DOCSLIB.ORG

New Jersey Future Van Abs 2014 Pinelands Growth Area Water

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
New Jersey Future Van Abs 2014 Pinelands Growth Area Water Effects of Land Development on Water Resources of the Pinelands Region Prepared for New Jersey Future by Daniel J. Van Abs, PhD, PP/AICP Principal Investigator Rutgers – The State University of New Jersey School of Environmental and Biological Sciences Department of Human Ecology 55 Dudley Road, New Brunswick, NJ 08903 e: [email protected] p: (848) 932-9432 June 2014 Cover photo credit: Van Abs Effects of Land Development on Water Resources of the Pinelands Region Daniel J. Van Abs, Oliver Stringham, Yuling Gao and Tim Evans June 2014 Contents Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................... v Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................... vii Overview of Target Area Results.............................................................................................................xiii Evesham/Medford Target Area ..........................................................................................................xiii Hammonton Target Area .................................................................................................................... xiv Little Egg Harbor/Tuckerton Target Area ............................................................................................ xiv Changes in Subwatershed Integrity ........................................................................................................ xv Water Quality .......................................................................................................................................... xvi Water Availability ................................................................................................................................... xvii Water Utilities ....................................................................................................................................... xviii Development Potential and Impacts ....................................................................................................... xx Recommendations .................................................................................................................................. xxi Considerations for State Agency Action ............................................................................................. xxi County and Municipal Actions ........................................................................................................... xxv Issues for Further Evaluation ............................................................................................................. xxv Chapter 1: Overview of Target Areas ............................................................................................................ 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 1 History and Pinelands Management Areas ............................................................................................... 1 Municipal Land Development Status ........................................................................................................ 3 Target Area Subwatersheds ...................................................................................................................... 4 Population and Employment Status and Trends ...................................................................................... 5 Municipal Development Potential ............................................................................................................ 7 Chapter 2: Watershed Characterization and Integrity................................................................................ 11 Evesham/Medford Target Area .............................................................................................................. 12 Land use/land cover and trends ......................................................................................................... 12 Impervious surfaces ............................................................................................................................ 16 Riparian areas and trends ................................................................................................................... 18 Flood prone areas and trends ............................................................................................................. 21 Forest areas and trends ...................................................................................................................... 23 Wetland areas and trends ................................................................................................................... 25 Ground water recharge ....................................................................................................................... 27 Protected areas ................................................................................................................................... 29 Summary for Target Area .................................................................................................................... 30 Hammonton Target Area ........................................................................................................................ 31 Land use/land cover and trends ......................................................................................................... 31 i Effects of Land Development on Water Resources of the Pinelands Region Impervious surfaces ............................................................................................................................ 34 Riparian areas and trends ................................................................................................................... 37 Flood prone areas and trends ............................................................................................................. 39 Forest areas and trends ...................................................................................................................... 39 Wetland areas and trends ................................................................................................................... 41 Ground water recharge ....................................................................................................................... 41 Protected areas ................................................................................................................................... 43 Summary for Target Area .................................................................................................................... 45 Tuckerton/Little Egg Harbor Township Target Area ............................................................................... 46 Land use/land cover and trends ......................................................................................................... 46 Impervious surfaces ............................................................................................................................ 49 Riparian areas and trends ................................................................................................................... 51 Flood prone areas and trends ............................................................................................................. 53 Forest areas and trends ...................................................................................................................... 55 Wetland areas and trends ................................................................................................................... 57 Ground water recharge ....................................................................................................................... 57 Protected areas ................................................................................................................................... 60 Summary for Target Area .................................................................................................................... 61 McDonalds Branch Comparison Area ..................................................................................................... 62 Overview and Summary .......................................................................................................................... 63 Chapter 3: Water Quality ............................................................................................................................ 65 Surface Water Quality Standards ............................................................................................................ 65 Surface Water Quality – Chemical and Physical ..................................................................................... 70 Surface Water Quality – Biological ......................................................................................................... 72 SWQS Violations...................................................................................................................................... 74 Ground Water Quality Standards ........................................................................................................... 78 Ground Water Quality............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2002 Integrated List of Waterbodies
    Appendix IA State of New Jersey's Sublist 1 2002 Integrated List of Waterbodies Phosphorus,Fecal Coliform, pH, Temperature, Atlantic Dissolved Oxygen, Nitrate, TSS, Unionized Coast 15 Absecon Creek S Br near Pomona 01410455 Ammonia NJDEP/USGS Data Atlantic Phosphorus, Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen, Coast 14 Albertson Br near Elm 0140940970 Nitrate, Dissolved Solids, Unionized Ammonia USGS/Pinelands Data Phosphorus,Fecal Coliform, pH, Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen, Nitrate, Dissolved Solids, NJDEP/USGS Data, Metal Northwest 11 AssunpInk Creek near Clarksville 01463620, 11-AS-2 TSS, Unionized Ammonia Recon Phosphorus, Fecal Coliform, Temperature, Atlantic Dissolved Oxygen, Nitrate, Dissolved Solids, Coast 15 Babcock Creek near Mays LandIng 01411196 TSS, Unionized Ammonia NJDEP/USGS Data Phosphorus, Temperature, Nitrate, Unionized Raritan 09 Barclay Brook near Englishtown 01405285 Ammonia NJDEP/USGS Data Phosphorus, Fecal Coliform, pH, Temperature, Atlantic Dissolved Oxygen, Nitrate, TSS, Unionized Coast 14 Bass River E Br near New Gretna 01410150 Ammonia NJDEP/USGS Data Phosphorus, Fecal Coliform, Temperature, Atlantic Dissolved Oxygen, Nitrate, Dissolved Solids, NJDEP/USGS Data, Metal Coast 14 Batsto River at Batsto 01409500, 14-BAT-1 TSS, Unionized Ammonia, Chromium, Zinc Recon Atlantic Phosphorus, Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen, Coast 14 Batsto River at Hampton Furnace 01409432 Nitrate, Dissolved Solids, Unionized Ammonia USGS/Pinelands Data Atlantic Phosphorus, Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen, Coast 14 Batsto River at Quaker Bridge 01409470
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwaters Where a License Is Required to Fish with Handline, Rod and Line Or Long Bow and Arrow Listed by County and Alphabetically by Name of Water
    Freshwaters where a license is required to fish with handline, rod and line or long bow and arrow Listed by county and alphabetically by name of water. A license is required upstream of each location. ATLANTIC COUNTY Oranoken Creek–Whitecar Mill, North of Beaver Dam Long Swamp Creek–Washington Street Bridge, Toms Absecon Creek–Dam at Lower Atlantic City Reservoir Oyster Creek–None–all saline water River Great Egg Harbor River–Power lines at confluence of Riggins Ditch–Route 47 Manahawkin Creek–Dams for Manahawkin W.M.A. Gravelly Run Sow and Pigs Branch Nantuxent–None–all saline impoundments bayside Middle River–None–all saline water water Metedeconk River–Rt. 70 Bridge, Laurelton Mullica River–Line between Seventh Ave., Sweetwater, Stow Creek–Buckhorn Rd. Bridge, Jericho Mill Creek–Mouth of Creek at lagoons in Beach Haven and ramp at Crowleys Landing Straight Creek–None–all saline water West Nacote Creek–Port Republic Dam West Creek–100 ft. below West Creek Lake Dam Mill Creek–Pine Beach–Ocean Gate Road Patcong Creek–Bargaintown Lake Dam (Pickle Factory Pond) Oyster Creek–Route 9 South River–Power lines immediately below Route 50 ESSEX COUNTY Parkers Run–None–all saline water Tuckahoe River–First northerly tributary downstream Passaic River–Erie Railroad Bridge between Newark Potters Creek–None–all saline water of Rt. 49 Bridge (McNeals Branch) (at Verona Ave.) and Kearny Stouts Creek–None–all saline water BERGEN COUNTY Peddie Ditch–None–all saline water Stouts Creek S. Br.–Bayside East Parkway Hackensack River–Cedar Lane Bridge between
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Pinelands Natural Heritage Trail Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan
    Southern Pinelands Natural Heritage Trail Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan Task 3: Intrinsic Qualities November 2008 Taintor & Associates, Inc. Whiteman Consulting, Ltd. Paul Daniel Marriott and Associates CONTENTS PART 1: INTRINSIC QUALITIES................................................................................................. 1 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 3 Overview: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Intrinsic Qualities............................................................ 3 2. Natural Quality ........................................................................................................................ 5 Introduction........................................................................................................................................... 5 Environmental History and Context...................................................................................................... 6 Indicators of Significance...................................................................................................................... 7 Significance as a Leader in Environmental Stewardship ................................................................... 17 The Major Natural Resources of the Pinelands and Their Significance............................................. 17 3. Recreational Quality ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Places to Fish-P65
    SEGMENTS OF PUBLICLY OWNED NEW JERSEY STREAMS OPEN TO ANGLING If you’ve ever looked around for a nice stretch of stream to fish and have run into a host of “No Trespassing” signs, the following list is for you. It’s a list of stream stretches publicly owned and open to the general angler. These represent only a small percent of the approximately 8,600 miles of freshwater streams in the State, however, these waters should provide stretches of uninterrupted “hassle free” fishing. Also included is a generalized description of the major gamefish and panfish population present as well as the recreational facilities available. —GOOD LUCK— ABBREVIATIONS AGENCY N.J.D.F. & W New Jersey Division of Fish and Wildlife LEGEND N.J.D.P. & F. New Jersey Division of Parks and Forestry FISHING QUALITY U.S.N.P.S. United States National Park Service 1—Very good U.S.F. & W.S. United States Fish & Wildlife Service 2—Good AREA 3—Fair D.W.G.N.R.A. Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area 4—Poor or none WMA Wildlife Management Area 5—Trout Available Only During NWR National Wildlife Refuge Stocking Period FACILITIES 6—Trout Available During Entire N—No Legal Fishing Season Y—Yes Length (mi.) Av. Width (ft.) Av. Swimming Area Picnicking Cabins Campsites Trout Smallmouth Bass Largemouth Bass Largemouth Pickerel Stream Agency Area Nearest Town(s) Catfish/Eels ATLANTIC COUNTY Mullica River N.J.D.P. & F. Wharton St. Forest Sweetwater-Jackson 14.0 150 N Y Y Y 4 4 4 2 2 BERGEN COUNTY Ramapo River County Ramapo Valley Mahwah 1.0 70 N Y N N 5 3 3 3 3 Reservation Saddle River County Saddle River Park Ridgewood 0.5 30 N Y N N 5 4 4 4 3 Saddle River Municipal Lake St.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmentally Sensitive Areas Guidance Document
    New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Release Prevention ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS GUIDANCE DOCUMENT Revised September 2014 Introduction This guidance on environmentally sensitive areas is intended for use as a reference and a guide when gathering information to be used in preparing the topographical maps for Discharge Prevention, Containment and Countermeasure (DPCC), and Discharge Cleanup and Removal (DCR) Plans. It gathers in one place all the citations listed in N.J.A.C. 7:1E-1.8, which establishes the definition of environmentally sensitive areas (ESA) for the purpose of developing the DPCC/DCR plan. The areas described in this document are by no means the only ESA in New Jersey, but represent those most likely to be adversely affected by a discharge of a hazardous substance. When used in conjunction with the requirements of N.J.A.C. 7:1E-4.10, Mapping criteria, it will prove useful in preparing the topographical maps and the offsite response measures that are required as part of the DCR plan. Additional information concerning the certification of ESA information is available in A Guide to the Preparation of Discharge Prevention, Containment and Countermeasure (DPCC) and Discharge Cleanup and Removal (DCR) Plans and Plan Renewals, available on the Bureau of Release Prevention website at http://www.nj.gov/dep/rpp/brp/dp/index.htm. N.J.A.C. 7:1E-4.2(b)9 requires that topographical maps be included in the DPCC plan, while N.J.A.C. 7:1E-4.10(d) requires that these maps cover all surrounding areas which could be affected by a discharge from the facility, including ESA.
    [Show full text]
  • Steady-State Computer Model of the Water-Table Aquifer in the Mullica River Basin, the Pine Barrens, New Jersey
    STEADY-STATE COMPUTER MODEL OF THE WATER-TABLE AQUIFER IN THE MULLICA RIVER BASIN, THE PINE BARRENS, NEW JERSEY By Arlen W. Harbaugh and Carol L. Tilley U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water Resources Investigations Report 84-4295 Prepared in cooperation with the NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES and the U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS Trenton, New Jersey 1984 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WILLIAM P. CLARK, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information, Copies of this report can write to: be purchased from: District Chief Open-File Services Section U.S. Geological Survey Western Distribution Branch Room 418, Federal Building U.S. Geological Survey 402 East State Street Box 25425, Federal Center Trenton, New Jersey 08608 Lakewood, Colorado 80225 CONTENTS Page Abstract ••... ..................... 1 Introduction •.. 1 Hydrogeology. 3 Physiographic features .. 3 Geologic features .•. 3 Hydrology ....•...• 4 Hydrologic cycle. 7 Steady-state model development .. 7 Model design. 9 Streams and swamps. 9 Grid design ....... 10 Boundary conditions ... 10 Model input data ... 12 Aquifer •. 12 Stream. 12 Stress. 15 Model calibration .. 15 Performance criteria. 15 Results ..... 19 Summary and conclusions .. 25 References cited .. 28 Appendix ........ 29 Model stream stage .. 30 Streambed conductance. 33 Model-simulated water leve 1 .. 36 iii ILLUSTRATIONS Page Figure 1. Map showing location of Mullica River basin, Pine Barrens, and Wharton State Forest............ 2 2. Block diagram of uppermost Coastal Plain sediments.. 6 3. Hydrologic cycle of Mullica River basin section..... 8 4. Map of model grid and boundaries .................... 11 5. Map of simulated altitude of base of Kirkwood- Cohansey aquifer system ..........................
    [Show full text]
  • Prepared in Cooperation with the NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT of ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, DIVISION of WATER RESOURCES
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY LOW-FLOW CHARACTERISTICS AND FLOW DURATION OF NEW JERSEY STREAMS By Brian D. Gillespie and Robert D. Sehopp Open-File Report 81-1110 Prepared in cooperation with the NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES Trenton, New Jersey January 1982 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR JAMES G. WATT, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director Tor additional information, write to: U.S. Geological Survey Room 430, Federal Building 402 East State Street Trenton, New Jersey 08608 Ill CONTENTS Page Abstract................................................... 1 Introduction............................................... 1 Method of study ............................................ 2 Flow-duration analysis..................................... 5 Low-flow frequency analysis................................ 7 Continuous gaging stations............................... 7 Partial-record sites..................................... 10 Selected references........................................ 14 Low-flow characteristics of gaging sites................... 15 Hudson, Hackensack, Passaic, Elizabeth, and Rahway River basins.............................................. 17 Station index, in downstream order..................... 19 Station descriptions and data.......................... 21 Raritan River basin...................................... 53 Station index, in downstream order..................... 55 Station descriptions and data.........................
    [Show full text]
  • An Assessment of Sewer and Water Supply Alternatives for Pinelands Growth Areas in the Mullica River Basin, Camden County
    AN ASSESSMENT OF SEWER AND WATER SUPPLY ALTERNATIVES FOR PINELANDS GROWTH AREAS IN THE MULLICA RIVER BASIN, CAMDEN COUNTY NEW JERSEY PINELANDS COMMISSION MAY 1988 AN ASSESSMENT OF SEWER AND WATER SUPPLY ALTERNATIVES FOR PINELANDS GROWTH AREAS IN THE MULLICA RIVER BASIN, CAMDEN COUNTY Prepared by the Staff of the New Jersey Pinelands Commission May, 1988 NEW JERSEY PINELANDS COMMISSION P.O. Box 7, New Lisbon, NJ 08064 TABLE OF CONTENTS page Intro.duction ........................................ 1 S;t:lld~ ~JrE!Cl •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 3 Existing Land Use and Land Cover •••••••••••••••••••• 6 Existing Sewer Service ••••••••••••••••••.••••••••••• 11 Estimated Buildout ................................. 12 Water Quality Assessment •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 15 Wetlands and Transitional Areas ••••••••••••••••••••• 24 Threatened and Endangered Species ••••••••••••••••••• 25 Estimates of Stream Flow Characteristics •••••••••••• 27 Hydrologic Budget and Nutrient Loading •••••••••••••• 34 Exi sting Condi tions ................................ 44 Water Supply and Sewage Disposal Alternatives ••••••• 47 Summary of Scenarios and Recommendations •••••••••••• 58 References . 59 INTRODUCTION In February 1987, the Pinelands commission received notice of the Camden County Municipal Utilities Authority's intention to propose a 208 water quality management plan for Chesilhurst Borough, Waterford Township, and Winslow Town­ ship, which was submitted to the Department of Environmental Protection for review and conceptual approval. The proposal recommended the transfer of existing and future sewage flows from Regional Growth Areas located in the three Atlantic Basin municipalities to the Delaware Basin. Information which was subsequently provided to the Commission by the Camden County Municipal Utilities Authority (CCMUA) indi­ cated that the ultimate design flow for this interbasin transfer was 3.6 million gallons per day and 2.75 million gallons per day from the Mullica River Basin and Great Egg Harbor River Basin, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Egg Harbor River Boat Dock
    1 likit4( _________ NOV 15 nal Supt. Exec /C (40r' (NF'S/PHSO/S&P-C) CI-15014%LS° Supt. Re: Gregory Norell Permit Application 315 Old River Road; Mays Landing, NJ Frank Cianfrani, Chief Regulatory Branch Department of the Army - Phila. District Wanarna.ker Building 100 Penn Square East Philadelphia, PA 19107-3390 Dear Mr. Cianfrani: We have received information from the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. regarding an application to legalize and extend the dock located at 315 Old River Road in Mays Landing. The proposed structure would be approximately 165 feet channelward for the mooring of private boats in the Great Egg Harbor National Scenic and Recreational River. We have reviewed the above referenced permit pursuant to section 7(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, as amended (P.L. 90-542) which states "no department or agency of the United States shall assist by loan, grant, license, or otherwise in the construction of any water resources project that would have a direct and adverse effect on the values for which such river was established, as determined by the Secretary charged with its administration." National Park Service authority under Section 7(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act has been upheld in federal district court. In the case of the United States versus Kenneth Harris in 1992 a decision was rendered that upheld the removal of an illegal dock on the Little Miami River. In 1998 in Sierra Club, et al., versus United States, the federal district court clarified what constitutes a "water resources project" and also upheld the authority to review such projects under Section 7(a).
    [Show full text]
  • New Jersey Estuaries Finfish Resource Assessment
    .. """ . Technical Report New Jersey Estuaries Finfish Resource Assessment Phase I: Literature Summarv.., Kenneth W. Able and Susan C. Kaiser Det.-ember l W4 Marine Field Statiun . d Coastal St:tences [nstitute ot Manne a_n .. f New Jersey 1 Rumers. The State U mverstty l K087 • Tuckenon. New Jersey 0 Contribution g4-xx TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ii LIST OF FIGURES ii I?'JTRODLCTION SCOPE RESULTS 2 Finfish Literature Summaries by Estuary Fiufish Literature Re'View.~ by E~tullfy LITERATURE CITED 60 APPENDIX 1: Checklist of New Jersey Estuarine Fishes 69 APPENDIX II: List of Unavailable and/or Marginal Literurure 77 LIST OF T.-\BLES TJble i. List llf estuanne syo.;rems ror finfish literature summaries 3 Table 2. List ot common and scientific.: names of fishes in summaries 5 Table 3-1: Finfish literature summary for Hudson River 9 Table 3-2. Finfish literature summary for Newark Bay 17 Table 3-3. Finfish literature summary for Raritan River & BayiNew York Harbur 18 Table 3-..J.. Finfish literature summary for Sandy Hook Bay 20 Table 3-5. Finfish literature summary for Shark River 23 Table 3-6. Finfish literuture sununary fm Manasquan Ri'fer 24 Table 3-7. Finfish liter..tture summary for Barnegat Bay 26 Table 3-X. Finfish liter..tture summary for Little Egg Harbor 34 Table 3-lJ. Finfish literature summary for Mullic.:a River & Great Bay 38 Table 3-10. Finfish litemture summary for Brig-..tntine 45 Table 3-ll. Finfish literature :mmll14lry for Great Egg Harbor 47 Table 3-12. Finfish literature summary for Corson\ fnlet ..J.X Table 3-13.
    [Show full text]
  • Work Plan for the Kirkwood Cohansey Project
    THE KIRKWOOD-COHANSEY PROJECT WORK PLAN PINELANDS COMMISSION AUGUST 11, 2003 THE KIRKWOOD-COHANSEY PROJECT WORK PLAN AUGUST 11, 2003 Contributors to Development of the Work Plan U. S. Geological Survey (USGS) Robert Nicholson Anthony Navoy, Ph.D. Jonathan G. Kennen, Ph.D. Rutgers University (Rutgers) Joan G. Ehrenfeld, Ph.D. Richard G. Lathrop, Ph.D. Ming Xu, Ph.D. N. J. Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) Kathleen Strakosch Walz Laura Nicholson U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Clifford G. Day Carlo Popolizio Lisa Arroyo Pinelands Commission (PC) John C. Stokes Robert A. Zampella, Ph.D. John F. Bunnell Kim J. Laidig Nicholas A. Procopio Larry L. Liggett Richard Federman Russell Davis Pinelands Commission P.O. Box 7 New Lisbon, NJ 08064 INTRODUCTION New Jersey Public Law 2001, Chapter 165 directs the Pinelands Commission to assess and prepare a report on the key hydrologic and ecological information needed to determine how the current and future water-supply needs within the Pinelands area may be met while protecting the Kirkwood- Cohansey aquifer system and avoiding any adverse ecological impact on the Pinelands area. The aquifer assessment is to be implemented in cooperation with the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Rutgers University, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, and the United States Geological Survey. The legislation appropriated $5,500,000 from the Water Supply Fund for the preparation of the assessment by the Pinelands Commission. Scientists from the cooperating agencies and institutions met periodically to design a draft work plan for the Kirkwood-Cohansey Project. The draft was reviewed by a panel of scientists with expertise in the areas of research addressed in the work plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Plan
    Edgewater Park Township Delanco Township Delanco Township Burlington Township Riverside Township COUNTY INVESTMENT AREA MAP COMMUNITY VISION OVERLAY Springfield Township Growth Areas Willingboro Township Metropolitan Core POLICY GOAL 1: Promote growth, development, and redevelopment activities in POLICY GOAL 3: Support and promote the vitality and revitalization of the City suburban and urban communities that contain existing or planned infrastructure, of Camden. Delran Township existing population and employment clusters, and dense settlement patterns. Westampton Township Riverton Borough Priority Growth Investment Area (PGIA) Innovation Hub Palmyra Borough POLICY GOAL 4: Leverage the synergy of educational, business, institutional uses Cinnaminson Township and regional attractions to spur a regional mixed-use hub inEastampton downtown Township Camden. Alternate Growth Investment Area (AGIA) Pennsauken / Route 73 Mount Holly Township Transit Centers Conservation/Preservation Areas Existing Philadelphia Pochack Creek POLICY GOAL 5: Encourage active transit corridors by clustering growth, POLICY GOAL 2: Encourage limited growth, conservation, or preservation development, and a vibrant mix of uses within a walkable distance of transit Proposed Pemberton Township Pennsauken Transit Center activities in areas that do not contain existing or planned infrastructure Moorestown Township stations. 90 supportive of large-scale growth and development, and contain a majority Hainesport Township of resources that are important to the environmental,
    [Show full text]