DOCSLIB.ORG

Scanning and Tail-Flicking in the Australian Dusky Moorhen

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Scanning and Tail-Flicking in the Australian Dusky Moorhen The Auk 113(2):499-501, 1996 Scanningand Tail-flicking in the Australian Dusky Moorhen ( Gallinula tenebrosa) DAVID A. RYAN, KYLIE M. BAWDEN, KATHRYN T. BERMINGHAM, AND MARK A. ELGAR Departmentof Zoology,University of Melbourne,Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia The Dusky Moorhen (Gallinulatenebrosa), which is Methods.--Dusky Moorhens were observed be- common in swampsand waterways, feeds on seeds tween 1300 and 1700 EST during March 1994 at the and the tips of grassesand shrubs (Marchant and Prince'sLawn in the Royal BotanicalGardens, Mel- Higgins 1993).During the breedingseason, adult male bourne,Victoria (37ø50'S,145øE). The lawn is an open, and female Dusky Moorhensare colorful,with bright grassyarea of about 3 ha, flanked by busheson three orange frontal shields.The color of the shield of fe- sidesand inclining to an ornamentallake towardsthe malesand younger malesfades to black or greenish easternedge. At least25 DuskyMoorhens frequented brown in autumn and winter (Eskell and Garnett 1979). the general vicinity of the lawn at any time. Pacific Juvenileshave a black shield and beak with a green- Black Ducks (Anassuperciliosa) also were seen occa- ish-yellow tip and olive-green legs. Both adult and sionallyon the lawn, foragingamong groups of Dusky juvenile Dusky Moorhens possesswhite undertail co- Moorhens. vers. Like manyother membersof the Rallidae,Dusky The behaviorof Dusky Moorhensforaging on the Moorhens foraging on the ground flick their tails grasswas recordedfrom a gardenbench that afforded vertically, revealing their conspicuousundertail co- a view of most of the study site. The presenceof verts (e.g. Garnett 1978, 1980, Woodland et al. 1980; observerson the benchapparently did not influence but see Ridpath 1972).The function of this behavior the behavior of the birds. Individual Dusky Moor- is poorly understood(see Craig 1982,Alvarez 1993). hens were selectedarbitrarily from throughoutthe There are severalpossible explanations why Dusky study area. We noted the color of the frontal shield Moorhenstail-flick, none of which are mutually ex- of the focal bird and categorizedthe bird as either clusive.First, tail-flicking may signal to conspecifics alone or in a group. A group was defined as four or that a predatoris present,or it may signal a degree more birds within 2 m of each other. Solitary birds of alertnessto a potential predator, thereby discour- were greaterthan 2 m from any conspecific.We also aging pursuit (see Woodland et al. 1980,Craig 1982, noted whether individuals were at the edgeor center Caro 1986).These ideas can only be testedby exam- of the group. A bird was defined asbeing at the edge ining the behaviorof birds in the presenceand ab- of a group if there were no other birds within 1800 senceof predators.Second, tail-flicking may be a con- of the perimeter of the group. We did not collectdata specificsignal of an individual's stateof vigilance or 'for birdsin pairsor triosbecause it wasnot possible perceptionof danger(see Caro 1986).This idea pre- to discern whether individuals were at the center or dictsthat birds that are more vigilant shouldalso tail- edgeof the group.It is probablethat somebirds were flick morefrequently. Finally, tail-flickingmay signal observedmore than once; while this is unlikely to the social status of the individual (Craig 1982), in introduceany systematicbias into the analysis,it may which casetail-flicking ratesshould covary with the reducethe statisticalpower. social status of the individual. The numbersof tail-flicksand proportionof time We investigated whether tail-flicking in Dusky spent scanningwere recordedover a 2-min period, Moorhen representsa conspecificsignal indicating after which another bird was selected. A tail-flick was an individual'sperception of dangerand/or its social defined as a single rapid movementof the tail in an status.We assumethat scanningbehavior is associated upward direction. Birds were recorded as scanning with predator detection(see Lima 1990) and that in- when they lifted up their headsand turned them on dividualsadjust their scanningrates according to their a horizontalplane. Observationperiods were termi- perceivedrisk of predation(Lima and Dill 1990).Nu- nated early if the compositionof the group changed, merousstudies show that scanningrates change with a disturbancecaused the birds to run or fly, or the group size and the locationof individuals within the birds were fed by visitors to the gardens;data from group (seeElgar 1989),which may reflect differences terminated observations were discarded. in the risk of predation (see Lima 1995). Thus, scan- Data were analyzed using proceduresin the pack- ning and tail-flicking ratesshould vary similarly for age SYSTAT5.2 for the Apple Macintoshcomputer individuals in both different-sized groups and dif- (Wilkinson 1992). Tail-flick rates were log(x + 1) ferent locationswithin a group.Additionally, if tail- transformedin order to approximatea normal distri- flicking signalssocial status, then individuals of dif- bution. ferent statusshould differ in tail-flicking rates. Resultsand discussion.--Atwo-way ANOVA, with 499 500 ShortCommunications andCommentaries [Auk,Vol. 113 TABLE1. Scanning and tail-flicking rates (per min; 50. • _+SE) of Dusky Moorhenswith and without de- veloped frontal shields foraging alone, in groups, and at center or edge of groups. n Flicks Scans A. Frontal shield and group sizea Frontal shield present (adults) ß Solitary 17 23.8 7.1 0.39 0.04 Group 27 6.3 2.4 0.19 0.02 ß ß ß ß Frontal shield absent(juveniles) ß Solitary 17 43.8 9.4 0.33 0.05 ß ß ß Group 30 9.1 2.2 0.20 0.02 ß ßß ß oo B. Frontal shield and position in groupb 0 Frontal shield present (adults) 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Center 7 2.14 2.14 0.14 0.03 Edge 20 7.75 3.08 0.20 0.02 Proportion of time spent scanning Frontal shield absent(juveniles) Fig. 1. Correlationbetween rate of tail-flickingby Center 9 5.00 1.55 0.16 0.03 DuskyMoorhens in groupsof four or more and pro- Edge 21 10.81 2.97 0.22 0.03 portion of time spent vigilant (r = 0.417, P = 0.001, ßTail-flicking rates (log transformed):frontal shield,F,,• • 4.63,P = n = 57). Correlation remainssignificant after remov- 0.03; group size, F• = 18.77, P < 0.001; interaction,F.• = 0.01, ns. ing observation(upper right) of bird that scannedfor Scanrates: frontal shield, F.• = 0.28, ns; group size, F• = 26.72, P < a long time and tail-flickedvery rapidly. 0.001; interaction, F• = 1.11, ns. bTail-flicking rates (log transformed):frontal shield,F,• = 4.24,P < 0.05; position, F•z• = 2.13, ns; interaction,F,• = 0.21, ns. Scanrates: frontal shield,F• = 0.37, ns;position, F,z• = 3.11, P < 0.08;interaction, rate for individuals foraging alone (r = -0.05, ns, n F,• = 0.01, ns. = 34). This result contrastswith the significantpos- itive correlationreported for the solitarilyforaging Purple Gallinule (Porphyrioporphyrio; Alvarez 1993). presenceof a developedfrontal shield as one factor However, tail-flicking and scanning were signifi- and grouping (solitaryor group of four or more) as cantly correlatedfor individuals foraging in groups the other,revealed that solitaryindividuals spent more of four or more (Fig. 1). This correlationwas not con- time scanningand tail-flicked at higher rates than founded by group size, becauseneither tail-flicking individualsin groupsof four or more(Table 1A). The nor scanningwere significantlycorrelated with group relationshipbetween scanningrates and grouping is sizefor groupsof four or more(r = - 0.116and - 0.022, consistent with those of numerous other studies of respectively).Alvarez (1993) also reported a positive, birds and mammals(Elgar 1989, but see Catterall et significant correlation between vigilance and tail- al. 1992).Alvarez (1993) alsoreported a negative cor- flicking among European Moorhens foraging in relation between group size and tail-flicking in the groups,but the possibleconfounding effect of group EuropeanMoorhen (G. chloropus).A similar two-way size was not controlled. ANOVA, with presenceof a developedfrontal shield The resultsof our study are difficult to interpret as one factor and position within the group (center within the contextof a singlefunction of tail-flicking. or edge) as the other, revealed little evidenceof a The similar patterns of variation in the time spent grouplocation effect on either scanningor tail-flick- scanningand tail-flicking rate supportthe idea that ing rates;there was qualitativelymore time spent tail-flicking in Dusky Moorhens provides a signal scanning and higher tail-flicking rates for Dusky about an individual's stateof alertnessor perception Moorhensat the edgeof a group,but this patternwas of danger.Perhaps Dusky Moorhens spend more time not statisticallysignificant (Table lB). scanningwhen alone than when in groups because In both of the aboveanalyses, the variationin tail- they perceivea higher risk of predation (seealso A1- flickingrates was significantly explained by the pres- varez 1993),and they must tail-flick more frequently enceof a developedfrontal shield. Dusky Moorhens becausethe intended recipient, by definition, is not without shieldstail-flicked almost twice asfrequently nearby. The positive correlation between scanning as those with shields, but these differences in tail- and tail-flicking ratesfor individuals in groupsof four flickingrates were not reflectedby similardifferences or more may reflect natural variationsin the per- in scanningrates (Table 1). ceivedrisk of predation,with the birdsadjusting their The correlationsbetween tail-flicking and scanning behavioraccordingly. In contrast,solitary birds may alsowere influencedby whetherthe birdswere alone invest so much time tail-flicking and scanning that it or in a group. There was no significantcorrelation is not possiblefor them to vary it consistentlywith betweenthe time spentscanning and the tail-flicking any additionalchanges in the perceivedrisk of pre- April1996] ShortCommunications andCommentaries 501 dation. Finally, although individualsat the edge of son'sgazelles: Some tests of the predictions.Anim. the group spentqualitatively moretime scanningand Behav. 34:663-684. tail-flickingthan thoseat the center,these differences CATTERALL,C.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lake Hamilton & Grange Wetlands
    3. LakeHamilton Location: This impoundment on the Fauna: Breeding resident water birds Grange Burn in Hamilton is adjacent to the include Musk Duck (pictured below, DL), Hamilton-Dunkeld railway line just east of Purple Swamphen, Dusky Moorhen, the town. From the town centre, drive Eurasian Coot and Pacific Black Duck. northeast along Gray St to access the west Blue-billed Duck are occasional visitors. side, or along the Glenelg Highway Spotted, Spotless and Baillon’s Crakes, (Ballarat Rd) and turning left at Riley St (to Buff-banded and Lewin’s Rails may be park at the spillway), or Rippon Rd to seen in the summer months, especially access the south side swimming beach between the beach and the footbridge at and playground area. A walking/cycling the eastern end of the lake. path 4.2 km in length runs through the parkland surrounding the Lake. The lake An Australian Little Bittern was heard in the was created in the 1970s for recreational reeds near the island early in 2009. (swimming, fishing, rowing and speed Spoonbills, herons and egrets may occur boats) and scenic purposes. in the reed beds all around the lake along with Australian Reed-warblers and Little Landform and geology: The lake is Grassbirds. The common honeyeaters are shallow and formed on the Grange Burn White-plumed, New Holland and Red floodplain. The landscape is basaltic Wattlebirds. The lake has permanent plains. The eastern end with the large water and may serve as an important island is pictured below (DL). refuge for water birds during droughts when large numbers of birds may be Flora: Little original native vegetation can present.
    [Show full text]
  • Birding Oxley Creek Common Brisbane, Australia
    Birding Oxley Creek Common Brisbane, Australia Hugh Possingham and Mat Gilfedder – January 2011 [email protected] www.ecology.uq.edu.au 3379 9388 (h) Other photos, records and comments contributed by: Cathy Gilfedder, Mike Bennett, David Niland, Mark Roberts, Pete Kyne, Conrad Hoskin, Chris Sanderson, Angela Wardell-Johnson, Denis Mollison. This guide provides information about the birds, and how to bird on, Oxley Creek Common. This is a public park (access restricted to the yellow parts of the map, page 6). Over 185 species have been recorded on Oxley Creek Common in the last 83 years, making it one of the best birding spots in Brisbane. This guide is complimented by a full annotated list of the species seen in, or from, the Common. How to get there Oxley Creek Common is in the suburb of Rocklea and is well signposted from Sherwood Road. If approaching from the east (Ipswich Road side), pass the Rocklea Markets and turn left before the bridge crossing Oxley Creek. If approaching from the west (Sherwood side) turn right about 100 m after the bridge over Oxley Creek. The gate is always open. Amenities The main development at Oxley Creek Common is the Red Shed, which is beside the car park (plenty of space). The Red Shed has toilets (composting), water, covered seating, and BBQ facilities. The toilets close about 8pm and open very early. The paths are flat, wide and easy to walk or cycle. When to arrive The diversity of waterbirds is a feature of the Common and these can be good at any time of the day.
    [Show full text]
  • A Classification of the Rallidae
    A CLASSIFICATION OF THE RALLIDAE STARRY L. OLSON HE family Rallidae, containing over 150 living or recently extinct species T and having one of the widest distributions of any family of terrestrial vertebrates, has, in proportion to its size and interest, received less study than perhaps any other major group of birds. The only two attempts at a classifi- cation of all of the recent rallid genera are those of Sharpe (1894) and Peters (1934). Although each of these lists has some merit, neither is satisfactory in reflecting relationships between the genera and both often separate closely related groups. In the past, no attempt has been made to identify the more primitive members of the Rallidae or to illuminate evolutionary trends in the family. Lists almost invariably begin with the genus Rdus which is actually one of the most specialized genera of the family and does not represent an ancestral or primitive stock. One of the difficulties of rallid taxonomy arises from the relative homo- geneity of the family, rails for the most part being rather generalized birds with few groups having morphological modifications that clearly define them. As a consequence, particularly well-marked genera have been elevated to subfamily rank on the basis of characters that in more diverse families would not be considered as significant. Another weakness of former classifications of the family arose from what Mayr (194933) referred to as the “instability of the morphology of rails.” This “instability of morphology,” while seeming to belie what I have just said about homogeneity, refers only to the characteristics associated with flightlessness-a condition that appears with great regularity in island rails and which has evolved many times.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Enhancement Plan 2014–2019 Aims to Support Increased Biodiversity and the Conservation of Native Fauna and Fauna Habitat Within the Local Environment
    Wildlife Enhancement Plan 2014 – 2019 www.subiaco.wa.gov.au Goal statement The Wildlife Enhancement Plan 2014–2019 aims to support increased biodiversity and the conservation of native fauna and fauna habitat within the local environment. Acknowledgements The city would like to thank Danielle Bowler from the City of Joondalup, Tamara Kabat from Bird Life Australia, Mathew Swan from the Department of Parks and Wildlife and Jake Tanner from the City of Fremantle for assisting with the development of this plan. The City of Subiaco is committed to protecting the global environment through local action. By printing this publication on Australian made 100 per cent recycled paper, the city aims to conserve the resources of the city. The document is available via the Internet at www.subiaco.wa.gov.au TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of contents Executive summary 4 Key definitions 5 Introduction 6 Wildlife conservation and enhancement 7 Parks, reserves and street trees 7 Wetlands 7 Greenways and remnant bushland areas 8 Aboriginal cultural significance 8 Community education 8 Management of identified risks 10 Climate change 10 Feral animals 10 Domestic animals 10 Plant pathogens 10 Resources and useful links 11 References 12 Appendix A: Fauna list 13 Photo courtesy of Margaret Owen CITY OF SUBIACO 2014 –2019 WILDLIFE ENHANCEMENT PLAN | 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Executive summary The Wildlife Enhancement Plan 2014–2019 aims to support increased biodiversity and the conservation of native fauna and fauna habitat within the city’s local environment. The plan includes actions to enhance wildlife conservation, as well as provide education and participation opportunities for the community.
    [Show full text]
  • Breeding Biology of the Dusky Moorhen in a Suburban Park
    Corella, 2003, 27(1 ): 24-30 BREEDING BIOLOGY OF THE DUSKY MOORHEN IN A SUBURBAN PARK 1 2 3 SEAN PYWELL' and ALAN LILL • • 'Wildlife Ecology Group, School of Biological Sciences, P.O. Box 18, Monash University, Victoria 3800 'School of Psychology, Psychiatry and Psychological Medicine, P.O. Box 17, Monash University, Victoria 3800 ·'Corresponding author Rereived: 23 May 2002 The breeding biology of a Dusky Moorhen Gal/inula tenebrosa population in Jells Park, Melbourne was studied from 1991 to 1996. Data were supplemented by records from the Birds Australia Nest Record Scheme for the period 1963-1995. The breeding season at Jells Park lasted from August to March. Mean individual clutch size was 6 eggs at Jells Park and 7 eggs in Nest Record Scheme. For breeding groups at Jells Park with only one laying female, clutch size was negatively correlated with laying date. The eggs comprising a clutch were usually laid daily, egg mass was about 7 per cent of adult mass and the mean incubation period was 23 days. Egg mass and incubation period conformed to allometric predictions based on adult mass, but clutch mass exceeded prediction simply because of the significant incidence of communal clutches. Clutch success was 61 per cent at Jells Park and 72 per cent in the Nest Record Scheme. Predation was the main nesting mortality agent. Survival of chicks from fledging to independence was 40-50 per cent at Jells Park. Females in the park contributed eggs to a similar ex1ent to single-female or communal clutches, but Nest Record Scheme females contributed about one more egg to communal than single-female clutches.
    [Show full text]
  • Eurasian Coot Fulica Atra Eating Waterbird Faeces
    AUSTRALIAN 150 PHILLIPPS: Eumsian Coot Eating Waterbird Faeces BIRD WATCHER Eurasian Coot Fulica atra Eating Waterbird Faeces -W.M.R. Plate 20 I have regularly watched Dusky Moorhens Gallinula tenebrosa at Albert Park Lake in metropolitan Melbourne engaged in the behaviour described by Starks & Peter (1991). There.are several small jetties at the north end of the lake which are used as roosts by many birds, including Pacific Black Duck Anas superciliosa, Eurasian Coot Fulica atra, Little Pied Phalacrocorax melanoleucos and Little Black P. sulcirostris Cormorants, and Silver Gulls Larus novaehollandiae. Frequently each jetty also has one or two Dusky Moorhens which systematically work it for the droppings of any of the roosting birds. On 21 July 1991, at about 0800 h, I was watching the birds on one of these jetties. There were about 20 Coots, 20 Silver Gulls and 12 Black Ducks. As usual there was a couple of scavenging Moorhens as well. Most of the Coots were simply roosting, but three of them were behaving much as the Moorhens were, attempting to pick up droppings from the timber planking by laying their heads to one side in order to scoop up the semi-solid morsels with the sides of their bills. Though their techniques were similar, the efforts of the Coots seemed clumsier and less effective than those of the Moorhens. There was one apparent agonistic encounter between the two species when a Coot and a Moorhen approached the same dropping from opposite directions. The Moorhen stretched out its neck and lunged at the Coot, which backed away.
    [Show full text]
  • AOS Classification Committee – North and Middle America Proposal Set 2018-B 17 January 2018
    AOS Classification Committee – North and Middle America Proposal Set 2018-B 17 January 2018 No. Page Title 01 02 Split Fork-tailed Swift Apus pacificus into four species 02 05 Restore Canada Jay as the English name of Perisoreus canadensis 03 13 Recognize two genera in Stercorariidae 04 15 Split Red-eyed Vireo (Vireo olivaceus) into two species 05 19 Split Pseudobulweria from Pterodroma 06 25 Add Tadorna tadorna (Common Shelduck) to the Checklist 07 27 Add three species to the U.S. list 08 29 Change the English names of the two species of Gallinula that occur in our area 09 32 Change the English name of Leistes militaris to Red-breasted Meadowlark 10 35 Revise generic assignments of woodpeckers of the genus Picoides 11 39 Split the storm-petrels (Hydrobatidae) into two families 1 2018-B-1 N&MA Classification Committee p. 280 Split Fork-tailed Swift Apus pacificus into four species Effect on NACC: This proposal would change the species circumscription of Fork-tailed Swift Apus pacificus by splitting it into four species. The form that occurs in the NACC area is nominate pacificus, so the current species account would remain unchanged except for the distributional statement and notes. Background: The Fork-tailed Swift Apus pacificus was until recently (e.g., Chantler 1999, 2000) considered to consist of four subspecies: pacificus, kanoi, cooki, and leuconyx. Nominate pacificus is highly migratory, breeding from Siberia south to northern China and Japan, and wintering in Australia, Indonesia, and Malaysia. The other subspecies are either residents or short distance migrants: kanoi, which breeds from Taiwan west to SE Tibet and appears to winter as far south as southeast Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • Rlch Swamp Contains Very Little Water. the Melaleuca Quinquenervia at Carr's Creek, Although Occupying Approximately the Same Ar
    28 RlCH [ Bird Wat cher swamp contains very little water. The Melaleuca quinquenervia at Carr's Creek, although occupying approximately the same area as at Gillett's Ridge. is growing much more densely and is in several feet of water. At Gillett's Ridge, the Cattle Egrets are accompanied by White, Plumed and Little Egrets, but no other species have been noted at Carr's Creek. U nfortunatel y, the Carr's Creek swamp is close to human habi­ tation. although the owners of the property are very sympathetic and interested . Eric Wheeler, Grafton, New South Wales, 15 / 4/ 1972. Black-tailed Native Hen in Desert Country. During periods of norma l rainfall the Black-tailed Native Hen, T ribonvx ventralis, frequents " swamps. grasslands near water" (Condon. f968. see also Cooper. 1955. McGill, 1960, Slater. 1971 , Storr, 1967, etc.). However. due to the exceptionally dry conditions that have pre­ va iled in so uthern South Australia and New South Wales, and the whole state of Victoria during the spring and early summer months of 1972. a southward irruption of this species has occurred. There are numerous reports in South Australian Ornithological A ssoci­ ation's "Newsletter" (December, 1972). where an effort is being made to collate the various record s for South A ustrali a, and also in other journals. Most of the observations are of birds near dams. la kes or swamps. At the time of writing. December 1972, the drought had inten­ sified and we a re able to appreciate the circumstances th at have ca used th e Native Hens to move so uthwa rd .
    [Show full text]
  • 2015-Birds-Of-ML1.Pdf
    FREE presents Birds of Mawson Lakes Linda Vining & MikeBIRDS Flynn of Mawson Lakes An online book available at www.mawsonlakesliving.info Republished as an ebook in 2015 First Published in 2013 Published by Mawson Lakes Living Magazine 43 Parkview Drive Mawson Lakes 5095 SOUTH AUSTRALIA Ph: +61 8 8260 7077 [email protected] www.mawsonlakesliving.info Photography and words by Mike Flynn Cover: New Holland Honeyeater. See page 22 for description © All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical photocopying, recording or otherwise, without credit to the publisher. BIRDS inof MawsonMawson LakesLakes 3 Introduction What bird is that? Birdlife in Mawson Lakes is abundant and adds a wonderful dimension to our natural environment. Next time you go outside just listen to the sounds around you. The air is always filled with bird song. Birds bring great pleasure to the people of Mawson Lakes. There is nothing more arresting than a mother bird and her chicks swimming on the lakes in the spring. What a show stopper. The huge variety of birds provides magnificent opportunities for photographers. One of these is amateur photographer Mike Flynn who lives at Shearwater. Since coming to live at Mawson Lakes he has become an avid bird watcher and photographer. I often hear people ask: “What bird is that?” This book, brought to you by Mawson Lakes Living, is designed to answer this question by identifying birds commonly seen in Mawson Lakes and providing basic information on where to find them, what they eat and their distinctive features.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Status of New Zealand Birds, 2008
    Notornis, 2008, Vol. 55: 117-135 117 0029-4470 © The Ornithological Society of New Zealand, Inc. Conservation status of New Zealand birds, 2008 Colin M. Miskelly* Wellington Conservancy, Department of Conservation, P.O. Box 5086, Wellington 6145, New Zealand [email protected] JOHN E. DOWDING DM Consultants, P.O. Box 36274, Merivale, Christchurch 8146, New Zealand GRAEME P. ELLIOTT Research & Development Group, Department of Conservation, Private Bag 5, Nelson 7042, New Zealand RODNEY A. HITCHMOUGH RALPH G. POWLESLAND HUGH A. ROBERTSON Research & Development Group, Department of Conservation, P.O. Box 10420, Wellington 6143, New Zealand PAUL M. SAGAR National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research, P.O. Box 8602, Christchurch 8440, New Zealand R. PAUL SCOFIELD Canterbury Museum, Rolleston Ave, Christchurch 8001, New Zealand GRAEME A. TAYLOR Research & Development Group, Department of Conservation, P.O. Box 10420, Wellington 6143, New Zealand Abstract An appraisal of the conservation status of the post-1800 New Zealand avifauna is presented. The list comprises 428 taxa in the following categories: ‘Extinct’ 20, ‘Threatened’ 77 (comprising 24 ‘Nationally Critical’, 15 ‘Nationally Endangered’, 38 ‘Nationally Vulnerable’), ‘At Risk’ 93 (comprising 18 ‘Declining’, 10 ‘Recovering’, 17 ‘Relict’, 48 ‘Naturally Uncommon’), ‘Not Threatened’ (native and resident) 36, ‘Coloniser’ 8, ‘Migrant’ 27, ‘Vagrant’ 130, and ‘Introduced and Naturalised’ 36. One species was assessed as ‘Data Deficient’. The list uses the New Zealand Threat Classification System, which provides greater resolution of naturally uncommon taxa typical of insular environments than the IUCN threat ranking system. New Zealand taxa are here ranked at subspecies level, and in some cases population level, when populations are judged to be potentially taxonomically distinct on the basis of genetic data or morphological observations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Breeding Ecology of the Moorhen, Gallinula Chloropus, in an Artificially Created Wetland Environment at WWT Llanelli, South Wales
    _________________________________________________________________________Swansea University E-Theses The breeding ecology of the moorhen, Gallinula chloropus, in an artificially created wetland environment at WWT Llanelli, South Wales. Forman, Daniel William How to cite: _________________________________________________________________________ Forman, Daniel William (2001) The breeding ecology of the moorhen, Gallinula chloropus, in an artificially created wetland environment at WWT Llanelli, South Wales.. thesis, Swansea University. http://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa42564 Use policy: _________________________________________________________________________ This item is brought to you by Swansea University. Any person downloading material is agreeing to abide by the terms of the repository licence: copies of full text items may be used or reproduced in any format or medium, without prior permission for personal research or study, educational or non-commercial purposes only. The copyright for any work remains with the original author unless otherwise specified. The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holder. Permission for multiple reproductions should be obtained from the original author. Authors are personally responsible for adhering to copyright and publisher restrictions when uploading content to the repository. Please link to the metadata record in the Swansea University repository, Cronfa (link given in the citation reference above.) http://www.swansea.ac.uk/library/researchsupport/ris-support/ THE BREEDING ECOLOGY OF THE MOORHEN, GALLINULA CHLOROPUS, IN AN ARTIFICIALLY CREATED WETLAND ENVIRONMENT AT WWT LLANELLI, SOUTH WALES A Thesis Presented by Daniel William Forman for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the University of Wales School of Biological Sciences University of Wales Swansea June 2001 ProQuest Number: 10805313 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted.
    [Show full text]
  • The Birds and Reptiles of the Iramoo Green Web, Brimbank
    The Birds and Reptiles of the Iramoo Green Web, Brimbank: Scoping the Requirements for Conservation By .Craig Dflidson and::: • Colin Hoc] re,2004) t^f.tij;" [tj i > VICTIiRIA UNIVERSITY OF T|CHNOLO iY 3 0001 00853 0182 FTS THESIS 333.954 160994 DOD ii'-'The Birds and Reptiles of the Iramoo Green Web; Brimbank: Scoping the Requirements for Conservation" By Craig Dodson Supervisor: Dr. Colin Hocking A thesis submitted to the Sustainability Group (Faculty of Science, Engineering and Technology) as part of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science (Honours) Victoria University (June 2004) THESIS 333.954160994 DOD 30001008530182 Dodson, Craig The birds and reptiles of the Iramoo Green Web, Brimbank : scoping the DECLARATION This document does not contain any material that has been accepted for any reward of any other degree or diploma in any university and to the best of my knowledge, no other material that has previously been published or written by any other person is contained in this document accept where referenced in the text. Craig Dodson n AKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my supervisor Dr. Colin Hocking for his guidance and encouragement during the formation of my honours jjroject and thesis and a special thanks goes to the Honours Coordinator Associate Professor Paul Boon for his patience in waiting for this thesis. Thanks goes also to the post-graduate students David Steart and Mark Scarr for their help and support in the formation of my thesis and with technical assistance on the computer. My fellow honour students Carolyn Burrell and Lucy Cassar, thank you for your support, technical assistance and friendship during my honours year.
    [Show full text]