Belgium 62 Belgium Belgium
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Portionate Measure in Relation to the Objective to Be Achieved, in That The
OPINION OF MR WARNER — CASE 52/79 portionate measure in relation to the objective to be achieved, in that the prohibition in question is relatively ineffective in view of the existence of natural reception zones, or discrimination which is prohibited by the Treaty in regard to foreign broadcasters, in that their geographical location allows them to broadcast their signals only in the natural reception zone. Kutscher O'Keeffe Touffait Mertens de Wilmars Pescatore Mackenzie Stuart Bosco Koopmans Due Delivered in open court in Luxembourg on 18 March 1980. A. Van Houtte H. Kutscher Registrar President OPINION OF MR ADVOCATE GENERAL WARNER DELIVERED ON 13 DECEMBER 1979 My Lords, Both raise questions of interpretation of Articles 59 to 66 of the EEC Treaty, relating to the free movement of services. Introduction Both have as their background the Of these two cases, one, Case 52/79, activities of undertakings providing comes to the Court by way of a television diffusion services in Belgium. reference for a preliminary ruling by the Essentially, such a service consists in Tribunal Correctionnel of Liège, the picking up by means of an aerial other, Case 62/79, by way of a reference television signals that have been for a preliminary ruling by the Cour broadcast over the air and distributing d'Appel of Brussels. the signals by cable to the television sets 860 PROCUREUR DU ROI v DEBAUVE of subscribers to the service. We were Counsel for the German Government, told that, from a technical point of view, but he did not press the point, nor would it is only the scale and professionalism of the overall picture have been much the operation (in particular, the size and altered if he had been right. -
Study on Early Business Cases for H2 in Energy Storage and More Broadly Power to H2 Applications
FUNDED BY STUDY ON EARLY BUSINESS CASES FOR H2 IN ENERGY STORAGE AND MORE BROADLY POWER TO H2 APPLICATIONS FINAL REPORT June 2017 A REPORT BY LEGAL NOTICELEGAL NOTICE This document has been prepared for the Fuel Cells and Hydrogen 2 Joint Undertaking, however This documentit reflects has been the prepared views offor the the Fuelauthors. Cells andNeither Hydrogen Fuel 2 JointCells Undertaking, and Hydrogen however 2 itJoint reflects Undertaking, the views of the nor authors. the Neither Fuel Cells Europeanand Hydrogen Commission 2 Joint Undertaking, or the nor Advisory the European Board Commission may be or held the Advisory responsibl Boarde may for be the held use responsible that may for bethe use that may be mademade of theof theinformation information contained contained in this publication. in this publication. © FCH 2 ©JU, FCH 2017 2 JU, 2017 Reproduction is allowed, provided the source is acknowledged. Reproduction is allowed, provided the source is acknowledged. TRACTEBEL ENGINEERING S.A. Avenue Ariane 7 1200 - Brussels - BELGIUM tel. +32 2 773 99 11 - fax +32 2 773 99 00 [email protected] tractebel-engie.com TECHNICAL DOCUMENT Our ref.: P2H-BC/4NT/0550274/000/03 TS: Imputation: P.009733/0004 PUBLIC Client: FCH-JU Project: EARLY BUSINESS CASES FOR H2 IN ENERGY STORAGE AND MORE BROADLY POWER TO H2 APPLICATIONS Subject: A study prepared for the FCH-JU by Tractebel and Hinicio Comments: 01 2017 06 16 FIN *C. Chardonnet (Tractebel) *V. Giordano (Tractebel) *S. Rapoport(Tractebel) *L. De Vos (Tractebel) *F. Genoese (Tractebel) *G. Roig (Tractebel) * F. Bart (Hinicio) *J-C. -
What Will Cities Look Like in 2030?
CITIES 2030 What will cities look like in 2030? ENGIE_tractebel RÉFÉRENCES COULEUR solid_BLUE_CMYK 26/10/2015 24, rue Salomon de Rothschild - 92288 Suresnes - FRANCE Tél.Sponsor : +33 (0)1 57 32 87 00 / Fax : +33 (0)1 57 32 87 87 contact person Web : www.carrenoir.com C100% Benoît CodronsC100% M100% (ENGIE Research) [email protected] Project contact person Géraldine Tondreau gé[email protected] Giacomo Bonato [email protected] Project team Géraldine Tondreau Giacomo Bonato Dieter Van Hemelrijck Stefanie Van Den Bogaerde Ive Braspenningx Contributors Salima Abu Jeriban Niels Leemput Arnaud Vanhove Jan Liefooghe Floor Anseeuw Images All images under CC Attribution 2.0 Generic (CC BY 2.0). Magnus D, Marc Smith, James Cridland, Molly Adams, Johnny Silvercloud, Marcio Ramalho from Flickr; Mr. Tickle, Calibas, Web Summit from Wikimedia; Jean Beaufort, Behindbluueeyes from needpix.com. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................p.2 PART I KEY GLOBAL TRENDS Urbanisation ...................................................................... p.10 Demographic ..................................................................... p.12 Environmental .................................................................. p.16 Social .................................................................................... p.20 Technologic ........................................................................ p.24 Geo-political ..................................................................... -
The Regulatory Framework for Wind Energy in EU Member States
33333333333333333333333 The regulatory framework for wind energy in EU Member States Part 1 of the Study on the social and economic value of wind energy – WindValueEU (ENER/C2/2012-462-1/SI2.671144) Javier SERRANO GONZÁLEZ Roberto LACAL ARÁNTEGUI 2015 Report EUR 27130 EN Cover picture: wind farm at the harbour. © Jos Beurskens. European Commission Joint Research Centre Institute for Energy and Transport Contact information Javier Serrano González Address: Joint Research Centre, Institute for Energy and Transport. Westerduinweg 3, NL-1755 LE Petten, The Netherlands E-mail: [email protected] Tel.: +31 224 56 51 87 JRC Science Hub https://ec.europa.eu/jrc Legal Notice This publication is a Science and Policy Report by the Joint Research Centre, the European Commission’s in-house science service. It aims to provide evidence-based scientific support to the European policy-making process. The scientific output expressed does not imply a policy position of the European Commission. Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use which might be made of this publication. All images except where otherwise indicated © European Union 2015 JRC93792 EUR 27130 EN ISBN 978-92-79-46032-6 (PDF) ISSN 1831-9424 (online) doi: 10.2790/282003 Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2015 © European Union, 2015 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Please cite this report as follows: The regulatory framework for wind energy in EU Member States. Part 1 of the Study on the social and economic value of wind energy – WindValueEU. -
Assessment Report on Technical, Legal, Institutional and Policy Conditions
Deliverable 2.1 ASSESSMENT REPORT ON TECHNICAL, LEGAL, INSTITUTIONAL AND POLICY CONDITIONS This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 953040. The sole responsibility for the content of this document lies with the COME RES project and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the European Union. Public SUMMARY WP: 2 Name of the WP: Starting conditions, potentials, barriers and drivers for the uptake of RES based community energy Dissemination Public Due delivery date: 28 February 2021 level: Type: Report Actual delivery date: 26 February 2021 Lead beneficiary: CICERO – Center for International Climate Research Contributing beneficiaries: FUB, VITO, BBH, RESCoop.eu, ECOAZIONI, ENEA, LEIF, TU/e, KAPE, INEGI, ECORYS Lead authors: Lead authors: Karina Standal and Stine Aakre Contributing authors: Irene Alonso (ECORYS); Isabel Azevedo (INEGI); Massimo Bastiani (Ecoazioni); Nicoletta del Bufalo (ECORYS); Martina Caliano (ENEA); Sarah Delvaux (VITO); Rosaria Di Nucci (FUB); Dörte Fouquet (BBH); Vincenzo Gatta (FUB); Xenia Gimenez (ACER); Gaidis Klāvs (IPE); Michael Krug (FUB); Ivars Kudreņickis (IPE); Erik Laes (TU/e); Kristin Linnerud (CICERO); Elena De Luca (ENEA), Pouyan Maleki (ECORYS); Erika Meynaerts (VITO); Piotr Nowakowski (KAPE); Maria Grazia Oteri (ENEA); Stavroula Pappa (REScoop.eu); Roland Schumann (ACER); Dirk Vansintjan (REScoop.eu); Virna Venerucci (Ecoazioni); Ryszard Wnuk (KAPE); Aija Zučika (LEIF); Solveig Aamodt (CICERO) Document history Submitted Version Date Reviewed/approved by Date for review by V0 Karina 18.02.2021 Kristin Linnerud, CICERO 19.02.2021 Standal, CICERO V1 Stine Aakre, 19.02.2021 Pouyan Maleki, ECORYS 22.02.2021 CICERO Rosaria Di Nucci FUB-FFU 24.02.2021 V2 Karina 26.02.2021 Rosaria Di Nucci FUB-FFU 26.02.2021 Standal, CICERO i COME RES 953040 - D2.1: ASSESSMENT REPORT ON TECHNICAL, LEGAL, INSTITUTIONAL AND POLICY CONDITIONS Public ABOUT COME RES COME RES - Community Energy for the uptake of renewables in the electricity sector. -
Wetenschappelijk Verslag 2005-2007
Onderzoekschool Ius Commune Wetenschappelijk verslag 2005-2007 VERANTWOORDING A. ALGEMEEN In dit wetenschappelijk verslag van de Onderzoeksschool Ius Commune is de productie over de jaren 2005, 2006 en 2007 opgenomen. De verslaglegging vindt hier plaats per subprogramma. Achtereenvolgens zijn dat de program- ma's: Algemeen verbintenissen- en contractenrecht; Europees personen-, fami- lie- en erfrecht; Goederenrecht; Aansprakelijkheid en verzekering; Grensover- schrijdend milieurecht; Rechtspersonen in Europa; Grondslagen en beginselen van burgerlijk procesrecht in Europa; Publiekrechtelijke rechtsvergelijking; Constitutionele processen in Europa en Constitutionele processen in de interna- tionale rechtsorde. De aan de Onderzoeksschool verbonden geassocieerde (deel)programma’s Fis- cale vraagstukken in de interne markt en Intellectuele eigendom zijn eveneens opgenomen in dit verslag. B. UITGANGSPUNTEN VOOR VERSLAGLEGGING I. Algemeen In dit verslag wordt onderscheid gemaakt tussen proefschriften, wetenschappe- lijke publicaties, vakpublicaties en annotaties. Het gehanteerde onderscheid is gebaseerd op de door de VSNU in haar Protocol 1998 ontwikkelde criteria voor beoordeling van het wetenschappelijk onderzoek. Bij de overzichten van publi- caties is afgezien van het opnemen van een rubriek ‘Overige producten van we- tenschappelijke activiteiten’ (redacteurschappen, lezingen, gastcolleges, etc.). Annotaties – geen officiële categorie binnen genoemde indeling – zijn groten- deels apart opgenomen. Sommige annotaties in met name enkele Belgische tijdschriften hebben echter een omvang en kwaliteit die opneming in de catego- rie ‘wetenschappelijke publicatie’ rechtvaardigen. Publicaties die volgens de VSNU-normen niet anders dan als vakpublicatie kunnen worden gekwalifi- ceerd (o.a. bijdragen aan losbladige uitgaven, aan praktijkuitgaven, etc.) wor- den als zodanig aangeduid. Volgens de VSNU-criteria wordt een publicatie als wetenschappelijk aange- merkt wanneer deze voldoet aan het criterium ‘increasing the body of academic knowledge’. -
Distribution Grids in Europe Facts and Figures 2020
Distribution Grids in Europe Facts and Figures 2020 December 2020 Eurelectric represents the interests of the electricity industry in Europe. Our work covers all major issues affecting our sector. Our members represent the electricity industry in over 30 European countries. We cover the entire industry from electricity generation and markets to distribution networks and customer issues. We also have affiliates active on several other continents and business associates from a wide variety of sectors with a direct interest in the electricity industry. We stand for The vision of the European power sector is to enable and sustain: - A vibrant competitive European economy, reliably powered by clean, carbon-neutral energy - A smart, energy efficient and truly sustainable society for all citizens of Europe We are committed to lead a cost-effective energy transition by: investing in clean power generation and transition-enabling solutions, to reduce emissions and actively pursue efforts to become carbon-neutral well before mid- century, taking into account different starting points and commercial availability of key transition technologies; transforming the energy system to make it more responsive, resilient and efficient. This includes increased use of renewable energy, digitalisation, demand side responseand reinforcement of grids so they can function as platforms and enablers for customers, cities and communities; accelerating the energy transition in other economic sectors by offering competitive electricity as a transformation tool for transport, heating and industry; embedding sustainability in all parts of our value chain and take measures to support the transformation of existing assets towards a zero carbon society; innovating to discover the cutting-edge business models and develop the breakthrough technologies that are indispensable to allow our industry to lead this transition. -
&\Brking Documenats
Eunopean Comnmunities EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT &\brking Documenats 1.981 ].982 23 FEBRUARY 1982 DOCUMENT I-IOI3/81 REPORT DRAWN I]P ()N BEIIALF OIT 'l'llE Cornmit-tee on Youth, CuI ture, Education, 1 nformation and Sport on radio and television broadcasting 1n thc European Community Rapporteur: MT W. IIAIIN i:nglish ljdition Pll 7 ).271/'f in. At its sitting oi- 19 September 1980, tlre European Pqrl lanl(.:nL referred to the Comrnittee on Youth, Culture, EducaLron, Information and Sport as the eommittee responsible and to the Committee on Budgets, the Political Affairs Committee and the Legal Affarrs Committee for their opinion, the motion for a resofution tabled by Mr PEDII*II,, Mr IIAHN and others on 'radio and television broadcasting in the European Community' (Doc. L-4O9/80), and the motion for a reeolution tabled by Ivlr SCHINZEL and others on rthe threat to diversity of opinion posed by commercial- j, isarion of new me<1ial(Doc. ]--4t'?/t)o). The ConuniLtce on BudqeLs srrbse,{rreht:Iy communicated its decision not I o drafL an opinion at thi.s stage. The commj.ttee declded that, although 'the subit'r:Ls rrf thr' t.vl() m(,i jr)r.:) for resolutj.on overlatrped in certain respecEs whi.clr might -c,1 rire cros$- references, they differed sufficientLy to warrant the preparatit-rn of two separate reports At its meeting of 22 october 1980, tlre Committee on Youth, Culture, Education, lnformation and Sport appointed Mr HAUN rapporteur onrradio and television broadeasting ir, the European Community'. The committee considered the motion for a resolution at its meetings of 23-24 September I98l and 10-Il Novem!'rer I'r8I. -
Training Simulators in Nuclear Power Plants: Experience, Programme Design and Assessment Methodology
INIS-X^-074 International Atomic Energy Agency International Working Group on Nuclear Power Plant Control and Instrumentation XA9847539 - \ TRAINING SIMULATORS IN NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS: EXPERIENCE, PROGRAMME DESIGN AND ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY Proceedings of a Specialists' Meeting Organized by the International Atomic Energy Agency in Co-operation with German Simulator Center KSG Kraftwerks-Simulator-Geselschaft mbH GfS Gesellschaft fur Simulatorschulung mbH 17-19 November 1997 Essen, Germany 29-35 FOREWORD Simulators became an indispensable part of training world-wide. They support like no other training and the process of teaching, learning and understanding. In most countries the number of simulator operators is limited, very often there is only one. Therefore, international exchange of information is important to share the experience gained in different countries in order to assure high international standards. A second aspect is the tremendous evolution in the computing capacities of the simulator hardware and the increasing functionality of the simulator software. This background has led the IAEA to invite the simulator experts for an experience exchange. The German Simulator Centre in Essen, which is operated by the companies KSG and GfS, was asked to host this Specialists' Meeting. The Specialists Meeting on "Training Simulators in Nuclear Power Plants: Experience, Programme Design and Assessment Methodology" was organized by IAEA in co-operation with the German Simulator Centre operated by KSG Kraftwerks-Simulator-Gesellschaft mbH and GfS Gesellschaft fur Simulatorschulung mbH and was held from 17 - 19 November 1997 in Essen, Germany. The meeting focused on developments in simulation technology, experiences with simulator upgrades, utilization of computerized tools as support and complement of simulator training, use of simulators for other purposes. -
Outlook on Power Market Adequacy Central Western Europe May 2019
Outlook on Power Market Adequacy Central Western Europe May 2019 For Discussion Purposes Study performed for ENGIE Advisory and Advanced Analytics 1 Capacity Outlook: More than 90GW of today’s reliable thermal capacity closed by 2030. Intermittent Wind and PV will double, increasing by more than 140GW. Nuclear Capacity Evolution RES & Existing Thermal - CWE4* [GW] Policy driven Nuclear phase-out in DE (end of 2022) and BE (2025) Nuclear in France according to RTE Ampere Scenario ( 63.1 GW today and 48.5 GW in 2030) RES Development Entso-E TYNDP 2018 : Decentralized Generation Capacity installed in EU14 (modelling scope): • PV 108 (350) GW in 2018 (2030), • Wind Onshore 133 (191) GW in 2018 (2030), x2 • Wind Offshore 16 (58) GW in 2018 (2030) Coal-based Generation Policy driven Coal is phased-out in FR (end of 2021), IT (2025), UK (non- Hydro RES CCS, 2025) and NL (2029). Technical lifetime of 40y in other countries (economic Photovoltaic extensions not allowed). Wind > 90 > GW Gas-based Generation Others (CHPs, Hydro PSs, etc.) Technical lifetime Biomass Operation of existing assets, based on technical lifetime: CCGTs, GTs CCGT 20y, GT 20y . A sensitivity is foreseen with economic asset management: lifetime extension, reconversion, Coal & Lignite brownfield development) Nuclear Demand & Peaks INTERNAL IEA WEO 2017 New Policies Scenario CAGR 2018-30 : ~0.35% (both for annual and peak load) * BE, DE, FR, NL May 2019 TRACTEBEL Advisory and Advanced Analytics 2 Without further incentives to keep existing or to build new reliable capacity, scarcity events tend to happen simultaneously across countries as of winter 2022-23. -
Energy Revolution: Energy Revolution: a Sustainable Pathway to a Clean Energy Revolution for Belgium
2050 © FRANKEN/GP © GRACE/GP © ZENIT/GP ENERGY REVOLUTION: ENERGY REVOLUTION: A SUSTAINABLE PATHWAY TO A CLEAN ENERGY REVOLUTION FOR BELGIUM Introduction 3 Technical summary 4 THE ‘ENERGY REVOLUTION’ SCENARIO: A SUSTAINABLE PATHWAY TO A CLEAN ENERGY FUTURE FOR BELGIUM 5 1 Development of energy demand 6 2 Population development 6 3 GDP development 6 4 Projection of energy intensities 6 5 Final energy demand 7 6 Electricity generation 8 7 Heat supply 10 8 Primary energy consumption 11 9 CO2-emissions 11 10 Costs of electricity generation 12 11 Employment in the electricity sector 13 © BELTRA/GP Greenpeace calls for 13 Summary map 14 published by Greenpeace Belgium date June 2006 institute Scenario developed by Stefan Kronshage, Dr.Wolfram Krewitt and Dr. Ulrike Lehr, Institute of Technical Thermodynamics, Department of Systems Analysis and Technology Assessment (DLR), Stuttgart, Germany design & layout Tania Dunster, hemisphere, Sweden contact person [email protected] 2| ENERGY REVOLUTION: A SUSTAINABLE PATHWAY TO A CLEAN ENERGY REVOLUTION FOR BELGIUM Introduction A sustainable pathway to a clean energy future for Belgium : in order to clarify what political and industrial action needs to be taken in Belgium, The climate challenge : climate change is real and is happening now. Greenpeace has asked the Institute of Technical Thermodynamics, Climate change - the result of the greenhouse gases we are pumping into the Department of Systems Analysis and Technology Assessment of the German atmosphere – already impacts our lives and is expected to severely affect us Aerospace Center (DLR) to develop the energy blueprint outlined in this in the coming years. -
Case No IV/M.568 - EDF / EDISON-ISE
EN Case No IV/M.568 - EDF / EDISON-ISE Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EEC)No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 08/06/1995 Also available in the CELEX database Document No 395M0568 Office for Official Publications of the European Communities L-2985 Luxembourg COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 08.06.1995 PUBLIC VERSION MERGER PROCEDURE ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION To the notifying parties Dear Sirs, Subject: Case No IV/M.568 - EDF/EDISON-ISE Your notification of 28 April 1995 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation No. 4064/89 1. The above operation involves the joint acquisition by Edison S.p.A. (Edison) and EDF International S.A.(EDFI) of 73.96% of the share capital of Ilva Servizi Energie S.r.l. (ISE). 2. After examination of the notification the Commission has concluded that the proposed operation falls within the scope of Council Regulation No 4064/89 and does not give rise to serious doubts as to its compatibility with the common market and the EEA Agreement. Rue de la Loi 200 - B-1049 Brussels - Belgium Telephone: exchange (+32-2)299.11.11 Telex: COMEU B 21877 - Telegraphic address: COMEUR Brussels I THE PARTIES 3. EDFI is a subsidiary of the French state owned company Electricité de France (EDF), the French state-owned electricity company ensuring the production, transportation and distribution of electricity in France. EDF is also active outside France both through associations with local producers and through exports of electricity to other national operators, in particular ENEL in Italy, which is EDF's third largest international customer with a total purchase of 15.2 billions of kWh.