DOCSLIB.ORG

Explaining Why Gleevec Is a Specific and Potent Inhibitor of Abl Kinase

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Explaining Why Gleevec Is a Specific and Potent Inhibitor of Abl Kinase Explaining why Gleevec is a specific and potent inhibitor of Abl kinase Yen-Lin Lina,1, Yilin Menga,1, Wei Jiangb, and Benoît Rouxa,b,2 aDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Gordon Center for Integrative Science, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637; and bBiosciences Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439 Edited by Axel T. Brunger, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, and approved December 12, 2012 (received for review August 20, 2012) Tyrosine kinases present attractive drug targets for specifictypes inhibition. Because the DFG-out conformation had never been of cancers. Gleevec, a well-known therapeutic agent against chronic observed previously with other related tyrosine kinases of the Src myelogenous leukemia, is an effective inhibitor of Abl tyrosine family, it was initially thought that this inactive conformation was kinase. However, Gleevec fails to inhibit closely homologous tyrosine only accessible to Abl kinase, leading to the suggestion that the low kinases, such as c-Src. Because many structural features of the binding affinity of Gleevec to c-Src might reflect its inability to adopt binding site are conserved, the molecular determinants responsible a DFG-out conformation. However, the latter was subsequently for binding specificity are not immediately apparent. Some have observed in an X-ray structure of c-Src in the DFG-out inactive attributed the difference in binding specificity of Gleevec to subtle conformation in complex with Gleevec (7), thus ruling out this variations in ligand–protein interactions (binding affinity control), possibility. Therefore, despite the extensive experimental studies and whereas others have proposed that it is the conformation of the the X-ray structures of Abl and c-Src, the basic question remains DFG motif, in which ligand binding is only accessible to Abl and not unanswered: Why is Gleevec a specific and potent inhibitor of Abl to c-Src (conformational selection control). To address this issue, the but not of c-Src? Two distinct mechanisms, binding affinity and absolute binding free energy was computed using all-atom molecu- conformational selection, have been invoked to explain the differ- lar dynamics simulations with explicit solvent. The results of the free ences in the binding specificity of Gleevec. In the first, it is hypoth- energy simulations are in good agreement with experiments, esized that specificity arises primarily from differences in binding thereby enabling a meaningful decomposition of the binding free affinities caused by subtle variations in the residue sequence of the ’ energy to elucidate the factors controlling Gleevec s binding speci- binding pocket presented by Abl and c-Src in the DFG-out confor- fi city. The latter is shown to be controlled by a conformational selec- mation. In the second, it is proposed that the DFG-out conforma- tion mechanism and also by differences in key van der Waals tion, although being accessible to both kinases, incurs a higher free interactions responsible for the stabilization of Gleevec in the bind- energy penalty in c-Src compared with Abl. ing pocket of Abl. Although a contrast can be drawn between the binding affinity and conformational selection mechanisms, both are necessarily thermodynamics | alchemical free energy perturbation | sampling oversimplified. Nevertheless, it is difficult to achieve a deeper un- derstanding of the underlying mechanism of the binding specificity yrosine kinases are crucial to cellular signaling pathways regu- of Gleevec without a detailed dissection of the equilibrium associ- ( ) Tlating cell growth, and for this reason, they represent attractive ation constant or absolute (standard) binding free energy, ΔGeq ° , drug targets for curing certain types of cancers. The development of in terms of all the thermodynamic contributions associated with the kinase inhibitors is, however, challenging because of the high se- protein conformational change and ligand binding. Achieving this quence conservation of the kinase ATP-binding site, the major site directly by experimental means is difficult because critical con- targeted by these small molecules. The difficulties encountered by tributions remain essentially “hidden” from direct experimental these efforts are displayed most clearly by Gleevec (Novartis), measurements. Computations based on atomic models offer a vir- a potent inhibitor of Abl tyrosine kinase (1). Gleevec is one of the tual, albeit approximate, route to address these issues. The binding most successful drugs against chronic myelogenous leukemia (2), of tyrosine-kinase inhibitors to target kinases has been the object of a pathological condition that is caused by mutations leading to a number of computational studies (8–14). So far, two computa- a constitutively activated Abl kinase (3, 4). The remarkable effec- tional studies have presented evidence supporting the view that tiveness of Gleevec raised the hope that one might be able to de- Gleevec binding specificity to Abl and c-Src is controlled by con- velop novel kinase inhibitors for specific cancers. The situation is formational selection (11, 14). However, the absolute binding free nonetheless complicated by the fact that Gleevec displays a much ( ) energy of Gleevec, ΔGeq ° , has never been calculated within lower inhibitory effect on c-Src for unclear reasons, even though a single and consistent computational model and methodology, and these two tyrosine kinases display a high degree of sequence the origin of binding specificity of Gleevec ultimately remains un- identity (47%) and similar structural scaffolds (Fig. 1). From this resolved despite previous efforts. In the present study, we report perspective, understanding the molecular basis for the binding complete computations of the absolute binding free energies of fi speci city of Gleevec is likely to hold important lessons for the Gleevec to the catalytic domain of Abl and c-Src kinases using de- rational design of kinase inhibitors in general. tailed all-atom molecular dynamics (MD) simulations with explicit The X-ray crystallographic structure of the Abl kinase in com- solvent molecules. The computations allow the identification of the plex with Gleevec revealed an important clue to understand the molecular basis of binding specificity explaining the binding spec- fi i city of Gleevec to Abl (5). A short motif composed of the resi- Author contributions: Y.-L.L., Y.M., W.J., and B.R. designed research; Y.-L.L. and Y.M. dues Asp-Phe-Gly near the N-terminal region of the activation performed research; Y.-L.L., Y.M., W.J., and B.R. analyzed data; and Y.-L.L., Y.M., W.J., loop (A-loop) adopted an unusual conformation referred to as and B.R. wrote the paper. “DFG-out,” giving rise to a previously unobserved inactive con- The authors declare no conflict of interest. formational state of the catalytic domain. This binding mode This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. contributing to the selectivity of Gleevec to Abl has been further 1Y.-L.L. and Y.M. contributed equally to this work. confirmed by a solution NMR study (6). The binding of Gleevec to 2To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected]. the DFG-out conformation appears to prevent the transition to This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10. the conformationally active form of the kinase, hence causing 1073/pnas.1214330110/-/DCSupplemental. 1664–1669 | PNAS | January 29, 2013 | vol. 110 | no. 5 www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1214330110 Downloaded by guest on October 2, 2021 Abl:Gleevec c-Src:Gleevec was obtained by integration of the Boltzmann factor of the 2D- PMF over the variable associated with the side-chain rotation of P-loop P-loop C-helix the aspartate residue (Fig. S1 shows the calculated 2D-PMFs for the DFG-flip in Abl and c-Src). The overall stability of the out vs. in C-helix ΔG = G − G A-loop conformation of the DFG motif, in→out [ out in], is esti- DFG mated to be 1.4 kcal/mol for Abl and 5.4 kcal/mol for c-Src. This motif shows that there is an inherent conformational selection phe- nomenon and that the inactive DFG-out conformation is more A-loop stable in Abl than in c-Src. Previous computational results based on metadynamics found a ΔGin→out of 4.0 kcal/mol and 6.0 kcal/mol for Abl and c-Src, respectively (14), confirming that the DFG flip is Fig. 1. Structural comparison of Abl and c-Src in the Gleevec-bound more costly in c-Src than in Abl. kinase domain. Binding Free Energy of Gleevec to the DFG-Out Conformation. The second task is to determine the absolute binding free energy of molecular determinants of ligand-protein recognition controlling Gleevec from a bulk solution to the binding pockets of Abl and fi the binding speci city of Gleevec, thereby permitting an objective c-Src with the DFG motif in the out configuration. Table 1 evaluation of the previously proposed mechanisms. The study summarizes the various free energy contributions to the binding demonstrates that the MD simulations, when combined with a rig- affinity of the ligand with the kinases [progression of the free orous step-by-step formulation of absolute binding free energy, energy during successive FEP/λ-replica exchange molecular dy- together with extensive sampling methodologies, can provide criti- namics (REMD) cycles is shown in Fig. S2]. When the DFG cal information underlying protein-ligand binding to help guide motif is in the out conformation, the absolute binding free en- rational de novo drug design. ergy of Gleevec to Abl kinase and c-Src is estimated be to −10.8 kcal/mol and −6.8 kcal/mol, respectively (these numbers include Results and Discussion the contribution for restricting the ligand conformations calcu- All the free energy contributions must be accounted for to draw lated from the rmsd PMF). This shows that when the two kinases fi de nitive conclusions about the mechanism underlying the bind- are in the DFG-out conformation, Abl provides a more favorable fi fl ing speci city of Gleevec to Abl and c-Src kinases (i.e., DFG- ip binding pocket than c-Src.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2025.Full-Text.Pdf
    Human Cancer Biology Inhibition of Phosphotyrosine Phosphatase 1B Causes Resistance in BCR-ABL-PositiveLeukemiaCellstotheABLKinaseInhibitorSTI571 Noriko Koyama,1Steffen Koschmieder,1SandhyaTyagi,1Ignacio Portero-Robles,1Jo« rg Chromic,1 Silke Myloch,1Heike Nu« rnberger,1Ta nja Ro s s m a ni t h , 1Wolf-Karsten Hofmann,2 Dieter Hoelzer,1and Oliver Gerhard Ottmann1 Abstract Protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B(PTP1B) is a negative regulator of BCR-ABL-mediated transfor- mation in vitro and in vivo. Toinvestigate whether PTP1B modulates the biological effects of the abl kinase inhibitor STI571in BCR-ABL-positive cells, we transfected Philadelphia chromosome ^ positive (Ph+) chronic myeloid leukemia cell-derived K562 cells with either wild-type PTP1B (K562/PTP1B), a substrate-trapping dominant-negative mutant PTP1B(K562/D181A), or empty vector (K562/mock). Cells were cultured with or without STI571and analyzed for its effects on proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. In both K562/mock and K562/PTP1B cells, 0.25 to 1 Amol/L STI571 induced dose-dependent growth arrest and apoptosis, as measured by a decrease of cell proliferation and an increase of Annexin V-positive cells and/or of cells in the sub-G1 apoptotic phase. Western blot analysis showed increased protein levels of activated caspase-3 and caspase-8 and induction of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase cleavage. Low con- centrations of STI571promoted erythroid differentiation of these cells. Conversely, K562/D181A cells displayed significantly lower PTP1B-specific tyrosine phosphatase activity and were signifi- cantly less sensitive to STI571-induced growth arrest, apoptosis, and erythroid differentiation. Pharmacologic inhibition of PTP1B activity in wild-type K562 cells, using bis(N,N-dimethylhy- droxamido)hydroxooxovanadate, attenuated STI571-induced apoptosis.
    [Show full text]
  • Insulin Receptor Substrates-5 and -6 Are Poor Substrates for the Insulin Receptor
    MOLECULAR MEDICINE REPORTS 3: 189-193, 2010 189 Insulin receptor substrates-5 and -6 are poor substrates for the insulin receptor SoETkIn VERSTEyHE1, CHRISToPHE BlanqUart2,3, CoRnElIa HamPE2,3, SHaUkaT maHmooD1, nEVEna CHRISTEFF2,3, PIERRE DE MEYTS1, STEVEn G. GRay1,4 and TARIK ISSAD2,3 1Receptor Systems Biology laboratory, Hagedorn Research Institute, novo nordisk a/S, 2820 Gentofte, Denmark; 2Institut Cochin, Université Paris Descartes, CnRS (UmR 8104), 75014 Paris; 3Inserm, U567, 75654 Paris, France; 4Translational Cancer Research Group, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, Institute of molecular medicine, St James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland Received September 30, 2009; accepted november 13, 2009 DoI: 10.3892/mmr_00000239 Abstract. Insulin receptor substrates (IRS)-5 and -6 are two leads to the activation of receptor tyrosine kinase and receptor recently identified members of the IRS family. We investi- phosphorylation, which enables the binding of docking proteins gated their roles as insulin receptor substrates and compared such as insulin receptor substrates (IRS)-1, -2, -3 and -4 and them with Src-homology-2-containing (Shc) protein, a Src-homology-2-containing protein (Shc). This in turn leads to well-established substrate. Bioluminescence resonance their phosphorylation and, thereby, intracellular signalling (1). energy transfer (BRET) experiments showed no interaction Until recently, the IRS family included IRS-1, -2, -3 and between the receptor and IRS-5, while interaction with IRS-6 -4 (2) and three downstream of kinases, Dok-1, -2 and -3. was not enhanced by insulin. By contrast, Shc showed an These seven proteins have similar amino-terminal pleckstrin insulin-induced BRET response, as did a truncated form of homology (PH) and similar phosphotyrosine binding (PTB) IRS-1 (1-262).
    [Show full text]
  • Insulin Activates the Insulin Receptor to Downregulate the PTEN Tumour Suppressor
    Oncogene (2014) 33, 3878–3885 OPEN & 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 0950-9232/14 www.nature.com/onc ORIGINAL ARTICLE Insulin activates the insulin receptor to downregulate the PTEN tumour suppressor J Liu1, S Visser-Grieve2,4, J Boudreau1, B Yeung2,SLo1, G Chamberlain1,FYu1, T Sun3,5, T Papanicolaou1, A Lam1, X Yang2 and I Chin-Sang1 Insulin and insulin-like growth factor-1 signaling have fundamental roles in energy metabolism, growth and development. Recent research suggests hyperactive insulin receptor (IR) and hyperinsulinemia are cancer risk factors. However, the mechanisms that account for the link between the hyperactive insulin signaling and cancer risk are not well understood. Here we show that an insulin-like signaling inhibits the DAF-18/(phosphatase and tensin homolog) PTEN tumour suppressor in Caenorhabditis elegans and that this regulation is conserved in human breast cancer cells. We show that inhibiting the IR increases PTEN protein levels, while increasing insulin signaling decreases PTEN protein levels. Our results show that the kinase region of IRb subunit physically binds to PTEN and phosphorylates on Y27 and Y174. Our genetic results also show that DAF-2/IR negatively regulates DAF-18/PTEN during C. elegans axon guidance. As PTEN is an important tumour suppressor, our results therefore suggest a possible mechanism for increased cancer risk observed in hyperinsulinemia and hyperactive IR individuals. Oncogene (2014) 33, 3878–3885; doi:10.1038/onc.2013.347; published online 2 September 2013 Keywords: PTEN; C. elegans; tumour suppressor; cancer; insulin signaling; genetics INTRODUCTION tumour suppression and further substantiate the importance of Insulin and insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1 signaling are the PTEN regulation in cancer progression.
    [Show full text]
  • Real-Time Quantification of BCR-ABL Mrna Transcripts Using the Lightcycler-T(9;22) Quantification Kit
    real-time-quantification 09.05.2000 19:18 Uhr Seite 8 Real-time Quantification of BCR-ABL mRNA Transcripts Using the LightCycler-t(9;22) Quantification Kit Heiko Wittor 1, Hermann Leying 1, Andreas Hochhaus 2, and Rob van Miltenburg 1 1 Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Penzberg, Germany 2 III. Medizinische Universitätsklinik, Fakultät für Klinische Medizin Mannheim der Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany ly different starting concentrations, so that the initial Introduction target concentration can be determined in a single PCR. The concentration of BCR-ABL transcripts is determi- Literature indicates that in 95 % of all subjects with ned relative to the number of transcripts of a control chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and in 25-30 % of gene, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH). subjects with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) a The entire procedure from sample preparation to reciprocal translocation between the long arms of quantitative result is performed in 4.5 hours. chromosome 9 and chromosome 22 [t(9;22)] can be found. This translocation or the resulting fusion pro- duct can be detected by a number of techniques, CLER including fluorescent in situ hybridization, Southern CY blotting, western blotting and reverse transcriptase TThe LightCycler System polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Of these techni- The LightCycler System is based on the amplification LIGHT ques, RT-PCR for the chimeric fusion transcript BCR- of target sequences using alternating heated and ABL has received most attention in relation to the ambient temperature cycles. Samples are contained in detection of minimal residual disease because of its glass capillaries with high surface-to-volume ratio, high sensitivity (1).
    [Show full text]
  • RET Gene Fusions in Malignancies of the Thyroid and Other Tissues
    G C A T T A C G G C A T genes Review RET Gene Fusions in Malignancies of the Thyroid and Other Tissues Massimo Santoro 1,*, Marialuisa Moccia 1, Giorgia Federico 1 and Francesca Carlomagno 1,2 1 Department of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; [email protected] (M.M.); [email protected] (G.F.); [email protected] (F.C.) 2 Institute of Endocrinology and Experimental Oncology of the CNR, 80131 Naples, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 10 March 2020; Accepted: 12 April 2020; Published: 15 April 2020 Abstract: Following the identification of the BCR-ABL1 (Breakpoint Cluster Region-ABelson murine Leukemia) fusion in chronic myelogenous leukemia, gene fusions generating chimeric oncoproteins have been recognized as common genomic structural variations in human malignancies. This is, in particular, a frequent mechanism in the oncogenic conversion of protein kinases. Gene fusion was the first mechanism identified for the oncogenic activation of the receptor tyrosine kinase RET (REarranged during Transfection), initially discovered in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). More recently, the advent of highly sensitive massive parallel (next generation sequencing, NGS) sequencing of tumor DNA or cell-free (cfDNA) circulating tumor DNA, allowed for the detection of RET fusions in many other solid and hematopoietic malignancies. This review summarizes the role of RET fusions in the pathogenesis of human cancer. Keywords: kinase; tyrosine kinase inhibitor; targeted therapy; thyroid cancer 1. The RET Receptor RET (REarranged during Transfection) was initially isolated as a rearranged oncoprotein upon the transfection of a human lymphoma DNA [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Inhibition of Syk Protein Tyrosine Kinase Induces Apoptosis and Blocks Proliferation in T-Cell Non-Hodgkin’S Lymphoma Cell Lines
    Letters to the Editor 229 Figure 1 (a–d) The BCR–ABL variants show similar tyrosine phosphorylation profiles in vitro.(a) Domain organization of the three BCR–ABL variants tested in this study. The coiled-coil (CC), DBL and pleckstrin homology (PH) domains pertain to BCR; the SH3, SH2 and TK domains pertain to ABL. The p200BCR–ABL variant lacks the PH domain, while p190BCR–ABL lacks both the PH and DBL-like domains. Each BCR–ABL variant was stably expressed in 32D cells and whole-cell lysates were subjected to immunoblot analysis with antibodies specific for (b) ABL or (c) global tyrosine phosphorylation (4G10). (d) Immunoblot analysis of STAT5 and STAT6 phosphorylation in whole cell lysates from Ba/F3 cells expressing each of the three BCR–ABL variants. (e–h) Deletion of the PH domain is sufficient to increase the lymphoid transformation potency of BCR–ABL. Donor bone marrow cells from (e) 5-FU-treated Balb/c mice or (f) non-5-FU-treated Balb/c mice were infected with equivalent titer retrovirus expressing p210BCR–ABL, p200BCR–ABL or p190BCR–ABL and transplanted into lethally irradiated recipient mice. Kaplan–Meier survival curves are shown. Mortality events due to CML-like disease, B-ALL-like disease and unrelated causes are marked with square, circle and triangle symbols, respectively. (g, h) Representative fluorescence-activated cell sorting analyzes for CML-like and B-ALL-like disease, respectively. Peripheral blood cells were measured for GFP expression on the y axis. The x axis represents staining with antibodies specific for myeloid cells (Ly6G), B cells (B220), T cells (Thy1.2), early myeloid cells (CD11b) or erythroid cells (Ter119).
    [Show full text]
  • Ipsogen® BCR-ABL1 Mbcr Kit Handbook
    July 2016 ipsogen® BCR-ABL1 Mbcr IS-MMR Kit Handbook 24 Version 1 Quantitative in vitro diagnostics For use with Rotor-Gene® Q, Applied Biosystems®, ABI PRISM®, and LightCycler® instruments 670723 QIAGEN GmbH, QIAGEN Strasse 1, 40724 Hilden, GERMANY R3 1072509EN Sample & Assay Technologies QIAGEN Sample and Assay Technologies QIAGEN is the leading provider of innovative sample and assay technologies, enabling the isolation and detection of contents of any biological sample. Our advanced, high-quality products and services ensure success from sample to result. QIAGEN sets standards in: Purification of DNA, RNA, and proteins Nucleic acid and protein assays microRNA research and RNAi Automation of sample and assay technologies Our mission is to enable you to achieve outstanding success and breakthroughs. For more information, visit www.qiagen.com. Contents Intended Use 5 Summary and Explanation 5 Background on CML 5 Disease monitoring 5 Principle of the Procedure 7 Materials Provided 9 Kit contents 9 Materials Required but Not Provided 10 Warnings and Precautions 11 General precautions 11 Reagent Storage and Handling 12 Specimen Handling and Storage 12 Procedure 13 Sample RNA preparation 13 Protocols Reverse transcription using SuperScript III Reverse Transcriptase 13 qPCR on Rotor Gene Q MDx 5plex HRM or Rotor-Gene Q 5plex HRM instruments with 72-tube rotor 16 qPCR on Applied Biosystems 7500 Real-Time PCR System, ABI PRISM 7900HT SDS, and LightCycler 480 instruments 20 qPCR on LightCycler 1.2, 1.5, and 2.0 Instruments 26 Interpretation
    [Show full text]
  • Targeting ALK: Precision Medicine Takes on Drug Resistance
    Published OnlineFirst January 25, 2017; DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-16-1123 REVIEW Targeting ALK: Precision Medicine Takes on Drug Resistance Jessica J. Lin 1 , Gregory J. Riely 2 , and Alice T. Shaw 1 ABSTRACT Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) is a validated molecular target in several ALK - rearranged malignancies, including non–small cell lung cancer. However, the clinical benefi t of targeting ALK using tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) is almost universally limited by the emergence of drug resistance. Diverse mechanisms of resistance to ALK TKIs have now been discov- ered, and these basic mechanisms are informing the development of novel therapeutic strategies to overcome resistance in the clinic. In this review, we summarize the current successes and challenges of targeting ALK. Signifi cance: Effective long-term treatment of ALK -rearranged cancers requires a mechanistic under- standing of resistance to ALK TKIs so that rational therapies can be selected to combat resistance. This review underscores the importance of serial biopsies in capturing the dynamic therapeutic vulnerabili- ties within a patient’s tumor and offers a perspective into the complexity of on-target and off-target ALK TKI resistance mechanisms. Therapeutic strategies that can successfully overcome, and poten- tially prevent, these resistance mechanisms will have the greatest impact on patient outcome. Cancer Discov; 7(2); 137–55. ©2017 AACR. INTRODUCTION trials demonstrating remarkable responses in this patient population ( 3–8 ). Yet, as with any targeted therapy, tumor The discovery of anaplastic lymphoma kinase ( ALK ) dates cells evolve and invariably acquire resistance to ALK TKIs, back to 1994 when a chromosomal rearrangement t(2;5), leading to clinical relapse.
    [Show full text]
  • Abnormality of C-Kit Oncoprotein in Certain Patients with Chronic
    Leukemia (2002) 16, 170–177 2002 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0887-6924/02 $25.00 www.nature.com/leu Abnormality of c-kit oncoprotein in certain patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia – potential clinical significance K Inokuchi, H Yamaguchi, M Tarusawa, M Futaki, H Hanawa, S Tanosaki and K Dan Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan Chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) is characterized by the patients, there are two bcr/abl mRNAs for P210BCR/ABL, one Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome and bcr/abl gene rearrangement with and one without exon b3 (b3-a2 type and b2-a2 type).4 which occurs in pluripotent hematopoietic progenitor cells expressing the c-kit receptor tyrosine kinase (KIT). To elucidate In a smaller number of CML patients, there are two other types the biological properties of KIT in CML leukemogenesis, we of bcr/abl mRNAs based on the breakpoint positions of the performed analysis of alterations of the c-kit gene and func- bcr gene, ie m-bcr and ␮-bcr for P190BCR/ABL and P230BCR/ABL, tional analysis of altered KIT proteins. Gene alterations in the respectively.5,6 Extensive studies have been performed on the c-kit juxtamembrane domain of 80 CML cases were analyzed subtypes of the bcr/abl gene and their relation to the prognosis by reverse transcriptase and polymerase chain reaction-single and clinical features.7,8 The established findings regarding the strand conformation polymorphism (RT-PCR-SSCP). One case had an abnormality at codon 564 (AAT→AAG, Asn→Lys), and influence of the subtype of the bcr/abl gene (b3-a2 or b2-a2) six cases had the same base abnormality at codon 541 on the clinical characteristics have been similar for each sub- (ATG→CTG, Met→Leu) in the juxtamembrane domain.
    [Show full text]
  • Laboratory Test to Detect Mutations in ABL Gene Conferring Resistance To
    Laboratory Test to Detect Mutations in the BCR-ABL fusion Gene Conferring Resistance to Gleevec The UNC Hospitals Molecular Genetics Laboratory performs reverse transcriptase PCR (RT- PCR) sequencing analysis to detect mutations in the kinase domain of the BCR-ABL fusion gene associated with resistance to Gleevec. Biology of the disease state: Gleevec® (imatinib mesylate, STI571), a targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is the current therapy of first choice for patients suffering from chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). The drug works by binding the active site of the ABL kinase, stabilizing the inactive form of BCR- ABL, and inhibiting phosphorylation and downstream activation. Response to Gleevec has been significantly better than with other available therapies, with fewer side effects. Even in the best responders, however, some BCR-ABL positive cells usually remain. Many patients who initially respond to Gleevec have been shown to relapse after a period of time due to the development of resistance. The most common mechanism of resistance to Gleevec is due to mutations in the ABL kinase domain that affect the ability of Gleevec to bind to the active site. This may occur through steric interference within the site itself or by changing the conformation of the fusion protein so that the binding site is masked. Clinical utility of testing for Gleevec® resistance mutations: It is recommended that CML patients on Gleevec be monitored with quantitative RT- PCR and that patients with a log increase in quantitative bcr-abl levels be assayed for the presence of Gleevec-resistance mutations. Depending on the exact mutation present, clinical intervention such as increasing dosage of Gleevec or adding another kinase inhibitor may be effective in controlling the levels of BCR-ABL.
    [Show full text]
  • Targeting the Function of the HER2 Oncogene in Human Cancer Therapeutics
    Oncogene (2007) 26, 6577–6592 & 2007 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0950-9232/07 $30.00 www.nature.com/onc REVIEW Targeting the function of the HER2 oncogene in human cancer therapeutics MM Moasser Department of Medicine, Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA The year 2007 marks exactly two decades since human HER3 (erbB3) and HER4 (erbB4). The importance of epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) was func- HER2 in cancer was realized in the early 1980s when a tionally implicated in the pathogenesis of human breast mutationally activated form of its rodent homolog neu cancer (Slamon et al., 1987). This finding established the was identified in a search for oncogenes in a carcinogen- HER2 oncogene hypothesis for the development of some induced rat tumorigenesis model(Shih et al., 1981). Its human cancers. An abundance of experimental evidence human homologue, HER2 was simultaneously cloned compiled over the past two decades now solidly supports and found to be amplified in a breast cancer cell line the HER2 oncogene hypothesis. A direct consequence (King et al., 1985). The relevance of HER2 to human of this hypothesis was the promise that inhibitors of cancer was established when it was discovered that oncogenic HER2 would be highly effective treatments for approximately 25–30% of breast cancers have amplifi- HER2-driven cancers. This treatment hypothesis has led cation and overexpression of HER2 and these cancers to the development and widespread use of anti-HER2 have worse biologic behavior and prognosis (Slamon antibodies (trastuzumab) in clinical management resulting et al., 1989).
    [Show full text]
  • Protein Tyrosine Kinases: Their Roles and Their Targeting in Leukemia
    cancers Review Protein Tyrosine Kinases: Their Roles and Their Targeting in Leukemia Kalpana K. Bhanumathy 1,*, Amrutha Balagopal 1, Frederick S. Vizeacoumar 2 , Franco J. Vizeacoumar 1,3, Andrew Freywald 2 and Vincenzo Giambra 4,* 1 Division of Oncology, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5E5, Canada; [email protected] (A.B.); [email protected] (F.J.V.) 2 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5E5, Canada; [email protected] (F.S.V.); [email protected] (A.F.) 3 Cancer Research Department, Saskatchewan Cancer Agency, 107 Wiggins Road, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5E5, Canada 4 Institute for Stem Cell Biology, Regenerative Medicine and Innovative Therapies (ISBReMIT), Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, 71013 San Giovanni Rotondo, FG, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected] (K.K.B.); [email protected] (V.G.); Tel.: +1-(306)-716-7456 (K.K.B.); +39-0882-416574 (V.G.) Simple Summary: Protein phosphorylation is a key regulatory mechanism that controls a wide variety of cellular responses. This process is catalysed by the members of the protein kinase su- perfamily that are classified into two main families based on their ability to phosphorylate either tyrosine or serine and threonine residues in their substrates. Massive research efforts have been invested in dissecting the functions of tyrosine kinases, revealing their importance in the initiation and progression of human malignancies. Based on these investigations, numerous tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been included in clinical protocols and proved to be effective in targeted therapies for various haematological malignancies.
    [Show full text]