Wehrmacht Panzer Companies
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Errors in American Tank Development in World War II Jacob Fox James Madison University
James Madison University JMU Scholarly Commons Masters Theses The Graduate School Spring 2013 The rW ong track: Errors in American tank development in World War II Jacob Fox James Madison University Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/master201019 Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Fox, Jacob, "The rW ong track: Errors in American tank development in World War II" (2013). Masters Theses. 215. https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/master201019/215 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the The Graduate School at JMU Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of JMU Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Wrong Track: Errors in American Tank Development in World War II Jacob Fox A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of History May 2013 ii Table of Contents Abstract ........................................................................................................... iii Introduction and Historiography ....................................................................... 1 Chapter One: America’s Pre-War tank Policy and Early War Development ....... 19 McNair’s Tank Destroyers Chapter Two: The Sherman on the Battlefield ................................................. 30 Reaction in the Press Chapter Three: Ordnance Department and the T26 ........................................ -
The Soviet-German Tank Academy at Kama
The Secret School of War: The Soviet-German Tank Academy at Kama THESIS Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Ian Johnson Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2012 Master's Examination Committee: Jennifer Siegel, Advisor Peter Mansoor David Hoffmann Copyright by Ian Ona Johnson 2012 Abstract This paper explores the period of military cooperation between the Weimar Period German Army (the Reichswehr), and the Soviet Union. Between 1922 and 1933, four facilities were built in Russia by the two governments, where a variety of training and technological exercises were conducted. These facilities were particularly focused on advances in chemical and biological weapons, airplanes and tanks. The most influential of the four facilities was the tank testing and training grounds (Panzertruppenschule in the German) built along the Kama River, near Kazan in North- Central Russia. Led by German instructors, the school’s curriculum was based around lectures, war games, and technological testing. Soviet and German students studied and worked side by side; German officers in fact often wore the Soviet uniform while at the school, to show solidarity with their fellow officers. Among the German alumni of the school were many of the most famous practitioners of mobile warfare during the Second World War, such as Guderian, Manstein, Kleist and Model. This system of education proved highly innovative. During seven years of operation, the school produced a number of extremely important technological and tactical innovations. Among the new technologies were a new tank chassis system, superior guns, and - perhaps most importantly- a radio that could function within a tank. -
What's New? ● Wings Simulations Has Jobs Available
Panzer-Elite What's New? ● Wings Simulations has jobs available. Further details can be found HERE. ● Scenario Editor tutorial by a fellow tanker: www.nav.to/mcdrumpe ● Having trouble reversing? Use backspace to stop, then down arrow to reverse ● tech support section with common known issues, tips and installation checker ● Having trouble with gunnery and optics? Panzer Elite gunnery article on SimHQ! Patch1.08 Beta Test A test version of Patch 1.08 is online. Please read the following to understand what the test is all about: This test is to preview potential difficulties with patch108. Not all issues has been adressed, but a complete list can be found HERE. Please READ this list, thanx! As this is a preliminary test it is possible that you need to reinstall Panzer Elite. Note that this patch requires Version 1.07 to work. To post bugs DO NOT EMAIL ME. Post those into the newly opened Patch108 Bug Forum. Visit our download section to download the test patch. This patch wouldnt have been possible without the effort of the Llenort Brothers. Thanx to you guys! NEW Forums open! We opened new forums today.We are sorry for the problems caused but it was beyond our control. You need to reregister to post in this forum, but its a lot more powerful than the old one. You might need to hit refresh on your browser to make the message board link active. Alternatively you can find the forum here. If you have problems using the new forum or suggestions, please email us! Warning: DirectX8 installation not recomended (yet) We do not recomend installing DirectX 8 at this time for Panzer Elite. -
Catalogos Modelismo Enero 2021.Xlsx
AEROBONUS 350001 1/35 WWII German Submarine Kriegsmarine Sailor #1 (Standing, Arms Bent) Bs150 AEROBONUS 350002 1/35 WWII German Submarine Kriegsmarine Crew #1 (Sitting, Arms Up) Bs150 AEROBONUS 350003 1/35 WWII German Submarine Kriegsmarine Crew #2 (Sitting, Arms Bent) Bs150 AEROBONUS 350004 1/35 WWII German Submarine Kriegsmarine Sailor #2 (Bending) Bs150 AEROBONUS 350005 1/35 WWII German Submarine Kriegsmarine Sailor w/Rope Bs150 AEROBONUS 350006 1/35 WWII German Submarine Kriegsmarine Sailor #3 (Posed as Climbing Ladder) Bs150 AEROBONUS 350007 1/35 WWII German Submarine Kriegsmarine Sailor #4 (Sitting, Arms Down) Bs150 AEROBONUS 350008 1/35 WWII German Submarine Kriegsmarine Sailor #5 (One Knee Bent) Bs150 AEROBONUS 350009 1/35 WWII German Submarine Kriegsmarine Sailor #6 (Standing, Arms at Side) Bs150 AEROBONUS 350010 1/35 WWII German Submarine Kriegsmarine Officer w/Binoculars Bs150 AEROBONUS 350011 1/35 WWII German Submarine Kriegsmarine Ceremony Officer #1 Bs150 AEROBONUS 350012 1/35 WWII German Submarine Kriegsmarine Ceremony Officer #2 (Saluting) Bs150 AEROBONUS 350013 1/35 WWII German Schnellboat Kriegsmarine Ceremony Sailor #1 Bs150 AEROBONUS 350014 1/35 WWII German Schnellboat Kriegsmarine Ceremony Sailor #2 Bs150 AEROBONUS 350015 1/35 WWII Geramn Schnellboat Kriegsmarine Ceremony Sailor #3 Bs150 AEROBONUS 350016 1/35 WWII German Schnellboat Kriegsmarine Ceremony Sailor #4 Bs150 AEROBONUS 350017 1/35 WWII Geramn Schnellboat Kriegsmarine Ceremony Sailor #4 Bs150 ACADEMY 12115 1/35 AH60L DAP Black Hawk Helicopter Bs865 ACADEMY -
Diplomová Práce Finální Verze Pro
Západo česká univerzita v Plzni Fakulta filozofická Diplomová práce Srovnání tankových vojsk SSSR a nacistického N ěmecka v období 2. sv ětové války Ladislav Sluka Plze ň 2019 Západo česká univerzita v Plzni Fakulta filozofická Katedra historických v ěd Studijní program Historické v ědy Studijní obor Moderní d ějiny Diplomová práce SROVNÁNÍ TANKOVÝCH VOJSK SSSR A NACISTICKÉHO N ĚMECKA V OBDOBÍ 2. SV ĚTOVÉ VÁLKY Ladislav Sluka Vedoucí práce: PhDr. Roman Kodet Ph.D. Katedra historických v ěd Fakulta filozofická Západo české univerzity v Plzni Plze ň, 2019 Čestné prohlášení Prohlašuji, že jsem bakalá řskou/diplomovou práci na téma "Srovnání tankových vojsk SSSR a Nacistického N ěmecka v období 2. sv ětové války" vypracoval samostatn ě pod odborným dohledem vedoucího diplomové práce za použití pramen ů uvedených v p řiložené bibliografii. Plze ň, dne 29.4.2019 …………………………… podpis autora 1 Úvod.............................................................................................................................1 2 SSSR a N ěmecko v období mezi válkami....................................................................4 2.1 Státní politika, ekonomika a pr ůmysl...................................................................4 2.2 Armáda..................................................................................................................9 2.3 Tankové síly........................................................................................................11 2.4 Sov ětsko-n ěmecká spolupráce............................................................................16 -
The Panzer Divisions Included a Balanced Mix of Tanks, Mechanized Infantry, and Motorized Artillery
DUE033 Cov.qxd:DUE033 Cov 22/11/10 11:21 Page 1 DUEL • 33 This is the account of machines of war pitted against each other and the combatants who operated them. Step onto the battlefield OSPREY and immerse yourself in the experience of real historic combat. PANZERIV CHARB1BIS DUEL Engage the Enemy PANZER IV VS CHAR B1 BIS France 1940 The Battle of France in 1940 involved the first large-scale tank-against-tank battles in history. The massive clashes at Stonne, Hannant, and Gembloux involved hundreds of tanks on both sides, yet have faded from memory due to the enormity of the French defeat. This book examines two of the premier opposing tanks of the Wehrmacht and the French Army, the German PzKpfw IV PANZER IV and the French Char B1 bis. With a complete history of the design, development, and deployment of these armored fighting vehicles, the story of these great battles is once again brought to life. Colorartwork Photographs Unrivaleddetail Cutawayartwork CHAR B1 BIS France 1940 STEVENJ.ZALOGA OSPREY PUBLISHING O SPREY WWW.OSPREYPUBLISHING.COM STEVEN J. ZALOGA DUE033 Text.qxd:DUE033 Text 4/10/10 08:43 Page 1 PANZER IV CHAR B1 BIS France 1940 STEVEN J. ZALOGA DUE033 Text.qxd:DUE033 Text 22/11/10 11:26 Page 2 First published in Great Britain in 2011 by Osprey Publishing, Author’s Note Midland House, West Way, Botley, Oxford, OX2 0PH, UK 44–02 23rd St, Suite 219, Long Island City, NY 11101, USA I would especially like to thank David Lehmann and Dr. -
Soviet Tank Development During the Second World War Jeremy Paugh Concordia University - Portland, [email protected]
Concordia University - Portland CU Commons Undergraduate Theses Spring 2019 Steel Monsters: Soviet Tank Development during the Second World War Jeremy Paugh Concordia University - Portland, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.cu-portland.edu/theses Part of the History Commons CU Commons Citation Paugh, Jeremy, "Steel Monsters: Soviet Tank Development during the Second World War" (2019). Undergraduate Theses. 185. https://commons.cu-portland.edu/theses/185 This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by CU Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Theses by an authorized administrator of CU Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HST 493- Steel Monsters: Soviet Armor Development During World War 2 A senior thesis submitted to The Department of History College of Arts & Sciences In partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Bachelor of Arts degree in History By: Jeremy Paugh Faculty Supervisor ______________________________________________ _____________ Dr. Joel Davis Date Department Chair _______________________________________________ _____________ Kimberly Knutsen Date Dean, College of Arts & Sciences ________________________________________________ _____________ Dr. Michael Thomas Date Provost _______________________________________________________ _____________ Michelle Cowing Date Concordia University Portland, Oregon May, 2018 1 Abstract: This thesis aims to explore the far-reaching effects of armored warfare and tank -
Intelligence Briefing for Finnish Forces Facing the Germans in the Lapland
intelligence Briefing for Finnish forces facing the Germans in the Lapland War 1944 to 1945 By Scott Elaurant, Jyrki Saari, Dion Holswich and Wayne Turner UPDATED ON 25 AUGUST 2014 1 Lapin Sota – The Campaign Against Germany BY SCOTT ELAURANT AND JYRKI SAARI The terms of the armistice required Finland to expel or intern The commander of III Corps, General Siilasvuo carried all troops of her former partner Germany in two weeks. This out a daring plan. On 1 October the Finnish JR11 from was difficult in the south, downright impossible in remote 3rd Division was transported by ship to Tornio, a port town Lapland where the 200,000 man German 20th Mountain on the Finnish – Swedish border. They managed to surprise Army could not have left the country in two weeks if it had the Germans from Division Group Kräutler, captured a withdrawn at full speed, assuming the Germans had even supply depot there, defeated the small garrison and cut the wanted to do so. withdrawal route of German troops to Muonio. However, the attack stopped when Finnish troops found a considerable This situation led to the Lapin Sota – the war in Lapland, liquor store in the supply depot and started a victory cel- against German troops remaining in Finland. Although ebration. The situation was rapidly brought under control, much less than the Continuation War in intensity and but the Germans still gained valuable time as the whole II number of troops involved, the Lapin Sota still ran over Battalion and part of I Battalion was temporarily unfit for seven months, included pitched battles, and cost the Finnish combat. -
(Strike Together, Not Divided!): the Panzer Divisions As New Dominating Strategy of Modern Warfare Stefano Alianelli the College of Wooster, [email protected]
The College of Wooster Libraries Open Works Senior Independent Study Theses 2013 Klotzen, Nicht Kleckern (Strike Together, Not Divided!): the Panzer Divisions As New Dominating Strategy of Modern Warfare Stefano Alianelli The College of Wooster, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://openworks.wooster.edu/independentstudy Part of the Military History Commons Recommended Citation Alianelli, Stefano, "Klotzen, Nicht Kleckern (Strike Together, Not Divided!): the Panzer Divisions As New Dominating Strategy of Modern Warfare" (2013). Senior Independent Study Theses. Paper 3805. https://openworks.wooster.edu/independentstudy/3805 This Senior Independent Study Thesis Exemplar is brought to you by Open Works, a service of The oC llege of Wooster Libraries. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Independent Study Theses by an authorized administrator of Open Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. © Copyright 2013 Stefano Alianelli The College of Wooster “Klotzen, Nicht Kleckern!” (Strike Together, Not Divided!) The Panzer Divisions as New Dominating Strategy of Modern Warfare by Stefano Alianelli Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements of Senior Independent Study Supervised by Hayden Schilling Department of History Spring 2013 Table of Contents Acknowledgements Introduction 1 Chapter One: Heinz Guderian and the Birth of the Panzer Divisions 6 Chapter Two: Poland: A Baptism by Fire and First Proof of Success for the Panzer Divisions 34 Chapter Three: France: Breach of Static Strategy by the Mobility of the Panzer Divisions 61 Conclusion 89 Annotative Bibliography 98 Acknowledgements I would like to give special thanks to my advisor Hayden Schilling whose devotion and interest in this project has been a great guide for accompanying me through the process of the Senior Independent Study. -
Riders on the Red Storm
Tank on Tank East Front - Tanksgiving Scenario RIDERS ON THE RED STORM Kursk July 10th, 1943 The Soviets have withstood five days of German attacks and were ready to launch a counterattack against the Nazi invad- ers. Their target: any German in sight. Soviet Tank Riders are assigned to protect the T-34s from any enemies that get to close. - Sean Druelinger Order of Battle Soviets Germans deploy in hexrows G1 – Q1 & G2 – Q2, inclusive. • 2 Panther & 1 Panther HQ (deploy in or within • 6 T-34s one hex of J9) • 3 T-34 HQs • 2 Tigers & 1 Tiger HQ (deploy in or within • 2 Katyusha three hexes of N10) • 6 Infantry stacked (on top) with a T-34 or T-34 • 4 Panzer IV & 1 Panzer IV HQ (deploy in or HQ (see special rule within one hex of E10) • 1 Wespe (deploy in hex J10) • 1 Ace (on any unit) • 1 Stuka Airstrike (Turn 4 only). Scenario Essentials Use Map E. The Soviets set up and move first. Victory Conditions The Soviets win a marginal victory by destroying 5 German armor units and the Wespe; they win a decisive victory by destroying 5 German armor units and the Wespe and control 2 Town hexes (E8 and I5) at the end of Turn 9. The Germans win a marginal victory by controlling the Town hex (I5) and not los- ing more than 5 armor units and the Wespe; they win a decisive victory if they control the Town hex (I5) and destroy 6 Soviet T-34s and not lose 5 of their own armor units and the Wespe. -
MECHANIZED ARMY DIVISIONS (22 June 1941) the GERMAN WORLD WAR II ORGANIZATIONAL SERIES
GERMAN WORLD WAR II ORGANIZATIONAL SERIES Volume 3/I MECHANIZED ARMY DIVISIONS (22 June 1941) THE GERMAN WORLD WAR II ORGANIZATIONAL SERIES 1/I 01.09.39 Mechanized Army Formations and Waffen-SS Formations (3rd Revised Edition) 1/II-1 01.09.39 1st and 2nd Welle Army Infantry Divisions 1/II-2 01.09.39 3rd and 4th Welle Army Infantry Divisions 1/III 01.09.39 Higher Headquarters — Mechanized GHQ Units — Static Units (2nd Revised Edition) 2/I 10.05.40 Mechanized Army Formations and Waffen-SS Formations (2nd Revised Edition) 2/II 10.05.40 Higher Headquarters and Mechanized GHQ Units (2nd Revised Edition) 3/I 22.06.41 Mechanized Army Divisions - (2nd Revised Edition) 3/II 22.06.41 Higher Headquarters and Mechanized GHQ Units (2nd Revised Edition) 4/I 28.06.42 Mechanized Army Divisions - (2nd Revised Edition) 4/II 28.06.42 Mechanized GHQ Units and Waffen-SS Formations 5/I 04.07.43 Mechanized Army Formations 5/II 04.07.43 Higher Headquarters and Mechanized GHQ Units 5/III 04.07.43 Waffen-SS Higher Headquarters and Mechanized Formations IN PREPARATION FOR PUBLICATION 2007/2008 7/I 06.06.44 Mechanized Army Formations 2/III 10.05.40 Army Infantry Divisions 3/III 22.06.41 Army Infantry Divisions IN PREPARATION FOR PUBLICATION 01.09.39 Landwehr Division — Mountain Divisions — Cavalry Brigade 10.05.40 Non-Mechanized GHQ Units Static Units 22.06.41 Mechanized Waffen-SS Formations Static Units 28.06.42 Higher Headquarters Army Divisions Static Units 04.07.43 Army Divisions Static Units 01.11.43 Mechanized Army Formations Mechanized GHQ Units Mechanized Waffen-SS Formations Army Divisions Static Units Higher Headquarters 06.06.44 Mechanized GHQ Units Mechanized Waffen-SS Formations Army Divisions Static Units Higher Headquarters 16.12.44 Mechanized Army Formations Mechanized GHQ Units Mechanized Waffen-SS Formations Army Divisions Static Units Higher Headquarters 1939 – 45 Luftwaffen Ground Combat Forces 1944 – 45 The 1944 Brigades 1939 – 45 Organizational Handbook GERMAN WORLD WAR II ORGANIZATIONAL SERIES by Leo W.G. -
Iabsm Army Lists for Poland for the 1939 September War
GERMANY IABSM ARMY LISTS FOR POLAND FOR THE 1939 SEPTEMBER WAR FULLY COMPATIBLE WITH IABSM V3 1 Introduction from Richard Clarke’s IABSM v2 Blitzkrieg theatre supplement: After its stumbling start in Poland in 1939, where the growth pains of its rapid expansion from the Army of Versailles were only masked by its numerical superiority over the Poles, the German Army’s belief in its abilities was buoyed up by early successes. It emerged to be undoubtedly the best led and most professional force of the early war. In addition the Germans had also inherited the Prussian tradition of creating well-balanced forces, able to act independently at all levels. Since Hitler’s rise to power in 1933 the emphasis on a “Volk im Waffen”, people under arms, that permeated virtually all aspects of German society had done much to produce a generation both ready and keen for war. The emphasis on developing leadership and military skills in the Nazi youth organisations contributed to make the German Army of this period an efficient machine. Despite its strengths, however, the Wehrmacht was not the unbeatable force that German propaganda would have had us believe. Indeed it was the seizing, and then retention, of the strategic initiative that gave the Germans victory rather than any inherent tactical superiority. At the level we are concerned with the German Army was balanced in structure and with a glut of experienced leaders. The flexible approach to orders and task achievement encouraged these leaders to think for themselves and this paid a high dividend, both in terms of military results and the development of leadership and tactical skills.