London Borough of Lambeth
Camberwell ‘M’ Proposed Controlled Parking Zone Consultation Report
April 2010
Notice This report was produced by Atkins Transport Planning and Management for the London Borough of Lambeth for the specific purpose of reporting on a consultation for the proposed Camberwell ‘M’ Controlled Parking Zone.
This report may not be used by any person other than the London Borough of Lambeth without their express permission. In any event, Atkins accepts no liability for any costs, liabilities or losses arising as a result of the use of or reliance upon the contents of this report by any person other than the London Borough of Lambeth.
Document History
JOB NUMBER: 5089217.100 DOCUMENT REF: Camberwell 'M' CPZ Consultation Report_V2.docx
A Revised Draft for Comment MH LH ST SM Apr 2010
- Draft for Comment MH LH ST CS Feb 2010
Revision Purpose Description Originated Checked Reviewed Authorised Date
5089217.100/Camberwell 'M' CPZ Consultation Report_V2.docx
London Borough of Lambeth Camberwell ‘M’ Proposed Controlled Parking Zone: Consultation Report
Contents Section Page
Executive Summary 4 1. Background 5 CPZ Proposal 5 2. Consultation Methodology 7 Methodology 7 Issues of Note 8 3. Consultation Results 9 Response Rate 9 Results 9 Respondent Status (Question 4) 10 Vehicle Ownership (Question 5) 10 Difficulty with Parking (Question 6) 11 Time of Difficulty with Parking (Question 7) 12 Alternative Parking (Question 8) 13 CPZ Response (Question 9) 14 Additional Comments (Question 10) 20 4. Parking Survey Summary 21 5. Summary and Conclusion 22
List of Tables Table 3.1 – Consultation Response Rate 9 Table 3.2 – Response to the Introduction of a CPZ per Street 15
List of Figures Figure 1.1 – Location Plan of Proposed Camberwell ‘M’ CPZ 5 Figure 3.1 – Respondents’ Association with Consultation Area 10 Figure 3.2 – Respondents’ Vehicle Ownership 10 Figure 3.3 – Respondents’ Difficulty with Parking 11 Figure 3.4 – Respondents’ Time of Difficulty with Parking 12 Figure 3.5 – Respondents’ Alternative Parking 13 Figure 3.6 – Respondents’ Response to the Introduction of a CPZ 14 Figure 3.7 – Response to the Introduction of a CPZ per Street 16 Figure 3.8 - Response to the Introduction of a CPZ per Address 17 Figure 3.9 – Confidence Intervals for the Introduction of a CPZ per Street 19
5089217.100/Camberwell 'M' CPZ Consultation Report_V2.docx 2
London Borough of Lambeth Camberwell ‘M’ Proposed Controlled Parking Zone: Consultation Report
Appendices Appendix A – Consultation Material 23 Appendix B – Key Comments from Public Meeting (07/12/09) 24 Appendix C – Full Breakdown of Response Rate 26 Appendix D – Demographic Breakdown of Respondents 32 D.1 Gender 33 D.2 Age 33 D.3 Health 34 D.4 Ethnic Group 34 Appendix E – Full Breakdown of Responses to Question 6 35 Appendix F – Full Breakdown of Responses to Question 8 38 Appendix G – Full Breakdown of Responses to Question 9 42 Appendix H – Summary of Additional Responses Received 45
List of Tables Table C.1 – Breakdown of Responses per Street 27 Table C.2 – Graded Response Rate per Street 30 Table E.1 – Breakdown of Responses to Question 6 36 Table F.1 – Breakdown of Responses to Question 8 39 Table G.1 – Breakdown of Responses to Question 9 43 Table H.1 – Summary of Additional Comments Received 46
List of Figures Figure D.1 – Demographic Breakdown by Gender 33 Figure D.2 – Demographic Breakdown by Age 33 Figure D.3 – Demographic Breakdown by Health 34 Figure D.4 – Demographic Breakdown by Ethnic Group 34
5089217.100/Camberwell 'M' CPZ Consultation Report_V2.docx 3
London Borough of Lambeth Camberwell ‘M’ Proposed Controlled Parking Zone: Consultation Report
Executive Summary
In 2008, the London Borough of Lambeth (the Council) received a petition from residents, requesting that a Controlled Parking Zone (CPZ) be investigated for the Myatts Field area, to address perceived parking problems. As a result of this, a consultation on proposals to introduce a CPZ across an area designated as Camberwell ‘M’, within the London Borough of Lambeth, was undertaken. 5161 consultation documents were distributed to residents and stakeholders, and a total of 621 were returned, giving an overall response rate of 12%. This response rate varied on a street by street basis. In response to being asked if they would like the Council to develop plans for a CPZ on their street, the majority of respondents (54%) stated that they were not in favour. This was in comparison to 40% of respondents who were in favour. Confidence intervals were calculated for the response to this question, on a street by street basis. This indicated that a limited number of streets have a high level of confidence that their response is reflective of the street as a whole. The streets of residents that were in favour of a CPZ were mainly located towards the north and west of the proposed area, with the streets against a CPZ mainly located towards the south and east of the area. However, it was identified that there were no areas of significant size which were completely in favour of the introduction of a CPZ. A parking survey was also carried out in the area to determine existing parking levels and identify any key issues ( Camberwell ‘M’ CPZ Consultation Parking Survey Technical Note, Atkins, January 2010 ). The results of this survey highlighted that that areas of high parking demand did not wholly correspond to areas where residents were in favour of a CPZ. It is understood that the Council will assess the results of the parking beat surveys and consultation and to decide on whether the CPZ proposal is progressed or not.
5089217.100/Camberwell 'M' CPZ Consultation Report_V2.docx 4
London Borough of Lambeth Camberwell ‘M’ Proposed Controlled Parking Zone: Consultation Report
1. Background CPZ Proposal 1.1 Atkins has been commissioned by the Council to manage the consultation of stakeholders on the proposal to introduce a CPZ across the area designated as Camberwell ‘M’. 1.2 This report outlines the methodology, analysis and results of the consultation. 1.3 Previous consultations by the Council to introduce the CPZ have ended in residents’ overwhelming objection to the proposals. However, in 2008 the Council received a petition requesting that a CPZ for the Myatts Field area be investigated, to address the perceived parking stress caused by commuter parking. After considering the views of the residents, the Council has decided to consult on the principle of implementing a CPZ, with the possibility that a viable zone is developed from the consultation. 1.4 The proposed CPZ area is situated within the Coldharbour and Vassall Wards, and is bordered by the Kennington ‘K’, Stockwell ‘S’ and Brixton ‘B’ CPZs to the west and the Camberwell ‘A’ CPZ to the east. A location plan of the consultation area is provided in Figure 1.1. Figure 1.1 – Location Plan of Proposed Camberwell ‘M’ CPZ
N
Source: Google Earth™ Mapping Service
5089217.100/Camberwell 'M' CPZ Consultation Report_V2.docx 5
London Borough of Lambeth Camberwell ‘M’ Proposed Controlled Parking Zone: Consultation Report
1.5 As part of the commission, the Council requested that parking beat surveys also be undertaken within the proposed CPZ area. This was to determine existing parking levels, as well as identify the key issues relating to parking. Atkins undertook surveys in November 2009 and issued a technical note (Camberwell ‘M’ CPZ Consultation Parking Survey Technical Note, Atkins, January 2010 ), outlining the results of the survey in January 2010. A brief summary of the parking survey results, and how they correspond to the results of the consultation, is provided in Section 4 of this report.
5089217.100/Camberwell 'M' CPZ Consultation Report_V2.docx 6
London Borough of Lambeth Camberwell ‘M’ Controlled Parking Zone: Consultation Report
2. Consultation Methodology Methodology 2.1 A consultation pack was produced, and approved by the Council, containing: • A consultation letter, explaining the reason for consultation and showing a plan of the CPZ area; • A questionnaire, with numerous questions designed to ascertain respondent views on the proposal, along with a diversity monitoring form; • A CPZ ‘Frequently Asked Questions’ factsheet; and • A pre-paid envelope for return of the questionnaire. 2.2 A copy of the consultation pack is included in Appendix A. 2.3 The distribution area, which corresponded to the proposed CPZ area, was defined by the Council. The addresses of all properties within the area were provided by the Council. A total of 5311 consultation packs were sent out to all of the properties and businesses within the area. Following post out, a total of 150 consultation packs were returned by the Royal Mail due to the address being inaccessible, addressee unknown or no such address existing. 2.4 It was noted that some of the consultation packs were returned as a result of properties located in high rise residential blocks being inaccessible. To address this issue, the estate management boards were contacted and asked to put up notices within the blocks to raise awareness with residents. The notices outlined that the consultation was being undertaken and included contact details to either request a questionnaire or submit comments regarding the proposal. 2.5 The Council also provided a list of key stakeholders to be consulted within the proposed CPZ area. This list was sent to the LB Lambeth Councillors within the affected Wards, who provided details of further key stakeholders as deemed necessary. Consultation packs were sent to 56 key stakeholders, some of whom were located outside the CPZ area. 2.6 In addition to the questionnaires issued, a notice was placed within the Council’s publication, the Lambeth Life, on 15 December 2009. The notice outlined that the consultation was being undertaken and included contact details to either request a questionnaire or submit comments regarding the proposal. The notice was placed to help ensure all residents were aware that the consultation was being undertaken and to allow them to request a consultation pack should they not have received one. 2.7 During the consultation period, a CPZ open meeting was arranged by a Calais Street resident and invites to attend were sent out independently of Atkins or the Council. The meeting was undertaken on 7 December 2009 at Longfield Hall on Burton Road, within the proposed CPZ area. Representatives from Atkins and the Council were present to discuss the proposal and answer questions from residents. Key discussion points raised at the meeting are enclosed in Appendix B. 2.8 The consultation period was originally set from 16 November to 18 December 2009 (5 weeks). However, due to the size of the proposed CPZ consultation area and concerns raised by residents about the robustness of previous consultations, the consultation period was extended to 22 January 2010 (total of 10 weeks).
5089217.100/Camberwell 'M' CPZ Consultation Report_V2.docx 7
London Borough of Lambeth Camberwell ‘M’ Controlled Parking Zone: Consultation Report
Issues of Note 2.9 The three main issues of note when carrying out the consultation were as follows: • Leaflets independent of the Council or Atkins were delivered to a number of households. The leaflets were anti-CPZ in tone, and included a link to an online petition to protest against the CPZ (http://nocpz.webhop.org). The petition stated that they “request that Lambeth Council and its Transport and Highways Team immediately withdraw their plans to implement a Controlled Parking Zone”. The petition can be viewed at the following website: http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/no-cpz-in-vassall-ward/signatures.html • A pack of 66 consultation replies were received in the post from PACCA TMO (Patmos Area Community Conservation Association – Tenant Management Organisation). It was noted that all replies were photocopies of the same reference number, a large number of the replies had the same ‘tick’ style, and every response was against the implementation of a CPZ. In some cases, the questionnaires were duplicates of responses already received from residents, but with different answers. Following advice from the Council, it was decided that these questionnaires should not be considered in the analysis. However, should the invalid responses have been taken into account, the key results as outlined in Section 3 would change as follows: - The response rate would increase from 12% to 13%; - The number of respondents against a CPZ would increase from 54% to 58%; - Cormont Road would change from being 50:50 to against a CPZ; and - Langton Road would change from being for a CPZ, to being against a CPZ. • A response was received from Robert Gallo, Chairman of Calais Street Residents Association (CSRA) on behalf of residents, on the 22 nd January 2010. The CSRA are also responsible for the Petition for the residents living around Myatts Field Park. The CSRA were not included on the original stakeholder mail out list, and therefore the response was not in the approved consultation document format. In addition, it was noted that a number of residents who represent the group had already sent in their individual responses to the consultation. It was therefore decided to exclude this response from analysis. However, it should be noted that the CSRA were strongly in favour of a CPZ being implemented and noted a number of reasons why a CPZ would be a suitably address the current parking problems on Calais Street and the surrounding area. The response also stated that as of January 2010, 104 signatures had been received in favour of a CPZ for the area around Myatts Field (http://gopetition.com/petitions/cpz-at-myatts-field-park.html). It is recommended that this is taken into account when considering the consultation responses. The full response is available on request.
5089217.100/Camberwell 'M' CPZ Consultation Report_V2.docx 8
London Borough of Lambeth Camberwell ‘M’ Controlled Parking Zone: Consultation Report
3. Consultation Results Response Rate 3.1 Of the 5161 consultation documents distributed to valid addresses and stakeholders, a total of 621 were returned, which gives an overall response rate of 12%. A breakdown of response rates between properties and stakeholders, to one decimal place, is shown in Table 3.1. Table 3.1 – Consultation Response Rate
Consultation Documents Sent Out Documents Received Response Rate Document Recipient
Residents and Business 5105 616 12.2% Owners
Stakeholders 56 5 8.9%
Total 5161 621 12.0%
3.2 A full count of the response rate, per street, is included in Appendix C. It should be noted that the individual response rates per street varied across the area. Table C.1 and C.2 in Appendix C colour codes the response rate, per street, based upon the thresholds below: • 0 – 10% response rate; • 10 – 20% response rate; and • 20% + response rate. 3.3 It is recommended that the Council reviews the analysis in the context of these individual response rates i.e. a street with a response rate of, for example, less than 20% may not be considered to be reflective of the street’s entire population. 3.4 Additional responses received during the consultation period were: • 1 letter; • 4 telephone calls; and • 5 emails. 3.5 A summary of the additional comments received as part of the questionnaire, as well as the additional correspondence comments above, have been included later in this Section. 3.6 All full responses to every questionnaire returned have been recorded and are available on request. Results 3.7 Questions 1 to 3 of the questionnaire attained personal information (name, address and postcode) of the respondent and this information has been omitted from this report for confidentiality. 3.8 The demographic breakdown of respondents is provided in Appendix D. 3.9 As previously mentioned, this consultation exercise had a 12% response rate, with varying response rates per street. It is therefore important, that when interpreting the response results in this Section, attention is given not only to the percentage sample but also to the actual numbers. This should minimise the possible distortion of results due to small samples.
5089217.100/Camberwell 'M' CPZ Consultation Report_V2.docx 9
London Borough of Lambeth Camberwell ‘M’ Controlled Parking Zone: Consultation Report
Respondent Status (Question 4) 3.10 Figure 3 .1 shows that 522 (84%) respondents are local residents, 33 (5%) are owners or employees of local businesses or organisations and 118 (19%) are residents on estates. 3.11 It should be noted that it was possible for respondents to appear twice in the data, for example, by both living and working in the consultation area. Figure 3.1 – Respondents’ Association with Consultation Area
600 522 (84%)
500
400
300
200 No. of Respondents of No. 118 (19%)
100 33 (5%)
0 Local Resident Owner/ Employee of Resident on an Estate Local Business Respondent Association
Vehicle Ownership (Question 5) 3.12 Figure 3 .2 shows that a majority (59%) of respondents own one car and 12% own more than one car. Approximately 6% of respondents own at least one motorcycle, and approximately 6% own at least one van or truck. 23% of respondents do not own a vehicle. 3.13 Again, i t should be noted that it was possible for respondents to appear twice in the data, for example, by owning both a car and a motorcycle. Figure 3.2 – Respondents’ Vehicle Ownership F 400 368 (59%) 300
200 148 (24%)
74 (12%) 100 36 (6%) 29 (5%) 2 (0.3%) 4 (0.6%) 0 One More Than One More Than One More Than
Respondents of No. One One One
Car Motorcycle Van/ Truck Do Not Own a Vehicle Vechile Ownership
5089217.100/Camberwell 'M' CPZ Consultation Report_V2.docx 10
London Borough of Lambeth Camberwell ‘M’ Controlled Parking Zone: Consultation Report
Difficulty with Parking (Question 6) 3.14 Figure 3.3 shows that the most significant pr oportion of respondents (42%) did not have difficulty parking in their area, compared to 37% of respondents who did. 21% of respondents either stated ‘not applicable’ or did not provide a response to this question. 3.15 A full analysis of the response s to Quest ion 6 , per street, is included in Appendix E . Figure 3.3 – Respondents’ Difficulty with Parking
400
264 (42%) 300 229 (37%)
200
118 (19%)
No. of Respondents of No. 100
10 (2%) 0 Yes No Not Applicable No Reply Difficulty with Parking
5089217.100/Camberwell 'M' CPZ Consultation Report_V2.docx 11
London Borough of Lambeth Camberwell ‘M’ Controlled Parking Zone: Consultation Report
Time of Difficulty with Parking (Question 7) 3.16 37% (229) of respondents stated that they have difficulty findi ng a parking space in their area. The times at which these respondents have most difficulty parking are shown in Figure 3.4. 3.17 It was possible for respondents to appear twice in the data, for example, by finding it hard to park on both a weekday and a Satur day. 3.18 The responses show that most respondents had problem parking on a weekday. The data indicated that parking problems were most significant during the morning and afternoon. This trend may be indicative of weekday commuter or business parking throughout the day, which is reduced as vehicles leave the area during the evening hours.
3.19 Parking problems were reduced during the weekend. The graph shows that Sunday evening is the most difficult time to park during the weekend, although the comments from responde nts did not reveal why that was the case. Figure 3.4 – Respondents’ Time of Difficulty with Parking
400
300
209 210 (34%) (34%)
200 Morning 143 (23%) Afternoon
No. of Respondents of No. 78 73 71 77 Evening (13%) (12%) (11%) (12%) 100 54 55 (9%) (9%)
0 Weekday Saturday Sunday Day and Time of Parking Difficulty
5089217.100/Camberwell 'M' CPZ Consultation Report_V2.docx 12
London Borough of Lambeth Camberwell ‘M’ Controlled Parking Zone: Consultation Report
Alternative Parking (Question 8) 3.20 Figure 3.5 shows the alternative streets where respondents park, should they not be able to park on their own street. Not all respondents noted that they parked in alternative streets, as highlighted by the 36% of people that replied to this question. 3.21 The figure illustrates that Knatchbull Road, Cormont Road and Vassall Road are the most utilised streets for alternative parking. Knatchbull Road and Cormont Road are located within the Myatt’s Field Area. Further investigation found that most respondents who parked here as an alternative, lived on other streets within the Myatt’ s Field area, thus alluding to the parking problems highlighted by residents in the area who initially raised the petition for a CPZ. 3.22 A full analysis of the responses, per street, to Question 8 is included in Appendix F. Figure 3.5 – Respondents’ Alternative Parking
33
30
26
20 20
12
No. of Respondents of No. 10 10 10 9 9 9 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 6 6 6 6 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 … Lorn Road Lorn Brief Street Brief MinetRoad MyattRoad Inglis Street Inglis LilfordRoad PauletRoad FoxleyRoad Burton Lane Burton Calais Street Calais Vassall Road Vassall Burton Road Burton Tindal Street Tindal Kendal Close Kendal Cancell Road Cancell Cowley Road Cowley Denmark Denmark Hill IndstynRoad LothianRoad PatmosRoad ClaribelRoad MostynRoad UpstallStreet FloddenRoad LangtonRoad ListowelClose HollandGrove Cranmer Cranmer Road Cormont Cormont Road Loughborough PenfordStreet Akerman Akerman Road EvandaleRoad Misc Response Misc Denmark Denmark Road TemplarStreet Halsmere Halsmere Road Cormont Cormont Street MandelaStreet Normandy Normandy Road KnatchbullRoad Frederick Frederick Crescent Road Name
5089217.100/Camberwell 'M' CPZ Consultation Report_V2.docx 13
London Borough of Lambeth Camberwell ‘M’ Controlled Parking Zone: Consultation Report
CPZ Response (Question 9) Summary Analysis 3.23 When asked if they wanted the Council to develop plans for a CPZ in their street, the majority of respondents (54%) were not in favour, compared to 40% of respondents who were in favour. 6% of respondents did not provide a response to this question. The responses are shown in Figure 3.6. Figure 3.6 – Respondents’ Response to the Introduction of a CP Z
400 335 (54%)
300 250 (40%)
200
No. of Repsondents of No. 100 36 (6%)
0 Yes No No Reply Overall Response to CPZ
3.24 The results were also broken down per street and full analysis of the responses, highlighting the ‘for’ and ‘against’ percentage for each street is shown in Appendix G. 3.25 The streets that are mostly in favour, not in favour, or are 50:50 (half in favour ; half not in favour) on their decision are listed in Table 3.2. The table shows that respondents from most streets are not in favour of a CPZ. 3.26 These streets are geographically shown in Figure 3.7. The map shows that the streets in favour of a CPZ are loca ted mainly towards the north and west of the proposed area, with the majority of streets towards the south and east of the area against the introduction of a CPZ. However, the map does not show any areas of significant size which are wholly in favour of a CPZ. 3.27 Individual responses, per property, are shown in Figure 3.8.
5089217.100/Camberwell 'M' CPZ Consultation Report_V2.docx 14
London Borough of Lambeth Camberwell ‘M’ Controlled Parking Zone: Consultation Report
Table 3.2 – Response to the Introduction of a CPZ per Street
Streets Mostly In Favour of a Streets Mostly Not in Favour of Streets 50:50 in their CPZ a CPZ Opinion
Brief Street Akerman Road Burton Lane Brixton Road Bowhill Close Foxley Square Calais Street Bramah Green Regency Mews Camberwell New Road Burton Road Russell Grove Carre Mews Cadman Close Upstall Street Cranmer Road Calais Gat e Welby Street Denmark Road Cancell Road Eythorne Road Chryssell Road Flodden Road Church Green Foxley Road Claribel Road Frederick Crescent Cormont Road Langton Road Cowley Road Lilford Road Cromwell Road Melbourne Mews Elliott Road Patmo s Road Evandale Road Salisbury Place Evesham Walk Templar Street Fountain Place Vassall Road Gosling Way Halsmere Road Holland Grove Kendal Close Knatchbull Road Listowel Close Lord Holland Lane Lothian Road Loughborough Road Mandela Street Minerva Close Minet Road Mostyn Road Myatt Road Normandy Road Paulet Road Penford Street Perseverance Place St Lawrence Way Tindal Street Turner Close Urlwin Walk
5089217.100/Camberwell 'M' CPZ Consultation Report_V2.docx 15
London Borough of Lambeth Camberwell ‘M’ Controlled Parking Zone: Consultation Report
Figure 3.7 – Response to the Introduction of a CPZ per Street
Brixton Rd N
Camberwell New Rd
Vassall Road
AkermanRd
Myatts Field
Knatchbull Rd
Paulet Rd
Lilford Road
Loughborough Rd
5089217.100/Camberwell 'M' CPZ Consultation Report_V2.docx 16
London Borough of Lambeth Camberwell ‘M’ Controlled Parking Zone: Consultation Report
Figure 3.8 - Response to the Introduction of a CPZ per Address
N
Myatts Field
5089217.100/Camberwell 'M' CPZ Consultation Report_V2.docx 17
London Borough of Lambeth Camberwell ‘M’ Controlled Parking Zone: Consultation Report
Quantified Analysis 3.28 Whilst reviewing the summary analysis for Question 9, it should be noted that the overall response rate per street may not be indicative of the street’s entire population. For example, whilst the majority of respondents from Brixton Road were in favour of a CPZ, the overall response rate for the road was only 5%, and therefore may not be considered representative of the whole street. It is recommended that the Council takes this into account when reviewing the analysis. 3.29 The detailed analysis provided in Appendix G colour codes each street based upon their individual response rate. The streets with lower overall response rates may be considered less representative of the entire street. 3.30 In order to help evaluate the statistical reliability of each street’s response to this question, the 95% confidence interval was calculated for the responses which stated ‘yes’ to the introduction of a CPZ. The results of this are shown in Figure 3.9. The bars on the graph show the percentage of respondents who were in favour of a CPZ on their street, whilst the error margin lines indicate the lower and upper confidence intervals for that particular response. 3.31 The range between the lower and upper confidence intervals indicates the percentage range in which we have confidence that the ‘yes’ responses we received for a street is indicative of the street as a whole. For example, if X% respondents were in favour of a CPZ, and the lower and upper confidence intervals were Y% and Z% respectively, we are between Y% and Z% confident that those X% respondents is representative of the street as a whole. 3.32 The graph is also split by the overall response rate to the consultation. Streets with a 0 – 10% response rate are highlighted in red (to the left), 10 – 20% response rate highlighted in yellow (in the centre), and 20% + highlighted in green (to the right). Those streets with lower response rates tend to have wider confidence intervals and the responses are therefore less indicative of the street as a whole. 3.33 Figure 3.9 indicates that there are a limited number of streets with an overall response rate of over 10%, and a confidence interval which would imply that the street as a whole would be in favour of a CPZ. However, it should be noted that if the Council proceed to design a zone which incorporates a number of streets, the confidence interval for that area is likely to be narrower than on an individual street basis. 3.34 For the Camberwell ‘M’ zone as a whole, the following confidence intervals were calculated: • 40% of respondents in favour of a CPZ, with a confidence interval between 36% and 44%; and • 54% of respondents not in favour of a CPZ, with a interval between 50% and 58%.
5089217.100/Camberwell 'M' CPZ Consultation Report_V2.docx 18
London Borough of Lambeth Camberwell ‘M’ Controlled Parking Zone: Consultation Report
Figure 3.9 – Confidence Intervals for the Introduction of a CPZ per Street
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0% Elliott Road Elliott Myatt Road Myatt Brief Street Brief Paulet Road Paulet Burton Lane Burton Foxley Road Foxley Minet Road Minet Urlwin Walk Urlwin Vassall Road Vassall Gosling Way Gosling Lilford Road Lilford Mews Carre Turner Close Turner Kendal Close Kendal Cancell Road Cancell Calais Street Calais Welby Street Welby Brixton Road Brixton Cowley Road Cowley Burton Road Burton Lothian Road Lothian Bowhill Close Bowhill Tindal Street Tindal Patmos Road Patmos Mostyn Road Mostyn Holland Lane Holland Langton Road Langton Church Green Church Road Claribel Russell Grove Russell Foxley Square Foxley Listowel Close Listowel Upstall Street Upstall Minerva Close Minerva Flodden Road Flodden Holland Grove Holland Cranmer Road Cranmer Bramah Green Bramah Road Cormont Chryssell Road Chryssell Evesham Walk Evesham Cadman Close Cadman Evandale Road Evandale Mansion Close Mansion Salisbury Place Salisbury Lawrence Way Lawrence Denmark Road Denmark Fountain Place Fountain Road Akerman Eythorne Road Eythorne Penford Street Penford Cromwell Road Cromwell Mandela Street Mandela Templar Street Templar Halsmere Road Halsmere Normandy Road Normandy Knatchbull Road Knatchbull Melbourne Mews Melbourne Frederick Crescent Frederick Perseverance Place Perseverance Loughborough Road Loughborough Camberwell New Road New Camberwell
Response Rate Key: Question 9 Response Key:
0 – 10% Overall Consultation Response Rate Upper Confidence
10 – 20% Overall Consultation Response Rate % of Respondents in Favour of a CPZ
20% + Overall Consultation Response Rate Lower Confidence
5089217.100/Camberwell 'M' CPZ Consultation Report_V2.docx 19
London Borough of Lambeth Camberwell ‘M’ Controlled Parking Zone: Consultation Report
Additional Comments (Question 10) Questionnaire Comments 3.35 All additional comments on the questionnaires were read and recorded in full in a spreadsheet. These are available on request. However, analysis of responses highlighted some specific key themes, which have been summarised below. Comments In Favour of a CPZ • Congestion: A large number of respondents (approximately 10%) noted congestion as a major problem in their area, resulting in difficulty with parking. A number of respondents stated that large commercial vehicles and commuters were the cause of this congestion. Geographically, it was highlighted that the Myatts Field area and Vassall Road were particular problem areas. • Safety: Some respondents stated that the high level of parking resulted in a safety issue, particularly for children. Comments Not in Favour of a CPZ • Permit Cost: A large number of respondents (approximately 12%) stated that they opposed the cost of the parking permit. Many stated that they felt the CPZ would act wholly as a money-making scheme for the Council and regarded the permits as a stealth tax. • No Need: A large number of respondents (approximately 11%) stated that there was no problem with parking on their particular road and they therefore felt that there was no need for a CPZ to be introduced. • Visitors: Some respondents noted that it would easier for visitors to park without a CPZ in place, than if temporary visitor permits were required. Miscellaneous Comments • Limited Hours of Restriction: Should a CPZ be introduced, a number of respondents requested that it only be limited to one, or a few hours, and should not be all day restriction. • Consideration for Local Businesses: A number of business owners commented that consideration be given to local business should a CPZ be introduced. For example, pay and display bays should be provided so that the CPZ does not have a detrimental impact upon business. • Dumped Vehicles: Some respondents noted that parking problems were caused by vehicles which have been dumped and left in situ for a number of months. Particular streets where this was noted are Vassall Road, Upstall Street, Knatchbull Road and Denmark Road. 3.36 It is important to bear in mind that most respondents usually only comment on what they disagree with. As a result, it was noted that most comments were typically in opposition to the proposals. 3.37 In particular, the most common theme in opposition to a CPZ was the cost of parking permits. This is concurrent with comments received at the CPZ open meeting. It is considered that a number of residents are against a CPZ simply on the basis of this, even if they believe the CPZ would help alleviate parking problems in their area. 3.38 It should be noted that many comments were received were specific to individual issues and problems. It is recommended that these are taken into consideration, prior to the further development of proposals. Phone Call/ Email/ Letter Comments Additional comments received via telephone, email and letter are summarised in Appendix H.
5089217.100/Camberwell 'M' CPZ Consultation Report_V2.docx 20
London Borough of Lambeth Camberwell ‘M’ Controlled Parking Zone: Consultation Report
4. Parking Survey Summary
4.1 The Council requested that parking beat surveys be undertaken within the proposed CPZ area. This was to determine existing parking levels, as well as identify the key issues relating to parking. This Section provides a summary of the findings as outlined in the Camberwell ‘M’ CPZ Consultation Parking Survey Technical Note (Atkins, January 2010) , and how they correspond to the results of the consultation. 4.2 Analysis of the parking survey data indicated a marked difference between parking patterns within the proposed CPZ between the Wednesday and Saturday, and also geographically across the area. 4.3 Analysis of the percentage use of unrestricted parking spaces indicated that during the Wednesday survey, an average of 72% of unrestricted spaces were in use across the proposed CPZ area, compared to 53% on the Saturday. Although the percentage use of unrestricted parking areas differed across the proposed CPZ area, these figures indicate that the area as a whole is not adversely affected by pressure on parking spaces. This may be why the most significant proportion of respondents (42%) to the consultation questionnaire did not have difficulty parking in their area, as opposed to the 37% who did (Question 6). 4.4 The parking survey data suggested that pressure on car parking spaces is greater during the week (particularly during the IP) and occupancy decreases significantly during the weekend. This resonates with the response to Question 7 of the consultation questionnaire, where respondents noted most difficulty with parking during the week, in the morning and afternoon. 4.5 Visual analysis of the data, in the form of CPZ parking model maps, showed that during both Wednesday and Saturday surveys, the areas of lowest parking demand were located towards the west and north of the area, and the areas of highest parking demand were located towards the east and south of the area. It was noted that roads within the Myatts Field area experienced noticeable demand, and this may be reflective of the large numbers of residents living in high rise buildings, for example in the Myatts Field Estate and Loughborough Estate. The trend may also be reflective of the light industrial estate located off Paulet Road, and Loughborough Junction Rail Station near to Rathgar Street, which may induce high parking occupancy on those roads. 4.6 However, the streets that were in favour of a CPZ, through the consultation questionnaire, were mainly located towards the north and west of the proposed area, with the streets against a CPZ mainly located towards the south and east of the area. This trend is, on the whole, in contrast to the parking survey results. This may be suggestive that in some cases other factors, apart from parking pressures, may be affecting respondent’s choice as to whether they are for or against a CPZ. The questionnaire indicated that the cost of parking permits heavily influenced people’s decisions, and that could be one of the reasons why areas of high parking pressure do not wholly correspond with respondents being in favour of a CPZ.
5089217.100/Camberwell 'M' CPZ Consultation Report_V2.docx 21
London Borough of Lambeth Camberwell ‘M’ Controlled Parking Zone: Consultation Report
5. Summary and Conclusion
5.1 A consultation was carried out on proposals to introduce a CPZ across an area designated as Camberwell ‘M’, within the London Borough of Lambeth. 5.2 The consultation was undertaken as a result of a petition being received by the Council in 2008, requesting that a CPZ for the Myatts Field area be investigated, to address the perceived parking stress caused by commuter parking. 5.3 Of the 5161 consultation documents distributed to addresses and stakeholders, a total of 621 were returned, giving an overall response rate of 12%. This response rate varied on a street by street basis. 5.4 Of these respondents, 84% are local residents, 5% are owners or employees of local businesses or organisations and 19% are residents on estates. The majority (59%) of respondents own at one car and 12% own more than one car. 23% of respondents do not own a vehicle. 5.5 The most significant proportion of respondents (42%) do not have difficulty with parking, although 37% do. Of those that do, it was found that parking problems were most significant on weekdays, particularly during the morning and afternoon. It is considered that this may coincide with weekday commuter or business activity. The responses indicated that parking problems were less significant during the weekend. This trend resonated with the results of the parking beat survey carried out in the area. 5.6 It was found that where residents parked in alternative streets to their own, Knatchbull Road, Cormont Road and Vassall Road had the highest level of displaced parking. Residents parking here were primarily from the Myatt’s Field area. 5.7 In response to being asked if they would like the Council to develop plans for a CPZ on their street, the majority of respondents (54%) stated that they were not in favour. This was in comparison to 40% of respondents who were in favour. Confidence intervals were calculated for the response to this question, on a street by street basis. This indicated that there are a limited number of streets with an overall response rate of over 10%, and a confidence interval which would imply that the street as a whole would be in favour of a CPZ 5.8 The streets that were in favour of a CPZ were mainly located towards the north and west of the proposed area, with the streets against a CPZ mainly located towards the south and east of the area. However, it was identified that there were no areas of significant size which were completely in favour of the introduction of a CPZ. On this basis, it may be difficult, or contentious, to form a viable zone. It should be noted that not all of the Myatts Field area were in favour of a CPZ, despite the original petition coming from residents in that area. 5.9 When comparing the parking survey results with the consultation results, it was found that areas of high parking demand did not wholly correspond to areas where residents were in favour of a CPZ. 5.10 Comments received from residents through the questionnaires, or alternative means, indicated that the key reasoning for a CPZ would be to mitigate parking issues and to improve safety. Conversely, the main reasons why residents opposed the introduction of a CPZ is the cost of parking permits, the belief that there is not an existing parking problem and the impracticality of permits for visitors. 5.11 It is understood that the Council will assess the results of the parking beat surveys and consultation and to decide on whether the CPZ proposal is progressed or not. It is recommended that response rates on a street by street basis, as well as the confidence intervals identified for the response to whether respondents are in favour of a CPZ, be taken into consideration.
5089217.100/Camberwell 'M' CPZ Consultation Report_V2.docx 22
London Borough of Lambeth Camberwell ‘M’ Controlled Parking Zone: Consultation Report
Appendix A Consultation Material
5089217.100/Camberwell 'M' CPZ Consultation Report_V2.docx 23
London Borough of Lambeth Camberwell ‘M’ Controlled Parking Zone: Consultation Report
Appendix B Key Comments from Public Meeting (07/12/09)
5089217.100/Camberwell 'M' CPZ Consultation Report_V2.docx 24
London Borough of Lambeth Camberwell ‘M’ Controlled Parking Zone: Consultation Report
Residents in Favour of CPZ • A resident on Calais Street stated the following reasons in support of a CPZ: - Concerned about safety with current level of parking; - Stated that a CPZ is the only solution to mitigate the parking problems in the area; and - Stated that they undertook an independent survey of residents and over 100 stated they would like a CPZ introduced. • Another resident on Calais Street stated the following reasons in support of a CPZ: - Would improve safety; and - Would provide a fair distribution of parking space. Residents Not in Favour of CPZ • A resident on Lilford Road stated the following reasons in opposition to a CPZ: - Stated that they did not want any CPZs across the whole of Lambeth, as it displaces parking to other areas and causes problems elsewhere. Would like an “all or nothing” approach to CPZs across Lambeth; and - Believes it is unrealistic to restrict parking in the entire area as some areas have ample parking, whilst other areas have almost none. • A resident on Cormont Road stated the following reasons in opposition to a CPZ: - Opposed the cost of parking permits; and - Feels that the problem has been displaced here as a result of the introduction of other CPZ schemes, and that there is plenty of available parking in Lambeth. General Comments • A number of residents considered the cost of parking permits as another tax and a money making exercise by the Council; • A number of residents stated that they cannot park their car and were therefore in favour of a CPZ; • A resident raised the issue of Southwark vehicles parking in Lambeth due to the entrance of the Southwark CPZ; • A resident requested that metered parking be provided for libraries, parks etc, should a CPZ be introduced; and • Cllr Steve Bradley stated the need for a fair and transparent consultation process.
5089217.100/Camberwell 'M' CPZ Consultation Report_V2.docx 25
London Borough of Lambeth Camberwell ‘M’ Controlled Parking Zone: Consultation Report
Appendix C Full Breakdown of Response Rate
5089217.100/Camberwell 'M' CPZ Consultation Report_V2.docx 26
London Borough of Lambeth Camberwell ‘M’ Controlled Parking Zone: Consultation Report
Table C.1 – Breakdown of Responses per Street
Road Names No. of Address No. of Respondents Response Rate (%)
Akerman Road 87 5 6%
Angell Road 1 0 0%
Barrington Road 1 0 0%
Bowhill Close 12 2 17%
Bramah Green 39 5 13%
Brief Street 26 7 27%
Brixton Road 291 14 5%
Burton Lane 17 2 12%
Burton Road 101 24 24%
Cadman Close 4 1 25%
Calais Street 41 16 39%
Camberwell New Road 172 24 14%
Cancell Road 32 6 19%
Carlton Court 1 0 0%
Carre Mews 5 2 40%
Chryssell Road 116 8 7%
Church Green 19 3 16%
Clapham Road 1 0 0%
Claribel Road 67 15 22%
Coldharbour Lane 2 0 0%
Cormont Road 240 36 15%
Cowley Estate 1 0 0%
Cowley Road 170 5 3%
Cranmer Road 63 6 10%
Cromwell Road 46 2 4%
Deal Walk 5 0 0%
Denmark Road 84 9 11%
Effra Road 1 0 0%
Elliott Road 45 3 7%
Evandale Road 45 6 13%
Evesham Walk 88 6 7%
Eythorne Road 182 7 4%
Fairbairn Green 38 0 0%
Flodden Road 45 13 29%
Fountain Place 51 2 4%
5089217.100/Camberwell 'M' CPZ Consultation Report_V2.docx 27
London Borough of Lambeth Camberwell ‘M’ Controlled Parking Zone: Consultation Report
Road Names No. of Address No. of Respondents Response Rate (%)
Foxley Road 117 9 8%
Foxley Square 79 5 6%
Frederick Crescent 29 6 21%
Gosling Way 360 16 4%
Gresham Road 1 0 0%
Halsmere Road 67 16 24%
Hammelton Green 23 0 0%
Hilda Terrace 9 0 0%
Holland Grove 143 15 10%
Holland Lane 19 4 21%
Housing Estate 1 0 0%
Inglis Street 4 0 0%
Kendal Close 30 4 13%
Knatchbull Road 158 40 25%
Langton Road 82 11 13%
Lawrence Way 53 4 8%
Lilford Road 178 39 22%
Listowel Close 14 2 14%
Lothian Road 139 13 9%
Loughborough Road 208 16 8%
Lower Lane 1 0 0%
Mandela Street 51 7 14%
Mansion Close 14 1 7%
Melbourne Mews 61 8 13%
Minerva Close 18 3 17%
Minet Road 5 1 20%
Mostyn Road 33 1 3%
Myatt Road 41 6 15%
Normandy Road 11 3 27%
North Estate 2 0 0%
Norval Green 10 0 0%
Patmos Road 33 3 9%
Paulet Road 265 44 17%
Penford Street 70 14 20%
Perseverance Place 14 3 21%
Regency Mews 8 4 50%
5089217.100/Camberwell 'M' CPZ Consultation Report_V2.docx 28
London Borough of Lambeth Camberwell ‘M’ Controlled Parking Zone: Consultation Report
Road Names No. of Address No. of Respondents Response Rate (%)
Rosebery Road 1 0 0%
Russell Grove 40 8 20%
Salisbury Place 69 8 12%
Sentiman Road 1 0 0%
Sorrell Close 12 0 0%
Tavern Lane 5 0 0%
Templar Street 46 11 24%
Tindal Street 22 5 23%
Turner Close 26 4 15%
Upstall Street 31 8 26%
Urlwin Walk 78 7 9%
Vassall Estate 1 0 0%
Vassall Road 320 41 13%
Vassel Garden 1 0 0%
Welby Street 16 2 13%
Wiltshire Road 1 0 0%
Wolfington Road 1 0 0%
Total 5161 621 12%
Key
0 – 10% Response Rate
10 – 20% Response Rate
20% + Response Rate
5089217.100/Camberwell 'M' CPZ Consultation Report_V2.docx 29
London Borough of Lambeth Camberwell ‘M’ Controlled Parking Zone: Consultation Report
Table C.2 – Graded Response Rate per Street
Road Names Response Rate (%)
0 – 10% Response Rate Cowley Road 3% Mostyn Road 3% Eythorne Road 4% Fountain Place 4% Cromwell Road 4% Gosling Way 4% Brixton Road 5% Akerman Road 6% Foxley Square 6% Elliott Road 7% Evesham Walk 7% Chryssell Road 7% Mansion Close 7% Lawrence Way 8% Foxley Road 8% Loughborough Road 8% Urlwin Walk 9% Patmos Road 9% Lothian Road 9% 10 – 20% Response Rate Cranmer Road 10% Holland Grove 10% Denmark Road 11% Salisbury Place 12% Burton Lane 12% Welby Street 13% Vassall Road 13% Bramah Green 13% Melbourne Mews 13% Evandale Road 13% Kendal Close 13% Langton Road 13% Mandela Street 14% Camberwell New Road 14% Listowel Close 14% Myatt Road 15% Cormont Road 15% Turner Close 15% Church Green 16% Paulet Road 17% Bowhill Close 17% Minerva Close 17% Cancell Road 19% 20% + Response Rate Minet Road 20% Penford Street 20% Russell Grove 20% Frederick Crescent 21% Holland Lane 21%
5089217.100/Camberwell 'M' CPZ Consultation Report_V2.docx 30
London Borough of Lambeth Camberwell ‘M’ Controlled Parking Zone: Consultation Report
Road Names Response Rate (%)
Perseverance Place 21% Lilford Road 22% Claribel Road 22% Tindal Street 23% Burton Road 24% Halsmere Road 24% Templar Street 24% Cadman Close 25% Knatchbull Road 25% Upstall Street 26% Brief Street 27% Normandy Road 27% Flodden Road 29% Calais Street 39% Carre Mews 40% Regency Mews 50%
5089217.100/Camberwell 'M' CPZ Consultation Report_V2.docx 31
London Borough of Lambeth Camberwell ‘M’ Controlled Parking Zone: Consultation Report
Appendix D Demographic Breakdown of Respondents
5089217.100/Camberwell 'M' CPZ Consultation Report_V2.docx 32
London Borough of Lambeth Camberwell ‘M’ C ontrolled Parking Zone: Consultation Report
D.1 Gender
Figure D.1 – Demographic Breakdown by Gender
400
313 (51%) 275 (44%) 300
200
No. of Respondents of No. 100 33 (5%)
0 Male Female No Reply Gender
D.2 Age
Figure D.2 – Demographic Breakdown by Age
300
191 (31%) 199 (32%) 200
95 (15%) 100 No. of Respondents of No. 66 (11%) 42 (7%) 27 (4%) 1 (0.2%) 0 16-19 20-29 30-44 45-59 60-74 75 and No Reply over Age
5089217.100/Camberwell 'M' CPZ Consultation Report_V2.docx 33
London Borough of Lambeth Camberwell ‘M’ C ontrolled Parking Zone: Consultation Report
D.3 Health ( Do you have any long standing illness, disability or infirmity?)
Figure D.3 – Demographic Breakdown by Health
500 431 (70%)
400
300
200 138 (22%) No. of Respondents of No. 100 52 (8%)
0 Yes No No Reply Health Problems
D.4 Ethnic Group
Figure D.4 – Demographic Breakdown by Ethnic Group
300 289 (47%)
200
97 (16%) 100 58 62 (9%) (10%)
No. of Respondents of No. 27 16 12 15 11 6 6 3 4 8 (4%) 7 (3%) (2%) (2%) (2%) (1%) (1%) (0%) (1%) (1%) (1%) 0 … … … Indian - Chinese Pakistani No Reply Reply No No Caribbean - White Irish White - Bangladeshi White British White - Other Ethnic Group Ethnic Other White and Black African Blackand White Other white background white Other Other mixed background mixed Other – White and Black Caribbean Blackand White Other Black or Black British British Blackor Black Other Other Asian or Asian British British Asian or British Asian Asian or Asian Other Other – Asian or Asian British British Asian or Asian Asian or Asian British British Asian or Asian Mixed Mixed Black or Black British British Black or Black Asian or Asian British British Asian or Asian Mixed Mixed Ethnicity
5089217.100/Camberwell 'M' CPZ Consultation Report_V2.docx 34
London Borough of Lambeth Camberwell ‘M’ Controlled Parking Zone: Consultation Report
Appendix E Full Breakdown of Responses to Question 6 Do you have difficulty finding a parking space in your street?
5089217.100/Camberwell 'M' CPZ Consultation Report_V2.docx 35
London Borough of Lambeth Camberwell ‘M’ Controlled Parking Zone: Consultation Report
Table E.1 – Breakdown of Responses to Question 6 No Total Location Yes % No % N/A % % Reply Respondents
Akerman Road 1 20% 1 20% 3 60% 0 0% 5
Bowhill Close 0 0% 2 100% 0 0% 0 0% 2
Bramah Green 1 20% 2 40% 2 40% 0 0% 5
Brief Street 4 57% 2 29% 1 14% 0 0% 7
Brixton Road 2 14% 6 43% 6 43% 0 0% 14
Burton Lane 0 0% 2 100% 0 0% 0 0% 2
Burton Road 8 33% 10 42% 4 17% 2 8% 24
Cadman Close 1 100% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1
Calais Street 13 81% 3 19% 0 0% 0 0% 16
Camberwell New Road 9 38% 7 29% 7 29% 1 4% 24
Cancell Road 2 33% 3 50% 1 17% 0 0% 6
Carre Mews 2 100% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 2
Chryssell Road 1 13% 4 50% 3 38% 0 0% 8
Church Green 0 0% 1 33% 2 67% 0 0% 3
Claribel Road 4 27% 9 60% 2 13% 0 0% 15
Cormont Road 7 19% 22 61% 5 14% 2 6% 36
Cowley Road 1 20% 1 20% 2 40% 1 20% 5
Cranmer Road 2 33% 3 50% 1 17% 0 0% 6
Cromwell Road 0 0% 2 100% 0 0% 0 0% 2
Denmark Road 6 67% 1 11% 2 22% 0 0% 9
Elliott Road 1 33% 2 67% 0 0% 0 0% 3
Evandale Road 4 67% 1 17% 1 17% 0 0% 6
Evesham Walk 2 33% 3 50% 1 17% 0 0% 6
Eythorne Road 1 14% 5 71% 1 14% 0 0% 7
Flodden Road 7 54% 2 15% 4 31% 0 0% 13
Fountain Place 1 50% 1 50% 0 0% 0 0% 2
Foxley Road 3 33% 5 56% 1 11% 0 0% 9
Foxley Square 3 60% 1 20% 1 20% 0 0% 5
Frederick Crescent 4 67% 1 17% 1 17% 0 0% 6
Gosling Way 1 6% 12 75% 3 19% 0 0% 16
Halsmere Road 5 31% 9 56% 2 13% 0 0% 16
Holland Grove 4 27% 5 33% 6 40% 0 0% 15
Holland Lane 0 0% 1 25% 3 75% 0 0% 4
Kendal Close 0 0% 2 50% 2 50% 0 0% 4
Knatchbull Road 20 50% 16 40% 4 10% 0 0% 40
5089217.100/Camberwell 'M' CPZ Consultation Report_V2.docx 36
London Borough of Lambeth Camberwell ‘M’ Controlled Parking Zone: Consultation Report
No Total Location Yes % No % N/A % % Reply Respondents
Langton Road 7 64% 2 18% 1 9% 1 9% 11
Lawrence Way 1 25% 1 25% 2 50% 0 0% 4
Lilford Road 23 59% 15 38% 1 3% 0 0% 39
Listowel Close 0 0% 2 100% 0 0% 0 0% 2
Lothian Road 7 54% 3 23% 3 23% 0 0% 13
Loughborough Road 4 25% 9 56% 3 19% 0 0% 16
Mandela Street 2 29% 4 57% 1 14% 0 0% 7
Mansion Close 1 100% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1
Melbourne Mews 1 13% 3 38% 4 50% 0 0% 8
Minerva Close 0 0% 3 100% 0 0% 0 0% 3
Minet Road 0 0% 1 100% 0 0% 0 0% 1
Mostyn Road 1 100% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1
Myatt Road 3 50% 3 50% 0 0% 0 0% 6
Normandy Road 0 0% 1 33% 2 67% 0 0% 3
Patmos Road 3 100% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 3
Paulet Road 19 43% 20 45% 5 11% 0 0% 44
Penford Street 1 7% 9 64% 4 29% 0 0% 14
Perseverance Place 1 33% 2 67% 0 0% 0 0% 3
Regency Mews 0 0% 2 50% 2 50% 0 0% 4
Russell Grove 2 25% 4 50% 2 25% 0 0% 8
Salisbury Place 2 25% 2 25% 4 50% 0 0% 8
Templar Street 5 45% 4 36% 2 18% 0 0% 11
Tindal Street 0 0% 4 80% 1 20% 0 0% 5
Turner Close 0 0% 2 50% 2 50% 0 0% 4
Upstall Street 1 13% 6 75% 1 13% 0 0% 8
Urlwin Walk 1 14% 4 57% 1 14% 1 14% 7
Vassall Road 23 56% 10 24% 6 15% 2 5% 41
Welby Street 1 50% 1 50% 0 0% 0 0% 2
Total 229 264 118 10 621
Key
0 – 10% Overall Consultation Response Rate
10 – 20% Overall Consultation Response Rate
20% + Overall Consultation Response Rate
5089217.100/Camberwell 'M' CPZ Consultation Report_V2.docx 37
London Borough of Lambeth Camberwell ‘M’ Controlled Parking Zone: Consultation Report
Appendix F Full Breakdown of Responses to Question 8 If you have to park in a different street, what is the name of the street you most commonly park in?
5089217.100/Camberwell 'M' CPZ Consultation Report_V2.docx 38
London Borough of Lambeth Camberwell ‘M’ Controlled Parking Zone: Consultation Report
Table F.1 – Breakdown of Responses to Question 8 N.B. Please note that some respondents named more than one alternative parking location
Resident Location Alternative Parking Locations (Number of responses per street indicated in brackets)
No Response (4) Claribel Rd Burton Rd (1) Akerman Road (1)
No Response (2) Bowhill Close
No Response (4) Cancell Rd Bramah Green (1)
No Response (1) Cormont Rd Brief Street (7)
No Response (8) Vassall Rd Minet Rd (1) Mandela St Loughboroug Mostyn Rd Brixton Road (3) (1) h Rd (1) (1)
No Response (2) Burton Lane
No Response Knatchbull Cormont Rd Brief St (3) Claribel Rd Burton Road (18) Rd (2) (2) (1)
No Response (1) Cadman Close
No Response (2) Cormont Rd Halsmere Rd Knatchbull Flodden Rd Misc. (1) Calais Street (9) (8) Rd (2) (1)
No Response (6) Cancell Road
No Response (2) Carre Mews
No Response (6) Vassall Rd Chryssell Road (2)
No Response (3) Church Green
No Response Brief St (1) Knatchbull Claribel Road (11) Rd (2)
No Response Cormont Rd Calais St (1) Knatchbull Brief St (1) Myatts Field Cormont Road (30) (1) Rd (2) Area (1)
No Response (4) Vassall Rd Cowley Road (1)
No Response (5) Vassall Rd Cranmer Road (1)
No Response (1) Lilford Rd (1) Cromwell Road
No Response (5) Camberwell Knatchbull Calais St (1) Denmark Road Business Rd (1) Centre (1)
Frederick Cres Cancell Rd Patmos Rd Elliott Road (1) (1) (1)
No Response (2) Burton Rd (2) Burton Ln (1) Akerman Rd Claribel Rd Loughboroug Brief St (1) Evandale Road (2) (1) Rd (1)
No Response (4) Loughboroug Misc. (1) Evesham Walk h Rd (1)
No Response (6) Akerman Rd Eythorne Road (1)
5089217.100/Camberwell 'M' CPZ Consultation Report_V2.docx 39
London Borough of Lambeth Camberwell ‘M’ Controlled Parking Zone: Consultation Report
Resident Location Alternative Parking Locations (Number of responses per street indicated in brackets)
No Response (8) Flodden Rd Calais St (3) Knatcbull Rd Flodden Road (1) (3)
No Response (2) Fountain Place
No Response (5) Vassall Rd Kendal Cl (1) Misc. (2) Foxley Road (1)
No Response (4) Frederick Foxley Square Cres (1)
No Response (3) Patmos Rd Myatt Rd (1) Cancell Rd Vassall Rd Frederick Crescent (1) (1) (1)
No Response Vassall Rd Mostyn Rd Cowley Rd Normandy Rd Cancell Rd Normandy Rd Gosling Way (10) (2) (1) (3) (1) (1) (1)
No Response Cormont Rd Halsmere Road (14) (2)
No Response (9) Vassall Rd Holland Grove (6)
No Response (3) Burton Ln (1) Holland Lane
No Response (3) Cranmer Rd Kendal Close (1)
No Response Penford St Cormont Rd Knatchbull Inglis St (5) Burton Rd (1) Templar St Upstall St (1) Knatchbull Road (22) (2) (4) Rd (3) (3)
No Response (4) Langton Rd Tindal St (3) Lothian Rd Langton Road (1) (4)
No Response (3) Indstyn Rd Lawrence Way (1)
No Response Claribel Rd Knatchbull Paulet Rd (6) Penford St Burton Rd (4) Minet Rd (8) Elan St (1) Misc. (2) Lilford Road (18) (2) Rd (8) (1)
No Response (2) Listowel Close
No Response (7) Calais St (1) Patmos Rd Akerman Rd Lothian Rd Tindal St (1) Misc. (1) Lothian Road (2) (1) (1)
No Response Evendale Rd Burton Rd (1) Burton Ln (1) Cormont Rd Loughborough Road (12) (2) (1)
No Response (5) Listowel Cl Vassall Rd Mandela Street (1) (1)
Cowley Rd (1) Mansion Close
No Response (8) Melbourne Mews
No Response (3) Minerva Close
No Response (1) Minet Road
Lorn Rd (1) Mostyn Road
No Response (3) Myatt Rd (1) Frederick Tindal St (1) Myatt Road Cres (2)
No Response (9) Langton Rd Lothian Rd Tindal St (1) Myatt Rd (1) Cranmer Rd Foxley Rd (1) Clalais St (2) Vassal Rd (2) Kendal Cl (2) Langton Rd New Road (2) (4) (2) (2)
5089217.100/Camberwell 'M' CPZ Consultation Report_V2.docx 40
London Borough of Lambeth Camberwell ‘M’ Controlled Parking Zone: Consultation Report
Resident Location Alternative Parking Locations (Number of responses per street indicated in brackets)
No Response (3) Normandy Road
Akerman Rd (2) Myatt Rd (1) Langton Rd Patmos Road (1)
No Response Knatchbull Inglis St (3) Lilford St (5) Penford St Upstall St (2) Templar St Burton St (1) Misc. (1) Paulet Road (24) Rd (5) (4) (6)
No Response Burton Rd (1) Knatchbull Penford Street (12) Rd (1)
No Response (3) Perseverance Place
No Response (4) Regency Mews
No Response (6) Cancell Rd Russell Grove (2)
No Response (7) Misc. (1) Salisbury Place
No Response (8) Cormont St Paulet Rd (1) Knatchbull Templar Street (2) Rd (1)
No Response (5) Tindal Street
No Response (2) Langton Rd Turner Close (2)
No Response (7) Knatchbull Upstall Street Rd (1)
No Response (6) Mostyn Rd Akerman Rd Urlwin Walk (1) (1)
No Response Palmos Rd Lanston Rd Frederick Langton Rd Holland Cancell Rd Foxley Rd, Mostyn Rd Elliot Rd (2) Tindal St (1) Kendal Cl (1) Cowley St (1) Mandela (1) Vassall Rd Denmark Hill Vassall Road (24) (4) (1) Cres (2) (5) Grove (3) (4) Elliot Rd (1) (1) (1) (1)
No Response (1) Welby Street
5089217.100/Camberwell 'M' CPZ Consultation Report_V2.docx 41
London Borough of Lambeth Camberwell ‘M’ Controlled Parking Zone: Consultation Report
Appendix G Full Breakdown of Responses to Question 9 Do you want the Council to develop plans for a Controlled Parking Zone in your street?
5089217.100/Camberwell 'M' CPZ Consultation Report_V2.docx 42
London Borough of Lambeth Camberwell ‘M’ Controlled Parking Zone: Consultation Report
Table G.1 – Breakdown of Responses to Question 9
No Total No Location Yes % Yes No % No Opinion Respondents Opinion (%)
Akerman Road 5 2 40% 3 60% 0 0%
Bowhill Close 2 0 0% 2 100% 0 0%
Bramah Green 5 0 0% 5 100% 0 0%
Brief Street 7 4 57% 3 43% 0 0%
Brixton Road 14 6 43% 5 36% 3 21%
Burton Lane 2 1 50% 1 50% 0 0%
Burton Road 24 8 33% 13 54% 3 13%
Cadman Close 1 0 0% 1 100% 0 0%
Calais Street 16 12 75% 4 25% 0 0%
Camberwell New Road 24 12 50% 11 46% 1 4%
Cancell Road 6 2 33% 3 50% 1 17%
Carre Mews 2 2 100% 0 0% 0 0%
Chryssell Road 8 1 13% 7 88% 0 0%
Church Green 3 1 33% 2 67% 0 0%
Claribel Road 15 3 20% 11 73% 1 7%
Cormont Road 36 15 42% 19 53% 2 6%
Cowley Road 5 3 60% 2 40% 0 0%
Cranmer Road 6 4 67% 2 33% 0 0%
Cromwell Road 2 0 0% 2 100% 0 0%
Denmark Road 9 5 56% 3 33% 1 11%
Elliott Road 3 0 0% 3 100% 0 0%
Evandale Road 6 2 33% 3 50% 1 17%
Evesham Walk 6 2 33% 3 50% 1 17%
Eythorne Road 7 4 57% 3 43% 0 0%
Flodden Road 13 7 54% 5 38% 1 8%
Fountain Place 2 0 0% 2 100% 0 0%
Foxley Road 9 5 56% 2 22% 2 22%
Foxley Square 5 2 40% 2 40% 1 20%
Frederick Crescent 6 4 67% 2 33% 0 0%
Gosling Way 16 3 19% 13 81% 0 0%
Halsmere Road 16 4 25% 12 75% 0 0%
Holland Grove 15 2 13% 9 60% 4 27%
Holland Lane 4 1 25% 3 75% 0 0%
Kendal Close 4 1 25% 2 50% 1 25%
Knatchbull Road 40 17 43% 22 55% 1 3%
5089217.100/Camberwell 'M' CPZ Consultation Report_V2.docx 43
London Borough of Lambeth Camberwell ‘M’ Controlled Parking Zone: Consultation Report
No Total No Location Yes % Yes No % No Opinion Respondents Opinion (%)
Langton Road 11 7 64% 2 18% 2 18%
Lawrence Way 4 1 25% 3 75% 0 0%
Lilford Road 39 20 51% 18 46% 1 3%
Listowel Close 2 0 0% 2 100% 0 0%
Lothian Road 13 5 38% 7 54% 1 8%
Loughborough Road 16 4 25% 11 69% 1 6%
Mandela Street 7 2 29% 5 71% 0 0%
Mansion Close 1 0 0% 1 100% 0 0%
Melbourne Mews 8 6 75% 1 13% 1 13%
Minerva Close 3 1 33% 2 67% 0 0%
Minet Road 1 0 0% 1 100% 0 0%
Mostyn Road 1 0 0% 1 100% 0 0%
Myatt Road 6 2 33% 4 67% 0 0%
Normandy Road 3 0 0% 3 100% 0 0%
Patmos Road 3 3 100% 0 0% 0 0%
Paulet Road 44 13 30% 28 64% 3 7%
Penford Street 14 3 21% 11 79% 0 0%
Perseverance Place 3 1 33% 2 67% 0 0%
Regency Mews 4 2 50% 2 50% 0 0%
Russell Grove 8 4 50% 4 50% 0 0%
Salisbury Place 8 5 63% 3 38% 0 0%
Templar Street 11 6 55% 5 45% 0 0%
Tindal Street 5 1 20% 4 80% 0 0%
Turner Close 4 1 25% 2 50% 1 25%
Upstall Street 8 4 50% 4 50% 0 0%
Urlwin Walk 7 1 14% 5 71% 1 14%
Vassall Road 41 22 54% 18 44% 1 2%
Welby Street 2 1 50% 1 50% 0 0%
Total 621 250 335 36
Key
0 – 10% Overall Consultation Response Rate
10 – 20% Overall Consultation Response Rate
20% + Overall Consultation Response Rate
5089217.100/Camberwell 'M' CPZ Consultation Report_V2.docx 44
London Borough of Lambeth Camberwell ‘M’ Controlled Parking Zone: Consultation Report
Appendix H
Summary of Additional Responses Received
5089217.100/Camberwell 'M' CPZ Consultation Report_V2.docx 45
London Borough of Lambeth Camberwell ‘M’ Controlled Parking Zone: Consultation Report
Table H.1 – Summary of Additional Comments Received
Form of Date From Response Response
In favour of CPZ, but not in favour of paying for Resident resident parking permit. Noted that vehicles from Phone Call 25/11/09 Address not stated other flats park outside her property and is in favour of controls to prevent this.
Resident Stated that they have no interest in the proposals and Phone Call 25/11/09 Address not stated would not be participating in the consultation.
Not in favour of CPZ as perceives parking permit Resident costs as an extra tax for residents and not prepared to Phone Call 08/01/10 Vassall Rd pay it. Also concerned that they would have to plan visitor permits in advance of guests arriving.
Stated that he was not in favour of the CPZ proposals, with one of the main concerns being the cost of resident permits. He also stated that he thought the consultation material did not sufficiently state all the 16/12/09 facts regarding CPZs and felt an open public meeting Phone Call and Resident should have been arranged before questionnaires 12/01/10 were sent out to discuss the proposal. Requested clarification from the Council on whether the proposal would still go ahead should the response rate be less than 12%.
Resident Not in favour of a CPZ and regards the proposal as a Email 24/11/09 Address not stated money making exercise by the Council.
Resident In support of a CPZ as commuter parking is Email 25/11/09 considered poor in the area and local resident parking Holland Grove is extremely difficult.
In support of a CPZ as parking is difficult on Knatchbull Road and often spaces outside properties Resident Email 30/11/09 are taken up by commuters or white vans. Knatchbull Road In favour of a timed system so that commuters and workers are unable to park between 8am and 11am.
Treasurer/Forum Pictures provided to illustrate parking difficulties at a Email 01/12/09 Representative funeral, and highlighted general parking problems for Vassall Gardens TRA visitors to St John Divine Church.
Resident Asked a number of questions with regard to CPZs, to Email 08/12/09 Address not stated which the Council replied.
Stated that the CPZ proposal does not address the parking issues in the Holland Town Estate, which is in Resident need of rational management. In particular, concern Letter 08/12/09 Brixton Road was stated with regard to indiscriminate parking on Mandela Street, which intrudes upon the ‘A level’ properties on Brixton Road.
5089217.100/Camberwell 'M' CPZ Consultation Report_V2.docx 46