DOCSLIB.ORG

The Sunset Limited? Amtrak’S Line Manager’S Report on the Sunset and Starlight Selden on Competition Arizona Meeting Jackson Hits the Rails President’S Commentary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Sunset Limited? Amtrak’S Line Manager’S Report on the Sunset and Starlight Selden on Competition Arizona Meeting Jackson Hits the Rails President’S Commentary ISSN 2325-629X IN THIS ISSUE: 2017 - Make or Break for the Sunset Limited? Amtrak’s Line Manager’s Report on the Sunset and Starlight Selden on Competition Arizona Meeting Jackson Hits the Rails President’s Commentary Photo by Georg Trub STEEL WHEELS / 4TH QUARTER 2016 1 RailPAC is a 501c3 Organization therefore all donations are tax deductible. 2 STEEL WHEELS / 4TH QUARTER 2016 anyway since with an optimum wheel-rail interface you achieve the best ride, the lowest fuel consumption, and the least rail and wheel wear. As for Positive Train Control, installing it on a 43 mile system, effectively President’s closed to other traffic, with a captive fleet of 14 dmus Commentary should not be that hard. The sad thing is that cost overruns and delays lend High Speed Rail ammunition to passenger rail’s many detractors. News came in October This is supposed to be a low cost “starter” system. that the HSR engineers Unfortunately regulations such as mandatory PTC had decided that small is and ADA requirements mean that there is no longer a beautiful. The word is that shorter trains need smaller cheap way to get into the passenger rail business. We stations which fit more easily into built urban areas. A are fortunate to have relatively recent additions such as lot of people could have told them that five or six years Metrolink and ACE. Would they be built under today’s ago before millions were spent on designing half mile regulatory regime? I seriously doubt it. long stations and even longer approach tracks. As far as my home town (Burbank) is concerned trying to Capitol Corridor squeeze a 16 car train into the confines of the available Remembering that Monterey CA was the capitol of right of way was never going to be easy. In any event Alta California I am minded to think that the Capitol shorter trains are more convenient for passengers (less Corridor service still has a long way to go. Not only walking, especially with luggage), and will make it far has it not reached Monterey but another former Capitol, easier to extend the system to San Diego, the East Bay San Jose, the third largest city in the State with about and Sacramento. a million people, has awful train service. San Jose and Oakland, our number 8 city, are about 42 miles apart. SMART Oakland’s population is about 420,000, about the same What the heck is happening at SMART? Opening a as that other fine port city Liverpool. 27 miles from new passenger rail service is not for the faint hearted, Liverpool is Manchester, with a similar population, just but SMART has the right of way, minimal interference over 400,000. The difference in rail service is striking. from existing rail traffic, and other similar systems such Off peak there are 4 trains an hour between Liverpool as the NCTD “Sprinter” from which to draw lessons and Manchester. Between Oakland and San Jose there and experience. As far as I can see they do not plan are 7 trains a day. to do anything that has not been done before. So why I have in a previous issue of SW drawn a similar another 6 months delay? The latest issue appears comparison between Los Angeles - San Diego and to be the engine crankshafts. But typically these London - Birmingham. The differences in all these underfloor engines are in modules and can be changed cases are striking, but at least the Capitol Corridor out quickly. Shortage of crankshafts? This seems agency is tackling the issue, and has a vision to unlikely. Cummins have been supplying engines of improve the situation. David Kutrosky, Managing this general type to rail operators around the world for Director of the agency, gave a presentation to the many years. We also hear that SMART has had trouble Steel Wheels Conference in Sacramento in September recruiting operating staff. This is not surprising given outlining some ambitious steps to radically improve the housing costs in the area and the lack of other railroad route. (See the Power Point at www.railpac.org) As he employment nearby. points out, CapCor is the only unified service linking the I think that the elephant in the room is the signaling entire region from the Sierra Foothills to Silicon Valley. system, both crossing gate actuation, and Positive There should be 100 mph passenger trains at least Train Control. SMART engineering staff are blaming hourly. He also pointed out that they have reached the scale on the head of the rail causing a failure to activate limit of track sharing as far as capacity and speed are crossing gates. If so that is a one-time problem solved concerned. From this point on serious infrastructure by grinding and profiling. That is a good thing to do investment will be needed. This is not a job for BART! STEEL WHEELS / 4TH QUARTER 2016 3 Steel Wheels in Sacramento, September 2016 Thank goodness the frequency and service hours make up for these deficiencies. On the subject of the Steel Wheels Conference, I have to thank the Board, and former board member Chuck Sunset Robuck, for filling in for me during my indisposition. At the Denver meeting we formed (or perhaps re-formed) The conference went well and the attendees enjoyed a “Sunset Limited” action group to take up the fight once some great presentations from Capitol Corridor, the again for service preservation and daily departures. San Joaquins, Amtrak and California High Speed Rail. These two requirements are complementary. The train Andy Selden came from Minnesota and talked about will not survive without a major improvement in the competition, while NARP Chair Peter LeCody and economics and this can only come about with a daily President Jim Mathews were welcomed and thanked for train. More on the Sunset later in this issue. making the trip out west. Coast Starlight Denver A highlight of the Steel Wheels conference was the I managed to make the trip to Denver in October for the presentation by Amtrak’s Eric Smith covering his work as NARP fall Council meeting. This was one of the best product manager for the Coast Starlight and Southwest NARP events I have ever been to, with lots of group Chief. Both Eric and his colleague Jay Fountain (Sunset, participation and sensible discussion about the issues. Texas Chief and Heartland Flyer) have a little over a year under their belts in their respective positions, and both are widely respected inside and outside Amtrak. Eric was Amtrak’s Metrolink operations manager, while Jay was previously the manager and liaison for the LOSSAN Surfliner service. In their old and new positions both report to Mike Chandler, Deputy General Manager, Southwest Region, Long Distance Business Line. Mike usually keeps a low profile but he should be acknowledged. He has just received the Presidential Service and Safety Award for Excellence in Leadership. He is supporting Jay, Eric and their teams in delivering the programs you’ll read about in this issue, and has been a great manager through some very tough times. Thank you Mike, for all you do. Hyundai emu Denver A line train heads for Denver Airport, “Wick” Moorman - new Amtrak CEO May 30, 2016. - Chase Gunnoe RailPAC welcomes former NS CEO Wick Moorman to the Andy Selden wrote about the Denver A line to the airport hot seat at Amtrak. We already hear that Mr. Moorman in the last issue of SW. Nothing has changed. Other is out and about on the trains and depots talking to than small type signs for “Transit Center” there is no passengers and employees. This is certainly better than indication, and certainly no advertizing of this convenient riding 10001, and we hope this is the precursor to a new service from the time you land all the way to the land management culture at the railroad. Good morale starts side, and that’s a long way from B93! It’s hard to believe at the top, and is essential for a successful organization, that Denver RTD can’t find a small budget for some but I think especially for a railroad which perforce relies so strategically placed announcements. What about on the much on personal initiative rather than direct supervision. “train” that connects the terminals? I for one am hoping that Moorman will be firm with the Otherwise the trip was slow, the track switches out of the Congress and cause them to let him get on with the job, airport and on and off the single line were good enough and at the same time motivating his people to give of their for boxcars but not for passenger comfort, (yes, single best so that he can justify further investment in a quality line, where we stopped and watched the cars go by), and product. the vehicles looked like hand me downs from the 1950s. 4 STEEL WHEELS / 4TH QUARTER 2016 LINK US, SCRIP - Or Run Through Tracks. Metrolink and Burbank Airport The essential project with no champion and few friends. You may be surprised to hear that the Burbank So whatever happened to the 2021 delivery date for what Transportation Commission opposed the Antelope Valley I have called the most important passenger rail project in line Metrolink station that had been approved by Metro. Southern California? The short version is that CHSRA The reasons were clear and I’ll summarize: decided they want their trains through Los Angeles on the Metrolink service is inadequate for the needs of airport surface and in a shared facility with Amtrak and Metrolink, workers and air travelers alike.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Venture Trainsets Redefining the Intercity Rail Experience
    Venture Trainsets Redefining the intercity rail experience usa.siemens.com/mobility Venture Trainsets | Mobility Next generation rail, built for North America. With our latest, intercity trainset, Built, tested, and proven Siemens is redefining what intercity rail While designed and built for tomorrow, the can be. It’s an unsurpassed passenger Venture trainsets are a proven product. Our experience that’s also raising the bar for vehicles are in use throughout North America efficiency with service-proven vehicles and have been built on a tested and designed for tomorrow and in production service-proven platform. Benefiting from today. In short, the Venture is a 21st century decades of experience in North America, trainset that’s being embraced by passengers, we’ve developed them to meet the unique operators, and agencies alike. needs of the market. All vehicles are designed and validated in accordance with FRA Riders will enjoy new levels of comfort and regulations, APTA standards and PRIIA 305 convenience along with the latest amenities. specifications for next generation equipment. The Venture features spacious interiors and flexibility for multiple configurations of First in safety economy, business, cafe and cab cars. Providing the most protection for the riding Integrated crash energy management public is our top priority. That’s why Venture provides next generation safety. trainsets feature the safest rail car design on Reduce operating costs and enhance the market. All carbodies incorporate Crash sustainability with the clean and green Energy Management (CEM) crumple zones Charger diesel-electric locomotive. Light to absorb energy at both ends of the car. and powerful, it delivers maximum Our design also includes a controlled performance and reliability up to collapse feature to enhance safety in the 125 mph.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Planning Documentation
    Project Planning Documentation Overview of Project Project funding will be used to complete necessary preliminary engineering and NEPA for a new 250 mile high-speed core express service between Dallas-Fort Worth and Houston. Based on the preliminary planning summarized in this document, the Dallas-Fort Worth to Houston route could utilize one of three routes analyzed, consisting of a BNSF route through Teague, a UPRR route through College Station, or a new green field route that parallels I-45. Additionally, all three of the routes include segments of the UPRR Terminal and West Belt Subdivisions in order to connect to the existing passenger rail station in downtown Houston and a small portion of the UPRR Dallas Subdivision to connect to the existing passenger rail station (Union Station) in Dallas. Purpose and Need The purpose of the Dallas/Fort Worth to Houston core express service preliminary engineering and NEPA documentation is to prepare the project for the next stage of final design and construction. The Dallas/Fort Worth to Houston corridor has been included in the Texas Rail Plan as well as a research study performed by the Texas Transportation Institute (TTI), and the America 2050 report as a key corridor with need for high speed rail service. Texas Rail Plan TxDOT completed and published the Texas Rail Plan in November 2010, which included a short term and long term program for passenger rail. The Dallas to Houston corridor was included in the short term program for preliminary planning and in the long term program for further development of the project.
    [Show full text]
  • March 25, 2019 Volume 39
    MARCH 25, 2019 ■■■■■■■■■■■ VOLUME 39 ■■■■■■■■■■ NUMBER 3 13 The Semaphore 17 David N. Clinton, Editor-in-Chief CONTRIBUTING EDITORS Southeastern Massachusetts…………………. Paul Cutler, Jr. “The Operator”………………………………… Paul Cutler III Cape Cod News………………………………….Skip Burton Boston Herald Reporter……………………… Jim South 24 Boston Globe & Wall Street Journal Reporters Paul Bonanno, Jack Foley Western Massachusetts………………………. Ron Clough Rhode Island News…………………………… Tony Donatelli “The Chief’s Corner”……………………… . Fred Lockhart Mid-Atlantic News……………………………. Doug Buchanan PRODUCTION STAFF Publication…………….………………… …. … Al Taylor Al Munn Jim Ferris Bryan Miller Web Page …………………..………………… Savery Moore Club Photographer……………………………. Joe Dumas The Semaphore is the monthly (except July) newsletter of the South Shore Model Railway Club & Museum (SSMRC) and any opinions found herein are those of the authors thereof and of the Editors and do not necessarily reflect any policies of this organization. The SSMRC, as a non-profit organization, does not endorse any position. Your comments are welcome! Please address all correspondence regarding this publication to: The Semaphore, 11 Hancock Rd., Hingham, MA 02043. ©2019 E-mail: [email protected] Club phone: 781-740-2000. Web page: www.ssmrc.org VOLUME 39 ■■■■■ NUMBER 3 ■■■■■ MARCH 2019 CLUB OFFICERS BILL OF LADING President………………….Jack Foley Vice-President…….. …..Dan Peterson Treasurer………………....Will Baker Book Review ........ ………12 Secretary……………….....Dave Clinton Chief’s Corner ...... ……. .3 Chief Engineer……….. .Fred Lockhart Contests ................ ……….3 Directors……………… ...Bill Garvey (’20) ……………………….. .Bryan Miller (‘20) Clinic……………..………3 ……………………… ….Roger St. Peter (’19) Editor’s Notes. ….….....….12 …………………………...Gary Mangelinkx (‘19) Members ............... …….....12 Memories .............. ………..4 th Potpourri ............... ..…..…..5 ON THE COVER: March 9-10 Show Running Extra....... .….……13 and Open House memories. (Photos by Joe Dumas) 2 FORM 19 ORDERS Fred Lockhart MARCH B.O.D.
    [Show full text]
  • From Heimburger House America'shh Greatest Circus Train Garratt Locomotives by Bruce C
    Heimburger House Publishing Company 2014 A Message from the Publisher Contents New Books ......................................................3 Favorite Heimburger House Titles .....................4 Dear Friends, “With a book in my hand, I feel as though I am Cookbooks .....................................................7 holding something special,” I heard someone say the other day. Construction Equipment..............................7, 31 At Heimburger House we feel the same way: books are great and have a special feel to them, they’re easy to hold in your Model Railroading .....................................7, 31 hand, you can quickly turn back to a page for reference, and the size of a book makes it spectacular for viewing photography and illustrations. Let’s face it, books have a lot going for them Railfan Titles ...................................................8 that Kindles do not. - You can count on Heimburger House to provide the finest Children’s Railroad Books ..............................28 books available on your favorite railroad transportation sub jects. And we’ve just released America’s Greatest Circus Regional History ...........................................31 Train and Garratt Locomotives, a 1925 reprint of the Garratt catalog. Bruce Nelson has gathered detailed information and photographs for years for his new circus book, and the Garratt Model Magazines ............................................32 catalog depicts what this United Kingdom firm once offered in their line-up of “stretch-limo” locomotives. Also, our children’s railroad book line continues to grow, and has become very, very popular: it’s a way to get young children involved with trains! Sincerely, Don Heimburger Publisher HH Heimburger House Publishing Company • Phone: (708) 366-1973 • Fax: (708) 366-1973 • E-mail: [email protected] • Mail: 7236 W. Madison St., Forest Park, Illinois 60130 USA See our entire book selection at www.heimburgerhouse.com New Books From Heimburger House America'sHH Greatest Circus Train Garratt Locomotives By Bruce C.
    [Show full text]
  • Union Depot Tower Interlocking Plant
    Union Depot Tower Union Depot Tower (U.D. Tower) was completed in 1914 as part of a municipal project to improve rail transportation through Joliet, which included track elevation of all four railroad lines that went through downtown Joliet and the construction of a new passenger station to consolidate the four existing passenger stations into one. A result of this overall project was the above-grade intersection of 4 north-south lines with 4 east-west lines. The crossing of these rail lines required sixteen track diamonds. A diamond is a fixed intersection between two tracks. The purpose of UD Tower was to ensure and coordinate the safe and timely movement of trains through this critical intersection of east-west and north-south rail travel. UD Tower housed the mechanisms for controlling the various rail switches at the intersection, also known as an interlocking plant. Interlocking Plant Interlocking plants consisted of the signaling appliances and tracks at the intersections of major rail lines that required a method of control to prevent collisions and provide for the efficient movement of trains. Most interlocking plants had elevated structures that housed mechanisms for controlling the various rail switches at the intersection. Union Depot Tower is such an elevated structure. Source: Museum of the American Railroad Frisco Texas CSX Train 1513 moves east through the interlocking. July 25, 1997. Photo courtesy of Tim Frey Ownership of Union Depot Tower Upon the completion of Union Depot Tower in 1914, U.D. Tower was owned and operated by the four rail companies with lines that came through downtown Joliet.
    [Show full text]
  • 20210419 Amtrak Metrics Reporting
    NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION 30th Street Station Philadelphia, PA 19104 April 12, 2021 Mr. Michael Lestingi Director, Office of Policy and Planning Federal Railroad Administrator U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Dear Mr. Lestingi: In accordance with the Metrics and Minimum Standards for Intercity Passenger Rail Service final rule published on November 16, 2020 (the “Final Rule”), this letter serves as Amtrak’s report to the Federal Railroad Administration that, as of April 10, 2021, Amtrak has provided the 29 host railroads over which Amtrak currently operates (listed in Appendix A) with ridership data for the prior month consistent with the Final Rule. The following data was provided to each host railroad: . the total number of passengers, by train and by day; . the station-specific number of detraining passengers, reported by host railroad whose railroad right-of-way serves the station, by train, and by day; and . the station-specific number of on-time passengers reported by host railroad whose railroad right- of-way serves the station, by train, and by day. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jim Blair Sr. Director, Host Railroads Amtrak cc: Dennis Newman Amtrak Jason Maga Amtrak Christopher Zappi Amtrak Yoel Weiss Amtrak Kristin Ferriter Federal Railroad Administration Mr. Michael Lestingi April 12, 2021 Page 2 Appendix A Host Railroads Provided with Amtrak Ridership Data Host Railroad1 Belt Railway Company of Chicago BNSF Railway Buckingham Branch Railroad
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation: Request for Passenger Rail Bonding -- Agenda Item II
    Legislative Fiscal Bureau One East Main, Suite 301 • Madison, WI 53703 • (608) 266-3847 • Fax: (608) 267-6873 Email: [email protected] • Website: http://legis.wisconsin.gov/lfb October 31, 2019 TO: Members Joint Committee on Finance FROM: Bob Lang, Director SUBJECT: Department of Transportation: Request for Passenger Rail Bonding -- Agenda Item II REQUEST On October 3, 2019, the Department of Transportation (DOT) submitted a request under s. 85.061 (3)(b) of the statutes for approval to use $13,248,100 BR in GPR-supported, general obligation bonding from DOT's passenger rail route development appropriation to fund the required state match for a recently awarded Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) grant for the purchase of six single-level coach cars and three cab-coach cars to be placed into service in the Milwaukee- Chicago Hiawatha corridor. BACKGROUND DOT is required to administer a rail passenger route development program funded from a transportation fund continuing appropriation (SEG) and a general fund-supported, general obligation bonding appropriation (BR). From these sources, DOT may fund capital costs related to Amtrak service extension routes (the Hiawatha service, for example) or other rail service routes between the cities of Milwaukee and Madison, Milwaukee and Green Bay, Milwaukee and Chicago, Madison and Eau Claire, and Madison and La Crosse. Under the program, DOT is not allowed to use any bond proceeds unless the Joint Finance Committee (JFC) approves the use of the proceeds and, with respect to any allowed passenger route development project, the Department submits evidence to JFC that Amtrak, or the applicable railroad, has agreed to provide rail passenger service on that route.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Michigan Rail Ridership Feasibility and Cost Estimate Study
    NORTHERN MICHIGAN RAIL RIDERSHIP FEASIBILITY AND COST ESTIMATE STUDY PREPARED FOR: The Groundwork Center For Resilient Communities Grant Fiduciary: Bay Area Transportation Authority PREPARED BY: Transportation Economics & Management Systems, Inc. OCTOBER 2018 FINAL REPORT This page intentionally left blank NORTHERN MICHIGAN RAIL RIDERSHIP FEASIBILITY AND COST ESTIMATE STUDY About the Groundwork Center for Resilient Communities The Groundwork Center for Resilient Communities works with people to build a thriving local farm and food economy; to make Michigan towns and villages stronger, more walkable, bike-able, and transit- friendly; and to develop local, clean energy. They seek to achieve on-the-ground results in northwest Michigan and leverage them to support other communities and improvements to state policy. All of this is designed to strengthen the local economy, protect the environment, and build community. Re-establishing passenger rail service between Ann Arbor, Petoskey, and Traverse City—homes to growing technology industries—will link the growing northwest with population centers in the southeast and universities along the way. Civic and business leaders believe this effort will help our state attract the next generation workforce that wants to live and thrive in Michigan without depending on a car. Groundwork believes that bringing passenger rail service back to northern Michigan is possible in less than a decade with a focused campaign of public engagement, technical analysis, and support from community, state and federal agencies. For More Information Groundwork center 148 E. Front Street, Suite 301 Traverse City, MI 49684-5725 (231) 941-6584 [email protected] Introduction October 2018 Page i NORTHERN MICHIGAN RAIL RIDERSHIP FEASIBILITY AND COST ESTIMATE STUDY This page intentionally left blank Introduction October 2018 Page ii NORTHERN MICHIGAN RAIL RIDERSHIP FEASIBILITY AND COST ESTIMATE STUDY Acknowledgements This study was prepared by Transportation Economics & Management Systems, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Amtrak Cascades Fleet Management Plan
    Amtrak Cascades Fleet Management Plan November 2017 Funding support from Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Information The material can be made available in an alternative format by emailing the Office of Equal Opportunity at [email protected] or by calling toll free, 855-362-4ADA (4232). Persons who are deaf or hard of hearing may make a request by calling the Washington State Relay at 711. Title VI Notice to Public It is the Washington State Department of Transportation’s (WSDOT) policy to assure that no person shall, on the grounds of race, color, national origin or sex, as provided by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise discriminated against under any of its federally funded programs and activities. Any person who believes his/her Title VI protection has been violated, may file a complaint with WSDOT’s Office of Equal Opportunity (OEO). For additional information regarding Title VI complaint procedures and/or information regarding our non-discrimination obligations, please contact OEO’s Title VI Coordinator at 360-705-7082. The Oregon Department of Transportation ensures compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; 49 CFR, Part 21; related statutes and regulations to the end that no person shall be excluded from participation in or be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance from the U.S. Department of Transportation on the grounds of race, color, sex, disability or national origin.
    [Show full text]
  • Dallas to Houston High-Speed Rail Final Environmental Impact Statement
    Dallas to Houston High-Speed Rail Final Environmental Impact Statement ERRATA AND UPDATED INFORMATION FRA has identified several statements in the Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) which require correction or clarification. In addition, FRA Is providing new and/or updated information from the release of the Final EIS. This updated information and/or minor corrections to language within the Final EIS, are not considered significant, and do not change the analysis or conclusions of the Final EIS. This information does not trigger the need to prepare a supplement, per the requirements of the U.S. Council on Environmental Quality National Environmental Policy Act regulations (40 CFR 1502.9(c)(1)). Page in Location/Section Final in Final EIS EIS Issue Correction or Update ES.2, Executive ES-3 Correction provided by Text is corrected as shown: Summary, TCRR on safety record and The Project includes the deployment of an electric-powered HSR system based on Central Japan Railway Description of for Tokaido Company’s Tokaido Shinkansen system. Accident statistics are not available for systems operating Project 2-1 Shinkansen HSR lines. technology comparable to the Project; however, Japan’s Tokaido Shinkansen HSR, which operates a and similar technology, has had no passenger fatalities resulting from a trainset accident, such as a derailment or collision, since the service began over 50 years ago.8, 9 The technology has a proven safety record with 2.2.1, only one three earthquake-related derailments since the service began, which resulted in no passenger Alternatives injuries. Considered, _________________ Technology 8 The only injuries and/or fatalities reported in association with the Tokaido Shinkansen HSR system was were related to another single passenger’s suicide by self-immolation on June 30, 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Los Angeles City Clerk
    CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM j!; 23 PM 3: 26 OFFICI:ft CITY ADMINWR ATIVE Date: July 22, 2014 To: Honorable Eric Garcetti, Mayor Attention: Mandy Morales, Legislative Coordinator From: Jon Kirk Mukri, General Manager Department of Transportation Subject: RECOMMENDED CONTRACT A A BS FOR THE CONTINUED MANAGEMENT AND PERFORMANCE OF LANDSCAPING AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR LADOT BIKE PATH AND TRANSIT FACILITIES SUMMARY The Department of Transportation (LADOT) requests authority to execute contracts with ShelterClean Services, Inc. (incumbent) for the continued provision of management and landscaping / maintenance services for LADOT bike path and transit facilities. RECOMMENDATIONS That the Council, subject to the approval of the Mayor: 1. AUTHORIZE the General Manager, Department of Transportation, to enter into a five-year contract with ShelterClean Services, Inc., for the management and performance of maintenance and landscaping services for eleven (11) City bike path facilities, with a total cost not-to-exceed $3,000,000, subject to the approval of the City Attorney as to form and legality. 2. AUTHORIZE the General Manager, Department of Transportation, to enter into a five-year contract with ShelterClean Services, Inc., for the management and performance of maintenance and landscaping services for seven (7) City transit facilities, with a total cost not-to-exceed $2,140,000, subject to the approval of the City Attorney as to form and legality. DISCUSSION As will be discussed in this section, the request for proposals(RFP) Evaluation Committee ranked the combined Economy of Scale proposal submitted by ShelterClean Services, Inc. as the best and most cost-effective for the City.
    [Show full text]
  • We Are Aerewith Enclosi:Mei; Eopy of a Letter •Vhicr We Sent
    SPEED SCll!NTlflC SCHOOL JAMES BRECKINRIDGE SPEED FOUNDATION DEPARTMENT OP ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING Natiomal Parks ana National Moauments Department of the Iaterior WashingtoR, D. C. Re: The California Zephyrs Gentlemen: We are Aerewith enclosi:mei; eopy of a letter •vhicR we sent to the Interstat~ Oommere8 Commissian, our Kentucky Senators, the Homorable John Sherman Cooper, a.Jtd tae Honorable Thruston Ballard Morto•, also to Mrs. Jolulson•s Beautification Commission (preservatioa of America's beauty) our aewspapers, Tb.e Louisvill~ Courier Jour•al anti Times, regarding the above topic. Also eaclosed is a type-written copy of an. article Which appeared. i:n TIME magazine, under "National Asset", February 24, 1967 (page 84, Railroa•SJ";-on the same subjecjso We would. urge that immeeiiate steps be taken to cieclare the 9alifornia Zeph\yr a 5ational asset, __!1lfational Monumemtn, .an.ti that mec­ essary subsidies be gra.Rted to ila.sure contimuaace of tfiis line for all timeo Quoting from Booklet "Glimpses of our Nattonal. Parka" (Unitea States P~tbil)Offioe, WashiJaiton, D. C.) page l - Secretary Work aefiD.ed th9 natiomal park sy-stem in tbe follo'Wia, woras: "Our existi.lilg national park system is unequaled for gra.1uieur. Ad.Giitional areas wh.en chosen should iia every re­ spect meauure up jo i;ae dignity-, presti.le, aad studs.rd o:f those alreacQ- establishea. ProposeQ park projects should contain scenery of aistillctive quality or some matural features so extraorain.ary or ulli'lue as to be of mational interest in Ameriea. We feel that the Zephyr trip is llni.11eatly qualifiea to be ineluQ.ed in the category of "Natio:aa.l Parks and Monuments", anti ·t;o be in some manner subsiEiized to guarptoe UR.in.terruptea service on this line.
    [Show full text]