Link to Thesis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Link to Thesis Effects of macroalgal habitats on the community and population structure of temperate reef fishes by Alejandro Pérez Matus A thesis submitted to Victoria University of Wellington in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Marine Biology Victoria University of Wellington Te Whare Wānanga o te Ūpoko o te Ika a Māui 2010 This thesis was conducted under the supervision of: Dr. Jeffrey S. Shima (Primary Supervisor) Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand Dr. Russell Cole National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA), Nelson, New Zealand and Dr. Malcolm Francis National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA), Wellington, New Zealand Notolabrus fucicola over Carpophyllum flexuosum, Kapiti Island, Wellington “Among the fishes, a remarkably wide range of biological adaptations to diverse habitat has evolved” Dr. T. Pitcher. Abstract Two families of brown macroalgae that occur in sympatry dominate temperate subtidal rocky coasts: the Laminareales, and the Fucales. Both of these families are habitat-forming species for a wide variety of invertebrates and fishes. Variation in the presence, density, and composition of brown macroalgae can have large influences on the evolution and ecology of associated organisms. Here, using a series of observational and experimental studies, I evaluated the effects of heterogeneity in the composition of brown macroalgal stands at the population and community levels for reef fishes. A central ecological challenge is the description of patterns that occur at local scales, and how these are manifested at larger ones. I conducted further sampling across a set of sites nested within locations over three regions, Juan Fernández Islands (Chile), Northern New Zealand, and Tasmania (Australia), to evaluate patterns of variation in the diversity and composition of fish assemblages. Specifically, I explored spatial variation in fish assemblages as a function of rocky reef habitats (dominated by brown-macroalgae) and other sources of variation (abiotic and biotic factors) that potentially mediate the relationship between fishes and reef habitats. Analyses suggest that spatial variation in diversity (e.g., species and trophic) may be explained by spatial variation in depth, temperature, and composition of macroalgal habitats. At each location, only 2-3 families dominated the composition of fish assemblages, but species identities varied among locations. In a subsequent study, I assessed the fish-habitat associations from sites within the Juan Fernández Islands, an isolated eastern Pacific Island that lack large brown macroalgae. I found that, despite the close proximity of these Islands to the South American continent, fish i assemblages were mostly composed of endemic representatives from families that dominate the fish assemblages in New Zealand and Australia. Spatial variation in depth and temperature did not contribute to the observed variation in fish abundance. Instead, I found that benthic habitat-forming species (particularly foliose brown macroalgae) appeared to limit the abundance of some reef fishes. These results suggest that a mixture of large-scale (e.g., stochastic recruitment) and small-scale processes (i.e., relating to habitat heterogeneity) influence the diversity, composition and abundance of fish assemblages. Subsequently, I evaluated relationships between reef fishes and macroalgae composition across multiple sites, surveyed repeatedly over four seasons. I found that fishes were associated with different components of heterogeneity in macroalgal habitats, potentially indicating interspecific partitioning of resources that may arise from differential feeding habits and size- susceptibility to predation. Seasonal variation in the fish-habitat associations was detected, and site differences in macroalgal composition explained significant variation in the local diversity of fishes. Using a series of small-scale lab and field-based manipulative experiments, I determined the demographic and behavioural responses of reef- associated fishes to heterogeneity in the composition of brown macroalgal habitats. I found that (i) different fish species distinguished between monospecific macroalgae stands (macroalgal identity affected the abundance of 7 of 15 reef fish species); (ii) there is within-species variation in the response of fishes to macroalgal composition (suggesting ontogenetic habitat shifts); and (iii) the abundance of 5 of 7 reef fish species, and the overall structure of the local fish assemblage, varied with the composition of mixed-species macroalgal stands. Lastly, I evaluated the potential for fishes to provision demographic feedbacks to macroalgae. Specifically, I conducted a mesocosm experiment to evaluate the effects of fishes on grazing amphipods, and therefore, the potential indirect-effects of fishes on large-brown macroalgae. I found that only one of the two fish species studied reduced grazer abundance. Although the second fish species did not consume grazing amphipods, its presence altered amphipod behaviour to significantly reduce grazing efficiency on the macroalgal-host. This study illustrates how density and trait-mediated indirect interactions can have similar effects on primary producers. Overall, my observational and experimental components of this thesis emphasize the influence of heterogeneity in macroalgal structures on the breadth of habitat use for reef fishes at multiple locations. I found strong behaviourally mediated linkages between the abundance of reef fishes and composition of macroalgal stand. I also provide some evidence that mutualistic relationships may exist between kelp and associated fishes. Dedicated to my grandfather Acknowledgments Although most of the Chapters here are written in first person, I have to mention that without the support that I have received from many people and institutions, this thesis would have never to come to an end. I have to thank them all. All my family and particularly Isabel, Barbara, Maria Isabel and my father, and Katja have done everything for me to make this journey possible. In all the moments I have received their support, thanks. The completion of this thesis is indebted to my supervisors. I have to say that I have world-class researchers in my committee. I had contributions from all of them. First, I have received valuable guidance, encouragement, support, and friendship from my primary supervisor, Dr. Jeff Shima. I am impressed by the amount of knowledge that Jeff has as a marine ecologist and his writing skills. I consider myself fortunate to be his student. Second, I was pleased to have Russell Cole. Despite his claims to a lack of memory, he is a library of information regarding the ecology of fishes and statistics. I learned a lot from him particularly through the editing of this thesis. But this all started when Malcolm Francis went to Chile with Eduardo Villouta. With Malcolm’s Book of reef fishes from New Zealand, I started to get on track. Every fish scientist knows Malcolm’s work. His support of my thesis and me has been priceless. I have received incredible support and several researchers have influenced me. Special mentions are deserved to Dr. Shirley Pledger (how lucky I was to meet her, thanks for sharing your knowledge in stats and in R), KC Burns, Nicole Phillips, Joe Zuccarello, Nokuthaba Sibanda, Shane Geange and Phil Neubauer who have helped me a lot in analyzing data and commenting on v my work. From other universities and institutions I must thank Dr. Alistair Poore (University of South Wales), Dr. Michael Graham (Moss Landing Marine Lab, California), Dr. Giacomo Bernardi (University of California), Dr. Patricio Ojeda (Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile), Dr. Alvaro Palma (Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile), Dr. Martin Thiel (Universidad Católica del Norte, Chile), Dr. Carlos Gaymer (Universidad Católica del Norte, Chile), Dr. Clive Roberts (Museum of NZ Te Papa Tongarewa), Dr. Franz Smith (CSIRO), Dr. Andrew Stewart (Museum of NZ Te Papa Tongarewa), Clinton Duffy and Helen Kettles (Department of Conservation, New Zealand). Lastly special recognition of this work goes to Dr. Steve Swearer (University of Melbourne), Dr. Richard Taylor (Auckland University), and Dr. Stephen Hartley (Victoria University of Wellington) who have provided reviews and useful comments that improved the quality of this work. The data from this thesis involved a lot of fieldwork; I travelled and dived into many different places. In most, I was pleased to meet friends and spend long days in the field. I started here in Wellington with my friend, Anna Smith, who helped me in the first data chapter. Her support was incredible and I don’t think I would have finished without her support. Without the help of el tila (no one in Chile could mentioned Tyler Eddys’s name properly) and Fabian Ramírez (very motivated student specially when diving), the surveys at Juan Fernández Islands in Chile would have been hard to do. My trip to north New Zealand was extraordinary with my friend Phillip (filipa) Neubauer and Anto do Santos. In Tasmania Carolina Zagal, Nikita and her pelirojo (Simon) hosted me and gave me all the support and friendship I could ask for. I have to thank a very keen diver and boat master, Paul Di Benedetto, and his family who provided support and help in the field with his boat and scuba tanks while in Tasmania. Benjamin Magaña, Alejandra Perea-Blazquez, Ursula Rojas, Katja Klopfer, Pelirojo Salinas, Gareth Williams, Claudio
Recommended publications
  • New Zealand Fishes a Field Guide to Common Species Caught by Bottom, Midwater, and Surface Fishing Cover Photos: Top – Kingfish (Seriola Lalandi), Malcolm Francis
    New Zealand fishes A field guide to common species caught by bottom, midwater, and surface fishing Cover photos: Top – Kingfish (Seriola lalandi), Malcolm Francis. Top left – Snapper (Chrysophrys auratus), Malcolm Francis. Centre – Catch of hoki (Macruronus novaezelandiae), Neil Bagley (NIWA). Bottom left – Jack mackerel (Trachurus sp.), Malcolm Francis. Bottom – Orange roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus), NIWA. New Zealand fishes A field guide to common species caught by bottom, midwater, and surface fishing New Zealand Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Report No: 208 Prepared for Fisheries New Zealand by P. J. McMillan M. P. Francis G. D. James L. J. Paul P. Marriott E. J. Mackay B. A. Wood D. W. Stevens L. H. Griggs S. J. Baird C. D. Roberts‡ A. L. Stewart‡ C. D. Struthers‡ J. E. Robbins NIWA, Private Bag 14901, Wellington 6241 ‡ Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, PO Box 467, Wellington, 6011Wellington ISSN 1176-9440 (print) ISSN 1179-6480 (online) ISBN 978-1-98-859425-5 (print) ISBN 978-1-98-859426-2 (online) 2019 Disclaimer While every effort was made to ensure the information in this publication is accurate, Fisheries New Zealand does not accept any responsibility or liability for error of fact, omission, interpretation or opinion that may be present, nor for the consequences of any decisions based on this information. Requests for further copies should be directed to: Publications Logistics Officer Ministry for Primary Industries PO Box 2526 WELLINGTON 6140 Email: [email protected] Telephone: 0800 00 83 33 Facsimile: 04-894 0300 This publication is also available on the Ministry for Primary Industries website at http://www.mpi.govt.nz/news-and-resources/publications/ A higher resolution (larger) PDF of this guide is also available by application to: [email protected] Citation: McMillan, P.J.; Francis, M.P.; James, G.D.; Paul, L.J.; Marriott, P.; Mackay, E.; Wood, B.A.; Stevens, D.W.; Griggs, L.H.; Baird, S.J.; Roberts, C.D.; Stewart, A.L.; Struthers, C.D.; Robbins, J.E.
    [Show full text]
  • And Long-Term Movement Patterns of Six Temperate Reef Fishes (Families Labridae and Monacanthidae)
    Mar: Freshwater Res., 1995,46, 853-60 Short- and Long-term Movement Patterns of Six Temperate Reef Fishes (Families Labridae and Monacanthidae) Neville S. Barrett Zoology Department, University of Tasmania, GPO Box 252C Hobart, Tas. 7001, Australia. Abstract. Movement patterns were studied on a 1-ha isolated reef surrounding Arch Rock in southern Tasmania. Short-term movements were identified from diver observations, and interpretation of long-term movements involved multiple recaptures of tagged individuals. Visual observations indicated that the sex-changing labrids Notolabrus tetricus, Pictilabrus laticlavius and Pseudolabrus psittaculus were all site-attached, with females having overlapping home ranges and males being territorial. In the non-sex-changing labrid Notolabrus fucicola and in the monacanthids Penicipelta vittiger and Meuschenia australis, there was no evidence of territorial behaviour and I-h movements were in excess of the scale of the study. The long-term results indicated that all species were permanent reef residents, with most individuals of all species except M. australis always being recaptured within a home range of 100 m X 25 m or less. Only 15% of individuals of M. australis were always recaptured within this range category. The natural habitat boundary of open sand between the Arch Rock reef and adjacent reefs appeared to be an effective deterrent to emigration. The use of natural boundaries should be an important consideration in the design of marine reserves where the aim is to minimize the loss of protected species to adjacent fished areas. Introduction associated with using SCUBA in colder waters with low Most tropical reef fishes are now regarded as sedentary, visibility.
    [Show full text]
  • Mullidae 3175
    click for previous page Perciformes: Percoidei: Mullidae 3175 MULLIDAE Goatfishes (surmullets) by J.E. Randall iagnostic characters: Body moderately elongate and somewhat compressed (size to 50 cm). Two Dlong unbranched barbels on chin; mouth low on head, the lower jaw inferior, the cleft slightly oblique; dentition variable but teeth conical, either in villiform bands or in 1 or 2 rows, never as enlarged canines (except in adult males of western Atlantic and eastern Pacific species of Pseudupeneus, the teeth of which are slightly enlarged). A single flat spine posteriorly on opercle (a second less developed spine may be present); margin of preopercle smooth. Two well-separated dorsal fins, the first with VII or VIII (usually VIII) slender spines (first spine often very small), the second fin with 9 soft rays (first unbranched); anal fin with I spine and 6 or 7 soft rays; caudal fin deeply forked, with 13 branched rays; pelvic fins with I spine and 5 soft rays; pectoral fins with 13 to 18 rays. Scales finely ctenoid; head and body completely scaly (except preorbital region of some species of Upeneus). Lateral line complete, following contour of back, the pored scales to base of caudal fin 27 to 38. Colour: ground colour in preservative usually pale, in life often whitish to light red; most species with distinctive black, brown, red, or yellow markings; median fins often with stripes or oblique bands. 2 dorsal fins, 1st with VII-VIII spines, 2nd with 9 soft rays 2 barbels on chin Habitat, biology, and fisheries: Most goatfishes inhabit shallow seas. They are usually found on open sand or mud bottoms, at least for feeding (though the species of Parupeneus and Mulloidichthys are often seen on coral reefs or rocky substrata).
    [Show full text]
  • Biogenic Habitats on New Zealand's Continental Shelf. Part II
    Biogenic habitats on New Zealand’s continental shelf. Part II: National field survey and analysis New Zealand Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Report No. 202 E.G. Jones M.A. Morrison N. Davey S. Mills A. Pallentin S. George M. Kelly I. Tuck ISSN 1179-6480 (online) ISBN 978-1-77665-966-1 (online) September 2018 Requests for further copies should be directed to: Publications Logistics Officer Ministry for Primary Industries PO Box 2526 WELLINGTON 6140 Email: [email protected] Telephone: 0800 00 83 33 Facsimile: 04-894 0300 This publication is also available on the Ministry for Primary Industries websites at: http://www.mpi.govt.nz/news-and-resources/publications http://fs.fish.govt.nz go to Document library/Research reports © Crown Copyright – Fisheries New Zealand TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1. INTRODUCTION 3 1.1 Overview 3 1.2 Objectives 4 2. METHODS 5 2.1 Selection of locations for sampling. 5 2.2 Field survey design and data collection approach 6 2.3 Onboard data collection 7 2.4 Selection of core areas for post-voyage processing. 8 Multibeam data processing 8 DTIS imagery analysis 10 Reference libraries 10 Still image analysis 10 Video analysis 11 Identification of biological samples 11 Sediment analysis 11 Grain-size analysis 11 Total organic matter 12 Calcium carbonate content 12 2.5 Data Analysis of Core Areas 12 Benthic community characterization of core areas 12 Relating benthic community data to environmental variables 13 Fish community analysis from DTIS video counts 14 2.6 Synopsis Section 15 3. RESULTS 17 3.1
    [Show full text]
  • Morphological Variations in the Scleral Ossicles of 172 Families Of
    Zoological Studies 51(8): 1490-1506 (2012) Morphological Variations in the Scleral Ossicles of 172 Families of Actinopterygian Fishes with Notes on their Phylogenetic Implications Hin-kui Mok1 and Shu-Hui Liu2,* 1Institute of Marine Biology and Asia-Pacific Ocean Research Center, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung 804, Taiwan 2Institute of Oceanography, National Taiwan University, 1 Roosevelt Road, Sec. 4, Taipei 106, Taiwan (Accepted August 15, 2012) Hin-kui Mok and Shu-Hui Liu (2012) Morphological variations in the scleral ossicles of 172 families of actinopterygian fishes with notes on their phylogenetic implications. Zoological Studies 51(8): 1490-1506. This study reports on (1) variations in the number and position of scleral ossicles in 283 actinopterygian species representing 172 families, (2) the distribution of the morphological variants of these bony elements, (3) the phylogenetic significance of these variations, and (4) a phylogenetic hypothesis relevant to the position of the Callionymoidei, Dactylopteridae, and Syngnathoidei based on these osteological variations. The results suggest that the Callionymoidei (not including the Gobiesocidae), Dactylopteridae, and Syngnathoidei are closely related. This conclusion was based on the apomorphic character state of having only the anterior scleral ossicle. Having only the anterior scleral ossicle should have evolved independently in the Syngnathioidei + Dactylopteridae + Callionymoidei, Gobioidei + Apogonidae, and Pleuronectiformes among the actinopterygians studied in this paper. http://zoolstud.sinica.edu.tw/Journals/51.8/1490.pdf Key words: Scleral ossicle, Actinopterygii, Phylogeny. Scleral ossicles of the teleostome fish eye scleral ossicles and scleral cartilage have received comprise a ring of cartilage supporting the eye little attention. It was not until a recent paper by internally (i.e., the sclerotic ring; Moy-Thomas Franz-Odendaal and Hall (2006) that the homology and Miles 1971).
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Biodiversity of the Gammaridea and Corophiidea
    Revista de Biología Tropical ISSN: 0034-7744 [email protected] Universidad de Costa Rica Costa Rica Chiesa, Ignacio L.; Alonso, Gloria M. Biodiversity of the Gammaridea and Corophiidea (Crustacea: Amphipoda) from the Beagle Channel and the Straits of Magellan: a preliminary comparison between their faunas Revista de Biología Tropical, vol. 55, núm. 1, 2007, pp. 103-112 Universidad de Costa Rica San Pedro de Montes de Oca, Costa Rica Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=44909914 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Biodiversity of the Gammaridea and Corophiidea (Crustacea: Amphipoda) from the Beagle Channel and the Straits of Magellan: a preliminary comparison between their faunas Ignacio L. Chiesa 1,2 & Gloria M. Alonso 2 1 Laboratorio de Artrópodos, Departamento de Biodiversidad y Biología Experimental, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Universitaria, C1428EHA, Buenos Aires, Argentina; ichiesa@ bg.fcen.uba.ar 2 Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia”, Div. Invertebrados, Av. Ángel Gallardo 470, C1405DJR, Buenos Aires, Argentina; [email protected] Received 10-XI-2005. Corrected 25-IV-2006. Accepted 16-III-2007. Abstract: Gammaridea and Corophiidea amphipod species from the Beagle Channel and the Straits of Magellan were listed for the first time; their faunas were compared on the basis of bibliographic information and material collected in one locality at Beagle Channel (Isla Becasses). The species Schraderia serraticauda and Heterophoxus trichosus (collected at Isla Becasses) were cited for the first time for the Magellan region; Schraderia is the first generic record for this region.
    [Show full text]
  • Digenea: Lecithasteridae) Recently Found in Australian Marine Fishes
    FOLIA PARASITOLOGICA 48: 109-114, 2001 Weketrema gen. n., a new genus for Weketrema hawaiiense (Yamaguti, 1970) comb. n. (Digenea: Lecithasteridae) recently found in Australian marine fishes Rodney A. Bray1 and Thomas H. Cribb2 1Department of Zoology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK; 2Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia Key words: Digenea, Lecithasteridae, Weketrema, Scolopsis, Plectorhinchus, Cheilodactylus, Latridopsis, Great Barrier Reef, Tasmania Abstract. A new genus, Weketrema, is erected in the family Lecithasteridae for the species hitherto known as Lecithophyllum hawaiiense. Weketrema hawaiiense (Yamaguti, 1970) comb. n. is redescribed from Scolopsis bilineatus (Bloch) (Perciformes: Nemipteridae) from Lizard Island and Heron Island, Queensland, Plectorhinchus gibbosus (Lacepède) (Perciformes: Haemulidae) from Heron Island and Cheilodactylus nigripes Richardson (Perciformes: Cheilodactylidae) and Latridopsis forsteri (Castelnau) (Perciformes: Latridae) from Stanley, northern Tasmania. The new genus is distinguished from related members of the family Lecithasteridae by its complete lack of a sinus-sac. Although placed in the subfamily Lecithasterinae pro tem, its true subfamily position is not entirely clear. Comment is made on its unusual distribution, both in terms of zoogeography and hosts. As more lecithasterid species are examined and Weketrema gen. n. emphasis is placed on the structure of the terminal genitalia, more unusual features are uncovered. This Diagnosis. Lecithasteridae: Lecithasterinae. Body paper is a report of a known species, Lecithophyllum small, elongate oval. Tegument unarmed. Pre-oral lobe hawaiiense Yamaguti, 1970, re-examined using newly distinct. Oral sucker subglobular, subterminal. Ventral collected Australian material, Differential Interference sucker oval, pre-equatorial. Prepharynx absent. Pharynx Contrast (DIC) microscopy and serial sections.
    [Show full text]
  • Description of a New Species of Mullid Fish from South-Western Australia, with Comments on Upeneichthys Lineatus
    Description of a new species of mullid fish from south-western Australia, with comments on Upeneichthys lineatus J. Barry Hutchins* Abstract Ul'et1elch/lns .\Iu/li IS described from 30 SpCClnlCnS from south-western Australia (Albany to Shark Hay). It IS distinguished from U. linca/us. the only other member of lpeneich/hl.\. bv the different colour pattcrn on the snout (horizontal blue lines vcrsus obl14ue blue lines respectively). different fin sizes. and a much smaller maximum length (IJX mm SI. versus at least 2XO mm SI.). Evidence IS also provided to show that three distinct lorms of Ul'eneich/hl.\ linea/us can be recognised. 1'. linea/us linea/us from eastern Australia. 1'. linea/us \'/a/llingii from southern and south-western Australia. and 1'. linea/lIS l'urusllS from New Zealand. Introduction Fishes of the mullid genus Upcncichthrs inhabit sandy and silty bottoms in coastal waters of southern Australia and New Zealand. A recent revicw of the genus (Ben-Tuvia 1986) recognised only one species, U. linca/us (Bloch and Schneider, 180 I), but also included a comment concerning the considerable morphological variability of the taxon. Subsequently Hutchins and Swainston (1986) and Stewart (1987) both distinguished two species, U. linca/us and U. vlamingii (Cuvier, 1829), although the findings of each study differed considerably. Hutchins and Swainston used U. linca/us for an eastern Australian goatfish and U. vlamingii for a species inhabiting southern and south-western Australia. However, the unpublished study of Stewart recommended that the species characterised by a dark stripe along the side of the body be known as U.
    [Show full text]
  • Determining the Diet of New Zealand King Shag Using DNA Metabarcoding
    Determining the diet of New Zealand king shag using DNA metabarcoding New Zealand King Shag, (Leucocarbo carunculatus) on Blumine Island, Marlborough Sounds, New Zealand in 2016 (Wikipedia commons). Aimee van der Reis & Andrew Jeffs Report Prepared For: Department of Conservation, Conservation Services Programme, Project BCBC2019-05. DOC MarineDRAFT Science Advisors Graeme Taylor and Dr Karen Middlemiss. November 2020 Reports from Auckland UniServices Limited should only be used for the purposes for which they were commissioned. If it is proposed to use a report prepared by Auckland UniServices Limited for a different purpose or in a different context from that intended at the time of commissioning the work, then UniServices should be consulted to verify whether the report is being correctly interpreted. In particular it is requested that, where quoted, conclusions given in Auckland UniServices reports should be stated in full. INTRODUCTION The New Zealand king shag (Leucocarbo carunculatus) is an endemic seabird that is classed as nationally endangered (Miskelly et al., 2008). The population is confined to a small number of colonies located around the coastal margins of the outer Marlborough Sounds (South Island, New Zealand); with surveys suggesting the population is currently stable (~800 individuals surveyed in 2020; Aquaculture New Zealand, 2020; Schuckard et al., 2015). Monitoring the colonies has become a priority and research is being conducted to better understand their population dynamics and basic ecology to improve the management of the population, particularly in relation to human activities such as fishing, aquaculture and land use (Fisher & Boren, 2012). The diet of the New Zealand king shag is strongly linked to the waters surrounding their colonies and it has been suggested that anthropogenic activities, such as marine farm structures, may displace foraging habitat that could affect the population of New Zealand king shag (Fisher & Boren, 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • Program and Abstracts
    Program and abstracts rd 43 Annual Larval Fish Conference Melià Palma Marina, Mallorca – Palma 21-24 May 2019 PROGRAM AND ABSTRACTS Scientific Committe Ignacio Catalán (Spain, Local Organizer) Patricia Reglero (Spain, Local Organizer) Itziar Álvarez (Spain, Local Organizer) Pilar Olivar (Spain) Su Sponaugle (USA) Marta Moyano (Germany) Akinori Takasuka (Japan) Raul Láiz (Spain) Dominique Robert (Canada) Welcome Oceans, lakes, rivers…in the world are full of larvae, that very small life stage which most animals in the water bodies experience when they are only a few days old. Most will die and only some will make it to the future after flowing with the currents, finding food and avoiding the predators while developing the organs they need to live. We invite you to talk and hear about them and their different ways. And which better place than Mallorca, our island, surrounded by the Mediterranean Sea, a sea full of biodiversity and life! Come and enjoy sharing sciencie and friendship with us. Welcome to the 43rd Annual Larval fish Conference in Mallorca. Sponsors We are grateful to the sponsors listed below for their support to organize this Conference, General Information Palma (https://www.spain-holiday.com/Palma) Located on the south coast of Mallorca, Palma is an important holiday resort and commercial port. The city offers the island’s best choice of hotels, restaurants and widest choice of entertainment. Despite having become a modern, vibrant city, Palma has managed to retain its old town and its ancient culture and charm. Palma’s airport handles millions of visitors each year and plays a major role in the Balearic’s tourism industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Colouration Patterns of Two Species of the Genus Scartichthys
    Revista de Biología Marina y Oceanografía Vol. 51, Nº2: 475-481, agosto 2016 RESEARCH NOTE Colouration patterns of two species of the genus Scartichthys (Blenniidae: Perciformes) in the coastal area of northern Chile Patrones de coloración de dos especies del género Scartichthys (Blenniidae: Perciformes) de la zona costera del norte de Chile Felipe Méndez-Abarca1 and Enrique A. Mundaca2 1Fundación Reino Animal, Cienfuegos S/N, Casilla 6-D, Arica, Chile. [email protected] 2Universidad Católica del Maule, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales, Escuela de Agronomía, Casilla 7-D, Curicó, Chile Abstract.- The aim of this study was to report the colouration patterns of live specimens of two Blenniidae species: Scartichthys gigas and S. viridis, from tide pools in the coastal area of 3 localities of northern Chile. Colouration patterns for S. gigas were: the two-bar front head covered/uncovered and the uniform orange-brown, found in specimens associated to kelps, for juveniles; an intermediate juvenile-adult reticulated bar-stained pattern described for the first time and the reticulated pattern for adults. For S. viridis the dark-light green pattern is described for juveniles and adults. The findings are discussed in terms of colouration patterns previously described for both species, with emphasis on the importance of using colouration patterns to improve species identification, reduce habitat disturbance and specimen removal from the wild. Key words: Scartichthys gigas, Scartichthys viridis, reticulated, intertidal INTRODUCTION Blenniidae is a family of benthic fish widely distributed in the from Guayaquil, Ecuador, to Valdivia, Chile (Chirichigno 1974) coastal waters around the world. Species of this family are and subsequently extended to Panamá (Williams 1990, Medina abundant in the intertidal zone (Mann 1954, Muñoz & Ojeda et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Cdnicyt Comi5ió Nacional De Inve5tigaoón Científica Y Tecnológica
    4 CDNICYT COMI5IÓ NACIONAL DE INVE5TIGAOÓN CIENTÍFICA Y TECNOLÓGICA GOBIERNO DE CHILE y -. -_ COM1S1O NACIONAL DL INVESIJUAL ION CIENCIA Y 1 LCNOLOUI\ VERSION OFICIAL FECHA: 16/3/2009 PROYECTO REGULAR N°1060127 INVESTIGADOR RESPONSABLE: THIEL MARTIN FONDO NACIONAL DE DESARROLLO CIENTIFICO Y TECNOLOGICO (FONDECYT) Bernarda Morín 551, Providencia - casilla 297- y, Santiago 21 Telefono: 435 43 50 FAX 365 4435 Email: informes.fondecyt@ con¡ cyt.cI INFORME FINAL PROYECTO FONDECYT REGULAR RELACIONADO SR. MARTIN THI N° PROYECTO: 1060127 DURACIÓN: 3 años AÑO ETAPA: 2008 TÍTULO PROYECTO: RAFTING DISPERSAL ON MACROALGAE DEPENDS QN FLOATINO TIME-FACTORS AFFECTING THE SURVI VAL OF FLOATING KELP AFTER DETACHMENT. DISCIPLINA PRINCIPAL: BIOLOGIA MARINA GRUPO DE ESTUDIO: BIOLOGIA 1 INVESTIGADOR(A) RESPONSABLE: THIEL MARTIN DIRECCIÓN: Larrondo 1281, Casilla 117 RELACIONAD COMUNA: Coquimbo CIUDAD: Coquimbo SR. IVAN GOrv REGIÓN: IV REGION FONO: 5 1-209939 EMAIL: [email protected] INFORME OBJETIVOS Cumplimiento de los Objetivos planteados en el Proyecto. Recuerde que los objetivos del proyecto no se refieren a listar actividades desarrolladas sino a los obietivos desarrollados N° OBJETIVOS CUMPLIMIENTO FUNDAMENTO 1 Examine the effect of water temperature and TOTAL grazing on fioatíng algae 2 Examine the effect of nutrients and temperature TOTAL on fioating algae 3 Examine the effect of PAR/UV-radiation and TOTAL - grazing 00 floating algae 4 Examine the effect of water temperature and TOTAL UV-radiation, on survival, growth and vitality of - floating Macrocystis spp. 5 Examine the effect of UV-radiation, on survival TOTAL growth and physiological performance of fioating Macrocystis spp. in their natural cnvironment. Otro(s) aspecto(s) que Ud.
    [Show full text]