Overview of Thermostable DNA Polymerases for Classical PCR Applications: from Molecular and Biochemical Fundamentals to Commercial Systems
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol (2013) 97:10243–10254 DOI 10.1007/s00253-013-5290-2 MINI-REVIEW Overview of thermostable DNA polymerases for classical PCR applications: from molecular and biochemical fundamentals to commercial systems Kay Terpe Received: 22 July 2013 /Revised: 20 September 2013 /Accepted: 22 September 2013 /Published online: 1 November 2013 # Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013 Abstract During the genomics era, the use of thermostable before becoming standard. Time and temperature of denaturing DNA polymerases increased greatly. Many were identified and can deactivate the polymerase more or less depending on the described—mainly of the genera Thermus, Thermococcus and used enzyme. Factors like DNA origin, primer and product Pyrococcus. Each polymerase has different features, resulting length as well as guanine–cytosine content should have a direct from origin and genetic modification. However, the rational influence on the choice of polymerase (Wu et al. 1991). Salt, choice of the adequate polymerase depends on the application magnesium and deoxyribonucleotide triphosphate (dNTP) con- itself. This review gives an overview of the most commonly centrations can greatly affect the PCR (Ling et al. 1991; used DNA polymerases used for PCR application: KOD, Pab Owczarzy et al. 2008). Additives like BSA (Al-Soud and (Isis™), Pfu, Pst (Deep Vent™), Pwo, Taq, Tbr, Tca, Tfi, Tfl, Rådström 2001), dimethylsulfoxide (Chester and Marshak Tfu, Tgo, Tli (Vent™), Tma (UITma™), Tne, Tth and others. 1993), formamide (Sarkar et al. 1990), betaine (Henke et al. 1997; Rees et al. 1993), ethylene glycol and 1,2-propanediol Keywords Thermostable DNA polymerase . Polymerase (Zhang et al. 2009), and others (Al-Soud and Rådström 2000; chain reaction (PCR) . Extension rate . Error rate . Half-life Varadaraj and Skinner 1994) are in use to optimize specificity time . Extension temperature and PCR amplification. Most of these important factors are recommended for calculations of the theoretical annealing tem- perature. Basis of this calculation is the melting temperature. Introduction Many formulas are used addicted in similar but not identical results (Table 2). The real optimal annealing temperature is very It is a matter of fact that thermostable DNA polymerases with often determined by using a thermal cycler with temperature 5′→3′ amplification activity are one of the key enzymes in gradient. Additional, the heating and cooling rates of the thermal many molecular applications. Therefore, industrial business cycler, the thermal conductivity of the thermoblock material, the volume is much and there is financial pressure to find better volume of the mixture (Chang and Lee 2005) and the thickness polymerases than the established ones. Mainly A-type and B- of the used plastic material have an important influence on the type polymerases are in use (Table 1). The increasing microbi- evaluation of an optimal PCR process (Table 3). The perfor- ology genome projects in combination with new molecular mance of the thermal cyclers as well as the transfer of protocols technologies facilitate launching new thermostable DNA poly- from one system to another are also important points which merases. However, marketing names like super, turbo, ultra, could be considered (Schoder et al. 2003, 2005). However, this dream, gold and many more confuse the users and are not review describes the common widely used thermostable DNA helpful. Published values of fidelity are mostly analysed at polymerases (Table 1) and their important features for PCR optimal conditions with λ-DNA. These error rates cannot trans- applications. mit for any application. A PCR process must often be validated A-type polymerases from bacteria Thermus K. Terpe (*) SensoQuest GmbH, Hannah-Vogt-Str. 1, 37085 Göttingen, Germany e-mail: [email protected] The genus Thermus belongs to the bacteria and to the class of URL: www.sensoquest.de Deinococci. Thermus species grow optimal at 65–70 °C, and 10244 Table 1 Overview of the most common thermophilic DNA polymerases and their characteristics (n.p. = not published) Name of DNA Species origin Optimal Extension rate Error rate = mutation 5′→3′/3′→5′ Extra Half-life time References polymerase extension [kbp/min] frequency per bp exonuclease nucleotide measured temperature per duplication activity overhang between − − (°C) [mf×bp 1×d 1] 95 and 100 °C − − Deep Vent™ Pyrococcus species GB-D 72 – 75 1.4 1.2 × 10 5– 2.7 × 10 6 No/yes 95 % blunt 95 °C/23 h Cline et al. (1996) − − − − [exo :2.0×10 4] [exo : no/no] [exo :70% 100 °C/8 h Huang and Keohavong (1996) blunt] − KOD1 Thermococcus 72 – 75 6.0 – 7.8 2.6 × 10 6 No/yes Blunt 95 °C/12 h Takagi et al. (1997) kodacaraensis 100 °C/3 h − − Pab (Isis™) Pyrococcus abyssi 70 – 80 n.p. 6.7 × 10 6– 6.6 × 10 7 No/yes Blunt 100 °C/5 h Dietrich et al. (2002) − − Pfu Pyrococcus furiosus 72 – 80 0.5 – 1.5 2.2 × 10 6– 0.7 × 10 6 No/yes Blunt 95 °C/95 % Cline et al. (1996) − − − [exo :6.0×10 5– [exo : no/no] after 1 h incubation Kim et al. (2007) − 2.0 × 10 5] Pwo Pyrococcus woesei 72 n.p. n.p. No/yes Blunt 100 °C/2 h Dabrowski and Kur (1998) − − Taq Thermus aquaticus 68 – 80 1.0 – 4.8 1.8 × 10 4–8.0 × 10 6 Yes/no 95 % 3′A97°C/10min Eckert and Kunkel (1990) 95 °C/40 min Flaman et al. (1994) Lee et al. (2010) Tbr Thermus brokianus 72 n.p. n.p. Yes/no 3′A 96°C/150min n.p. (DyNAzyme™) Tca Thermus caldophilus 70 – 80 1.0 – 2.3 n.p. Yes/no 3′A95°C/70minParketal.(1993) Tfi Thermus filiformis 70 –72 1.0 n.p. Yes/no 3′A 94°C/40min Choietal.(1999) Zheng et al. (2008) Tfl Thermus flavus 70 –74 2.0 – 4.0 n.p. Yes/no 3′A97°C/10minKaledin et al. (1981) 95 °C/40 min − − Tfu Thermococcus fumiculans 72 0.32 5.3 × 10 5–0.9 × 10 5 No/yes Blunt 95 °C/3.3 h Cambon-Bonavita et al. (2000) 100 °C/2 h − − Tgo Thermococcus 72 1.5 5.6 × 10 6– 3.5 × 10 6 No/yes Blunt 95 °C/2 h Bonch-Osmolovskaya et al. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol (2013) 97:10243 gorgonarius (1996) − − Tli (Vent™) Thermococcus litoralis 72 – 80 1.0 4.5 × 10 5– 2.8 × 10 6 No/yes Blunt 95 % 95 °C/6.7 h Cline et al. (1996) − − − − [exo :1.9×10 4] [exo : no/no] [exo : 100 °C/1.8 h Mattila et al. (1991) blunt 70 %] − − Tma (UlTma™) Thermotoga maritima 65 – 75 n.p. 7.4 × 10 5– 3.2 × 10 5 No/yes Blunt 95 % 97.5 °C/50 min Diaz and Sabino (1998) Flaman et al. (1994) − TNA1_pol Thermococcus sp. NA1 75 3.6 2.2 × 10 4 No/yes n.p. 95 °C/12.5 h Kim et al. (2007) 100 °C/3.5 h Tne Thermotoga neopolitana 72 – 75 n.p. n.p. No/yes n.p. 90 °C/1 h Chatterjee et al. (2002) − Tpe Thermococcus 75 2.0 3.4 × 10 6 No/yes 90 % blunt 95 °C/4 h Lee et al. (2010) peptonophilus Tth Thermus thermophilus 70 – 74 1.5 – 2.0 n.p. Yes/no 3′A 95 °C/20 min Carballeira et al. (1990) − Tzi (Pfx50™) Thermococcus zilligii 68 0.5 – 1.0 2.0 × 10 6 Yes/no Blunt n.p. Griffiths et al. (2007) – 10254 Appl Microbiol Biotechnol (2013) 97:10243–10254 10245 Table 2 Formulas for calculation of the melting temperature (Tm)of recommended. The empirical results calculated with the T7 primer allow oligonucleotides (summarized in von Ahsen et al. 2001). Empirical the deductive reasoning that optimal annealing conditions should be formulas based on GC content, length and the concentration of monova- optimized using gradient function of thermal cyclers. However, next to + lent cations [Na ]. PCR is typically performed in 0.05 M monovalent the manual way for empirical calculation of the Tm, many programs are in cation concentration [Na+]. The number of nucleotides in the oligonucle- use which consider additional sequence-specific stacking effects and otide is n . Mismatches and additives like detergents are not thermodynamic data Formulas for calculating the melting temperature (Tm) of oligonucleotides using the example of T7 primer with the sequence Tm (°C) TAATACGACTCACTATAGGG and 0.05 M monovalent cation concentration 4×(G + C)+2×(A + T) 56.0 69.3+0.41×(%GC)−650/n 53.2 69.3+0.41×(%GC)−535/n 59.0 + 77.1+0.41 (%GC)+11.7 (log10[Na ])−528/n 51.9 + + −1 77.8+0.41 (%GC)+11.7 (log10[Na ]×(1.0+0.7×[Na ]) −528/n 53.1 + 80.4+0.345 (%GC)+log10[Na ]×[17.0−0.135(%GC)]−550/n 51.6 + 81.5+0.41 (%GC)+16.6 (log10[Na ])−500/n 51.3 + + −1 81.5+0.41 (%GC)+16.6 log10([Na ]×(1.0+0.7×[Na ]) )−500/n 51.1 they survive temperatures between 50 and 80 °C. Their heat enzymes have a molecular mass of approximately 94– stable A-type DNA polymerase which belongs to the same 95 kDa (Choi et al. 1999;Lawyeretal.1993;Parketal. family that includes the prokaryotic Pol I polymerases 1993), and an intrinsic 5′→3′ exonuclease activity, but lack a (Braithwaite and Ito 1993) has been analysed since many 3′→5′ proofreading nuclease activity. The fidelity of all en- years (Chien et al. 1976), and ever since this time more and zymes depends on the pH and on concentrations of substrates more polymerases from Thermus were characterized. The Mg2+ and dNTP which formed complexes with primers and templates.