© Reg. No. cPn. \º¿ Government of tIcf k¿°m¿ KL/TV(N)/12/2009-2011 2011

KERALA GAZETTE

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

6th September 2011 Vol. LVI , TUESDAY 2011 sk]v‰w-_¿ 6 No. Xncp-h-\-¥-]p-cw, sNmΔ 36 hmeyw 56 } 15th Bhadra 1933 \º¿ } 1933 `m{Zw 15

PART I Notifications and Orders issued by the Government

Labour and Rehabilitation Department that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication Labour and Rehabilitation (A) to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki, . The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three ORDERS months. (1) ANNEXURE G. O. (Rt.) No. 901/2011/LBR. Thiruvananthapuram, 27th June 2011. 1. Whether the dismissal of Shri Sunny John, Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an PF No. 1393 and Shri Kunjukutty, PF No. 1299 by industrial dispute exists between 1. The General Manager, the management of Pullikkanam Estate is Cochin Malabar Estate and Industries Limited, justifiable or not? Malabar House, Bristo Road,Wellington Island, Kochi-3, 2. If not what are the reliefs the workers entitled 2. The Manager, Pullikkanam Estate, Pullikkanam P. O., to get? Vagaman, Idukki and the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by the President, the Plantation (2) Labour Congress, Thekkungal Buildings, Collectorate P.O., G. O. (Rt.) No. 1060/2011/LBR. in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order; Thiruvananthapuram, 22nd July 2011. And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for industrial dispute exists between 1. The Managing Director, adjudication; Express Publications (Madurai) Limited, Express Gardens, Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by 29, 2nd Main Road, Chennai-600 058, 2. The General section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 Manager, Express Publications (Madurai) Limited, (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct Express House, Kaloor, Kochi-682 017 and the worker of 6th SEPT. 2011] KERALA GAZETTE 136 the above referred establishment Smt. Kumari Nirmala, (4) Mele Kuthirakadu Puthan Veedu, Manchadimoodu, Vattiyoorkavu P. O., Thiruvananthapuram in respect of G. O. (Rt.) No. 1062/2011/LBR. matters mentioned in the annexure to this order; Thiruvananthapuram, 22nd July 2011.

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director, adjudication; Labour Publications Limited, P. O., Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Kottayam-686 635 and the workman of the above referred section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 establishment Shri Shyam Kumar, Vettathuchirayil House, (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication , Kozhikombu, Marangattupilly P. O., Kottayam in to the Labour Court, . The Labour Court will pass respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order; the award within a period of three months. And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is ANNEXURE necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for 1. Whether the denial of employment of adjudication; Smt. A. Kumari Nirmala, Sweeper with effect from Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by 8-3-2011 by the management of Express Publications (Madurai) Limited, is justifiable section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 or not? (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct 2. If not what relief the worker is entitled to? that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Ernakulam. The Labour Court will (3) pass the award within a period of three months. G. O. (Rt.) No. 1061/2011/LBR. Thiruvananthapuram, 22nd July 2011. ANNEXURE Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an 1. Whether the dismissal of Shri Shyam Kumar, industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director, Worker with effect from 31-12-2009 effected by the Quilon Co-operative Spinning Mills Limited, management of Publication Limited, Karamcode P. O., , Kollam and the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by Kottayam is justifiable or not? the General Secretary, Quilon Co-operative Spinning Mills 2. If not what relief the worker is entitled to? Workers Union, CITU, Karamcode P. O., Chathannoor, Kollam in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to (5) this order; G. O. (Rt.) No. 1063/2011/LBR. And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is Thiruvananthapuram, 22nd July 2011. necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication; Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director, section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 Labour India Publications Limited, Marangattupilly P. O., (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct Kottayam-686 635 and the workman of the above referred that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication establishment Shri Sandeep Kumar, P., Puthenpurackal to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months. House, Andoor, Marangattupilly P. O., Kottayam in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order; ANNEXURE And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is Whether the denial of employment of S/Sri A.S. Jose (Card No. 28), T. Ajayaghosh (Card necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for No. 365), N. Muraleedharan Pillai (Card No. 323), adjudication; Rajendran Pillai (Card No. 406), N. S. Johny Anand (Card No. 243), P. Rajan (Card No. 231), Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Viswanatha Pillai (Card No. 101) and N. T. Sajimon section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Card No. 529), of the Quilon Co-operative (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct Spinning Mills Limited, Karamcode P. O., that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication Chathannoor, Kollam by the management is to the Labour Court, Ernakulam. The Labour Court will justifiable? If not what are the relief they are pass the award within a period of three months. entitled to? 6th SEPT. 2011] KERALA GAZETTE 137

ANNEXURE that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication 1. Whether the dismissal of Shri Sandeep Kumar, P., to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass Worker with effect from 31-12-2009 effected by the award within a period of three months. the management of Labour India Publication Limited, Kottayam is justifiable or not? ANNEXURE 2. If not what relief the worker is entitled to? Whether the denial of employment to Shri N. Rajan, (6) Lift Operator-cum-Room Boy, Summer Shade G. O. (Rt.) No. 1064/2011/LBR. Complex, Nedumangadu by the management is Thiruvananthapuram, 22nd July 2011. justifiable? If not what are the reliefs he is Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an entitled to? industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director, Labour India Publications Limited, Marangattupilly P. O., (8) Kottayam-686 635 and the workman of the above referred establishment Shri Sajith Kumar, P., Puthenpurackal House, G. O. (Rt.) No. 1087/2011/LBR. Andoor, Kozhikombu, Marangattupilly P. O., Kottayam in Thiruvananthapuram, 26th July 2011. respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order; And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for industrial dispute exists between (1) Managing Director, adjudication; Express Publications (Madurai) Limited, Express Gardens, Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by 29, 2nd Main Road, Chennai-600 058, (2) The General section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct Manager, Express Publications (Madurai) Limited, The New that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication Indian Express, Express House, Kaloor, Kochi-682 017 to the Labour Court, Ernakulam. The Labour Court will and the workman of the above referred establishment pass the award within a period of three months. represented by the General Secretary, New Indian ANNEXURE Express Employees Association (Kerala), Narayaneeyam, 1. Whether the dismissal of Shri Sajith Kumar, P., Near Statue Junction, Thripunithura, Fort P. O., Worker with effect from 31-12-2009 effected by the management of Labour India Publication Ernakulam-682 301 in respect of matters mentioned in the Limited, Kottayam is justifiable or not? annexure to this order; 2. If not what relief the worker is entitled to? And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is (7) necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for G. O. (Rt.) No. 1086/2011/LBR. adjudication; Thiruvananthapuram, 26th July 2011. Whereas, the Government are of opinion Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by that an industrial dispute exists between section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 Shri A. Abdul Rasheed Babu, Citadel, Golf Links Road, (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct Kowdiar, Thiruvananthapuram and the workman of the that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication above referred establishment Shri N. Rajan, Vadakkathil to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass Veedu, Karapparambu, Kannaramkode, Karippoor P. O., the award within a period of three months. Nedumangadu, Thiruvananthapuram in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order; ANNEXURE

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is 1. Whether the transfer of Shri P. S. Ajayakumar, necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for Workman, Thiruvananthapuram Branch by the adjudication; management of Express Publications (Madurai) Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Limited with effect from 3-8-2010 is justifiable section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 or not? (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct 2. If not what relief the worker is entitled to? 6th SEPT. 2011] KERALA GAZETTE 138

(9) Hospital Employees Congress, H. O., DCC Office, Kollam in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this G. O. (Rt.) No. 1111/2011/LBR. order; Thiruvananthapuram, 28th July 2011. And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for industrial dispute exists between (1) The Managing Director, adjudication; Express Publications (Madurai) Limited, Express Gardens, Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by 29, 2nd Main Road, Chennai-600 058, (2) The General section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 Manager, Express Publications (Madurai) Limited, Branch (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication Office, Express House, Kaloor, Kochi-682 017 and the to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass workmen of the above referred establishment represented the award within a period of three months. by the General Secretary, New Indian Express Employees ANNEXURE Association (Kerala), Reg. No. 07/06/09, Express House, Kaloor, Kochi in respect of matters mentioned in the Whether the denial of employment of Smt. G. Minimol, Nurse by the management of annexure to this order; Unity Orthopaedic Centre-Accident Trauma And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is Care Unit, Karunagappally is justifiable? If not necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for what are the reliefs she is entitled to? adjudication; (11)

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by G. O. (Rt.) No. 1113/2011/LBR. section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 Thiruvananthapuram, 28th July 2011. (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director, to the Labour Court, Ernakulam. The Labour Court will Labour India Publications Limited, Marangattupilly P. O., Kottayam-686 635 and the workman of the above referred pass the award within a period of three months. establishment Shri Shobin Mathew, Nilackapillil House, ANNEXURE Marangattupilly P. O., Kottayam in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order; 1. Whether the punishment related to the case of loss of newspaper reel imposed on And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for Shri K. Radhakrishna Pillai, Workman by the adjudication; management of Express Publications (Madurai) Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Limited, Branch Office, Kochi is justifiable section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 or not? (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct 2. If not what relief the workman is entitled to get? that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Ernakulam. The Labour Court will (10) pass the award within a period of three months. G. O. (Rt.) No. 1112/2011/LBR. ANNEXURE Thiruvananthapuram, 28th July 2011. 1. Whether the dismissal of Shri Shobin Mathew, Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an Worker with effect from 31-12-2009 effected by industrial dispute exists between the Proprietor, Unity the management of Labour India Publication Orthopaedic Centre-Accident Trauma Care Unit, Limited, Kottayam is justifiable or not? Karunagappally and the worker of the above referred establishment represented by the Secretary, Kerala Private 2. If not what relief the worker is entitled to? 6th SEPT. 2011] KERALA GAZETTE 139

(12) Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 G. O. (Rt.) No. 1114/2011/LBR. (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct Thiruvananthapuram, 28th July 2011. that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication Whereas, the Government are of opinion that to the Labour Court, Ernakulam. The Labour Court will an industrial dispute exists between the President, pass the award within a period of three months. Venkurinji Service Co-operative Bank Limited No. 3023, ANNEXURE Mukkuttuthara P. O. and the workman of the 1. Whether the dismissal of Shri Harikumar, P. A., above referred establishment Shri N. M. Mathew, Worker with effect from 31-12-2009 effected by Njallaniyil House, Edathikavu, Chathanthara P. O., the management of Labour India Publication in respect of matters mentioned in the Limited, Kottayam is justifiable or not? annexure to this order; 2. If not what relief the worker is entitled to? And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for (14) adjudication; G. O. (Rt.) No. 1116/2011/LBR. Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Thiruvananthapuram, 28th July 2011. section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct industrial dispute exists between Shri T. B. Jayakumar, that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication Proprietor, Mukthi Pharma, Mudapuram, , to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass Thiruvananthapuram and the workman of the above the award within a period of three months. referred establishment Shri S. Rajasekharan Nair, TC T6/28-1, Malavika Bhavan, Mukhakkadu Lane, ANNEXURE Anayara P. O., Thiruvananthapuram-695 029 in respect of Whether the dismissal from service of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order; Shri N. M. Mathew, Njallaniyil House, Edathikavu, And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is Chathanpara P. O., Worker with effect from necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for 9-1-2009 by the management of Venkurinji Service adjudication; Co-operative Bank, Mukkuttuthara is justifiable or not? If not what relief the worker is entitled Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by to get? section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct (13) that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication G. O. (Rt.) No. 1115/2011/LBR. to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass Thiruvananthapuram, 28th July 2011. the award within a period of three months. ANNEXURE Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director, Whether the denial of employment to Labour (India) Publications Limited, Labour India Complex, Shri S. Rajasekharan Nair, Machine Operator with Marangattupilly P. O., Kottayam-686 635 and the workman effect from 13-9-2005 by the Proprietor, Mukthi of the above referred establishment Shri Harikumar, P. A., Pharma, Mudapuram, Chirayinkil, Thiruvananthapuram Panachickal House, Marangattupilly P. O., Kottayam in is justifiable? If not what are the reliefs he is respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order; entitled to? By order of the Governor, And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for RACHEL VARGHESE, adjudication; Under Secretary to Government.