DOCSLIB.ORG

Whsc1l1 Regulates Estrogen Receptor Activity in Sum44 Breast Cancer Cells Jonathan Curtis Irish Wayne State University

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Whsc1l1 Regulates Estrogen Receptor Activity in Sum44 Breast Cancer Cells Jonathan Curtis Irish Wayne State University Wayne State University Wayne State University Dissertations 1-1-2016 Whsc1l1 Regulates Estrogen Receptor Activity In Sum44 Breast Cancer Cells Jonathan Curtis Irish Wayne State University, Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/oa_dissertations Part of the Oncology Commons Recommended Citation Irish, Jonathan Curtis, "Whsc1l1 Regulates Estrogen Receptor Activity In Sum44 Breast Cancer Cells" (2016). Wayne State University Dissertations. 1641. https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/oa_dissertations/1641 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@WayneState. It has been accepted for inclusion in Wayne State University Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@WayneState. WHSC1L1 REGULATES ESTROGEN RECEPTOR ACTIVITY IN SUM44 BREAST CANCER CELLS by JONATHAN CURTIS IRISH DISSERTATION Submitted to the Graduate School of Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY 2016 MAJOR: Cancer Biology Approved By: Advisor Date © COPYRIGHT BY JONATHAN CURTIS IRISH 2016 All Rights Reserved DEDICATION I dedicate this work to my loving, patient wife Cesira. To my parents, Lori and Sean, who have been unwavering in their support of me and my family during my temporally and geographically long educational journey. Finally, to my grandparents and aunt, Curtis, Norma, and Linda, for motivating me to study cancer. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my mentor, Dr. Ethier, for providing an environment where I could learn think critically and become proficient at applying the scientific method to problems in biology. I owe my future in science in no small part to the time spent with Dr. Ethier and all of the members of the Ethier lab from whom I was able to learn so much. Thank you also to Dr. Wilson and the MUSC sequencing core for their patience and expertise during my struggles with my next-gen sequencing experiments. I also would like to thank Dr. Yang for his co-mentorship at Wayne State, and his support in helping me with my understanding of my work in the context of previous work performed by him and others in the Ethier lab, and especially with his help in organizing and structuring my writing for my dissertation. Thank you to Dr. Sheng for giving me my first chance in the lab, and for allowing me to develop my passion for developing the technical skills required to perform challenging experiments soundly. To my committee, particularly Dr. Matherly, and Dr. Brush, thank you so much for your guidance and patience. I could not have done this without your support. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS DEDICATION ................................................................................................................ ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................... iii LIST OF TABLES .......................................................................................................... viii LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................................................................... ix LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................. xi CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 1 1.1 General Introduction ..................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Genomic basis of cancer ................................................................................................ 4 1.3 Breast Cancer Oncogenomics ......................................................................................... 7 1.4 Epigenetic Regulation .................................................................................................... 8 1.4.1 DNA Methylation ........................................................................................................... 9 1.4.2 DNA methylation in cancer .......................................................................................... 11 1.4.3 Histone Modification ................................................................................................... 12 1.4.4 Histone Variants .......................................................................................................... 14 1.4.5 Histone Tail Modification ............................................................................................. 14 1.4.6 Histone Acetylation ..................................................................................................... 15 1.4.7 Histone Acetyltransferases (HATs) .............................................................................. 16 1.4.8 Histone Phosphorylation ............................................................................................. 17 1.5 Histone Methylation ..................................................................................................... 19 1.5.1 Histone lysine demethylases ....................................................................................... 21 1.5.2 Histone H3 methylation on lysine 4 ............................................................................. 22 1.5.3 H3K9 methylation ........................................................................................................ 24 iv 1.5.4 H3K27 methylation ...................................................................................................... 26 1.5.5 H3K79 methylation ...................................................................................................... 27 1.6 NSD family of histone lysine methyltransferases .......................................................... 29 1.7 Epigenetic Dysregulation in Breast Cancer .................................................................... 32 1.7.1 WHSC1L1 is amplified in 12-15% of Breast Cancers .................................................... 34 1.7.2 Breast cancer sub-types ............................................................................................... 37 1.7.3 Histological Subtyping of Breast Cancer ...................................................................... 38 CHAPTER 2 KNOCKDOWN OF WHSC1L IN SUM44 CELLS ALTERS CELL PROLIFERATION AND GENE EXPRESSION ............................................................................................. 44 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 44 2.2 Results .......................................................................................................................... 47 2.2.1 WHSC1L1-short is the major expressed isoform in breast epithelial cells .................. 47 2.2.2 WHSC1L1-short knockdown reduces cell growth ........................................................ 50 2.2.3 Knockdown of WHSC1L1-short alters expression of seVeral genes actiVe in breast cancer ................................................................................................................................... 55 2.2.4 SUM44 cells respond negatiVely to estrogen .............................................................. 60 2.2.5 Gene expression profiling of SUM44 cells after treatment with estrogen .................. 66 2.3 Discussion .................................................................................................................... 70 2.4 Materials and Methods ................................................................................................ 74 2.4.1 shRNA Vectors .............................................................................................................. 74 2.4.2 LentiViral infection protocol ........................................................................................ 74 2.4.3 Antibodies .................................................................................................................... 74 2.4.4 Cell culture ................................................................................................................... 75 2.4.5 Proliferation assays ...................................................................................................... 75 2.4.6 Western blotting .......................................................................................................... 76 2.4.7 RNA expression profiling ............................................................................................. 76 v 2.4.8 Bioinformatics and Statistical analysis ......................................................................... 77 CHAPTER 3 ESTROGEN RECEPTOR ALPHA BINDS CHROMATIN IN THE ABSENCE OF ESTROGEN IN SUM44 CELLS ....................................................................................... 78 3.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 78 3.2 Results .......................................................................................................................... 79 3.2.1 ERa binds chromatin in the absence of estrogen in SUM44 cells ................................ 79 3.2.2 Motif enrichment at ERa binding sites ........................................................................ 84 3.2.3 ERa binding decreases upon WHSC1L1-short knockdown .......................................... 87 3.3 Discussion ...................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • RUNX1 Control of Mammary Epithelial and Breast Cancer Cell Phenotypes
    University of Massachusetts Medical School eScholarship@UMMS GSBS Dissertations and Theses Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences 2017-12-12 RUNX1 Control of Mammary Epithelial and Breast Cancer Cell Phenotypes Deli Hong University of Massachusetts Medical School Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Follow this and additional works at: https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/gsbs_diss Part of the Cancer Biology Commons, and the Cell Biology Commons Repository Citation Hong D. (2017). RUNX1 Control of Mammary Epithelial and Breast Cancer Cell Phenotypes. GSBS Dissertations and Theses. https://doi.org/10.13028/M21Q2F. Retrieved from https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/gsbs_diss/949 This material is brought to you by eScholarship@UMMS. It has been accepted for inclusion in GSBS Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of eScholarship@UMMS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RUNX1 CONTROL OF MAMMARY EPITHELIAL AND BREAST CANCER CELL PHENOTYPES A Dissertation Presented By Deli Hong Submitted to the Faculty of the University of Massachusetts Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Worcester in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY December 12, 2017 Program of Cell Biology RUNX1 CONTROL OF MAMMARY EPITHELIAL AND BREAST CANCER CELL PHENOTYPES A Dissertation Presented By Deli Hong This work was undertaken in the Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences Program of Cell Biology The signature of the Thesis Advisor signifies validation of Dissertation content Gary S. Stein, Ph. D., Thesis Advisor The signatures of the Dissertation Defense Committee signify completion and approval as to style and content of the Dissertation Leslie Shaw, Ph.
    [Show full text]
  • Detection of Interacting Transcription Factors in Human Tissues Using
    Myšičková and Vingron BMC Genomics 2012, 13(Suppl 1):S2 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/13/S1/S2 PROCEEDINGS Open Access Detection of interacting transcription factors in human tissues using predicted DNA binding affinity Alena Myšičková*, Martin Vingron From The Tenth Asia Pacific Bioinformatics Conference (APBC 2012) Melbourne, Australia. 17-19 January 2012 Abstract Background: Tissue-specific gene expression is generally regulated by combinatorial interactions among transcription factors (TFs) which bind to the DNA. Despite this known fact, previous discoveries of the mechanism that controls gene expression usually consider only a single TF. Results: We provide a prediction of interacting TFs in 22 human tissues based on their DNA-binding affinity in promoter regions. We analyze all possible pairs of 130 vertebrate TFs from the JASPAR database. First, all human promoter regions are scanned for single TF-DNA binding affinities with TRAP and for each TF a ranked list of all promoters ordered by the binding affinity is created. We then study the similarity of the ranked lists and detect candidates for TF-TF interaction by applying a partial independence test for multiway contingency tables. Our candidates are validated by both known protein-protein interactions (PPIs) and known gene regulation mechanisms in the selected tissue. We find that the known PPIs are significantly enriched in the groups of our predicted TF-TF interactions (2 and 7 times more common than expected by chance). In addition, the predicted interacting TFs for studied tissues (liver, muscle, hematopoietic stem cell) are supported in literature to be active regulators or to be expressed in the corresponding tissue.
    [Show full text]
  • GATA3 As an Adjunct Prognostic Factor in Breast Cancer Patients with Less Aggressive Disease: a Study with a Review of the Literature
    diagnostics Article GATA3 as an Adjunct Prognostic Factor in Breast Cancer Patients with Less Aggressive Disease: A Study with a Review of the Literature Patrizia Querzoli 1, Massimo Pedriali 1 , Rosa Rinaldi 2 , Paola Secchiero 3, Paolo Giorgi Rossi 4 and Elisabetta Kuhn 5,6,* 1 Section of Anatomic Pathology, Department of Morphology, Surgery and Experimental Medicine, University of Ferrara, 44124 Ferrara, Italy; [email protected] (P.Q.); [email protected] (M.P.) 2 Section of Anatomic Pathology, ASST Mantova, Ospedale Carlo Poma, 46100 Mantova, Italy; [email protected] 3 Surgery and Experimental Medicine and Interdepartmental Center of Technology of Advanced Therapies (LTTA), Department of Morphology, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy; [email protected] 4 Epidemiology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42122 Reggio Emilia, Italy; [email protected] 5 Division of Pathology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milano, Italy 6 Department of Biomedical, Surgical, and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, 20122 Milano, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-02-5032-0564; Fax: +39-02-5503-2860 Abstract: Background: GATA binding protein 3 (GATA3) expression is positively correlated with Citation: Querzoli, P.; Pedriali, M.; estrogen receptor (ER) expression, but its prognostic value as an independent factor remains unclear. Rinaldi, R.; Secchiero, P.; Rossi, P.G.; Thus, we undertook the current study to evaluate the expression of GATA3 and its prognostic value Kuhn, E. GATA3 as an Adjunct in a large series of breast carcinomas (BCs) with long-term follow-up. Methods: A total of 702 Prognostic Factor in Breast Cancer consecutive primary invasive BCs resected between 1989 and 1993 in our institution were arranged Patients with Less Aggressive in tissue microarrays, immunostained for ER, progesterone receptor (PR), ki-67, HER2, p53, and Disease: A Study with a Review of GATA3, and scored.
    [Show full text]
  • Mutations and Altered Expression of SERPINF1 in Patients with Familial Otosclerosis Joanna L
    Human Molecular Genetics, 2016, Vol. 25, No. 12 2393–2403 doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddw106 Advance Access Publication Date: 7 April 2016 Original Article ORIGINAL ARTICLE Mutations and altered expression of SERPINF1 in patients with familial otosclerosis Joanna L. Ziff1, Michael Crompton1, Harry R.F. Powell2, Jeremy A. Lavy2, Christopher P. Aldren3, Karen P. Steel4,†, Shakeel R. Saeed1,2 and Sally J. Dawson1,* 1UCL Ear Institute, University College London, London WC1X 8EE, UK, 2Royal National Throat Nose and Ear Hospital, London WC1X 8EE, UK, 3Department of ENT Surgery, The Princess Margaret Hospital, Windsor SL4 3SJ, UK and 4Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton CB10 1SA, UK *To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: þ44 2076798935; Email: [email protected] Abstract Otosclerosis is a relatively common heterogenous condition, characterized by abnormal bone remodelling in the otic capsule leading to fixation of the stapedial footplate and an associated conductive hearing loss. Although familial linkage and candidate gene association studies have been performed in recent years, little progress has been made in identifying disease- causing genes. Here, we used whole-exome sequencing in four families exhibiting dominantly inherited otosclerosis to identify 23 candidate variants (reduced to 9 after segregation analysis) for further investigation in a secondary cohort of 84 familial cases. Multiple mutations were found in the SERPINF1 (Serpin Peptidase Inhibitor, Clade F) gene which encodes PEDF (pigment epithelium-derived factor), a potent inhibitor of angiogenesis and known regulator of bone density. Six rare heterozygous SERPINF1 variants were found in seven patients in our familial otosclerosis cohort; three are missense mutations predicted to be deleterious to protein function.
    [Show full text]
  • Disruption of the Neuronal PAS3 Gene in a Family Affected with Schizophrenia D Kamnasaran, W J Muir, M a Ferguson-Smith,Dwcox
    325 ORIGINAL ARTICLE J Med Genet: first published as 10.1136/jmg.40.5.325 on 1 May 2003. Downloaded from Disruption of the neuronal PAS3 gene in a family affected with schizophrenia D Kamnasaran, W J Muir, M A Ferguson-Smith,DWCox ............................................................................................................................. J Med Genet 2003;40:325–332 Schizophrenia and its subtypes are part of a complex brain disorder with multiple postulated aetiolo- gies. There is evidence that this common disease is genetically heterogeneous, with many loci involved. See end of article for In this report, we describe a mother and daughter affected with schizophrenia, who are carriers of a authors’ affiliations t(9;14)(q34;q13) chromosome. By mapping on flow sorted aberrant chromosomes isolated from lym- ....................... phoblast cell lines, both subjects were found to have a translocation breakpoint junction between the Correspondence to: markers D14S730 and D14S70, a 683 kb interval on chromosome 14q13. This interval was found to Dr D W Cox, 8-39 Medical contain the neuronal PAS3 gene (NPAS3), by annotating the genomic sequence for ESTs and perform- Sciences Building, ing RACE and cDNA library screenings. The NPAS3 gene was characterised with respect to the University of Alberta, genomic structure, human expression profile, and protein cellular localisation to gain insight into gene Edmonton, Alberta T6G function. The translocation breakpoint junction lies within the third intron of NPAS3, resulting in the dis- 2H7, Canada; [email protected] ruption of the coding potential. The fact that the bHLH and PAS domains are disrupted from the remain- ing parts of the encoded protein suggests that the DNA binding and dimerisation functions of this Revised version received protein are destroyed.
    [Show full text]
  • Transcription Factor P73 Regulates Th1 Differentiation
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15172-5 OPEN Transcription factor p73 regulates Th1 differentiation Min Ren1, Majid Kazemian 1,4, Ming Zheng2, JianPing He3, Peng Li1, Jangsuk Oh1, Wei Liao1, Jessica Li1, ✉ Jonathan Rajaseelan1, Brian L. Kelsall 3, Gary Peltz 2 & Warren J. Leonard1 Inter-individual differences in T helper (Th) cell responses affect susceptibility to infectious, allergic and autoimmune diseases. To identify factors contributing to these response differ- 1234567890():,; ences, here we analyze in vitro differentiated Th1 cells from 16 inbred mouse strains. Haplotype-based computational genetic analysis indicates that the p53 family protein, p73, affects Th1 differentiation. In cells differentiated under Th1 conditions in vitro, p73 negatively regulates IFNγ production. p73 binds within, or upstream of, and modulates the expression of Th1 differentiation-related genes such as Ifng and Il12rb2. Furthermore, in mouse experimental autoimmune encephalitis, p73-deficient mice have increased IFNγ production and less dis- ease severity, whereas in an adoptive transfer model of inflammatory bowel disease, transfer of p73-deficient naïve CD4+ T cells increases Th1 responses and augments disease severity. Our results thus identify p73 as a negative regulator of the Th1 immune response, suggesting that p73 dysregulation may contribute to susceptibility to autoimmune disease. 1 Laboratory of Molecular Immunology and the Immunology Center, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892-1674, USA. 2 Department of Anesthesia, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. 3 Laboratory of Molecular Immunology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. 4Present address: Department of Biochemistry and Computer Science, Purdue University, West ✉ Lafayette, IN 37906, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • View Is Portrayed Schematically in Figure 7B
    BASIC RESEARCH www.jasn.org Recombination Signal Binding Protein for Ig-kJ Region Regulates Juxtaglomerular Cell Phenotype by Activating the Myo-Endocrine Program and Suppressing Ectopic Gene Expression † † ‡ Ruth M. Castellanos-Rivera,* Ellen S. Pentz,* Eugene Lin,* Kenneth W. Gross, † Silvia Medrano,* Jing Yu,§ Maria Luisa S. Sequeira-Lopez,* and R. Ariel Gomez* *Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, †Department of Biology, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, and §Department of Cell Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia; and ‡Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York ABSTRACT Recombination signal binding protein for Ig-kJ region (RBP-J), the major downstream effector of Notch signaling, is necessary to maintain the number of renin-positive juxtaglomerular cells and the plasticity of arteriolar smooth muscle cells to re-express renin when homeostasis is threatened. We hypothesized that RBP-J controls a repertoire of genes that defines the phenotype of the renin cell. Mice bearing a bacterial artificial chromosome reporter with a mutated RBP-J binding site in the renin promoter had markedly reduced reporter expression at the basal state and in response to a homeostatic challenge. Mice with conditional deletion of RBP-J in renin cells had decreased expression of endocrine (renin and Akr1b7)and smooth muscle (Acta2, Myh11, Cnn1,andSmtn) genes and regulators of smooth muscle expression (miR- 145, SRF, Nfatc4, and Crip1). To determine whether RBP-J deletion decreased the endowment of renin cells, we traced the fate of these cells in RBP-J conditional deletion mice. Notably, the lineage staining patterns in mutant and control kidneys were identical, although mutant kidneys had fewer or no renin- expressing cells in the juxtaglomerular apparatus.
    [Show full text]
  • Neurons That Regulate Mouse Torpor
    Article Neurons that regulate mouse torpor https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2387-5 Sinisa Hrvatin1,6 ✉, Senmiao Sun1,2,6, Oren F. Wilcox1, Hanqi Yao1, Aurora J. Lavin-Peter1, Marcelo Cicconet3, Elena G. Assad1, Michaela E. Palmer1, Sage Aronson4, Received: 22 January 2020 Alexander S. Banks5, Eric C. Griffith1 & Michael E. Greenberg1 ✉ Accepted: 7 May 2020 Published online: xx xx xxxx The advent of endothermy, which is achieved through the continuous homeostatic Check for updates regulation of body temperature and metabolism1,2, is a defning feature of mammalian and avian evolution. However, when challenged by food deprivation or harsh environmental conditions, many mammalian species initiate adaptive energy-conserving survival strategies—including torpor and hibernation—during which their body temperature decreases far below its homeostatic set-point3–5. How homeothermic mammals initiate and regulate these hypothermic states remains largely unknown. Here we show that entry into mouse torpor, a fasting-induced state with a greatly decreased metabolic rate and a body temperature as low as 20 °C6, is regulated by neurons in the medial and lateral preoptic area of the hypothalamus. We show that restimulation of neurons that were activated during a previous bout of torpor is sufcient to initiate the key features of torpor, even in mice that are not calorically restricted. Among these neurons we identify a population of glutamatergic Adcyap1-positive cells, the activity of which accurately determines when mice naturally initiate and exit torpor, and the inhibition of which disrupts the natural process of torpor entry, maintenance and arousal. Taken together, our results reveal a specifc neuronal population in the mouse hypothalamus that serves as a core regulator of torpor.
    [Show full text]
  • Itcs) in the Mouse Amygdala of Tshz1 Mutants Correlates with Fear, Depression, and Social Interaction Phenotypes
    1160 • The Journal of Neuroscience, January 31, 2018 • 38(5):1160–1177 Development/Plasticity/Repair Loss of Intercalated Cells (ITCs) in the Mouse Amygdala of Tshz1 Mutants Correlates with Fear, Depression, and Social Interaction Phenotypes X Jeffrey Kuerbitz,1 Melinda Arnett,5 Sarah Ehrman,1 XMichael T. Williams,3 XCharles V. Vorhees,3 X Simon E. Fisher,6,7 Alistair N. Garratt,8 XLouis J. Muglia,5 Ronald R. Waclaw,1,4 and XKenneth Campbell1,2 Divisions of 1Developmental Biology, 2Neurosurgery, 3Neurology, 4Experimental Hematology and Cancer Biology, 5Center for Prevention of Preterm Birth, Perinatal Institute, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH 45229, 6Language and Genetics Department, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, 6500 AH Nijmegen, The Netherlands, 7Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, and 8Institute of Cell Biology and Neurobiology, Center for Anatomy, Charite´ University Hospital Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany The intercalated cells (ITCs) of the amygdala have been shown to be critical regulatory components of amygdalar circuits, which control appropriate fear responses. Despite this, the molecular processes guiding ITC development remain poorly understood. Here we establish the zinc finger transcription factor Tshz1 as a marker of ITCs during their migration from the dorsal lateral ganglionic eminence through maturity. Using germline and conditional knock-out (cKO) mouse models, we show that Tshz1 is required for the proper migration and differentiation of ITCs. In the absence of Tshz1, migrating ITC precursors fail to settle in their stereotypical locations encapsulating the lateral amygdala and BLA. Furthermore, they display reductions in the ITC marker Foxp2 and ectopic persistence of the dorsal lateral ganglionic eminence marker Sp8.
    [Show full text]
  • Mediator of DNA Damage Checkpoint 1 (MDC1) Is a Novel Estrogen Receptor Co-Regulator in Invasive 6 Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast 7 8 Evelyn K
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.16.423142; this version posted December 16, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. 1 Running Title: MDC1 co-regulates ER in ILC 2 3 Research article 4 5 Mediator of DNA damage checkpoint 1 (MDC1) is a novel estrogen receptor co-regulator in invasive 6 lobular carcinoma of the breast 7 8 Evelyn K. Bordeaux1+, Joseph L. Sottnik1+, Sanjana Mehrotra1, Sarah E. Ferrara2, Andrew E. Goodspeed2,3, James 9 C. Costello2,3, Matthew J. Sikora1 10 11 +EKB and JLS contributed equally to this project. 12 13 Affiliations 14 1Dept. of Pathology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus 15 2Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Shared Resource, University of Colorado Comprehensive Cancer Center 16 3Dept. of Pharmacology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus 17 18 Corresponding author 19 Matthew J. Sikora, PhD.; Mail Stop 8104, Research Complex 1 South, Room 5117, 12801 E. 17th Ave.; Aurora, 20 CO 80045. Tel: (303)724-4301; Fax: (303)724-3712; email: [email protected]. Twitter: 21 @mjsikora 22 23 Authors' contributions 24 MJS conceived of the project. MJS, EKB, and JLS designed and performed experiments. JLS developed models 25 for the project. EKB, JLS, SM, and AEG contributed to data analysis and interpretation. SEF, AEG, and JCC 26 developed and performed informatics analyses. MJS wrote the draft manuscript; all authors read and revised the 27 manuscript and have read and approved of this version of the manuscript.
    [Show full text]
  • A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of Β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus
    Page 1 of 781 Diabetes A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus Robert N. Bone1,6,7, Olufunmilola Oyebamiji2, Sayali Talware2, Sharmila Selvaraj2, Preethi Krishnan3,6, Farooq Syed1,6,7, Huanmei Wu2, Carmella Evans-Molina 1,3,4,5,6,7,8* Departments of 1Pediatrics, 3Medicine, 4Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, 5Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, the 6Center for Diabetes & Metabolic Diseases, and the 7Herman B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202; 2Department of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, 46202; 8Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202. *Corresponding Author(s): Carmella Evans-Molina, MD, PhD ([email protected]) Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Drive, MS 2031A, Indianapolis, IN 46202, Telephone: (317) 274-4145, Fax (317) 274-4107 Running Title: Golgi Stress Response in Diabetes Word Count: 4358 Number of Figures: 6 Keywords: Golgi apparatus stress, Islets, β cell, Type 1 diabetes, Type 2 diabetes 1 Diabetes Publish Ahead of Print, published online August 20, 2020 Diabetes Page 2 of 781 ABSTRACT The Golgi apparatus (GA) is an important site of insulin processing and granule maturation, but whether GA organelle dysfunction and GA stress are present in the diabetic β-cell has not been tested. We utilized an informatics-based approach to develop a transcriptional signature of β-cell GA stress using existing RNA sequencing and microarray datasets generated using human islets from donors with diabetes and islets where type 1(T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) had been modeled ex vivo. To narrow our results to GA-specific genes, we applied a filter set of 1,030 genes accepted as GA associated.
    [Show full text]
  • A Clinicopathological and Molecular Genetic Analysis of Low-Grade Glioma in Adults
    A CLINICOPATHOLOGICAL AND MOLECULAR GENETIC ANALYSIS OF LOW-GRADE GLIOMA IN ADULTS Presented by ANUSHREE SINGH MSc A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the University of Wolverhampton for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Brain Tumour Research Centre Research Institute in Healthcare Sciences Faculty of Science and Engineering University of Wolverhampton November 2014 i DECLARATION This work or any part thereof has not previously been presented in any form to the University or to any other body whether for the purposes of assessment, publication or for any other purpose (unless otherwise indicated). Save for any express acknowledgments, references and/or bibliographies cited in the work, I confirm that the intellectual content of the work is the result of my own efforts and of no other person. The right of Anushree Singh to be identified as author of this work is asserted in accordance with ss.77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. At this date copyright is owned by the author. Signature: Anushree Date: 30th November 2014 ii ABSTRACT The aim of the study was to identify molecular markers that can determine progression of low grade glioma. This was done using various approaches such as IDH1 and IDH2 mutation analysis, MGMT methylation analysis, copy number analysis using array comparative genomic hybridisation and identification of differentially expressed miRNAs using miRNA microarray analysis. IDH1 mutation was present at a frequency of 71% in low grade glioma and was identified as an independent marker for improved OS in a multivariate analysis, which confirms the previous findings in low grade glioma studies.
    [Show full text]