DOCSLIB.ORG

Harnessing Data for America's Communities

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Harnessing Data for America's Communities HARNESSING DATA FOR AMERICA’S WHAT COMMUNITIES COUNTS EDITED BY Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco & the Urban Institute HARNESSING DATA FOR AMERICA’S WHAT COMMUNITIES COUNTS EDITED BY Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco & the Urban Institute FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF SAN FRANCISCO 101 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94105 URBAN INSTITUTE 2100 M Street NW Washington, DC 20037 Senior Editors: Naomi Cytron Kathryn L.S. Pettit G. Thomas Kingsley Contributing Editors: David Erickson Ellen S. Seidman Copyright © 2014. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco and Urban Institute. This book may be reproduced in whole or in part provided that it is: 1. For noncommercial, personal, or educational purposes only (i.e., not for private gain), and 2. Appropriately credited to its author or authors, the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, and the Urban Institute. The views expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the views of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, the Federal Reserve System, or the Urban Institute. ISBN 978-0-692-31338-1 Library of Congress Control Number: 2014954968 Printed in the United States of America TABLE OF CONTENTS vii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 1 FOREWORD Sarah Rosen Wartell, Urban Institute John C. Williams, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco 1 INTRODUCTION 7 A Roadmap: How to Use this Book 11 Data and Community—Foundation for an Agenda G. Thomas Kingsley and Kathryn L.S. Pettit, Urban Institute TRANSFORMING DATA INTO POLICY-RELEVANT 2 INFORMATION 42 The Future of Community Indicator Systems J. Benjamin Warner, Jacksonville Community Council Inc. 58 The County Health Rankings: “A Treasure Trove of Data” Bridget Catlin, University Of Wisconsin, Madison 75 Making Sense of Markets: Using Data to Guide Reinvestment Strategies Ira Goldstein, The Reinvestment Fund i 88 IN BRIEF — The Low Income Investment Fund’s Social Impact Calculator Nancy O. Andrews and Dan Rinzler, LIIF 94 Health Impact Assessments: Improving Public Health through Community Development Aaron Wernham, The Health Impact Project 3 ENHANCING DATA ACCESS AND TRANSPARENCY 108 Making the Most of Open Data Emily Shaw, Sunlight Foundation 124 The Creation of the National Mortgage Database Robert Avery, Federal Housing Finance Agency Marsha J. Courchane, Charles River Associates Peter Zorn, Freddie Mac 138 IN BRIEF — Applying Technology Advances to Improve Public Access to Mortgage Data Ren Essene and Michael Byrne, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau 148 Three Data Access Trends Shaping the Future of Community Development: Open Data, My Data, and Smart Disclosure Amias Gerety, U.S. Treasury Department Office of Financial Institutions Sophie Raseman, U.S. Treasury Department Office of Consumer Policy 168 IN BRIEF — Can Data From Nonprofit Hospital Tax Returns Improve Community Health? Erik Bakken and David Kindig, University of Wisconsin, Madison ii 176 The Youth Sector: Supporting Cross-Institutional Community Collaboration through Shared Data Rebecca A. London, University of California, Santa Cruz Milbrey Mclaughlin, Stanford University 190 Data Integration for Social Policy: Challenges and Opportunities John Petrila, University of South Florida 206 Affordable Housing as a Platform for Resident Success: Building the Evidence Base Bill Kelly, SAHF Fred Karnas, The Kresge Foundation 220 The Transformative Power of Shared Data Annie Donovan and Rick Jacobus, CoMetrics 238 IN BRIEF — Data Transparency and Standardization Paige Chapel, Aeris (formerly CARS Inc.) 4 STRENGTHENING THE VALIDITY AND USE OF DATA 244 Enhancing Data Quality, Relevance, and Use through Community-Based Participatory Research Meredith Minkler, University of California, Berkeley 260 Using Data to Understand Residential Mobility and Neighborhood Change Claudia J. Coulton, Case Western Reserve University 272 IN BRIEF — Putting Data into Action for Regional Equity in California’s San Joaquin Valley Alex Karner, Arizona State University Jonathan London, University of California, Davis Dana Rowangould, Sustainable Systems Research, LLC Catherine Garoupa White, University of California, Davis iii 278 Shared Measurement: Advancing Evaluation of Community Development Outcomes Maggie Grieve, Success Measures at NeighborWorks America 296 New Ways of Using Data in Federal Place-Based Initiatives: Opportunities to Create a Results Framework and Raise the Visibility of Equity Issues Victor Rubin and Michael McAfee, PolicyLink 318 Everything Old is New Again: Building Nonprofit Capacity in the Age of Big Data Susana Vasquez and Patrick Barry, LISC Chicago 336 IN BRIEF — Enabling and Driving Performance Management in Local Government Cory Fleming and Randall Reid, International City/County Management Association 5 ADOPTING MORE STRATEGIC PRACTICES 342 “Narrative” and “Vehicle”: Using Evidence to Inform Policy Raphael W. Bostic, University of Southern California 356 IN BRIEF — Sustaining Data Culture within Local Government Erika Poethig, Urban Institute 360 Evaluating Social Determinants of Health in Community Development Projects David Fleming, Hilary N. Karasz and Kirsten Wysen, Public Health—Seattle King County 378 Using Data to Drive Change in Complex Community Systems Patricia Bowie and Moira Inkelas, University of California, Los Angeles iv 396 The Role of Data and Measurement in Impact Investing: How Do You Know if You’re Making a Difference? Ian Galloway, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco 408 Strengthening Community Development: A Call for Investment in Information Infrastructure Alaina J. Harkness, John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation 6 CONCLUSION 428 What Counts? Naomi Cytron, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This book is a joint project of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco and the Urban Institute. The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation provided the Urban Institute with a grant to cover the costs of staff and research that were essential to this project. We also benefitted from the field-building work on data from Robert Wood Johnson grantees, many of whom are authors in this volume. Our advisory committee also deserves special acknowledgment. Their perspectives, insights, and deep expertise were critical in shaping this volume. Most of all, we are indebted to our authors; their profound commitment to the idea that data has the potential to improve the policies and programs affecting the lives of low-income people and communities is registered on every page of this book. Barbara Ray and her team at Hiredpen, Inc. were more than copy editors. Barbara has been a co-creator of this project and for that we are grateful. The cover art and layout were designed by C&G Partners LLC, who created an important visual theme for this work. Burness Communications was invaluable in helping us think through how to take what can often be a dry subject and make it more accessible to a wider audience. And our colleagues at the Urban Institute and the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco provided important encourage- ment and support. This book builds on an earlier one, Investing in What Works for America’s Communities. That book started a national conversation on the next generation of community development and anti-poverty work and we are grateful to the Low Income Investment Fund and their sponsor, the Citi Foundation, for keeping this conversation alive, engaged, and productive. And finally, we want to thank Sarah Wartell, president of the Urban Institute, and John Williams, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of vii San Francisco. Sarah was an early architect and advocate of this project and both Sarah and John provided support and enthusiasm as we brought this project to fruition. Senior Editors Naomi Cytron Senior Research Associate, Community Development Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Kathryn L.S. Pettit Senior Research Associate, Metropolitan Housing and Communities Policy Center Urban Institute G. Thomas Kingsley Senior Fellow, Metropolitan Housing and Communities Policy Center Urban Institute Contributing Editors David Erickson Director, Center for Community Development Investment Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Ellen S. Seidman Senior Fellow Urban Institute viii Advisory Committee Nancy Adler Vice-Chair, Department of Psychiatry and Director, Center for Health and Community University of California, San Francisco Nancy Andrews President and CEO Low Income Investment Fund Patricia Auspos Senior Fellow Aspen Institute Roundtable on Community Change Raphael Bostic Professor and Judith and John Bedrosian Chair in Governance and the Public Enterprise Sol Price School of Public Policy, University of Southern California Audrey Choi CEO, Institute for Sustainable Investing and Managing Director and Head, Global Sustainable Finance Morgan Stanley Claudia Coulton Lillian F. Harris Professor of Urban Research and Social Change Jack, Joseph and Morton Mandel School of Applied Social Sciences, Case Western Reserve University Stephen Downs Chief Technology and Information Officer Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Jeff Edmondson Managing Director StriveTogether ix Ingrid Gould Ellen Paulette Goddard Professor of Urban Policy and Planning, Wagner School of Public Service and Director, Furman Center for Real Estate and Urban Policy New York University David Fleming Director and Health Officer Public Health—Seattle & King County Ira Goldstein President of Policy Solutions The Reinvestment Fund Josh Guyer Program Analyst, Office of Economic Resilience U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Alaina Harkness Program Officer, Community and Economic Development
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Oil and Gas Industry Investments in the National Rifle Association and Safari Club International Reshaping American Energy, Land, and Wildlife Policy
    JOE RIIS JOE Oil and Gas Industry Investments in the National Rifle Association and Safari Club International Reshaping American Energy, Land, and Wildlife Policy By Matt Lee-Ashley April 2014 WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.ORG Oil and Gas Industry Investments in the National Rifle Association and Safari Club International Reshaping American Energy, Land, and Wildlife Policy By Matt Lee-Ashley April 2014 Contents 1 Introduction and summary 3 Oil and gas industry investments in three major sportsmen groups 5 Safari Club International 9 The National Rifle Association 11 Congressional Sportsmen’s Foundation 13 Impact of influence: How the oil and gas industry’s investments are paying off 14 Threats to endangered and threatened wildlife in oil- and gas-producing regions 19 Threats to the backcountry 22 Threats to public access and ownership 25 Conclusion 27 About the author and acknowledgments 28 Endnotes Introduction and summary Two bedrock principles have guided the work and advocacy of American sports- men for more than a century. First, under the North American Model of Wildlife Conservation, wildlife in the United States is considered a public good to be conserved for everyone and accessible to everyone, not a commodity that can be bought and owned by the highest bidder.1 Second, since President Theodore Roosevelt’s creation of the first wildlife refuges and national forests, sportsmen have fought to protect wildlife habitat from development and fragmentation to ensure healthy game supplies. These two principles, however, are coming under growing fire from an aggressive and coordinated campaign funded by the oil and gas industry. As part of a major effort since 2008 to bolster its lobbying and political power, the oil and gas industry has steadily expanded its contributions and influ- ence over several major conservative sportsmen’s organizations, including Safari Club International, or SCI, the National Rifle Association, or NRA, and the Congressional Sportsmen’s Foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • How an Army of Techies Is Taking on City Hall
    How an Army of Techies Is Taking on City Hall By: Anya Kamenetz, November 29, 2010 Fast Company, December 2010/Januarry 2011 Still waiting for a full reboot in Washington, D.C., an army of citizen techies is redefining civic engagement on a hyperlocal level. Ben Berkowitz had a problem. His block of State Street, an expanse of charming storefronts and wood-frame houses that stretches from the border of Yale's campus into New Haven's grittier East Rock neighborhood, kept getting hit with graffiti. The 31-year- old did everything a good citizen was supposed to do: He called the city. He left multiple voice mails. He urged his neighbor to speak up. Eventually, he founded the Upper State Street Association to foster neighborhood pride. But still, the spray paint lingered. "I was feeling that helplessness when you've left three messages, you don't know what the resolution is going to be, and you don't have a way to hold anyone accountable," he says. A programmer by trade, Berkowitz sought a technological outlet for his frustrations. What if reporting graffiti or a broken traffic light or a clogged storm drain was as easy as snapping a photo with your mobile phone? What if that report was sent directly to all the groups that might give a damn, including city hall, the police department, the local utility company, and the neighborhood watch? Even better, what if all your neighbors could see those nearby reports and lend their own voices to apply pressure and get problems fixed? His solution, SeeClickFix, launched in beta in March 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • HARD, SOFT and DARK MONEY Introduction Early Political Scandals
    HARD, SOFT AND DARK MONEY Introduction Early political scandals involved money used for bribery or buying votes. Modern day scandals involve the appearances of corruption depending where gifts and campaign money came from. The U.S. Supreme Court has made a number of controversial decisions expanding the amounts of money in politics by characterizing political donations and expenditures to be exercises of freedom of speech. Among other results, those decisions have created a large and growing category of election related donations and contributions called “dark money.” Important Terms Defined Terms relating to money in politics that are used in this paper have definitions more exactly set out by law. These terms are fully addressed in the MIP paper Definitions for Money in Politics, Disclosure Requirements for PACs The relationships of PACs to their disclosure requirements are shown in the chart below. May Funding Disclosure Donations coordinate Corporations Sources required limited with can donate candidate Political parties PAC’s Super Pac’s 527’s 501(c)’s Dark Money Twenty-nine types of corporations are listed in §501(c) of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) as qualified for nonprofit status. Social Welfare Organizations under §501(c) (4), Labor Unions under §501(c)(5), and Trade Associations under §501(c)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code are not required to report from whom they get their donations. Hence these donations are referred to as dark money. Since social welfare or business interests often intersect with political issues, these groups are allowed to use funds to influence elections, but there is otherwise no dollar limit on how much that can be, and they only need to report the majority of their expenditures in general terms.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554
    Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554 Complaint of ) ) Campaign Legal Center, Common Cause, and ) Sunlight Foundation ) ) Against ) ) Hearst Properties, Inc., licensee of WISN-TV, ) Milwaukee, Wisconsin ) ) For Violations of the Communications Act ) §317 and FCC Rule 47 CFR §73.1212 ) To: Media Bureau COMPLAINT The Campaign Legal Center, Common Cause, and Sunlight Foundation1 file this complaint regarding violations of the Communications Act and the Federal Communications Commission’s (“FCC”) regulations by Hearst Properties, Inc., licensee of WISN-TV. WISN-TV is an ABC broadcast television station in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. In November 2015, WISN-TV aired political advertisements identified as paid for by Independence USA PAC (“Independence”). Despite the fact that even a cursory search of the public record would have shown that Michael Bloomberg is the sole funder of Independence USA PAC, WISN-TV did not identify Michael Bloomberg as the sponsor of the advertisements or, evidently, make inquiry of Independence USA of its sources of funding, and instead identified the sponsor of the ads as “Independence USA PAC.” On November 19, 2015, while the advertisements were still running on WISN-TV, Complainants provided evidence directly to WISN-TV establishing that Independence USA PAC 1 Descriptions of these organizations can be found in Exhibit A. was not the ad’s true sponsor.2 Specifically, Complainants provided evidence that Michael Bloomberg has provided 100 per cent of Independence’s funding since its creation.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
    USCA Case #17-7035 Document #1694255 Filed: 09/25/2017 Page 1 of 58 Nos. 17-7035 (Lead Case), 17-7039 In the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS; NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION, INC.; and AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEATING, REFRIGERATING, AND AIR-CONDITIONING ENGINEERS, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG, INC., Defendant-Appellant. (Full caption on inside cover) Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia BRIEF OF SIXTY-SIX LIBRARY ASSOCIATIONS, NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS, LEGAL TECHNOLOGY COMPANIES, FORMER SENIOR GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, LIBRARIANS, INNOVATORS, AND PROFESSORS OF LAW AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT-APPELLANT (AMENDED TO ADD FURTHER SIGNATORIES) Charles Duan Counsel of Record Meredith F. Rose Public Knowledge 1818 N Street NW, Suite 410 Washington, DC 20036 (202) 861-0020 [email protected] Counsel for amici curiae Rev. c9e1c40d USCA Case #17-7035 Document #1694255 Filed: 09/25/2017 Page 2 of 58 AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS; NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION, INC.; and AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEATING, REFRIGERATING, AND AIR-CONDITIONING ENGINEERS, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG, INC., Defendant-Appellant. AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATION, INC.; AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, INC.; and NATIONAL COUNCIL ON MEASUREMENT IN EDUCATION, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG, INC., Defendant-Appellant, AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS; NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION, INC.; and AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEATING, REFRIGERATING, AND AIR-CONDITIONING ENGINEERS, INC., Intervenors-Appellees. USCA Case #17-7035 Document #1694255 Filed: 09/25/2017 Page 3 of 58 CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS, AND RELATED CASES Pursuant to Circuit Rule 28(a)(1), amici curiae certify as follows.
    [Show full text]
  • Collection: Vertical File, Ronald Reagan Library Folder Title: Reagan, Ronald W
    Ronald Reagan Presidential Library Digital Library Collections This is a PDF of a folder from our textual collections. Collection: Vertical File, Ronald Reagan Library Folder Title: Reagan, Ronald W. – Promises Made, Promises Kept To see more digitized collections visit: https://www.reaganlibrary.gov/archives/digitized-textual-material To see all Ronald Reagan Presidential Library inventories visit: https://www.reaganlibrary.gov/archives/white-house-inventories Contact a reference archivist at: [email protected] Citation Guidelines: https://reaganlibrary.gov/archives/research- support/citation-guide National Archives Catalogue: https://catalog.archives.gov/ . : ·~ C.. -~ ) j/ > ji· -·~- ·•. .. TI I i ' ' The Reagan Administration: PROMISES MADE PROMISES KEPI . ' i), 1981 1989 December, 1988 The \\, hile Hollst'. Offuof . Affairs \l.bshm on. oc '11)500 TABIE OF CDNTENTS Introduction 2 Economy 6 tax cuts 7 tax reform 8 controlling Government spending 8 deficit reduction 10 ◄ deregulation 11 competitiveness 11 record exports 11 trade policy 12 ~ record expansion 12 ~ declining poverty 13 1 reduced interest rates 13 I I I slashed inflation 13 ' job creation 14 1 minority/wmen's economic progress 14 quality jobs 14 family/personal income 14 home ownership 15 Misery Index 15 The Domestic Agenda 16 the needy 17 education reform 18 health care 19 crime and the judiciary 20 ,,c/. / ;,, drugs ·12_ .v family and traditional values 23 civil rights 24 equity for women 25 environment 26 energy supply 28 transportation 29 immigration reform 30
    [Show full text]
  • Abigail P. Dumalus December 2018 Macroeconomics of Life Satisfaction
    Abigail P. Dumalus December 2018 Macroeconomics of Life Satisfaction Inequality (Working Paper, Unpublished) Abstract Not much is known about the variations that macroeconomic movements bring to the significance of how people’s subjective life satisfaction (LS) assessments are aggregately distributed. Now more than ever, leaders, policymakers, academia, the media, and the general public may find it worthwhile to know more about LS inequality. The question “How do macroeconomic shifts influence LS inequality?” is closely examined. Whereas most subjective well-being (SWB) studies in economic literature have been dealing with causes and consequences of overall happiness across societies, this paper investigates the macroeconomics of LS inequality. Using internationally comparable upward-looking LS inequality and measures of macroeconomic shifts within a nested cross-country dataset, robust and conclusive empirical evidence is provided to highlight the fundamental role of macroeconomic movements in shaping perceived differences in LS. Findings in this research adequately bolster the substance of how such changes in the macroeconomic landscape have a bearing on shaping SWB or happiness on the aggregate level. Results also carefully explore how disparities in well-being are adversely or favorably motivated by extreme LS responses due to macroeconomic fluctuations. This study makes a twofold contribution to the literature on the effects of macroeconomic movements on well-being. First, using the Cowell-Flachaire status-inequality method, this paper constructs the first multi-country estimate of LS inequality, which could be a more suitable measure of overall welfare. The distribution of LS illustrates a more inclusive and substantial investigation of the impacts of any inequalities that may spring from macroeconomic shifts in society.
    [Show full text]
  • GEORGETOWN LAW INSTITUTE for PUBLIC REPRESENTATION Directors 600 New Jersey Avenue, NW, Suite 312 Hope M
    GEORGETOWN LAW INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC REPRESENTATION Directors 600 New Jersey Avenue, NW, Suite 312 Hope M. Babcock Washington, DC 20001-2075 Angela J. Campbell Telephone: 202-662-9535 Michael T. Kirkpatrick Fax: 202-662-9634 Benton Senior Counselor Andrew Jay Schwartzman Staff Attorneys Meghan M. Boone Justin Gundlach Daniel H. Lutz* Aaron Mackey July 6, 2015 Cathy Williams Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 via email to [email protected] and [email protected] RE:` Information Collection regarding Local Public Inspection Files and Political Files OMB Control Number 3060-0215 Dear Ms. Williams, The Campaign Legal Center, Sunlight Foundation, and Common Cause (“CLC et al.”) are writing to strongly support the continued collection of information under FCC Rules 47 CFR §§ 73.3526 and 73.3527 (local public inspection files) and §76.1701 and §73 1943 (political files). They also offer some suggestions to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected. The information in the public inspection file is necessary for the Commission to carry out its public interest responsibilities The Notice correctly states that the public and FCC use public file information to evaluate licensee performance, ensure that broadcast stations address issues of concern to their communities of license, and ensure that stations comply with Commission policies concerning licensee control. 80 Fed. Reg. 26048 (May 6, 2015). To serve these functions, it is essential that the public have access to the information in the public files. Requiring television stations to make their public inspection files available online has greatly improved public access.
    [Show full text]
  • Fordham University ECON 3235 Darryl Mcleod Latin American Economies Fall 2019 Syllabus V1 8-26-2019
    Fordham University ECON 3235 Darryl McLeod Latin American Economies Fall 2019 Syllabus v1 8-26-2019 Course Description: This is a wonderful time to study Latin America’s wondrously diverse and challenging economies. Many LatAm countries are in the tropics, hence Puerto Rico battles devastating hurricane Maria while Brazil fights Amazon fires. Drug relate violence roils Mexico and Central America leading many to flee North. Yet in terms of equity and social mobility Latin America has outperformed the U.S. as since 2000 virtually every major LatAm economy experienced a “golden decade” of falling poverty and inequality and rising social mobility as a new resilient middle class emerged. Colombia, once plagued with storied violent drug lords, cartels and corruption (see Narcos seasons 1-3) has emerged from a long civil war and now shelters 1.2 million plus desperate Venezuelan immigrants. Many LatAm countries (Costa Rica for example) seem to happy if not rich, this is the Easterlin paradox: more happiness with less income per person. We hope so. A century ago Argentina was among the World’s 10 richest countries, since then it has fallen into the 80s. Still if you have visited Argentina recently, especially Buenos Aires, you know their subway looks exactly like New York’s but works better with lower fares. Venezuela on the other hand is an economic and social (humanitarian) nightmare. With inflation of 10 million percent plus we can’t even computer Venezuela’s misery index (inflation + the unemployment rate). Malnutrition is now widespread in what was a decade ago one of the richest LatAm countries… how has this unfathomable tragedy befallen a wonderful people? Whose can we blame? How can we fix it? You tell me (a great case study, many bonus points for even trying).
    [Show full text]
  • Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress
    Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress Professor Joseph E. STIGLITZ, Chair, Columbia University Professor Amartya SEN, Chair Adviser, Harvard University Professor Jean-Paul FITOUSSI, Coordinator of the Commission, IEP www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr Other Members Bina AGARWAL University of Delhi Kenneth J. ARROW StanfordUniversity Anthony B. ATKINSON Warden of Nuffield College François BOURGUIGNON School of Economics, Jean-Philippe COTIS Insee, Angus S. DEATON Princeton University Kemal DERVIS UNPD Marc FLEURBAEY Université Paris 5 Nancy FOLBRE University of Massachussets Jean GADREY Université Lille Enrico GIOVANNINI OECD Roger GUESNERIE Collège de France James J. HECKMAN Chicago University Geoffrey HEAL Columbia University Claude HENRY Sciences-Po/Columbia University Daniel KAHNEMAN Princeton University Alan B. KRUEGER Princeton University Andrew J. OSWALD University of Warwick Robert D. PUTNAM Harvard University Nick STERN London School of Economics Cass SUNSTEIN University of Chicago Philippe WEIL Sciences Po Rapporteurs Jean-Etienne CHAPRON INSEE General Rapporteur Didier BLANCHET INSEE Jacques LE CACHEUX OFCE Marco MIRA D’ERCOLE OCDE Pierre-Alain PIONNIER INSEE Laurence RIOUX INSEE/CREST Paul SCHREYER OCDE Xavier TIMBEAU OFCE Vincent MARCUS INSEE Table of contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. SHORT NARRATIVE ON THE CONTENT OF THE REPORT Chapter 1: Classical GDP Issues . 21 Chapter 2: Quality of Life . 41 Chapter 3: Sustainable Development and Environment . 61 II. SUBSTANTIAL ARGUMENTS PRESENTED
    [Show full text]
  • PHOENIX Since Our Founding in 1972, ICMA-RC’S Mission Has Been to Help Public Employees Build Retirement Security
    ICMA’s 98th Annual Conference Annual Conference 98th ICMA’s ICMA’s 98 th AnnuAl ConferenCe 40TH ANNIVERSARY 1972-2012 BUILDING RETIREMENT SECURITY PHOENIX Since our founding in 1972, ICMA-RC’s mission has been to help public employees build retirement security. We deliver on our mission Maricopa County by focusing on service, quality and value. • Phoenix/Maricopa County, Arizona Arizona County, Phoenix/Maricopa ICMA-RC is proud to be the principal sponsor of ICMA’s 98th Annual Conference and founder of the Center for State and Local Government Excellence, an organization that shares our dedication to public employees. Visit ICMA-RC’s booth (501) or website at www.icmarc.org. For additional education and research, visit the Center for State and ICMA thanks our Strategic Partner Local Government Excellence at www.slge.org. Honeywell for their co-sponsorship of the conference final program booklet. • what’s holding you back? 2012 7–10, October Cigna is proud to be the exclusive health care sponsor of ICMA’s 98th Annual Conference. Cigna.com/healthiergov BUILDING COMMUNITY We can help your city leap forward. Anxious about rising energy and operating RISING TO SEIZE THE OPPORTUNITIES costs? Concerned about the poor condition of your facilities, lighting and water utility infrastructure? We have jointly developed solutions for many cities and counties that turn expenses into improvements, create value for your citizens and staff, and help all of you achieve your vision for the future. October 7–10, 2012 Phoenix Convention Center Phoenix, Arizona Health Benefits and Services Call 800-345-6770, ext. 605 or “Cigna” is a registered service mark and the “Tree of Life” logo and visit buildingsolutions.honeywell.com “GO YOU” are service marks of Cigna Intellectual Property, Inc., © 2012 Honeywell International Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Delegate Research Information
    MSC 65th Student Conference on National Affairs Texas A&M University Delegate Research Information Round Table Modern Monopolies: The Influence of Mega-Corporations Facilitator: Casey Fleming ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This delegate research information is not intended to be a comprehensive assessment of your assigned round table topic, but rather a starting point to help launch your own personal investigations into the various associated issues. It is encouraged, if not expected, that your policy proposals will be inclusive of aspects pertaining to your round table topic that are not covered in this research compilation. You, your facilitator, your round table host, and your fellow roundtable delegates are all responsible for crafting a policy proposal that takes this into consideration. Terms & Actors Terms Bureaucracy - agencies made by the federal government to help enforce laws made. Most direct source of corruption from corporations. Citizens United vs. Federal Election Committee- landmark Case settled in 2010 by the Supreme Court that overturned certain long-standing restrictions on political fundraising and spending. Federal Campaign Act - passed in 1971, this law is the primary source of regulation concerning political fundraising and spending. Later amendments would go on to establish the Federal Election Committee (FEC). Lobbying- communicating with a public official for the purpose of influencing the passage, defeat, amendment, or postponement of legislative or executive action. Megacorporation- a large collection of companies owned by a single parent company. Shadowban - when an individual(s)’ content isn’t shown to the public despite not being officially “banned” by the network. Actors “Big Oil” - the supermajors are considered to be BP, Chevron Corporation, ExxonMobil, Royal Dutch Shell, Total and Eni (and sometimes ConocoPhillips).
    [Show full text]