Securitization of the Crisis in Ukraine

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Securitization of the Crisis in Ukraine FACULTY OF SOCIAL STUDIES Securitization of the Crisis in Ukraine Master thesis OLEKSANDR SLYVCHUK Supervisor: Monika Gabriela Bartoszewicz, MA, MLitt, PhD Department of Political Science Conflict and Democracy Studies Brno 2020 SECURITIZATION OF THE CRISIS IN UKRAINE Bibliografický záznam Autor: Oleksandr Slyvchuk Fakulta sociálních studií Masarykova univerzita Katedra politologie Název práce: Securitization of the Crisis in Ukraine Studijní program: Magisterský studijní program Studijní obor: Conflict and Democracy Studies Vedoucí práce: Monika Gabriela Bartoszewicz, MA, MLitt, PhD Rok: 2020 Počet stran: 120 Klíčová slova: Donbas, hrozba, konflikt, publikum, referenční objekt, Rusko, sekuritizace, sekuritizující aktér, Ukrajina 2 SECURITIZATION OF THE CRISIS IN UKRAINE Bibliographic record Author: Oleksandr Slyvchuk Faculty of Social Studies Masaryk University Department of Political Science Title of Thesis: Securitization of the crisis in Ukraine Degree Programme: Master's degree Field of Study: Conflict and Democracy Studies (Eng.) Supervisor: Monika Gabriela Bartoszewicz, MA, MLitt, PhD Year: 2020 Number of Pages: 120 Keywords: Audience, conflict, Donbas, referent object, Russia, securitization, securitizing actor, threat, Ukraine 3 SECURITIZATION OF THE CRISIS IN UKRAINE Abstrakt V roce 2014 se Ukrajina stala terčem zahraniční ozbrojené agrese. Ruská Federace v té době obsadila a zabrala poloostrov Krym a následně její vojska pronikla dále na území regionů východní Ukrajiny, oblasti Doněck a Luhansk, a vyvolala tam vlny separatismu. Odpovědí ukrajinské vlády bylo rozhodnutí nasazení národních ozbrojených sil ke vzdoru proti novým ruským vlivům v regionu a k obnovení právního státu na území, nad kterým ztratila kontrolu. Tyto vojenské operace vyústily ve zdlouhavý konflikt, který doposud nebyl vyřešen. Tato diplomová práce pojednává o následcích ruské agrese, která zapříčinila sekuriti- zaci tohoto celého konfliktu, neboť bezpečnost se stala centrální záležitostí národní politiky Ukrajiny. Pro podporu tohoto tvrzení se odvolávám na teorii sekuritizace zpracovanou na Kodaňské škole bezpečnostních studií. Tento výzkum je založen na jedné případové studii. Analýza odkazuje na ukrajinské politické procesy, jednotlivé politiky a celé frakce, ruské zájmy na Ukrajině a diskurzní analýzu. Mé výsledky poukazují na to, že ukrajinská krize je sekuritizována. Mimoto, meziná- rodní vztahy s Moskvou jsou taktéž předmětem sekuritizace. Ruská účast ve sférách mimo těch bezpečnostních je často označována za neblahou; proruské politické nálady jsou po- važovány za zrádné. Společnosti a elity obou zemí dávají důraz na bezpečnost v rozhodování otázek konfliktu, což způsobuje vnitrostátní debaty a ovlivňuje politický směr. Sekuritizace je překážkou k vyřešení konfliktu na Ukrajině. Tento výzkum zdůrazňuje potřebu vzetí vývoje sekuritizace na Ukrajině v potaz pro analýzu budoucího vývoje a zpracování pří- padných scénářů vyřešení konfliktu. Bezpečnostní agenda nepřestane hrát klíčovou roli v dohledné budoucnosti Ukrajiny. 4 SECURITIZATION OF THE CRISIS IN UKRAINE Abstract In 2014 Ukraine experienced foreign armed aggression. The Russian Federation an- nexed the Crimean Peninsula, intruded into the Ukrainian eastern regions, Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts, and instigated separatism there. The Government of Ukraine decided to involve national armed forces in order to oppose Russian interests in the region and restore the rule of law over the uncontrolled territory. The military operation transformed into the protracted conflict that has not been resolved yet. The thesis claims that after the Russian aggression took place security started to play the central role in the national policy that caused securitization of the Ukrainian conflict. To support this statement, I refer to the theory of securitization elaborated by the Copenhagen School of security studies. The research is based on a single case study. The analysis refers to the Ukrainian political processes, individual politicians and whole factions, Russian inter- ests in Ukraine, discourse analysis. My results showed that the Ukrainian crisis is securitized. Moreover, state relations with Moscow also are a matter for securitization. The Russian presence in other than the security spheres is often represented as ominous; pro-Russian political moods are considered to be treasonous. Both state elites and society pay much attention to security in decision- making that results in domestic debates and influences the political flow. Securitization is an obstacle for the conflict resolution in Ukraine. This research emphasizes the need to take into account securitization development in Ukraine for the analysis of future developments and elaboration of the conflict resolution scenarios. The security agenda will not cease to play the central role in the near future in Ukraine. 5 SECURITIZATION OF THE CRISIS IN UKRAINE 6 SECURITIZATION OF THE CRISIS IN UKRAINE Affidativ I hereby declare that I have created the Master thesis on the topic of Securitization of the Crisis in Ukraine independently. All sources that I used to write this thesis were quoted in the text and are listed in the bibliography section. Brno, June 3, 2020 Oleksandr Slyvchuk 7 SECURITIZATION OF THE CRISIS IN UKRAINE 8 SECURITIZATION OF THE CRISIS IN UKRAINE Acknowledgments I would like to express gratitude to my supervisor Monika Gabriela Bartoszewicz, MA, MLitt, PhD, for the patient guidance, counselling and consistent encouragement that helped me in my first profound research in the field of political science. 9 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents List of Images 11 List of Graphs 13 List of Terms and Abbreviations 14 1 Introduction 15 2 The Ukrainian Crisis. Its Reasons and Main Events 18 3 The Theory of Securitization 28 4 The Main Actors of Securitization in Ukraine 34 4.1 The pro-Ukrainian faction ................................................................................. 35 4.2 The pro-Russian faction .................................................................................... 44 4.3 The role of the Church....................................................................................... 54 5 Main Security Narratives 62 5.1 Large-scale war ................................................................................................. 64 5.2 Land corridor to Crimea .................................................................................... 65 5.3 Russian Federation is the sponsor of terrorism ................................................. 66 5.4 Nord Stream 2 pipeline is the energy threat for Ukraine .................................. 67 5.5 Civil war in Donbas ........................................................................................... 68 5.6 Responsibility to protect Russians and Russian speakers abroad ..................... 70 5.7 NATO and the US play the pivotal role in provoking the Ukrainian crisis ...... 71 6 Securitization Analysis in Ukraine 76 6.1 Turning point in 2019 ........................................................................................ 81 6.2 The reverse of roles ........................................................................................... 86 7 Future Development of the Crisis 94 8 Conclusions 99 Bibliography 103 10 LIST OF IMAGES List of Images Image 1. The map of the administrative division of Ukraine and territories controlled by Rus- sia and pro-Russian militants. 18 Image 2. The map shows the distinction in public opinion over the integration of Ukraine with the European Union. The support of the Euromaidan was the lowest in southeastern regions. 20 Image 3. The map of the Crimean Peninsula shows locations of main cities and military fa- cilities. 22 Image 4. The map of the uncontrolled territories in the Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts. 24 Image 5. Geography of the Kerch strait incident. 26 Image 6. The billboard says: “We - Ukraine. Army protects our land. Language protects our heart. Faith protects our soul. Petro Poroshenko”. 40 Image 7. The usual regional division used in the Ukrainian media and public policy dis- courses. 45 Image 8. Public opinion about the prospects of Russia-Ukrainian relations in the future. Re- sults divided by regions. 46 Image 9. Public opinion about the state’s policy towards Russia. 46 Image 10. Public moods according to the pro-Western political orientation. 47 Image 11. Public support of granting special status for Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts and status of the second state language to Russian. 47 Image 12. Public opinion about the status of self-proclaimed state entities “Donetsk People’s Republic and “Luhansk People’s Republic”. 48 Image 13. Public support of the direct Ukraine - “DPR” - “LPR” negotiations. 49 Image 14. Conflict of terminology around the Donbas crisis in public discourses. 49 Image 15. Opinion disparities over the conflict resolution. 50 Image 16. Electoral support of the “Opposition bloc” political party in the parliamentary elec- tions in 2014. 51 Image 17. Electoral support of the “Opposition Platform - For Life” political party in the parliamentary elections in 2019. 52 Image 18. Dominance of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of Moscow Patriarchate over the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of Kyiv Patriarchate by oblast. 56 Image 19. Booklet distributed by the Security Service of Ukraine that affiliates Moscow Pa- triarchate of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church with pro-Russian militants in Donbas. 59 Image 20. Booklet distributed by the Security Service of Ukraine that affiliates Moscow Pa-
Recommended publications
  • Euromaidan Newsletter # 6 CIVIC SECTOR of EUROMAIDAN
    CIVIC SECTOR OF EUROMAIDAN GRASSROOTS MOVEMENT EuroMaidan Newsletter # 6 Rise up, Ukraine! Protestors seize state administration buildings all over Ukraine January 25 and 26, 2014 . People all over Ukraine began http://goo.gl/hSnIGA taking over the Oblast (Region) Local State Businessmen of Crimea formed the initiative “For January January 2014 Administration buildings. In Western regions the State Crimea without Dictatorship” and announced their 8 2 Administrations have recognized the authority of the support for Maidan. Read more (in Russian) at - People’s Council created at Maidan in Kyiv. http://goo.gl/3o65u2 Protestors were blocked in their attempts to seize the January 26. Multiple journalists were injured in government buildings in Dnipropetrovsk, Zaporizhzhya, Zaporizhya on Jan. 26 as police cleaned out the square Chernihiv, and Kherson oblasts, while the Sumy and where about 10,000 protesters were trying to seize the #6. 24 Cherkasy districts were occupied for only a short time. oblast government's state administration building. Read In the East – in Zaporizhia, Dnipropetrovsk, Odesa, more details at http://goo.gl/LsaQSO Kharkiv - mass demonstrations are still being held near In Dnipropetrovsk the attempt to seize the state local administrations. See the map for details. Massive administration building was thwarted by police and hired repressions, tortures and arrests have been reported in thugs (“titushki”). In clashes with titushki people were these cities. Watch videos from the seizure of the state beaten, and journalists shot with traumatic weapons. administrations in Rivne, Khmelnytskyi, and Sumy at Watch video at http://goo.gl/E9q6MW Map of NEWSLETTER Ukraine showing: regions where oblast state administration s have been seized by citizens; mass rallies; and attempts at administration building seizure.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukrainian Civil Society from the Orange Revolution to Euromaidan: Striving for a New Social Contract
    In: IFSH (ed.), OSCE Yearbook 2014, Baden-Baden 2015, pp. 219-235. Iryna Solonenko Ukrainian Civil Society from the Orange Revolution to Euromaidan: Striving for a New Social Contract This is the Maidan generation: too young to be burdened by the experi- ence of the Soviet Union, old enough to remember the failure of the Orange Revolution, they don’t want their children to be standing again on the Maidan 15 years from now. Sylvie Kauffmann, The New York Times, April 20141 Introduction Ukrainian civil society became a topic of major interest with the start of the Euromaidan protests in November 2013. It has acquired an additional dimen- sion since then, as civil society has pushed for reforms following the ap- pointment of the new government in February 2014, while also providing as- sistance to the army and voluntary battalions fighting in the east of the coun- try and to civilian victims of the war. In the face of the weakness of the Ukrainian state, which is still suffering from a lack of political will, poor governance, corruption, military weakness, and dysfunctional law enforce- ment – many of those being in part Viktor Yanukovych’s legacies – civil so- ciety and voluntary activism have become a driver of reform and an import- ant mobilization factor in the face of external aggression. This contribution examines the transformation of Ukrainian civil society during the period between the 2004 Orange Revolution and the present day. Why this period? The Orange Revolution and the Euromaidan protests are landmarks in Ukraine’s post-independence state-building and democratiza- tion process, and analysis of the transformation of Ukrainian civil society during this period offers interesting findings.2 Following a brief portrait of Ukrainian civil society and its evolution, the contribution examines the rela- tionships between civil society and three other actors: the state, the broader society, and external actors involved in supporting and developing civil soci- ety in Ukraine.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitution of Ukraine
    Constitution of Ukraine Preamble The Verkhovna Rada (the Parliament) of Ukraine on behalf of the Ukrainian people - Ukrainian citizens of all nationalities, expressing the sovereign will of the people, relying on the centuries-old history of Ukrainian state-building and upon the right to self- determination realised by the Ukrainian nation, all the Ukrainian people, aspiring to ensure human rights and freedoms, and life conditions worthy of human dignity, supporting the strengthening of civil harmony on the Ukrainian soil, striving to develop and strengthen a democratic, social, law-based state, realizing the responsibility in the eyes of God, before our own conscience, past, present and future generations, guided by the Act of Declaration of the Independence of Ukraine of 24 August 1991, approved by the national vote on 1 December 1991, adopts this Constitution as the Fundamental Law of Ukraine. Title I General Principles Article 1. Ukraine shall be a sovereign and independent, democratic, social, law-based state. Article 2. The sovereignty of Ukraine shall extend throughout its entire territory. Ukraine shall be a unitary state. The territory of Ukraine within its present borders shall be indivisible and inviolable. Article 3. An individual, his life and health, honour and dignity, inviolability and security shall be recognised in Ukraine as the highest social value. Human rights and freedoms, and guarantees thereof shall determine the essence and course of activities of the State. The State shall be responsible to the individual for its activities. Affirming and ensuring human rights and freedoms shall be the main duty of the State. Article 4. There shall be a single form of citizenship in Ukraine.
    [Show full text]
  • Resuscitate Healthcare
    #8 (114) August 2017 First conclusions in the Supreme Old and new promising sectors Student activism in Ukraine Court selection process of Ukraine’s agriculture and post-Soviet states RESUSCITATE HEALTHCARE WWW.UKRAINIANWEEK.COM Featuring selected content from The Economist FOR FREE DISTRIBUTION CONTENTS | 3 BRIEFING 32 Merchants of peace: How the “civil 4 Crime and (illusory) punishment: war” rhetoric is used to gain political What counterarguments Berkut capital lawyers use in Maidan trials 34 Student force: The strengths and POLITICS weaknesses of Ukrainian youth movements 7 Delay in court: First results in the selection of candidates for the 38 Between Komsomol and protests: Supreme Court The trajectory of student movements in former USSR countries over the past ECONOMICS 25 years 10 Cultivating change: Production and NEIGHBOURS export transformations in Ukraine's 40 Michael Binyon on divides agricultural industry in the UK’s political establishment 14 Payback time! Is Ukraine ready to pay as Brexit talks start back the bulk of its external debts? 42 Karl Schlögel: 18 An uneven recovery: How the “We have to fight for Ukraine to once economy of regions has changed over again get in the center of attention in the past three years European affairs” German historian on Ukraine FOCUS on the European mental map 22 Seeing the obvious: Why Ukraine’s and the challenges of the new current healthcare system must be historical situation changed HISTORY 24 A major deficit: Staff and funding as the key driver of transformation 46 A view from 2017:
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of BELGRADE FACULTY of POLITICAL SCIENCE Regional Master's Program in Peace Studies MASTER's THESIS Revisiting T
    UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE FACULTY OF POLITICAL SCIENCE Regional Master’s Program in Peace Studies MASTER’S THESIS Revisiting the Orange Revolution and Euromaidan: Pro-Democracy Civil Disobedience in Ukraine Academic supervisor: Student: Associate Professor Marko Simendić Olga Vasilevich 9/18 Belgrade, 2020 1 Content Introduction ………………………………………………………………………………………3 1. Theoretical section……………………………………………………………………………..9 1.1 Civil disobedience…………………………………………………………………………9 1.2 Civil society……………………………………………………………………………... 19 1.3 Nonviolence……………………………………………………………………………... 24 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………………… 31 2. Analytical section……………………………………………………………………………..33 2.1 The framework for disobedience………………………………………………….…….. 33 2.2 Orange Revolution………………………………………………………………………. 40 2.3 Euromaidan……………………………………………………………………………… 47 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………………… 59 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………………… 62 References……………………………………………………………………………………….67 2 INTRODUCTION The Orange Revolution and the Revolution of Dignity have precipitated the ongoing Ukraine crisis. According to the United Nations Rights Office, the latter has claimed the lives of 13,000 people, including those of unarmed civilian population, and entailed 30,000 wounded (Miller 2019). The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees adds to that 1.5 million internally displaced persons (IDPs), 100,000 refugees and asylum-seekers (UNHCR 2014). The armed conflict is of continued relevance to Russia, Europe, as well as the United States. During the first 10 months,
    [Show full text]
  • Making Waves
    Making Waves Sea Blindness and Australia’s Second Sea Navy (RAN), HMAS Stirling, at Garden Island, off Fre- Brian K. Wentzell mantle, Western Australia. The base is now the home of all Collins-class submarines, five Anzac frigates and a It is interesting to examine countries with coasts on more single fleet tanker. There is also a heliport to support he- than one ocean. Which coast is emphasized illustrates licopters assigned to the ships. Other resources, includ- much about the country’s history. Thus in Canada, the ing the landing ships, air warfare destroyers, coastal pa- focus has historically been on the Atlantic Ocean. Only trol vessels and mine warfare forces would have to deploy recently has focus changed to the Pacific coast and even from the east coast and northern areas to counter a major more recently the Arctic coast. For Australia the focus has maritime threat in the eastern Indian Ocean. been on the Pacific Ocean, and not the Indian Ocean. The Royal Australian Air Force has three air bases, two of David Brewster, writing for the Australian Strategic Policy which are in a maintained but inactive status in the north Institute, has highlighted the importance of the Indian coast area of Western Australia, and the other is a training Ocean as a waterway to world markets from the west and airfield shared with the Republic of Singapore Air Force northwest of the Australian continent. His article, entitled near Perth, which is on the southwest coast. Aside from “Australia’s Second Sea: Facing Our Multipolar Future in two training squadrons, there are no dedicated combat, the Indian Ocean,” exposes Australia’s national blindness early warning, maritime patrol or cargo aircraft based in to the importance of this ocean to the economy and secur- the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Kremlin-Linked Forces in Ukraine's 2019 Elections
    Études de l’Ifri Russie.Nei.Reports 25 KREMLIN-LINKED FORCES IN UKRAINE’S 2019 ELECTIONS On the Brink of Revenge? Vladislav INOZEMTSEV February 2019 Russia/NIS Center The Institut français des relations internationales (Ifri) is a research center and a forum for debate on major international political and economic issues. Headed by Thierry de Montbrial since its founding in 1979, Ifri is a non-governmental, non-profit organization. As an independent think tank, Ifri sets its own research agenda, publishing its findings regularly for a global audience. Taking an interdisciplinary approach, Ifri brings together political and economic decision-makers, researchers and internationally renowned experts to animate its debate and research activities. The opinions expressed in this text are the responsibility of the author alone. ISBN: 978-2-36567-981-7 © All rights reserved, Ifri, 2019 How to quote this document: Vladislav Inozemtsev, “Kremlin-Linked Forces in Ukraine’s 2019 Elections: On the Brink of Revenge?”, Russie.NEI.Reports, No. 25, Ifri, February 2019. Ifri 27 rue de la Procession 75740 Paris Cedex 15—FRANCE Tel. : +33 (0)1 40 61 60 00—Fax : +33 (0)1 40 61 60 60 Email: [email protected] Website: Ifri.org Author Dr Vladislav Inozemtsev (b. 1968) is a Russian economist and political researcher since 1999, with a PhD in Economics. In 1996 he founded the Moscow-based Center for Post-Industrial Studies and has been its Director ever since. In recent years, he served as Senior or Visiting Fellow with the Institut fur die Wissenschaften vom Menschen in Vienna, with the Polski Instytut Studiów Zaawansowanych in Warsaw, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Auswärtige Politik in Berlin, the Center for Strategic and International Studies, and the Johns Hopkins University in Washington.
    [Show full text]
  • Brexit: the Unintended Consequences
    A SYMPOSIUM OF VIEWS Brexit: The Unintended Consequences Bold policy changes always seem to produce unintended consequences, both favorable and unfavorable. TIE asked more than thirty noted experts to share their analysis of the potential unintended consequences—financial, economic, political, or social—of a British exit from the European Union. 6 THE INTERNATIONAL ECONOMY SPRING 2016 Britain has been an liberal approaches to various elements of financial market frameworks. essential part of an Yet our opinions can differ. First, we have almost completely different experiences with our countries’ fi- opinion group nancial industries during the Great Recession. The Czech financial sector served as a robust buffer, shielding us defending more from some of the worst shocks. The British have had a rather different experience with their main banks, which market-based and to some extent drives their position on risks in retail bank- ing. This difference is heightened by the difference in the liberal approaches. relative weight of financial institutions in our economies, as expressed by the size of the financial sector in relation MIROSLav SINGER to GDP. The fact that this measure is three to four times Governor, Czech National Bank larger in the United Kingdom than in the Czech Republic gives rise to different attitudes toward the risk of crisis in here is an ongoing debate about the economic mer- the financial industry and to possible crisis resolution. In its and demerits of Brexit in the United Kingdom. a nutshell, in sharp contrast to the United Kingdom, the THowever, from my point of view as a central banker Czech Republic can—if worse comes to worst—afford to from a mid-sized and very open Central European econ- close one of its major banks, guarantee its liabilities, and omy, the strictly economic arguments are in some sense take it into state hands to be recapitalized and later sold, overwhelmed by my own, often very personal experience without ruining its sovereign rating.
    [Show full text]
  • Resilient Ukraine Resilient
    Resilient Ukraine: Safeguarding Society from Russian Aggression Russian from Society Ukraine: Safeguarding Resilient Research Paper Mathieu Boulègue and Orysia Lutsevych Ukraine Forum | June 2020 Resilient Ukraine Safeguarding Society from Russian Aggression Mathieu Boulègue and OrysiaLutsevych Chatham House Contents Summary 2 1 Introduction 3 2 The Impact of the Armed Conflict 13 3 Creating Resilience Dividends: Case Studies 27 4 Recommendations 33 5 Conclusion 37 About the Authors 38 Acknowledgments 39 1 | Chatham House Resilient Ukraine: Safeguarding Society from Russian Aggression Summary • Despite military conflict and an increasingly adversarial relationship with Russia, Ukraine has largely maintained its democratic reforms thanks to its resilience and determination to decide its own future. The country is gradually developing the capacity of its state institutions and civil society to address the political and social consequences of Russian aggression. • Russia’s three main levers of influence in Ukraine include the ongoing armed conflict, corruption, and the poor quality of the political sphere. The Kremlin seeks to exploit these vulnerabilities to promote polarization and encourage a clash between Ukraine’s citizens and its governing elite by taking military action, manipulating the corruption narrative, supporting pro-Russia parties, and fuelling religious tensions through the Russian Orthodox Church (ROC). • The ramifications of the military operation in Donbas reverberate strongly across the country and domestic politics. The most prominent spillover effects include the circulation of firearms and the weakened capacity of authorities to reintegrate internally displaced people (IDPs) and war veterans. • With no clear way to end the armed conflict, there is a growing risk of societal polarization. This could have negative consequences for any prospective peace agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • IFES Faqs on Elections in Ukraine
    Elections in Ukraine 2019 Presidential Election Frequently Asked Questions Europe and Eurasia International Foundation for Electoral Systems 2011 Crystal Drive | Floor 10 | Arlington, VA 22202 | www.IFES.org March 22, 2019 Frequently Asked Questions When is Election Day? ................................................................................................................................... 1 Why is this election important? .................................................................................................................... 1 What is the role of the president? ................................................................................................................ 1 What is the legal framework governing the elections? ................................................................................ 1 What is the electoral system? ....................................................................................................................... 2 Who are the candidates? .............................................................................................................................. 2 How are elections administered? ................................................................................................................. 3 Who can vote in these elections? ................................................................................................................. 4 How do citizens register to vote? ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Changes in Electoral Systems: a Comparative Analysis of the Local Election in Ukraine in 2006 and 2010
    STUDIA VOL. 36 POLITOLOGICZNE STUDIA I ANALIZY Olena Yatsunska The impact of changes in electoral systems: a comparative analysis of the local election in Ukraine in 2006 and 2010 KEY WORDS: local government, local elections, proportional electoral system, majoritarian electoral system, mixed majoritarian-proportional electoral system, Ukraine STUDIA I ANALIZY Having gained independence in 1991 Ukraine, like most Central and East- ern European countries, faced the need for radical Constitutional reforms, with reorganization of local government figuring high in the agenda. Like other post-soviet countries, Ukraine had to decide on the starting point and like in the neighboring countries, democratic euphoria of the early 1990s got the upper hand: local authorities were elected on March 18, 1990, while the Law On Local People’s Deputies of Ukrainian SSR and Local Self-government was adopted by Verkhovna Rada of Ukrainian SSR on December 7, 1990. Ukrain- ian Researchers in the field of local government and its reforms concur with the opinion that the present dissatisfactory state of that institution was con- ditioned by the first steps made by Ukrainian Politicians at the beginning of the ‘transition’ period. Without clear perspective of reform, during more than 20 years of Independence, Ukrainian local government has abided dozens of laws, sometimes rather contradictory and has survived more than 10 stages of restructuring. Evolution of election legislation in Ukraine is demonstrated by Table 1. The table shows that since 1994 three electoral systems have been tested in Ukraine: 1, Majoritarian, 2, Proportional except elections to village and settlement councils and 3, ‘Mixed’ system (50% Majoritarian+50% Proportional).
    [Show full text]
  • Migration and the Ukraine Crisis a Two-Country Perspective This E-Book Is Provided Without Charge Via Free Download by E-International Relations (
    EDITED BY AGNIESZKA PIKULICKA-WILCZEWSKA & GRETA UEHLING Migration and the Ukraine Crisis A Two-Country Perspective This e-book is provided without charge via free download by E-International Relations (www.E-IR.info). It is not permitted to be sold in electronic format under any circumstances. If you enjoy our free e-books, please consider leaving a small donation to allow us to continue investing in open access publications: http://www.e-ir.info/about/donate/ i Migration and the Ukraine Crisis A Two-Country Perspective EDITED BY AGNIESZKA PIKULICKA-WILCZEWSKA & GRETA UEHLING ii E-International Relations www.E-IR.info Bristol, England 2017 ISBN 978-1-910814-27-7 (paperback) ISBN 978-1-910814-28-4 (e-book) This book is published under a Creative Commons CC BY-NC 4.0 license. You are free to: • Share – copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format • Adapt – remix, transform, and build upon the material Under the following terms: • Attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. • Non-Commercial – You may not use the material for commercial purposes. Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission. Please contact [email protected] for any such enquiries, including for licensing and translation requests. Other than the terms noted above, there are no restrictions placed on the use and dissemination of this book for student learning materials / scholarly use.
    [Show full text]