ANALYZING and IMPROVING VISCOELASTIC PROPERTIES of HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE by REAJ UDDIN AHMED Bachelor of Science in Mechanic

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ANALYZING and IMPROVING VISCOELASTIC PROPERTIES of HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE by REAJ UDDIN AHMED Bachelor of Science in Mechanic ANALYZING AND IMPROVING VISCOELASTIC PROPERTIES OF HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE By REAJ UDDIN AHMED Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology Dhaka, Bangladesh 2009 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE July, 2011 ANALYZING AND IMPROVING VISCOELASTIC PROPERTIES OF HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE Thesis Approved: Dr. Jay C. Hanan Thesis Adviser Dr. Ranji Vaidyanathan Dr. Sandip Harimkar Dr. Mark E. Payton Dean of the Graduate College . ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First of all, I would like to show my heartiest gratitude to my supervisor, Dr. Jay C. Hanan, who has been very helpful throughout my entire Masters Program. His guidance, inspiration and support from the beginning of my graduate studies gave me constant motivation to perform this work. I consider myself lucky to be able to work under his supervision. I would also like to thank Dr. Ranji Vaidyanathan, for his immense help in this thesis. I worked in his lab for a major part of this work and his mentoring and constructive suggestions really mean a lot to me. I would also like to thank Dr. Sandip Harimkar for agreeing to be a member in my thesis committee. I am also thankful to Niagra Bottling LLC, for funding the project. I would like to thank Dr. Tzuchia Erica Tseng and Mr. Bill Hall for helping me with the samples. I would also like to thank Dr. Liz Orwin for helping regarding equipments. Special thanks go to Sudheer Bandla, who has always been very helpful and taught me many things. I would like to thank my colleagues Mazhar Islam, Ranjan Ganapthi Mahadevan, Massod Allakarami, Advait Bhat, Balaji Jayakumar, Rohit Vaidya, Praful Bari for their assistance in my work. My friends Krishnan Lakshminarayanan, Seshasai , Gandikota, Mrinalini Mulukutla, Sarat Das, Nazmul Khan Shahan, Mehedi Sarwar also helped me in many ways while I was working for this thesis. Last, but not least, I would like to show my gratitude to my parents, brother and sister for their patience and understanding during my studies in abroad. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................... iv LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................ vii LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................................................................... viii CHAPTER I ...................................................................................................................... 1 1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Polyethylene (PE) ................................................................................................. 1 1.1.1. Types of PE ................................................................................................... 3 1.2. High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) .................................................................... 4 1.3. Viscoelasticity, Creep, and Stress Relaxation of Polymers ................................. 6 1.3.1. Simple Model for Creep and Stress Relaxation ............................................ 9 CHAPTER II ................................................................................................................... 15 2. OPTIMIZATION OF HDPE PROPERTIES ............................................................ 15 2.1. Motivation .......................................................................................................... 15 2.2. Viscoelasticity of HDPE .................................................................................... 16 2.3. Approaches ......................................................................................................... 18 2.3.1. Additives: CaCO 3........................................................................................ 18 2.3.2 Ageing and Annealing ................................................................................ 23 2.3.2.1. Ageing in Amorphous Material ........................................................... 24 2.3.2.2. Ageing in Semi-Crystalline Materials ................................................. 25 2.3.2.3. Residual Stresses and Ageing .............................................................. 26 2.3.2.4. Annealing............................................................................................. 27 CHAPTER III ................................................................................................................. 29 3. MATERIALS AND METHOD................................................................................. 29 3.1. Dynamic Mechanical Analysis (DMA).............................................................. 29 3.1.1. Introduction and Working Principle ........................................................... 29 3.1.2. ASTM recommendation for Dynamic Mechanical Analysis...................... 31 iv 3.1.3 DMA Q800 ................................................................................................. 32 3.1.3.1. Clamps of DMA Q800 ........................................................................ 34 3.1.3.1.1. Tension Film Clamp ......................................................................... 35 3.1.3.2. Calibration of DMA Q800 .................................................................. 36 3.1.3.2.1. Electronics Calibration .................................................................... 36 3.1.3.2.2. Force Calibration (Balance and Weight) ......................................... 37 3.1.3.2.3. Dynamic Calibration ......................................................................... 37 3.1.3.2.4. Position Calibration .......................................................................... 38 3.1.3.2.5. Clamp Calibration ............................................................................. 38 3.1.4. Sample used for DMA Q800 ...................................................................... 38 3.1.4.1. HDPE-CaCO 3 Composites .................................................................. 38 3.1.4.2. Neat HDPE from Closure .................................................................... 40 3.1.5. Tests and Parameters................................................................................... 42 3.1.5.1. HDPE-CaCO 3 Composites .................................................................. 42 Stress Strain ........................................................................................................ 42 Viscoelasticity .................................................................................................... 43 Creep Tests ......................................................................................................... 44 Stress Relaxation Test ........................................................................................ 46 3.1.5.2. Neat HDPE from Closure .................................................................... 46 3.2. Density of HDPE-CaCO 3 composites ................................................................ 47 3.3. Seal Failure from Squeeze Pressure ................................................................... 48 3.3.1. Methods....................................................................................................... 49 CHAPTER IV .................................................................................................................. 51 4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ................................................................................ 51 4.1. HDPE-CaCO 3 Composites ................................................................................. 51 4.1.1. Stress Strain curves for HDPE-CaCO 3 ....................................................... 51 4.1.2. Viscoelastic properties ................................................................................ 52 4.1.2.1. As a Function of Temperature ............................................................. 52 4.1.2.2. As a Function of Frequency ................................................................. 56 4.1.3. Creep Behavior ........................................................................................... 59 4.1.3.1 Short Term Creep .................................................................................... 59 v 4.1.3.2 Long Term Creep .................................................................................... 61 4.1.4. Stress Relaxation ......................................................................................... 64 4.2. Neat HDPE from Closure ................................................................................... 68 4.2.1 Ageing ......................................................................................................... 68 4.2.1.1 Non-annealed samples............................................................................. 68 4.2.1.2 Annealed samples .................................................................................... 72 Annealed for 30 minutes .................................................................................... 72 Annealed for 1 hour............................................................................................ 74 4.2.2. Annealing .................................................................................................... 77 4.3. Seal
Recommended publications
  • Quadrant EPP Cestilene™ HD 1000 Polyethylene Datasheet
    www.lookpolymers.com email : [email protected] Quadrant EPP Cestilene™ HD 1000 Polyethylene Category : Polymer , Thermoplastic , Polyethylene (PE) , HDPE , High Density Polyethylene (HDPE), Injection Molded Material Notes: Data provided by Quadrant Engineering Plastic Products for polymers in their European product line. Order this product through the following link: http://www.lookpolymers.com/polymer_Quadrant-EPP-Cestilene-HD-1000-Polyethylene.php Physical Properties Metric English Comments Density 0.930 g/cc 0.0336 lb/in³ ISO 1183 Water Absorption 0.010 % 0.010 % immersion Mechanical Properties Metric English Comments Hardness, Shore D 60 60 after 15 sec.; ISO 868 62 62 after 3 sec.; ISO 868 Ball Indentation Hardness 36.0 MPa 5220 psi ISO 2039-1 Tensile Strength, Yield 19.0 MPa 2760 psi ISO 527 Elongation at Break >= 50 % >= 50 % ISO 527 Elongation at Yield 15 % 15 % ISO 527 Tensile Modulus 0.750 GPa 109 ksi ISO 527 Compressive Yield Strength 4.50 MPa 653 psi at 1% nominal strain; ISO 604 8.00 MPa 1160 psi at 2% nominal strain; ISO 604 14.0 MPa 2030 psi at 5% nominal strain; ISO 604 Charpy Impact Unnotched NB NB ISO 179/1eU Charpy Impact, Notched 11.0 J/cm² 52.4 ft-lb/in² Partial Break; ISO 179/1eA Abrasion 100 100 Relative loss per DSM internal test (CESTILENE HD 1000 = 100) Thermal Properties Metric English Comments 175 - 225 µm/m-°C 97.2 - 125 µin/in-°F CTE, linear @Temperature 20.0 °C @Temperature 68.0 °F Thermal Conductivity 0.400 W/m-K 2.78 BTU-in/hr-ft²-°F Melting Point 130 - 135 °C 266 - 275 °F ISO 3146; DSC, 10°C/min
    [Show full text]
  • Engineered-Plastics.Pdf
    PLASTIC PLASTICS REFERENCE HANDBOOK REGAL PLASTIC SUPPLY COMPANY PLASTICS REFERENCE HANDBOOK Copyright 1999—2000 Regal Plastic Supply Company, a division of Regal Supply Company INTRODUCTION Established in 1954, Regal Plastic Supply Company is considered one of the foremost pioneers in the plastic distribution industry. Throughout the years, the innovative “customer- oriented plan for success” thinking has become a credible trademark our customers rely on. Fortifying that philosophy, Regal introduced its Plastic Materials Reference Guide in 1984. As products and industries continue to evolve, so does this compilation of technical data. We view providing our customers with tools for effective planning and purchasing as important as meeting product “supply and demand”. You will find this guide an invaluable reference source for researching or finding the answer pertaining to your plastic application. The product information contained herein covers the most commonly used materials; it does not reflect our total capacity. True customer service is a thought process not developed overnight. Our experience and stability in the industry gives Regal the opportunity to assist you in your plastics endeavors as you utilize staff who are accessible, knowledgeable and resourceful with regard to all inquiries. We invite you to visit the Regal Plastic Supply Company location in your vicinity. All locations maintain generous inventories of plastic sheet, rod, tube, film, and numerous finished products. Regal Plastic Supply Company thanks all of our customers for their patronage over the years. We will continue in our efforts to provide the best in JIT inventory and personal service. Plastic is in your future and Regal Plastic Supply Company is your best source.
    [Show full text]
  • Brominated Polystyrene(BPS) FR
    Brominated Polystyrene(BPS) FR Description Product Name : Brominated Polystyrene(BPS) Equivalent Name : Albermarle Saytex HP3010 ; Albermarle Saytex HP7010 ; Dead Sea FR‐803P Cas No. : 88497‐56‐7 Application It provides outstanding thermal stability and electrical performance. It is particularly suitable for engineering plastic applications such as polyesters (PET, PBT, PCT) and PA (nylons).it has outstanding thermal stability. It is an ideal choice for high temperature applications such as engineering plastics. Due to its stability, it can often be used where other flame retardants fail to survive. Due toits polymeric structure, it is non‐blooming in all applications. Excellent electrical properties provide yet another reason to choose this flame retardant for demanding engineering plastic applications. Benefits and Features Excellent Flow In Resin,Superior Color,Excellent Thermal Stability, Excellent Melt Stability, Excellent Non Blistering Performance, Improved Mechanical Properties,Low Loading Typical Properties BPS 3010 Appearance .............................................................................................................................................................. White grain/ yellowish powder. Content % ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................66 min. Melting point °C .............................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Recent Developments in Biobased Polymers Toward
    polymers Review The Recent Developments in Biobased Polymers toward General and Engineering Applications: Polymers that Are Upgraded from Biodegradable Polymers, Analogous to Petroleum-Derived Polymers, and Newly Developed Hajime Nakajima, Peter Dijkstra and Katja Loos * ID Macromolecular Chemistry and New Polymeric Materials, Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands; [email protected] (H.N.); [email protected] (P.D.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +31-50-363-6867 Received: 31 August 2017; Accepted: 18 September 2017; Published: 18 October 2017 Abstract: The main motivation for development of biobased polymers was their biodegradability, which is becoming important due to strong public concern about waste. Reflecting recent changes in the polymer industry, the sustainability of biobased polymers allows them to be used for general and engineering applications. This expansion is driven by the remarkable progress in the processes for refining biomass feedstocks to produce biobased building blocks that allow biobased polymers to have more versatile and adaptable polymer chemical structures and to achieve target properties and functionalities. In this review, biobased polymers are categorized as those that are: (1) upgrades from biodegradable polylactides (PLA), polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs), and others; (2) analogous to petroleum-derived polymers such as bio-poly(ethylene terephthalate) (bio-PET); and (3) new biobased polymers such as poly(ethylene 2,5-furandicarboxylate)
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Biodegradability of Recombinant Structural Protein
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Environmental biodegradability of recombinant structural protein Yuya Tachibana1,2*, Sunita Darbe3, Senri Hayashi1, Alina Kudasheva3, Haruna Misawa1, Yuka Shibata1 & Ken‑ichi Kasuya1,2* Next generation polymers needs to be produced from renewable sources and to be converted into inorganic compounds in the natural environment at the end of life. Recombinant structural protein is a promising alternative to conventional engineering plastics due to its good thermal and mechanical properties, its production from biomass, and its potential for biodegradability. Herein, we measured the thermal and mechanical properties of the recombinant structural protein BP1 and evaluated its biodegradability. Because the thermal degradation occurs above 250 °C and the glass transition temperature is 185 °C, BP1 can be molded into sheets by a manual hot press at 150 °C and 83 MPa. The fexural strength and modulus of BP1 were 115 ± 6 MPa and 7.38 ± 0.03 GPa. These properties are superior to those of commercially available biodegradable polymers. The biodegradability of BP1 was carefully evaluated. BP1 was shown to be efciently hydrolyzed by some isolated bacterial strains in a dispersed state. Furthermore, it was readily hydrolyzed from the solid state by three isolated proteases. The mineralization was evaluated by the biochemical oxygen demand (BOD)‑ biodegradation testing with soil inocula. The BOD biodegradability of BP1 was 70.2 ± 6.0 after 33 days. Many commercially available polymers have some associated environmental problems1,2. Te increase in the production and subsequent disposal of synthetic polymers causes serious environmental pollution because these polymers do not degrade in the natural environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Engineering Plastic ®
    ENGINEERING PLASTIC ® General Engineering Plastic ACRYLIC (PERSPEX) TECAST-T (CAST NYLON) TECADUR (PET) BAKELITE HMWPE-500 TECAMID 6 (NYLON) POLYSTONE PP NYOIL HDPE-300 TECAFORM AH (POM) POLYCARBONATE ABS UHMWPE-1000 TECAMID 66 (PA66) TEFLON EPOXY G10 High Performance Engineering Plastic G 10 ESD TECATOR- PAI PPS PPO- NORYL TAKIRON PVC ESD UHMV-PE CONDUCTIVE TECAPEI-ULTEM TAKIRON PC ESD TORLON ENSITAL- POM SD UHMV-PE ANTI STATIC TURCITE AC-350/450 TECAPEEK VESPEL DELRIN AF ENGINEERING PLASTIC ® General Engineering Plastic Nylon 6 tough, wear- resistant, good vibration-absorption Nylon 6 MoS2 tough, better wear- resistant, and non stick properties than Nylon 6 Nylon 6 Glass Reinforced high strength and rigidity high wear resistance, harder, stiffer and better dimensional stability under Nylon 66 heat than Nylon 6 Nylon 66 Glass Reinforced high rigidity and strength hard, high compressive strength and wear resistance, high degree of Nylon 6 Cast crystallisation Cast Nylon 6 MoS2 very high wear resistance, very hard and rigid high wear resistance, low coefficient of friction - recommended for bearings Cast Nylon 6 Oil Impregnated with pv-value high strength, tough, low creep, better resistance to hydrolysis than Acetal Acetal Copolymer Homopolymer Acetal Homopolymer high strength Acetal Copolymer Glass Reinforced high strength, low thermal expansion, very low water absorption ABS tough, hard, can be galvanized PVC Excellent corrosion resistance, withstands strong acids and alkalis Polycarbonate transparent, tough, low creep, good electrical properties Polycarbonate Glass Reinforced high strength, low thermal expansion PET tough, hard, stable in dimension UHMW PE Excellent wear and abrasions resistance. Low coefficient of friction HDPE Good wear and abrasions resistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Compatibility of Refrigerants and Lubricants with Engineering Plastics
    DOE/CE/23810-15 COMPATIBILITY OF REFRIGERANTS AND LUBRICANTS WITH ENGINEERING PLASTICS Final Report Richard C. Cavestri, Ph.D. Imagination Resources, Inc. 5130 Blazer Memorial Parkway Dublin, Ohio 43017 September 1993 Prepared for The Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration Technology Institute Under ARTI MCLR Project Number 650-50600 This project is supported, in whole or in part, by U.S. Department of Energy grant number DE-FG02-91CE23810: Materials Compatibility and Lubricants Research (MCLR) on CFC-Refrigerant Substitutes. Federal funding supporting this project constitutes 93.67% of allowable costs. Funding from non-government sources supporting this project consists of direct cost sharing of 6.33% of allowable costs; and in-kind contributions from the air-conditioning and refrigeration industry. DISCLAIMER The U.S. Department of Energy's and the air-conditioning industry's support for the Materials Compatibility and Lubricants Research (MCLR) program does not constitute an endorsement by the U.S. Department of Energy, nor by the air-conditioning and refrigeration industry, of the views expressed herein. NOTICE This report was prepared on account of work sponsored by the United States Government. Neither the United States Government, nor the Department of Energy, nor the Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration Technology Institute, nor any of their employees, nor of any of their contractors, subcontractors, or their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product or process disclosed or represents that its use would not infringe privately-owned rights. COPYRIGHT NOTICE (for journal publication submissions) By acceptance of this article, the publisher and/or recipient acknowledges the right of the U.
    [Show full text]
  • (Bio)Degradable Polymers from Renewable Resources
    International Conference (Bio)Degradable Polymers from Renewable Resources Vienna, November 18 – 21, 2007 ABSTRACTS Polish Academy of Sciences Scientific Centre in Vienna The Conference is held under auspices of the European Polymer Federation Sponsors Polish Academy of Sciences Polska Akademia Nauk Ministry of Science and Higher Education, Poland Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyzszego˙ Federal Ministry of Transport, Innovation and Technology, Austria Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Innovation und Technologie ACS PUBLICATIONS HIGH QUALITY. HIGH IMPACT. CONTENTS Conference Committees and Organizers . 5 Conference Programme . 6 Conference Venues. .8 Overview of Abstracts . 9 Abstracts of Invited Lectures. .13 Abstracts of Poster Contributions . 33 Author Index . 108 List of Participants . 111 SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE Ann-Christine Albertsson (Sweden) – co-Chair Gerhart Braunegg (Austria) – co-Chair Francesco Ciardelli (Italy) Danuta Ciechanska (Poland) Andrzej Dworak (Poland) Zbigniew Florjanczyk (Poland) Shiro Kobayashi (Japan) Izabella Krucinska (Poland) Andrej Krzan (Slovenia) Christopher K. Ober (USA) Gabriel Rokicki (Poland) Tadeusz Spychaj (Poland) Robert F. Stepto (UK) Piotr Tomasik (Poland) Jean-Pierre Vairon (France) Danuta Zuchowska (Poland) Chairman of the Conference Stanislaw Penczek Chairman of the Organizing Committee Stanislaw Slomkowski Conference Secretary Andrzej Nadolny CO-ORGANIZERS OF THE CONFERENCE Polish Academy of Sciences, Scientific Centre in Vienna, Austria International Network (Bio)degradable Polymers from Renewable
    [Show full text]
  • FACT SHEET European Bioplastics
    FACT SHEET European Bioplastics Bio-based plastics in the automotive market – clear benefits and strong performance Overview of materials and market development Cutting fuel consumption and emissions by reducing a vehi- b. Bio-based technical performance polymers e.g. cle’s weight is a central objective and major challenge for the polytrimethylene terephthalate (PTT) or thermoplastic automotive industry. Bioplastics materials are well suited to copolyester elastomers (TPC-ET) or bio-based poly- contributing towards this goal. Leading automotive brands amides around the world are already using bio-based plastics (e.g. bio- based polyamides, bio-based polyesters, etc.) with the aim of 2. Plastics that are both bio-based and biodegradable e.g. reducing their products’ environmental impact. polylactic acid (PLA), polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) and polybutylene succinates (PBS), but can also be used in durable This fact sheet presents an overview of available bio-based applications. plastic materials, general benefits of bio-based plastics, bio- based plastics market development, and bio-based plastic per- Several bio-based plastics are used in the automotive market, formance in the automotive sector. including bio-based polyamides, PTT and bio-based polyole- fines as well as PLA-blends. What are bio-based plastics? Benefits of bio-based plastics Bio-based plastics comprise a range of materials with differing properties1: Saving scarce resources, counting on renewable feedstock 1. Bio-based or partially bio-based, non-biodegradable Bio-based plastics help to reduce the dependency on limited (i.e. durable) plastics such as fossil resources, which are expected to increase in price sig- nificantly over the coming decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Material Selection Selection
    alroplastics.com 800-877-ALRO 2 5 7 6 Material Selection Selection Advantages of Stock Shapes ...............................................10 Material General Selection Criteria ...............................................10-11 Product Descriptions ..................................................... 12-15 Product Selection Chart ................................................. 16-19 IAPD Thermoplastic Rectangle ...................................... 20-21 Property Comparison Charts Slide Wear .......................................................................22 Rotational Wear ..............................................................22 Temperature, Continuous Use .......................................23 Friction Comparison .......................................................23 Tensile Strength ..............................................................24 Impact Resistance ..........................................................24 Thermal Dimensional Stability ......................................25 Moisture Dimensional Stability .....................................25 Hardness Comparison ...................................................26 Weight Comparison ........................................................26 WARNING: These products can potentially expose you to chemicals including, 4-Dioxane, Acetaldehyde, Acrylonitrile, Bisphenol-A, Carbon Black, Chromium, Cumene, Dichloromethane, Ethyl Acrylate, Ethylbenzene, Ethylene Glycol, Formaldehyde, Glass Fibers, Hexachlorobenzene, Lead, Methanol, Nickel, Polyvinyl
    [Show full text]
  • Engineering Plastics – the Manual This Manual Is Designed to Provide Readers with a Compact Outline of Our Extensive Fund of Plastics-Related Knowledge
    Stock shapes Engineering plastics – The Manual This manual is designed to provide readers with a compact outline of our extensive fund of plastics-related knowledge. Alongside a grounding of theoretical facts and informa- tion, the manual also provides a range of practical tips and material recommendations, together with calculation ex- amples for component design and advice on the further processing of plastics. 4 Overview of plastics 6 Classification of plastics 7 Ensinger process chain 8 Processing methods Materials 12 TECARAN ABS 13 TECANYL 14 TECAFINE PE 15 TECAFINE PMP 16 TECAPRO MT / TECAFINE PP 18 TECAFORM 20 TECAMID 22 TECAST / TECARIM 24 TECADUR / TECAPET 26 TECANAT 28 TECAFLON 30 TECAPEI 32 TECASON S, P, E 34 TECATRON 36 TECAPEEK 38 TECATOR 40 TECASINT Properties 44 Modifications / additives 46 Thermal properties 50 Mechanical properties 54 Processing influences 55 Tribological characteristics 57 Electrical properties 60 Chemical resistance 62 Moisture absorption 63 Flame retardant classification 64 Radiation resistance 66 Certifications and approvals Material selection and calculations 70 Material selection 72 Calculations Further processing This manual is designed to provide readers with a compact 76 Processing plastics outline of our extensive fund of plastics-related knowledge. 77 Machining guidelines Alongside a grounding of theoretical facts and informa- 78 Tempering tion, the manual also provides a range of practical tips and 80 Welding material recommendations, together with calculation ex- 82 Gluing amples for component
    [Show full text]
  • Impact Behaviour of Acrylonitrile-Butadiene-Styrene After Temperature and Humidity Load
    MATEC Web of Conferences 125, 02048 (2017) DOI: 10.1051/ matecconf/201712502048 CSCC 2017 Impact behaviour of acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene after temperature and humidity load Lenka Hylova 1,*, Miroslav Manas1 1Tomas Bata University in Zlin, nam. T. G. Masaryka 5555, 76001 Zlin, Czech Republic Abstract. This study deals with acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS) which was subjected the drop-weight test before and after temperature and humidity load. ABS is an engineering plastic and also an important engineering terpolymer, which has butadiene part uniformly distributed through the acrylonitrile-styrene matrix and is commonly used in production of automotive interior components. The injection moulded ABS samples were subjected the penetration test at fall height 100 J before and after temperature and humidity load and the results were subsequently evaluated and discussed. It was found out that ABS after temperature and humidity load has lower impact resistance. 1 Introduction construction, computer and business equipment, personal care products, toys, medical devices and in automotive Acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS) is an engineering interior components [1-3]. plastic and also an important engineering terpolymer, Brazilian scientists investigated three types of which has butadiene part uniformly distributed through commercial ABS, namely GP (ABS for general-purpose the acrylonitrile-styrene matrix. ABS was use), HI (an ABS high impact) and HH (ABS high heat commercialized at the latter of 1940s by U.S. Rubber and resistance). They studied activation energy of all three originally was made by blending of polystyrene-co- ABS and they realized that it is much higher than acrylonitrile (SAN) and NBR acrylonitrile-butadiene reported in the literature.
    [Show full text]