Assyrian Illustrations of Nineveh

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Assyrian Illustrations of Nineveh Iranica Antiqua, vol. XXXIII, 1998 ASSYRIAN ILLUSTRATIONS OF NINEVEH BY Julian READE There are several groups of Assyrian wall-panels which show Nineveh or its neighbourhood. The well-known Sennacherib series, showing the trans- port of colossal figures from the quarry towards the city, stops short of Nineveh itself. Other groups from the reign of Ashurbanipal present various questions, and it is a pleasure to offer a brief discussion of them to the most recent of many western archaeologists to have worked at this remarkable site. One group was carved about 645-643 BC in several rooms of the North Palace. The main subject of the wall-panels in Room C is the royal lion- hunt by chariot, which takes place in a hunting ground, a flat area or arena guarded by dogs and by soldiers with high siege-shields (Barnett 1976: pls V-XIII). The hunt must be happening at home, in or near Nineveh. If the Assyrian word ambassu means or can mean “game-park”, which seems probable if not entirely certain (Oppenheim 1965: 333; Matsushima 1987: 138-41), then Ashurbanipal’s gamepark can be roughly located (Figure 1). Gate 9 of the city, the so-called Adad Gate, in the northern wall near the north-eastern corner, was named abul dadad sa (kur)ambassi, or in another text abul [….] ambassi sa giskir[âti]), “the Gate of Adad of the Game-park” or “Gate of the Gamepark of the Gardens” (Frahm 1997: 274- 5). So the game-park was reached through this corner of the city, and was probably outside the walls. The hunting ground, if not directly part of the game-park, was surely nearby. The wall-panels in Room E, showing lions in a garden, and the famous Room S1 picnic scene of king and queen drinking together in a screened arbour near a marsh, might represent the ambassu itself or the garden which adjoined it (Barnett 1976: pls XIV-XV, LXIV; Frahm 1997: 83). Deller (1987) has argued that the picnic should be located in the qersu, but this in turn could have been within the garden. One of the Room C wall-panels shows, beside the arena, a single tree- covered mound or hill up which spectators are scrambling; on its summit 82 J. READE Fig. 1. Plan of Nineveh, with author’s restorations. is a stela carved with a scene of a king in his chariot, killing lions (Figure 2). This mound and its stela have not been located, but one may speculate on a connection between it and a story, deriving from the fourth-century traveller Amyntas, which survives in the much later Deipnosophistai of Athenaeus (12: 530). According to this story, the Persian king Cyrus, whose own tomb David Stronach has of course investigated, destroyed a mound with an Assyrian stela on top while besieging Nineveh. Since Cyrus ASSYRIAN ILLUSTRATIONS OF NINEVEH 83 Fig. 2. Mound with stela beside hunting arena (WA 120861-2). Place and Thomas 1867-70: III, pl. 51.3. did not capture Nineveh, the story had undergone some distortion before reaching Amyntas, but there is an area of oddly disturbed ground outside the moat of Nineveh between Gates 7 and 8. At this point the moat was either never dug or has been filled in, and one could imagine a mound out- side it being used to fill the moat, and perhaps even serving as the basis of a siege-ramp. This point overlooks relatively flat ground stretching eastward to that part of the Khosr valley, between the Al-Jilah dams and the point where the river enters the city, which can plausibly be identified with an artificial swamp created by Sennacherib (Thompson and Hutchinson 1929: 115). Presumably lions in this swamp were some of those which so dis- turbed the peace of Ashurbanipal’s subjects (Luckenbill 1927: 363). Appro- priately, one series of wall-panels from Room S (Barnett 1976: pl. LIV) shows Ashurbanipal hunting lions beside a narrow watercourse or canal. There is a rather similar hill, with a different stela on top, in the lower register of one of Sargon’s wall-panels from Room VII at Khorsabad 84 J. READE Fig. 3. Mound with stela and building beside hunting scene. Botta and Flandin 1849-50: II, pl. 114. Fig. 4. City-walls and palace facade (part of WA 124938). Drawn by Ann Searight. ASSYRIAN ILLUSTRATIONS OF NINEVEH 85 Fig. 5. Aqueduct, building, stela and park (part of WA 124939). Drawn by Ann Searight. (Figure 3); this is the end of a composition showing a bird-shoot. Beside Sargon’s hill is a columned building partly projecting over a watercourse, apparently the place where the party celebrated after the shoot, as shown in a composition in the upper register of the same wall-panels. It seems likely that there existed in the Assyrian countryside, at least from the reign of Sargon onwards, places which in some ways anticipated the celebrated parádeisov gardens of later Persian kings. Sargon’s combination of stela, columned building and watercourse is repeated in another group of Ashurbanipal panels, which were in Room H of the North Palace. In this room, as in Room XXXIII of the South-West Palace and Room I of the North Palace, the wall-panels were divided into two registers. In the other two rooms the surviving parts of the lower reg- isters showed scenes from campaigns, and those of the upper registers showed triumphs in Assyria after victory; this was probably the case in Room H also, but there the only surviving parts of the upper register derive from a corner of the room which was isolated between two doors. There 86 J. READE Fig. 6. The upper dam at Al-Jilah, Nineveh: part of an elaborate system of waterworks requiring detailed survey. R. Campbell Thompson photograph (British Museum). was apparently inadequate space for a full narrative composition, and only the landscape was shown. There have been divergent views about the order of the surviving wall- panels (Gadd 1936: 197; Reade 1964: 5; Barnett 1976: 41), as it was not properly recorded at the time of excavation, but it can now be reconstructed with confidence. A narrow slab 6, on the left, is lost. Next to the right was slab 7, WA 124938, showing a walled city and palace (Figure 4). To its right was an inner corner; this was formed either by a narrow slab that was left unnum- bered and is now lost, or more probably by the left edge, sawn away and lost, of slab 8, which corresponds to the left-hand side of WA 124939, showing a garden (Figure 5). The right-hand side of WA 124939 is part of a separate adjoining wall-panel, slab 9, the right-hand side of which reached an outer corner; WA 124940 is the remainder of slab 9, originally round the corner, and closes the scene. Slab 9 must have been sawn in two after excavation, to facilitate packing; the saw-marks, cutting transversely back behind the faces of the two pieces, are still visible. ASSYRIAN ILLUSTRATIONS OF NINEVEH 87 Fig. 7. Rock-cut memorial at Bahandawaya, seen from the south/south-west. The niche is approached by steps and surrounded by double rows of circular hollows cut to accommodate pillar bases; the king is carved at the back of the niche. The egress of a water tunnel appears at lower left. Author’s photograph. There is then the question of where the city and the garden were located. The garden of slabs 8-9 is on a hill, irrigated by an aqueduct; there is no sign of a city-wall, but more trees are visible at a higher level on the left. The aqueduct is like the one built by Sennacherib at Jerwan, which brought the waters of the Khazir, via the Khosr valley and the vicinity of Khorsabad, to Nineveh. Yet the Jerwan aqueduct was hardly built to irrigate gardens immediately around it, as this one does, and there could perhaps have been other such aqueducts much closer to Nineveh (Figure 6). On top of the hill there is a summer-house with Aeolic columns, a royal stela, and an altar on the slope in front. In a somewhat similar arrangement at Bahandawaya, at the head of Sennacherib’s Wadi al-Milh canal, steps lead up to a rock-cut stela in a niche, and holes in the rock around presumably functioned as the bases of supporting columns (Figures 7-8). Evidently there could have been several such monuments, Urartian in inspiration like 88 J. READE Fig. 8. Bahandawaya niche viewed from west/south-west. Author’s photograph. the canal-system itself. Alternatively the Room H landscape could be another version of the scene on the Khorsabad wall-panel. Finally there are the streams of water irrigating trees on the side of the hill, which could be in any one of the gardens built by Sennacherib or a later king (e.g. Luckenbill 1927: 177, 269, 322). Sennacherib’s garden of the game-park (Frahm 1997: 83) is perhaps the one place near Nineveh which could have combined all these features. So far as we know, however, it was a long way from the royal palaces. Alternative proposals for locating the garden on Kuyunjik explain the proximity of the city in the composition (Dalley 1994); they do not explain the additional trees in the background, nor the relationship of the garden to Kuyunjik’s defensive wall and east gate. The double city-wall on slab 7 could certainly be the west face of the city- wall of Nineveh, with Gate 13 at the bottom, and the wall of the citadel rising behind it (Figure 9); it is unclear if the city-wall was continued on a panel to the right.
Recommended publications
  • Iscrizioni Reali Dal Vicino Oriente Antico Assiria
    Università di Pisa Dpt. di Civiltà e Forme del Sapere ISCRIZIONI REALI DAL VICINO ORIENTE ANTICO ASSIRIA Materiali per il corso di Storia del Vicino Oriente antico Traduzione di Giuseppe Del Monte Pisa – 2013 2 3 SOMMARIO L’ETÀ DEL MEDIO BRONZO 5-11 Zarriqum (ca. 2050-2042) 6 Costruzione del tempio di Bēlet-ekallim Sillūlu (ca. 2000?) 6 Impronte di sigillo da Kültepe Šallim-aḫum (ca. 1970) 6 Costruzione del tempio di Assur ad Assur Ilu-šumma (ca. 1950) 7 Costruzione del tempio di Ištar ad Assur Erišum I (ca. 1940-1910) 7 Lavori al tempio ad Assur La Porta del tribunale Šamšī-Adad I (ca. 1833-1776) 9 Ricostruzione del tempio di Assur ad Assur Ricostruzione del tempio di Ištar a Ninive L’ETÀ DEL TARDO BRONZO 13-29 Puzur-Assur III (ca. 1500) 15 Lavori al tempio di Ištar ad Assur Assur-bēl-nišēšu (1417-1409) 15 Costruzione di un muro ad Assur Assur-rīm-nišēšu (1408-1401) 15 Costruzione di un muro ad Assur Assur-uballit I (1363-1328) 16 Costruzione di un edificio ad Assur Eliminazione di una sorgente d’acqua Enlil-nērārī (1327-1318) 17 Restauro delle mura esterne di Assur Arik-dīn-ili (1317-1306) 17 Costruzione del tempio di Šamaš Adad-nērārī I (1305-1274) 18 Progetto di costruzione di un palazzo a Taite Salmanassar I (1273-1244) 20 Restauro del tempio del dio Assur Eḫursagkurkurra Tukultī-Ninurta I (1243-1207) 22 Costruzione dell’Elugalumunkurkurra ad Assur Costruzione della nuova residenza regia Kar-Tukultī-Ninurta Assur-nādin-apli (1206-1203) 27 Deviazione del corso del Tigri Assur-rēša-iši I (1133-1116) 28 Restauri al tempio di Ištar di
    [Show full text]
  • The Hanging Gardens of ‘Babylon’ – Sponsored By: Finding the Mysterious Lost Seventh Wonder of the Ancient World
    Royal Geographical Society The Globe with IBG The Royal Geographical Society – Hong Kong Advancing geography and geographical learning Annual Review 2017 The Royal Geographical Society – Hong Kong is generously The Hanging Gardens of ‘Babylon’ – sponsored by: Finding the Mysterious Lost Seventh Wonder of the Ancient World RGS Lecture Venue Sponsors: After 2,500 years, the world’s oldest mystery has finally been solved. In a amazing publication by Oxford University scholar Dr Stephanie Dalley, it has been revealed that the famed Hanging Gardens of Babylon were not actually located in Babylon and were built by an entirely different king at a completely different time than previously thought. Through the utilisation of creative spy tactics, a thorough analysis of one of the world’s oldest travel guides and investigation into the unique agricultural features of the region, the enigma known as the Hanging Gardens of Babylon has been cracked once and for all. Wrong Place, Wrong Time, Wrong King Although the Hanging Gardens of Babylon are revered globally, the Gardens appeared lost in history, with little concrete evidence confirming their whereabouts. The historian Herodotus, and the scholar Callimachus of Cyrene, made early lists of The Globe is generously sponsored by: “seven wonders”, intended to guide travelers, with mention of the Hanging Gardens, but their original writings did not survive. The universally accepted understanding was that this Ancient Wonder of the World was located in Babylon, and built by king Nebuchadnezzar II for his homesick wife, Amytis of Media. Centuries of research and exploration had clarified nothing about the uncertainties surrounding the lost The Globe• 2017 1 FEATURE ARTICLE gardens – until now.
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL SOTD the Lost Gardens of Babylon Press Release
    Press Contact: Donna Williams 212.560.8030, [email protected] Facebook: www.facebook.com/wnet-thirteen Twitter: @ThirteenNY Secrets of the Dead episodes online at pbs.org/secrets THIRTEEN’s Secrets of the Dead Uncovers Clues to the Site of the Most Elusive of the Ancient Wonders of the World, in The Lost Gardens of Babylon Airing Tuesday, May 6 at 9 pm on PBS Of the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World, the Hanging Garden of Babylon is the most elusive of these constructions of classical antiquity. While traces have been found of the Great Pyramid of Gaza, the Temple of Artemis at Ephesus, the Statue of Zeus at Olympia, the Mausoleum of Halicarnassus, the Colossus of Rhodes and the Lighthouse of Alexandria, centuries of digging have turned up nothing about the lost gardens of Babylon – until now. Why, in the nearly 3,000 years since the gardens were presumably built, has no archeological evidence ever been found to support their existence? Is the Hanging Garden of Babylon a myth or a mystery to be solved? Secret of the Dead: The Lost Gardens of Babylon, premiering Tuesday, May 6, 9-10 p.m. ET on PBS (check local listings), travels with Dr. Stephanie Dalley of Oxford University’s Oriental Institute and author of The Mystery of the Hanging Garden of Babylon , to one of the most dangerous places on earth, as she sets out to answer these questions and prove not only that the gardens did exist, but also identify where they most likely were located, describe what they looked like and explain how they were constructed.
    [Show full text]
  • SENNACHERIB's AQUEDUCT at JERWAN Oi.Uchicago.Edu
    oi.uchicago.edu THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO ORIENTAL INSTITUTE PUBLICATIONS JAMES HENRY BREASTED Editor THOMAS GEORGE ALLEN Associate Editor oi.uchicago.edu oi.uchicago.edu SENNACHERIB'S AQUEDUCT AT JERWAN oi.uchicago.edu THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PRESS CHICAGO, ILLINOIS THE BAKER & TAYLOR COMPANY NEW YORK THE CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS LONDON THE MARUZEN-KABUSHIKI-KAISHA TOKYO, OSAKA, KYOTO, FUKUOKA, SENDAI THE COMMERCIAL PRESS, LIMITED SHANGHAI oi.uchicago.edu oi.uchicago.edu 4~ -d~ Royal Air Force Official Crown Copyrighl Reored THE JERWAN AQUEDUCT. AnB VIEW oi.uchicago.edu THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO ORIENTAL INSTITUTE PUBLICATIONS VOLUME XXIV SENNACHERIB'S AQUEDUCT AT JERWAN By THORKILD JACOBSEN and SETON LLOYD WITH A PREFACE BY HENRI FRANKFORT THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PRESS CHICAGO, ILLINOIS oi.uchicago.edu COPYRIGHT 1035 BY THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. PUBLISHIED MAY 1935 COMPOSED AND PRINTED BY THE UNIVERSITr OF CHICAGO PRE8S CHICAGO,ILLINOIS, U.S.A. oi.uchicago.edu PREFACE It so happens that the first final publication of work undertaken by the Iraq Expedition refers neither to one of the sites for which the Oriental Institute holds a somewhat permanent concession nor to a task carried out by the expedition as a whole. The aqueduct at Jerwan- identified by Dr. Jacobsen at the end of the 1931/32 season-was explored by the two authors of this volume in March and April, 1933, on the strength of a sounding permit of four weeks' validity. Mrs. Rigmor Jacobsen was responsible for the photography. It was only by dint of a sustained and strenuous effort that the excavation was completed within the stipulated period.
    [Show full text]
  • The Faculty of Oriental Studies
    FACULTY OF ORIENTAL STUDIES UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD EGYPTOLOGY AND ANCIENT NEAR EASTERN STUDIES A handbook for Undergraduates reading Egyptology and Ancient Near Eastern Studies ACADEMIC YEAR 2013–2014 1 CONTENTS Introduction 3 Oriental Studies at Oxford 3 The BA in Egyptology and Ancient Near Eastern Studies 5 About Egyptian 6 About Akkadian 7 Outline of the Course 9 Teaching 10 Further study resources, internships, and travel abroad 11 Structure of the academic years 12 First year 12 Second year 14 Third year 17 Examinations 20 Teaching and research staff 23 Joint Consultative Committee 24 Resources for EANES in Oxford 24 Set texts (or Prescribed texts) 28 Appendix A: Faculty Information 38 2 INTRODUCTION This handbook gives outline information about the BA course in Egyptology and Ancient Near Eastern Studies. It is designed both as a source of information and as a guide to other sources of information. We hope that it will be particularly useful to you as you begin the course and when you start to study a second subject in your second year, but we also hope it will be a valuable source of information throughout the whole three years of the BA. Please read the booklet carefully. Comments and criticism of the handbook are always welcome; they should be sent to Dr Jacob Dahl, EANES Subject Group Co-ordinator, Oriental Institute, Pusey Lane. Faculty handbooks are available on the Oriental Studies Faculty’s website; this one is at http://www.orinst.ox.ac.uk/nme/eanes-hbk.pdf . Updates may be posted there; you can also find a great deal of related documentation through the website.
    [Show full text]
  • Sennacherib, Archimedes, and the Water Screw the Context of Invention in the Ancient World
    Sennacherib, Archimedes, and the Water Screw The Context of Invention in the Ancient World STEPHANIE DALLEY and JOHN PETER OLESON This article will present the cases for and against Archimedes as the origi- nal inventor of the most striking and famous device attributed to him, the water screw. It takes the form of a case study that focuses as much on the context and motives for the invention as on the possible inventor himself. In brief, an Archimedean water screw consists of a cylinder containing sev- eral continuous helical walls that, when the entire cylinder is rotated on its longitudinal axis, scoop up water at the open lower end and dump it out the upper end. Both Aage Drachmann and John Oleson have summarized the literary and archaeological evidence from the classical world suggesting that Archimedes (287–212 B.C.) was the first person to design and construct a mechanical water-raising screw, and they accept him as the inventor.1 Stephanie Dalley, on the other hand, reinterpreting a passage of cuneiform Akkadian and a statement by Strabo, has proposed that the water screw was Dr. Dalley is Shillito Research Fellow in Assyriology at the Oriental Institute and Somerville College, University of Oxford. She has published primary editions of cunei- form texts from excavations in Iraq and Syria and from museums in Britain, as well as specialized studies and more general books. She has translated all the Assyrian texts used in this article. Dr. Oleson is professor of Greek and Roman Studies at the University of Victoria, British Columbia. His areas of fieldwork and research include ancient hydraulic technology, Roman harbors and their construction, and the Roman Near East.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Heritages of Water the Cultural Heritages of Water in the Middle East and Maghreb ______
    Cultural Heritages of Water The cultural heritages of water in the Middle East and Maghreb __________________________________________________________________________ Les patrimoines culturels de l’eau Les patrimoines culturels de l’eau au Moyen-Orient et au Maghreb THEMATIC STUDY | ÉTUDE THEMATIQUE Second edition | Deuxième édition Revised and expanded | Revue et augmentéé International Council on Monuments and Sites 11 rue du Séminaire de Conflans 94220 Charenton-le-Pont France © ICOMOS, 2017. All rights reserved ISBN 978-2-918086-21-5 ISBN 978-2-918086-22-2 (e-version) Cover (from left to right) Algérie - Vue aérienne des regards d’entretien d’une foggara (N.O Timimoune, Georges Steinmetz, 2007) Oman - Restored distributing point (UNESCO website, photo Jean-Jacques Gelbart) Iran - Shustar, Gargar Dam and the areas of mills (nomination file, SP of Iran, ICHHTO) Tunisie - Vue de l’aqueduc de Zaghouan-Carthage (M. Khanoussi) Turkey - The traverten pools in Pamukkale (ICOMOS National Committee of Turkey) Layout : Joana Arruda and Emeline Mousseh Acknowledgements In preparing The cultural heritages of water in the Middle East and Maghreb Thematic Study, ICOMOS would like to acknowledge the support and contribution of the Arab Regional Centre for World Heritage and in particular H.E. Sheikha Mai bint Mohammed AI Khalifa, Minister of Culture of the Kingdom of Bahrain; Pr. Michel Cotte, ICOMOS advisor; and Regina Durighello, Director of the World Heritage Unit. Remerciements En préparant cette étude thématique sur Les patrimoines culturels de l'eau au Moyen-Orient et au Maghreb, l’ICOMOS remercie pour son aide et sa contribution le Centre régional arabe pour le patrimoine mondial (ARC-WH) et plus particulièrement S.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Archeological Hills and Monuments, Examples from Iraq
    Journal of Earth Sciences and Geotechnical Engineering, vol. 6, no.2, 2016, 1-28 ISSN: 1792-9040 (print), 1792-9660 (online) Scienpress Ltd, 2016 Geology of the Archeological Hills and Monuments, Examples from Iraq Varoujan K. Sissakian1, Ayda D. Abdul Ahad2, Nadhir Al-Ansari3 and Sven Knutsson3 Abstract Iraq is the cradle of many civilizations; therefore, it is very rich in archeological sites, which are represented in different forms; among them are the archeological hills and monuments. Hundreds of archeological hills and monuments are located in different parts of Iraq, but the majority of the hills are located in the Mesopotamia and Low Mountainous Province; with less abundant in the Jazira Province. The isolated archeological hills are of two different forms: Either are in form of dumping soil to a certain height to build the hill, or has gained their heights due to the presence of multi stories of civilizations. In both cases, the geological setting has played a big role in the formation of the isolated archeological hills. The archeological isolated hills, which are built by soil dumping are usually of conical shape; flat topped and limited sizes; with heights not more than 10 m and base diameter of (20 – 100) m. They can be seen from far distances that attain to few kilometers. Since they are usually built in flat areas and are believed to be used as watching towers. However, those which are present in the Mesopotamia Province are smaller in size; not more than (3 – 5) m in height and about 10 m in base diameter; also with conical shape, they are called as "Ishan".
    [Show full text]
  • Engineering the Hanging Garden of Babylon
    › 40 TheStructuralEngineer Professional guidance July 2016 Hanging Garden of Babylon Engineering the Hanging Garden of Babylon Sean Brady examines the remarkable engineering works that may have underpinned one of the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World. Introduction What would you do, hypothetically speaking, if you wanted to prove the existence of the Hanging Garden of Babylon? You could Figure 1 study the writings on the subject, identify Reconstruction drawing of the garden’s likely location, then excavate Sennacherib’s palace garden at Nineveh1 to fi nd physical proof. But what if there was DALLEY STEPHANIE OF PERMISSION BY REPRODUCED BALL. TERRY BY DRAWING a problem? What if, after decades of digging, were above the water table and artifi cially in the ancient city of Khorsabad2. One day you found nothing, not a single shred moistened. It was lush all year round, a Jacobsen is approached by a workman, of evidence? symbol of abundance and fertility – a true Hussain Ali of Faddhiliyah, who says that Would this mean the garden was a myth Garden of Eden in an arid land. the previous summer he worked in a small and never existed? Or would it mean you But there are problems with these village at the foot of the mountains. The were just digging in the wrong place? descriptions. They are not fi rst-hand village had 18 or so mud huts, and a number accounts. They were provided by Greek of them had been repaired using cut stones Seven Wonders and Roman writers who never actually – stones that bore inscriptions. Jacobsen The Seven Wonders of The Ancient World saw the garden, written several centuries listens, but is sceptical.
    [Show full text]
  • 443 Water Management in Assyria from the Ninth To
    ARAM, 13-14 (2001-2002), 443-460 S. DALLEY 443 WATER MANAGEMENT IN ASSYRIA FROM THE NINTH TO THE SEVENTH CENTURIES BC1 STEPHANIE DALLEY The Assyrians, building up from the ninth century onwards, ruled an empire that eventually stretched from Tarsus in Cilicia to the eastern border of Egypt, from Armenia to Bahrein. Enormous wealth and talent flowed into the heart- land through tax, tribute and trade, through deportation and the magnetic at- traction of working for the most powerful kings in the world. From an Assyrian perspective it was the duty of a successful king not only to enrich the nation through conquest, but also to display power through fine buildings and the patronage of great art, through engineering works and the conspicuous management of water provided for great cities, parks and gardens, notably at Nineveh, Nimrud and Arbela. Provided that the technology was available, the Assyrian king had the manpower and the raw materials to achieve whatever he wanted, regardless of time, wastefulness and the health and safety of his work- men. Assyrian achievements in water management are seldom mentioned in books which claim to describe the early development of technology. Many books and articles on ancient technology, such as those of White, Landels and Oleson, begin with the Greek world, or restrict themselves to purely archaeo- logical evidence from the Near East. The volume of World Archaeology in 1980 which was dedicated to the subject of Water Management did not cover the Assyrian evidence. The Bulletin of Sumerian Agriculture did not cover the Assyrians in its volume on irrigation and water control.2 Another cause for neglect lies in differences in the way that various branches of learning have developed.
    [Show full text]
  • Around 225 BC a Greek Engineer, Philo, Produced a List of Seven Temata
    We know where the 7 wonders of the ancient world are—except for one The true location of the Hanging Gardens of Babylon remains an unsolved mystery, but the latest research suggests looking in a different place. Around 225 B.C. a Greek engineer, Philo, produced a list of seven temata— “things to be seen”—that are better known today as the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World: the Pyramids at Giza; the Statue of Zeus at Olympia; the Temple of Artemis at Ephesus; the Mausoleum at Halicarnassus; the Colossus of Rhodes; the Pharos of Alexandria; and, most mysterious of all, the Hanging Gardens of Babylon. Many revisions of Philo’s list followed, and other sites were added and removed according to the tastes of the times. But the Philo seven have become canonical, a snapshot of the monuments whose size and engineering prowess awed the classical mind. Only the Pyramids at Giza (built in the mid-third millennium B.C.) remains intact today. Although five of the others have disappeared, or are in ruins, enough documentary and archaeological evidence is available to confirm that they once stood proud, and are not the product of hearsay or legend. However, the Hanging Gardens of Babylon, held by tradition to be the work of Babylon’s mighty King Nebuchadrezzar II (r. 605-561 B.C.), is the list’s great enigma. No clue of such gardens has come to light in ruins, or in any reference in Babylonian sources. The hunt for the gardens is one of the most tantalizing quests in Mesopotamian scholarship, and archaeologists are still puzzling out where such gardens may have been located in Babylon, or what was so special about them.
    [Show full text]
  • Selected Ancient Stone Bridges with Corbelled False-Arch Structure
    CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING REPORTS E-ISSN 2450-8594 CEER 2018; 28 (4): 163-179 DOI: 10.2478/ceer-2018-0059 Original Research Article SELECTED ANCIENT STONE BRIDGES WITH CORBELLED FALSE-ARCH STRUCTURE Mariusz MA ŚLAK 1, Doncho PARTOV 2 1Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24, Cracow, Poland 2University of Structural Engineering and Architecture “Lyuben Karavelov”, Suchodolska 175, Sofia, Bulgaria Abstract The oldest man-made false-arch stone bridges are presented and briefly described. It is shown that this construction technique was based on the experiences of the first builders, formed at the junction of ancient Egyptian, Mycenaean as well as Assyrian and Babylonian cultures. Arches in such bridges have not yet been constructed in a classical manner, i.e. one that was later prevalent by the Romans, but these were only the primitive arch-like structures, with a false needle vault, that were shaped mainly by corbelling. This type of the structure, if it was used in bridges, turned out to be much more stable than the well-known at that time and commonly used in gateway passages oval “true-arch” built from sun-dried mud bricks. Keywords: arch stone bridge, false arch, needle vault, mud brick arch, corbelled arch, culvert, aqueduct. 1 Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24, 31-155 Cracow, Poland, phone: +48126415673, e-mail: [email protected] 164 Mariusz MAŚLAK, Doncho PARTOV 1. INTRODUCTION – THE ANCIENT DOMES AND ARCH- VAULTED GALLERIES It is common knowledge that the oldest man-made building structures, if these were built of stone, were erected in the so-called post and lintel system.
    [Show full text]