DOCSLIB.ORG

In the Supreme Court of British Columbia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
In the Supreme Court of British Columbia IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: Coutinho & Ferrostaal GmbH v. Tracomex (Canada) Ltd., 2015 BCSC 787 Date: 20150513 Docket: S116044 Registry: Vancouver Between: Coutinho & Ferrostaal GmbH Plaintiff 2015 BCSC 787 (CanLII) And: Tracomex (Canada) Ltd., Metales Tracomex Limitada, Jorge Mitarakis, Pola Namias, Super H. Holdings Ltd., Westcan Rail Ltd. Defendants - and - Docket: S120939 Registry: Vancouver Between: Imbamar S.A. Plaintiff And: Coutinho & Ferrostaal GmbH Defendant - and - Docket: S122034 Registry: Vancouver Between: 0291633 Manitoba Ltd. Plaintiff Coutinho & Ferrostaal GmbH v. Tracomex (Canada) Ltd. Page 2 And: Tracomex (Canada) Ltd., Metales Tracomex Limitada, Coutinho & Ferrostaal GmbH, and Imbamar S.A. Defendants Before: The Honourable Mr. Justice Voith Reasons for Judgment Counsel for Coutinho & Ferrostaal GmbH: Alex L. Eged David W.P. Moriarty 2015 BCSC 787 (CanLII) Counsel for Imbamar S.A.: Michelle Tribe Rosalie Clark Counsel for 0291633 Manitoba Ltd.: Kieran Siddall Scott Boucher Place and Date of Trial: Vancouver, B.C. May 26-30, June 3-6, August 18-20, 2014, January 12-14, 16, 19-22, 27-30, 2015 Place and Date of Judgment: Vancouver, B.C. May 13, 2015 Coutinho & Ferrostaal GmbH v. Tracomex (Canada) Ltd. Page 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1) Introduction ................................................................................................................... 5 2) An Understanding of the Parties ............................................................................. 7 3) Background and History ............................................................................................ 8 4) Changes in Position .................................................................................................. 14 5) The United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods .................................................................................................................................... 21 i) Romalpa Clauses ..................................................................................................... 22 ii) The Focus of the Convention ................................................................................. 23 iii) The Interaction of Romalpa Clauses, The Convention and Domestic Law .... 24 2015 BCSC 787 (CanLII) iv) Is the Trac Chile Contract and/or the Title Reservation Clause Governed by the PPSA? ......................................................................................................................... 25 v) Interests Under the PPSA that are not Registered ............................................. 27 vi) Conclusion ................................................................................................................. 27 6) Agency .......................................................................................................................... 28 i) Imbamar’s Position................................................................................................... 28 7) Was Mr. Krause C & F’s Agent? ............................................................................. 35 i) Actual Agency ........................................................................................................... 35 ii) Implied Agency ......................................................................................................... 38 iii) Ostensible Authority ................................................................................................. 39 iv) Agency and Section 26 of the SGA ....................................................................... 44 8) Is C & F Entitled to Rescission of the Trac Chile Contract? .......................... 46 9) Did the Tracomex Companies Make a Fraudulent Misrepresentation to C & F that Induced it to Enter into the Trac Chile Contract? ................................. 46 10) Limits on Rescission............................................................................................. 47 i) Laches........................................................................................................................ 47 ii) Affirmation ................................................................................................................. 48 iii) Third-Party Rights .................................................................................................... 48 a) Ordinary Course of Business ............................................................................. 50 b) The “Good Faith” Issue ....................................................................................... 57 11) Does the Imbamar Contract Create a Security Interest that is Subject to the PPSA? ............................................................................................................................ 65 i) The Analytical Framework ...................................................................................... 66 ii) Proper Sources of Evidence ................................................................................... 68 iii) The Purpose of the Imbamar Contract ................................................................. 70 Coutinho & Ferrostaal GmbH v. Tracomex (Canada) Ltd. Page 4 iv) Value of the Steel Rail Relative to the Price in the Imbamar Contract ............ 75 v) The Repurchase Option .......................................................................................... 75 vi) Obligations of Ownership ........................................................................................ 78 12) Did Imbamar Abandon Possession of the Steel Rail so that 029’s Registration of its Interest in the Steel Rail took Priority over Imbamar’s Interests? ............................................................................................................................. 79 i) Attachment, Perfection and Priorities under the PPSA ...................................... 79 ii) Break in the Continuity of Imbamar’s Possession............................................... 81 13) Summary of Conclusions .................................................................................... 84 2015 BCSC 787 (CanLII) Coutinho & Ferrostaal GmbH v. Tracomex (Canada) Ltd. Page 5 1) Introduction [1] These reasons arise out of three separate actions that were tried at the same time: 1) In action No. S116044, Coutinho & Ferrostaal GmbH, (“C & F”), a German company, has sued several defendants including Tracomex (Canada) Ltd. (“Trac Canada”), Metales Tracomex Limited (“Trac Chile”), Jorge Mitarakis and his wife Pola Namias. Mr. Mitarakis was the president of both Tracomex companies. C & F alleges that in “back-to-back” contracts dated July 22, 2015 BCSC 787 (CanLII) 2009 and August 6, 2009 respectively. C & F first bought 3,560 metric tonnes (“MT”) of used steel scrap rails (the “Steel Rail”), from Trac Canada and then sold the Steel Rail to Trac Chile. It was a term of those contracts that the Steel Rail be shipped from a storage yard in Abbotsford, British Columbia to a terminal or storage facility near Tacoma, Washington. It is alleged, inter alia, that the defendants provided C & F with 155 bills of lading and other documents that fraudulently represented that the Steel Rail had been shipped across the United States’ border when that was not so. C & F seeks, inter alia, rescission of the contract it made with Trac Chile (the “Trac Chile Contract”). Mr. Mitarakis passed away prior to the trial of this matter, and neither the Tracomex companies nor Ms. Namias participated at trial. 2) In action No. S120939, Imbamar S.A. (“Imbamar”), a Uruguayan company, has sued C & F. It alleges that it was advised by Mr. Bernd Krause, who it argues was C & F’s agent in Chile, that Trac Chile, rather than C & F, had title to the Steel Rail. Moreover, it says it was told by Mr. Krause that C & F was not only aware of the fraudulent nature of the bills of lading and other commercial documents, but that C & F had actually Coutinho & Ferrostaal GmbH v. Tracomex (Canada) Ltd. Page 6 overseen and directed the preparation of such fraudulent materials. It argues that it relied on Mr. Krause’s representations, qua agent for C & F, that it purchased the Steel Rail bona fide, and for value in the ordinary course of Trac Chile’s business, and that title to the Steel Rail passed to it. 3) In action No. S122034, 0291633 Manitoba Ltd. (“029”) has sued each of the Tracomex companies, Imbamar and C & F. 029 alleges that it loaned money to Trac Canada. Those loans were never repaid. During the course of the trial, 029 discontinued its 2015 BCSC 787 (CanLII) action against C & F and it obtained default judgment against the two Tracomex companies. 029 argues that the agreement made between Imbamar and Trac Chile for the Steel Rail is, in substance, a security agreement, and that 029’s registration of its interest in the Steel Rail takes priority over Imbamar’s interest in that rail. [2] A number of factual and legal issues arise from these three actions and the pleadings that were filed in respect of them. Several of these issues were either conceded or abandoned during the trial. The primary issues which remain are: i. What is the relationship between the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods, 11 April 1980, 1489 UNTS 59, [Convention] and either or both of the Sale of Goods Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 410 [SGA], and the Personal Property Security Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 359 [PPSA]? ii. Was Mr. Krause the agent of C & F? iii. Is
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Security Interests US Style: a Device for Financing Small Businessmen and Protecting Yourself in Liquidation John A
    Bond Law Review Volume 4 | Issue 2 Article 1 1992 Security Interests US Style: A Device for Financing Small Businessmen and Protecting Yourself in Liquidation John A. Spanogle Jr Bond University William Wallace Kirkpatrick George Washington University Follow this and additional works at: http://epublications.bond.edu.au/blr This Article is brought to you by the Faculty of Law at ePublications@bond. It has been accepted for inclusion in Bond Law Review by an authorized administrator of ePublications@bond. For more information, please contact Bond University's Repository Coordinator. Security Interests US Style: A Device for Financing Small Businessmen and Protecting Yourself in Liquidation Abstract There have been several articles which have compared the current Australian approach, using charges, and the North American approach, using security interests; but they have all been prepared by non-North American authors, and some do not have a full perspective of the effects of UCC Article 9. In addition, the Commonwealth Attorney General’s office seems to base its current evaluation of the North American approach on a single quotation from a book published in 1964. Both UCC Article 9 and the United States insolvency laws have been redrafted since that time of twenty-eight years ago, so perhaps it is useful for an American explanation of current American law. Thus, this paper will outline the significant aspects of the North American ’security interest’ approach to secured financing. Keywords United States, Australia, security interests, charges,
    [Show full text]
  • The Practical Lender
    VEDDERPRICE ® Finance and Transactions Group October 2008 The Practical Lender Cross-Border Lending Introduction IRC § 956-The “Deemed subsidiary’s current and accumulated earnings and Globalization of business has Dividend Rule” profi ts are less than the amount accelerated. In order to remain Under Internal Revenue Code of the U.S. obligation, then all competitive, lenders must be (“IRC”) § 956, the obligation of a of the foreign subsidiary’s prepared to structure U.S. corporate parent to a future earnings and profi ts will transactions with cross-border lender will trigger a “deemed be subject to the deemed lending features—loans to dividend” of the controlled distribution up to the amount of foreign borrowers or loans foreign subsidiary’s current and the U.S. loan obligation (after against the value of foreign accumulated earnings and subtracting prior deemed borrowers’ assets. Cross- profi ts up to the amount of the distributions). border lending requires lenders U.S. loan obligation if any one Borrowers and lenders often to address issues related to of the following three events assume that a U.S. parent taxes, security and available occurs: (a) 66⅔ percent or cannot pledge the stock of a remedies. This article briefl y more of the foreign subsidiary’s foreign subsidiary and that a discusses these issues and outstanding voting stock is foreign subsidiary cannot focuses on the laws of Canada pledged to the U.S. parent’s guarantee or pledge its assets and Mexico relative to security lender (accompanied by certain in support of the loan to the and insolvency. Practical tips restrictions on the disposition of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Remedies of the Seller
    CHAPTER 12 REMEDIES OF THE SELLER 1 ACTION FOR THE PRICE = e seller’s right to bring an action for the price is described in s 49 of the Act in rather sur- prisingly restrictive terms. Section 49 states that he is entitled to do so only in two speciO ed situations: (1) where, under the contract of sale, the property in the goods has passed to the buyer, and he wrongfully neglects or refuses to pay for the goods according to the terms of the contract (s 49(1)); (2) where, under the contract, the price is payable on a day certain irrespective of delivery, and the buyer wrongfully neglects or refuses to pay the price (s 49(2)). However, there are some other situations where the seller may sue for the price (see para- graph (c) below); so s 49 cannot be regarded as a complete statement of the law. (a) Where the property has passed to the buyer (s 49(1)) For the seller to be able to sue for the price under this subsection, it is not su< cient that the property has passed to the buyer. = e buyer must also have wrongfully neglected or refused to pay the price; and this neglect or refusal will not be ‘wrongful’ if the price is not yet due under the terms of the contract (eg where the seller has agreed to give credit), or if the seller is in breach of certain obligations on his part (eg where s 28 applies, to be ready and willing to give possession of the goods to the buyer in exchange for the price).
    [Show full text]
  • The Estey Centre Journal Of
    Volume 14 Number 2 2013/p. 68-86 esteyjournal.com The Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy Passing of Property in Goods in Contracts of International Sale of Goods Richard Kayibanda Assistant Lecturer, National University of Rwanda, Butare, Rwanda The existing international legal instruments that deal with contracts of sale do not cater for the transfer of ownership in goods sold, yet transfer of ownership is core to the contract of sale. This incapacity is mainly due to divergence in different countries’ legal systems as far as transfer of ownership is concerned, leaving parties to an international contract with no option other than expressly agreeing on the law applicable to the transfer of ownership. However, for various reasons parties may forget or be unable to determine the applicable law. This article attempts to highlight different options that can be resorted to in order to cope with the problem of transfer of ownership in contracts that deal with international sale of goods. Keywords: transfer of ownership, contract of international sale Editorial Office: 410 22nd St. E., Suite 820, Saskatoon, SK, Canada, S7K 5T6. _____ Phone (306) 244-4800; Fax (306) 244-7839; email: [email protected] 68 Richard Kayibanda Introduction contract of sale of goods is one of various legal transactions people enter into in A their daily lives. A contract of sale entails necessarily the transfer of title to (property in) goods sold.1 A contract of sale between parties whose places of business are located in different states is an international one.2 In such a case different legal systems and backgrounds are involved and it is necessary to find the common ground between contracting parties.
    [Show full text]
  • Secured Credit Under English and American Law
    This page intentionally left blank Secured Credit under English and American Law Secured credit drives economic activity. Under English law it is possible to create security over almost any asset, but the law is widely considered to be unsatisfactory for several reasons, including a cumbersome regis- tration system, a preoccupation with formalistic distinctions and the lack of clear and rationally determined priority rules. Gerard McCormack examines the current state of English law, highlighting its weaknesses. He uses Article 9 of the American Uniform Commercial Code as a ref- erence point: this article has successfully serviced the world’s largest economy for over forty years and is increasingly used as the basis for legislation by Commonwealth jurisdictions including Canada and New Zealand. The Law Commission has suggested the enactment of simi- lar legislation in England. In addition, McCormack considers whether there really is a case for the priority of secured credit, as well as whether there are other international models to draw upon. The appendix con- tains the text of Article 9. GERARD McCORMACK is Baker and McKenzie Professor of Cor- porate Law at the University of Manchester. His recent publications include Registration of Company Charges (1994), Reservation of Title (2nd edn 1995) and Proprietary Claims and Insolvency (1997). Cambridge Studies in Corporate Law Series Editor Professor Barry Rider, University of London Corporate or Company Law encompasses the law relating to the creation, op- eration and management of corporations and their relationships with other legal persons. Cambridge Studies in Corporate Law offers an academic platform for discussion of these issues. The series is international in its choice of both authors and subjects, and aims to publish the best original scholarship on topics ranging from labour law to capital regulation.
    [Show full text]
  • Retail Insolvencies in Canada Series, #2: Supplier Perspectives
    Retail Insolvencies in Canada Series, #2: Supplier Perspectives By Linc Rogers and Aryo Shalviri This is the second instalment in a series examining large retail insolvencies in Canada from the perspective of various stakeholders. The Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (Canada) (CCAA) is the principal statute for the reorganization or sale of large corporate debtors in Canada and the functional equivalent to Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Chapter 11) in the United States. Accordingly, our series focuses on CCAA proceedings, with references to alternate insolvency proceedings where applicable. This article discusses retail insolvencies from the perspective of third-party inventory suppliers and service providers, and follows the CCAA filing of Toys “R” Us (Canada) Ltd. (Toys Canada), a leading toy and baby products retailer. The first article in this series, focusing on the landlord perspective on retail insolvencies, was published shortly after Sears Canada’s June 22, 2017 CCAA filing. n September 19, 2017, Toys Canada obtained Chapter Although Toys US was facing significant fiscal challenges, O11 protection from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Toys Canada had strong financial metrics. Nonetheless, Eastern District of Virginia, together with its U.S. parent Toys Canada was facing a liquidity crisis due to the loss (Toys US) and various affiliated entities. Later that same of access to its operating facility following the event of day, Toys Canada also filed for CCAA protection before the default that was triggered under its credit facilities by Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List). the Chapter 11 filing. In its court materials, Toys Canada © Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP | October 2017 | blakes.com acknowledged the need to modernize its stores and In the recent Target Canada CCAA proceeding, the court — significantly improve its online sales platform in order to with the support of Target Canada and the court-appointed remain competitive in its market sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Revue Du Barreau Revue Du Barreau Du Québec Édition Courante Archives Revue Du Barreau: Volume 63 Numéro 2
    Accueil » Publications » Revue Revue du Barreau Revue du Barreau du Québec Édition courante Archives Revue du Barreau: volume 63 numéro 2 Hommage à Suzanne Vadboncœur Michel Deschamps Matrimonial Regimes in Quebec Private International Law: Where Are We Now? Jeffrey Talpis La propriété collective au Québec : les enjeux Générosa Bras Miranda The Quebec R.R.S.P. and Bank of Nova Scotia v. Thibault John B. Claxton Analysis of the Interaction between Security under Section 427 of the Bank Act and Provincial Law: A Bijural Perspective Marc-Alexandre Poirier Chroniques Droit comparé. De la preuve et des systèmes judiciaires en France et au Québec 112K Luc-Marie Augagneur Droit du travail. L'insolvabilité de l'employeur et l'application des lois régissant les rapports collectifs de travail 95K Jacques Deslauriers et Pierre Verge Sûretés. Les décisions Bombardier Inc. c. Hermes Aero LLC et l'autonomie des crédits standby 93K Marc Lemieux Liste des mémoires de maîtrise et thèses de doctorat acceptés en 2003 79K Nos disparus en 2003 52K Index des auteurs 52K Index analytique 58K Table de la jurisprudence commentée 54K Table de la législation commentée 51K Plan du site | Liens utiles | Bottin | Contactez-nous Mise à jour : NaN undefined NaN Hommage à Suzanne Vadboncœur Je voudrais rendre hommage à Suzanne Vadboncœur qui a été secrétaire du Comité de la Revue du Barreau jusqu’à ce qu’elle soit nommée juge à la Cour du Québec en novembre 2003. Suzanne est devenue avocate en 1976 et elle est entrée au service du Barreau du Québec en 1980 ; au moment de sa nomination à la magistrature, elle y occupait le poste de directrice du service de recherche et législation.
    [Show full text]
  • An Article on Property Law
    Ius Commune Research Project Ius Commune and Private Law Programme An Article on Property Law Security Interests in Personal Property: the Perspectives of Harmonisation Author: Ihor Olekhov University of Edinburgh LL.M. Student The author wishes to thank Professor George Gretton of the University of Edinburgh for the very helpful comments and encouragement in preparation of this article. The author also acknowledges the support of the British Council and the Open Society Institute (Hungary) in making this research possible. Of course, any inaccuracies made in the article remain the author’s sole responsibility. Edinburgh, 2002 Security Interests in Personal Property: the Perspectives of Harmonisation Abstract The article discusses the perspectives of harmonisation of secured financing law, an area of property law traditionally viewed as ill suited for harmonisation, in the national legal systems and on an international level. The author analyses the intricacies of secured transactions in England, Germany, the United States and Ukraine and comes to a number of unique and unusual conclusions with respect to the harmonisation of the laws governing security interests in these countries. In this connection, the existing approaches to security interests are classified into “form- based” and “in-substance” legal systems based on Article 9 of the US Uniform Commercial Code or its analogues. Further, the author describes the international efforts aimed at harmonisation of secured financing law and recent sector-by-sector initiatives (Convention on International Interests in Mobile Equipment, UN Convention on Assignment of Receivables in International Trade, UNCITRAL Legislative Guide on Secured Transactions, EBRD Model Law and Principles, and Inter-American Model Law).
    [Show full text]
  • THE NEW PROVINCIAL CHATTEL SECURITY LAW REGIMES Jacob S. Ziegel* Toronto in 1967, Ontario Adopted the Personal Property Security
    THE NEW PROVINCIAL CHATTEL SECURITY LAW REGIMES Jacob S. Ziegel* Toronto In 1967, Ontario adopted the Personal Property Security Act 1967, which was a Canadian adaptation ofArticle 9 ofthe American Uniform Commercial Code. Since then the four Western provinces have adopted similar legislation and more provinces .are expected tofollow suit in theforeseeablefuture This article describes the history of the personal property security legislation in some detail as well as successive efforts by .the Canadian Par Associaüon the Uniforns Law Conference of Canada and, more'recently, the Western provinces to promote harmonization oflegislationamongtheprovinces,itassessestheoperational.impact ofthe legislation, and it discusses some key policy issues and problems that are common to all the Acts. The author_.concludes that the new legislation is now solidly entrenched in , Canada. However, he regrets -the fact that it has taken- so long to . reach this point and that many important differences remain between the Ontario Act and1991 CanLIIDocs 177 the legislation adopted in the Western provinces L'Ontario a adopté en 1967 la Personal Property Security Act 1967, . adaptation canadienne de larticle 9 du Code commercial uniforme américain. Depuis cette date les quatre provinces de 'l'ouest ont adopté des lois: semblables et dautres provincesferont sans doute de même dans un avenir plus ou moins proche. Dans cet article l'auteur décrit de façon assez détaillée l'histoire de la -législation, de même. que les efforts répétés de lAssociation dû barreau canadien,_
    [Show full text]
  • Tallorder Singapore Raises the Bar for the Bunker Industry
    www.bunkerspot.com Volume 14 Number 5 October/November 2017 RSPO'" TALLORDER SINGAPORE RAISES THE BAR FOR THE BUNKER INDUSTRY INSIDE: SHIPPING OUTLOOK ARBITRATION FUEL QUALlTY LPG owbunker The bankruptcy of OW Bunker in 2014 and Hanjin Shipping's market exit last year together provided a salutary - and long overdue - wake-up call for the bunker industry and wider maritime sector. Steve Simms of Sirnms Showers reviews the subsequent legal and cornmercial changes and actions that have wrought further upheaval in the shipping world in such a short space of time ometlme just befare 7 November 2014 talk witI1 him (Rlp finds that many are gone) about Rlp Van Winkle. Deep In a forest, (the date of OW Bunker's insolvency and they ask: 'Wtry should we buy through Rip finds a group of Dutch sailors from Sfili ng In Denmark). a bunker trader you and not direct from physical suppliers?' Henry Hudson's 1620 New York expedi­ namad Rlp flnds a group of strangers. Rip's expertise had a/ways added falr value tion. Mystariousty, they are aliva from more They invite Rip to take a drink wHh them (It for those customers, so what has changed? than 100 years earliar. Rip drinks with them could haya been Aquavit, the potent Oanish Rip arrests a ship to collect on sorne old char­ and wakes up 20 years later. He has slept natianal distillate): terer accounts. The owner's first question to through the entire American Revolution. His By degrees Rip's awe and apprehension him is, 'Did you pay the physical supplier?' dog and many friands are dead, his now subsided.
    [Show full text]
  • Lending and Taking Security in Israel: Overview Peter Sugarman, Yuval Shalheveth and Ricki Newman Yigal Arnon & Co
    Country Q&A GLOBAL GUIDE 2015/16 FINANCE Lending and taking security in Israel: overview Peter Sugarman, Yuval Shalheveth and Ricki Newman Yigal Arnon & Co. global.practicallaw.com/3-612-3625 OVERVIEW OF THE LENDING MARKET Common forms of security The most common form of security interest granted over real estate 1. What have been the main trends and important is a mortgage (mashkanta). A mortgage can be granted over real developments in the lending market in your jurisdiction in estate property that is registered with the Israeli Land Registry. If the last 12 months? the real estate property is not yet registered, a security interest can be granted over it by way of a pledge. A mortgage and a pledge are similar in most of their legal characteristics, while the main The main trends and important developments in the lending difference between them relates to their registration procedures market over the last 12 months are as follows: (see Question 3). • There has been an increase in the scope of participation by Under the Land Law, the registration of a mortgage with the Land Israeli institutional investors in credit transactions as well as Registry has strong binding power and is very difficult to challenge. diversification of deals in which these investors participate. The Therefore, a registered mortgage is considered a valuable and main reason behind this seems to be the lack of investment trustworthy security. However, under the Enforcement Law 1967, alternatives yielding high rates of return. enforcement of a mortgage registered on a residence in which the pledgor resides, requires evidencing that the pledgor and his family • More transactions have been carried out by large-scale have an alternative reasonable residence or that they have international lending syndicates, particularly in the offshore sufficient means to finance such an alternative reasonable natural gas projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Contracts Jurisprudence and Article Nine of the Uniform Commercial Code
    Hastings Law Journal Volume 37 | Issue 6 Article 2 1-1986 Contracts Jurisprudence and Article Nine of the Uniform Commercial Code: The Allowable Scope of Future Advance and All Obligations Clauses in Commerical Security Agreements Bruce A. Campbell Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Bruce A. Campbell, Contracts Jurisprudence and Article Nine of the Uniform Commercial Code: The Allowable Scope of Future Advance and All Obligations Clauses in Commerical Security Agreements, 37 Hastings L.J. 1007 (1986). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal/vol37/iss6/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Law Journal by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Contracts Jurisprudence and Article Nine of the Uniform Commercial Code: The Allowable Scope of Future Advance and All Obligations Clauses in Commercial Security Agreements By BRUCE A. CAMPBELL* Many commercial security agreements under Article Nine of the Uniform Commercial Code' provide that payment or performance of all the debtor's obligations to the creditor is secured.2 Such agreements pur- port to secure not only the debtor's primary obligation 3 to repay the creditor's first advance, but in addition all of the debtor's secondary obli- gations 4 to the creditor, including, among others, the obligation to repay * Associate Professor of Law, The University of Toledo College of Law. B.A., 1964, DePauw University; M.A., 1966, Ph.D., 1973, Michigan State University; J.D., 1973, Univer- sity of Michigan Law School.
    [Show full text]