DOCSLIB.ORG

Strategy and Policy Committee 12 March 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Strategy and Policy Committee 12 March 2019 Report No. 19-29 Decision Required LAKES MANAGEMENT UPDATE 1. PURPOSE 1.1. This paper provides Council with an update on Horizons non-regulatory work programme around lakes including an overview of the lakes monitoring and research programme and lake restoration work. This report summarises information analysed in preparation for Horizons State of Environment report and also overviews recent reports completed in 2018 for Horizons to inform restoration planning for lakes in the Region. 2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2.1. In 2018, the data from the regional lakes programme was analysed to inform the 2019 State of Environment (SOE) report. The regional lakes monitoring programme was introduced in 2014 expanding the monitoring programme from one lake (Horowhenua) to monitoring four lakes. In 2015 the programme was further expanded to monitor a total of 15 lakes (7%) of the 226 that are more than a hectare in size within the region. At the time this programme was introduced, Lake Horowhenua was already being regularly monitored, with a comprehensive monitoring programme to inform restoration as a part of the Lake Horowhenua Accord, however no other lakes were being monitored for Sate of Environment water quality reporting purposes. 2.2. The regional lake monitoring programme has provided a significant step forward to providing information on lakes in the region. This information was analysed and compared to water quality targets of the One Plan and new requirements of regional councils introduced via the National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management (NPS-FM) in 2011 and its amendments in 2014 and 2017. The results of this analysis are overviewed in this paper below and it is noted that the analysis is limited in terms of the representation of the state of lakes in the region due to the small number of lakes monitored and the low frequency of sampling events (quarterly sampling, rather than monthly). A review of the lakes monitoring programme is being scoped for the next financial year. 2.3. The monitoring results show that a number of the region’s lakes are in poor condition. A key finding of the analysis is that all lakes currently monitored for water quality in the Horizons Region fail to meet the national bottom line for at least one of the specified water quality attributes in the NPS-FM. Further detail is provided in the body of the report. 2.4. To date, Horizons has undertaken a range of regulatory and non-regulatory work around lakes. The regulatory programme has, through the One Plan, set water quality targets for lakes and identified some lake catchments as priority areas for nutrient management rules. Additionally, the One Plan has established non-regulatory methods for the protection and enhancement of Lake Horowhenua and other coastal lakes, as well as a method for lake quality research, monitoring and reporting. It is noted that the development of the One Plan, which was notified in 2007 predated the NPS-FM 2011 and its subsequent amendments (2014 and 2017) and that there are differences in the requirements of these policy documents. 2.5. Alongside the development and implementation of policy around lake management, there has been a range of consent and compliance work including consenting for restoration work at Lake Horowhenua and the ongoing consent process for the discharge of stormwater by Whanganui Prison to Lakes Pauri and Wiritoa. Trigger levels for Lakes Management Update Page 1 Strategy and Policy Committee 12 March 2019 groundwater abstraction in coastal sand country have also been introduced via consent processes where there is a risk of reduced flows to coastal dune lakes. 2.6. The non-regulatory programmes traditionally focussed on fencing and planting of lake margins and inflowing streams, as well as education around the potential for transfer of aquatic weeds through use of lakes for food gathering and recreation. Around 2010, the focus of these programmes shifted toward developing further understanding of lakes and how to restore them using a wider tool box for restoration options including both in-lake interventions and out of lake (catchment) interventions. Prioritisation of lakes for this science and restoration work has largely been based around the lakes that are used recreationally, the lakes that are in priority catchments for the nutrient management rules of the One Plan and more broadly, coastal dune lakes. Examples of this work are provided in the paper below including two lakes that have received significant regional investment by Council (Lake Horowhenua and Lake Waipu). In both cases Horizons, iwi/hapu, the respective local District Council’s (Horowhenua and Rangitīkei) and others, have invested as a part of a work programme receiving significant investment via Central Government. 2.7. A key part of the investment in lake restoration, including seeking external resourcing from central government, has been obtaining the monitoring and science information to develop restoration options. To assist with development of further restoration work for other lakes in the region, two Envirolink-funded reports were commissioned to review existing data for lakes and to identify knowledge gaps for restoration planning. The reports were split based on lake types using examples of a small number of deep lakes (including Lakes Pauri, Wiritoa and Dudding) and shallow lakes (including Lakes Waipu and William). It is noted that these reports do not provide detailed action plans for restoration of the lakes. Another level of planning and information is required for lake specific action plans to be developed. As such, these reports identify data and information necessary to undertake the further work of developing restoration options, and subsequent action plans. 2.8. The restoration planning reports and more recent information from the regional lakes monitoring programme shows that some of the lakes in the region are at risk of ‘flipping’. This is a process where the lake shifts from having aquatic plants to being in a state where the lake is dominated by algae, where cyanobacteria blooms can dominate. Monitoring data from both Lake Dudding and more recently Lake Wiritoa, have shown signs of the lakes progressing to flipping. This paper provides further detail and discussion around this issue for both lakes. Some further information is being gathered for these lakes prior to a meeting of lake experts to advise on the issue. An initial workshop with lake experts is to be held this financial year for Dudding Lake, with an aim to obtain recommendations around any further information that is needed, an assessment of potential intervention options, information on the degree of risk of flipping and level of urgency for action. This workshop is being developed in collaboration with Rangitīkei District Council. A similar workshop is intended for Lake Wiritoa following initial data collection. Workshop outcomes will be reported to Council. 2.9. The initial focus for the lakes programme has been around the characterisation of a small number of the region’s coastal lakes with a view to establishing their current state and initiating work around lake restoration for some lakes. The combination of the state of environment reporting and the recently completed restoration options reports has provided insights into the state of water quality in some of the regions lakes and the amount of information available to analyse this. With this information now available, the programme would benefit from a wider review to ensure that future work is aligned with both regional and national monitoring and reporting requirements, and that sufficient information is collected to inform interventions for restoration. A number of identified options for monitoring or further restoration work are identified in the reports however are outside the current capacity and resourcing of the existing programme. As a part of the work programme in the next financial year, a group of experts will be engaged to work with Horizons staff to review the lakes programme including establishing a range of options for upgrading the monitoring programme to improve overall reporting on lakes in relation to the Lakes Management Update Page 2 Strategy and Policy Committee 12 March 2019 national and regional policies and to inform potential restoration work. This will include an option to reconfigure the use of current budget and options for increased investment. The outcomes of this work will be reported to Council for consideration. 3. RECOMMENDATION That the Committee recommends that Council: a. receives the information contained in Report No. 19-29. b. endorses the proposed approach in the paper. 4. FINANCIAL IMPACT 4.1. There are no current financial impacts associated with this item. This report reflects previously endorsed budgets approved as part of Council’s annual planning and long term planning processes, and identified work programmes delivered as part of the Science and Freshwater Operational Plan’s, including use of resources from other partners such as central government. 5. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT 5.1. This item is a public item. Further presentation of information around lake ecological condition and water quality will be made to the public as part of Horizons State of Environment reporting during 2019. 6. SIGNIFICANT BUSINESS RISK IMPACT 6.1. No significant business risk has been identified. 7. BACKGROUND 7.1. In the Horizons region there are 226 lakes greater than one hectare in size. These range from coastal dune lakes such as Lake Wiritoa and Lake Horowhenua, through to dammed water courses found throughout the hill country to the north of the region, and volcanic lakes such as Crater Lake at Mt. Ruapehu. 7.2. Our region’s lakes, and their associated wetlands, provide for a range of community values. In addition to ecological, cultural and spiritual values, a number of lakes in the region are also popular areas for water sports, fishing and hunting and gathering of kai.
Recommended publications
  • Schedule D Part3

    Schedule D Part3

    Schedule D Table D.7: Native Fish Spawning Value in the Manawatu-Wanganui Region Management Sub-zone River/Stream Name Reference Zone From the river mouth to a point 100 metres upstream of Manawatu River the CMA boundary located at the seaward edge of Coastal Coastal Manawatu Foxton Loop at approx NZMS 260 S24:010-765 Manawatu From confluence with the Manawatu River from approx Whitebait Creek NZMS 260 S24:982-791 to Source From the river mouth to a point 100 metres upstream of Coastal the CMA boundary located at the seaward edge of the Tidal Rangitikei Rangitikei River Rangitikei boat ramp on the true left bank of the river located at approx NZMS 260 S24:009-000 From confluence with Whanganui River at approx Lower Whanganui Mateongaonga Stream NZMS 260 R22:873-434 to Kaimatira Road at approx R22:889-422 From the river mouth to a point approx 100 metres upstream of the CMA boundary located at the seaward Whanganui River edge of the Cobham Street Bridge at approx NZMS 260 R22:848-381 Lower Coastal Whanganui From confluence with Whanganui River at approx Whanganui Stream opposite Corliss NZMS 260 R22:836-374 to State Highway 3 at approx Island R22:862-370 From the stream mouth to a point 1km upstream at Omapu Stream approx NZMS 260 R22: 750-441 From confluence with Whanganui River at approx Matarawa Matarawa Stream NZMS 260 R22:858-398 to Ikitara Street at approx R22:869-409 Coastal Coastal Whangaehu River From the river mouth to approx NZMS 260 S22:915-300 Whangaehu Whangaehu From the river mouth to a point located at the Turakina Lower
  • Bibliography of Plant Checklists for Areas in Whanganui Conservancy

    Bibliography of Plant Checklists for Areas in Whanganui Conservancy

    Bibliography of plant checklists for areas in Whanganui Conservancy MARCH 2010 Bibliography of plant checklists for areas in Whanganui Conservancy MARCH 2010 B Beale, V McGlynn and G La Cock, Whanganui Conservancy, Department of Conservation Published by: Department of Conservation Whanganui Conservancy Private Bag 3016 Wanganui New Zealand Bibliography of plant checklists for areas in Whanganui Conservancy - March 2010 1 Cover photo: Himatangi dunes © Copyright 2010, New Zealand Department of Conservation ISSN: 1178-8992 Te Tai Hauauru - Whanganui Conservancy Flora Series 2010/1 ISBN: 978-0-478-14754-4 2 Bibliography of plant checklists for areas in Whanganui Conservancy - March 2010 COntEnts Executive Summary 7 Introduction 8 Uses 10 Bibliography guidelines 11 Checklists 12 General 12 Egmont Ecological District 12 General 12 Mt Egmont/Taranaki 12 Coast 13 South Taranaki 13 Opunake 14 Ihaia 14 Rahotu 14 Okato 14 New Plymouth 15 Urenui/Waitara 17 Inglewood 17 Midhurst 18 Foxton Ecological District 18 General 18 Foxton 18 Tangimoana 19 Bulls 20 Whangaehu / Turakina 20 Wanganui Coast 20 Wanganui 21 Waitotara 21 Waverley 21 Patea 21 Manawatu Gorge Ecological District 22 General 22 Turitea 22 Kahuterawa 22 Manawatu Plains Ecological District 22 General 22 Hawera 23 Waverley 23 Nukumaru 23 Maxwell 23 Kai Iwi 23 Whanganui 24 Turakina 25 Bibliography of plant checklists for areas in Whanganui Conservancy - March 2010 3 Tutaenui 25 Rata 25 Rewa 25 Marton 25 Dunolly 26 Halcombe 26 Kimbolton 26 Bulls 26 Feilding 26 Rongotea 27 Ashhurst 27 Palmerston
  • Order Paper Tuesday 11 September 2018, 6:30Pm Ture Tangata Office, Ihipera-Koria Street, Rātana Pa

    Order Paper Tuesday 11 September 2018, 6:30Pm Ture Tangata Office, Ihipera-Koria Street, Rātana Pa

    Rātana Community Board Order Paper Tuesday 11 September 2018, 6:30pm Ture Tangata Office, Ihipera-Koria Street, Rātana Pa Website: www.rangitikei.govt.nz Email: [email protected] Telephone: 06 327-0099 Facsimile: 06 327-6970 Chair: Charlie Mete Deputy Chair: Maata Kare Thompson Membership Charlie Rourangi Thomas Tataurangi Cr Soraya Peke-Mason Please Note: Items in this Agenda may be subject to amendments or withdrawal at the Meeting. It is recommended therefore that items not be reported upon until after adoption by the Council. Reporters who do not attend the Meeting are requested to seek confirmation of the Agenda material or proceedings of the Meeting from the Chief Executive prior to any media reports being filed. Rangitīkei District Council Rātana Community Board Meeting Agenda – Tuesday 11 September2018 – 6:30 pm Contents 1 Whakamoemiti........................................................................................................2 2 Public Forum ...........................................................................................................2 3 Apologies.................................................................................................................2 4 Members’ Conflict of Interest.................................................................................2 Agenda note 5 Confirmation of Order of Business and Late Items.................................................2 Agenda note 6 Confirmation of Minutes.........................................................................................2
  • Report 4 Rural Areas of Twenty Territorial Authorities.Pdf (2.910Mb)

    Report 4 Rural Areas of Twenty Territorial Authorities.Pdf (2.910Mb)

    BISHOP’S ACTION FOUNDATION and the NATIONAL SCIENCE CHALLENGE REPORT FOUR Rural Areas within Twenty Territorial Local Authorities, Compared Ann Pomeroy Centre for Sustainability: Agriculture, Food, Energy and Environment University of Otago December 2019 Acknowledgements This report was sponsored by the Bishop’s Action Foundation, Taranaki and part-funded by the National Science Challenge (NSC) project ‘Harnessing the Hinterland’ through the University of Otago, Department of Geography. Sincere thanks to my Otago University colleagues Professor Etienne Nel and Dr Sean Connelly for their support and guidance throughout the NSC project. Disclaimer: Every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information in this report, and all reasonable skill and care has been exercised in its preparation. Neither the Bishops Action Foundation, the University of Otago, nor the author accept liability for any error of fact or opinion which may be present, nor for the consequences of any decision based on this information or arising out of the provision of information in this report. 2 CONTENTS Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................. 2 Disclaimer: .............................................................................................................................................. 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................. 4 SECTION 1: Background
  • 1414 the NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE No.· 53

    1414 the NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE No.· 53

    1414 THE NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE No.· 53 the north-western boundary of MOitukawa 2B 16A; thence the Pohangina River, to and along the north-eastern boundary south-westerly along the north-western boundaries of that of Lot 2, D.P. 239, to its easternmost corner; :thence south­ Block and MotUikawa 2B 16B 1B, 2B 16B 3, 2B 15A, 2B 15B 2, westerly along the s'Outh-eastern boundary of Lot 2, D.P. 239 2B 15B 1, 2B 13B, 2B 13A, 2B 12 and 2B llB and southerly along (including the crossing 'Of Wharite and Saddle Roads), the :the western boundary of Motukawa 2B lIB and its production south-eastern boundaries of Lot 2, D.P. 27494, Lort: 1, D.P. 239, ,to the middle of the Hautapu River; thence down the middle and its production to the middle of the Manawatu River; of that river to a point in line with the south-eastern boundary thence easterly up the middle of that river ,to a point in line of Raketapauma 2B 1; thence south-weSiterlyto and along wirth the western boundary of Section 1, Blo'ck I, Mangahao that boundary and the south-eastern boundaries of Rake­ S.D.; thence southerly to. and along that boundary, its pro­ tapauma 2B lA, 14A, 14B, Lots 2 and 3, D.P. 3427, and Rake­ duction to the middle 'Of N OI1th Range Road and along the tapauma ID 2 and ID 1 ,to the middle of Maukuku Road; middle of that road to a point in line W!iJth the south-western thence north-westerly along the middle of rthat road, Kaimatawi boundary of Section 13, in Block XIX, Mangahao S.D.; thence Road and Turakina Valley Road to a pomt in line with the to and along that boundary, the north-western boundaries 'Of northern boundary of Secti'on 3, Block II, Maungakareltu Sections 1, 2, and 3, Block VI, Mangahao S.D., Section 4, S.D.; thence westerly to and along that boundary and Sections Block V, Mangahao S.D., the end of Inglish Road, and part 2 and 1, Block II, aforesaid and [he nOl1thern boundaries of of a State !forest, ,taken for the preservation 'Of timber, to Sections 4, 3, and 2, Block I, Maungakaretu S.D., the pro­ Trig.
  • Hikurangi Response Planning Toolbox Plenty (31,000); 11% for Tairāwhiti-Gisborne (4,600); 29% and Within the Regional Response Concept Paper Annex

    Hikurangi Response Planning Toolbox Plenty (31,000); 11% for Tairāwhiti-Gisborne (4,600); 29% and Within the Regional Response Concept Paper Annex

    Hikurangi subduction zone RESPONSE PLANNING TOOLBOX TE WHAKAMAHERE JULY 2020 URUPARE A HIKURANGI Acknowledgements This toolbox acknowledges the funding received from the National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA) -administered Resilience Fund, GNS scientists and input from other experts, the Hikurangi Response Planning project team and the East Coast Life at the Boundary Steering Group. In addition, this toolbox acknowledges the valuable contribution of response planning outputs from the following initiatives, which have helped inform the content of this toolbox: l SAFER South Island / Te Waipounamu Alpine Fault Earthquake Response Framework l Wellington Earthquake National Initial Response Plan (WENIRP) l Wellington Region Earthquake Plan (WREP) l National and regional lifeline studies p 2 Contents Acknowledgments ....................................... 2 2.5.1 Planning considerations and recommendations: social environment............22 Introduction ...................................................4 2.5.2 Planning considerations and recommendations: built environment ..............25 Scope ................................................................ 5 2.5.3 Planning considerations and Audience .......................................................... 5 recommendations: natural environment .........28 Geographical Context ................................... 5 2.5.4 Planning considerations and recommendations: economic environment ... 29 Legislative Context .......................................6 2.5.5 Further considerations..........................................
  • Whanganui to Bulls — NZ Walking Access Commission Ara Hīkoi Aotearoa

    Whanganui to Bulls — NZ Walking Access Commission Ara Hīkoi Aotearoa

    10/5/2021 Whanganui to Bulls — NZ Walking Access Commission Ara Hīkoi Aotearoa Whanganui to Bulls Walking Difculty Medium Length 62.3 km Journey Time 2-3 days Region Manawatū-Whanganui Sub-Regions Rangitīkei , Whanganui Part of Collections Te Araroa - New Zealand's Trail , Te Araroa - North Island Track maintained by Te Araroa Trail Trust https://www.walkingaccess.govt.nz/track/whanganui-to-bulls/pdfPreview 1/3 10/5/2021 Whanganui to Bulls — NZ Walking Access Commission Ara Hīkoi Aotearoa As you come out of Whanganui, take No 2 Line Road which can be accessed by the following options: 1. Walking up Portal Street from Anzac Parade 2. Climbing the Durie Hill (355) steps to the tower at the top, or 3. Taking the Durie Hill Elevator (closed xmas day). 8am-6pm Mon-Fri. 10am-5. m Sat & Sun. $2 charge. If you take the steps or elevator following Durie Street to Portal Street, this then carries on to N02 Line. Walk to Fordell which is approx 14km's, turn right onto Warrengate Road for approximately 4km and walk to SH3. Turn left and walk for 3km and cross the Whangaehu River Bridge. Turn right across the bridge into Whangaehu Beach Road and walk to the end. Go through the gate and carry on following the track to the beach. From Whangaehu to the Beach is approximately 8km. Turn left and walk along the beach til you get to the Turakina River (cross between markers). Check tide (https://tides.niwa.co.nz ) and cross at low tide. You will reach the beach settlement of Koitiata.
  • ISSUE 16 from the Putorino Landfill on Monday 18 January 2021 Our Contractor, Mayor’S Desk Central Demolition, Began Establishing Their He New Year Is Upon Us

    ISSUE 16 from the Putorino Landfill on Monday 18 January 2021 Our Contractor, Mayor’S Desk Central Demolition, Began Establishing Their He New Year Is Upon Us

    RANGITĪKEI 46 High St, Marton Private Bag 1102, Marton 4741 P: 0800 422 522 (24 hrs) E: [email protected] FB: Rangitikei/DC www.rangitikei.govt.nz Connect ISSUE 16 FROM THE Putorino Landfill On Monday 18 January 2021 our contractor, Mayor’s Desk Central Demolition, began establishing their he new year is upon us. I trust you all enjoyed a relaxed worksite for remediation Tand restful Christmas break with family and friends. of Putorino Landfill. The work that we are concentrating most on at Council at the The first three weeks of work will involve moment is the significant contract we have with our community moving their plant and equipment to site, – the Long Term Plan or LTP. This will take up most of our time installing site offices, erecting fencing and between now and June. This is where we set our aspirations and aims in the vision of Council, implementing other safety precautions. work out the work programme and the budget that’s required to drive it. The Long Term Plan is a 10 year document that is reviewed every three years. The challenges in the LTP are vast. Once the resource consent applications On the positive side our district is changing dramatically. We are getting industry wanting are approved, sheet piling will be installed to come here, we have hundreds of new houses going in and the much needed increase in to protect the river and cliff face while the landfill material is excavated, tested, population will make the rates affordable in the future. In the short term there comes some Marton Junction School children with Peaches, Lou (RDC pain with this in terms of making sure that the infrastructure needs to support the new Animal Controller) and their books from Kelsview Dog sorted and transported for disposal.
  • Average Deprivation Scores for Census Area Units

    Average Deprivation Scores for Census Area Units

    Average Deprivation Scores for Census Area Units For administrative purposes, Statistics New Zealand The first table lists the CAUs, as well as the codes for divides the country into about 1900 Census Area Units the District Health Board (DHB) and Territorial Authority (CAUs) of unequal population size. Each is made up (TA) to which each belongs, and for each provides the of many meshblocks. At the time of the 2006 Census CAU deprivation decile and the population-weighted there were 1927 CAUs and 41,376 meshblocks. The average deprivation value. As with the NZDep2006 small NZDep2006 index of deprivation was created from area deciles, the value 1 indicates a CAU in the 10 per 23,786 NZDep2006 small areas that were, in general, cent least deprived CAUs in New Zealand, and the value either one meshblock, or two nearby meshblocks. 10 indicates that the CAU is in the 10 per cent most deprived CAUs. CAU averages and deciles are missing For many purposes it is useful to have an idea of the – indicated by a period – for CAUs where the usually deprivation characteristic of CAUs, which are often linked resident population was insufficient to calculate any to natural neighbourhoods, such as suburbs. Users component NZDep scores. should be aware though that there may be considerable variation in deprivation among the small areas that make An alphabetical index of the CAU names is provided after up the CAUs. This variation will be hidden when using an this table for cross-reference. average deprivation statistic for the CAU. Each CAU is part of one of the 21 DHBs.
  • Regional Wetland Inventory and Prioritisation Project

    Regional Wetland Inventory and Prioritisation Project

    Regional Wetland Inventory and Prioritisation Project February 2005 Authors Helmut Janssen, Olivier Ausseil, Alistair Beveridge Acknowledgments The authors gratefully acknowledge the contributions of Wanganui District Council, James Lambie and Melanie Dixon (GWRC), Colin Ogle and Nick Singers (Department of Conservation), Anne Gaelle Ausseil and Bev Clarkson (Landcare Research), Maree Clark, Fleur Maseyk, Malinda Matthewson, Ruth Fleeson, Elaine Iddon, Joe Martin, Craig Davey, Neil Mickleson, Noel Procter, Grant McLaren, Campbell Sinclair, Claire Ridler, Aaron Madden, Hilary Webb, and Lindsay Fung (Horizons Regional Council) Front Cover Photo Reed-land and Kahikatea wetland forest - McPherson Forest and Bird Reserve Photo: Helmut Janssen February 2005 ISBN No: 1-877310-63-8 Report No: 2005/EXT/615 For more information contact Offices: Head Office: Depots: Taumarunui Palmerston North Levin 34 Maata Street 11-15 Victoria Avenue 11 Bruce Road Phone 07-895 5209 Phone 06-952 2800 Phone 06-367 8259 Wanganui Freephone 0508 446 749 Taihape 6 Bates Street Torere Rd, Ohotu Phone 06-345 0705 [email protected] Phone 06-388 0192 Marton www.horizons.govt.nz Pahiatua Hammond Street Cnr Huxley & Queen Streets Phone 06-327 7189 24 hr Pollution Hotline Phone 06-376 7758 Freephone 0508 476 558 Dannevirke Kairanga Weber Road Cnr Rongotea & Kairanga-Bunnythorpe Roads Phone 06-374 6700 Phone 06-350 1761 FOREWORD This report is the culmination of three years of intensive work by Horizons Regional Council to catalogue and prioritise wetlands in the Region in terms of their ecological values. Horizons Regional Council has responsibilities under the Resource Management Act (1991) with respect to native biodiversity management, and has agreed the highest native biodiversity priority for the Region is wetlands and their effective management.
  • NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE Published by Authority

    NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE Published by Authority

    No. S3 1399 THE NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE Published by Authority WELLINGTON: THURSDAY, 22 AUGUST 1968 State Housing Land Set Apart for the Purposes of the Maori As the same are more particularly delineated on the plans Housing Act 1935 marked and coloured as above~mentioned, and deposited in the office of the Minister of Works at Weliington. BIEiRNtA!RD !FERGUSSON, Governor-General Given under the hand of His iEixcellency the Governor­ General, and issued under the Seal ,of New Zealand, this A PROCLAMATION 26th day of 'July 1%8. PURSUANT to section 2 of the Maori Housing Amendment [L.S.] JOHN RAE, for the Minister of Works. Act 1938, I, Brigadier Sir Bernard Edward Fergusson, the Governor-General of New Zealand, hereby proclaim and GOD SAVE THE QUEEN! declare that the State housing land, within the meaning of (P.W. 72/1/3/0; D.O. 72/1/3/02) the Housing Act 1955, described in the Schedule hereto, is hereby set apart for the purposes of the Maori Housing Act 1935. Land Taken for Road in Block VI, Newcastle Survey District, SCHEDULE Raglan County NORm AUCKLAND LAND DISTRICT A. R. P. Being ARTHUR PORRITT, Governor-General o 0 26.7 Lot 228, Deposited Plan 48892, and being paI1t of Allotment 53, Parish of Pakuranga, which said A PROCLAMATION piece of land is part of the land comprised and PURSUANT to the Public Works Act 1928, I, Sir Arthur Espie described in certificate of title, Volume 1973, Porritt, Baronet, the Govenor-General of New Zealand, hereby folio 48 (North Auckland Registry), subject to proclaim and declare that the land described in the Scheduie Proclamation 15177, defining the middle line of hereto is hereby taken for road; and I also declare that this a transmission line.
  • Sample Properties All Rates GST Inclusive Version 27 Carryforward Bulls Community Centre Year 2020.21 Differentials 1.20 Commercial 1.50 Utilities 20/21 RATES

    Sample Properties All Rates GST Inclusive Version 27 Carryforward Bulls Community Centre Year 2020.21 Differentials 1.20 Commercial 1.50 Utilities 20/21 RATES

    Sample Properties All Rates GST Inclusive Version 27 Carryforward Bulls Community Centre Year 2020.21 Differentials 1.20 Commercial 1.50 Utilities 20/21 RATES: New Valuation Data $ $ $ % Change in Percentage Change Year 2020.21 Rates Rates with Change Change Valuation $'s in Valuation Location Old New For new Total Total Area Capital Value Capital Value 2020-21 Valuations Koitiata 1349009700 1 Wainui St Koitiata 0.08 230,000 435,000 1,608 1,864 256 15.92% 205,000 89.13% 1349007300 1 Omana St Koitiata 0.08 160,000 300,000 1,422 1,570 148 10.38% 140,000 87.50% 1349001500 1 Wainui St Koitiata 0.09 165,000 310,000 1,435 1,592 156 10.88% 145,000 87.88% 1349007400 1 Omana St Koitiata 0.08 125,000 235,000 1,330 1,428 99 7.44% 110,000 88.00% - Taihape Commercial - 1353050000 1.2 Hautapu St New Super Market Taihape 0.27 2,370,000 2,800,000 9,453 9,775 322 3.41% 430,000 18.14% 1353055900 1.2 Hautapu St Taihape 0.16 410,000 710,000 3,843 4,452 609 15.86% 300,000 73.17% 1353049700 1.2 Hautapu St Taihape 0.06 175,000 185,000 3,220 3,227 7 0.22% 10,000 5.71% 1353050400 1.2 Hautapu St Taihape 0.10 215,000 195,000 2,907 2,804 -104 -3.56% -20,000 (9.30%) 1353055600 1.2 Hautapu St Taihape 0.06 146,000 170,000 2,725 2,745 21 0.76% 24,000 16.44% 1353064700 1.2 Kuku St Taihape 0.05 104,000 215,000 2,613 2,850 237 9.07% 111,000 106.73% 1353062201 1.2 Huia St Taihape 0.10 325,000 405,000 3,199 3,294 95 2.97% 80,000 24.62% - - Taihape Non Commercial - 1353011600 1 Pukeko St Taihape 0.22 330,000 435,000 3,212 3,295 83 2.59% 105,000 31.82% 1353011400 1 Pukeko