DOCSLIB.ORG

EHT Master Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
EHT Master Plan Egg Harbor Township Master Plan Atlantic County, New Jersey Prepared For: Egg Harbor Township Planning Board 3515 Bargaintown Road Egg Harbor Township, New Jersey 08234 Prepared By: 3122 Fire Road, Suite 201 Egg Harbor Township, New Jersey 08234 Vincent J. Polistina, PE, PP, CME New Jersey PE No. 41978 New Jersey PP No. 5595 Adopted April 15, 2002 Revised October, 2002 Amendments Adopted November 13, 2002 Township of Egg Harbor Master Plan 2002 Governing Body James J. McCullough, Jr., Mayor Francis Sutton, Deputy Mayor John Carman, Jr. Stanley R. Glassey Robert Reed Planning Board Members 2001 Planning Board Members 2002 Ralph Henry, Chairman Ralph Henry, Chairman Michael Duffy, Vice-Chairman Michael Duffy, Vice Chairman Charles Eykyn John Carman, Jr. Jane Flipping, Alt. No. 1 Charles Eykyn James Garth Jane Flipping, Alt. No. 1 Robert Levy James Garth Carolyn Maltz Robert Levy James McCullough Carolyn Maltz Peter Miller James McCullough Dorothy Saslav, Alt. No. 2 Peter Miller Francis Sutton Dorothy Saslav, Alt. No. 2 Planning Board Staff Theresa Wilbert, Land Use Administrator Kathy Fiedor James Varallo Patty Chatigny, Zoning Officer Several previously adopted planning documents were utilized in the preparation of this Master Plan. These documents are included as references as indicated below: 1982 Master Plan by E. Eugene Oross Associates 1988 Reexamination Report by Adams, Rehmann and Heggan Associates 1988 Land Use Element by Adams, Rehmann and Heggan Associates 1991 Natural Resources Inventory by Adams, Rehmann and Heggan Associates 1992 Land Use Element by Adams, Rehmann and Heggan Associates 1993 Open Space and Recreation Plan by Adams, Rehmann and Heggan Associates 1994 Reexamination Report by Randall E. Scheule 1996 Housing Element by Randall E. Scheule 1998 Housing Element and Fair Share Plan by Randall E. Scheule 2000 Reexamination Report by James A. Mott TABLE OF CONTENTS Background Studies Chapter 1 - Introduction.......................................................................................................... 1-1 Chapter 2 - History.................................................................................................................. 2-1 Chapter 3 - Demographic Profile ............................................................................................ 3-1 Chapter 4 - Economic Profile.................................................................................................. 4-1 Chapter 5 – Housing Profile.................................................................................................... 5-1 Chapter 6 – Existing Utility Service ....................................................................................... 6-1 Chapter 7 - Existing Land Use Plan........................................................................................ 7-1 Chapter 8 – Future Projections ............................................................................................... 8-1 A. Population B. Housing C. Economic D. Education E. Transportation Master Plan Chapter 9 – Statement of Goals, Objectives, Assumptions .................................................... 9-1 Chapter 10 – Conservation Element ..................................................................................... 10-1 Chapter 11 – Recreation / Open Space Element ................................................................... 11-1 Chapter 12 – Land Use Element ........................................................................................... 12-1 Chapter 13 - Relationship of Egg Harbor Master Plan to Other Plans ................................. 13-1 Chapter 14 - Recommendations............................................................................................ 14-1 Appendix 1998 Housing Element prepared by Randall E. Scheule and adopted by the Planning Board on May 27, 1998 LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES Tables Table No. Title 3-1 Population Estimates, 1930 – 2000 3-2 Population Densities, 1980, 1990, 2000 3-3 Number of Persons Enrolled in Educational Facilities 4-1 Number of Employed Residents 4-2 Unemployment Rates, 1990 – 2000 4-3 Location of Largest Employers 4-4 Casino Employment 5-1 Number of Housing Units, 1990 & 2000 5-2 Residential Building Permits Issued, 1980 - 2001 6-1 Wastewater Flows 6-2 Solid Waste Collection 8-1 Population Estimates, 2001 - 2010 8-2 Population Densities, 2000 & 2010 8-3 Major Developments Approved since 1995 8-4 Number of Housing Units, 2000 - 2010 8-5 Number of Employed Residents 8-6 Number of Persons Enrolled in Public Schools 8-7 Proposed Improvements (EHT Board of Education) 10-1 Average Monthly Temperature and Precipitation 10-2 Average Rainfall Intensity 10-3 Hydrologic Budget Analysis Data 10-4 Water Quality Station Data 10-5 Groundwater Quality Criteria 10-6 Upland Forest Species 10-7 Lowland Forest Species – Pitch Pine Lowland Forest 10-8 Lowland Forest Species – Hardwood Swamp Forest 10-9 Lowland Forest Species – Cedar Swamp Forest 10-10 Lowland Forest Species – Pond and Bog-Shrub Wetland 10-11 Saltwater Marsh Species 10-12 Wetland Vegetation – Coastal 10-13 Wetland Vegetation – Inland 10-14 Population Estimates, 1930 – 2010 10-15 Housing Units, 1990 & 2000 10-16 Building Permits Issued, 1980 - 1999 10-17 Proposed Developments – CRW & RA Zones 10-18 Zoning Districts in Proposed River Conservation Zone 11-1 County Land in EHT Acquired through Dedicated Open Space Tax 11-2 Recreational Amenities at Parks throughout the Township 11-3 Recreational Amenities at Public Schools throughout the Township 11-4 General Standards for Recreational Facilities 11-5 County Priority Level 1 Sites 12-1 Minimum Lot Areas – Pinelands Zones 12-2 Land Use Compatibility in Noise Exposure Zones 12-3 Pinelands Mandated Residential Units – Master Plan 1993 12-4 Pinelands Mandated Residential Units – Master Plan 2002 Figures Figure No. Title 3-1 Population Estimates, 1930 – 2000 3-2 Population by Age Groups 3-3 Percent of Population Enrolled in School 3-4 Educational Attainment in Population 25 Years or Older 4-1 Occupation by Percent 4-2 Largest Employers 5-1 Residential Building Permits Issued, 1980 – 2000 6-1 Sanitary Sewer Availability 7-1 Existing Land Use Map 7-2 Existing Zoning Map 8-1 Population Estimates, 2000 – 2010 10-1 Watersheds 10-2 Water Bodies 10-3 Topography 10-4 Flood Prone Areas 10-5 Soil Types 10-6 Vegetation 10-7 Population Estimates, 1930 – 2010 10-8 Residential Building Permits, 1980 - 1999 10-9 River Management Boundary Map 11-1 Open Space / Recreation Map 12-1 Pinelands Regional Growth Area 12-2 Proposed Zoning Map 12-3 Compatible Land Use Zones (CLUZ) Map 13-1 Neighboring Municipalities 13-2 State Planning Areas Chapter 1: Introduction As indicated in the Egg Harbor Township Master Plan Reexamination report of July, 2000, significant changes in State legislation along with continued pressure from the growth mandated by the Pinelands Commission have resulted in the need for Egg Harbor Township to review its Master Plan and development regulations. The Reexamination Report recommended a comprehensive review of the Master Plan and Land Use Element for possible modifications geared towards growth management issues. The Township has experienced an unprecedented level of growth during the past five (5) years and it now faced with the need for a revision to the Master Plan and Land Use Element. The statutory requirements for the Master Plan are established in NJSA 40:55D-28 (Municipal Land Use Law). At a minimum, in order for the Township to establish valid zoning and land development standards, the Master Plan must contain the following: 1) A statement of the objectives, principles, assumptions, policies and standards upon which the constituent proposals for the physical, economic and social development of the municipality are based. 2) A land use plan element (a) taking into account and stating its relationship to the statement provided for in paragraph (1) hereof, and other master plan elements provided for in paragraphs (3) through (13) hereof and natural conditions, including, but not necessarily limited to, topography, soil conditions, water supply, drainage, flood plain areas, marshes, and woodlands; (b) showing the existing and proposed location, extent and intensity of development of land to be used in the future for varying types of residential, commercial, industrial, agricultural, recreational, educational and other public and private purposes or combination of purposes; and stating the relationship thereof to the existing and any proposed plan and zoning ordinance; and (c) showing the existing and proposed location of any airports and the boundaries of any airport safety zones delineated pursuant to the “Air Safety and Zoning Act of 1983,” P.L. 1983, c. 260 (C. 6:1-80 et seq.); and (d) including a statement of the standards of population density and development intensity recommended for the municipality; 3) A housing plan element pursuant to section 10 of P.L. 1985, c. 222 (C. 52:27D-310), including, but not limited to, residential standards and proposals for the construction and improvement of housing. The Master Plan must also contain a specific policy statement indicating the relationship of the proposed development of the municipality, as developed in the master plan to (1) the master plans of contiguous municipalities, (2) the master plan of the county in which the municipality is located, (3) the State Development and Redevelopment Plan adopted pursuant to the “State Planning Act,” sections 1 through 12 of P.L. 1985, c. 398
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Trends and Challenges in Brownfield Revitalization: a Gis Based Approach
    XVII International Scientific Conference on Industrial Systems (IS'17) Novi Sad, Serbia, October 4. – 6. 2017. University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Technical Sciences, Department for Industrial Engineering and Management Available online at http://www.iim.ftn.uns.ac.rs/is17 TRENDS AND CHALLENGES IN BROWNFIELD REVITALIZATION: A GIS BASED APPROACH Jelena Ignjatić (Urban and Spatial Planning Institute of Vojvodina, Železnička 6/III, Novi Sad, 21000 Serbia, [email protected]) Bojana Nikolić (University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Technical Sciences, Trg Dositeja Obradovića 6, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia, [email protected]) Aeksandar Rikalović (University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Technical Sciences, Trg Dositeja Obradovića 6, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia, [email protected]) Abstract Brownfield sites have negative effects on the spatial, economic, environmental and social aspects of community life. During the past decades, examples of good practice around the world showed that the revitalization of brownfields contributed to material and non-material prosperity, and the realization of a sustainable economic and social development. Once large corporations, who represented the foundation of economic development of Vojvodina, Serbia, are now mainly devastated and powerless to independently find a solution for revitalization. Investors are faced with the problem of non-defined, disorganized and unregulated locations, but primarily with the lack of associated database, which would shorten the process of selecting the most suitable location. To activate brownfield sites, it is necessary to pinpoint these locations, and conduct a detailed analysis. When it comes to trends in revitalization of brownfields in the practice of other countries, the use of geographic information systems (GIS) has proven to be one of the most effective tools for visualization of attributes of the brownfields in terms of socio-economic factors, the environment, and the immediate surrounding of the location.
    [Show full text]
  • Growing Smarter in Plymouth's Fifth Century; Master Plan 2004-2024
    i PLYMOUTH PLANNING BOARD LORING TRIPP, Chair PAUL MCALDUFF NICHOLAS FILLA, Vice Chair WENDY GARPOW, ALTERNATE LARRY ROSENBLUM MALCOLM MCGREGOR PLYMOUTH MASTER PLAN COMMITTEE (2004) ENZO MONTI, Chair JOHN MARTINI RUTH AOKI, Vice Chair LARRY ROSENBLUM AILEEN DROEGE IRA SMITH SASH ERSKINE LORING TRIPP ELAINE SCHWOTZER LUTZ CHARLES VANDINI PREVIOUS MEMBERS OF THE MASTER PLAN COMMITTEE THOMAS BOTT JAMES MASON TERRY DONOGHUE MARY MULCAHY WILLIAM FRANKS DON QUINN ROBERTA GRIMES ROBERT REIFEISS REBECCA HALL TOM WALLACE GERRE HOOKER BRIAN WHITFIELD LOUISE HOUSTON MARK WITHINGTON TOM MALONEY DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT LEE HARTMANN, AICP MASTER PLAN CONSULTANT MICHAEL PESSOLANO EDITING AND GRAPHIC DESIGN: GOODY, CLANCY & ASSOCIATES Photos: Larry Rosenblum Paul McAlduff Goody Clancy Thanks to everyone in Plymouth who helped create the Master Plan. GROWING SMARTER IN PLYMOUTH’S FIFTH CENTURY Town of Plymouth, Massachusetts Master Plan, 2004–2024 Plymouth Planning Board Master Plan Committee August 2006 Table of Contents VISION STATEMENT FOR PLYMOUTH, MASSACHUSETTS MASTER PLAN OVERVIEW 1. LAND USE 2. NATURAL RESOURCES 3. OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 4. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL RESOURCES 5. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 6. PUBLIC FACILITIES/SERVICES 7. TRANSPORTATION APPENDIX: MAPS vi Vision Statement for Plymouth, Massachusetts In 20 years, the Town of Plymouth will be a beautiful, maturing community with vibrant and pleasant village centers, a preserved and enhanced historic heritage, long stretches of accessible coastline, integrated areas of commerce and compact housing, and vast, connected areas of open space set aside for preservation, outdoor activities, and appreciation of nature. Plymouth will retain its outstanding visual character, de- fined by clean ponds, rivers, wetlands, coastline, and forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwaters Where a License Is Required to Fish with Handline, Rod and Line Or Long Bow and Arrow Listed by County and Alphabetically by Name of Water
    Freshwaters where a license is required to fish with handline, rod and line or long bow and arrow Listed by county and alphabetically by name of water. A license is required upstream of each location. ATLANTIC COUNTY Oranoken Creek–Whitecar Mill, North of Beaver Dam Long Swamp Creek–Washington Street Bridge, Toms Absecon Creek–Dam at Lower Atlantic City Reservoir Oyster Creek–None–all saline water River Great Egg Harbor River–Power lines at confluence of Riggins Ditch–Route 47 Manahawkin Creek–Dams for Manahawkin W.M.A. Gravelly Run Sow and Pigs Branch Nantuxent–None–all saline impoundments bayside Middle River–None–all saline water water Metedeconk River–Rt. 70 Bridge, Laurelton Mullica River–Line between Seventh Ave., Sweetwater, Stow Creek–Buckhorn Rd. Bridge, Jericho Mill Creek–Mouth of Creek at lagoons in Beach Haven and ramp at Crowleys Landing Straight Creek–None–all saline water West Nacote Creek–Port Republic Dam West Creek–100 ft. below West Creek Lake Dam Mill Creek–Pine Beach–Ocean Gate Road Patcong Creek–Bargaintown Lake Dam (Pickle Factory Pond) Oyster Creek–Route 9 South River–Power lines immediately below Route 50 ESSEX COUNTY Parkers Run–None–all saline water Tuckahoe River–First northerly tributary downstream Passaic River–Erie Railroad Bridge between Newark Potters Creek–None–all saline water of Rt. 49 Bridge (McNeals Branch) (at Verona Ave.) and Kearny Stouts Creek–None–all saline water BERGEN COUNTY Peddie Ditch–None–all saline water Stouts Creek S. Br.–Bayside East Parkway Hackensack River–Cedar Lane Bridge between
    [Show full text]
  • An Exploratory Study of Awareness and Perceived Relevance of Gis Among General Contractors in the Usa
    www.itcon.org - Journal of Information Technology in Construction - ISSN 1874-4753 AN EXPLORATORY STUDY OF AWARENESS AND PERCEIVED RELEVANCE OF GIS AMONG GENERAL CONTRACTORS IN THE USA SUBMITTED: November 2018 REVISED: June 2019 PUBLISHED: July 2019 at https://www.itcon.org/2019/18 EDITOR: Amor R. Anne Arendt, Associate Professor; Utah Valley University, Department of Technology Management [email protected] Armen Ilikchyan, Assistant Professor; Utah Valley University, Department of Technology Management [email protected] Robert Warcup, Associate Professor; Utah Valley University, Department of Construction Technologies [email protected] SUMMARY: This document analyzes the awareness and perceived relevance of geographic information systems and related technologies by construction industry general contractors via an exploratory survey of individuals in the field. A quantitative survey was developed based on an extensive literature review and meta-analysis. The survey was then administered at the Association of General Contractors (AGC) 2018 convention in New Orleans, LA. Eighty-eight construction industry related individuals participated. When asked if they were familiar with GIS, a tool for organizing data so it can be displayed and analyzed based on its geospatial characteristics, 32.95% (n=29) said they were not, 57.95% (n=51) said they were, and 9.09% (n=8) did not respond to the question. The researchers further assessed respondents who stated yes to familiarity with GIS or left it blank in depth. Within this group, the greatest perceived relevance was in property and site survey maps (4.37 average), digital mapping (4.22 average), engineering surveys (3.95 average), and topographic or planimetric mapping (3.95 average).
    [Show full text]
  • HAILEY WOODS Urban Planning Portfolio
    HAILEY WOODS Urban Planning Portfolio 1 Hailey Woods CONTACT INFORMATION EDUCATION JOB EXPERIENCE 1212 W. Rex Street Bachelors of Urban Planning Muncie, Indiana 47304 and Development Chillers Microcreamery [email protected] Ball State University May 2011-August 2016 - Shift Manager (502) 468-2030 Historic Preservation Minor Responsibilities include overseeing co-workers, customer service, handling complaints and solving problems, and training new employees SKILLS RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Emens Auditorium Software Floyd County Planning Office August 2014-Current - Ticket Sales Associate • ArcGIS May 2016-August 2016 Responsibilities included interacting with the • InDesign Planning Intern community, customer service, answering phones, and sales • Photoshop • Contributed demographic • Microsoft Office research and analysis for updated • Community Analyst by ESRI comprehensive plan REFERENCES • SketchUP • Designed document template using InDesign for the Comprehensive Don Lopp Plan Urban Planning Director of Planning and Operations • Developed alternative site plans for • Conducting site analysis a community center and baseball (812) 948-4110 • Researching and analyzing park [email protected] census data • Developing alternative Bachelors of Urban Planning and Trevor Young solutions Development Capstone Project Owner of Chillers Microcreamery August 2016-December 2016 (812) 987-1298 • Writing initiatives, memos, PLAN 401 Field Studio [email protected] and reports • Creating goals and • Served on a team of students to Lisa Dunaway, AICP, LEED AP objectives create an Urban Redevelopment Instructor of Urban Planning • Collaborating with Plan for the City of Portland, Indiana (765) 285-1906 • Conducted surveys and interviews [email protected] community members with residents • Public Participation • Participated in 4 community • Public Speaking meetings throughout the semester 2 3 CONTENTS 01. Urban Infill Project Phase 1: Analysis | 8 Phase 2: Alternatives | 10 Phase 3: Final Proposal | 12 02.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Pinelands Natural Heritage Trail Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan
    Southern Pinelands Natural Heritage Trail Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan Task 3: Intrinsic Qualities November 2008 Taintor & Associates, Inc. Whiteman Consulting, Ltd. Paul Daniel Marriott and Associates CONTENTS PART 1: INTRINSIC QUALITIES................................................................................................. 1 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 3 Overview: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Intrinsic Qualities............................................................ 3 2. Natural Quality ........................................................................................................................ 5 Introduction........................................................................................................................................... 5 Environmental History and Context...................................................................................................... 6 Indicators of Significance...................................................................................................................... 7 Significance as a Leader in Environmental Stewardship ................................................................... 17 The Major Natural Resources of the Pinelands and Their Significance............................................. 17 3. Recreational Quality ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Places to Fish-P65
    SEGMENTS OF PUBLICLY OWNED NEW JERSEY STREAMS OPEN TO ANGLING If you’ve ever looked around for a nice stretch of stream to fish and have run into a host of “No Trespassing” signs, the following list is for you. It’s a list of stream stretches publicly owned and open to the general angler. These represent only a small percent of the approximately 8,600 miles of freshwater streams in the State, however, these waters should provide stretches of uninterrupted “hassle free” fishing. Also included is a generalized description of the major gamefish and panfish population present as well as the recreational facilities available. —GOOD LUCK— ABBREVIATIONS AGENCY N.J.D.F. & W New Jersey Division of Fish and Wildlife LEGEND N.J.D.P. & F. New Jersey Division of Parks and Forestry FISHING QUALITY U.S.N.P.S. United States National Park Service 1—Very good U.S.F. & W.S. United States Fish & Wildlife Service 2—Good AREA 3—Fair D.W.G.N.R.A. Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area 4—Poor or none WMA Wildlife Management Area 5—Trout Available Only During NWR National Wildlife Refuge Stocking Period FACILITIES 6—Trout Available During Entire N—No Legal Fishing Season Y—Yes Length (mi.) Av. Width (ft.) Av. Swimming Area Picnicking Cabins Campsites Trout Smallmouth Bass Largemouth Bass Largemouth Pickerel Stream Agency Area Nearest Town(s) Catfish/Eels ATLANTIC COUNTY Mullica River N.J.D.P. & F. Wharton St. Forest Sweetwater-Jackson 14.0 150 N Y Y Y 4 4 4 2 2 BERGEN COUNTY Ramapo River County Ramapo Valley Mahwah 1.0 70 N Y N N 5 3 3 3 3 Reservation Saddle River County Saddle River Park Ridgewood 0.5 30 N Y N N 5 4 4 4 3 Saddle River Municipal Lake St.
    [Show full text]
  • Site Plan Instructions P1
    Planning Division Submittal Requirements PLAN INSTRUCTIONS PROJECT DRAWINGS: The following drawings and information must be included with your application submittal. Note that in the City of West Hollywood, drawings must be prepared and certified by licensed design professionals (Architect and Landscape Architect) and engineering professionals (Surveyor, Civil Engineer, Structural Engineer, Soils/Geotechnical Engineer, Seismic Engineer, etc.) In accordance with State Law, professionals are not permitted to stamp and sign documents or drawings that have not been prepared by them under their direct supervision. Please note that larger projects are subject to the Concurrent Plan Check Process. 1. ARCHITECTURAL DRAWING CONVENTIONS a. Provide north indication arrow, and orient plans with north toward the top (if possible); b. Plan must be drawn to scale, with scale indicated. Use Engineer’s or Architect’s scale: 1” = 10’, 1/4” = 1’, etc.; c. Indicate demolished walls with dashed lines, walls to remain as solid lines and new walls filled; d. Provide correct submittal date on all drawing sheets; e. Use line weights properly-(i.e. heaviest for elements that are cut through, lightest for transparent elements, door swings, etc.); f. Show stairs accurately with arrows indicating direction; g. Show all property lines. Do not use edge of paper for property lines. 2. PROJECT DATA (should be included on cover sheet or site plan sheet) a. Include Index Sheet with all plan sets; b. Address and legal description of subject property; c. Name, address and phone number of the applicant, owner and architect; d. Existing and proposed land use and number of stories; e. Building square footage ; f.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Residential Development, Planning, and Zoning in Arlington County, Virginia
    A History of Residential Development, Planning, and Zoning in Arlington County, Virginia April 2020 Acknowledgements This report would not have been possible without the guidance and feedback from Arlington County staff, including Mr. Russell Danao-Schroeder, Ms. Kellie Brown, Mr. Timothy Murphy, and Mr. Richard Tucker. We appreciate your time and insights. Prepared by Dr. Shelley Mastran Jennifer Burch Melissa Cameron Randy Cole Maggie Cooper Andrew De Luca Jose Delcid Dinah Girma Owain James Lynda Ramirez-Blust Noah Solomon Alex Wilkerson Madeline Youngren Cover Image Source: https://www.flickr.com/photos/arlingtonva/29032004740/in/album-72157672142122411/ i Table of Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................................................................................ i Prepared by ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... i Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................................................................................. ii Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................................................................................... iii Key Findings ...............................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Environmentally Sensitive Areas Guidance Document
    New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Release Prevention ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS GUIDANCE DOCUMENT Revised September 2014 Introduction This guidance on environmentally sensitive areas is intended for use as a reference and a guide when gathering information to be used in preparing the topographical maps for Discharge Prevention, Containment and Countermeasure (DPCC), and Discharge Cleanup and Removal (DCR) Plans. It gathers in one place all the citations listed in N.J.A.C. 7:1E-1.8, which establishes the definition of environmentally sensitive areas (ESA) for the purpose of developing the DPCC/DCR plan. The areas described in this document are by no means the only ESA in New Jersey, but represent those most likely to be adversely affected by a discharge of a hazardous substance. When used in conjunction with the requirements of N.J.A.C. 7:1E-4.10, Mapping criteria, it will prove useful in preparing the topographical maps and the offsite response measures that are required as part of the DCR plan. Additional information concerning the certification of ESA information is available in A Guide to the Preparation of Discharge Prevention, Containment and Countermeasure (DPCC) and Discharge Cleanup and Removal (DCR) Plans and Plan Renewals, available on the Bureau of Release Prevention website at http://www.nj.gov/dep/rpp/brp/dp/index.htm. N.J.A.C. 7:1E-4.2(b)9 requires that topographical maps be included in the DPCC plan, while N.J.A.C. 7:1E-4.10(d) requires that these maps cover all surrounding areas which could be affected by a discharge from the facility, including ESA.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommended Drawing Numbering, Scales and Dimensioning 1 / 3
    Recommended Drawing Numbering, Scales and Dimensioning 1 / 3 Architectural Drawings: General: G101 Cover Sheet G102 General Information G201 Live Safety Plan Civil: C100 Site Topo Plan C200 Demolition Plan C300 Site Staking/Signing/Striping/Erosion Control Plan C400 Grading & Drainage Plan C500 Utility Plan Landscape: I‐1 Irrigation Plan I‐2 Irrigation Details L‐1 Landscape Plan L‐2 Landscape Details Architectural: AC01 Overall Architectural Site Plan AC02 Enlarged Architectural Site Plan AC03 Site Plan Details A001 Finish Schedule & Legend A002 Opening Schedule, Elevations A101 Floor Plan A102 Dimension Plan A103 Lower Roof Plan A104 Upper Roof Plan A105 Canopy Plan and Details A111 Enlarged Floor Plans A201 Exterior Elevations A201 Exterior Elevations A301 Building Sections A302 Building Sections A311 Wall Sections A312 Details – Curved Roof A313 Details – Curved Roof A316 Wall Partition Types A321 Plan Details A331 Section Details A332 Typical Details and Profiles A341 Roof Details A351 Interior Column Details A401 Interior Elevations A402 Interior Elevations A501 Reflected Ceiling Plan A601 Equipment Plan Recommended Drawing Numbering, Scales and Dimensioning 2 / 3 The recommendation scales* for key architectural drawings are as follows: Site plan – engineering scale 1:20 or similar, depend upon size of site Arch Floor Plan – 1/8” Arch Ceiling Plan – 1/8” Arch Roof Plan – 1/8” or 1/16” – (try to show roof as one drawing view) Interiors Floor Finish Plan – 1/8” Interiors Furniture Plan – 1/8” Enlarged Arch Floor Plans – ¼” or larger as needed (typically the toilet rooms) Arch Exterior Elevations – 1/8” Arch Building Section – ¼” or ½” if needed for a specialty area (ie lobby) Arch typical wall sections – ¾” Wall types (wall sections or plan views) – 1 ½” Details ‐ Plan and Section – 1 ½” or 3” Interior Elevations – ¼” or 3/8” as needed *Note: set up each drawing on a 42” x 30” page.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Create a Site Plan Site Plan: a Drawing of a Property As Seen from Above, Including, but Not Limited to a North Arrow, Grand Tree Locations, and Date
    How to create a Site Plan Site Plan: A drawing of a property as seen from above, including, but not limited to a north arrow, grand tree locations, and date. Show proposed improvements with exact size, shape and location of all existing and proposed buildings and structures, parking areas, driveways, walkways and patios. 1 Use a Scale Choose a standard scale, either an Architectural or Engineering Scale and note the numeric scale used on plan (i.e. 1 inch = 20 feet). Draw Property Lines 2 Label all dimensions in feet. A plat of the neighborhood may help you in determining the dimensions of the parcel. This may be available Show the property lines from the RMC office of the county in and note the dimensions. which the property is located. Draw all Buildings and Structures on the Plan 3 • Show existing buildings and structures as a solid line and all additions as a dashed line. • Be sure to show the precise footprint of all buildings or structures including, but not limited to steps, decks, porches, fences, bay windows and HVAC platforms. Draw Driveway and Parking on the Plan 4 Show all parking areas, driveways, walkways and patios in their precise locations in relation to your property lines and with their accurate foot- print. Show proposed paved areas with a dashed line. Locate Grand Trees 5 • A Grand Tree is a tree with a diameter at 4 1/2 feet above grade that is 24 inches or greater. • Use a dot to indicate the precise location of the center of the tree.
    [Show full text]