DOCSLIB.ORG

BST-Vorlage 2013

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
BST-Vorlage 2013 PolicyBrief Policy Brief | 07.2017 The condition of NGOs and civil society in Belarus Veranika Laputska (in cooperation with Łukasz Wenerski) History and legal background various ages and social statuses, fell under this umbrella. This form of organization – a When in 1991 Belarus gained its “public association” – is still the most independence from the USSR, Belarusian popular type of a civil society organization civil society could be characterized as in Belarus. typical for a post-Soviet third sector. On the one hand, a large number of public On the other hand, some organizations associations had existed since Soviet originated from “informal” groups dating times, but they were in fact closely back to samizdat activities but later associated with the state and the established their associations, thanks to Communist Party, rather than with the the years of perestroika and glasnost. They population. This group comprised either were devoted to the revival of Belarusian pro-government or state-founded national traditions, culture and memory. organizations whose aim was to control Such organizations enjoyed prosperity and and influence state ideology, morality, and gained real popularity during the first years the upbringing and education of a of Belarus’s independence in the early maximum amount of Soviet citizens. To a years of the 1990s, whereas the first group great extent, practically all “public was facing an ideological crisis as the associations,” including those which communist ideology which used to unite operate in sports, culture and education and support them did not exist anymore. and involve the participation of people of NGOs and civil society in Belarus | page 2 The situation changed after the first Presidential Decree No. 2 of 16 January Belarusian president, Aliaksandr 1999 banned all organizations not Lukashenka, was elected in 1994. registered by the government. Later this Gradually acquiring more and more power ban was introduced to the Law “On Political and striving to obtain personal control over Parties” and the law “On Public public, political and social life, Lukashenka Associations” together with administrative used the entire range of instruments at his penalties for the violation of these laws disposal to achieve his goals. Among them ranging from a fine to arrest for up to fifteen were the elimination of his political days. Two other amendments of the opponents, changing the constitution and Criminal Code of Belarus made operating external policy priorities through state on behalf of an unregistered organization referendums, openly criticizing foreign or political party even more risky. On 15 states and their official representatives, and December 2005, Article 193.1 entitled expanding his personal authority over mass “Illegal Organization of a Public media, education and civil society Association, a Religious Organization or a organizations. Fund, or Participation in Their Activities” was enacted. It proscribed punishments of As early as 1996, the Open Society a fine or imprisonment for up to two years Foundation, which had been supporting for activities in any non-registered many third-sector and educational organization, fund or political party. In initiatives in Belarus, was expelled from the addition, Part 2 was added to Article 193 of country. This was followed by demands the Criminal Code, envisaging up to three that several other donor organizations years of imprisonment if activities that cease to exist. At the same time, the violate citizens’ rights were carried out by a Belarusian authorities made use of another non-registered party or association. powerful instrument – Belarusian legislation –which after the formation of a new Periods of oppression over Belarusian civil parliament loyal to the Belarusian president society are, to a great extent, cyclic and was accountable solely to the chief of state. usually coincide with Lukashenka’s struggles with his political rivals. This The state body which is responsible for the becomes apparent when one takes into registration of non-governmental consideration the years of his harshest organizations and political parties in struggles with the political opposition which Belarus is the Ministry of Justice and the typically take place just before and after chief directorates of justice at the oblast presidential elections in Belarus. For executive committees and Minsk. The instance, the 1999 amendment to the National Department for Religious Affairs is Criminal Code took place in the year when responsible for the registration of religious the last major politically motivated anti- organizations. Not only were they more governmental demonstrations took place. reluctant to register new organizations and political parties, they also amended key At the time, the opposition political parties, laws regulating the activities of Belarusian quite strong and enjoying popular support, NGOs. Thus, the once progressive Law tried to organize presidential elections, “On Public Associations” of 1994 was undermining the results of a constitutional amended in 1999 and 2005, gradually referendum of 1996 which renewed the limiting the scope of NGOs’ ability to presidential term of the incumbent in 1996 function in the country. as opposed to 1994, when he was elected. The amendment of 2005, in turn, was NGOs and civil society in Belarus | page 3 adopted a year before the 2006 abroad or set up bank accounts in presidential elections, when civil society European banks. This enables them to associations traditionally exert efforts to continue their activities, as the Belarusian encourage participation, often as partners society is afraid to provide open financial of political parties. support to the majority of NGOs for fear of being persecuted by the authorities who, in In line with this timeline, many non- turn, do not hide their views and often call governmental organizations were liquidated Belarusian civil society the “fifth column” in or suppressed, even though many of them the public mass-media. do not necessarily carry out any political activities. One of the most notorious recent Belarusian civil society and NGOs cases took place in 2011 during the period from 2015 to today of another wave of suppression imposed After the last crackdown in 2011, the on Belarusian civil society after particularly Belarusian civil society has gradually rebuilt numerous anti-government demonstrations its structures. In the meantime, a new in the aftermath of the 2010 presidential restrictive Law “On Non-Profit elections. Aliaksandr Lukashenka won yet Organizations” was drafted. Additionally, by again, despite the fact that the elections the beginning of the last phase of the were not recognized as integral, fair and October 2015 presidential campaign, all transparent by the OSCE and partner major political prisoners were released. European organizations which had come for election observation. Having arrested Although a strategy of registering as few seven out of the nine presidential political parties as possible (in practice candidates, the Belarusian president also none since 2000) was still in place, the imposed severe measures over Belarusian Belarusian authorities have been gradually political parties and NGOs. Ales Bialiatski, increasing the registration of public the head of one of the most famous human associations and funds (see Table 1 and rights organizations – “Viasna” – was Table 2). arrested in August 2011 and spent almost Table 1. Dynamics of the Number Public three years in jail after the Belarusian Associations Growth in Belarus Ministry of Justice received information Number of newly Total amount of from colleagues in Lithuania and Poland registered registered public associations public associations confirming the receipt of foreign funds (based on results of in Belarus as of the without their declaration or taxation in the preceding year) specified date October 12, 2003 94 2,248 Belarus. January 1, 2004 155 2,214 January 1, 2005 61 2,259 The Bialiatski case throws light on an January 1, 2006 85 2,247 January 1, 2007 100 2,248 important peculiarity regarding the January 1, 2008 94 2,255 functioning of civil society organizations in January 1, 2009 - 2,221 January 1, 2010 94 2,225 Belarus. Due to Belarusian legislative January 1, 2011 134 2,325 restrictions, public associations and January 1, 2012 118 2,402 January 1, 2013 111 2,477 political parties are prohibited from January 1, 2014 70 2,521 receiving financial support from abroad. January 1, 2015 86 2,596 January 1, 2016 106 2,665 This, as well as other provisions introduced January 1, 2017 116 2,731 by presidential decree that were aimed at Source: Legal Transformation Center / Assembly of Pro-Democratic NGOs. Freedom of Association and restricting the ability of Belarusian civil Legal Conditions for Non-Commercial Organizations society to function forced many in Belarus. Available at: http://belngo.info/2017.freedom-of-association- organizations to move their activities 2016.html. Accessed on 15.05.2017. NGOs and civil society in Belarus | page 4 Table 2. Dynamics of the Foundations • Funds are non-governmental Growth in Belarus organizations founded by citizen(s) and Number of newly Total amount of (or) legal persons without membership registered registered foundations foundations in requirements on the basis of voluntary (based on results of Belarus as of the property contributions and pursuing the preceding year) specified date January 1, 2008 9 64 charitable, social, educational goals, January
Load more

Recommended publications
  • English Version of This Report Is the Only Official Document
    Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights REPUBLIC OF BELARUS PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS 23 September 2012 OSCE/ODIHR Election Observation Mission Final Report Warsaw 14 December 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................1 II. INTRODUCTION AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS....................................................3 III. POLITICAL BACKGROUND.........................................................................................3 IV. LEGAL FRAMEWORK AND ELECTORAL SYSTEM..............................................4 V. ELECTION ADMINISTRATION ...................................................................................5 A. CENTRAL ELECTION COMMISSION.....................................................................................6 B. DISTRICT AND PRECINCT ELECTION COMMISSIONS..........................................................7 VI. VOTER REGISTRATION ...............................................................................................7 VII. CANDIDATE REGISTRATION .....................................................................................8 VIII. ELECTION CAMPAIGN ...............................................................................................10 A. CAMPAIGN ENVIRONMENT................................................................................................10 B. CAMPAIGN FINANCE..........................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Protests in Belarus (1994-2011) .Pdf
    Number of Participants Number of Day Month Year Location (numeric) Arrests Topic Organizing Group Sources UPI "Belarus against Marks Russification of National Front of Independence 27 7 1994 Minsk 6500 0 Belarus Belarus Day" "the state's decision to discontinue eight [opposition] UPI "Belarussians 4 1 1995 Minsk 300 0 newspapers" protest press ban" " lower taxes, increase wages, create new jobs and enlarge AP "Thousands spending for health Rally In Minsk care, education Against Low Pay, 26 1 1995 Minsk 40000 0 and science." Unions Price Hikes" "introduction of teaching in the BBC World "Police Belarussian confiscate grenade language at higher at Belarussian educational Assembly of language 15 2 1995 unk 100 1 establishments," Belarussian Gentry demonstration" PAP News Wire Financing of "BELARUSSIAN construction of ASSOCIATION OF POLES DEMAND Polish language POLES IN POLISH SCHOOL 1 3 1995 Minsk 10 0 school BELARUS IN GRODNO" BBC World " Police arrest student activists Procession of for burning state 24 5 1995 Minsk 70 30 Uknown Political Convicts flag" ITAR-TASS "Minsk workers march on Police arrest presidential student activists residence in payment of back for burning state protest at wage 17 7 1995 Minsk . 0 wages flag arrears" AFP "Security forces arrest Minsk Minsk Metro metro strike 21 8 1995 Minsk 150 1 Metro strike Workers leaders" Number of Participants Number of Day Month Year Location (numeric) Arrests Topic Organizing Group Sources Interfax "Belarusian Popular Front Reconsideration of protests against oil oil agreement with
    [Show full text]
  • Warsaw East European Review Review European East Warsaw More Information on Recruitment: Volume I1/2012
    Warsaw East European Conference vol. ii/2012 • In the academic year 2012/2013 THE CENTRE FOR EAST EUROPEAN STUDIES will be inviting applications for the following scholarship programs: ◆ The Kalinowski Scholarship Program ◆ Scholarships of the Polish Government for Young Academicians ◆ 25 scholarships to enter the 2-year Master’s Program in Specialist Eastern Studies ◆ The Lane Kirkland Scholarship Program Warsaw East ◆ The Krzysztof Skubiszewski Scholarship European Review Warsaw East European Review Review European East Warsaw More information on recruitment: www.studium.uw.edu.pl volume i1/2012 R Warsaw East European Conference Okl_Warsaw East European Review 2012.indd 1 2012-07-09 08:27:20 e W E E R / Warsaw East European Conferenc e W E E R / Warsaw East European Conferenc INTERNAT I ONAL BOARD : Egidijus Aleksandravičius, Vytautas Magnus University Stefano Bianchini, University of Bologna Miroslav Hroch, Charles University Yaroslav Hrytsak, Ukrainian Catholic University Andreas Kappeler, University of Vienna Zbigniew Kruszewski, University of Texas, El Paso Jan Kubik, Rutgers University Alexey Miller, Russian Academy of Sciences Richard Pipes, Harvard University Mykola Riabchuk, Kyiv-Mohyla Academy Alexander Rondeli, Georgian Foundation for Strategic and International Studies John Micgiel, Columbia University Barbara Törnquist-Plewa, Lund University Theodore Weeks, Southern Illinois University ED I TOR I AL COMM I TTEE : Jan Malicki, University of Warsaw (Director of the WEEC – Warsaw East European Conference, chair of the Committee) Leszek Zasztowt (chair of the WEEC Board), University of Warsaw Andrzej Żbikowski (secretary of the WEEC Board, University of Warsaw ED I TOR -I N -CH I EF Jerzy Kozakiewicz, University of Warsaw ASS I STANT ED I TOR Konrad Zasztowt, University of Warsaw ISBN: 978-83-61325-239 ISSN: 2299-2421 Copyright © by Studium Europy Wschodniej UW 2012 COVER AND TYPOGRAPH ic DES I GN J.M & J.J.M.
    [Show full text]
  • Review–Chronicle
    REVIEWCHRONICLE of the human rights violations in Belarus in 2005 Human Rights Center Viasna ReviewChronicle » of the Human Rights Violations in Belarus in 2005 VIASNA « Human Rights Center Minsk 2006 1 REVIEWCHRONICLE of the human rights violations in Belarus in 2005 » VIASNA « Human Rights Center 2 Human Rights Center Viasna, 2006 REVIEWCHRONICLE of the human rights violations in Belarus in 2005 INTRODUCTION: main trends and generalizations The year of 2005 was marked by a considerable aggravation of the general situation in the field of human rights in Belarus. It was not only political rights » that were violated but social, economic and cultural rights as well. These viola- tions are constant and conditioned by the authoritys voluntary policy, with Lu- kashenka at its head. At the same time, human rights violations are not merely VIASNA a side-effect of the authoritarian state control; they are deliberately used as a « means of eradicating political opponents and creating an atmosphere of intimi- dation in the society. The negative dynamics is characterized by the growth of the number of victims of human rights violations and discrimination. Under these circums- tances, with a high level of latent violations and concealed facts, with great obstacles to human rights activity and overall fear in the society, the growth points to drastic stiffening of the regimes methods. Apart from the growing number of registered violations, one should men- Human Rights Center tion the increase of their new forms, caused in most cases by the development of the state oppressive machine, the expansion of legal restrictions and ad- ministrative control over social life and individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • Int Cat Css Blr 30785 E
    The Cost of Speaking Out Overview of human rights abuses committed by Belarusian authorities during peaceful protests in February-March 2017 © Truth Hounds Truth Hounds E [email protected] /facebook.com/truthhounds/ W truth-hounds.org IPHR - International Partnership for Human Rights Square de l'Aviation 7A 1070 Brussels, Belgium E [email protected] @IPHR W IPHRonline.org /facebook.com/iphronline CSP - Civic Solidarity Platform W civicsolidarity.org @CivicSolidarity /facebook.com/SivicSolidarity Crimea SOS E [email protected] /facebook.com/KRYM.SOS/ W krymsos.com Table of contents 1. Introduction and methodology 4 2. Chronological overview of events 5 2.1. February protests against the law on taxing the unemployed 5 2.2. March wave of administrative arrests of civil society activists and journalists 6 2.3. Increasing use of force by law enforcement officials 7 2.4. Criminal and administrative arrests prior to the 25 March Freedom Day protest in Minsk 9 2.5 Ill-treatment, excessive use of force and arbitrary detentions by police on 25 March - Freedom Day in Minsk 10 2.6 Raid of NGO HRC Viasna office and detention of 57 human rights defenders 14 2.7. Further arrests and reprisals by the authorities 14 2.8. Criminal cases related to allegations of attempted armed violence 16 3. Police use of force and arbitrary detentions during assemblies 17 3.1. International standards 17 3.2. Domestic legislation 18 3.2. Structure of the law enforcement services 19 3.4. Patterns of human rights abuses 19 4. Overview of concerns related to violations of freedom of assembly 20 4.1.
    [Show full text]
  • BELARUS Restrictions on the Political and Civil Rights of Citizens Following the 2010 Presidential Election
    BELARUS Restrictions on the Political and Civil Rights of Citizens Following the 2010 Presidential Election of person. Article 4: No one shall be held in slavery Article 1: All human beings are born free and equal or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms. Article 5: No one shall be subjected to in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. Article 6: Everyone has the right to recognition spirit of brotherhood. Article 2: Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, everywhere as a person before the law. Article 7: All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimi- without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, nation to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination. Article 8: Everyone has the right to an effective rem- basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person edy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty. by law. Article 9: No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, Article 3: Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security June 2011 564a Uladz Hrydzin © This report has been produced with the support of the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA).
    [Show full text]
  • Situation of Human Rights in Belarus in 2012
    Human Rights Center «Viasna» Situation of Human Rights in Belarus in 2012 REVIEW-CHRONICLE Мinsk, 2013 SITUATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN BELARUS IN 2012 REVIEW-CHRONICLE Compiled by Tatsiana Reviaka Editing and introduction by Valiantsin Stefanovich The book was prepared on the basis of the monthly reviews of the situation of human rights in Belarus in 2012. Each of the monthly reviews includes the analysis of the most important events which influenced the observation of human rights for the given period, as well as the most evident and characteristic features of the abuses registered at that time. The review was prepared on the basis of personal applications of victims of human rights violations, the facts that were registered by human rigths defenders or voiced in open information sources. The book makes use of photos by Yuliya Darashkevich Dzmitry Bushko, Siarhei Hudzilin, Nastassia Loika, the web-sites http://photo.bymedia. net, http://nn.by, http://euroradio.fm, http://www.svaboda.org, http://volkovysk.by, http://gazetaby.com, http://mfront.net, http://www.reuters.com, http://belsat.eu/be, belhouse.org and the archive of the Human Rights Center «Viasna». TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 9 Review-Chronicle of Human Rights Violations in Belarus in January 2012 19 Politically motivated criminal prosecution 19 Harassment and pressurization of human rights activists and organizations 21 Torture and cruel treatment, poor conditions of detention 23 Death penalty 25 Administrative prosecution of social and political activists 25 Restrictions on freedom of speech 27 Restrictions on freedom of assembly 28 Situation of freedom of association 30 Review-Chronicle of Human Rights Violations in Belarus in February 2012 31 Political prisoners.
    [Show full text]
  • SITUATION of HUMAN RIGHTS in BELARUS in 2014
    Human Rights Centre “Viasna” SITUATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS in BELARUS in 2014 REVIEW-CHRONICLE Minsk, 2015 SITUATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN BELARUS in 2014 REVIEW-CHRONICLE Author and compiler: Tatsiana Reviaka Editor and author of the foreword: Valiantsin Stefanovich The edition was prepared on the basis of reviews of human rights violations in Belarus published every month in 2014. Each of the monthly reviews includes an analysis of the most important events infl uencing the observance of human rights and outlines the most eloquent and characteristic facts of human rights abuses registered over the described period. The review was prepared on the basis of personal appeals of victims of human rights abuses and the facts which were either registered by human rights activists or reported by open informational sources. The book features photos from the archive of the Human Rights Center “Viasna”, as well as from publications on the websites of Radio Free Europe/ Radio Liberty Belarus service, the Nasha Niva newspaper, tv.lrytas.lt, baj.by, gazetaby.com, and taken by Franak Viachorka and Siarhei Hudzilin. Human Rights Situation in 2014: Trends and Evaluation The situation of human rights during 2014 remained consistently poor with a tendency to deterioration at the end of the year. Human rights violations were of both systemic and systematic nature: basic civil and political rights were extremely restricted, there were no systemic changes in the fi eld of human rights (at the legislative level and (or) at the level of practices). The only positive development during the year was the early release of Ales Bialiatski, Chairman of the Human Rights Centre “Viasna” and Vice-President of the International Federation for Human Rights.
    [Show full text]
  • National Awakening in Belarus: Elite Ideology to 'Nation' Practice
    National Awakening in Belarus: Elite Ideology to 'Nation' Practice Tatsiana Kulakevich SAIS Review of International Affairs, Volume 40, Number 2, Summer-Fall 2020, pp. 97-110 (Article) Published by Johns Hopkins University Press For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/783885 [ Access provided at 7 Mar 2021 23:30 GMT from University Of South Florida Libraries ] National Awakening in Belarus: Elite Ideology to ‘Nation’ Practice Tatsiana Kulakevich This article examines the formation of nationalism in Belarus through two dimensions: elite ideology and everyday practice. I argue the presidential election of 2020 turned into a fundamental institutional crisis when a homogeneous set of ‘nation’ practices against the state ideology replaced existing elite ideology. This resulted in popular incremental changes in conceptions of national understanding. After twenty-six consecutive years in power, President Lukashenka unintentionally unleashed a process of national awakening leading to the rise of a new sovereign nation that demands the right to determine its own future, independent of geopolitical pressures and interference. Introduction ugust 2020 witnessed a resurgence of nationalist discourse in Belarus. AUnlike in the Transatlantic world, where politicians articulate visions of their nations under siege—by immigrants, refugees, domestic minority popu- lations—narratives of national and political failure dominate in Belarus Unlike trends in the Transatlantic resonate with large segments of the voting public.
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Belarus
    Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights REPUBLIC OF BELARUS EARLY PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS 17 November 2019 ODIHR Election Observation Mission Final Report Warsaw 4 March 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ 2 II. INTRODUCTION AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ....................................................................... 5 III. BACKGROUND AND POLITICAL CONTEXT ........................................................................... 5 IV. ELECTORAL SYSTEM AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK .............................................................. 7 A. ELECTORAL SYSTEM ........................................................................................................................ 7 B. LEGAL FRAMEWORK ....................................................................................................................... 8 V. ELECTION ADMINISTRATION ................................................................................................... 9 VI. VOTER REGISTRATION .............................................................................................................. 11 VII. CANDIDATE REGISTRATION .................................................................................................... 12 VIII. ELECTION CAMPAIGN ............................................................................................................... 15 IX. CAMPAIGN FINANCE .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Campaign Human Rights Defenders for Free
    CIVIL CAMPAIGN HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDERS FOR FREE ELECTIONS Elections to the House of Representatives of the National Assembly of Belarus of the sixth convocation Observation is carried out by activists of the Belarusian Helsinki Committee and the Human Rights Center “Viasna” in the framework of the campaign Human Rights Defenders For Free Elections Report on the Formation of Precinct Election Commissions I. GENERAL CONCLUSIONS - on July 27, local authorities completed the formation of precinct election commissions, which are an important element of the electoral process, as they are directly involved in the organization of voting and the counting of votes. A total of 5,971 PECs were formed, with 65,856 people selected as election commissioners. - the formation of the PECs took place against a background of widely announced new approaches to be applied by the authorities in charge of the process: the possibility of observers (including international ones) to attend the meetings of bodies in charge of forming the commissions, discussing business and political qualities of the nominated candidates. In cases where the amount of nominees exceeds the stipulated quota, information on each nominee should be considered and a separate vote should be carried out; - the Central Election Commission did not support the proposal of the Human Rights Defenders for Free Elections campaign to remove the concept of ‘political qualities’ from para. 6 of the CEC’s Decree No. 18 of 8 June 2016 before the beginning of the formation of the PECs, which, according
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Parliamentary (ENG)
    INTERNATIONAL ELECTION OBSERVATION MISSION Republic of Belarus – Early Parliamentary Elections, 17 November 2019 STATEMENT OF PRELIMINARY FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS PRELIMINARY CONCLUSIONS The 17 November early parliamentary elections proceeded calmly but did not meet important international standards for democratic elections. There was an overall disregard for fundamental freedoms of assembly, association and expression. A high number of candidates stood for election, but an overly restrictive registration process inhibited the participation of opposition. A limited amount of campaigning took place, within a restrictive environment that, overall, did not provide for a meaningful or competitive political contest. Media coverage of the campaign did not enable voters to receive sufficient information about contestants. The election administration was dominated by the executive authority, limiting its impartiality and independence, and the integrity of the election process was not adequately safeguarded. Significant procedural shortcomings during the counting of votes raised concerns about whether results were counted and reported honestly, and an overall lack of transparency reduced the opportunity for meaningful observation. The 110 members of the House of Representatives are elected for four-year terms across majoritarian districts. The elections were called by the president on 5 August, effectively dissolving the outgoing parliament approximately one year before the expiration of its mandate, without reference to any of the constitutional grounds for dissolution, contrary to OSCE commitments. The authorities maintained that the elections were not considered early under national law and were scheduled within the competency of the president. Overall, the legal framework does not adequately guarantee the conduct of elections in line with OSCE commitments and other international standards and obligations, underlying the need for a comprehensive and inclusive reform.
    [Show full text]