DOCSLIB.ORG

Report: Keep Telstra Public

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report: Keep Telstra Public The Senate Environment, Communications, Information Technology and the Arts Legislation Committee Provisions of the Telstra (Transition to Full Private Ownership) Bill 2003 October 2003 © Commonwealth of Australia 2003 ISBN 0 642 71301 4 This document was printed by the Senate Printing Unit, Parliament House, Canberra Committee membership Members Senator Alan Eggleston, Chair (LP, WA) Senator Sue Mackay, Deputy Chair (ALP, TAS) Senator Andrew Bartlett (AD, QLD) Senate Kate Lundy (ALP, ACT) Senator Santo Santoro (LP, QLD) Senator Tsebin Tchen (LP, VIC) Substitute Members Senator John Cherry (AD, QLD) to replace Senator Bartlett for matters relating to the Communications portfolio Senator Bill Heffernan (LP, NSW) to replace Senator Santoro for the inquiry on 1 October 2003 Participating Members Senator the Hon Eric Abetz (LP, TAS) Senator the Hon Nick Bolkus (ALP, SA) Senator the Hon Ron Boswell (NATS, QLD) Senator Bob Brown (AG, TAS) Senator George Campbell (ALP, NSW) Senator Kim Carr (ALP, VIC) Senator Grant Chapman (LP, SA) Senator Stephen Conroy (ALP, VIC) Senator the Hon Helen Coonan (LP, NSW) Senator Christopher Evans (ALP, WA) Senator the Hon John Faulkner (ALP, NSW) Senator Alan Ferguson (LP, SA) Senator Jeannie Ferris (LP, SA) Senator Brian Harradine (IND, TAS) Senator Leonard Harris (PHON, QLD) Senator Bill Heffernan (LP, NSW) Senator Gary Humphries (LP, ACT) Senator Susan Knowles (LP, WA) Senator Meg Lees (AD, SA) Senator Ross Lightfoot (LP, WA) Senator Jan McLucas (ALP, QLD) Senator Brett Mason (LP, QLD) Senator Julian McGauran (NATS, VIC) Senator Claire Moore (ALP, QLD) Senator Shayne Murphy (IND, TAS) Senator Kerry Nettle (AG, NSW) iii Senator Robert Ray (ALP, VIC) Senator John Watson (LP, TAS) Senator Penny Wong (ALP, SA) Committee Secretariat Mr Michael McLean, Secretary Ms Chris Samuel, Principal Research Officer Ms Jacquie Hawkins, Research Officer Ms Sharon Babyack, Executive Assistant Committee Address Environment, Communications, Information Technology and the Arts Legislation Committee S1.57, Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 Tel: 02 6277 3526 Fax: 02 6277 5818 Email: [email protected] Internet: http://www.aph.gov.au/senate/committee/ecita_ctte/index.htm iv Table of Contents Committee Membership ......................................................................................... iii Recommendations ................................................................................................... vii Chapter 1: Introduction............................................................................................1 The reference.........................................................................................................1 The Bill..................................................................................................................1 Background ...........................................................................................................1 Conduct of the inquiry...........................................................................................4 Discussion .............................................................................................................6 Chapter 2: Summary of evidence received...................................................... 9 Satisfaction with standards of service and employment implications ................11 The benefits of privatisation................................................................................13 Chapter 3: The sale process ............................................................................ 17 Chapter 4: The best way to protect consumers: regulation or ownership? ................................................................................ 21 Current consumer safeguards..............................................................................22 Targeted funding for future proofing ..................................................................23 Additional safeguards..........................................................................................24 Disability services ...............................................................................................27 Chapter 5: Competition regulation................................................................ 29 Accounting separation.........................................................................................32 Chapter 6: Conclusions and recommendations ............................................ 35 Labor Senators Minority Report: Keep Telstra Public................................. 39 Chapter 1: Introduction............................................................................... 39 Summary of the Bill..............................................................................................39 Conduct of the inquiry ..........................................................................................40 Chapter 2: Summary of evidence received ................................................ 43 v Chapter 3: Sale Scheme Hybrid Securities & Other Financial Matters .....................................................................................53 Sale Scheme Hybrid Securities ...........................................................................53 Other Financial Matters.......................................................................................54 Chapter 4: Conclusion: Keep Telstra Public............................................. 57 Recommendation..................................................................................... 59 Australian Democrats Minority Report ........................................................ 61 Introduction .........................................................................................................61 In the Public Interest and Benefit........................................................................64 Recommendations ...............................................................................................86 APPENDIX 1: List of Submitters .............................................................................87 APPENDIX 2: Witnesses at Public Hearings ..........................................................93 APPENDIX 3: Exhibits..............................................................................................99 vi RECOMMENDATIONS Recommendation 1: The Committee recommends that reviews by the Regional Telecommunications Independent Review Committee (RTIRC) into telecommunications in regional, rural and remote parts of Australia be undertaken at least every three rather than every five years. Recommendation 2: The Committee recommends that in the event that a recommendation or recommendations of the RTIC are not accepted by the Minister, the Minister be required to give reasons for the decision. Recommendation 3: The Committee also recommends that the Government launch a public awareness program to improve understanding of the current system of regulation of the telecommunications industry and the rights of consumers under this regulatory regime. Recommendation 4: The Committee reports to the Senate that it has considered the Telstra (Transition to Full Private Ownership) Bill 2003 and recommends that the Bill should proceed. vii viii CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION The reference 1.1 On 13 August 2003, on the recommendation of the Selection of Bills Committee, the Senate referred the provisions of the Telstra (Transition to Full Private Ownership) Bill 2003 to the Committee for inquiry and report by 30 October 2003. 1.2 The inquiry was specifically advertised twice, initially in all national and major metropolitan newspapers on 20 August and subsequently on or around 17 September 2003 in the regional press that published on a daily basis. Invitations to submit were also placed in The Australian on 27 August and 10 September, and on the Committee’s webpage. The Committee received 168 submissions, which are listed at Appendix 1. 1.3 The Committee took evidence from 89 witnesses at seven public hearings in Canberra (17 September and 2, 7 and 14 October 2003), Sydney (30 September 2003), Dubbo (1 October 2003) and Nambour (3 October 2003). Details of witnesses who appeared at the public hearings are listed in Appendix 2. In the course of the hearings witnesses tabled a number of documents and other material for the information of the Committee. These exhibits are listed in Appendix 3. 1.4 The Committee expresses its appreciation to all those who made submissions and gave evidence to this inquiry. The Bill 1.5 The purpose of the Bill is to amend the Telstra Corporation Act 1991 to repeal provisions that require the Commonwealth to retain 50.1% of equity in Telstra, thus enabling the Corporation to become fully privately owned. The Bill sets out arrangements for the conduct of the sale of the Commonwealth’s remaining equity in Telstra. It also includes provisions designed to future proof Telstra’s services after the sale, especially in regional, rural and remote communities, including a framework for regular independent reviews of the adequacy of regional telecommunications services.1 Background 1.6 This is the fifth Senate committee inquiry into the privatisation of Telstra. In May 1996, the Government introduced legislation to Parliament to sell one-third of the Commonwealth’s equity in Telstra Corporation by means of a share float. The Bill 1 Telstra (Transition to Full Private Ownership) Bill 2003, Explanatory Memorandum, pp. 2-3. 2 was subsequently referred to the Senate Environment, Recreation, Communications
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Upholding the Australian Constitution Volume Seventeen
    Upholding the Australian Constitution Volume Seventeen Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference of The Samuel Griffith Society Greenmount Beach Resort, Hill Street, Coolangatta © Copyright 2005 by The Samuel Griffith Society. All rights reserved. Table of Contents Foreword John Stone Dinner Address Hon Chief Justice Paul de Jersey, AC Evolution of the Judicial Function: Undesirable Blurring? Introductory Remarks John Stone Chapter One Kevin Lindeberg The Heiner Affair Chapter Two Professor Suri Ratnapala Constitutional Vandalism under Green Cover Chapter Three Bruce Grundy The Missing Constitutional Ingredient: An Upper House Chapter Four John Nethercote Senate Vacancies: Casual or Contrived? Chapter Five Sir David Smith, KCVO, AO The Governor-General is our Head of State Chapter Six Professor Andrew Fraser Monarchs and Miracles Chapter Seven Dr John Forbes Native Title Today Chapter Eight Bob Bottom, OAM Frauding the Vote in Queensland i Chapter Nine Bryan Pape The Use and Abuse of the Commonwealth Finance Power Chapter Ten Dr Dominic Katter Australia’s International Legal Obligations: Maritime Zones and Christmas Island Chapter Eleven Professor Gregory Rose The United Nations as a Source of International Legal Authority Appendix I John Stone Tribute to the late Sir Harry Gibbs Appendix II Rt Hon Sir Harry Gibbs, GCMG, AC, KBE Australia Day Messages, 2001-2005 Appendix III Contributors ii Foreword John Stone Important though the periodic Conferences of The Samuel Griffith Society are, the Proceedings of our 17th Conference, held at Coolangatta on 8-10 April last, which are recorded in this volume of our series Upholding the Australian Constitution, pale into insignificance compared with the subsequent death of our President, the Right Honourable Sir Harry Gibbs, GCMG, AC, KBE.
    [Show full text]
  • Report to the Senate
    SENATE COMMUNITY AFFAIRS LEGISLATION COMMITTEE Consideration of Legislation Referred to the Committee HEALTH INSURANCE COMMISSION (REFORM AND SEPARATION OF FUNCTIONS) BILL 1997 SEPTEMBER 1997 © Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia 1997 ISSN 1038-2755 Senate Community Affairs Legislation Committee Secretariat Mr Elton Humphery Secretary The Senate Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 Phone: 02 6277 3515 Fax: 02 6277 5829 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: http://www.aph.gov.au/senate This document was produced from camera-ready copy prepared by the Senate Community Affairs Legislation Committee Secretariat and printed by the Senate Printing Unit, Parliament House, Canberra MEMBERSHIP OF THE COMMITTEE Members Senator Sue Knowles, Chairman LP, Western Australia Senator Meg Lees, Deputy Chair AD, South Australia Senator Kay Denman ALP, Tasmania Senator Alan Eggleston LP, Western Australia Senator Michael Forshaw ALP, New South Wales Senator Karen Synon LP, Victoria Participating Members Senator Eric Abetz LP, Tasmania Senator Bob Brown Greens, Tasmania Senator the Hon Bob Collins ALP, Northern Territory Senator Mal Colston Ind, Queensland Senator Barney Cooney ALP, Victoria Senator the Hon Rosemary Crowley ALP, South Australia Senator Chris Evans ALP, Western Australia Senator the Hon John Faulkner ALP, New South Wales Senator Brenda Gibbs ALP, Queensland Senator Brian Harradine Ind, Tasmania Senator Sue Mackay ALP, Tasmania Senator Dee Margetts GWA, Western Australia Senator Shayne Murphy ALP, Tasmania Senator
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Senate Environment, Communications
    The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia Inquiry into Electromagnetic Radiation Report of the Senate Environment, Communications, Information Technology and the Arts References Committee May 2001 ii © Commonwealth of Australia 2001 ISBN 0 642 71126 7 This document is produced from camera-ready copy prepared by the Senate Environment, Communications, Information Technology and the Arts References Committee Secretariat, and printed by the Senate Printing Unit, Parliament House, Canberra. iii TERMS OF REFERENCE On 8 December 1999 the Senate referred the following matters to the Environment, Communications, Information Technology and the Arts References Committee for inquiry (to commence not before 31 March 2000) and report by 31 October 2000 (subsequently extended to 4 May 2001): (a) an examination of the allocation of funding from the Commonwealth’s $4.5 million fund for electro-magnetic radiation research and public information; (b) a review of current Australian and international research into electro-magnetic radiation and its effects as it applies to telecommunications equipment, including but not limited to, mobile telephones; (c) an examination of the current Australian Interim Standard [AS/NZS 2772.1 (Int): 1998], as it applies to telecommunications; (d) an examination of efforts to set an Australian Standard dealing with electro- magnetic emissions; (e) an examination of the merits of the transfer of the responsibility for setting a new Australian standard for electro-magnetic emissions to the Australian Radiation Protection
    [Show full text]
  • Publication: Platypus and Parliament
    PLATYPUS AND PARLIAMENT The Australian Senate in Theory and Practice DR STANLEY BACH has published extensively on the United States Congress and other legislatures and has worked as a consultant on parliamentary process in Asia, Africa, South America and Eastern Europe. For more than 30 years he worked with and provided advice to Senators and Representatives on the operations of the US Congress. From 1988 to 2002 he held the office of Senior Specialist in the Legislative Process for the Congressional Research Service of the Library of Congress. In 2002 Dr Bach was awarded a Fulbright Senior Scholar Award to study bicameralism in Australia. While in Canberra he was a Fellow in the Political Science Program of the Research School of Social Sciences at the Australian National University. He was also awarded a fellowship in the Department of the Senate which enabled him to observe the operations of the Commonwealth Parliament at first hand. This book is published as part of the Department of the Senate’s program to promote public knowledge and awareness of the role and activities of the Senate. The views expressed in the book are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Senate or its staff. PLATYPUS AND PARLIAMENT The Australian Senate in Theory and Practice STANLEY BACH Department of the Senate Published by The Department of the Senate Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 Australia First published 2003 © Stanley Bach This book is copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 and subsequent amendments, no part may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted by any means or process whatsoever without the written permission of the publisher and the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • A Law Unto Themselves? Australian Regulation of Forestry Operations
    A Law Unto Themselves? Australian Regulation of Forestry Operations by Thomas Ian Baxter BEc / LLB(Hons) (Tas), Grad Cert Leg Prac (Tas), LLM (ANU) Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Faculty of Law, University of Tasmania, Hobart (November 2014) Declaration This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for a degree or diploma by the University or any other institution, except by way of background information and duly acknowledged in the thesis, and to the best of my knowledge and belief no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference is made in the thesis, nor does the thesis contain any material that infringes copyright. Signed Thomas Ian Baxter Date Authority of Access This thesis may be made available for loan and limited copying and communication in accordance with the Copyright Act 1986 (Cth). Signed Thomas Ian Baxter Date ii Abstract This thesis critically examines federal environmental regulation of Australian forestry operations, particularly the effective exclusion of forestry operations in regional forest agreement [RFA] regions from Australia’s omnibus environmental statute, the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth) [EPBC Act]. The thesis tests the official rationale for this exclusionary policy, termed ‘RFA exceptionalism’, and where it leaves Australia’s compliance with key international environmental treaty obligations. Australia’s federal and State Governments and industry have asserted that RFAs (governed by the Regional Forest Agreement Act 2002 (Cth)) provide equivalent environmental protection to that of the EPBC Act. Therefore, they say, forestry operations undertaken in RFA regions do not require assessment under the EPBC Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Participation Requirements and Penalties in the Social Security System
    Senate Community Affairs References Committee Report on Participation Requirements and Penalties in the Social Security System SEPTEMBER 2002 Commonwealth of Australia 2002 ISBN 0 642 711 801 Senate Community Affairs References Committee Secretariat Mr Elton Humphery Secretary The Senate Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 Phone: 02 6277 3515 Fax: 02 6277 5829 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: http://www.aph.gov.au/senate This document was produced by the Senate Community Affairs References Committee Secretariat and printed by the Senate Printing Unit, Parliament House, Canberra. iii MEMBERSHIP OF THE COMMITTEE Members Senator Steve Hutchins, Chairman ALP, New South Wales Senator Sue Knowles, Deputy Chairman LP, Western Australia Senator Guy Barnett LP, Tasmania Senator Meg Lees IND, South Australia Senator Jan McLucas ALP, Queensland Senator Claire Moore ALP, Queensland Participating Members Senator the Hon Eric Abetz LP, Tasmania Senator Andrew Barlett AD, Queensland Senator Mark Bishop ALP, Western Australia Senator Paul Calvert LP, Tasmania Senator Kim Carr ALP, Victoria Senator Grant Chapman LP, South Australia Senator John Cherry* AD, Queensland Senator Helen Coonan LP, New South Wales Senator Trish Crossin ALP, Northern Territory Senator Kay Denman ALP, Tasmania Senator Alan Eggleston LP, Western Australia Senator Chris Evans ALP, Western Australia Senator the Hon John Faulkner ALP, New South Wales Senator Alan Ferguson LP, South Australia Senator Jeannie Ferris LP, South Australia Senator Michael Forshaw ALP, New
    [Show full text]
  • Publication: Platypus and Parliament
    6 Coalitions in the Chamber By this point, there should be no doubt that there are two dominating facts of parliamentary life in Canberra: first, the government controls the House, always in numbers and invariably in votes; and second, the government rarely controls the Senate in either sense. In turn, there are two primary reasons for the second of these facts: first, both the ALP and the Coalition enjoy roughly comparable levels of public support, but neither enjoys majority support in the electorate; and second, the system of proportional representation for electing Senators ensures a fairly accurate translation of votes into seats, so that neither an ALP government nor a Coalition government can expect to have a dependable voting majority in the Senate. Complementing these reasons is a third. The staggered election of Senators, by which half the Senate is elected every three years (except following double dissolutions) means that even if a landslide election should bring a new government into office, that government may have to wait another three years before it can even hope to translate its public support into a solid Senate majority, assuming its public support survives that long, and it can win a second, successive landslide victory. The need for Senate coalitions The key implication of this situation is that the Commonwealth legislative process is not simply a process of translating the government’s policies into laws, as would be the case in a true ‘Westminster’ system in which (1) the government can depend on majority support in the lower house, as it can in Canberra, but (2) the government also controls the upper house, or the upper house can do no more than delay enactment of the government’s program, which is not the case in Canberra.
    [Show full text]
  • Informing the Euthanasia Debate: Perceptions of Australian Politicians
    1368 UNSW Law Journal Volume 41(4) INFORMING THE EUTHANASIA DEBATE: PERCEPTIONS OF AUSTRALIAN POLITICIANS ANDREW MCGEE,* KELLY PURSER,** CHRISTOPHER STACKPOOLE,*** BEN WHITE,**** LINDY WILLMOTT***** AND JULIET DAVIS****** In the debate on euthanasia or assisted dying, many different arguments have been advanced either for or against legal reform in the academic literature, and much contemporary academic research seeks to engage with these arguments. However, very little research has been undertaken to track the arguments that are being advanced by politicians when Bills proposing reform are debated in Parliament. Politicians will ultimately decide whether legislative reform will proceed and, if so, in what form. It is therefore essential to know what arguments the politicians are advancing in support of or against legal reform so that these arguments can be assessed and scrutinised. This article seeks to fill this gap by collecting, synthesising and mapping the pro- and anti-euthanasia and assisted dying arguments advanced by Australian politicians, starting from the time the first ever euthanasia Bill was introduced. I INTRODUCTION Euthanasia attracts continued media, societal and political attention.1 In particular, voluntary active euthanasia (‘VAE’) and physician-assisted suicide * BA (Hons) (Lancaster), LLB (Hons) (QUT), LLM (QUT), PhD (Essex); Senior Lecturer, Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Faculty of Law, Queensland University of Technology. ** BA/LLB (Hons) (UNE), PhD (UNE); Senior Lecturer, Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Faculty of Law, Queensland University of Technology. *** LLB/BBus (Hons) (QUT), BCL (Oxford). **** LLB (Hons) (QUT), DPhil (Oxford), Professor, Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Faculty of Law, Queensland University of Technology. ***** BCom (UQ), LLB (Hons) (UQ), LLM (Cambridge), PhD (QUT); Professor, Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Faculty of Law, Queensland University of Technology.
    [Show full text]
  • Methods of Appointment to the ABC Board
    The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia Above Board? Methods of appointment to the ABC Board Report of the Senate Environment, Communications, Information Technology and the Arts References Committee September 2001 ii © Commonwealth of Australia 2001 ISBN 0 642 71160 7 This document is produced from camera-ready copy prepared by the Senate Environment, Communications, Information Technology and the Arts References Committee Secretariat, and printed by the Senate Printing Unit, Parliament House, Canberra. MEMBERSHIP OF THE COMMITTEE - 39TH PARLIAMENT Members: Senator Lyn Allison (Chair) (AD, VIC) Senator John Tierney (Deputy Chair) (LP, NSW) Senator Mark Bishop (ALP, WA) Senator the Hon Nick Bolkus (ALP, SA) Senator Kate Lundy (ALP, ACT) Senator Tsebin Tchen (LP, VIC) Participating Members: Senator the Hon Eric Abetz (LP, TAS) Senator Steve Hutchins (ALP, NSW) Senator Andrew Bartlett (AD, QLD) Senator Sue Knowles (LP, WA) Senator the Hon Ron Boswell (NP, Senator Meg Lees (AD, SA) QLD) Senator Sue Mackay (ALP, TAS) Senator Bob Brown (AG, TAS) Senator Brett Mason (LP, QLD) Senator Paul Calvert (LP, TAS) Senator Julian McGauran (NPA, VIC) Senator George Campbell (ALP, NSW) Senator Jan McLucas (ALP, QLD) Senator Kim Carr (ALP, VIC) Senator Shayne Murphy (ALP, TAS) Senator Grant Chapman (LP, SA) Senator Marise Payne (LP, NSW) Senator Helen Coonan (LP, NSW) Senator the Hon Chris Schacht (ALP, Senator Winston Crane (LP, WA) SA) Senator Alan Eggleston (LP, WA) Senator Natasha Stott Despoja (AD, Senator the Hon John Faulkner (ALP, SA) NSW)
    [Show full text]
  • Community Affairs References Committee
    The Senate Community Affairs References Committee A hand up not a hand out: Renewing the fight against poverty Report on poverty and financial hardship March 2004 Commonwealth of Australia 2004 ISBN 0 642 71199 2 Senate Community Affairs References Committee Secretariat Mr Elton Humphery (Secretary) Ms Christine McDonald (Principal Research Officer) Mr Peter Short (Senior Research Officer) Ms Leonie Peake (Research Officer) Ms Ingrid Zappe (Executive Assistant) The Senate Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 Phone: 02 6277 3515 Fax: 02 6277 5829 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: http://www.aph.gov.au/senate_ca This document was produced by the Senate Community Affairs References Committee Secretariat and printed by the Senate Printing Unit, Parliament House, Canberra. iii MEMBERSHIP OF THE COMMITTEE Members Senator Steve Hutchins, Chairman ALP, New South Wales Senator Sue Knowles, Deputy Chairman LP, Western Australia Senator Gary Humphries LP, Australian Capital Territory Senator Meg Lees APA, South Australia Senator Jan McLucas ALP, Queensland Senator Claire Moore ALP, Queensland Participating Members Senator the Hon Eric Abetz LP, Tasmania Senator Lyn Allison* AD, Victoria Senator Mark Bishop ALP, Western Australia Senator Kim Carr ALP, Victoria Senator Grant Chapman LP, South Australia Senator Helen Coonan LP, New South Wales Senator Trish Crossin ALP, Northern Territory Senator Kay Denman ALP, Tasmania Senator Alan Eggleston LP, Western Australia Senator Chris Evans ALP, Western Australia Senator the Hon John Faulkner
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Australians Who Experienced Institutional Or Out-Of-Home Care As Children
    The Senate Community Affairs References Committee Forgotten Australians A report on Australians who experienced institutional or out-of-home care as children August 2004 Commonwealth of Australia 2004 ISBN 0 642 71239 5 Senate Community Affairs References Committee Secretariat Mr Elton Humphery (Secretary) Ms Christine McDonald (Principal Research Officer) Ms Geraldine Badham (Principal Research Officer) Mr Peter Short (Senior Research Officer) Ms Leonie Peake (Research Officer) Ms Ingrid Zappe (Executive Assistant) The Senate Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 Phone: 02 6277 3515 Fax: 02 6277 5829 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: http://www.aph.gov.au/senate_ca The collage used on the inside cover includes photos of Balmain Industrial School – Balmain; Church of England Boys Home – Walkerville; Dalmar Children's Home – Carlingford; Dalwood – Seaforth; Magill Boys Home - Magill; Marsden Home for Boys – Kallangur; Mater Dei Orphanage – Narellan and Yarra Bay House – La Perouse. These photos have come from individual submissions and CLAN. The CLAN website at www.clan.org.au also contains an extensive photographic gallery of orphanages and children's homes. This document was produced by the Senate Community Affairs References Committee Secretariat and printed by the Senate Printing Unit, Parliament House, Canberra. Any nation that does not care for and protect all of its children does not deserve to be called a nation Nelson Mandela v MEMBERSHIP OF THE COMMITTEE Members Senator Jan McLucas, Chair (from 29.3.04) ALP, Queensland
    [Show full text]
  • SENATE Form Guide
    COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA SENATE Form Guide MAY 2002 SENATE FORM MANUAL DOCUMENT APPROVAL This Senate Form Manual has been endorsed and approved for use by: Ms Val Barrett Group Manager Client Services Group Department of the Parliamentary Reporting Staff DOCUMENT VERSION CONTROL Document name: Senate Form Manual Document status: Final Version No: 1.1 File Name: FileNET\HPS_Doc_Services\Hansard Documentation\Chambers\Draft Senate Form Manual Date: 10 May 2002 Distribution: Hansard DOCUMENT CONTROL VERSION DATE OF ISSUE AUTHOR REASON FOR CHANGE 0.1 11 February Heather Snedden Draft first release 1.0 10 May Heather Snedden Final IMPORTANT NOTICE THIS DOCUMENT IS DYNAMIC AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE. PLEASE REFER TO THE RELEVANT ADDRESS ON FILENET TO ENSURE USE OF THE CURRENT VERSION. PRINTED COPIES CEASE TO BE CONTROLLED DOCUMENTS. 11/09/03 2 May 2002 SENATE FORM ‘Form’ is the term given to the conventions in words and style that have, over time, been accepted by Hansard for use in parliamentary proceedings transcription. In the HPS (Hansard Production System) a proforma, activated through Alt-p, will produce the style required as well as the form of words needed for specific situations. It also provides the hidden codes necessary for production in ParlInfo and on the Internet. The autocorrects feature in Word allows you to type abbreviations that will be reproduced on screen as expanded text. Once an abbreviation is typed, it may be expanded by any key that is not a letter or number except Ctrl, Shift, Lock and Alt. Examples of form are laid out in three columns (as below).
    [Show full text]