DOCSLIB.ORG

Marketing Fragment 6 X 10.T65

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Marketing Fragment 6 X 10.T65 Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-81842-1 - The Reformation of Rights: Law, Religion, and Human Rights in Early Modern Calvinism John Witte Index More information Index to biblical sources Genesis 20:12, 49, 108 2:15, 36 21:7–11, 58 4:13, 57 21:18–32, 58 6:2, 138 22:1–4, 230 6:5, 58 22:28, 109 9:3, 58 23:13, 66 9:23, 109 23:20–23, 58, 66 14:1–9, 52 23:25–31, 58, 66 14:19, 75 28:1–43, 66 16:1, 58 29–30, 58 16:12, 51 33:1–23, 66 18:2, 58 Leviticus 19:6, 58 19:5, 49, 108 20:7, 234 20:9, 58 20:9, 58 25:44, 58 21:14, 58 27:8, 58 22:9, 52 27:30–33, 75 27:1, 58 Numbers 27:3–9, 58 1:20, 58 32:34, 52 3:5–10, 57 33:3, 230 5:8, 75 34:1–3, 51 8:6, 75 34:4, 58 11:1–35, 75 39:11, 56 13:1–30, 75 45:5, 57 18:20–24, 75 50:5–6, 168 18–22, 57 Exodus 28:8–19, 75 1:15–22, 58, 66 30:1–16, 58 6:16–18, 75 31:1–54, 66 7:1–7, 75 36:1–5, 58 10:21–29, 66 Deuteronomy 12:4–14, 66 3:12–20, 57 13:1–59, 75 4-6, 190, 296 15:20, 234 5:4–7, 61 17:8–16, 58 5:8–10, 66 19:6, 234 5:16, 49, 58, 66, 108, 116 19:9–15, 57 5:19, 58 20:1–6, 66 5:23–27, 59 20:3, 58 6:5, 64 20:5–6, 231 10:12–13, 64 20:9, 58 12:19, 75 369 © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-81842-1 - The Reformation of Rights: Law, Religion, and Human Rights in Early Modern Calvinism John Witte Index More information 370 Index to biblical sources 13:12–17, 66 68:9, 57 15:1–11, 56 69:36, 57 16:18–19, 56 72:4, 58 17:12–13, 66 74:2, 57 17:14–15, 188 81:5, 57 17:14–18, 56 82, 92 17:16–20, 63 82:3, 58 18:1–8, 75 82:6, 48, 93 18:14–18, 56, 63 87:6, 57 19:18, 64 89:19, 57 20:5–8, 58 105:6–11, 44, 57 20:11, 167 112:1, 92 21:10–14, 138 Proverbs 25:5, 287 21:14–17, 58 Isaiah 21:23, 66 2:5, 57 22:25–30, 52 7:1–25, 58 23:9–14, 66 10:1–34, 66 24:1, 257 22:1–25, 57 24:7, 56 26:1–21, 66 25:1–4, 58, 66 41:1–29, 66 25:17–19, 58 42:3, 67 26:16–19, 122 44:1–28, 66 27:11–15, 122 45:1–25, 66 29-30, 190 54:17, 57 29:9–18, 122 55:1, 243 34:1–29, 57 57:1–21, 66 Joshua 58:5, 66 14:13, 57 60:1–23, 66 16:1, 57 Jeremiah 1 Samuel 12:14, 66 8, 56 18:18, 66 8:11–22, 57, 66 22:1–3, 58 10:25, 122 22:13–14, 57 11:6-10, 76 24:10, 57 17, 57 25:7, 66 26:22–25, 66 28:4, 66 2 Samuel 30:9, 60 1:1–4, 116 34:17, 66 1:4, 122 40:1–3, 168 1–4, 63 41:1–3, 58 5:1–3, 188 50:5, 287 1 Kings Ezekiel 1:34–40, 188 1:3, 66 12:1–20, 188 5:11, 66 1 Chronicles 29:17, 49 8:17, 57 2 Chronicles 15:15, 287 13:17–18, 66 Job 16:21, 66 10:16–17, 63 18:5–9, 66 19:26–29, 63 20:18–19, 66 34:138, 63 20:27–28, 66 Psalms 20:34, 66 2:12, 66 20:37, 66 7:6–8, 57 20:39, 66 16:2–3, 66 Daniel 24:1–4, 75 4:1-3 47:7, 57 4:17, 66 © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-81842-1 - The Reformation of Rights: Law, Religion, and Human Rights in Early Modern Calvinism John Witte Index More information Index to biblical sources 371 6:16, 66 6:44, 243 6:21–22, 60 7:37, 243 6:22, 66, 116 8:11, 57 8:11, 66 8:32, 230 9:27, 66 8:32–36, 172 11:41–42, 57 8:33, 57 Hosea 8:36, 230 13:4–5, 66 18:11, 66 13:15, 57 Acts Amos 5:1–11, 49, 101 5:12, 58 5:9, 124 7:16, 66 5:29, 51, 66 8:3–4, 58 9:16, 57 Jonah 2:8–9, 66 13:46, 57 Micah 2:7, 66 15, 101 Habbakuk 2:3, 66 15:4, 66 2:19, 66 15:22, 101, 102 Zephaniah 1:5, 66 17:7, 51, 66 Malachi 22:1, 66 2:1–6, 9, 66 23:5, 109 2:9, 66 Romans 2:14, 16, 138 2:15, 157 2:16, 138 3:30, 57 Sirach 33:20, 167 5:17, 57 Matthew 6:18, 230 5:18, 257 6:22, 230 5:38–41, 50 8:2, 230 5:39, 52, 169 9:12–13, 57 15:4, 49, 108 12:17–19, 50 16:19, 98 12:19, 51, 52 18:15–18, 98 13, 50, 243 18:16, 101 13:1, 50, 124 19:3, 257 13:1–5, 108 19:6, 256 13:1–7, 49 19:9, 257 13:1–9, 124 19:11, 138 13:1–10, 50, 64 21:12–17, 102 13:5, 50 22:21, 108, 238 14:4, 230 Mark 14:5, 230, 243 2:23–28, 163 14:9–10, 243 7:10, 49, 108 14:10, 230 12:17, 108 1 Corinthians 16:16, 243 4:15, 66 Luke 6:12, 167 6:1–5, 163 7:4–6, 168 6:29, 169 7:10, 37, 58 6:29–30, 49 7:11, 58 15:20, 58 7:14, 138 20:25, 108 7:14–15, 50 John 7:15, 258 1:12, 57 7:23, 230, 243 2:4, 66 7:37, 57 3:16; 8:33, 57 8:9, 167 3:29, 58 8:13, 230 4:21–23, 243 9:1–12, 172 5:22, 66 9:11, 138 © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-81842-1 - The Reformation of Rights: Law, Religion, and Human Rights in Early Modern Calvinism John Witte Index More information 372 Index to biblical sources 9:19, 243 2 Timothy 10:23, 57 2:2, 234 11:6, 67 5, 138 14:34–36, 49 Titus 2 Corinthians 3:17, 230, 243 1:5–6, 75 Galatians 3:1, 49 2:16, 243 3:10, 67, 75 3:10, 230 Philemon 3:15, 287 9, 66 3:19, 59 13, 66 4:3, 243 17, 66 4:7, 230 Hebrews 4:9–10, 243 2:5, 57, 66 4:26, 243 2:5, 17, 66 5:1, 230 2:17, 57, 66 5:13, 59, 230 2:15, 230 5:13–14, 243 6:12, 57 5:21, 57 7:5–12, 75 Ephesians 7:10, 57 5:6, 66 James 5:21–33, 49 1:18, 57 5:29, 168 1:25, 230 6:1–2, 49, 108 2:12, 230 6:5, 49 1 Peter Philippians 1:14, 61 2:6, 66 2:5–9, 234 2:12, 49 2:9, 218 Colossians 2:13, 49 2:16, 243 2:13–17, 108 2:23, 243 2:16, 62, 230 3:18, 49 5:3, 234 3:22, 49 Jude 1–2, 75 1 Thessalonians, 218 Revelations 2 Thessalonians 3:6, 57 1:6, 234 1 Timothy 3:18, 243 2:12, 75 5:10, 218 3:1, 101 20:6, 218 6:1, 49 22:17, 240, 243 © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-81842-1 - The Reformation of Rights: Law, Religion, and Human Rights in Early Modern Calvinism John Witte Index More information Index Acton Lord Dutch revolt and republic, importance of Adams, John, 17, 31 thought to, 150, 154, 155, 171, 199, 203–207 Althusius and Dutch revolt and republic, 155, (See also Dutch revolt and republic) 203, 204 on equality of persons under law, 178 Body of Liberties, influence of, 285 on establishment of Calvinism by state, 173, Calvin and, 39 175, 196–199 Milton and, 275 on family on non-divine nature of government private natural association, marital authority, 39, 314 household as, 184–186 Puritans, admiration for, 277–279 right to family life, 177 on religious liberty and religious pluralism, human nature, symbiotic theory of, 155, 292–293 182–183 on social covenant, 301–302 legal theory of, 156–169 adiaphora, 46, 92, 94 Milton influenced by, 272 An Agreement of the Free People of England, on natural law, 157–160 215–217 Bible, discerned from, 159 Alciatus, Andreas, 42 concordance with biblical and positive law, Alleine, Richard, 290 160–169 Alsted, Johann Heinrich, 289 demonstrative theory of, 155, 165–169 Althusius, Johannes, 8–10, 203–207 marital household as private natural association, theory of, 182–184 association, 184–186 on Bible and moral law, 153 obligations, natural vs.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A-Level History, HIS1D: Stuart Britain and the Crisis of Monarchy 1603-1702 Absolutism Challenged: Britain 1603-49 Section 2: Revolution 1629-1649
    A-Level History, HIS1D: Stuart Britain and the Crisis of Monarchy 1603-1702 Absolutism Challenged: Britain 1603-49 Section 2: Revolution 1629-1649. Part 1: 1629-1642 KEY TOPIC AREAS 1629-42: KEY TOPIC AREAS 1629-42: Divisions over Religion: Arminianism and Laudianism; Puritanism, and Millenarianism Political divisions in Personal rule: Short Parliament • Arminianism and Laudianism • The Short Parliament • Puritanism • Continued Opposition in 1640 • The emergence of Millenarianism Political divisions • The Long Parliament. Political divisions in Personal rule: Finance • The leadership and importance of John Pym. • Fiscal policy used in Personal rule Causes of the English Civil War • The opposition that it caused • Events culminating in the outbreak of the Civil War. Political divisions in Personal rule: Scotland • Policies in Scotland • The Crisis of 1637-42 • The extent of Opposition Political divisions in Personal rule: Ireland • Policies in Ireland • The Crisis of 1637-42 • The extent of Opposition A-Level History, HIS1D: Stuart Britain and the Crisis of Monarchy 1603-1702 Absolutism Challenged: Britain 1603-49 Section 2: Revolution 1629-1649. Part 1: 1629-1642 KEY WORDS KEY INDIVIDUALS Articles of Perth: had been forced through the Scottish Kirk in 1618. They were a set of Charles Stuart: ruled as Charles I 1625-1649 commands outlining religious practices. To Presbyterians, the commands seemed like William Laud: a key Arminian cleric who became the Archbishop of Canterbury in Catholicism 1633 and made changes to the Anglican Church Bill of Attainder: medieval method which allowed anyone who was seen as a threat to the Henrietta Maria: Catholic wife of Charles I, she aroused suspicion of a Catholic state t be removed by Parliament without formal trial conversion of the King and the court Book of Sports: originally produced by James in 1618.
    [Show full text]
  • English Civil War to Restoration Key Concept: Narrative Account Topic Summary Chronological Events Should Be Sequenced in Your Writing in Chronological Order
    Unit 3: The English Civil War to Restoration Key concept: Narrative Account Topic Summary Chronological Events should be sequenced in your writing in chronological order. Past tense Narratives should be written in the past tense e.g. the king was crowned in 1660. 1660 Charles II is 1605 The Gun- 1629 The 1640 Charles I crowned King, powder Plot start of the recalls Parliament 1648 Parliament 1653 Oliver Crom- beginning the Third person Narratives should be written in the third person . Do not use ‘I’; ‘we’; or ‘you’ almost destroys ‘eleven-years to pay for the wins the Second well becomes ‘Lord Restoration Parliament Bishops’ War tyranny’ Civil War Protector’ Linking Connections should be made between events, linking them together in a clear se- quence. Relevant detail Include relevant details for each event you are describing, including dates, names, etc. 1625 Charles I 1637 Archbishop 1642 The English 1648 Trial and exe- 1603 James I 1658 Death of becomes King Laud introduces Civil War breaks cution of Charles I; becomes King Oliver Cromwell of England of England his prayer book to out England declared a Scotland Commonwealth Key People Charles I The second Stuart king of England, execut- Archbishop Laud Famously introduced new prayer ed by Parliament in 1648 following the Civil War. books along with other religious changes that bought back some Catholic practices. Keywords John Pym Puritan member of Parliament, and a Oliver Cromwell Parliamentary general, who be- major opponent of Charles I before the Civil War. came Lord Protector of the Commonwealth in 1653 Absolutist A ruler who has supreme authority and power Long Parliament A parliament, which met, on and off, from 1640- 1660 General Monck A general who had worked with Charles II The king of England following the Resto- Bishops’ War An uprising against Charles I’s religious reforms which Newcastle Propositions A series of Parliament’s demands in 1646, Charles I and Cromwell who dismissed Parliament ration.
    [Show full text]
  • Charles I: Anatomy of a Regicide
    CHARLES I: ANATOMY OF A REGICIDE __________________ A University Thesis Presented to the Faculty of California State University, East Bay __________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in History __________________ By Robert Louis Brady September, 2015 CHARLES I: ANATOMY OF A REGICIDE By Robert Louis Brady Date: {lf2::;:_ Dee E. Andrews ii TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................1 CHAPTER ONE. CHURCH AND STATE (1509-1625) ............................................14 Henry VIII ............................................................................................................14 Edward VI ............................................................................................................26 Mary I ....................................................................................................................32 Elizabeth I .............................................................................................................43 James I ...................................................................................................................52 Charles I ................................................................................................................73 CHAPTER TWO. RELIGIOUS TENSIONS UNDER CHARLES I ..........................75 The Catholic Question ........................................................................................75 Arminian
    [Show full text]
  • In the Time of a Woman, Which Sex Was Not Capable of Mature Deliberation
    Cornell University Law School Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository Cornell Law Faculty Publications Faculty Scholarship 7-18-2013 'In the Time of a Woman, Which Sex Was Not Capable of Mature Deliberation': Late Tudor Parliamentary Relations and their Early Stuart Discontents Josh Chafetz Cornell Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/facpub Part of the European History Commons, Legal History, Theory and Process Commons, and the Political History Commons Recommended Citation Chafetz, Josh, "'In the Time of a Woman, Which Sex Was Not Capable of Mature Deliberation': Late Tudor Parliamentary Relations and their Early Stuart Discontents" (2013). Cornell Law Faculty Publications. Paper 587. http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/facpub/587 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cornell Law Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 33760-ylh_25-2 Sheet No. 4 Side A 07/10/2013 12:28:45 CHAFETZ 7/5/2013 12:38 PM Articles “In the Time of a Woman, Which Sex Was Not Capable of Mature Deliberation”: Late Tudor Parliamentary Relations and Their Early Stuart Discontents Josh Chafetz* 33760-ylh_25-2 Sheet No. 4 Side A 07/10/2013 12:28:45 INTRODUCTION It is one of the most well-known incidents in English constitutional history. On December 1, 1641, the increasingly restive House of Commons presented Charles I with the so-called Grand Remonstrance, a list of 206 enumerated grievances, encompassing the entirety of his reign to date.1 The King was not amused.
    [Show full text]
  • Puritan Iconoclasm During the English Civil War
    Puritan Iconoclasm during the English Civil War Julie Spraggon THE BOYDELL PRESS STUDIES IN MODERN BRITISH RELIGIOUS HISTORY Volume 6 Puritan Iconoclasm during the English Civil War This work offers a detailed analysis of Puritan iconoclasm in England during the 1640s, looking at the reasons for the resurgence of image- breaking a hundred years after the break with Rome, and the extent of the phenomenon. Initially a reaction to the emphasis on ceremony and the ‘beauty of holiness’ under Archbishop Laud, the attack on ‘innovations’, such as communion rails, images and stained glass windows, developed into a major campaign driven forward by the Long Parliament as part of its religious reformation. Increasingly radical legislation targeted not just ‘new popery’, but pre-Reformation survivals and a wide range of objects (including some which had been acceptable to the Elizabethan and Jacobean Church). The book makes a detailed survey of parliament’s legislation against images, considering the question of how and how far this legislation was enforced generally, with specific case studies looking at the impact of the iconoclastic reformation in London, in the cathedrals and at the universities. Parallel to this official movement was an unofficial one undertaken by Parliamentary soldiers, whose violent destructiveness became notori- ous. The significance of this spontaneous action and the importance of the anti-Catholic and anti-episcopal feelings that it represented are also examined. Dr JULIE SPRAGGON works at the Institute of Historical Research
    [Show full text]
  • Why Did People Want the King Back in 1646
    Civil War > Why did people go to war in 1642? > Key people & events Why did people go to war in 1642? Key people & events Charles I’s Personal Rule Most monarchs disliked having to listen to Parliament. However, they always had to call Parliaments because they needed money and they needed Parliament to agree to taxes to raise that money. In return, MPs could express their concerns in Parliament about particular issues. From 1629-40 Charles I ruled without calling Parliament. During this Personal Rule, Charles began to work closely with his officials to raise money without asking Parliament. He did this very successfully. Charles increased his income from £600,000 to £900,000 per year. However, he created a lot of bad feeling as a result. • In 1626-7 he introduced a forced loan. Wealthy nobles and gentry were forced to Charles money whether or not they wanted to. Five knights who refused to pay the loan were thrown into prison without a fair trial and left there. • Charles brought in a range of new customs duties and collected them very effectively. (New customs duties usually had to be approved by Parliament.) • Charles also sold monopolies and patents. These gave control of a particular trade to one individual or company. This meant that other traders either had to pay to take part in the trade or they might be forced out of it altogether. • Charles collected ship money. This was a tax traditionally paid in counties that had coastlines. It paid for the navy to protect the coast. Charles forced people in all counties to pay ship money.
    [Show full text]
  • The Arrest and Trial of Archbishop William Laud
    THE ARREST AND TRIAL OF ARCHBISHOP WILLIAM LAUD By NICHOLAS ROBERT CHARLES FORWARD A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham For the degree of MASTER OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Modern History School of Historical Studies College of Arts and law University of Birmingham March 2012 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Archbishop William Laud was arrested on 18 December 1640, and specific treason charges were brought forward early in 1641. However he did not stand trial until 1644. This study aims to assess the charges; consider the reasons for the significant delay between the arrest and trial; review the law of treason pertaining at the time and how this was applied to Laud; analyse the condemnatory and often vindictive views of Laud within the public sphere as reflected in the pamphlets and newsbooks of the period; and assess in detail the trial itself. Along with Thomas Wentworth, earl of Strafford, Laud was a principle counsellor to the king and a major hate figure for parliament who considered the two men responsible for leading the king astray during the period of the personal rule.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cambridge Companion to Early Modern Women's Writing
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-71242-2 - The Cambridge Companion to Early Modern Women’s Writing Edited by Laura Lunger Knoppers Frontmatter More information The Cambridge Companion to Early Modern Women’s Writing Featuring the most frequently taught female writers and texts of the early modern period, this Companion introduces the reader to the range, complexity, historical importance and aesthetic merit of women’s writing in Britain from 1500 to 1700. Presenting key textual, historical and methodological information, the volume exemplifies new and diverse approaches to the study of women’s writing. The book is clearly divided into three sections, covering: how women learned to write and how their work was circulated or published; how and what women wrote in the places and spaces in which they lived, worked, socialized and worshipped; and the different kinds of writing women produced, from poetry, drama and fiction to letters, diaries and political prose. This structure makes the volume readily adaptable to course usage. The Companion is enhanced by an introduction that lays out crucial framework and critical issues, and by chronologies that situate women’s writings alongside political and cultural events. Laura Lunger Knoppers is Professor of English at Pennsylvania State University. She has published widely on seventeenth-century British literature, visual culture, politics and religion, particularly on the works of John Milton. Her books include Historicizing Milton: Spectacle, Power, and Poetry in Restoration England (1994) and Constructing Cromwell: Ceremony, Portrait, and Print, 1645–1661 (2000). She has served as President of the Milton Society of America and as elected member of the Seventeenth-Century Literature Division, Modern Language Society of America.
    [Show full text]
  • One of Many: Martial Law and English Laws C. 1500 – C. 1700 John
    One of Many: Martial Law and English Laws c. 1500 – c. 1700 John Michael Collins Minneapolis, MN Bachelor of Arts, with honors, Northwestern University, 2006 MPHIL, with distinction, Cambridge University, 2008 A Dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Virginia in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History University of Virginia August 2013 Abstract This dissertation provides the first history of martial law in the early modern period. It seeks to reintegrate martial law in the larger history of English law. It shows how jurisdictional barriers constructed by the makers of the Petition of Right Parliament for martial law unintentionally transformed the concept from a complementary form of criminal law into an all-encompassing jurisdiction imposed by governors and generals during times of crisis. Martial law in the early modern period was procedure. The Tudor Crown made it in order to terrorize hostile populations into obedience and to avoid potential jury nullification. The usefulness of martial law led Crown deputies in Ireland to adapt martial law procedure to meet the legal challenges specific to their environment. By the end of the sixteenth century, Crown officers used martial law on vagrants, rioters, traitors, soldiers, sailors, and a variety of other wrongs. Generals, meanwhile, sought to improve the discipline within their forces in order to better compete with their rivals on the European continent. Over the course of the seventeenth century, owing to this desire, they transformed martial law substance, procedure, and administration. The usefulness of martial law made many worried, and MPs in 1628 sought to restrain martial law to a state of war, defined either as the Courts of Westminster being closed or by the presence of the enemy’s army with its standard raised.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Charles I 1625–40 15 3
    HISTORY History Historical Investigations and Interpretations Unit AS 1 Option 2: England 1603–49 Content Page Introduction 2 1. James I 1603–25 3 2. Charles I 1625–40 15 3. Civil War 1642–46 25 4. Revolution 1646–49 30 HISTORY Introduction In this option, students focus on the reigns of James I and Charles I. This period of English history witnessed enormous political, economic and social changes, which erupted in Civil War in 1642. Students investigate the origins of this conflict by analysing the problems faced by James I and Charles I and by evaluating the impact of their financial, foreign and religious policies. Students also study the reasons for Parliament’s victory in the Civil War and the political revolution that followed. This option is assessed in a written examination lasting one hour 30 minutes. Candidates answer two questions. Question 1 is a short response question and candidates answer one question from a choice of two. Question 2 is a source-based question with two parts. In Question 2(a) candidates assess the usefulness of a primary and/or contemporary source to an historian studying a particular historical event or development. In Question 2(b) candidates assess which of two different interpretations of a particular historical event or development they find more convincing. Question 1 targets Assessment Objective AO1: the candidate’s ability to demonstrate, organise and communicate knowledge and understanding to analyse and evaluate the key features related to the periods studied, making substantiated judgements and exploring concepts, as relevant, of cause, consequence, change, continuity, similarity, difference and significance.
    [Show full text]
  • American History 1010: Lecture Outline
    Scholars Crossing Faculty Publications and Presentations Helms School of Government 1992 American History 1010: Lecture Outline Steven Alan Samson Liberty University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/gov_fac_pubs Part of the Other Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons, Political Science Commons, and the Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration Commons Recommended Citation Samson, Steven Alan, "American History 1010: Lecture Outline" (1992). Faculty Publications and Presentations. 309. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/gov_fac_pubs/309 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Helms School of Government at Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 AMERICAN HISTORY 1010: LECTURE OUTLINE Steven Alan Samson I. THE STUDY OF HISTORY A. THE NATURE OF HISTORY 1. Role of Ideas and Presuppositions 2. Dual Purpose of History a. Seeking Facts: Reliability and Selectivity b. Interpreting Meaning Reading I: Philosophies of History: A Secular View B. INESCAPABLE CONCEPTS 1. Sovereignty: Ultimacy 2. Ends: Goal, Purposes 3. Means: Blueprints, Plan, Method 4. Truth: Standard, Epistemology, Infallibility 5. Consequences: Ethics, Liability Reading II: Inescapable Concepts C. TWO EARLY VIEWS OF HISTORY 1. Cyclical a. Revolution b. Sacred Calendar c. Golden Age d. Polytheism e. Eternal Recurrence: Friedrich Nietzsche f. Oswald Spengler and Arnold Toynbee 2. Linear a. Teleology (telos = goal) b. History as a Story c. God's Self-Revelation d. Providence and Theophany (appearance of God) e. "The Greatest Story Ever Told" f. Salvation by Grace Through Faith g.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 9: the Late Middle Ages Section 1: the Black Death
    AP European History Chapter 10: 1640-1669 Section 1: 1640-1649 Political History By Dallin F. Hardy England Short Parliament 1640 Second Bishops’ War 1640 Battle of Newburn August 28, 1640 England vs. Scotland Results Scottish victory Long Parliament 1640-1660 Prohibited Taxation without consent John Pym Leader of Long Parliament Thomas Wentworth 1640-1641 Advisor to the King 1st Earl of Strafford Execution of Thomas Wentworth May 12, 1641 Grand Remonstrance November 22, 1641 Scottish Rebellion 1641 Parliament Should become commander-in-chief of English armed forces Irish Rebellion of 1641 1641 Invasion of Parliament January 4, 1642 Charles I Sought to arrest Leaders of Parliament Left London to Raise an army Militia Ordinance March 1642 English Civil War 1642-1646 Cavaliers Supporters of King Charles I Roundheads Supporters of Parliament Battle of Edgehill October 23, 1642 Battle of Adwalton Moor June 30, 1643 Battle of Newbury September 20, 1643 Siege of Oxford May 1644-June 1646 Battle of Marston Moor July 2, 1644 Execution of William Laud January 10, 1645 Archbishop of Canterbury New Model Army 1645 Oliver Cromwell 1645-1646 Commander of New Model Army Battle of Naseby June 14, 1645 Escape of Charles I April 1646 From Siege of Oxford Surrender of Charles I May 6, 1646 To Scotland Captivity of Charles I January-November 1647 Escape of Charles I November 1647 Second English Civil War 1648-1649 Battle of Preston August 17-19, 1648 Pride’s Purge December
    [Show full text]