DOCSLIB.ORG

Companhia De Pescarias Do Algarve Rope Grown Mediterranean Mussel Fishery

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Companhia De Pescarias Do Algarve Rope Grown Mediterranean Mussel Fishery Food Certification International Ltd Findhorn House Dochfour Business Centre Dochgarroch Inverness, IV3 8GY United Kingdom T: +44(0)1463 223 039 F: +44(0)1463 246 380 www.foodcertint.com MSC SUSTAINABLE FISHERIES CERTIFICATION Companhia de Pescarias do Algarve rope grown Mediterranean mussel Fishery Public Consultation Draft Report August 2014 Prepared For: Companhia de Pescarias do Algarve, S.A Prepared By: Food Certification International Ltd Food Certification International Public Consultation Draft Report Companhia de Pescarias do Algarve rope grown Mediterranean mussel Fishery Public Consultation Draft Report August 2014 Authors: Bert Keus, Rod Cappell Certification Body: Client: Food Certification International Ltd Companhia de Pescarias do Algarve, S.A Address: Address: Findhorn House Rua Manuel Belmarço Nº 28 Dochfour Business Centre 1º Dto. 8000-390 Dochgarroch Faro Inverness, IV3 8GY Portugal Scotland, UK Name: Fisheries Department Name: Filipa Bettencourt, Quality Director Tel: +44(0) 1463 223 039 Tel: 00351 289 822279 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Web: www.foodcertint.com 2 version 2.0 (01/06/13) Food Certification International Public Consultation Draft Report Companhia de Pescarias do Algarve rope grown Mediterranean mussel Fishery Contents Glossary of Terms ................................................................................................................................. 5 1. Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 6 2. Authorship and Peer Reviewers ...................................................................................................... 8 2.1 Assessment Team ....................................................................................................................... 8 2.1.1 Peer Reviewers ...................................................................................................................... 9 3. Description of the Fishery .............................................................................................................. 10 3.1 Unit(s) of Certification and scope of certification sought ............................................................. 10 3.1.1 Scope of Assessment in Relation to Enhanced Fisheries ................................................... 10 3.1.2 Scope of Assessment in Relation to Introduced Species Based Fisheries (ISBF) .............. 11 3.2 Overview of the fishery................................................................................................................ 12 3.2.1 Companhia de Pescarias do Algarve, S.A ........................................................................... 12 3.2.2 Species and Fishing Practice ............................................................................................... 15 3.2.3 Administrative Framework.................................................................................................... 18 3.3 Principle One: Target Species Background ................................................................................ 20 3.4 Principle Two: Ecosystem Background ...................................................................................... 21 3.4.1 Endangered, threatened or protected species (ETP) .......................................................... 21 3.4.2 Habitats ................................................................................................................................ 22 3.4.3 Ecosystem ............................................................................................................................ 23 4. Evaluation Procedure ..................................................................................................................... 28 4.1 Harmonised Fishery Assessment ............................................................................................... 28 4.1.1 Harmonisation Details .......................................................................................................... 28 4.2 Previous assessments ................................................................................................................ 29 4.3 Assessment Methodologies ........................................................................................................ 29 4.3.1 Assessment Tree ................................................................................................................. 29 4.4 Evaluation Processes and Techniques ....................................................................................... 29 4.4.1 Site Visits.............................................................................................................................. 29 4.4.2 Consultations ....................................................................................................................... 30 4.4.3 Evaluation Techniques ......................................................................................................... 31 5. Traceability ...................................................................................................................................... 33 5.1 Eligibility Date.............................................................................................................................. 33 5.2 Traceability within the Fishery ..................................................................................................... 33 5.2.1 Description of Tracking, Tracing and Segregation Systems within the Fishery and Management systems in place relating to Traceability ................................................................. 33 5.2.2 Evaluation of Risk of Vessels Fishing Outside of UoC ........................................................ 34 5.2.3 Risk of Substitution of Mixing Certified / Non-Certified Catch prior to point of landing ........ 34 5.2.4 At-Sea Processing ............................................................................................................... 34 5.2.5 Trans-Shipment .................................................................................................................... 34 5.2.6 Robustness of management systems relating to traceability ............................................... 35 3 version 2.0 (01/06/13) Food Certification International Public Consultation Draft Report Companhia de Pescarias do Algarve rope grown Mediterranean mussel Fishery 5.3 Eligibility to Enter Further Chains of Custody ............................................................................. 35 5.3.1 Eligible points of landing ...................................................................................................... 35 5.3.2 Parties eligible to use the fishery certificate ......................................................................... 35 6. Evaluation Results .......................................................................................................................... 36 6.1 Principle Level Scores ................................................................................................................ 36 6.2 Summary of Scores .................................................................................................................... 36 6.3 Summary of Conditions ............................................................................................................... 37 6.3.1 Recommendations ............................................................................................................... 37 6.4 Determination, Formal Conclusion and Agreement .................................................................... 37 7. References ....................................................................................................................................... 38 Appendix 1. Scoring & Rationale ...................................................................................................... 41 Appendix 1a – MSC Principles & Criteria ......................................................................................... 41 Appendix 1.1 Performance Indicator Scores and Rationale ............................................................. 44 Appendix 2. Peer Review Reports .................................................................................................... 88 Peer Reviewer 1 ................................................................................................................................ 88 Peer Reviewer 2 ................................................................................................................................ 99 Appendix 3. Stakeholder submissions .......................................................................................... 110 4 version 2.0 (01/06/13) Food Certification International Public Consultation Draft Report Companhia de Pescarias do Algarve rope grown Mediterranean mussel Fishery Glossary of Terms APA Agência Portuguesa do Ambiente (Portuguese Environmental Agency) APPAA Área Piloto de Produção Aquícola da Armona (Armona island pilot area for aquaculture production) Quercus Associação Nacional de Conservação da Natureza CFP Common Fisheries Policy CIIMAR Centro Interdisciplinar de Pesquisa Marinha e Ambiental - Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research CCMAR Centro de Ciências do Mar, Universidade do Algarve – Centre of Marine Sciences, Univerity of the Algarve CRAM-Q Centro de Reabilitação
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Impacts of Ocean Acidification on Marine Shelled Molluscs
    Mar Biol DOI 10.1007/s00227-013-2219-3 ORIGINAL PAPER Impacts of ocean acidification on marine shelled molluscs Fre´de´ric Gazeau • Laura M. Parker • Steeve Comeau • Jean-Pierre Gattuso • Wayne A. O’Connor • Sophie Martin • Hans-Otto Po¨rtner • Pauline M. Ross Received: 18 January 2013 / Accepted: 15 March 2013 Ó Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013 Abstract Over the next century, elevated quantities of ecosystem services including habitat structure for benthic atmospheric CO2 are expected to penetrate into the oceans, organisms, water purification and a food source for other causing a reduction in pH (-0.3/-0.4 pH unit in the organisms. The effects of ocean acidification on the growth surface ocean) and in the concentration of carbonate ions and shell production by juvenile and adult shelled molluscs (so-called ocean acidification). Of growing concern are the are variable among species and even within the same impacts that this will have on marine and estuarine species, precluding the drawing of a general picture. This organisms and ecosystems. Marine shelled molluscs, which is, however, not the case for pteropods, with all species colonized a large latitudinal gradient and can be found tested so far, being negatively impacted by ocean acidifi- from intertidal to deep-sea habitats, are economically cation. The blood of shelled molluscs may exhibit lower and ecologically important species providing essential pH with consequences for several physiological processes (e.g. respiration, excretion, etc.) and, in some cases, increased mortality in the long term. While fertilization Communicated by S. Dupont. may remain unaffected by elevated pCO2, embryonic and Fre´de´ric Gazeau and Laura M.
    [Show full text]
  • First Record of the Mediterranean Mussel Mytilus Galloprovincialis (Bivalvia, Mytilidae) in Brazil
    ARTICLE First record of the Mediterranean mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis (Bivalvia, Mytilidae) in Brazil Carlos Eduardo Belz¹⁵; Luiz Ricardo L. Simone²; Nelson Silveira Júnior³; Rafael Antunes Baggio⁴; Marcos de Vasconcellos Gernet¹⁶ & Carlos João Birckolz¹⁷ ¹ Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), Centro de Estudos do Mar (CEM), Laboratório de Ecologia Aplicada e Bioinvasões (LEBIO). Pontal do Paraná, PR, Brasil. ² Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Museu de Zoologia (MZUSP). São Paulo, SP, Brasil. ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1397-9823. E-mail: [email protected] ³ Nixxen Comercio de Frutos do Mar LTDA. Florianópolis, SC, Brasil. ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8037-5141. E-mail: [email protected] ⁴ Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), Departamento de Zoologia (DZOO), Laboratório de Ecologia Molecular e Parasitologia Evolutiva (LEMPE). Curitiba, PR, Brasil. ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8307-1426. E-mail: [email protected] ⁵ ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2381-8185. E-mail: [email protected] (corresponding author) ⁶ ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5116-5719. E-mail: [email protected] ⁷ ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7896-1018. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. The genus Mytilus comprises a large number of bivalve mollusk species distributed throughout the world and many of these species are considered invasive. In South America, many introductions of species of this genus have already taken place, including reports of hybridization between them. Now, the occurrence of the Mediterranean mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis is reported for the first time from the Brazilian coast. Several specimens of this mytilid were found in a shellfish growing areas in Florianópolis and Palhoça, Santa Catarina State, Brazil.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Bivalve Molluscs from British Columbia, Canada
    List of Bivalve Molluscs from British Columbia, Canada Compiled by Robert G. Forsyth Research Associate, Invertebrate Zoology, Royal BC Museum, 675 Belleville Street, Victoria, BC V8W 9W2; [email protected] Rick M. Harbo Research Associate, Invertebrate Zoology, Royal BC Museum, 675 Belleville Street, Victoria BC V8W 9W2; [email protected] Last revised: 11 October 2013 INTRODUCTION Classification rankings are constantly under debate and review. The higher classification utilized here follows Bieler et al. (2010). Another useful resource is the online World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS; Gofas 2013) where the traditional ranking of Pteriomorphia, Palaeoheterodonta and Heterodonta as subclasses is used. This list includes 237 bivalve species from marine and freshwater habitats of British Columbia, Canada. Marine species (206) are mostly derived from Coan et al. (2000) and Carlton (2007). Freshwater species (31) are from Clarke (1981). Common names of marine bivalves are from Coan et al. (2000), who adopted most names from Turgeon et al. (1998); common names of freshwater species are from Turgeon et al. (1998). Changes to names or additions to the fauna since these two publications are marked with footnotes. Marine groups are in black type, freshwater taxa are in blue. Introduced (non-indigenous) species are marked with an asterisk (*). Marine intertidal species (n=84) are noted with a dagger (†). Quayle (1960) published a BC Provincial Museum handbook, The Intertidal Bivalves of British Columbia. Harbo (1997; 2011) provided illustrations and descriptions of many of the bivalves found in British Columbia, including an identification guide for bivalve siphons and “shows”. Lamb & Hanby (2005) also illustrated many species.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyrighted Material
    Shellfi sh Aquaculture and the Environment COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL Chapter 1 The r ole of s hellfi sh f arms in p rovision of e cosystem g oods and s ervices Jo ã o G. Ferreira , Anthony J.S. Hawkins , and Suzanne B. Bricker Introduction It is not unusual to use different culture techniques for the same species at different What i s a f arm? stages of the growth cycle, or to rear benthic organisms off- bottom, taking advantage of a Shellfi sh farms vary widely in type, situation, greater exposure to pelagic primary produc- and size. The type of culture can vary accord- tion, better oxygenation, and predator ing to species, and even within the same species exclusion. various approaches may be used, depending In a similar way, shellfi sh can be grown in on factors such as tradition, environmental intertidal areas, competing for space with conditions, and social acceptance. For instance, other uses (e.g., geoduck grown in PVC tubes mussels are cultivated on rafts in Galicia in Puget Sound, USA; oysters on trestles in (Spain), and on longlines in the Adriatic Sea Dungarvan Harbour, Ireland), or subtidally (Fabi et al. 2009 ). But they are also grown on (e.g., scallop off Zhangzidao Island, northeast poles in the intertidal area in both France China). Cultivation takes place within estuar- ( bouchot ) and China ( muli zhuang ), or dredged ies, coastal lagoons, and bays (e.g., Figure from the bottom in Carlingford Lough 1.1 ), and increasingly in offshore locations, (Ireland) and in the Eastern Scheldt (the where there are less confl icts with other stake- Netherlands).
    [Show full text]
  • Polychlorinated Biphenyls and Organochlorine Pesticides in Seafood from the Gulf of Naples (Italy)
    706 Journal of Food Protection, Vol. 70, No. 3, 2007, Pages 706–715 Copyright ᮊ, International Association for Food Protection Polychlorinated Biphenyls and Organochlorine Pesticides in Seafood from the Gulf of Naples (Italy) MARIA CARMELA FERRANTE,1* TERESA CIRILLO,2 BARBARA NASO,1 MARIA TERESA CLAUSI,1 ANTONIA LUCISANO,1 AND RENATA AMODIO COCCHIERI2 1Department of Pathology and Animal Health and 2Department of Food Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy MS 06-223: Received 18 April 2006/Accepted 28 September 2006 Downloaded from http://meridian.allenpress.com/jfp/article-pdf/70/3/706/1679430/0362-028x-70_3_706.pdf by guest on 29 September 2021 ABSTRACT Seven target polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs; IUPAC nos. 28, 52, 101, 118, 138, 153, and 180) and the organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) hexachlorobenzene (HCB) and dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) and its related metabolites (p,pЈ-DDT, p,pЈ-DDE, and p,pЈ-DDD) were quantified in edible tissues from seven marine species (European hake, red mullet, blue whiting, Atlantic mackerel, blue and red shrimp, European flying squid, and Mediterranean mussel) from the Gulf of Naples in the southern Tyrrhenian Sea (Italy). PCBs 118, 138, and 153 were the dominant congeners in all the species examined. The concentrations of all PCBs (from not detectable to 15,427 ng gϪ1 fat weight) exceeded those of all the DDTs (from not detectable to 1,769 ng gϪ1 fat weight) and HCB (not detectable to 150.60 ng gϪ1 fat weight) in the samples analyzed. The OCP concentrations were below the maximum residue limits established for fish and aquatic products by the Decreto Minis- terale 13 May 2005 in all the samples analyzed; therefore the OCPs in the southern Tyrrhenian Sea species are unlikely to be a significant health hazard.
    [Show full text]
  • Bivalve Mollusc Exploitation in Mediterranean Coastal Communities: an Historical Approach
    Journal of Biological Research-Thessaloniki 12: 00 – 00, 2009 J. Biol. Res.-Thessalon. is available online at http://www.jbr.gr Indexed in: WoS (Web of Science, ISI Thomson), SCOPUS, CAS (Chemical Abstracts Service) and DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals) Bivalve mollusc exploitation in Mediterranean coastal communities: an historical approach ELENI VOULTSIADOU1*, DROSOS KOUTSOUBAS2 and MARIA ACHPARAKI1 1 Department of Zoology, School of Biology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 541 24 Thessaloniki, Greece 2 Department of Marine Sciences, School of Environment, University of the Aegean, 81100 Mytilene, Greece Received: 3 July 2009 Accepted after revision: 14 September 2009 The aim of this work was to survey the early history of bivalve mollusc exploitation and con- sumption in the Mediterranean coastal areas as recorded in the classical works of Greek antiq- uity. All bivalve species mentioned in the classical texts were identified on the basis of modern taxonomy. The study of the works by Aristotle, Hippocrates, Xenocrates, Galen, Dioscorides and Athenaeus showed that out of the 35 exploited marine invertebrates recorded in the texts, 20 were molluscs, among which 11 bivalve names were included. These data examined under the light of recent information on bivalve exploitation showed that the diet of ancient Greeks in- cluded the same bivalve species consumed nowadays in the coastal areas of the Mediterranean. The habitats of the exploited bivalves and consequently their fishing areas were well known and recorded in the classical texts. Information on the morphology and various aspects of the biolo- gy of certain edible species was given mostly in Aristotle’s zoological works, while Xenocrates and Athenaeus presented instructions and recipes on how bivalves were cooked and served.
    [Show full text]
  • Growth of the Mediterranean Mussel (Mytilus Galloprovincialis Lam., 1819) on Ropers in the Black Sea, Turkey*
    Tr. J. of Veterinary and Animal Sicences 23 (1999) 183-189 © TÜBİTAK Growth of The Mediterranean Mussel (Mytilus galloprovincialis Lam., 1819) on Ropers in The Black Sea, Turkey* Orhan ARAL Ondokuz Mayıs University, Faculty of Fisheries, Sinop-TURKEY Received: 23.06.1997 Abstract: In the present study, the growth of the Mediterranean mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis Lam., 1819 in the Black Sea on ropes has been studied. The result of a 18 month-trial showed that the mussels grew 72.84±0.74 mm in lenght. Temperature of seawater has been measured (minimum of 7˙˚C in the month of February and maximum of 27.7˚C in August). Salinity varied from 17.2 to 19.3‰. Key Words: Mediterranean mussel, Black Sea, Growing. Karadenizde Halatlarda Akdeniz Midyesi (Mytilus galloprovincialis Lam., 1819) Yetiştirciliği Özet: Bu araştırmada, Karadeniz’de Akdeniz midyesinin (Mytilus galloprovincialis Lam., 1819) halatlarda yetiştiricilik olanakları ile büyüme özellikleri araştırılmıştır. 18 ay süren deneme sonucunda midyeler, 72.84±0.74 mm uzunluğa gelmişlerdir. Denizsuyu sıcaklığı en düşük şubat ayında 7˚C, en yüksek ise ağustos ayında 24.7˚C olarak saptanmıştır. Tuzluluk ise ‰17.2 ile ‰19.3 arasında değişim göstermiştir. Anahtar Sözcükler: Akteniz midyesi, Karadeniz, Yetiştiricilik. Introduction Studies related to Mediterranean mussel in Turkey Today in the world numerous species of mussels are have been generally focussed on the determination of being farmed. Some species including (Mytilus edulis L., natural mussels beds, biometrical features and 1758, Mytilus galloprovincialis Lam., 1819, and Mytilus productivity (3, 8-12). smaragdinus L., 1758) are of economic significance and Rapid growth of mussels in the Black Sea has been grow in large quantity For example, the growth rate of recorded in summer and in autumn.
    [Show full text]
  • Marlin Marine Information Network Information on the Species and Habitats Around the Coasts and Sea of the British Isles
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) MarLIN Marine Information Network Information on the species and habitats around the coasts and sea of the British Isles Common mussel (Mytilus edulis) MarLIN – Marine Life Information Network Biology and Sensitivity Key Information Review Dr Harvey Tyler-Walters 2008-06-03 A report from: The Marine Life Information Network, Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. Please note. This MarESA report is a dated version of the online review. Please refer to the website for the most up-to-date version [https://www.marlin.ac.uk/species/detail/1421]. All terms and the MarESA methodology are outlined on the website (https://www.marlin.ac.uk) This review can be cited as: Tyler-Walters, H., 2008. Mytilus edulis Common mussel. In Tyler-Walters H. and Hiscock K. (eds) Marine Life Information Network: Biology and Sensitivity Key Information Reviews, [on-line]. Plymouth: Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. DOI https://dx.doi.org/10.17031/marlinsp.1421.1 The information (TEXT ONLY) provided by the Marine Life Information Network (MarLIN) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK: England & Wales License. Note that images and other media featured on this page are each governed by their own terms and conditions and they may or may not be available for reuse. Permissions beyond the scope of this license are available here. Based on a work at www.marlin.ac.uk (page left blank) Date: 2008-06-03 Common mussel (Mytilus edulis) - Marine Life Information Network See online review for distribution map Clump of mussels.
    [Show full text]
  • Growth and Condition Index of Mussel Mytilus Galloprovincialis in Experimental Integrated Aquaculture
    Aquaculture Research, 2007, 38, 1714^1720 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2109.2007.01840.x Growth and condition index of mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis in experimental integrated aquaculture Melita Peharda1, Ivan %upan2, Lav Bavc›evicŁ3, Anamarija FrankicŁ4 & Tin Klanjsflc›ek5 1Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries, Síetalisfl te Ivana Mesfl trovicŁ a, Split, Croatia 2Convento Albamaris, Augusta Síenoe, Biograd, Croatia 3Croatian Agriculture Extension Institute, Ivana Ma&uranicŁ a, Zadar, Croatia 4University of Massachusetts Boston, EEOS Department, Boston, MA, USA 5Ru:er Bosfl kovicŁ Institute, Bijenic› ka, Zagreb, Croatia Correspondence: M Peharda, Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries, Síetalis› te Ivana Mes› trovicŁ a 63, 21000 Split, Croatia. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Introduction Integrating mussel and ¢n¢sh aquaculture has been Simultaneous culture of several species in the same recognized as a way to increase pro¢ts and decrease water body with the objective of optimizing the use environmental impacts of ¢n¢sh aquaculture, but of space and nutrients is termed integrated aquacul- not enough is known about the e¡ects of ¢n¢sh aqua- ture, polyculture or co-culture. Integrated aquacul- culture on mussel growth. Here we present a pilot ture is traditionally used in the fresh-water pond study aimed at determining how distance from ¢n- aquaculture (Marcel 1990; Landau 1992). Recently, ¢sh aquaculture a¡ects mussel growth. To this end, potential for integration of marine ¢sh and bivalve we measured growth and condition index of mussel aquaculture is being assessed (Jones & Iwama 1991; (Mytilus galloprovincialis) at three di¡erent distances Taylor, Jamieson & Carefoot 1992; Stirling & Okumus (0, 60 and 700 m) from ¢n¢sh aquaculture in the 1995; Mazzola, Favaloro & SaraØ1999; Mazzola & SaraØ eastern Adriatic Sea.
    [Show full text]
  • Petricolaria Pholadiformis Crepidula Fornicata (Victoria) Spartina Anglica Cecina Manchurica (Nanaimo) Intertidal NIS in BC – Plants / Algae
    Distribution of Non-indigenous Intertidal Species on the Pacific Coast of Canada Graham E. Gillespie, Antan C. Phillips, Debbie L. Paltzat and Tom W. Therriault Pacific Biological Station Nanaimo, BC, Canada Acknowledgements • Sylvia Behrens Yamada (Oregon State University) • Susan Bower (Fisheries and Oceans Canada) • Jason Dunham (Fisheries and Ocean Canada) • Rick Harbo (Fisheries and Oceans Canada) Introduction • Non-indigenous species (NIS) are of concern globally – PICES WG on NIS – Canadian government programs to collect, synthesize and distribute data on NIS – Survey work to determine distribution and abundance of intertidal NIS • Strait of Georgia (Jamieson, Therriault) • Other areas of British Columbia Objectives • Provide updated information on distribution of intertidal NIS on the Pacific Coast of Canada • Synthesize information on distribution, source and pathway Legend and Data Sources • White circles ○are survey locations • Yellow circles ● are collection records from: – Other survey databases (limited species) – Literature and public records • Red circles ● are collection records from: – Exploratory intertidal clam surveys 1990-present – Exploratory NIS surveys 2006 Boundary Bay • Sole location for: • Primary location for: Crassostrea virginica Urosalpinx cinerea Crepidula convexa (Ladysmith) Nassarius fraterculus Neotrapezium liratum Nassarius obsoletus (Ladysmith) Petricolaria pholadiformis Crepidula fornicata (Victoria) Spartina anglica Cecina manchurica (Nanaimo) Intertidal NIS in BC – Plants / Algae • Wireweed, Sargassum
    [Show full text]
  • Global Connectivity Patterns of the Notoriously Invasive Mussel, Mytilus Galloprovincialis Lmk Using Archived CO1 Sequence Data Thomas Pickett and Andrew A
    Pickett and David BMC Res Notes (2018) 11:231 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3328-3 BMC Research Notes RESEARCH NOTE Open Access Global connectivity patterns of the notoriously invasive mussel, Mytilus galloprovincialis Lmk using archived CO1 sequence data Thomas Pickett and Andrew A. David* Abstract Objective: The invasive mussel, Mytilus galloprovincialis has established invasive populations across the globe and in some regions, have completely displaced native mussels through competitive exclusion. The objective of this study was to elucidate global connectivity patterns of M. galloprovincialis strictly using archived cytochrome c oxidase 1 sequence data obtained from public databases. Through exhaustive mining and the development of a systematic workfow, we compiled the most comprehensive global CO1 dataset for M. galloprovincialis thus far, consisting of 209 sequences representing 14 populations. Haplotype networks were constructed and genetic diferentiation was assessed using pairwise analysis of molecular variance. Results: There was signifcant genetic structuring across populations with signifcant geographic patterning of haplotypes. In particular, South Korea, South China, Turkey and Australasia appear to be the most genetically isolated populations. However, we were unable to recover a northern and southern hemisphere grouping for M. galloprovin- cialis as was found in previous studies. These results suggest a complex dispersal pattern for M. galloprovincialis driven by several contributors including both natural and anthropogenic dispersal mechanisms along with the possibility of potential hybridization and ancient vicariance events. Keywords: Invasions, Population, Dispersal, Haplotype, Mytilidae Introduction costs continues to decline, public data banks that archive Quantifying dispersal in marine environments has been sequences are growing at an exponential rate [3].
    [Show full text]
  • Mytilus Galloprovincialis (PT)
    EXPERIMENTAL ESTIMATION OF PARAMETER VALUES TO DETERMINE EFFECTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON SHELLFISH PRODUCTION CERES Climate change and European aquatic RESources Pauline Kamermans & Camille Saurel This project receives funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Aquaculture Europe, 17-20 October 2017 grant agreement No 678193. Dubrovnik, Croatia CERES Importance of shellfish aquaculture in EU ClimatechangechangeandandEuropeanEuropean Aquatic aquaticRESourcesRESources 14 Scallops Global production Oysters Mussels 12 Clams fast growth + 5 % per Abalone 10 year 8 EU production declining 6 ©FreeVectorMap.com 4 Production (Milion Tons) (Milion Production 2 0 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Year Need for adaptation to CC CERES Shellfish Storylines ClimatechangechangeandandEuropeanEuropean Aquatic aquaticRESourcesRESources ©FreeVectorMap.com CERES Species Groups ClimatechangechangeandandEuropeanEuropean Aquatic aquaticRESourcesRESources Species group Region Species SG10 North Sea blue mussel SG11 North Sea blue mussel SG12 North Sea Pacific oyster, European oyster SG13 Iberian Atlantic manila clam, carpet shell SG14 Iberian Atlantic Pacific oyster, Portugese oyster SG15 Mediterranean©FreeVectorMap.com Sea manila clam, carpet shell SG16 Mediterranean Sea Mediterranean mussel mussels oysters clams CERES CC scenarios PML ClimatechangechangeandandEuropeanEuropean Aquatic aquaticRESourcesRESources Coastal areas in Temperature North Sea (NL+DK) Salinity Iberian Atlantic (PT) Oxygen pH Phytoplankton chlorophyll
    [Show full text]