DOCSLIB.ORG

Monitoring Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Monitoring Report CROSSING THE LINE OF CONTACT MONITORING REPORT June – July 2017 Advocacy, Protection and Legal Assistance to the IDP 2 Contents INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................3 1. METHODOLOGY.........................................................................................................4 2. DEMOGRAPHICS OF RESPONDENTS.......................................................................5 3. RESIDENCE, DISPLACEMENT AND RETURNS..........................................................7 4. FREQUENCY, DURATION AND REASONS FOR CROSSING.....................................8 5. CONCERNS WHILE CROSSING THE LINE OF CONTACT........................................11 6. INABILITY TO CROSS...............................................................................................13 OBSERVATIONS ......................................................................................................14 General observations ..........................................................................................14 Incidents....................................................................................................................15 RECOMMENDATIONS ..........................................................................................................16 Annexes .......................................................................................................................18 Annex 1. Brief information on EECP crossings during June-July.........................18 Annex 2. Observations at EECPs .....................................................................19 vpl.com.ua 3 INTRODUCTION This report is based on the results of a survey conducted by the Charitable Foundation «The Right to Protection» (R2P) at the five entry-exit checkpoints (EECPs) to enter the non-government- controlled area (NGCA) and administered on a regular basis since June 2017. The survey is a part of the monitoring of violations of rights of conflict-affected populations within the framework of the project «Advocacy, Protection and Legal Assistance to the Internally Displaced Population of Ukraine» implemented by R2P with the support of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). The purpose of the survey is to explore reasons and concerns of those travelling from the NGCA to the government-controlled area (GCA), as well as conditions and risks associated with crossing the line of contact through EECPs. The information collected in the survey helps identify needs, gaps and trends, and provides an evidentiary basis for advocacy efforts. Tens of thousands of people cross the five operating EECPs every day. In summer 2017 the total number of people crossing EECPs daily ranged from 30,000 to 40,0001. Since the creation of official corridors for crossing the line of contact, their operation has raised a great number of complaints. The imbalance between the number of such corridors / number of the EECP staff and the number of people wishing to cross the line of contact is obvious. This leads to numerous negative phenomena and significantly limits civilian freedom of movement. Information about long lines, unsatisfactory equipment of the EECPs, corruption and incidents appear regularly in the media and on social networks, inducing human rights advocates to conduct thorough monitoring of observance of the rights of the people crossing the line of contact through the operating EECPs. By observing the crossing processes and studying opinions of persons crossing the line of contact, R2P contributes to monitoring the protection environment and respect for civilians’ rights in the crossing process. Novotroitske EECP 1 The State Border Guard Service statistics Advocacy, Protection and Legal Assistance to the IDP 4 1. METHODOLOGY This report is based on a survey of persons crossing the line of contact at the five operating EECPs located in Donetsk (EECPs Maiorske, Marinka, Hnutove and Novotroitske) and Luhansk (Stanytsia Luhanska) Oblasts. The information collected during the survey is supplemented with observations conducted at each EECP. The survey of persons crossing the line of contact was carried out from 6 June to 31 July 2017. The data was collected during regular visits to each of the five specified EECPs on a weekly basis during June and July (35 and 42 visits respectively). The data collection methodology was the same at all EECPs. R2P monitors surveyed civilians queuing at the EECPs. The survey was conducted anonymously and on a voluntary basis. All the persons interviewed for the survey were informed about its purpose. The survey was conducted in the form of personal interviews with people aged 18 and above. The monitors approached every fourth person in line with a request to complete the survey. If a person refused to participate in the survey, monitors proceeded to survey the next fourth person in line. The monitors reached people waiting to cross the EECPs in the lines for pedestrians and for vehicles2. However, there was no strictly set/demanded proportion for interviews in both lines. People travelling both to and from the GCA took part in the survey. It is noteworthy that there was no established proportion of interviewees depending on the direction of crossing due to the fact that R2P monitors had limited access to the lines of people waiting to cross from the NGCA at some EECPs3. Stanytsia Luhanska EECP Along with the survey, the R2P monitors observed the EECP infrastructure, waiting conditions and other details related to the crossing process. Nevertheless, at all EECPs the monitors had no access to check the situation and waiting conditions further than the last Ukrainian checkpoint (the so- called «zero» checkpoint). At three EECPs (Hnutove, Marinka and Novotroitske), the monitors could observe only lines and areas close to the EECP operational zone from the GCA side. The monitors also noted incidents that took place at the EECPs. So, such information is also included in the report. To get a better understanding of trends and tendencies regarding crossing the line of contact, information from the state services (data from State Border Guard Service of Ukraine) and the external public reports (produced by respective NGOs) was used. 2 Considering that currently, Stanytsia Luhanska EECP is open only for pedestrian crossing, all the respondents interviewed during the survey were from the pedestrian line. There were some restrictions in access to the vehicle line at Maiorske EECP. Consequently, most respondents interviewed at this particular EECP were from the pedestrian line. At the rest of the EECPs (Hnutove, Marinka and Novotroitske) people from both types of lines were interviewed. 3 R2P monitors had access to individuals waiting in the lines from the NGCA side crossing into the GCA at Maiorske and Stanytsia Luhanska EECPs only. vpl.com.ua 5 2. DEMOGRAPHICS OF RESPONDENTS During the reporting period, R2P monitors surveyed a total of 4,290 persons crossing the line of contact. 38 per cent of the respondents were male and 62 per cent were female. The majority of the respondents were over 25 years old; age disaggregation is similar at all five checkpoints. AGE DISAGGREGATION 6,3% ‒ 18-25 22,5% ‒ 65 + ‒ 25-40 43,8% ‒ 40-65 27,5% More than 500 people were interviewed at each of the five EECPs over the reporting period with the following breakdown by location: NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS 785 522 ‒ Hnutove ‒ Stanytsia Luhanska 1065 801 ‒ Maiorske ‒ Novotroitske 1117 ‒ Marinka The majority of interviewed persons were travelling to the NGCA4. DIRECTION OF CROSSING to NGCA to GCA Hnutove 36,6% 63,4% Maiorske 97,4% 2,6% Marinka 96,5% 3,5% Novotroitske 47,5% 52,5% Stanytsia Luhanska 45,6% 54,4% 4 Such proportion of the respondents travelling in different directions is caused by the fact that the surveyors had limited access to people waiting to travel from the NGCA (near Ukrainian zero checkpoint or inside EECP operational zone). Advocacy, Protection and Legal Assistance to the IDP 6 11 per cent of the respondents who crossed the line of contact were travelling with children. Less than 5 per cent were persons with specific needs. To improve crossing conditions for such persons, a new version of the Temporary Order was amended and states that people who accompany children under 3 years old, elderly persons, women with visible signs of pregnancy and persons with specific needs can bypass the checkpoint line and cross ahead of others. According to the previous informal rules, only people with babies up to one year old were allowed to use the expedited line. Only 10 per cent of respondents stated that they belonged to a category entitled to a simplified crossing procedure with the following breakdown by category: RESPONDENTS ENTITLED TO EXPEDITED CROSSING 44,5% 2,8% other specific needs 47,3% children under 3 54,9% 1,9% pregnant elderly 5 According to Order no. 590 of 28 November 2016. https://ssu.gov.ua/ua/pages/32 vpl.com.ua 7 3. RESIDENCE, DISPLACEMENT AND RETURNS The predominant majority of respondents (91,3 per cent) indicated the NGCA as their place of residence prior to the conflict. It is noteworthy that 79,6 per cent of them stated that they were permanently residing in the NGCA at the time of the survey. DISPLACEMENT 7,9% Moved several times but did not return 45,8% 46,2% Moved once and still residing Moved but then returned at initial displacement location 27 per cent of all the respondents stated that they had changed their place of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Report on the Human Rights Situation in Ukraine 16 May to 15 August 2018
    Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Report on the human rights situation in Ukraine 16 May to 15 August 2018 Contents Page I. Executive summary .......................................................................................................................... 1 II. OHCHR methodology ...................................................................................................................... 3 III. Impact of hostilities .......................................................................................................................... 3 A. Conduct of hostilities and civilian casualties ............................................................................. 3 B. Situation at the contact line and rights of conflict-affected persons ............................................ 7 1. Right to restitution and compensation for use or damage of private property ..................... 7 2. Right to social security and social protection .................................................................... 9 3. Freedom of movement, isolated communities and access to basic services ...................... 10 IV. Right to physical integrity ............................................................................................................... 11 A. Access to detainees and places of detention ............................................................................ 11 B. Arbitrary detention, enforced disappearance and abduction, torture and ill-treatment ............... 12 C. Situation
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Report 32/2021 10 February 20211
    - 1 - 1 Daily Report 32/2021 10 February 20211 Summary The SMM recorded ten ceasefire violations in Donetsk region. In the previous reporting period, it recorded 42 ceasefire violations in the region. The Mission recorded 40 ceasefire violations in Luhansk region. In the previous reporting period, it recorded five ceasefire violations in the region. The Mission continued monitoring the disengagement areas near Stanytsia Luhanska, Zolote and Petrivske, and again saw containers inside and near the southern edge of the area near Zolote. The Mission facilitated and monitored adherence to localized ceasefires to enable operation and maintenance of critical civilian infrastructure and a transfer of funds. The SMM continued following up on the situation of civilians, including at five entry- exit checkpoints and two corresponding checkpoints of the armed formations in Donetsk and Luhansk regions. The SMM’s freedom of movement continued to be restricted, including at a checkpoint of the armed formations near Bezimenne and on a road near non- government-controlled Korsun, Donetsk region.* Ceasefire violations2 Number of recorded ceasefire violations3 Number of recorded explosions4 1 Based on information from the Monitoring Teams as of 19:30, 9 February 2021. All times are in Eastern European Time. 2 For a complete breakdown of ceasefire violations, please see the annexed table. During the reporting period, the SMM camera in Petrivske was not operational, and weather conditions limited the observational capabilities of some of the other SMM cameras. 3 Including explosions. 4 Including from unidentified weapons. - 2 - Map of recorded ceasefire violations - 3 - In Donetsk region, the SMM recorded ten ceasefire violations, including nine explosions (five undetermined and four outgoing, all of undetermined weapons), which occurred in areas on the north-western edge of Horlivka (non-government-controlled, 39km north-east of Donetsk) and near the Donetsk Filtration Station (DFS) (15km north of Donetsk).
    [Show full text]
  • Mental Health in Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts - 2018
    Mental health in Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts - 2018 1 Content List of abbreviations....................................................................................................................................... 3 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 4 2. METHODOLOGY OF THE RESEARCH ....................................................................................................... 6 3. RESUME .................................................................................................................................................. 8 4. RECOMMENDATIONS BASED ON THE FINDINGS OF THE RESEARCH .................................................. 13 5. PREVALENCE OF MENTAL HEALTH PROBLEMS AMONG THE PEOPLE LIVING IN DONETSK AND LUHANSK OBLASTS ...................................................................................................................................... 16 А. Detecting the traumatic experience .................................................................................................... 16 B. Prevalence of symptoms of PTSD, depression, anxiety disorder, excess alcohol consumption. ........ 18 C. Prevalence of mental health problems among the inner circle of the respondents .......................... 27 D. Indicators of mental well-being .......................................................................................................... 27 6. ACCESS TO ASSISTANCE WHEN SUFFERING FROM
    [Show full text]
  • Lysychansk City Profile Eastern Ukraine 2019 DOWNLOAD
    LYSYCHANSK CITY PROFILE 2019 GOOD GOVERNANCE Lysychansk 15 cities* 7.1 TRUST IN MAYOR OR 1.6 HEAD OF THE TOWN TRUST IN TOWN 2.2 ADMINISTRATION 2.4 2.3 TRUST IN POLICE 3.5 PERCEIVED LEVEL ACCOUNTABILITY UKRAINIAN OF CORRUPTION OF AUTHORITIES AUTHORITIES CARE TRUST IN OBLAST STATE 3.0 Feeling that authorities ADMINISTRATION represent citizens’ concerns and views, TRUST IN 76 % of citizens in Lysychansk believe equally care about all NON-GOVERNMENTAL 5.0 parliamentarians, judges, and prosecutors parts of Ukraine and are ORGANIZATIONS can be bribed. ready to listen 0 2 4 6 8 10 Recommended initiatives to strengthen trust in local authorities could focus on transparent communication of their actions to increase accountability and responsiveness to citizens’ needs. Promote activities connecting citizens and their local administration to raise awareness about reforms, available public services, and anti- corruption initiatives. COMMUNITY BONDS SOCIAL PROXIMITY Accepting members of different socio-demographic groups as their close friends and colleagues Lysychansk 15 cities* PEOPLE FROM 6.4 EASTERN UKRAINE SOCIAL PROXIMITY CONFIDENCE THAT IDPS 5.7 PEOPLE FROM 5.8 DIFFERENT GROUPS WILL LISTEN PEOPLE LIVING 5.2 IN THE NGCA CONTACT WITH 2.4 DIFFERENT GROUPS PEOPLE FROM 5.0 0 2 4 6 8 10 WESTERN UKRAINE PRO-EU 5.0 MEDIA CONSUMPTION ORIENTED PEOPLE INFORMATION ATO/JFO MILITARY CONSUMPTION FROM 6.7 5.0 PERSONNEL FRIENDS AND FAMILY ONLINE MEDIA 5.3 PRO-RUSSIA 4.4 CONSUMPTION ORIENTED PEOPLE 0 2 4 6 8 10 0 2 4 6 8 10 Media consumption in Lysychansk is among the lowest People in Lysychansk feel the lowest social proximity across all 15 cities.
    [Show full text]
  • ENGLISH Only
    SEC.FR/876/20 29 December 2020 OSCE+ ENGLISH only THEMATIC REPORT CHECKPOINTS ALONG THE CONTACT LINE: CHALLENGES CIVILIANS FACE WHEN CROSSING 1 November 2019 - 15 November 2020 December 2020 1 Published by the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine © OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine 2020 All rights reserved. The contents of this publication may be freely used and copied for non-commercial purposes, provided that any such reproduction is accompanied by an acknowledgement of the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine as the source. Available electronically in English, Ukrainian and Russian at: http://www.osce.org/ukraine-smm 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive summary 4 Introduction 7 Chapter 1: Legislative and regulatory developments 9 Measures taken at the entry-exit checkpoints (EECP) and at the corresponding checkpoints of the 9 armed formations amid the COVID-19 outbreak (16 March to 10 June 2020) Regulatory developments following the partial reopening of the EECPs and of the corresponding check- 10 points (10 June to 15 November 2020) Other developments 12 Chapter 2: Impact on civilians of the freedom of movement restrictions and of the crossing requirements 14 after the partial reopening of the EECPs and the corresponding checkpoints Impact of freedom of movement restrictions on access to rights and services 14 Partial reopening of the EECPs and corresponding checkpoints, and burden of crossing requirements 18 on civilians Chapter 3: Opening of the Stanytsia Luhanska bridge and construction works near Zolote and Shchas- 22 tia Opening of the renovated section of the Stanytsia Luhanska bridge 22 Construction and works near Shchastia and Zolote 22 Conclusion 26 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Crucial aspects of the lives of civilians in the conflict-affected areas of eastern Ukraine depend on their ability to cross the contact line.
    [Show full text]
  • NRC: Profiling of IDP Situation in Luhansk Region, Ukraine
    ProfilingAnnual of IDP situation Report in Luhansk Region, Ukraine Data-drivenfrom approach the toBoard durable solutions 2019 Acknowledgements NRC would like to thank NRC staff and Mr. Petr Kostohryz, JIPS staff, members of the Techni- cal Working Group and the Advisory Group, Luhansk State Regional Administration, in partic- ular the Social Protection Department, Prof. Volodymyr Sarioglo, Analytical Center Sociocon- sulting, NGO Stabilisation Support Services, Luhansk Regional IDP Council. List of Abbreviations CSO Civil Society Organisation GCA Government-Controlled Area (includes any government-controlled area in Ukraine not limited to Luhansk or Donetsk regions) GDP Gross Domestic Product IASC Inter-Agency Standing Committee IDP Internally Displaced Person JIPS Joint IDP Profiling Service NGCA Non-Government Controlled Area NGO Non-Governmental Organisation NRC Norwegian Refugee Council SME Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise SSS NGO Stabilisation Support Services UAH Ukrainian Hryvnia UN United Nations Profiling of IDP situation in Luhansk Region, Ukraine Data-driven approach to durable solutions 2 Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary ...............................................................4 2. Introduction .......................................................................5 3. Methodology ......................................................................7 4. Limitations ........................................................................7 5. International Standards and National Frameworks on Durable Solutions
    [Show full text]
  • Committee of Ministers Secretariat Du Comite Des Ministres
    SECRETARIAT GENERAL SECRETARIAT OF THE COMMITTEE OF MINISTERS SECRETARIAT DU COMITE DES MINISTRES Contact: Clare OVEY Tel: 03 88 41 36 45 Date: 12/01/2018 DH-DD(2018)32 Documents distributed at the request of a Representative shall be under the sole responsibility of the said Representative, without prejudice to the legal or political position of the Committee of Ministers. Meeting: 1310th meeting (March 2018) (DH) Item reference: Action plan (09/01/2018) Communication from Ukraine concerning the case of NEVMERZHITSKY v. Ukraine (Application No. 54825/00) * * * * * * * * * * * Les documents distribués à la demande d’un/e Représentant/e le sont sous la seule responsabilité dudit/de ladite Représentant/e, sans préjuger de la position juridique ou politique du Comité des Ministres. Réunion : 1310e réunion (mars 2018) (DH) Référence du point : Plan d’action Communication de l’Ukraine concernant l’affaire NEVMERZHITSKY c. Ukraine (requête n° 54825/00) (anglais uniquement) DH-DD(2018)32 : Communication from Ukraine. Documents distributed at the request of a Representative shall be under the sole responsibility of the said Representative, without prejudice to the legal or political position of the Committee of Ministers. DGI 09 JAN. 2018 Annex to the letter of the Agent of Ukraine SERVICE DE L’EXECUTION before the European Court of Human Rights DES ARRETS DE LA CEDH of 05 January 2018 no. 190/5.2.1/ін-18 Updated Action plan on measures to be taken for implementation of the European Court’s judgments in the cases of Nevmerzhitsky group v. Ukraine (application no. 54825/00, judgment of 05/04/2005, final on 12/10/2005); Yakovenko group (Application No.
    [Show full text]
  • Sievierodonetsk (Luhansk Oblast) 18 June 2015
    General Coordination Meeting – Sievierodonetsk (Luhansk Oblast) 18 June 2015 Discussion Action Points/Decisions 1. Summary of steps taken based on decisions of the previous meeting by UN OCHA OCHA to follow up on the implications of new Temporary Order of entry/exit to NGCAs for humanitarian cargo UN OCHA summarized activities based on the decisions of the last General Coordination Meeting. The movement. issue of unaccompanied minors is being addressed both at oblast and national levels. WHO keeps checking if tuberculin was delivered to all raions of the oblast. For the moment, it is confirmed that Bilovodsk, Milove and Markivka raions and Lysychansk didn’t receive it. WHO and UN OCHA had the meetings with the authorities in Bilovodsk, Milove and Markivka raions. The maternity hospital in Bilovodsk serves three raions and many women come for delivery from NGCAs of the oblast. The authorities asked to support the hospital with hygiene kits both for women and for newborns. At the national level UN OCHA continues to provide support in the development of the Law on “humanitarian assistance”. It is expected that the draft is finalized by June 30 and then passed for discussion to the Parliament of Ukraine. As of today only 30% of required funding has been funded or pledged as part of Humanitarian Response Plan (HRP). The new Temporary Order on entry/exit to NGCAs has been adopted and came into force. For the moment no commercial cargoes are permitted to NGCAs due to security situation. 2. Update of the current humanitarian situation in Oblast from UN OCHA and LOMCA SES to share the estimated costs of transition center with the humanitarian partners for their participation in The number of officially registered IDPs is growing despite of difficulties in crossing the contact line.
    [Show full text]
  • Donbas, Ukraine: Organizations and Activities
    Geneva Centre for Security Sector Governance Civil Society in Donbas, Ukraine: Organizations and Activities Volodymyr Lukichov Tymofiy Nikitiuk Liudmyla Kravchenko Luhansk oblast DONBAS DONBAS Stanytsia Donetsk Luhanska Zolote oblast Mayorske Luhansk Donetsk Maryinka Novotroitske RUSSIA Hnutove Mariupol Sea of Azov About DCAF DCAF - Geneva Centre for Security Sector Governance is dedicated to improving the se- curity of people and the States they live in within a framework of democratic governance, the rule of law, and respect for human rights. DCAF contributes to making peace and de- velopment more sustainable by assisting partner states and international actors supporting them to improve the governance of their security sector through inclusive and participatory reforms. It creates innovative knowledge products, promotes norms and good practices, provides legal and policy advice and supports capacity building of both state- and non-state security sector stakeholders. Active in over 70 countries, DCAF is internationally recognized as one of the world’s leading centres of excellence for security sector governance (SSG) and security sector reform (SSR). DCAF is guided by the principles of neutrality, impartiality, local ownership, inclusive participation, and gender equality. www.dcaf.ch. Publisher DCAF - Geneva Centre for Security Sector Governance P.O.Box 1360 CH-1211 Geneva 1 Switzerland [email protected] +41 (0) 22 730 9400 Authors: Volodymyr Lukichov, Tymofiy Nikitiuk, Liudmyla Kravchenko Copy-editor: dr Grazvydas Jasutis, Richard Steyne
    [Show full text]
  • Latest from the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine (SMM), Based on Information Received As of 19:30, 29 April 20 | OSCE
    4/30/2018 Latest from the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine (SMM), based on information received as of 19:30, 29 April 20 | OSCE Latest from the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine (SMM), based on information received as of 19:30, 29 April 20 KYIV 30 April 2018 This report is for the media and the general public. The SMM recorded more ceasere violations in Donetsk region and fewer in Luhansk region between the evenings of 27 and 28 April, compared with the previous reporting period. Between the evenings of 28 and 29 April, it recorded fewer ceasere violations in Donetsk and Luhansk regions, compared with the previous 24 hours. The Mission continued monitoring the disengagement areas near Stanytsia Luhanska, Zolote and Petrivske; it recorded ceasere violations inside the Petrivske and the Stanytsia Luhanska disengagement areas; its access remained restricted there and elsewhere, including in Izvaryne, Kadiivka and Voznesenivka.* Members of the armed formations told an SMM patrol that it would be detained if it did not comply with requests to inspect SMM vehicles at a checkpoint north of Horlivka*. The SMM observed weapons in violation of withdrawal lines on both sides of the contact line. The SMM observed damage in residential areas in Pikuzy and Bila Hora and followed up on reports of civilian casualties in Dokuchaievsk and Donetsk city. It continued to facilitate access to the Donetsk Filtration Station for Voda Donbassa employees and heard ceasere violations in the area, including by a multiple launch rocket system, despite security guarantees. The SMM also continued to facilitate and monitor repairs to power lines near Yuzhna-Lomuvatka and conrmed that Vodafone services had been restored in several non-government-controlled areas of Donetsk region.
    [Show full text]
  • Places of Illegal Detention
    EASTERN-UKRAINIAN CENTER FOR CIVIC INITIATIVES PLACES OF ILLEGAL DETENTION IN EASTERN UKRAINE DURING THE MILITARY CONFLICT HDIM WARSAW 2016 AUTHORS Volodymyr Shcherbachenko Ganna Ianova Olexandr Pavlichenko "JUSTICE FOR PEACE IN DONBAS" COALITION The Coalition was established in December 2014 and includes 17 NGOs, mainly from the Ukrainian regions of Donetsk and Luhansk. The Coalition members are: Alchevsk Human Rights Analytical Centre, Centre for Civil Liberties / Euromaidan SOS, Civic Organization “Kharkiv Human Rights Protection Group,” Donbas SOS, Donetsk "Memorial," Eastern-Ukrainian Centre for Civic Initiatives, Ecological and Cultural Centre “Bakhmat,” Human Rights Centre “Postup” / Vostok SOS, Luhansk Regional Human Rights Centre “Alternative,” Luhansk Rights Defence Group, Public Committee for Protection of Constitutional Rights and Freedoms of Citizens, Public Movement “Ochyshchennya,” Public Organization “Mirny bereg,” “Social Action” Centre NGO, Starobilsk District Public Human Rights Women’s Organization “Victoria,” Starobilsk Public Organization CONTEXT he armed conflict in Eastern Ukraine led to numerous gross and systemic violations of human rights on the territory of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions, in particular the establishment of a network of illegal T detention places by Ukrainian army and Russia-backed separatists. International human rights law and international humanitarian law prohibit arbitrary detention.1 Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions, applicable in both international and non-international armed
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights in Eastern Ukraine During the Coronavirus Pandemic
    Human rights in Eastern Ukraine during the coronavirus pandemic Results of monitoring along the Line of Contact IN LIMBO February This report is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development 8-12 (USAID). The contents are the responsibility of PROGRESS and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. HUMAN RIGHTS IN EASTERN UKRAINE DURING THE CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC 3 Results of monitoring along the Line of Contact February 8-12 Introduction Before the COVID-19 pandemic, there were over one million crossings per month on average at the entry-exit checkpoints (EECPs) to cross between government-controlled areas of Ukraine and areas controlled by Russia-backed separatists.1 Safe crossing for civilians through the EECPs at the Line of Contact (LoC), the demarcation line separating government- and non-government-controlled areas, is essential. This is especially important for many elderly residents living in non-government- controlled areas, who must cross through EECPs to access government pensions, withdraw cash, collect documents, or purchase medicine or food. Since the COVID-19 pandemic, numerous and shifting guidelines and quarantine restrictions have dramatically increased the difficulty of crossing the LoC via the EECPs. Due to all these factors, those who have been near or tried crossing the EECPs often feel unsafe. Crossing the LoC during the COVID-19 pandemic also entails several additional requirements, not all of which people can fulfill. These requirements include having a suitable smartphone to install an obligatory mobile application, Vdoma, when not all crossers have smartphones or internet access; self-isolation requirements; and allowing time for delays in processing documents required from the crossers by either Ukrainian or so-called “Donetsk People’s Republic (DNR)/Luhansk People’s Republic (LNR)” de facto authorities.
    [Show full text]