<<

CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk

Provided by82A Elsevier - Publisher Connector JACC Vol. 5, No.5 May 1985:82A-90A

Pharmacokinetic Between and Other

FRANK I. MARCUS, MD, FACC Tucson, Arizona

Drug interactions with digoxin are important because of particularly , have a similar effect. ­ this agent's narrow . Amongthe drugs sparing drugs, such as , can alter that can decrease digoxin are cholestyr­ digoxin . amine, gels, kaolin-peetate, certain antimicro­ Indomethacin may decrease renal of dig­ bial drugs and cancer chemotherapeutic agents. In oxin in preterm infants. Finally, rifampin, an selected patients, may enhance digoxin bio­ used in the treatment of tuberculosis, may lower steady availability by eliminating intestinal flora that metabo­ state serum digoxin levels in patients with severe renal lize digoxin. disease. Physicians must maintain constant vigilance Antiarrhythmic drugs, such as and amio­ whenever are added to or withdrawn from darone, can markedly increase steady state serum dig­ a therapeutic regimen that includes digoxin. oxin levels. Certain channel blocking drugs, (J Am Coil CardioI1985;5:82A-90A)

Historical Perspective There is a high incidence of toxicity during the therapeutic use of this class of drugs. Interactions of cardiac glycosides interactions with digoxin could only have been with other drugs contribute significantly to the high prev­ suspected but not verified before the availability of assays alence of digitalis toxicity. This review will focus on the sufficiently sensitive to measure digoxin in biological fluids pharmacokinetic interactions of digoxin. The drugs that have (1-4). In 1971, Caldwell and Greenberger (5) investigated been investigated for interactions are listed in Table 1 and the possibility that cholestyramine, an anion exchange resin their mechanisms and magnitude are summarized in Table known to bind neutral sterols, might be effective in de­ 2. creasing the duration of digitalis toxicity. Subsequently, Smith (6) documented that cholestyramine coadministered with digoxin could decrease digoxin absorption. Binnion Drugs That Affect Bioavailability of Digoxin (7) also reported extremely low levels of serum digoxin in Cholestyramine. When 4 to 8 g of cholestyramine are a patient who was taking kaolin-pectate with digoxin and given at the same time as digoxin, there is a 25% decrease identified that kaolin-pectate decreased the bioavailability in steady state serum digoxin levels (12). The mechanism of digoxin. This led to an intensive investigation of drugs of this interference appears to be related to physical binding that might decrease digoxin bioavailability. The startling of digoxin to the resin (5). Administration of digoxin 8 hours observation by Ejvinsson (8) that quinidine coadministered before cholestyramine prevents the interference with ab­ with digoxin caused a marked elevation in plasma concen­ sorption of the glycoside (12). This can also be trations of digoxin led to exploration of other antiarrhythmic minimized by prescribing digoxin in a solution contained drug interactions with digoxin. Subsequently, the pace of in a gelatin capsule (Lanoxicap). The Lanoxicap preparation investigation of drug interactions with digoxin has escalated also produces less variability in digoxin absorption when and numerous interactions with digoxin have been unveiled cholestyramine is given with the capsules as compared with (9-11). the tablets. The focus on drug interactions with digoxin is appropriate . Antacid gels (13), but not the tablets (14), for this agent since it not only is one of the most commonly appear to decrease the absorption of a single dose of digoxin prescribed drugs, but also has a narrow therapeutic index. by approximately 25%. The mechanism of this reduction of digoxin absorption by antacids is unclear. Since only trisilicate has been found to adsorb digoxin in From the Section of Cardiology, Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tuc­ vitro (15) while other antacids also lowered plasma levels son, Arizona. Address for reprints: Frank I. Marcus, MD, Section of Cardiology, in human beings, the decreased absorption of digoxin may Arizona Health ~"iences Center, Tucson, Arizona 85724. be due to factors other than adsorption. The effect of con-

© 1985 by the American College of Cardiology 0735-1097/85/$3.30 JACC Vol. 5, No.5 MARCUS 83A May 1985:82A-90A DRUG INTERACI"IONS WITH DIGOXIN

Table 1. Generic and Trade Names of Drugs Investigated for drugs. Certain antimicrobial drugs such Interaction With Digoxin as neomycin, sulfasalazineand paraaminosalicylic (PAS), Generic Name Brand Name often used for their effect on intestinal function and flora, appear to depress digoxin absorption (12,20,21). This in­ Cholestyramine Questran Kaolin-pectate Kaopectate teraction results in an 18 to 28% decrease in the bioavail­ Neomycin Neomycin ability of digoxin and is not minimized by temporal sepa­ Sulfasalazine Azulfidine ration of the time of administration of digoxin and the Para-amino salicylic acid PAS, Teebacin concurrently administered antimicrobial agent. Propantheline Probanthine Antibiotic treatment may increase serum digoxin levels Quinidine Quinidine Plaquenil by an entirely different mechanism. Digoxin undergoes bio­ Cordarone transformation to dihydrodigoxin and its corresponding Pronestyl aglycone, dihydrodigoxigenin. These two metabolites, which Disopyramide Norpace are relatively inactive, are referred to as digoxin reduction Mexitil products. Digoxin reduction products appear to be made F1ecainide F1ecainide Moricizine Ethmozine exclusively by bacteria in the , probably Verapamil Calan; Isoptin in the colon (22). The reduced metabolites virtually dis­ Cardizem appear from the stool and urine after therapy with certain Procardia antibiotics, and this can lead to an increase in bioavailability Tiapamil* of digoxin (23). In a recent study (23), a 5 day course of * * erythromycin or was found to raise the serum Lidotlazin* digoxin concentrations by 43 to 116% in three volunteers Spironolactone Aldactone who produced large amounts of digoxin reduction products Dyrenium; also in Dyazide (> 35 to 40% of total urinary digoxin and its metabolites). Midamor; also in Moduretic Since only 10% of subjects produce large amounts of these *U.S. trade names not now available. reduced derivatives, this increase in digoxin levels due to antibioticsshould occur in only a minority of patients (22,24). Administration of digoxin in capsule form decreases the comitant administration of antacids and digoxin on steady percent of digoxin reduction products formed, presumably state plasma levels of digoxin remains to be established. by more complete absorption of digoxin in the small intes­ Until this information is available, it is advisable not to tine (25). Thus, the increase in bioavailability during admin­ administer digoxin at the same time as antacids. istration of these antibiotics should be minimized with the Kaolin-pectateand bran. The decreased bioavailability use of the capsule forms of digoxin. of digoxin as a result of the coadministration of an antidi­ Drugs that alter gut motility. Digoxin absorption is arrheal suspension containing 18% kaolin and 0.4% pectin not affected by medications that alter gut motility, such as (Kaopectate) was first reported by Binnion (7) after ob­ propantheline (Probanthine) or metoclopramide (26). serving ineffective levels of digoxin in a patient who Cancer chemotherapeutic agents. Digoxin absorption had taken the antidiarrheal at the same time as digoxin. and steady state levels may be markedly decreased by cancer Brown and Juhl (13) subsequently verified Binnion's find­ (27). This inhibition of digoxin absorption is ings in a cross-over study employing 10 normal volunteers. reversible after 1 week. The mechanism of this interaction The magnitude of this is still not clear since appears to be temporary damage of the intestinal mucosa there have been no studies to determine the effect of this by the cytostatic drugs. combination on steady state plasma levels of digoxin. The decrease in digoxin absorption can be abolished by giving Interaction of Digoxin With digoxin 2 hours before administration of the antidiarrheal agent (16) or may be minimized by administration of the Antiarrhythmic Drugs capsule formulation of digoxin (17). Quinidine. In 1978, Ejvinsson (8) reported that the con­ When digoxin was given at the beginning of a meal current administration of quinidine to 12 patients increased containing a high content of fiber, there was a 20% decrease average serum digoxin concentrations from 0.9 to 1.6 ng/ml. in cumulative 6 day urinary digoxin excretion (12). Others One of the six patients whose plasma concentrations rose (18) were not able to document a decrease in digoxin ab­ above therapeutic range developed symptoms of digitalis sorption when digoxin was given 15 to 30 minutes before intoxication. This observation has since been amply con­ a meal containing high fiber content. The mechanism of this firmed (28-30). The mechanism of this interaction is com­ possible interaction appears to be an adsorption of digoxin plex. Quinidine may enhance digoxin bioavailability (31), to bran (19). although this is disputed (32). There is a decrease in the 84A MARCUS JACC Vol. 5, No.5 DRUG INTERACTIONS WITH DIGOXIN May 1985:82A-90A

volume of distribution of digoxin, suggestive of a displace­ portant mechanisms responsible for the digoxin-quinidine ment of digoxin binding by quinidine (33,34). interaction are a quinidine-induced reduction of both renal Renal and nonrenal ofdigoxin. The most im- and nonrenal clearances of digoxin (33-35). Since glorner-

Table 2. Pharmacokinetic Drug Interactions With Digoxin

Type of Study Mechanism of Mean Interaction: Magnitude Single Dose Steady Suggested Drug Effect on Digoxin of Interaction* Digoxin State Intervention References

Cholestyramine Adsorption of ~ 25% X I) Give digoxin 8 12 digoxin hours before cholestyramine 2) Use solution or capsule form of digoxin Antacids Unclear ~ 25% X Temporal separation 13 of time of administration Kaolin-pectate Adsorption of ? X I) Give digoxin 2 13,16,17 digoxin hours before kaolin-pectate 2) ? Use solution or capsule form of digoxin Bran Adsorption of ~ 20% X Temporal separation 12,18 digoxin of time of administration Neomycin Unknown ~ 28% X Increase dose 21 Sulfasalazine ~ 18% X of digoxin 20 PAS I ~ 22% X 12 Erythromycin 1 Bioavailability 143 to 116% X I) Measure serum 23,25 Tetracycline I by 1 intestinal digoxin (in <10% metabolism of concentration of subjects) digoxin by 2) Decrease digoxin certain gut flora dose 3) Use solution or capsule form of digoxin Quinidine ? ~ Bioavailability 1100% X X I) Decrease 28-30 ~ volume of dose by 50% distribution, 2) Measure serum ~ renal and nonrenal digoxin clearance concentration Amiodarone ~ Renal and nonrenal 170 to 100% X Same as for 53,54,57 clearance quinidine Verapamil ~ Renal and nonrenal 170 to 100% X Same as for 66,67 clearance quinidine Diltiazem ? ~ Renal clearance 122% X None 71,72 Nicardipine Unknown 115% X None 76 Tiapamil Unknown 160% X Same as for 76 quinidine Spironolactone ~ Renal and nonrenal 130% X Measure serum 86,90 clearance digoxin concentration Triameterene ~ Nonrenal clearance 120% X Measure serum 86 digoxin concentration Indomethacin ? ~ Renal clearance 150% X Decrease dose by 97 (preterm infants) 25%

*Alteration in bioavailability or serum concentration. For single dose studies, the magnitude of the anticipated change in serum digoxin concentration was estimated from pharmacokinetic data, particularly the change in total body clearance. 1 = increased; ~ = decreased; ? = questionable. JACC Vol. 5, No.5 MARCUS 85A May 1985:82A-90A DRUG INTERACTIONS WITH DIGOXIN

ular filtration rate is unchanged during concurrent digoxin­ Amiodarone. In 1981, Moysey et al. (52) observed a quinidine administration, it is clear that the decreased renal mean increase in plasma digoxin concentration of 70% in elimination of digoxin in human beings results from a quin­ seven patients when amoidarone, 600 mg/day, was admin­ idine-induced decrease in tubular secretion of digoxin (36). istered concurrently with digoxin. The mean concentration Decisive evidence for a decrease in the nonrenal excretion of digoxin after amiodarone was 2 ng/ml. Four patients of digoxin under the influence of quinidine was established developed symptoms compatible with digoxin toxicity. The by comparing the kinetics of digoxin in anuric patients on plasma digoxin level increased by 25% within 24 hours after chronic hemodialysis when given digoxin alone and con­ the initiation of amiodarone treatment. These observations comitantly with quinidine (37-39). The combination ther­ have subsequently been confirmed (53.54). There is sugges­ apy resulted in a rise in serum digoxin concentration in these tive evidence that the increase in digoxin levels may in part anuric patients . be directly related to the dose of amiodarone since a linear The increase in digoxin serum concentration is directly, correlation was observed between plasma amiodarone levels but not linearly, related to the dose of quinidine (11,40). and digoxin serum levels (55). However. a daily amiodarone The rate at which a new digoxin steady state is achieved is dose of 400 mg is sufficient to reduce clearance of a digoxin dependent on the digoxin elimination half-life. If the half­ concentration by 26% (56). life of digoxin is 36 hours, approximately 7 days (1'12 days Mechanism. The digoxin-amiodarone interaction is due x 5 half-lives) are required to achieve a new steady state in part to a decrease in the renal clearance of digoxin, a digoxin level. However, in patients with a glomerular fil­ decrease in nonrenal clearance and an increase in digoxin tration rate of less than 50 ml/rnin , the time required for half-life . No significant decrease in the volume of distri­ digoxin to reach a new steady state with the addition of bution of digoxin was observed after amiodarone therapy quinidine may be considerably longer. (56,57). Electrophysiologic and inotropic effects. It is clear that Digitalis toxicity . When serum digoxin levels are raised the elevation of digoxin levels by concurrent quinidine as a result of the arniodarone-digoxin interaction, digitalis admini stration results in enhanced electrophysiologic effects toxicity may result. Generally, the toxic manifestations con­ demon strated on the surface electrocardiogram as a prolon­ sist of bradycardia or variou s degree s of atrioventricular gation of the PR interval , by central man­ (AV) block rather than digitalis-toxic tachyarrhythmias ifestations of toxicity such as anorexia, nausea , vomiting (57.58). Recommendations for digoxin dose adjustment during and scotomata and also by enhanced ventricular ectopic concomitant amiodarone therapy are similar to those when activity (41-45). quinidine is given with digoxin . The elevated serum digoxin levels induced by concurrent Other antiarrhythmic drugs. There are several antiar­ administration of digoxin and quinidine have been reported rhythmic drugs that do not appear to have any clinically not to show an enhanced inotropic effect as measured by relevant pharmacokinetic interactions with digoxin. These systolic time intervals (46-48). Schenck-Gustafsson et al. include procainamide (59), disopyramide (59-61), mexi­ (49), however, measured inotropic effects of digoxin at letine (59,62), (63) and ethmozine (64). steady state during digoxin administration alone and during digoxin and quinidine administration. They then gave suf­ Interaction of Digoxin With Calcium Channel ficient digoxin to achieve a serum digoxin concentration similar to that obtained when digoxin and quinidine were Blocking Drugs given concomitantly. They concluded that digoxin elevation The pharmacokinetic interaction between digoxin and due to quinidine was accompanied by an increased cardiac calcium channel blocking drugs varies from none with ni­ effect. fedipine to an increased serum digoxin level of more than Digitalis toxicity . Clinical evidence indicates that there 70% when verapamil and digoxin are given concomitantly. are increased electrophysiologic and inotropic effects as­ Verapamil. In 1980. Klein et al. (65) reported that serum sociated with the elevation of serum digoxin as a result of digoxin levels increased 70% during concurrent treatment concurrent quinidine admini stration . This combination of with verapamil . They found (66) that the effect of verapamil drugs can cause of digitalis toxicity. on serum digoxin concentration developed gradually within Therefore, the dose of digoxin should be decreased by ap­ the first few days after verapamil was coadministered with proximately 50% and the serum digoxin levels should be digoxin and approached the new steady state value within measured approximately I week after the tWQ drugs are 7 days after the start of verapamil therapy. The interaction given together. If the dose of quinidine is increased, one is dose-dependent. The mechanism of the digoxin-verapamil can anticipate a further increase in serum digoxin levels. interaction consists of decreases in both renal and extrarenal , the I-isomer of quinidine, also reduces total clearance of digoxin by verapamil (67). Since the creatinine body clearance and increases the half-life of digoxin (50). clearance does not change under the influence of verapamil , It is likely that hydroxychloroquine, a quinine derivative, the decreased renal clearance of digoxin appears to be due has similar interactions with digoxin (51). to an inhibition of tubular secretion. 86A MARCUS JACC Vol. 5, No.5 DRUG INTERACTIONS WITH DIGOXIN May 1985:82A-90A

The elevated plasma digoxin concentration induced by dietary is increased may show some moderate de­ verapamil is associated with an inotropic effect as assessed crease in steady state serum digoxin levels (81). by a measurement of systolic time intervals (68). When the Diuresis-induced . Although and serum digoxin levels are markedly elevated as a result of loop diuretic drugs themselves do not alter the kinetics of coadministration of verapamil, lethal cardiac toxicity may digoxin excretion, they induce a dose-dependent loss of occur (69). This is more likely to take the form of severe potassium from the body, resulting in a decreased serum bradycardia or asystole, rather than initiation of the tach­ potassium concentration. It is well known that hypokalemia yarrhythmias that are observed when quinidine induces el­ is associated with sensitivity to digitalis and, thus, increases evated serum digoxin levels (67,70). It seems prudent to its toxicity (82,83), but it is not well appreciated that when decrease the dose of digoxin by 50% when verapamil and the serum potassium is as low as 2 to 3 mEq/liter, the tubular digoxin are given concurrently. secretion of digoxin is nearly blocked. This reduced tubular Diltiazem. There is minimal pharmacokinetic interac­ secretion of digoxin results in a diminished plasma clearance tion between diltiazem and digoxin (71). An average in­ of digoxin and thereby a prolonged elimination half-life of crease in steady state plasma digoxin concentration of 22% digoxin (84,85). Thus, hypokalemia itself can result in an was observed when diltiazem, 180 mg/day, was given to increase in serum digoxin level as well as enhancing toxicity 24 normal subjects who were receiving l3-acetyldigoxin, 0.2 (85). mg daily (72). This interaction may be due to a diltiazem­ Potassium-sparing diuretic drugs. The potassium­ induced decrease in renal clearance of digoxin (71). The sparing diuretic drugs, spironolactone, triamterene and ami­ magnitude of the diltiazem interaction is small; therefore, loride, have been reported to induce changes in digoxin digoxin dose adjustment is probably unnecessary. kinetics (86-89). Spironolactone increases the plasma con­ Nifedipine. There is no pharmacokinetic interaction be­ centration of digoxin by inhibiting tubular secretion of di­ tween nifedipine and digoxin, either in patients (73) or in goxin. This results in a decrease in the renal clearance of normal subjects (74,75). digoxin. The extrarenal clearance of digoxin also decreases Other calcium channel blocking drugs. Tiapamil, a (88,90). In contrast, amiloride alters digoxin pharmacoki­ congener of verapamil, causes an increase in serum digoxin netics by different mechanisms. This drug causes an increase levels of60%, similar to that of verapamil (76). Nicardipine in renal clearance, but a marked decrease in extrarenal clear­ is related to nifedipine and increases plasma digoxin min­ ance. The net result is a tendency to decrease digoxin total imally, in the order of 15%. A similar minimal increase in body clearance (87). Possible mechanisms for these obser­ digoxin levels is induced by gallopamil (77). There is no vations include an increased tubular secretion of digoxin to pharmacokinetic interaction between digoxin and account for the increased renal clearance and a decrease in (78). the hepatic elimination rate of digoxin to account for the decrease in extrarenal clearance. Triamterene does not alter renal elimination of digoxin, but reduces the extrarenal Interaction With Diuretic Drugs clearance of digoxin. When triamterene is given with di­ and sodium-induced diuresis. Diuresis goxin, the total digoxin elimination is reduced by 20% (86). induced by furosemide does not significantly affect the ex­ The effects of the potassium-sparing diuretic drugs on cretion of digoxin (79,80). However, Naafs et al. (81) re­ steady state serum digoxin levels have not been adequately ported that diuresis caused a 70% increase in digoxin clear­ evaluated. Potassium-sparing diuretic drugs have different ance and a 20% decrease in serum digoxin levels in 10 mechanisms and sites of action, which may account for their patients who were taking digoxin for atrial fibrillation and differing effects on digoxin pharmacokinetics. Spironolac­ who did not have congestive heart failure. These subjects tone exerts its effects from the capillary side of the renal were initially sodium-depleted, both by dietary restriction tubular cell, whereas triamterene and amiloride act on the of sodium as well as by diuretic drugs. When the sodium luminal side (91). Spironolactone does not increase intra­ diet was liberalized to a moderately high sodium diet, the cellular potassium concentration, whereas triamterene and digoxin clearance increased by 70% and the serum digoxin amiloride do. levels decreased by 20%. Mechanisms that have been iden­ Combined digitalis, quinidine and diuretic drug ther­ tified for renal excretion of digoxin include glomerular fil­ apy. Patients with cardiac disease are frequently treated tration, tubular secretion and proximal tubular reabsorption with multiple medications and the combination of a potas­ of digoxin. Naafs et al. (81) postulated that one of the sium-sparing diuretic drug, digoxin and quinidine is not mechanisms responsible for the increase in digoxin clear­ unusual. This combination of quinidine and spironolactone ance due to sodium loading was diminished passive prox­ caused significant reductions in total body clearance of di­ imal back diffusion of filtered and secreted digoxin. Sodium goxin, nonrenal digoxin clearance and digoxin renal clear­ loading has been shown to diminish proximal fractional ance beyond the reductions induced by either drug alone reabsorption of glomerular ultrafiltrate. Thus, it is possible (90). Therefore, the effects of these two drugs on steady that patients who are on a strict low sodium diet and whose state serum digoxin concentrations should be additive. JACC Vol. 5, No.5 MARCUS 87A May 1985:82A-90A DRUG INTERACTIONS WITH DIGOXIN

Clinical significance. The clinical significance of an an­ in tum, the interaction between quinidine and digoxin was ticipated elevation of steady state serum digoxin levels in­ diminished, thereby lowering seurm digoxin levels. It is duced by the potassium-sparing diuretic drugs is not clear. possible that digoxin was directly accelerated Waldorff et al. (86,87) found that both spironolactone and by rifampin. This case report (10 I) illustrates the complex amiloride attenuated the positive inotropic effect of digitalis interaction that may occur with multiple drug therapy. evaluated by systolic time intervals and echocardiography, . Fraley et al. (102) reported a 25% decrease whereas triamterene induced no changes in digoxin-elicited in steady state serum digoxin concentrations when digoxin inotropy. Since the magnitude of this interaction of potas­ was given together with cimetidine. These results are in sium-sparing diuretic drugs has not been established, mea­ contrast to those of Jordaens et al. (103) who studied the surement of the steady state serum digoxin levels may be pharmacokinetics of oral digoxin in eight healthy volun­ warranted. teers, both with and without concurrent cimetidine. They concluded that cimetidine had no effect on the area under Miscellaneous Drug Interactions the plasma concentration versus time curve of digoxin. Vasodilator drugs. Total renal clearance of digoxin was With Digoxin increased by 50% in 8 patients during administration of Anti-inflammatory drugs. No pharmacokinetic inter­ nitroprusside or (104). Because the glomerular action has been observed with (92), benoxaprofen filtration rate was unchanged and the estimated renal blood (93) or tiaprofenic acid (94). Elevated serum levels of di­ flow was increased, the mechanism of this alteration in goxin were observed after I week of concomitant therapy digoxin renal clearance was thought to be an increase in with , but this increase in digoxin level did not tubular secretion of digoxin. It is not yet known whether persist after 28 days (95). long-term vasodilator therapy increases the dosage require­ Indomethacin therapy did not alter digoxin pharmaco­ ments for digoxin in patients with congestive heart failure. kinetics in healthy adult volunteers with normal renal func­ tion (96), but was found to cause an increase of 45% in serum digoxin levels in preterm infants when coadminis­ Summary tered with digoxin for the treatment of patent ductus arte­ An intensifying myriad of interactions with digoxin is riosus (97). Administration of indomethacin to the infants now being revealed. It is no wonder that digoxin intoxication was associated with a significant decrease in urinary output, has been so difficult to avoid. Patients with heart disease suggesting that the increase in serum digoxin level was due may be treated concomitantly with anticholesterolemic drugs, to a decreased glomerular filtration rate and a decrease in diuretic drugs, calcium channel blocking agents, vasodila­ the renal clearance of digoxin. These authors (97) suggested tors and , some of which have been shown to that when indomethacin is added to digoxin therapy in pre­ interact with digoxin. The accumulated information regard­ term infants, the digoxin dose should be reduced by 50%. ing drug interactions with digoxin should contribute to greater The increase in serum digoxin level associated with indo­ safety in the use of the drug, provided that the physician methacin may also apply to adult patients since a lowering maintains constant vigilance whenever any is of effective renal plasma flow has been observed in patients added to or withdrawn from a therapeutic regimen that in­ after indomethacin administration (96). Therefore, the po­ dudes digoxin. tential for digoxin-indomethacin interaction may be greater Although there has been a tremendous increase in our in patients with abnormalities in renal function. knowledge of the drug interactions, more investigation is Rifampin. Rifampin, an antibiotic used for the treat­ needed to define the full scope and magnitude of these ment of tuberculosis, has been shown to remarkably lower interactions with digitalis, particularly during steady state. the steady state serum digoxin level in several patients de­ We are also greatly in need of accurate and sensitive meth­ pendent on dialysis (98,99). There is limited evidence (98) ods to reliably measure the inotropic and vagotonic effects to suggest that this interaction is due to an increased bio­ of digitalis to assess the effects of these drug interactions. transformation of digoxin in these patients with minimal to no renal function. Rifampin accelerates the metabolism of [ am indebted to Paul Fenster, MD and Paul Nolan, MD for critical review numerous drugs, including digoxin (100). Other possible of this manuscript. [ gratefully acknowledge the secretarial assistance of Debbie Hunter. explanations for the digoxin-rifampin interaction include decreased absorption of digoxin or increased biliary excretion. A complex drug interaction involving rifampin. digoxin and quinidine has been reported (1O/). Therapy with ri­ References fampin produced a decline in both the serum quinidine con­ I. Lowenstein 1M. A method for measuring plasma levels of digitalis centration and serum digoxin concentration. It was postu­ glycosides. Circulation 1965;31:228-33. lated that rifampin increased the metabolism of quinidine; 2. OliverGC Jr. Parker BM, Brasfield DL, ParkerCW. The measurement 88A MARCUS rxcc Vol. 5, No.5 DRUG INTERACTIONS WITH DIGOXIN May 1985:82A-90A

of in human serum by radioimmunoassay. J Clin Invest level and renal excretion of f3-acetyl digoxin. Clin Phannacol Ther 1968;47:1035-42. 1981;30:518-27. 3. Lukas DS, Peterson RE. Double isotope dilution derivative assay of 28. Mungall DR, Robichaux RP, Perry W, et al. Effects of quinidine on digitoxin in plasma, urine, and stool of patients maintained on the serum digoxin concentration. Ann Intern Med 1980;93:689-93. drug. J Clin Invest 1966;45:782-95. 29. Risler T, Peters U, Grabensee B, Seipel L. Untersuchungen zur In­ 4. Smith TW, Butler VP Jr, Haber E. Determination of therapeutic and teraktion von Chinidin and Digoxin beim Menschen. Dtsch Med Wschr toxic serum concentration by radioimmunoassay. N Engl J Med 1979;I04: 1523-6. 1969;281:1212-6. 30. Doering W, Konig E. Anstieg der Digoxinkonzentration mim Serum 5. Caldwell JH, Greenberger NJ. Interruption of the enterohepatic cir­ unter Chinidinmedikation. Med Klin 1978;73:1085-8. culation of digitoxin by cholestyramine. J Clin Invest 197I;50:2626-37. 31. Pedersen KE, Christiansen BD, Klitgaard NA, Nielsen-Kudsk F. Ef­ 6. Smith TW. New approaches to the management of digitalis intoxi­ fect of quinidine on digoxin bioavailability. Eur J Clin Phannacol cation. In: Storstein 0, ed. Symposium on Digitalis. Oslo: Glydenal 1983;24:41-7. Norsk Forlag, 1973:312-23. 32. Hager WD, Mayersohn M, Graves PE. Digoxin bioavailability during 7. Binnion PF. Absorption of different commercial preparations of di­ quinidine administration. Clin Phannacol Ther 1981;30:594-8. goxin in the normal human subject, and the influences of antacid, 33. Hager WD, Fenster PE, Mayersohn M, et al. Digoxin-quinidine in­ , and ion-exchange agents. In Ref 6:216-23. teraction. N Engl J Med 1979;300:1238-41. 8. Ejvinsson G. Effect of quinidine on plasma concentrations of digoxin. 34. Schenck-Gustafsson K, Dahlquist R. Pharmacokinetics of digoxin in Br Med J 1978;1:279-80. patients subjected to the quinidine-digoxin interaction. Br J Clin Phar­ 9. Johnson BF, Urbach DR. Drug interactions involving digitalis gly­ macoI1981;11:181-6. cosides. Q Rev Drug Metab Interact 1982;4;264-87. 35. Doering W. Quinidine-digoxin interaction. N Engl J Med 10. Brown DD, Spector R, Juhl RP. Drug interactions with digoxin. Drugs 1979;301:400-4. 1980;20:198-206. 36. Schenck-Gustafsson K, Juhlin-Dannfelt A, Dahlquist R. Renal func­ II. Marcus FI, Fenster PE. Digoxin interactions with other cardiac drugs. tion and digoxin clearance during quinidine therapy. Clin Physiol J Cardiovasc Med 1983;8:25-30. 1982;2:401-4. 12. Brown DD, Juhl RP, Warner SL. Decreased bioavailability of digoxin 37. Doering W, Fichtl B, Herrmann M, Besenfelder E. Quinidine-digoxin due to hypocholesterolemic interventions. Circulation 1978;58:164-72. interaction: evidence for involvement of an extrarenal mechanism. Eur 13. Brown DD, Juhl RP. Decreased bioavailability of digoxin due to J Clin Phannacol 1982;21:281-5. antacids and kaolin-pectin. N Engl J Med 1976;295:1034-7. 38. George CF, Renwick AG. Quinidine and the non-renal elimination of 14. Vohringer HF, Kuhlmann J, Rietbrock N. Der Einfluss von Antacida digoxin. J Phann Phannacol 1982;34:280. auf die Plasmakonzentration von Digoxin beim Menschen. Deutsche 39. Fenster PE, Hager WD, Perrier D, Powell JR, Graves PE, Michael Medizinische Wochenschrift 1976;101:106-8. UFo Digoxin-quinidine interaction in patients with chronic renal fail­ 15. Khalil SAH. The uptake of digoxin and digitoxin by some antacids. ure. Circulation 1982;66:1277-80. J Phann Phannacol 1974;26:961-7. 40. Leahey EB Jr, Bigger JT Jr, Butler VP Jr, et al. Quinidine-digoxin 16. Albert KS, Ayres JW, DiSanto AR, et al. Influence of kaolin-pectin interaction: time course and pharmacokinetics. Am J Cardiol suspension on digoxin bioavailability. J Phann Sci 1978;67:1582-6. 1981;48:1141-6. 17. Allen MD, Greenblatt DJ, Hannatz JS, Smith TW. Effective mag­ 41. Reiffel JA, Leahey EB Jr, Drusin RE, Heissenbuttel RH, Lovejoy nesium-aluminum hydroxide and kaolin-pectin on absorption of di­ WP, Bigger JTJr. A previously unrecognized drug interaction between goxin from tablets and capsules. J Clin Phannacol 1981;21:26-30. quinidine and digoxin. Clin Cardiol 1979;2:40-2. 18. Woods MN, Ingelfinger JA. The lack of effect of bran on digoxin 42. Reid PR, Meek AG. Digoxin-quinidine interaction. Johns-Hopkins absorption. Clin Phannacol Ther 1979;26:21-3. Med J 1979;145:227-9. 43. Leahey EB Jr, Reiffel JA, Drusin RE, Heissenbuttel RH, Lovejoy 19. Floyd RA. Digoxin interaction with bran and high fiber foods. Am J WP, Bigger JT Jr. Interaction between quinidine and digoxin. JAMA Hosp Phann 1978;35:660. 1978;240:533-4. 20. Juhl RP, Summers RW, Guillory JK, Blaug SM, Cheng FH, Brown 44. Leahey EB Jr, Reiffel JA, Heissenbuttel RH, Drusin RE, Lovejoy DD. Effect of sulfasalazine on digoxin bioavailability. Clin Phannacol WP, Bigger JT Jr. Enhanced cardiac effect of digoxin during quinidine Ther 1976;20:387-94. treatment. Arch Intern Med 1979;139:519-2I. 21. Lindenbaum J, Maulitz RM, Butler VP Jr. Inhibition of digoxin ab­ 45. Pieroni RE, Marshall J. Fatal digoxin-quinidine interaction in an el­ sorption by neomycin. Gastroenterology 1976;71:391-404. derly woman. J Am Geriatr Soc 1981;29:422-5. 22. Lindenbaum J, Tse-Eng D, Butler VP Jr, Rund DG. Urinary excretion 46. Steiness E, Waldorff S, Hansen PB, Kjaergard H, Buch J, Egelad H. of reduced metabolites of digoxin. Am J Med 1981;71:67-74. Reduction of digoxin-induced inotropism during quinidine adminis­ 23. Lindenbaum J, Rund DG, Butler VP Jr, Tse-Eng D, Saha JR. Inac­ tration. Clin Phannacol Ther 1980;27:791-5. tivation of digoxin by the gut flora: reversal by antibiotic therapy. N 47. Hirsh PD, Weiner HJ, North RRL. Further insights into digoxin­ Engl J Med 1981;305:789-94. quinidine interaction: lack of correlation between serum digoxin con­ 24. Peters U, Falk LC, Kalman SM. Digoxin metabolism in patients. Arch centration and inotropicstate of the heart. Am J Cardiol 1980;46:863-8. Intern Med 1978;138:1074-6. 48. Das G, Barr CE, Carlson J. Reduction of digoxin effect during the 25. Rund DG, Lindenbaum J, Dobkin JF, Butler VP Jr, Saha JR. De­ digoxin-quinidine interaction. Clin Phannacol Ther 1984;35:317-2 I. creased digoxin cardioinactive-reduced metabolites after administra­ 49. Schenck-Gustafsson K, Jogestrand T, Brodin LA, Nordlander R, tion of an encapsulated liquid concentrate. Clin Phannacol Ther Dahlquist R. Cardiac effects of treatment with quinidine and digoxin, 1983;34:738-43. alone and in combination. Am J Cardiol 1983;51:777-82. 26. Johnson BF, O'Grady J, Bye C. The influence of digoxin particle size 50. Wandell M, Powell JR, Hager WD, et al. Effect of quinidine on on absorption of digoxin and the effect of propantheline and meto­ digoxin kinetics. Clin Phannacol Ther 1980;28:425-30. clopramide. Br J Clin Phannacol 1978;5:465-7. 51. Leden I. Digoxin hydroxychloroquine interaction? Acta Med Scand 27. Kuhlmann J, Zilly W, Wilke J. Effects of cytostatic drugs on plasma 1982;211:411-12. JACC Vol. 5, No.5 MARCUS 89A May 1985:82A-90A DRUGINTERACTIONS WITH DIGOXIN

52. Moysey 10, Jaggarao NSV, Grundy EN, Chamberlain DA. Amio­ 77. Belz GG, Doering W, Munkes R, Matthews J. Interaction between darone increases plasma digoxin concentrations. Br Med J 1981;282:272. digoxin and calcium antagonists and antiarrhythmic drugs. Clin Phar­ 53. Oetgen WJ, Sobol SM, Tri TB, Heydorn WH, Rakita L. Amiodarone­ macol Ther 1983;33:410-6. digoxin interaction, clinical and experimental observations. Chest 78. Keren G, Tepper D, Butler B, et al. Studies on the possible mech­ 1984;86:75-9. anisms of lidoflazine arrhythmogenicity. 1984;4:742-7. 54. Nager G, Nager F. Interaktion zwischen Amiodaron und Digoxin. 79. Brown DD, Dormois JC, Abraham GN. Effect of furosemide on the Schweiz Med Wschr 1983;113:1727-30. renal excretion of digoxin. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1976;20:395-400. 55. Furlanello F, Inama G, Ferrari M, et al. Un altro tipo di interazione 80. Malcolm AD, Leung FY, Fuchs JCA, Duarte JE. Digoxin kinetics fra livelli ematici della digitale e di farmaci antiaritmici: digoxena ed during furosemide administration. Clin Pharmacol Ther amiodarone. G Ital Cardiol 1981:II :1725-8. 1977;21:567-74. 56. Fenster PE, White NW Jr, Hanson CD. Pharmacokinetic evaluation 81. Naafs MAB, Van der Hoek C, Schopman W, Van Duin S, Koorevaar of the digoxin-amiodarone interaction. J Am Coli Cardiol 1985;5:108-12. G, Silberbusch J. Renal clearance of digoxin in man after sodium loading or furosemide treatment. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1983;25:375-9. 57. Nademanee K, Kannan R, Hendrickson J, Ookhtens M, Kay I, Singh BN. Arniodarone-digoxin interaction: clinical significance, time course 82. Marcus FI, Nimmo L, Kapadia GG, Goldsmith C. The effect of of development, potential pharmacokinetic mechanisms and thera­ acute hypokalemia on the myocardial concentration and body dis­ peutic implications, J Am Coli Cardiol 1984;4:111-6. tribution of tritiated digoxin in the dog. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1971;178:271-81. 58. Koren G, Hesslein PS, Macleod SM. Digoxin toxicity associated with amiodarone therapy in children. J Pediatr 1984;104:467-70. 83. Hall RJ, Gelbart A, Billingham M, Snidow G, Goldman RH. Effect of chronic potassium depletion on digitalis-induced intropy and ar­ 59. Leahey EB Jr, Reiffel JA, Giardina EGV, Bigger JT. The effect of rhythmias. Cardiovasc Res 1981;15:98-107. quinidine and other oral antiarrhythmic drugs on serum digoxin. Ann Intern Med 1980;82:805-6. 84. Steiness E. Suppression of renal excretion of digoxin in hypokalemic patients. Clin Pharm Ther 1978;23:511-4. 60. Risler T, Burk M, Peters U, Grabensee B, Seipel L. On the interaction between digoxin and disopyramide. Clin Pharmacol Ther 85. Steiness E. , digitalis and arrhythmias. Acta Med Scand 1983;34:176-80. [SuppII1981:647:75-8. 61. Wellens HJJ, Gorgels AP, Braat SJ, Bar SW, Vanagt EJ, Phaf B. 86. Waldorff S, Hansen PB, Egeblad H, et al. Interactions between Effects of oral disopyramide on serum digoxin levels. A prospective digoxin and potassium-sparing diuretics. Clin Pharmacol Ther study. Am Heart J 1980;100:934-5. 1983;33:418-23. 62. Day T, Hunt D. Interaction between mexiletine and digoxin. Med J 87. Waldorff S, Hansen PB, Kjaergard H, Buch J, Egeblad H, Steiness Aust 1983;2:630. E. Amiloride-induced changes in digoxin dynamics and kinetics: abolition of digoxin-induced inotropism with amiloride. Clin Phar­ 63. Lewis GP, Holtzman JL. Interaction of flecainide with digoxin and macol Ther 1981;30:172-6. . Am J Cardiol 1984;53:52b-7b. 88. Waldorff S, Andersen JD, Heeboll-Nielsen N, et al. Spironolactone­ 64. MacFarland R, Moeller VR, Pieniaszek HJ Jr, Whitney CC Jr. Marcus induced changes in digoxin kinetics. Clin Pharmacol Ther Fl. Assessment of the potential pharmacokinetic interaction between 1978;24:162-7. digoxin and ethmozine. J Clin Pharmacol (in press). 89. Thomas RW, Maddox RR. The interaction of spironolactone and 65. Klein HO, Lang R, Di Segni E, Kaplinsky E. Verapamil-digoxin digoxin: a review and evaluation. Ther Drug Monit 1981:3:117-20. interaction. N Engl J Med 1980;303:160. 90. Fenster PE, Hager WD, Goodman MM. Digoxin-quinidine-spiron­ 66. Klein HO, Lang R, Weiss E, et al. The influence of verapamil on olactone interaction. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1984;36:70-3. serum digoxin concentration. Circulation 1982;65:998-1003. 91. Gussin RZ. Potassium-sparing diuretics. J Clin Pharmacol 67. Pedersen KE, Dorph-Pedersen A, Hvidt S, Klitgaard NA, Nielsen­ 1977:17:651-62. Kudsk F. Digoxin-verapamil interaction. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1981;30:311-6. 92. Fenster PE, Comess KA, Hanson CD, Finley PRo Kinetics of the digoxin-aspirin combination. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1982;32:428-30. 68. Pedersen KE, Thayssen P, Klitgaard NA, Cristiansen RD, Nielsen­ 93. Zoller B, Engel HJ, Faust-Tinnefeldt G, Geissler HE, Gilfrich HJ, Kudsk F. Influence of verapamil on the inotropism and pharmacoki­ Zimmer M. An interaction study between benoxaprofen and digoxin. netics of digoxin. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1983;25:199-206. Eur J Rheumatol Inflamm 1982;5:82-6. 69. Zatuchni J. Verapamil-digoxin interaction. Am Heart J 1984;108:412-3. 94. Doering VW, Isbary J. Der Einfluss von Tiaprofensaure auf die 70. Kaplanski J, Weinhouse E, Topaz M, Genchik G. Verapamil and Digoxin-konzentration mim Serum. Arzneim-Forsch/Drug Res digoxin: interactions in the rat. Res Commun Chern Pathol Pharmacol 1983;33:167-8. 1983;42:377-88. 95. Quattrocchi FP, Robinson JD, Curry RW Jr, Grieco ML, Schulman 71. Yoshida A, Fugita M, Kurosawa N, et al. Effect of diltiazem on SG. The effect of ibuprofen on serum digoxin concentrations. Drug plasma level and urinary excretion of digoxin in healthy subjects. Clin Intell Clini Pharm 1983;17:286-8. Pharmacol Ther 1984;35:681-5. 96. Finch MB, Johnston GD, Kelly JG, McDevitt DG. Pharmacokinetics 72. Rameis H, Magometschnigg D, Ganzinger U. The diltiazem-digoxin of digoxin alone and in the presence of indomethacin therapy. Br J interaction. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1984;36:183-9. Clin Pharmacol 1984;17:353-5. 73. Schwartz JB, Raizner A, Akers S. The effect of nifedipine on serum 97. Koren G, Zarfin Y, Perlman M, Macleod SM. Effects of indo­ digoxin concentrations in patients. Am Heart J 1984;107:669-73. methacin on digoxin pharmacokinetics in pre-term infants. Pediatr 74. Pedersen KE, Dorph-Pedersen A, Hvidt S, Klitgaard NA, Kjaer K, Pharmacol 1984;4:25-30. Nielsen-Kudsk F. Effect of nifedipine on digoxin kinetics in healthy 98. Gault H, Longerich L, Dawe M, Fine A. Digoxin-rifampin inter­ subjects. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1982;32:562-5. action. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1984;35:750-4. 75. Schwartz JB, Migliore PJ. Effect of nifedipine on serum digoxin 99. Novi C, Bissoli F, Simonati D, Volpini T, Baroli A, Vignati G. concentration and renal digoxin clearance. Clin Pharmacol Ther Rifampin and digoxin: possible drug interaction in a dialysis patient. 1984;36:19-24. JAMA 1980;244:2521-2. 76. Lessem J, Bellinetto A. Interaction between digoxin and the calcium 100. Baciewicz AM, Self TH. Rifampin drug interaction. Arch Intern antagonists nicardipine and tiapamil. Clin Ther 1983;5:595-602. Med 1984;144:1667-71. 90A MARCUS lACC Vol. 5, No.5 DRUG INTERACTIONS WITH DIGOXIN May 1985:82A-90A

10I. Bussey HI, Merritt GJ, Hill EO. The influence of ruampin on quin­ 103. Jordaens L, Hoegaerts J, Belpaire E. Noninteraction of cimetidine idine and digoxin. Arch Intern Med 1984;144:1021-3. with digoxin absorption. Acta Clin Belg 1976;36:109-10. 102. Fraley DS, Britton HL, Schwinghammer TL, Kalla R. Effect of 104. Cogan JJ, Humphreys MH, Carlson CJ, Benowitz NL, Rapaport E. cimetidine on steady-state serum digoxin concentrations. Clin Pharm Acute vasodilator therapy increases renal clearance of digoxin in 1983;2:163-5. patients with congestive heart failure. Circulation 1981;64:973-6.