DOCSLIB.ORG

Cannock Chase Local Plan (Part 2) Issues & Options Consultation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cannock Chase Local Plan (Part 2) Issues & Options Consultation Cannock Chase Local Plan (Part 2) Issues & Options Consultation Summary of Representations August 2017 www.cannockchasedc.gov.uk Search for ‘Cannock Chase Life’ @CannockChaseDC Local Plan Part 2 - Overall Comments Rep ID Respond Comment Council Response No. ent IO 1 Allen M The sites on the map are in a g reen belt area and not adjoined Some sites are adjoined by urban areas, others are not but we (Mrs) by any built up areas. have to consider the long list of all site options being put forward The Parish Council are unaware of the plans. (by landowners / developers) before refining this down to a short Any objection to the plan must be put forward before 23 March list of the most appropriate sites to take forward. All Parish 2017. Councils were consulted on the plans. The closing date for this Very few individuals have access to the plan. round of consultation was 27 th March 2017. The consultation was extensively publicised via a range of means which is set out in the Cabinet report dated 24 th August 2017 http://www.cannockchasedc.gov.uk/council/council-and- committees-minutes-reports-and-agendas IO2 AONB The approach could be read as introducing the potential for the We have to consider the long list of all site options being put Unit allocation of development sites in the AONB at first reading. forward (by landowners / developers) which includes sites in the However, note that these are only site options proposed for Green Belt and AONB before refining this down to a short list of appraisal at this time and in the document there is some the most appropriate sites to take forward, and the context for recognition that the AONB represents a major constraint in this will be informed by the policies in the adopted Local Plan terms of housing and employment development. Express Part 1. concern that the document opens up some locations in the AONB to unnecessary debate, confusing the public, site owners Comments will be taken account of as site assessment is and developers. Outline fundamental AONB principles (based undertaken. upon national legislation and policy) which should inform the LPP2: 1 - Sites in the AONB should not be considered for new housing or employment development, unless they are small scale (for example, less than 10 dwellings or 0.25 hectares), clearly within the built-up framework of an existing settlement and not covered by Green Belt. 2 - Where sites adjoining the AONB, or within its setting and - 1 1 visible from the AONB, are considered for new housing or employment development this should include a detailed assessment of the potential mitigate landscape impact and to create sustainable connections (non-vehicular for people and as wildlife corridors) to the AONB. 3 - The potentially complementary (but occasionally conflicting) needs of SAC mitigation and the protection of the AONB should be considered and outlined in an updated IDP. In addition, Cannock Chase AONB is one of the most urban/pressured designated landscapes in the country, where the maintenance of the Green Belt complements the protected area and its setting, should be given full weight. IO3 AONB Request number of amendments to the plan including a specific This will be looked at further in the context of the adopted Local Unit reference to the extent and importance of the AONB in Cannock Plan Part 1 (so that policy is not duplicated). Chase District and to recognise the need to co-operate with others in the AONB partnership to protect the designated area and including a Natural Environment & Landscape section in the document (in addition to the current consideration of only Green Space and Historic Environment). Other changes identified below against relevant sections of plan. IO4 Betts D I've looked at the plans and am alarmed at the potential The plans contain a ‘lon g list’ of sites which are being promoted devastating construction. (by landowners and developers) but these options will be refined down to a short list of options which can address the needs of the district. Minimising negative impacts is a key element of the assessment process. IO5 Binder G Wish to be kept informed of future consultations. Noted IO6 Binder P Wish to be kept informed of future consultations. Noted IO7 Bradley B Concern regarding lack of publicity for the Local Plan Part 2 Feedback on the consultation process has been noted and where consultation- should have included a note within the recent possible improvements will be made moving forward – please Council Tax Bill letter to every resident. Should ensure wider see Cabinet report dated 24 th August 2017 reaching publicity for the next stage of the consultation. http://www.cannockchasedc.gov.uk/council/council-and- - 2 2 committees -minutes -reports -and -agendas IO8 Bradley B The inclusion of He dnesford Hills as part of the AONB should be It is beyond the scope of Local Plan P art 2 to change the formalised in Local Plan Part 2. boundaries of the AONB as these are determined by a different process, see https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/areas-of- outstanding-natural-beauty-natural-englands-role/areas-of- outstanding-natural-beauty-natural-englands-role IO9 Briggs T There was no drop in event in Cannock Wood. Considering the Drop in events were held at local libraries, however as there is no amount of land put forward for development locally and the library in Cannock Wood, CCDC requested to attend the Cannock impact on the village it would surely have been appropriate to Wood Parish Council meeting given the amount of interest in the hold a planned event, especially given the number of elderly area. In terms of the consultation, whilst the process was residents. After a local resident made information known a extensively advertised it is recognised that there is always room meeting was called attended by CCDC and at least 130 people for improvement where resources allow and this will be looked including myself. at when we take forward the next stage of the plan. Further detail is set out in the Cabinet report dated 24th August 2017 It is unfortunate that the opportunity was not taken to include http://www.cannockchasedc.gov.uk/council/council-and- information about this consultation in the Council Tax billing committees-minutes-reports-and-agendas letters, an efficient and effective way to reach local people. I found out through social media, we do not receive a local paper and there has been nothing through the post. I wonder how many residents do not know this consultation is taking place. IO10 Brown C For the avoidance of doubt, what are the timescales for; The Local Development Scheme is the project timetable for the Local Plan. This can be seen at 1. The conclusion of the Part 2? http://www.cannockchasedc.gov.uk/residents/planning/plannin 2. When the recommendations will be approved, and by who? g-policy/local-development-scheme . It is in the process of being updated however, and we aim to adopt the document towards the end of 2018. The next stage of the process will be for the Council to consult on a draft plan (the ‘Proposed submission’ document). The plan will then be submitted to the Secretary of State and a Planning Inspector will be appointed to independently examine the plan. If he / she finds the plan to be - 3 3 acceptable then the Council will be able to formally adopt it. IO11 Bunting C Please look at some of the sites that are unused, waste land or Yes, agreed: these are issues which are all considered – and will even empty properties before expanding the towns and villages continue to be so – as the plan is developed. until they all join together. I moved to this area from the edge of the Derbyshire dales 15 years ago, and it was due to the open spaces and the small separate villages that made me feel at home and I decided to stay. If you want to keep tourists coming to this area you need to stop filling in the gaps because soon it will look like Birmingham from the air. IO12 Cannock Cannock Chase District Council have commissioned research into This will be considered further in terms of whether the matter is Chase Broadband and Wi-Fi, this begun by examining wireless access best addressed via Local Plan Part 2, the Infrastructure Delivery Council provision in Cannock Town Centre. In finding that provision was Plan or the Developer Contributions SPD. (Officer adequately met by industry, the report also provided a short comment audit of all connectivity in the Cannock Chase Council area and s - provided recommendations on best to focus finite resources on Economic achieving world-class connectivity. Develop ment) Findings The report found that Council was lacking in terms of not having any planning guidelines in relation to Broadband for new developments taking place in the District. Therefore, the report recommends that Cannock Chase Council, working with other Staffordshire planners should issue planning guidelines to potential planning applicants. Providing planning guidance for Broadband provision will ensure that Broadband infrastructure is in place in the early stages of development. The guidance would encourage the developers to make contact with service providers at outline planning stage this would secure a choice of direct access service providers. Given enough notice BT and Virginmedia will deliver services at no cost to developers. In many cases BT and Virginmedia will pay - 4 4 developers a fee per premise. This recommendation is also consistent and supported by changes in BT, where they have announced that developments with more than 30 premises can receive direct fibre connections.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lichfield Community Safety Delivery Plan
    Lichfield District Community Safety Delivery Plan 2017 - 2020 Foreword Our aim is to ensure that Lichfield District remains one of the safest places in the county and this Delivery Plan will provide the means by which the community safety priorities highlighted in the 2016 Strategic Assessment can be delivered. Members of our Safer Community Partnership will lead on the delivery of our priority actions, but we cannot make this happen on our own. We hope that partners, stakeholders, local people and communities will take responsibility, demonstrate commitment and make a real contribution to help realise our vision for a safe District. The Partnership has embraced a number of changes over recent years, not least the challenges brought about by the current financial pressures experienced by all public sector organisations. Difficult decisions are having to be made which impact on people's quality of life, so it's important we utilise what funding we do have effectively. Other challenges we need to be mindful of are national and international terrorism and violence which has had a high media profile over recent times, together with the extent of child sexual exploitation (CSE) and Modern Day Slavery (MDS) within our communities. Much more emphasis is being placed on identifying and supporting people, especially young people and children, who are vulnerable to any form of exploitation and radicalisation. The opportunities and threats of social media have also become a major consideration going forward as we need to support local residents, especially young people to use it safely. Community safety is a complex and challenging area of work and we are grateful for the support and enthusiasm of all who are driven to continually improve the quality of life for people who live in the District.
    [Show full text]
  • The Local Government Boundary Commission For
    THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND KEY ELECTORAL REVIEW OF STAFFORDSHIRE DISTRICT BOUNDARY PROPOSED ELECTORAL DIVISION BOUNDARY Draft recommendations for electoral division boundaries WARD BOUNDARY PARISH BOUNDARY in the County of Staffordshire May 2011 PARISH WARD BOUNDARY Sheet 5 of 7 LICHFIELD DISTRICT DISTRICT NAME DOVE ED PROPOSED ELECTORAL DIVISION NAME SHOBNALL WARD WARD NAME BRANSTON CP PARISH NAME This map is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of HENHURST PARISH WARD PARISH WARD NAME the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office © Crown copyright. Scale : 1cm = 0.07500 km Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Grid Interval 1km The Local Government Boundary Commission for England GD100049926 2011. COINCIDENT BOUNDARIES ARE SHOWN AS THIN COLOURED LINES SUPERIMPOSED OVER WIDER ONES. SHEET 5, MAP 5a SHEET 5, MAP 5b Proposed electoral division boundaries in the east of East Staffordshire borough Proposed electoral division boundaries in the south east of East Staffordshire borough 8 Sandyford Dingle 3 Sports Field A Postern House Sports Farm Ground Rolleston on Dove B D CA E Rolleston Sinai Park i M L s L A IS m Equine Centre il T C l E R a S O W n t A N r t e Y l e R a d m O R A a D i l w C a R y A Y D T O H V O E Rolleston on Dove R C BURTON TOWN ED N L E IF R F O R Golf Course A O (8) D A Beacon Hill D Stretton SHOBNALL WARD ROLLESTON ON DOVE WARD SHOBNALL CP ROLLESTON ON DOVE CP The Rough al an
    [Show full text]
  • Wolverhampton City Council OPEN EXECUTIVE DECISION ITEM (AMBER)
    Agenda Item: 5 Wolverhampton City Council OPEN EXECUTIVE DECISION ITEM (AMBER) SPECIAL ADVISORY GROUP Date: 28 October 2011 Portfolio(s) ALL Originating Service Group(s) DELIVERY Contact Officer(s)/ SUSAN KEMBREY KEY DECISION: YES Telephone Number(s) 4300 IN FORWARD PLAN: YES Title BOUNDARY COMMISSION REVIEW OF PARLIAMENTARY CONSTITUENCIES – WEST MIDLANDS REGION CONSULTATION ON INITIAL PROPOSALS Recommendation (a) That the initial proposals of the Boundary Commission for England for the review of Parliamentary Constituencies in the West Midland region England as detailed in Sections 2 and 3 of the report be noted (b) That the Special Advisory Group recommend Cabinet to invite the three political groups to formulate their individual views on the proposals set out in the consultation paper for submission to the Boundary Commission direct. 1 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 To advise of the consultation exercise on the initial proposals of the Boundary Commission for the review of Parliamentary Constituencies in the West Midland region and the date to respond to the consultation. 2.0 BACKGROUND 2.1 The Boundary Commission for England (BCE) is an independent and impartial non- departmental public body which is responsible for reviewing Parliamentary constituency boundaries in England. The BCE conduct a review of all the constituencies in England every five years. Their role is to make recommendations to Parliament for new constituency boundaries. The BCE is currently conducting a review of all Parliamentary constituency boundaries in England based on new rules laid down by Parliament. These rules involve a reduction in the number of constituencies in England (from 533 to 502) and stipulate that every constituency, apart from two specific exemptions, must have an electorate no smaller than 72,810 and no larger than 80,473.
    [Show full text]
  • Burntwood, Hammerwich & Wall
    Burntwood, Hammerwich & Wall Local List Proposals 2019 1 CONTENTS 1. Introduction 3 1.1 Background to the Lichfield District Council Local List 3 1.2 Criteria for the Selection of Locally Important Buildings 4 2.0 Burntwood 5 2.1 Proposed Burntwood Local List 6 2.1.1 Highfield 6 2.1.2 Summerfield and All Saints 13 2.1.3 Chasetown 14 2.1.4 Chase Terrace 16 2.1.5 Boney Hay and Central 17 3.0 Hammerwich 19 4.0 Wall 23 Appendix A – Local List selection criteria 26 Appendix B – List of proposed additions to the Lichfield District Council Local List 29 2 1. Introduction This report has been prepared by the Conservation and Urban Design Team at Lichfield District Council to gain approval for the addition of buildings and structures onto Lichfield’s register of buildings of special local interest. It is intended that this will be the first report of a rolling programme of reports to be presented to the Council until all areas of the district have been reviewed. 1.1 Background to the Lichfield District Council Local List Currently Lichfield District Councils Local List only covers buildings within some of the 22 designated Conservation Areas. These buildings were assessed at the time that the conservation area appraisals were carried out. However, there are numerous buildings and structures across the district which are locally important, and are currently not identified. Whilst the local listing does not offer the same level of protection as statutorily listed buildings, they do become a material consideration within planning decisions, allowing the opportunity for their local distinctiveness to be taken into consideration through the planning process.
    [Show full text]
  • Registered Pharmacies 2019-07-12
    The list of pharmacies registered to sell PPCs on our behalf is sorted alphabetically in postcode order. 0 NAME PREMISES ADDRESS 1 PREMISES ADDRESS 2 PREMISES ADDRESS 3 PREMISES ADDRESS 4 POSTCODE LLOYDS PHARMACY SAINSBURYS, EVERARD CLOSE ST ALBANS HERTFORDSHIRE AL1 2QU BOOTS UK LIMITED 9 ST PETERS STREET ST.ALBANS HERTFORDSHIRE AL1 3DH FREEMAN GRIEVES LTD 111-113 ST PETERS STREET ST.ALBANS HERTFORDSHIRE AL1 3ET LLOYDS PHARMACY PARKBURY HOUSE ST PETER ST ALBANS HERTFORDSHIRE AL1 3HD IMED PHARMACY 67 HATFIELD ROAD ST ALBANS HERTFORDSHIRE AL1 4JE ST ALBANS PHARMACY 197 CELL BARNES LANE ST ALBANS HERTFORDSHIRE AL1 5PX LLOYDS PHARMACY SAINSBURYS, BARNET ROAD LONDON COLNEY ST ALBANS HERTFORDSHIRE AL2 1AB LLOYDS PHARMACY 17 RUSSELL AVENUE ST ALBANS HERTFORDSHIRE AL3 5ES NORMANDY PHARMACY 52 WAVERLEY ROAD ST ALBANS HERTFORDSHIRE AL3 5PE CROWN PHAMRACY 65 HIGH STREET REDBOURN ST ALBANS HERTFORDSHIRE AL3 7LW MANOR PHARMACY (WHEATHAMPSTEAD) LTD 2 HIGH STREET WHEATHAMPSTEAD HERTFORDSHIRE AL4 8AA BOOTS UK LIMITED 23-25 HIGH STREET HARPENDEN HERTFORDSHIRE AL5 2RU LLOYDS PHARMACY 40 HIGH STREET WELWYN GARDEN CITY HERTFORDSHIRE AL6 9EQ LLOYDS PHARMACY 84 HALDENS WELWYN GARDEN CITY HERTFORDSHIRE AL7 1DD BOOTS UK LIMITED 65 MOORS WALK WELWYN GARDEN CITY HERTFORDSHIRE AL7 2BQ BOOTS UK LIMITED 31 COLE GREEN LANE WELWYN GARDEN CITY HERTFORDSHIRE AL7 3PP PEARTREE PHARMACY 110 PEARTREE LANE WELWYN GARDEN CITY HERTFORDSHIRE AL7 3UJ BOOTS UK LIMITED 126 PEARTREE LANE WELWYN GARDEN CITY HERTFORDSHIRE AL7 3XY BOOTS UK LIMITED 31 THE HOWARD CENTRE WELWYN GARDEN
    [Show full text]
  • Staffordshire County Council GIS Locality Analysis for Burntwood
    Staffordshire County Council GIS Locality Analysis for Burntwood Town in Lichfield District Council area: Specialist Housing for Older People December 2018 GIS Locality Analysis: Burntwood Town Page 1 Contents 1 Burntwood Town Mapping ................................................................................................. 3 1.1 Bus routes within Burntwood North ........................................................................... 3 1.2 Burntwood Locality Population Demographics .......................................................... 4 1.3 Summary of demographic information ..................................................................... 10 1.4 Burntwood Locality Analysis ..................................................................................... 11 1.5 Access to Local Facilities and Services ...................................................................... 12 1.6 Access to Leisure and Recreational Opportunities ................................................... 20 1.7 Access to local care facilities/age appropriate housing in Burntwood North .......... 21 2 Burntwood town centre summary ................................................................................... 27 2.1 Burntwood Locality Population Demographics ........................................................ 27 2.2 Access to retail, banking, health and leisure services ............................................... 27 2.3 Access to specialist housing and care facilities ......................................................... 28
    [Show full text]
  • Burntwood Neighbourhood Plan Consultation Statement
    Burntwood Regulation 16 Submission Neighbourhood Development Plan Consultation Statement, June 2019 Burntwood Regulation 16 Submission Neighbourhood Development Plan Consultation Statement June 2019 1 Burntwood Regulation 16 Submission Neighbourhood Development Plan Consultation Statement, June 2019 Figure 1 – Burntwood Neighbourhood Development Plan Area [produced on behalf of the Town Council by Lichfield District Council] 2 Burntwood Regulation 16 Submission Neighbourhood Development Plan Consultation Statement, June 2019 1.0 Introduction and Background 1.1 This Consultation Statement has been prepared to accompany the Regulation 16 Submission Draft of the Burntwood Neighbourhood Development Plan. This Consultation Statement should be read alongside the Basic Condition Statement and other submitted documents. 1.2 This Consultation Statement has been prepared in accordance with The Neighbourhood Planning (General) Regulations 2012 (SI No. 637) Part 5 Paragraph 15 (2)1 which defines a “consultation statement” as a document which: (a) contains details of the persons and bodies who were consulted about the proposed neighbourhood development plan; (b) explains how they were consulted; (c) summarises the main issues and concerns raised by the persons consulted; and (d) describes how these issues and concerns have been considered and, where relevant, addressed in the proposed neighbourhood development plan. 1.3 The Burntwood Neighbourhood Development Plan (NDP) has been prepared in response to the Localism Act 2011, which gives town and parish councils and other relevant bodies, new powers to prepare statutory Neighbourhood Plans to help guide development in their local areas. These powers give local people the opportunity to shape new development, as planning applications are determined in accordance with national planning policy and the local development plan, and neighbourhood plans form part of this Framework.
    [Show full text]
  • SUPPORT STAFFORDSHIRE (LICHFIELD) VCSE FORUM Wednesday 12Th June 2019, 13.00 – 15.00 Open House, Burntwood
    SUPPORT STAFFORDSHIRE (LICHFIELD) VCSE FORUM Wednesday 12th June 2019, 13.00 – 15.00 Open House, Burntwood PRESENT: Caroline Roberts Burntwood Live at Home Scheme Rev Steve Speight Life Church Lichfield Marisha Place Staffordshire Police Lichfield and District Partnership Manager Tahir Ahmed Balfour Beatty Vinci Helen Titterton Places of Welcome Ali Betteridge University Hospitals Burton and Derby NHS Foundation Trust Pauline Walker Burntwood Breast Care Beryl Phillips Burntwood Breast Care Jane Reynolds SCYVS Liz Bacon Fun Club Hub Kerry McCabe-Crowley Fun Club Hub Sue Jupp T.L.C Club Maggi Huckfield Liberty Staffordshire Jill Hart-Sanderson Blast Loz Cadman COGS Tracy Blakey COGS Geoff Goodyear Phoenix Counselling Sarah McCormick SPARKS / Little Owls Matt Price HS2 Chris Humphreys HS2 Lynne Vickers University Hospitals Burton and Derby NHS Foundation Trust Jo Brain BLAST Caroline Partridge Friends of Chase Terrace Park Brian Harman Burntwood Memorial Institute Heather Brooks WS7 Community Trips Ruth Beard STP Together Kerry Heath Lichfield District Children’s Centre Jenny Simkins Lichfield District Children’s Centre Simon Astbury Steps to Work Vicky Rowley Staffordshire County Council Public Health & Prevention Commissioning Manager Debbie Nash Staffordshire County Council District Children’s Commissioning Officer Jan Matthews The Voluntary Car Scheme – Lichfield and Cannock Chase areas Graham Hunt Burntwood Town Council – Town Clark Gifford Foote Meeting Point Handsacre J Westwood T.L.C Club Charlotte Slater Liberty Staffordshire Gemma
    [Show full text]
  • Burntwood Regulation 14 Draft NDP April 2018
    Burntwood Neighbourhood Development Plan – Made 08 June 2021 1 Burntwood Neighbourhood Development Plan – Made 08 June 2021 2029 Vision By 2029 Burntwood will be a positive, outward facing but internally connected and coherent community that is sustainable, successful, serves the needs of all its people and is open to opportunities and potentials that will continue to enhance and strengthen its position. 2 Burntwood Neighbourhood Development Plan – Made 08 June 2021 Table of Contents Foreword 1.0 Introduction and Background 5 2.0 Policy Context 10 3.0 A Portrait of Burntwood 14 4.0 Key Planning Issues 26 5.0 Vision and Objectives 30 6.0 Neighbourhood Plan Policies 32 7.0 Burntwood Town Centre 33 8.0 Chasetown, Swan Island, other Neighbourhood Centres and Local Shops 43 9.0 A Healthy Burntwood Community that Retains Local Identities 52 10.0 Housing 54 11.0 Local Heritage 58 12.0 Improving Accessibility 60 12.0 Recreation, Open Spaces and Community Facilities 62 14.0 Monitoring and Review 76 Appendices Appendix 1 Listed Buildings Appendix 2 Identified Open Spaces Appendix 3 Glossary 3 Burntwood Neighbourhood Development Plan – Made 08 June 2021 Foreword The creation of the Neighbourhood Development Plan is a unique and exciting opportunity for the Burntwood community to establish a blueprint for a long term sustainable plan for the town, which will transform the area from a conjoined collection of four villages with local foci, into a modern, well laid out cohesive town with a vibrant and diverse town centre based around a pedestrian square. Healthier living will be encouraged through non-car based transit between areas, more open air recreation and leisure and a better quality of life all residents by the provision of appropriate affordable housing and community based support.
    [Show full text]
  • Consultants' Report
    APPENDIX 1a ITEM NO. 20. 18 Cannock Chase District Council Stadium Site, Pye Green Road, Cannock Consultation into proposed Stadium Site development December 2012 www.askforresearch.co.uk 18 Cannock Chase District Council ITEM NO. 20. 19 Contents Page Introduction 4 Executive Summary 6 Summary 8 Main report 13 Section 1: Profile of consultees 13 1. Profile of consultees 2. Gender of consultees 3. Age of consultees 4. Disability of consultees 5. Lists for Section 1 Section 2: Current use of the Stadium Site 18 1. Current use of the Stadium Site 2. Frequency of use of the Stadium Site 3. Type of use of the Stadium Site 4. Reasons why the Stadium Site is not used 5. Lists for Section 2 Section 3: Stadium Site potential facilities 23 1. Range of facilities for the Stadium Site 2. Preference for sport and recreation facilities on the Stadium Site 3. Lists for Section 3 Section 4: Options for the development of the 34 Stadium Site 1. Facilities for people with disabilities 2. Priority access to facilities 3. Preference for a sport hub, recreation hub or a hub for both sport and recreation 4. Lists for Section 4 www.askforresearch.co.uk 19 Cannock Chase District Council ITEM NO. 20. 20 Page Section 5: Development of the Stadium Site 50 1. Potential frequency of use of the Stadium Site 2. Concerns about the Stadium Site’s potential development 3. Agreement with the proposal to develop the Stadium Site 4. Comments regarding the Stadium Site and its potential development 5. Lists for Section 5 Section 6: Additional comments 70 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Consultation: Booklet 1
    Initial Consultation: Booklet 1 ‘Changing from Community School Category to Foundation Trust Category and acquiring a Charitable Trust’ The reason for the consultation The Governing Boards of Chase Terrace Primary School, Highfields Primary School, Holly Grove Primary School and Ridgeway Primary School are proposing to change their legal school category from community to foundation, and at the same time acquire a trust to be known as the Burntwood Co-operative Learning Trust. What we would like you to do We would like to know what you think of our proposals so we invite you to take part in our public consultation. You can do this by: a) Reading this booklet. (You may also wish to read Booklet Two which provides answers to a number of commonly asked questions). Copies of this will be available from school as well as electronically from each school website details of which can be found at the end of this booklet together with e-mail addresses for each school to whom a request can be made. b) Completing the Questionnaire Response Form you have been sent and returning it to the school; c) Attending one of the Consultation Meetings – see detail inside for the appropriate meeting. 1 Contents of this Booklet Section Page 1 Executive Summary ............................................................................................... 3 2 Visions and Values ................................ 5 3 What will the Trust do? .......................................................................................... 6 4 How will the Trust work? ...................................................................................... 10 5 Foundation Status and Trust Status .................................................................... 11 6 What Foundation Trust Status will mean for ...................................................... 12 a) Parents and Carers; b) Learners; c) Employees; d) The Wider Community. 7 The Consultation Process...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Proposals for New Parliamentary Constituency Boundaries in the West Midlands Contents
    Initial proposals for new Parliamentary constituency boundaries in the West Midlands Contents Summary 3 1 What is the Boundary Commission for England? 5 2 Background to the 2018 Review 7 3 Initial proposals for the West Midlands 11 Initial proposals for the Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent 12 sub-region Initial proposals for the Herefordshire, Shropshire, 13 Telford and Wrekin, Warwickshire, West Midlands, and Worcestershire sub-region 4 How to have your say 19 Annex A: Initial proposals for constituencies, 23 including wards and electorates Glossary 37 Initial proposals for new Parliamentary constituency boundaries in the West Midlands 1 Summary Who we are and what we do What is changing in the West Midlands? The Boundary Commission for England is an independent and impartial The West Midlands has been allocated non-departmental public body which is 53 constituencies – a reduction of six from responsible for reviewing Parliamentary the current number. constituency boundaries in England. Our proposals leave seven of the 59 The 2018 Review existing constituencies unchanged. We have the task of periodically reviewing As it has not always been possible to the boundaries of all the Parliamentary allocate whole numbers of constituencies constituencies in England. We are currently to individual counties, we have grouped conducting a review on the basis of rules some county and local authority areas set by Parliament in 2011. The rules tell into sub-regions. The number of us that we must make recommendations constituencies allocated to each sub-region for new Parliamentary constituency is determined by the electorate of the boundaries in September 2018.
    [Show full text]