DOCSLIB.ORG

Zurcher V. the Stanford Daily Records

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf0z09n4kn Online items available Guide to the Zurcher v. The Stanford Daily Records Processed by Patricia White; machine-readable finding aid created by Patricia White Stanford University. Libraries.Department of Special Collections and University Archives Stanford, California 2000 Copyright © 2015 The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University. All rights reserved. Note This encoded finding aid is compliant with Stanford EAD Best Practice Guidelines, Version 1.0. Guide to the Zurcher v. The SC0580 1 Stanford Daily Records Overview Call Number: SC0580 Creator: Stanford Daily. Title: Zurcher v. The Stanford Daily records Dates: 1969-1999 Physical Description: 1.5 Linear feet Language(s): The materials are in English. Physical Location: Special Collections and University Archives materials are stored offsite and must be paged 36-48 hours in advance. For more information on paging collections, see the department's website: http://library.stanford.edu/spc . Repository: Department of Special Collections and University Archives Green Library 557 Escondido Mall Stanford, CA 94305-6064 Email: [email protected] Phone: (650) 725-1022 URL: http://library.stanford.edu/spc Custodial History Gift of The Stanford Daily, 1999. Information about Access The materials are open for research use. Ownership & Copyright Property rights reside with the repository. Literary rights reside with the creators of the documents or their heirs. To obtain permission to publish or reproduce, please contact the Public Services Librarian of the Dept. of Special Collections and University Archives. Cite As [Identification of item], Zurcher v. The Stanford Daily Records (SC0580). Dept. of Special Collections and University Archives, Stanford University Libraries, Stanford, Calif. Historical Note On April 12, 1971, Palo Alto police officers obtained a warrant to search the offices of the student newspaper The Stanford Daily for photographic evidence of the April 9th Stanford University Hospital sit-in, in which property was damaged and nine officers injured. It was the first known use of a search warrant in an American newspaper office. On May 12, The Daily filed a law suit against James Zurcher, chief of police, and other officers claiming that the search was in violation of First, Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights. The case attracted national attention and became a test of the freedom of the press. Although lower courts upheld the case it was later reversed by the U. S. Supreme Court. Scope and Content These records, created by The Stanford Daily as well as their attorneys (Jerome B. Falk, Jr. and Robert H. Mnookin of the Howard, Prim, Rice, Nemerovski, Canday & Pollack law firm and Anthony G. Amsterdam of the Stanford Law School), include correspondence, 1971-80; legal documents (depositions, motions, petitions, briefs, and others), 1974-1978; a notebook on the case's oral argument kept by attorney Jerome B. Falk; transcripts from the trial, 1971-72; and clippings and news articles, 1971-1978. There is also a trial transcript from an earlier case (testimony of Mark Weinberger in People v. Steven Kessler, Oct. 23, 1969) involving The Stanford Daily photographers covering a demonstration. Correspondents include attorneys Anthony G. Amsterdam, Robert H. Mnookin, Jerome B. Falk, Jr., and Franklin R. Garfield; Daily editors Felicity Barringer, Edward H. Kohn, and Fred Mann; and Peter G. Stone and Marilyn D. Norek, attorneys for Palo Alto. Access Terms Falk, Jerome B. Kohn, Edward H. Mann, Frederick G. Mnookin, Robert H. Norek, Marilyn D. Guide to the Zurcher v. The SC0580 2 Stanford Daily Records Stone, Peter G. Taubman, Felicity Barringer. Freedom of the press--Cases.--United States Freedom of the press--United States. Stanford Daily. Records Box 1, Folder 1 Appeal memos (1 of 2) Box 1, Folder 2 Appeal memos (2 of 2) Box 1, Folder 3 Appellees' Opening Brief - draft Box 1, Folder 4 Appellees' Opening Brief 1975 Box 1, Folder 5 Attorneys' fees Box 1, Folder 6 Audit letters, 1978-1980 Box 1, Folder 7 Correspondence, 1971 Box 1, Folder 8 Correspondence, 1972 Jan-May Box 1, Folder 9 Correspondence, 1972 Jun-Dec Box 1, Folder 10 Correspondence, 1973 Jan-May Box 1, Folder 11 Correspondence, 1973 Jun-Dec Box 2, Folder 1 Correspondence, 1974 Jan-Apr Box 2, Folder 2 Correspondence, 1974 Jun-Dec Box 2, Folder 3 Correspondence, 1975-1976 Sep Box 2, Folder 4 Correspondence, 1976 Oct-1977 May Box 2, Folder 5 Correspondence, 1977 Jun-Dec Box 2, Folder 6 Correspondence and clippings re legal bills, 1972-1979 Box 2, Folder 7 Depositions: Jerome B. Falk, Jr., Franklin B. Garfield, 1974; 1974 Box 2, Folder 8 Miscellaneous legal documents Box 2, Folder 9 Notes for oral argument, JBF Box 2, Folder 10 Pleadings: 1. Motion of Joseph Berman, Charles Lyle and Robert Litterman to Quash Subpoenas Duces Tecum; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof 2. Motion for continuance of Hearing on Motion to Quash Subpoenas Duces Tecum; Affidavit in Support Thereof Box 2, Folder 11 Pleadings: 91. Notice of Joining of Co-Counsel Feb 14, 1977 92. Petition for Rehearing by Defendants-Appellants Zurcher, Bondander, Deisinger, Martin, and Peardon and Suggestion that Rehearing be in Banc Feb 14, 1977 93. Petition for Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing In Banc on Behalf of Appellants Bergna and Brown Feb 16, 1977 94. Order of U.S. Court of Appeals rejecting petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc (March 28, 1977) 95. Motion for Stay of Mandate pending Application for Certiorari Apr 1, 1977 96. Memorandum in Opposition to Motion for Stay of Mandate Apr 4, 1977 97. Reply to Memorandum in Opposition to Motion for Stay of Mandate Apr 8, 1977 98. Order Staying Issuance of Mandate (filed 12-Apr-77 99. Motion for Extension of Stay of Mandate Apr 18, 1977 Box 3, Folder 1 Pleadings: 100. Memorandum in Opposition to Motion for Extension of Stay of Mandate Apr 19, 1977 101. SUPREME COURT OF U.S.: Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (served 4/25/77; received 4/26/77) Guide to the Zurcher v. The SC0580 3 Stanford Daily Records Records 102. Letter to Clerk of Supreme Court in response to Petition for Writ of Certiorari (May 2, 1977) 103. Letter to clerk of Supreme Court by opposing counsel (May 4, 1977) 104. Appearance form before Supreme Court of U.S. (mailed May 6, 1977) 105. SUPREME COURT OF U. S.: Petition for Writ of Certiorari [filed by petitioners Bergna and Brown] (served received May 13, 1977; May 16, 1977) Box 3, Folder 2 Pleadings: 106. Letter to Clerk of Supreme Court by respondents re filing no response to petition for certiorari (May 20, 1977) 107. Appearance form before Supreme Court of U. S. (re second petition for Certiorari) mailed) (May 25, 1977 108. Counsel for City Attorney, City of Palo Alto's Appearance Form before Supreme Court of U. S. (received July 6, 1977) 109. Brief for Respondents in Opposition (U. S. Supreme Court) (July 29, 1977) Box 3, Folder 3 Pleadings: 131. Notice of denial of motion of Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press to argue Jan 16, 1978 132. Respondents' Reply to the Brief of the United States as Amicus Curiae Jan 16, 1978 133. Petitioners' Reply to the Brief of the United States as Amicus Curiae Jan 24, 1978 Box 3, Folder 4 Pleadings: 134. U.S. SUPREME COURT OPINION (decided May 31, 1978) 135. Petition for Rehearing (June 23, 1978) 136. Motion of the American Civil Liberties Union and the American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California for Leave to File Brief Amici Curiae in Support of Petition for Rehearing and Brief Amici Curiae in Support of Petition for Rehearing (June 23, 1978) 137. Certificate of Counsel [of SLM] and cover letter to the Court (June 26, 1978) 138. Motion for Leave to File Brief and Brief in Support of Petition for Rehearing Submitted by Amici Curiae [Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press et al] June 26, 1978 139. Letter to Clerk of U. S. Supreme Court re error in Petition for Rehearing (July 12, 1978) Box 3, Folder 5 Pleadings: 140. Order remanding cause to U.S.D.C. (July 28, 1978) 141. Notice from Supreme Court re recovery for costs (June 28, 1978) 142. Cost Bill of All Defendants-Appellants Aug 8, 1978 143. Amended cost Bill of All Defendants-Appellants Aug 11, 1978 144. U.S.D.C. notification re filing of mandate of U. S. Crt. App. Aug 17, 1978 145. Order [granting ACLU & Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press leave to file briefs amici curiae and denying petition for rehearing] Oct 2, 1978 146. [Proposed] Judgment (Amended) (received 6-Oct-78 147. Letter "response" requesting deferment of entry of judgment from Falk Oct 6, 1978 148. Reply letter from County of Santa Clara Oct 11, 1978 149. Further letter to Judge Peckham from Jerry Falk Nov 1, 1978 150. Judgment (Amended) Nov 2, 1978 151. cost Bill of All Defendants-Appellants Nov 7, 1978 152. Amended Cost Bill of All Defendants-Appellants Nov 13, 1978 153. U.S.D.C.: Notice [attaching Amended Cost Bill of All Defendants-Appellants] Nov 28, 1978 Box 3, Folder 6 Publicity, 1971-1978 Box 3, Folder 7 Publicity: Stanford Daily issues, 1971-1978 Box 3, Folder 8 Supreme Court Decision, 1978 [from internet source, 1999] Box 3, Folder 9 Transcript, 23-Oct-69 Box 3, Folder 10 Transcript, Jun 4, 1971; Sep 10, 1971 Box 3, Folder 11 Transcript, July 10, 1972 Guide to the Zurcher v. The SC0580 4 Stanford Daily Records Records Box 3, Folder 13 Transcript, Apr 2, 1973; Jun 27, 1973 Guide to the Zurcher v.
Recommended publications
  • 2013-14 Arts Report (Pdf)

    2013-14 Arts Report (Pdf)

    2013-14 Arts Explosion Rocks Stanford 1 A Private Art Collection Becomes a Stanford Collection 2-3 Curricular Innovation 4-5 Interdisciplinary Dexterity 6-7 Anatomy of an Exhibition 8 Visual Thinkers 9 Renaissance Man 10-11 Festival Jérôme Bel 12 The Next Bing Thing 13 Sound Pioneer 14 Politicians, Producers & Directors 15 Theater Innovators 16 Museums & Performance Organizations 17 Looking Ahead 17 Academic Arts Departments & Programs 18-19 “Arts Explosion Rocks Stanford.” Arts Centers, Institutes & Resources 20-21 Student Arts Groups 22-23 That was the headline of a May 2014 article in the San Francisco Chronicle – and it’s a great descrip- Fashion at Stanford 24 tion of the experience of the arts at Stanford in 2013-14. Honors in the Arts: The Inaugural Year 25 Support for Stanford Arts 26 It was a year of firsts: the first full season in Bing Concert Hall, the first year of two innovative curric- 2013-14 Arts Advisory Council 27 ular programs – ITALIC and Honors in the Arts - and the first year of the new “Creative Expression” Faculty & Staff 27 breadth requirement (see p. 4). Stanford Arts District 28 BING CONCERT HALL’S It was also – perhaps most prominently – a year of planning and breathless anticipation of the opening GUNN ATRIUM of the Anderson Collection at Stanford University, which took place to great fanfare in September 2014. In the midst of it all there were exciting multidisciplinary exhibitions at the Cantor Arts Center, amaz- ing student projects and performances throughout campus, and a host of visits by artists including Carrie Mae Weems, Tony Kushner, and Annie Leibovitz.
  • The Stanford Daily an Independent Newspaper

    The Stanford Daily an Independent Newspaper

    The Stanford Daily An Independent Newspaper VOLUME 199, NUMBER 36 99th YEAR MONDAY, APRIL 15, 1991 Electronic mail message may be bylaws violation By Howard Libit Staff writer Greek issues Over the weekend, campaign violations seemed to be the theme of the Council of Presidents and addressed in ASSU Senate races. Hearings offi- cer Jason Moore COP debate said the elec- By MirandaDoyle tions commis- Staff writer sion will look into vio- possible Three Council of Presi- lations by Peo- dents slates debated at the pie's Platform Sigma house last candidatesand their supporters of Kappa night, answering questions several election bylaws that ranging from policies revolve around campaigning toward Greek organizations through electronic mail. to the scope ofASSU Senate Students First also complained debate. about the defacing and removing Beth of their fliers. The elec- Morgan, a Students of some First COP said will be held Wednesday and candidate, tion her slate plans to "fight for Thursday. new houses to be built" for Senate candidate Nawwar Kas- senate fraternities and work on giv- rawi, currently a associate, ing the Interfraternity sent messages yesterday morning Council and the Intersoror- to more than 2,000 students via ity Council more input in electronic urging support for mail, decisions concerning frater- the People's Platform COP Rajiv Chandrasekaran — Daily "Stand and Deliver" senate nities and sororities. First lady Barbara Bush was one of many celebrities attending this weekend's opening ceremonies for the Lucile Salter Packard Chil- slate, member ofthe candidates and several special fee MaeLee, a dren's Hospital. She took time out from a tour of the hospital to meet two patients, Joshua Evans, 9, and Shannon Brace, 4.
  • The Mont Pelerin Society

    The Mont Pelerin Society

    A SPECIAL MEETING THE MONT PELERIN SOCIETY JANUARY 15–17, 2020 FROM THE PAST TO THE FUTURE: IDEAS AND ACTIONS FOR A FREE SOCIETY CHAPTER THIRTY-FOUR MAKING THE CASE FOR LIBERTY RUSSELL ROBERTS HOOVER INSTITUTION • STANFORD UNIVERSITY 1 1 MAKING THE CASE FOR LIBERTY Prepared for the January 2020 Mont Pelerin Society Meeting Hoover Institution, Stanford University Russ Roberts John and Jean De Nault Research Fellow Hoover Institution Stanford University [email protected] 1 2 According to many economists and pundits, we are living under the dominion of Milton Friedman’s free market, neoliberal worldview. Such is the claim of the recent book, The Economists’ Hour by Binyamin Applebaum. He blames the policy prescriptions of free- market economists for slower growth, inequality, and declining life expectancy. The most important figure in this seemingly disastrous intellectual revolution? “Milton Friedman, an elfin libertarian…Friedman offered an appealingly simple answer for the nation’s problems: Government should get out of the way.” A similar judgment is delivered in a recent article in the Boston Review by Suresh Naidu, Dani Rodrik, and Gabriel Zucman: Leading economists such as Friedrich Hayek and Milton Friedman were among the founders of the Mont Pelerin Society, the influential group of intellectuals whose advocacy of markets and hostility to government intervention proved highly effective in reshaping the policy landscape after 1980. Deregulation, financialization, dismantling of the welfare state, deinstitutionalization of labor markets, reduction in corporate and progressive taxation, and the pursuit of hyper-globalization—the culprits behind rising inequalities—all seem to be rooted in conventional economic doctrines.
  • Mini-Reunion Locations on Or Near Campus

    Mini-Reunion Locations on Or Near Campus

    PLEASE READ THESE IMPORTANT DISCLAIMERS Though we did our best to capture as many available locations near Class Headquarter Tents as possible, there is no guarantee that all spaces within the directory will be open, haven’t moved, or otherwise been made unavailable at the time of Reunion Homecoming. Sometimes, venues changes hours of service, facilities move or remove benches, or simply the location is reserved or later forbidden by the university for use by alumni gatherings. Most locations will remain valid and useful for purposes of Mini-Reunion gatherings. Nearly all campus locations are available on a first come first served basis unless otherwise indicated. NOTE: Any location near student residences or a student program is subject to the NO ALCOHOL being served university policy. There are many locations we haven’t captured yet on the West and South sides Need to find a place to meet your classmates? of campus because their proximity is not as close to the Tents. Any location too- near a student residence will likely not be listed and would require the permission by the dorm’s Resident Fellow or Resident Advisor (example: Toyon Courtyard). We thank you in advance for your understanding CONTACT US For any questions, suggestions, or to report any new or updated information please email us here at: mini- reunions@ alumni.stanford.edu Arrillaga Family Dining Commons Proximity to Headquarter/Tailgate Tent: ~ 0.5 mi (10 min walk) On/Off Campus: On campus For ideal # of attendees: Up to 40 Reservation possible: No; if more than 15 people
  • Beth Van Schaack Professor of Law Santa Clara University School of Law � 500 El Camino Real � Santa Clara, CA 95053

    Beth Van Schaack Professor of Law Santa Clara University School of Law 500 El Camino Real Santa Clara, CA 95053

    Beth Van Schaack Professor of Law Santa Clara University School of Law 500 El Camino Real Santa Clara, CA 95053 EDUCATION YALE LAW SCHOOL, J.D. (1997) • Student Director, Schell Center for International Human Rights & Lowenstein Human Rights Clinic • Editor, YALE LAW JOURNAL STANFORD UNIVERSITY, B.A., Human Biology with a concentration in Feminism & Public Policy, (1991); Phi Beta Kappa EXPERIENCE STANFORD LAW SCHOOL, STANFORD UNIVERSITY (2014-15) Leah Kaplan Visiting Professor in Human Rights. Teaching, blogging, and writing in the areas of human rights, national security, international criminal law, the law of armed conflict; developed new international criminal law intensive course with site visits to The Hague; developed new Policy Lab on Legal & Policy Tools to Prevent Atrocities; teaching International Justice with the International Policy Studies Program. FREEMAN SPOGLI INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDIES AT STANFORD UNIVERSITY • Visiting Scholar, Center for International Security & Cooperation (2013-2014). Researching U.S. and global policy on atrocities prevention and response. • Visiting Scholar, Center on Democracy, Development & the Rule of Law (2009-10). Researched the uses and misuses of international humanitarian law in U.S. litigation and the responsiveness of the major international institutions (including United Nations bodies, human rights committees, and international criminal tribunals) to women’s human rights claims. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, Washington D.C. • Deputy, Ambassador-at-Large for War Crimes Issues, Office of Global Criminal Justice (2012- 2013). Helped advise the Secretary of State and the Under Secretary for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights on issues related to war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide; helped formulate U.S.
  • The Red Guide

    The Red Guide

    The Red Guide THE (UN)OFFICIAL GUIDE TO STANFORD LAW SCHOOL The First and Only Guide to SLS Created by and for SLS Students Brought to you by: Stanford Law Association (SLA) Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 2 ACADEMIC TERMS & TIPS ............................................................................................................................ 4 IMPORTANT: How to Get a SLATA Outline ................................................................................................... 5 TIPS FOR PET OWNERS ................................................................................................................................. 7 TIPS FOR OUTDOOR LOVERS ........................................................................................................................ 7 FOOD AND COFFEE MAP .............................................................................................................................. 8 STUDY SPOT MAP ........................................................................................................................................ 9 MAP OF CAMPUS ....................................................................................................................................... 11 TIPS FOR STUDENT-PARENTS ..................................................................................................................... 12 TIPS FOR SIGNIFICANT OTHERS
  • Stanford Law School

    Stanford Law School

    Stanford Law School 2014 Fiscal Year Summary • September 1, 2013 to August 31, 2014 081402 StanfordLaw_FYE_final_4C_v2.indd 1 12/1/14 10:20 AM Thank From the Dean I am delighted to share Stanford Law School’s 2014 Fiscal Year Summary. We are thriving as an institution due to the collective efforts of our community and the Yo u extraordinary generosity of our supporters. Thank you! Our small size continues to be a hallmark of the Stanford Law experience. Students have close connections to our world-class faculty, both inside and Our alumni, outside of the classroom. Our clinical program, which is now large enough parents, and to serve every member of the student body, is without peer. Students participate in a “legal residency,” working full-time for a quarter under the friends make supervision of our exceptional clinical faculty in one of 11 clinics. a profound We are always looking for ways to improve the Stanford Law School difference at experience. In order to better prepare our students for their futures, we Stanford Law have launched new initiatives in law and policy and global legal practice. In the Law and Policy Lab, which offered 22 practicums in its first year, School. More students have the opportunity to analyze policy problems for non-profit and than 50% of our government clients. Our global legal practice initiative includes a new, foundational course focused around complex case studies in a transnational setting, and annual budget opportunities for our students to enroll in short courses that occur in part overseas. relies on the We could not be the exceptional institution we are without your support.
  • Co-Operative Living at Stanford a Report of SWOPSI 146

    Co-Operative Living at Stanford a Report of SWOPSI 146

    CoopAtStan-28W Weds May 16 7:00 pm Draft Only — Draft Only — Draft Only Co-operative Living at Stanford A Report of SWOPSI 146 May 1990 Preface This report resulted from the hard work of the students of a Stanford Workshops on Political and Social Issues (SWOPSI) class called “Co-operative Living and the Current Crisis at Stanford.” Both instructors and students worked assiduously during Winter quarter 1990 researching and writing the various sections of this report. The success of the class’s actions at Stanford and of this report resulted from blending academics and activism (a fun but time-consuming combination). Contributing to this report were: Paul Baer (instructor) Chris Balz Natalie Beerer Tom Boellstorff Scott Braun Liz Cook Joanna Davidson (instructor) Yelena Ginzburg John Hagan Maggie Harrison Alan Haynie Madeline Larsen (instructor) Dave Nichols Sarah Otto Ethan Pride Eric Rose (instructor) Randy Schutt Eric Schwitzgebel Raquel Stote Jim Welch Michael Wooding Bruce Wooster ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There are many people who contributed to this final report and the resolution of the Co-op crisis. Although we would like to mention everyone by name, it might double the length of this entire document. Our everlasting thanks go out to everyone who contributed. Especially Leland Stanford for having his co-operative vision, the SWOPSI Office for carrying it on and providing the opportunity for this class to happen, Henry Levin, our faculty sponsor for his help with the proposal process, Lee Altenberg, whose tremendous knowledge of Stanford co-operative lore is exceeded only by his boundless passion for the co-ops themselves; the Co-op Alumni network, the folks at the Davis, Berkeley, and Cornell co-ops, NASCO, and all of the existing Stanford co-ops for their support during this entire process.
  • C L a S S O F 2 0 2 1 G R a D U a T I

    C L a S S O F 2 0 2 1 G R a D U a T I

    CLASS OF 2021 GRADUATION STANFORD UNIVERSITY JUNE 12, 2021 SLS2:00 P.M. CLASSSLS OF 2021 GRADUATION TO THE MEMBERS, FRIENDS, AND FAMILIES OF THE CLASS OF 2021: Congratulations to the Class of 2021, which today joins a distinguished group of Stanford Law graduates whose history stretches back to 1893 when the fledgling Stanford University began its program in law. It is my honor to uphold Stanford’s tradition of excellence, which began that year when the university started teaching law and recruited its first law professors. One was Benjamin Harrison, former president of the United States, whom Governor Stanford invited to deliver a landmark series of lectures on the Constitution. The other was Nathan Abbott, who would head the nascent law program. Dean Abbott assembled around him a small faculty, and he imparted a standard of rigor and excellence that endures to this day. In 1895 the university conferred the degree of Bachelor of Arts in Law. The first graduate degree, a Master of Arts in Law, was introduced in 1901 and the equivalent of today’s professional Doctor of Jurisprudence (JD) degree was inaugurated as the Bachelor of Laws (LLB). Stanford Law School has since developed the degrees of Doctor of the Science of Law (JSD), Master of Legal Studies (MLS), Master of the Science of Law (JSM), Master of Laws (LLM), and 29 joint degrees. Following Abbott’s departure in 1907, the deanship was held successively by Frederic Woodward (1908-1916), Charles Huston (1916-1922), and Marion Rice Kirkwood (1922- 1945). During Dean Kirkwood’s tenure, the law school saw the successful introduction of a moot court program, the institution of the Stanford Law Association (forerunner of today’s alumni law societies), and the first directory of Stanford Law alumni.
  • Stanford Law School

    Stanford Law School

    Stanford Law School 2016 FISCAL YEAR SUMMARY 9.1.2015 - 8.31.2016 Letter from the Dean Each year I have the honor of sharing the results of the Stanford Law School community’s collective generosity during the previous fiscal year. Last year, more than 3,400 alumni and friends made a gift to SLS. On behalf of all of us at the law school—faculty, students, and staff—thank you. Your gifts enable us to recruit and retain world-class faculty who are redefining fields from global law and business to health law to constitutional law; to provide generous financial aid so the best and brightest students can receive a Stanford legal education regardless of their ability to pay; and to build on the strength of our core curriculum through new interdisciplinary programs and We are Stanford Law. hands-on, experiential learning opportunities that better prepare our students to develop solutions to real-world problems. Problem Solvers. Leaders. Innovators. Your support provides the critical resources we need to maintain and expand cutting-edge teaching and research and to train the leaders of tomorrow. Thank you for your commitment to Stanford Law School. Sincerely, M. Elizabeth Magill Richard E. Lang Professor of Law and Dean Financial Overview 5% 6% Stanford Law School would not be the world-class institution it is without the philanthropic support of Library Student Services our alumni and friends. Every gift is an investment in our faculty, students, and programs, and together, Maintains library services and Enhances the student experience outside of research resources, including the classroom through services and activities, these gifts have an immediate and sustained impact on the school.
  • Beth Van Schaack Leah Kaplan Visiting Professor in Human Rights, Stanford Law School Faculty Affiliate, Stanford Center for Human Rights & International Justice

    Beth Van Schaack Leah Kaplan Visiting Professor in Human Rights, Stanford Law School Faculty Affiliate, Stanford Center for Human Rights & International Justice

    Beth Van Schaack Leah Kaplan Visiting Professor in Human Rights, Stanford Law School Faculty Affiliate, Stanford Center for Human Rights & International Justice EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF LEIDEN • PhD in International Criminal Law (2020) YALE LAW SCHOOL, J.D. (1997) • Student Director, Schell Center for International Human Rights & Lowenstein Human Rights Clinic • Editor, YALE LAW JOURNAL STANFORD UNIVERSITY, B.A. (1991) • Majored in Human Biology with a concentration in Feminism & Public Policy • Phi Beta Kappa EXPERIENCE STANFORD LAW SCHOOL (2014-present) • Acting Director, International Human Rights & Conflict Resolution Clinic (Spring & Fall 2019). Supervise students engaged in full-time human rights clinical projects involving fact-finding, litigation, and advocacy on behalf of clients and partner organizations. • Leah Kaplan Visiting Professor in Human Rights. Teaching, blogging, and writing in multiple areas of international law. Courses developed and taught: Human Rights Theory & Practice; Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Human Trafficking; International Justice; Contemporary Issues in International Criminal Law; International Criminal Law: From Stanford to The Hague (with a field study to The Netherlands); Human Trafficking: Law & Policy (with a field study to Thailand); Understanding the Impact of New Technologies on Human Rights Investigations & Transitional Justice (with field study to Colombia); and Human Rights Stories. • Co-Founder & Co-Director, Stanford Human Rights in Trauma Mental Health Program, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine. • Lecturer, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine. • Faculty Affiliate, Stanford Center for Human Rights & International Justice. CENTER FOR ADVANCED STUDY IN THE BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES (2017-18). • Fellow. Conducted research on innovations in accountability and transitional justice emerging from the conflicts in Syria and Iraq.
  • 2007 Stanford Men's Volleyball Outlook

    2007 Stanford Men's Volleyball Outlook

    Date Opponent/Event Time 01/05/07 at UCSB/Elephant Bar Tournament All Day 01/06/07 at UCSB/Elephant Bar Tournament All Day 01/12/07 Cal State Northridge 7:00 p.m. 01/13/07 UC Santa Barbara 5:00 p.m. 01/19/07 BYU 7:00 p.m. 01/20/07 BYU 7:00 p.m. 01/26/07 at IPFW 7:00 p.m. 01/27/07 at IPFW 7:00 p.m. 01/30/07 Pacific 7:00 p.m. 02/02/07 at Long Beach State 7:30 p.m. 02/03/07 at UC San Diego 7:00 p.m. 02/09/07 at UC Irvine 7:00 p.m. 02/10/07 at UCLA 7:00 p.m. 02/16/07 UC Irvine 7:00 p.m. 02/17/07 UCLA 7:00 p.m. 02/22/07 at Pepperdine 7:00 p.m. 02/23/07 at USC 7:00 p.m. 03/02/07 at Pacific 7:00 p.m. 03/05/07 Quincy 7:00 p.m. 03/09/07 Long Beach State 7:00 p.m. 03/10/07 UC San Diego 7:00 p.m. 03/30/07 at Cal State Northridge 7:00 p.m. 03/31/07 at UC Santa Barbara 7:00 p.m. 04/06/07 Pepperdine 7:00 p.m. 04/07/07 USC 7:00 p.m. 04/13/07 at Hawai’i 7:00 p.m. 04/14/07 at Hawai’i 7:00 p.m. 04/18/07 MPSF Play-in Match 04/21/07 MPSF Quarter Finals 04/26/07 MPSF Semi-Finals 04/28/07 MPSF Finals 05/03/07 NCAA Semi-Finals (Columbus, OH) 05/05/07 NCAA Championship (Columbus, OH) Home games in Bold • Schedule subject to change Please go to www.GoStanford.com for most recent schedule and information 2007 ST ANFORD M EN’ S V OLLEYBALL Stanford Quick Facts Team Info Credits Location .....................................Stanford, California 2006 Overall Record .........................................