Confessing the Faith
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
American Presbyterian History Week 2 – the Westminster Assembly Trinity Presbyterian Church 1
American Presbyterian History Week 2 – The Westminster Assembly Trinity Presbyterian Church 1. Historical Setting of the Westminster Assembly a. English Reformation i. It was a series of events in England during the 1500s which resulted in the Church of England breaking away from Roman Catholic Church. ii. It was initially sparked by King Henry VIII’s desire for a divorce, but ultimately led to reformation in the Church of England. b. The Puritans i. The Puritans were those during the 16th and 17th century who thought the English Reformation hadn't gone far enough. ii. The Puritans were not agreed on the reforms. c. Political Timeline i. England and Scotland were united under one crown from 1625 to 1649. ii. English Civil War took place from 1642 to 1651. This is the timeframe of the Westminster Assembly, which began in 1643. iii. The Commonwealth of England existed from 1649 to 1660. iv. The restoration of the monarchy happened in 1660 with Charles II. 2. Effort in Unity: Forming the Westminster Assembly a. In the midst of the civil war, this was an effort by Parliament to seek advice on further reforms of the church, as an effort to unite a divided church. b. The English Parliament, without the king’s consent, called for the assembly on June 12, 1643. c. The members of the assembly were known as the Westminster Divines, comprised of 121 ministers of the Church of England, 6 commissioners representing the Church of Scotland, and 30 members of Parliament. d. The original intent was for the assembly to propose amendments to the Thirty-Nine Articles, which was the existing confession of faith for the Church of England. -
The Reasons for Past Failure of Evangelical Unity ALAN CLIFFORD
The Reasons for Past Failure of Evangelical Unity ALAN CLIFFORD Introduction An attempt to evaluate the failures of earlier generations must sure!) be conducted with humility. After alL we are in no position to sit in judgment on our fathers. We have inherited a confused and confusing situation which too many seem content to perpetuate. Neither can we expect to solve all the problems which men of greater wisdom and godliness than our own seemed unable effectually to resolw. Yet we should not be victims of our past. Despite Hegel's pessimistic observation. we ought to be able to learn from past mistakes. If the Apostle Paul insists that the Old Testament Scriptures were ·written for our learning' (Romans 15:4). then we have a clear duty to evaluate our past and mend our ways accordingly. That said. the very terms of the discussion are not immune from our own subjectivity and bias. One may be certain on objective medical and physiological grounds of the causes of heart failure. hut what is regarded as failure in Christian unity is largely determined by conflicting theological perspectives. All political parties agree that unemployment is a bad thing. hut they disagree when it comes to solving the problem. Likewise. even evangelicals differ in their ·policies' of ecclesiastical reunion. In the face of a dismal historical record. it is necessary to view our subject from a clear. Biblical perspective. When alll)ur uncertain and subjective evaluations have been sifted. we may be certain of one glorious. incontrovertible revealed truth: the unity of the elect people of God is an assured fact both in time and eternity. -
Catholicity Global and Historical: Constantinople, Westminster, and the Church in the Twenty-First Century
WTJ 72 (2010): 43-57 CATHOLICITY GLOBAL AND HISTORICAL: CONSTANTINOPLE, WESTMINSTER, AND THE CHURCH IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY ROBERT LETHAM ‘‘We believe in one, holy,catholic, and apostolic church’’: so runs the Niceno- Constantinopolitan creed, the one thread that holds together the tattered frag- ments of the Christian church. In this creed Constantinople I asserts four things: the unity of the church—it is one; its holiness—it belongs to God; its catholicity—the church is international, found throughout the world, and ‘‘teaches completely, without any omissions, all the doctrines which ought to be known to humanity’’;1 and its apostolicity—the church is founded on the apostles and the apostolic teaching. This Niceno-Constantinopolitan quadrilateral is based firmly on the teaching of the Bible. It is expressed clearly in one concise passage, Eph 2:11-22. Here Paul focuses on the unity of the church, for the Jew–Gentile division has been broken down by Christ so that ‘‘he made both one’’; ‘‘he created the two in him into one new man.’’ Peace with God in and through Christ simultaneously recon- ciles and unites the strongest enemies in one body to God through the cross. Later, Paul affirms that there is one baptism. In his other letters the same theme is prominent. Romans was probably written against the backcloth of tensions at Rome between Jewish and Gentile Christians. Yetthe gospel is for both, and both are branches of the same olive tree. Philippians addresses the need for the church to stand shoulder to shoulder in the face of persecution, for each to look not on their own interests but those of the other, for Euodia and Syntyche to reach a common agreement. -
Church and People in Interregnum Britain
Downloaded from the Humanities Digital Library http://www.humanities-digital-library.org Open Access books made available by the School of Advanced Study, University of London Press ***** Publication details: Church and People in Interregnum Britain Edited by Fiona McCall https://humanities-digital-library.org/index.php/hdl/catalog/book/ church-and-people-in-interregnum-britain DOI: 10.14296/2106.9781912702664 ***** This edition published in 2021 by UNIVERSITY OF LONDON PRESS SCHOOL OF ADVANCED STUDY INSTITUTE OF HISTORICAL RESEARCH Senate House, Malet Street, London WC1E 7HU, United Kingdom ISBN 978-1-912702-66-4 (PDF edition) This work is published under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. More information regarding CC licenses is available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses Church and people in interregnum Britain New Historical Perspectives is a book series for early career scholars within the UK and the Republic of Ireland. Books in the series are overseen by an expert editorial board to ensure the highest standards of peer-reviewed scholarship. Commissioning and editing is undertaken by the Royal Historical Society, and the series is published under the imprint of the Institute of Historical Research by the University of London Press. The series is supported by the Economic History Society and the Past and Present Society. Series co-editors: Heather Shore (Manchester Metropolitan University) and Elizabeth Hurren (University of Leicester) Founding co-editors: Simon Newman (University -
Judaizing and Singularity in England, 1618-1667
Judaizing and Singularity in England, 1618-1667 Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Aidan Francis Cottrell-Boyce, Gonville and Caius College, June 2018. For Anna. Abstract In the seventeenth century, in England, a remarkable number of small, religious movements began adopting demonstratively Jewish ritual practices. They were labelled by their contemporaries as Judaizers. Typically, this phenomenon has been explained with reference to other tropes of Puritan practical divinity. It has been claimed that Judaizing was a form of Biblicism or a form of millenarianism. In this thesis, I contend that Judaizing was an expression of another aspect of the Puritan experience: the need to be recognized as a ‘singular,’ positively- distinctive, separated minority. Contents Introduction 1 Singularity and Puritanism 57 Judaizing and Singularity 99 ‘A Jewish Faccion’: Anti-legalism, Judaizing and the Traskites 120 Thomas Totney, Judaizing and England’s Exodus 162 The Tillamites, Judaizing and the ‘Gospel Work of Separation’ 201 Conclusion 242 Introduction During the first decades of the seventeenth century in England, a remarkable number of small religious groups began to adopt elements of Jewish ceremonial law. In London, in South Wales, in the Chilterns and the Cotswolds, congregations revived the observation of the Saturday Sabbath.1 Thomas Woolsey, imprisoned for separatism, wrote to his co-religionists in Amsterdam to ‘prove it unlawful to eat blood and things strangled.’2 John Traske and his followers began to celebrate Passover -
Memorial Volume of the Westminster Assembly, 1647-1897
MEMORIAL VOLUME WESTMINSTER ASSEMBLY 1 647- 1 897. CONTAINING ELEVEN ADDRESSES DELIVERED BEFORE THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH IN THE UNITED STATES, AT CHARLOTTE, N. C, IN MAY, 1897. IN COMMEMORATION OF THE TWO HUNDRED AND FIFTIETH ANNIVERSARY OF THE WESTMINSTER ASSEMBLY, AND OF THE FORMATION OF THE WESTMINSTER STANDARDS. SECOND EDITION. Published by the direction of the General Assembly of iSg-}. The Presbyterian Committee of Publication. REV. J. HENRY SMITH. D. D. Copyright, 1897, JAMES K. HAZEN, Secretary of Publication^ ! PREFACE, The General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church in the United States, held in 1896 at Memphis, Tenn., resolved to commemorate in some suitable way the Two Hundred and Fiftieth Anniversary of the Westminster Assembly of Divines. It also appointed an ad interim committee to prepare an order of exercises for this cele- bration b}^ the Assembly of 1897. This Assembly met at Charlotte, N. C, and these commemorative services were held in connection with its sessions. Eleven ad- dresses of great excellence were delivered before the Assembly, and in the presence of very large audiences. The Assembly resolved to have these addresses pub- lished in a suitable volume, and appointed a small com- mittee to cooperate with the Committee of Publication in issuing it. An Introduction is added, which may have some value, and the portraits inserted may give additional interest to the volume. May the blessing of the Head of the Church make these addresses, in this permanent form, of abiding servdce to the cause of truth and righteousness for man}- j-ears to come FRANCIS R. -
The Westminster Confession of Faith
John 5:39 "...search the Scriptures..." search search Home Newsletter Puritan Theology Puritan History Puritan Study Puritan Shop Email Us The Westminster Confession of Faith A List of the Members of the Assembly Attendees of the Westminster Assembly and their writings online and off. The Promise and Vow taken by every member admitted to sit in the Assembly: I [NAME] do seriously promise and vow, in the presence of Almighty God, that in this Assembly, whereof I am a member, I will maintain nothing in point of doctrine, but what I believe to be most agreeable to the word of God; nor in point of discipline, but what may make most for God’s glory, and the peace and good of this Church. Admitted to sit and hear in October 1644, the Prince Elector Palatine, and on one occasion permitted to speak. Peers: Algernon, Earl of Northumberland. William, Earl of Bedford. Philip, Earl of Pembroke and Montgomery. William, Earl of Salisbury. Henry, Earl of Holland. Edward, Earl of Manchester. William, Lord Viscount Say and Seale. Edward, Lord Viscount Conway. Philip, Lord Wharton. Edward, Lord Howard of Escrick. Basil, Earl of Denbigh. Oliver, Earl of Bolingbroke. William, Lord Grey of Warkey vice Bedford, Holland, and Conway. Robert, Earl of Essex, Lord General. Robert, Earl of Warwick, Lord High Admiral. Members of the House of Commons: John Selden, Esq. Francis Rous, Esq. Edmund Prideaux, Esq. Sir Henry Vane, Knt., senior. John Glynn, Esq., Recorder of London. John White, Esq. Bouldstrode Whitlocke, Esq. Humphrey Salloway, Esq. Mr. Serjeant Wild. Oliver St. John, Esq., His Majesty’s Solicitor. -
The Great Tew Circle, 1630-1639
Athens Journal of History - Volume 5, Issue 4 – Pages 247-258 The Great Tew Circle, 1630-1639 By Michael J. Langford The Great Tew Circle comprised a group of theologians, philosophers and poets who met regularly in Lord Falkland's house at Great Tew, near Oxford, from the early 1630s until around 1639. Although strongly royalist and Anglican, on many matters, especially that of toleration, they defended views that would later be classed as liberal.1 This article introduces the reader to the Great Tew Circle, and explores its relationship with the better-known Cambridge Platonists, most of whom flourished a few decades later. Common ground included the influence of Plato and an appeal to 'reason', although exactly how reason should to be understood raises interesting issues. Introduction The Great Tew Circle comprised a collection of theologians, philosophers and poets who met together in Lord Falkland's house at Great Tew, about sixteen miles from Oxford, from the early 1630s until around 1639 when rumbles of the civil war – which broke out in 1642 -- summoned Falkland to matters of state, and the group discussions were discontinued. Thereafter, despite the deaths of Falkland and Chillingworth, the Circle maintained some influence and a degree of association between many of its members remained, in part through the continued patronage of Falkland's widow. At first sight, the Restoration of Charles II in 1660 might seem to mark a kind of success for the aspirations of the Circle, and particularly for the efforts of Henry Hammond during the Commonwealth period, but although the return to monarchy and state Anglicanism did represent some aspects of the Circle's agenda, the generally narrow and intolerant agenda of the new order certainly did not. -
Letham, Westassembly.Indd 3 9/30/09 10:50:59 AM © 2009 by Robert Letham
The Westminster Assembly READING ITS THEOLOGY IN HISTORICAL CONTEXT Robert Letham R Letham, WestAssembly.indd 3 9/30/09 10:50:59 AM © 2009 by Robert Letham All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means—electronic, mechanical, photo- copy, recording, or otherwise—except for brief quotations for the purpose of review or comment, without the prior permission of the publisher, P&R Publishing Company, P.O. Box 817, Phillipsburg, New Jersey 08865-0817. Unless otherwise indicated, Scripture quotations are from The Holy Bible, English Standard Version, copyright © 2001 by Crossway Bibles, a division of Good News Publishers. Used by permission. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Letham, Robert. The Westminster Assembly : reading its theology in historical context / Robert Letham. p. cm. — (The Westminster Assembly and the Reformed faith) Includes bibliographical references and indexes. ISBN 978-0-87552-612-6 (pbk.) 1. Westminster Assembly (1643-1652) 2. Theology, Doctrinal—History—17th century. 3. Church history—17th century. 4. Presbyterian Church—Doctrines. 5. Reformed Church—Doctrines. 6. Westminster Confession of Faith. I. Title. BX9053.L48 2009 230'.52—dc22 2009026674 Letham, WestAssembly.indd 4 9/30/09 10:50:59 AM In memoriam Philip Edgcumbe Hughes (1915-1990) Anglicanus ecclesiasticus Doctor eminentissimus seminarii Presbyterianii Theologus Calvinianus Scholasticus Reformationis ac Novi Testamenti Consiliarius doctissimus In impositione manuum cum presbyterio ordinatione mea participavit, et sic in successionem apostolorum meo loculum donavit! Letham, WestAssembly.indd 5 9/30/09 10:50:59 AM You are at this time as a citty set upon a mountaine; the eyes of E[ngland], S[cotland], I[reland] & of all reformed churches are upon you; a delight to this meeting [?]; a desire & fervent expectation. -
9781845502539
T HE R EFORMED F AITH Exposition of The Westminster Confession of Faith 99781845502539781845502539 - EExpositionxposition ooff tthehe WWestminsterestminster CConfessiononfession - RRobertobert SShaw.inddhaw.indd 1 005/02/20085/02/2008 009:13:189:13:18 99781845502539781845502539 - EExpositionxposition ooff tthehe WWestminsterestminster CConfessiononfession - RRobertobert SShaw.inddhaw.indd 2 005/02/20085/02/2008 009:14:139:14:13 T HE R EFORMED F AITH Exposition of The Westminster Confession of Faith Robert Shaw 99781845502539781845502539 - EExpositionxposition ooff tthehe WWestminsterestminster CConfessiononfession - RRobertobert SShaw.inddhaw.indd 3 005/02/20085/02/2008 009:14:139:14:13 ISBN 1-84550-253-1 ISBN 978-1-84550-253-9 © Christian Focus Publications 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 First published in 1845. First Christian Focus Publications edition in 1973. Reprinted 1980, 1992, 1998, 2008 Th is edition published in 2008 in the Christian Heritage Imprint by Christian Focus Publications, Geanies House, Fearn, Ross-shire, IV20 1TW, Scotland, UK www.christianfocus.com Cover design by Daniel Van Straaten Printed by Cromwell, Wiltshire All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form, by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior per-mission of the publisher or a licence permitting restricted copying. In the U.K. such licences are issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, Saff ron House, 6-10 Kirby Street, London, EC1 8TS. www.cla.co.uk 99781845502539781845502539 - EExpositionxposition ooff tthehe WWestminsterestminster CConfessiononfession - RRobertobert SShaw.inddhaw.indd 4 005/02/20085/02/2008 009:14:149:14:14 FOREWORD Th e Westminster Confession of Faith is one of the noblest and most infl uential documents of the Christian Church. -
Reassessing John Owen's
TRINITARIAN DOXOLOGY: REASSESSING JOHN OWEN’S CONTRIBUTION TO REFORMED ORTHODOX TRINITARIAN THEOLOGY1 Ryan M McGraw Research Associate, University of the Free State Associate Professor of Systematic Theology, Greenville Presbyterian Theological Seminary [email protected] ABSTRACT Reformed orthodox theologian Gisbertus Voetius (1589-1676) referred to the doctrine of the Trinity as ‘the foundation of fundamentals’. Richard Muller notes that if any dogma comes close to achieving such status, it is the doctrine of the Trinity. It is thus surprising that most modern treatments of trinitarian theology assume that sixteenth and seventeenth century Reformed orthodoxy had virtually nothing to contribute to this vital doctrine. The recent Cambridge Companion to the Trinity and the Oxford Handbook of the Trinity both reflect this assumption. This article addresses how Reformed authors tried to harmonise the historical doctrine of the Trinity with their principle of sola scriptura. It does not treat positive developments or applications of the doctrine. The void left in the secondary literature has not adequately probed the bold claims of Voetius or the scholarly reflections of Muller. John Owen (1616-1683) is a growing exception to this trend. Both historians and theologians are starting to recognise his significance as a theologian in general and a trinitarian theologian in particular, but they often stop short of observing how he intertwined his trinitarian theology and piety throughout his writings. This article will reassess Owen’s contribution to Reformed trinitarian theology in two major segments. The first does so by critiquing two recent treatments of his work. The remaining material explores the 1 This article appeared first as a single article in Westminster Theological Journal. -
Recently Discovered Memoranda of the Westminster Assembly
Recently Discovered Memoranda ARTICLE 1. RECENTLY DISCOVERED MEMORANDA OF THE WESTMINSTER ASSEMBLY. Minutes of the Sessions of the Westminster Assembly of Divines, while engaged in preparing their Directory for Church Gov- ernment, Confession of Faith, and Catechisms (November, 1644, to March, 1649). From Transcripts of the Originals, procured by a Committee of the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland. Edited for the Committee by the Rev. ALEX. F. MITCHELL, D. D., Professor of Ecclesiastical His- tory of the University of St. Andrews, and the Rev. JOHN STRUTHERS, LL.D., Minister of Prestonpans. William Black- wood & Sons, Edinburgh and London, 1874. Pp. 556, 8vo. The Dr. Williams Library, Grafton Street, London, seems to be a rich mine of Presbyterian antiquities. From it were ob- tained the “Knox Papers,” which have proved so valuable in the illustration of Knox’s career as an English Reformer. And in it also have recently been found these “Minutes of the Westmin- ster Assembly of Divines,” contained in three volumes of manu- script foolscap, inscribed with this title, though in a more modern hand than the manuscripts themselves. In the judgment of those competent to decide such a question, there can be no doubt that the “Minutes” are in the handwriting of Adonirain Byfield himself, one of the Clerks of the Westminster Assembly, whose name is written several times on the records in the same hand- writing as the Minutes. The whole record extends from August 4, 1643, to April 24, 1652. The present published volume, however, embraces only that portion of the records extending from November, 1644, to March, 1649.