Agglomeration Under Forward-Looking Expectations: Potentials and Global Stability∗
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Country Perspectives on the Challenges to Nuclear Disarmament
Reducing and Eliminating Nuclear Weapons: Country Perspectives on the Challenges to Nuclear Disarmament Reducing and Eliminating Nuclear Weapons: Country Perspectives on the Challenges to Nuclear Disarmament www.fissilematerials.org © 2010 International Panel on Fissile Materials This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License To view a copy of this license, visit www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 Table of Contents About the IPFM 1 Overview 2 Country Perspectives China 10 France 16 Germany 22 India 26 Iran 30 Israel 36 Japan 46 North Korea 56 South Korea 63 Pakistan 67 Russia 74 United Kingdom 84 United States 93 Endnotes 102 Contributors 123 About the IPFM The International Panel on Fissile Materials (IPFM) was founded in January 2006. It is an independent group of arms-control and nonproliferation experts from seventeen countries, including both nuclear weapon and non-nuclear weapon states. The mission of the IPFM is to analyze the technical basis for practical and achievable policy initiatives to secure, consolidate, and reduce stockpiles of highly enriched urani- um and plutonium. These fissile materials are the key ingredients in nuclear weapons, and their control is critical to nuclear disarmament, halting the proliferation of nuclear weapons, and ensuring that terrorists do not acquire nuclear weapons. Both military and civilian stocks of fissile materials have to be addressed. The nuclear weapon states still have enough fissile materials in their weapon stockpiles for tens of thousands of nuclear weapons. On the civilian side, enough plutonium has been sepa- rated to make a similarly large number of weapons. Highly enriched uranium is used in civilian reactor fuel in more than one hundred locations. -
National Perspectives on Nuclear Disarmament
NATIONAL PERSPECTIVES ON NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT EDITED BY: Barry M. Blechman Alexander K. Bollfrass March 2010 Copyright ©2010 The Henry L. Stimson Center Cover design by Shawn Woodley All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written consent from The Henry L. Stimson Center. The Henry L. Stimson Center 1111 19th Street, NW 12th Floor Washington, DC 20036 phone: 202-223-5956 fax: 202-238-9604 www.stimson.org TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface .....................................................................................................................v Introduction ...........................................................................................................vii BRAZIL | A Brazilian Perspective on Nuclear Disarmament Marcos C. de Azambuja.....................................................................1 CHINA | China’s Nuclear Strategy in a Changing World Stategic Situation Major General Pan Zhenqiang (Retired)........................................13 FRANCE | French Perspectives on Nuclear Weapons and Nuclear Disarmament Bruno Tertrais ..................................................................................37 INDIA | Indian Perspectives on the Global Elimination of Nuclear Weapons Rajesh M. Basrur .............................................................................59 IRAN | Iranian Perspectives on the Global Elimination of Nuclear Weapons Anoush Ehteshami............................................................................87 -
Okinawa Page 1 Blair & Kendall
March: Okinawa Page 1 INDEX Blair & Kendall- Recommendations ............................................................................................................. 7 Relocation- Delayed ...................................................................................................................................... 8 Relocation- Futenma Bad- Accidents ........................................................................................................... 9 Relocation- Futenma Good ......................................................................................................................... 10 Relocation- Guam Bad ................................................................................................................................ 12 Relocation- Guam Bad ................................................................................................................................ 13 Relocation- Guam Bad ................................................................................................................................ 14 Relocation- Guam Good- China ................................................................................................................. 16 Relocation- Guam Good- North Korea ....................................................................................................... 17 Relocation- Henoko- Happening Now ........................................................................................................ 18 Relocation- Henoko- Happening Now ....................................................................................................... -
The 17Th Japan-US Security Seminar
A Year of Surprises: The 17th Japan-US Security Seminar A Conference Report Brad Glosserman Rapporteur Jointly sponsored by The Consulate General of Japan in San Francisco The Japan Institute of International Affairs (JIIA) and the Pacific Forum CSIS Co-hosted by Yoshiji Nogami and Ralph A. Cossa Issues & Insights Vol. 11-No. 11 J.W. Marriot Hotel San Francisco, CA, USA March 2011 Japan Institute of International Affairs The Japan Institute of International Affairs (www.jiia.or.jp) is a private, non-profit research institution specializing in international affairs. Based in Tokyo and founded in 1959, it conducts research and fosters international exchanges designed to help formulate Japan’s foreign policies. JIIA helped found and serves as the secretariat for the Pacific Economic Cooperation Council’s Japan National Committee. It publishes a variety of periodicals and books in Japanese and English, and convenes a number of annual symposia with research institutes throughout the world. Pacific Forum CSIS Based in Honolulu, Pacific Forum CSIS (www.pacforum.org/) operates as the autonomous Asia-Pacific arm of the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, D.C. The Forum’s programs encompass current and emerging political, security, economic business, and oceans policy issues through analysis and dialogue undertaken with the region’s leaders in the academic, government, and corporate areas. Founded in 1975, it collaborates with a broad network of research institutes from around the Pacific Rim, drawing on Asian perspectives and disseminating project findings and recommendations to opinion leaders, governments, and members of the public throughout the region. Table of Contents Foreword By Yoshiji Nogami and Ralph A. -
Young Leaders
Alliances in Motion: Next Generation Views of America’s Northeast Asia Alliances PACIFIC FORUM CSIS YOUNG LEADERS Issues & Insights Vol. 10 – No. 20 Maui, Hawaii August 2010 Pacific Forum CSIS Based in Honolulu, the Pacific Forum CSIS (www.pacforum.org) operates as the autonomous Asia-Pacific arm of the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, DC. The Forum’s programs encompass current and emerging political, security, economic, business, and oceans policy issues through analysis and dialogue undertaken with the region’s leaders in the academic, government, and corporate arenas. Founded in 1975, it collaborates with a broad network of research institutes from around the Pacific Rim, drawing on Asian perspectives and disseminating project findings and recommendations to opinion leaders, governments, and members of the public throughout the region. The Young Leaders Program The Young Leaders Program invites young professionals and graduate students to join Pacific Forum policy dialogues and conferences. The program fosters education in the practical aspects of policy-making, generates an exchange of views between young and seasoned professionals, promotes interaction among younger professionals, and enriches dialogues with generational perspectives for all attendees. Fellows must have a strong background in the area covered by the conference they are attending and an endorsement from respected experts in their field. Supplemental programs in conference host cities and mentoring sessions with senior officials and specialists add to the Young Leader experience. The Young Leaders Program is currently supported by Chevron, the Henry Luce Foundation, the Sasakawa Peace Foundation, and the Yuchengco Group, with a growing number of universities, institutes, and organizations also helping to sponsor individual participants. -
UNIVERSITY of MINNESOTA Spring 1988 Graduate School
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Spring 1988 Graduate School Commencement Ph.D. Centenary Ceremony UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Spring 1988 Graduate School Commencement Ph.D. Centenary Ceremony Board ofRegents The Honorable Wendell R. Anderson, Wayzata The Honorable Charles H. Casey, West Concord The Honorable M. Elizabeth Craig, Minnetonka The Honorable Jack P. Grahek, Ely The Honorable Wally Hilke, St. Paul The Honorable Elton A. Kuderer, Fairmont The Honorable David M. Lebedoff, Minneapolis The Honorable Charles F. McGuiggan, Marshall The Honorable Wenda W. Moore, Minneapolis The Honorable David K. Roe, Minneapolis The Honorable Stanley D. Sahlstrom, Crookston The Honorable Mary T. Scbertler, St. Paul Administrative Officers Richard J. Sauer, Interim President C. Eugene Allen, Acting Vice President for Institute of Agriculture, Forestry, and Home Economics Roger W. Benjamin, Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs Carol N. Campbell, Acting Vice President for Finance and Physical Planning StephenS. Dunham, General Counsel and Vice President Richard B. Heydinger, Vice President for External Relations Neal A. Vanselow, Vice President for Health Sciences Frank B. Wilderson, Vice President for Student Affairs The University of Minnesota is committed to the policy that all persons shall have equal access to its programs, facilities, and employment without regard to race, religion, color, sex, national origin, handicap, age, veteran status, or sexual orientation. Table ofContents page Order of Events ............................................................. -
NCAA Division II-III Football Records (Special Regular- and Postseason
SPECIAL REGULAR- AND POSTSEASON GAMES 107 Special Regular- and Postseason Games 11-19-77—Mo. Western St. 35, Benedictine (KS) 30 (1,000) 12-9-72—Harding 30, Langston 27 Postseason Games 11-18-78—Chadron St. 30, Baker (KS) 19 (3,000) DOLL AND TOY CHARITY GAME 11-17-79—Pittsburg St. 43, Peru St. 14 (2,800) 11-21-80—Cameron 34, Adams St. 16 (Gulfport, Miss.) 12-3-37—Southern Miss. 7, Appalachian St. 0 (2,000) UNSANCTIONED OR OTHER BOWLS BOTANY BOWL RECORDS The following bowl and/or postseason games were 11-24-55—Neb.-Kearney 34, Northern St. 13 EASTERN BOWL (Allentown, Pa.) unsanctioned by the NCAA or otherwise had no BOY’S RANCH BOWL team classified as major college at the time of the 12-14-63—East Carolina 27, Northeastern 6 (2,700) bowl. Most are postseason games; in many cases, (Abilene, Texas) 12-13-47—Missouri Valley 20, McMurry 13 (2,500) ELKS BOWL complete dates and/or statistics are not avail- 1-2-54—Charleston (WV) 12, East Carolina 0 (4,500) (at GAME ALL-STAR / BOWL able and the scores are listed only to provide a BURLEY BOWL Greenville, N.C.) historical reference. Attendance of the game, (Johnson City, Tenn.) 12-11-54—Newberry 20, Appalachian St. 13 (at Raleigh, N.C.) if known, is listed in parentheses after the score. 1-1-46—High Point 7, Milligan 7 (3,500) FISH BOWL ALL-SPORTS BOWL 11-28-46—Southeastern La. 21, Milligan 13 (7,500) 11-27-47—West Chester 20, Carson-Newman 6 (10,000) (Corpus Christi, Texas) (Oklahoma City) 11-48—Southwestern (TX) 7, Corpus Christi 0 12-9-61—Okla.