2013 – Salt Lake City, UT

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2013 – Salt Lake City, UT SALT LAKE CITY 2013 AAPG-RMS SEPTEMBER 22-24 2013 AAPG Rocky Mountain Section Meeting Hosted by the Utah Geological Association The Program is sponsored by Newfield Exploration Company Thank you to our generous sponsors Mt. Elbert (CO) - 14,440 ft - >$5,000 Gannett Peak (WY) - 13,804 ft - $2,000 - $5,000 Kings Peak (UT) - 13,528 ft - $1,000 - $2,000 Wheeler Peak (NM) - 13,167 ft - $100 - $1,000 1 SALT LAKE CITY 2013 AAPG-RMS SEPTEMBER 22-24 WE WELCOME YOU TO SALT LAKE CITY On behalf of the Rocky Mountain Section of AAPG and the Utah Geological Association, we welcome you to Salt Lake City. The 2013 organizing committee has worked hard to prepare an excellent conference with diverse field trips, comprehen- sive short courses, and a technical program that highlights the latest research on a wide variety of geoscience topics. Don’t forget to check out the core posters, located in the exhibit hall, representing several major reservoir types in the Rockies. There are still tickets available for the private party at the new Natural History Museum of Utah on Monday evening. Located on the east bench, with panoramic views of the Salt Lake Valley, this 163,000-square-foot facility is one of the finest Natural History Museums in the country. The entire museum will be yours to explore and enjoy, along with dinner, drinks, and live music by the local folk band Otter Creek. The All-Convention Luncheon on Tuesday will step away from the traditional petroleum discussion and look to the heavens. Dr. Rebecca Williams, Mars research scientist with the Planetary Science Institute, will present the latest findings from the Mars Science Laboratory Curiosity. Many of Utah’s geologic landscapes have served as analogs to the features seen on Mars. One of the committee’s goals was to greatly increase the number of student attendees (over 100 students are registered). As a professional, please take time to engage these students, inquire about their future goals, and share your hard- earned experiences. Help make this meeting the beginning of an exciting career. Salt Lake City has changed significantly since it last hosted a RMS meeting. We encourage you take some time to explore all the new amenities the city has to offer and hopefully you will get a chance to make it up into the mountains and enjoy the wonderful fall weather. Craig Morgan, RMS Conference General Chair and UGA President Michael Vanden Berg, RMS President UGA Officers RMS Officers President – Craig Morgan President – Michael Vanden Berg President-Elect – Grant Willis President-Elect – Elmo Brown Treasurer – Paul Inkenbrandt Secretary-Treasurer – Sue Cluff Secretary – Sonja Heuscher Secretary-Treasurer-Elect – Cat Campbell Program Chair – Danny Horns Past President – Robert Suydam Past President – Kimm Harty 2 CONFERENCE COMMITTEE CHAIRS COMMITTEE CHAIRPERSON COMMITTEE CHAIRPERSON General Chair Craig Morgan Guest Activities Terri Morgan RMS President Michael Vanden Berg Mary Chidsey Finance Roger Bon Social Events Paul Inkenbrandt Technical Program Tom Chidsey Volunteers Lauren Birgenheier Short Courses Tom Anderson Sponsorship David Wavrek Field Trips Paul Anderson Randy White Exhibit Hall Robert Ressetar Marc Eckels Publicity and Awards Steve Schamel Convention Signs Terry Massoth Registration Stephanie Carney Teacher Activities Sandy Eldredge Judging Brad Hill Standing (left to right): Randy White, Steve Schamel, Dave Wavrek, Brad Hill, Mary Chidsey, Tom Chidsey, Robert Ressetar, Terri Morgan, Craig Morgan, Stephanie Carney Sitting/kneeling (left to right): Michael Vanden Berg, Terry Massoth, Lauren Birgenheier, Roger Bon, Tom Anderson, Paul Inkenbrandt Not pictured: Paul Anderson, Marc Eckels, Sandy Eldredge TABLE OF CONTENTS Meeting Schedule of Events........................................................................................................................4 General Information at a Glance................................................................................................................6 Hilton Layout................................................................................................................................................8 Special Events...............................................................................................................................................9 Spouse & Guest Activities..........................................................................................................................13 Exhibits.........................................................................................................................................................15 Awards.........................................................................................................................................................18 Short Courses..............................................................................................................................................21 Field Trips....................................................................................................................................................23 Technical Program......................................................................................................................................26 Abstracts.....................................................................................................................................................38 What to see and do in Salt Lake City........................................................................................................77 3 Cover photo credit, Adam Barker; others courtesy of Michael Vanden Berg MEETING SCHEDULE OF EVENTS All activities and events will be held at the Hilton Salt Lake City Center in downtown Salt Lake City unless otherwise noted. FRIDAY, SEPT. 20 7:30 AM Departure Field Trip 1 – San Rafael Swell: Geological Centerpiece of Utah (returns 8:30 PM Sat.) SATURDAY, SEPT. 21 8:00 AM - 5:00 PM Short Course 1 – Geology and Geomechanics of Shale Reservoirs (at TerraTek, A Schlumberger company) SUNDAY, SEPT. 22 8:00 AM - 7:00 PM Registration 8:00 AM - 4:30 PM Field Trip 2 – The Greatest Story Ever Told by Nine Miles of Rock: Exploring the Geology of Little Cottonwood Canyon, Wasatch Mountains 8:00 AM - 4:00 PM Short Course 2 – Petrophysical evaluation of Unconventional Resources (Seminar Theater) 8:00 AM - 4:00 PM Short Course 3 – Effective Use of Seismic Attributes for the Interpreter (Energy & Geoscience Institute, University of Utah) 8:00 AM - 4:00 PM Exhibitor Set-up (Grand Ballroom) 8:45 AM - 10:00 AM Mormon Tabernacle Choir performance 9:00 AM - 4:00 PM Field Trip 3 – Great Salt Lake and Pleistocene Lake Bonneville (Free field trip for students and young professionals) 10:00 AM - 4:00 PM Speaker Ready Room (Canyons C) 12:00 Noon - 5:00 PM Guest Hospitality Suite (Conrad Suite, Room 1807) 5:00 PM - 7:00 PM Icebreaker (Grand Ballroom/Lobby) MONDAY, SEPT. 23 6:30 AM - 7:45 AM AAPG House of Delegates’ Breakfast (Granite Conference Center, by invitation only) 7:00 AM - 7:45 AM Speaker/Poster Presenter Breakfast (Salon II) 7:00 AM - 7:45 AM Judges’ Breakfast (Salon I) 7:00 AM - 5:00 PM Registration 7:00 AM - 5:00 PM Speaker Ready Room (Canyons C) 8:00 AM - 5:00 PM Guest Hospitality Suite (Conrad Suite, Room 1807) 8:00 AM - 8:30 AM Opening Session (Alpine) 8:40 AM - 5:00 PM Exhibit Hall Open (Grand Ballroom) 8:40 AM - 12:00 Noon Oral Sessions (Alpine/Canyons A&B) 8:40 AM - 12:00 Noon Poster Sessions (Topaz/Lobby) 8:40 AM - 5:00 PM Core Posters (Grand Ballroom) 9:00 AM - 4:00 PM Guest/Spouse Field Trip – Sundance Resort 10:00 AM - 10:40 AM Morning Break (Grand Ballroom/Lobby/Topaz) 12:15 PM - 1:20 PM DPA Luncheon (Granite Conference Center, ticketed event) 1:20 PM - 5:00 PM Oral Sessions (Alpine/Canyons A&B) 1:20 PM - 5:00 PM Energy Policy Forum (Seminar Theater) 1:20 PM - 5:00 PM Poster Sessions (Topaz/Lobby) 4 3:00 PM - 3:40 PM Afternoon Break (Grand Ballroom/Lobby/Topaz) 5:00 PM - 6:00 PM RMS Foundation Meeting (Granite Boardroom, by invitation only) 6:00 PM - 10:00 PM Night at the New Natural History Museum of Utah (Ticketed event, transportation provided to and from the museum, 301 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City) TUESDAY, SEPT. 24 6:00 AM - 7:45 AM RMS Executive Committee Meeting (Granite Conference Center, by invitation only) 7:00 AM - 7:45 AM Speaker/Poster Presenter Breakfast (Salon II) 7:00 AM - 12:00 Noon Registration 7:00 AM - 4:00 PM Speaker Ready Room (Canyons C) 8:00 AM - 5:00 PM Guest Hospitality Suite (Conrad Suite, Room 1807) 8:00 AM - 11:00/11:20 AM Oral Sessions (Alpine/Canyons A&B) 8:00 AM - 11:20 AM Forum – Rocky Mountain Natural Gas: A Marketer’s Perspective 8:00 AM - 11:20 AM Poster Sessions (Topaz/Lobby) 8:30 AM - 5:00 PM Core Posters (Grand Ballroom) 8:30 AM - 5:00 PM Exhibit Hall Open (Grand Ballroom) 8:45 AM - 11:00 AM Guest Activity – Family Search Genealogy Class 9:20 AM - 9:40 AM Morning Break (Grand Ballroom/Lobby/Topaz) 11:40 AM - 1:40 PM All-Convention Luncheon (Alpine, ticketed event) 2:20 PM - 4:00 PM Oral Sessions (Alpine/Canyons A&B) 2:20 PM - 5:00 PM Poster Sessions (Topaz/Lobby) 4:00 PM - 5:00 PM Closing Reception (Grand Ballroom/Lobby/Topaz) 6:00 PM - 10:00 PM President’s Reception (Squatters Pub, by invitation only, 147 W. Broadway, SLC) WEDNESDAY, SEPT. 25 6:30 AM - 7:30 PM Field Trip 4 – Geology of Nine Mile Canyon, Wasatch and Green River Formations 8:00 AM - 4:30 PM Short Course 4 – Microbial Carbonate Reservoirs from Utah - Core Workshop (Utah Core Research Center, transporation provided to and from UCRC, 240 North
Recommended publications
  • Historical Information H.4 Pre-Event Reports Book 1 Project Rulison: Pre
    Historical Information H.4 Pre-Event Reports Book 1 Project Rulison: Pre-Shot Predictions of Structural Effects HPR .2 DISCLAIMER Portions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document. PROJECT RULISON: Pre - Shot Predictions of Structural Effects John A. -~lume& Associates Research Division San ~rancisco,California March 1969 Prepared under Contract AT(26-1)-99 for the Nevada Operations Office, USAEC This page intentionally left blank PROJECT RULISON: PRE-SHOT PREDICTIONS OF STRUCTURAL EFFECTS CONTENTS -Page ABSTRACT ......................../'. .... i i I SUMMARY ............................ v INTRODUCTION.......................... 1 SEISMICITY ........................... 2 STRUCTURAL HAZARD EVALUATION .................. 3 EARTH STRUCTURAL HAZARDS .................... 11 HYDRAULIC STRUCTURE AND WATER SUPPLY HAZARDS .......... 17 SAFETY PRECAUTIONS AND EVACUATION RECOMt4ENDATIONS ....... 22 DAMAGE COST PREDICTIONS .................... 24 CONDITION SURVEYS ....................... 26 MAP (In pocket inside back cover) This page intentionally left blank . ~ ABSTRACT This report includes results of pre-RULISON structural response investigations and a preliminary evaluation of hazards associated with ground motion effects on buildings, reservoirs, and earth structures. Total damage repair costs from an engineering judg- ment prediction are provided. Spectral Matrix Method calcula- tions are now in progress. Also included are general safety recommendations. A summary of predictions follows: Structural Response Damaging motions are probable in the region inside 25 kilometers. Structural hazards exist in Grand Valley, at the Anvil Points Research Station, and at various small ranches out to a distance of 14 ki lometers from Ground Zero (GZ) . The area is much more densely populated than would appear from initial project informa- tion. Earth Structure Hazards Rockfall and hazards to slope stability create major problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Kings Lake From: Utah Place Names
    Kings Lake from: Utah Place Names KINGS LAKE (Duchesne County) is in the central Uinta Mountains on the southwest slopes of Kings Peak. See the peak below for name source. >T4N,R4W,USM; 11,416' (3,480m). KINGS PEAK (Duchesne County) is in the south central section of the Uinta Mountains between the headwaters of the Uinta and Yellowstone rivers. Kings Peak is the highest point in Utah. The peak was named for Clarence King, an early director of the U.S. Geological Survey. >13,528' (4,123m). Bibliography: Layton, Stanford J. "Fort Rawlins, Utah: A Question of Mission and Means." Utah Historical Quarterly 42 (Winter 1974): 68-83. Marsell, Ray E. "Landscapes of the North Slopes of the Uinta Mountains." A Geological Guidebook of the Uinta Mountains, 1969. Utah's Geography and Counties. Salt Lake City: Author, 1967. Stegner, Wallace. Beyond the Hundredth Meridian. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1954.Utah, A Guide to the State. Work Projects Administration. Comp. by Utah State Institute of Fine Arts, Salt Lake County Commission. New York: Hastings House, 1941. U.S. Board on Geographic Names, Decision List, No. 6602. EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS... 1. An asterisk (*) following a place name indicates past or present inhabitation. 2. When a series of letters and numbers are present towards the end of an entry after the ">" symbol, the first group indicates section/township/range as closely as can be pinpointed (i.e., S12,T3S,R4W,SLM, or USM). A section equals approximately one square mile, reflecting U.S. Geological Survey topographic map sections. Because Utah is not completely mapped, some entries are incomplete.
    [Show full text]
  • Coal Fields of Northwestern Colorado and Northeastern Utah
    COAL FIELDS OF NORTHWESTERN COLORADO AND NORTHEASTERN UTAH. By HOYT S. GALE. INTRODUCTION. NATURE OF THE PRESENT INVESTIGATION. This paper is a preliminary statement of the results of work in the coal fields of northwestern Colorado and northeastern Utah during the summer of 1907.° In 1905 a preliminary reconnaissance of the Yampa coal field, of Routt County, was made.6 In the summer of 1906 similar work was extended southwestward from the Yampa field, and the Danforth Hills and Grand Hogback coal fields, of Routt, Rio Blanco, and Garfield counties, were mapped.6 The work of the past season was a continuation of that of the two preceding years, extend­ ing the area studied westward through Routt and Rio Blanco counties, Colo., and including some less extensive coal fields in^Uinta County, Utah, and southern Uinta County, Wyo. ACCESSIBILITY. At present these fields have no_ railroad connection, although surveys for several projected lines have recently been made into the region. Of these lines, the Denver, Northwestern and Pacific Railway ("Moffat road") is under active construction in .the eastern part of Routt County and bids fair to push westward not far from the lower Yampa and White River fields in the near future. An extension of the Uintah Railway has been surveyed from Dragon to Vernal, Utah, crossing the projected route of the "MofFat road" near Green River. The Union Pacific Railroad has made a preliminary survey south from Rawlins, Wyo., intending to reach the Yampa Valley in the vicinity of Craig. a A more complete report combining the results of the preceding season's work in the Danforth Hills and Grand Hogback fields with those of last season's work as outlined here, together with detailed contour maps of the whole area, will be published as a (separate bulletin of the Survey.
    [Show full text]
  • ()Olorado Native Piant Society
    ()olorado Native PIant Society NEWSLETTER VOLLl'lE 4 NLmER 1 JANUARY - FEBRUARY 1980 llIEnlCATED TO lHE ApPRECIATIGl AND lDNSERVATION OF lHE CoLORADO FLORAII OFFICERS 1979-l9OO CORRESPONDENCE President: Lloyd Hayes Please direct all correspondence and inquiries Vice-President: Scott Peterson to the Secretary, Sue Martin, USDA Crops Secretary: Sue Martin Research Laboratory, Colorado State University Treasurer: ~Ia 1t Ruzzo Ft. Collins 80523 MEI>1BERSHIP RENEWALS & INFORfAATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS * Please direct all membership applications, Ann Armstrong (81) Boulder 494-0545 renewals and address changes to Myrna Miriam Denham (80) Boulder 442-1020 Steinkamp. USDA Crops Research Laboratory. Virginia Dionigi (80) Hygiene 776-2609 Colorado State University. Ft. Collins 80523 Tom Eamon (81) Golden 279-1076 Hugo Ferchau (80) Gunnison SCHEDULE OF ~1BERSHIP FEES Lloyd Hayes (80) Ft. Collins 226-5365 Bob Heapes (81) Parker 841-3978 LIFE $ 250.00 Sue Martin (81) Ft. Collins 226-3371 SUPPORTING 50.00 Scott Peterson (80) Ft. Collins 484-2884 SOCIETY 25.00 Mark Phillips (80) Lafayette 823-3021 FAMILY 12.00 Walt Ruzzo (81) Ft. Collins 493-0305 INDIVIDUAL 8.00 STUDENT &RETIRED 4.00 The CONPS Newsletter is sent to all other *Year when term expires is given in (). Native Plant Societies in exchange for Numbers following names are phones theirs. Nonmembers may subscribe to the where Directors can be reached. All of Newsletter for $ 4.00. Colorado is covered by the area code 303. Cct.f>1 ITTEES NEWSLETTER EDUCATION Virginia Oionig; EDITOR: Dieter H. Wilken, Dept. of Botany HORTICULTURE & &Plant Pathology, Colorado State Univ. REHABI UTATI ON f1ark Phi 11 ; ps Ft.
    [Show full text]
  • Glenwood Springs and Kremmling Field Offices RMP Revision Evaluation of Proposed Areas of Critical Environmental Concern
    Glenwood Springs and Kremmling Field Offices RMP Revision Evaluation of Proposed Areas of Critical Environmental Concern Glenwood Springs and Kremmling Field Offices RMP Revision Areas of Critical Environmental Concern Report on the Application of the Relevance and Importance Criteria November 2007 Prepared by: United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Glenwood Springs & Kremmling Field Offices Approval: /s/ Jamie Connell /s/ David Stout Jamie Connell David Stout Glenwood Springs Field Manager Kremmling Field Manager Glenwood Springs, Colorado Kremmling, Colorado 2 Table of Contents I. Executive Summary 4 II. Introduction 7 III. Requirements for ACEC Designation 7 IV. Evaluation Process 9 A. Glenwood Springs Relevant and Importance Criteria 11 Determinations B. Kremmling Relevant and Importance Criteria 36 Determinations V. List of Preparers 46 Appendices 1 – References 2 – Natural Heritage Program Definitions 3 – Maps of Proposed ACECs found to meet the relevance and importance criteria 3 I. Executive Summary As part of the Glenwood Springs and Kremmling Resource Management Plan (RMP) revisions, the BLM Interdisciplinary (ID) Team analyzed whether proposed Areas of Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC) meet the relevance and importance criteria. The Glenwood Springs Field Office (GSFO) analyzed 91 proposed ACECs (existing, internally and externally proposed) and found that 17 met the relevance and importance criteria (total proposed acres = 66,497 acres): Blue Hill ACEC (existing) Bull Gulch ACEC (existing) Deep
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape Character Descriptions of the White River National Forest
    Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume 3 Landscape Character Descriptions of the White River National Forest Headwaters of the South Fork of the White River Jan Spencer – Landscape Architect Writer/Editor Ron Wright – Soil Scientist Bill Kight – Heritage Resource Manager Kit Buell – Wildlife Biologist Carolyn Upton – Social/Economics Specialist Marsha Raus – Fisheries Biologist Narrative and Photography Contributors: Ron Taussig, Beth Boyst, George Myser, Tom Kuekes, Al Grimshaw, Dan Mathews, Paula Johnston, Kathy Hardy, Angela Glenn, Gary Osier P-1 Appendix P White River National Forest Preface The word landscape evokes certain unique and special images and meanings to each of us as individuals. As children we may have attached a sense of place to some small parcel of ground, be it a backyard or an open meadow blooming with the rainbow color of wildflowers. The rest of our lives then build upon those early impressions, layer upon layer of geographic recognition. Year after year we go back to a stream, yet each time we fish there we read something new into the landscape. It may even be some picnic spot with a backdrop of mountain majesty we can still see in our mind even with our eyes closed. These places uplift our spirit, but we are hard-pressed to put into words exactly how or why we feel the way we do. The comforting sense of familiarity a prominent granite peak holds for us never quite gets communicated beyond the photo image. “Like all real treasures of the mind, perception can be split into infinitely small fractions without losing its quality.
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forests Coal
    Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forests Coal Resource and Development Potential Report (2004, revised 2006) ii TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose and Scope .......................................................................................................... 1 Acknowledgments........................................................................................................... 1 II. Geologic Units............................................................................................................... 1 Description.................................................................................................................. 5 III. Coal Fields .................................................................................................................... 5 Carbondale Coal Field .................................................................................................... 6 Crested Butte Coal Field................................................................................................. 6 Grand Mesa Coal Field ................................................................................................... 8 Somerset Coal Field........................................................................................................ 8 Tongue Mesa Coal Field................................................................................................. 9 IV. Coal Characteristics
    [Show full text]
  • Access Status Recreation Potential
    Recreation BLM BLM Parcel Potential Potential State District/Field Project Area Name County Size (approx. Access Status 1 - Low Acquisition Office acres) 2 - Medium Tool 3 - High Colorado River CO Harris Gulch Garfield 2,500 Restricted Access 3 Easement, Fee Valley Colorado River CO Upper Grand Hogback Garfield 7,600 Restricted Access 3 Easement, Fee Valley Colorado River CO Consolidated Reservoir Garfield 1,950 Restricted Access 3 Easement, Fee Valley Colorado River CO South Canyon (2 parcels) Garfield 3,790 Restricted Access 3 Easement, Fee Valley CO Grand Junction Bangs Canyon Clarks Bench Mesa 831 Restricted Access 3 Easement, Fee CO Grand Junction Bangs Canyon East Creek Mesa 6,268 Restricted Access 3 Easement, Fee CO Grand Junction Bottle Rock Mesa 869 no legal access 2 Easement CO Grand Junction Bull Draw Mesa 2,480 Restricted Access 2 Easement CO Grand Junction Larsen Canyon Mesa 878 Restricted Access 2 Easement CO Grand Junction Mount Logan Garfield 760 Restricted Access 2 Easement CO Grand Junction Mud Spring Canyon Garfield 6,313 Restricted Access 3 Easement CO Grand Junction Pritchard Spring Garfield 1,278 no legal access 2 Easement CO Grand Junction Sink Creek Mesa 8,481 Restricted Access 2 Easement CO Grand Junction Snyder Creek Mesa 698 no legal access 2 Easement CO Grand Junction South Grand Mesa Slopes Mesa 6,113 Restricted Access 2 Easement CO Grand Junction The Breaks Mesa 2,543 no legal access 2 Easement CO Grand Junction The Palisade Fish Creek Mesa 2,026 Restricted Access 2 Easement CO Grand Junction The Palisade
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography of United States Landslide Maps and Reports Christopher S. Alger and Earl E. Brabb1 Open-File Report 85-585 This Re
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Bibliography of United States landslide maps and reports Christopher S. Alger and Earl E. Brabb 1 Open-File Report 85-585 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature. 1 Menlo Park, California Contents Page Introductlon......................................... 1 Text References...................................... 8 Bibliographies With Landslide References............. 8 Multi State-United States Landslide Maps and Reports. 8 Alabama.............................................. 9 Alaska............................................... 9 American Samoa....................................... 14 Arizona.............................................. 14 Arkansas............................................. 16 California........................................... 16 Colorado............................................. 41 Connecticut.......................................... 51 Delaware............................................. 51 District of Columbia................................. 51 Florida.............................................. 51 Georgi a.............................................. 51 Guam................................................. 51 Hawa i i............................................... 51 Idaho................................................ 52 II1i noi s............................................. 54 Indiana.............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Of Ground Water Compliance at the New Rifle, Colorado, UMTRA Project Site
    DOE/EA-1406 Final Environmental Assessment of Ground Water Compliance at the New Rifle, Colorado, UMTRA Project Site July 2003 Work Performed Under DOE Contract No. DE−AC13−02GJ79491 for the U.S. Department of Energy Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE/EA-1406 Rev. 0 Final Environmental Assessment of Ground Water Compliance at the New Rifle, Colorado, UMTRA Project Site July 2003 Prepared by U.S. Department of Energy Grand Junction Office Grand Junction, Colorado Work Performed Under DOE Contract No. DE-AC13-02GJ79491 U01341 This Page Intentionally Blank Contents Page Acronyms and Abbreviations ....................................................................................................... vii Executive Summary....................................................................................................................... ix 1.0 Introduction.......................................................................................................................1 1.1 Background .....................................................................................................................1 1.2 Site Description...............................................................................................................3 1.3 Site History.....................................................................................................................4 1.4 Overview of Contaminant Sources .................................................................................6 2.0 Purpose and Need for Action..................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Revised Joe Elliott, Councilor Cablecast Live on Comcast Channel 10 Ed Green, Councilor Sean Strode, Councilor Streamed Live at Riflenow.Org
    City of CITY COUNCIL Rifle AGENDA City Council City Hall Barbara Clifton, Mayor City Council Chambers Theresa Hamilton, Mayor Pro Tem 202 Railroad Avenue Joe Carpenter, Councilor Rifle, CO Brian Condie, Councilor Revised Joe Elliott, Councilor Cablecast Live on Comcast Channel 10 Ed Green, Councilor Sean Strode, Councilor Streamed Live at RifleNOW.org The City of Rifle will make reasonable accommodations for access to City services, programs, and activities and will make special communication arrangements for persons with disabilities. Please call (970) 665-6405 for assistance. REGULAR MEETING May 20, 2020 WORKSHOP 6:00 P.M. CONFERENCE ROOM 6:00 p.m. Discuss leasing of City Vehicles through Enterprise Fleet Management (Brian Prunty) REGULAR MEETING 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS The City Council may take action on any of the following agenda items as presented or modified prior to or during the meeting, and items necessary or convenient to effectuate the agenda items. 7:00 p.m. 1. Regular Meeting Call to Order, Pledge of Allegiance, and Roll Call 7:03 p.m. 2. Citizen Comments - for items not listed as public hearings on the agenda. Please limit comments to 3 minutes. Email comments prior to the meeting to: [email protected] or Electronic Meeting Participation: Please click the link below to join the webinar: Click here to join electronic meeting or (www.rifleco.org/ElectronicMeetings) Password: 929942 Participate by phone: Dial: 1 301 715 8592 or 1 312 626 6799 / Webinar ID: 416 406 740 7:10 p.m. 3. Consent Agenda – consider approving the following items: A.
    [Show full text]
  • Eriophorum Scheuchzeri Hoppe (White Cottongrass): a Technical Conservation Assessment
    Eriophorum scheuchzeri Hoppe (white cottongrass): A Technical Conservation Assessment Prepared for the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Species Conservation Project March 2, 2006 Juanita A. R. Ladyman, Ph.D. JnJ Associates LLC 6760 S. Kit Carson Circle East Centennial, CO 80122 Peer Review Administered by Society of Conservation Biology Ladyman, J.A.R. (2006, March 2). Eriophorum scheuchzeri Hoppe (white cottongrass): a technical conservation assessment. [Online]. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/r2/ projects/scp/assessments/eriophorumscheuchzeri.pdf [date of access]. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The time spent and help given by all the people and institutions mentioned in the reference section are gratefully acknowledged. I value the information provided by Jacques Cayouette, with Agriculture and Agri-food Canada, and thank him for his help. I also appreciate the access to files and the assistance given to me by Andrew Kratz, USDA Forest Service Region 2, and Chuck Davis, US Fish and Wildlife Service, both in Denver, Colorado. The information sent from Bonnie Heidel, Wyoming Natural Diversity Database; Teresa Prendusi, USDA Forest Service Region 4; Thomas A. Zanoni, New York Botanical Garden; Rusty Russell, United States National Herbarium; Ronald Hartman and Joy Handley, Rocky Mountain Herbarium at the University of Wyoming; Alan Batten, University of Alaska Museum of the North; Mary Barkworth and Michael Piep, the Intermountain Herbarium; Jennifer Penny and Marta Donovan, British Columbia Conservation Data Centre; John Rintoul, Alberta Natural Heritage Information Center; and Ann Kelsey, Garrett Herbarium, are also very much appreciated. I would also like to thank Deb Golanty, Helen Fowler Library at Denver Botanic Gardens, for her persistence in retrieving some rather obscure articles.
    [Show full text]