $ 19,045,000 Prior 12,329,000 Caltrans DFTIP Amend 0.00 21400000662 Total 12,329,000 416,000 4,548,000 1,752,000 Current 6,716,000

Grouped Projects for Safety Improvements SHOPP PE Carry Over Mobility Program: Projects are consistent with 40 CFR RW ******** Version 1 - 09/03/20 ******** MOBIL01 Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - Project data transfered from 2018 FTIP. Railroad/highway crossing, Safer non-Federal-aid Const 12,325,000 1,100,000 1,670,000 12,030,000 ******** Version 9 - 06/23/2020 ******** SHOPPAC Updated per Caltrans adopted 2020 SHOPP 5-13-20 1.03 $ 27,125,000 Prior 12,325,000 Caltrans DFTIP Amend 0.00 21400000669 Total 12,325,000 1,100,000 1,670,000 12,030,000 Current 14,800,000

Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 PE Carry Over Exempt Tables 2 categories - Fencing, Safety roadside RW ******** DFTIP Version 1 - 09/22/2020******** SHOPPRS01 rest areas. (Using Toll Credits) ******** Version 5 - 07/07/2020 ******** Const 11,000,000 544,000 26,386,000 Updated per Caltrans adopted 2020 SHOPP 5-13-20 SHOPPAC ******** Version 1 - 05/14/18 ******** 1.04 $ 37,930,000 Prior 11,000,000 Caltrans DFTIP Amend 0.00 21400000697 Total 11,000,000 544,000 26,386,000 Current 26,930,000

Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 PE Carry Over Exempt Tables 2 categories - Widening narrow RW ******** DFTIP Version 1 - 09/22/2020******** STANCOG pavements or reconstructing bridges (no additional ******** Version 4 - 07/07/2020 ******** travel lanes). Const 7,164,000 894,000 1,962,000 11,755,000 Updated per Caltrans adopted 2020 SHOPP 5-13-20 SHOPPAC ******** Version 1 - 05/14/18 ******** 1.06 $ 21,775,000 Prior 7,164,000 Caltrans DFTIP Amend 0.00 21400000704 Total 7,164,000 894,000 1,962,000 11,755,000 Current 14,611,000

Page 14 of 15 Stanislaus Council of Governments 2021 Federal Transportation Improvement Program STIP / Regional Choice

99 In Modesto and Salida, from 0.75 mile south of PE 300,000 Carry Over R21.0/R22.1 Pelandale Avenue to 0.35 mile north of Pelandale RW 4,336,000 ******** DFTIP Version 1 - 09/22/2020******** 01STA0531 Avenue. Reconstruct the SR99/Pelandale interchange RTP #M79 10-47211 and construct auxiliary lane. Const 3,100,914 ******** Version 3 - 07/07/2020 ******** CMAQ/NH/CITY ******** Version 1 - 05/14/18 ******** 0.00 $ 7,736,914 Prior 4,336,000 Modesto, City of DFTIP Amend 0.00 11400000206 Total 4,336,000 300,000 3,100,914 Current 2,200,914 1,200,000

Planning, Programming and Monitoring. PE Carry Over RW ******** Version 1 - 09/03/20 ******** 98STA014I Project data transfered from 2018 FTIP. Const 5,276,000 214,000 214,000 215,000 215,000 215,000 ******** Version 14 - 06/22/2020 ******** STIP-AC Updated per Adopted 2020 STIP 0.00 $ 6,349,000 Prior 5,276,000 Stanislaus Council DFTIP Amend 0.00 11400000014 Total 5,276,000 214,000 214,000 215,000 215,000 215,000 of Governments Current 1,073,000

Near Modesto and Escalon. On McHenry Avenue, PE 2,456,958 Carry Over from Ladd Road/Patterson Road (State Route 108) to RW 2,075,000 ******** Version 1 - 09/03/20 ******** 98STA014I the south end of the McHenry Bridge. Widen to 5 lanes. LPP Competitive FFY 20/21 $2,128,000 CON Phase (Toll Credits) Const 17,790,109 CTC Adoption 12/2/20 STIP-AC/CO/STPL/LTF/MEA Project data transfered from 2018 FTIP. RTP #S104 0.00 $ 22,322,067 Prior 3,325,000 1,206,958 Stanislaus County DFTIP Amend 0.00 11400000178 Total 4,531,958 17,790,109 Current 8,155,000 2,128,000 7,507,109

Page 15 of 15 Appendix B

2021 Fiscal Constraint

Fiscal Constraint The FTIP, by law, must be financially constrained and consistent with 23 CFR 450 (93.108) as well as include a financial plan demonstrating that the projects selected can be implemented while the existing transportation system is being adequately operated and maintained. Only highway or transportation projects for which funds can reasonably be expected to be available may be included in the FTIP. A Financial Plan has been developed for the 2021 FTIP which demonstrates the Region possesses enough financial resources for projects that are to be implemented using current and/or reasonably available revenues. StanCOG is responsible for the certification that all projects under its programming domain (CMAQ, STBGP, etc.) are prioritized as required by federal law. The Stanislaus Region lies within the San Joaquin Valley Air Basin which is an air quality non-attainment area. Projects programmed in the first two-years of the quadrennial programming element of the 2021 FTIP shall be limited to projects with funds that are "available" or "committed". Available or committed revenue sources are those sources currently being used for transportation investments. These would include any federal, state, and local revenues, or other revenue streams (i.e. farebox, local gas tax, etc.). Additionally, project priority must be given to the projects that implement Transportation Control Measures (TCMs) within the Region. Year of Expenditure (YOE) requirements, outlined in the FAST Act, ensure that all project costs are estimated not in current dollars, but at the year of completion. StanCOG includes a uniform inflation for all projects to estimate the true project cost at the year of completion. This appendix contains the Stanislaus Region's financial constraint tables. The "Revenues" shows the available, programmable revenues for the four-year programming element. The "Programming" table shows project costs programmed against revenues. Lastly, the "Programming/Revenues" table shows the fiscal constraint of each funding program for each programming year in the quadrennial programming period of the 2021 FTIP. The federal and state revenue projections are based on the best available data as currently provided through the Caltrans. StanCOG has used these estimates throughout the project selection process in order to fully allocate the available revenues for eligible projects. In addition, local funds indicated are available and provided by a variety of sources including gas tax, development impact fees and direct developer contributions, general funds, transit fares, and local transportation funds (LTF). Local funding commitments are outlined in each agency’s local capital improvement program (CIP), which is adopted annually by local resolution. CMAQ & STBGP Estimated Apportionments FFY 2020/21 – 2023/24 The funding estimates adopted by the State are in accordance with current revenue estimates. Programming decisions made in StanCOG's 2021 FTIP reflecting Caltrans’ revenue estimates for the CMAQ and STBGP programs. These projections are also presented in this appendix. StanCOG has utilized these funding estimates throughout its project selection process with the aim of fully allocating all available revenues for eligible highway or transportation projects. Transit Transit agencies have provided StanCOG with anticipated available funding revenue and project costs pursuant to the Federal Transit Administration's Circular 7008.1A. Because transit grants are on an annual cycle, transit projects and funds shown beyond FFY 2020/21 are "projections". As the annual allocations become available the FTIP will be amended to reflect the actual grant amounts. These amendments reflect transit operation and capital assumptions throughout the four-year quadrennial element. TABLE 1: REVENUE

Stanislaus Council of Governments 2021 Federal Transportation Improvement Program ($'s in 1,000)

N O 4 YEAR (FTIP Period) T Funding Source/Program E FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 TOTAL S Sales Tax City County Gas Tax Gas Tax (Subventions to Cities) Gas Tax (Subventions to Counties) Other Local Funds $20,402 $18,211 $1,350 $118,470 $158,433 County General Funds $9,850 $11,442 $1,000 $35,000 $57,292

LOCAL City General Funds $10,552 $6,769 $350 $83,470 $101,141 Street Taxes and Developer Fees RSTP Exchange funds Transit Transit Fares Other (See Appendix 1) $10,551 $37,202 $3,755 $3,542 $55,050 Local Total $30,953 $55,413 $5,105 $122,012 $213,483 Tolls Bridge Corridor Regional Sales Tax

REGIONAL Other (See Appendix 2) Regional Total State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOPP) 1 $12,886 $8,180 $40,066 $18,955 $80,087 SHOPP $12,886 $8,180 $40,066 $18,955 $80,087 SHOPP Prior State Minor Program State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) 1 $5,074 $214 $215 $215 $5,718 STIP $974 $214 $215 $215 $1,618 STIP Prior $4,100 $4,100 State Bond Proposition 1A (High Speed Passenger Train Bond Program) Proposition 1B (Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, and Port Security Bond Act of 2006) STATE Active Transportation Program (ATP) 1 $4,321 $2,402 $6,723 Highway Maintenance (HM) Program 1 Highway Bridge Program (HBP) 1 $20,090 $11,705 $10,699 $1,483 $43,977 Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB1) $2,128 $2,128 Traffic Congestion Relief Program (TCRP) State Transit Assistance (STA)(e.g., population/revenue based, Prop 42) Other (See Appendix 3) $6,139 $451 $6,590 State Total $50,638 $20,550 $53,382 $20,653 $145,223 5307 - Urbanized Area Formula Grants $8,400 $14,134 $5,940 $6,520 $34,994 5309 - Fixed Guideway Capital Investment Grants 5309b - New and Small Starts (Capital Investment Grants) 5309c - Bus and Bus Related Grants 5310 - Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities $437 $437 5311 - Formula Grants for Rural Areas 5311f - Intercity Bus 5337 - State of Good Repair Grants

FEDERALTRANSIT 5339 - Bus and Bus Facilities Formula Grants $4,800 $4,800 $9,800 $4,800 $24,200 FTA Transfer from Prior FTIP Other (See Appendix 4) Federal Transit Total $13,637 $18,934 $15,740 $11,320 $59,631 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Improvement Program 2 $7,161 $13,595 $7,200 $7,198 $35,154 Construction of Ferry Boats and Ferry Terminal Facilities (Ferry Boat Program) Coordinated Border Infrastructure Program Federal Lands Access Program Federal Lands Transportation Program GARVEE Bonds Debt Service Payments Highway Infrastructure Program (HIP) $3,247 $551 $3,798 High Priority Projects (HPP) and Demo Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) $221 $221 National Highway Freight Program (NHFP) Nationally Significant Freight and Highway Projects (FASTLANE/INFRA Grants) FEDERALHIGHWAY Railway-Highway Crossings Program Recreational Trails Program SAFETEA-LU Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STBGP/RSTP) $7,306 $7,353 $7,351 $7,349 $29,359 Other (see Appendix 5) Federal Highway Total $17,714 $21,720 $14,551 $14,547 $68,532 Other Federal Railroad Administration (see Appendix 6) RAIL

FEDERAL Federal Railroad Administration Total

Federal Total $31,351 $40,654 $30,291 $25,867 $128,163

TIFIA (Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act) Other (See Appendix 7) FINANCE INNOVATIVE Innovative Financing Total REVENUE TOTAL $112,942 $116,617 $88,778 $168,532 $486,869

Financial Summary Notes: 1 State Programs that include both state and federal funds. 2 Includes repayment of $6,393,437 of CMAQ Funds in FY 2022

Caltrans, Division of Transportation Programming Office of Federal Transportation Management Program Revised 6/2/2020 TABLE 1: REVENUE - APPENDICES

Stanislaus Council of Governments 2021 Federal Transportation Improvement Program ($'s in 1,000)

Appendix 1 - Local Other 4 YEAR (FTIP Period) CURRENT Local Other FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 TOTAL Local Measure $3,388 $365 $3,753 LTF Fund Total $3,863 $371 $405 $192 $4,831 LTF Advanced Construction $33,116 $33,116 TDA Fund Total $3,300 $3,350 $3,350 $3,350 $13,350

Local Other Total $10,551 $37,202 $3,755 $3,542 $55,050

Appendix 2 - Regional Other Regional Other 4 YEAR (FTIP Period) CURRENT FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 TOTAL

Regional Other Total

Appendix 3 - State Other State Other 4 YEAR (FTIP Period) CURRENT FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 TOTAL Local Bridge Seismic Retrofit Account Fund $574 $32 $606 Active Transportation Program-State SB1 ATP $5,565 $5,565 Transit Fund Total $419 $419

State Other Total $6,139 $451 $6,590

Appendix 4 - Federal Transit Other Federal Transit Other 4 YEAR (FTIP Period) CURRENT FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 TOTAL

Federal Transit Other Total

Appendix 5 - Federal Highway Other Federal Highway Other 4 YEAR (FTIP Period) CURRENT FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 TOTAL

Federal Highway Other Total

Appendix 6 - Federal Railroad Administration Other Federal Railroad Administration Other 4 YEAR (FTIP Period) CURRENT FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 TOTAL

Federal Railroad Administration Other Total

Appendix 7 - Innovative Other Innovative Other 4 YEAR (FTIP Period) CURRENT FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 TOTAL

Innovative Other Total

Page 2 of 5 TABLE 2: PROGRAMMED

Stanislaus Council of Governments 2021 Federal Transportation Improvement Program ($'s in 1,000)

N O 4 YEAR (FTIP Period) T Funding Source/Program E FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 TOTAL S

Local Total $30,953 $55,413 $5,105 $122,012 $213,483 LOCAL

Tolls Bridge Corridor Regional Sales Tax

REGIONAL Other (See Appendix A) Regional Total State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOPP) 1 $12,886 $8,180 $40,066 $18,955 $80,087 SHOPP $12,886 $8,180 $40,066 $18,955 $80,087 SHOPP Prior State Minor Program State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) 1 $5,074 $214 $215 $215 $5,718 STIP $974 $214 $215 $215 $1,618 STIP Prior $4,100 $4,100 State Bond Proposition 1A (High Speed Passenger Train Bond Program) Proposition 1B (Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, and Port Security Bond Act of 2006) STATE Active Transportation Program (ATP) 1 $4,321 $2,402 $6,723 Highway Maintenance (HM) Program 1 Highway Bridge Program (HBP) 1 $20,090 $11,705 $10,699 $1,483 $43,977 Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB1) $2,128 $2,128 Traffic Congestion Relief Program (TCRP) State Transit Assistance (STA)(e.g., population/revenue based, Prop 42) Other (See Appendix B) $6,139 $451 $6,590 State Total $50,638 $20,550 $53,382 $20,653 $145,223 5307 - Urbanized Area Formula Grants $8,400 $14,134 $5,940 $6,520 $34,994 5309 - Fixed Guideway Capital Investment Grants 5309b - New and Small Starts (Capital Investment Grants) 5309c - Bus and Bus Related Grants 5310 - Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities $437 $437 5311 - Formula Grants for Rural Areas 5311f - Intercity Bus 5337 - State of Good Repair Grants

FEDERAL TRANSIT 5339 - Bus and Bus Facilities Formula Grants $4,800 $4,800 $9,800 $4,800 $24,200 FTA Transfer from Prior FTIP Other (See Appendix C) Federal Transit Total $13,637 $18,934 $15,740 $11,320 $59,631 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Improvement Program $6,240 $7,376 $13,616 Construction of Ferry Boats and Ferry Terminal Facilities (Ferry Boat Program) Coordinated Border Infrastructure Program Federal Lands Access Program Federal Lands Transportation Program GARVEE Bonds Debt Service Payments Highway Infrastructure Program (HIP) $3,247 $3,247 High Priority Projects (HPP) and Demo Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) $221 $221 National Highway Freight Program (NHFP) Nationally Significant Freight and Highway Projects (FASTLANE/INFRA Grants)

FEDERAL HIGHWAY Railway-Highway Crossings Program Recreational Trails Program SAFETEA-LU Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STBGP/RSTP) $7,190 $5,896 $13,086 Other (see Appendix D) Federal Highway Total $16,677 $13,493 $30,170 Other Federal Railroad Administration (see Appendix E)

Federal Railroad Administration Total FEDERAL RAIL Federal Total $30,314 $32,427 $15,740 $11,320 $89,801 TIFIA (Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act) Other (See Appendix F) FINANCE INNOVATIVE Innovative Financing Total

PROGRAMMED TOTAL $111,905 $108,390 $74,227 $153,985 $448,507

Financial Summary Notes: 1 State Programs that include both state and federal funds.

Caltrans, Division of Transportation Programming Office of Federal Transportation Management Program LG: Revised 6/5/2018 TABLE 2: PROGRAMMED - APPENDICES

Stanislaus Council of Governments 2021 Federal Transportation Improvement Program ($'s in 1,000)

Appendix A - Regional Other 4 YEAR (FTIP Period) CURRENT Regional Other FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 TOTAL

Regional Other Total

Appendix B - State Other State Other 4 YEAR (FTIP Period) CURRENT FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 TOTAL Local Bridge Seismic Retrofit Account Fund $574 $32 $606 Active Transportation Program-State SB1 ATP $5,565 $5,565 Transit Fund Total $419 $419

State Other Total $6,139 $451 $6,590

Appendix C - Federal Transit Other Federal Transit Other 4 YEAR (FTIP Period) CURRENT FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 TOTAL

Federal Transit Other Total

Appendix D - Federal Highway Other Federal Highway Other 4 YEAR (FTIP Period) CURRENT FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 TOTAL

Federal Highway Other Total

Appendix E - Federal Railroad Administration Other Federal Railroad Administration Other 4 YEAR (FTIP Period) CURRENT FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 TOTAL

Federal Railroad Administration Other Total

Appendix F - Innovative Finance Other Innovative Other 4 YEAR (FTIP Period) CURRENT FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 TOTAL

Innovative Other Total

Page 4 of 5 TABLE 3: REVENUE-PROGRAMMED

Stanislaus Council of Governments 2021 Federal Transportation Improvement Program ($'s in 1,000)

4 YEAR (FTIP Period)

Funding Source/Program FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 TOTAL

Local Total LOCAL

Tolls Bridge Corridor Regional Sales Tax

REGIONAL Other Regional Total State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOPP) 1 SHOPP SHOPP Prior State Minor Program State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) 1 STIP STIP Prior State Bond Proposition 1A (High Speed Passenger Train Bond Program)

STATE Proposition 1B (Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, and Port Security Bond Act of 2006) Active Transportation Program (ATP) 1 Highway Maintenance (HM) Program 1 Highway Bridge Program (HBP) 1 Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB1) Traffic Congestion Relief Program (TCRP) State Transit Assistance (STA)(e.g., population/revenue based, Prop 42) Other State Total 5307 - Urbanized Area Formula Grants 5309 - Fixed Guideway Capital Investment Grants 5309b - New and Small Starts (Capital Investment Grants) 5309c - Bus and Bus Related Grants 5310 - Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities 5311 - Formula Grants for Rural Areas 5311f - Intercity Bus 5337 - State of Good Repair Grants

FEDERAL TRANSIT 5339 - Bus and Bus Facilities Formula Grants FTA Transfer from Prior FTIP Other Federal Transit Total Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Improvement Program $921 $6,219 $7,200 $7,198 $21,538 Construction of Ferry Boats and Ferry Terminal Facilities (Ferry Boat Program) Coordinated Border Infrastructure Program Federal Lands Access Program Federal Lands Transportation Program GARVEE Bonds Debt Service Payments Highway Infrastructure Program (HIP) $551 $551 High Priority Projects (HPP) and Demo Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) National Highway Freight Program (NHFP) Nationally Significant Freight and Highway Projects (FASTLANE/INFRA Grants) FEDERAL HIGHWAY Railway-Highway Crossings Program Recreational Trails Program SAFETEA-LU Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STBGP/RSTP) $116 $1,457 $7,351 $7,349 $16,273 Other Federal Highway Total $1,037 $8,227 $14,551 $14,547 $38,362 Other Federal Railroad Administration RAIL

FEDERAL Federal Railroad Administration Total Federal Total $1,037 $8,227 $14,551 $14,547 $38,362 TIFIA (Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act) Other FINANCE INNOVATIVE Innovative Financing Total REVENUE - PROGRAMMED TOTAL $1,037 $8,227 $14,551 $14,547 $38,362

Caltrans, Division of Transportation Programming Office of Federal Transportation Management Program LG: Revised 6/5/2018 CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR QUALITY (CMAQ) IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FFY 2020/21 Apportionment Estimate for Distribution 10/29/2020

DOF Population EPA EPA CO Carbon Ozone Factor Weighted Estimated MPO/County Estimate Classification Classification Monoxide 2 Population Apportionment (1/1/2020) 8-hr Ozone (2015) 1 (1971) 1 Factor 2

Amador 37,676 Marginal 1.0 37,676 $ 345,555 Butte 210,291 Marginal 1.0 210,291 $ 1,928,737 Calaveras (Central Mtn County) 45,023 Marginal 1.0 45,023 $ 412,940 Fresno (SJ Valley) 1,023,358 Extreme 1.4 1,432,701 $ 13,140,381 Kings (SJ Valley) 153,608 Extreme 1.4 215,051 $ 1,972,396

KERN 917,553 $ 11,477,321 Kern (SJ Valley) 806,896 Extreme 1.4 1,129,654 $ 10,360,911 Kern (Eastern Kern) 110,657 Moderate 1.1 121,723 $ 1,116,411

Madera (SJ Valley) 158,147 Extreme 1.4 221,406 $ 2,030,679 Mariposa (So. Mtn County) 18,067 Marginal 1.0 18,067 $ 165,706 Merced (SJ Valley) 283,521 Extreme 1.4 396,929 $ 3,640,538

MTC 7,790,537 $ 71,576,374 MTC (SF Bay Area) 7,350,313 Marginal 1.0 7,350,313 $ 67,415,253 MTC-Solano Co (SF Bay Area) 305,577 Marginal 1.0 305,577 $ 2,802,677 MTC-Solano Co (Sac Metro) 134,647 Moderate 1.1 148,112 $ 1,358,444

Nevada County (Western part ) 98,114 Moderate 1.1 107,925 $ 989,865

SACOG (Sac Metro) 2,430,763 $ 24,523,793 El Dorado 160,685 Moderate 1.1 176,754 $ 1,621,139 Placer 392,258 Moderate 1.1 431,484 $ 3,957,463 Sacramento 1,555,365 Moderate 1.1 1,710,902 $ 15,691,965 Yolo 221,705 Moderate 1.1 243,876 $ 2,236,766 Sutter 100,750 Moderate 1.1 110,825 $ 1,016,459

San Diego 3,343,355 Moderate 1.1 3,677,691 $ 33,730,868 San Joaquin (SJ Valley) 773,632 Extreme 1.4 1,083,085 $ 9,933,786

SCAG Region 19,021,787 $ 283,066,147 Los Angeles (SCAB) 9,764,043 Extreme 1.4 Maintenance 1.2 16,403,592 $ 150,449,692 Los Angeles (MDAB) 408,908 Severe 1.3 531,580 $ 4,875,524 Riverside (SCAB) 1,925,702 Extreme 1.4 Maintenance 1.2 3,235,179 $ 29,672,265 Riverside (MDAB) 27,903 Severe 1.3 36,274 $ 332,695 Riverside (SSAB) 487,793 Severe 1.3 634,131 $ 5,816,092 Orange (SCAB) 3,194,332 Extreme 1.4 Maintenance 1.2 5,366,478 $ 49,220,007 Ventura 842,886 Serious 1.2 1,011,463 $ 9,276,890 San Bernardino (SCAB) 1,630,574 Extreme 1.4 Maintenance 1.2 2,739,364 $ 25,124,772 San Bernardino (MDAB) 549,963 Severe 1.3 714,952 $ 6,557,362 Imperial 188,777 Marginal 1.0 188,777 $ 1,731,416 (Tribal) Morongo - Riverside County 612 Serious 1.2 734 $ 6,736 (Tribal) Pechanga - Riverside County 294 Marginal 1.0 294 $ 2,696

SLOCOG - San Luis Obispo (Eastern Part) 277,259 Marginal 1.0 277,259 $ 2,542,951 Stanislaus (SJ Valley) 557,709 Extreme 1.4 780,793 $ 7,161,237 TRPA (El Dorado and Placer) 145,000 Moderate 1.1 159,500 $ 1,462,895 Tehama (Tuscan Buttes) 65,129 Marginal 1.0 65,129 $ 597,347 Tulare (SJ Valley) 479,977 Extreme 1.4 671,968 $ 6,163,122 Tuolumne 54,917 Marginal 1.0 54,917 $ 503,685 Statewide Total 37,885,423 52,047,448 $ 477,366,324 Notes: 1. OZONE: EPA nonattainment areas for the 2015 Ozone NAAQS: https://www.epa.gov/ozone-designations/additional-designations-2015-ozone-standards; CARBON MONOXIDE 1971 (CO): EPA letter 3/21/2018, redesignated CA CO areas to attainment after June 1, 2018 except areas in Southern California Air Basin (SCAB).

2. Ozone and CO factors per CA Streets and Highways CodeSection 182.7(b).

California Department of Transportation Division of Financial Programming 10/29/2020 CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR QUALITY (CMAQ) IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FFY 21/22 Apportionment Estimate for 2021 FTIP/FSTIP Development 6/8/2020

DOF Population EPA Carbon Ozone CO Classification Weighted Estimated MPO/County Estimate Classification Monoxide Factor 2 1 Population Apportionment (1/1/2020) 8-hr Ozone (2015) 1 Factor 2

Amador 37,676 Marginal 1.0 37,676 $ 347,540 Butte 210,291 Marginal 1.0 210,291 $ 1,939,816 Calaveras (Central Mtn County) 45,023 Marginal 1.0 45,023 $ 415,312 Fresno (SJ Valley) 1,023,358 Extreme 1.4 1,432,701 $ 13,215,862 Kings (SJ Valley) 153,608 Extreme 1.4 215,051 $ 1,983,726

KERN 917,553 $ 11,543,250 Kern (SJ Valley) 806,896 Extreme 1.4 1,129,654 $ 10,420,426 Kern (Eastern Kern) 110,657 Moderate 1.1 121,723 $ 1,122,823

Madera (SJ Valley) 158,147 Extreme 1.4 221,406 $ 2,042,344 Mariposa (So. Mtn County) 18,067 Marginal 1.0 18,067 $ 166,658 Merced (SJ Valley) 283,521 Extreme 1.4 396,929 $ 3,661,450

MTC 7,790,537 $ 71,987,525 MTC (SF Bay Area) 7,350,313 Marginal 1.0 7,350,313 $ 67,802,502 MTC-Solano Co (SF Bay Area) 305,577 Marginal 1.0 305,577 $ 2,818,776 MTC-Solano Co (Sac Metro) 134,647 Moderate 1.1 148,112 $ 1,366,247

Nevada Co. (western part) 98,114 Moderate 1.1 107,925 $ 995,551

SACOG (Sac Metro) 2,430,328 $ 24,660,249 El Dorado 160,685 Moderate 1.1 176,754 $ 1,630,452 Placer 392,258 Moderate 1.1 431,484 $ 3,980,195 Sacramento 1,555,365 Moderate 1.1 1,710,902 $ 15,782,104 Yolo 221,270 Moderate 1.1 243,397 $ 2,245,200 Sutter 100,750 Moderate 1.1 110,825 $ 1,022,298

San Diego 3,343,355 Moderate 1.1 3,677,691 $ 33,924,626 San Joaquin (SJ Valley) 773,632 Extreme 1.4 1,083,085 $ 9,990,848

SCAG Region 19,021,787 $ 284,692,144 Los Angeles (SCAB) 9,764,043 Extreme 1.4 Maintenance 1.2 16,403,592 $ 151,313,909 Los Angeles (MDAB) 408,908 Severe 1.3 531,580 $ 4,903,530 Riverside (SCAB) 1,925,702 Extreme 1.4 Maintenance 1.2 3,235,179 $ 29,842,709 Riverside (MDAB) 27,903 Severe 1.3 36,274 $ 334,606 Riverside (SSAB) 487,793 Severe 1.3 634,131 $ 5,849,501 Orange (SCAB) 3,194,332 Extreme 1.4 Maintenance 1.2 5,366,478 $ 49,502,738 Ventura 842,886 Serious 1.2 1,011,463 $ 9,330,179 San Bernardino (SCAB) 1,630,574 Extreme 1.4 Maintenance 1.2 2,739,364 $ 25,269,095 San Bernardino (MDAB) 549,963 Severe 1.3 714,952 $ 6,595,029 Imperial 188,777 Marginal 1.0 188,777 $ 1,741,362 (Tribal) Morongo - Riverside County 612 Serious 1.2 734 $ 6,774 (Tribal) Pechanga - Riverside County 294 Marginal 1.0 294 $ 2,712

SLOCOG - San Luis Obispo (Eastern Part) 277,259 Marginal 1.0 277,259 $ 2,557,558 Stanislaus (SJ Valley) 557,709 Extreme 1.4 780,793 $ 7,202,372 Tahoe (El Dorado and Placer) 145,000 Moderate 1.1 159,500 $ 1,471,298 Tehama (Tuscan Butte) 65,129 Marginal 1.0 65,129 $ 600,778 Tulare (SJ Valley) 479,977 Extreme 1.4 671,968 $ 6,198,525 Tuolumne 54,917 Marginal 1.0 54,917 $ 506,578 Statewide Total 37,884,988 52,046,970 $ 480,104,011 Notes: 1. OZONE: EPA nonattainment areas for the 2015 Ozone NAAQS: https://www.epa.gov/ozone-designations/additional-designations-2015-ozone-standards; CARBON MONOXIDE 1971 (CO): EPA letter 3/21/18, redesignated CA CO areas to attainment after June 1, 2018 except areas in the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB).

2. Ozone and CO factors per CA Streets and Highways CodeSection 182.7(b).

Caltrans Division of Transportation Programming Office of Federal Programming and Database Management, 6/8/2020 CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR QUALITY (CMAQ) IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FFY 22/23 Apportionment Estimate for 2021 FTIP/FSTIP Development 6/8/2020

DOF Population EPA Carbon Ozone CO Classification Weighted Estimated MPO/County Estimate Classification Monoxide Factor 2 1 Population Apportionment (1/1/2020) 8-hr Ozone (2015) 1 Factor 2

Amador 37,676 Marginal 1.0 37,676 $ 347,430 Butte 210,291 Marginal 1.0 210,291 $ 1,939,202 Calaveras (Central Mtn County) 45,023 Marginal 1.0 45,023 $ 415,180 Fresno (SJ Valley) 1,023,358 Extreme 1.4 1,432,701 $ 13,211,678 Kings (SJ Valley) 153,608 Extreme 1.4 215,051 $ 1,983,098

KERN 917,553 $ 11,539,594 Kern (SJ Valley) 806,896 Extreme 1.4 1,129,654 $ 10,417,127 Kern (Eastern Kern) 110,657 Moderate 1.1 121,723 $ 1,122,468

Madera (SJ Valley) 158,147 Extreme 1.4 221,406 $ 2,041,697 Mariposa (So. Mtn County) 18,067 Marginal 1.0 18,067 $ 166,605 Merced (SJ Valley) 283,521 Extreme 1.4 396,929 $ 3,660,291

MTC 7,790,537 $ 71,964,729 MTC (SF Bay Area) 7,350,313 Marginal 1.0 7,350,313 $ 67,781,032 MTC-Solano Co (SF Bay Area) 305,577 Marginal 1.0 305,577 $ 2,817,883 MTC-Solano Co (Sac Metro) 134,647 Moderate 1.1 148,112 $ 1,365,814

Nevada Co. (western part) 98,114 Moderate 1.1 107,925 $ 995,236

SACOG (Sac Metro) 2,430,328 $ 24,652,440 El Dorado 160,685 Moderate 1.1 176,754 $ 1,629,935 Placer 392,258 Moderate 1.1 431,484 $ 3,978,935 Sacramento 1,555,365 Moderate 1.1 1,710,902 $ 15,777,106 Yolo 221,270 Moderate 1.1 243,397 $ 2,244,489 Sutter 100,750 Moderate 1.1 110,825 $ 1,021,975

San Diego 3,343,355 Moderate 1.1 3,677,691 $ 33,913,883 San Joaquin (SJ Valley) 773,632 Extreme 1.4 1,083,085 $ 9,987,684

SCAG Region 19,021,787 $ 284,601,994 Los Angeles (SCAB) 9,764,043 Extreme 1.4 Maintenance 1.2 16,403,592 $ 151,265,994 Los Angeles (MDAB) 408,908 Severe 1.3 531,580 $ 4,901,977 Riverside (SCAB) 1,925,702 Extreme 1.4 Maintenance 1.2 3,235,179 $ 29,833,259 Riverside (MDAB) 27,903 Severe 1.3 36,274 $ 334,500 Riverside (SSAB) 487,793 Severe 1.3 634,131 $ 5,847,648 Orange (SCAB) 3,194,332 Extreme 1.4 Maintenance 1.2 5,366,478 $ 49,487,062 Ventura 842,886 Serious 1.2 1,011,463 $ 9,327,224 San Bernardino (SCAB) 1,630,574 Extreme 1.4 Maintenance 1.2 2,739,364 $ 25,261,093 San Bernardino (MDAB) 549,963 Severe 1.3 714,952 $ 6,592,941 Imperial 188,777 Marginal 1.0 188,777 $ 1,740,810 (Tribal) Morongo - Riverside County 612 Serious 1.2 734 $ 6,772 (Tribal) Pechanga - Riverside County 294 Marginal 1.0 294 $ 2,711

SLOCOG - San Luis Obispo (Eastern Part) 277,259 Marginal 1.0 277,259 $ 2,556,748 Stanislaus (SJ Valley) 557,709 Extreme 1.4 780,793 $ 7,200,092 Tahoe (El Dorado and Placer) 145,000 Moderate 1.1 159,500 $ 1,470,832 Tehama (Tuscan Butte) 65,129 Marginal 1.0 65,129 $ 600,588 Tulare (SJ Valley) 479,977 Extreme 1.4 671,968 $ 6,196,562 Tuolumne 54,917 Marginal 1.0 54,917 $ 506,418 Statewide Total 37,884,988 52,046,970 $ 479,951,982 Notes: 1. OZONE: EPA nonattainment areas for the 2015 Ozone NAAQS: https://www.epa.gov/ozone-designations/additional-designations-2015-ozone-standards; CARBON MONOXIDE 1971 (CO): EPA letter 3/21/18, redesignated CA CO areas to attainment after June 1, 2018 except in the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB)

2. Ozone and CO factors per CA Streets and Highways CodeSection 182.7(b).

Caltrans Division of Transportation Programming Office of Federal Programming and Database Management, 6/8/2020 CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR QUALITY (CMAQ) IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FFY 23/24 Apportionment Estimate for 2021 FTIP/FSTIP Development 6/8/2020

DOF Population EPA Carbon Ozone CO Classification Weighted Estimated MPO/County Estimate Classification Monoxide Factor 2 1 Population Apportionment (1/1/2020) 8-hr Ozone (2015) 1 Factor 2

Amador 37,676 Marginal 1.0 37,676 $ 347,318 Butte 210,291 Marginal 1.0 210,291 $ 1,938,575 Calaveras (Central Mtn County) 45,023 Marginal 1.0 45,023 $ 415,046 Fresno (SJ Valley) 1,023,358 Extreme 1.4 1,432,701 $ 13,207,409 Kings (SJ Valley) 153,608 Extreme 1.4 215,051 $ 1,982,457

KERN 917,553 $ 11,535,866 Kern (SJ Valley) 806,896 Extreme 1.4 1,129,654 $ 10,413,761 Kern (Eastern Kern) 110,657 Moderate 1.1 121,723 $ 1,122,105

Madera (SJ Valley) 158,147 Extreme 1.4 221,406 $ 2,041,038 Mariposa (So. Mtn County) 18,067 Marginal 1.0 18,067 $ 166,551 Merced (SJ Valley) 283,521 Extreme 1.4 396,929 $ 3,659,108

MTC 7,790,537 $ 71,941,478 MTC (SF Bay Area) 7,350,313 Marginal 1.0 7,350,313 $ 67,759,132 MTC-Solano Co (SF Bay Area) 305,577 Marginal 1.0 305,577 $ 2,816,973 MTC-Solano Co (Sac Metro) 134,647 Moderate 1.1 148,112 $ 1,365,373

Nevada Co. (western part) 98,114 Moderate 1.1 107,925 $ 994,914

SACOG (Sac Metro) 2,430,328 $ 24,644,475 El Dorado 160,685 Moderate 1.1 176,754 $ 1,629,409 Placer 392,258 Moderate 1.1 431,484 $ 3,977,649 Sacramento 1,555,365 Moderate 1.1 1,710,902 $ 15,772,009 Yolo 221,270 Moderate 1.1 243,397 $ 2,243,764 Sutter 100,750 Moderate 1.1 110,825 $ 1,021,644

San Diego 3,343,355 Moderate 1.1 3,677,691 $ 33,902,926 San Joaquin (SJ Valley) 773,632 Extreme 1.4 1,083,085 $ 9,984,457

SCAG Region 19,021,787 $ 284,510,041 Los Angeles (SCAB) 9,764,043 Extreme 1.4 Maintenance 1.2 16,403,592 $ 151,217,121 Los Angeles (MDAB) 408,908 Severe 1.3 531,580 $ 4,900,394 Riverside (SCAB) 1,925,702 Extreme 1.4 Maintenance 1.2 3,235,179 $ 29,823,620 Riverside (MDAB) 27,903 Severe 1.3 36,274 $ 334,392 Riverside (SSAB) 487,793 Severe 1.3 634,131 $ 5,845,759 Orange (SCAB) 3,194,332 Extreme 1.4 Maintenance 1.2 5,366,478 $ 49,471,074 Ventura 842,886 Serious 1.2 1,011,463 $ 9,324,211 San Bernardino (SCAB) 1,630,574 Extreme 1.4 Maintenance 1.2 2,739,364 $ 25,252,931 San Bernardino (MDAB) 549,963 Severe 1.3 714,952 $ 6,590,811 Imperial 188,777 Marginal 1.0 188,777 $ 1,740,248 (Tribal) Morongo - Riverside County 612 Serious 1.2 734 $ 6,770 (Tribal) Pechanga - Riverside County 294 Marginal 1.0 294 $ 2,710

SLOCOG - San Luis Obispo (Eastern Part) 277,259 Marginal 1.0 277,259 $ 2,555,922 Stanislaus (SJ Valley) 557,709 Extreme 1.4 780,793 $ 7,197,765 Tahoe (El Dorado and Placer) 145,000 Moderate 1.1 159,500 $ 1,470,357 Tehama (Tuscan Butte) 65,129 Marginal 1.0 65,129 $ 600,394 Tulare (SJ Valley) 479,977 Extreme 1.4 671,968 $ 6,194,560 Tuolumne 54,917 Marginal 1.0 54,917 $ 506,254 Statewide Total 37,884,988 52,046,970 $ 479,796,913 Notes: 1. OZONE: EPA nonattainment areas for the 2015 Ozone NAAQS: https://www.epa.gov/ozone-designations/additional-designations-2015-ozone-standards; CARBON MONOXIDE 1971 (CO): EPA letter 3/21/18, redesignated CA CO areas to attainment after June 1, 2018 except areas in the the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB).

2. Ozone and CO factors per CA Streets and Highways CodeSection 182.7(b).

Caltrans Division of Transportation Programming Office of Federal Programming and Database Management, 6/8/2020 STBGP/REGIONAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (RSTP) FFY 2020/21 Apportionment Estimate for Distribution 10/29/2020

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

STBGP STBGP Traditional Estimated Total STBGP Large UZA STBGP Small Area Small Area Small Area including Estimated Additional CTAP State Flexible Apportionment MPO/RTPA/County Apportionment Apportionment (Pop < 200k) State Flexible Traditional Apportionment Distribution by Adjustment Adjustment Distribution (Pop >200k) 1, 3 (Pop <200k) 1 Net After CTAP Apportionment Distribution STIP Formula (sum of Col 8, 9) (Col 3 minus 4) (sum of Col 5, 6) (sum of Col 2, 7)

MTC Region $ 85,745,316 $ 13,793,298 $ 95,781 $ 13,697,517 $ - $ 13,697,517 $ 99,442,833 $ 2,177,840 $ 101,620,673

MTC other than large UZAs $ 13,793,298 $ 95,781 $ 13,697,517 $ - $ 13,697,517 $ 13,697,517 Antioch $ 3,872,413 $ - $ - $ - $ 3,872,413 Concord $ 8,591,463 $ - $ - $ - $ 8,591,463 SF-Oakland $ 45,766,032 $ - $ - $ - $ 45,766,032 Santa Rosa $ 4,299,177 $ - $ - $ - $ 4,299,177 San Jose $ 23,216,232 $ - $ - $ - $ 23,216,232 SACOG Region $ 24,041,083 $ 7,578,753 $ 30,426 $ 7,548,327 $ 7,548,327 $ 31,589,410 $ 748,338 $ 32,337,748

Sacramento (Sacramento UZA) $ 18,958,592 $ 818,704 $ 19,031 $ 799,673 $ - $ 799,673 $ 19,758,265 $ 421,372 Placer (Sacramento UZA) $ 3,552,587 $ 1,145,044 $ 4,520 $ 1,140,524 $ - $ 1,140,524 $ 4,693,111 $ 115,106 El Dorado (Sacramento UZA) $ 856,708 $ 1,222,425 $ 2,001 $ 1,220,425 $ - $ 1,220,425 $ 2,077,133 $ 61,642 Sutter $ - $ 1,302,570 $ 1,253 $ 1,301,317 $ - $ 1,301,317 $ 1,301,317 $ 38,890 Yolo (Sacramento UZA) $ 673,196 $ 2,097,927 $ 2,667 $ 2,095,261 $ - $ 2,095,261 $ 2,768,457 $ 81,478 Yuba $ - $ 992,083 $ 955 $ 991,128 $ - $ 991,128 $ 991,128 $ 29,849 2 $ 2,022,446 $ - $ 1,946 $ - $ 2,022,446 17,297 2,039,743 TRPA (South Lake Tahoe, CA-NV) $ - SCAG Region $ 14,814,395 $ 251,321,553 $ 5,528,413 $ 256,849,966 Los Angeles Co Total $ 135,903,502 $ 1,030,581 $ 131,765 $ 898,816 $ - $ 898,816 $ 136,802,317 $ 2,692,970 $ 139,495,288 Los Angeles County $ - $ 1,030,581 $ 131,765 $ 898,816 $ - $ 898,816 $ 898,816 LA-LongBeach-Anaheim $ 127,140,605 $ - $ - $ - $ 127,140,605 Lancaster-Palmdale $ 4,759,290 $ - $ - $ - $ 4,759,290 Thousand Oaks $ 395,939 $ - $ - $ - $ 395,939 Santa Clarita $ 3,607,667 $ - $ - $ - $ 3,607,667 San Bernardino Co Total $ 27,950,332 $ 430,368 $ 27,309 $ 403,058 $ - $ 403,058 $ 28,353,390 $ 842,609 $ 29,195,999 San Bernardino County $ - $ 430,368 $ 27,309 $ 403,058 $ - $ 403,058 $ 403,058 Riverside-San Bernardino $ 14,954,595 $ - $ - $ - $ 14,954,595 Victorville-Hesperia $ 4,581,245 $ - $ - $ - $ 4,581,245 LA-LongBeach-Anaheim $ 8,414,492 $ - $ - $ - $ 8,414,492 Riverside Co Total $ 22,980,805 $ 7,452,466 $ 29,284 $ 7,423,181 $ - $ 7,423,181 $ 30,403,986 $ 724,534 $ 31,128,520 Riverside County $ - $ 7,452,466 $ 29,284 $ 7,423,181 $ - $ 7,423,181 $ 7,423,181 Riverside-San Bernardino $ 12,002,046 $ - $ - $ - $ 12,002,046 Indio-Cathedral City $ 4,820,117 $ - $ - $ - $ 4,820,117 Murrieta-Temecula-Menifee $ 6,158,642 $ - $ - $ - $ 6,158,642 Orange Co Total $ 41,922,046 $ 63,467 $ 40,401 $ 23,066 $ - $ 23,066 $ 41,945,112 $ 830,005 $ 42,775,117 Orange County $ - $ 63,467 $ 40,401 $ 23,066 $ - $ 23,066 $ 23,066 MissionViejo-Lake Forest-San Clemente $ 8,023,951 $ - $ - $ - $ 8,023,951 LA-LongBeach-Anaheim $ 33,898,095 $ - $ - $ - $ 33,898,095 Ventura Co Total $ 7,750,474 $ 3,679,939 $ 10,999 $ 3,668,940 $ - $ 3,668,940 $ 11,419,414 $ 279,628 $ 11,699,042 Ventura County $ - $ 3,679,939 $ 10,999 $ 3,668,940 $ - $ 3,668,940 $ 3,668,940 Oxnard $ 5,122,507 $ - $ - $ - $ 5,122,507 Thousand Oaks $ 2,600,224 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,600,224 LA-LongBeach-Anaheim $ 27,742 $ - $ - $ - $ 27,742 Imperial County $ - $ 2,399,643 $ 2,309 $ 2,397,334 $ - $ 2,397,334 $ 2,397,334 $ 158,666 $ 2,555,999 AMBAG Region $ - $ 10,074,243 $ 9,694 $ 10,064,549 $ - $ 10,064,549 $ 10,064,549 $ 278,765 $ 10,343,313 Monterey $ - $ 5,706,755 $ 5,491 $ 5,701,263 $ - $ 5,701,263 $ 5,701,263 $ 158,504 $ 5,859,767 Santa Cruz $ - $ 3,607,576 $ 3,471 $ 3,604,105 $ - $ 3,604,105 $ 3,604,105 $ 91,059 $ 3,695,164 San Benito $ - $ 759,912 $ 731 $ 759,180 $ - $ 759,180 $ 759,180 $ 29,202 $ 788,382 Alpine $ - $ 16,155 $ 16 $ 16,140 $ 115,068 $ 131,208 $ 131,208 $ 13,251 $ 144,459 Amador $ - $ 523,726 $ 504 $ 523,222 $ - $ 523,222 $ 523,222 $ 30,065 $ 553,287 Butte $ - $ 3,024,852 $ 2,911 $ 3,021,941 $ - $ 3,021,941 $ 3,021,941 $ 89,008 $ 3,110,950 Calaveras $ - $ 626,667 $ 603 $ 626,064 $ - $ 626,064 $ 626,064 $ 35,949 $ 662,013 Colusa $ - $ 294,497 $ 283 $ 294,213 $ - $ 294,213 $ 294,213 $ 23,804 $ 318,017 Del Norte $ - $ 393,368 $ 379 $ 392,990 $ - $ 392,990 $ 392,990 $ 22,212 $ 415,201 Fresno (Fresno UZA) $ 9,130,689 $ 3,792,367 $ 12,435 $ 3,779,932 $ - $ 3,779,932 $ 12,910,621 $ 335,683 $ 13,246,304 Glenn $ - $ 386,659 $ 372 $ 386,287 $ - $ 386,287 $ 386,287 $ 24,937 $ 411,224 Humboldt $ - $ 1,850,976 $ 1,781 $ 1,849,195 $ - $ 1,849,195 $ 1,849,195 $ 89,629 $ 1,938,824 Inyo $ - $ 254,995 $ 245 $ 254,750 $ 418,603 $ 673,353 $ 673,353 $ 123,904 $ 797,257 Kern (Bakersfield) $ 7,308,618 $ 4,339,797 $ 11,209 $ 4,328,588 $ - $ 4,328,588 $ 11,637,206 $ 452,274 $ 12,089,480 Kings $ - $ 2,103,400 $ 2,024 $ 2,101,376 $ - $ 2,101,376 $ 2,101,376 $ 66,338 $ 2,167,714 Lake $ - $ 889,100 $ 856 $ 888,245 $ - $ 888,245 $ 888,245 $ 38,917 $ 927,162 Lassen $ - $ 479,783 $ 462 $ 479,321 $ - $ 479,321 $ 479,321 $ 56,973 $ 536,294 Madera $ - $ 2,074,292 $ 1,996 $ 2,072,296 $ - $ 2,072,296 $ 2,072,296 $ 61,723 $ 2,134,019 Mariposa $ - $ 250,939 $ 241 $ 250,698 $ - $ 250,698 $ 250,698 $ 23,291 $ 273,989 Mendocino $ - $ 1,207,755 $ 1,162 $ 1,206,593 $ - $ 1,206,593 $ 1,206,593 $ 84,501 $ 1,291,094 Merced $ - $ 3,516,982 $ 3,384 $ 3,513,598 $ - $ 3,513,598 $ 3,513,598 $ 110,140 $ 3,623,738 Modoc $ - $ 133,176 $ 128 $ 133,048 $ 163,359 $ 296,407 $ 296,407 $ 30,416 $ 326,823 Mono $ - $ 195,268 $ 188 $ 195,080 $ 34,645 $ 229,725 $ 229,725 $ 92,058 $ 321,783 Nevada $ - $ 1,357,939 $ 1,307 $ 1,356,632 $ - $ 1,356,632 $ 1,356,632 $ 47,149 $ 1,403,781 Plumas $ - $ 275,083 $ 265 $ 274,818 $ - $ 274,818 $ 274,818 $ 33,979 $ 308,797 San Diego (San Diego UZA) $ 41,240,411 $ 1,789,695 $ 41,519 $ 1,748,176 $ - $ 1,748,176 $ 42,988,588 $ 952,884 $ 43,941,472 Mission Viejo-Lake Forest-San $ 117,176 $ - $ - $ - $ 117,176 $ 117,176 San Joaquin (Stockton) $ 5,168,856 $ 4,327,230 $ 9,138 $ 4,318,092 $ - $ 4,318,092 $ 9,486,948 $ 228,782 $ 9,715,730 San Luis Obispo $ - $ 3,707,328 $ 3,567 $ 3,703,760 $ - $ 3,703,760 $ 3,703,760 $ 168,004 $ 3,871,764 Santa Barbara $ - $ 5,828,271 $ 5,608 $ 5,822,663 $ - $ 5,822,663 $ 5,822,663 $ 188,839 $ 6,011,502 Shasta $ - $ 2,436,697 $ 2,345 $ 2,434,352 $ - $ 2,434,352 $ 2,434,352 $ 97,321 $ 2,531,673 Sierra $ - $ 44,548 $ 43 $ 44,505 $ 86,703 $ 131,208 $ 131,208 $ 16,139 $ 147,347 Siskiyou $ - $ 617,345 $ 594 $ 616,751 $ 38,180 $ 654,930 $ 654,930 $ 66,905 $ 721,835 Stanislaus (Modesto) $ 4,995,749 $ 2,148,759 $ 6,875 $ 2,141,884 $ - $ 2,141,884 $ 7,137,633 $ 169,110 $ 7,306,743 Tehama $ - $ 872,574 $ 840 $ 871,734 $ - $ 871,734 $ 871,734 $ 49,578 $ 921,312 Trinity $ - $ 189,548 $ 182 $ 189,366 $ 62,546 $ 251,912 $ 251,912 $ 35,166 $ 287,078 Tulare (Visalia) $ 3,060,923 $ 3,062,319 $ 5,892 $ 3,056,427 $ - $ 3,056,427 $ 6,117,350 $ 209,566 $ 6,326,916 Tuolumne $ - $ 761,232 $ 732 $ 760,499 $ - $ 760,499 $ 760,499 $ 38,810 $ 799,309 Statewide Total $ 419,338,427 $ 100,276,076 $ 500,000 $ 99,778,022 $ 919,105 $ 100,697,127 $ 520,035,554 $ 12,857,957 $ 532,893,510

1 2010 Census Population used for distribution except for TRPA. FAST Act designated Tahoe as a Bi-State MPO and was assigned a population of 145,000 for the California portion.

2 TRPA's share of CTAP adjustment, $1,946 (Col 4) is deducted from their share of STIP formula distribution in Col 9.

3 Total apportionment amount distributed to Large UZA >200k is slightly less than the flowchart value. Difference is the estimated apportionment given to CA for Reno UZA.

California Department of Transportation, Division of Financial Programming 10/29/2020 STBGP/REGIONAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (RSTP) FFY 21/22 Apportionment Estimate for 2021 FTIP/FSTIP Development 6/8/2020

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

MTC Region $ 86,328,102 $ 13,887,047 $ 95,781 $ 13,791,266 $ - $ 13,791,266 $ 100,119,368 $ 2,147,354 $ 102,266,721

MTC other than large UZAs $ 13,887,047 $ 95,781 $ 13,791,266 $ - $ 13,791,266 $ 13,791,266 Antioch $ 3,898,732 $ - $ - $ - $ 3,898,732 Concord $ 8,649,857 $ - $ - $ - $ 8,649,857 SF-Oakland $ 46,077,090 $ - $ - $ - $ 46,077,090 Santa Rosa $ 4,328,397 $ - $ - $ - $ 4,328,397 San Jose $ 23,374,025 $ - $ - $ - $ 23,374,025 SACOG Region $ 24,204,483 $ 7,630,264 $ 30,426 $ 7,599,838 $ 7,599,838 $ 31,804,321 $ 737,863 $ 32,542,183 Sacramento (Sacramento UZA) $ 19,087,448 $ 824,268 $ 19,031 $ 805,237 $ - $ 805,237 $ 19,892,685 $ 415,473 Placer (Sacramento UZA) $ 3,576,733 $ 1,152,827 $ 4,520 $ 1,148,306 $ - $ 1,148,306 $ 4,725,039 $ 113,495 El Dorado (Sacramento UZA) $ 862,531 $ 1,230,734 $ 2,001 $ 1,228,733 $ - $ 1,228,733 $ 2,091,264 $ 60,779 Sutter $ - $ 1,311,423 $ 1,253 $ 1,310,170 $ - $ 1,310,170 $ 1,310,170 $ 38,346 Yolo (Sacramento UZA) $ 677,771 $ 2,112,186 $ 2,667 $ 2,109,520 $ - $ 2,109,520 $ 2,787,291 $ 80,338 Yuba $ - $ 998,826 $ 955 $ 997,871 $ - $ 997,871 $ 997,871 $ 29,431 2 $ 2,036,192 $ - $ 1,946 $ - $ 2,036,192 17,027 2,053,220 TRPA (South Lake Tahoe, CA-NV) $ - SCAG Region $ 14,916,730 $ 253,031,357 $ 5,451,024 $ 258,482,380 Los Angeles Co Total $ 136,827,198 $ 1,037,585 $ 131,765 $ 905,820 $ - $ 905,820 $ 137,733,018 $ 2,655,273 $ 140,388,291 Los Angeles County $ - $ 1,037,585 $ 131,765 $ 905,820 $ - $ 905,820 $ 905,820 LA-LongBeach-Anaheim $ 128,004,742 $ - $ - $ - $ 128,004,742 Lancaster-Palmdale $ 4,791,638 $ - $ - $ - $ 4,791,638 Thousand Oaks $ 398,630 $ - $ - $ - $ 398,630 Santa Clarita $ 3,632,188 $ - $ - $ - $ 3,632,188 San Bernardino Co Total $ 28,140,302 $ 433,293 $ 27,309 $ 405,983 $ - $ 405,983 $ 28,546,285 $ 830,814 $ 29,377,099 San Bernardino County $ - $ 433,293 $ 27,309 $ 405,983 $ - $ 405,983 $ 405,983 Riverside-San Bernardino $ 15,056,237 $ - $ - $ - $ 15,056,237 Victorville-Hesperia $ 4,612,382 $ - $ - $ - $ 4,612,382 LA-LongBeach-Anaheim $ 8,471,683 $ - $ - $ - $ 8,471,683 Riverside Co Total $ 23,136,999 $ 7,503,118 $ 29,284 $ 7,473,833 $ - $ 7,473,833 $ 30,610,832 $ 714,392 $ 31,325,224 Riverside County $ - $ 7,503,118 $ 29,284 $ 7,473,833 $ - $ 7,473,833 $ 7,473,833 Riverside-San Bernardino $ 12,083,621 $ - $ - $ - $ 12,083,621 Indio-Cathedral City $ 4,852,878 $ - $ - $ - $ 4,852,878 Murrieta-Temecula-Menifee $ 6,200,500 $ - $ - $ - $ 6,200,500 Orange Co Total $ 42,206,977 $ 63,898 $ 40,401 $ 23,498 $ - $ 23,498 $ 42,230,475 $ 818,387 $ 43,048,862 Orange County $ - $ 63,898 $ 40,401 $ 23,498 $ - $ 23,498 $ 23,498 MissionViejo-Lake Forest-San Clemente $ 8,078,487 $ - $ - $ - $ 8,078,487 LA-LongBeach-Anaheim $ 34,128,490 $ - $ - $ - $ 34,128,490 Ventura Co Total $ 7,803,152 $ 3,704,950 $ 10,999 $ 3,693,951 $ - $ 3,693,951 $ 11,497,103 $ 275,714 $ 11,772,817 Ventura County $ - $ 3,704,950 $ 10,999 $ 3,693,951 $ - $ 3,693,951 $ 3,693,951 Oxnard $ 5,157,324 $ - $ - $ - $ 5,157,324 Thousand Oaks $ 2,617,897 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,617,897 LA-LongBeach-Anaheim $ 27,931 $ - $ - $ - $ 27,931 Imperial County $ - $ 2,415,952 $ 2,309 $ 2,413,643 $ - $ 2,413,643 $ 2,413,643 $ 156,445 $ 2,570,088 AMBAG Region $ - $ 10,142,714 $ 9,694 $ 10,133,020 $ - $ 10,133,020 $ 10,133,020 $ 274,862 $ 10,407,883 Monterey $ - $ 5,745,542 $ 5,491 $ 5,740,051 $ - $ 5,740,051 $ 5,740,051 $ 156,285 $ 5,896,335 Santa Cruz $ - $ 3,632,096 $ 3,471 $ 3,628,624 $ - $ 3,628,624 $ 3,628,624 $ 89,785 $ 3,718,409 San Benito $ - $ 765,077 $ 731 $ 764,345 $ - $ 764,345 $ 764,345 $ 28,793 $ 793,138 Alpine $ - $ 16,265 $ 16 $ 16,250 $ 114,958 $ 131,208 $ 131,208 $ 13,066 $ 144,274 Amador $ - $ 527,285 $ 504 $ 526,781 $ - $ 526,781 $ 526,781 $ 29,644 $ 556,426 Butte $ - $ 3,045,411 $ 2,911 $ 3,042,501 $ - $ 3,042,501 $ 3,042,501 $ 87,762 $ 3,130,263 Calaveras $ - $ 630,926 $ 603 $ 630,323 $ - $ 630,323 $ 630,323 $ 35,446 $ 665,769 Colusa $ - $ 296,498 $ 283 $ 296,215 $ - $ 296,215 $ 296,215 $ 23,471 $ 319,686 Del Norte $ - $ 396,042 $ 379 $ 395,663 $ - $ 395,663 $ 395,663 $ 21,901 $ 417,564 Fresno (Fresno UZA) $ 9,192,748 $ 3,818,143 $ 12,435 $ 3,805,708 $ - $ 3,805,708 $ 12,998,455 $ 330,984 $ 13,329,439 Glenn $ - $ 389,287 $ 372 $ 388,915 $ - $ 388,915 $ 388,915 $ 24,588 $ 413,503 Humboldt $ - $ 1,863,556 $ 1,781 $ 1,861,775 $ - $ 1,861,775 $ 1,861,775 $ 88,374 $ 1,950,149 Inyo $ - $ 256,728 $ 245 $ 256,483 $ 416,870 $ 673,353 $ 673,353 $ 122,170 $ 795,523 Kern (Bakersfield) $ 7,358,293 $ 4,369,293 $ 11,209 $ 4,358,084 $ - $ 4,358,084 $ 11,716,377 $ 445,943 $ 12,162,320 Kings $ - $ 2,117,696 $ 2,024 $ 2,115,672 $ - $ 2,115,672 $ 2,115,672 $ 65,409 $ 2,181,081 Lake $ - $ 895,143 $ 856 $ 894,288 $ - $ 894,288 $ 894,288 $ 38,373 $ 932,660 Lassen $ - $ 483,044 $ 462 $ 482,582 $ - $ 482,582 $ 482,582 $ 56,175 $ 538,757 Madera $ - $ 2,088,391 $ 1,996 $ 2,086,395 $ - $ 2,086,395 $ 2,086,395 $ 60,859 $ 2,147,253 Mariposa $ - $ 252,645 $ 241 $ 252,403 $ - $ 252,403 $ 252,403 $ 22,965 $ 275,368 Mendocino $ - $ 1,215,963 $ 1,162 $ 1,214,801 $ - $ 1,214,801 $ 1,214,801 $ 83,318 $ 1,298,120 Merced $ - $ 3,540,886 $ 3,384 $ 3,537,502 $ - $ 3,537,502 $ 3,537,502 $ 108,598 $ 3,646,100 Modoc $ - $ 134,081 $ 128 $ 133,953 $ 162,454 $ 296,407 $ 296,407 $ 29,990 $ 326,397 Mono $ - $ 196,595 $ 188 $ 196,407 $ 33,318 $ 229,725 $ 229,725 $ 90,769 $ 320,494 Nevada $ - $ 1,367,168 $ 1,307 $ 1,365,861 $ - $ 1,365,861 $ 1,365,861 $ 46,489 $ 1,412,350 Plumas $ - $ 276,952 $ 265 $ 276,688 $ - $ 276,688 $ 276,688 $ 33,503 $ 310,191 San DiegoMission (San Diego Viejo-Lake UZA) Forest-San $ 41,520,710 $ 1,801,859 $ 41,519 $ 1,760,341 $ - $ 1,760,341 $ 43,281,051 $ 939,545 $ 44,220,596 Clemente $ 117,973 $ - $ - $ - $ 117,973 $ 117,973 San Joaquin (Stockton) $ 5,203,988 $ 4,356,641 $ 9,138 $ 4,347,503 $ - $ 4,347,503 $ 9,551,491 $ 225,579 $ 9,777,070 San Luis Obispo $ - $ 3,732,525 $ 3,567 $ 3,728,958 $ - $ 3,728,958 $ 3,728,958 $ 165,652 $ 3,894,610 Santa Barbara $ - $ 5,867,884 $ 5,608 $ 5,862,276 $ - $ 5,862,276 $ 5,862,276 $ 186,195 $ 6,048,471 Shasta $ - $ 2,453,259 $ 2,345 $ 2,450,914 $ - $ 2,450,914 $ 2,450,914 $ 95,958 $ 2,546,872 Sierra $ - $ 44,851 $ 43 $ 44,808 $ 86,400 $ 131,208 $ 131,208 $ 15,913 $ 147,121 Siskiyou $ - $ 621,541 $ 594 $ 620,947 $ 33,984 $ 654,930 $ 654,930 $ 65,968 $ 720,898 Stanislaus (Modesto) $ 5,029,704 $ 2,163,363 $ 6,875 $ 2,156,488 $ - $ 2,156,488 $ 7,186,192 $ 166,743 $ 7,352,935 Tehama $ - $ 878,504 $ 840 $ 877,665 $ - $ 877,665 $ 877,665 $ 48,884 $ 926,549 Trinity $ - $ 190,837 $ 182 $ 190,654 $ 61,258 $ 251,912 $ 251,912 $ 34,674 $ 286,586 Tulare (Visalia) $ 3,081,728 $ 3,083,133 $ 5,892 $ 3,077,241 $ - $ 3,077,241 $ 6,158,968 $ 206,632 $ 6,365,601 Tuolumne $ - $ 766,405 $ 732 $ 765,673 $ - $ 765,673 $ 765,673 $ 38,266 $ 803,939 Statewide Total $ 422,188,546 $ 100,957,623 $ 500,000 $ 100,459,569 $ 909,242 $ 101,368,812 $ 523,557,358 $ 12,677,938 $ 536,235,295

1 2010 Census Population used for distribution except for TRPA. FAST Act designated Tahoe as a Bi-State MPO and was assigned a population of 145,000 for the California portion.

2 TRPA's share of CTAP adjustment, $1,946 (Col 4) is deducted from their share of STIP formula distribution in Col 9.

3 Total apportionment amount distributed to Large UZA >200k is slightly less than the 4-yr Summary Table. Difference is the estimated apportionment given to CA for Reno UZA.

Caltrans Division of Transportation Programming Office of Federal Programming and Database Management, 6/8/2020 STBGP/REGIONAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (RSTP) FFY 22/23 Apportionment Estimate for 2021 FTIP/FSTIP Development 6/8/2020

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

STBGP STBGP Traditional Estimated Estimated Total STBGP Large UZA STBGP Small Area Small Area Small Area including State Additional CTAP State Flexible Apportionment Apportionment MPO/RTPA/County Apportionment Apportionment (Pop < 200k) Flexible Traditional Distribution by Adjustment Adjustment Distribution Distribution (Pop >200k) 1, 3 (Pop <200k) 1 Net After CTAP Apportionment STIP Formula (sum of Col 2, 7) (sum of Col 8, 9) (Col 3 minus 4) (sum of Col 5, 6)

MTC Region $ 86,328,102 $ 13,887,047 $ 95,781 $ 13,791,266 $ - $ 13,791,266 $ 100,119,368 $ 2,119,173 $ 102,238,541

MTC other than large UZAs $ 13,887,047 $ 95,781 $ 13,791,266 $ - $ 13,791,266 $ 13,791,266 Antioch $ 3,898,732 $ - $ - $ - $ 3,898,732 Concord $ 8,649,857 $ - $ - $ - $ 8,649,857 SF-Oakland $ 46,077,090 $ - $ - $ - $ 46,077,090 Santa Rosa $ 4,328,397 $ - $ - $ - $ 4,328,397 San Jose $ 23,374,025 $ - $ - $ - $ 23,374,025 SACOG Region $ 24,204,483 $ 7,630,264 $ 30,426 $ 7,599,838 $ 7,599,838 $ 31,804,321 $ 728,179 $ 32,532,500 Sacramento (Sacramento UZA) $ 19,087,448 $ 824,268 $ 19,031 $ 805,237 $ - $ 805,237 $ 19,892,685 $ 410,021 Placer (Sacramento UZA) $ 3,576,733 $ 1,152,827 $ 4,520 $ 1,148,306 $ - $ 1,148,306 $ 4,725,039 $ 112,005 El Dorado (Sacramento UZA) $ 862,531 $ 1,230,734 $ 2,001 $ 1,228,733 $ - $ 1,228,733 $ 2,091,264 $ 59,981 Sutter $ - $ 1,311,423 $ 1,253 $ 1,310,170 $ - $ 1,310,170 $ 1,310,170 $ 37,843 Yolo (Sacramento UZA) $ 677,771 $ 2,112,186 $ 2,667 $ 2,109,520 $ - $ 2,109,520 $ 2,787,291 $ 79,284 Yuba $ - $ 998,826 $ 955 $ 997,871 $ - $ 997,871 $ 997,871 $ 29,045 2 $ 2,036,192 $ - $ 1,946 $ - $ 2,036,192 16,778 2,052,971 TRPA (South Lake Tahoe, CA-NV) $ - SCAG Region $ 14,916,730 $ 253,031,357 $ 5,379,488 $ 258,410,844 Los Angeles Co Total $ 136,827,198 $ 1,037,585 $ 131,765 $ 905,820 $ - $ 905,820 $ 137,733,018 $ 2,620,427 $ 140,353,445 Los Angeles County $ - $ 1,037,585 $ 131,765 $ 905,820 $ - $ 905,820 $ 905,820 LA-LongBeach-Anaheim $ 128,004,742 $ - $ - $ - $ 128,004,742 Lancaster-Palmdale $ 4,791,638 $ - $ - $ - $ 4,791,638 Thousand Oaks $ 398,630 $ - $ - $ - $ 398,630 Santa Clarita $ 3,632,188 $ - $ - $ - $ 3,632,188 San Bernardino Co Total $ 28,140,302 $ 433,293 $ 27,309 $ 405,983 $ - $ 405,983 $ 28,546,285 $ 819,911 $ 29,366,196 San Bernardino County $ - $ 433,293 $ 27,309 $ 405,983 $ - $ 405,983 $ 405,983 Riverside-San Bernardino $ 15,056,237 $ - $ - $ - $ 15,056,237 Victorville-Hesperia $ 4,612,382 $ - $ - $ - $ 4,612,382 LA-LongBeach-Anaheim $ 8,471,683 $ - $ - $ - $ 8,471,683 Riverside Co Total $ 23,136,999 $ 7,503,118 $ 29,284 $ 7,473,833 $ - $ 7,473,833 $ 30,610,832 $ 705,017 $ 31,315,849 Riverside County $ - $ 7,503,118 $ 29,284 $ 7,473,833 $ - $ 7,473,833 $ 7,473,833 Riverside-San Bernardino $ 12,083,621 $ - $ - $ - $ 12,083,621 Indio-Cathedral City $ 4,852,878 $ - $ - $ - $ 4,852,878 Murrieta-Temecula-Menifee $ 6,200,500 $ - $ - $ - $ 6,200,500 Orange Co Total $ 42,206,977 $ 63,898 $ 40,401 $ 23,498 $ - $ 23,498 $ 42,230,475 $ 807,647 $ 43,038,122 Orange County $ - $ 63,898 $ 40,401 $ 23,498 $ - $ 23,498 $ 23,498 MissionViejo-Lake Forest-San Clemente $ 8,078,487 $ - $ - $ - $ 8,078,487 LA-LongBeach-Anaheim $ 34,128,490 $ - $ - $ - $ 34,128,490 Ventura Co Total $ 7,803,152 $ 3,704,950 $ 10,999 $ 3,693,951 $ - $ 3,693,951 $ 11,497,103 $ 272,096 $ 11,769,199 Ventura County $ - $ 3,704,950 $ 10,999 $ 3,693,951 $ - $ 3,693,951 $ 3,693,951 Oxnard $ 5,157,324 $ - $ - $ - $ 5,157,324 Thousand Oaks $ 2,617,897 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,617,897 LA-LongBeach-Anaheim $ 27,931 $ - $ - $ - $ 27,931 Imperial County $ - $ 2,415,952 $ 2,309 $ 2,413,643 $ - $ 2,413,643 $ 2,413,643 $ 154,391 $ 2,568,035 AMBAG Region $ - $ 10,142,714 $ 9,694 $ 10,133,020 $ - $ 10,133,020 $ 10,133,020 $ 271,255 $ 10,404,275 Monterey $ - $ 5,745,542 $ 5,491 $ 5,740,051 $ - $ 5,740,051 $ 5,740,051 $ 154,234 $ 5,894,284 Santa Cruz $ - $ 3,632,096 $ 3,471 $ 3,628,624 $ - $ 3,628,624 $ 3,628,624 $ 88,606 $ 3,717,231 San Benito $ - $ 765,077 $ 731 $ 764,345 $ - $ 764,345 $ 764,345 $ 28,415 $ 792,760 Alpine $ - $ 16,265 $ 16 $ 16,250 $ 114,958 $ 131,208 $ 131,208 $ 12,894 $ 144,102 Amador $ - $ 527,285 $ 504 $ 526,781 $ - $ 526,781 $ 526,781 $ 29,255 $ 556,037 Butte $ - $ 3,045,411 $ 2,911 $ 3,042,501 $ - $ 3,042,501 $ 3,042,501 $ 86,610 $ 3,129,111 Calaveras $ - $ 630,926 $ 603 $ 630,323 $ - $ 630,323 $ 630,323 $ 34,980 $ 665,303 Colusa $ - $ 296,498 $ 283 $ 296,215 $ - $ 296,215 $ 296,215 $ 23,163 $ 319,378 Del Norte $ - $ 396,042 $ 379 $ 395,663 $ - $ 395,663 $ 395,663 $ 21,613 $ 417,277 Fresno (Fresno UZA) $ 9,192,748 $ 3,818,143 $ 12,435 $ 3,805,708 $ - $ 3,805,708 $ 12,998,455 $ 326,641 $ 13,325,096 Glenn $ - $ 389,287 $ 372 $ 388,915 $ - $ 388,915 $ 388,915 $ 24,266 $ 413,180 Humboldt $ - $ 1,863,556 $ 1,781 $ 1,861,775 $ - $ 1,861,775 $ 1,861,775 $ 87,214 $ 1,948,990 Inyo $ - $ 256,728 $ 245 $ 256,483 $ 416,870 $ 673,353 $ 673,353 $ 120,567 $ 793,920 Kern (Bakersfield) $ 7,358,293 $ 4,369,293 $ 11,209 $ 4,358,084 $ - $ 4,358,084 $ 11,716,377 $ 440,090 $ 12,156,468 Kings $ - $ 2,117,696 $ 2,024 $ 2,115,672 $ - $ 2,115,672 $ 2,115,672 $ 64,551 $ 2,180,223 Lake $ - $ 895,143 $ 856 $ 894,288 $ - $ 894,288 $ 894,288 $ 37,869 $ 932,157 Lassen $ - $ 483,044 $ 462 $ 482,582 $ - $ 482,582 $ 482,582 $ 55,438 $ 538,020 Madera $ - $ 2,088,391 $ 1,996 $ 2,086,395 $ - $ 2,086,395 $ 2,086,395 $ 60,060 $ 2,146,455 Mariposa $ - $ 252,645 $ 241 $ 252,403 $ - $ 252,403 $ 252,403 $ 22,664 $ 275,067 Mendocino $ - $ 1,215,963 $ 1,162 $ 1,214,801 $ - $ 1,214,801 $ 1,214,801 $ 82,225 $ 1,297,026 Merced $ - $ 3,540,886 $ 3,384 $ 3,537,502 $ - $ 3,537,502 $ 3,537,502 $ 107,173 $ 3,644,675 Modoc $ - $ 134,081 $ 128 $ 133,953 $ 162,454 $ 296,407 $ 296,407 $ 29,597 $ 326,004 Mono $ - $ 196,595 $ 188 $ 196,407 $ 33,318 $ 229,725 $ 229,725 $ 89,578 $ 319,303 Nevada $ - $ 1,367,168 $ 1,307 $ 1,365,861 $ - $ 1,365,861 $ 1,365,861 $ 45,879 $ 1,411,740 Plumas $ - $ 276,952 $ 265 $ 276,688 $ - $ 276,688 $ 276,688 $ 33,063 $ 309,751 San DiegoMission (San Diego Viejo-Lake UZA) Forest-San $ 41,520,710 $ 1,801,859 $ 41,519 $ 1,760,341 $ - $ 1,760,341 $ 43,281,051 $ 927,215 $ 44,208,266 Clemente $ 117,973 $ - $ - $ - $ 117,973 $ 117,973 San Joaquin (Stockton) $ 5,203,988 $ 4,356,641 $ 9,138 $ 4,347,503 $ - $ 4,347,503 $ 9,551,491 $ 222,619 $ 9,774,109 San Luis Obispo $ - $ 3,732,525 $ 3,567 $ 3,728,958 $ - $ 3,728,958 $ 3,728,958 $ 163,478 $ 3,892,436 Santa Barbara $ - $ 5,867,884 $ 5,608 $ 5,862,276 $ - $ 5,862,276 $ 5,862,276 $ 183,752 $ 6,046,028 Shasta $ - $ 2,453,259 $ 2,345 $ 2,450,914 $ - $ 2,450,914 $ 2,450,914 $ 94,699 $ 2,545,613 Sierra $ - $ 44,851 $ 43 $ 44,808 $ 86,400 $ 131,208 $ 131,208 $ 15,704 $ 146,912 Siskiyou $ - $ 621,541 $ 594 $ 620,947 $ 33,984 $ 654,930 $ 654,930 $ 65,102 $ 720,033 Stanislaus (Modesto) $ 5,029,704 $ 2,163,363 $ 6,875 $ 2,156,488 $ - $ 2,156,488 $ 7,186,192 $ 164,555 $ 7,350,747 Tehama $ - $ 878,504 $ 840 $ 877,665 $ - $ 877,665 $ 877,665 $ 48,242 $ 925,907 Trinity $ - $ 190,837 $ 182 $ 190,654 $ 61,258 $ 251,912 $ 251,912 $ 34,219 $ 286,131 Tulare (Visalia) $ 3,081,728 $ 3,083,133 $ 5,892 $ 3,077,241 $ - $ 3,077,241 $ 6,158,968 $ 203,921 $ 6,362,889 Tuolumne $ - $ 766,405 $ 732 $ 765,673 $ - $ 765,673 $ 765,673 $ 37,764 $ 803,437 Statewide Total $ 422,188,546 $ 100,957,623 $ 500,000 $ 100,459,569 $ 909,242 $ 101,368,812 $ 523,557,358 $ 12,511,535 $ 536,068,892

1 2010 Census Population used for distribution except for TRPA. FAST Act designated Tahoe as a Bi-State MPO and was assigned a population of 145,000 for the California portion.

2 TRPA's share of CTAP adjustment, $1,946 (Col 4) is deducted from their share of STIP formula distribution in Col 9.

3 Total apportionment amount distributed to Large UZA >200k is slightly less than the 4-yr Summary Table. Difference is the estimated apportionment given to CA for Reno UZA.

Caltrans Division of Transportation Programming Office of Federal Programming and Database Management, 6/8/2020 STBGP/REGIONAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (RSTP) FFY 23/24 Apportionment Estimate for 2021 FTIP/FSTIP Development 6/8/2020

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

STBGP STBGP Traditional Estimated Total STBGP Large UZA STBGP Small Area Small Area Small Area including State Estimated Additional CTAP State Flexible Apportionment MPO/RTPA/County Apportionment Apportionment (Pop < 200k) Flexible Traditional Apportionment Distribution by Adjustment Adjustment Distribution (Pop >200k) 1, 3 (Pop <200k) 1 Net After CTAP Apportionment Distribution STIP Formula (sum of Col 8, 9) (Col 3 minus 4) (sum of Col 5, 6) (sum of Col 2, 7)

MTC Region $ 86,328,102 $ 13,887,047 $ 95,781 $ 13,791,266 $ - $ 13,791,266 $ 100,119,368 $ 2,090,429 $ 102,209,797

MTC other than large UZAs $ 13,887,047 $ 95,781 $ 13,791,266 $ - $ 13,791,266 $ 13,791,266 Antioch $ 3,898,732 $ - $ - $ - $ 3,898,732 Concord $ 8,649,857 $ - $ - $ - $ 8,649,857 SF-Oakland $ 46,077,090 $ - $ - $ - $ 46,077,090 Santa Rosa $ 4,328,397 $ - $ - $ - $ 4,328,397 San Jose $ 23,374,025 $ - $ - $ - $ 23,374,025 SACOG Region $ 24,204,483 $ 7,630,264 $ 30,426 $ 7,599,838 $ 7,599,838 $ 31,804,321 $ 718,302 $ 32,522,623 Sacramento (Sacramento UZA) $ 19,087,448 $ 824,268 $ 19,031 $ 805,237 $ - $ 805,237 $ 19,892,685 $ 404,460 Placer (Sacramento UZA) $ 3,576,733 $ 1,152,827 $ 4,520 $ 1,148,306 $ - $ 1,148,306 $ 4,725,039 $ 110,486 El Dorado (Sacramento UZA) $ 862,531 $ 1,230,734 $ 2,001 $ 1,228,733 $ - $ 1,228,733 $ 2,091,264 $ 59,168 Sutter $ - $ 1,311,423 $ 1,253 $ 1,310,170 $ - $ 1,310,170 $ 1,310,170 $ 37,330 Yolo (Sacramento UZA) $ 677,771 $ 2,112,186 $ 2,667 $ 2,109,520 $ - $ 2,109,520 $ 2,787,291 $ 78,208 Yuba $ - $ 998,826 $ 955 $ 997,871 $ - $ 997,871 $ 997,871 $ 28,651 2 $ 2,036,192 $ - $ 1,946 $ - $ 2,036,192 16,524 2,052,717 TRPA (South Lake Tahoe, CA-NV) $ - SCAG Region $ 14,916,730 $ 253,031,357 $ 5,306,522 $ 258,337,878 Los Angeles Co Total $ 136,827,198 $ 1,037,585 $ 131,765 $ 905,820 $ - $ 905,820 $ 137,733,018 $ 2,584,884 $ 140,317,902 Los Angeles County $ - $ 1,037,585 $ 131,765 $ 905,820 $ - $ 905,820 $ 905,820 LA-LongBeach-Anaheim $ 128,004,742 $ - $ - $ - $ 128,004,742 Lancaster-Palmdale $ 4,791,638 $ - $ - $ - $ 4,791,638 Thousand Oaks $ 398,630 $ - $ - $ - $ 398,630 Santa Clarita $ 3,632,188 $ - $ - $ - $ 3,632,188 San Bernardino Co Total $ 28,140,302 $ 433,293 $ 27,309 $ 405,983 $ - $ 405,983 $ 28,546,285 $ 808,790 $ 29,355,075 San Bernardino County $ - $ 433,293 $ 27,309 $ 405,983 $ - $ 405,983 $ 405,983 Riverside-San Bernardino $ 15,056,237 $ - $ - $ - $ 15,056,237 Victorville-Hesperia $ 4,612,382 $ - $ - $ - $ 4,612,382 LA-LongBeach-Anaheim $ 8,471,683 $ - $ - $ - $ 8,471,683 Riverside Co Total $ 23,136,999 $ 7,503,118 $ 29,284 $ 7,473,833 $ - $ 7,473,833 $ 30,610,832 $ 695,454 $ 31,306,286 Riverside County $ - $ 7,503,118 $ 29,284 $ 7,473,833 $ - $ 7,473,833 $ 7,473,833 Riverside-San Bernardino $ 12,083,621 $ - $ - $ - $ 12,083,621 Indio-Cathedral City $ 4,852,878 $ - $ - $ - $ 4,852,878 Murrieta-Temecula-Menifee $ 6,200,500 $ - $ - $ - $ 6,200,500 Orange Co Total $ 42,206,977 $ 63,898 $ 40,401 $ 23,498 $ - $ 23,498 $ 42,230,475 $ 796,692 $ 43,027,167 Orange County $ - $ 63,898 $ 40,401 $ 23,498 $ - $ 23,498 $ 23,498 MissionViejo-Lake Forest-San Clemente $ 8,078,487 $ - $ - $ - $ 8,078,487 LA-LongBeach-Anaheim $ 34,128,490 $ - $ - $ - $ 34,128,490 Ventura Co Total $ 7,803,152 $ 3,704,950 $ 10,999 $ 3,693,951 $ - $ 3,693,951 $ 11,497,103 $ 268,405 $ 11,765,508 Ventura County $ - $ 3,704,950 $ 10,999 $ 3,693,951 $ - $ 3,693,951 $ 3,693,951 Oxnard $ 5,157,324 $ - $ - $ - $ 5,157,324 Thousand Oaks $ 2,617,897 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,617,897 LA-LongBeach-Anaheim $ 27,931 $ - $ - $ - $ 27,931 Imperial County $ - $ 2,415,952 $ 2,309 $ 2,413,643 $ - $ 2,413,643 $ 2,413,643 $ 152,297 $ 2,565,941 AMBAG Region $ - $ 10,142,714 $ 9,694 $ 10,133,020 $ - $ 10,133,020 $ 10,133,020 $ 267,576 $ 10,400,596 Monterey $ - $ 5,745,542 $ 5,491 $ 5,740,051 $ - $ 5,740,051 $ 5,740,051 $ 152,142 $ 5,892,192 Santa Cruz $ - $ 3,632,096 $ 3,471 $ 3,628,624 $ - $ 3,628,624 $ 3,628,624 $ 87,405 $ 3,716,029 San Benito $ - $ 765,077 $ 731 $ 764,345 $ - $ 764,345 $ 764,345 $ 28,030 $ 792,375 Alpine $ - $ 16,265 $ 16 $ 16,250 $ 114,958 $ 131,208 $ 131,208 $ 12,720 $ 143,928 Amador $ - $ 527,285 $ 504 $ 526,781 $ - $ 526,781 $ 526,781 $ 28,859 $ 555,640 Butte $ - $ 3,045,411 $ 2,911 $ 3,042,501 $ - $ 3,042,501 $ 3,042,501 $ 85,436 $ 3,127,936 Calaveras $ - $ 630,926 $ 603 $ 630,323 $ - $ 630,323 $ 630,323 $ 34,506 $ 664,829 Colusa $ - $ 296,498 $ 283 $ 296,215 $ - $ 296,215 $ 296,215 $ 22,848 $ 319,064 Del Norte $ - $ 396,042 $ 379 $ 395,663 $ - $ 395,663 $ 395,663 $ 21,320 $ 416,983 Fresno (Fresno UZA) $ 9,192,748 $ 3,818,143 $ 12,435 $ 3,805,708 $ - $ 3,805,708 $ 12,998,455 $ 322,210 $ 13,320,665 Glenn $ - $ 389,287 $ 372 $ 388,915 $ - $ 388,915 $ 388,915 $ 23,937 $ 412,851 Humboldt $ - $ 1,863,556 $ 1,781 $ 1,861,775 $ - $ 1,861,775 $ 1,861,775 $ 86,032 $ 1,947,807 Inyo $ - $ 256,728 $ 245 $ 256,483 $ 416,870 $ 673,353 $ 673,353 $ 118,931 $ 792,284 Kern (Bakersfield) $ 7,358,293 $ 4,369,293 $ 11,209 $ 4,358,084 $ - $ 4,358,084 $ 11,716,377 $ 434,121 $ 12,150,498 Kings $ - $ 2,117,696 $ 2,024 $ 2,115,672 $ - $ 2,115,672 $ 2,115,672 $ 63,675 $ 2,179,347 Lake $ - $ 895,143 $ 856 $ 894,288 $ - $ 894,288 $ 894,288 $ 37,355 $ 931,643 Lassen $ - $ 483,044 $ 462 $ 482,582 $ - $ 482,582 $ 482,582 $ 54,686 $ 537,268 Madera $ - $ 2,088,391 $ 1,996 $ 2,086,395 $ - $ 2,086,395 $ 2,086,395 $ 59,245 $ 2,145,640 Mariposa $ - $ 252,645 $ 241 $ 252,403 $ - $ 252,403 $ 252,403 $ 22,356 $ 274,759 Mendocino $ - $ 1,215,963 $ 1,162 $ 1,214,801 $ - $ 1,214,801 $ 1,214,801 $ 81,110 $ 1,295,911 Merced $ - $ 3,540,886 $ 3,384 $ 3,537,502 $ - $ 3,537,502 $ 3,537,502 $ 105,720 $ 3,643,221 Modoc $ - $ 134,081 $ 128 $ 133,953 $ 162,454 $ 296,407 $ 296,407 $ 29,195 $ 325,602 Mono $ - $ 196,595 $ 188 $ 196,407 $ 33,318 $ 229,725 $ 229,725 $ 88,363 $ 318,088 Nevada $ - $ 1,367,168 $ 1,307 $ 1,365,861 $ - $ 1,365,861 $ 1,365,861 $ 45,257 $ 1,411,118 Plumas $ - $ 276,952 $ 265 $ 276,688 $ - $ 276,688 $ 276,688 $ 32,615 $ 309,303 San DiegoMission (San Diego Viejo-Lake UZA) Forest-San $ 41,520,710 $ 1,801,859 $ 41,519 $ 1,760,341 $ - $ 1,760,341 $ 43,281,051 $ 914,639 $ 44,195,690 Clemente $ 117,973 $ - $ - $ - $ 117,973 $ 117,973 San Joaquin (Stockton) $ 5,203,988 $ 4,356,641 $ 9,138 $ 4,347,503 $ - $ 4,347,503 $ 9,551,491 $ 219,599 $ 9,771,090 San Luis Obispo $ - $ 3,732,525 $ 3,567 $ 3,728,958 $ - $ 3,728,958 $ 3,728,958 $ 161,261 $ 3,890,218 Santa Barbara $ - $ 5,867,884 $ 5,608 $ 5,862,276 $ - $ 5,862,276 $ 5,862,276 $ 181,259 $ 6,043,536 Shasta $ - $ 2,453,259 $ 2,345 $ 2,450,914 $ - $ 2,450,914 $ 2,450,914 $ 93,415 $ 2,544,328 Sierra $ - $ 44,851 $ 43 $ 44,808 $ 86,400 $ 131,208 $ 131,208 $ 15,491 $ 146,699 Siskiyou $ - $ 621,541 $ 594 $ 620,947 $ 33,984 $ 654,930 $ 654,930 $ 64,219 $ 719,150 Stanislaus (Modesto) $ 5,029,704 $ 2,163,363 $ 6,875 $ 2,156,488 $ - $ 2,156,488 $ 7,186,192 $ 162,323 $ 7,348,515 Tehama $ - $ 878,504 $ 840 $ 877,665 $ - $ 877,665 $ 877,665 $ 47,588 $ 925,253 Trinity $ - $ 190,837 $ 182 $ 190,654 $ 61,258 $ 251,912 $ 251,912 $ 33,755 $ 285,667 Tulare (Visalia) $ 3,081,728 $ 3,083,133 $ 5,892 $ 3,077,241 $ - $ 3,077,241 $ 6,158,968 $ 201,155 $ 6,360,123 Tuolumne $ - $ 766,405 $ 732 $ 765,673 $ - $ 765,673 $ 765,673 $ 37,252 $ 802,925 Statewide Total $ 422,188,546 $ 100,957,623 $ 500,000 $ 100,459,569 $ 909,242 $ 101,368,812 $ 523,557,358 $ 12,341,805 $ 535,899,162

1 2010 Census Population used for distribution except for TRPA. FAST Act designated Tahoe as a Bi-State MPO and was assigned a population of 145,000 for the California portion.

2 TRPA's share of CTAP adjustment, $1,946 (Col 4) is deducted from their share of STIP formula distribution in Col 9.

3 Total apportionment amount distributed to Large UZA >200k is slightly less than the 4-yr Summary Table. Difference is the estimated apportionment given to CA for Reno UZA.

Caltrans Division of Transportation Programming Office of Federal Programming and Database Management, 6/8/2020 PROPOSED ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (ATP) FUND ESTIMATE ($ in thousands) 4-Year 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 Total RESOURCES

STATE RESOURCES Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA)[1] $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $400,000 State Highway Account (SHA) 34,200 34,200 34,200 34,200 136,800 State Resources Subtotal $134,200 $134,200 $134,200 $134,200 $536,800

FEDERAL RESOURCES STBG Set-Aside for Transportation Alternatives[2] $66,730 $66,730 $66,730 $66,730 $266,920 Recreational Trails 1,900 1,900 1,900 1,900 7,600 Other Federal 19,950 19,950 19,950 19,950 79,800 Federal Resources Subtotal $88,580 $88,580 $88,580 $88,580 $354,320

TOTAL RESOURCES AVAILABLE[3] $222,780 $222,780 $222,780 $222,780 $891,120 ADJUSTMENTS

Previously Programmed Resources[4] $122,780 $122,780 $0 $0 $245,560 [5] Reserved Resources Available for 2023 ATP $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000 $200,000

PROGRAMMABLE RESOURCES AVAILABLE $100,000 $100,000 $122,780 $122,780 $445,560 DISTRIBUTIONS

CALIFORNIA CONSERVATION CORPS[6] ($4,000) $0 $0 $0 ($4,000) URBAN REGIONS (MPO Administered) State ($38,400) ($40,000) ($13,187) ($13,187) ($104,774) Federal 0 0 (35,925) (35,925) (71,849) Urban Regions Subtotal ($38,400) ($40,000) ($49,112) ($49,112) ($176,624)

SMALL URBAN & RURAL REGIONS (State Administered) State ($9,600) ($10,000) ($4,863) ($4,863) ($29,325) Federal 0 0 (7,415) (7,415) (14,831) Small Urban & Rural Regions Subtotal ($9,600) ($10,000) ($12,278) ($12,278) ($44,156)

STATEWIDE COMPETITION (State Administered) State ($48,000) ($50,000) ($16,150) ($16,150) ($130,300) Federal 0 0 (45,240) (45,240) (90,480) Statewide Competition Subtotal ($48,000) ($50,000) ($61,390) ($61,390) ($220,780)

TOTAL DISTRIBUTIONS AVAILABLE[7] ($100,000) ($100,000) ($122,780) ($122,780) ($445,560)

TOTAL DISTRIBUTIONS $222,780 $222,780 $222,780 $222,780 $891,120 [1] SEC. 36 of Senate Bill 1 adds Streets and Highways Code, Section 2032, appropriates $100 million annually for ATP. [2] Surface Transportation Block Grant (STBG) Set-Aside for Transportation Alternatives (TA) was formerly the Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) included in MAP-21. [3] Total resources available includes future reservation funds. [4] Resources committed as part of the 2019 ATP cycle. [5] Reserved for future ATP cycle programming. [6] Item 2660-108-3290, Budget Act of 2017 (Chs. 14, 22, and 54, Stats. 2017) appropriates no less than $4 million per year for five fiscal years to the California Conversation Corps for active transportation projects. [7] Federal resources are available in all years of the 2021 ATP Fund Estimate (FE) but are not displayed as 2021-22 and 2022-23 distributions due to their inclusion in the 2019 ATP cycle. Reserved state resources for 2023-24 and 2024-25 are not displayed in the distributions because they will be included in the distributions for those years in the 2023 ATP Fund Estimate. Notes: Individual numbers may not add to total due to independent rounding. STBG Set-Aside for TA reflects preliminary FHWA estimates pursuant to Fixing America's Surface Transportation (FAST) Act. Final dollar amounts may vary based on actual apportionment and obligational authority by FHWA or any changes in Federal guidance. All years in the 2021 ATP Fund Estimate extend beyond FAST Act authorization, but is assumed to be funded at the same level in absence of a new Federal Act. ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (ATP) Annual Distributions: Four-Year Funding Table ($ in thousands) 4-Year 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 Total STATE AND FEDERAL RESOURCES

State Reserved Resources from 2019 ATP[1] $100,000 $100,000 $200,000 Ongoing ATP Funding $122,780 $122,780 $245,560 DISTRIBUTION STATEWIDE COMPETITION - STATE (State Administered) State ($48,000) ($50,000) ($16,150) ($16,150) ($130,300) Federal $0 $0 ($45,240) ($45,240) ($90,480) Statewide Competition Subtotal ($48,000) ($50,000) ($61,390) ($61,390) ($220,780) SMALL URBAN & RURAL REGIONS - STATE (State Administered) State ($9,600) ($10,000) ($4,863) ($4,863) ($29,325) Federal $0 $0 ($7,415) ($7,415) ($14,831) Small Urban & Rural Regions Subtotal ($9,600) ($10,000) ($12,278) ($12,278) ($44,156) URBAN REGIONS (MPO Administered)[2] MTC Region State ($8,045) ($8,381) ($2,898) ($2,898) ($22,223) Federal $0 $0 ($7,392) ($7,392) ($14,783) MTC Subtotal ($8,045) ($8,381) ($10,290) ($10,290) ($37,006) SACOG Region State ($2,559) ($2,666) ($1,129) ($1,129) ($7,484) Federal $0 $0 ($2,144) ($2,144) ($4,289) SACOG Subtotal ($2,559) ($2,666) ($3,273) ($3,273) ($11,773) SCAG Region State ($20,310) ($21,157) ($6,026) ($6,026) ($53,519) Federal $0 $0 ($19,950) ($19,950) ($39,899) SCAG Subtotal ($20,310) ($21,157) ($25,976) ($25,976) ($93,419) Fresno COG (Fresno UZA) Region State ($1,047) ($1,090) ($507) ($507) ($3,151) Federal $0 $0 ($832) ($832) ($1,664) Fresno COG (Fresno UZA) Subtotal ($1,047) ($1,090) ($1,339) ($1,339) ($4,815) Kern COG (Bakersfield) Region State ($945) ($984) ($517) ($517) ($2,962) Federal $0 $0 ($691) ($691) ($1,383) Kern COG (Bakersfield) Subtotal ($945) ($984) ($1,208) ($1,208) ($4,345) Lake Tahoe (Bi-State) Region State ($163) ($170) ($41) ($41) ($414) Federal $0 $0 ($168) ($168) ($336) Lake Tahoe (Bi-State) Subtotal ($163) ($170) ($209) ($209) ($750) SANDAG (San Diego UZA) Region State ($3,483) ($3,628) ($991) ($991) ($9,092) Federal $0 $0 ($3,463) ($3,463) ($6,927) SANDAG (San Diego UZA) Subtotal ($3,483) ($3,628) ($4,454) ($4,454) ($16,019) San Joaquin COG (Stockton) Region State ($771) ($803) ($473) ($473) ($2,520) Federal $0 $0 ($513) ($513) ($1,027) San Joaquin COG (Stockton) Subtotal ($771) ($803) ($986) ($986) ($3,547) Stanislaus COG (Modesto) Region State ($579) ($603) ($284) ($284) ($1,749) Federal $0 $0 ($457) ($457) ($914) Stanislaus COG (Modesto) Subtotal ($579) ($603) ($740) ($740) ($2,662) Tulare CAG (Visalia) Region State ($498) ($518) ($323) ($323) ($1,661) Federal $0 $0 ($314) ($314) ($627) Tulare CAG (Visalia) Subtotal ($498) ($518) ($636) ($636) ($2,288) [3] Urban Regions Subtotal ($38,400) ($40,000) ($49,112) ($49,112) ($176,624) CALIFORNIA CONSERVATION CORPS[4] ($4,000) $0 $0 $0 ($4,000)

TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS ($100,000) ($100,000) ($122,780) ($122,780) ($445,560)

[1] Resources set-aside for programming in the 2021 ATP FE from the 2019 ATP Fund Estimate. [2] Distribution based on Urban Region's proportion of total population within all Urban Regions. [3] Per Senate Bill 99, guidelines shall include a process to ensure no less than 25 percent of overall program funds benefit disadvantaged communities. [4] Budget Act Item 2660-108-3290 allocates no less than $4 million per year of RMRA resources for five fiscal years to the California Conversation Corps for active transportation projects. Note: Individual numbers may not add to total due to independent rounding. Appendix C

Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality (CMAQ) Back Up Lists

Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ)

Bicycle/Pedestrian Grouped Projects - FFY 2020/21 CMAQ Agency Project Description Project Location Local Funds Project Cost Federal Funds Herndon Road, El Camino Avenue, and Eastgate Ceres Bike Lane Corridors - Class II Lanes Blvd. $ 44,578 Toll Credits $ 44,578

Modesto Bike/Ped Improvements Virginia Corridor Trail Phase VII $ 887,615 $ 3,207,350 $ 4,094,965

Newman Pedestrian Faciltities Kern Street $ 102,472 $ 58,276 $ 160,748 Along Roselle Avenue from Patterson Road to Pocket Riverbank Pedestrian Access & ADA Improvements Avenue along the east side $ 280,000 $ 50,000 $ 330,000

Riverbank Bicycle & Pedestrian Improvements Callander Avenue $ 200,000 $ 580,083 $ 780,083 Totals $ 1,514,665 $ 3,895,709 $ 5,410,374

Bicycle/Pedestrian Grouped Projects - FFY 2021/22 CMAQ Agency Project Description Project Location Local Funds Project Cost Federal Funds Herndon Road, El Camino Avenue, and Eastgate Ceres Bike Lane Corridors - Class II Lanes Blvd. $ 309,569 Toll Credits $ 309,569 Hatch Road from Eastgate Boulevard to Faith Home Ceres Class I Bike Path Road $ 290,941 $ 82,509 $ 373,450 Whitmore Avenue between Tully Road and Charles Hughson Bike/Ped Improvements Street $ 244,459 $ 31,672 $ 276,131 East and West sides of Roselle Avenue between Riverbank Pedestrian Access Crawford and Rosebrook Drive $ 399,850 Toll Credits $ 399,850 F Street Frontage Improvements: Western Avenue to Waterford Bike/Ped Improvements 1st Street $ 25,000 $ 133,670 $ 158,670 Totals $ 1,269,819 $ 247,851 $ 1,517,670 Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ)

Intersection Channelization Grouped Projects - FFY 2020/21 CMAQ Agency Project Description Project Location Local Funds Project Cost Federal Funds

Riverbank Traffic Flow Improvements 1st Street and Patterson Road $ 250,250 Toll Credits $ 250,250 Totals $ 250,250 $ - $ 250,250

Intersection Channelization Grouped Projects - FFY 2021/22 CMAQ Agency Project Description Project Location Local Funds Project Cost Federal Funds Traffic Management Intersection Improvements at Roselle Ave. and Morrill Rd., sidewalk infill to link Riverbank Traffic Flow Improvements pedestrian commute access along Morrill Road $ 230,852 $ 195,618 $ 426,470 Totals $ 230,852 $ 195,618 $ 426,470 Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ)

Intersection Signalization Grouped Projects - FFY 2020/21 CMAQ Agency Project Description Project Location Local Funds Project Cost Federal Funds

Ceres Traffic Signal Morgan and Service Road $ 304,150 $ 130,150 $ 434,300 Claus Road between Briggsmore Avenue and Modesto Signal Coordination Creekwood Drive $ 47,250 $ 27,750 $ 75,000

Modesto Signal Coordination Scenic Drive between Bodem Street and Oakdale Road $ 63,000 $ 37,000 $ 100,000 1) Monte Vista Ave between N. Tegner Rd and Golden State Blvd. 2) Golden State Blvd between Olive Ave and East Ave Turlock Traffic Signal Synchronization 3) Geer Rd between Monte Vista Ave and Hawkeye Ave $ 20,350 Toll Credits $ 20,350

Turlock Signal Synchronization Monte Vista Ave between Geer Road and Berkeley Ave $ 13,448 Toll Credits $ 13,448 Totals $ 448,198 $ 194,900 $ 643,098

Intersection Signalization Grouped Projects - FFY 2021/22 CMAQ Agency Project Description Project Location Local Funds Project Cost Federal Funds Claus Road between Briggsmore Avenue and Modesto Signal Coordination Creekwood Drive $ 189,000 $ 111,000 $ 300,000

Modesto Signal Coordination Scenic Drive between Bodem Street and Oakdale Road $ 252,000 $ 148,000 $ 400,000

Turlock Traffic Signal West Main and Tegner $ 1,100,000 Toll Credits $ 1,100,000 1) Monte Vista Ave between N. Tegner Rd and Golden State Blvd. 2) Golden State Blvd between Olive Ave and East Ave Turlock Traffic Signal Synchronization 3) Geer Rd between Monte Vista Ave and Hawkeye Ave $ 234,025 Toll Credits $ 234,025

Turlock Signal Synchronization Monte Vista Ave between Geer Road and Berkeley Ave $ 103,098 Toll Credits $ 103,098

Turlock Signalize Walnut/Taylor Intersection Improvements $ 85,000 Toll Credits $ 85,000

Waterford Traffic Signal Yosemite and Pasadena Signalization Improvements $ 500,000 $ 100,000 $ 600,000 Totals $ 2,463,123 $ 359,000 $ 2,822,123 Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ)

Ride-Sharing/Van-Pooling, Telework Grouped Projects - FFY 2020/21 CMAQ Agency Project Description Project Location Local Funds Project Cost Federal Funds

Modesto Rideshare Program City of Modesto Rideshare Program $ 80,000 Toll Credits $ 80,000

StanCOG Regional Rideshare Program Regional Rideshare Program $ 320,000 Toll Credits $ 320,000

StanCOG Regional Telework Program Regionwide $ 983,458 Toll Credits $ 983,458 Totals $ 1,383,458 $ - $ 1,383,458

Ride-Sharing/Van-Pooling, Telework Grouped Projects - FFY 2021/22 CMAQ Agency Project Description Project Location Local Funds Project Cost Federal Funds

Modesto Rideshare Program City of Modesto Rideshare Program $ 81,000 Toll Credits $ 81,000

StanCOG Regional Rideshare Program Regional Rideshare Program $ 324,000 Toll Credits $ 324,000

StanCOG Regional Telework Program Regionwide $ 187,198 Toll Credits $ 187,198 Totals $ 592,198 $ - $ 592,198 Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ)

Traffic Control Devices Grouped Projects - FFY 2020/21 CMAQ Agency Project Description Project Location Local Funds Project Cost Federal Funds

Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Signal Synchronization Phase III: Service/Blaker Road from Blaker Rd to Central Ave.; Central Ave/Don Pedro from E Service Rd to Don Pedro Rd. ; Don Pedro Rd Ceres Traffic Control Devices at Mitchell Road existing FO communication $ 218,492 $ 28,308 $ 246,800

ITS Signal Sychronization Phase IV: on Crows Landing/Hackett Road and Crows Landing/Whitmore Ceres Traffic Control Devices Road, Whitmore/Morgan Road $ 402,335 $ 83,412 $ 485,747

Modesto Traffic Control Devices Radio Communication Upgrades $ 122,500 Toll Credits $ 122,500

Modesto Traffic Control Devices Purchase of Travel Time Bluetooth Devices $ 150,000 Toll Credits $ 150,000

Modesto Traffic Control Devices Purchase of Video Detection Cameras $ 550,000 Toll Credits $ 550,000 Totals $ 1,443,327 $ 111,720 $ 1,555,047 Appendix D

Surface Transportation Block Grant Program Back Up List

Pavement Resurfacing and/or Rehabilitation Grouped Projects FFY 20/21

STBGP Agency Project Description Project Location Local Funds Total Project Cost Federal Funds

Blaker Road (Hackett to Whitmore Avenue) and Central Avenue Ceres Overlay (Industrial Way to Service Road) $ 527,673 $ 110,591 $ 638,264

Hughson Resurfacing Whitmore Avenue from Santa Fe Avenue to Euclid Avenue $ 175,000 $ 116,916 $ 291,916

Oakdale Pavement Reconstruction J Street Improvements (Davitt - 1st) $ 283,113 $ 137,415 $ 420,528

Riverbank Reconstruction Callendar Avenue - North of Topeka Street and South of Santa Fe Street $ 271,276 $ 600,083 $ 871,359

Turlock Rehabilitation Hedstrom Road between Geer Road and Colorado Avenue $ 874,236 Toll Credits $ 874,236

Phase M Albers Rd from Claribel Rd to Milnes Road within Stanislaus County Right- Stanislaus County Pavement Rehabilitation of-Way. Hickman Rd from E. Whitmore Avenue to S. Appling Rd $ 2,112,398 Toll Credits $ 2,112,398 Totals $ 4,243,696 $ 965,005 $ 5,208,701

Pavement Resurfacing and/or Rehabilitation Grouped Projects FFY 21/22

STBGP Agency Project Description Project Location Local Funds Total Project Cost Federal Funds

Ceres Overlay Whitmore Ave. from Crows Landing to Morgan Rd $ 527,460 $ 402,642 $ 930,102

Hughson Resurfacing Whitmore Avenue between Tully Road and Charles Street $ 175,000 $ 116,916 $ 291,916

Newman Rehabilitation The Intersection of Inyo Avenue & Canal School Road $ 373,076 Toll Credits $ 373,076

Newman Rehabilitation Inyo Avenue from L Street to Canal School Road $ 350,000 $ 20,073 $ 370,073

Oakdale Pavement Reconstruction J Street Improvements (Sierra - 5th) $ 282,999 $ 162,849 $ 445,848

Patterson Rehabilitation Sperry Avenue from American Eagle to Ward $ 534,361 $ 61,291 $ 595,652

Riverbank Overlay Santa Fe Street - Fifth Street to Seventh Street $ 271,276 $ 58,724 $ 330,000

Turlock Rehabilitation Pedras Road between Geer Road and Golden State Boulevard $ 873,883 Toll Credits $ 873,883

Waterford Pavement Reconstruction F Street Frontage Improvements: Western Avenue to 1st Street $ 50,000 $ 5,735 $ 55,735 Totals $ 3,438,055 $ 828,230 $ 4,266,285 Appendix E

2020 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Project List

Appendix F

Active Transportation Program (ATP) Back Up List

2021 FTIP

Stanislaus Council of Governments Active Transportation Program Grouped Project Listing

2021 FTIP Programming Years 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 ATP Local ATP Local ATP Local ATP Local State Total Project Local Local Local Local Agency Project Title Prior Funds Funds Funds Funds Funds Funds Funds Funds Only Cost Measure Measure Measure Measure 20-21 20-21 21-22 21-22 22-23 22-23 23-24 23-24 Funding Citywide Active Ceres $131,000 $119,000 $0 $12,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 x Transportation Plan

Safe Routes to School Morgan Ceres $979,000 $115,000 $674,000 $190,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 x Road Corridor Improvement

Paradise Road Area Modesto Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety $3,983,000 $392,000 $3,555,000 $36,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Improvements

High School G Street Bike/Ped Oakdale $703,000 $45,000 $658,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SB1 Corridor Improvements

Airport Neighborhood Active Stanislaus Transportation Connectivity $6,161,000 $484,000 $4,907,000 $0 $600,000 $0 $0 $170,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SB1 County and Safety Project

Bret Harte Elementary Safe Stanislaus Crossing and Active $3,005,000 $225,000 $0 $0 $183,000 $0 $0 $195,000 $2,402,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 County Transportation Connectivity Project City of Waterford SRTS Waterford $137,000 $21,000 $92,000 $24,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 x Crosswalks Safety project

Totals $15,099,000 $ 1,401,000 $9,886,000 $262,000 $783,000 $0 $0 $365,000 $2,402,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Appendix G

Highway Bridge Program (HBP) Back Up List

2018/19-2023/24 Highway Bridge Program

See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing provides the backup project information to support the lump sum amounts programmed in the FTIP. 11/6/2020, 8:58 AM

Notes: 1) This is the FTIP lump sum “backup” list for HBP funded projects. Please see the Local Assistance web site for the most current listings:

http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/hbrr99/HBP_FSTIP.html

2) The purpose of this list is to show which projects being advanced by local agencies have met the eligibility requirements of the federal Highway Bridge Program and have been prioritized for funding by the Department in cooperation with local agencies for funding.

3) Contractual funding levels are determined at time of federal authorization/obligation for given phase of work. For details see Chapter 3 of the Local Assistance Procedures Manual.

4) For FTIP/FSTIP purposes, Federal Highway Bridge Program (HBP) funding constraint is managed by Caltrans.

5) Prop 1B bond funds for the Local Seismic Safety Retrofit Program (LSSRP) used for matching federal funds are also managed by Caltrans.

6) Financial constraint of LOCAL matching funds (including regional STIP funds) and LOCAL Advance Construction (AC) is the responsibility of the MPOs and their local agencies.

7) Some projects show that they are programmed using State STP funds. These funds are HBP funds transferred to the STP for bridge work that is not ordinarily eligible for HBP funds. See the HB Program Guidelines for details. Do not confuse these STP funds with Regional STP funds.

8) Corrections to this report should be addressed to the District Local Assistance Engineer:

https://dot.ca.gov/programs/local-assistance/other-important-issues/local-assistance-contacts

Note id: 24

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 11/6/2020, 8:58 AM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt brf Page 1 2018/19-2023/24 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing provides the backup project information to support the lump sum amounts programmed in the FTIP. District: 10 County: Stanislaus Responsible Agency HBP-ID Project Description

Patterson 4097 BRIDGE NO. 38C0214, ROGERS ROAD OVER DELTA-MENDOTA CANAL, 0.5 MI N/O SPERRY AVE. Replace the existing 2 lane bridge with a 2 lane bridge (not capacity increasing).

Phase Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Project #: PE 550,000 100,000 184,750 834,750 5244(032) R/W 726,000 726,000 CON 6,013,000 6,013,000 Total 550,000 100,000 910,750 6,013,000 7,573,750

Fund Source Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 486,915 88,530 806,287 5,323,309 6,705,041 Local Match 63,085 11,470 104,463 689,691 868,709 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 550,000 100,000 910,750 6,013,000 7,573,750

PE Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 486,915 88,530 163,559 739,004 Local Match 63,085 11,470 21,191 95,746 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 550,000 100,000 184,750 834,750

R/W Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 642,728 642,728 Local Match 83,272 83,272 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 726,000 726,000

CON Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 5,323,309 5,323,309 Local Match 689,691 689,691 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 6,013,000 6,013,000

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 11/6/2020, 8:58 AM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt brf Page 2 2018/19-2023/24 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing provides the backup project information to support the lump sum amounts programmed in the FTIP. District: 10 County: Stanislaus Responsible Agency HBP-ID Project Description

Stanislaus County 2271 BRIDGE NO. 38C0003, SANTA FE AVENUE OVER TUOLUMNE RIVER, 1.0 MI S OF S.H. 132. Replacement with combination of LSSRP Seismic Retrofit funds.. No adding lane capacity.

Phase Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Project #: PE 1,532,531 1,532,531 5938(080) 5938(188) R/W 150,000 150,000 CON 14,189,464 4,056,491 18,245,955 Total 15,871,995 4,056,491 19,928,486

Fund Source Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 14,051,477 3,591,211 17,642,689 Local Match 1,356,786 465,280 1,822,065 LSSRP Bond 463,732 463,732 Local AC Total 15,871,995 4,056,491 19,928,486

PE Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 1,356,750 1,356,750 Local Match 175,781 175,781 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 1,532,531 1,532,531

R/W Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 132,795 132,795 Local Match 17,205 17,205 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 150,000 150,000

CON Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 12,561,932 3,591,211 16,153,144 Local Match 1,163,799 465,280 1,629,079 LSSRP Bond 463,732 463,732 Local AC Total 14,189,464 4,056,491 18,245,955

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 11/6/2020, 8:58 AM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt brf Page 3 2018/19-2023/24 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing provides the backup project information to support the lump sum amounts programmed in the FTIP. District: 10 County: Stanislaus Responsible Agency HBP-ID Project Description

Stanislaus County 2272 BRIDGE NO. 38C0004A, HICKMAN ROAD OVER TUOLUMNE RIVER, 0.15 MI S STATE ROUTE 132. Replace existing 2-lane bridge with a standard 2-lane bridge. (LSSRP contribution) .

Phase Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Project #: PE 2,040,000 2,040,000 5938(199) R/W 150,000 150,000 CON 20,930,000 1,674,696 22,604,696 Total 2,190,000 20,930,000 1,674,696 24,794,696

Fund Source Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 1,938,807 18,529,329 1,482,608 21,950,744 Local Match 251,193 1,818,569 192,088 2,261,849 LSSRP Bond -0 582,103 582,103 Local AC Total 2,190,000 20,930,000 1,674,696 24,794,696

PE Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 1,806,012 1,806,012 Local Match 233,988 233,988 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 2,040,000 2,040,000

R/W Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 132,795 132,795 Local Match 17,205 17,205 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 150,000 150,000

CON Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 18,529,329 1,482,608 20,011,937 Local Match 1,818,569 192,088 2,010,656 LSSRP Bond -0 582,103 582,103 Local AC Total 20,930,000 1,674,696 22,604,696

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 11/6/2020, 8:58 AM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt brf Page 4 2018/19-2023/24 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing provides the backup project information to support the lump sum amounts programmed in the FTIP. District: 10 County: Stanislaus Responsible Agency HBP-ID Project Description

Stanislaus County 3610 BRIDGE NO. 38C0009, CRABTREE ROAD OVER DRY CREEK, 1.8 MI. S/O WARNERVILLE RD. Replace 2-lane bridge with a standard 2-lane bridge. 9/14/2010: Toll Credits programmed for PE & CON. 10/1/2015: Toll credits used for R/W.

Phase Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Project #: PE 795,000 140,400 935,400 5938(227) R/W 75,000 75,000 CON 4,452,000 4,452,000 Total 795,000 215,400 4,452,000 5,462,400

Fund Source Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 795,000 215,400 4,452,000 5,462,400 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 795,000 215,400 4,452,000 5,462,400

PE Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 795,000 140,400 935,400 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 795,000 140,400 935,400

R/W Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 75,000 75,000 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 75,000 75,000

CON Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 4,452,000 4,452,000 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 4,452,000 4,452,000

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 11/6/2020, 8:58 AM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt brf Page 5 2018/19-2023/24 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing provides the backup project information to support the lump sum amounts programmed in the FTIP. District: 10 County: Stanislaus Responsible Agency HBP-ID Project Description

Stanislaus County 2273 BRIDGE NO. 38C0010, CROWS LANDING ROAD OVER SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, NEAR W. CARPENTER RD. Bridge replacement with limted LSSRP Seismic Retrofit funds. High cost agreement required.

Phase Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Project #: PE 2,233,000 2,233,000 5938(071) 5938(076) R/W 650,000 650,000 CON 19,463,478 3,277,404 22,740,882 Total 2,883,000 19,463,478 3,277,404 25,623,882

Fund Source Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 2,552,320 8,455,652 1,199,582 10,477,270 22,684,823 Local Match 330,680 2,232,461 -573,500 375,918 2,365,559 LSSRP Bond 573,500 573,500 Local AC 17,231,017 -8,455,652 -1,199,582 -7,575,784 Total 2,883,000 19,463,478 3,277,404 25,623,882

PE Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 1,976,875 1,976,875 Local Match 256,125 256,125 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 2,233,000 2,233,000

R/W Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 575,445 575,445 Local Match 74,555 74,555 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 650,000 650,000

CON Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 8,455,652 1,199,582 10,477,270 20,132,503 Local Match 2,232,461 -573,500 375,918 2,034,879 LSSRP Bond 573,500 573,500 Local AC 17,231,017 -8,455,652 -1,199,582 -7,575,784 Total 19,463,478 3,277,404 22,740,882

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 11/6/2020, 8:58 AM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt brf Page 6 2018/19-2023/24 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing provides the backup project information to support the lump sum amounts programmed in the FTIP. District: 10 County: Stanislaus Responsible Agency HBP-ID Project Description

Stanislaus County 3883 BRIDGE NO. 38C0033, LAS PALMAS AVENUE OVER SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, 3 MI N/E STATE ROUTE 33. Preventive Maintenance project. Repair and strengthen column/pile extension at Bents 4 through 8.

Phase Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Project #: PE 100,000 418,000 518,000 5938(200) R/W CON 3,920,000 3,920,000 Total 100,000 418,000 3,920,000 4,438,000

Fund Source Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 88,530 370,055 3,470,376 3,928,961 Local Match 11,470 47,945 449,624 509,039 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 100,000 418,000 3,920,000 4,438,000

PE Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 88,530 370,055 458,585 Local Match 11,470 47,945 59,415 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 100,000 418,000 518,000

CON Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 3,470,376 3,470,376 Local Match 449,624 449,624 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 3,920,000 3,920,000

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 11/6/2020, 8:58 AM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt brf Page 7 2018/19-2023/24 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing provides the backup project information to support the lump sum amounts programmed in the FTIP. District: 10 County: Stanislaus Responsible Agency HBP-ID Project Description

Stanislaus County 3628 BRIDGE NO. 38C0073, TIM BELL ROAD OVER DRY CREEK, 0.8 MI. S/O CLARIBEL ROAD. Replace historic 2-lane bridge with a standard 2-lane bridge. 9/14/2010: Toll Credits programmed for PE & CON. 1/27/2016: Toll credits used for R/W.

Phase Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Project #: PE 1,522,000 748,000 2,270,000 5938(189) R/W 110,000 110,000 CON 18,115,000 18,115,000 Total 1,522,000 110,000 748,000 18,115,000 20,495,000

Fund Source Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 1,522,000 110,000 748,000 18,115,000 20,495,000 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 1,522,000 110,000 748,000 18,115,000 20,495,000

PE Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 1,522,000 748,000 2,270,000 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 1,522,000 748,000 2,270,000

R/W Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 110,000 110,000 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 110,000 110,000

CON Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 18,115,000 18,115,000 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 18,115,000 18,115,000

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 11/6/2020, 8:58 AM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt brf Page 8 2018/19-2023/24 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing provides the backup project information to support the lump sum amounts programmed in the FTIP. District: 10 County: Stanislaus Responsible Agency HBP-ID Project Description

Stanislaus County 4502 BRIDGE NO. 38C0078, OAKDALE-WATERFORD HIGHWAY OVER CLARIBEL LATERAL, 0.5 MI N/O CLARIBEL RD. Replace existing 2-lane Change! bridge with a standard 2-lane bridge. 10/12/2016 10:40:13 AM.

Phase Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Project #: PE 725,000 81,000 806,000 5938(259) R/W 150,000 150,000 CON 2,900,000 2,900,000 Total 725,000 81,000 150,000 2,900,000 3,856,000

Fund Source Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 641,843 71,709 132,795 2,567,370 3,413,717 Local Match 83,158 9,291 17,205 332,630 442,283 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 725,000 81,000 150,000 2,900,000 3,856,000

PE Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 641,843 71,709 713,552 Local Match 83,158 9,291 92,448 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 725,000 81,000 806,000

R/W Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 132,795 132,795 Local Match 17,205 17,205 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 150,000 150,000

CON Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 2,567,370 2,567,370 Local Match 332,630 332,630 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 2,900,000 2,900,000

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 11/6/2020, 8:58 AM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt brf Page 9 2018/19-2023/24 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing provides the backup project information to support the lump sum amounts programmed in the FTIP. District: 10 County: Stanislaus Responsible Agency HBP-ID Project Description

Stanislaus County 3619 BRIDGE NO. 38C0150, GILBERT ROAD OVER TURLOCK IRRIGATION DISTRICT (TID) CERES MAIN CANAL, S/O HATCH ROAD. Replace 2-lane bridge with a new 2-lane bridge. 9/16/2010: Toll Credits programmed for PE & CON.

Phase Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Project #: PE 443,000 443,000 5938(190) R/W CON 1,993,750 1,993,750 Total 443,000 1,993,750 2,436,750

Fund Source Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 443,000 1,993,750 2,436,750 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC 1,993,750 -1,993,750 Total 443,000 1,993,750 2,436,750

PE Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 443,000 443,000 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 443,000 443,000

CON Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 1,993,750 1,993,750 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC 1,993,750 -1,993,750 Total 1,993,750 1,993,750

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 11/6/2020, 8:58 AM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt brf Page 10 2018/19-2023/24 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing provides the backup project information to support the lump sum amounts programmed in the FTIP. District: 10 County: Stanislaus Responsible Agency HBP-ID Project Description

Stanislaus County 3652 BRIDGE NO. 38C0154, PLEASANT VALLEY ROAD OVER SOUTH SAN JOAQUIN MAIN CANAL, 0.3 MI. E/O VICTORY ROAD. Replace 2-lane bridge with a standard 2-lane bridge. 9/20/2010: Toll Credits programmed for PE & CON.

Phase Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Project #: PE 613,000 613,000 5938(226) R/W CON 3,058,750 3,058,750 Total 613,000 3,058,750 3,671,750

Fund Source Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 613,000 3,058,750 3,671,750 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC 3,058,750 -3,058,750 Total 613,000 3,058,750 3,671,750

PE Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 613,000 613,000 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 613,000 613,000

CON Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 3,058,750 3,058,750 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC 3,058,750 -3,058,750 Total 3,058,750 3,058,750

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 11/6/2020, 8:58 AM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt brf Page 11 2018/19-2023/24 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing provides the backup project information to support the lump sum amounts programmed in the FTIP. District: 10 County: Stanislaus Responsible Agency HBP-ID Project Description

Stanislaus County 4497 BRIDGE NO. 38C0157, MONTPELIER ROAD, OVER T.I.D. MAIN CANAL, AT DALLAS RD. Replace existing 2-lane bridge with 2-lane bridge. 10/11/2016 3:33:50 PM.

Phase Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Project #: PE 850,000 850,000 5938(260) R/W 100,000 100,000 CON 3,400,000 3,400,000 Total 850,000 100,000 3,400,000 4,350,000

Fund Source Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 752,505 88,530 3,010,020 3,851,055 Local Match 97,495 11,470 389,980 498,945 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 850,000 100,000 3,400,000 4,350,000

PE Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 752,505 752,505 Local Match 97,495 97,495 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 850,000 850,000

R/W Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 88,530 88,530 Local Match 11,470 11,470 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 100,000 100,000

CON Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 3,010,020 3,010,020 Local Match 389,980 389,980 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 3,400,000 3,400,000

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 11/6/2020, 8:58 AM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt brf Page 12 2018/19-2023/24 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing provides the backup project information to support the lump sum amounts programmed in the FTIP. District: 10 County: Stanislaus Responsible Agency HBP-ID Project Description

Stanislaus County 359 BRIDGE NO. 38C0168, KILBURN ROAD OVER ORESTIMBA CREEK, .45 MI S CROWS LANDING RD. Replace historic 2-lane bridge with a standard 2-lane bridge on improved alignment (No Added Lane Capacity). 4/1/2010: Toll Credits programmed for PE, R/W, & Con.

Phase Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Project #: PE 683,000 140,129 422,870 1,245,999 5938(157) R/W 72,000 72,000 CON 2,807,000 2,807,000 Total 683,000 140,129 72,000 422,870 2,807,000 4,124,999

Fund Source Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 683,000 140,129 72,000 422,870 2,807,000 4,124,999 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 683,000 140,129 72,000 422,870 2,807,000 4,124,999

PE Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 683,000 140,129 422,870 1,245,999 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 683,000 140,129 422,870 1,245,999

R/W Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 72,000 72,000 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 72,000 72,000

CON Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 2,807,000 2,807,000 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 2,807,000 2,807,000

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 11/6/2020, 8:58 AM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt brf Page 13 2018/19-2023/24 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing provides the backup project information to support the lump sum amounts programmed in the FTIP. District: 10 County: Stanislaus Responsible Agency HBP-ID Project Description

Stanislaus County 3666 BRIDGE NO. 38C0170, COOPERSTOWN ROAD OVER GALLUP CREEK, 2.8 MI. NW/O LA GRANGE ROAD. Replace 2-lane bridge with a standard 2-lane bridge. 9/21/2010: Toll Credits programmed for PE & CON. 7/23/2013: Toll credits used for R/W.

Phase Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Project #: PE 455,000 90,000 545,000 5938(191) R/W 25,000 25,000 CON 2,500,000 2,500,000 Total 455,000 115,000 2,500,000 3,070,000

Fund Source Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 455,000 115,000 2,500,000 3,070,000 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 455,000 115,000 2,500,000 3,070,000

PE Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 455,000 90,000 545,000 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 455,000 90,000 545,000

R/W Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 25,000 25,000 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 25,000 25,000

CON Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 2,500,000 2,500,000 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 2,500,000 2,500,000

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 11/6/2020, 8:58 AM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt brf Page 14 2018/19-2023/24 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing provides the backup project information to support the lump sum amounts programmed in the FTIP. District: 10 County: Stanislaus Responsible Agency HBP-ID Project Description

Stanislaus County 3675 BRIDGE NO. 38C0180, SHIELLS ROAD OVER CENTRAL CALIFORNIA IRRIGATION DISTRICT (CCID) MAIN CANAL, 0.42 MI. E/O EASTIN ROAD. Replace 2-lane bridge with a standard 2-lane bridge. 9/22/2010: Toll Credits programmed for PE & CON. 9/27/2016: Toll credits used for R/W.

Phase Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Project #: PE 440,000 440,000 5938(192) R/W CON 1,612,500 269,884 1,882,384 Total 2,052,500 269,884 2,322,384

Fund Source Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 2,052,500 269,884 2,322,384 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 2,052,500 269,884 2,322,384

PE Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 440,000 440,000 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 440,000 440,000

R/W Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total

CON Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 1,612,500 269,884 1,882,384 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 1,612,500 269,884 1,882,384

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 11/6/2020, 8:58 AM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt brf Page 15 2018/19-2023/24 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing provides the backup project information to support the lump sum amounts programmed in the FTIP. District: 10 County: Stanislaus Responsible Agency HBP-ID Project Description

Stanislaus County 3872 BRIDGE NO. 38C0231, MILTON ROAD OVER ROCK CREEK TRIBUTARY, 3.7 MI. N/O SR 4. Replace 2-lane bridge with a standard 2-lane bridge.

Phase Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Project #: PE 675,000 100,000 775,000 5938(201) R/W 75,000 75,000 CON 3,780,000 3,780,000 Total 675,000 175,000 3,780,000 4,630,000

Fund Source Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 597,578 154,928 3,346,434 4,098,939 Local Match 77,423 20,073 433,566 531,061 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 675,000 175,000 3,780,000 4,630,000

PE Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 597,578 88,530 686,108 Local Match 77,423 11,470 88,893 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 675,000 100,000 775,000

R/W Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 66,398 66,398 Local Match 8,603 8,603 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 75,000 75,000

CON Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 3,346,434 3,346,434 Local Match 433,566 433,566 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 3,780,000 3,780,000

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 11/6/2020, 8:58 AM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt brf Page 16 2018/19-2023/24 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing provides the backup project information to support the lump sum amounts programmed in the FTIP. District: 10 County: Stanislaus Responsible Agency HBP-ID Project Description

Stanislaus County 4500 BRIDGE NO. 38C0232, MILTON ROAD, OVER HOODS CREEK, 1.6 MI S/O SR4. Replace existing 2 lane bridge with new 2 lane bridge.

Phase Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Project #: PE 925,000 925,000 5938(262) R/W 100,000 100,000 CON 3,700,000 3,700,000 Total 925,000 100,000 3,700,000 4,725,000

Fund Source Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 818,903 88,530 3,275,610 4,183,043 Local Match 106,098 11,470 424,390 541,958 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 925,000 100,000 3,700,000 4,725,000

PE Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 818,903 818,903 Local Match 106,098 106,098 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 925,000 925,000

R/W Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 88,530 88,530 Local Match 11,470 11,470 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 100,000 100,000

CON Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 3,275,610 3,275,610 Local Match 424,390 424,390 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 3,700,000 3,700,000

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 11/6/2020, 8:58 AM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt brf Page 17 2018/19-2023/24 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing provides the backup project information to support the lump sum amounts programmed in the FTIP. District: 10 County: Stanislaus Responsible Agency HBP-ID Project Description

Stanislaus County 3677 BRIDGE NO. 38C0236, ST. FRANCIS AVENUE OVER MODESTO IRRIGATION DISTRICT (MID) MAIN CANAL, 0.1 MI. W/O McHENRY AVENUE. Replace 2-lane bridge with a standard 2-lane bridge. 9/22/2010: Toll Credits programmed for PE & CON. 9/17/2014: Toll credits used for R/W.

Phase Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Project #: PE 360,000 360,000 5938(193) R/W 25,000 25,000 CON 2,650,000 2,650,000 Total 385,000 2,650,000 3,035,000

Fund Source Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 385,000 2,650,000 3,035,000 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 385,000 2,650,000 3,035,000

PE Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 360,000 360,000 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 360,000 360,000

R/W Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 25,000 25,000 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 25,000 25,000

CON Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 2,650,000 2,650,000 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 2,650,000 2,650,000

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 11/6/2020, 8:58 AM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt brf Page 18 2018/19-2023/24 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing provides the backup project information to support the lump sum amounts programmed in the FTIP. District: 10 County: Stanislaus Responsible Agency HBP-ID Project Description

Stanislaus County 3682 BRIDGE NO. 38C0257, COOPERSTOWN ROAD OVER RYDBERG CREEK, 3.9 MI. NW/O LA GRANGE ROAD. Replace 2-lane bridge with a standard 2-lane bridge. 9/28/2010: Toll Credits programmed for PE & CON. 7/23/2013: Toll credits used for R/W.

Phase Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Project #: PE 762,000 25,000 787,000 5938(194) R/W 75,000 75,000 CON 2,925,190 2,925,190 Total 762,000 75,000 25,000 2,925,190 3,787,190

Fund Source Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 762,000 75,000 25,000 2,925,190 3,787,190 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 762,000 75,000 25,000 2,925,190 3,787,190

PE Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 762,000 25,000 787,000 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 762,000 25,000 787,000

R/W Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 75,000 75,000 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 75,000 75,000

CON Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 2,925,190 2,925,190 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 2,925,190 2,925,190

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 11/6/2020, 8:58 AM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt brf Page 19 2018/19-2023/24 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing provides the backup project information to support the lump sum amounts programmed in the FTIP. District: 10 County: Stanislaus Responsible Agency HBP-ID Project Description

Stanislaus County 4504 BRIDGE NO. 38C0262, PIONEER AVENUE, OVER LONE TREE CREEK, 100FT S/O FREELOVE ROAD. Replace existing functionally obsolete 2-lane bridge with a standard 2-lane bridge (No Added Lane Capacity). 10/12/2016: Toll Credits programmed for PE, R/W, & CON.

Phase Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Project #: PE 625,000 196,000 821,000 5938(261) R/W 100,000 100,000 CON 2,500,000 2,500,000 Total 625,000 296,000 2,500,000 3,421,000

Fund Source Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 625,000 296,000 2,500,000 3,421,000 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 625,000 296,000 2,500,000 3,421,000

PE Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 625,000 196,000 821,000 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 625,000 196,000 821,000

R/W Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 100,000 100,000 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 100,000 100,000

CON Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 2,500,000 2,500,000 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 2,500,000 2,500,000

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 11/6/2020, 8:58 AM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt brf Page 20 2018/19-2023/24 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing provides the backup project information to support the lump sum amounts programmed in the FTIP. District: 10 County: Stanislaus Responsible Agency HBP-ID Project Description

Stanislaus County 3805 BRIDGE NO. 38C0272, SONORA ROAD OVER MARTELLS CREEK, 0.1 MI E/O FRANKENHEIMER RD. Scour Countermeasure. 3/11/2011: Toll Credits programmed for PE & CON. 6/6/2019: Toll credits used for R/W.

Phase Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Project #: PE 28,969 422,515 102,000 553,484 5938(203) R/W CON 1,848,000 1,848,000 Total 28,969 422,515 102,000 1,848,000 2,401,484

Fund Source Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 28,969 119,515 405,000 1,848,000 2,401,484 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC 303,000 -303,000 Total 28,969 422,515 102,000 1,848,000 2,401,484

PE Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 28,969 119,515 405,000 553,484 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC 303,000 -303,000 Total 28,969 422,515 102,000 553,484

CON Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 1,848,000 1,848,000 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 1,848,000 1,848,000

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 11/6/2020, 8:58 AM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt brf Page 21 2018/19-2023/24 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing provides the backup project information to support the lump sum amounts programmed in the FTIP. District: 10 County: Stanislaus Responsible Agency HBP-ID Project Description

Stanislaus County 3687 BRIDGE NO. 38C0302, TEGNER ROAD OVER TURLOCK IRRIGATION DISTRICT (TID) LATERAL #5, AT JCT W/ HARDING ROAD. Replace 2-lane bridge with a standard 2-lane bridge. 9/23/2010: Toll Credits programmed for PE & CON. 9/17/2013: Toll credits used for R/W.

Phase Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Project #: PE 380,000 380,000 5938(196) R/W 50,000 50,000 CON 1,950,000 40,000 1,990,000 Total 2,380,000 40,000 2,420,000

Fund Source Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 2,380,000 40,000 2,420,000 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 2,380,000 40,000 2,420,000

PE Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 380,000 380,000 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 380,000 380,000

R/W Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 50,000 50,000 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 50,000 50,000

CON Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 1,950,000 40,000 1,990,000 Local Match LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 1,950,000 40,000 1,990,000

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 11/6/2020, 8:58 AM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt brf Page 22 2018/19-2023/24 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing provides the backup project information to support the lump sum amounts programmed in the FTIP. District: 10 County: Stanislaus Responsible Agency HBP-ID Project Description

Stanislaus County 2282 BRIDGE NO. 39C0001, RIVER ROAD OVER SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, STANISLAUS COUNTY LINE. LSSRP Seismic Retrofit

Phase Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Project #: PE 1,696,000 900,000 960,000 3,556,000 5938(037) 5938(176) R/W 276,000 276,000 CON 18,150,000 18,150,000 Total 1,696,000 900,000 1,236,000 18,150,000 21,982,000

Fund Source Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 1,501,469 796,770 1,094,231 16,068,195 19,460,665 Local Match 194,531 103,230 110,112 407,873 LSSRP Bond 31,657 2,081,805 2,113,462 Local AC Total 1,696,000 900,000 1,236,000 18,150,000 21,982,000

PE Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 1,501,469 796,770 849,888 3,148,127 Local Match 194,531 103,230 110,112 407,873 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 1,696,000 900,000 960,000 3,556,000

R/W Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 244,343 244,343 Local Match LSSRP Bond 31,657 31,657 Local AC Total 276,000 276,000

CON Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 16,068,195 16,068,195 Local Match LSSRP Bond 2,081,805 2,081,805 Local AC Total 18,150,000 18,150,000

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 11/6/2020, 8:58 AM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt brf Page 23 2018/19-2023/24 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing provides the backup project information to support the lump sum amounts programmed in the FTIP. District: 10 County: Stanislaus Responsible Agency HBP-ID Project Description

Stanislaus County 4610 BRIDGE NO. PM00185, Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program (BPMP) various bridges in Stanislaus County. See Caltrans Local Assistance HBP website for backup list of projects.

Phase Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Project #: PE 850,000 850,000 R/W CON 2,391,000 2,391,000 Total 850,000 2,391,000 3,241,000

Fund Source Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 752,505 2,116,752 2,869,257 Local Match 97,495 274,248 371,743 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 850,000 2,391,000 3,241,000

PE Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 752,505 752,505 Local Match 97,495 97,495 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 850,000 850,000

CON Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 2,116,752 2,116,752 Local Match 274,248 274,248 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 2,391,000 2,391,000

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 11/6/2020, 8:58 AM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt brf Page 24 2018/19-2023/24 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing provides the backup project information to support the lump sum amounts programmed in the FTIP. District: 10 County: Stanislaus Responsible Agency HBP-ID Project Description

Stanislaus County 4632 BRIDGE NO. PM00192. Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program (BPMP) various bridges in Stanislaus County - scour countermeasures. See Caltrans Local Assistance HBP website for backup list of projects.

Phase Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Project #: PE 825,000 825,000 R/W CON 2,445,000 2,445,000 Total 825,000 2,445,000 3,270,000

Fund Source Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 730,373 2,164,559 2,894,931 Local Match 94,628 280,442 375,069 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 825,000 2,445,000 3,270,000

PE Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 730,373 730,373 Local Match 94,628 94,628 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 825,000 825,000

CON Summary: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 2,164,559 2,164,559 Local Match 280,442 280,442 LSSRP Bond Local AC Total 2,445,000 2,445,000

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 11/6/2020, 8:58 AM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt brf Page 25 2018/19-2023/24 Highway Bridge Program See the appropriate FTIP/FSTIP for current funding commitments. This listing provides the backup project information to support the lump sum amounts programmed in the FTIP. District: 10 County: Stanislaus Responsible Agency HBP-ID Project Description

MPO Summary: Stanislaus Area Association Of Governments Number of Projects: 24 Totals: Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Beyond Total Fed $ 31,336,564 23,020,124 2,838,250 16,288,060 8,177,536 10,698,595 1,482,878 76,489,815 170,331,821 Local Match 2,285,168 2,331,793 2,519,211 -266,712 255,408 404,593 192,123 3,274,570 10,996,153 LSSRP Bond 463,732 582,103 573,500 31,657 2,081,805 3,732,797 Local AC 303,000 22,283,517 -13,508,152 -1,502,582 -7,575,784

Total for all Phases 34,085,464 26,237,019 27,640,978 3,086,696 6,962,020 3,527,404 1,675,000 81,846,190 185,060,771

Caltrans, Division of Local Assistance 11/6/2020, 8:58 AM Det2 FL4 SmlTxt brf Page 26 Appendix H

Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Back Up List

Caltrans Division of Local Assistance Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) 2019 FTIP Back-Up List, sorted by MPO, Agency and Unique Project ID 12/15/2020

Federal Funds Programmed Current Total Current Approved Unique HR3 Other/Local District Agency MPO Project Location Description of Work Project Cost Programmed "Prior" 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Federal Funds Project ID Eligibility* Funds Estimate Federal Funds (total)

Intersections of Paradise Rd at Install Rectangular Rapid Flashing Stanislaus H9-10-011 No 10 STANCOG Vernon Ave and 9th Street at Stella Beacons (RRFBs) at uncontrolled $365,400 $221,300 $115,400 $28,700 $0 $221,300 $0 $0 $250,000 County Ave. crossings.

Total (STANCOG) $365,400 $221,300 $115,400 $28,700 $0 $221,300 $0 $0 $250,000

Page 1 of 1 Printed On: 12/15/2020 Appendix I

State Highway Operations and Protection Program (SHOPP) Back Up List

Stanislaus Council of Governments 2020 SHOPP Lump Sum by Category and Fund Type Dollars x $1000

TOTAL PRIOR 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 24/25 PE RW CON Stanislaus County

SHOPP - Bridge Preservation Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account $14,611 $894 $1,962 $11,755 $2,841 $37 $11,733

TOTAL $14,611 $894 $1,962 $11,755 $2,841 $37 $11,733

SHOPP - Collision Reduction Surface Transportation Program $8,599 $1,501 $1,925 $5,173 $3,112 $1,115 $4,372

TOTAL $8,599 $1,501 $1,925 $5,173 $3,112 $1,115 $4,372

SHOPP - Mandates National Hwy System $9,543 $2,827 $416 $4,548 $1,752 $3,374 $845 $5,324

TOTAL $9,543 $2,827 $416 $4,548 $1,752 $3,374 $845 $5,324

SHOPP - Mobility Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account $14,800 $1,100 $1,670 $12,030 $2,520 $910 $11,370

TOTAL $14,800 $1,100 $1,670 $12,030 $2,520 $910 $11,370

SHOPP - Roadside Preservation National Hwy System $26,930 $544 $26,386 $529 $32 $26,369

TOTAL $26,930 $544 $26,386 $529 $32 $26,369

SHOPP - Roadway Preservation National Hwy System $9,957 $1,526 $8,431 $1,420 $106 $8,431

TOTAL $9,957 $1,526 $8,431 $1,420 $106 $8,431 County TOTAL $84,440 $4,353 $12,886 $8,180 $40,066 $18,955 $13,796 $3,045 $67,599

MPO TOTAL $84,440 $4,353 $12,886 $8,180 $40,066 $18,955 $13,796 $3,045 $67,599

1/24/2021 5:29:25PM Stanislaus Council of Governments 2020 SHOPP Lump Sum by Category and Fund Type Dollars x $1000

MPO_ID CTIPS ID CO Dist EA Route DESCRIPTION PE RW CON

SHOPP - Bridge Preservation

Stanislaus County

Near Patterson, from Fink Road Undercrossing No. 38-0114L to Khaksa Road 2,841 37 11,733 11400000211 STA 10 1H280 5 Undercrossing No. 38-0127L/R at various locations. Rehabilitate bridge decks with concrete overlay, replace joint seals and/or approach slabs. County Total 2,841 37 11,733

MPO SHOPP - Bridge Preservation Total: 2,841 37 11,733

1/24/2021 5:29:25PM Stanislaus Council of Governments 2020 SHOPP Lump Sum by Category and Fund Type Dollars x $1000

MPO_ID CTIPS ID CO Dist EA Route DESCRIPTION PE RW CON

SHOPP - Collision Reduction

Stanislaus County

In Riverbank, at Claus Road intersection. Intersection improvements. 3,112 1,115 4,372 11400000216 STA 10 1K840 108

County Total 3,112 1,115 4,372

MPO SHOPP - Collision Reduction Total: 3,112 1,115 4,372

1/24/2021 5:29:25PM Stanislaus Council of Governments 2020 SHOPP Lump Sum by Category and Fund Type Dollars x $1000

MPO_ID CTIPS ID CO Dist EA Route DESCRIPTION PE RW CON

SHOPP - Mandates

Stanislaus County

In Waterford, from Reinway Avenue to F Street. Upgrade pedestrian facilities to 2,020 807 3,572 11400000205 STA 10 1G420 132 make compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards.

In Modesto, near Zeff Road Undercrossing. Construct stormwater Best 1,354 38 1,752 11400000214 STA 10 1H600 99 Management Practices (BMPs).

County Total 3,374 845 5,324

MPO SHOPP - Mandates Total: 3,374 845 5,324

1/24/2021 5:29:25PM Stanislaus Council of Governments 2020 SHOPP Lump Sum by Category and Fund Type Dollars x $1000

MPO_ID CTIPS ID CO Dist EA Route DESCRIPTION PE RW CON

SHOPP - Mobility

Stanislaus County

In Stanislaus and San Joaquin Counties, on various routes at various locations. 2,520 910 11,370 11400000212 STA 10 1F970 99 Install Transportation Management System (TMS) elements, and enhance highway worker safety. County Total 2,520 910 11,370

MPO SHOPP - Mobility Total: 2,520 910 11,370

1/24/2021 5:29:25PM Stanislaus Council of Governments 2020 SHOPP Lump Sum by Category and Fund Type Dollars x $1000

MPO_ID CTIPS ID CO Dist EA Route DESCRIPTION PE RW CON

SHOPP - Roadside Preservation

Stanislaus County

Near Westley, at the Westley Safety Roadside Rest Area (SRRA). Replace 529 32 26,369 11400000193 STA 10 1C270 5 SRRA buildings.

County Total 529 32 26,369

MPO SHOPP - Roadside Preservation Total: 529 32 26,369

1/24/2021 5:29:25PM Stanislaus Council of Governments 2020 SHOPP Lump Sum by Category and Fund Type Dollars x $1000

MPO_ID CTIPS ID CO Dist EA Route DESCRIPTION PE RW CON

SHOPP - Roadway Preservation

Stanislaus County

In and near Ceres and Modesto, at various locations from Mitchell Road to Kansas 1,420 106 8,431 11400000203 STA 10 1E620 99 Avenue; also in Merced County, on Route 59 near the city of Merced, at Childs Avenue (PM 14.0). Upgrade drainage pump plants. County Total 1,420 106 8,431

MPO SHOPP - Roadway Preservation Total: 1,420 106 8,431

1/24/2021 5:29:25PM Appendix J

Exempt Categories and Grouped Classifications

Table 2 Exempt Projects (§193.126)

Notwithstanding the other requirements of this subpart, highway and transit projects of the types listed in Table 2 of this section are exempt from the requirement to determine conformity. Such projects may proceed toward implementation even in the absence of a conforming transportation plan and TIP. A particular action of the type listed in Table 2 of this section is not exempt if the MPO in consultation with other agencies (see §93.105(c)(1)(iii)), the EPA, and the FHWA (in the case of a highway project) or the FTA (in the case of a transit project) concur that it has potentially adverse emissions impacts for any reason. States and MPOs must ensure that exempt projects do not interfere with TCM implementation.

TABLE 2—EXEMPT PROJECTS, 40 CFR 93.126 Safety 1. Railroad/highway crossing. 2. Projects that correct, improve, or eliminate a hazardous location or feature. 3. Safer non-Federal-aid system roads. 4. Shoulder improvements. 5. Increasing sight distance. 6. Highway Safety Improvement Program implementation. 7. Traffic control devices and operating assistance other than signalization projects. 8. Railroad/highway crossing warning devices. 9. Guardrails, median barriers, crash cushions. 10. Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation. 11. Pavement marking. 12. Emergency relief (23 U.S.C. 125). 13. Fencing. 14. Skid treatments. 15. Safety roadside rest areas. 16. Adding medians. 17. Truck climbing lanes outside the urbanized area. 18. Lighting improvements. 19. Widening narrow pavements or reconstructing bridges (no additional travel lanes). 20. Emergency truck pullovers.

Mass Transit 1. Operating assistance to transit agencies. 2. Purchase of support vehicles. 3. Rehabilitation of transit vehicles1. 4. Purchase of office, shop, and operating equipment for existing facilities. 5. Purchase of operating equipment for vehicles (e.g., radios, fareboxes, lifts, etc.). 6. Construction or renovation of power, signal, and communications systems. 7. Construction of small passenger shelters and information kiosks. 8. Reconstruction or renovation of transit buildings and structures (e.g., rail or bus buildings, storage and maintenance facilities, stations, terminals, and ancillary structures). 9. Rehabilitation or reconstruction of track structures, track, and trackbed in existing rights- 1 of-way. 10. Purchase of new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for minor expansions of the fleet1. 11. Construction of new bus or rail storage/maintenance facilities categorically excluded in 23 CFR part 771.

Air Quality 1. Continuation of ride-sharing and van-pooling promotion activities at current levels. 2. Bicycle and pedestrian facilities.

Other 1. Specific activities which do not involve or lead directly to construction, such as: • Planning and technical studies. • Grants for training and research programs. • Planning activities conducted pursuant to titles 23 and 49 U.S.C. • Federal-aid systems revisions. 2. Engineering to assess social, economic, and environmental effects of the proposed action or alternatives to that action. 3. Noise attenuation. 4. Emergency or hardship advance land acquisitions (23 CFR 710.503). 5. Acquisition of scenic easements. 6. Plantings, landscaping, etc. 7. Sign removal. 8. Directional and informational signs. 9. Transportation enhancement activities (except rehabilitation and operation of historic transportation buildings, structures, or facilities). 10. Repair of damage caused by natural disasters, civil unrest, or terrorist acts, except projects involving substantial functional, locational or capacity changes.

NOTE: In PM10 and PM2.5 nonattainment or maintenance areas, such projects are exempt only if they are in compliance with control measures in the applicable implementation plan.

[62 FR 43801, Aug. 15, 1997, as amended at 69 FR 40081, July 1, 2004; 71 FR 12510, Mar. 10, 2006; 73 FR 4441, Jan. 24, 2008]

§93.127 Projects exempt from regional emissions analyses.

Notwithstanding the other requirements of this subpart, highway and transit projects of the types listed in Table 3 of this section are exempt from regional emissions analysis requirements. The local effects of these projects with respect to CO concentrations must be considered to determine if a hot-spot analysis is required prior to making a project-level conformity determination. The local effects of projects with respect to PM10 and PM2.5concentrations must be considered and a hot-spot analysis performed prior to making a project-level conformity determination, if a project in Table 3 also meets the criteria in §93.123(b)(1). These projects may then proceed to the project development process even in the absence of a conforming transportation plan and TIP. A particular action of the type listed in Table 3 of this section is not exempt from regional emissions analysis if the MPO in consultation with other agencies (see §93.105(c)(1)(iii)), the EPA, and the 2 FHWA (in the case of a highway project) or the FTA (in the case of a transit project) concur that it has potential regional impacts for any reason. Table 3 follows:

TABLE 3—PROJECTS EXEMPT FROM REGIONAL EMISSIONS ANALYSES 1. Intersection channelization projects. 2. Intersection signalization projects at individual intersections. 3. Interchange reconfiguration projects. 4. Changes in vertical and horizontal alignment. 5. Truck size and weight inspection stations. 6. Bus terminals and transfer points.

[58 FR 62235, Nov. 24, 1993, as amended at 71 FR 12511, Mar. 10, 2006]

§ 93.128 Traffic signal synchronization projects. Traffic signal synchronization projects may be approved, funded, and implemented without satisfying the requirements of this subpart. However, all subsequent regional emissions analyses required by §§ 93.118 and 93.119 for transportation plans, TIPs, or projects not from a conforming plan and TIP must include such regionally significant traffic signal synchronization projects.

3 Appendix K

Authority Delegation to StanCOG Executive Director to Approve Administrative Modifications

Appendix L

Public Engagement – Notice/Proof of Publication

Public Engagement Public participation is critical to successful regional transportation planning and programming. When the public is engaged in the planning process, the input received helps ensure that needs are being addressed. It also ensures that the public gains a better understanding of the tradeoffs and constraints associated with transportation planning. StanCOG, as the MPO, is required to ensure that the public has access to, and can participate in, the development of long-range planning and shorter-term programming documents. Federal legislation requires that StanCOG develop a public participation plan (PPP) that spells out the methods by which the MPO will provide reasonable opportunities for the public to comment on all planning documents, particularly the RTP/SCS and the FTIP. The level and details of public participation specific to the development of the FTIP are outlined in the 2020 StanCOG Public Participation Plan, which reflects StanCOG’s commitment to increased and improved public outreach. The public notice of involvement activities and time established for public review on the FTIP satisfies many regulations including the Federal Transit Administration’s Section 5307 Program of Projects (POP) requirements per Circular 9030.1E. Outreach Methods StanCOG, as part of the FTIP update processes provides convenient and accessible forms of public participation, StanCOG uses electronic methods of input, including surveys, to allow those to participate on their time and from the convenience of their home or office. The 2021 FTIP was released for a 30-day public review and comment period which began on October 28, 2020 and concluded on November 30, 2020. During this review and comment period, a StanCOG public hearing will be held to allow the public an opportunity to provide direct input to the body of elected officials that will ultimately adopt the Plan—the StanCOG Policy Board. The 2021 FTIP public hearing will be held on November 18, 2020. In addition, StanCOG uses various public notification strategies, including public notices in English and in Spanish languages, news releases to print and broadcast media, phone calls, e-mail correspondence, and through the StanCOG website. StanCOG has prepared the 2021 FTIP in cooperation with its member agencies, transit operators, state and federal agencies, and in consultation with all interested parties to the maximum extent practical. As federal funding programs under the MPO's control are developed, notifications are sent out to eligible agencies and the public, informing them of the appropriate way projects may be submitted for consideration. The process also involves StanCOG's, Management and Finance, Citizens Advisory, and Technical Advisory Committees, and the StanCOG Policy Board. In addition to the general notifications, StanCOG maintains an extensive agenda mailing list and posts all agendas and attachments on the website, whereby interested parties can review the information. Prior to adoption of the FTIP, public notices are published in a local paper of wide circulation, including a Spanish language newspaper. Visualization StanCOG uses visualization techniques, including drawings, computer models, visual simulation, geographic information system (GIS) maps and other state of the art techniques to help the public understand impacts related to funding and constructing transportation projects. These techniques provide further transparency on many of the issues in the plans and programs. StanCOG maintains a website that provides worldwide access to all StanCOG documents, including the 2019 FTIP, its programs, policies, projects, amendments, and amendment procedures. The website contains contact information for all StanCOG’s staff members to assist any user in accessing and understanding the information. The link to access the StanCOG web site is www.stancog.org. The public can also contact the StanCOG office by phone at 209.525.4600. Hard copies of StanCOG’s documents are also available at the StanCOG office located at: Stanislaus Council of Governments 1111 "I" Street, Suite 308 Modesto, CA 95354 Additionally, StanCOG meetings are publicly noticed and held in convenient, accessible locations.

Affidavit of Publication PUBLIC NOTICE STANISLAUS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS (STANCOG) To make a public comment during the PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND Public Hearing, please use the •Raise PUBLIC REVIEW AND COMMENT Hand" feature In GoToWeblnar and you PERIOD ON THE will be called on by the chair during the DRAFT2021FEDERAL meeting. TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (FTIP), DRAFT 2018 Option 2: To listen to the meeting by REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION teleconference only, use the above PLAN (RTP) AMENDMENT 2, AND phone number and acc~ss code. Using CORRESPONDING DRAFT CONFORMITY this option, your comments must be ANALYSIS submitted via email to publkcomment@ stancog org or by calling 209-525-460·0 ·NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the by 3:00 pm on November 18. Comments Stanislaus Council of Govetnments will be shared with Polley Board members (StanCOG) will hold a public hearing on and placed Into the record during the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, November 18, 2020 at 6:00 p.m. during public hearing. Every effort will be made the StanCOG Polley Board meeting for to read comments received Into the County of Stanislaus the purpose of receiving comments on record, but some comments may not be . the Draft 2021 Federal Transportation read due to tii;ne limitations. Improvement Program (FTIP), Draft 2018 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Spanish translation services will be Amendment 2, and the corresponding available at the hearing and other KATICA KROLL Draft Conformity Analysis. language support or reasonable Ame\icans with Dlsabllltles Act The 2021 HIP Is a near-term accommodations may be requested 72 Of the said County, being duly sworn, deposes and listing of capital Improvement and hours In advance of the hearing. operational expenditures utilizing federal says: and state monies for transportation Public comments can also be submitted projects In Stanlsla4s County during the during a 30-day public review and I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of next four years. comment period, which will commence the county aforesaid; I am over the age of on October 28, 2020 and conclude on The 2018 RTP/SCS Is a long November 30, 2020 at 2:00 p.m. Written twenty-one years, and not a party to or interested term coordinated transportation/land comments can be submitted to the use strategy to meet Stanislaus County's StanCOG office via U. S. Mail at 111 1 I m the above entitled matter. I am the principal transportation needs out to the year Street, Suite 308, Modesto, CA, 95354, clerk of CERES COURIER, 121 South Center Street, 2042. latte ntion Debbie Truj illo, Assistant nd Planner or via email at publiccomment@ 2 Floor, Turlock, California, a newspaper of general The corresponding r- stancog.org. Comments received by 2:00 Conformity Analysis contains the p.m. on November 20, 2020 w ill be made circulation, published in Ceres, California in the City documentation to support a finding a part of the record. that the 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP/SCS of Ceres, County of Stanislaus, and which newspaper Amendment 2 meet the air quality This public notice also satisfies the has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation, conformity requirements for ozone and Program of Projects (POP) req uirements particulate matter. of the Federa l Transit Administration (FTA) by the Superior Court of the County of Stanislaus, Urbanized Area Formula Program, Se ction The Polley Board, meeting will be held 5307, and the Bus and Bus Facilities State of California. That the remotely using the video conferencing Program, Section 5339. If no comments notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in software GoToWeblnar. In accordance are received on the proposed POP, the with Governor Newsom's Executive Order proposed transit program (funded w ith N-29-20, the StariCOG Boa.rd Room will be type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published FTA 53 07 and FTA 5339 dollars) will be the closed to the public during the November final program. in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper 18th Polley Board meeting and Public Hearing. In the interest of maintaining Further information or a ha rd copy appropriate social distancing measures, of the document may be obtained members of the public may participate by contacting the Sta nCOG Office at In the meeting electronically and shall (209) 525-4600. Th e draft document have the right to observe and offer public is available on the StanCOG website at comment during the meeting. www.stancog.org located under the OCTOBER 28, 2020 Fea tured Information section of the The following options are available to > homepage. members of the public to listen to the Policy Board meeting and Public Hearing After consideri ng the comments, I certify ( or declare) under penalty of perjury that the and provide comments to the Polley the document w ill be cons idered for th Board members during the meeting: foregoing is true and correct, this 28 day of October, adoption, by resolution, by the StanCOG Policy Boa rd at a reg ularly scheduled 2020 Option 1: To listen and speak, Join the meeting from your_computer or tablet. meeting to be held on Jan uary 20, 2021. Please register at anytime In advance Th e document w ill then be submitted to of the StanCOG November Polley Board state and fe dera l agencies for approval. Meeting on November 18, 2020 at: -C!>ntact Person: https·//attendee gotoweblnarcom/ Debbie Trujillo, Assistant Planner reglster/51 2306BSB247190B00 StanCOG After registering, you will receive 11 11 I Street, Suite 308 a confirmation email containing Modesto, CA 95354 Instructions for Joining the weblnar. Publication Date: 10/28/2020 CC#l0-06 Participants will also need to use a telephone for audio purposes. Dial In using the following phone number and access code with your telephone: + 1 (41 S) 655-0060 Access Code: 358-998-548

STANISLAUS COUNCIL OF GOV- able at the hearing and other language DECLARATION OF PUBLICATION ERNMENTS (STANCOG) support or reasonable Americans with NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND Disabilities Act accommodations may be (C.C.P. S2015.5) PUBLIC REVIEW AND COMMENT requested 72 hours in advance of the PERIOD ON THE hearing. DRAFT 2021 FEDERAL TRANSPOR- TATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Public comments can also be submitted (FTIP), during a 30-day public review and com- COUNTY OF STANISLAUS DRAFT 2018 REGIONAL TRANS- ment period, which will commence on PORTATION PLAN (RTP) AMEND- October 28, 2020 and conclude on No- STATE OF CALIFORNIA MENT 2, AND CORRESPONDING vember 30, 2020 at 2:00 p.m. Written DRAFT CONFORMITY ANALYSIS comments can be submitted to the StanCOG office via U.S. Mail at 1111 I NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Street, Suite 308, Modesto, CA, 95354, at- Stanislaus Council of Governments tention Debbie Trujillo, Assistant (StanCOG) will hold a public hearing on Planner or via email at November 18, 2020 at 6:00 p.m. during [email protected]. Com- the StanCOG Policy Board meeting for ments received by 2:00 p.m. on Novem- the purpose of receiving comments on ber 20, 2020 will be made a part of the the Draft 2021 Federal Transportation record. I am a citizen of the United States and a resident Improvement Program (FTIP), Draft 2018 Regional Transportation Plan This public notice also satisfies the Pro- Of the Dallas, TX; I am over the age of (RTP) Amendment 2, and the gram of Projects (POP) requirements of corresponding Draft Conformity Analy- the Federal Transit Administration Eighteen years, and not a party to or interested sis. (FTA) Urbanized Area Formula Pro- In the above entitle matter. I am a printer and gram, Section 5307, and the Bus and Bus The 2021 FTIP is a near-term listing of Facilities Program, Section 5339. If no Principal clerk of the publisher capital improvement and operational comments are received on the proposed expenditures utilizing federal and POP, the proposed transit program of THE MODESTO BEE, printed in the City state monies for transportation proj- (funded with FTA 5307 and FTA 5339 ects in Stanislaus County during the dollars) will be the final program. of MODESTO, County of STANISLAUS, next four years. Further information or a hard copy of the State of California, daily, for which said The 2018 RTP/SCS is a long-term co- document may be obtained by ordinated transportation/land use contacting the StanCOG Office at (209) newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of strategy to meet Stanislaus County's 525-4600. The draft document is availa- transportation needs out to the year ble on the StanCOG website at general circulation by the Superior Court of the 2042. www.stancog.org located under the Fea- tured Information section of the County of STANISLAUS, State of California, The corresponding Conformity Analy- homepage. sis contains the documentation to sup- Under the date of February 25, 1951, Action port a finding that the 2021 FTIP and After considering the comments, the do- 2018 RTP/SCS Amendment 2 meet cument will be considered for adoption, No. 46453; that the notice of which the annexed is the air quality conformity require- by resolution, by the StanCOG Policy a printed copy, has been published in each issue ments for ozone and particulate mat- Board at a regularly scheduled meeting ter. to be held on January 20, 2021. The do- there of on the following dates, to wit: cument will then be submitted to state The Policy Board meeting will be held re- and federal agencies for approval. motely using the video conferencing software GoToWebinar. In accordance with Contact Person: Governor Newsom's Executive Order N- Debbie Trujillo, Assistant Planner 29-20, the StanCOG Board Room will be StanCOG closed to the public during the November 1111 I Street, Suite 308 18th Policy Board meeting and Public Modesto, CA 95354 Hearing. In the interest of maintaining Pub Dates 10/28/20 appropriate social distancing measures, members of the public may participate in the meeting electronically and shall have Oct 28, 2020 the right to observe and offer public comment during the meeting.

The following options are available to members of the public to listen to the Pol- icy Board meeting and Public Hearing and provide comments to the Policy Board members during the meeting:

Option 1: To listen and speak, join the meeting from your computer or tablet. Please register at anytime in advance of the StanCOG November Policy Board Meeting on November 18, 2020 at: https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/ register/512306858247190800

After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing instructions for joining the webinar.

Participants will also need to use a telephone for audio purposes. Dial in using the following phone number and access code with your telephone: +1 (415) 655-0060 I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury Access Code: 358-998-548 That the foregoing is true and correct and that To make a public comment during the Public Hearing, please use the "Raise This declaration was executed at Hand" feature in GoToWebinar and you will be called on by the chair during the meeting. MODESTO, California on Option 2: To listen to the meeting by teleconference only, use the above October 28th, 2020 phone number and access code. Using this option, your comments must be submitted via email to [email protected] or by call- (By Electronic Facsimile Signature) ing 209-525-4600 by 3:00 pm on Novem- ber 18. Comments will be shared with Policy Board members and placed into the record during the public hearing. Every effort will be made to read comments received into the record, but some comments may not be read due to time limitations.

Spanish translation services will be avail-

CASE NO. 10117902 key 108226 PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2015.5 C. C. P.)

This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp STATE OF CALIFORNIA,

County of Stanislaus Proof of Publication of I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of PUBLIC NOTICE the county aforesaid; I am over the age of STANCOG twenty-one years, and not a party to or interested STANISLAUS COUNCIL OF m the above entitled matter. I am the principal GOVERNMENTS (STANCOG) NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND clerk of THE OAKDALE LEADER, 122 South PUBLIC REVIEW AND COMMENT PERIOD ON THE Third Avenue , Oakdale, California, a newspaper of DRAFT 2021 FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT general circulation, published in Oakdale, California PROGRAM (FTIP), in the City of Oakdale, County of Stanislaus, and DRAFT 2018 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN which newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of (RTP) AMENDMENT 2, AND CORRESPONDING DRAFT general circulation, by the Superior Court of the CONFORMITY ANALYSIS

County of Stanislaus, State of California. That the NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in Stanislaus Council of Governments (StanCOG) will hold a public hearing on type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published November 18, 2020 at 6:00 p.m. during the StanCOG Policy Board meeting for in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper the purpose of receiving comments on the Draft 2021 Federal Transportation and not in any supplement thereof on the following Improvement Program (FTIP), Draft dates, to-wit: 2018 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Amendment 2, and the corresponding Draft Conformity Analysis.

Oct. 28, 2020 The 2021 FTIP Is a near term listing of capital Improvement I certify or declare under penalty of perjury that the and operational expenditures foregoing is true and correct. utilizing federal and state monies for transportation projects In Stanislaus County during the next four years.

Dated at Oakdale The 2018 RTP/SCS Is a long term coordinated transportation/land use strategy to meet Stanislaus County's· , transportation needs out to the year The 28th day of Oct, 2020 2042.

The corresponding Conformity Analysis contains the documentation to support a finding thatthe 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP/SCS Amendment 2 meet the air quality conformity requirements for ozone and particulate matter.

The Polley Board meeting will be held remotely using the video conferencing I software GoToWeblnar. In accordance with Governor Newsom's Executive i Order N-29;20, the StanCOG Board Room will be closed to the public during the November 18th Policy Board meeting Signature and Public Hearing. In the Interest of maintaining appropriate social distancing measures, members of the public may participate In the meeting electronically and shall have the right to observe and offer public comment during the meeting.

The following options are available to ~ members of the public to listen to the Polley Board meeting and Public Hearing and provide comments to the Polley Board members during the me.eting : Option 1: To listen ana speaK, JOln the meeting from your computer or tablet. Please register at anytime In advance of the StanCOG November Polley Board Meeting on November 18, 2020 at: https://attendee.gotoweblnar.com/ register/S 12306858247190B00

After registering, you wlll receive a confirmation email containing Instructions for Joining the weblnar.

Participants will also need to use a telephone for audio purposes.

Dial In using the following phone number and access code with your telephone: +1 (415) 655-0060 Access Code: 358-998-54B

To make a public comment during the Public Hearing, please use the"Ralse Hand" feature in GoToWeblnar and you will be called on by the chair during the meeting.

Option 2: To listen to the meeting by teleconference only, use the above phone number and access code. Using this option, your comments must be submitted via email to publlccomment@ stancog.org or by calling 209-525--4600 by 3:00 pm on November 18. Comments will be shared with Polley Board members and placed Into the record during the public hearing. Every effort will be made to read comments received Into the record, but some comments may not be read due to time li mitation

Spanish translation services wlll be available at the hearing and other language support or reasonable Americans with Disabllltles Act accommodations may be requested 72 hours In advance of the hearing.

Public comments can also be submitted during a 30-day public review and comment period, which will commence on October 28, 2020 and conclude on November 30, 2020 at 2:00 p.m. Written comments can be submitted to the StanCOG office via U.S. Mall at 1111 I Street, Suite 308, Modesto, CA, 95354, attention Debbie Trujillo, Assistant Planner or via email at publlccomment@ stancog.org. Comments received by 2:00 p.m. on November 20, 2020 wlll be made a part of the record.

This public notice also satisfies the Program of Projects (POP) requirements of the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Urbanized Area Formula Program, Section 5307, and the Bus and Bus Facilities Program, Section 5339. If no comn:ients are received on the proposed POP, the proposed transit program (funded with FTA 5307 and FTA 5339 dollars) will be the final program.

Further Information or a hard copy of the document may be obtained by contacting the StanCOG Office at (209) 525-4600. The draft document Is a'vallable on the StanCOG website at www.stancog.org located under the Featured Information section of the homepage.

After considering the comments, the document will be considered for adoption, by resolution, by the StanCOG Polley Board at a regularly scheduled meeting to be held on January 20, 2021. The document will then be submitted to state and federal agencies for approval.

Contact Person: Debbie Trujillo, Assistant Planner StanCOG 1111 I Street, Suite 308 Modesto, CA 95354 PUBLICATION DATE: 10/28/2020 OL#20-174

PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2015.5 C. C. P.)

STA TE OF CALIFORNIA, This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp

County of Stanislaus

I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid; I am over the age of twenty Proof of Publication of one years, and not a party to or interested in the PUBLIC NOTICE above entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of STANCOG STANISLAUS COUNCIL OF THE RIVERBANK NEWS, 122 South Third Ave, GOVERNMENTS (STANCOGJ Oakdale, California, a newspaper of general circulation, NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND PUBLIC REVIEW AND COMMENT published in Riverbank, California in the City of ~ERIODONTHE DRAFT2021FEDERAL Riverbank, County of Stanislaus, and which newspaper TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (FTIP), r. has been adjudged a Newspaper of general circulation, DRAFT 2018 REGIONAL by the Superior Court of the County of Stanislaus, State TRANSPORTATION PLAN of California. That the Notice, of which the annexed is (RTP) AMENDMENT 2, AND CORRESPONDING DRAFT a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil), . CONFORMITY ANALYSIS has been published in each regular and entire issue of NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on Stan Isla us Council ofGovernments (StanCOGJ will hold a public hearing on the following dates, to-wit: November 18, 2020 at 6:00 p.m. during the StanCOG P91lcy Board meeting for the purpose of receiving comments on October 28, in the year 2020 the Draft 2021 Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIPJ, Draft 2018 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Amendment 2, and the corresponding I certify or declare under penalty of perjury that the Draft Conformity Analysis.

Fore going is true and correct. • The 2021 FTIP Is a near-terr'n listing of capital Improvement and operational ex,:,enditures utilizing federal and state Dated at Riverbank, California monies for transportation projects In Stanislaus County during the next four years. 1 This 28 \ day of October, 2020 • The 2018 RTP/SCS is a long-term coordinated transportation/land use strategy,to meet Stanislaus County's transportation needs out to the year 2042.

• The corresponding Conformity Analysis contains the documentation to support a finding that the 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP/SCS Amendment 2 meet the air' quality conformity requirements for ozone and particulate matter.

The Polley Board meeting will be held Signature remotely using the video conferencing software GoToWebinar. In accordance with Governor Newsom's Executive Order N-29-20, the StanCOG Board Room will be closed to the public during the November 18th Polley Board meeting and Public Hearing. In the Interest of maintaining appropriate social distancing measures, members of the public may partl~lpate In the meeting electronically and shall have the right to observe and offer public comment during the meeting.

The following options are available to members of the public to listen to the Polley Board meeting and Public Hearing and provide comments to the Polley Board member~ during the meeting: Option 1: To listen and speak, Join the meeting from your computer or tablet. Please register at anytime In advance of the StanCOG November Policy Board Meeting on November 18, 2020 at: https://attendee.gotoweblnar.com/ reglster/512306858247190800

After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing Instructions for Joining the weblnar.

Participants .will also need to use a telephone for audio purposes. Dial In using the following phone number and access code with your telephone: + 1 (415) 655-0060 Access Code: 358-998-548

To make a public comment during the Public Hearing, please use the "Raise Hand"feature In GoToWeblnar and you will be called on by the chair during the mtttlng.

Option 2: To listen to the meeting by t leconference only, use the above phone number and access code. Using . this option, your comments must be submitted via email to publlccomment@ stancog.org or by call Ing 209-525-4600 by 3:00 pm on November 18. Comments will be shared with Polley Board members and placed Into the record during the public hearing. Every effort will be made to read comments received into the record, but some comments may not be read due to time limitations.

Spanish translation services will be available at the hearing and other language support or reasonable Americans with Disabilities Act accommodations may be requested 72 hours In advance of the hearing.

Public comments can also be submitted during a 30-day public review and comment period, which will commence on October 28, 2020 and conclude on November 30, 2020 al 2:00 p.m. Written comments can be submitted to the StanCOG office via U.S. Mall at 1111 I, Street, Suite 308, Modesto, CA, 95354, attention Debbie Trujillo, Assistant Planner or via email at publlccomment@ stancog.org. Comments received by 2:00 p.m. on November 20, 2020 will be .made a part of the record.

This public notice also satisfies the Program of Proje•cts (POP) requirements of the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Urbanized Area Formula Program, Section 5307, and the Bus and Bus Facilities Program, Section 5339. If no comments are received on the proposed POP, the proposed transit program (funded with FTA 5307 and FTA 5339 dollars) will be the final program.

Further information or a hard copy of the document may be obtained by contacting the StanCOG Office at (209) 525-4600. The draft document Is available on the StanCOG website at www.stancog.org located under the Featured Information section of the homepage.

Contact Person: Debbie Trujillo, Assistant Planner StanCOG 1111 I Street, Suite 308 Modesto, CA 95354 PUBLICATION DATE: 10/28/2020 RN#20-099 Affidavit of Publication

PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE STANISLAUS COUNCIL OF Participants will also need to use a GOVERNMENTS (STANCOG) telephone for audio purposes. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND Dial In using the following phone number PUBLIC REVIEW AND COMMENT and access code with your telephone. PERIOD ON THE + 1 (415) 655-0060 DRAFT 2021 FEDERAL Access Code: 358-998-548 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT • ,PROGRAM (FTIP), DRAFT 2018 To make a public comment during the REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION Public Hearing, please use the "Raise PLAN (RTP) AMENDMENT 2, AND Hand"feature In GoToWeblnar and you CORRESPONDING DRAFT CONFORMITY will be called on by the chair during the ANALYSIS meeting. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Option 2:To listen to the meeting by County of Stanislaus Stanislaus Council of Governments teleconference only, use the above (StanCOG) will hold a public hearing on phone number and access code. Using November 18, 2020 at 6:00 p.m. during the StanCOG Polley Board meeting for . !~.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~:n:~!~,~~~~~t't the purpose of receiving comments on stancog org or by calling 209-525-4600 KATICA KROLL the Draft 2021 Federal Transportation r by 3:00 pm on November 18. Comments Improvement Program (FTIP), Draft will be shared with Polley Board members 2018 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) and placed Into the record during the Amendment 2, and the corresponding public hearing. Every effort will be made Of the said County, being duly sworn, deposes and Draft Conformity Analysis. to read comments received Into the record, but some comments may not be says: The 2021 FTIP Is a near-term read due to time limitations. I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of listing of capital Improvement and operational expenditures utilizing federal Spanish translation services will be the county aforesaid; I am over the age of and state monies for transportation available at the hearing and other projects In Stanislaus County during the language support or reasonable . Americans with Dlsabllitles Act twenty-one years, and not a party to or interested next four years. accommodations may be requested 72 in the above entitled matter. I am the principal The 2018 RTP/SCS Is a long hours In advance of the hearing. term coordinated transportation/land clerk of THE TURLOCK DAILY JOURNAL, 121 Public comments can also be submitted nd use strategy to meet Stanislaus County's South Center Street, 2 Floor, Turlock, California, a transportation needs out to the year during a 30-day public review and · comment period, which will commence 2042. newspaper of general circulation, published in Turlock, on October 28, 2020 and conclude on The corresponding November 30, 2·020 at 2:00 p.m. Written California in the City of Turlock, County of Conformity Analysis contains the comments can be submitted to the Stanislaus, and which newspaper has been adjudged a documentation to support a finding StanCOG office via U.S. Mall at 1111 I that the 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP/SCS Street, Suite 308, Modesto, CA, 95354, newspaper of general circulation, by the Superior Amendment 2 meet the air quality . attention Debbie Trujillo, Assistant conformity requirements for ozone and Planner or via email at pubUccomment@ Comments received by 2:00 Court of the County of Stanislaus, State of California. partlclltate matter. stancog org 1 p.m . on November 20, 2020 will be made That the The Polley Board meeting will be held a part of the record. notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in remotely using the video conferencing software GoToWeblnar. In accordance This public notice also satisfies the type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published with Governor Newsom's Executive Order Program of Projects (POP) requirements N-29-20, the StanCOG Board Room will be of the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper closed to the public during the November Urbanized Area Formula Program, Section 18th Polley Board meeting and Public 5307, and the Bus and Bus Facilities Hearing. In the interest of maintaining Program, Section 5339. If no comments appropriate social distancing measures, are received on the proposed POP, the members of the public may participate proposed transit program (funded with OCTOBER 28, 2020 In the meeting electronically and shall FTA 5307 and FTA 5339 dollars). will be the have the right to observe and offer public final program. comment during the meeting. Further information or a hard copy I certify ( or declare) under penalty of perjury that the The following options are available to of the document may be obtained foregoing is true and correct, this 28 th day of October, members of the public to listen to the by contacting the StanCOG Offi'ce at Polley Board meeting and Public Hearing (209) 525-4600. The draft document 2020. · and provide comments to the Polley Is available on the StanCOG website at Board members during the meeting: www stancog org located under the Featured Information section of the Option 1: To listen and speak, joln the homepage. meeting from your computer or tablet. Please register at anytime In advance After considering the comments, of the StanCOG November Polley Board the document will be considered for Meeting on November 18, 2020 at: adoption, by resolution, by the StanCOG bttps·/Jattendee gotowebinar com/ Polley Board at a regularly scheduled meeting to be held on January 20, 2021. register/SJ 2306BSB247J 9DB00 The document will then be submitted to After registering, you will receive state and federal agencies for approval. a confirmation email containing Instructions for Joining the weblnar. Contact Person: Debbie Trujillo, Assist.ant P.lanner StanCOG 1111 I Street, Suite 308 Modesto, CA 95354 Publication Date: 10/28/2020 The Modesto Bee mod bee.com

AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION

Account# Ad Number dentification PO Amount Cols De th 341788 0004790050 $870.84 3 10.25 In

Attention: Declaration of Publication

CO STAN COG C.C.P. S2015.5 1111 I STREET, #308 STATE OF CALIFORNIA MODESTO, CA 95354 ss. County of Stanislaus

I am a citizen of the United States; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of the Vida en el Valle, which has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of Stanislaus, State of California, under the date of February 25, 1951 Action No. 46453. The notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in each issue thereof on the following dates, to wit:

October 28, 2020

Legal Clerk

I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed at Dallas, Texas on:

AMANDA DAWN GRISHAM My Notaiy ID# 132031326 Expires May 30, 2023

Legal document please do not destroy! CONSEJO DE GOBIERNOS DE STANISLAUS (STANCOG) A VISO DE APERTURA A LECTURA PUBLICA, PERIODO DE COMENTARIOS, Y AUDIENCIA PUBLICA SOHRE EL PROGRAMA FEDERAL DE MEJORA DEL TRANSPORTE (FTIP) PRELIMINAR DEL 2021, Y LA 2" ENMIENDA AL PROGRAMA REGIONAL DE MEJORAMIENTO DEL TRANSPORTE (RTP) PRELIMINAR DEL ANO 2018, Y SU ANALISIS DE CONFORMIDAD CORRESPONDIENTE

POR MEDIO DE LA PRESENTE SE DA A VISO que el Consejo de Gobiernos de Stanislaus (StanCOG) celebrara una audiencia publica a las 6:00 p.m. del I 8 de noviembre de 2020 durante la reunion del Comite de Polfticas del StanCOG con el fin de escuchar comentarios sobre tres documentos preliminares: el Programa Federal de Mejoramiento del Transporle (FTIP) de 2021, la 2' Enmienda al Plan de Transporte Regional (RTP) del 2018, y su correspondiente Analisis de Conformidad.

I. El FTIP del 2021 es un listado de mejoras de crftica importancia y gastos de operacion que utilizan fondos estatales y federates, los que se anticipan realizar al corto plazo en el curso de los proximos cuatro aiios en el Condado Stanislaus. 2. El RTP/SCS 2018 es una estrategia a largo plazo donde se coordinan las regulaciones del transporte y uso de suelo para suplir las necesidades viales del Condado de Stanislaus hasta el aiio 2042. 3. El correspondiente Analisis de Conforrnidad contiene la documentacion que avala la conclusion que el FTIP del 2021 y la 2' Enmienda al RTP/SCS del 2018 cumplen con los requisitos de conformidad de la calidad del aire respecto del ozono y la materia en suspension.

Esta reunion del Comite de Politicas seni realizada virtualmente, via teleconferencia, a traves de la plataforrna GoT0Webi11ar. En cumplimiento con la Orden Ejecutiva N-29-20 dictaminada por el Gobernador Newsom, el Salon de Juntas del Consejo de Gobiernos de Stanislaus (StanCOG) se mantendra cerrado al publico durante la reunion del Comite de Polfticas y Audiencia Publica del 18 de noviembre, 2020. Con el interes de observar las medidas del distanciamiento social apropiado, los miembros del pliblico podran participar electronicamente y tendran el derecho de observar y ofrecer comentarios pliblicos durante dicha reunion.

Par~ escuchar la reunion del Comite de Polfticas y Audiencia Publica, y ofrecer oportunidad de dirigirse a los miembros del Comite de Polfticas se ofreceran las siguientes opciones a la comunidad:

Opcion 1: Para escuchar y hablar duranle la Audiencia Publica con un computador o tableta. Sirva inscribirse con anticipacion para la Reunion del Comite de Polfticas del StanCOG del 18 de noviembre, 2020 en: https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/5 l 230685824 7190800

Despues de inscribirse, usted recibira una confirmacion por correo electronico con instrucciones de coma ingresar a esta video-teleconferencia (webi11ar). Los participantes necesitaran de su telefono para acceder al audio de la junta. En su telefono marque el siguienle nlimero y use el siguiente codigo: +I (415) 655-0060 Codigo de Acceso: 358-998-548

Si desea hacer un comentario en alglin punto espedfico de la agenda, use el baton "Raise Hand (Levante la Mano)" disponible en el GoToWebinar y el presidente le reconocera y le dara acceso durante la junta.

Opcion 2: Para participar solo escuchando la teleconferencia, sirvase marcar el mlmero y el codigo de acceso. Si usted participa solo a !raves de su telefono, puede someter sus comentarios por correo eleclronico a [email protected], o llamando al 209-525-4600 antes de las 3:00 pm del 18 de noviembre. Esos comentarios seran compartidos con los miembros del Camile de Polfticas e incluidos en el acta de la reunion durante de la audiencia abierta. Se hara todo lo posible para leer los comentarios recibidos durante la reunion para el archivo, pero habra comentarios que nose leeran debido a limitaciones de tiempo.

En esta audiencia habra servicio de interprete al idioma espaiiol tanto coma apoyo en otros lenguajes coma razonables adaptaciones en cumplimienlo con el Acta de Estadounidenses Incapacitados. Sfrvase solicitar cualquier acomodo con un minima de 72 horas de anticipacion a la audiencia.

Se podran someter comentarios duranle el periodo de 30 dfas para la inspeccion y comentario de parte del publico, mismo que comenzara el 28 de octubre, 2020, y que concluye a las 2:00 p.m. el 30 de noviembre del 2020. Comentarios por escrito se pueden someter por correo a las oficinas del StanCOG, Calle I # 1111, Suite 308, Modesto, CA 95354, a la atencion de Debbie Trujillo, Auxiliar de Planificacion, o por correo electronico a [email protected]. Los comentarios escritos que se reciban hasla las 2:00 p.m. del 20 de noviembre, 2020, pasaran a formar parte del archivo.

Este anuncio publico satisface, ademas, los requisitos del Programa de Proyectos (POP) que dictamina la Seccion 5307 -Programa de Formulas de Areas Urbanizadas- y la Seccion 5339 -Programa de Autobuses e Infraestructura de Transporte Publico-- de la Administracion Federal de Transito Publico (FT A). De no recibirse comentarios sabre el POP aquf propuesto, el programa de transito publico presentado (financiado con dolares "FTA 5307" y "FTA 5339") seni el proyecto final.

Mayor informacion o copias impresas de estos documentos se pueden obtener comunicandose con la oficina del StanCOG telefoneando al (209) 525-4600. Los documentos preliminares estan disponibles para su lectura en el sitio virtual del StanCOG (www.stancog.org) -bajo la seccion "Featured /11/ormation (Inforrnacion Destacada)" del portal.

Luego de considerar los comentarios, el Comite de Polfticas de StanCOG sometera los documentos a votacion para su aprobacion - por resolucion- en su junta ordinaria del el 20 de enero del 2021. Los documentos seran entonces sometidos a las respectivas agencias estatales y federates para su aprobacion.

Persona a Contactar: Debbie Trujillo, Auxiliar de Planificacion StanCOG Suite 308 del 1111 de la Calle I Modesto, CA 95354

PROOF OF PUBLICATION This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp (2015.5 C.C.P.)

STATE OF CALIFORNIA County,of Stanislaus Proof of Publication of

Public Notice Notice of Public Hearing and Public Review and I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the Comment Period on the Draft 2021 Federal County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP), and not a party to or interested in the above-entitled matter. I am the printer, foreman or principal clerk of Draft 2018 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) The West Side INDEX, a newspaper of general Amendment 2, and Corresponding Draft circulation, printed and published weekly in the City of Conformity Analysis Newman, County of Stanislaus, and which newspaper Stanislaus Council of Governments (StanCOG) has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of Stanislaus, State of California, under the date of April 25, 1952, Case Number 46882; that the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: October 29

in the year 2020.

I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Dated at Newman, California, this 29th day of October, 2020.

~00~•

PROOF OF PUBLICATION purposes. PUBLIC NOTICE • PUBLIC NOTICE Dial in using the following phone number and access code STANISLAUS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS (STANCOG) with your telephone: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ANO PUBLIC REVIEW ANO +1 (415) 655-0060 COMMENT PERIOD ON THE Access Code: 358-998-548 DRAFT 2021 FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (FTIP), To make a public comment during the Public Hearing, DRAFT 2018 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN please use the "Raise Hand" feature in GoToWebinar (RTP) AMENDMENT 2, ANO CORRESPONDING DRAFT and you will be called on by the chair during the meeting. CONFORMITY ANALYSIS Option 2: To listen to the meeting by teleconference NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Stanislaus Council of only, use the above phone number and access code. Governments (StanCOG) will hold a public hearing on November Using this option, your comments must be submitted 18, 2020 ijt 6:00 p.m. during the StanCOG Policy Board meeting via email to [email protected] or by calling for the purpose of receiving comments on the Draft 2021 209-525-4600 by 3:00 pm on November 18. Comments Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP), Draft · will be shared with Policy Board members and placed 2018 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Amendment 2, and the into the record during the public hearing. Every effort will corresponding Draft Conformity Analysis. be made to read comments received into the record, but some comments may not be read due to time limitations. D The 2021 FTIP is a near-term listing of capital improvement and operational expenditures utilizing Spanish translation services will be available at the hearing and federal and state monies for transportation projects in other language support or reasonable Americans with Disabilities Stanislaus County during the next four years. Act accommodations may be requested 72 hours in advance of the hearing. D The 2018 RTP/SCS is a long-term coordinated transportation/land use strategy to meet Stanislaus Public comments can also be submitted during a 30-day public County's transportation needs out to the year 2042. review and comment period, which will commence on October 28, 2020 and conclude on November 30 , 2020 at 2:00 p.m. D The corresponding Conformity Analysis contains the Written comments can be submitted to the StanCOG office documentation to support a finding that the 2021 FTIP via U.S. Mail at 1111 I Street, Suite 308, Modesto, CA, 95354, and 2018 RTP/SCS Amendment 2 meet the air quality attention Debbie Trujillo, Assistant Planner or via email at conformity requirements for ozone and particulate [email protected]. Comments received by 2:00 p.m. matter. on November 20, 2020 will be made a part of the record.

The Policy Board meeting will be held remotely using the This public notice also satisfies the Program of Projects (POP) video conferencing software GoToWebinar. In accordance with requirements of the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Governor Newsom's Executive Order N-29-20, the StanCOG Urbanized Area Formula Program, Section 5307, and the Bus Board Room will be closed to the public during the November and Bus Facilities Program, Section 5339. If no comments are 18th Policy Board meeting and Public Hearing. In the interest of received on the proposed POP, the proposed transit program maintaining appropriate social distancing measures, members of (funded with FTA 5307 and FTA 5339 dollars) will be the final the public may participate in the meeting electronically and shall program. have the right to observe and offer public comment during the meeting. Further information or a hard copy of the document may be obtained by contacting the StanCOG Office at (209) 525-4600 . The following options are available to members of the public The draft document is available on the StanCOG website at to listen to the Policy Board meeting and Public Hearing and www.stancog.org located under the Featured Information section provide comments to the Policy Board members during the of the homepage. meeting: After considering the comments, the document will be considered Option 1: To listen and speak, join the meeting for adoption, by resolution, by the StanCOG Policy Board from your computer or tablet. at a regularly scheduled meeting to be held on January 20, Please register at anytime in advance of the 2021. The document will then be submitted to state and federal StanCOG November Policy Board Meeting on agencies for approval. November 18, 2020 at: https://attendee .qotowebinar.com/ Contact Person: register/512306858247190800 Debbie Trujillo, Assistant Planner StanCOG After registering, you will receive a confirmation email 1111 I Street, Suite 308 containing instructions for joining the webinar. Modesto, CA 95354

Participants will also need to use a telephone for audio PUBLISH ED: Oct. 29, 2020 Appendix M

StanCOG Responses to Comments Received During Public Review Period and Hearing

2021 FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (FTIP), 2018 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN (RTP) AMENDMENT 2, AND CORRESPONDING AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY ANALYSIS (AQCA)

Response to Comments

Summary

A public comment period for StanCOG’s Draft 2021 FTIP, 2018 RTP Amendment 2, and corresponding Air Quality Conformity Analysis was initiated on October 28, 2020 and concluded on November 30, 2020. In addition, a public hearing was conducted via webinar on November 18, 2020 at the StanCOG Policy Board meeting to solicit public comments regarding the draft documents. StanCOG staff has evaluated all of the comments received during the public comment period and hearing and has provided a written response to each of the comments.

StanCOG appreciates and thanks the commenting parties for their review of and contributions to the 2021 FTIP, 2018 RTP Amendment 2, and corresponding Air Quality Conformity Analysis documents.

StanCOG Staff Reponse to:

Comment 1 Caltrans Division of Financial Programming comments received from Mr. Abhijit Bagde, via email received by StanCOG on November 19, 2020.

Comment 2 Caltrans Division Program Project and Asset Management comment received from Mr. Jes Padda, per email received by StanCOG on November 4, 2020

Comment 1: Caltrans Division of Financial Programming comments received from Mr. Abhijit Bagde per email received by StanCOG on November 19, 2020

General Comments

General Comment #1: Page 14, System Preservation, Operations and Maintenance: Include in the FTIP’s financial plan an analysis of revenues dedicated for maintaining and operating the federal-aid system, including the basis for calculation for the StanCOG region. Also address any anticipated shortfall in available revenues and describe plans to deal with the gap.

Staff’s Response: Comment noted and has been addressed.

General Comment #2: Page 15, Amendments + Modifications: Please update the reference to the current FSTIP and FTIP Administrative Modification Procedures dated December 18, 2019.

Staff’s Response: The date for the current FSTIP and FTIP Administrative Modification Procedures has been updated on page 15 under Amendments + Modifications.

General Comment #3: Page 18, Performance based planning and programming: Thank you for providing comprehensive analysis on StanCOG's efforts in achieving performance measures targets. Please refer to the information discussed at the November 17, 2020 CFPG meeting. Please complete and include the template (in excel) along with the final 2021 FTIP.

Staff’s Response: This section has been updated per discussion at the November 17, 2020 CFPG meeting.

General Comment #4: Page 32, Expedite Project Selection Procedures: Include SHOPP, HSIP and SRTS to the list of projects managed by the state.

Staff’s Response: The State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOPP), Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP), and Safe Routes to School (SRTS) have been added to the Expedited Project Selection Procedures on page 32.

General Comment #5: Ensure that the FTIP explicitly states that public involvement activities and time established for public review and comment for the FTIP satisfy the Program of Projects (POP) requirements of the FTA 5307 Program.

Staff’s Response: Comment noted and has been addressed.

Financial Summary

Financial Summary #1: Please email us the financial summary in excel by February 1, 2021.

Staff’s Response: Comment noted.

Financial Summary #2: STIP: Update the revenue per 2020 STIP Fund Estimate (https://catc.ca.gov/-/media/ctcmedia/documents/programs/stip/2020-stip/201907-fe-share-stip- a11yada.pdf).

Staff’s Response: The revenue per the 2020 STIP Fund Estimate has been updated.

Financial Summary #3: CMAQ revenue amount for the FY 2021/22 are not consistent with the estimated provided by our office on June 8, 2020. Please clarify if the revenue estimate includes any borrowing of apportionments.

Staff’s Response: The CMAQ revenue estimate for FY 2021/22 does include repayment of apportionments. This has been noted in the financial/revenue worksheet.

Financial Summary #4: Highway Infrastructure Program (HIP): Clarify if the revenues shown for FY 2021 and FY 2022 are from the prior years as the HIP has had three cycles of funding announced by FHWA (FFYs 2018, 2019 and 2020). See link below for information. https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dot-media/programs/local-assistance/documents/hip/2020/hipfunds- fact-sheet.pdf

Staff’s Response: The revenue shown in FY 2021 is from the FFY’s 2018 and 2019 cycle and FY 2022 is from 2020 cycle.

Financial Summary #5: Update Highway Bridge Program (HBP) information per information transmitted on November 9, 2020.

Staff’s Response: The Highway Bridge Program (HBP) has been updated per information transmitted on November 9, 2020.

Project Listings

Project Listing #1: Include RTP reference information for all the projects

Staff’s Response: Comment noted. RTP reference is included in the CTIPS program.

Project Listing #2: CTIPS Ids 11400000014, 21400000303, 21400000698: Verify planning studies (non-transportation capital) are included in the Overall Work Program. Planning studies do not need to be listed in the FTIP.

Staff’s Response: CTIPS IDs 11400000014 and 21400000303 are included in the StanCOG Overall Work Program. CTIPS ID 21400000698 is the City of Modesto’s Transit Planning – Short Term and Long Term project for Modesto Area Express.

Project Listing #3: CTIPS Ids 21400000718, 21400000717 - Include the total project cost. Also clarify FY when RW and Construction phases are scheduled.

Staff’s Response: Comment noted. Estimated project costs and estimated RW and Construction phases addressed in the Title Description sections of the CTIPS pages.

Project Listing #4: CTIPS Id 21400000667 - Provide details of the scope of the project

Staff’s Response: CTIPS ID 21400000667 has been updated to include details of the project scope of work.

Project Listing #5: CTIPS Id 21400000447 - Update funding per HBP listing transmitted on 11/09/20. Also update the detailed listings in "Appendix G".

Staff’s Response: Funding for CTIPS ID 21400000447 has been updated per transmitted list dated November 9, 2020 and the updated detailed list in Appendix G has been included.

Project Listing #6: CTIPS Ids 21400000699, 21400000701, 21400000702 - Please provide details on how many buses are scheduled to be acquired in each year.

Staff’s Response: CTIPS IDs 21400000669, 21400000701, and 21400000702 have been updated to include the number of buses to be acquired in each year.

Project Listing #7: CTIPS Id 21400000712 - Please clarify the project scope and what is the purpose of programming $10,000 in FY 2020/21.

Staff’s Response: Comment noted. Clarification on project scope and programming has been addressed.

Comment 2: Caltrans Division Program Project and Asset Management comment received from Mr. Jes Padda, per email received by StanCOG on November 4, 2020

Comment Received: I am reviewing the StanCOG Draft 2021 FTIP and I noticed that the “SR 132 Dakota Avenue to Gates Road” project that we are working together on is noted as the “SR 132 Extension Dakota to Gates”. For consistency and since we have a number of project documents with the project name “SR 132 Dakota Avenue to Gates Road”, would it be possible to change the project name in the FTIP? This would avoid confusion by the public and agencies particularly since you do not use an “EA number 10-1E280” to reference projects in Stanislaus County.

Staff’s Response: Comment noted. Project description has been updated administratively.

Attachment 1

Caltrans Division of Financial Programming comments received from Mr. Abhijit Bagde, via e-mail received by StanCOG on November 19, 2020.

Comment 1

From: Bagde, Abhijit J@DOT To: Debbie Trujillo Cc: Dayak, Silvia@DOT Subject: Review comments on STANCOG"s Draft 2021 FTIP Date: Thursday, November 19, 2020 10:52:50 AM

Hello Debbie,

Thank you very much for providing us an opportunity to review STANCOG's Draft 2021 FTIP. My compliments to you and staff for preparing an excellent document.

Please include response to the comments below when submitting final 2021 FTIP to Caltrans.

Let me know of any questions.

General Comments:

1. Page 14, System Preservation, Operations and Maintenance: Include in the FTIP’s financial plan an analysis of revenues dedicated for maintaining and operating the federal-aid system, including the basis for calculation for the Stancog region. Also address any anticipated shortfall in available revenues and describe plans to deal with the gap. 2. Page 15, Amendments + Modifications: Please update the reference to the current FSTIP and FTIP Administrative Modification Procedures dated December 18, 2019. 3. Page 18, Performance based planning and programming: Thank you for providing comprehensive analysis on Stancog's efforts in achieving performance measures targets. Please refer to the information discussed at the November 17, 2020 CFPG meeting. Please complete and include the template (in excel) along with the final 2021 FTIP. 4. Page 32, Expedite Project Selection Procedures: Include SHOPP, HSIP and SRTS to the list of projects managed by the state. 5. Ensure that the FTIP explicitly states that public involvement activities and time established for public review and comment for the FTIP satisfy the Program Of Projects (POP) requirements of the FTA 5307 Program. Financial Summary:

1. Please email us the financial summary in excel by February 1, 2021. 2. STIP: Update the revenue per 2020 STIP Fund Estimate (https://catc.ca.gov/-/media/ctcmedia/documents/programs/stip/2020-stip/201907-fe-share-stip-a11yada.pdf).

2020 STIP FUND ESTIMATE

1 2 2020 STIP FUND ESTIMATE Table 1 - Reconciliation to County and Interregional Shares ($ in millions) 2019-20

catc.ca.gov

3. CMAQ revenue amount for the FY 2021/22 are not consistent with the estimated provided by our office on June 8, 2020. Please clarify if the revenue estimate includes any borrowing of apportionments. 4. Highway Infrastructure Program (HIP): Clarify if the revenues shown for FY 2021 and FY 2022 are from the prior years as the HIP has had three cycles of funding announced by FHWA( FFYs 2018, 2019 and 2020). See link below for information. https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dot-media/programs/local-assistance/documents/hip/2020/hipfunds-fact-sheet.pdf 5. Update Highway Bridge Program (HBP) information per information transmitted on November 9, 2020. Project Listings:

1. Include RTP reference information for all the projects 2. CTIPS Ids 11400000014, 21400000303, 21400000698: Verify planning studies (non- transportation capital) are included in the Overall Work Program. Planning studies do not need to be listed in the FTIP. 3. CTIPS Ids 21400000718, 21400000717 - Include the total project cost. Also clarify FY when RW and Construction phases are scheduled. 4. CTIPS Id 21400000667 - Provide details of the scope of the project 5. CTIPS Id 21400000447 - Update funding per HBP listing transmitted on 11/09/20. Also update the detailed listings in "Appendix G". 6. CTIPS Ids 21400000699, 21400000701, 21400000702 - Please provide details on how many buses are scheduled to be acquired in each year 7. CTIPS Id 21400000712 - Please clarify the project scope and what is the purpose of programming $10,000 in FY 2020/21. Thank you.

********************************************************************** Abhijit J. Bagde, P.E. Senior Transportation Engineer Division of Financial Programming Office of Federal Programming and Data Management (916) 654-3638 FAX: (916) 654-2738 Website https://dot.ca.gov/programs/financial-programming/office-of-federal-programming-data- management-ofpdm Attachment 2

Caltrans Division Program Project and Asset Management comment received from Mr. Jes Padda, per email received by StanCOG on November 4, 2020. Comment 2

From: Padda, Jes S@DOT Sent: Wednesday, November 4, 2020 2:33 PM To: Isael Ojeda Cc: Theron Roschen ; Lugo, Jennifer@DOT ; Cheas, Moninth@DOT Subject: StanCOG Draft 2021 FTIP, Draft 2018 RTP Amendment 2, & Corresponding Conformity Analysis Importance: High

Good Afternoon Isael,

I am reviewing the StanCOG Draft 2021 FTIP and I noticed that the “SR 132 Dakota Avenue to Gates Road” project that we are working together on is noted as the “SR 132 Extension Dakota to Gates”. For consistency and since we have a number of project documents with the project name “SR 132 Dakota Avenue to Gates Road”, would it be possible to change the project name in the FTIP? This would avoid confusion by the public and agencies particularly since you do not use an “EA number 10-1E280” to reference projects in Stanislaus County.

Thank you,

Jes Padda, P.E. Project Manager Program Project and Asset Management Office (209) 948-7765 Cell (209) 351-4432 Appendix N

2018 RTP Amendment 2 Summary of Changes

Regionally Significant Project Listings for Possible Federal Environmental Action during the “TIP” Period 2018 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Amendment 2 Summary of Changes

The RTP conforms to the applicable State Implementation Plan (SIPs), meets all applicable transportation planning requirements per 23 CFR Part 450 and 40 CFR Part 93, and meets the transportation conformity regulations. This change requires a formal RTP amendment, including a new regional emissions analysis. The RTP Amendment 2 updates a project scope for one project. The 2018 RTP remains financially constrained. StanCOG’s 2018 RTP Tier I Roadway Project List Appendix K has been updated accordingly.

2018 RTP Amendment 2 includes the following change:

• Faith Home Road (S103) – Amends project description from “4-Lane Expressway” to “2- Lane Expressway”.

In addition to the formal change mentioned above, this amendment will also include the following administrative change:

• 132 (S101) – Amends project limits description from “SR 132 Extension Dakota to Gates” to “SR 132 Dakota Avenue to Gates Road” to align with project description with Caltrans documents. STANCOG 2018 Regional Transportation Plan

Tier I Roadway Projects Purpose / Need Project Details (P = Primary Purpose / X = Need)

Open to Funding ID Jurisdiction Location Project Limits Description Total Cost

Traffic Source Oper. Safety Streets System System Preserv. Capacity Enhance. Alt. Mode Complete Complete

City of Ceres

Morgan Rd and (Morgan/Aristocrat & Construct Roundabouts and C20 Ceres $1,177,000 2018 CMAQ X X Central Ave Central/Pine/Industrial) Intersection Reconfiguration Install fiber optic and signal ITS Signal C21 Ceres Various Locations interconnect cables and associated $583,000 2018 CMAQ X Synchronization, Phase II conduit.

C22 Ceres Morgan Rd Service Rd & Morgan Rd Install Traffic Signal $347,800 2018 PFF/CMAQ X X

PFF / STBGP/ C23 Ceres SR-99 Mitchell Rd/Service Rd Construct New Interchange - Phase I $134,000,000 2023 X Other

C24 Ceres Morgan Rd 7th St to Grayson Rd Widen from 2 to 4 lanes $938,700 2030 PFF X

C25 Ceres Whitmore Ave Mitchell Rd to Faith Home Widen from 2 to 4 lanes $1,072,500 2020 PFF X Crows Landing Rd & A C26 Ceres Crows Landing Rd Install Traffic Signal $430,500 2020 WLSP/PFF X X Street C27 Ceres Whitmore Ave Ustick Rd to Blaker Rd Widen from 2 to 4 lanes $1,621,200 2025 PFF X

C28 Ceres Grayson Rd Grayson Rd & Morgan Rd Install Traffic Signal $1,075,200 2030 CMAQ, PFF X X Hatch Rd & Faith Home C29 Ceres Hatch Rd Install Traffic Signal $600,000 2025 CMAQ, PFF X X Rd C30 Ceres Central Ave Hatch Rd to Grayson Rd Widen from 2 to 4 lanes $8,361,100 2025 PFF X

C31 Ceres Mitchell Rd River Rd to Service Rd Widen to 6 lanes $9,146,800 2030 PFF X Crows Landing Rd & C32 Ceres Crows Landing Rd Install Traffic Signal $499,100 2040 CMAQ, PFF X X Grayson Rd C33 Ceres Service Road Service Road & Ustick Install Traffic Signal $499,100 2035 WLSP/PFF X X Roeding Rd & Faith Home C34 Ceres Roeding Rd Install Traffic Signal $499,100 2035 CMAQ, PFF X X Rd Whitmore Ave. @ E C35 Ceres Whitmore Ave Install Traffic Signal $499,100 2020 WLSP/PFF X X Street Whitmore Ave & Boothe C36 Ceres Whitmore Ave Install Traffic Signal $514,000 2020 CMAQ, PFF X X Rd Whitmore Ave. @ Knox C37 Ceres Whitmore Ave Install Traffic Signal $545,300 2028 WLSP/PFF X X Rd Redwood Rd & Central C38 Ceres Central Ave Ave and Grayson Rd & Install Traffic Signals $1,268,400 2035 PFF X X Central Ave Herndon Rd to Faith C39 Ceres Hatch Rd Install Complete Street Improvements $27,086,200 2030 PFF X X X Home Rd C40 Ceres Service Rd Moore Rd to Central Rd Install Complete Street Improvements $40,000,000 2035 PFF X X X Crows Landing Rd & B C41 Ceres Crows Landing Rd Install Traffic Signal $578,500 2030 WLSP/PFF X X Street C42 Ceres Ustick Rd Ustick Rd & F Street Install Traffic Signal $578,500 2030 WLSP/PFF X X Whitmore Ave. and Ustick C43 Ceres Whitmore Ave Install Traffic Signal $578,500 2030 WLSP/PFF X X Rd C44 Ceres Various Locations Various Locations Signal & ITS Improvements $3,353,200 2035 CMAQ X X Reconstruct Major Streets (Annual C45 Ceres Various Locations Various Locations $19,175,400 2035 STBGP X Basis) C46 Ceres Crows Landing Rd Service Rd to Grayson Rd Widen from 2 to 4 lanes $2,980,100 2035 PFF X

C47 Ceres Ustick Rd Ustick Rd & C Street Install Traffic Signal $670,700 2030 WLSP/PFF X X Whitmore Ave & Faith C48 Ceres Whitmore Ave Install Traffic Signal $670,700 2035 CMAQ, PFF X X Home Rd C49 Ceres Ustick Rd Ustick Rd & G Street Install Traffic Signal $777,500 2040 WLSP/PFF X X

C50 Ceres Grayson Rd Ustick Rd to Central Ave Widen from 2 to 4 lanes $2,889,600 2040 PFF X Roeding Rd & Mitchell C51 Ceres Mitchell Rd Traffic Signal Modification $433,900 2018 CMAQ X X Road Service Rd., Central Ave. C52 Ceres Various Locations ITS Signal Synchronization Phase III $1,300,000 2018 CMAQ X X & Don Pedro Rd. Crows Landing Rd. C53 Ceres Various Locations ITS Signal Synchronization Phase IV $552,425 2018 CMAQ X X Whitmore Rd. C54 Ceres Mitchell Rd Roeding Rd to Service Rd Mitchell Overlay Phase IV $680,000 2018 STBGP X

C55 Ceres Service Rd Central Ave to Blaker Rd Service Road Overlay Phase II $570,000 2018 STBGP X

C56 Ceres Service Rd Blaker Rd to Morgan Rd Service Road Overlay Phase I $660,000 2018 STBGP X

C57 Ceres Blaker Rd Service Rd to Hackett Rd Blaker Road Overlay Phase 1 $650,000 2019 STBGP X

Page 1 of 22 STANCOG 2018 Regional Transportation Plan

Tier I Roadway Projects Purpose / Need Project Details (P = Primary Purpose / X = Need)

Open to Funding ID Jurisdiction Location Project Limits Description Total Cost

Traffic Source Oper. Safety Streets System System Preserv. Capacity Enhance. Alt. Mode Complete Complete Reconstruct Local Streets (Annual C58 Ceres Various Locations Various Locations $53,756,000 2035 STBGP X Basis) Preventive Maintenance Local Streets Measure L & C59 Ceres Various Locations Various Locations $4,084,000 2035 X (Annual Basis) Prop 1B C60 Ceres Service Rd Morgan Rd & Service Rd Install Traffic Signal $560,000 2019 ATP X X

C61 Ceres Various Locations Various Locations Traffis Signal Optimization $100,000 2019 ATP X X

C62 Ceres El Camino Ave El Camino Ave at Pine St Roundabout $600,000 2020 ATP X X X

Total Ceres $326,963,125

Caltrans

NB & SB from Witmore CA01 Caltrans SR 99 Ave (Ceres) to Hammett TMS electrical elements $2,000,000 2019 SHOPP X Rd (near Ripon)

Pelandale to STA/SJ Install ramp meters, fiber optic and ITS CA02 Caltrans SR 99 $2,800,000 2020 SHOPP X County Line elements

SB on/off ramps at CA04 Caltrans SR 99 Briggsmore Ave/ Acceleration and deceleration lanes $2,400,000 2019 SHOPP X X Carpenter Rd Interchange

On SR 99 between Hatch CA05 Caltrans SR 99 Construct auxiliary lanes $2,640,000 2022 SHOPP X X Rd and South 9th St

On SR 99 from Keyes Rd CA06 Caltrans SR 99 Construct auxiliary lane $6,226,000 2025 SHOPP X X to Taylor Rd

STIP, IIP, Shoulder widening SR-132 from PM CA11 Caltrans SR 132 PM 0- 1.44 $3,500,000 2028 RSTP, CMAQ, X 1.44 to SJ River Bridge 20

Construct NB and SB SR-99 auxilliary STIP, IIP, CA12 Caltrans SR 99 PM 3.63 to 4.10 lanes between Monte Vista rd to Taylor $6,800,000 2028 X X RSTP, CMAQ Rd

Construct NB and SB SR-99 auxilliary STIP, IIP, CA13 Caltrans SR 99 PM R14.57 to R15.12 lanes between Crows Landing Rd to $7,100,000 2030 X X RSTP, CMAQ Tuolumne Blvd

Construct NB and SB auxilliary lanes STIP, IIP, CA14 Caltrans SR 99 PM R4.74 to R5.48 between Fulkerth Rd and Monte Vista $6,500,000 2030 X X RSTP, CMAQ Rd

Construct NB and SB SR-99 auxilliary STIP, IIP, CA15 Caltrans SR 99 PM R3.367 to R 4.29 lane between West Main St to Fulkerth $6,500,000 2030 X X RSTP, CMAQ Rd

STIP, IIP, CA16 Caltrans SR 132 PM 20.40 to PM 23.10 Widen shoulder SR-132 $3,900,000 2030 X RSTP, CMAQ

Widen shoulder SR-132 near STIP, IIP, CA17 Caltrans SR 132 PM 23.27 to 27.10 $4,900,000 2030 X Waterford RSTP, CMAQ

STIP, IIP, CA18 Caltrans SR 33 PM 1.31 to PM 6.80 Widen shoulder SR-33 $8,900,000 2030 X RSTP, CMAQ

Repair, update, and install ITS I-5, SR 99, SR132, elements, including installation of CA19 Caltrans SR 108, SR 120, and Various locations MVPs, approx 10 CMS, 15 CCTV $4,800,000 2022 SHOPP X SR 219 cameras, 60 TMS, 8 EMS, 5 RWIS and Fiber Optic lines Install ramp meters and ITS elements CA20 Caltrans SR 99 PM 17.0 - 24.7 $27,300,000 2020 SHOPP X from Stanislaus River to Kansas Ave Install ramp meters and ITS elements CA21 Caltrans SR 99 PM 15- 17.0 on SR-99 from Kansas Ave to $19,500,000 2022 SHOPP X Tuolumne River Road In Stanislaus County on SR-99 from Whitmore Ave CA22 Caltrans SR 99 Install ramp meters and ITS elements $23,400,000 2022 SHOPP X to Tuolumne River Road. PM 12.2- 15.0 In Stanislaus County on SR-99 from 6th Street to CA23 Caltrans SR 99 Install ramp meters and ITS elements $15,600,000 2023 SHOPP X Richland Ave. PM 11.0 - 12.4

Page 2 of 22 STANCOG 2018 Regional Transportation Plan

Tier I Roadway Projects Purpose / Need Project Details (P = Primary Purpose / X = Need)

Open to Funding ID Jurisdiction Location Project Limits Description Total Cost

Traffic Source Oper. Safety Streets System System Preserv. Capacity Enhance. Alt. Mode Complete Complete In Stanislaus County on SR-99 from W. Barnhart CA24 Caltrans SR 99 Install ramp meters and ITS elements $26,325,000 2023 SHOPP X Road to Service Road. PM7.5- 10.5 In Stanislaus County on SR-99 from W. Canal CA25 Caltrans SR 99 Install ramp meters and ITS elements $29,250,000 2022 SHOPP X Drive to W. Barnhart Road. PM 4.0-7.5 In Stanislaus County on SR-99 from 0.6 South of CA26 Caltrans SR 99 Install ramp meters and ITS elements $29,250,000 2022 SHOPP X Lander Ave to W. Canal Drive. PM 1.0-4.0 Improve NB and SB on/off ramps at STIP, IIP, CA27 Caltrans SR 99/ SR 165 I/C SR 99/ SR 165 I/C Central Turlock/SR-165 Lander Ave $2,500,000 2024 X X RSTP, CMAQ interchange

Total Caltrans $242,091,000

City of Hughson

Whitmore Avenue and STBGP, Whitmore Avenue H06 Hughson Santa Fe Avenue Construct Roundabout $1,000,000 2021 Measure L, X X and Santa Fe Avenue Intersection CMAQ

Hatch Rd to Whitmore Dev. Impact H07 Hughson Euclid Ave Install Complete Street Improvements $2,630,400 2022 X X X X Ave Fees, SB 1

Whitmore Ave to Santa Fe Improve to 2-lane Major Dev. Impact H08 Hughson 7th Street $2,288,100 2023 X Ave Collector Fees, SB 1

7th Street and Santa 7th Street and Santa Fe Dev. Impact H09 Hughson Roadway Realignment Project $350,000 2024 X X Fe Avenue Avenue Fees

Various Intersection 2018- STBGP, H10 Hughson Various Locations Various Locations $39,000 X X Improvements 2042 CMAQ

Dev Impact Whitmore Avenue to S Improve to 2-lane H11 Hughson Tully Road $450,000 2020 Fees, STBGP, X City Limit Major Collector (Goods Movement) SB 1

Dev Impact H12 Hughson Santa Fe Ave South of Hatch Road Construct Roundabout $1,000,000 2024 X Fees, CMAQ

Dev Impact H13 Hughson Santa Fe Ave North of 7th Street Construct Roundabout $1,000,000 2022 X Fees, CMAQ

2018- STBGP, H14 Hughson Various Locations Various Locations Roadway Rehabilitation $8,548,075 X X 2042 Measure L

Total Hughson $17,305,575

City of Modesto

M49 Modesto 10th Street J St. to Morton Blvd Pedestrian & Bicycle Enhancements $8,000,000 2020 STBGP, Local X X

M50 Modesto J Street Needham to 9th Street Pedestrian & Bike Enhancements $10,000,000 2020 STBGP, Local X X

M51 Modesto Carpenter Rd Chicago Ave To Maze Rd Install Complete Street Improvements $19,001,600 2020 CMAQ, CFF X X X X

McHenry Ave to Coffee M52 Modesto Claratina Ave Widen from 2 to 6-lane Expressway $16,391,000 2018 STBGP, CFF X Rd M53 Modesto Claratina Ave Coffee Rd. to Oakdale Rd Widen from 2 to 6-lane Expressway $16,391,000 2020 STBGP, CFF X Pelandale Ave to Kiernan M54 Modesto Dale Rd Widen from 4 to 6 lanes $7,600,700 2020 STBGP, CFD X Ave Pelandale Ave to M55 Modesto Dale Rd Widen from 4 to 6 lanes $3,800,400 2020 STBGP X Standiford Ave CFF, CFD M56 Modesto Claus Rd Briggsmore to Sylvan Widen from 2 to 4 lanes $5,000,000 2023 Tax, X Developer

M57 Modesto Hwy 132 SR 99 to 9th Street Various improvements $7,000,000 2022 STIP X Sylvan Ave to Claratina STBGP, CFF, M58 Modesto Oakdale Rd Widen from 3 to 6 lanes $7,600,700 2020 X X Ave Local M59 Modesto Oakdale Rd Floyd Ave to Sylvan Ave Complete Street Improvements $7,600,700 2020 STBGP, Local X X Sylvan Ave to Claratina STBGP, CFF, M60 Modesto Roselle Ave Widen from 2 to 4 lanes $8,867,400 2020 X Rd Local M61 Modesto Scenic Avenue Coffee to Bodem Safety Improvements $2,533,600 2019 STBGP, HSIP X

2020- STBGP, M62 Modesto Various Locations Various Locations Roadway Rehabilitation $200,000,000 X 2042 Measure L

Page 3 of 22 STANCOG 2018 Regional Transportation Plan

Tier I Roadway Projects Purpose / Need Project Details (P = Primary Purpose / X = Need)

Open to Funding ID Jurisdiction Location Project Limits Description Total Cost

Traffic Source Oper. Safety Streets System System Preserv. Capacity Enhance. Alt. Mode Complete Complete 2020- CMAQ, M63 Modesto Various Locations Various Locations Various intersection Improvements $75,000,000 X X 2042 Measure L Widen Sisk Rd/Pelandale Intersection to the south-west corner of the intersection, construct a second left- SR 99/Pelandale turn lane from EB Pelandale to NB Sisk M79 Modesto SR 99 $5,000,000 2025 STIP, CFF X Interchange (Phase 2) Rd, a third dedicated through lane on EB Pelandale, and a dedicated right- turn lane from EB Pelandale to SB Sisk Rd. Briggsmore/Carpenter PE & ROW (reconstruction to 8 lane M80 Modesto SR 99 $20,000,000 2020 STIP, Local X Interchange interchange)

Standiford/Beckwith PE & ROW (reconstruction to 8 lane STIP, Local, M81 Modesto SR 99 $20,000,000 2020 X Interchange interchange) CFF Construct a two-lane expressway from N. Dakota Ave to the Needham St. State Route 99 to Dakota Overcrossing. (Phase 1 of ultimate L, SB 1, STIP, M82 Modesto 132 Ave Phase 1 (2-lane build-out of SR132 West $100,000,000 X X X 2020 CMAQ, STBG expressway) Freeway/Expressway Project) (Reference: 2014 RTP Project ID - RE01). State Route 99 to Dakota Construct a four lane freeway from N. Ave (Phase 2 Ultimate 4 L, SB 1, STIP, M83 Modesto 132 Dakota Ave to the Needham St. $160,000,000 2028 X X X lane facility with SR-99 CMAQ, STBG Overcrossing. connections)

Briggsmore/Carpenter L, SB 1, STIP, M84 Modesto SR 99 Reconstruct to 8 Lane Interchange $98,679,400 2026 X X X Interchange CMAQ, STBG

L, SB 1, STIP, Standiford/Beckwith M85 Modesto SR-99 Reconstruct to 8 Lane Interchange $100,000,000 2035 CMAQ, STBG, X Interchange CFF, Local

Total Modesto $898,466,500

City of Newman

CFF, LTF, Highway 33 to Canal STBGP, Local, N02 Newman Merced Avenue Install Collector Street improvements $3,965,100 2019 X X X School Rd SB1, Measure L

CFF, LTF, Inyo Ave to South City Install 4 Lane Arterial Roadway N03 Newman SR-33 (South) $5,700,500 2020 CMAQ, X limits Improvements STBGP, Local

CFF, LTF, Highway 33/Sherman N04 Newman SR-33 (South) Install Traffic Signal $1,900,200 2020 CMAQ, X X Parkway STBGP, Local

CFF, LTF, Highway 33 to Canal STBGP, Local, N05 Newman Inyo Ave Install Collector Street improvements $7,751,800 2021 X X School Rd SB1, Measure L

CFF, LTF, Install 4 Lane Arterial Roadway STBGP, Local, N06 Newman SR-33 Yolo St to Sherman Pkwy $4,753,100 2022 X Improvements SB1, Measure L

CFF, LTF, Sherman Pkwy to Stuhr Install 4 Lane Arterial Roadway STBGP, Local, N07 Newman SR-33 $4,298,600 2024 X Road Improvements SB1 , Measure L

CFF, LTF, STBGP, CCID Canal to Highway Install 2 Lane Arterial Roadway N08 Newman Stuhr Road $8,117,200 2025 CMAQ, Local, X X X X 33 Improvements SB 1, Measure L

CFF, LTF, Yolo Avenue to Inyo Install 4 Lane Arterial Roadway STBGP, Local, N09 Newman SR-33 $3,689,700 2030 X Avenue Improvements SB 1, Measure L

Page 4 of 22 STANCOG 2018 Regional Transportation Plan

Tier I Roadway Projects Purpose / Need Project Details (P = Primary Purpose / X = Need)

Open to Funding ID Jurisdiction Location Project Limits Description Total Cost

Traffic Source Oper. Safety Streets System System Preserv. Capacity Enhance. Alt. Mode Complete Complete

CFF, LTF, STBGP, City Limit to Driskell Collector Street Improvements, N10 Newman Hills Ferry Road $137,500 2018 CMAQ, Local, X Avenue Microsurface Oil 2" SB1, Measure L CFF, LTF, CMAQ, Drisekll Avenue to Hwy. N11 Newman Merced Street, Traffic flow and roadway improvements $87,290 2018 STBGP, Local, X X 33 SB1, Measure L CFF, LTF, STBGP, Collector Street Improvements N12 Newman Inyo Avenue Hwy 33 to City Limit $294,050 2018 CMAQ, Local, X X Pulverized Construction SB1, Measure L CFF, LTF, STBGP, Inyo Avenue to Patchett Collector Street Improvements N13 Newman Upper Road $62,740 2018 CMAQ, Local, X X Drive Pulverized Construction SB 1, Measure L CFF, LTF, STBGP, Collector Street Improvements N14 Newman Yolo Street S Street to Hwy 33 $124,340 2018 CMAQ, Local, X X Pulverized Construction SB 1, Measure L CFF, LTF, STBGP, Inyo Avenue to Collector Street Improvements N15 Newman Prince Road $67,040 2018 CMAQ, Local, X X X X X Strawbridge Pulverized Construction SB 1, Measure L CFF, LTF, STBGP, Collector Street Improvements N16 Newman Orestimba Road Lions Park to S Street $134,770 2018 CMAQ, Local, X X Pulverized Construction SB 1, Measure L

Oresrtimba Road to Collector Street Improvements LTF, SB1, N17 Newman Hardin Road $96,795 2018 X X Stephens Ave. Pulverized Construction Measure L

Mariposa to Stephens, LTF, SB1, N18 Newman R Street Pulverized Construction $177,460 2018 X X including Stephens Ave. Measure L

Merced County line Highway and pedestrian safety L, SB 1, STIP, N19 Newman SR 33 $10,000,000 2020 X X X northward to Yolo Avenue improvements CMAQ, STBG

Total Newman $51,358,185

City of Oakdale

O13 Oakdale D St Rodeo to Stearns Rd Install Complete Street Improvements $4,426,950 2018 CFF X X X

CFF, STBGP, O14 Oakdale F St Maag Ave to Stearns Rd Widen Roadway to 5-lanes $4,356,000 2023 X Developer

CFF, STBGP, O15 Oakdale F St Willowood to Oak Widen Roadway to 5-lanes $763,688 2024 X Developer

Orsi Road to Stearns CFF, O16 Oakdale J St Install Complete Street Improvements $3,460,600 2035 X X X Road Developer CFF, O17 Oakdale Crane Road F Street to Pontiac Widen Roadway to 4-lanes $1,702,500 2020 X Developer CFF, O18 Oakdale Orsi Rd Sierra Rd to F St Install Complete Street Improvements $3,460,600 2030 X X X Developer O19 Oakdale Sierra Rd Maag Ave to Stearns Rd Install Complete Street Improvements $1,435,500 2026 CFF, STBGP X X

CFF, O20 Oakdale Stearns Rd F St to Sierra Rd Install Complete Street Improvements $4,034,400 2023 X X Developer

CFF, Dev. Impact Fees, O21 Oakdale F St / Crane Intersection Improve intersection & modify signal $199,500 2026 X General Fund, SB 1

CFF, Dev. Impact Fees, O22 Oakdale F St / Willowood Intersection Striping $22,500 2023 X General Fund, SB 1

Page 5 of 22 STANCOG 2018 Regional Transportation Plan

Tier I Roadway Projects Purpose / Need Project Details (P = Primary Purpose / X = Need)

Open to Funding ID Jurisdiction Location Project Limits Description Total Cost

Traffic Source Oper. Safety Streets System System Preserv. Capacity Enhance. Alt. Mode Complete Complete

CFF, Dev. Install Signal & Intersection Impact Fees, O23 Oakdale F St / Stearns Intersection $768,800 2028 X Improvements General Fund, SB 1

CFF, Dev. Install Signal & Intersection Impact Fees, O24 Oakdale Greger / Kaufman Intersection $433,125 2042 X Improvements General Fund, SB 1

CFF, Dev. Impact Fees, O25 Oakdale J St / 5th Ave Intersection Striping & Signage $22,500 2019 X General Fund, SB 1

CFF, Dev. Impact Fees, O26 Oakdale J St / Maag Ave Intersection Striping & Signage $22,500 2018 X General Fund, SB 1

CFF, Dev. Impact Fees, O27 Oakdale Sierra / Maag Intersection Striping & Signage $22,500 2019 X General Fund, SB 1

CFF, Dev. Install Signal & Intersection Impact Fees, O28 Oakdale Sierra / Stearns Intersection $456,000 2025 X Improvements General Fund, SB 1

Install Traffic Signals and Various 2018- O29 Oakdale Various Locations Various Locations $1,000,000 CMAQ X X Intersection Improvements 2025

STBGP, 2018- O30 Oakdale Various Locations Various Locations Roadway Rehabilitation $25,000,000 CMAQ, Prop X 2042 42

L, SB 1, STIP, O32 Oakdale SR108-SR120 Oakdale / County Intersection Improvements at Rodeo $10,000,000 2028 X X CMAQ, STBG

Total Oakdale $61,587,663

City of Patterson

Baldwin Road to Rogers Install Complete Street Improvements, Dev. Fees, P03 Patterson Sperry Ave $12,610,000 2020 X X Road widen to four lanes STBGP

Signal and Off-Ramp Improvements at Dev. Fees, Sperry Ave P04 Patterson I-5 to Rogers Road interchange. Widen Sperry Ave to 4 $17,505,000 2020 STIP, CMAQ, X X Interchange Lanes between Rogers Road and I-5. Local

New Delta Mendota to Keytone P05 Patterson Rogers Rd Widen from 2 to 4 lanes $5,000,000 2020 Development, X Pacific Park Way Dev. Fees

2018- Dev. Fees, P06 Patterson Various Locations Various Locations Install Traffic Signals $17,008,800 X X 2030 CMAQ

2018- STBGP, P07 Patterson Various Locations Various Locations Roadway Rehabilitation $5,510,100 X 2030 CMAQ

L, SB 1, STIP, P08 Patterson Zacharias Rd Raines Rd to I-5 Construct New Interchange at I-5 $75,000,000 2030 X X X CMAQ, STBG

Total Patterson $132,633,900

City of Riverbank

STBGP, LTF, 2018- R16 Riverbank Various Locations Various Locations Roadway Rehabilitation $4,000,000 SB-1, X 2025 Measure L Pavement STBGP, LTF, Management: 2018- R17 Riverbank Various Locations Roadway Rehabilitation $36,000,000 SB-1, X Prevntative 2038 Measure L Maintenance

Page 6 of 22 STANCOG 2018 Regional Transportation Plan

Tier I Roadway Projects Purpose / Need Project Details (P = Primary Purpose / X = Need)

Open to Funding ID Jurisdiction Location Project Limits Description Total Cost

Traffic Source Oper. Safety Streets System System Preserv. Capacity Enhance. Alt. Mode Complete Complete

STBGP, Dev. R18 Riverbank Patterson Road First Street to Claus Rd Install Complete Street Improvements $6,844,500 2025 Fees/Traffic X X X Impact Fees

Dev. R19 Riverbank Roselle Avenue Patterson to Claribel Install Complete Street Improvements $4,311,400 2025 Fees/Traffic X X X Impact Fees

Dev. R20 Riverbank Claus Road California to Claribel Widen roadway from 2-4 lanes $1,895,700 2025 Fees/Traffic X Impact Fees Signal improvements with pedestrian R21 Riverbank Patterson Rd Patterson at Roselle $1,307,000 2018 CMAQ X X crossings and sidewalks R22 Riverbank Patterson Rd Patterson at Third Signal improvements $450,300 2025 CMAQ X X

R23 Riverbank Claus Road Claus at California Signal improvements $652,400 2020 CMAQ X X

R24 Riverbank Patterson Rd Patterson at Eighth Signal improvements $403,200 2030 CMAQ X X

R25 Riverbank Patterson Rd Patterson at First Intersection Improvements $933,500 2020 CMAQ X X Roselle/Morrill R26 Riverbank Intersection Roselle at Morrill Intersection Improvements $434,000 2018 CMAQ X Improvements

Install signal light at Claus & SR-108 L, SB 1, STIP, R27 Riverbank Claus Rd SR-108 at Claus and Install congestion Management $4,201,000 2023 CMAQ, X X Improvements at First Street & SR-108 STBGP

Dev. First Street north of R28 Riverbank First Street Railroad crossing improvements $396,600 2020 Fees/Traffic X X Patterson Road Impact Fees

Dev. Third Street north of R29 Riverbank Third Street Railroad crossing improvements $500,000 2021 Fees/Traffic X X Patterson Road Impact Fees

Dev. Eighth Street north of R30 Riverbank Eighth Street Railroad crossing improvements $500,000 2022 Fees/Traffic X X Patterson Road Impact Fees

Dev. Snedigar Road north of R31 Riverbank Snedigar Road Railroad crossing improvements $311,566 2023 Fees/Traffic X X Patterson Road Impact Fees

Dev. Patterson Road west of R32 Riverbank Patterson Rd Railroad crossing improvements $311,566 2019 Fees/Traffic X X Terminal Avenue Impact Fees

Measure L - Install Congestion Management R33 Riverbank SR-108 SR-108 at First Street $2,512,700 2027 Regional X improvements Project

Total Riverbank $65,965,432

StanCOG

2018- L, SB 1, RE17 StanCOG Countywide Countywide DIBS $5,000,000 X X 2042 CMAQ

Total StanCOG Regional $5,000,000

Stanislaus County

Crows Landing Road Stanislaus Improve 22 miles to Expressway PFF, SB 1, L, S01 Corridor SR-99 to Interstate 5 $9,060,000 2035 X X X X County standards STBGP Improvements Stanislaus SR-99 Interchange with PFF, SB 1, L, S02 SR-99 Reconstruct interchange $15,000,000 2035 X County Crows Landing Road STBGP Stanislaus I-5 Interchange with Fink PFF, SB 1, L, S03 I-5 Reconstruct interchange $25,000,000 2035 X County Road STBGP Stanislaus SR-99 Interchange with PFF, SB 1, L, S04 SR-99 Reconstruct interchange $45,000,000 2035 X County Hammett Road STBGP Feasibility Study - widen to 8 lane Stanislaus North County limits to PFF, SB 1, L, S05 SR-99 HOV/HOP expresslane; including ramp $1,000,000 2035 X X County South County limits STBGP metering Stanislaus S21 Various Locations Various Locations Roadway Rehabilitation $165,000,000 2040 STBGP, L X County Stanislaus McHenry Ave @ S22 McHenry Ave Seismic Bridge Replacement $21,493,000 2018 HBP, PFF X X X County Stanislaus River Bridge Stanislaus Crows Landing Rd. & S23 Crows Landing Rd Intersection Improvements $2,520,000 2018 CMAQ, PFF, L X X County Grayson Rd

Page 7 of 22 STANCOG 2018 Regional Transportation Plan

Tier I Roadway Projects Purpose / Need Project Details (P = Primary Purpose / X = Need)

Open to Funding ID Jurisdiction Location Project Limits Description Total Cost

Traffic Source Oper. Safety Streets System System Preserv. Capacity Enhance. Alt. Mode Complete Complete Stanislaus S24 Albers Rd Milnes to Claribel Widen to 3 lanes $5,600,000 2022 PFF, L X County Stanislaus Seismic Bridge Replacement - 3-lane HBP/LSSRP, S25 Crows Landing Rd San Joaquin River Bridge $18,000,000 2020 X X X County Bridge PFF Stanislaus Hickman Rd @ Tuolumne S26 Hickman Rd Seismic Bridge Replacement $23,410,000 2021 HBP/LSSRP X X County River Stanislaus Hills Ferry Rd @ San S27 Hills Ferry Rd Seismic Bridge Retrofit - Mandatory $7,800,500 2020 HBP/LSSRP X X County Joaquin River Stanislaus Santa Fe Ave @ HBP/LSSRP, S28 Santa Fe Ave Seismic Bridge Replacement $14,300,000 2019 X X X County Tuolumne River Bridge PFF Stanislaus Seventh St @ Tuolumne Seismic Bridge Replacement; 4 lane S29 Seventh St $45,000,000 2021 HBP X X X X X County River Bridge bridge with pedestrian access Stanislaus Crows Landing Rd & S30 Crows Landing Rd Intersection improvements $2,520,000 2020 CMAQ, PFF, L X X County Keyes Rd Stanislaus Crows Landing Rd & S31 Crows Landing Rd Intersection Improvements $2,500,000 2021 PFF, L X X County Fulkerth Ave Stanislaus Kilburn Rd @ Orestimba S32 Kilburn Rd Replace Bridge (Critical) $3,611,707 2019 HBP X X County Creek Bridge Stanislaus Crows Landing Rd & S33 Carpenter Rd Intersection Improvements $2,500,000 2029 CMAQ, PFF, L X X County Carpenter Rd Stanislaus Carpenter Rd & Grayson S34 Carpenter Rd Intersection Improvements $2,500,000 2026 CMAQ, PFF, L X X County Rd Stanislaus S35 Carpenter Rd Carpenter Rd & Keyes Rd Intersection Improvements $2,400,000 2029 CMAQ, PFF, L X X County Stanislaus Carpenter Rd & W. Main S36 Carpenter Rd Intersection Improvements $2,160,000 2021 CMAQ, PFF, L X X County St Stanislaus Carpenter Rd & Whitmore S37 Carpenter Rd Intersection Improvements $3,000,000 2018 CMAQ, PFF, L X X County Ave Stanislaus S38 W. Main St. W. Main St & Central Ave Intersection Improvements $5,000,000 2022 CMAQ, PFF, L X X County Stanislaus S39 Claribel Rd Claribel Rd & Roselle Ave Intersection Improvements $4,250,000 2018 CMAQ, PFF X X County Stanislaus S40 Geer Rd Geer & Santa Fe Intersection Improvements $3,240,000 2018 CMAQ, PFF, L X X County Stanislaus S41 Geer Rd Geer & Whitmore Intersection Improvements $3,000,000 2018 CMAQ, PFF,L X X County Stanislaus Golden State Blvd & Golf S42 Golden State Blvd Intersection Improvements $2,388,200 2020 CMAQ, PFF X X County Rd / Berkeley Ave Stanislaus Keyes Road & SR 99 S43 Keyes Road Ramp Signalization $750,000 2018 PFF X X County Exit/Entrance Ramps Stanislaus S44 Santa Fe Ave Santa Fe Ave & East Ave Intersection Improvements $2,400,000 2029 CMAQ, PFF, L X X County Stanislaus Intersection Improvements; Upgrade S45 Santa Fe Ave Santa Fe Ave & Keyes Rd $3,600,000 2023 CMAQ, PFF, L X X County Railroad Crossing Equipment

Stanislaus Intersection Improvements; Upgrade S46 Santa Fe Ave Santa Fe Ave & Main St $3,600,000 2022 CMAQ, PFF, L X X County Railroad Crossing Equipment

Stanislaus Santa Fe Ave & Service Intersection Improvementsl; Upgrade S47 Santa Fe Ave $3,600,000 2023 CMAQ, PFF, L X X County Rd Railroad Crossing Equipment Stanislaus Whitmore Ave to Keyes S48 Carpenter Rd Widen to 3 lanes $4,500,000 2020 PFF, L X County Rd Stanislaus Keyes Rd to Monte Vista S49 Carpenter Rd Widen to 3 lanes $2,900,000 2022 PFF, L X County Ave Stanislaus Monte Vista Ave to W. S50 Carpenter Rd Widen to 3 lanes $2,700,000 2020 L X County Main St Stanislaus Terminal Ave to Claribel S51 Claus Rd Widen to 3 lanes $2,648,600 2024 L X County Rd Stanislaus Keyes Rd to Monte Vista S52 Crows Landing Rd Widen to 3 lanes $2,900,000 2020 L X County Ave Stanislaus Monte Vista Ave to W. S53 Crows Landing Rd Widen to 3 lanes $2,459,800 2020 L X County Main St Stanislaus S54 Crows Landing Rd W. Main St to Harding Rd Widen to 3 lanes $2,533,600 2021 L X County Stanislaus Harding Rd to Carpenter S55 Crows Landing Rd Widen to 3 lanes $3,091,100 2023 L X County Rd Stanislaus Carpenter Rd to River Rd/ S56 Crows Landing Rd Widen to 3 lanes $2,000,000 2025 PFF, L X County Marshall Rd Stanislaus River Rd/Marshall Rd to S57 Crows Landing Rd Widen to 3 lanes $9,700,000 2024 L X County SR-33 Stanislaus S58 Geer-Albers Taylor Rd to Santa Fe Ave Widen to 3 lanes $3,700,000 2022 L X County Stanislaus S59 Geer-Albers Santa Fe Ave to Hatch Rd Widen to 3 lanes $3,927,000 2023 L X County Stanislaus S60 Geer-Albers Hatch Rd to SR-132 Widen to 3 lanes $3,628,600 2024 L X County Stanislaus S61 Geer-Albers SR-132 to Milnes Rd Widen to 3 lanes $10,696,400 2028 L X County Stanislaus S62 Santa Fe Ave Keyes Rd to Geer Rd Widen to 3 lanes $4,405,700 2026 L X County

Page 8 of 22 STANCOG 2018 Regional Transportation Plan

Tier I Roadway Projects Purpose / Need Project Details (P = Primary Purpose / X = Need)

Open to Funding ID Jurisdiction Location Project Limits Description Total Cost

Traffic Source Oper. Safety Streets System System Preserv. Capacity Enhance. Alt. Mode Complete Complete Stanislaus S63 Santa Fe Ave Geer Rd to Hatch Rd Widen to 3 lanes $3,116,000 2028 L X County Stanislaus S64 Santa Fe Ave Hatch to Tuolumne River Widen to 3 lanes $2,809,900 2028 L X County Stanislaus San Joaquin River to S65 W. Main St Widen to 3 lanes $3,900,000 2024 L X County Carpenter Rd Stanislaus Carpenter Rd to Crows S66 W. Main St Widen to 3 lanes $3,443,700 2020 L X County Landing Rd Stanislaus Crows Landing Rd to S67 W. Main St Widen to 3 lanes $4,300,000 2020 L X County Mitchell Rd Stanislaus Mitchell Rd to Washington S68 W. Main St Widen to 3 lanes $3,783,900 2022 L X County Rd Stanislaus S69 SR-219 SR-99 to McHenry Ave Widen to 6-lanes $41,527,100 2024 STIP X County Stanislaus Cooperstown Road at Bridge Replacement - Off System S70 Cooperstown Rd $2,600,000 2019 HBP X X County Gallup Creek Bridge Toll Credits Stanislaus Cooperstown Road at Bridge Replacement - Off System S71 Cooperstown Rd $2,300,000 2021 HBP X X County Rydberg Creek Bridge Toll Credits Stanislaus Crabtree Road at Dry Bridge Replacement - Off System S72 Crabtree Rd $5,322,000 2020 HBP X X County Creek Bridge Toll Credits Stanislaus Gilbert Road at Ceres Bridge Replacement - Off System S73 Gilbert Rd $2,423,000 2019 HBP X X County Main Canal Bridge Toll Credits Pleasant Valley Road at Stanislaus Bridge Replacement - Off System S74 Pleasant Valley Rd South San Joaquin Main $2,900,000 2019 HBP X X County Bridge Toll Credits Canal Stanislaus Shiells Road over CCID Bridge Replacement - Off System S75 Shiells Rd $2,041,000 2019 HBP X X County Main Canal Bridge Toll Credits Stanislaus St. Francis Ave at MID Bridge Replacement - Off System S76 St. Francis $1,885,000 2019 HBP X X County Main Canal Bridge Toll Credits Tegner Road at Turlock Stanislaus Bridge Replacement - Off System S77 Tegner Rd Irrigation District Lateral $2,586,100 2019 HBP X X County Bridge Toll Credits #5 Stanislaus Tim Bell Road at Dry Bridge Replacement - Off System S78 Tim Bell Road $15,482,400 2018 HBP X X County Creek Bridge Toll Credits Stanislaus Las Palmas Ave over San S79 Las Palmas Bridge Rehabilitation $24,221,700 2022 HBP X X County Joaquin River Stanislaus Milton Road over Rock Bridge Replacement - Off System S80 Milton Road $4,530,000 2020 HBP X X County Creek Tributary Bridge Toll Credits Stanislaus Sonora Road over S81 Sonora Road Replacement $3,200,000 2022 HBP X X County Martells Creek Stanislaus Claribel Road to S82 Albers Rd Widen to 5 lanes $6,000,000 2022 PFF/STBGP X County Warnerville Road Stanislaus South County Turlock City Limits to Construct 2-6 Lane Expressway on S83 $278,000,000 2025 PFF X X County Corridor Interstate 5 new alignment Stanislaus Oakdale-Waterford Over Claribel Bridge S84 Replace Bridge $1,928,700 2022 HBP X X X County Hwy Lateral Stanislaus S85 Valley Home Rd. Over Lone Tree Creek Bridge Rehabilitation $2,314,300 2022 HBP X X County Stanislaus S86 Pioneer Ave. Over Lone Tree Creek Replace Bridge $1,725,250 2022 HBP X X X County Stanislaus Over Rock Creek S87 Milton Rd. Replace Bridge $1,989,000 2022 HBP X X X County Tributary Stanislaus S88 Milton Rd. Over Hood Creek Replace Bridge $3,714,900 2022 HBP X X X County Stanislaus S89 Lake Road Over T.I.D. Main Canal Replace Bridge $4,295,050 2022 HBP X X X County Stanislaus Ower Main Canal @ S90 Montpelier Road Replace Bridge $2,669,050 2022 HBP X X X County Dallas Rd Stanislaus CMAQ, S91 Claribel Rd Claribel at Roselle Signal improvements $4,242,774 2019 X X County STBGP Stanislaus SR 132 Extension Dakota Construct 4-lane divided expressway or L, SB 1, STIP, S101 132 $117,000,000 2026 X X X County Avenue to Gates Road freeway (County) CMAQ, STBG

Stanislaus L, SB 1, STIP, S102 North County Corridor Tully Rd to SR 120/108 Construct 2-6 lane expressway $680,000,000 2026 X X X County CMAQ, STBG

Stanislaus 4-Lane Expressway L, SB 1, STIP, S103 Faith Home Road Hatch Rd to Garner Road $71,700,000 2025 X X X County 2-Lane Expressway CMAQ, STBG

Stanislaus Ladd Rd to the south end L, SB 1, STIP, S104 McHenry Widen to 5 Lanes $13,025,000 2021 X X County of the McHenry Bridge CMAQ, STBG Stanislaus Over TID Ceres Main S105 Keyes Road Replace Bridge $1,500,000 2021 SB1 X X County Canal Stanislaus Over TID Upper Lateral S106 Quincy Road Replace Bridge $1,500,000 2021 SB2 X X County #3 Stanislaus Eastin Road & Orestimba Low water crossing - bridge or culvert S107 Eastin Road $2,500,000 2021 HSIP, SB1 X County Creek construction Stanislaus Catfish Camp to 1,200' S108 Crows Landing Road Raise Road profile $475,000 2021 SB1 X X County southwest

Page 9 of 22 STANCOG 2018 Regional Transportation Plan

Tier I Roadway Projects Purpose / Need Project Details (P = Primary Purpose / X = Need)

Open to Funding ID Jurisdiction Location Project Limits Description Total Cost

Traffic Source Oper. Safety Streets System System Preserv. Capacity Enhance. Alt. Mode Complete Complete

Stanislaus Geer Road and Santa Fe Intersection Improvements - curb, S109 Geer Road $1,000,000 2020 SB1 X County Avenue gutter, SD improvements @ NW corner Stanislaus W. Main St & Faith Home S110 Faith Home Rd Intersection Improvements $2,520,000 2025 CMAQ, PFF, L X County Rd

Total Stanislaus County $1,843,465,031

City of Turlock

CMAQ, Dev. T14 Turlock SR-99 SR-99 & Fulkerth Rd Reconstruct Interchange $12,667,800 2020 Fees, STBGP, X X STIP Reconstruction and rehabilitate Lander Ave. and 500 ft. roadway, install median, add Class II Measure L, SB T15 Turlock W. Main St. $6,200,000 2018 X X west of S. Walnut Rd. and Class III bicycle facilities, add 1 sidewalk. Widen from 2-lane to 4-lane Arterial Dev. Fees, T16 Turlock Fulkerth Rd Tegner Rd to Dianne Dr $580,400 2022 X X with Class II bike facility and transit STBG Install Median; Add one (1) lane with Dev. Fees, T17 Turlock Monte Vista Ave Olive Ave to Berkeley Ave $1,317,500 2020 X X X Class II bike facility STBG Washington Rd to Tegner Widen from 2-lane to 4-lane Arterial Dev. Fees, T18 Turlock Fulkerth Rd $3,419,800 2022 X X Rd with Class II bike facility STBG Linwood Ave to Fulkerth Widen from 2-lane to 4-lane Arterial Dev. Fees, T19 Turlock Washington Rd $2,176,400 2030 X X Rd with Class II bike facility and transit STBG

Linwood Ave to W. Main Construct new 2-lane Industrial Dev. Fees, T20 Turlock Tegner Rd $434,600 2025 X X St Collector with Class II bike facility STBG

Construct new 2-lane Collector with Dev. Fees, T21 Turlock W. Canal Dr SR-99 to Tegner Rd $2,065,400 2025 X X Class I bike facility STBG

Tuolumne Rd to Tornell Widen from 2-lane to 4-lane Arterial T22 Turlock N. Olive Ave $757,600 2025 Dev. Fees X X Rd with Class II bike facility

Widen from 2-lane to 4-lane Arterial T23 Turlock N. Olive Ave Canal Dr to Wayside Rd $852,600 2025 Dev. Fees X X with Class II bike facility and transit

Widen from 2-lane to 4-lane Arterial T24 Turlock N. Olive Ave Wayside Dr to North Ave $888,100 2025 Dev. Fees X X with Class II bike facility and transit Widen from 2-lane to 3-lane Collector Dev. Fees, T25 Turlock W. Linwood Ave Walnut Rd to Lander Ave with Class II bike facility and transit $615,700 2030 X X STBG (West Ave. South to Lander)

Walnut Rd to Washington Widen from 2-lane to 3-lane Collector Dev. Fees, T26 Turlock W. Linwood Ave $4,207,400 2025 X X Rd with Class II bike facility STBG

Washington Rd to Kilroy Construct new 2-lane Collector with Dev. Fees, T27 Turlock W. Canal Dr $2,507,600 2025 X X Rd Class I bike facility STBG

Widen from 2-lane to 4-lane Arterial with Class III bike facility from Minaret Golden State Blvd to Dev. Fees, T28 Turlock East Ave to S. Berkeley/Class II from S. Berkeley $5,958,600 2030 X X Daubenberger Rd STBG to Daubenberger and transit from Oak to S. Johnson Complete 6-lane Boulevard with Class Taylor Rd to Monte Vista Dev. Fees, T29 Turlock Golden State Blvd II bike facility and transit from $3,310,100 2030 X X Ave STBG Christoffersen to Monte Vista Monte Vista Ave to Complete 6-lane Boulevard with Class Dev. Fees, T30 Turlock Golden State Blvd $2,869,300 2028 X X Fulkerth Rd II bike facility STBG W. Main St to W. Canal Dev. Fees, T31 Turlock N. Kilroy Ave Construct new Collector $743,100 2025 X Dr STBG Monte Vista Ave to Dev. Fees, T32 Turlock Tegner Rd Complete 2-lane Industrial Collector $674,300 2025 X Fulkerth Rd STBG Fulkerth Rd to north of Construct new 2-lane Industrial Dev. Fees, T33 Turlock Tegner Rd $995,700 2025 X Pedretti Park Collector STBG Tegner Rd to Golden Widen from 2-lane to 4-lane Collector Dev. Fees, T34 Turlock Taylor Rd $505,500 2025 X X State Blvd with Class II bike facility STBG Spengler Way to W. Dev. Fees, T35 Turlock S. Kilroy Ave Construct new Industrial Collector $934,000 2025 X Linwood Ave STBG Golden State Blvd to SR- Widen from 2-lane to 4-lane Arterial Dev. Fees, T36 Turlock Taylor Rd $139,600 2025 X X 99 with Class II bike facility STBG Construct new 2-lane Industrial Dev. Fees, T37 Turlock Tegner Rd W. Main St to Fulkerth Rd $2,795,800 2025 X X Collector with Class II bike facility STBG Install Traffic Signals and Various CMAQ, Dev. 2018- T38 Turlock Various Locations Various Locations Intersection and Synchronization $15,000,000 Fees, X X 2045 Improvements Measure L Lander Ave (SR-165) to S. CMAQ, Dev. T39 Turlock SR-99 Construct New Interchange $35,785,000 2028 X City Limits Fees, STIP CMAQ, Dev. T40 Turlock SR-99 W. Main St Construct New Interchange $19,091,000 2025 Fees, STIP, X Measure L

Page 10 of 22 STANCOG 2018 Regional Transportation Plan

Tier I Roadway Projects Purpose / Need Project Details (P = Primary Purpose / X = Need)

Open to Funding ID Jurisdiction Location Project Limits Description Total Cost

Traffic Source Oper. Safety Streets System System Preserv. Capacity Enhance. Alt. Mode Complete Complete CMAQ, Dev. T41 Turlock SR-99 Taylor Rd Reconstruct existing Interchange $15,000,000 2030 X X Fees, STIP CMAQ, Dev. T42 Turlock SR-99 Tuolumne Rd Construct New Overpass $9,693,400 2028 X Fees, STIP Fulkerth Rd to Monte Construct 4-lane Expressway with Dev. Fees, T43 Turlock Washington Rd $2,674,000 2025 X X Vista Ave Class II bike facility and transit STBG Golden State Blvd & Widen Intersection from 2 to 4 lanes Dev. Fees, T44 Turlock Golden State Blvd $2,690,400 2025 X X Taylor Rd with bike improvements STBG Construct an Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Transportation 2020- FTA, CMAQ, T45 Turlock Various Locations Various Locations $12,500,000 X X Management Center with related 2025 LTF equipment and services 2018- STBG, T46 Turlock Various Locations Various Locations Roadway Rehabilitation $94,000,000 X 2045 Measure L

Total Turlock $264,050,700

City of Waterford

Concrete Replacement and Pavement Measure L, SB W03 Waterford Summers Street F St to La Gallina Ave $344,692 2018 X X X Rehabilitation 1 Measure L, W04 Waterford I Street Bentley St to Church St Pavement Rehabilitation $148,716 2019 X CDBG, SB 1 Curb, Gutter & Sidewalk Infill, Measure L, W05 Waterford Main Street Church St to G St $350,000 2019 X X X Pavement Rehabilitation CDBG, SB 1 Measure L, W06 Waterford H Street Yosemite to Dorsey Pavement Rehabilitation $453,546 2020 X CDBG, SB 1 Curb, Gutter & Sidewalk Infill, Measure L, W07 Waterford G Street Yosemite to Church $685,000 2021 X X X X Pavement Rehabilitation CDBG, SB 1 Loy St, Barnes St, Measure L, SB W08 Waterford Tohara Ln, and Loop Pavement Rehabilitation $235,016 2022 X 1 Welch Dr Curb, Gutter & Sidewalk Infill, Measure L, SB W09 Waterford Riverside Western Ave to Sean Ct. $600,000 2023 X Pavement Rehabilitation 1 Curb, Gutter & Sidewalk Infill, Measure L, W10 Waterford Church Street Yosemite to Kadota Ave $435,000 2018 X X X Pavement Rehabilitation CDBG, SB 1 Traffic Signals, intersection 2017- CMAQ, W11 Waterford Various Locations Various Locations improvements and other transportation $3,000,000 X X 2042 STBGP, HSIP enhancements STBGP, 2017- CDBG, W12 Waterford Various Locations Various Locations Roadway Rehabilitation $15,000,000 X 2042 Measure L, SB 1

Total Waterford $21,251,970

Total Roadway: $3,930,139,081

Page 11 of 22 STANCOG 2018 Regional Transportation Plan

Tier I Transit Projects Purpose / Need Project Details (P = Primary Purpose / X = Need)

Open to Funding ID Location Description Total Cost

Traffic Source Oper. Safety Streets System Preserv. Capacity Enhance. Alt. Mode Alt. Complete

ACE 2nd Main Ripon to Modesto (Stanislaus A01 Ceres to Modesto County -> Modesto, MP 104.29-113.00) [Civil $9,479,511 2027 SB 132 X

2nd Main Ripon to Modesto (Stanislaus A02 Ceres to Modesto County -> Modesto, MP 104.29-113.00) $29,972,106 2027 SB 132 X [Structures and Bridges 2nd Main Ripon to Modesto (Stanislaus A03 Ceres to Modesto County -> Modesto, MP 104.29-113.00) $259,518 2027 SB 132 X [Roadway 2nd Main Ripon to Modesto (Stanislaus County -> Modesto, MP 104.29-113.00) A04 Ceres to Modesto $51,586,937 2027 SB 132 X [Track/Signals - 45,058 TF New, 3270 UP

2nd Main Ripon to Modesto (Stanislaus A05 Ceres to Modesto County -> Modesto, MP 104.29-113.00) $792,144 2027 SB 132 X [Utilities Modesto Station (Platform, MP 112.30- A06 Ceres to Modesto 112.70) $5,944,951 2027 SB 132 X

Modesto Station (Parking, MP 112.30-112.70) A07 Ceres to Modesto $975,010 2027 SB 132 X

2nd Main Modesto to Ceres (Modesto Station - A08 Ceres to Modesto > Ceres Station, MP 113.57-117.27) [Civil $3,093,502 2027 SB 132 X

2nd Main Modesto to Ceres (Modesto Station - A09 Ceres to Modesto > Ceres Station, MP 113.57-117.27) $32,434,620 2027 SB 132 X [Structures and Bridges 2nd Main Modesto to Ceres (Modesto Station - > Ceres Station, MP 113.57-117.27) [Track and A10 Ceres to Modesto $22,813,175 2027 SB 132 X Signals - 19,300 TF New

2nd Main Modesto to Ceres (Modesto Station - A11 Ceres to Modesto > Ceres Station, MP 113.57-117.27) [Utilities $653,519 2027 SB 132 X

Ceres Station (Plaform, MP 117.07-117.27) A12 Ceres to Modesto [Reduced to 350 Space Parking, Incl. ROW and $6,759,383 2027 SB 132 X Ped Bridge Ceres Station (Parking MP 117.07-117.27) A13 Ceres to Modesto [Reduced to 350 Space Parking, Incl. ROW and $15,289,507 2027 SB 132 X Ped Bridge Operations to extend service to Modesto and L, SB 1, A14 Ceres to Modesto $40,000,000 2027 X Ceres STIP, CMAQ

Total ACE $220,053,883

City of Ceres

Ceres Transit C64 Operate CDAR and CAT $61,778,500 2018-2042 LTF X Operations Ceres Area Transit Update electronic farebox systems in C65 (CAT) and Ceres Dial-A- $50,000 2025 LTF X transit buses Ride (CDAR)

Bus Stop Improvements - Shelters, C66 Various Locations $80,000 2022 LTF X Benches, Pads, & Litter Receptacles

Bus Stop Improvements - Shelters, C67 Various Locations Benches, Pads, & Litter Receptacles, and $200,000 2032 LTF X Turnouts Bus Stop Improvements - Shelters, C68 Various Locations Benches, Pads, & Litter Receptacles, and $200,000 2040 LTF X Turnouts

Page 12 of 22 STANCOG 2018 Regional Transportation Plan

Tier I Transit Projects Purpose / Need Project Details (P = Primary Purpose / X = Need)

Open to Funding ID Location Description Total Cost

Traffic Source Oper. Safety Streets System Preserv. Capacity Enhance. Alt. Mode Alt. Complete Transit Plan - Study for future routes in Ceres Area Transit C69 newly annexed areas, new schools & $150,000 2025 LTF X (CAT) transit center Ceres Dial-A-Ride Purchase New & Replacement Transit C70 $2,320,000 2018-2042 LTF X (CDAR) Buses (9) Transit service to Ceres ACE Station; C71 ACE Connection $7,363,423 2022-2042 LTF X Transit service to begin in 2023 Surface Parking and undercrossing to ACE C72 El Camino Ave $1,500,000 2025 SB1 X station traffic mitigation

C73 Railroad Ave Overflow Parking ACE Station $1,500,000 2030 SB1 X

C74 Park and Ride Lot Near Whitmore Overpass $1,000,000 2025 LTF X

Develop a Park and C75 Near Freeway/ACE Station $1,200,000 2035 LTF X X Ride Lot

Total Ceres $77,341,923

City of Modesto

M64 MAX Station / facilities $3,500,000 2018 LTF / CMAQ X

M65 MAX Operations (including farebox subsidy) $1,400,000 2019-2042 LTF, CMAQ X

STIP, LTF, STA, Max and Dial-a-Ride Operating Costs (and 5339,5307 M66 MAX $464,354,600 2017-2042 X Federal Match) 5337, Measure L, Fares STIP, LTF, Bus Stop Improvements (upgrade 100 bus STA, stops with additional amentieis, including 5339,5307 M67 MAX $5,686,900 2017-2042 X shelters, wayside signs, benches and trash 5337, cans) Measure L, Fares STIP, LTF, STA, 5339,5307 M68 MAX Capital Cost of Contracting $125,126,000 2017-2042 X 5337, Measure L, Fares STIP, LTF, STA, 5339,5307 M69 MAX Operate ADA Paratransit system $1,447,800 2017-2042 X 5337, Measure L, Fares STIP, LTF, STA, 5339,5307 M70 MAX Preventative Maintenance $211,691,000 2017-2042 X 5337, Measure L, Fares STIP, LTF, STA, Purchase Buses (includes replacing 4 5339,5307 M71 MAX $7,615,000 2017-2042 X Diesel powered, with 4 electric powered) 5337, Measure L, Fares

Page 13 of 22 STANCOG 2018 Regional Transportation Plan

Tier I Transit Projects Purpose / Need Project Details (P = Primary Purpose / X = Need)

Open to Funding ID Location Description Total Cost

Traffic Source Oper. Safety Streets System Preserv. Capacity Enhance. Alt. Mode Alt. Complete STIP, LTF, STA, 5339,5307 M72 MAX Support Equipment/Tools $7,445,300 2017-2042 X 5337, Measure L, Fares STIP, LTF, STA, 5339,5307 M73 MAX Training $826,900 2017-2042 X 5337, Measure L, Fares STIP, LTF, STA, 5339,5307 M74 MAX Transit Center Enhancements $4,015,600 2017-2042 X 5337, Measure L, Fares STIP, LTF, STA, Technology Improvements to include 5339,5307 M75 MAX $5,521,300 2017-2042 X Traffic Signal Priortization 5337, Measure L, Fares STIP, LTF, STA, Install Bus Rapid Transit improvements 5339,5307 M76 MAX $42,678,550 2020 X and Operate Service (Various Locations) 5337, Measure L, Fares

M77 MAX Rideshare Program, City of Modesto $362,600 2017-2042 CMAQ X

Total Modesto $881,671,550

Stanislaus County

Prop 1B, S92 Stanislaus County Various construction projects $15,000,000 2018-2042 CMAQ, X 5311(f) Prop 1B, LTF, S93 Stanislaus County Transit Bus Replacement Program $32,500,000 2018-2042 X 5311(f) Capital Projects (Expansion Buses, Prop 1B , Upgrade Electronic Fareboxes, Security S94 Stanislaus County $19,000,000 2018-2042 CMAQ, LTF, X X X X Camera Systems, Transit amenities and 5311(f) facilities) Transit facilities amenities : (100) Bus Stop Prop 1B, S95 Stanislaus County Shelters/Facilities with amenities & Solar $2,500,000 2018-2042 X X CMAQ, LTF, lighting Install and implement Intelligent Transportation Systems with Traffic (TSP) Prop 1B, S96 Stanislaus County $18,000,000 2018-2042 X Traffic Signal Priority in StaRT's service CMAQ, LTF area Fare revenues, 5307, 5311, S97 Stanislaus County Operating Costs $1,125,000,000 2018-2042 X LTF, STA, CMAQ, Measure L

Implement and Operate Commuter and 5307, LTF, S98 Stanislaus County $20,000,000 2022 X Express Bus Services STA, CMAQ

Page 14 of 22 STANCOG 2018 Regional Transportation Plan

Tier I Transit Projects Purpose / Need Project Details (P = Primary Purpose / X = Need)

Open to Funding ID Location Description Total Cost

Traffic Source Oper. Safety Streets System Preserv. Capacity Enhance. Alt. Mode Alt. Complete Transit Fare Subsidy (TFS) Program - StaRT Employee Ride Program S99 Stanislaus County $1,000,000 2018-2042 CMAQ, LTF X Emission Reductions: PM10 (1,424) / 1.08 factor= .013 PM 2.5

S100 Stanislaus County Mandated Federal and State Training $750,000 2018-2042 FTA/LTF X X X X

Total Stanislaus County $1,233,000,000

StanCOG

RE18 Countywide MOVE $43,723,246 2018-2042 Measure L X X

Total StanCOG Regional $43,723,246

City of Turlock

T47 Turlock Various Construction Projects $6,567,400 2018-2025 FTA/LTF X

Construct a Turlock Regional Transit 1418 N. Golden State FTA, Prop T48 Center building, parking lot and passenger $5,900,000 2018 X X Blvd. 1B, LTF amenities Bus parking lot with fueling infrastructure T49 701 S. Walnut Rd. $1,900,000 2019-2020 Prop 1B, LTF X X and operations building Capital Purchases (Busses, Bus Stop and FTA, CMAQ, T50 Turlock Station Improvements, Support Equipment, $17,684,600 2018-2040 X Prop 1B, LTF etc.) Acquisition of zero emission transit buses FTA, CMAQ, T51 Turlock $16,500,000 2025-2040 X X X and related fueling infrastructure LTF

T52 Turlock Maintenance on Vehicles and Facilities $3,534,700 2018-2040 FTA/LTF X X

Upgrades to fareboxes, AVL systems, GIS T53 Turlock enhancements, computer systems and $1,500,000 2018-2025 FTA/LTF X X other technology improvements FTA, Advertising, Measure L, T54 Turlock Operating Costs $29,703,400 2018-2040 3rd-party X Funding Agreements, LTF

T55 Turlock Improvements to reduce transit headways $14,000,000 2020 STIP, 5309 X X

CMAQ,FTA, T56 Turlock Implement commuter bus service $5,000,000 2022 X X LTF L, SB 1, T57 Turlock Improvements to improve transit headway $20,000,000 2035 CMAQ, LTF, X STIP, Fares

Total Turlock $122,290,100

Total Transit: $2,578,080,702

Page 15 of 22 STANCOG 2018 Regional Transportation Plan

Tier I Bicycle/Pedestrian Projects Purpose / Need Project Details (P = Primary Purpose / X = Need)

Open to Funding ID Location Project Limits Description Total Cost

Traffic Source Oper. Safety Streets System System Preserv. Capacity Enhance. Alt. Mode Complete Complete

City of Ceres

TID Lateral from Roeding Rd to C01 Mitchell Rd Mitchell Rd Bike/Ped Project - Phase IV $415,600 2018 CMAQ X X Service Rd C02 Mitchell Rd Service Rd to Southern City Limits Mitchell Rd Bike/Ped Project - Phase V $347,200 2020 CMAQ X X

C03 El Camino Ave Whitmore Ave to Service Rd Signage/Striping $8,000 2020 CMAQ, BTA X X

C04 Herndon Rd Joyce Rd to Whitmore Ave Signage/Striping or widening $17,300 2020 CMAQ, BTA X X

C05 Joyce Rd Bystrum Rd to Herndon Rd Signage/Striping $6,200 2030 CMAQ, BTA X X

C06 Hatch Rd East Gate Blvd. to Faith Home Rd Hatch Rd TID Bike/Ped Project - Phase IV $356,500 2025 CMAQ X X

C07 Whitmore Ave Mitchell Rd to Blaker Rd Signage/Striping $10,700 2025 CMAQ, BTA X X 300' w/o Morgan Rd to Crows C08 Whitmore Ave Signage/Striping or widening $114,100 2025 CMAQ, BTA X X Landing Rd C09 Roeding Rd Ceres Main Canal to 6th St Signage/Striping $5,800 2030 CMAQ, BTA X X

C10 Various Locations Various Locations Misc. Bike/Pedestrian Facility Projects $2,958,100 2035 CMAQ X X

C11 Mitchell Rd Hatch Rd to Tenaya Rd Signage/Striping or widening $364,100 2035 CMAQ, BTA X X

C12 Rhode Drive Mitchell Rd to Esmar Rd Signage/Striping $5,800 2035 CMAQ, BTA X X

C13 Rhode Drive Esmar Rd to Nunes Rd Signage/Striping or widening $153,300 2040 CMAQ, BTA X X Construct Bike/Ped Facility (3 phase C14 Hatch Rd Morgan Rd to Herndon Rd $2,221,300 2040 CMAQ, BTA X X project) C15 TID Lateral #2 Ustick Rd to Mitchell Rd Bicycle/Pedestrian Facility $4,553,700 2040 CMAQ, BTA X X

C16 Whitmore Avenue Mitchell Rd to Eastgate Blvd Bicycle/Pedestrian Facility $1,250,000 2019 ATP X X X ATP Grant devlope Citywide bicycle C17 Various Locations Various Locations $100,000 2019 ATP X X X Masterplan Herndon Ave., El Camino Ave. & C18 Various Locations Bike lane facilities $400,000 2020 CMAQ X X X Eastgate Blvd. Citywide improvements to Ped head C19 Various Locations Various Locations countdown, push buttons and crosswalk $136,300 2018 HSIP X X X enhancements

Total Ceres $13,424,000

City of Hughson

CMAQ, H01 Hatch Rd Santa Fe Ave to Euclid Ave Construct Multi-Use Trail $783,000 2020 Measure L, X ATP

Construction Sidewalk and pedestiran CMAQ, H02 Whitmore Avenue E of Tully Road to Charles Street $393,000 2020 X improvements (across railroad tracks) STBGP, ATP

Construct Bikeway and Pedestrian CMAQ, H03 Various Locations Various Locations $1,981,300 2018-2042 X X Improvements (Per Non-Motorized Plan) STBGP, ATP

Measure L, Construct Sidewalk In-Fill and H04 Hughson Avenue Santa Fe Avenue to 7th Street $500,000 2019 Dev. Impact X X Streetscape Improvements (ADA) Fees

Construct Sidewalk In-Fill and H05 Various Locations Various Locations $192,000 2018-2042 CMAQ, CDBG X X Streetscape Improvements (ADA)

Total Hughson $3,849,300

City of Modesto

M33 Various Locations Various Locations Non-Motorized Improvements $30,000,000 2018-2040 CMAQ, BTA X

M34 Various Locations Various Locations Safe Routes to School projects $8,000,000 2018-2040 ATP X

M35 Hetch Hetchy ROW Semallon Dr to Riverbank Class I Trail Improvements $6,000,000 2030 CMAQ, CFF X ATP, Measure M36 Lincoln Corridor Yosemite to Orangeburg Class I Bike path/Ped Bike Bridge $10,000,000 2040 X L CMAQ, CFF, M37 Virginia Corridor Woodrow to Pelandale Bike/Ped facility including overcrossings $8,000,000 2040 X X Local

Page 16 of 22 STANCOG 2018 Regional Transportation Plan

Tier I Bicycle/Pedestrian Projects Purpose / Need Project Details (P = Primary Purpose / X = Need)

Open to Funding ID Location Project Limits Description Total Cost

Traffic Source Oper. Safety Streets System System Preserv. Capacity Enhance. Alt. Mode Complete Complete ATP, Measure M38 Downtown Class IV Virginia Corridor to Dry Creek Class IV Bike Path $5,000,000 2025 X X L ATP, Measure M39 Dry Creek Bike Path Kewin to Beardbrook Park Class I Bike Path Connecting Trails $5,000,000 2028 X L

Contruct Class 1 Trail along MID Lateral CMAQ, CFF, M40 MID Canal System MID Lateral Nos. 3,4 and 7 $15,000,000 2018-2040 X Nos. 3, 4 and 7 Measure L

CFF, Measure M41 MID Canal System Carver to Virginia Corridor Class I Bike Path along MID $3,000,000 2019-2023 X L M42 Stoddard Ave Campus Way to Tully Rd MJC Class I Bike Path Phase 3 $2,000,000 2020-2023 Measure L X X Class I and Class IV Bike Path along M43 Claus Rd Creekwood to Sylvan $4,000,000 2018-2025 STBGP, CFF X X Claus Rd. Tuolumne River CMAQ, PROP M44 Mitchell Rd to Carpenter Rd Remaining Trail Improvements $20,000,000 2020 X Restoration Project 84

CMAQ, CFF, M45 Pelandale Ave Dale Road to Virginia Corridor Class I bike path $5,000,000 2019-2022 X X Measure L

CMAQ, CFF, M46 Various Locations Various Locations Pedestrian/ADA modifications $20,000,000 2018-2025 X X BTA Class II Bicycle Improvements(Class II - CMAQ, CFF, M47 Various Locations Various Locations Signage/Striping, Curb, Gutter & $10,000,000 2018-2025 X X BTA Sidewalk)

Paradise from Sheridan to 1st, S. Pedestrian and Bicylcle Safety Jefferson from Paradise to Vine, 1st ATP, Local, M48 Paradise Road Area Improvements around Modesto High $4,000,000 2040 X X X from Vine to Sierra and G St from Measure L School Sierra to 2nd

M78 Various Locations Various Locations Non-Motorized Improvements $30,553,200 2035 STBGP X

Total Modesto $185,553,200

City of Newman

CFF, LTF, N01 Various Locations Various Locations Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements $6,543,500 2019-2035 CMAQ, X X STBGP, Local

Total Newman $6,543,500

City of Oakdale

Cottle's Trail Multi-Use A St to the Oakdale Plaza Shopping O09 Construct Class I Bike Lane $776,200 2018 CMAQ, LTF X Trail Center

CFF, CMAQ, Stanislaus River LTF, O10 South of Kerr Park to A Street Construct Class I Bike Lane $2,768,500 2023 X Corridor Developer Fees, Grants

Valley View Multi-Use CMAQ, O11 Kerr Park to Stanislaus River Construct Class I Bike Lane $1,144,000 2040 X Trail, Phase I Grants

CMAQ, Install Sidewalks, upgrade ADA-compliant O12 Various Locations Various Locations $3,000,000 2018-2040 Grants, LTF, X X ramps, install and/or enhance crosswalks Measure L

Pedestrian/Bicycle Infrastructure O31 Various Locations Various Locations $3,032,200 2035 STBGP X Improvements

Total Oakdale $10,720,900

City of Patterson

Roadway Rehabilitation and complete STBGP / P01 Various Locations Various Locations $5,510,100 2018-2030 X X street improvements. CMAQ

Construct & Rehabilitate Class I and P02 Various Locations Various Locations $3,964,600 2018-2030 CMAQ X X Class II bike lanes

Total Patterson $9,474,700

Page 17 of 22 STANCOG 2018 Regional Transportation Plan

Tier I Bicycle/Pedestrian Projects Purpose / Need Project Details (P = Primary Purpose / X = Need)

Open to Funding ID Location Project Limits Description Total Cost

Traffic Source Oper. Safety Streets System System Preserv. Capacity Enhance. Alt. Mode Complete Complete

City of Riverbank

CMAQ / R01 Oakdale Road Patterson Rd to Claribel Ave Bicycle Lanes $166,000 2020 X X X Measure L

Pedestrian/Bicycle Infrastructure CMAQ / LTF / R02 Various Locations Various Locations $4,768,600 2018-2040 X X Improvements Measure L SB-1/ R03 Various Locations Various Locations ADA/Sidewalk Improvements $1,811,900 2018-2035 X X Measure L

R04 Various Locations Various Locations School Traffic Safety Project $1,461,100 2018-2030 ATP X X

Park Hetch Hetchy Trail R05 Hetch Hetchy Trail Install trail system improvements $1,730,100 2025 Development X System Fees

CMAQ, Dev. Jacob Myer Park R06 Jacob Myer Park Bridge Install trail system bridge $9,828,200 2025 Fees/Traffic X Pedestrian Bridge Impact Fees

Park R07 Various Locations Various Locations Rails with Trails $817,800 2022-2029 Development X X Fees/CMAQ CMAQ / ATP / Bicycle/Pedestrian/Traffic Install Bicycle & Pedestrian infrastructure R08 Calender Avenue $800,000 2022 Measure L / X X Management Improvements improvements SB 1

R09 Patterson Road First Street to Claus Road Sidewalk & ADA Improvements $182,000 2018 LTF/CMAQ X X

Sidewalk & ADA Improvements, Drainage R10 Roselle Avenue Roselle Avenue Patterson to Pocket $330,000 2018 LTF/CMAQ X X and ROW

Bicycle Lane Striping and Road R11 Roselle Avenue Patterson Rd to Claribel Ave $267,050 2018 CMAQ X X Improvements

R12 Roselle Avenue Pedestrian Access over MID Canal Installation of Sidewalk over MID Canal $400,000 2019 CMAQ X

Bicycle/Pedestrian Path along BNSF R13 Patterson Road Third Street to Terminal Avenue $400,000 2020 CMAQ X X Railroad

Bicycle/Pedestrian Path along BNSF R14 Patterson Road Terminal to Claus Road $1,200,000 2020 ATP X X Railroad

R15 Roselle Avenue Crawford Road to Sylvan Avenue Bicycle/Pedestrian Path w/ ADA $1,614,000 2022 ATP X X

Total Riverbank $25,776,750

Stanislaus County

PFF - City S07 Hickman Road East Ave. to City Limit Shoulders Widenning - Class 2 Bikepath $2,500,000 2022 X X County S08 Santa Fe Road Keyes Rd to SR132 Shoulder Widening - Class 2 Bikepath $2,000,000 2022 STBGP, L X X

STBGP/Non- Hammett Rd to SR-219/Sisk inc. S09 Pirrone Road Shoulder Widening - Class 2 Bikepath $913,400 2019 motorized X X MCS LTF, L STBGP/Non- S10 Geer Rd. /Albers Rd. Santa Fe to Patterson Rd. Shoulder Widening - Class 2 Bikepath $2,250,000 2022 motorized X X LTF, L STBGP/Non- S11 Coffee Road Claratina Ave to Ladd Rd Shoulder Widening - Class 2 Bikepath $500,000 2022 motorized X X LTF, L STBGP/Non- S12 East Ave Daubenberger to Hickman Shoulder Widening - Class 2 Bikepath $500,000 2022 motorized X X LTF, L

S13 Crows Landing Road School Ave to Whitmore Ave Bike/Ped Improvements $3,200,000 2021 CMAQ, Local X X X X

STBGP/Non- S14 Crows Landing Road Hwy 33 to Keyes Rd Shoulder Widening - Class 2 Bikepath $3,250,000 2022 motorized X X LTF, L STBGP/Non- S15 West Main St Sycamore to Washington Shoulder Widening - Class 2 Bikepath $3,250,000 2022 motorized X X LTF, L Non- S16 Robertson Road Carpenter Rd to Hays St Pedestrian Improvements $1,000,000 2019 motorized X X LTF, L

Page 18 of 22 STANCOG 2018 Regional Transportation Plan

Tier I Bicycle/Pedestrian Projects Purpose / Need Project Details (P = Primary Purpose / X = Need)

Open to Funding ID Location Project Limits Description Total Cost

Traffic Source Oper. Safety Streets System System Preserv. Capacity Enhance. Alt. Mode Complete Complete Non- Bret Harte S17 Glenn Ave, Las Vegas St, Butte Ave Pedestrian Improvements $1,300,000 2019 motorized X X Neighborhood LTF, L Non- S18 Airport Neighborhood Various Locations Pedestrian Improvements $1,500,000 2020 motorized X X LTF, L Non- S19 Downtown Denair Various Locations Pedestrian Improvements $2,000,000 2020 motorized X X LTF, L Construct Bicycle and Pedestrian S20 Various Locations Various Locations Improvements (Class I Bikeways / $3,600,000 2020 CMAQ, ATP X X Sidewalk, etc.)

Total Stanislaus County $27,763,400

City of Turlock

ATP, SysDev, CMAQ, T06 Various Locations Various Locations Construct Class I Bike Paths $6,000,000 2018-2045 X STBG, Measure L

ATP, SysDev, Construct Class II Bike Lanes and Class CMAQ, T07 Various Locations Various Locations $5,500,000 2018-2019 X X III Bike Pathes STBG, Measure L

N. Golden State Blvd. and 1,200 ft. Construct buffered Class II Bike Lanes T08 Christoffersen Pkwy. $475,000 2018-2019 ATP, CMAQ X X east of N. Berkeley Ave. along entire 3.2 mile length Sandstone St. and Christoffersen T09 N. Tegner Rd. Construct Class I Shared Use Path $50,000 2019-2020 ATP, CMAQ X Pkwy. Construct sidewalk, Class II Bike Lanes T10 W. Linwood Ave Lander Ave. and West Ave. South and Pedestrian Activated Hybrid Beacon $940,000 2040 ATP, SB 1 X X Crossing System

T11 Monte Vista Ave Olive Ave to Berkeley Ave Class II Bike Lanes $217,400 2018 STBG, SB1 X X

ATP, HSIP, T12 Various Locations Various Locations ADA/Pedestrian Improvements $4,000,000 2018-2045 Local, SB 1, X Local ADA, L Private T13 Various Locations Various Locations Implement bike share program $150,000 2019 X partnerships Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk and T58 Various Locations Various Locations $18,890,900 2035 STBGP X Bike/Pedestrian Improvements

Total Turlock $36,223,300

City of Waterford

CMAQ, Sidewalk Installation and Pavement STBGP, W01 Yosemite Blvd Western to Pasadena $380,000 2018-2019 X X X Widening Measure L, SB-1 Construct a four lane freeway from N. CMAQ, TE, W02 Various Locations Various Locations Dakota Ave to the Needham St. $10,000,000 2017-2042 X X ATP Overcrossing. Total Waterford $10,380,000

Total Bike/Ped: $329,709,050

Page 19 of 22 STANCOG 2018 Regional Transportation Plan

Tier I Aviation Projects Purpose / Need Project Details (P = Primary Purpose / X = Need)

Open to Funding ID Location Description Total Cost

Traffic Source Oper. Safety Streets System System Preserv. Capacity Capacity Enhance. Alt. Mode Complete

City of Modesto

Phase II Fleet Maintenance Facility for STBGP / M01 Modesto Fleet Services $9,000,000 2019 X X X Light and Heavy Equipment CMAQ

Modesto City-County M02 Part 77 Airspace - Property Acquisition $400,000 2019 FAA AIP X X Airport

Modesto City-County M03 Update Airport Layout Plan $300,000 2018 FAA AIP X Airport

Modesto City-County M04 Design - Reconstruction of Taxiway C $245,000 2019 FAA AIP X Airport

Modesto City-County M05 Reconstruction of Taxiway C $1,636,534 2020 FAA AIP X Airport

Modesto City-County M06 Airfield Drainage Improvements $1,928,640 2018 FAA AIP X Airport

Modesto City-County FAA AIP / M07 Airfield Electrical Improvements $294,700 2024 X Airport PFC

Modesto City-County FAA AIP / M08 Airfield Slurry Seal - Design/Construct $1,214,200 2025 X Airport PFC

Modesto City-County Computer Base Airfield Drivers Education FAA AIP / M09 $134,400 2024 X Airport Program PFC

Modesto City-County FAA AIP / M10 Construct Entrance Road $346,600 2025 X Airport PFC

Modesto City-County FAA AIP / M11 Construct New Airport Fire Station $1,522,700 2026 X Airport PFC

Modesto City-County FAA AIP / M12 Construct New Airport Maintenance Shop $1,568,400 2024 X Airport PFC

Modesto City-County FAA AIP / M13 Construct Terminal Building $8,811,300 2025 X Airport PFC

Modesto City-County FAA AIP / M14 Engineering & Contingencies $4,471,700 2025 X Airport PFC

Modesto City-County FAA AIP / M15 Environmental Planning Studies $756,300 2026 X Airport PFC

Modesto City-County FAA AIP / M16 Equipment Replacement $2,337,000 2027 X Airport PFC

Modesto City-County FAA AIP / M17 Expand Airport Apron $2,276,300 2025 X Airport PFC

Modesto City-County FAA AIP / M18 Extend RW/TX 500' $10,000,000 2029 X Airport PFC

Modesto City-County FAA AIP / M19 Land Acquisition - Phase 1 $2,110,400 2026 X Airport PFC

Modesto City-County FAA AIP / M20 Land Acquisition - Phase 2 $2,173,700 2027 X Airport PFC

Modesto City-County FAA AIP / M21 Land Acquisition - Phase 3 $1,940,400 2028 X Airport PFC

Modesto City-County FAA AIP / M22 Masterplan Update $453,800 2026 X Airport PFC

Modesto City-County FAA AIP / M23 Obstruction Removal - Tree Trimming $530,500 2022 X X Airport PFC

Modesto City-County FAA AIP / M24 Pavement Removal $14,000 2020 X Airport PFC

Page 20 of 22 STANCOG 2018 Regional Transportation Plan

Tier I Aviation Projects Purpose / Need Project Details (P = Primary Purpose / X = Need)

Open to Funding ID Location Description Total Cost

Traffic Source Oper. Safety Streets System System Preserv. Capacity Capacity Alt. Mode Enhance. Complete

Modesto City-County FAA AIP / M25 Realign Airport Way $602,100 2025 X Airport PFC

Modesto City-County FAA AIP / M26 Relocate Localizer $492,000 2029 X Airport PFC

Modesto City-County FAA AIP / M27 Relocate Perimeter Road $196,800 2029 X Airport PFC

Modesto City-County FAA AIP / M28 Remove old terminal $954,600 2025 X Airport PFC

Modesto City-County FAA AIP / M29 Replace VASI with PAPI, RW10L/28R $101,400 2023 X Airport PFC

Modesto City-County FAA AIP / M30 Runway 28R Extension - NEPA/CEQA $327,900 2026 X Airport PFC

Modesto City-County FAA AIP / M31 Taxiway E Re-alignment $633,400 2029 X Airport PFC

Modesto City-County FAA AIP / M32 Terminal Complex - NEPA/CEQA $514,000 2025 X Airport PFC

Total Modesto $58,288,774

City of Oakdale

Oakdale Municipal O01 Perimeter Fence Phase 2 $460,000 2018 FAA / State X X Airport

Oakdale Municipal O02 Pavement Rehab Phase 1 Runway $310,000 2018 FAA / State X X Airport

Oakdale Municipal O03 Pavement Rehab Phase 2 Taxiway $400,000 2019 FAA / State X X Airport

Oakdale Municipal O04 Pavement Rehab Phase 3 Apron $275,000 2020 FAA / State X X Airport

Oakdale Municipal O05 Pavement Rehab Phase 4 Apron/Taxi $1,200,000 2021 FAA / State X X Airport

Oakdale Municipal O06 Airport Layout Plan $216,000 2022 FAA / State X X X X Airport

Oakdale Municipal O07 Runway Safety Area/Drainage Environ $225,000 2023 FAA / State X X X Airport

Oakdale Municipal O08 Airport Fire Protection Project $530,500 2030 FAA / State X X Airport

Total Oakdale $3,616,500

Stanislaus County

Industrial Development. The 1,528-acre Crows Landing property is bound by Marshall Road and S06 Industrial Park-Phase 1- State Route 33 to the north, Fink Road to $32,000,000 2019 Local X X A the south, Bell Road to the east, and Davis Road to the west.

Total Stanislaus County $32,000,000

City of Turlock

Widen Runway 12-30, RSA & FAA / State / Turlock Municipal T01 Infrastructure Improvements Including $2,163,300 2018 Private X Airport Airfield Electrical Upgrades. (TRAA)

Page 21 of 22 STANCOG 2018 Regional Transportation Plan

Tier I Aviation Projects Purpose / Need Project Details (P = Primary Purpose / X = Need)

Open to Funding ID Location Description Total Cost

Traffic Source Oper. Safety Streets System System Preserv. Capacity Capacity Alt. Mode Enhance. Complete

Rehabilitate/Reconstruct Apron A1; FAA / State / Turlock Municipal T02 Relocate Wind Indicator & Segmented $650,000 2019 Private X Airport Circle (Construction) (TRAA)

Extend Parallel Taxiway "A"; Construct FAA / State / Turlock Municipal T03 new runway/taxiway connector. (Design $75,000 2020 Private X Airport Only) (TRAA)

Extend Parallel Taxiway "A"; Construct FAA / State / Turlock Municipal T04 new runway/taxiway connector. $550,000 2021 Private X Airport Construction. (TRAA)

FAA / State / Turlock Municipal T05 Update Airport Master Plan $200,000 2022 Private X Airport (TRAA)

Total Turlock $3,638,300

Total Aviation: $97,543,574

Page 22 of 22 Appendix O

Air Quality Conformity Analysis Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

CONFORMITY ANALYSIS FOR THE 2021 FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT AND THE 2018 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN AMENDMENT #2

FEBRUARY 17, 2021

STANISLAUS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS

This report was funded in part through grant(s) from the Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration, U. S. Department of Transportation. The views and opinions of the Stanislaus Council of Governments expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the U.S. Department of Transportation Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...... 1 CONFORMITY REQUIREMENTS ...... 2 CONFORMITY TESTS ...... 3 RESULTS OF THE CONFORMITY ANALYSIS ...... 3 REPORT ORGANIZATION ...... 4 CHAPTER 1: FEDERAL AND STATE REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS ...... 5 A. FEDERAL AND STATE CONFORMITY REGULATIONS ...... 5 B. CONFORMITY REGULATION REQUIREMENTS ...... 7 C. AIR QUALITY DESIGNATIONS APPLICABLE TO THE SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY ...... 9 D. CONFORMITY TEST REQUIREMENTS ...... 11 E. ANALYSIS YEARS ...... 17 CHAPTER 2: LATEST PLANNING ASSUMPTIONS AND TRANSPORTATION MODELING ...... 21 A. SOCIOECONOMIC DATA ...... 23 B. TRANSPORTATION MODELING ...... 24 C. TRAFFIC ESTIMATES ...... 29 D. VEHICLE REGISTRATIONS ...... 29 E. STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN MEASURES ...... 30 CHAPTER 3: AIR QUALITY MODELING ...... 32 A. EMFAC2014 ...... 32 B. ADDITIONAL PM-10 ESTIMATES ...... 33 C. PM2.5 APPROACH ...... 35 D. SUMMARY OF PROCEDURES FOR REGIONAL EMISSIONS ESTIMATES ...... 37 CHAPTER 4: TRANSPORTATION CONTROL MEASURES ...... 39 A. TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY REGULATION REQUIREMENTS FOR TCMS ...... 39 B. APPLICABLE AIR QUALITY IMPLEMENTATION PLANS ...... 41 C. IDENTIFICATION OF 2002 RACM THAT REQUIRE TIMELY IMPLEMENTATION DOCUMENTATION ...... 42 D. TCM FINDINGS FOR THE TIP AND REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN ...... 43 E. RTP CONTROL MEASURE ANALYSIS IN SUPPORT OF 2003 PM-10 PLAN ...... 44 CHAPTER 5: INTERAGENCY CONSULTATION ...... 47 A. INTERAGENCY CONSULTATION ...... 47 B. PUBLIC CONSULTATION ...... 48 CHAPTER 6: TIP AND RTP CONFORMITY ...... 49 REFERENCES ...... 54

i Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

APPENDICES

Appendix A: Conformity Checklist Appendix B: Transportation Project Listing Appendix C: Conformity Analysis Documentation Appendix D: Timely Implementation Documentation for Transportation Control Measures Appendix E: Public Hearing Process Documentation Appendix F: Response to Public Comments

Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

TABLES

Table 1-1: On-Road Motor Vehicle 2008 and 2015 Ozone Standard Emissions Budgets ...... 12 Table 1-2: On-Road Motor Vehicle PM-10 Emissions Budgets ...... 13 Table 1-3: On-Road Motor Vehicle 1997 (24-hour and annual) and 2012 (annual) PM2.5 Standard Emissions Budgets ...... 14 Table 1-4: On-Road Motor Vehicle 1997 (24-hour and annual) PM2.5 Standard Emissions Budgets ...... 15 Table 1-5: On-Road Motor Vehicle 2012 (annual) PM2.5 Standard Emissions Budgets ...... 16 Table 1-6 On-Road Motor Vehicle 2006 24-Hour PM2.5 Standard Emissions Budgets ...... 17 Table 1-7: San Joaquin Valley Conformity Analysis Years ...... 18 Table 1-8: San Joaquin Valley Conformity Analysis Years for the Upcoming Budgets ...... 19 Table 2-1: Summary of Latest Planning Assumptions for the Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis ...... 22 Table 2-2: Traffic Network Comparison for Horizon Years Evaluated in Conformity Analysis 29 Table 2-3: 2007 PM-10 Maintenance Plan Measures Assumed in the Conformity Analysis ..... 30 Table 2-4: 2008 PM2.5 (1997 Standard) Plan Measures Assumed in the Conformity Analysis 31 Table 2-5: 2012 PM2.5 (2006 Standard) Plan Measures Assumed in the Conformity Analysis 31 Table 6-1: Conformity Results Summary ...... 51

iii Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This report presents the Conformity Analysis for the 2021 Federal Transportation Improvement Program (2021 FTIP) and 2018 Regional Transportation Plan Amendment #2 (2018 RTP Amendment #2). The Stanislaus Council of Governments is the designated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) in Stanislaus County, California and is responsible for regional transportation planning.

On September 27, 2019, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) published the “Safer Affordable Fuel- Efficient (SAFE) Vehicles Rule Part One: One National Program” (effective November 26, 2019). The Part One Rule revoked California’s authority to set its own greenhouse gas emissions standards, which were incorporated in the EMFAC2014 emissions model. On November 20, 2019, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) released “EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors to Account for the SAFE Vehicles Rule Part One” for use in regional conformity analyses. On March 12, 2020, EPA concurred on the use of CARB’s EMFAC off-model adjustment factors in conformity demonstrations. On April 30, EPA and NHTSA published the SAFE Vehicles Rule for Model Years 2021-2026 Passenger Cars and Light Trucks (Final SAFE Rule) rolling back federal fuel economy standards. On June 26, 2020 CARB issued a public notice stating that EMFAC adjustments released in November continue to be suitable for conformity purposes. The conformity analysis for the 2021 FTIP and the 2018 RTP Amendment #2 incorporates these emissions modeling adjustments.

The 2018 PM2.5 Plan addressing 1997, 2006 and 2012 PM2.5 standards was adopted by the San Joaquin Valley Air District on November 15, 2018 and California Air Resources Board on January 24, 2019 and was subsequently submitted for EPA review. On March 27, EPA published a proposed rule approving portions of the 2018 PM2.5 Plan, including the 2006 PM2.5 conformity budgets and trading mechanism. The Final rule on sections that pertain to 2006 24-hour PM2.5 standard Serious area nonattainment was released on July 22, 2020; therefore, this conformity analysis incorporates new 2018 PM2.5 SIP budgets for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 standards. The remaining components of the 2018 PM2.5 Plan addressing the 1997 and 2012 PM2.5 standards are currently undergoing EPA review. Should EPA act on these additional SIP elements, this conformity analysis includes an “upcoming budget test” in case the new transportation conformity budgets become available prior to federal approval of the 2021 FTIP conformity analysis.

This analysis demonstrates that the criteria specified in the transportation conformity regulations for a conformity determination are satisfied by the 2021 FTIP and the 2018 RTP Amendment #2; a finding of conformity is therefore supported. The 2021 FTIP, 2018 RTP Amendment #2, and the corresponding Conformity Analysis were approved by the Stanislaus Council of Governments (StanCOG) Policy Board on February 17, 2021. Federal approval is anticipated on or before April 30, 2021. FHWA/FTA last issued a finding of conformity for the 2019 FTIP and the 2018 RTP, as amended if applicable, on October 9, 2020.

1 Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

The 2021 FTIP and the 2018 RTP Amendment #2 have been financially constrained in accordance with the requirements of 40 CFR 93.108 and consistent with the U.S. DOT metropolitan planning regulations (23 CFR Part 450). A discussion of financial constraint and funding sources is included in the appropriate documents.

The applicable Federal criteria or requirements for conformity determinations, the conformity tests applied, the results of the conformity assessment, and an overview of the organization of this report are summarized below.

CONFORMITY REQUIREMENTS The Federal transportation conformity regulations (40 Code of Federal Regulations Parts 51 and 93) specify criteria and procedures for conformity determinations for transportation plans, programs, and projects and their respective amendments. The Federal transportation conformity regulation was first promulgated in 1993 by the U.S. EPA, following the passage of amendments to the Federal Clean Air Act in 1990. The Federal transportation conformity regulation has been revised several times since its initial release to reflect both EPA rule changes and court opinions. The transportation conformity regulation is summarized in Chapter 1.

The conformity regulation applies nationwide to “all nonattainment and maintenance areas for transportation-related criteria pollutants for which the area is designated nonattainment or has a maintenance plan” (40 CFR 93.102). Currently, the San Joaquin Valley (or portions thereof) is designated as nonattainment with respect to Federal air quality standards for ozone, and particulate matter under 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5); and has a maintenance plan for particulate matter under 10 microns in diameter (PM-10). Therefore, transportation plans and programs for the nonattainment areas for Stanislaus County area must satisfy the requirements of the Federal transportation conformity regulation. Note that the urbanized/metropolitan areas of Kern, Fresno, Stanislaus and San Joaquin Counties have attained the CO standard and maintained attainment for 20 years. In accordance with Section 93.102(b)(4), conformity requirements for the CO standard stop applying 20 years after EPA approves an attainment redesignation request or as of June 1, 2018. Therefore, future conformity analysis for the TIP and RTP no longer include a CO conformity demonstration.

Under the transportation conformity regulation, the principal criteria for a determination of conformity for transportation plans and programs are: (1) the TIP and RTP must pass an emissions budget test using a budget that has been found to be adequate by EPA for transportation conformity purposes, or an interim emission test; (2) the latest planning assumptions and emission models specified for use in conformity determinations must be employed; (3) the TIP and RTP must provide for the timely implementation of transportation control measures (TCMs) specified in the applicable air quality implementation plans; and (4) interagency and public consultation.

2 Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

On-going interagency consultation is conducted through the San Joaquin Valley Interagency Consultation Group to ensure Valley-wide coordination, communication and compliance with Federal and California Clean Air Act requirements. Each of the eight Valley MPOs and the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District (Air District) are represented. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Federal Transit Administration (FTA), the U.S. EPA, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) and Caltrans are also represented on the committee. The final determination of conformity for the TIP and RTP is the responsibility of FHWA, and FTA within the U.S. DOT.

FHWA has developed a Conformity Checklist (included in Appendix A) that contains the required items to complete a conformity determination. Appropriate references to these items are noted on the checklist.

CONFORMITY TESTS The conformity tests specified in the Federal transportation conformity regulation are: (1) the emissions budget test, and (2) the interim emission test. For the emissions budget test, predicted emissions for the TIP/RTP must be less than or equal to the motor vehicle emissions budget specified in the approved air quality implementation plan or the emissions budget found to be adequate for transportation conformity purposes. If there is no approved air quality plan for a pollutant for which the region is in nonattainment or no emission budget has been found to be adequate for transportation conformity purposes, the interim emission test applies. Chapter 1 summarizes the applicable air quality implementation plans and conformity tests for ozone, PM- 10, and PM2.5.

RESULTS OF THE CONFORMITY ANALYSIS

A regional emissions analysis was conducted for the years 2020, 2021, 2023, 2024, 2026, 2029, 2031, 2037 and 2042 for each applicable pollutant. Addition analysis years 2022 and 2025 were also included in this conformity analysis to address upcoming 2018 PM2.5 Plan budgets for the 2012 PM2.5 standard. All analyses were conducted using the latest planning assumptions and emissions models. The major conclusions of StanCOG’s Conformity Analysis for the 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2 are:

• For 2008 and 2015 8-hour ozone, the total regional on-road vehicle-related emissions (ROG and NOx) associated with implementation of the 2021 FTIP and the 2018 RTP Amendment #2 for all years tested are projected to be less than the approved emissions budgets specified in the 2018 Updates to the California State Implementation Plan for the San Joaquin Valley (2018 SIP Update). The conformity tests for ozone are therefore satisfied. • For PM-10, the total regional vehicle-related emissions (PM-10 and NOx) associated with implementation of the 2021 FTIP and the 2018 RTP Amendment #2 for all years tested are either (1) projected to be less than the approved emissions budgets, or (2) less than the emission budgets using the approved PM-10 and NOx trading mechanism for transportation conformity

3 Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

purposes from the 2007 PM-10 Maintenance Plan (as revised in 2015). The conformity tests for PM-10 are therefore satisfied. • For the 1997 annual and 24-hour and 2012 annual PM2.5 standards, the total regional on-road vehicle-related emissions associated with implementation of the 2021 FTIP and the 2018 RTP Amendment #2 for the analysis years are either (1) projected to be less than the approved emission budgets, or (2) less than the emission budgets using the approved PM2.5 and NOx trading mechanism for transportation conformity purposes from the 2008 PM2.5 Plan (as revised in 2011). In addition, this conformity analysis includes an “upcoming budget test” demonstrating conformity to the 2018 PM2.5 Plan transportation conformity budgets for the 1997 and 2012 PM2.5 budgets, should EPA approve or find these adequate before federal approval of the 2021 FTIP conformity analysis. The conformity tests for PM2.5 for the 1997 and 2012 standards are therefore satisfied. • For the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 standard, the total regional on-road vehicle-related emissions associated with implementation of the 2021 FTIP and the 2018 RTP Amendment #2 for the analysis years are either (1) projected to be less than the approved emission budgets, or (2) less than the emission budgets using the approved PM2.5 and NOx trading mechanism for transportation conformity purposes from the 2018 Plan for the 1997, 2006, and 2012 PM2.5 Standards (2018 PM2.5 Plan). The conformity tests for PM2.5 for the 2006 standard are therefore satisfied. • The 2021 FTIP and the 2018 RTP Amendment #2 will not impede and will support timely implementation of the TCMs that have been adopted as part of applicable air quality implementation plans. The current status of TCM implementation is documented in Chapter 4 of this report. Since the local SJV procedures (e.g., Air District Rule 9120 Transportation Conformity) have not been approved by EPA, consultation has been conducted in accordance with Federal requirements.

REPORT ORGANIZATION The report is organized into six chapters. Chapter 1 provides an overview of the applicable Federal and State conformity regulations and requirements, air quality implementation plans, and conformity test requirements. Chapter 2 contains a discussion of the latest planning assumptions and transportation modeling. Chapter 3 describes the air quality modeling used to estimate emission factors and mobile source emissions. Chapter 4 contains the documentation required under the Federal transportation conformity regulation for transportation control measures. Chapter 5 provides an overview of the interagency requirements and the general approach to compliance used by the San Joaquin Valley MPOs. The results of the conformity analysis for the TIP/RTP are provided in Chapter 6.

Appendix E includes public hearing documentation conducted on the 2021 FTIP, 2018 RTP Amendment #2 and the corresponding Conformity Analysis on November 18, 2020. Comments received on the conformity analysis and responses made as part of the public involvement process are included in Appendix F.

4 Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

CHAPTER 1: FEDERAL AND STATE REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS

The criteria for determining conformity of transportation programs and plans under the Federal transportation conformity regulation (40 CFR Parts 51 and 93) and the applicable conformity tests for the San Joaquin Valley nonattainment areas are summarized in this section. The Conformity Analysis for and the 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2 was prepared based on these criteria and tests. Presented first is a review of the development of the applicable conformity regulation and guidance procedures, followed by summaries of conformity regulation requirements, air quality designation status, conformity test requirements, and analysis years for the Conformity Analysis.

StanCOG is the designated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for Stanislaus County in the San Joaquin Valley. As a result of this designation StanCOG prepares the TIP, RTP, and associated conformity analyses. The TIP serves as a detailed four year (FY 2020/21 – 2023/24) programming document for the preservation, expansion, and management of the transportation system. The 2018 RTP has a 2042 horizon that provides the long term direction for the continued implementation of the freeway/expressway plan, as well as improvements to arterial streets, transit, and travel demand management programs. The TIP and RTP include capacity enhancements to the freeway/expressway system commensurate with available funding.

A. FEDERAL AND STATE CONFORMITY REGULATIONS

CLEAN AIR ACT AMENDMENTS

Section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act (CAA, 1990) requires that Federal agencies and MPOs not approve any transportation plan, program, or project that does not conform to the approved State Implementation Plan (SIP). The 1990 amendments to the Clean Air Act expanded Section 176(c) to more explicitly define conformity to an implementation plan to mean:

“Conformity to the plan's purpose of eliminating or reducing the severity and number of violations of the national ambient air quality standards and achieving expeditious attainment of such standards; and that such activities will not (i) cause or contribute to any new violation of any standard in any area; (ii) increase the frequency or severity of any existing violation of any standard in any area; or (iii) delay timely attainment of any standard or any required interim emission reductions or other milestones in any area.”

Section 176(c) also provides conditions for the approval of transportation plans, programs, and projects, and requirements that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) promulgate conformity determination criteria and procedures no later than November 15, 1991.

Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

FEDERAL RULE

The initial November 15, 1991 deadline for conformity criteria and procedures was partially completed through the issuance of supplemental interim conformity guidance issued on June 7, 1991 for carbon monoxide, ozone, and particulate matter ten microns or less in diameter (PM-10). EPA subsequently promulgated the Conformity Final Rule in the November 24, 1993 Federal Register (EPA, 1993). The 1993 Rule became effective on December 27, 1993. The Federal Transportation Conformity Final Rule has been amended several times from 1993 to present. These amendments have addressed a number of items related to conformity lapses, grace periods, and other related issues to streamline the conformity process.

EPA published the Transportation Conformity Rule PM2.5 and PM10 Amendments on March 24, 2010; the rule became effective on April 23, 2010 (EPA, 2010a). This PM amendments final rule amends the conformity regulation to address the 2006 PM2.5 national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS). The final PM amendments rule also addresses hot-spot analyses in PM2.5 and PM10 and carbon monoxide nonattainment and maintenance areas.

On March 14, 2012, EPA published the Transportation Conformity Rule Restructuring Amendments, effective April 13, 2012 (EPA, 2012a). The amendments restructure several sections of the rule so that they apply to any new or revised NAAQS. In addition, several clarifications to improve implementation of the rule were finalized.

On March 6, 2015, EPA published Implementation of the 2008 National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone: State Implementation Plan Requirements final rule (effective April 6, 2015), which shifted the San Joaquin Valley 2008 Ozone Standard attainment date from December 31, 2032 to July 20, 2032 (EPA, 2015). EPA’s March 2015 ozone implementation rule also revoked the 1997 Ozone Standard for transportation conformity purposes. On February 16, 2018, the U.S. Court of Appeals ruled against parts of the EPA’s 2015 Ozone Implementation Rule related to the revocation of the 1997 ozone standard and the relevant “anti-backsliding” requirements. However, according to Transportation Conformity Guidance for the South Coast II Court Decision, nonattainment areas with existing 2008 ozone conformity budgets are not required to address the 1997 ozone standards for conformity purposes.

On December 6, 2018, EPA published the Implementation of the 2015 National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone: Nonattainment Area State Implementation Plan Requirements final rule, effective February 4, 2019 (EPA, 2018). The rule clarified that nonattainment areas must continue to demonstrate conformity to the 2008 ozone standards.

On August 24, 2016, EPA published its Final Rule titled Implementing National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Fine Particles: State Implementation Plan Requirements. According to the implementation rule, areas designated as nonattainment for the 1997 PM2.5 standards, must continue to demonstrate conformity to these standards until attainment (EPA, 2016).

6 Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL GUIDANCE

EPA reissued Guidance for Transportation Conformity Implementation in Multi-Jurisdictional Nonattainment and Maintenance Areas in July 2012 (EPA, 2012c). This guidance updates and supersedes the July 2004 “multi-jurisdictional” guidance (EPA, 2004a), but does not change the substance of the guidance on how nonattainment areas with multiple agencies should conduct conformity determinations. This guidance applies to the San Joaquin Valley since there are multiple MPOs within a single nonattainment area. The main principle of the guidance is that one regional emissions analysis is required for the entire nonattainment area. However, separate modeling and conformity documents may be developed by each MPO. The Transportation Conformity Guidance for 2015 Ozone NAAQS Nonattainment Areas released in June 2018 incorporates the 2012 Multi-Jurisdictional Guidance by reference.

Part 3 of the guidance applies to nonattainment areas that have adequate or approved conformity budgets addressing a particular air quality standard. This Part currently applies to the San Joaquin Valley for ozone and PM-10. The guidance allows MPOs to make independent conformity determinations for their plans and TIPs as long as all of the other subareas in the nonattainment area have conforming transportation plans and TIPs in place at the time of each MPO and the Department of Transportation (DOT) conformity determination.

With respect to PM2.5, the Transportation Conformity Rule PM2.5 and PM10 Amendments published on March 24, 2010 effectively incorporates the “multi-jurisdictional” guidance directly into the rule. The Rule allows MPOs to make independent conformity determinations for their plans and TIPs as long as all of the other subareas in the nonattainment area have conforming transportation plans and TIPs in place at the time of each MPO and DOT conformity determination.

DISTRICT RULE

The San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District (Air District) adopted Rule 9120 Transportation Conformity on January 19, 1995 in response to requirements in Section 176(c)(4)(c) of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments. In May 2015, the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District requested ARB to withdraw Rule 9120 from California State Implementation Plan consideration.

In July of 2015, ARB sent a letter to EPA withdrawing Rule 9120 from the California State Implementation Plan. Therefore, EPA can no longer act on the Rule. It should also be noted that EPA has changed 40 CFR 51.390 to streamline the requirements for State conformity SIPs. Since a transportation conformity SIP cannot be approved for the San Joaquin Valley, the Federal transportation conformity rule governs.

B. CONFORMITY REGULATION REQUIREMENTS The Federal regulations identify general criteria and procedures that apply to all transportation conformity determinations, regardless of pollutant and implementation plan status. These include: 1) Conformity Tests — Sections 93.118 and 93.119 specify emissions tests (budget and interim emissions) that the TIP/RTP must satisfy in order for a determination of conformity to be found.

7 Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

The final transportation conformity regulation issued on July 1, 2004 requires a submitted SIP motor vehicle emissions budget to be found adequate or approved by EPA prior to use for making conformity determinations. The budget must be used on or after the effective date of EPA’s adequacy finding or approval. 2) Methods / Modeling: Latest Planning Assumptions — Section 93.110 specifies that conformity determinations must be based upon the most recent planning assumptions in force at the time the conformity analysis begins. This is defined as “the point at which the MPO begins to model the impact of the proposed transportation plan or TIP on travel and/or emissions. New data that becomes available after an analysis begins is required to be used in the conformity determination only if a significant delay in the analysis has occurred, as determined through interagency consultation” (EPA, 2010b). All analyses for the Conformity Analysis were conducted using the latest planning assumptions and emissions models in force at the time the conformity analysis started in September 2020 (see Chapter 2). Latest Emissions Models — Section 93.111 requires that the latest emission estimation models specified for use in SIPs must be used for the conformity analysis. EPA has approved EMFAC2017 for conformity use on August 15, 2019 and the final rule started the two-year grace period to transition to the new emissions model for use in conformity demonstrations. Therefore, EMFAC2014 continued to be used in this conformity analysis as documented in Chapter 3. EPA issued a federal register notice on December 14, 2015 formally approving EMFAC2014 for use in conformity determinations. On November 20, 2019, California Air Resources Board (CARB) released “EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors to Account for the SAFE Vehicles Rule Part One” for use in regional conformity analyses. On March 12, 2020, EPA concurred on the use of CARB’s EMFAC off-model adjustment factors in conformity demonstrations. On April 30, EPA and NHTSA published SAFE Vehicles Rule for Model Years 2021-2026 Passenger Cars and Light Trucks (Final SAFE Rule) rolling back federal fuel economy standards. On June 26, 2020 CARB issued a public notice stating that EMFAC adjustments released in November continue to be suitable for conformity purposes. The conformity analysis for the 2021 FTIP Amendment and 2018 RTP Amendment #2 incorporates these adjustments. 3) Timely Implementation of TCMs — Section 93.113 provides a detailed description of the steps necessary to demonstrate that the TIP/RTP are providing for the timely implementation of TCMs, as well as demonstrate that the plan and/or program is not interfering with this implementation. TCM documentation is included in Chapter 4 of the Conformity Analysis. 4) Consultation — Section 93.105 requires that the conformity determination be made in accordance with the consultation procedures outlined in the Federal regulations. These include: • MPOs are required to provide reasonable opportunity for consultation with State air agencies, local air quality and transportation agencies, the USDOT and EPA (Section 93.105(a)(1)). • MPOs are required to establish a proactive public involvement process, which provides opportunity for public review and comment prior to taking formal action on a conformity determination (Section 93.105(e)).

8 Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

The TIP, RTP, and corresponding conformity determinations are prepared by each MPO. Copies of the Draft documents are provided to member agencies and others, including FHWA, Federal Transit Administration (FTA), EPA, Caltrans, CARB, and the Air District for review. The conformity analysis is required to be publicly available and an opportunity for public review and comment is provided. StanCOG’s adopted consultation process and policy for conformity analysis includes a 30-day comment period followed by a public meeting.

C. AIR QUALITY DESIGNATIONS APPLICABLE TO THE SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY The conformity regulation (section 93.102) requires documentation of the applicable pollutants and precursors for which EPA has designated the area nonattainment or maintenance. In addition, the nonattainment or maintenance area and its boundaries should be described.

StanCOG is located in the federally designated San Joaquin Valley Air Basin. The borders of the basin are defined by mountain and foothill ranges to the east and west. The northern border is consistent with the county line between San Joaquin and Sacramento Counties. The southern border is less defined, but is roughly bounded by the Tehachapi Mountains and, to some extent, the Sierra Nevada range. The conformity analysis for the 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2 includes analyses of existing and future air quality impacts for each applicable pollutant.

The San Joaquin Valley is currently designated as nonattainment for the National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for 8-hour ozone (revoked 1997, 2008 and 2015 standards), particulate matter under 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5) (1997, 2006 and 2012 standards); and has a maintenance plan for particulate matter under 10 microns in diameter (PM-10). Note that the urbanized/metropolitan areas of Kern, Fresno, Stanislaus and San Joaquin Counties have attained the CO standard and maintained attainment for 20 years. In accordance with Section 93.102(b)(4), conformity requirements for the CO standard stop applying 20 years after EPA approves an attainment redesignation request or as of June 1, 2018. Therefore, future conformity analyses no longer include a CO conformity demonstration.

State Implementation Plans have been prepared to address ozone, PM-10 and PM2.5:

• The 2016 Ozone Plan (2008 standard) was adopted by the Air District on June 16, 2016 and subsequently adopted by ARB on July 21, 2016. EPA found the new ozone budgets adequate on June 29, 2017 (effective July 14, 2017). In response to recent court decisions regarding the baseline RFP year, ARB adopted the revised 2008 ozone conformity budgets as part of the 2018 Updates to the California State Implementation Plan (2018 SIP Update) on October 25, 2018. EPA approved the 2016 Ozone Plan and the budgets on March 25, 2019.

• The 2007 PM-10 Maintenance Plan (as revised in 2015) was approved by EPA on July 8, 2016 (effective September 30, 2016).

9 Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

• The 2008 PM2.5 Plan (1997 Standard), as revised in 2011, was approved by EPA on November 9, 2011 (effective January 9, 2012).

• The 2018 PM2.5 Plan was partially approved by EPA on July 22, 2020 (effective as of publication) inclusive of the revised conformity budgets and trading mechanism for the 2006 24-hr PM2.5 standard.

EPA’s March 2015 final rule implementing the 2008 Ozone Standard also revoked the 1997 Ozone Standard for transportation conformity purposes. This revocation became effective April 6, 2015. On February 16, 2018, the U.S. Court of Appeals ruled against parts of the EPA’s 2015 Ozone Implementation Rule related to the revocation of the 1997 ozone standard and the relevant “anti- backsliding” requirements. However, according to the Transportation Conformity Guidance for the South Coast II Court Decision, nonattainment areas with existing 2008 ozone conformity budgets are not required to address the 1997 ozone standards for conformity purposes.

EPA designated the San Joaquin Valley nonattainment area for the 2008 Ozone Standard, effective July 20, 2012. Transportation conformity applies one year after the effective date (July 20, 2013). Federal approval for the eight SJV MPO’s 2008 Ozone standard conformity demonstrations was received on July 8, 2013.

On June 4, 2018 EPA published final designations classifying the San Joaquin Valley as “extreme” nonattainment for 2015 ozone with an attainment deadline of 2038, effective August 3, 2018. Transportation conformity applies one year after the effective date or August 3, 2019. It is important to note that the 2015 ozone standard nonattainment area boundary for the San Joaquin Valley is exactly the same as the nonattainment area boundary for the 2008 ozone standard.

On November 13, 2009, EPA published Air Quality Designations for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 standard, effective December 14, 2009. Nonattainment areas are required to meet the standard by 2014; transportation conformity began to apply on December 14, 2010. On January 20, 2016 EPA published Designation of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes; California; San Joaquin Valley; Reclassification as Serious Nonattainment for the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS finalizing SJV reclassification to Serious nonattainment effective February 19, 2016. Nonattainment areas are required to meet the standard as expeditiously as practicable, but no later than December 31, 2019. It is important to note that the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 nonattainment area boundary for the San Joaquin Valley is exactly the same as the nonattainment area boundary for the 1997 annual PM2.5 standard.

EPA’s nonattainment area designations for the new 2012 PM2.5 standards became effective on April 15, 2015. Conformity for a given pollutant and standard applies one year after the effective date (April 15, 2016). It is important to note that the 2012 PM2.5 standards nonattainment area boundary for the San Joaquin Valley are exactly the same as the nonattainment area boundary for the 1997 annual PM2.5 standard.

On July 29, 2016, EPA released its Final Rule for Implementing National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Fine Particles. According to the implementation rule, areas designated as nonattainment for the 1997 PM 2.5 standards, must continue to demonstrate conformity to these

10 Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

standards until attainment. In the San Joaquin Valley, the 1997 standards (both 24-hour and annual) continue to apply.

D. CONFORMITY TEST REQUIREMENTS The conformity (Section 93.109(c)–(k)) rule requires that either a table or text description be provided that details, for each pollutant and precursor, whether the interim emissions tests and/or the budget test apply for conformity. In addition, documentation regarding which emissions budgets have been found adequate by EPA, and which budgets are currently applicable for what analysis years is required.

Specific conformity test requirements established for the San Joaquin Valley nonattainment areas for ozone, and particulate matter are summarized below.

Section 93.124(d) of the 1997 Final Transportation Conformity regulation allows for conformity determinations for sub-regional emission budgets by MPOs if the applicable implementation plans (or implementation plan submission) explicitly indicates an intent to create such sub-regional budgets for the purpose of conformity. In addition, Section 93.124(e) of the 1997 rules states: “…if a nonattainment area includes more than one MPO, the implementation plan may establish motor vehicle emission budgets for each MPO, or else the MPOs must collectively make a conformity determination for the entire nonattainment area.” Each applicable implementation plan and estimate of baseline emissions in the San Joaquin Valley provides motor vehicle emission budgets by county, to facilitate county-level conformity findings.

OZONE (2008 AND 2015 STANDARDS)

The San Joaquin Valley currently violates both the 2008 and 2015 ozone standards; thus, the conformity determination includes all corresponding analyses (see discussion under Air Quality Designations Applicable to the San Joaquin Valley above). Under the existing conformity regulations, regional emissions analyses for ozone areas must address nitrogen oxides (NOx) and volatile organic compounds (VOC) precursors. It is important to note that in California, reactive organic gases (ROG) are considered equivalent to and are used in place of volatile organic compounds (VOC).

EPA’s final rule implementing the 2008 ozone standard also revoked the 1997 ozone standard for transportation conformity purposes. This revocation became effective April 6, 2015. Current federal guidance does not require 2008 ozone nonattainment areas to address the 1997 ozone standard for conformity purposes.

On March 25, 2019, EPA published a final rule approving the 2008 ozone conformity budgets and the 2018 Updates to the California State Implementation Plan. The EPA final rule identified both reactive organic gases (ROG) and nitrogen oxides (NOx) subarea budgets in tons per average summer day for each MPO in the nonattainment area.

In accordance with Section 93.109(c)(2) of the conformity rule and the 2015 Ozone Transportation Conformity Guidance, if a 2015 ozone nonattainment area has adequate or approved SIP budgets

11 Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

that address the 2008 ozone standard, it must use the budget test until new 2015 ozone standard budgets are found adequate or approved. It is important to note that the boundaries for the 2015 ozone standard and 2008 ozone standard are identical. In addition, the 2015 Ozone Implementation Rule did not revoke 2008 standard requirements. Consequently, for this conformity analysis, the SJV MPOs will conduct demonstrations for both 2008 and 2015 ozone standards using subarea emissions budgets as established in the 2018 Updates to the California State Implementation Plan.

The conformity budgets from Table 1 of the March 25, 2019 Federal Register are provided in Table 1-1 below. These budgets will be used to compare to emissions resulting from the 2021 FTIP and the 2018 RTP Amendment #2.

Table 1-1: On-Road Motor Vehicle 2008 and 2015 Ozone Standard Emissions Budgets (summer tons/day)

2020 2023 2026 2029 2031 County ROG NOx ROG NOx ROG NOx ROG NOx ROG NOx Fresno 6.7 23.9 5.5 14.1 4.9 13.2 4.5 12.4 4.2 12.1 Kern (SJV) 5.4 20.9 4.5 14.5 4.2 14.4 4.0 14.3 3.9 14.3 Kings 1.2 4.5 1.0 2.7 0.9 2.6 0.8 2.6 0.8 2.6 Madera 1.5 4.3 1.1 2.7 1.0 2.5 0.9 2.4 0.8 2.3 Merced 2.2 8.8 1.7 6.0 1.5 5.9 1.3 5.6 1.2 5.4 San Joaquin 4.7 11.2 3.9 7.4 3.5 7.0 3.1 6.6 2.8 6.3 Stanislaus 3.1 8.8 2.6 5.6 2.2 4.9 2.0 4.5 1.8 4.3 Tulare 3.0 7.6 2.4 4.6 2.1 4.0 1.8 3.7 1.7 3.5 (a) Note that 2008 ozone budgets were established by rounding up each county’s emissions totals to the nearest tenth of a ton.

PM-10

The 2007 PM-10 Maintenance Plan (as revised in 2015) was approved by EPA on July 8, 2016 (effective September 30, 2016), which contains motor vehicle emission budgets for PM-10 and NOx, as well as a trading mechanism. Motor vehicle emission budgets are established based on average annual daily emissions. The motor vehicle emissions budget for PM-10 includes regional re-entrained dust from travel on paved roads, vehicular exhaust, travel on unpaved roads, and road construction. The conformity budgets from Table 2 of the August 12, 2016 Federal Register are provided below and will be used to compare emissions for each analysis year.

The PM-10 SIP allows trading from the motor vehicle emissions budget for the PM-10 precursor NOx to the motor vehicle emissions budget for primary PM-10 using a 1.5 to 1 ratio. The trading mechanism allows the agencies responsible for demonstrating transportation conformity in the San Joaquin Valley to supplement the 2005 budget for PM-10 with a portion of the 2005 budget for NOx, and use these adjusted motor vehicle emissions budgets for PM-10 and NOx to demonstrate

12 Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

transportation conformity with the PM-10 SIP for analysis years after 2005. As noted above, EPA approved the 2007 PM-10 Maintenance Plan (with minor technical corrections to the conformity budgets) on July 8, 2016, which includes continued approval of the trading mechanism.

The trading mechanism will be used only for conformity analyses for analysis years after 2005. To ensure that the trading mechanism does not impact the ability to meet the NOx budget, the NOx emission reductions available to supplement the PM-10 budget shall only be those remaining after the NOx budget has been met. Table 1-2: On-Road Motor Vehicle PM-10 Emissions Budgets (tons per average annual day)

2020(b) County PM-10 NOx Fresno 7.0 25.4 Kern(a) 7.4 23.3 Kings 1.8 4.8 Madera 2.5 4.7 Merced 3.8 8.9 San Joaquin 4.6 11.9 Stanislaus 3.7 9.6 Tulare 3.4 8.4 (a)Kern County subarea includes only the portion of Kern County within the San Joaquin Valley Air Basin. (b) Note that EPA did not take action on the 2005 budgets of the 2007 PM10 Maintenance Plan (as revised in 2015). These budgets are not in the timeframe of this conformity analysis.

PM2.5

EPA and FHWA have indicated that areas violating both the annual and 24-hour standards for PM2.5 must address all standards in the conformity determination. The San Joaquin Valley currently violates both the 1997 annual and 24-hour and 2012 annual PM2.5 standards and the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 standards; thus, the conformity determination includes all corresponding analyses (see discussion under Air Quality Designations Applicable to the San Joaquin Valley above).

Given that EPA may act on the remaining components of the 2018 PM2.5 Plan prior to federal approval of the 2021 FTIP conformity analysis, the new transportation conformity budgets

Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

addressing the 1997 and 2012 PM2.5 standards are also included in this conformity analysis (“upcoming budget test”).

1997 (24-hour and annual) and 2012 (annual) PM2.5 Standards

The 2008 PM2.5 Plan for the 1997 PM2.5 standard (as revised in 2011) was approved by EPA on November 9, 2011, which contains motor vehicle emission budgets for PM2.5 and NOx established based on average annual daily emissions, as well as a trading mechanism. The motor vehicle emissions budget for PM2.5 includes directly emitted PM2.5 motor vehicle emissions from tailpipe, brake wear and tire wear. VOC, SOx, ammonia, and dust (from paved roads, unpaved roads, and road construction) were found to be insignificant and not included in the motor vehicle emission budgets for conformity purposes. The conformity budgets from Table 5 of the November 9, 2011 Federal Register are provided in Table 1-3 below and will be used to compare emissions resulting from the 2021 FTIP and the 2018 RTP Amendment #2.

In accordance with Section 93.109(i)(3) of the conformity rule, if a 2012 PM2.5 nonattainment area has adequate or approved SIP budgets that address the annual 1997 PM2.5 standards, it must use the budget test until new 2012 PM2.5 standard budgets are found adequate or approved. The attainment year of 2021 will be modeled. For this Conformity Analysis, the SJV will conduct determinations for subarea emission budgets as established in the 2008 PM2.5 (1997 Standard) Plan.

In addition, the final PM2.5 Implementation Rule requires areas designated as nonattainment for the 1997 PM2.5 standards to continue demonstrate conformity to these standards until attainment. In the San Joaquin Valley, the 1997 standards (both 24-hour and annual) continue to apply.

Table 1-3: On-Road Motor Vehicle 1997 (24-hour and annual) and 2012 (annual) PM2.5 Standard Emissions Budgets (tons per average annual day)

2012(a) 2014 County PM2.5 NOx PM2.5 NOx Fresno 1.5 35.7 1.1 31.4 Kern (SJV) 1.9 48.9 1.2 43.8 Kings 0.4 10.5 0.3 9.3 Madera 0.4 9.2 0.3 8.1 Merced 0.8 19.7 0.6 17.4 San Joaquin 1.1 24.5 0.9 21.6 Stanislaus 0.7 16.7 0.6 14.6 Tulare 0.7 15.7 0.5 13.8 (a) 2012 budgets are not in the timeframe of this conformity analysis.

Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

The 2008 PM2.5 SIP includes a trading mechanism that allows trading from the motor vehicle emissions budget for the PM-2.5 precursor NOx to the motor vehicle emissions budget for primary PM-2.5 using a 9 to 1 ratio. The trading mechanism allows the agencies responsible for demonstrating transportation conformity in the San Joaquin Valley to supplement the applicable budget for PM-2.5 with a portion of the applicable corresponding budget for NOx, and use these adjusted motor vehicle emissions budgets for PM-2.5 and NOx to demonstrate transportation conformity with the PM-2.5 SIP for analysis years after 2014. As noted above, EPA approved the 2008 PM2.5 Plan (as revised in 2011) on November 9, 2011, which includes approval of the trading mechanism.

The trading mechanism will be used only for conformity analyses for analysis years after 2014. To ensure that the trading mechanism does not impact the ability to meet the NOx budget, the NOx emission reductions available to supplement the PM-2.5 budget shall only be those remaining after the NOx budget has been met.

As noted above, in accordance with the EPA Transportation Conformity Rule Restructuring Amendments Nonattainment areas allows 2012 PM2.5 areas with adequate or approved 1997 PM2.5 budgets to determine conformity for both NAAQS at the same time, using the budget test.

“Upcoming Budget Test” to the 1997 and 2012 PM2.5 Standards

The 2018 PM2.5 Plan contains motor vehicle emission budgets for PM2.5 and NOx established based on average annual daily emissions, as well as a trading mechanism. The motor vehicle emissions budget for PM2.5 includes directly emitted PM2.5 motor vehicle emissions from tailpipe, brake wear and tire wear. VOC, SOx, ammonia, and dust (from paved roads, unpaved roads, and road construction) were found to be insignificant and not included in the motor vehicle emission budgets for conformity purposes. The applicable conformity budgets are provided in Table 1-4 for the 1997 PM2.5 standard and Table 1-5 for the 2012 PM2.5 standard and will be used to compare emissions resulting from the 2021 FTIP Amendment and the 2018 RTP Amendment #2.

Table 1-4: On-Road Motor Vehicle 1997 (24-hour and annual) PM2.5 Standard Emissions Budgets (tons per average annual day)

2017(a) 2020 County PM2.5 NOx PM2.5 NOx Fresno 0.9 28.5 0.8 15.1 Kern (SJV) 0.8 28.0 0.7 13.3 Kings 0.2 5.8 0.2 2.8 Madera 0.2 5.3 0.2 2.5 Merced 0.3 10.7 0.3 5.3 San Joaquin 0.7 14.9 0.6 7.6 Stanislaus 0.4 11.9 0.4 6.1 Tulare 0.4 10.8 0.4 5.2 (a) 2017 budgets are not in the timeframe of this conformity analysis.

15 Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

Table 1-5: On-Road Motor Vehicle 2012 (annual) PM2.5 Standard Emissions Budgets (tons per average annual day)

2019 2022 2025 County PM2.5 NOx PM2.5 NOx PM2.5 NOx Fresno 0.9 27.6 0.9 21.2 0.8 13.5 Kern (SJV) 0.8 25.1 0.8 19.4 0.8 11.9 Kings 0.2 5.1 0.2 4.1 0.2 2.5 Madera 0.2 4.6 0.2 3.5 0.2 2.0 Merced 0.3 9.4 0.3 7.6 0.3 4.5 San Joaquin 0.6 12,7 0.6 10.0 0.6 6.3 Stanislaus 0.4 10.5 0.4 8.1 0.4 5.2 Tulare 0.4 9.3 0.4 6.9 0.4 4.2 (a) Note that 2019 PM2.5 budgets are not in the timeframe of this conformity analysis.

The 2018 PM2.5 SIP includes a trading mechanism that allows trading from the motor vehicle emissions budget for the PM2.5 precursor NOx to the motor vehicle emissions budget for primary PM2.5 using a 6.5 to 1 ratio on an annual basis. The trading mechanism allows the agencies responsible for demonstrating transportation conformity in the San Joaquin Valley to supplement the applicable budget for PM2.5 with a portion of the applicable corresponding budget for NOx, and use these adjusted motor vehicle emissions budgets for PM2.5 and NOx to demonstrate transportation conformity with the 2018 PM2.5 SIP.

The trading mechanism will be used only for conformity analyses for analysis years after 2020. To ensure that the trading mechanism does not impact the ability to meet the NOx budget, the NOx emission reductions available to supplement the PM2.5 budget shall only be those remaining after the NOx budget has been met.

2006 24-Hour PM2.5 Standard

The 2018 PM2.5 Plan addressing 1997, 2006 and 2012 PM2.5 standards was adopted by the San Joaquin Valley Air District on November 15, 2018 and California Air Resources Board on January 24, 2019. On March 27, EPA published a proposed rule approving portions of the 2018 PM2.5 Plan, including the 2006 PM2.5 conformity budgets and trading mechanism. Final rule on sections that pertain to 2006 24-hour PM2.5 standard Serious area nonattainment was published on July 22, 2020. Therefore, the conformity analysis for the 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2 incorporates new transportation conformity budgets and the new attainment year of 2024 for 2006 24-hour PM2.5 standards.

The 2018 PM2.5 Plan for the 2006 PM2.5 standard contains motor vehicle emission budgets for PM2.5 and NOx established based on average winter daily emissions, as well as a trading

16 Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

mechanism. The motor vehicle emissions budget for PM2.5 includes directly emitted PM2.5 motor vehicle emissions from tailpipe, brake wear and tire wear. VOC, SOx, ammonia, and dust (from paved roads, unpaved roads, and road construction) were found to be insignificant and not included in the motor vehicle emission budgets for conformity purposes. The conformity budgets from the March 27, 2020 Federal Register, Table 14 are provided in Table 1-4 below and will be used to compare emissions resulting from the 2021 FTIP and the 2018 RTP Amendment #2.

Table 1-6 On-Road Motor Vehicle 2006 24-Hour PM2.5 Standard Emissions Budgets (tons per average winter day)

2017 2020 2023 2024 County PM2.5 NOx PM2.5 NOx PM2.5 NOx PM2.5 NOx Fresno 0.9 29.3 0.9 25.9 0.8 15.5 0.8 15.0 Kern (SJV) 0.8 28.7 0.8 23.8 0.7 13.6 0.7 13.4 Kings 0.2 5.9 0.2 4.9 0.2 2.9 0.2 2.8 Madera 0.2 5.5 0.2 4.4 0.2 2.6 0.2 2.5 Merced 0.3 11.0 0.3 9.1 0.3 5.5 0.3 5.3 San 0.7 15.5 0.6 12.3 0.6 7.9 0.6 7.6 Joaquin Stanislaus 0.4 12.3 0.4 9.8 0.4 6.2 0.4 6.0 Tulare 0.4 11.2 0.4 8.7 0.4 5.3 0.4 5.1 (a) Note that 2017 PM2.5 budgets are not in the timeframe of this conformity analysis.

The 2018 PM2.5 SIP includes a trading mechanism that allows trading from the motor vehicle emissions budget for the PM2.5 precursor NOx to the motor vehicle emissions budget for primary PM-2.5 using an 2 to 1 ratio. The trading mechanism allows the agencies responsible for demonstrating transportation conformity in the San Joaquin Valley to supplement the applicable budget for PM-2.5 with a portion of the applicable corresponding budget for NOx, and use these adjusted motor vehicle emissions budgets for PM2.5 and NOx to demonstrate transportation conformity with the PM2.5 SIP for analysis years after 2020. As noted above, EPA approved the 2018 PM2.5 Plan budgets and the trading mechanism for 2006 24-hr PM2.5 standards on July 22, 2020 (effective as of publication).

E. ANALYSIS YEARS The conformity regulation (Section 93.118[b] and [d]) requires documentation of the years for which consistency with motor vehicle emission budgets must be shown. In addition, any interpolation performed to meet tests for years in which specific analysis is not required need to be documented.

For the selection of the horizon years, the conformity regulation requires: (1) that if the attainment year is in the time span of the transportation plan, it must be modeled; (2) the last year forecast in

17 Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

the transportation plan must be a horizon year; and (3) horizon years may not be more than ten years apart. In addition, the conformity regulation requires that conformity must be demonstrated for each year for which the applicable implementation plan specifically establishes motor vehicle emission budgets.

Section 93.118(b)(2) clarifies that when a maintenance plan has been submitted, conformity must be demonstrated for the last year of the maintenance plan and any other years for which the maintenance plan establishes budgets in the time frame of the transportation plan. Section 93.118(d)(2) indicates that a regional emissions analysis may be performed for any years, the attainment year, and the last year of the plan’s forecast. Other years may be determined by interpolating between the years for which the regional emissions analysis is performed.

Section 93.118(d)(2) indicates that the regional emissions analysis may be performed for any years in the time frame of the transportation plan provided they are not more than ten years apart and provided the analysis is performed for the attainment year (if it is in the time frame of the transportation plan) and the last year of the plan’s forecast period. Emissions in years for which consistency with motor vehicle emissions budgets must be demonstrated, as required in paragraph (b) of this section (i.e., each budget year), may be determined by interpolating between the years for which the regional emissions analysis is performed. Table 1-7 below provides a summary of conformity analysis years that apply to this conformity analysis. Table 1-8 summarizes conformity analysis years for the “upcoming budget test”.

Table 1-7: San Joaquin Valley Conformity Analysis Years

Attainment/ RTP Maintenance Intermediate Horizon Pollutant Budget Years1 Year Years Year 2008 and 2015 2011/2017/2020/2023/2026 2031/20372 NA 2042 Ozone /2029 PM-10 NA 2020 2029/2037 2042 1997 and 2012 NA 2014/20213 2029/2037 2042 PM2.5 2006 24-hour 2017/2020/2023/2024/2026 2024 2029/2037 2042 PM2.5 1Budget years that are not in the time frame of the transportation plan/conformity analysis are not included as analysis years (e.g., 2011, 2014, 2017), although they may be used to demonstrate conformity. 22031 is the attainment year for the 2008 ozone standard. 2037 is the attainment year for the 2015 ozone standard. 3 2014 is the attainment year for the 1997 PM2.5 standards. 2021 is the attainment year for the 2012 PM2.5 standards. 42026 is a post-attainment budget year for the 2006 PM2.5 standard and is not required to be included in a conformity analysis.

18 Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

Table 1-8: San Joaquin Valley Conformity Analysis Years for the Upcoming Budgets

Attainment/ RTP Maintenance Intermediate Horizon Pollutant Budget Years1 Year Years Year 1997 annual 2017/2020/20232 2020 2029/2037 2042 and 24-hour PM2.5 2012 annual 2019/2022/2025/20283 2025 2031/2037 2042 PM2.5 1Budget years that are not in the time frame of the transportation plan/conformity analysis are not included as analysis years (e.g., 2017), although they may be used to demonstrate conformity. 2,3 2023 and 2028 are the post-attainment budget years for the 1997 PM2.5 standard and 2012 PM2.5 standard, respectively, and are not required to be included in a conformity analysis.

For the 2008 ozone standard, the San Joaquin Valley has been classified as an extreme nonattainment area with an attainment date of July 20, 2032. In accordance with the March 2015 Implementation of the 2008 National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone: State Implementation Plan Requirements final rule, the attainment year of 2031 must be modeled. When using the budget test, the attainment year of the 2008 ozone standard must be analyzed (i.e. 2031).

For the 2015 ozone standard, the San Joaquin Valley has been classified as an extreme nonattainment area with an attainment date of August 3, 2038. In accordance with the December 2018 final rule, Implementation of the 2015 National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone: Nonattainment Area State Implementation Plan Requirements, the attainment year of 2037 must be modeled. When using the budget test, the attainment year of the 2015 ozone standard must be analyzed (i.e. 2037).

The Clean Air Act requires all states to attain the 1997 PM2.5 standards as expeditiously as practicable beginning in 2010, but by no later than April 5, 2010 unless EPA approves an attainment date extension. States must identify their attainment dates based on the rate of reductions from their control strategies and the severity of the PM2.5 problem. On February 9, 2016 EPA released its proposed Approval and Disapproval of California Air Plan; San Joaquin Valley Serious Area Plan and Attainment Date Extension for the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS. No final EPA action has been taken on the plan. As a result, the proposed SIP budgets are assumed to be unavailable for use and the 2008 PM2.5 Plan conformity budgets are the only budgets applicable at this time for the 1997 PM2.5 standard. The San Joaquin Valley 2018 PM2.5 Plan includes an attainment deadline extension request for the 1997 PM2.5 standards. Therefore, the attainment year 2020 must be modeled for the “upcoming budget test”, should EPA approve the bump up to Serious request and/ or find the new 1997 PM2.5 budgets adequate.

On January 20, 2016, EPA finalized reclassification of the San Joaquin Valley to Serious nonattainment for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 Standard. On August 16, 2016, the 2012 PM2.5 Plan was approved by EPA, effective September 30, 2016, inclusive of new conformity budgets and trading mechanism for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 standard with a requirement to attain the standard

19 Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

as expeditiously as practicable and no later than December 31, 2019. In 2019, CARB submitted an attainment deadline extension request as part of the 2018 PM2.5 Plan. On March 27, EPA published a proposed rule approving portions of the 2018 PM2.5 Plan, including the 2006 PM2.5 standard attainment deadline extension, as well as conformity budgets and trading mechanism. The attainment year of 2024 must be modeled.

On April 15, 2015, EPA classified the San Joaquin Valley as Moderate nonattainment for the 2012 PM2.5 Standards. In accordance with Section 93.109(i)(3) of the conformity rule, if a 2012 PM2.5 nonattainment area has adequate or approved SIP budgets that address the annual 1997 PM2.5 standards, it must use the budget test until new 2012 PM2.5 standard budgets are found adequate or approved. When using the budget test, the attainment year must be analyzed (e.g. 2021). In addition, in areas that have approved or adequate budgets for the 1997 annual PM2.5 standards, consistency with those budgets must also be determined. The attainment year of 2021 must be modeled. The San Joaquin Valley 2018 PM2.5 Plan includes a reclassification request to Serious for the 2012 PM2.5 standards with an attainment deadline of 2025. Therefore, the attainment year 2025 must be modeled for the “upcoming budget test”, should EPA approve the request for a later attainment year and/or find the new 2012 PM2.5 budgets adequate.

Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

CHAPTER 2: LATEST PLANNING ASSUMPTIONS AND TRANSPORTATION MODELING

The Clean Air Act states that “the determination of conformity shall be based on the most recent estimates of emissions, and such estimates shall be determined from the most recent population, employment, travel, and congestion estimates as determined by the MPO or other agency authorized to make such estimates.” On January 18, 2001, the USDOT issued guidance developed jointly with EPA to provide additional clarification concerning the use of latest planning assumptions in conformity determinations (USDOT, 2001).

According to the conformity regulation, the time the conformity analysis begins is “the point at which the MPO or other designated agency begins to model the impact of the proposed transportation plan or TIP on travel and/or emissions.” The conformity analysis and initial modeling began in September 2020.

Key elements of the latest planning assumption guidance include: • Areas are strongly encouraged to review and strive towards regular five-year updates of planning assumptions, especially population, employment and vehicle registration assumptions. • The latest planning assumptions must be derived from the population, employment, travel and congestion estimates that have been most recently developed by the MPO (or other agency authorized to make such estimates) and approved by the MPO. • Conformity determinations that are based on information that is older than five years should include written justification for not using more recent information. For areas where updates are appropriate, the conformity determination should include an anticipated schedule for updating assumptions. • The conformity determination must use the latest existing information regarding the effectiveness of the transportation control measures (TCMs) and other implementation plan measures that have already been implemented.

StanCOG uses the CUBE transportation model. The model was validated in 2017 for the 2015 base year. The latest planning assumptions used in the transportation model validation and Conformity Analysis is summarized in Table 2-1.

Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

Table 2-1: Summary of Latest Planning Assumptions for the Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis

Year and Source of Data Next Scheduled Assumption (MPO action) Modeling Update Population Base Year: 2015 This data is New data is disaggregated to the expected to be Projections: StanCOG Policy TAZ level for input adopted by Board adopted population into the TP+/CUBE StanCOG by 2022 projections from the UOP for the base year for the next RTP Center for Business and validation. update. Policy in 2016. Employment Base Year: 2015 This data is New data is disaggregated to the expected to be Projections: Employment TAZ level for input adopted by data is based on projections into the TP+/CUBE StanCOG by 2022 from the UOP Center for for the base year for the next RTP Business and Policy in 2016 validation. update.

Traffic Counts The transportation model TP+/CUBE was Traffic counts are was validated in 2017 to the validated using these updated every five 2015 base year using daily traffic counts. years, if funds are and peak hour traffic counts. available. Vehicle Miles of The StanCOG Policy Board TP+/CUBE is the VMT is an output Travel accepted the 2017 transportation model of the transportation model used to estimate transportation validation for the 2015 base VMT in XX County. model. VMT is year in December 2017 affected by the TIP/RTP project updates and is included in each new conformity analysis.

22 Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

Year and Source of Data Next Scheduled Assumption (MPO action) Modeling Update Speeds The 2017 transportation TP+/CUBE. The A speed study will model validation was based transportation model be conducted every on survey data on peak and includes a feedback five years, if off-peak highway speeds loop that assures adequate funds are collected in 2017. congested speeds are available. consistent with travel Speed distributions were speeds. updated in EMFAC2014, using methodology approved by ARB and with EMFAC2014 information from the transportation model.

A. SOCIOECONOMIC DATA

POPULATION, EMPLOYMENT AND LAND USE

The conformity regulation requires documentation of base case and projected population, employment, and land use used in the transportation modeling. USDOT/EPA guidance indicates that if the data is more than five years old, written justification for the use of older data must be provided. In addition, documentation is required for how land use development scenarios are consistent with future transportation system alternatives, and the reasonable distribution of employment and residences for each alternative.

Supporting Documentation:

In September 2017, StanCOG policy board adopted employment projections to the year 2040 for Stanislaus County. StanCOG hired the University of Pacific (UOP) Research and Forecasting Center which developed employment projections based on HIS-Global Insight regional forecasting models and prepared using IHS-Global Insight’s Aremos forecasting software. Stanislaus County’s forecast is based on its own unique econometric model, but has drivers linked to state and national forecasts to account for macro trends. UOP developed judgement to adjust the econometric forecasts to account for local knowledge and foreseeable short and medium-turn developments such as opening and closing years of large facilities, local real estate market trends or major infrastructure projects.

Also in September 2017, the StanCOG policy board adopted population forecasts to the year 2050 for Stanislaus County. The forecasts are from the San Joaquin Valley Demographic Forecasts: 2010- 2050 prepared by The Planning Center, 2016. The forecast was part of a San Joaquin Valley demographic study commissioned by the eight metropolitan planning organizations of the valley, in an effort to obtain recently prepared projections.

Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

The study includes three primary forecasts of population, households, and housing units. Other projections developed by The Planning Center, e. g., age distribution, average household size, household income, household type, race/ethnicity, are derived from the three primary forecasts. The Planning Center forecasts are based on several different projections including household trend, total housing unit trend, housing construction trend, employment trend, cohort-component model, population trend, average household size trend, and household income trend. The least-squares linear curve forms the basis for all projections because the forecasts are long-term and curve-fitting techniques (e.g., parabolic curve, logistic curve) do not provide reasonable long-term results. Three measures evaluated the adequacy of each projection: mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), F- test, and t-test.

For Population, Employment, and Land Use assumptions, StanCOG, in conjunction with the San Joaquin Council of Governments (SJCOG) and the Merced County Association of Governments (MCAG) used a tool called Envision Tomorrow.

Envision Tomorrow is a suite of scenario planning tools that tests different land-use and transportation options. The primary tool is a Scenario Builder which is used to develop land use scenarios for evaluation. The Scenario Builder is a Geographic Information Systems (GIS) based application that lets the user “paint the landscape” by allocating various, created development types across a study area to create unique land use scenarios. The tool then allows real-time evaluation of each scenario through a set of user-defined indicators. The indicators measure such things as the scenario’s impact on land use, housing, sustainability, transportation and economic conditions. General plans, specific plans, community plans, zoning maps, Assessor’s parcel data information, and environmental constraints, if any, are all inputs into the Scenario Builder tool. The growth forecast is allocated by the user into various locations as desired in this tool. Once the coordinated land use/transportation scenario is developed, the output of that process is converted into transportation model inputs and run through the MPO travel demand model to estimate vehicle miles traveled attributable to the MPO scenarios.

It is important to note that the output of the scenario planning tool does not yield VMT estimates. As described in the MIP Travel Model section below, the MIP process created standardized land use input categories across all eight San Joaquin Valley MPOs. These standardized categories ensure consistent transportation modeling of household and employment types across all eight MPOs to generate an accurate process to estimate vehicle miles traveled (VMT).

B. TRANSPORTATION MODELING The San Joaquin Valley Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) utilize the TP+/CUBE traffic modeling software. The Valley MPO regional traffic models consist of traditional four-step traffic forecasting models. They use land use, socioeconomic, and road network data to estimate facility-specific roadway traffic volumes. Each MPO model covers the appropriate county area, which is then divided into hundreds or thousands of individual traffic analysis zones (TAZs). In addition, the model roadway networks include thousands of nodes and links. Link types include freeway, freeway ramp, other State route, expressway, arterial, collector, and local collector. Current and future-year road networks were developed considering local agency circulation elements of their general plans, traffic impact studies, capital improvement programs, and the State Transportation Improvement Program. The models use equilibrium, a capacity sensitive

Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

assignment methodology, and the data from the model for the emission estimates differentiates between peak and off-peak volumes and speeds. In addition, the model is reasonably sensitive to changes in time and other factors affecting travel choices. The results from model validation/calibration were analyzed for reasonableness and compared to historical trends.

Specific transportation modeling requirements in the conformity regulation are summarized below, followed by a description of how the Stanislaus Council of Governments transportation modeling methodology meets those requirements.

StanCOG completed the update of its traffic model in Citilabs Cube modeling software with validation to a new base year of 2015. The StanCOG regional traffic model is a four-step mode choice traffic model. It uses land use, socioeconomic, and road network data to estimate facility specific roadway traffic volumes. The study area for the StanCOG model covers all of San Joaquin, Stanislaus, and Merced Counties, making it a three county transportation model. The model region is divided up into approximately 6540 traffic analysis zones. Link types include freeway, freeway ramp, other state route, expressway, arterial, collector, and local roads. Current and future year road networks were developed considering local agency circulation elements of their general plans, traffic impact studies, capital improvement programs, and the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP).

The travel demand model estimates travel demand and traffic volumes for the A.M. three-hour peak period, P.M. three-hour peak period, and mid-day, and evening. Daily forecasts are calculated by summing the A.M. and P.M. three-hour peak periods with the mid-day and evening period. The model also generates traffic forecasts for the A.M. peak hour and the P.M. peak hour.

Land use and socioeconomic data at the Traffic Analysis Zone level are used for determining trip generation in the traffic model. Population and employment projections at the countywide, jurisdictional, and TAZ level were developed based on historical growth rates, and a consensus process utilizing input from each of the StanCOG local jurisdictions.

TRAFFIC COUNTS

The conformity regulation requires documentation that a network-based travel model is in use that is validated against observed counts for a base year no more than 10 years before the date of the conformity determination. Document that the model results have been analyzed for reasonableness and compared to historical trends and explain any significant differences between past trends and forecasts (for per capita vehicle-trips, VMT, trip lengths mode shares, time of day, etc.).

Supporting Documentation:

StanCOG used the National Performance Management Research Data Set (NPMRDS) from the Federal Highway Administration. The NPMRDS provides average speed data (5 minute averaging time) for federally defined roadway segments designated as part of the National Highway System (NHS). In addition, traffic counts were done on selected arterial roads within the county in 2017 for better validation accuracy to the transportation model.

Data from the 2001 California Household Travel Study (CHTS) were also used to validate the three county travel demand model.

25 Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

The Estimated Vehicle Miles Traveled in the 2015 validated base year is calibrated to within 3 percent of the estimate in the 2015 Highway Performance Monitoring System report for Stanislaus County.

SPEEDS

The conformity regulation requires documentation of the use of capacity sensitive assignment methodology and emissions estimates based on a methodology that differentiates between peak and off-peak volumes and speeds, and bases speeds on final assigned volumes. In addition, documentation of the use of zone-to-zone travel impedances to distribute trips in reasonable agreement with the travel times estimated from final assigned traffic volumes. Where transit is a significant factor, document that zone-to-zone travel impedances used to distribute trips are used to model mode split. Finally, document that reasonable methods were used to estimate traffic speeds and delays in a manner sensitive to the estimated volume of travel on each roadway segment represented in the travel model.

Supporting Documentation:

The valley traffic models include a feedback loop that uses congested travel times as an input to the trip distribution step. The feedback loop ensures that the congested travel speeds used as input to the air pollution emission models are consistent with the travel speeds used throughout the traffic model process.

The StanCOG traffic model includes a feedback loop that uses congested travel times as an input to the trip distribution step. The feedback loop ensures that the congested travel speeds used as input to the air pollution emission models are consistent with the peak hour and off-peak travel speeds used throughout the traffic model process.

TRANSIT

The conformity regulation requires documentation of any changes in transit operating policies and assumed ridership levels since the previous conformity determination. Document the use of the latest transit fares and road and bridge tolls.

Supporting Documentation:

The StanCOG Model is based on the latest available assumptions on transit fares for all transit operators in the model region along with auto ownership costs. StanCOG’s unmet transit needs analysis report for fiscal year 2020-21 lists each local transit operator’s service characteristics. The report can be found here: http://www.stancog.org/pdf/tnas/utn-analysis-report-2020-2021.pdf.

The mode choice model uses a multinomial logit formulation, which assigns the probability of using a particular travel mode based on attractiveness measure for that mode in relation to the sum of the attractiveness of the other mode. The model predicts the following seven modes:

1. Drive Alone 2. 2-Person vehicle

26 Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

3. 3+-Person vehicle 4. Walk to Transit 5. Drive to Transit 6. Walk 7. Bike

Daily transit trips are assigned to the transit network. Transit trips are assigned to the single best path based on in-vehicle time plus weighted out-of- vehicle times. The transit trips are assigned in four groups:

1. Peak period (A.M. plus P.M.), walk access 2. Peak period (A.M. plus P.M.), drive access 3. Off-peak, walk access 4. Off-peak, drive access

The peak period transit trips represent trips occurring during the A.M. three-hour peak period plus the P.M. three hour peak period. Peak period transit trips are assigned to the peak transit service (peak period headways) with travel times based on the congested speeds from the A.M. peak period traffic assignment. Off-peak transit trips represent trips during the remaining 18 hours and are assigned to the off-peak transit service (off-peak headways) with travel times based on the congested road speeds from the off-peak traffic assignment.

VALIDATION/CALIBRATION

The conformity regulation requires documentation that the model results have been analyzed for reasonableness and compared to historical trends and explain any significant differences between past trends and forecasts (for per capita vehicle-trips, VMT, trip lengths mode shares, time of day, etc.). In addition, documentation of how travel models are reasonably sensitive to changes in time, cost, and other factors affecting travel choices is required. The use of HPMS, or a locally developed count-based program or procedures that have been chosen to reconcile and calibrate the network- based travel model estimates of VMT must be documented.

Supporting Documentation:

The models were validated by comparing its estimates of base year traffic conditions with base year traffic counts. The base year validations meet standard criteria for replicating total traffic volumes on various road types and for percent error on links. The base year validation also meets standard criteria for percent error relative to traffic counts on groups of roads (screen-lines) throughout each county.

For Serious and above nonattainment areas, transportation conformity guidance, Section 93.122(b)(3) of the conformity regulation states:

Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS) estimates of vehicle miles traveled (VMT) shall be considered the primary measure of VMT within the portion of the nonattainment or maintenance area and for the functional classes of roadways included in HPMS, for urban areas which are sampled on a separate urban area basis. For areas with network-based travel models, a factor (or factors) may be developed to reconcile and calibrate the network-based travel model estimates of

27 Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

VMT in the base year of its validation to the HPMS estimates for the same period. These factors may then be applied to model estimates of future VMT. In this factoring process, consideration will be given to differences between HPMS and network-based travel models, such as differences in the facility coverage of the HPMS and the modeling network description. Locally developed count- based programs and other departures from these procedures are permitted subject to the interagency consultation procedures.

The StanCOG Model was validated by comparing its estimates of base year traffic conditions with base year traffic counts. The base year validations meet established state/federal criteria for replicating total traffic volumes on various road types and for percent error on links. The base year validation also meets standard criteria for percent error relative to traffic counts on groups of roads (screen-lines) throughout each county. The validated 2015 StanCOG Model estimate of total Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) was within 3 percent of the estimate of the VMT from the 2015 Highway Performance Monitoring System

FUTURE NETWORKS

The conformity regulation requires that a listing of regionally significant projects and federally- funded non-regionally significant projects assumed in the regional emissions analysis be provided in the conformity documentation. In addition, all projects that are exempt must also be documented.

§93.106(a)(2)ii and §93.122(a)(1) requires that regionally significant additions or modifications to the existing transportation network that are expected to be open to traffic in each analysis year be documented for both Federally funded and non-federally funded projects (see Appendix B).

§93.122(a)(1) requires that VMT for non-regionally significant Federal projects is accounted for in the regional emissions analysis. It is assumed that all SJV MPOs include these projects in the transportation network (see Appendix B).

§93.126, §93.127, §93.128 require that all projects in the TIP/RTP that are exempt from conformity requirements or exempt from the regional emissions analysis be documented. In addition, the reason for the exemption (Table 2, Table 3, traffic signal synchronization) must also be documented (see Appendix B). It is important to note that the CTIPs exemption code is provided in response to FHWA direction.

Supporting Documentation:

The build highway networks include qualifying projects based on the 2021 FTIP and the 2018 RTP. Not all of the street and freeway projects included in the TIP/RTP qualify for inclusion in the highway network. Projects that call for study, design, or non-capacity improvements are not included in the networks. When these projects result in actual facility construction projects, the associated capacity changes are coded into the network as appropriate. Since the networks define capacity in terms of number of through traffic lanes, only construction projects that increase the lane-miles of through traffic are included.

28 Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

Generally, Valley MPO highway networks include all roadways included in the county or cities classified system. These links typically include all freeways plus expressways, arterials, collectors and local collectors. Highway networks also include regionally significant planned local improvements from Transportation Impact Fee Programs and developer funded improvements required to mitigate the impact of a new development.

Small-scale local street improvements contained in the TIP/RTP are not coded on the highway network. Although not explicitly coded, traffic on collector and local streets is simulated in the models by use of abstract links called “centroid connectors”. These represent local streets and driveways which connect a neighborhood to a regionally-significant roadway. Model estimates of centroid connector travel are reconciled against HPMS estimates of collector and local street travel.

C. TRAFFIC ESTIMATES A summary of the population, employment, and travel characteristics for the StanCOG transportation modeling area for each scenario in the Conformity Analysis is presented in Table 2- 2.

Table 2-2: Traffic Network Comparison for Horizon Years Evaluated in Conformity Analysis

Average Weekday Total Lane Horizon Year Total Population Employment VMT (millions) Miles 2020 571,139 192,931 11.5 4,844 2021 577,919 195,012 11.6 N/A 2022 584,700 196,248 11.8 N/A 2023 591,480 199,175 11.9 N/A 2024 598,308 200,636 12.0 N/A 2025 605,041 202,830 12.2 N/A 2026 612,153 205,024 12.3 N/A 2029 632,825 210,873 12.9 5,064 2031 646,607 214,772 13.0 N/A 2037 687,433 226,136 13.7 5,083 2042 720,568 235,307 14.1 5,083

D. VEHICLE REGISTRATIONS StanCOG does not estimate vehicle registrations, age distributions or fleet mix. Rather, current forecasted estimates for these data are developed by CARB and included in the EMFAC2014 model (http://www.arb.ca.gov/msei/onroad/latest_version.htm). EMFAC2014 is the most recent model for use in California conformity analyses. Vehicle registrations, age distribution and fleet mix are developed and included in the model by CARB and cannot be updated by the user. While EPA

29 Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

issued final approval for EMFAC2017 use in conformity demonstrations on August 15, 2019, the Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2 relies on EMFAC2014 in line with the grace period established in the Final Rule. EPA issued a federal register notice on December 14, 2015 formally approving EMFAC2014 for conformity.

E. STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN MEASURES The air quality modeling procedures and associated spreadsheets contained in Chapter 3 Air Quality Modeling assume emission reductions consistent with the applicable air quality plans. The emission reductions assumed for these committed measures reflect the latest implementation status of these measures. Committed control measures in the applicable air quality plans that reduce mobile source emissions and are used in conformity, are summarized below.

OZONE

No committed control measures are included in the 2008 ozone standard conformity demonstration as part of the 2016 Ozone Plan.

PM-10

Committed control measures in the EPA approved 2007 PM-10 Maintenance Plan that reduce mobile source emissions are shown in Table 2-3. However, reductions from these control measures were not applied to this conformity analysis because they were not needed to demonstrate conformity.

Table 2-3: 2007 PM-10 Maintenance Plan Measures Assumed in the Conformity Analysis

Measure Description Pollutants PM-10 annual exhaust ARB existing Reflash, Idling, and Moyer NOx annual exhaust PM-10 paved road dust District Rule 8061: Paved and Unpaved Roads PM-10 unpaved road dust District Rule 8021 Controls: Construction, Demolition, Excavation, Extraction, and Other PM-10 road construction dust Earthmoving Activities NOTE: State reductions from the Carl Moyer, Reflash and Idling have been included in EMFAC2014.

PM2.5

Committed control measures in the 2008 PM2.5 Plan (as revised) and 2012 PM2.5 Plan (as revised in 2015) that reduce mobile source emissions are shown in Table 2-4 and 2-5, respectively.

Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

However, reductions from these control measures were not applied to this conformity analysis because they were not needed to demonstrate conformity.

Table 2-4: 2008 PM2.5 (1997 Standard) Plan Measures Assumed in the Conformity Analysis

Measure Description Pollutants Existing Local Reductions: District Rule 9310 Annual PM2.5 (School Bus Fleets) Annual NOx Existing State Reductions: Carl Moyer Annual PM2.5 Program & AB 1493 GHG Standards Annual NOx New/Proposed Local Reductions: District Rule Annual PM2.5 9410 (Employer Based Trip Reduction) Annual NOx New/Proposed State Reductions: Annual PM2.5 Smog Check Annual NOx NOTE: This table is consistent with the 2008 PM2.5 Plan (as revised in 2011) as approved by EPA on November 9, 2011 (effective January 9, 2012). State reductions from the Carl Moyer, AB1493, and Smog Check have been included in EMFAC2014.

Table 2-5: 2012 PM2.5 (2006 Standard) Plan Measures Assumed in the Conformity Analysis

Measure Description Pollutants Existing Local Reductions: District Rule 9310 Annual PM2.5 (School Bus Fleets) Annual NOx Existing State Reductions: Carl Moyer Annual PM2.5 Program & AB 1493 GHG Standards Annual NOx New/Proposed Local Reductions: District Rule Annual PM2.5 9410 (Employer Based Trip Reduction) Annual NOx New/Proposed State Reductions: Annual PM2.5 Smog Check Annual NOx NOTE: This table is consistent with the 2012 PM2.5 Plan (as revised in 2015) approved by EPA on August 16, 2016 (effective September 30, 2016). State reductions from the Carl Moyer, AB1493 and Smog Check have been included in EMFAC2014.

Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

CHAPTER 3: AIR QUALITY MODELING

The model used to estimate vehicle exhaust emissions for ozone precursors and particulate matter is EMFAC2014. CARB emission factors for PM10 have been used to calculate re-entrained paved and unpaved road dust, and fugitive dust associated with road construction. For this conformity analysis, model inputs not dependent on the TIP or RTP are consistent with the applicable SIPs, which include:

• The 2016 Ozone Plan (2008 standard) was adopted by the Air District on June 16, 2016 and subsequently adopted by the ARB on July 21, 2016. EPA found the new ozone budgets adequate on June 29, 2017 (effective July 14, 2017). In response to recent court decisions regarding the baseline RFP year, ARB adopted the revised 2008 ozone conformity budgets as part of the 2018 Updates to the California State Implementation Plan Update on October 25, 2018. EPA approved the budgets and the plan on March 25, 2019.

• The 2007 PM-10 Maintenance Plan (as revised in 2015) was approved by EPA on July 8, 2016 (effective September 30, 2016).

• The 2008 PM2.5 Plan (1997 Standards), as revised in 2011, was approved by EPA on November 9, 2011 (effective January 9, 2012).

The conformity regulation requirements for the selection of the horizon years are summarized in Chapter 1; regional emissions have been estimated for the horizon years summarized in Table 1-7 and Table 1-8 for the “upcoming budget test”.

A. EMFAC2014 The EMFAC model (short for EMission FACtor) is a computer emissions modeling software that estimates emission rates for motor vehicles for calendar years from 2000 to 2050 operating in California. Pollutant emissions for hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, particulate matter, lead, sulfur oxides, and carbon dioxide are output from the model. Emissions are calculated for passenger cars, light, heavy, and medium-duty trucks, motorcycles, buses and motor homes.

EMFAC is used to calculate current and future inventories of motor vehicle emissions at the state, county, air district, air basin, or MPO level. EMFAC contains default vehicle activity data that can be used to estimate a motor vehicle emissions inventory in tons/day for a specific year and season,

32 Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

and as a function of ambient temperature, relative humidity, vehicle population, mileage accrual, miles of travel, and vehicle speeds.

Section 93.111 of the conformity regulation requires the use of the latest emission estimation model in the development of conformity determinations. On December 30, 2014, ARB released EMFAC2014, which is the latest update to the EMFAC model for use by California State and local governments to meet Clean Air Act (CAA, 1990) requirements. Nearly a year later, on December 14, 2015, EPA announced the availability of this latest version of the California EMFAC model for use in SIP development in California. EMFAC2014 was required for conformity analysis on or after December 14, 2017.

On March 1, 2018 ARB released the latest update to the EMFAC model – EMFAC2017v1.0.2. The model was submitted for EPA review in the fall of 2018 and EPA published final approval of EMFAC for conformity use on August 15, 2019. The announcement set a grace period of 2 years before EMFAC2017 is required for use in new regional emissions analyses, therefore this analysis still relies on EMFAC2014 for all conformity tests.

On September 27, 2019, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) published the “Safer Affordable Fuel- Efficient (SAFE) Vehicles Rule Part One: One National Program” (effective November 26, 2019). The Part One Rule revoked California’s authority to set its own greenhouse gas emissions standards, which were incorporated in EMFAC2014 emissions model. On November 20, 2019, California Air Resources Board (CARB) released “EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors to Account for the SAFE Vehicles Rule Part One” for use in regional conformity analyses. On March 12, 2020, EPA concurred on the use of CARB’s EMFAC off-model adjustment factors in conformity demonstrations. On April 30, EPA and NHTSA published SAFE Vehicles Rule for Model Years 2021-2026 Passenger Cars and Light Trucks (Final SAFE Rule) rolling back federal fuel economy standards. On June 26, 2020 CARB issued a public notice stating that EMFAC adjustments released in November continue to be suitable for conformity purposes. The conformity analysis for the 2021 FTIP and the 2018 RTP Amendment #2 incorporates these emissions modeling adjustments.1

A transportation data template has been prepared to summarize the transportation model output for use in EMFAC 2014. The template includes allocating VMT by speed bin by hour of the day.

EMFAC2014 was used to estimate exhaust emissions for CO, ozone, PM-10, and PM2.5 conformity demonstrations consistent with the applicable air quality plan. Note that the statewide SIP measures documented in Chapter 2 are already incorporated in the EMFAC2014 model as appropriate.

B. ADDITIONAL PM-10 ESTIMATES PM-10 emissions for re-entrained dust from travel on paved and unpaved roads will be calculated separately from roadway construction emissions. It is important to note that with the final approval of the 2007 PM-10 Maintenance Plan, EPA approved a methodology to calculate PM-10 emissions

1 https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/msei/emfac_off_model_adjustment_factors_final_draft.pdf.

33 Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

from paved and unpaved roads in future San Joaquin Valley conformity determinations. The Conformity Analysis uses these methodologies and estimates construction-related PM-10 emissions consistent with the 2007 PM-10 Maintenance Plan. The National Ambient Air Quality Standards for PM-10 consists of a 24-hour standard, which is represented by the motor vehicle emissions budgets established in the 2007 PM-10 Maintenance Plan. It is important to note that EPA revoked the annual PM-10 Standard on October 17, 2006. The PM-10 emissions calculated for the conformity analysis represent emissions on an annual average day and are used to satisfy the budget test.

CALCULATION OF REENTRAINED DUST FROM PAVED ROAD TRAVEL

On January 13, 2011 EPA released a new method for estimating re-entrained road dust emissions from cars, trucks, buses, and motorcycles on paved roads. On February 4, 2011, EPA published the Official Release of the January 2011 AP-42 Method for Estimating Re-Entrained Road Dust from Paved Roads approving the January 2011 method for use in regional emissions analysis and beginning a two year conformity grace period, after which use of the January 2011 AP-42 method is required (e.g. February 4, 2013) in regional conformity analyses.

The road dust calculations have been updated to reflect this new methodology. More specifically, the emission factor equation and k value (particle size multiplier) have been updated accordingly. CARB default assumptions for roadway silt loading by roadway class, average vehicle weight, and rainfall correction factor remain unchanged. Emissions are estimated for five roadway classes including freeways, arterials, collectors, local roads, and rural roads. Countywide VMT information is used for each road class to prepare the emission estimates.

CALCULATION OF REENTRAINED DUST FROM UNPAVED ROAD TRAVEL

The base methodology for estimating unpaved road dust emissions is based on a CARB methodology in which the miles of unpaved road are multiplied by the assumed VMT and an emission factor. In the 2007 PM-10 Maintenance Plan, it is assumed that all non-agricultural unpaved roads within the San Joaquin Valley receive 10 vehicle passes per day. An emission factor of 2.0 lbs PM-10/VMT is used for the unpaved road dust emission estimates. Emissions are estimated for city/county maintained roads.

CALCULATION OF PM-10 FROM ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION

Section 93.122(e) of the Transportation Conformity regulation requires that PM-10 from construction-related fugitive dust be included in the regional PM-10 emissions analysis, if it is identified as a contributor to the nonattainment problem in the PM-10 implementation plan. The emission estimates are based on a CARB methodology in which the miles of new road built are converted to acres disturbed, which is then multiplied by a generic project duration (i.e., 18 months) and an emission rate. Emission factors are unchanged from the previous estimates at 0.11 tons PM- 10/acre-month of activity. The emission factor includes the effects of typical control measures, such as watering, which is assumed to reduce emissions by about 50%. Updated activity data (i.e.,

Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

new lane miles of roadway built) is estimated based on the highway and transit construction projects in the TIP/RTP.

PM-10 TRADING MECHANISM

C. PM2.5 APPROACH EPA and FHWA have indicated that areas violating both the annual and 24-hour standards for PM2.5 must address all standards in the conformity determination. The San Joaquin Valley currently violates both the 1997 and 2012 annual PM2.5 standards, and the 1997 and 2006 24-hour PM2.5 standards; thus the conformity determination includes analyses to all PM2.5 standards.

The following PM2.5 approach addresses the 1997 (annual and 24-hour), the 2012 (annual), and the 2006 24-hour standards:

EMFAC2014 incorporates data for temperature and relative humidity that vary by geographic area, calendar year and season. The annual average represents an average of all the monthly inventories. A winter average represents an average of the California winter season (October through February). EMFAC will be run to estimate direct PM2.5 and NOx emissions from motor vehicles for an annual or winter average day as described below.

EPA guidance indicates that State and local agencies need to consider whether VMT varies during the year enough to affect PM2.5 annual emission estimates. The availability of seasonal or monthly VMT data and the corresponding variability of that data need to be evaluated.

PM2.5 areas that are currently using network based travel models must continue to use them when calculating annual emission inventories. The guidance indicates that the interagency consultation process should be used to determine the appropriate approach to produce accurate annual inventories for a given nonattainment area. Whichever approach is chosen, that approach should be used consistently throughout the analysis for a given pollutant or precursor. The interagency consultation process should also be used to determine whether significant seasonal variations in the output of network based travel models are expected and whether these variations would have a significant impact on PM2.5 emission estimates.

The SJV MPOs all use network based travel models. However, the models only estimate average weekday VMT. The SJV MPOs do not have the data or ability to estimate seasonal variation at this time. Data collection and analysis for some studies are in the preliminary phases and cannot be relied upon for other analyses. Some statewide data for the seasonal variation of VMT on freeways does exist. However, traffic patterns on freeways do not necessarily represent the typical traffic pattern for local streets and arterials.

In many cases, traffic counts are sponsored by the MPOs and conducted by local jurisdictions. While some local jurisdictions may collect weekend or seasonal data, typical urban traffic counts

Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

occur on weekdays (Tuesday through Thursday). Data collection must be more consistent in order to begin estimation of daily or seasonal variation.

The SJV MPOs believe that the average annual day calculated from the current traffic models and EMFAC2014 represent the most accurate VMT data available. The MPOs will continue to discuss and research options that look at how VMT varies by month and season according to the local traffic models.

It is important to note that the guidance indicates that EPA expects the most thorough analysis for developing annual inventories will occur during the development of the SIP, taking into account the needs and capabilities of air quality modeling tools and the limitations of available data. Prior to the development of the SIP, State and local air quality and transportation agencies may decide to use simplified methods for regional conformity analyses.

The regional emissions analyses in PM2.5 nonattainment areas must consider directly emitted PM2.5 motor vehicle emissions from tailpipe, brake wear, and tire wear. In California, areas will use EMFAC2014. As indicated under the Conformity Test Requirements, re-entrained road dust and construction-related fugitive dust from highway or transit projects is not included at this time. In addition, NOx emissions are included; however, VOC, SOx, and ammonia emissions are not.

1997 Standard – If EPA does not approve or find adequate the 1997 PM2.5 budgets in the 2018 PM2.5 Plan, the 2008 PM2.5 Plan budgets will continue to be used. The 2008 PM2.5 Plan (as revised in 2011) was approved by EPA on November 9, 2011 (effective January 9, 2012) and contains motor vehicle emission budgets for PM2.5 and NOx established based on average annual daily emissions. The annual inventory methodology contained in the 2008 PM2.5 Plan (as revised in 2011) and used to establish emissions budgets is consistent with the methodology used herein. The motor vehicle emissions budget for PM2.5 includes directly emitted PM2.5 motor vehicle emissions from tailpipe, brake wear and tire wear. VOC, SOx, ammonia, and dust (from paved roads, unpaved roads, and road construction) were found to be insignificant and not included in the motor vehicle emission budgets for conformity purposes. However, if the 2018 PM2.5 Plan conformity budgets are approved or found adequate, the “upcoming budget test” addresses conformity to these budgets.

2006 Standard – On March 27, 2020, EPA proposed approval of portions of the 2018 PM2.5 Plan that pertain to the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 standard, including granting attainment deadline extension to 2024. This portion of the 2018 PM2.5 Plan was finalized on July 22, 2020, effective as of publication. The 2018 PM2.5 Plan contains motor vehicle emission budgets for PM2.5 and NOx established based on average winter daily emissions. The winter inventory methodology contained in the 2018 PM2.5 Plan and used to establish emissions budgets is consistent with the methodology used herein. The motor vehicle emissions budget for PM2.5 include directly emitted PM2.5 motor vehicle emissions from tailpipe, brake wear and tire wear. VOC, SOx, ammonia, and dust (from paved roads, unpaved roads, and road construction) were found to be insignificant and not included in the motor vehicle emission budgets for conformity purposes. It is important to note that the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 nonattainment area boundary for the San Joaquin Valley is exactly the same as the nonattainment area boundary for the 1997 PM2.5 standards.

2012 Standard – EPA’s nonattainment area designations for the 2012 PM2.5 standard became effective on April 15, 2015. Conformity applies one year after the effective date (April 15, 2016).

36 Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

In accordance with Section 93.109(i)(3) of the federal transportation conformity rule, if a 2012 PM2.5 area has adequate or approved SIP budgets that address the annual 1997 standards, it must use the budget test until new 2012 PM2.5 standard budgets are found adequate or approved. It is important to note that the 2012 annual PM2.5 nonattainment area boundary for the San Joaquin Valley is exactly the same as the nonattainment area boundary for the 1997 and 2006 PM2.5 standards. If EPA does not take action on the new 2012 PM2.5 budgets in the 2018 PM2.5 Plan, the 2008 PM2.5 Plan (as revised in 2011) budgets will continue to be used in this conformity analysis. However, if the new conformity budgets are approved or found adequate, the “upcoming budget test” addresses conformity to these budgets.

1997 and 2012 PM2.5 TRADING MECHANISM

Consistent with the PM2.5 implementation rule, the 2008 PM2.5 Plan budgets and trading mechanism will continue to be used in this conformity analysis. The 2008 PM2.5 SIP (as revised in 2011) allows trading from the motor vehicle emissions budget for the PM2.5 precursor NOx to the motor vehicle emissions budget for primary PM2.5 using a 9 to 1 ratio. This trading mechanism will be used for the 1997 annual and 24-hour hour and 2012 PM2.5 standard conformity analyses for analysis years after 2014.

For the “upcoming budget test”, the 2018 PM2.5 Plan budgets and trading mechanism will also be used in this conformity analysis. The 2018 PM2.5 Plan allows trading from the motor vehicle emissions budget for the PM2.5 precursor NOx to the motor vehicle emissions budget for primary PM2.5 using a 6.5 to 1 ratio. This trading mechanism will be used for the 1997 annual and 24-hour hour and 2012 PM2.5 standard conformity analyses for analysis years after 2020.

2006 PM2.5 TRADING MECHANISM

On July 22, 2020, EPA partially approved the 2018 PM2.5 SIP including the 2006 PM2.5 standard trading mechanism that allows trading from the motor vehicle emissions budget for the PM2.5 precursor NOx to the motor vehicle emissions budget for primary PM-2.5 using an 2 to 1 ratio. This trading mechanism will be used for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 standard conformity analysis for analysis years after 2020.

D. SUMMARY OF PROCEDURES FOR REGIONAL EMISSIONS ESTIMATES New step-by-step air quality modeling instructions were developed for SJV MPO use with EMFAC2014. These instructions were originally provided for interagency consultation in May 2016 and updated in September 2020. EPA, FHWA, and ARB concurred.

Documentation of the conformity analysis for the 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2 is provided in Appendix C, including:

37 Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

• 2021 FTIP Conformity EMFAC Spreadsheet • 2021 FTIP Conformity Paved Road Spreadsheet • 2021 FTIP Conformity Unpaved Road Dust Spreadsheet • 2021 FTIP Conformity Construction Spreadsheet • 2021 FTIP Conformity Totals Spreadsheet

Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

CHAPTER 4: TRANSPORTATION CONTROL MEASURES

This chapter provides an update of the current status of transportation control measures identified in applicable implementation plans. Requirements of the Transportation Conformity regulation relating to transportation control measures (TCMs) are presented first, followed by a review of the applicable air quality implementation plans and TCM findings for the TIP/RTP.

A. TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY REGULATION REQUIREMENTS FOR TCMS The Transportation Conformity regulation requires that the TIP/RTP “must provide for the timely implementation of TCMs in the applicable implementation plan.” The Federal definition for the term “transportation control measure” is provided in 40 CFR 93.101:

“any measure that is specifically identified and committed to in the applicable implementation plan that is either one of the types listed in Section 108 of the CAA [Clean Air Act], or any other measure for the purpose of reducing emissions or concentrations of air pollutants from transportation sources by reducing vehicle use or changing traffic flow or congestion conditions. Notwithstanding the first sentence of this definition, vehicle technology based, fuel-based, and maintenance-based measures which control the emissions from vehicles under fixed traffic conditions are not TCMs for the purposes of this subpart.”

In the Transportation Conformity regulation, the definition provided for the term “applicable implementation plan” is:

“Applicable implementation plan is defined in section 302(q) of the CAA and means the portion (or portions) of the implementation plan, or most recent revision thereof, which has been approved under section 110, or promulgated under section 110(c), or promulgated or approved pursuant to regulations promulgated under section 301(d) and which implements the relevant requirements of the CAA.”

Section 108(f)(1) of the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 lists the following transportation control measures and technology-based measures: (i) programs for improved public transit; (ii) restriction of certain roads or lanes to, or construction of such roads or lanes for use by, passenger buses or high occupancy vehicles; (iii) employer-based transportation management plans, including incentives; (iv) trip-reduction ordinances; (v) traffic flow improvement programs that achieve emission reductions;

Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

(vi) fringe and transportation corridor parking facilities serving multiple occupancy vehicle programs or transit service; (vii) programs to limit or restrict vehicle use in downtown areas or other areas of emission concentration particularly during periods of peak use; (viii) programs for the provision of all forms of high-occupancy, shared-ride services; (ix) programs to limit portions of road surfaces or certain sections of the metropolitan area to the use of non-motorized vehicles or pedestrian use, both as to time and place; (x) programs for secure bicycle storage facilities and other facilities, including bicycle lanes, for the convenience and protection of bicyclists, in both public and private areas; (xi) programs to control extended idling of vehicles; (xii) programs to reduce motor vehicle emissions, consistent with title II, which are caused by extreme cold start conditions; (xiii) employer-sponsored programs to permit flexible work schedules; (xiv) programs and ordinances to facilitate non-automobile travel, provision and utilization of mass transit, and to generally reduce the need for single occupant vehicle travel, as part of transportation planning and development efforts of a locality, including programs and ordinances applicable to new shopping centers, special events, and other centers of vehicle activity; (xv) programs for new construction and major reconstructions of paths, tracks or areas solely for the use by pedestrian or other non-motorized means of transportation when economically feasible and in the public interest. For purposes of this clause, the Administrator shall also consult with the Secretary of the Interior; and (xvi) program to encourage the voluntary removal from use and the marketplace of pre-1980 model year light duty vehicles and pre-1980 model light duty trucks.

TCM REQUIREMENTS FOR A TRANSPORTATION PLAN

The EPA regulations in 40 CFR 93.113(b) indicate that transportation control measure requirements for transportation plans are satisfied if two criteria are met:

“(1) The transportation plan, in describing the envisioned future transportation system, provides for the timely completion or implementation of all TCMs in the applicable implementation plan which are eligible for funding under Title 23 U.S.C. or the Federal Transit Laws, consistent with schedules included in the applicable implementation plan.

(2) Nothing in the transportation plan interferes with the implementation of any TCM in the applicable implementation plan.”

40 Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

TCM REQUIREMENTS FOR A TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

Similarly, in 40 CFR Section 93.113(c), EPA specifies three TCM criteria applicable to a transportation improvement program:

“(1) An examination of the specific steps and funding source(s) needed to fully implement each TCM indicates that TCMs which are eligible for funding under title 23 U.S.C. or the Federal Transit Laws are on or ahead of the schedule established in the applicable implementation plan, or, if such TCMs are behind the schedule established in the applicable implementation plan, the MPO and DOT have determined that past obstacles to implementation of the TCMs have been identified and have been or are being overcome, and that all State and local agencies with influence over approvals or funding for TCMs are giving maximum priority to approval or funding of TCMs over other projects within their control, including projects in locations outside the nonattainment or maintenance area;

(2) If TCMs in the applicable implementation plan have previously been programmed for Federal funding but the funds have not been obligated and the TCMs are behind the schedule in the implementation plan, then the TIP cannot be found to conform:

• if the funds intended for those TCMs are reallocated to projects in the TIP other than TCMs, or • if there are no other TCMs in the TIP, if the funds are reallocated to projects in the TIP other than projects which are eligible for Federal funding intended for air quality improvement projects, e.g., the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program;

(3) Nothing in the TIP may interfere with the implementation of any TCM in the applicable implementation plan.”

B. APPLICABLE AIR QUALITY IMPLEMENTATION PLANS Only transportation control measures from applicable implementation plans for the San Joaquin Valley region are required to be updated for this analysis. For this conformity analysis, the applicable implementation plans, according to the definition provided at the start of this chapter, are summarized below.

APPLICABLE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR OZONE

The 2016 Ozone Plan does not include new TCMs for the San Joaquin Valley.

APPLICABLE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR PM-10

The 2007 PM-10 Maintenance Plan (as revised in 2015) was approved by EPA on July 8, 2016 (effective September 30, 2016). No new local agency control measures were included in the Plan.

41 Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

The Amended 2003 PM-10 Plan was approved by EPA on May 26, 2004 (effective June 25, 2004). A local government control measure assessment was completed for this plan. The analysis focused on transportation-related fugitive dust emissions, which are not TCMs by definition. The local government commitments are included in the Regional Transportation Planning Agency Commitments for Implementation Document, April 2003.

However, the Amended 2002 and 2005 Ozone Rate of Progress Plan contains commitments that reduce ozone related emissions; these measures are documented in the Regional Transportation Planning Agency Commitments for Implementation Document, April 2002. These commitments are included by reference in the Amended 2003 PM-10 Plan to provide emission reductions for precursor gases and help to address the secondary particulate problem. Since these commitments are included in the Plan by reference, the commitments were approved by EPA as TCMs.

APPLICABLE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR PM2.5

Portions of the 2018 PM2.5 Plan pertaining to 2006 24-hour PM2.5 standards were approved by EPA on July 22, 2020 (effective as of publication). The 2008 PM2.5 Plan (as revised in 2011) was approved by EPA on November 9, 2011 (effective January 9, 2012). However, the Plans do not include any additional TCMs for the San Joaquin Valley.

C. IDENTIFICATION OF 2002 RACM THAT REQUIRE TIMELY IMPLEMENTATION DOCUMENTATION As part of the 2004 Conformity Determination, FHWA requested that each SIP (Reasonably Available Control Measure - RACM) commitment containing federal transportation funding and a transportation project and schedule be addressed more specifically. FHWA verbally requested documentation that the funds were obligated and the project was implemented as committed to in the SIP.

The RTPA Commitment Documents, Volumes One and Two, dated April 2002 (Ozone RACM) were reviewed, using a “Summary of Commitments” table. Commitments that contain specific Federal funding/transportation projects/schedules were identified for further documentation. In some cases, local jurisdictions used the same Federal funding/transportation projects/schedules for various measures; these were identified as combined with (“comb w/”) reference as appropriate. A not applicable (“NA”) was noted where federally-funded project is vehicle technology based, fuel based, and maintenance based measures (e.g., LEV program, retrofit programs, clean fuels - CNG buses, etc.).

In addition, the RTPA Commitment Document, Volume Three, dated April 2003 (PM-10 BACM) was reviewed, using the Summary of Commitments table. Commitments that contain specific Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) funding for the purchase and/or operation of street sweeping equipment have been identified. Only one commitment (Fresno - City of Reedley) was identified.

42 Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

The Project TID Table was developed to provide implementation documentation necessary for the measures identified. Detailed information is summarized in the first five columns, including the commitment number, agency, description, funding and schedule (if applicable).

For each project listed, the TIP in which the project was programmed, as well as the project ID and description have been provided. In addition, the current implementation status of the project has been included (e.g., complete, under construction, etc). MPO staff determined this information in consultation with the appropriate local jurisdiction. Any projects not implemented according to schedule or project changes are explained in the project status column. These explanations are consistent with the guidance and regulations provided in the Transportation Conformity regulation.

Supplemental documentation was provided to FHWA in August and September 2004 in response to requests for information on timely implementation of TCMs in the San Joaquin Valley. The supplemental documentation included the approach, summary of interagency consultation correspondence, and three tables completed by each of the eight MPOs. The Supplemental Documentation was subsequently approved by FHWA as part of the 2004 Conformity Determination.

The Project TID table that was prepared at the request of FHWA for the 2004 Conformity Analysis, has been updated in each subsequent conformity analysis. This documentation has been updated as part of this Conformity Analysis. A summary of this information is provided in Appendix D.

In March 2005, the SJV MPOs began interagency consultation with FHWA and EPA to address outstanding RACM/TCM issues. In general, criteria were developed to identify commitments that require timely implementation documentation. The criteria were applied to the 2002 RACM Commitments approved by reference as part of the Amended 2003 PM-10 Plan. In April 2006, EPA transmitted final tables that identified the approved RACM commitments that require timely implementation documentation for the Conformity Analysis. Subsequently, an approach to provide timely implementation documentation was developed in consultation with FHWA.

A new 2002 RACM TID Table was prepared in 2006 to address the more general RACM commitments that require additional timely implementation documentation per EPA. A brief summary of the commitment, including finite end dates if applicable, is included for each measure. The MPOs provided a status update regarding implementation in consultation with their member jurisdictions. If a specific project has been implemented, it is included in the Project TID Table under “Additional Projects Identified”. This documentation was included in the Conformity Analysis for the 2007 TIP and 2004 RTP (as amended) that was approved by FHWA in October 2006.The 2002 RACM TID Table has been updated as part of this Conformity Analysis. A summary of this information is provided in Appendix D.

D. TCM FINDINGS FOR THE TIP AND REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN Based on a review of the transportation control measures contained in the applicable air quality plans, as documented in the two tables contained in Appendix D, the required TCM conformity findings are made below:

43 Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

The TIP/RTP provide for the timely completion or implementation of the TCMs in the applicable air quality plans. In addition, nothing in the TIP or RTP interferes with the implementation of any TCM in the applicable implementation plan, and priority is given to TCMs.

E. RTP CONTROL MEASURE ANALYSIS IN SUPPORT OF 2003 PM-10 PLAN In May 2003, the San Joaquin Valley MPO Executive Directors committed to conduct feasibility analyses as part of each new RTP in support of the 2003 PM-10 Plan. This commitment was retained in the 2007 PM-10 Maintenance Plan. In accordance with this commitment, StanCOG undertook a process to identify and evaluate potential control measures that could be included in the 2018 RTP. The analysis of additional measures included verification of the feasibility of the measures in the PM-10 Plan BACM analysis, as well as an analysis of new PM-10 commitments from other PM-10 nonattainment areas.

A summary of the process to identify potential long-range control measures analysis and results to be evaluated as part of the RTP development was transmitted to the Interagency Consultation (IAC) partners for review. FHWA and EPA concurred with the summary of the long-range control measure approach in September 2009.

The Local Government Control Measures considered in the PM-10 Plan BACM analysis that were considered for inclusion in the 2018 RTP included: • Paving or Stabilizing Unpaved Roads and Alleys • Curbing, Paving, or Stabilizing Shoulders on Paved Roads • Frequent Routine Sweeping or Cleaning of Paved Roads (i.e., funding allocation for the purchase of PM-10 efficient street sweepers for member jurisdictions) • Repave or Overlay Paved Roads with Rubberized Asphalt

It is important to note that the first three measures considered in the PM-10 Plan BACM analysis (i.e., access points, street cleaning requirements, and erosion clean up) are not applicable for inclusion in the RTP.

With the adoption of each new RTP, the MPOs will consider the feasibility of these measures, as well as identify any other new PM-10 measures that would be relevant to the San Joaquin Valley. StanCOG also considered PM-10 commitments from other PM-10 nonattainment areas that had been developed since the previous RTP was approved. Federal websites were reviewed for any PM-10 plans that have been approved since 2012. New PM-10 plans that have been reviewed include:

A. West Pinal County, AZ Moderate PM-10 Nonattainment Area SIP, submitted December 21, 2015 (EPA approval effective May 31, 2017). Contingency measures include paving or chemically stabilizing unpaved roads.

44 Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

B. Owens Valley, CA Serious PM-10 Nonattainment Area SIP, submitted June 9, 2016 (EPA approval effective April 12, 2017). Road dust was determined to be below de minimis thresholds and no mobile source control measures were adopted.

C. Mammoth Lake, CA PM-10 Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan, submitted October 21, 2014 (EPA approval effective November 4, 2015). The Mammoth Lake general plan places a cap on the growth of VMT. Contingency measures include improved street sweeping procedures and reduced use of volcanic cinders on roadways.

D. Las Vegas, NV Serious PM-10 Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan, submitted September 7, 2012 (EPA approval effective November 5, 2014). Most stringent measures were introduced in 2001. Stabilization of unpaved roads including paving roads with volumes over 150 vehicles per day. Paved road sweeping and mitigation measures.

E. Payson, AZ PM-10 Limited Maintenance Plan submitted January 23, 2012 (EPA approval effective May 19, 2014). Contingency measures include paving or chemically stabilizing unpaved roads.

F. South Coast, CA PM-10 Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan submitted April 28, 2010 (EPA approval effective July 26, 2013). No PM-10 specific dust control measures cited for mobile sources.

G. Juneau’s Mendenhall Valley, AK PM-10 Limited Maintenance Plan submitted February 20, 2009 (EPA approval effective July 8, 2013). The attainment plan control measures included optimizing sanding and de-icing materials to minimize entrainment, spring street sweeping, and paving of dirt roads. No additional measures were identified for the LMP to continue attainment of the NAAQS. Contingency measures include paving of dirt roads and stabilization of unpaved shoulders.

H. Eugene-Springfield, OR PM-10 Redesignation Request and Limited Maintenance Plan submitted January 13, 2012 (EPA approval effective June 10, 2013). Motor vehicles were not identified as a significant source and no control measures were included for onroad mobile sources.

I. Sandpoint, ID PM-10 Limited Maintenance Plan submitted December 12, 2011 (EPA approval effective May 23, 2013). Ordinances require the application of certain types of sand in the winter along with increased street sweeping.

Based on review of commitments from other PM-10 nonattainment areas that have been developed since the previous RTP, no additional on-road fugitive dust controls measures are available for consideration.

Based on consultation with CARB and the Air District, StanCOG considered priority funding allocations in the 2018 RTP for PM-10 and NOx emission reduction projects in the post-attainment year timeframe that go beyond the emission reduction commitments made for the attainment year 2010 for the following four measures:

Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

(1) Paving or Stabilizing Unpaved Roads and Alleys (2) Curbing, Paving, or Stabilizing Shoulders on Paved Roads (3) Frequent Routine Sweeping or Cleaning of Paved Roads (i.e., funding allocation for the purchase of PM-10 efficient street sweepers for member jurisdictions); and (4) Repave or Overlay Paved Roads with Rubberized Asphalt

StanCOG and its member jurisdictions consider both short- and long-term PM-10 emission reductions to be a priority. StanCOG conducts a Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) “Call for Projects” that includes funding for PM-10 projects. These additional projects are included in the FTIP once that process is concluded. Reliable long-term funding estimates for the PM-10 portion of the “Call for Projects” process is not available and therefore, not included in the RTP. Currently, Caltrans incorporates rubberized asphalt as general policy to meet recycled content requirements on high volume state highway facilities. In 2003, Caltrans established a goal of using at least 15 percent rubberized asphalt concrete compared to all flexible pavement by weight; Caltrans has exceeded this goal each year. In 2005, AB 338 was passed and requires Caltrans to gradually phase in the use of crumb rubber, which is used to make rubberized asphalt concrete, on state highway construction and repair projects, to the extent feasible. StanCOG will continue to work with member jurisdictions and evaluate the ability to proceed with PM-10 projects as part of the FTIP and RTP.

Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

CHAPTER 5: INTERAGENCY CONSULTATION

The requirements for consultation procedures are listed in the Transportation Conformity Regulations under section 93.105. Consultation is necessary to ensure communication and coordination among air and transportation agencies at the local, State and Federal levels on issues that would affect the conformity analysis such as the underlying assumptions and methodologies used to prepare the analysis. Section 93.105 of the conformity regulation notes that there is a requirement to develop a conformity SIP that includes procedures for interagency consultation, resolution of conflicts, and public consultation as described in paragraphs (a) through (e). Section 93.105(a)(2) states that prior to EPA approval of the conformity SIP, “MPOs and State departments of transportation must provide reasonable opportunity for consultation with State air agencies, local air quality and transportation agencies, DOT and EPA, including consultation on the issues described in paragraph (c)(1) of this section, before making conformity determinations.” The Air District adopted Rule 9120 Transportation Conformity on January 19, 1995 in response to requirements in Section 176(c)(4)(c) of the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990. Since EPA has not approved Rule 9120 (the conformity SIP), the conformity regulation requires compliance with 40 CFR 93.105 (a)(2) and (e) and 23 CFR 450.

Section 93.112 of the conformity regulation requires documentation of the interagency and public consultation requirements according to Section 93.105. A summary of the interagency consultation and public consultation conducted to comply with these requirements is provided below. Appendix E includes the public meeting process documentation. The responses to comments received as part of the public comment process are included in Appendix F.

A. INTERAGENCY CONSULTATION Consultation is generally conducted through the San Joaquin Valley Interagency Consultation Group (combination of previous Model Coordinating Committee and Programming Coordinating Group). The San Joaquin Valley Interagency Consultation (IAC) Group has been established by the Valley Transportation Planning Agency's Director's Association to provide a coordinated approach to valley transportation planning and programming (Transportation Improvement Program, Regional Transportation Plan, and Amendments), transportation conformity, climate change, and air quality (State Implementation Plan and Rules). The purpose of the group is to ensure Valley wide coordination, communication and compliance with Federal and California Transportation Planning and Clean Air Act requirements. Each of the eight Valley MPOs and the Air District are represented. In addition, the Federal Highway Administration, Federal Transit Administration, the Environmental Protection Agency, the California Air Resources Board and Caltrans (Headquarters, District 6, and District 10) are all represented. The IAC Group meets approximately quarterly.

47 Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

The draft boilerplate conformity document was distributed for interagency consultation on October 14, 2020. Comments received have been addressed and incorporated into this version of the analysis.

The Conformity Analysis for the 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2 was developed in consultation with StanCOG local partner agencies, including member jurisdictions, Caltrans, and local transit agencies.

The Conformity Analysis for the 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2 was released on October 28, 2020 for a 30-day public comment period, followed by adoption on February 17, 2021. Federal approval is anticipated on or before April 30, 2021.

B. PUBLIC CONSULTATION In general, agencies making conformity determinations shall establish a proactive public involvement process that provides opportunity for public review and comment on a conformity determination for FTIPs/RTPs. In addition, all public comments must be addressed in writing.

All MPOs in the San Joaquin Valley have standard public involvement procedures. StanCOG has an adopted consultation process and policy for conformity analysis which includes a 30-day public notice and comment period followed by a public hearing. A public meeting is also conducted prior to adoption and all public comments are responded to in writing. The Appendices contain corresponding documentation supporting the public involvement procedures.

Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

CHAPTER 6: TIP AND RTP CONFORMITY

The principal requirements of the transportation conformity regulation for TIP/RTP assessments are: (1) the TIP and RTP must pass an emissions budget test with a budget that has been found to be adequate by EPA for transportation conformity purposes, or an interim emission test; (2) the latest planning assumptions and emission models must be employed; (3) the TIP and RTP must provide for the timely implementation of transportation control measures (TCMs) specified in the applicable air quality implementation plans; and (4) consultation. The final determination of conformity for the TIP/RTP is the responsibility of the Federal Highway Administration and the Federal Transit Administration.

The previous chapters and the appendices present the documentation for all of the requirements listed above for conformity determinations except for the conformity test results. Prior chapters have also addressed the updated documentation required under the transportation conformity regulation for the latest planning assumptions and the implementation of transportation control measures specified in the applicable air quality implementation plans.

This chapter presents the results of the conformity tests, satisfying the remaining requirement of the transportation conformity regulation. Separate tests were conducted for ozone, PM-10 and PM2.5 (1997 and 2012 PM2.5 standards, and 2006 24-hour PM2.5 standards). The applicable conformity tests were reviewed in Chapter 1. For each test, the required emissions estimates were developed using the transportation and emission modeling approaches required under the transportation conformity regulation and summarized in Chapters 2 and 3. The results are summarized below, followed by a more detailed discussion of the findings for each pollutant. Table 6-1 presents results for ozone (ROG/NOx), PM-10 (PM-10/NOx), and PM2.5 (PM2.5/NOx) respectively, in tons per day for each of the horizon years tested.

Ozone:

For 2008 and 2015 8-hour ozone, the applicable conformity test is the emissions budget test, using the 2018 Updates to the California State Implementation Plan budgets for the San Joaquin Valley established for ROG and NOx for an average summer (ozone) season day. EPA approved the plan and the budgets on March 25, 2019. The modeling results for all analysis years indicate that the on- road vehicle ROG and NOx emissions predicted for each of the “Build” scenarios are less than the emissions budgets. The TIP/RTP therefore satisfy the conformity emissions test for volatile organic compounds and nitrogen oxides.

PM-10:

For PM-10, the applicable conformity test is the emissions budget test, using the 2007 PM-10 Maintenance Plan budgets for PM-10 and NOx. This Plan revisions including conformity budgets was approved by EPA on July 8, 2016 (effective September 30, 2016). The modeling results for

Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

all analysis years indicate that the PM-10 emissions predicted for the “Build” scenarios are less than the emissions budget for 2020. The TIP/RTP therefore satisfy the conformity emissions tests for PM-10.

1997 PM2.5 Standards:

If EPA does not take action on the 2018 PM2.5 Plan, the 2008 PM2.5 Plan budgets will continue to be used in this conformity analysis. For 1997 PM2.5 Standards, the applicable conformity test is the emission budget test, using budgets established in the 2008 PM2.5 Plan. EPA approved the 2008 PM2.5 Plan (as revised in 2011) November 9, 2011 (effective January 9, 2012). The modeling results for all analysis years indicate that the on-road vehicle PM2.5 and NOx emissions predicted for the “Build” scenarios are less than the emissions budget. However, if the 2018 PM2.5 Plan conformity budgets are approved or found adequate, the “upcoming budget test” demonstrates conformity to the new 1997 PM2.5 budgets. The TIP/RTP therefore satisfy the conformity emissions test for PM2.5 and nitrogen oxides.

2006 PM2.5 Standard:

On July 22, 2020, EPA approved portions of the 2018 PM2.5 Plan that pertain to the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 standard, including new transportation conformity budgets and trading mechanism. For the 2006 PM2.5 standard, the applicable conformity test is the emission budget test, using approved budgets established in the 2018 PM2.5 Plan. The modeling results for all analysis years indicate that the on-road vehicle PM2.5 and NOx emissions predicted for the “Build” scenarios are less than the emissions budget. The TIP/RTP therefore satisfy the conformity emissions test for PM2.5 and nitrogen oxides.

2012 PM2.5 Standard:

In accordance with Section 93.109(c)(2), areas designated nonattainment for the 2012 PM2.5 standards are required to use existing adequate or approved SIP motor vehicle emissions budgets for a prior annual PM2.5 standard until budgets for the 2012 PM2.5 standards are either found adequate or approved. If EPA does not take action on the 2018 PM2.5 Plan, the 2008 PM2.5 Plan (as revised in 2011) budgets will continue to be used in this conformity analysis. For the 2012 PM2.5 standards, the applicable conformity test is the emissions budget test, using the 2008 PM2.5 Plan (1997 standard) budgets. EPA approved the 2008 PM2.5 Plan (as revised in 2011) November 9, 2011, effective January 9, 2012. The modeling results for all analysis years indicate that the on- road vehicle PM2.5 and NOx emissions predicted for the “Build” scenarios are less than the emissions budget. However, if the 2018 PM2.5 Plan conformity budgets are approved or found adequate, the “upcoming budget test” demonstrates conformity to the new 2012 PM2.5 budgets. The TIP/RTP therefore satisfy the conformity emissions test for PM2.5 and nitrogen oxides.

As all requirements of the Transportation Conformity Regulation have been satisfied, a finding of conformity for the Conformity Analysis for the 2021 FTIP and the 2018 RTP Amendment #2 is supported.

50 Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

Table 6-1: Conformity Results Summary

Standard Analysis Year Emissions Total DID YOU PASS? ROG (tons/day) NOx (tons/day) ROG NOx 2020 Budget 3.1 8.8 2020 3.1 8.8 YES YES

2023 Budget 2.6 5.6 2023 2.5 5.5 YES YES

2026 Budget 2.2 4.9 2008 and 2026 2.2 4.9 YES YES 2015 Ozone

2029 Budget 2.0 4.5 2029 2.0 4.5 YES YES

2031 Budget 1.8 4.3 2031 1.8 4.3 YES YES 2037 1.5 3.9 YES YES 2042 1.3 3.9 YES YES

Standard Analysis Year Emissions Total DID YOU PASS? PM-10 (tons/day) NOx (tons/day) PM-10 NOx 2020 Budget 3.7 9.6 2020 3.7 9.2 YES YES

2020 Budget 3.7 9.6 2029 2.8 4.7 YES YES PM-10

2020 Budget 3.7 9.6 2037 2.6 4.0 YES YES

2020 Budget 3.7 9.6 2042 2.7 4.0 YES YES PM-10 Total On-Road Exhaust Paved Road Dust Unpaved Road Dust Road Construction Dust Total PM-10 Nox PM-10 Nox PM-10 Nox PM-10 Nox PM-10 Nox 2020 0.773 9.234 1.292 0.272 1.365 3.7 9.2 2029 0.814 4.667 1.442 0.272 0.299 2.8 4.7 2037 0.855 4.044 1.426 0.272 0.035 2.6 4.0 2042 0.882 3.966 1.583 0.272 0.000 2.7 4.0

51 Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

Standard Analysis Year Emissions Total DID YOU PASS? PM2.5 (tons/day) NOx (tons/day) PM2.5 NOx

2014 Budget 0.6 14.6 2021 0.3 8.4 YES YES

1997 24-Hour and 1997 & 2014 Budget 0.6 14.6 2012 Annual 2029 0.3 4.7 YES YES PM2.5 Standards 2014 Budget 0.6 14.6 2037 0.3 4.0 YES YES

2014 Budget 0.6 14.6 2042 0.4 4.0 YES YES Standard Analysis Year Emissions Total DID YOU PASS? PM2.5 (tons/day) NOx (tons/day) PM2.5 NOx

2020 Budget 0.4 9.8 2020 0.4 9.5 YES YES

2023 Budget 0.4 6.2 2023 0.4 5.9 YES YES

2006 PM2.5 2024 Budget 0.4 6.0 Winter 24- 2024 0.4 5.7 YES YES Hour Standard 2024 Budget 0.4 6.0 2031 0.4 4.5 YES YES

2024 Budget 0.4 6.0 2037 0.4 4.2 YES YES

2024 Budget 0.4 6.0 2042 0.4 4.1 YES YES

Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

UPCOMING BUDGET TEST

(Note: EPA Action is Pending as of This Analysis; The 1997 and 2012 PM2.5 Budget Test Above Will be Used if EPA Doesn’t Determine Adequacy or Approval of the New Budgets before Federal Approval of the 2021 FTIP Conformity Analysis)

PM2.5 (tons/day) NOx (tons/day) PM2.5 NOx

2020 Budget 0.4 9.6 2020 0.4 9.3 YES YES

1997 24-Hour 2020 Budget 0.4 9.6 and Annual 2029 YES YES PM2.5 0.4 4.7 Standards 2020 Budget 0.4 9.6 2037 0.4 4.1 YES YES

2020 Budget 0.4 9.6 2042 0.4 4.0 YES YES

PM2.5 (tons/day) NOx (tons/day) PM2.5 NOx

2019 Budget 0.4 10.5 2020 0.4 9.3 YES YES

2022 Budget 0.4 8.1 2022 0.4 7.8 YES YES

2012 Annual 2025 Budget 0.4 5.6 PM2.5 2025 0.4 5.3 YES YES Standards

2025 Budget 0.4 5.6 2031 0.4 4.4 YES YES

2025 Budget 0.4 5.6 2037 0.4 4.1 YES YES

2025 Budget 0.4 5.6 2042 0.4 4.0 YES YES

Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

REFERENCES

CAA, 1990. Clean Air Act, as amended November 15, 1990. (42 U. S. C. Section 7401et seq.) November 15, 1990.

EPA, 1993. 40 CFR Parts 51 and 93. Criteria and Procedures for Determining Conformity to State or Federal Implementation Plans of Transportation Plans, Programs and Projects Funded or Approved Under Title 23 U.S.C. or the Federal Transit Act. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Federal Register, November 24, 1993, Vol. 58, No. 225, p. 62188.

EPA, 2004a. Companion Guidance for the July 1, 2004, Final Transportation Conformity Rule: Conformity Implementation in Multi-jurisdictional Nonattainment and Maintenance Areas for Existing and New Air Quality Standards. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. July 21, 2004.

EPA, 2010a. 40 CFR Part 93. Transportation Conformity Rule PM2.5 and PM10 Amendments; Final Rule. Federal Register, March 24, 2010, Vol. 75, No. 56, p. 14260.

EPA, 2010b. Transportation Conformity Regulations EPA-420-B-10-006. March.

EPA, 2012a. 40 CFR Part 93. Transportation Conformity Rule Restructuring Amendments; Final Rule. Federal Register, March 14, 2012, Vol. 77, No. 50, p. 14979.

EPA, 2012b. Transportation Conformity Guidance for 2008 Ozone Nonattainment Areas. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. EPA-420-B-12-045. July 2012.

EPA, 2012c. Guidance for Transportation Conformity Implementation in Multi-Jurisdictional Nonattainment and Maintenance Areas. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. EPA-420-B-12- 046. July 2012.

EPA, 2015. Implementation of the 2009 National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone: State Implementation Plan Requirements. Final Rule. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Vol. 80. No. 44. March 6, 2015.

EPA, 2016. Fine Particulate Matter National Ambient Air Quality Standards: State Implementation Plan Requirements. Final Rule. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. PA-HQ- OAR-2013-0691. July 29, 2016.

EPA, 2018(a). Implementation of the 2015 National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone: Nonattainment Area State Implementation Plan Requirements. Final Rule. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Vol. 83, No. 234, December 6, 2018. EPA, 2018(b). Transportation Conformity Guidance for the South Coast II Court Decision. EPA- 420-B-12-050. November 2018.

54 Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

EPA, 2018(c). Transportation Conformity Guidance for 2015 Ozone NAAQS Nonattainment Areas. EPA-420-B-18-023. June 2018.

USDOT. 2001. Use of Latest Planning Assumptions in Conformity Determinations. Memorandum from U.S. Department of Transportation. January 18, 2001.

USDOT. 2001. Federal Highway Administration. Planning Assistance and Standards. 23 CFR 450. October 16.

Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

APPENDIX A

CONFORMITY CHECKLIST

1 Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

CONFORMITY ANALYSIS DOCUMENTATION

Checklist for MPO TIPs/RTPs

40 CFR Criteria Page Comments §93.102 Document the applicable pollutants and precursors Ch. 1, p. 6 – for which EPA designates the area as nonattainment 9 or maintenance. Describe the nonattainment or maintenance area and its boundaries. §93.102 PM10 areas: document whether EPA or state has Ch. 1, p. 11 – (b)(2)(iii) found VOC and/or NOx to be a significant 12 contributor or if the SIP establishes a budget §93.102 PM2.5 areas: document if both EPA and the state Ch. 1, p. 11 – (b)(2)(iv) have found that NOx is not a significant contributor 12 or that the SIP does not establish a budget (otherwise, conformity applies for NOx) §93.102 (b) PM2.5 areas: document whether EPA or state has Ch. 1, p. 14 (2)(v) found VOC, SO2, and/or NH3 to be a significant contributor or if the SIP establishes a budget §93.104 Document the date that the MPO officially adopted, Executive (b, c) accepted or approved the TIP/RTP and made a Summary conformity determination. Include a copy of the p.1; MPO resolution. Include the date of the last prior Appendix E conformity finding made by DOT. §93.104 If the conformity determination is being made to (e) meet the timelines included in this section, document N/A when the new motor vehicle emissions budget was approved or found adequate. §93.106 Document that horizon years are no more than 10 Ch. 1, p. 17 years apart ((a)(1)(i)). Document that the first horizon year is no more than 10 years from the based year used to validate the transportation demand planning model ((a)(1)(ii)). Document that the attainment year is a horizon year, if in the timeframe of the plan ((a)(1)(iii)). Describe the regionally significant additions or modifications to the existing transportation network that are expected to be open to traffic in each analysis year ((a)(2)(ii)). Document that the design concept and scope of projects allows adequate model representation to determine intersections with regionally significant facilities, route options, travel times, transit ridership and land use. Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

40 CFR Criteria Page Comments §93.108 Document that the TIP/RTP is fiscally constrained Executive (23 CFR 450). Summary p. 1 §93.109 Document that the TIP/RTP complies with any Executive (a, b) applicable conformity requirements of air quality Summary p. implementation plans (SIPs) and court orders. 3 – 4 §93.109 Provide either a table or text description that details, Ch. 1, p. 11 (c,) for each pollutant, precursor and applicable standard, – 20 whether the interim emissions test(s) and/or the budget test apply for conformity. Indicate which emissions budgets have been found adequate by EPA, and which budgets are currently applicable for what analysis years. §93.109(e) CO or PM10: Document if the area has a limited Ch. 1, p. 12 maintenance plan and from where that information comes §93.109(f) Document if motor vehicle emissions are an Ch. 1, p. 16 insignificant contributor and in what SIP that determination is found §93.110 Document the use of latest planning assumptions Ch. 2, p. 21- (a, b) (source and year) at the “time the conformity 31 analysis begins,” including current and future population, employment, travel and congestion. Document the use of the most recent available vehicle registration data. Document the date upon which the conformity analysis was begun. EPA-DOT Document the use of planning assumptions less than Ch. 2, p. 21- guidance five years old. If unable, include written justification 31 for the use of older data. (December 2008 guidance,) §93.110 Document any changes in transit operating policies (c,d,e,f) and assumed ridership levels since the previous Ch. 2, p. 21- conformity determination (c). 31 Document the assumptions about transit service, use of the latest transit fares, and road and bridge tolls (d). Document the use of the latest information on the effectiveness of TCMs and other SIP measures that have been implemented (e). Document the key assumptions and show that they were agreed to through Interagency and public consultation (f). §93.111 Document the use of the latest emissions model Ch. 3, p. 32 – approved by EPA. If the previous model was used 33 and the grace period has ended, document that the analysis began before the end of the grace period. §93.112 Document fulfillment of the interagency and public Ch. 5, p. 47 – consultation requirements outlined in a specific 48 implementation plan according to §51.390 or, if a SIP revision has not been completed, according to

Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

40 CFR Criteria Page Comments §93.105 and 23 CFR 450. Include documentation of consultation on conformity tests and methodologies as well as responses to written comments. §93.113 Document timely implementation of all TCMs in Ch. 4, p. 39 – approved SIPs. Document that implementation is 46; Appendix consistent with schedules in the applicable SIP and D document whether anything interferes with timely implementation. Document any delayed TCMs in the applicable SIP and describe the measures being taken to overcome obstacles to implementation. §93.114 Document that the conformity analyses performed Executive for the TIP is consistent with the analysis performed Summary p. for the Plan, in accordance with 23 CFR 1 450.324(f)(2). For Areas with SIP Budgets: §93.118, Document what the applicable budgets are, and for Ch. 1, p. 11 - §93.124 what years. 20 Document if there are subarea budgets established, and for which areas (93.124(c)). Document if there is a safety margin established, and what are the budgets with the safety margin included. (93.124(a)). Document if there has been any trading among budgets, and if so, which SIP establishes the trading mechanism, and how it is used in the conformity analysis (93.124(b)). If there is more than one MPO in the area, document whether separate budgets are established for each MPO (93.124(d)). §93.118 Document that emissions from the transportation Ch. 6, p. 49 – (a, c, e) network for each applicable pollutant and precursor, 53 including projects in any associated donut area that are in the TIP and regionally significant non-Federal projects, are consistent with any adequate or approved motor vehicle emissions budget for all pollutants and precursors in applicable SIPs. §93.118 Document for which years consistency with motor Ch. 1, p. 18 (b) vehicle emissions budgets must be shown. §93.118 Document the use of the appropriate analysis years in (d) the regional emissions analysis for areas with SIP Ch. 6, p. 49 – budgets, and the analysis results for these years. 53 Document any interpolation performed to meet tests for years in which specific analysis is not required. For Areas without Applicable SIP Budgets: §93.119 Document whether the area must meet just one or Ch. 6, p. 49 – both interim emissions tests. If both, document that 53 it is the “less than” form of these tests (i.e., §93.119(b)(1) and (c)(1) vs. (b)(2), (c)(2), and (d)).

Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

40 CFR Criteria Page Comments §93.119i Document that emissions from the transportation Ch. 6, p. 49 – (a, b, c, d) network for each applicable pollutant and precursor, 53 including projects in any associated donut area that are in the TIP and regionally significant non-Federal projects, are consistent with the requirements of the “Action/Baseline” or “Action/Baseline Year” emissions tests as applicable. §93.119 Document the appropriate baseline year. Ch. 6, p. 49 – (e) 53

§93.119 Document the use of appropriate pollutants and if Ch. 1, p. 5 – (f) EPA or the state has made a finding that a particular 20 precursor or component of PM10 is significant or insignificant. §93.119 Document the use of the appropriate analysis years in (g) the regional emissions analysis for areas without Ch. 3, p. 32 – applicable SIP budgets. 38

§93.119 Document how the baseline and action scenarios are Ch. 2, 21 – (h, i) defined for each analysis year. 31

For All Areas Where a Regional Emissions Analysis Is Needed §93.122 Document that all regionally significant federal and Ch. 2, 21 – (a)(1) non-Federal projects in the 31 nonattainment/maintenance area are explicitly modeled in the regional emissions analysis. For each project, identify by which analysis year it will be open to traffic. Document that VMT for non- regionally significant Federal projects is accounted for in the regional emissions analysis §93.122 Document that only emission reduction credits from Ch. 2, 21 – (a)(2, 3) TCMs on schedule have been included, or that partial 31 credit has been taken for partially implemented TCMs (a)(2). Document that the regional emissions analysis only includes emissions credit for projects, programs, or activities that require regulatory action if: the regulatory action has been adopted; the project, program, activity or a written commitment is included in the SIP; EPA has approved an opt-in to the program, EPA has promulgated the program, or the Clean Air Act requires the program (indicate applicable date). Discuss the implementation status of these programs and the associated emissions credit for each analysis year (a)(3). §93.122 For nonregulatory measures that are not included in N/A (a)(4,5,6,7) the transportation plan and TIP, include written commitments from appropriate agencies (a)(4). Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

40 CFR Criteria Page Comments Document that assumptions for measures outside the transportation system (e.g. fuels measures) are the same for baseline and action scenarios (a)(5). Document that factors such as ambient temperature are consistent with those used in the SIP unless modified through interagency consultation (a)(6). Document the method(s) used to estimate VMT on off-network roadways in the analysis (a)(7). §93.122 Document that a network-based travel model is in Ch. 2, 21 – (b)(1)(i)ii use that is validated against observed counts for a 31 base year no more than 10 years before the date of the conformity determination. Document that the model results have been analyzed for reasonableness and compared to historical trends and explain any significant differences between past trends and forecasts (for per capita vehicle-trips, VMT, trip lengths mode shares, time of day, etc.). §93.122 Document the land use, population, employment, and Ch. 2, 21 – (b)(1)(ii) ii other network-based travel model assumptions. 31

§93.122 Document how land use development scenarios are Ch. 2, 21 – (b)(1)(iii) ii consistent with future transportation system 31 alternatives, and the reasonable distribution of employment and residences for each alternative. §93.122 Document use of capacity sensitive assignment Ch. 2, 21 – (b)(1)(iv) ii methodology and emissions estimates based on a 31 methodology that differentiates between peak and off-peak volumes and speeds, and bases speeds on final assigned volumes. §93.122 Document the use of zone-to-zone travel impedances Ch. 2, 21 – (b)(1)(v) ii to distribute trips in reasonable agreement with the 31 travel times estimated from final assigned traffic volumes. Where transit is a significant factor, document that zone-to-zone travel impedances used to distribute trips are used to model mode split. §93.122 Document how travel models are reasonably Ch. 2, 21 – (b)(1)(vi) ii sensitive to changes in time, cost, and other factors 31 affecting travel choices. §93.122 Document that reasonable methods were used to Ch. 2, 21 – (b)(2) ii estimate traffic speeds and delays in a manner 31 sensitive to the estimated volume of travel on each roadway segment represented in the travel model. §93.122 Document the use of HPMS, or a locally developed Ch. 2, 21 – (b)(3) ii count-based program or procedures that have been 31 chosen through the consultation process, to reconcile and calibrate the network-based travel model estimates of VMT. §93.122 In areas not subject to §93.122(b), document the Ch. 2, 21 – (d) continued use of modeling techniques or the use of 31

Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

40 CFR Criteria Page Comments appropriate alternative techniques to estimate vehicle miles traveled §93.122 Document, in areas where a SIP identifies Ch. 3, p. 34 (e, f) construction-related PM10 or PM2.5 as significant pollutants, the inclusion of PM10 and/or PM2.5 construction emissions in the conformity analysis. §93.122 If appropriate, document that the conformity Appendix B (g) determination relies on a previous regional emissions analysis and is consistent with that analysis, i.e. that: (g)(1)(i): the new plan and TIP contain all the Appendix B projects that must be started to achieve the highway and transit system envisioned by the plan (g)(1)(ii): all plan and TIP projects are included in Appendix B the transportation plan with design concept and scope adequate to determine their contribution to emissions in the previous determination; (g)(1)(iii): the design concept and scope of each Appendix B regionally significant project in the new plan/TIP are not significantly different from that described in the previous; (g)(1)(iv): the previous regional emissions analysis Appendix B meets 93.118 or 93.119 as applicable §93.126, Document all projects in the TIP/RTP that are Appendix B §93.127, exempt from conformity requirements or exempt §93.128 from the regional emissions analysis. Indicate the reason for the exemption (Table 2, Table 3, traffic signal synchronization) and that the interagency consultation process found these projects to have no potentially adverse emissions impacts. i Note that some areas are required to complete both Interim emissions tests. ii 40 CFR 93.122(b) refers only to serious, severe and extreme ozone areas and serious CO areas above 200,000 population. Also note these procedures apply in any areas where the use of these procedures has been the previous practice of the MPO (40 CFR 93.122(d)).

Disclaimers This checklist is intended solely as an informational guideline to be used in reviewing Transportation Plans and Transportation Improvement Programs for adequacy of their conformity documentation. It is in no way intended to replace or supersede the Transportation Conformity regulations of 40 CFR Parts 51 and 93, the Statewide and Metropolitan Planning Regulations of 23 CFR Part 450 or any other EPA, FHWA or FTA guidance pertaining to transportation conformity or statewide and metropolitan planning. This checklist is not intended for use in documenting transportation conformity for individual transportation projects in nonattainment or maintenance areas. 40 CFR Parts 51 and 93 contain additional criteria for project-level conformity determinations.

Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

APPENDIX B

TRANPORTATION PROJECT LISTING

1 Regionally Significant Listing 2018 RTP/SCS

Ceres C24 Morgan Rd Widen from 2 to 4 lanes 7th St to Grayson Rd $ 938,700 XX X Mitchell Rd to Faith Ceres C25 Whitmore Ave Widen from 2 to 4 lanes Home $ 1,072,500 XXXXXXXXXX X Ustick Rd to Blaker Ceres C27 Whitmore Ave Widen from 2 to 4 lanes Rd $ 1,621,200 XXXXX X Hatch Rd to Grayson Ceres C30 Central Ave Widen from 2 to 4 lanes Rd $ 8,361,100 XXXXX X River Rd to Service Ceres C31 Mitchell Rd Widen to 6 lanes Rd $ 9,146,800 XX X On SR 99 between Hatch Rd and South 9th Caltrans CA05 SR 99 Construct auxiliary lanes St $ 2,640,000 XXXXXXXX X

On SR 99 from Caltrans CA06 SR 99 Construct auxiliary lane Keyes Rd to Taylor Rd $ 6,226,000 XXXXX X Construct NB and SB SR-99 auxiliary lanes between Monte Vista Caltrans CA12 SR 99 Rd to Taylor Rd PM 3.63 to 4.10 $ 6,800,000 XXX X

Construct NB and SB SR-99 auxiliary lanes between Crowslanding Rd to Caltrans CA13 SR 99 Tuolumne Blvd PM R14.57 to R15.12 $ 7,100,000 XX X Construct NB and SB auxiliary lanes between Fulkerth Rd and Monte Caltrans CA14 SR 99 Vista Rd PM R4.74 to R5.48 $ 6,500,000 XX X Construct NB and SB SR-99 auxiliary lane between West Main St Caltrans CA15 SR 99 to Fulkerth Rd PM R3.367 to R 4.29 $ 6,500,000 XX X Improve NB and SB on/off ramps at Central Turlock/SR-165 Lander Ave Caltrans CA27 SR 99/ SR 165 I/C interchange SR 99/ SR 165 I/C $ 2,500,000 X XXXX X Improve to 2-lane Major Whitmore Ave to Hughson H08 7th Street Collector Santa Fe Ave $ 2,288,100 XXXXXXX X Improve to 2-lane Major Collector (Goods Whitmore Avenue to S Hughson H11 Tully Road Movement) City Limit $ 450,000 XXXXXXXXXX X Widen from 2 to 6-lane McHenry Ave to Modesto M52 Claratina Ave Expressway Coffee Rd $ 16,391,000 XXXXXXXXXX X Widen from 2 to 6-lane Coffee Rd. to Modesto M53 Claratina Ave Expressway Oakdale Rd $ 16,391,000 XXXXXXXXXX X Pelandale Ave to Modesto M54 Dale Rd Widen from 4 to 6 lanes Kiernan Ave $ 7,600,700 XXXXXXXXXX X Pelandale Ave to Modesto M55 Dale Rd Widen from 4 to 6 lanes Standiford Ave $ 3,800,400 XXXXXXXXXX X Briggsmore to Modesto M56 Claus Rd Widen from 2 to 4 lanes Sylvan $ 5,000,000 XXXXXXX X Sylvan Ave to Modesto M58 Oakdale Rd Widen from 3 to 6 lanes Claratina Ave $ 7,600,700 XXXXXXXXXX X Sylvan Ave to Modesto M60 Roselle Ave Widen from 2 to 4 lanes Claratina Rd $ 8,867,400 XXXXXXXXXX X PE & ROW (reconstruction to 8 Standiford/Beckwith Modesto M81 SR 99 lane interchange) Interchange $ 20,000,000 XXXXXXXXXX X Regionally Significant Listing 2018 RTP/SCS

Construct a two-lane expressway from N. Dakota Ave to the Needham St. Overcrossing. (Phase 1 of ultimate build-out of SR132 West Freeway/Expressway Project) State Route 99 to (Reference: 2014 RTP Project ID Dakota Ave Phase 1 (2- Modesto M82 SR 132 - RE01). lane expressway) $ 100,000,000 XXXXXXXXXX X

State Route 99 to Construct a four lane freeway from N. Dakota Ave (Phase 2 Dakota Ave to the Needham St. Ultimate 4 lane facility Modesto M83 SR 132 Overcrossing. with SR-99 connections) $ 160,000,000 XXX X Reconstruct to 8 Lane Briggsmore Modesto M84 SR 99 Interchange Interchange $ 98,679,400 XXXX X Reconstruct to 8 Lane Standiford/Beckwith Modesto M85 SR 99 Interchange Interchange $ 100,000,000 XX Install 4 Lane Arterial Roadway Yolo St to Sherman Newman N06 SR 33 Improvements Pkwy $ 4,753,100 XXXXXXXX X Install 4 Lane Arterial Roadway Sherman Pkwy to Newman N07 SR 33 Improvements Stuhr Road $ 4,298,600 XXXXXX X Install 2 Lane Arterial Roadway CCID Canal to Newman N08 Stuhr Road Improvements Highway 33 $ 8,117,200 XXXXX X Install 4 Lane Arterial Roadway Yolo Avenue to Inyo Newman N09 SR 33 Improvements Avenue $ 3,689,700 XX X Maag Ave to Stearns Oakdale O14 F St Widen Roadway to 5-lanes Rd $ 4,356,000 XXXXXXX X

Oakdale O15 F St Widen Roadway to 5-lanes Willowood to Oak $ 763,688 XXXXXX X

Oakdale O17 Crane Road Widen Roadway to 4-lanes F Street to Pontiac $ 1,702,500 XXXXXXXXXX X

Install Complete Street Baldwin Road to Rogers Patterson P03 Sperry Ave Improvements, widen to four lanes Road $ 12,610,000 XXXXXXXXXX X

Signal and Off-Ramp Improvements at interchange. Widen Sperry Ave to 4 Patterson P04 Sperry Ave Interchange Lanes between Rogers Road and I-5. I-5 to Rogers Road $ 17,505,000 XXXXXXXXXX X Delta Mendota to Keyton Pacific Park Patterson P05 Rogers Road Widen from 2 to 4 lanes Way $ 5,000,000 XXXXXXXXXX X

Patterson P08 Zacharias Rd Construct New Interchange Raines Rd to I-5 $ 75,000,000 XX X

Riverbank R20 Claus Road Widen roadway from 2-4 lanes California to Claribel $ 1,895,700 XXXXX X Crows Landing Road Corridor Improve 22 miles to Expressway Stanislaus County S01 Improvements standards SR-99 to Interstate 5 $ 9,060,000 XX Claribel Road to Stanislaus County S82 Albers Rd Widen to 5 lanes Warnerville Road $ 6,000,000 XXXXXXXX X Construct 2-6 lane Expressway Turlock City Limits to Stanislaus County S83 South County Corridor on new alignment Interstate 5 $ 278,000,000 XXXXX X

Construct 4-lane divided expressway SR 132 Extension Stanislaus County S101 SR 132 or freeway (County) Dakota to Gates $ 117,000,000 XXXX X Construct a four-lane Tully Rd to SR Stanislaus County S102 North County Corridor expressway 120/108 $ 680,000,000 XXXX X Regionally Significant Listing 2018 RTP/SCS

Jurisdiction/Agency TIP/RTP CTIPs Project ID Description Estimated Cost Project ID (if available) Facility Name/Route Type of Improvement Project Limits 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2029 2031 2037 2042 Hatch Rd to Garner Stanislaus County S103 Faith Home Road 2 Lane Expressway Rd $ 71,700,000 XXXXX X Ladd Rd to the south end of the McHenry Stanislaus County S104 McHenry Widen to 5 Lanes Bridge $ 13,025,000 XXXXXXXXX X Whitmore Ave to Stanislaus County S48 Carpenter Rd Widen to 3 lanes Keyes Rd $ 4,500,000 XXXXXXXXXX X Keyes Rd to Monte Stanislaus County S49 Carpenter Rd Widen to 3 lanes Vista Ave $ 2,900,000 XXXXXXXX X Monte Vista Ave to Stanislaus County S50 Carpenter Rd Widen to 3 lanes W. Main St $ 2,700,000 XXXXXXXXXX X Terminal Ave to Stanislaus County S51 Claus Rd Widen to 3 lanes Claribel Rd $ 2,648,600 XXXXXX X Taylor Rd to Santa Stanislaus County S58 Geer-Albers Widen to 3 lanes Fe Ave $ 3,700,000 XXXXXXXX X Santa Fe Ave to Stanislaus County S59 Geer-Albers Widen to 3 lanes Hatch Rd $ 3,927,000 XXXXXXX X

Stanislaus County S60 Geer-Albers Widen to 3 lanes Hatch Rd to SR-132 $ 3,628,600 XXXXXX X

Stanislaus County S61 Geer-Albers Widen to 3 lanes SR-132 to Milnes Rd $ 10,696,400 XXX X Keyes Rd to Geer Stanislaus County S62 Santa Fe Ave Widen to 3 lanes Rd $ 4,405,700 XXXX X

Stanislaus County S63 Santa Fe Ave Widen to 3 lanes Geer Rd to Hatch Rd $ 3,116,000 XXX X SR-99 to McHenry Stanislaus County S69 SR-219 Widen to 6-lanes Ave $ 41,527,100 XXXXXX X

Turlock T14 SR-99 Reconstruct Interchange SR-99 & Fulkerth Rd $ 12,667,800 XXxXXxXXXX X Widen from 2-lane to 4-lane Arterial with Class II bike facility and Turlock T16 Fulkerth Rd transit Tegner Rd to Dianne Dr $ 580,400 XXXXXXXX X Install Median; Add one (1) lane Olive Ave to Turlock T17 Monte Vista Ave with Class II bike facility Berkeley Ave $ 1,317,500 XXXXXXXXXX X Widen from 2-lane to 4-lane Washington Rd to Turlock T18 Fulkerth Rd Arterial with Class II bike facility Tegner Rd $ 3,419,800 XXXXXXXX X Widen from 2-lane to 4-lane Arterial with Class II bike facility Linwood Ave to Fulkerth Turlock T19 Washington Rd and transit Rd $ 2,176,400 XX X Construct new 2-lane Industrial Collector with Class II bike Linwood Ave to W. Main Turlock T20 Tegner Rd facility St $ 434,600 XXXXX X Construct new 2-lane to 4-lane Arterial with Class II bike facility and Turlock T21 W. Canal Dr transit SR 99 to Tegner Rd $ 2,065,400 XXXXX X Widen from 2-lane to 4-lane Tuolumne Rd to Turlock T22 N. Olive Ave Arterial with Class II bike facility Tornell Rd $ 757,600 XXXXX X Widen from 2-lane to 4-lane Arterial with Class II bike facility Turlock T23 N. Olive Ave and transit Canal Dr to Wayside Rd $ 852,600 XXXXX X Widen from 2-lane to 4-lane Arterial with Class II bike facility Turlock T24 N. Olive Ave and transit Wayside Dr to North Ave $ 888,100 XXXXX X

Widen from 2-lane to 3-lane Collector with Class II bike facility and transit Walnut Rd to Lander Turlock T25 W. Linwood Ave (West Ave. South to Lander) Ave $ 615,700 XX X Regionally Significant Listing 2018 RTP/SCS

Jurisdiction/Agency TIP/RTP CTIPs Project ID Description Estimated Cost Project ID (if available) Facility Name/Route Type of Improvement Project Limits 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2029 2031 2037 2042 Widen from 2-lane to 3-lane Collector with Class II bike Walnut Rd to Turlock T26 W. Linwood Ave facility Washington Rd $ 4,207,400 XXXXX X Construct new 2-lane Collector Washington Rd to Turlock T27 W. Canal Dr. with Class I bike facility Kilroy Rd $ 2,507,600 XXXXX X

Widen from 2-lane to 4-lane Arterial with Class III bike facility from Minaret to S. Berkeley/Class II from S. Berkeley to Daubenberger and transit Golden State Blvd to Turlock T28 East Ave from Oak to S. Johnson Daubenberger Rd $ 5,958,600 XX X

Complete 6-lane Boulevard with Class II bike facility and transit from Taylor Rd to Monte Vista Turlock T29 Golden State Blvd Christoffersen to Monte Vista Ave $ 3,310,100 XX X Complete 6-lane Boulevard with Monte Vista Ave to Turlock T30 Golden State Blvd Class II bike facility Fulkerth Rd $ 2,869,300 XXX X W. Main St to W. Turlock T31 N. Kilroy Ave Construct new Collector Canal Dr $ 743,100 XXXXX X Complete 2-lane Industrial Monte Vista Ave to Turlock T32 Tegner Rd Collector Fulkerth Rd $ 674,300 XXXXX X Construct new 2-lane Industrial Fulkerth Rd to north Turlock T33 Tegner Rd Collector of Pedretti Park $ 995,700 XXXXX X Widen from 2-lane to 4-lane Collector with Class II bike Tegner Rd to Golden Turlock T34 Taylor Rd facility State Blvd $ 505,500 XXXXX X Construct new Industrial Spengler Way to W. Turlock T35 S. Kilroy Ave Collector Linwood Ave $ 934,000 XXXXX X Widen from 2-lane to 4-lane Golden State Blvd to Turlock T36 Taylor Rd Arterial with Class II bike facility SR-99 $ 139,600 XXXXX X Construct new 2-lane Industrial Collector with Class II bike W. Main St to Fulkerth Turlock T37 Tegner Rd facility Rd $ 2,795,800 XXXXX X

Turlock T40 SR-99 Construct New Interchange W. Main St $ 19,091,000 XXXXX X

Turlock T41 SR-99 Reconstruct existing Interchange Taylor Rd $ 15,000,000 XX X Construct 4-lane Expressway with Class II bike facility and Fulkerth Rd to Monte Turlock T43 Washington Rd transit Vista Ave $ 2,674,000 XXXXX X Exempt Project Listing

Exemption Jurisdiction/Agency ID CTIPS Project Location Description Project Limits Total Cost Code ID (If available) TID Lateral from Roeding Rd to Service Ceres C01 Mitchell Rd Mitchell Rd Bike/Ped Project - Phase IV $415,600 Rd 3.02 Ceres C02 Mitchell Rd Mitchell Rd Bike/Ped Project - Phase V Service Rd to Southern City Limits $347,200 3.02 Ceres C03 El Camino Ave Signage/Striping Whitmore Ave to Service Rd $8,000 1.11 Ceres C04 Herndon Rd Signage/Striping or widening Joyce Rd to Whitmore Ave $17,300 1.11 Ceres C05 Joyce Rd Signage/Striping Bystrum Rd to Herndon Rd $6,200 1.11 Ceres C06 Hatch Rd Hatch Rd TID Bike/Ped Project - Phase IV East Gate Blvd. to Faith Home Rd $356,500 3.02 Ceres C07 Whitmore Ave Signage/Striping Mitchell Rd to Blaker Rd $10,700 1.11 300' w/o Morgan Rd to Crows Landing Ceres C08 Whitmore Ave Signage/Striping or widening $114,100 Rd 1.11 Ceres C09 Roeding Rd Signage/Striping Ceres Main Canal to 6th St $5,800 1.11 Ceres C10 Various Locations Misc. Bike/Pedestrian Facility Projects Various Locations $2,958,100 3.02 Ceres C11 Mitchell Rd Signage/Striping or widening Hatch Rd to Tenaya Rd $364,100 1.11 Ceres C12 Rhode Drive Signage/Striping Mitchell Rd to Esmar Rd $5,800 1.11 Ceres C13 Rhode Drive Signage/Striping or widening Esmar Rd to Nunes Rd $153,300 1.11 Ceres C14 Hatch Rd Construct Bike/Ped Facility (3 phase project) Morgan Rd to Herndon Rd $2,221,300 3.02 Ceres C15 TID Lateral #2 Bicycle/Pedestrian Facility Ustick Rd to Mitchell Rd $4,553,700 3.02 Ceres C16 Whitmore Avenue Bicycle/Pedestrian Facility Mitchell Rd to Eastgate Blvd $1,250,000 3.02 Ceres C17 Various Locations ATP Grant devlope Citywide bicycle Masterplan Various Locations $100,000 4.03 Herndon Ave., El Camino Ave. & Ceres C18 Various Locations Bike lane facilities $400,000 Eastgate Blvd. 3.02 Citywide improvements to Ped head countdown, push buttons and Ceres C19 Various Locations Various Locations $136,300 crosswalk enhancements 3.02 (Morgan/Aristocrat & Ceres C20 Morgan Rd and Central Ave Construct Roundabouts and Intersection Reconfiguration $1,177,000 Central/Pine/Industrial) 5.04 Ceres C21 Various Locations Install fiber optic and signal interconnect cables and associated conduit. ITS Signal Synchronization, Phase II $583,000 5.02 Ceres C22 Morgan Rd Install Traffic Signal Service Rd & Morgan Rd $347,800 5.02 Ceres C26 Crows Landing Rd Install Traffic Signal Crows Landing Rd & A Street $430,500 5.02 Ceres C28 Grayson Rd Install Traffic Signal Grayson Rd & Morgan Rd $1,075,200 5.02 Ceres C29 Hatch Rd Install Traffic Signal Hatch Rd & Faith Home Rd $600,000 5.02 Ceres C32 Crows Landing Rd Install Traffic Signal Crows Landing Rd & Grayson Rd $499,100 5.02 Ceres C33 Service Road Install Traffic Signal Service Road & Ustick $499,100 5.02 Ceres C34 Roeding Rd Install Traffic Signal Roeding Rd & Faith Home Rd $499,100 5.02 Ceres C35 Whitmore Ave Install Traffic Signal Whitmore Ave. @ E Street $499,100 5.02 Ceres C36 Whitmore Ave Install Traffic Signal Whitmore Ave & Boothe Rd $514,000 5.02 Ceres C37 Whitmore Ave Install Traffic Signal Whitmore Ave. @ Knox Rd $545,300 5.02 Redwood Rd & Central Ave and Grayson Ceres C38 Central Ave Install Traffic Signals $1,268,400 Rd & Central Ave 5.02 Ceres C39 Hatch Rd Install Complete Street Improvements Herndon Rd to Faith Home Rd $27,086,200 3.02 Ceres C40 Service Rd Install Complete Street Improvements Moore Rd to Central Rd $40,000,000 3.02 Ceres C41 Crows Landing Rd Install Traffic Signal Crows Landing Rd & B Street $578,500 5.02 Ceres C42 Ustick Rd Install Traffic Signal Ustick Rd & F Street $578,500 5.02 Ceres C43 Whitmore Ave Install Traffic Signal Whitmore Ave. and Ustick Rd $578,500 5.02 Ceres C44 Various Locations Signal & ITS Improvements Various Locations $3,353,200 5.02 Ceres C47 Ustick Rd Install Traffic Signal Ustick Rd & C Street $670,700 5.02 Ceres C48 Whitmore Ave Install Traffic Signal Whitmore Ave & Faith Home Rd $670,700 5.02 Ceres C49 Ustick Rd Install Traffic Signal Ustick Rd & G Street $777,500 5.02 Ceres C51 Mitchell Rd Traffic Signal Modification Roeding Rd & Mitchell Road $433,900 5.02 Service Rd., Central Ave. & Don Pedro Ceres C52 Various Locations ITS Signal Synchronization Phase III $1,300,000 Rd. 5.02 Exempt Project Listing

Ceres C53 Various Locations ITS Signal Synchronization Phase IV Crows Landing Rd. Whitmore Rd. $552,425 5.02 Ceres C54 Mitchell Rd Mitchell Overlay Phase IV Roeding Rd to Service Rd $680,000 1.1 Ceres C55 Service Rd Service Road Overlay Phase II Central Ave to Blaker Rd $570,000 1.1 Ceres C56 Service Rd Service Road Overlay Phase I Blaker Rd to Morgan Rd $660,000 1.1 Ceres C57 Blaker Rd Blaker Road Overlay Phase 1 Service Rd to Hackett Rd $650,000 1.1 Ceres C58 Various Locations Reconstruct Local Streets (Annual Basis) Various Locations $53,756,000 1.1 Ceres C59 Various Locations Preventive Maintenance Local Streets (Annual Basis) Various Locations $4,084,000 1.1 Ceres C60 Service Rd Install Traffic Signal Morgan Rd & Service Rd $560,000 5.02 Ceres C61 Various Locations Traffis Signal Optimization Various Locations $100,000 5.02 Ceres C62 El Camino Ave Roundabout El Camino Ave at Pine St $600,000 5.04 Ceres C64 Ceres Transit Operations Operate CDAR and CAT Operate CDAR and CAT $61,778,500 2.01 Ceres Area Transit (CAT) and Update electronic farebox systems in Ceres C65 Update electronic farebox systems in transit buses $50,000 Ceres Dial-A-Ride (CDAR) transit buses 2.05 Bus Stop Improvements - Shelters, Ceres C66 Various Locations Bus Stop Improvements - Shelters, Benches, Pads, & Litter Receptacles $80,000 Benches, Pads, & Litter Receptacles 2.08 Bus Stop Improvements - Shelters, Bus Stop Improvements - Shelters, Benches, Pads, & Litter Receptacles, Ceres C67 Various Locations Benches, Pads, & Litter Receptacles, $200,000 and Turnouts and Turnouts 2.08 Bus Stop Improvements - Shelters, Bus Stop Improvements - Shelters, Benches, Pads, & Litter Receptacles, Ceres C68 Various Locations Benches, Pads, & Litter Receptacles, $200,000 and Turnouts and Turnouts 2.08 Transit Plan - Study for future routes in Transit Plan - Study for future routes in newly annexed areas, new Ceres C69 Ceres Area Transit (CAT) newly annexed areas, new schools & $150,000 schools & transit center transit center 4.01 Purchase New & Replacement Transit Ceres C70 Ceres Dial-A-Ride (CDAR) Purchase New & Replacement Transit Buses (9) $2,320,000 Buses (9) 2.1 Ceres C71 ACE Connection Transit service to Ceres ACE Station; Transit service to begin in 2023 Transit service to Ceres ACE Station $7,363,423 2.01 Ceres C72 El Camino Ave Surface Parking and undercrossing to ACE station traffic mitigation El Camino Ave at North St $1,500,000 2.08 Ceres C73 Railroad Ave Overflow Parking ACE Station Railroad Ave, Central Ave, Hackett Rd $1,500,000 2.08 Ceres C74 Park and Ride Lot Develop a Lighted Park and Ride Lot Near Whitmore Overpass $1,000,000 2.08 Ceres C75 Develop a Park and Ride Lot Develop a lighted Park and Ride 2nd Lot Near Freeway/ACE Station $1,200,000 2.08

NB & SB from Witmore Ave (Ceres) to Caltrans CA01 SR 99 TMS electrical elements $2,000,000 Hammett Rd (near Ripon) 5.07 Caltrans CA02 SR 99 Install ramp meters, fiber optic and ITS elements Pelandale to STA/SJ County Line $2,800,000 5.07 On SR 99 from Mitchell Rd to Merced Caltrans CA03 SR 99 Install Ramp Metering $3,097,000 County 5.07 On SR 99 from San Joaquin County to Caltrans CA08 SR 99 Install Ramp Metering $15,758,000 Mitchell Rd 5.07 Caltrans CA11 SR 132 Shoulder widening SR-132 from PM 1.44 to SJ River Bridge PM 0- 1.44 $3,500,000 1.04 Caltrans CA16 SR 132 Widen shoulder SR-132 PM 20.40 to PM 23.10 $3,900,000 1.04 Caltrans CA17 SR 132 Widen shoulder SR-132 near Waterford PM 23.27 to 27.10 $4,900,000 1.04 Caltrans CA18 SR 33 Widen shoulder SR-33 PM 1.31 to PM 6.80 $8,900,000 1.04 Repair, update, and install ITS elements, including installation of MVPs, I-5, SR 99, SR132, SR 108, SR Caltrans CA19 approx 10 CMS, 15 CCTV cameras, 60 TMS, 8 EMS, 5 RWIS and Fiber Various locations $4,800,000 120, and SR 219 Optic lines 5.07 Install ramp meters and ITS elements from Stanislaus River to Kansas Caltrans CA20 SR 99 PM 17.0 - 24.7 $27,300,000 Ave 5.07 Exempt Project Listing

Install ramp meters and ITS elements on SR-99 from Kansas Ave Caltrans CA21 SR 99 PM 15- 17.0 $19,500,000 Tuolumne River Road 5.07 In Stanislaus County on SR-99 from Caltrans CA22 SR 99 Install ramp meters and ITS elements Whitmore Ave to Tuolumne River Road. $23,400,000 PM 12.2- 15.0 5.07 In Stanislaus County on SR-99 from 6th Caltrans CA23 SR 99 Install ramp meters and ITS elements $15,600,000 Street to Richland Ave. PM 11.0 - 12.4 5.07 In Stanislaus County on SR-99 from W. Caltrans CA24 SR 99 Install ramp meters and ITS elements Barnhart Road to Service Road. PM7.5- $26,325,000 10.5 5.07 In Stanislaus County on SR-99 from W. Caltrans CA25 SR 99 Install ramp meters and ITS elements Cananl Drive to W. Barnhart Road. PM $29,250,000 4.0-7.5 5.07 In Stanislaus County on SR-99 from 0.6 Caltrans CA26 SR 99 Install ramp meters and ITS elements South of Lander Ave to W. Canal Drive. $29,250,000 PM 1.0-4.0 5.07

Hughson H01 Hatch Rd Construct Multi-Use Trail Santa Fe Ave to Euclid Ave $783,000 3.02 Construction Sidewalk and pedestiran improvements (across railroad Hughson H02 Whitmore Avenue E of Tully Road to Charles Street $393,000 tracks) 3.02 Construct Bikeway and Pedestrian Improvements (Per Non-Motorized Hughson H03 Various Locations Various Locations $1,981,300 Plan) 3.02 Hughson H04 Hughson Avenue Construct Sidewalk In-Fill and Streetscape Improvements (ADA) Santa Fe Avenue to 7th Street $500,000 3.02 Hughson H05 Various Locations Construct Sidewalk In-Fill and Streetscape Improvements (ADA) Various Locations $192,000 3.02 Whitmore Avenue and Santa Whitmore Avenue and Santa Fe Avenue H06 Construct Roundabout $1,000,000 Hughson Fe Avenue Intersection 5.04 Hughson H07 Euclid Ave Install Complete Street Improvements Hatch Rd to Whitmore Ave $2,630,400 3.02 7th Street and Santa Fe Hughson H09 Roadway Realignment Project 7th Street and Santa Fe Avenue $350,000 Avenue 5.03 Various Intersection Hughson H10 Various Locations Various Locations $39,000 Improvements 5.02 Hughson H12 Santa Fe Ave Construct Roundabout South of Hatch Road $1,000,000 5.04 Hughson H13 Santa Fe Ave Construct Roundabout North of 7th Street $1,000,000 5.04 Hughson H14 Various Locations Roadway Rehabilitation Various Locations $8,548,075 1.1

Modesto M01 Modesto Fleet Services Phase II Fleet Maintenance Facility for Light and Heavy Equipment $9,000,000 2.03 Modesto M02 Modesto City-County Airport Part 77 Airspace - Property Acquisition $400,000 4.01 Modesto M03 Modesto City-County Airport Update Airport Layout Plan $300,000 4.01 Modesto M04 Modesto City-County Airport Design - Reconstruction of Taxiway C $245,000 4.01 Modesto M05 Modesto City-County Airport Reconstruction of Taxiway C $1,636,534 4.12 Modesto M06 Modesto City-County Airport Airfield Drainage Improvements $1,928,640 4.01 Modesto M07 Modesto City-County Airport Airfield Electrical Improvements $294,700 4.01 Modesto M08 Modesto City-County Airport Airfield Slurry Seal - Design/Construct $1,214,200 1.1 Modesto M09 Modesto City-County Airport Computer Base Airfield Drivers Education Program $134,400 4.01 Exempt Project Listing

Modesto M10 Modesto City-County Airport Construct Entrance Road $346,600 4.12 Modesto M11 Modesto City-County Airport Construct New Airport Fire Station $1,522,700 2.08 Modesto M12 Modesto City-County Airport Construct New Airport Maintenance Shop $1,568,400 2.08 Modesto M13 Modesto City-County Airport Construct Terminal Building $8,811,300 2.08 Modesto M14 Modesto City-County Airport Engineering & Contingencies $4,471,700 4.01 Modesto M15 Modesto City-County Airport Environmental Planning Studies $756,300 4.01 Modesto M16 Modesto City-County Airport Equipment Replacement $2,337,000 4.01 Modesto M17 Modesto City-County Airport Expand Airport Apron $2,276,300 4.01 Modesto M18 Modesto City-County Airport Extend RW/TX 500' $10,000,000 4.12 Modesto M19 Modesto City-County Airport Land Acquisition - Phase 1 $2,110,400 4.12 Modesto M20 Modesto City-County Airport Land Acquisition - Phase 2 $2,173,700 4.12 Modesto M21 Modesto City-County Airport Land Acquisition - Phase 3 $1,940,400 4.12 Modesto M22 Modesto City-County Airport Masterplan Update $453,800 4.01 Modesto M23 Modesto City-County Airport Obstruction Removal - Tree Trimming $530,500 4.09 Modesto M24 Modesto City-County Airport Pavement Removal $14,000 1.1 Modesto M25 Modesto City-County Airport Realign Airport Way $602,100 4.12 Modesto M26 Modesto City-County Airport Relocate Localizer $492,000 4.12 Modesto M27 Modesto City-County Airport Relocate Perimeter Road $196,800 4.12 Modesto M28 Modesto City-County Airport Remove old terminal $954,600 4.12 Modesto M29 Modesto City-County Airport Replace VASI with PAPI, RW10L/28R $101,400 4.12 Modesto M30 Modesto City-County Airport Runway 28R Extension - NEPA/CEQA $327,900 4.12 Modesto M31 Modesto City-County Airport Taxiway E Re-alignment $633,400 4.12 Modesto M32 Modesto City-County Airport Terminal Complex - NEPA/CEQA $514,000 4.12 Modesto M33 Various Locations Non-Motorized Improvements Various Locations $30,000,000 3.02 Modesto M34 Various Locations Safe Routes to School projects Various Locations $8,000,000 3.02 Modesto M35 Hetch Hetchy ROW Class I Trail Improvements Semallon Dr to Riverbank $6,000,000 3.02 Modesto M36 Lincoln Corridor Class I Bike path/Ped Bike Bridge Yosemite to Orangeburg $10,000,000 3.02 Modesto M37 Virginia Corridor Bike/Ped facility including overcrossings Woodrow to Pelandale $8,000,000 3.02 Modesto M38 Downtown Class IV Class IV Bike Path Virginia Corridor to Dry Creek $5,000,000 3.02 Modesto M39 Dry Creek Bike Path Class I Bike Path Connecting Trails Kewin to Beardbrook Park $5,000,000 3.02 Modesto M40 MID Canal System Contruct Class 1 Trail along MID Lateral Nos. 3, 4 and 7 MID Lateral Nos. 3,4 and 7 $15,000,000 3.02 Exempt Project Listing

Modesto M41 MID Canal System Class I Bike Path along MID Carver to Virginia Corridor $3,000,000 3.02 Modesto M42 Stoddard Ave MJC Class I Bike Path Phase 3 Campus Way to Tully Rd $2,000,000 3.02 Modesto M43 Claus Rd Class I and Class IV Bike Path along Claus Rd. Creekwood to Sylvan $4,000,000 3.02 Tuolumne River Restoration Modesto M44 Remaining Trail Improvements Mitchell Rd to Carpenter Rd $20,000,000 Project 3.02 Modesto M45 Pelandale Ave Class I bike path Dale Road to Virginia Corridor $5,000,000 3.02 Modesto M46 Various Locations Pedestrian/ADA modifications Various Locations $20,000,000 3.02 Class II Bicycle Improvements(Class II - Signage/Striping, Curb, Gutter & Modesto M47 Various Locations Various Locations $10,000,000 Sidewalk) 3.02 Paradise from Sheridan to 1st, S. Pedestrian and Bicylcle Safety Improvements around Modesto High Jefferson from Paradise to Vine, 1st Modesto M48 Paradise Road Area $4,000,000 School from Vine to Sierra and G St from Sierra to 2nd 3.02 Modesto M78 Various Locations Non-Motorized Improvements Various Locations $30,553,200 3.02 Modesto M64 MAX Station / facilities $3,500,000 2.08 Modesto M65 MAX Operations (including farebox subsidy) $1,400,000 2.01 Modesto M66 MAX Max and Dial-a-Ride Operating Costs (and Federal Match) $464,354,600 2.01 Bus Stop Improvements (upgrade 100 bus stops with additional Modesto M67 MAX $5,686,900 amentieis, including shelters, wayside signs, benches and trash cans) 2.08 Modesto M68 MAX Capital Cost of Contracting $125,126,000 2.01 Modesto M69 MAX Operate ADA Paratransit system $1,447,800 2.01 Modesto M70 MAX Preventative Maintenance $211,691,000 2.03 Purchase Buses (includes replacing 4 Diesel powered, with 4 electric Modesto M71 MAX $7,615,000 powered) 2.1 Modesto M72 MAX Support Equipment/Tools $7,445,300 2.02 Modesto M73 MAX Training $826,900 4.01 Modesto M74 MAX Transit Center Enhancements $4,015,600 2.08 Modesto M75 MAX Technology Improvements to include Traffic Signal Priortization $5,521,300 2.06 Install Bus Rapid Transit improvements and Operate Service (Various Modesto M76 MAX $42,678,550 Locations) 2.01 Modesto M77 MAX Rideshare Program, City of Modesto $362,600 3.01 Modesto M49 10th Street Pedestrian & Bicycle Enhancements J St. to Morton Blvd $8,000,000 3.02 Modesto M50 J Street Pedestrian & Bike Enhancements Needham to 9th Street $10,000,000 3.02 Modesto M51 Carpenter Rd Install Complete Street Improvements Chicago Ave To Maze Rd $19,001,600 3.02 Modesto M57 Hwy 132 Various improvements SR 99 to 9th Street $7,000,000 1.1 Modesto M59 Oakdale Rd Complete Street Improvements Floyd Ave to Sylvan Ave $7,600,700 3.02 Modesto M61 Scenic Avenue Safety Improvements Coffee to Bodem $2,533,600 1.06 Modesto M62 Various Locations Roadway Rehabilitation Various Locations $200,000,000 1.1 Modesto M63 Various Locations Various intersection Improvements Various Locations $75,000,000 5.02 Widen Sisk Rd/Pelandale Intersection to the south-west corner of the intersection, construct a second left-turn lane from EB Pelandale to NB Modesto M79 SR 99 SR 99/Pelandale Interchange (Phase 2) $5,000,000 Sisk Rd, a third dedicated through lane on EB Pelandale, and a dedicated right-turn lane from EB Pelandale to SB Sisk Rd. 5.02 Modesto M80 SR 99 PE & ROW (reconstruction to 8 lane interchange) SR 99/Briggsmore Interchange $20,000,000 5.04 Modesto M84 SR 99 Reconstruct to 8 Lane Interchange Briggsmore Interchange $98,679,400 5.04 Newman N05 Inyo Ave Install Collector Street improvements Highway 33 to Canal School Rd $7,751,800 1.1 Newman N10 Hills Ferry Road Collector Street Improvements, Microsurface Oil 2" City Limit to Driskell Avenue $137,500 1.1 Newman N11 Merced Street, Traffic flow and roadway improvements Drisekll Avenue to Hwy. 33 $87,290 4.12 Newman N12 Inyo Avenue Collector Street Improvements Pulverized Construction Hwy 33 to City Limit $294,050 1.1 Newman N13 Upper Road Collector Street Improvements Pulverized Construction Inyo Avenue to Patchett Drive $62,740 1.1 Newman N14 Yolo Street Collector Street Improvements Pulverized Construction S Street to Hwy 33 $124,340 1.1 Newman N15 Prince Road Collector Street Improvements Pulverized Construction Inyo Avenue to Strawbridge $67,040 1.1 Exempt Project Listing

Newman N16 Orestimba Road Collector Street Improvements Pulverized Construction Lions Park to S Street $134,770 1.1 Newman N17 Hardin Road Collector Street Improvements Pulverized Construction Oresrtimba Road to Stephens Ave. $96,795 1.1 Mariposa to Stephens, including Newman N18 R Street Pulverized Construction $177,460 Stephens Ave. 1.1 Merced County line northward to Yolo Newman N19 SR 33 Highway and pedestrian safety improvements $10,000,000 Avenue 3.02

Oakdale O01 Oakdale Municipal Airport Perimeter Fence Phase 2 $460,000 4.01 Oakdale O02 Oakdale Municipal Airport Pavement Rehab Phase 1 Runway $310,000 1.1 Oakdale O03 Oakdale Municipal Airport Pavement Rehab Phase 2 Taxiway $400,000 1.1 Oakdale O04 Oakdale Municipal Airport Pavement Rehab Phase 3 Apron $275,000 1.1 Oakdale O05 Oakdale Municipal Airport Pavement Rehab Phase 4 Apron/Taxi $1,200,000 1.1 Oakdale O06 Oakdale Municipal Airport Airport Layout Plan $216,000 4.03 Oakdale O07 Oakdale Municipal Airport Runway Safety Area/Drainage Environ $225,000 4.01 Oakdale O08 Oakdale Municipal Airport Airport Fire Protection Project $530,500 4.01 A St to the Oakdale Plaza Shopping Oakdale O09 Cottle's Trail Multi-Use Trail Construct Class I Bike Lane $776,200 Center 3.02 Oakdale O10 Stanislaus River Corridor Construct Class I Bike Lane South of Kerr Park to A Street $2,768,500 3.02 Valley View Multi-Use Trail, Oakdale O11 Construct Class I Bike Lane Kerr Park to Stanislaus River $1,144,000 Phase I 3.02 Install Sidewalks, upgrade ADA-compliant ramps, install and/or enhance Oakdale O12 Various Locations Various Locations $3,000,000 crosswalks 3.02 Oakdale O13 D St Install Complete Street Improvements Rodeo to Stearns Rd $4,426,950 3.02 Oakdale O16 J St Install Complete Street Improvements Orsi Road to Stearns Road $3,460,600 3.02 Oakdale O18 Orsi Rd Install Complete Street Improvements Sierra Rd to F St $3,460,600 3.02 Oakdale O19 Sierra Rd Install Complete Street Improvements Maag Ave to Stearns Rd $1,435,500 3.02 Oakdale O20 Stearns Rd Install Complete Street Improvements F St to Sierra Rd $4,034,400 3.02 Oakdale O21 F St / Crane Improve intersection & modify signal Intersection $199,500 5.02 Oakdale O22 F St / Willowood Striping Intersection $22,500 1.11 Oakdale O23 F St / Stearns Install Signal & Intersection Improvements Intersection $768,800 5.02 Oakdale O24 Greger / Kaufman Install Signal & Intersection Improvements Intersection $433,125 5.02 Oakdale O25 J St / 5th Ave Striping & Signage Intersection $22,500 1.11 Oakdale O26 J St / Maag Ave Striping & Signage Intersection $22,500 1.11 Oakdale O27 Sierra / Maag Striping & Signage Intersection $22,500 1.11 Oakdale O28 Sierra / Stearns Install Signal & Intersection Improvements Intersection $456,000 5.02 Oakdale O29 Various Locations Install Traffic Signals and Various Intersection Improvements Various Locations $1,000,000 5.02 Oakdale O30 Various Locations Roadway Rehabilitation Various Locations $25,000,000 1.1 Oakdale O31 Various Locations Pedestrian/Bicycle Infrastructure Improvements Various Locations $3,032,200 3.02 Oakdale O32 SR108-SR120 Intersection Improvements at Rodeo Oakdale / County $10,000,000 5.02

Patterson P01 Various Locations Roadway Rehabilitation and complete street improvements. Various Locations $5,510,100 1.1 Patterson P02 Various Locations Construct & Rehabilitate Class I and Class II bike lanes Various Locations $3,964,600 3.02 Patterson P03 Sperry Ave Install Complete Street Improvements, widen to four lanes Baldwin Road to Rogers Road $12,610,000 3.02 Patterson P06 Various Locations Install Traffic Signals Various Locations $17,008,800 5.02 Patterson P07 Various Locations Roadway Rehabilitation Various Locations $5,510,100 1.1 Patterson P08 Zacharias Rd Construct New Interchange at I-5 Raines Rd to I-5 $75,000,000 5.04

Riverbank R16 Various Locations Roadway Rehabilitation Various Locations $4,000,000 1.1 Pavement Management: Riverbank R17 Roadway Rehabilitation Various Locations $36,000,000 Prevntative Maintenance 1.1 Riverbank R18 Patterson Road Install Complete Street Improvements First Street to Claus Rd $6,844,500 3.02 Riverbank R19 Roselle Avenue Install Complete Street Improvements Patterson to Claribel $4,311,400 3.02 Riverbank R21 Patterson Rd Signal improvements with pedestrian crossings and sidewalks Patterson at Roselle $1,307,000 3.02 Riverbank R22 Patterson Rd Signal improvements Patterson at Third $450,300 5.02 Exempt Project Listing

Riverbank R23 Claus Road Signal improvements Claus at California $652,400 5.02 Riverbank R24 Patterson Rd Signal improvements Patterson at Eighth $403,200 5.02 Riverbank R25 Patterson Rd Intersection Improvements Patterson at First $933,500 5.02 Roselle/Morrill Intersection Riverbank R26 Intersection Improvements Roselle at Morrill $434,000 Improvements 5.02 Install signal light at Claus & SR-108 and Install congestion Management Riverbank R27 Claus Rd SR-108 at Claus $4,201,000 Improvements at First Street & SR-108 5.02 Riverbank R28 First Street Railroad crossing improvements First Street north of Patterson Road $396,600 1.01 Riverbank R29 Third Street Railroad crossing improvements Third Street north of Patterson Road $500,000 1.01 Riverbank R30 Eighth Street Railroad crossing improvements Eighth Street north of Patterson Road $500,000 1.01 Riverbank R31 Snedigar Road Railroad crossing improvements Snedigar Road north of Patterson Road $311,566 1.01 Patterson Road west of Terminal Riverbank R32 Patterson Rd Railroad crossing improvements $311,566 Avenue 1.01 Riverbank R33 SR-108 Install Congestion Management improvements SR-108 at First Street $2,512,700 1.07

StanCOG RE17 Countywide DIBS Countywide $5,000,000 3.01 StanCOG RE18 Countywide MOVE Countywide $43,723,246 2.01

SR-99 Interchange with Crows Landing Stanislaus County S02 SR-99 Reconstruct interchange $15,000,000 Road 5.02 Stanislaus County S03 I-5 Reconstruct interchange I-5 Interchange with Fink Road $25,000,000 5.02 Stanislaus County S04 SR-99 Reconstruct interchange SR-99 Interchange with Hammett Road $45,000,000 5.02 Feasibility Study - widen to 8 lane HOV/HOP expresslane; including ramp North County limits to South County Stanislaus County S05 SR-99 $1,000,000 metering limits 4.01 Stanislaus County S07 Hickman Road Shoulders Widenning - Class 2 Bikepath East Ave. to City Limit $2,500,000 3.02 Stanislaus County S08 Santa Fe Road Shoulder Widening - Class 2 Bikepath Keyes Rd to SR132 $2,000,000 3.02 Stanislaus County S09 Pirrone Road Shoulder Widening - Class 2 Bikepath Hammett Rd to SR-219/Sisk inc. MCS $913,400 3.02 Stanislaus County S10 Geer Rd. /Albers Rd. Shoulder Widening - Class 2 Bikepath Santa Fe to Patterson Rd. $2,250,000 3.02 Stanislaus County S11 Coffee Road Shoulder Widening - Class 2 Bikepath Claratina Ave to Ladd Rd $500,000 3.02 Stanislaus County S12 East Ave Shoulder Widening - Class 2 Bikepath Daubenberger to Hickman $500,000 3.02 Stanislaus County S13 Crows Landing Road Bike/Ped Improvements School Ave to Whitmore Ave $3,200,000 3.02 Stanislaus County S14 Crows Landing Road Shoulder Widening - Class 2 Bikepath Hwy 33 to Keyes Rd $3,250,000 3.02 Stanislaus County S15 West Main St Shoulder Widening - Class 2 Bikepath Sycamore to Washington $3,250,000 3.02 Stanislaus County S16 Robertson Road Pedestrian Improvements Carpenter Rd to Hays St $1,000,000 3.02 Stanislaus County S17 Bret Harte Neighborhood Pedestrian Improvements Glenn Ave, Las Vegas St, Butte Ave $1,300,000 3.02 Stanislaus County S18 Airport Neighborhood Pedestrian Improvements Various Locations $1,500,000 3.02 Construct Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements (Class I Bikeways / Stanislaus County S20 Various Locations Various Locations $3,600,000 Sidewalk, etc.) 3.02 Stanislaus County S21 Various Locations Roadway Rehabilitation Various Locations $165,000,000 1.1 Stanislaus County S22 McHenry Ave Seismic Bridge Replacement McHenry Ave @ Stanislaus River Bridge $21,493,000 1.19 Stanislaus County S23 Crows Landing Rd Intersection Improvements Crows Landing Rd. & Grayson Rd $2,520,000 5.02 Stanislaus County S25 Crows Landing Rd Seismic Bridge Replacement - 3-lane Bridge San Joaquin River Bridge $18,000,000 1.19 Stanislaus County S26 Hickman Rd Seismic Bridge Replacement Hickman Rd @ Tuolumne River $23,410,000 1.19 Stanislaus County S27 Hills Ferry Rd Seismic Bridge Retrofit - Mandatory Hills Ferry Rd @ San Joaquin River $7,800,500 1.19 Stanislaus County S28 Santa Fe Ave Seismic Bridge Replacement Santa Fe Ave @ Tuolumne River Bridge $14,300,000 1.19 Stanislaus County S29 Seventh St Seismic Bridge Replacement; 4 lane bridge with pedestrian access Seventh St @ Tuolumne River Bridge $45,000,000 1.19 Stanislaus County S30 Crows Landing Rd Intersection improvements Crows Landing Rd & Keyes Rd $2,520,000 5.02 Exempt Project Listing

Stanislaus County S31 Crows Landing Rd Intersection Improvements Crows Landing Rd & Fulkerth Ave $2,500,000 5.02 Stanislaus County S32 Kilburn Rd Replace Bridge (Critical) Kilburn Rd @ Orestimba Creek Bridge $3,611,707 1.19 Stanislaus County S33 Carpenter Rd Intersection Improvements Crows Landing Rd & Carpenter Rd $2,500,000 5.02 Stanislaus County S34 Carpenter Rd Intersection Improvements Carpenter Rd & Grayson Rd $2,500,000 5.02 Stanislaus County S35 Carpenter Rd Intersection Improvements Carpenter Rd & Keyes Rd $2,400,000 5.02 Stanislaus County S36 Carpenter Rd Intersection Improvements Carpenter Rd & W. Main St $2,160,000 5.02 Stanislaus County S37 Carpenter Rd Intersection Improvements Carpenter Rd & Whitmore Ave $3,000,000 5.02 Stanislaus County S38 W. Main St. Intersection Improvements W. Main St & Central Ave $5,000,000 5.02 Stanislaus County S39 Claribel Rd Intersection Improvements Claribel Rd & Roselle Ave $4,250,000 5.02 Stanislaus County S40 Geer Rd Intersection Improvements Geer & Santa Fe $3,240,000 5.02 Stanislaus County S41 Geer Rd Intersection Improvements Geer & Whitmore $3,000,000 5.02 Golden State Blvd & Golf Rd / Berkeley Stanislaus County S42 Golden State Blvd Intersection Improvements $2,388,200 Ave 5.02 Keyes Road & SR 99 Exit/Entrance Stanislaus County S43 Keyes Road Ramp Signalization $750,000 Ramps 5.02 Stanislaus County S44 Santa Fe Ave Intersection Improvements Santa Fe Ave & East Ave $2,400,000 5.02 Stanislaus County S45 Santa Fe Ave Intersection Improvements; Upgrade Railroad Crossing Equipment Santa Fe Ave & Keyes Rd $3,600,000 1.01 Stanislaus County S46 Santa Fe Ave Intersection Improvements; Upgrade Railroad Crossing Equipment Santa Fe Ave & Main St $3,600,000 1.01 Stanislaus County S47 Santa Fe Ave Intersection Improvementsl; Upgrade Railroad Crossing Equipment Santa Fe Ave & Service Rd $3,600,000 1.01 Stanislaus County S70 Cooperstown Rd Bridge Replacement - Off System Bridge Toll Credits Cooperstown Road at Gallup Creek $2,600,000 1.19 Stanislaus County S71 Cooperstown Rd Bridge Replacement - Off System Bridge Toll Credits Cooperstown Road at Rydberg Creek $2,300,000 1.19 Stanislaus County S72 Crabtree Rd Bridge Replacement - Off System Bridge Toll Credits Crabtree Road at Dry Creek $5,322,000 1.19 Stanislaus County S73 Gilbert Rd Bridge Replacement - Off System Bridge Toll Credits Gilbert Road at Ceres Main Canal $2,423,000 1.19 Pleasant Valley Road at South San Stanislaus County S74 Pleasant Valley Rd Bridge Replacement - Off System Bridge Toll Credits $2,900,000 Joaquin Main Canal 1.19 Stanislaus County S75 Shiells Rd Bridge Replacement - Off System Bridge Toll Credits Shiells Road over CCID Main Canal $2,041,000 1.19 Stanislaus County S76 St. Francis Bridge Replacement - Off System Bridge Toll Credits St. Francis Ave at MID Main Canal $1,885,000 1.19 Stanislaus County S79 Las Palmas Bridge Rehabilitation Las Palmas Ave over San Joaquin River $24,221,700 1.19 Stanislaus County S80 Milton Road Bridge Replacement - Off System Bridge Toll Credits Milton Road over Rock Creek Tributary $4,530,000 1.19 Stanislaus County S81 Sonora Road Replacement Sonora Road over Martells Creek $3,200,000 1.19 Stanislaus County S84 Oakdale-Waterford Hwy Replace Bridge Over Claribel Bridge Lateral $1,928,700 1.19 Stanislaus County S85 Valley Home Rd. Bridge Rehabilitation Over Lone Tree Creek $2,314,300 1.19 Stanislaus County S86 Pioneer Ave. Replace Bridge Over Lone Tree Creek $1,725,250 1.19 Stanislaus County S88 Milton Rd. Replace Bridge Over Hood Creek $3,714,900 1.19 Stanislaus County S89 Lake Road Replace Bridge Over T.I.D. Main Canal $4,295,050 1.19 Stanislaus County S90 Montpelier Road Replace Bridge Ower Main Canal @ Dallas Rd $2,669,050 1.19 Stanislaus County S91 Claribel Rd Signal improvements Claribel at Roselle $4,242,774 5.02 Stanislaus County S92 Various construction projects $15,000,000 1.1 Stanislaus County S93 Transit Bus Replacement Program $32,500,000 2.1 Capital Projects (Expansion Buses, Upgrade Electronic Fareboxes, Stanislaus County S94 $19,000,000 Security Camera Systems, Transit amenities and facilities) 2.08 Transit facilities amenities : (100) Bus Stop Shelters/Facilities with Stanislaus County S95 $2,500,000 amenities & Solar lighting 2.08 Install and implement Intelligent Transportation Systems with Traffic Stanislaus County S96 $18,000,000 (TSP) Traffic Signal Priority in StaRT's service area 2.04 Stanislaus County S97 Operating Costs $1,125,000,000 2.01 Stanislaus County S98 Implement and Operate Commuter and Express Bus Services $20,000,000 2.01 Exempt Project Listing

Transit Fare Subsidy (TFS) Program - StaRT Employee Ride Program Stanislaus County S99 $1,000,000 Emission Reductions: PM10 (1,424) / 1.08 factor= .013 PM 2.5 2.01 Stanislaus County S100 Mandated Federal and State Training $750,000 4.01 Stanislaus County S105 Keyes Road Replace Bridge Over TID Ceres Main Canal $1,500,000 1.19 Stanislaus County S106 Quincy Road Replace Bridge Over TID Upper Lateral #3 $1,500,000 1.19 Stanislaus County S107 Eastin Road Low water crossing - bridge or culvert construction Eastin Road & Orestimba Creek $2,500,000 1.19 Stanislaus County S108 Crows Landing Road Raise Road profile Catfish Camp to 1,200' southwest $475,000 5.03 Intersection Improvements - curb, gutter, SD improvements @ NW Stanislaus County S109 Geer Road Geer Road and Santa Fe Avenue $1,000,000 corner 5.02 Stanislaus County S110 Faith Home Rd Intersection Improvements W. Main St & Faith Home Rd $2,520,000 5.02

Widen Runway 12-30, RSA & Infrastructure Improvements Including Turlock T01 Turlock Municipal Airport $2,163,300 Airfield Electrical Upgrades. 4.12 Rehabilitate/Reconstruct Apron A1; Relocate Wind Indicator & Turlock T02 Turlock Municipal Airport $650,000 Segmented Circle (Construction) 4.12 Extend Parallel Taxiway "A"; Construct new runway/taxiway connector. Turlock T03 Turlock Municipal Airport $75,000 (Design Only) 4.12 Extend Parallel Taxiway "A"; Construct new runway/taxiway connector. Turlock T04 Turlock Municipal Airport $550,000 Construction. 4.12 Turlock T05 Turlock Municipal Airport Update Airport Master Plan $200,000 4.01 Turlock T06 Various Locations Construct Class I Bike Paths Various Locations $6,000,000 3.02 Turlock T07 Various Locations Construct Class II Bike Lanes and Class III Bike Pathes Various Locations $5,500,000 3.02 N. Golden State Blvd. and 1,200 ft. east Turlock T08 Christoffersen Pkwy. Construct buffered Class II Bike Lanes along entire 3.2 mile length $475,000 of N. Berkeley Ave. 3.02 Turlock T09 N. Tegner Rd. Construct Class I Shared Use Path Sandstone St. and Christoffersen Pkwy. $50,000 3.02 Construct sidewalk, Class II Bike Lanes and Pedestrian Activated Hybrid Turlock T10 W. Linwood Ave Lander Ave. and West Ave. South $940,000 Beacon Crossing System 3.02 Turlock T11 Monte Vista Ave Class II Bike Lanes Olive Ave to Berkeley Ave $217,400 3.02 Turlock T12 Various Locations ADA/Pedestrian Improvements Various Locations $4,000,000 3.02 Turlock T13 Various Locations Implement bike share program Various Locations $150,000 3.02 Reconstruction and rehabilitate roadway, install median, add Class II and Lander Ave. and 500 ft. west of S. Turlock T15 W. Main St. $6,200,000 Class III bicycle facilities, add sidewalk. Walnut Rd. 1.09 Install Traffic Signals and Various Intersection and Synchronization Turlock T38 Various Locations Various Locations $15,000,000 Improvements 5.02 Turlock T39 SR-99 Construct New Interchange Lander Ave (SR-165) to S. City Limits $35,785,000 5.04 Turlock T44 Golden State Blvd Widen Intersection from 2 to 4 lanes with bike improvements Golden State Blvd & Taylor Rd $2,690,400 5.02 Construct an Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Transportation Turlock T45 Various Locations Various Locations $12,500,000 Management Center with related equipment and services 1.07 Turlock T46 Various Locations Roadway Rehabilitation Various Locations $94,000,000 1.1 Turlock T47 Turlock Various Construction Projects $6,567,400 1.1 Construct a Turlock Regional Transit Center building, parking lot and Turlock T48 Turlock Regional Transit Center site $5,900,000 passenger amenities 2.08 Turlock T49 Bus parking lot with fueling infrastructure and operations building Northern portion of Corporation Yard $1,900,000 2.08 Capital Purchases (Busses, Bus Stop and Station Improvements, Support Turlock T50 $17,684,600 Equipment, etc.) 2.08 Acquisition of zero emission transit buses and related fueling Turlock T51 $16,500,000 infrastructure 2.1 Turlock T52 Maintenance on Vehicles and Facilities $3,534,700 2.03 Upgrades to fareboxes, AVL systems, GIS enhancements, computer Turlock T53 $1,500,000 systems and other technology improvements 2.05 Exempt Project Listing

Turlock T54 Operating Costs $29,703,400 2.01 Turlock T55 Improvements to reduce transit headways $14,000,000 2.01 Turlock T57 Improvements to improve transit headway $20,000,000 2.01 Turlock T58 Various Locations Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk and Bike/Pedestrian Improvements Various Locations $18,890,900 3.02

Waterford W01 Yosemite Blvd Sidewalk Installation and Pavement Widening Western to Pasadena $380,000 3.02 Waterford W03 Summers Street Concrete Replacement and Pavement Rehabilitation F St to La Gallina Ave $344,692 1.1 Waterford W04 I Street Pavement Rehabilitation Bentley St to Church St $148,716 1.1 Waterford W05 Main Street Curb, Gutter & Sidewalk Infill, Pavement Rehabilitation Church St to G St $350,000 1.1 Waterford W06 H Street Pavement Rehabilitation Yosemite to Dorsey $453,546 1.1 Waterford W07 G Street Curb, Gutter & Sidewalk Infill, Pavement Rehabilitation Yosemite to Church $685,000 1.1 Loy St, Barnes St, Tohara Ln, Waterford W08 Pavement Rehabilitation Loop $235,016 and Welch Dr 1.1 Waterford W09 Riverside Curb, Gutter & Sidewalk Infill, Pavement Rehabilitation Western Ave to Sean Ct. $600,000 1.1 Waterford W10 Church Street Curb, Gutter & Sidewalk Infill, Pavement Rehabilitation Yosemite to Kadota Ave $435,000 1.1 Traffic Signals, intersection improvements and other transportation Waterford W11 Various Locations Various Locations $3,000,000 enhancements 5.02 Waterford W12 Various Locations Roadway Rehabilitation Various Locations $15,000,000 1.1

Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

APPENDIX C

CONFORMITY ANALYSIS DOCUMENTATION

2021 FTIP Conformity Analysis EMFAC2014 Emission Estimates Stanislaus County

EMFAC Emissions (tons/day)

Stanislaus

Pollutant Source Description

2008 and 2015 Ozone 2020 2023 2026 2029 2031 2037 2042 Ozone EMFAC 2014 (Summer Run) ROG Total Exhaust (All Vehicles Total) 3.09 2.49 2.17 1.95 1.78 1.44 1.29

Conformity Total 3.10 2.50 2.20 2.00 1.80 1.50 1.30

Ozone EMFAC 2014 (Summer Run) NOx Total Exhaust (All Vehicles Total) 8.79 5.43 4.84 4.47 4.21 3.89 3.82

Conformity Total 8.80 5.50 4.90 4.50 4.30 3.90 3.90

2020 2029 2037 2042 PM-10 EMFAC 2014 (Annual Run) PM-10 Total (All Vehicles Total) 0.77 0.81 0.86 0.88 * includes tire & brake wear

Conformity Total 0.77 0.81 0.86 0.88

PM-10 EMFAC 2014 (Annual Run) NOx Total Exhaust (All Vehicles Total) 9.23 4.67 4.04 3.97

Conformity Total 9.23 4.67 4.04 3.97

2021 2029 2037 2042 PM2.5 Annual EMFAC 2014 (Annual Run) PM2.5 Total Exhaust (All Vehicles Total) 0.34 0.34 0.35 0.36 (1997 and 2012 * includes tire & brake wear standards) Conformity Total 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.40

PM2.5 Annual EMFAC 2014 (Annual Run) NOx Total Exhaust (All Vehicles Total) 8.36 4.67 4.04 3.97 (1997 and 2012 standards) Conformity Total 8.40 4.70 4.00 4.00

2020 2023 2024 2031 2037 2042 PM2.5 24-hour EMFAC 2014 (Winter Run) PM2.5 Total Exhaust (All Vehicles Total) 0.35 0.32 0.33 0.34 0.35 0.36 (2006 standard) * includes tire & brake wear

Conformity Total 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40

10/23/2020 2021 FTIP Conformity Analysis EMFAC2014 Emission Estimates Stanislaus County

PM2.5 24-hour EMFAC 2014 (Winter Run) NOx Total Exhaust (All Vehicles Total) 9.50 5.87 5.63 4.49 4.12 4.04 (2006 standard)

Conformity Total 9.50 5.90 5.70 4.50 4.20 4.10

UPCOMING BUDGET TEST (Note: EPA Action is Pending as of This Analysis; The 1997 and 2012 PM2.5 Budget Test Above Will be Used if EPA Doesn’t Determine Adequacy or Approval of the New Budgets before Federal Approval of the 2021 FTIP Conformity Analysis)

2020 2029 2037 2042 PM2.5 Annual EMFAC 2014 (Annual Run) PM2.5 Total Exhaust (All Vehicles Total) 0.35 0.34 0.35 0.36 (1997 standard) * includes tire & brake wear

Conformity Total 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40

PM2.5 Annual EMFAC 2014 (Annual Run) NOx Total Exhaust (All Vehicles Total) 9.23 4.67 4.04 3.97 (1997 standard)

Conformity Total 9.30 4.70 4.10 4.00

2020 2022 2025 2031 2037 2042 PM2.5 Annual EMFAC 2014 (Annual Run) PM2.5 Total Exhaust (All Vehicles Total) 0.35 0.34 0.33 0.34 0.35 0.36 (2012 standard) * includes tire & brake wear

Conformity Total 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40

PM2.5 Annual EMFAC 2014 (Annual Run) NOx Total Exhaust (All Vehicles Total) 9.23 7.71 5.28 4.39 4.04 3.97 (2012 standard)

Conformity Total 9.30 7.80 5.30 4.40 4.10 4.00

10/23/2020 2021 FTIP Conformity Analysis EMFAC2014 Emission Estimates Stanislaus County

2021 FTIP Conformity Analysis Results Summary -- Stanislaus

Standard Analysis Year Emissions Total DID YOU PASS? ROG (tons/day) NOx (tons/day) ROG NOx 2020 Budget 3.1 8.8 2020 3.1 8.8 YES YES

2023 Budget 2.6 5.6 2023 2.5 5.5 YES YES

2026 Budget 2.2 4.9 2008 and 2026 2.2 4.9 YES YES 2015 Ozone

2029 Budget 2.0 4.5 2029 2.0 4.5 YES YES

2031 Budget 1.8 4.3 2031 1.8 4.3 YES YES 2037 1.5 3.9 YES YES 2042 1.3 3.9 YES YES

Standard Analysis Year Emissions Total DID YOU PASS? PM-10 (tons/day) NOx (tons/day) PM-10 NOx PM-10 Total On-Road Exhaust Paved Road Dust Unpaved Road Dust Road Construction Dust Total 2020 Budget 3.7 9.6 PM-10 Nox PM-10 Nox PM-10 Nox PM-10 Nox PM-10 Nox 2020 3.7 9.2 YES YES 2020 0.773 9.234 1.292 0.272 1.365 3.7 9.2 2029 0.814 4.667 1.442 0.272 0.299 2.8 4.7 2020 Budget 3.7 9.6 2037 0.855 4.044 1.426 0.272 0.035 2.6 4.0 2029 2.8 4.7 YES YES 2042 0.882 3.966 1.583 0.272 0.000 2.7 4.0 PM-10

2020 Budget 3.7 9.6 2037 2.6 4.0 YES YES

2020 Budget 3.7 9.6 2042 2.7 4.0 YES YES

10/23/2020 2021 FTIP Conformity Analysis EMFAC2014 Emission Estimates Stanislaus County

Standard Analysis Year Emissions Total DID YOU PASS? PM2.5 (tons/day) NOx (tons/day) PM2.5 NOx

2014 Budget 0.6 14.6 2021 0.3 8.4 YES YES

1997 24-Hour and 1997 & 2014 Budget 0.6 14.6 2012 Annual 2029 0.3 4.7 YES YES PM2.5 Standards 2014 Budget 0.6 14.6 2037 0.3 4.0 YES YES

2014 Budget 0.6 14.6 2042 0.4 4.0 YES YES

Standard Analysis Year Emissions Total DID YOU PASS? PM2.5 (tons/day) NOx (tons/day) PM2.5 NOx

2020 Budget 0.4 9.8 2020 0.4 9.5 YES YES

2023 Budget 0.4 6.2 2023 0.4 5.9 YES YES

2006 PM2.5 2024 Budget 0.4 6.0 Winter 24- 2024 0.4 5.7 YES YES Hour Standard 2024 Budget 0.4 6.0 2031 0.4 4.5 YES YES

2024 Budget 0.4 6.0 2037 0.4 4.2 YES YES

2024 Budget 0.4 6.0 2042 0.4 4.1 YES YES

UPCOMING BUDGET TEST

PM2.5 (tons/day) NOx (tons/day) PM2.5 NOx

2020 Budget 0.4 9.6 2020 0.4 9.3 YES YES

1997 24-Hour 2020 Budget 0.4 9.6 and Annual 2029 YES YES PM2.5 0.4 4.7 Standards 2020 Budget 0.4 9.6 2037 0.4 4.1 YES YES

10/23/2020 2021 FTIP Conformity Analysis EMFAC2014 Emission Estimates Stanislaus County

2020 Budget 0.4 9.6 2042 0.4 4.0 YES YES

PM2.5 (tons/day) NOx (tons/day) PM2.5 NOx

2019 Budget 0.4 10.5 2020 0.4 9.3 YES YES

2022 Budget 0.4 8.1 2022 0.4 7.8 YES YES

2012 Annual 2025 Budget 0.4 5.6 PM2.5 2025 0.4 5.3 YES YES Standards

2025 Budget 0.4 5.6 2031 0.4 4.4 YES YES

2025 Budget 0.4 5.6 2037 0.4 4.1 YES YES

2025 Budget 0.4 5.6 2042 0.4 4.0 YES YES

10/23/2020 2021 FTIP Conformity Analysis EMFAC2014 Emission Estimates Stanislaus County

Paved Road Dust Emissions (tons/day)

STANISLAUS 2020

Control- VMT Base Emissions Rain Adj. Emissions Rain Adj. Emissions District Rule 8061/ISR Adjusted VMT Daily (million/year) (PM10 tpy) (PM10 tpy) (PM10 tons/day) Control Rates Emissions Enter Freeway VMT ==> Freeway 4,383,519 1,600 122.253 118.151 0.324 0.075 0.299 Enter Arterial VMT ==> Arterial 6,325,796 2,309 293.574 283.722 0.777 0.282 0.558 Enter Collector VMT ==> Collector 557,296 203 25.864 24.996 0.068 0.407 0.041 Urban 146,466 53 50.924 49.215 0.135 0.324 0.091 Enter Total of Urban and Rural Rural 83,465 30 125.532 121.319 0.332 0.090 0.302 Local VMT Here => 229,931 Totals 11,496,542 4,196 618.148 597.403 1.637 1.292

STANISLAUS 2029

Control- VMT Base Emissions Rain Adj. Emissions Rain Adj. Emissions District Rule 8061/ISR Adjusted VMT Daily (million/year) (PM10 tpy) (PM10 tpy) (PM10 tons/day) Control Rates Emissions Enter Freeway VMT ==> Freeway 5,333,568 1,947 148.750 143.758 0.394 0.075 0.364 Enter Arterial VMT ==> Arterial 6,749,536 2,464 313.240 302.728 0.829 0.282 0.596 Enter Collector VMT ==> Collector 559,452 204 25.964 25.092 0.069 0.407 0.041 Urban 164,353 60 57.143 55.226 0.151 0.324 0.102 Enter Total of Urban and Rural Rural 93,658 34 140.863 136.135 0.373 0.090 0.339 Local VMT Here => 258,011 Totals 12,900,568 4,709 685.959 662.939 1.816 1.442

STANISLAUS 2037

Control- VMT Base Emissions Rain Adj. Emissions Rain Adj. Emissions District Rule 8061/ISR Adjusted VMT Daily (million/year) (PM10 tpy) (PM10 tpy) (PM10 tons/day) Control Rates Emissions Enter Freeway VMT ==> Freeway 5,451,111 1,990 152.028 146.926 0.403 0.075 0.372 Enter Arterial VMT ==> Arterial 7,367,086 2,689 341.900 330.426 0.905 0.282 0.650 Enter Collector VMT ==> Collector 593,478 217 27.543 26.618 0.073 0.407 0.043 Urban 2 0 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.324 0.000 Enter Total of Urban and Rural Rural 99,356 36 149.432 144.417 0.396 0.090 0.360 Local VMT Here => 273,708 Totals 13,511,033 4,932 670.903 648.389 1.776 1.426

STANISLAUS 2042

Control- VMT Base Emissions Rain Adj. Emissions Rain Adj. Emissions District Rule 8061/ISR Adjusted VMT Daily (million/year) (PM10 tpy) (PM10 tpy) (PM10 tons/day) Control Rates Emissions Enter Freeway VMT ==> Freeway 5,599,133 2,044 156.156 150.916 0.413 0.075 0.382 Enter Arterial VMT ==> Arterial 7,624,045 2,783 353.825 341.951 0.937 0.282 0.673 Enter Collector VMT ==> Collector 613,139 224 28.455 27.500 0.075 0.407 0.045 Urban 179,872 66 62.539 60.440 0.166 0.324 0.112 Enter Total of Urban and Rural Rural 102,502 37 154.163 148.990 0.408 0.090 0.371 Local VMT Here => 282,374 Totals 14,118,690 5,153 755.139 729.797 1.999 1.583

DO NOT CHANGE ANY ITEMS BELOW THIS LINE

STANISLAUS Road Type Base EF (lb PM10/ VMT HPMS Local Urban/Rural Percent Freeway 0.000152818 From 1998 Assembly of Statistical Reports - Caltrans Arterial 0.000254296 63.7% Urban Collector 0.000254296 36.3% Rural Local 0.00190513 100.0% Total Rural 0.008241141

STANISLAUS January February March April May June July August September October November December Total/Average Rain Days 9.0 8.0 7.7 4.7 2.0 1.0 0 0 1.0 2.3 5.7 7.3 48.7 Total Days 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 365 Rain Reduction Factor 0.93 0.93 0.94 0.96 0.98 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.98 0.95 0.94 0.97

10/23/2020 2021 FTIP Conformity Analysis EMFAC2014 Emission Estimates Stanislaus County

Unpaved Road Dust Emissions (tons/day)

STANISLAUS 2020

Control- Vehicle Passes VMT Base Emissions Rain Adj. Emissions Rain Adj. Emissions District Rule 8061/ISR Adjusted per Day Miles (1000/year) (PM10 tpy) (PM10 tpy) (PM10 tons/day) Control Rates Emissions City/County 47.02 10 171.6 171.623 148.585 0.407 0.333 0.272

STANISLAUS 2029

STANISLAUS 2037

STANISLAUS 2042

DO NOT CHANGE ANY ITEMS BELOW THIS LINE

STANISLAUS January February March April May June July August September October November December Total/Average Rain Days 9.0 8.00 7.7 4.7 2.0 1.0 0 0 1.0 2.3 5.7 7.3 48.7 Total Days 31 28.00 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 365 Rain Reduction Factor 0.71 0.71 0.75 0.84 0.94 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.92 0.81 0.76 0.87

10/23/2020 2021 FTIP Conformity Analysis EMFAC2014 Emission Estimates Stanislaus County

Road Construction Dust

STANISLAUS Description 2020 2029 2037 2042 Year Lane Miles Year Lane Miles Year Lane Miles Year Lane Miles Baseline 2005 3513 2020 4884 2029 5064 2037 5083 Horizon 2020 4,884 2029 5,064 2037 5,083 2042 5,083 Difference 15 1371 9 180 8 19 5 0

Lane Miles per Year 91 20 2 0

Acres Disturbed 355 78 9 0

Acre-Months 6381 1396 166 0

Emissions (tons/year) 701.952 153.600 18.240 0.000

Annual Average Day Emissions (tons) 1.923 0.421 0.050 0.000

District Rule 8021 Control Rates 0.290 0.290 0.290 0.290

Total Emissions (tons per day) 1.365 0.299 0.035 0.000

10/23/2020

Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

APPENDIX D

TIMELY IMPLEMENTATION DOCUMENTATION FOR TRANSPORTATION CONTROL MEASURES

Stanislaus Council of Governments RACM Timely Implementation Documentation

Commitment Commitment Commitment RACM Commitment Agency TIP TIP Project ID Project Description &RQIRUPLW\$QDO\VLV 20&RQIRUPLW\$QDO\VLV Description Schedule Funding 20

(as of July 2020) (as of September 2020)

ST 1.4 Ceres Implement fixed route bus service FY 2002/2003 CMAQ 2002 11400000089 Purchase new CNG Minibus Complete Complete

Install pedestrian facilities along the north side of Whitmore Avenue--Install pedestrian facilities along north ST 9.2/9.3/9.11/15.1 Hughson Whitmore Avenue from Charles Avenue to 6th 2003 CMAQ 2002 21400000029 Complete Complete side from Charles Ave to 6th St Street

Install pedestrian and bike facilities on Charles bike/ped. Facilities on Charles St. from Hughson Ave. to north 2004 TEA 2000 1001STA183C Complete Complete Street from Hughson Avenue to north of Fox Road of Fox Road

Try Transit Week, Modesto's International Festival and annual ST 1.7 Modesto Free Transit During Special Events not specified FTA, Local and fares 2000 21400000053 Complete Complete Thanksgiving dinner

Expansion of ATMS Northeast, ATMS Northwest $490,428/$805,000/$1,290,94 ST 5.1 Modesto 2002, 2003, 2002 and Phase III of CCT 0 CMAQ

2000 None Expand ATMS Northeast Complete Complete 2002 21400000039 Expand ATMS Northwest Complete Complete 2002 11400000067 Phase III of CCTV Complete Complete

ST 1.4 Oakdale Restructure transit to a fixed route service 2003 CMAQ 2002 11400000073 Purchase 2 natural gas trolleys Complete Complete

ST 5.3 Oakdale roundabout at Gilbert avenue and G Street 2004 $154,928 CMAQ 2004 21400000058 Gilbert Ave/"G" St Round-about Complete Complete

two bicycle/pedestrian trail projects and one bike ST 9.2/9.3/9.5/15.1 Oakdale 2005 $192,000/$10,000 CMAQ rack 2002 21400000055 Bicycle/pedestrian trail (PG & E) Complete Complete Project has successfully received E-76 for preliminary Project has successfully received E-76 for preliminary engineering. Project sponsor is reassessing schedule for 2002 11400000100 Bicycle/pedestrian trail (Valley View) engineering. Project delays due to staff turnover. Project the completion of project due to delays with receiving E- sponsor is currently reassessing schedule. 76. ST 9.2/9.3/9.5/15.1 Oakdale 2002 11400000097 Bike Racks Complete Complete

ROTA ( Riverbank ST 10.2 Bike Racks on Buses ongoing CMAQ 2000 11400000073 add bike racks to buses Complete Complete Oakdale Transit Authority)

Reduce Traffic Congestion at Major ST 5.3 Patterson ongoing CMAQ 2000 11400000101 Install traffic signals at Intersections 1. Ward @ Eagle and Complete Complete 2. Hwy 33 and M Street Complete Complete

ST 1.4/1.5 Riverbank Restructure transit to include a fixed route service 2003 CMAQ 2002 11400000073 Purchase 2 natural gas trolleys Complete Complete

ST 9.3 Riverbank Infill project to provide sidewalks 2004 $192,253 CMAQ 2002 21400000199 Downtown sidewalk infill project Complete Complete

Signal project at intersection of Hawkeye and E Hawkeye & Dels Lane -- install signal with interconnection ST 5.2/5.3/5.4/5.13 Turlock 2003 CMAQ 2002 11400000102 Complete Complete Del and coordination with existing signals

Canal drive, Quincy to daubenburger -- extend class 1 bicycle ST 9.2/9.3/9.5/15.1 Turlock Bike/ped trail on Canal Drive 2005 CMAQ 2002 11400000103 - 11400000104 Complete Complete path

1 Stanislaus Council of Governments RACM Timely Implementation Documentation

Commitment Commitment Commitment RACM Commitment Agency TIP TIP Project ID Project Description &RQIRUPLW\$QDO\VLV 20&RQIRUPLW\$QDO\VLV Description Schedule Funding

(as of July 2019) (as of July 2020)

Welch bike path extension from Amy Lane to ST 9.2/9.3 Waterford 2003 $136,336 CMAQ 2004 11400000106 Welch St, Amy to Bentley - construct bicycle path Complete Complete Bentley Street

Reduce Traffic Congestion at Major ST 5.3/5.4 County 2004 PFF; STP; STIP 2000 1. Albert Road Widening and improvements; Complete Complete Intersections; Site-specific TCMs 2. install five (5) traffic signals at: (a) Carpenter Rd @ Robertson; Complete Complete (b) Crows Landing @ Butte Ave; Complete Complete (c) Finch Rd @ Mariposa; Complete Complete (d) Keyes Rd @ Geer; and, Complete Complete Project under construction. Planned completion by the (e) Stoddard Rd @ Kiernan Ave Fall of Complete 2010.

ST 8.1 County Employee Ride Program on-going CMAQ 2002 + Amendment 21400000087 Transit Fare Subsidy Program Complete Complete

River Road bicycle project, Shackleford area ST 9.3/9.11 County sidewalk project, and Glenn/Luster/Maud sidewalk 2004 CMAQ project

On May 7, 2008 EPA concurred on TCM substitution for On May 7, 2008 EPA concurred on TCM substitution for this project. The substitute project (Grayson Road Bike this project. The substitute project (Grayson Road Bike 2002 21400000088 River Rd Bike Lane from Ninth St to Mitchell Rd Lane) was completed in August 2005. No further updates Lane) was completed in August 2005. No further updates are required. are required.

2002 11400000110 Construct sidewalks and curb ramps Complete Complete

2002 21400000083 School Sidewalk Program Complete Complete

Additional Projects Identified

ST 3.1 StanCOG Commute Connection 2002/2003 CMAQ 2002 11400000015 Provide regional rideshare services through FY2002/03 Complete Complete

Update traffic signal coordination program within the existing ST5.2 Ceres Coordinate Traffic Signal Systems CMAQ 2004 21400000204 Complete Complete system

Evaluate intersections (a) widen the south approach of the Site-Specific Transportation Control Central Avenue / Hatch Road intersection; (b) widen Service ST5.4 Ceres RSTP 2004 21400000258 Complete Complete Measures Road / Mitchell Road intersection; (c) Widen Whitmore Overpass

ST1.1 Modesto Regional Express Bus Program CMAQ 2004 21400000234 Purchase of buses to operate regional express bus service Complete Complete

CMAQ 2007 21400000396 Complete Complete

ST5.2 Modesto Coordinate Traffic Signal Systems CMAQ 2002 11400000066 Downtown Traffic Signal Coordination Complete Complete

2 Stanislaus Council of Governments RACM Timely Implementation Documentation

Commitment Commitment Commitment RACM Commitment Agency TIP TIP Project ID Project Description &RQIRUPLW\$QDO\VLV 20&RQIRUPLW\$QDO\VLV Description Schedule Funding (as of July ) (as of July 2020)

CMAQ 2004/2007 21400000238 Traffic Signal coordination outside the Downtown Core Complete Complete

Modesto Coordinate Traffic Signal Systems 2006/2007 CMAQ 2004 21400000238 Outside Downtown Traffic Signal Coordination. Complete Complete

Reduce Traffic Congestion at Major ST5.3 Modesto CMAQ 2002 11400000062 Construction of right turns at Scenic Ave & Bodem Ave. Complete Complete Intersections

Right Turn Lanes (a) CMAQ/Local 2004 EA 956525 Briggsmore Overpass (b) Orangeburg Complete Complete at Sisk

CMAQ/Local 2004 EA 956531 Construction of left turn lanes Briggsmore at McHenry Complete Complete

CMAQ/Local 2004 EA 4A0644 Install Traffic Signal detector loops Complete Complete

CMAQ/Local 2007/07 21400000206 Install Roundabout at Sharon and Maid Mariane Complete Complete

Geometric or traffic control improvements at specific Site-Specific Transportation Control ST5.4 Modesto Local Funds(CFD) N/A N/A congested intersections (a) Briggsmore Ave Complete Complete Measures (b) Pelandale Ave (c ) Floyd Ave

Traffic signal modification at 10th and G Streets, 11th and G CMAQ/Local 2004 EA 656420 Streets, 12th and G Streets, 14th and G Streets, and 17th and Complete Complete G Streets

CFD(Community facilities Pedestrian and Bicycle Overpasses Where ST15.2 Modesto District) and Modesto City N/A N/A Pedestrian overpass on Sylvan Avenue at Millbrook Avenue Complete Complete Safety Dictates Schools

Ecnicia Ave Roundabout- Install Roundabout w/signing ST5.13 Modesto Fewer stop signs CMAQ 2004 21400000204 Complete Complete & striping La Loma at Buena Vista & Conejo @ Encia

Modesto Fewer stop signs CMAQ 2004 21400000235 Roundabout at Sylvan/Roselle Complete Complete

ST5.2 Patterson Coordinate Traffic Signal Systems CMAQ 2004 21400000243 Ward Avenue/Las Palmas Ave Traffic Signals Complete Complete

Encourage the Purchase and use of alternative, ST17.15 Riverbank CMAQ 2002 11400000078 Purchase CNG Vehicles Complete Complete cleaner vehicles.

Encourage the Purchase and use of alternative, ST 17.15 Riverbank 2002/2003 CMAQ 2002 01STA200 Purchase CNG Vehicles Complete Complete cleaner vehicles

3 Stanislaus Council of Governments RACM Timely Implementation Documentation

Commitment Commitment Commitment RACM Commitment Agency TIP TIP Project ID Project Description &RQIRUPLW\$QDO\VLV 20&RQIRUPLW\$QDO\VLV Description Schedule Funding

(as of July 2019) (as of July 2020)

2002 FTA Section 5307 funds N/A N/A Purchase CNG Vehicles Complete Complete

2003/2004 CMAQ 2002 01STA201 Purchase CNG Vehicles Complete Complete

2004/2005 FTA Section 5307 funds N/A N/A Purchase CNG Vehicles Complete Complete

New Projects Identified

Reduce Traffic Congestion at Major ST5.3 Ceres 2007 CMAQ 2004/2007 21400000224 Traffic Signal Coordination Complete Complete Intersections

ST 9.2/9.3/9.5/15.1/10.2 Oakdale/Riverbank Bike racks on buses 2002 21400000336 Bike racks Complete Complete

ST9.2 Patterson Encouragement of Pedestrian Travel 2007 CMAQ/Local 2004/07 21400000349 Class I and II Bike Lane and pedestrian facilities Complete Complete

Encourage the purchase and use of alternative ST17.15 Riverbank 2006 CMAQ/Local 2004/07 21400000245 Purchase CNG VAC Truck Complete Complete cleaner vehicles

ST1.4 Turlock Mass Transit Alternatives 2008 FTA Section 5307 funds 2007 21400000373 Purchase new bus Complete Complete

ST10.2 Turlock Bike Racks on Buses 2008 FTA Section 5307 funds 2007 21400000373 Bike Racks Complete Complete

Encourage the purchase and use of alternative ST 17.15 Turlock 2007 CMAQ/Local 2007 21400000247 Purchase CNG Vehicles Complete Complete cleaner vehicles

4 Stanislaus Council of Governments Conformity Analysis for 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP Amendment #2

APPENDIX E

PUBLIC MEETING PROCESS DOCUMENTATION Affidavit of Publication PUBLIC NOTICE STANISLAUS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS (STANCOG) To make a public comment during the PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND Public Hearing, please use the •Raise PUBLIC REVIEW AND COMMENT Hand" feature In GoToWeblnar and you PERIOD ON THE will be called on by the chair during the DRAFT2021FEDERAL meeting. TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (FTIP), DRAFT 2018 Option 2: To listen to the meeting by REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION teleconference only, use the above PLAN (RTP) AMENDMENT 2, AND phone number and acc~ss code. Using CORRESPONDING DRAFT CONFORMITY this option, your comments must be ANALYSIS submitted via email to publkcomment@ stancog org or by calling 209-525-460·0 ·NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the by 3:00 pm on November 18. Comments Stanislaus Council of Govetnments will be shared with Polley Board members (StanCOG) will hold a public hearing on and placed Into the record during the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, November 18, 2020 at 6:00 p.m. during public hearing. Every effort will be made the StanCOG Polley Board meeting for to read comments received Into the County of Stanislaus the purpose of receiving comments on record, but some comments may not be . the Draft 2021 Federal Transportation read due to tii;ne limitations. Improvement Program (FTIP), Draft 2018 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Spanish translation services will be Amendment 2, and the corresponding available at the hearing and other KATICA KROLL Draft Conformity Analysis. language support or reasonable Ame\icans with Dlsabllltles Act The 2021 HIP Is a near-term accommodations may be requested 72 Of the said County, being duly sworn, deposes and listing of capital Improvement and hours In advance of the hearing. operational expenditures utilizing federal says: and state monies for transportation Public comments can also be submitted projects In Stanlsla4s County during the during a 30-day public review and I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of next four years. comment period, which will commence the county aforesaid; I am over the age of on October 28, 2020 and conclude on The 2018 RTP/SCS Is a long November 30, 2020 at 2:00 p.m. Written twenty-one years, and not a party to or interested term coordinated transportation/land comments can be submitted to the use strategy to meet Stanislaus County's StanCOG office via U. S. Mail at 111 1 I m the above entitled matter. I am the principal transportation needs out to the year Street, Suite 308, Modesto, CA, 95354, clerk of CERES COURIER, 121 South Center Street, 2042. latte ntion Debbie Truj illo, Assistant nd Planner or via email at publiccomment@ 2 Floor, Turlock, California, a newspaper of general The corresponding r- stancog.org. Comments received by 2:00 Conformity Analysis contains the p.m. on November 20, 2020 w ill be made circulation, published in Ceres, California in the City documentation to support a finding a part of the record. that the 2021 FTIP and 2018 RTP/SCS of Ceres, County of Stanislaus, and which newspaper Amendment 2 meet the air quality This public notice also satisfies the has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation, conformity requirements for ozone and Program of Projects (POP) req uirements particulate matter. of the Federa l Transit Administration (FTA) by the Superior Court of the County of Stanislaus, Urbanized Area Formula Program, Se ction The Polley Board, meeting will be held 5307, and the Bus and Bus Facilities State of California. That the remotely using the video conferencing Program, Section 5339. If no comments notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in software GoToWeblnar. In accordance are received on the proposed POP, the with Governor Newsom's Executive Order proposed transit program (funded w ith N-29-20, the StariCOG Boa.rd Room will be type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published FTA 53 07 and FTA 5339 dollars) will be the closed to the public during the November final program. in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper 18th Polley Board meeting and Public Hearing. In the interest of maintaining Further information or a ha rd copy appropriate social distancing measures, of the document may be obtained members of the public may participate by contacting the Sta nCOG Office at In the meeting electronically and shall (209) 525-4600. Th e draft document have the right to observe and offer public is available on the StanCOG website at comment during the meeting. www.stancog.org located under the OCTOBER 28, 2020 Fea tured Information section of the The following options are available to > homepage. members of the public to listen to the Policy Board meeting and Public Hearing After consideri ng the comments, I certify ( or declare) under penalty of perjury that the and provide comments to the Polley the document w ill be cons idered for th Board members during the meeting: foregoing is true and correct, this 28 day of October, adoption, by resolution, by the StanCOG Policy Boa rd at a reg ularly scheduled 2020 Option 1: To listen and speak, Join the meeting from your_computer or tablet. meeting to be held on Jan uary 20, 2021. Please register at anytime In advance Th e document w ill then be submitted to of the StanCOG November Polley Board state and fe dera l agencies for approval. Meeting on November 18, 2020 at: -C!>ntact Person: https·//attendee gotoweblnarcom/ Debbie Trujillo, Assistant Planner reglster/51 2306BSB247190B00 StanCOG After registering, you will receive 11 11 I Street, Suite 308 a confirmation email containing Modesto, CA 95354 Instructions for Joining the weblnar. Publication Date: 10/28/2020 CC#l0-06 Participants will also need to use a telephone for audio purposes. Dial In using the following phone number and access code with your telephone: + 1 (41 S) 655-0060 Access Code: 358-998-548