Fourth Annual Monitoring Report
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Higher Folds Community Centre Evaluation of the BIG Lottery Funded
Higher Folds Community Centre Evaluation of the BIG Lottery funded project Into the Future 2008-2013 and continuing evaluation of further progress to date Company number: 03560600 October 2015 Charity number: 1076911 1 Contents Page Section Section title number 1. Introduction and methodology for our self-evaluation 4 Contributors to the evaluation Sources of guidance Steps taken to evaluate the Project 2. The work of the project – Into the Future 2008-13 5 Planned outcomes Higher Folds Community Centre objectives Wigan Council strategic priorities Market research to assist evaluation Progress reporting to stakeholders 3. The methods and tools we used to collect our 8 information and monitoring data Various methods and tools 4. Review and analysis of the information and data 9 Measurement against planned outcomes Successes and failures Examples from project users Improvement actions during and after the Project 5. External evaluation of the project 14 G & M Associates Wigan Council Surveys of users, non-users and other stakeholders 2 6. Conclusions and recommendations from “Into the 16 Future” – moving forward What worked What didn’t work What we can improve Benefits to users 7. Further developments at the Centre since July 2013 20 when the BIG Lottery project “Into the Future” ended Wigan Council, the Deal for the Future for Communities 2015-2020 and the Community Investment Fund Work to meet the strategic priorities of Wigan Council and other local public services “We Decide” the Participatory Budget project and event with Greater Manchester Police and local groups Latest market research on issues to be addressed in the Higher Folds and wider WN7 area 8. -
A Landscape Character Assessment
WIGAN: A LANDSCAPE CHARACTER ASSESSMENT Final Report Prepared for Wigan Council by Agathoclis Beckmann March 2009 CONTENTS Page No 1. INTRODUCTION 01 2. METHODOLOGY 05 3. LANDSCAPE CONTEXT 09 4. PHYSICAL INFLUENCES ON THE LANDSCAPE 13 5. ECOLOGICAL CONTEXT 16 6. HUMAN INFLUENCES AND THE HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT 23 7. LANDSCAPE CHARACTER TYPES AND AREAS 33 CHARACTER TYPE 1: UNDULATING ENCLOSED FARMLAND 37 AREA 1.A EAST LANCASHIRE ROAD CORRIDOR 42 LOWTON HEATH TO LATELY COMMON AREA 1.B ASPULL COMMON, LEIGH TO BAMFURLONG 49 AREA 1.C EDGE GREEN TO LAND GATE 57 AREA 1.D BOARS HEAD, LOWER HAIGH AND HINDLEY HALL 63 AREA 1.E FRAGMENTED AREAS INCLUDING ALDER FARM 71 (HINDLEY), BICKERSHAW/CRANKWOOD, GIBFIELD, HOWE BRIDGE/ATHERTON HALL, SHAKERLEY/MOSLEY COMMON, GARRETT HALL AND HIGHER GREEN (ASTLEY) CHARACTER TYPE 2: ELEVATED ENCLOSED FARMLAND 81 AREA 2.A BILLINGE AND ORRELL RIDGE 88 AREA 2.B THE DOUGLAS/GATHURST VALLEY 97 AREA 2.C SHEVINGTON AND STANDISH SPURS 104 AREA 2.D STANDISH CREST 112 AREA 2.E ASPULL RIDGE 119 CHARACTER TYPE 3: STEEP-SIDED WOODED VALLEYS 127 AREA 3.A SMITHY BROOK 131 AREA 3.B DEAN BROOK AND ACKHURST BROOK 137 AREA 3.C CALICO BROOK, HULLET HOLE BROOK AND 143 WORTHINGTON BROOK AREA 3.D MILL BROOK AND FRODSHAM’S BROOK 148 AREA 3.E RIVER DOUGLAS (ADLINGTON PARK TO 154 BOTTLING WOOD) AREA 3.F BORSDANE BROOK 163 CHARACTER TYPE 4: WETLANDS AND FLASHES 168 AREA 4.A APPLEY BRIDGE TO MARTLAND MILL 173 AREA 4.B WIGAN FLASHES 179 AREA 4.C HEY BROOK CORRIDOR. -
Local Government Boundary Commission for England Report No
Local Government Boundary Commission For England Report No. 324 LOCAL BOUNDARY COjVli,iI3SIGI'< FOR ENGLA10) REPORT NO. 32-*+ UKIAJ, COVlttNMKNT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR KHGLAND CHAIRMAN Sir Nicholas Morrison KCB DEPUTY CHAIRMAN Mr J M Rankin QC MEMBERS Lady Bowden Mr J T Brockbank Mr R R Thornton CB DL Mr D P Harrison To the Rt Hon Merlyn Hees, HP Secretary of State for the Home Department PROPOSALS I'Xl. FUTUi-£ liLECTOIiAL AHhANGhMMTS RJii THE. METROPOLITAN BOROUGH OF WIGAN 1. We, the Local Government Boundary Commission for England, having carried out our initial review of the electoral arrangements for the Metropolitan Borough of Wigan in accordance with the requirements of section 63 of, and Schedule 9 to, the Local Government Act 1972, present our proposals for the future electoral arrangements for that borough. 2. In accordance with the procedure laid down in section 60(1) and (2) of the 1972 Act, notice was given on 28 August 1975.that we were to undertake this review. This was incorporated in a consultation letter addressed to Wigan ' Metropolitan Borough Council, copies of which were circulated to the Greater Manchester County Council, the Members of Parliament for the constituencies concerned and the headquarters of the main political parties. Copies were also sent to the editors of the local newspapers circulating in the area and of the local government press. Notices inserted in the local press announced the start of the review and invited comments from members of the public and from interested bodies, 3. Wigan Metropolitan Borough Council were invited to prepare a draft scheme of representation for our consideration. -
Fe Youth Works.Pdf
Final Evaluation of the Youth Works Higher Folds Programme March 2008 Youth Works Higher Folds Final Evaluation of the Youth Works Higher Folds Programme March 2008 Youth Works Higher Folds Consultant’s Statement Wider Impact Consultancy is pleased to submit a positive report in relation to the overall delivery of the Youth Works Higher Folds Programme. We are delighted to commend the Youth Works Higher Folds Programme, in particular those front line staff who have worked hard to ensure programme objectives have been achieved and have without doubt enhanced and improved the lives of young people living on the estate. Outputs agreed with the principle funder, the Coalfields Regeneration Trust have been exceeded and impressive outcomes will help cement the value the Youth Works programme can make to involving young people in the social, physical and economic regeneration of local communities. Based on research findings and our experience, a number of recommendations are suggested, which if acted on, have the potential to add value to the wider regeneration of the Higher Folds estate. Edwin Lewis, Wider Impact Consultancy Limited March 2008 © Wider Impact Consultancy, March 2008 Youth Works Higher Folds Youth Works Higher Folds ‘Diamonds in the dust’ Report Commissioned by Groundwork Lancashire West & Wigan Delivered by Wider Impact Consultancy www.widerimpact.com Youth Works Higher Folds Contents Sections Description Page 1.0 Executive Summary 1 2.0 Acknowledgements 6 3.0 Terms of Reference 7 4.0 Methodology 8 5.0 Groundwork Lancashire Wes