DOCSLIB.ORG

Deorbitsail.Com Space Vehicle Control Group Surrey Space Centre, University of Surrey Email: [email protected]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Deorbitsail.Com Space Vehicle Control Group Surrey Space Centre, University of Surrey Email: V.Lappas@Surrey.Ac.Uk De-Orbiting of Satellites using Solar Sails Professor Vaios Lappas www.deorbitsail.com Space Vehicle Control Group Surrey Space Centre, University of Surrey Email: [email protected] Presentation Contents • The Problem: Space Debris and Debris/Satellite Deorbiting • DEORBITSAIL • The future: – DEPLOYTECH – InflateSAIL – Active Debris Removal Demonstration Mission Introducing Surrey…. Surrey Space Centre: formed in 1979 at the University of Surrey, pioneering microsatellites — now 90 academic researchers specialising in space engineering. Surrey Satellite Technology Ltd: formed in 1985 by the University of Surrey, is a British satellite manufacturing company; £40M revenues & 320 staff; SST-US in Denver, Co; EO services (DMCii); launch services; recently acquired by EADS. SSTL+SSC+ Astrium: achieving a synergy of academic research and commercial exploitation The University of Surrey • “Pushing the Boundaries of Low Cost Small Satellite Applications and Technologies” • Training the next generation of space engineers, scientists, entrepreneurs and business leaders • Hands-on education and research using in-orbit assets • Largest space engineering research group Surrey’s SNAP-1 6.5 kg SSC’s Ground-Station and Satellite Development Lab Nano-Satellite (2000) The Problem: Space Debris... The Problem: Space Debris • Satellites with a completed service Image courtesy of ESA/ESOC • Launch vehicle upper stages remain in space for years – Some explode due to depleted tanks • 5,500 tones of space debris in low earth orbit • Threat to: – Space assets – Astronauts/space stations – Environment • Space: Expensive Real-Estate – Earth observation, telecommunications, navigation Space Debris in LEO Image courtesy of ESA/ESOC Satellite/Space Debris Evolution ADR-Active Debris Removal Orbital Debris Distribution Operational payloads Non- • Largest portion (2/3) of orbital debris is 6% Fragments operational concentrated in LEO 40% payloads • Only 6% of Earth orbiting objects are 26% operational payloads Mission- Rocket • LEO altitude distribution shows peak at related bodies objects 780km 18% 10% Altitude Distribution in LEO 800 700 MEO Other 600 4% 8% 500 Highly 400 300 eccentric 200 orbits No. of objects No. of 100 11% LEO 0 67% 0 GEO 80 160 240 320 400 480 560 640 720 800 880 960 1120 1200 1280 1360 1440 1520 1600 1680 1760 1840 1920 1040 10% Altitude (km) 5 June 2011 Kick-off meeting 9 25 Year Deorbiting Requirement • Orbital debris mitigation guidelines have been debated in great detail in the space community. • In February 2007 and after a multi-year effort the United Nations' Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (COPUOS) adopted a set of space debris mitigation guidelines which includes a 25 year deorbit requirement from LEO. • The guidelines were accepted by the COPUOS in June 2007 and endorsed by the United Nations in January 2008. • To become the law in many countries in Europe • Can we develop a simple, low cost deorbiting system for satellites or upper stages to stop the problem getting worse? • Can we clean up space from space junk? Deorbiting Technology for Debris Mitigation • There is a need to develop low cost, very compact passive/active deorbiting systems for satellites/upper stages • Developments/solutions/missions at Surrey: • Micro-electric propulsion (currently at TRL 3-7) • Cubesail: 3 kg, 5 x 5m drag sail mission funded by Astrium (launch 2012) • DEORBITSAIL: 4 kg, 5 x 5m drag sail funded-EU/FP7 (launch 2013-2014) • InflateSAIL: 4 kg, scalable 5.6m circular drag sail funded –EU (launch 2014) • Gossamer Deorbit system: 5 x 5m drag sail for deorbiting (ESA funded) • Active Debris Removal mission using tether/net/dragsail using nanosats • Using low cost, practical solutions, based on COTS; in orbit demonstration using cubesat technology/nanosatellite missions DEORBITSAIL Mission Objectives • Demonstrate deployment of 25 m2 solar sail (~5m x 5m) • Test satellite deorbiting – Use drag for deorbiting • Test Solar Sail propulsion – Change in inclination ≈ 2°/year in 800 km orbit • Implement a 3-axis active ADCS to align sail to orbit plane for minimum drag in LEO • Measure solar force over a minimum 1 year period • Funded by EU FP7 (Space Call) • Launch date: 2013 • Complete spacecraft specifications: 3U Cubesat, 4 kg, 10 x 10 x 30 cm The Team The Technology Deployment System Concept Cubesail Concept • Back-to-back tape measures for booms • 4x booms coiled around a centre spindle • Sail membrane attached to boom ends and lifted above the coiling plane • Simple, robust, ultra-light (< 2 kg) Sail Deployment Subsystem Control electronics Batteries CubeSat base • 1.7x1.7m 4-Quadrant Sail Central Shaft prototype • 4 x1.3m 0.3mm Co-coiled Booms Sail membrane (two tape-springs held front-to- front) Membrane spindle • In-house heat-treatment of Becu flat strips to provide curvature 25mm boom • Coated with aluminized Kapton Spindle release tube (sheath) for thermal control Deployment on the Airbearing Cubesail Deployed 1.7 x 1.7 m sail Improved 1.7 x 1.7 m Sail DEORBITSAIL: ‘Drag Mode’ • In Drag-Sail mode the deployed membranes will be used to increase the area of the spacecraft • It will interact with the atmospheric particles, causing an increase in drag and result in a more rapid deorbiting. DEORBITSAIL: ‘Solar Sail’ • Use of photons from the Sun (free!) • Build up of a significant velocity (continuous reflection of photons) in time • ‘Propellant-less’ propulsion system DEORBITSAIL ’Bus’ Concept • 3U CubeSat form factor (10 x 10 x 34cm) • 10 x 10 x 10 cm unit keeps housekeeping subsystems – Power, RF link, on-board computer • Use PPOD deployer – Low risk – Plenty of launch opportunities Satellite Bus-Cubesat 3U Deorbitsail: Current Status • In Year 1 of project (M10) • Completed: – Literature/technology survey – Mission requirements, thermal analysis, ADCS analysis • In process: – Conceptual design – Sail/subsystem design • Near term: – PDR (end of 2012) – Engineering Model (end of 2012) Future Work • 3 Nanosatellite missions – Cubesail, 5 x 5m sail, launch in 2012, funded by Astrium – DEORBITSAIL, 6 x 6m sail, launch in 2013, funded by EU – InflateSAIL, cool gas inflatable sail, funded by the EU (DEPLOYTECH and QB50) • ESA Project: Gossamer DEORBITER • Active Debris Removal – Cubesail/nanosatellite mission using a tether/net to capture debris, docking, deorbiting with sail Inflatesail 5.6 m diameter Mylar or CP-1 3 x 7 m booms for deployment 3U Cubesat Deployable arrays EU Funding: DEPLOYTECH, QB50 Small Satellite Deorbiting System 10 x 10 x 15 cm Sail Container 12 x 12 x 15 cm Deployment System 30 cm 30 cm height Small Satellite Deorbiting System Deployed Small Satellite Deorbiting System Stowed Electric Propulsion • SSC: 5 vacuum chambers, 2 thrust balances (1-20 mN, 0.1 mN acc.) Micro-Pulsed Plasma Hollow cathode thruster Quad Confinement Thruster Helicon Double Layer Thruster Experimental unit to be Target spec Thruster. Target spec -1.2-4.3 µN flown on SSTL’s – 650 sec Isp -600 sec Isp -50-185secIsp TechDemoSat-1 (2011) – 3.8 mN thrust -10 mN thrust -STRaND nanosat -1-2 mN, 200sec Isp – 200 W power < 1kW power -flight in 2011 -In house avionics –Thrust Vector Control -No grids -TRL 7 -TRL 5-7 –TRL 3 -TRL 3-5 Conclusion • DEORBITSAIL: – A unique, low cost space mission tackling the Space Debris problem – Simple and innovative design – Practical, in-orbit demonstration – Solar Sailing • Space Debris, an important issue – Protecting the space environment – Protecting space assets – Public is very interested: BBC, Economist, De Spiegel, New Scientist, Le Monde, Times… .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Solar Cruiser Mission: Demonstrating Large Solar Sails for Deep Space Missions
    The Solar Cruiser Mission: Demonstrating Large Solar Sails for Deep Space Missions Les Johnson*, Frank M. Curran**, Richard W. Dissly***, and Andrew F. Heaton* * NASA Marshall Space Flight Center ** MZBlue Aerospace NASA Image *** Ball Aerospace Solar Sails Derive Propulsion By Reflecting Photons Solar sails use photon “pressure” or force on thin, lightweight, reflective sheets to produce thrust. NASA Image 2 Solar Sail Missions Flown (as of October 2019) NanoSail-D (2010) IKAROS (2010) LightSail-1 (2015) CanX-7 (2016) InflateSail (2017) NASA JAXA The Planetary Society Canada EU/Univ. of Surrey Earth Orbit Interplanetary Earth Orbit Earth Orbit Earth Orbit Deployment Only Full Flight Deployment Only Deployment Only Deployment Only 3U CubeSat 315 kg Smallsat 3U CubeSat 3U CubeSat 3U CubeSat 10 m2 196 m2 32 m2 <10 m2 10 m2 3 Current and Planned Solar Sail Missions CU Aerospace (2018) LightSail-2 (2019) Near Earth Asteroid Solar Cruiser (2024) Univ. Illinois / NASA The Planetary Society Scout (2020) NASA NASA Earth Orbit Earth Orbit Interplanetary L-1 Full Flight Full Flight Full Flight Full Flight In Orbit; Not yet In Orbit; Successful deployed 6U CubeSat 90 Kg Spacecraft 3U CubeSat 86 m2 >1200 m2 3U CubeSat 32 m2 20 m2 4 Near Earth Asteroid Scout The Near Earth Asteroid Scout Will • Image/characterize a NEA during a slow flyby • Demonstrate a low cost asteroid reconnaissance capability Key Spacecraft & Mission Parameters • 6U cubesat (20cm X 10cm X 30 cm) • ~86 m2 solar sail propulsion system • Manifested for launch on the Space Launch System (Artemis 1 / 2020) • 1 AU maximum distance from Earth Leverages: combined experiences of MSFC and JPL Close Proximity Imaging Local scale morphology, with support from GSFC, JSC, & LaRC terrain properties, landing site survey Target Reconnaissance with medium field imaging Shape, spin, and local environment NEA Scout Full Scale EDU Sail Deployment 6 Solar Cruiser Mission Concept Mission Profile Solar Cruiser may launch as a secondary payload on the NASA IMAP mission in October, 2024.
    [Show full text]
  • Orbit Transfer Problems and the Results You Obtained
    MS&E 315 and CME 304 Solar sailing between Earth and Mars 1 Overview In this project, you will use your knowledge of nonlinear optimization to help a space agency design a cargo mission. The mission consists of making a cargo spacecraft perform interplanetary orbit transfers between Earth and Mars, and the agency is considering using a solar sail to propel the spacecraft. They need you to determine how the spacecraft should be operated to perform these orbit transfers in the shortest possible time for different solar sail technologies. 2 Mission information 2.1 Simplifications The agency has determined that the following simplifications are acceptable for your analysis: 1. Orbits are heliocentric, circular and co-planar. 2. Gravitational effects due to celestial bodies other than the Sun are ignored. 3. The Sun and spacecraft are modeled as point masses. 4. The Sun has spherically symmetric gravitational and radiation fields. 2.2 Problem description The problem you have to solve consists of determining how the solar sail of the spacecraft should be oriented to make the spacecraft perform each of the interplanetary orbit transfers Earth-Mars and Mars-Earth in the shortest possible time. You have to perform this analysis for some, say three, of the available solar sail technologies so that the agency can choose the most appropriate one in terms of cost and performance. Each solar sail technology is identified by a characteristic acceleration, as described in the next subsection. Figure1 shows a diagram of the orbits of interest, where rE and !E denote the radius and angular velocity, respectively, of Earth's orbit around the Sun, and rM and !M denote the radius and angular velocity, respectively, of Mars's orbit around the Sun.
    [Show full text]
  • Hybrid Solar Sails for Active Debris Removal Final Report
    HybridSail Hybrid Solar Sails for Active Debris Removal Final Report Authors: Lourens Visagie(1), Theodoros Theodorou(1) Affiliation: 1. Surrey Space Centre - University of Surrey ACT Researchers: Leopold Summerer Date: 27 June 2011 Contacts: Vaios Lappas Tel: +44 (0) 1483 873412 Fax: +44 (0) 1483 689503 e-mail: [email protected] Leopold Summerer (Technical Officer) Tel: +31 (0)71 565 4192 Fax: +31 (0)71 565 8018 e-mail: [email protected] Ariadna ID: 10-6411b Ariadna study type: Standard Contract Number: 4000101448/10/NL/CBi Available on the ACT website http://www.esa.int/act Abstract The historical practice of abandoning spacecraft and upper stages at the end of mission life has resulted in a polluted environment in some earth orbits. The amount of objects orbiting the Earth poses a threat to safe operations in space. Studies have shown that in order to have a sustainable environment in low Earth orbit, commonly adopted mitigation guidelines should be followed (the Inter-Agency Space Debris Coordination Committee has proposed a set of debris mitigation guidelines and these have since been endorsed by the United Nations) as well as Active Debris Removal (ADR). HybridSail is a proposed concept for a scalable de-orbiting spacecraft that makes use of a deployable drag sail membrane and deployable electrostatic tethers to accelerate orbital decay. The HybridSail concept consists of deployable sail and tethers, stowed into a nano-satellite package. The nano- satellite, deployed from a mothership or from a launch vehicle will home in towards the selected piece of space debris using a small thruster-propulsion firing and magnetic attitude control system to dock on the debris.
    [Show full text]
  • Propulsion Systems for Interstellar Exploration
    The Future of Electric Propulsion: A Young Visionary Paper Competition 35th International Electric Propulsion Conference October 8-12, 2017 Atlanta, Georgia Propulsion Systems for Interstellar Exploration Steven L. Magnusen Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach, FL, USA Alfredo D. Tuesta∗ National Research Council Postdoctoral Associate, Washington, DC, USA [email protected] August 4, 2017 Abstract The idea of manned spaceships exploring nearby star systems, although difficult and unlikely in this generation or the next, is becoming less a tale of science fiction and more a concept of rigorous scientific interest. In 2003, NASA sent two rovers to Mars and returned images and data that would change our view of the planet forever. Already, scientists and engineers are proposing concepts for manned missions to the Red Planet. As we prepare to visit the planets in our solar system, we dare to explore the possibilities and venues to travel beyond. With NASA’s count of known exoplanets now over 3,000 and growing, interest in interstellar science is being renewed as well. In this work, the authors discuss the benefits and deficiencies of current and emerging technologies in electric propulsion for outer planet and extrasolar exploration and propose innovative and daring concepts to further the limits of present engineering. The topics covered include solar and electric sails and beamed energy as propulsion systems. I. Introduction Te Puke is the name for the voyaging canoe that the Polynesians developed to sail across vast distances in the Pacific Ocean at the turn of the first millennium. This primitive yet sophisticated canoe, made of two hollowed out tree trunks and crab claw sails woven together from leaves, allowed Polynesian sailors to navigate the open ocean by studying the stars.
    [Show full text]
  • Advancing Asteroid Surface Exploration Using Sublimate- Based Regenerative Micropropulsion and 3D Path Planning
    Advancing Asteroid Surface Exploration Using Sublimate- Based Regenerative Micropropulsion And 3D Path Planning Item Type text; Electronic Thesis Authors Wilburn, Greg Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction, presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 07/10/2021 15:36:40 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/636641 ADVANCING ASTEROID SURFACE EXPLORATION USING SUBLIMATE-BASED REGENERATIVE MICROPROPULSION AND 3D PATH PLANNING by Greg Wilburn ____________________________ Copyright © Greg Wilburn 2019 A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF AEROSPACE AND MECHANICAL ENGINEERING In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2019 Acknowledgements The author would first like to thank his thesis committee members for their help and direction in solving some of the complex problems in this work. The author acknowledges the time and effort of his advisor, Dr. Jekan Thangavelauthum, for his guidance over the entire course of the project. Recognition is deserved for Dr. Erik Asphaug and Dr. Stephen Schwarz for their development of the AMIGO robot concept. The development of MEMS systems presented could not have been done without the coursework and guidance from Dr. Eniko Enikov. Special thanks goes to my friends and family who have supported and encouraged me through my graduate studies. I couldn’t have done it without you, Emilia! 3 Table of Contents I.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Propulsion Technology for Small Spacecraft
    Space Propulsion Technology for Small Spacecraft The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Krejci, David, and Paulo Lozano. “Space Propulsion Technology for Small Spacecraft.” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 106, no. 3, Mar. 2018, pp. 362–78. As Published http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2017.2778747 Publisher Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Version Author's final manuscript Citable link http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/114401 Terms of Use Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike Detailed Terms http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ PROCC. OF THE IEEE, VOL. 106, NO. 3, MARCH 2018 362 Space Propulsion Technology for Small Spacecraft David Krejci and Paulo Lozano Abstract—As small satellites become more popular and capa- While designations for different satellite classes have been ble, strategies to provide in-space propulsion increase in impor- somehow ambiguous, a system mass based characterization tance. Applications range from orbital changes and maintenance, approach will be used in this work, in which the term ’Small attitude control and desaturation of reaction wheels to drag com- satellites’ will refer to satellites with total masses below pensation and de-orbit at spacecraft end-of-life. Space propulsion 500kg, with ’Nanosatellites’ for systems ranging from 1- can be enabled by chemical or electric means, each having 10kg, ’Picosatellites’ with masses between 0.1-1kg and ’Fem- different performance and scalability properties. The purpose tosatellites’ for spacecrafts below 0.1kg. In this category, the of this review is to describe the working principles of space popular Cubesat standard [13] will therefore be characterized propulsion technologies proposed so far for small spacecraft.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of the Solar Sail with Electric Propulsion Systems
    .:- .:- &,, NASA CONTRACTOR REPORT *o Qo COMPARISON OF THE SOLAR SAIL WITH ELECTRIC PROPULSION SYSTEMS Prepared by . -... THE MACNEAL-SCHWENDLER CORPORATION Los Angeles, Calif. 90041 for . .. NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION. WASHINGTON, D. c. ea FEBRUARY 1972 TECH LIBRARY KAFB, NM 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. NASA CR-1986 I 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date COMPARISON OF THE SOLAR SAIL WITH ELECTRIC February 1972 PROPULSIONSYSTEMS 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Richard H. MacNeal 'EMSR 13A 10. Work Unit No. 9. Performing Organization Name and Address The MacNeal-SchwendlerCorpmTtkCm ~-~ 74.42 NO. FigueroaStreet 11. Contract or Grant No. Los Angeles , California90041 NAS7-699 13. Type of Re rt and Period Covered 2. Sponsoring AgencyName and Address ContracGr NationalAeronautics and Space Administration FinalReport Washington, D. C. 20546 14. Sponsoring AgencyCade RWS 5. Supplementary Notes 6. Abstract A studyof the propulsive efficiencies of solar sails and electric propulsionsystems which shows increasing efficiency for solar sails for. launch mission durations. 7. Key- Words (Suggested by Author(s) 1 18. Distribution Statement Solar sails, electricpropulsion systems Unlimited advancedspace concepts. i ~~ "- .. 19. Security Classif. (of this report) 20. Security Classif. (of this page) 21. No. of Pages 22. Price' Unclassified Unclassified 13 $3 .?70 For sale by the National Technical InformationService, Springfield, Virginia 22151 COMPARISON OF THE SOLAR SA1 L WITHELECTRIC PROPULSION SYSTEMS By Richard H. MacNeal The MacNeal-SchwendlerCorporation ABSTRACT The propulsiveefficiencies of the solar sail and ofelectric propul- sion systemsare compared on the basis of specificimpulse. It is shown thatthe solar sail is more efficientat onea.u.
    [Show full text]
  • Beam Powered Propulsion Systems
    Beam Powered Propulsion Systems Nishant Agarwal University of Colorado, Boulder, 80309 While chemical rockets have dominated space exploration, other forms of rocket propulsion based on nuclear power, electrostatic and magnetic drives, and other principles have been considered from the earliest days of the field with the goal to improve efficiency through higher exhaust velocities, in order to reduce the amount of fuel the rocket vehicle needs to carry. However, the gap between technology to reach orbit from surface and from orbit to interplanetary travel still remains open considering both economics of time and money. In addition, methods have been tested over the years to reach the orbit with single stage rocket from earth’s surface which will eventually result in drastic cost savings. Reusable SSTO vehicles offer the promise of reduced launch expenses by eliminating recurring costs associated with hardware replacement inherent in expendable launch systems. No Earth- launched SSTO launch vehicles have ever been constructed till date. Beam Powered Propulsion has emerged as a promising concept that is capable to fulfill all regimes of space travel. This paper takes a look at these concepts and studies the feasibility of Microwave Propulsion for possibility of SSTO vehicle. Nomenclature At = nozzle throat area C* = characteristic velocity Cf = Thrust Coefficient Cp = Specific heat constant Dt, Dexit = Diameter of nozzle throat, Nozzle exit diameter g = acceleration due to gravity Gamma = Specific heat ratio LOX/LH = Liquid Oxygen/Liquid Hydrogen MR = mass ratio Mi,Ms,Mp = total mass, structural mass, propellant mass, payload mass Mpayl = payload mass Mdot = flow rate Isp = Specific Impulse Ve = exhaust velocity I.
    [Show full text]
  • High Speed AB-Solar Sail*
    1 Article High Reflective Solar Sail after Cathcarth 6 3 06 AIAA-2006-4806 High Speed AB-Solar Sail* Alexander Bolonkin C&R, 1310 Avenue R, #F-6, Brooklyn, NY 11229, USA T/F 718-339-4563, [email protected], [email protected], http://Bolonkin.narod.ru Abstract The Solar sail is a large thin film used to collect solar light pressure for moving of space apparatus. Unfortunately, the solar radiation pressure is very small about 9 N/m2 at Earth's orbit. However, the light force significantly increases up to 0.2 - 0.35 N/m2 near the Sun. The author offers his research on a new revolutionary highly reflective solar sail which flyby (after special maneuver) near Sun and attains velocity up to 400 km/sec and reaching far planets of the Solar system in short time or enable flights out of Solar system. New, highly reflective sail-mirror allows avoiding the strong heating of the solar sail. It may be useful for probes close to the Sun and Mercury and Venus. Key words: AB-solar sail, highly reflective solar sail, high speed propulsion. * This work is presented as paper AIAA-2006-4806 for 42 Joint Propulsion Conference, Sacramento, USA, 9-12 July, 2006. Introduction A solar sail is a thin film reflector that uses solar energy for propulsion. The spacecraft deploys a large, lightweight sail which reflects light from the Sun (or some other source). The radiation pressure on the sail provides thrust by reflecting photons. The solar radiation pressure is very small 6.7 Newtons per gigawatt.
    [Show full text]
  • Novel Solar Sail Mission Concepts for Space Weather Forecasting
    AAS 14-239 NOVEL SOLAR SAIL MISSION CONCEPTS FOR SPACE WEATHER FORECASTING Jeannette Heiligers,* and Colin R. McInnes† This paper proposes two novel solar sail concepts for space weather forecasting: heliocentric Earth-following orbits and Sun-Earth line confined solar sail mani- folds. The first concept exploits a solar sail acceleration to rotate the argument of perihelion such that aphelion, where extended observations can take place, is always located along the Sun-Earth line. The second concept exploits a solar sail acceleration to keep the unstable, sunward manifolds of a solar sail Halo orbit around a sub-L1 point close to the Sun-Earth line. By travelling upstream of space weather events, these manifolds then allow early warnings for such events. The orbital dynamics involved with both concepts will be investigated and the observation conditions in terms of the time spent within a predefined surveillance zone are evaluated. All analyses are carried out for current sail technology (i.e. Sunjammer sail performance) to make the proposed concepts feasible in the near-term. The heliocentric Earth-following orbits show a reason- able increase in useful observation time over inertially fixed, Keplerian orbits, while the manifold concept enables a significant increase in the warning time for space weather events compared to existing satellites at the classical L1 point. INTRODUCTION Solar coronal mass ejections are believed to be the cause of magnetic storms that can have detrimental effects on vital assets on ground and in space: destruction of power grids leading to power outages, damage to oil pipelines, need for aviation re-routing, damage to Earth-orbiting satellites and hazardous conditions for astronauts onboard the International Space Station.
    [Show full text]
  • The Principal Behind All Propulsion Systems Is Newton's Third Law, For
    Principals of Solar Sailing Richard Rieber Introduction The principal behind all propulsion systems is Newton’s Third Law, for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. Traditional space propulsion systems have utilized an onboard reaction mass that is accelerated to high velocities via an exothermic reaction or electromagnetic forces. The concept of solar sailing eliminates the need for carrying an on board propellant by harnessing the solar pressure. Since the forces generated from an individual photon is incredibly small, large numbers of photons must be intercepted which requires a large surface area. The momentum transferred to the spacecraft can be nearly double that of the photons due to reflection. In the best situation, only 9 Newtons of force are available for every square kilometer located at 1 AU. By controlling the angle of the sail relative to the sun, the spacecraft can lose momentum and spiral towards the sun, or gain momentum and spiral away from the sun. History The concept of light pressure was demonstrated by James Clerk Maxwell in 1873. It wasn’t until Peter Lebedew in 1900 that light pressure was experimentally measured. However, science fiction writings describing a spacecraft powered by large mirrors date as early as 1889. The first technical paper written on the topic of solar sailing was by Fridrickh Tsander in 1924. Solar sailing essentially died with Tsander in 1933 and wasn’t resurrected again until Carl Wiley, under the pseudonym of Russell Sanders published a detailed technical discussion of the physics of solar sailing in no other journal than Astounding Science Fiction in 1951.
    [Show full text]
  • 6.2021-1260 Publication Date 2021 Document Version Final Published Version Published in AIAA Scitech 2021 Forum
    Delft University of Technology overview of the nasa advanced composite Wilkie, W. Keats; Fernandez, Juan M.; Stohlman, Olive R.; Schneider, Nigel R.; Dean, Gregory D.; Kang, Jin Ho; Warren, Jerry E.; Cook, Sarah M.; Heiligers, Jeannette; More Authors DOI 10.2514/6.2021-1260 Publication date 2021 Document Version Final published version Published in AIAA Scitech 2021 Forum Citation (APA) Wilkie, W. K., Fernandez, J. M., Stohlman, O. R., Schneider, N. R., Dean, G. D., Kang, J. H., Warren, J. E., Cook, S. M., Heiligers, J., & More Authors (2021). overview of the nasa advanced composite. In AIAA Scitech 2021 Forum (pp. 1-23). [AIAA 2021-1260] (AIAA Scitech 2021 Forum; Vol. 1 PartF). American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc. (AIAA). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2021-1260 Important note To cite this publication, please use the final published version (if applicable). Please check the document version above. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons. Takedown policy Please contact us and provide details if you believe this document breaches copyrights. We will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. This work is downloaded from Delft University of Technology. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to a maximum of 10. AIAA SciTech Forum 10.2514/6.2021-1260 11–15 &amp; 19–21 January 2021, VIRTUAL EVENT AIAA Scitech 2021 Forum An Overview of the NASA Advanced Composite Solar Sail (ACS3) Technology Demonstration Project W.
    [Show full text]