End of Year Progress Report Overview
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Browser Wars
Uppsala universitet Inst. för informationsvetenskap Browser Wars Kampen om webbläsarmarknaden Andreas Högström, Emil Pettersson Kurs: Examensarbete Nivå: C Termin: VT-10 Datum: 2010-06-07 Handledare: Anneli Edman "Anyone who slaps a 'this page is best viewed with Browser X' label on a Web page appears to be yearning for the bad old days, before the Web, when you had very little chance of read- ing a document written on another computer, another word processor, or another network" - Sir Timothy John Berners-Lee, grundare av World Wide Web Consortium, Technology Review juli 1996 Innehållsförteckning Abstract ...................................................................................................................................... 1 Sammanfattning ......................................................................................................................... 2 1 Inledning .................................................................................................................................. 3 1.1 Bakgrund .............................................................................................................................. 3 1.2 Syfte ..................................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Frågeställningar .................................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Avgränsningar ..................................................................................................................... -
"Phylogenetic Profiling"
Introductory Review Phylogenetic p rofiling Matteo Pellegrini, Todd O. Yeates and David Eisenberg Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA Sorel T. Fitz-Gibbon IGPP Center for Astrobiology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA 1. Introduction Biology has been profoundly changed by the development of techniques to se- quence DNA. The advent of rapid sequencing in conjunction with the capability to assemble sequence fragments into complete genome sequences enables researchers to read and analyze entire genomes of organisms. Parallel progress has been made in algorithms to study the evolutionary history of proteins. The techniques rely on the ability to measure the similarity of protein sequences in order to determine the likelihood that different proteins are descended from a common ancestor. It is therefore possible to reconstruct families of proteins that share a common ancestor. Combining these two capabilities, we can now not only determine which proteins are coded within an organism’s genome but we can also discover the evolutionary relationships between the proteins of multiple organisms. Phylogenetic profiling is the study of which protein types are found in which organisms. In order to perform phylogenetic profiling, one must first establish a classification of proteins into families. An example of such a classification scheme across a broad range of fully sequenced organisms is the Clusters of Orthologous Groups (Tatusov, 1997), where an attempt is made to group together proteins that perform a similar function. Next, each organism is described in terms of which protein families are coded or not coded in its genome. -
Pellegrini M. Using Phylogenetic Profiles To
Chapter 9 Using Phylogenetic Profiles to Predict Functional Relationships Matteo Pellegrini Abstract Phylogenetic profiling involves the comparison of phylogenetic data across gene families. It is possible to construct phylogenetic trees, or related data structures, for specific gene families using a wide variety of tools and approaches. Phylogenetic profiling involves the comparison of this data to determine which families have correlated or coupled evolution. The underlying assumption is that in certain cases these couplings may allow us to infer that the two families are functionally related: that is their function in the cell is coupled. Although this technique can be applied to noncoding genes, it is more commonly used to assess the function of protein coding genes. Examples of proteins that are functionally related include subunits of protein complexes, or enzymes that perform consecutive steps along biochemical pathways. We hypothesize the deletion of one of the families from a genome would then indirectly affect the function of the other. Dozens of different implementations of the phylogenetic profiling technique have been developed over the past decade. These range from the first simple approaches that describe phylogenetic profiles as binary vectors to the most complex ones that attempt to model to the coevolution of protein families on a phylogenetic tree. We discuss a set of these implementations and present the software and databases that are available to perform phylogenetic profiling. Key words: Phylogenetic profiles, Coevolution, Functional associations, Comparative genomics, Coevolving proteins 1. Introduction The remarkable improvements in sequencing technology that have occurred over the past few decades have made the sequenc- ing of genomes an ever more routine task. -
Aquatic Microbial Ecology 75:117
Vol. 75: 117–128, 2015 AQUATIC MICROBIAL ECOLOGY Published online June 4 doi: 10.3354/ame01752 Aquat Microb Ecol Metagenomic assessment of viral diversity in Lake Matoaka, a temperate, eutrophic freshwater lake in southeastern Virginia, USA Jasmin C. Green1, Faraz Rahman1, Matthew A. Saxton2,3, Kurt E. Williamson1,2,* 1Department of Biology, College of William & Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia 23185, USA 2Environmental Science and Policy Program, College of William & Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia 23185, USA 3Present address: Department of Marine Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA ABSTRACT: Little is known about the composition and diversity of temperate freshwater viral communities. This study presents a metagenomic analysis of viral community composition, taxo- nomic and functional diversity of temperate, eutrophic Lake Matoaka in southeastern Virginia (USA). Three sampling sites were chosen to represent differences in anthropogenic impacts: the Crim Dell Creek mouth (impacted), the Pogonia Creek mouth (less impacted) and the main body of the lake (mixed). Sequences belonging to tailed bacteriophages were the most abundant at all 3 sites, with Podoviridae predominating. The main lake body harbored the highest virus genotype richness and included cyanophage and eukaryotic algal virus sequences not found at the other 2 sites, while the impacted Crim Dell Creek mouth showed the lowest richness. Cross-contig com- parisons indicated that similar virus genotypes were found at all 3 sites, but at different rank- abundances. Hierarchical cluster analysis of multiple viral metagenomes indicated high genetic similarity between viral communities of related environments, with freshwater, marine, hypersaline, and eukaryote-associated environments forming into clear groups despite large geographic dis- tances between sampling locations within each environment type. -
Discontinued Browsers List
Discontinued Browsers List Look back into history at the fallen windows of yesteryear. Welcome to the dead pool. We include both officially discontinued, as well as those that have not updated. If you are interested in browsers that still work, try our big browser list. All links open in new windows. 1. Abaco (discontinued) http://lab-fgb.com/abaco 2. Acoo (last updated 2009) http://www.acoobrowser.com 3. Amaya (discontinued 2013) https://www.w3.org/Amaya 4. AOL Explorer (discontinued 2006) https://www.aol.com 5. AMosaic (discontinued in 2006) No website 6. Arachne (last updated 2013) http://www.glennmcc.org 7. Arena (discontinued in 1998) https://www.w3.org/Arena 8. Ariadna (discontinued in 1998) http://www.ariadna.ru 9. Arora (discontinued in 2011) https://github.com/Arora/arora 10. AWeb (last updated 2001) http://www.amitrix.com/aweb.html 11. Baidu (discontinued 2019) https://liulanqi.baidu.com 12. Beamrise (last updated 2014) http://www.sien.com 13. Beonex Communicator (discontinued in 2004) https://www.beonex.com 14. BlackHawk (last updated 2015) http://www.netgate.sk/blackhawk 15. Bolt (discontinued 2011) No website 16. Browse3d (last updated 2005) http://www.browse3d.com 17. Browzar (last updated 2013) http://www.browzar.com 18. Camino (discontinued in 2013) http://caminobrowser.org 19. Classilla (last updated 2014) https://www.floodgap.com/software/classilla 20. CometBird (discontinued 2015) http://www.cometbird.com 21. Conkeror (last updated 2016) http://conkeror.org 22. Crazy Browser (last updated 2013) No website 23. Deepnet Explorer (discontinued in 2006) http://www.deepnetexplorer.com 24. Enigma (last updated 2012) No website 25. -
Integrating Genomic Data to Predict Transcription Factor Binding
Integrating Genomic Data to Predict Transcription Factor Binding Dustin T. Holloway 1 Mark Kon 2 Charles DeLisi 3 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 1 Molecular Biology Cell Biology and Biochemistry, 3 Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, U.S.A. Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, 2 Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, U.S.A. Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215 , U.S.A. Abstract Transcription factor binding sites (TFBS) in gene promoter regions are often predicted by using position specific scoring matrices (PSSMs), which summarize sequence patterns of experimentally determined TF binding sites. Although PSSMs are more reliable than simple consensus string matching in predicting a true binding site, they generally result in high numbers of false positive hits. This study attempts to reduce the number of false positive matches and generate new predictions by integrating various types of genomic data by two methods: a Bayesian allocation procedure, and support vector machine classification. Several methods will be explored to strengthen the prediction of a true TFBS in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome: binding site degeneracy, binding site conservation, phylogenetic profiling, TF binding site clustering, gene expression profiles, GO functional annotation, and k-mer counts in promoter regions. Binding site degeneracy (or redundancy) refers to the number of times a particular transcription factor’s binding motif is discovered in the upstream region of a gene. Phylogenetic conservation takes into account the number of orthologous upstream regions in other genomes that contain a particular binding site. Phylogenetic profiling refers to the presence or absence of a gene across a large set of genomes. -
Scalable Phylogenetic Profiling Using Minhash Uncovers Likely Eukaryotic Sexual Reproduction Genes
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/852491; this version posted November 22, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 1 Scalable Phylogenetic Profiling using MinHash Uncovers Likely Eukaryotic Sexual Reproduction Genes 1,2,3,* 1,2,3 4,5 1,2,3,6,7,* David Moi , Laurent Kilchoer , Pablo S. Aguilar and Christophe Dessimoz 1 2 Department of Computational Biology, University of Lausanne, Switzerland; Center for Integrative Genomics, 3 4 University of Lausanne, Switzerland; SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland; Instituto de 5 Investigaciones Biotecnologicas (IIBIO), Universidad Nacional de San Martín Buenos Aires, Argentina; Instituto de 6 Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias (IFIBYNE-CONICET), Department of Genetics, Evolution, and 7 Environment, University College London, UK; Department of Computer Science, University College London, UK. *Corresponding authors: [email protected] and [email protected] Abstract Phylogenetic profiling is a computational method to predict genes involved in the same biological process by identifying protein families which tend to be jointly lost or retained across the tree of life. Phylogenetic profiling has customarily been more widely used with prokaryotes than eukaryotes, because the method is thought to require many diverse genomes. There are now many eukaryotic genomes available, but these are considerably larger, and typical phylogenetic profiling methods require quadratic time or worse in the number of genes. We introduce a fast, scalable phylogenetic profiling approach entitled HogProf, which leverages hierarchical orthologous groups for the construction of large profiles and locality-sensitive hashing for efficient retrieval of similar profiles. -
Review Article Protein-Protein Interaction Detection: Methods and Analysis
Hindawi Publishing Corporation International Journal of Proteomics Volume 2014, Article ID 147648, 12 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/147648 Review Article Protein-Protein Interaction Detection: Methods and Analysis V. Srinivasa Rao,1 K. Srinivas,1 G. N. Sujini,2 and G. N. Sunand Kumar1 1 Department of CSE, VR Siddhartha Engineering College, Vijayawada 520007, India 2 Department of CSE, Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Technology, Hyderabad 500075, India Correspondence should be addressed to V. Srinivasa Rao; [email protected] Received 26 October 2013; Revised 5 December 2013; Accepted 20 December 2013; Published 17 February 2014 Academic Editor: Yaoqi Zhou Copyright © 2014 V. Srinivasa Rao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Protein-protein interaction plays key role in predicting the protein function of target protein and drug ability of molecules. The majority of genes and proteins realize resulting phenotype functions as a set of interactions. The in vitro and in vivo methods like affinity purification, Y2H (yeast 2 hybrid), TAP (tandem affinity purification), and so forth have their own limitations like cost, time, and so forth, and the resultant data sets are noisy and have more false positives to annotate the function of drug molecules. Thus, in silico methods which include sequence-based approaches, structure-based approaches, chromosome proximity, gene fusion, in silico 2 hybrid, phylogenetic tree, phylogenetic profile, and gene expression-based approaches were developed. Elucidation of protein interaction networks also contributes greatly to the analysis of signal transduction pathways. -
Mapping Global and Local Co-Evolution Across 600 Species to Identify Novel Homologous Recombination Repair Genes
Downloaded from genome.cshlp.org on October 9, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Mapping global and local co-evolution across 600 species to identify novel homologous recombination repair genes Dana Sherill-Rofe1*, Dolev Rahat1,2*, Steven Findlay3,4,#, Anna Mellul1,#, Irene Guberman1, Maya Braun1, Idit Bloch1, Alon Lalezari1, Arash Samiei 3,4, Ruslan Sadreyev5,6,7, Michal 8 3,4,9,10 2,† 1,†, Goldberg , Alexandre Orthwein , Aviad Zick and Yuval Tabach 1Department of Developmental Biology and Cancer Research, Institute for Medical Research- Israel-Canada, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel. 2Sharett Institute of Oncology, Hadassah Medical Center, Ein-Kerem, Jerusalem, Israel. 3Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 4Division of Experimental Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 5Department of Molecular Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA USA. 6Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA. 7Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA. 8Department of Genetics, Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Sciences, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel. 9Department of Microbiology and Immunology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 10Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. *These authors contributed equally to this work. # These authors contributed equally to this work. -
Microbetrace: Retooling Molecular Epidemiology for Rapid Public Health Response
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.22.216275; this version posted July 24, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. This article is a US Government work. It is not subject to copyright under 17 USC 105 and is also made available for use under a CC0 license. 1 Title: MicrobeTrace: Retooling Molecular Epidemiology for Rapid Public Health Response 2 Authors: Ellsworth M. Campbell1,*, Anthony Boyles2,, Anupama Shankar1, Jay Kim 2, Sergey 3 Knyazev1,3,4, William M. Switzer1 4 Affiliations 5 1Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30329 6 2Northrup Grumman, Atlanta, GA 30345 7 3Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, TN 37830 8 4Department of Computer Science, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, 30303 9 Title character count (with spaces): 71 10 Abstract word count: 165 (of limit 150) 11 Manuscript word count, excluding figure captions: 4552 (of limit 5000) 12 Figure caption word count: 490 13 Conflicts of Interest and Source of Funding: None 14 * To whom correspondence should be addressed. 15 Authors contributed equally. 16 Abstract 17 Motivation 18 Outbreak investigations use data from interviews, healthcare providers, laboratories and surveillance 19 systems. However, integrated use of data from multiple sources requires a patchwork of software that 20 present challenges in usability, interoperability, confidentiality, and cost. Rapid integration, visualization 21 and analysis of data from multiple sources can guide effective public health interventions. 22 Results 23 We developed MicrobeTrace to facilitate rapid public health responses by overcoming barriers to data 24 integration and exploration in molecular epidemiology. -
Phylogenetic Profiling of the Arabidopsis Thaliana Proteome
Open Access Research2004Gutiérrezet al.Volume 5, Issue 8, Article R53 Phylogenetic profiling of the Arabidopsis thaliana proteome: what comment proteins distinguish plants from other organisms? Rodrigo A Gutiérrez*†§, Pamela J Green‡, Kenneth Keegstra*† and John B Ohlrogge† Addresses: *Department of Energy Plant Research Laboratory, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1312, USA. †Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1312, USA. ‡Delaware Biotechnology Institute, University of Delaware, 15 § Innovation Way, Newark, DE 19711, USA. Current address: Department of Biology, New York University, 100 Washington Square East, New reviews York, NY 10003, USA. Correspondence: Rodrigo A Gutiérrez. E-mail: [email protected] Published: 15 July 2004 Received: 16 March 2004 Revised: 10 May 2004 Genome Biology 2004, 5:R53 Accepted: 7 June 2004 The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at http://genomebiology.com/2004/5/8/R53 reports © 2004 Gutiérrez et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL Phylogenetic<p>Theopportunitycodingof life</p> genes availability to profilingof decipher <it>Arabidopsis of theof the the complete genetic Arabidopsis thaliana genomefactors </it>onthaliana that sequence define the proteome: ofbasis plant <it>Arab of form whattheir idopsisand proteinspattern function. thaliana of distingu sequence To </it>together beginish similarityplants this task, from wi to thwe other organismsthose have organisms? of classified other across organisms the the nuc threlear proe domains protein-vides an deposited research Abstract Background: The availability of the complete genome sequence of Arabidopsis thaliana together with those of other organisms provides an opportunity to decipher the genetic factors that define plant form and function. -
BIJOU BROWSER Sirer, Fotolia .Com
RevIews Firefox for Mobile (Fennec) Mozilla in the palm of your hand BIJOU BROWSER .com Fotolia Sirer, Firefox goes mobile – a “desktop” browser in the palm of your hand. bookmarks, form data, saved passwords, history, and other information. Finally, BY NATHAN WILLIS Mozilla’s interest in promoting the open web extends beyond the rendered page ith Firefox, Mozilla has main- pect to be able to access the same sites itself, so Fennec had to support the same tained dominance in the open on the go as they do at home or at work, plugins and extensibility that make Fire- wsource web browser market and they expect them to work the same fox a popular platform on PCs. for years – on the desktop. But, as way. If all this strikes you as a tall order, it phones and other pocket-sized devices Other mobile browsers invariably cut is. To simplify development, the team increase in power, extending that reach corners on the web experience by com- decided to target Nokia’s Maemo mobile poses a new challenge. Mozilla competes pressing pages into images; turning off platform first; Maemo is Linux-based against closed source, third-party brows- JavaScript; omitting tabs, video, and and arguably the most desktop-Linux- ers like Opera Mini and platform-spe- audio playback; and so on. In some like of any of the Linux mobile phone cific, preinstalled browsers like Maemo’s cases, this results in a visually identical stacks. It uses standard libraries like MicroB. static page, but increasingly, it means GStreamer, D-Bus, Qt, any others.