l
I STATE EXPERT APPRAISAL COMMITTEE - TAMIL NADU
Minutes of the 139'n Meeting of the state Expert Appraisal committee (SEAC) held on 23'November 2ol9 for Aoo.aisal of Building and construction proiects. Townships and Area Development proiects & Mining proiects at conference Hall. 2nd floor (down). Panaqal MaliSai. Saidapet. Chennai.
Agenda no: 139 - 02- 01 (File No: 7225/2019)
Proposed Construction of lndustrial Sheds by M/s. Bagur togistics park private Limited at S. No. 4/5, 4/6, 4nB, 6/8, 6/4B28,7nilA, 9/1, 9/2A, 14/1, AnA, AnB, U/3, 14/5, t4/64, 14/68, 14/7,15/1,1s/2, 15/3. 16/1, t6/2, t6/3, 17/4, 17/5,21fi,21/2,21/3,21/4, 21/i1, 26/3 &. 26/4 of Mettupanthanapalli Village, soolagiri raluk Krishnagiri District, TanrilNadu. - For Environmental Clearance. (srA/TN/MrS/l 2 25 62/2019)
The proposal was placed in the l39th SEAC Meeting held on 23.11.2019. The project proponent gave detailed presentation. The salient features of the project and the environmental L impact assessment as presented by the proponent are as follows:
l. The proposed project is a construction of an industrial shed and the prospective I Tenants are warehouses, Godowns, lndustrial Goods storage, Data centres and i
I FMCG Packaging. l I 2. The total land area of project is 2,33,332.4 Sq.m with total built up area is l,2o,5BZ 5q.m.
3. The project is located at12"37'29.18', N Latitude and 7g. 4'53.20" E Latitude. 4. The project comprises il nos. of sheds. Brock A (G + Mezz floors), Brock B (G + Mezz floors), Block C (G + Mezz flocrs), Block D (G + Mezz floors), Block E (G + Mezz floors), Block F (G + Mezz floors). Biock H (G + Mezz floorg, Block J (G +
Mezz floors) , Block Gl (Ground Floor). Block G2 (Ground Floor) & Block Gala G3 (Ground Floor) ci=._:> CHAIRMAN jilEEAc-TN 5. The daily fresh water requirement is 219 kLD for domestic purpose (23 kLD) and greenbelt development (196 kLD) will be sourced through Local Body/Private tankers. The waste water of 67 kLD generated is treated through 80 kLD capacity
STP Plant (Moving Bed Bio Reactor - MBBR) resulting in 67 kLD of treated sewage
in which 47 kLD is ured for flushing.20 kLD for Greenbelt development. 6. An area of 61,828 Sq.m is earmarked as greenbelt development of 2,916 nos' of
native tree species . 7. There are 136 number of car parks & 473 number of truck parks proposed in the parking area of 19,438 sq.m. 8. Power requirement is reported to be 4,900 kVA which will be sourced from TNEB grid.Back.uppowersupplyisthroughlno.of5o0kVAwithastackheightofS.5 m above the ground lwel. 9. The runoff from the project site harvested through an underground storaSe sump of 23 kL capacity. 5O Nos. of recharge pits are proposed in the storm water drain which runs all along the periphery of the site.
10. Total solid waste estimated to be generated is 952 kg/daf in which 567 kg/day is Biodegradable waste, which will be treated in organic watte convertor (owc) within the project site and then used as manure for gardening purPose within project 5ite. The Non Biodegradable waste of 378 kg/day will be sent to recyclers. TheSTPSludgeofTkg/daywillbedriedandusedasmanureforSreenbelt develoPment.
The SEAC noted the following: l.TheProponentM/s.BagurLogisticsParkPrivateLimitedhasappliedfor Environment Clearance "Building and Construction Projects- at 5' No' 4/5' 4/6, 4/78, 6/8, 6/4828,7/281A, s/1,9/2A, 14/1,14/2A, 14/28' 14/3,14/5,
17 17 5' 21 /1, 21 /2, 1 4/ 6A, 14/ 68, 14/7, 1 5 /1, 1 5/2, t s / 3, 16/1, 16/2, t6/3' / 4' / 21/3,21/4,21/11,26/3&26/4ofMettuPanthanapalliVillage'Soolagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District' Tamil Nadu. I C{2' *- CHAIRMAN SEAC.TN 2. The projed/activity is covered under Category "8" of ltem 8(a) "Building and Construction Projects" of the Schedule to the EIA Notification, 2006.
Based on the presentation made by the proponent and the documents furnished. the SEAC directed the proponent to furnish the following details.
1. The proposal for cER shalr be furnished as per the office memorandum of MoEF&cc dated 0r.05.2018 after working out the cost of project as per pwD guidelines.
2. The layout plan furnished for the greenbert area earmarked with GpS coordinates by the project proponent on the periphery of the site and the same shall be submitted for DTCp approval. 3. The proponent shafl furnish the A Register and crarify on the vilage road previously existing. 4. The proponent shall furnish AAe details and present and future traffic studies.
The SEAC directed proponent the to furnish the above said detairs and on receipt of aforesaid detairs, sEAc would further deriberate on this project and decide the further course of action.
.{-. C--}. CHAIRMAN g-.3EAC-TN
7 Agenda no: 139 -02-02 (File No. 7056 /2019) Proposed Grey Granite quarry lease over an extent of 1.72.0Ha in S.F.No: 418/3,4,5' 6, 7, 8. 9, 12, 13, 421/1, 2, 3, 4A, 48, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12A, l2B Baleguli - 2 Village' Krishnagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District, Tamil Nadu by Thiru. c. R. Tamilvanan- For Environmental Clearance. (srMrN/Ml N/4O9 4O/2O19)
The proposal was placed in the l39th 5EAC Meeting held on 23.11.2019. The project proponent gave detailed presentation. The salient features of the project and the environmental impact assessment as presented by the proponent are as follows:
1. Government Order / Leare details: a. The quarry lease was applied in the name of Thiru'C'R'Tamilvanan' Krishnagiri, Precise Area Communication was issued by the District for Collector, Krishnagiri' vide Rc.No.l53 /MME'2/2O19' Dated: 25'02'2019 a period of 5 years. lt is a fresh lease for Grey Granite quarry over an 12'13'421 Extent of 1.7 2 -O Ha in S. F.No'41 8/3,4'5'6'7'8'9' /1'2'3'4A'48'5' District' 6,7,8,12A'128 at Baleguli 2 Village' Krishnagiri Taluk' Krishnagiri
2. Mining Plan / Scheme of Mining approved details: The mining plan a. The Mining plan was prepared for the period of 5 years' Geology and was got approval from the Deputy Director' Department of Mining, Krishnagiri District vide Rc'No'9625/MM5/2018' Dated: 09.05.2019. Krishnagiri District' Mining Plan 3. As per the DePartment of Geology and Mining' approvalforthe5years,theProductionschedulefor5yearsstateJthatthetotal quantii of 6rey Granite should not exceed 3O'572m3 ' a. For First year - 6,l2Om3 of GreY Cranite b. For Second year ' 5,712m3 of Grey Granite Ct, \ CHAIRMAN O SEAC.TN c. For Third year - 6,032m3 of Grey Granite d. For Fourth year - 6,028m3 of Grey Granite e. For Fifth year - 6,680m3 of Grey Granite 4. The quarry operation is proposed upto a depth of 27m (2m Top soil + 5m Weathered Rock + 20m Grey 6ranite) Below Ground Level 5. The quarry operation involves manual jack hammer drilling, mild explosive blasting, Diamond wire cutting and dressing the splitted blocks. 6. Grey Granite is to be transported by using Tippers of 2 Nos. (20 T Capacity). 7. The project is locate at 12'24'54.73"N to 1225'01.47"N Latitude and 78"17'22.32'E to 7817'27.06" E Longitude.
8. The total Manpower requirement is 29 Nos.
9. Total cort of the proiects is Rs. 2.28 crores and EMp cost about Rs. 7 lakhs.
10. The water table is found to be at the depth of 55m in summer and 5om in rainy sea50n. ll. Lease area applied is not covered under HACA region.
12. No coastal Regulation Zone (cRZ) within the radius of lokm from the lease area.
13. No lnterstate boundary & western Ghats Boundary within the radius of lOkm from the lease area.
14. No National Park & wild Life sanctuary within the radius of lOkm from the lease area.
15. No critically polluted area as notified by the central pollution control Board conrtituted under water (Prevention and control of pollution) Act 1974 within the radius of lOkm from the lease area. ct4= CHAIRMAN f,..rac-rr.t
j 16. No Protected Area, Eco Sensitive Zone & Eco Sensitive Area within the radius of 10km.
17. No habitation within the radius of the 300m from the lease area as stated in the letter obtained from VAO, Baleguli 2 Village, Krishnagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District dated O5/O7/2019.
18. Letter obtained from the Deputy Direaor, Department of Geology and Mining' Krishnagiri vide Letter RC. No. 565/2016/ Mines, dated 25.06.2019 informed that the details of the existing and abandoned quarries within 500m radius from the proposed
Grey Cranite quarry as follows. r) Existing other quarries:
5. Name of the lessee / Village Lease S. F. No. Extent Remark No. Permit Holder &Taluk period Lease 1 Tvl.Pluto-D Baleguli 2 411/1, 1.82.O 03.08.1995 6ranite,l5-C, Village, 420/1, to Expiry (Erwhile Nethaji Bye Pass Krishnagiri 425/1 02.o8.2005 Road, Dharmapuri Taluk (Part) Rule 39)
2l Proposed Area:
s. Village Name of the applicant S. F. No. Extent Remark No. &Taluk l. M/s. C.R.T. Granite Park, Baleguli 2 418/ 3.4.5,6,7,8,9,12, 1.72.O Applied No-5/157, Street, Marys Village, 13.421/1,2,3,4A., area Teachers Colony, N.G.O Krishnagiri 48,5,6,7,8,12A,128 Colony Post, Dindigul Taluk 624005. c{-._>I CHAIRMAN SEAC-TN 3) Lease Expired: s. Name of the Lessee / Lease Village &Taluk S. F. No. Extent Remark No. Permit Holder period
.. NtL..
The Total extent of the Existing / Proposed quarries are about (1.82.0 + 1.22.0) = 3.54.0Ha
The SEAC noted the following:
l. The Proponent, Thiru.c.R.Tamilvanan has applied for Environment clearance
for the Grey Granite quarry over an extent of l.Z2.O Ha S.F.No: 4lgl3, 4. 5. 6,7, 8, 9, 12,13, 421/1,2, 3, 4A, 48, 5,6, 1, B, t2A, l2B Bateguli _ 2 Viilage, Krishnagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District, Tamil Nadu ..Mining 2. The projea/activity is covered under category "8" of rtem r(a) of Mineral Projects" of the Schedule to the EIA Notification, 2006. After the detailed presentation, the SEAC directed the proponent to furnish the following details
Ground l. water quarity study carried out on the wefls rocated in the surrounding area within 2km. 2. AAQ' Fugitive emission modering and Noise studies (both day &. night) carried out. on receipt of the aforesaid detairs, SEAC decided to make an on - the - spot inspection to assess the present status of the site by the sub-committee constituted by the SEAC. Based on the inspection report, sEAC wourd further deliberate on this proiect and decide the further course of action.
i- -+> CHAIRMAN f--srec-rH
h Agenda no: 139 - 02- 03 (File No. 7072 nOP) Proposed Rough stone and Gravel quarry lease over an extentof 3.24.OHa in S.F.No: 2$n P), Sircar Kathankanni Village, UthukuliTaluk, Tiruppur Dinrict, Tamil Nadu by Thiru. K. Palanisamy- For Environmental Clearance.
(5lMrN/MlN/,10 899 no19)
The proposal was placed in the l39rh SEAC Meeting held on 23.11.2019. The project proponent gave detailed presentation. The salient features of the project and the environmental impact assessment as presented by the proponent are as follows:
l. Government Order / Lease details: a. The quarry lease was applied in the name of Thiru' K' Palanisamy' Precise AreaCommunicationwasissuedbytheDistrictCollector,Tiruppurvide Rc.No. 528lMines/2018, O4'O7'2O19for a period of 5 years' lt is a fresh in lease for Rough stone and Gravel quarry over an extent of 3'24'0Ha S.F.No: 263,/2 (P), 5ircarKathankanni Village' Uthukuli Taluk' Tiruppur District, Tamil Nadu.
2. Mining Plan / Scheme of Mining approved details: mining plan a. The Mining plan was prePared for the period of 5 years' The Geology and was got approval from the Assistant Director' Department of 0l'08'201 9' Mi ning, Tiruppur District vide Rc'No'628/Min es/2}18' dated Mining Plan 3. As per the Department of Ceology and Mining' TiruPpurDistrict' approvalforthe5years,theproductionschedulefor5yearsstatesthatthetotal not quantity of Rough stone should not exceed 2'7O'165m3and Gravel should
exceed 16,047m3 of Gravel a. For First year - 53'395m3 of Rough stone and 4'37 4m3 of Gravel b. For Second year - 54,300m3 of Rough stone and 3'159m3 of Gravel c. For Third year - 54,180m3 of Rough stone and 8'514m3
+s+'CHAIRMAN L SEAC.TN d. For Fourth year - 54,055m3 of Rough stone e. For Fifth year - 54,235m3 of Rough stone 4. The quarry operation is proposed up to a depth of 28m (3m Gravel + 25m Rough stone) below ground level. 5. The quarry operation is proposed to carry out with open cait semi mechanized mining with 5.0m vertical bench and width. 5. Rough stones are to be transported by Tippers of 3 Nos. (20 T Capacity). 7. The project is located at ll'07'20.64"N to ll'07'25.42"Nlatitude and
7 7"3O'O3.7 6' E to 7 7"30'1 4.36" ELongitude.
8. The total Manpower requirement is 30Nos.
9. Total cost of the projects is Rs. 55.48lakhs and EMP cost about Rs. 3.80lakhs
10. The Water table is found to be at the depth of 50m in summer season and 45m in rainy season.
ll. Lease applied area is not covered under HACA region.
12. No coastal Regulation Zone (cRZ) within the radius of l0km from the lease area. 13. No Interstate boundary & western Ghats Boundary within the radius of lOkm from the lease area.
14. No National Park & wild Life sanctuary within the radius of lokm from the lease area.
15. No critically polluted area as notified by the central pollution control Board conitituted under water (Prevention and control of pollution) Act 1974 within 'lOkm the radius of from the lease area.
16. No Protected Area, Eco Sensitive Zone & Eco sensitive Area within the radius of 10km.
17. No habitation within the radius of the 300m from the lease area as stated in the letter obtained from VAo, SircarKathankanni Village, uthukuliraluk, Tiruppur Dinrict dated 30.07.2019.
18. Letter obtained from the Assistant Director, Department of Geology and Mining, Tiruppur vide Letter Roc. No. 628/Mines/2o19, dated 22.11.2019 inforled that .^J_ Cnlrnrrll(-+, 6-s{ac-rn the following quarries are situated within a radial distance of 500 meters from the applied fields.
The SEAC noted the following: l. The Proponent, Thiru. K. Palanisamy has applied for Environment Clearance for the Rough stone and Gravel quarry lease over an extent of 3.24.0Ha in S.F.No: 263/2 (P), SircarKathankanni Village, Uthukuli Taluk, Tiruppur District, Tamil Nadu 2. The project/activity it covered under Category "8" of ltem 1(a) "Mining of Mineral Projects" of the Schedule to the EIA Notification, 2006.
After the detailed presentation, the SEAC directed the ProPonent to furnish the following details l. Photographs of fencing arrangement provided along the boundary of the site. 2. lt was noted that documents furnished by the proponent mining activity was already been carried out in the mine lease area. lt is directed to furnish the following details from AD, mines a) What was the period of the operation and stoppage of the earlier mines? b) Quantity of minerals mined out. c) Depth of mining d) Name of the person(s) already mined in that leases area' e) Copies of EC and CTO already obtained if any and its comPliance 3. The proponent shall furnish proposed safety measures which should include measuret proposed along the boundary of the quarry site' security Suards are to be engaged during the entire period of mining operation'
On receipt of the aforesaid details, SEAC would further deliberate on this proiect and decide the further course of action. ci=.-+, *
Agenda no: 139 -02-04 (File No. 7205 /2019) Expansion of Multi Specialty Hospital and Research Campus by M/s. SANCO Foundation at T.5. No. 27, 28, 29. 30, 31, 39. Q, 72fi82, 72fi838, 18, 23/2A, 24^, 24n, 25 &.26. North Vellore No. 9, Ward No.l, Block No. 2 & 3, North Vellore Town, Vellore North Taluk, Vellore District in the state of Tamil Nadu - For Environmental Clearance. (sh,rrN/Mr5/l2lmnog)
The proposal was place in the 139tr SEAC Meeting held on 23.11.2019. The project proponent gave detailed presentation. The salient features of the proiect and the environmental impact assessment as prescribed by the proponent are as follows:
L Environmental Clearance (EC) has been obtained from SEIAA,TN (Letter
N o. S EI AA,/TN/F.67 24/ EC/ 8(a) / 65 4/ 2019 dt: il.07. 201 9) for Construcrion of Multi Specialty Hospital & Research lnstitute Building comprises of Basement I + BaJement ll + Ground floor to Eleven floors 2. SANCO Foundation has acquired additional land (12,807 Sq.m) adjoining the proiect site and proposes to construct an additional block (comprising of one level Basement + Ground Floor) in the additional land acquired. 3. The project is located at
I t2'55' 12.48' N 79'g',29.29* E
2 l2'56'0.44' N 79" g',29.50. E
3 l2'56'0.64',N 79" g',30.32', E
4 l2'55'12.56- N 79" 8', 31.71. E
4. The land area of the project is 24,430 Sq.m and the built-up area is 51,9@ sq.m CL- > CHAIRMAN LJEAC-TN
I t) 5. The project comprises of Block 1- Basement ll + Basement I + Ground Floor to Eleven Floor and Block 2- Basement I * 6round Floor. 6. The total number of beds is 392 Nos..The expected number of occupancy in the project is 2,094 nos. 7. The daily fresh water requirement is 338 kLD for domestic purpose (206 kLD), Pathology & Laundry (22 kLD) and HVAC 010 kLD) will be sourced through local body (Vellore Corporation). 22 kLD of effluent will be treated in ETP with 22 kLD capacity. The treated effluent will be sent to STP.298 kLD of waste water (Sewage + Effluent) is generated which is treated through STP (MBBR Technology) with 325 kLD capacity resulting in 298 kLD of treated water in which 80 kLD is used for flushing, 13 kLD for Greenbelt development and 136 kLD for HVAC. 8. 3,665 Sq.m is earmarked as greenbelt area with 310 nos. of native species. 9. 568 number of car parks & 616 number of two wheeler parks - 8'209 Sq'm of area allotted. lO.7,5OO kVA of power is required which is sourced from TNEB grid .Back-up power supply is through 4 no. of 1,500 kVA DG Sets with a stack height of 6m above the ground level. ll. The runoff from the project site harvested through collection sump of 200k1.
12. Total waste eitimated to be generated is 958 kg/day in which 558 kg/day is Biodegradable waste, which will be treated in organic waste convertor (OWC) within the project site mixed with 30 kglday STP sludge and then
used as manure for gardening PurPose within Project site and 37O kglday is Non Biodegradable watte will be sold to reryclers. The 944 kglday of bio medical waste will be handed over to TNPCB authorized reryclers.
CL.+' The SEAC noted the following: l. Environmental Clearance (EC) has already been issued from SEIAA,TN (Letter No. SE|AA/TN/F.6724/EC/8(a)/654/2019 dt: 11.07.2019) for Construction of Multi Speciality Hospital & Research lnititute Building comprises of Basement l+ Basement ll + Ground floor to Eleven floors 2. Expansion of Multi Expansion of Multi Specialty Hospital and Research Campus by M/s. SANCO Foundation at T.5. No. 27,28,29,30, 31, 39, 40,72/182,72/lB3B, 18,23/2A,24/1,24/2,25 6,.26, North Vellore No.9, Ward No.l, Block No.2 &
3, North Vellore Town, Vellore North Taluk, Vellore Dinrict. The details of EC
obtained and proposed expansion of the project as as follows:
I t.);)t,lt!L_"
.-.i t) i -1-'n:;.r-,!.\ U'jr-.4
1 Plot Area 11,523 5q.m 24.430 Sq.m
2. Total Built-up area 47,591 Sq.m 51,900 Sq.m
28 + G+11 Block I I ZA+ 6+ll Floors 3. Block Details Block I Floors Block2 I B+GFloor 4. No. of beds 387 Nos. 392 Nos. Total Fresh Water 5. 317 KLD 338 KLD Requirement 6. Sewage 6eneration 293 KLD 298 KLD 7. 5TP Capacity 3OO KLD 325 KLD 8. Effluent Generation 2I KLD 22 KLD 9. ETP Capacity 2I KLD 22 KLD 10. Total solid waste 914 K{day 928 Kg/day il Bio Medical Waste 935 Kg/day 944 Kg/day
12. DG Sets l50O KVA (3 Nos.) 1500 KVA (4 Nos.)
13. Total Project Cost Rs. 177 Crores Rs. 213 Crores ct CHAIRMAN-> D-SeeC-rN
7 3. The project/activity is covered under category "B" of item 8(a) "Building and Construction projects" of the Schedule to the EIA Notification, 2006.
The project proponent gave presentation about the proposal, based on the presentation made by the proponent and the documents furnished, the SEAC decided to F&g#ocltathe proposal for o ^Ce"t nonnakendi+ie+e:- 1-[b^i-',6 "nZ L
It was noticed by the SEAC that the previous EC was only issued on 11.7.2019 and it is not clearly notified why expansion within 4 months. Also, it is not clear how far the construction of the hospital as per the previous EC was over and the specific condition that were stipulated in the earlier EC namely construction of culverts, storm water
management nlans ,@ action taken for green belt development need to be permitted / presented along with the new proposal and hence it was decided that the proponent may make a re-presentation of the project.
Agenda no: 139 -02-05 (File No. 7038 /2019) Proposed Rough stone and Gravel quarry lease over an extent of 0.78.OHa in S.F.No: l50l/82(Part), Sengurichi Village, Dindigul Taluk. Dindigul District, Tamil Nadu by M/s. Sree Sirumalai Minerals - For Environmental Clearance. (5tA,rrN/Mt N/4O8O1/2O19t
The proposal was place in the l39th SEAC Meeting held on 23.11.2019. The projea proponent gave detailed Presentation. The salient features of the project and the environmental impact assessment as prescribed by the proponent are as follows:
-l-. > cHA)tRMAN (yrEAc-rN l. Government Order / Lease details: a. The quarry lease was applied in the name of M/s. Sree Sirumalai Minerals, Precise Area Communication was issued by the District Collector, Dindigul
vide Rc.No.68l2O19 (G&M) Dated: 14.05.2019 for a period of 5 years. lt is a fresh lease for Rough stone and Gravel quarry over an Extent of
0.78.0Ha in 5.F.Nos. lsOlB/2(P) at Sengurichi Village, Dindigul East Taluk, Dindigul District. 2. Mining Plan / Scheme of Mining approved details: a. The Mining plan was prepared for the period of 5 years. The mining plan was got approval from the Assistant Director, Department of Geology and Mining, Dindigul Dirtrict vide Rc.No.68/2019 (G&M) Dated:20.05.20t9.
3. As per the Department of Geology and Mining, Dindigul District. Mining Plan approval for the 5 years, the production schedule for 5 years states that the total quantity of Rough stone should not exceed 101880m3.
a. For First year - 22914 m3 of Rough stone
b. For Second year - 19732 m1 of Rough stone
c. For Third year - 16787 m3 of Rough stone
d. For Fourth year - 14079 m3 of Rough stone
e. For Fifth year - 28368 m3 of Rough stone
4. The quarry operation is proposed upto a depth of 375m Rough stone. 5. The quarry operation is proposed to carry out with open cart semi mechanized mining with 5.0m vertical bench and width. 6. Rough rtone are to be transported by Tippers of lNos. (lO M. T Capacity). 7. The project is locate at I0ol9'53.83"N -10019'56.72"N latitude andZBoOg'42.24',E -78009'50.08"E Longitude.
8. The total Manpower requirement is 18 Nos.
9. Total cost of the projects is Rs. 33.50 lakhs and EMP cost about Rs. 3.0 lakhs 10. The Water table is found to be at the depth of 55m in summer and 50m in rainy teason. cL, >-' CHAIRMANf- g4ec-rN
6 Il. Lease applied area is not covered under HACA region. 12. No Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) within the radius of 10km from the lease area. 13. No lnterstate boundary & Western Ghats Boundary within the radius of 10km from the lease area,
14. No National Park & Wild Life Sanctuary within the radius of lOkm from the lease
area.
15. No critically polluted area as notified by the Central Pollution Control Board constituted under Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act 1974 within the radius of lOkm from the lease area.
16. No Protected Area, Eco Sensitive Zone & Eco Sensitive Area within the radius of l0km.
17. No habitation within the radius of the 3oom from the lease area as stated in the letter obtained from VAo, Sengurichi Village, Dindigul East Taluk, Dindigul District dated 2t/O5/2O19.
18. Letter obtained from the Assistant Director, Department of Geology and Mining' Dindigul vide Letter RC. No. 68l2019(C&M) dated 07.08.2019 informed that the details of the exirting and abandoned quarries within 500m radius from the proposed Rough Stone & Gravel quarry as follows. r) Existing other quarries: Name of the lessee / s. F. S. No. Village &Taluk Extent Remark Permit Holder No.
I Nil
2) Proposed Area:
s. Name of the applicant Village &Taluk S. F. No. Extent Remarks No.
1 M/s.Sree 5irumalai Minerals, 5engurichi r50rB/2(P) 0.78.0 M.5elvamani, .--:br__)-=,-..- CHAIRMAf SEAC.TN Managing Partner, village, Dindigul No.243 B,Masilamanipuram, East Balakrishnapuram Village, Taluk,Dindigul Dindigul.
3) Lease Expired: 5. Name of the Lessee / Village Lease 5. F. No. Extent Remark No. Permit Holder &Taluk period
..... Nt1 .....
The Total extent of the Existing / Proposed quarries are 0.78.0ha The SEAC noted the following: L The Proponent, M/s. Sree Sirumalai Minerals has applied for Environment Clearance for the Rough stone and Gravel quarry lease over an extent of 0.78.0Ha in 5.F.No: l5OlB/2(Part),Sengurichi Village, Dindigul Taluk, Dindigul District, Tamil Nadu
2. The project/activity is covered under Category "B" of ltem I (a) "Mining of Mineral Projectl' of the Schedule to the EIA Notification, 2006.
The project proponent gave presentation about the proposal. Based on the presentation made by the proponent and the documents furnished, the SEAC decided to recommend the proposal for grant of Environmental Clearance to SEIAA subject to the following conditions in addition to normal conditions:
L Ground water quality monitoring should be conducted once in six months and the report should be submitted to TNPCB. 2. Proper barrier for reducing the Noise level shall be established like providing Green Belt along the boundary of the quarrying site, etc. and to prevent dust ci:- x CHAIRMA}.f-- lsac-rN
q pollution, suitable working methodology needs to be adopted taking wind direction into consideration. 3. The operation of the quarry should no way impact the agriculture activity & water bodies near the proiect iite. 4. Transportation of the quarried materials shall not cause any hindrance to the Village people/Existing Village road. 5. The Project Proponent shall comply with the mining and other relevant rules and regulations where ever applicable. 6. The quarrying activity shall be stopped if the entire quantity indicated in the Mining plan is quarried even before the expiry of the quarry lease period and the same shall be monitored by the District Authorities. 7. The recommendation for the issue of environmental clearance is subiect to the outcome of the Hon'ble NGT, Principal Bench, New Delhi in O.A No.186 of 2Ol5 (M.A.No.350/2016) and O.A. No.2OOl2016 and O.A.No.580/2016 (M.A.No.1l8212016) and O.A.No.l02l2017 and O.A.No.404/2016 (M.A.No.
7 58/2O16.M.A.No.920l20l6,M.A.No.ll2212016, M.A.No.l2l2O17 &' M.A. No. 843/2017) and O.A.No.4O5/2016 and O.A.No.520 of 2016 (M.A.No. 981 /2016, M.A.No.9821201 5 & M.A.No.3 84/2017). 8. To ensure safety measures along the boundary of the quarry site' security Suards are to be engaged during the entire period of mining oPeration. 9. The mine closure plan submitted by the project proponent shall be strictly followed after the lapse of the mine as reported.
10. The proponent shall comply with the conditions stipulated in the letter No RC No. 7637IMM5/2O18 dated 28/12/2018 obtained from Department of Geology and mining.
11. The proposal for CER shall be furnished as per the office memorandum of MoEF&CC dated 01.05.2018.
c{_,}I CHAIRMAh- vSEAC.TN Agenda no: 139 -02-06 (File No. 6645 /2019) Proposed development of a proposes development of a nev.r cornerstone ' DLF lT ' park at Survqy No l/5 &l/9 of Block 7, Tiruvanmiyur Village , Mylapore - Taluk, Chennai - District, and 5F No 3OO/28 3OO/2C&. 301/3 Kottivakkam, Tamabaram - Taluk, Kandripuram - District by M/s DLF lnfo Park Dwelopers (Chennai) Limited - The propored proiect have signed an Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with Govt. of Tamil Nadu for developing an lT park - Terms of Reference.
(stA,rtN/M I S/2 8 068/ 2Ot 8) The project was apprised in EAC meeting at MOEF and TOR (Ierms of Reference) issued by MOEF videTOR Vide Lr. F.No. MOEFCC/ 21-92/2}18-tl.-ttl dated 30.11.2018. Baseline studies were conducted from December 20t7 - February 2018 and EIA report in compliance with issued TOR has been submitted.
The proposed Development will comprise 8 Blocks each of G + 23 Floors with three Common Basements in a Total Plot area of 107768 sq.m . Total Built-up Area of the proposed development will be 835650 Sq.m. The site will be developed with lawns, greenbelt, neatly paved driveways, parking facilities, etc. Within the total plot area. The green belt area will be 16165.2 Sq.m which is 15o/o of the total plot area; apart from that, an OSR [Open Space Reservation] area of 10776.8 Sq.m @ I Oolo of the plot area is identified for gifting to the Greater chennai corporation for utilizing the same as a park with extensive green belt and open for public. water required for construction phase is 67 KLD of which Domestic water- 6 KLD, construction work- 5o KLD, Miscellaneouj- 5 KLD and flushing water requirement- 6 kLD. The Total water requirement during construction phase shall be met through Authorized Tankers. cJ-4' CHAIRMAN E---tmc-rru
lo The project envisages an overall population of 44372 inclusive of the prospective regular workers and facility supporting staffs & visitors.
Daily freshwater requirement for the project will be 559 KLD in the Fir$ Phase and ll52 kLD, thus a total of 18ll KLD, which shall be met through CMWSSB provision and used for domestic purposes and HVAC cooling makeup as well. The sewage generated after treatment 798 KLD out of which 58 KLD will be utilized for green belt, 35 kLD for Green development in OSR and HVAC 705 KLD; Treated Grey water @ 840 kLD [ 380 KLD for first phase and 460 KLD for second Phaselwill be used entirely for flushin8 requirement. sTP shall be based on MBBR technology. The treated waste water quality shall be of superior quality for usage back in HVAC make up and Flushing applicationr.
Solid waste generation shall be 6.656MT lDay of which 2.662 MT /Day Bio-degradable wastes will be disposed through orSanic waste converters of adequate capacity and 3.994 MT/Dav of Non-Biodegradable recyclable wastes will be handed over to authorized recyclers. Organic sludge generation of 540 Kg/day from STP shall be mixed along with the organic waste Senerated from OWC and will be blended with suitable bio-enzymes so that the resultant manure is enriched with nutrients. E-waste / Battery waste as generated by prospective tenants shall be advised to dispose the same after securing due authorization and relevant approvals from TNPCB to authorized vendors wherein as Property Developer DLF shall ensure the periodical renewal of those
authorization. Hazardous waste Senerated from the facility, which is mainly the DG oil to the tune of around 25OO lits / annum, shall be disposed through authorized recyclers
as per the provisions of respective rules as prescribed by MoEF&CC / TNPCB.
The power required @ 26359 KW shall be sourced through TANGEDCO. Twenty Nos' of 2000 KVA DC, seti are propoied for power back up with exhaust stack routed to the top of the main building through and exhausted at an elevation of 6 mts abovect+ the roof CHAIRMAN Vy':erctn . The DG sets shall be housed inside a separate room with wall acoustics done to ensure the noise levels are curtailed and in compliance to CPCB/TNPCB norms.
The project propores INR ll3 Lakhs towards environmental management plan during conitruction phase and INR 1085 Lakhs towards the same for operational phase.
The total cost of the project is about INR 2470 crores. The project proposes a CER budget of INR 517 Lakhs during the first phase operation and INR 717 lakhs will be spent on CER adopting nearby public facilities and other open areas as stipulated by the MoEF& CC vide OM dated : lst May 2018, in consultation with the Dirtrict Administration.
The SEAC noted the following:
a) The Proponent, IWs DLF lnfo Park Douelopers (Chennai) Limited has applied for Terms of Reference for the proposes development of a new cornerstone "
DLF lT ' park at Survey No 1/5 &1/9 of Block 7, Tiruvanmiyur Village , Mylapore - Taluk, Chennai - District, and 5F No 3OO/28 3OO/2C&. 3Ot/3 Kottivakkam, Tamabaram - Taluk, Kanchipuram - District, Tamilnadu , Tamil Nadu
b) The project/activity is covered under Cate gory "B" of ltem 8(b) "Building and Construction Projects" of the Schedule to the EIA Notification, 2005.
After the detailed presentation, the SEAC noted that the MRTS railway line is passing through the project site. Hence the SEAC directed the proponent to obtain Noc from competent authority (Government/MRTS) for the tranrit below the MRTS line within the project site. On receipt of the aforesaid details, SEAC would further deliberate on thi, project and decide the further course of action.
C!-, =--.- CHAIRMAN 2-srac-rN Agenda no: 139 -02- 07 (File No. 7081 /2019) Proposed Routh stone and Gravel quarry lease over an extent of 1.90.0Ha in S.F.No: 444/1, 444/2, Veppillai Village, Kadaiyampatti Taluk, Salem District, Tamil Nadu by Thiru.S.Sivakumar - For Environmental Clearance.
(s lMrN/M l N/41261 / 2O1 9) l. Government Order / Lease details: a. The quarry lease was aPplied in the name of Thiru.S.Sivakumar' Salem, Precise Area Communication was issued by the District Collector, Salem No.Na.Ka.25ll2Ol9lMines/A,dated: 16.05.2019 for a period of 5 years. lt is a fresh lease for Rough Stone and Gravel quarry over an Extent of 1.90.0Ha in 5.F.Nos. 444/1 & 444/2 at Veppilai Village' Kadaiyampatti Taluk, Salem District. 2. Mining Plan / Scheme of Mining approved details: a. The Mining plan was prepared for the period of 5 year5. The mining plan was got approval from the Deputy Director' Department of Geology and Mining, Salem District vide RoC.No.251/2O19/Mines/A, Dated: 09.O2-2O19 ' b. As per the Department of Ceology and Mining, Salem District. Mining Plan approval for the 5 years, the production schedule for 5 years states that the '1,74,603m3 total quantity of Rough stone should not exceed and 44,52Om3 of Gravel. c. For First year - 3,43,364m3 of Rough stone and 21132 m3 of Gravel d. For Second year - 38,563m3 of Rough stone and 10,230 m3 of Cravel e. For Third year - 52,O24m3 of Rough stone and 13,158 m3 of Gravel f. For Fourth year - 26,850m3 of Rough stone and 0m3 of Cravel g. For Fifth year - 22,425m3 of Rough stone and 0m3 of Gravel 3. The quarry operation is proposed uPto a depth of 45m below Sround level. 4. The quarry operation is proposed to carry out with open cast semi mechanized mining with 5.0m vertical bench and 5.0m width. t Cl:, t-\ cHAIRMAN ,/ v/sEAc:tN 5. Rough stone and Gravel are to be transported by Tipper of 2 Nos. (10 M.Tons Capacity). 6. The project is located at 11057'08.19" N to 11057'16.38" N latitude and 780 08'
27.18" E to 780 08' 35.ll"E Longitude.
7. The total Manpower requirement is l5Nos.
8. Total cost of the projects is Rs. 32.90 lakhs and EMP cost about Rs. 3.6lakhs 9. The Water table is found to be at the depth of 62m
10. Lease applied area is not covered under HACA region.
11. No Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) within the radius of lOkm from the lease area. 12. No lnterstate boundary & Western Ghats Boundary within the radius of lOkm from the lease area.
13. No National Park & Wild Life Sanctuary within the radius of lOkm from the lease area,
14. No critically polluted area as notified by the Central Pollution Control Board conrtituted under Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act 1974 within the radius of lOkm from the lease area. 15. No Protected Area, Eco Sensitive Zone & Eco Sensitive Area within the radius of l0km.
15. No habitation within the radius of the 500m from the lease area as rtated in the letter obtained from VAO, Veppilai Village, Kadaiyampatti Taluk. Salem District dated O3/O7/2019.
17. Letter obtained from the Deputy Director, Department of Geology and Mining, Salem vide Letter RC. No.215/2019/ Mines- A, dated 16.07.2019 informed that the details of the existing and abandoned quarries within 5OOm radius from the proposed Rough Stone quarry as follows:
s. Quarry detail Village & Taluk 5. F. No. Extent No.
1 Existing Quarry cj--+ CHAIRMAN f*e,lc-rN
t) Nil 2. Abandoned Quarry Nil
3. Proposed Quarry Thiru.S.Sivakumar Veppilai Village, 444/1 & 444/2 r.90.0 Rough itone & Kadaiyampatti Ha Gravel Quarry Taluk
The SEAC noted the following: l. The Proponent, Thiru.S.Sivakumar has applied for Environment Clearance for the Rough ttone and 6ravel quarry lease over an extent of 1.90.0 Ha in S.F.No: zt44ll & 444/2, Veppilai Village, Kadaiyampatti Taluk' Salem District' Tamil Nadu 2. The projecl/activity is covered under Category "8" of ltem l(a) "Mining of Mineral ProjectC' of the Schedule to the EIA Notification, 2006.
The project proPonent gave Presentation about the proposal. Based on the presentation made by the ProPonent and the documents furnished, the SEAC decided to recommend the proposal for grant of Environmental Clearance to SEIpV{ subject to the following conditions in addition to normal conditions: l. Ground water quality monitoring should be conducted once in six months and the report should be submitted to TNPCB. 2. Proper barrier for reducing the Noise level shall be established like providing Green Belt along the boundary of the quarrying site, etc. and to Prevent dust pollution, suitable working methodology needs to be adopted taking wind direction into consideration.
3. The operation of the quarry should no way impact the agriculture activity & water bodies near the proiect iite.
cHAl RMAN VeAC-TN 4. Transportation of the quarried materials shall not cause any hindrance to the Village people/Existing Village road.
5. The Project Proponent shall comply with the mining and other relevant rules and regulations where ever applicable. 6. The quarrying activity shall be stopped if the entire quantity indicated in the Mining plan is quarried even before the expiry of the quarry lease period and the same shall be monitored by the District Authorities. 7. The recommendation for the issue of environmental clearance is subject to the outcome of the Hon'ble NGT, Principal Bench, New Delhi in O.A No.l86 of 2016 (M.A.No.350/2016) and O.A. No.200/2016 and O.A.No.580/2016 (M.A.No.1l8212016) and O.A.No.102l2017 and O.A.No.404/2016 (M.A.No. 7 58/2O16,M.A.No.920l20l6,M.A.No.ll2212016, M.A.No.l212017 & M.A. No. 843/2017) and O.A.No.4O5/2016 and O.A.No.520 of 2Ot6 (M.A.No. 9et /ZOt6, M.A.No.982,22O16 & M.A.No.384/2017). 8. To ensure safety measures along the boundary of the quarry site, security guards are to be engaged during the entire period of mining operation. 9. The mine closure plan submitted by the projea proponent shall be strictly followed after the lapse of the mine as reported. 10. proponent The shall comply with the conditions stipulated in the letter No RC No. 7637lMM5/2018 dared 29/r2/2or9 obtained from Department of Georogy and mining.
I I ' The proposal for cER shall be furnished as per the office memorandum of MoEF&CC dated 01.05.2018.
cJ=4= gHATRMAN !--sFlc-rN
r] CHAIRMAN SEAC.TN Agenda No. 139A24,g (File No. 7253/2019)
Proposed Coleroon River Sand quarrying over an extent of I2.OO.O Ha at S.F. No. 4954(Pan) in Agaraleathur Village, Sirkazhi Taluk, Nagapattinam District, Tamil Nadu by M/s. The Executive Engineer, AVD|VRD- For Terms of Reference.
(srMrN/Nc P/ 4 s864/2O19)
The proposal was placed in this 139th SEAC Meeting held on 23.11.2019. The project proponent gave detailed presentation. The salient features of the project and the
Environmental impact Assersment as presented by the proponent are as follows: l. Government order / lease details: The Quarry lease was applied in the name of Executive Engineer, Mining and
Monitoring Division Thanjavur, Precise area communication letter was issued by the District Collector, Nagapattinam District Vide Letter Na.Ka.401/Kanimam,/2018 dated 09.02.2019. lt is a fresh lease for sand euarry for over an extent of 12.00.0 Ha in S.F. No: 495ll(part) in Agaraleathur Village in Sirkazhi Taluk, Nagapattinam District.
2. Mining Plan approval details :
Mining Plan was prepared for the period of Eleven Months. The mining plan was EiL tn" Assistant t* "ppror$ Director, Department of Geology and Mining, Nagapattinam Diitrict Vide letter Rc. No.40llMines/2019 dated 22.O4.2019.
3. As per the Department of Geology and Mining, Nagapattianm Dinrict. Mining Plan approval for the Eleven Months, the production schedule for Eleven Months states that the total quantity of should not exceed l9gl75 cu.m of shoals and 120000cu.m of sand.
4. The quarry operation is proposed upto a depth of lm below the theoretical bed level.
CS=.I CHAIRMAN-} SEAC.TN tq 5. The Quarry operation is proposed to carry out with open cast semi mechanised mining.
6. 0'9m3 bucket capacity and tippers/trucks 10-20 Tons capacity are proposed for quarrying operation. The sand is directly loaded into tippers^rucks. 7. Total number of excavators used for quarrying sand-4Nos
8. The project is located at ll'15'13.27" N to ll.l5'32.90-N latitude and 79"38'56.36" E to 79"39'03.00',E longitude. 9. The total Manpower requirement is 3g Nos.
10. Total cost of the poect is Rs. 5r5Lakhs and EMp cost about Rs. 2.g6lakhs.
I l. The water table is found to be at the depth of 6-g m below the ground level 12. Applied lease area is not covered under HACA region. 13. No coastal Regulation zone (cRZ) is located within the radius of l0 m from the lease area
14. No interstate boundary & western chats Boundary is located within the radius of l0 km from the lease area.
15. No National Park & wild life sanctuary is located within the radius of l0 km from the lease area
16. No critically polluted area as notified by the central pollution control board constituted under water (Prevention and control of pollution Acr 1gz4 is located within the radius of I0 km.
17. No protected Area, Eco Sensitive Zone & Eco sensitive area is located within the radius of l0 km.
18. No habitation is located within the radius of the 300 m from the lease area as stated in the letter obtained from VAO, Agaraleathur Village in sirkazhi raluk, Nagapattinam District. SEAC Noted that
l. The proponent, M/s. The Executive Engineer, AX/DAVRD, submitted application for Terms of Reference in Form-r, pre- Feasibility report for the
CHAIRMAN SEAC-TN [-4 River Coleroon Sand Quarrying over an extent of 12.00.0 Ha at 495/l(Part). Agaraleathur Village in Sirkazhi Taluk. Nagapattinam District, Tamil Nadu
2. The proiect/activity is covered under Category "Bl" of ltem 1(a) "Mining of Mineral Projects" of the Schedule to the EIA Notification, 2006.
Based on the presentation made by the proponent. the SEAC decided to recommend the proposal grant of rerms of References (roR) to SE|M with public Hearing, subjea to the following specific conditions in addition to the normal conditions as part of ToR:
l. The details ofthe location to cover land use and ecologically sensitive areas.
a. Details of wells in the vicinity, ground water tables and other surface water bodies in the vicinity.
b. Thickness of Sand and its variation covering the entire area; similarly the width of the sand bed.
c. Agricultural land if any, surrounding the quarry site.
d. The composition of sand and other minerars preJent in the river bed. e. Details of the river bed.
f. Hinory of mining in the area shall be furnished.
2. Reclamation of the sand area after mining needs to be submitted.
3. Justification for usage of more porclains in individual sand mining area, to be given.
4. Adequate safety measures in the quarrying area with respect to porclains to be deployed.
5. Adequate plan for traffic management for the loaded vehicres passing through nearby habitation.
2. The impact of dust pollution and noise on the habitations nearby. st-I 5 CHAIRMAN SEAC.TN t"^ ttr 3. The A/t/D has give to scientific evidence for concluding that river sand depth is
I m.may not cause any significant impact on the ground water table in the surrounding environment
4. The AVD has to furnish the details regarding agricultural activities that are
taking place around the proiect area.
5. The details of the open/bore weils in the vicinity of the proiect site should be furnished.
6. Study the quality and quantity of ground water in 5km radius in the downstream of the proiect site.
7. Study the lmpact of sand mining on the structures located in the nearby vicinity.
8. The route map for the Lorries for accessing the proiect area and for
transporting mined sand should be specified.
9. The details regarding traffic volume in the vicinity of project area should be furnished.
10. To prevent dust pollution, suitable working methodology needs to be adopted taking wind direction into consideration.
11. A detail study shall be conducted on the impact of sand mining with the
habitation and cultivation in the nearby area along the river bed and its
mitigation measures.
12. The mining area must be demarcated leaving at least 50m from the river
embankment on either side.
13. Contouring of the river bed has to be taken to ascertain the relative levels of
sand in the river and alio to suggest the depth of sand mining.
CHAIRMAN
1""'EAC.TN 14. The EIA report should be as per the Guidelines for Sustainable Sand Mining issued in 2016 W the MoEF & CC, GOt, New Delhi. 15. Wherever irrigation channels take off from the river within the boundary of
the mining project, the mining operation should not affect the flow of water in
the irrigation channels. ln such a way a plan of action should be submitted.
16. EMP should contain break up details such as tools, labor and environmental
monitoring cost, cost for the ground water monitoring in the surrounding area
shall be part of the EMP cort, variation of depth of ground water and quality
shall be monitored during the projea period by conducting survey once in 3 months. This cost shall also be included in EMp.
17. The recommendation for the issue of rerms of Reference is subject to the final outcome of the Hon'bre NGT, principar Bench, New Derhi in o.A No. rg6 of 2016 (M.A.No.3so/2o16) and o.A.No.200/2016 and o.A.No.5g0/2016 (M.A.No.1l8212016) and O.A.No.l0212017 and O.A.No.404l2016 (M.A. No. 7581201 6, M.A.No.9 20/2016, M. A.No.t122/2016. M.A. No.l 2/201 7 M.A.No.843/2Ofi) & and O.A.No.4OS/2O16 and O.A.No.52O of 2Ot6 (M.A. No.98ll201 6, M.A.No.9 B2/2Ot 6 & M.A. No. 3841201 7). 18. The proposal for cER shail be furnished with time frame as per the office memorandum of MoEF&CC dated 01.05.201g.
19. ln addition to following detailj to be furnished.
i. Quantity estimated to be mined through machineries with extent.
ii. Quantity estimated to be mined through manual mining with extent. iii. certificate from the vAo stating the details of habitation located within
300 m radius from the boundary of the proposed site along with FMB sketch.
ai-.I \ CHAIRMAN - SEAC.TN (/- IL iv. The project proponent has to furnish the affidavit stating that there are no bridges, culverts, cross masonaries, water head works or any other civil
structureJ is located within 500 mts., of the proposed quarry site. v. The RL Upstream, RL Downstream, RL StartinS. RL Ending, Chainage Starting km, Ending km details shall be furnished.
vi. Geological sections Map should be furnished. vii. 500m, lkm & 5km radius of clear Google Map showing all the features like agricultural activities, habitations, etc viii. The self purification capacity of the river shall be furnished. ix. Adequate plan for traffic management for the loaded vehicles passing through nearby habitation.
CHAIRMAN SEAC-TN t--, Agenda No. 139 -02 -O9 (File No. e96/2O17) Proposed construction of Manaparal SIPCOT Park by lWs. State lndustries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu Limited at S.F. No. (Annexure -l) of lGnnudaiyanpatty, K Peryapatty (N) and Chattirapatty Villages, Manaparai Taluk, Trlchy District- For Environmental Clearance. (SIMIN/NCP/2O3s7 /2017) Brief History: The Proponent of "M/s. State lndustries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu" has applied for ToR for the proposed construction of Manaparai SIPCOT Park at 5.F. No. (Annexure -l) of Kannudaiyanpatty, K. Peryapatty (N) and Chattirapatty Villages Manaparai Taluk, Trichy Dirtrict. Tamilnadu on 01.02.2018. The SEIAA-TN asked for certain particulars from the proponent for which the proponent responded partially.
The proposal was placed in the lltst SEAC Meeting held on 16.05.2019.
The Salient features of the project proposal are as follows:
I ' The SIPCOT proposes to develop Manaparai industrial Park exclusively for industries
that are not covered under the EIA Notification, 2006 at the Kannudaiyanpatty, K. Peryapatty (N) and chattirapatty Villages in an area of 436.05 Ha. The Manaparai industrial park is likely to accommodate General Engineering industries and all other such industries which are not under the purview of EIA Notification, 2006, which do not require Environmental Clearance.
2. 6 MLD of water will be sourced from Cauvery river basin for the project.
3. Summary of land use pattern has been furnished which contain critical errors.
The SEAC interacted with the proponent about the project proposal. The following is the summary of the discussion:
1. The proponent has furnished the type of industries likely to come up in the project. However, the number of industries (at least approximately) likely to
come up in the park has not been specified. The data regarding this aspect is very vital for assessing the possible environmental impactr and finalising the ('--\-.^t \ Chairman L JEAC-TN b-.- t? necessary environmental management measures required for the industries. Only with this data, it will be possible to foresee the type of environmental
issues that will be coming uP like air pollution, water pollution, solid waste, hazardous waste etc. Therefore, the proponent was directed to furnish the complete concept about the comPosition of the industrial project along with
appropriate management Plan. 2. ln the summary of land use pattern, the Percentage land use for member industries. roads and storm water drains' common amenitieJ and Sreen belt '100o/o. add up to 124.5 o/o which cannot be more than This needs to be verified and reviied. o/o 3. Similarly the green belt area totally i5 said to be 34.5 whereas the addition of the break uP amounts to 41.69 o/o. This needs to be verified and revised' 4. A layout plan showing the various features like the industrial plots, roads, drainage. and green belt should be furnished. 5. The SEAC decided to direct the Proponent to revise the proposal to include the data and information as directed above and submit the revised proposal to the SEAC for further course of action. The above minuter was communicated to the proiect Proponent vide SEIAA-TN letter dated: 18.05.2018. The proponent has furnished reply vide their letter dated: 04.06.2018 and received by the office on 05.05.2018. The original proposal along with the reply was placed in the ll5th SEAC Meeting held on 27.06.2018.
The features of the proposed industrial park as noted in the letter are as follows: 1. The industrial park is envisaged to accommodate the following industries which do not fall under A &B category as per EIA notification 2006 and amendments thereof: 5.No. Type of lndustries Approximate Area (in no. of units Hectares)
1 Engineering units such 89 132.56 ci=-t \ Chairman - 'ir'SEAC.TN ai fabrication, machining, forging, castings, etc 2 Auto componentt 56 82.85 3 Food Processing 22 33.14 4 Packaging Units 22 33.14 5 Other non polluting 34 49.71 industries Total 223 331.40 2. The land use pattern of the park is ven here under: 5l.No. Description Area (in hectare) o/o of area I PIot area 331.40 76.O 2 Road and storm water 29.65 6.8 drainage 3 Common amenities 4.36 r.0 4 Commercial activities 19.62 4.5 5 Green belt outside plot 43.61 r0.0 area 6 Green belt along roadside 7.41 1.7 Total 436.O5 r00 3. The green belt area with direct contribution and implementation by SIPCOT is envisaged for an extent of 51.02 Ha (outside plot area. all along the boundary and along the roadside). Further, member industries will provide green belt for 3Oo/o of the allotted area. Overall, 34.5Oo/o of total area of the industrial park
will be under green belt as given below: 5l.No. Description Area (Ha) I By S|PCOT, outside the plot area 43.61 2 By SIPCOT. along the road side and 7.41 centre median 3 member industries (3Oo/o of the plot 99.42 area allotted to member industries) Total 150.44 Percentage of green belt among total 34.5Oo/o area of industrial park i.e. 436.05 Ha
4. Total area for the proposed industrial park is 436.05 Ha which comprises of Poromboke Land (10.15.5 Ha) & dry land (425.9Q Ha). ln the G.O. (Ms). No. 94 lndustries Department dated: 14.05.2013, the Government of Tamil Nadu have accorded administrative sanction for the acquisition of 436.05**+ Ha for the SEAC.TN E.- t1 industrial park. However. the SIPCOT is yet to acquire the land. The SIPCOT is also yet to obtain the necessary land use certificate for the establishment of industrial park in the land identified.
Based on the presentation made by the proponent, the SEAC Members interacted with the proponent about the project. The SEAC Members insisted that certain essential utilities like solid waste management, industrial effluent treatment and Storm water drainage should be the responsibility of the SIPCOT. Similarly, the 5IPCOT should ensure that apart from the common green belt created by SIPCOT. the industries should create additional green belt so that the total green belt area adds up to 33 o/o. The SEAC was also informed that source of water for the project will be Cauvery Water supply system. Since the material contained in the reply furnished has not been incorporated in the prefeasibility report already submitted and the SEAC Members have made a few suggestions for consideration of SlPCOT, the SEAC directed the SIPCOT to revise the prefeasibility report and submit the tame to SEAC on 28.06.2018. Accordingly, the SIPCOT submitted the revised prefeasibility report which was perused by the SEAC. Based on the deliberation stated above. the SEAC decided to recommend the proposal to create Manaparai SIPCOT Park by M/s. State lndustries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu Limited at 5.F. No. (Annexure -l) of Kannudaiyanpatty, K. Peryapatty (N) and Chattirapatty Villages, Manaparai Taluk, Trichy District. The ToR recommended will be the standard ToR applicable to proiects governed under category 8(b), Township & Area Development Projects. The MoEF & CC has already issued guidelines (February 2010 Annexures I & ll) for preparing the EIA report for Township & Area Development Projects and the proponent should be directed to strictly follow the guidelines and modify as necessary to suit the lndustrial park in the place of Township & Area Development Projects. This recommendation is also subject to the fulfilment of the following conditions: 1. The SIPCOT must submit land ownership document for the proposed project (436.05 Ha) along with the EIA report.
G Chairman nH-rN 2. The SIPCOT must submit permissible land use classification certificate obtained from competent authority for the proposed project (436.05 Ha) along with the
EIA report. 3. The proponent should furnish the layout plan showing the green belt area with dimensions & DGPS (Differential Global Positioning System) co-ordinates of areas allocated for green belt (33olo) and 5hall be provided along with the EIA report. The proposal was considered in 323'h SEIAA meeting held on 16.07.2018 and after detailed discussion, the Committee decided to prescribe standard ToR as per Annexure-l along with following Additional ToR.
1. The applicant shall obtain revised land use clarsification for the project area before entering to the sale deed
2. The SIPCOT shall provide green belt of 33o/o in common area and revise the plan accordingly. Further, the SIPCOT shall furnish the report for developing green belt with 5 rows of tree all along the periphery of the SIPCOT and in patched within to make up for 33o/o in common area. 3. Storm water management study shall be carried out en8a8in8 the services of reputed institutions.
4. Sufficient soil and moisture conservation along contours should be carried out. 5. Development of artificial/natural water source within the premises. 6. Detailed biodiversity ttudy has to be carried out by the proponent engaging the
services of reputed institutions. 7. Rain Water Harvesting System: The SIPCOT shall establish storm water collection and storage facility for'l4lo00 cu.m in order to recover and reuse rain water during normal rains. The Proponent, M/s .State lndustries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu has applied for Environmental Clearance to SEIAA-TN on 05.04.2019 for the development of Manaparai SIPCOT Park in 5.F No. (Annexure -l) of Kannudaiyanpatty, K. Peryapatty (N) and Chattirapatty Villages. Manaparai Taluk. Trichy District, Tamil Nadu. st4= Chairman sEACrIr{ b,. r9 proposal The was placed in this r33d SEAC Meeting herd on 24.og.2org. The project proponent gave detailed prerentation. The salient features of the project and the environmental impact assessment as presented by the proponent are as fo[ows: l. Project Location: Survey No: (Annexure -l) Revenue Village: Kannudaiyanpatty, K.periyapatty (N) and Chattirapatty Taluk: Manaparai District: Tiruchirapalli 2. Location Details:
Longitude; 78O 26' 18.6"E to ZBo 27' 55.5"E:
Latitude: 100 38' 37.7"N to lOo 40' Og.4-N 3. Area Details
Area Sl.No. Description (Heaares)
1 Plot area 33 r.55
2 Roads and Storm water drainage 23.OO
Common amenities (EB, Waterutorage, Fire Services, 3 3.51 Administrative Offi ce, etc.)
4 Commercial activities 11.72 5 Creen Belt outiide plot area (OSR) 43.64 6 ,r,a@ 5.96
7 Solid Waste Management 16.95
Total 436.O5 4. Creen Belt Development:
5l.No. Description Area (Hectarer) I By SIPCOT outside the plot area 43.64 2. By SIPCOT along the Road sides and Central meridian 5.69 3. By Member lndustries (3O o/o of the total ploi area 99.47 I GL. q--.- Chairman u SEAC.TN 5.'" allotted to Member lndustries) i.e 3Oo/o of 331.55 Ha Total r48.80 Percentage of Green Belt among Total Area of 34.12o/o lndustrial Park i.e 436.05 hectares 5. Water requirement: 6 MLD from TWAD.
6. Effl uent Treatment Plant:
All Member units will be mandated to install "Zero Liquid Discharge" based Effluent Treatment Plants to reclaim water for recycle/reuse in their utilities and green belt development.
7. Solid Waste Management;
Solid waste Benerated from the member industries will be handled by respective indurtries and they will be managed in compliance to Hazardous Solid Waste Management Rules,20l6.Specifically to address the Solid Waste Management. lt is proposed to have designated space of 16.95 Ha to encourage any private players to provide the Solid Waste Management Facility. Rain Water Harvesting: RWHS will be established as per the standard practices as percolation pits and as per guidelines the of Tamilnadu Water Supply and Drainage Board fl-WAD). 9. Estimated Cost of Proiect - Rs.500 crores.
The SEAC noted the following: promotion l. The Proponent, M/s .State lndustries corporation of ramil Nadu has applied for Environmental clearance to SEIAA-TN for the construction of Manaparai SlPcor Park in s.F No. (Annexure -l) of Kannudaiyanpatty. K. Peryapatty (N) and chattirapatty Villages, Manaparai raluk, Trichy District, Tamil Nadu.
2. The project/activity is covered under category "B" of ltem g(b) "Township and area development Proiects" of the schedule to the ErA Notification. 2006. Qd_-I a-\ LnallTnan SEAC-TN lr' 2o 3. ToR issued vide letter No SEIAA-TN/F.No.6496/2O18l8(b)/ToR-507/2018 Dated: 16.07.2018
Based on the presentation made by the proponent and the documents furnished. The
SEAC decided to call for following additional details from the project proponent and
the proponent has submitted his reply as follows, a) The SIPCOT murt submit land ownership document for the proposed project (436.05 Ha) along with the EIA report. The proponent has enclosed the copy of the G.O.No (M, No.94 dated 14.05.2013. The Above G.O does not specify the Survey No (Annexure -l) proposed by the project proponent while issuing Terms of Reference. Hence' the relevant document for the ownership of the above land to SIPCOT shall be furnished. b) The SIPCOT must submit permilsible land use clatslfication certificate obtained from competent authority for the proposed project (436.05 Ha) along with the EIA report. For this also the Proponent has enclosed the coPy of the G.O.No (Ms) No'94 dated 14.05.2O13.
As requested in the Terms of Reference, the proponent is requested to submit the permissible land use clasrification certificate from the DTCP for the Survey No (Annexure -l) for the proposed SIPCOT park. c) The proponent should fumish the layout plan Jhoriuing the Sreen belt area with dimensions & DGPS (Differential Global Positioning Synem) co-ordinatet of areas allocated for green belt (33%) and shall be provided along with the EIA report'
The proponent has fumished the Sreen belt break up in the tabular form given below:
SIPCOT outside the plot area By SIPCOT along the Road sides and Central meridian By Member lndustries (30 o/o of the total plot a rea allotted to Member lndustries) i.e 3Oo/o of 331.55 Ha --j-- Z'/'>- Lnalrman SEAC.TN Total r48.80 Percentage of Green Belt among Total Area of 34.12o/o lndustrial Park i.e 436.05 hectares Along with layout plan of the SIPCOT park in their EIA report annexure -8. It was noted from the layout plan that the Green Belt area allotted has following: i) Outside plot area (OSR) - 43.6a Ha ii) By SIPCOT along the Road sides and Central meridian - 5.69 Ha But not shown Member lndustries (3O o/o of the total plot area
allotted to Member lndustries) i.e 3Oo/o - 331.55 Ha in the layout plan ' The proponent was requested to revise the land break up details for the 6reen belt development for 33olo of total project area (excluding the member industrial unit) and revised layout for the Green belt shall be furnished with dimensions and
GPS co-ordinates. d) Storm water manaSement study rhall be canied out en8a8in8 the services of reputed institutions. The proponent has informed that college of Engineering, Anna University will be involved to study the storm water manaSement and the finding will be incorporated in designing of Storm water manaSement system' Theaforesaidreplywasnotacceptable.Since'TermsofReferencewasissued engaging the requesting that"Storm water manaSement study shall be carried out servicesofrePutedinstitutionsalongwiththeElAreport.But'theproponenthas not furnished. Hence, request to submit the said rePort' e)DetailedbiodiversitystudyhastobecaniedoutbytheProPonentensaSinSthe
services of rePuted inttitutlonJ. Theproponenthasfurnishedthat..Thereisnospecificbiodiversityintheimpact areaoftheproposedlP.However,slPCTwillinitiatesuchstudybeforeany
Project activitY." AspertheTermsofReference.theProponenthastostudythebiodiversityby engagingtheservicesofreputedinstitutionsandfurnishthereportalonSwiththe
EIA. {- o..- Chairman r-- SEAC-TN 7r'
2, ln addition to that the proiect proponent is requested to furnish the following details:
f) The unit shall furnish water balance and furnish proposal for installation of STP
with design adequacy along with scheme for recycling the treated sewate. g) The project proponent shall demark the lnlet canals to the nearby water body and shall furnish the plan and layout for the Storm Water Management. h) The project proponent shall furnish the AAQ survey stating the period of survey with photographs. i) Provisional approval for the source of water supply from competent authority shall be furnished.
j) The project proponent shall furnish the details on power requirements and DC Sets to be installed.
k) The project proponent shall furnish the plan and layout for the Rainwater Harvesting. on receipt of the above details, the project proponent will be requested to re- prejent before the SEAC about the proposal along with the aforesaid details. The proponent has furnished the above said detail on20.ll.2Ol9
The subject was placed in the 139'h sEAC Meeting held on 23.11.2019. Based on the presentation made by the proponent and the documents furnished,the SEAC decided to recommend the proposal for grant of Environmental clearance to SEIAA subject to the following condition in addition to normal condition:
l. The project proponent shall ensure that the individual member units will not be allowed to carry out manufacturing of products stipurated in G.o. (Ms) No. 84 dated 25/06/2018 on banning of one time use on and throwaway plastics.
2. The proponent shourd strictry compry with, Tamir Nadu covernment Order (Ms) No.84 Environment and forests (EC.2) Department dated 25.06.2018 regarding ban on one time use and throwaway plastics irrespective of thickness with effect from o,l.0r.2019 under Environment (Protection) Act, 1986. a{-.t } Chairman
E-.-'EAC.TN 3. The project proponent must submit the permissible land use classification certificate obtained from competent authority for the proposed project before obtain the CTE from TNPCB. 4. The proponent shall obtain the necessary permission/ NOC of water supply from the TWAD Board/competent Authourity. 5. The proposal for CER shall be furnished as per the office memorandum of MoEF & CC dated 01.05.2018 before placing the subject to SEIAA. 6. The allotted industrial units shall obtain consent from the TNPCB separately for their establishment & operation in this industrial estate. 7. The project proponent shall ensure the 33olo of the total area of the
proiect site should be covered with green belt . 8. The proponent shall provide Rain Water Harvesting pits so as to recharge the ground water table. 9. Discharge of treated sewage shall conform to the norms & standards prescribed by the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board. 10. lt is the sole responsibility of the proponent that the treated sewage disposed for green belt development/ avenue plantation should not pollute the soil/ ground water/ adjacent canals/ lakes/ ponds, etc.
I L The Developer has to ensure that all the member industries within the lndustrial Park shall make their own arrangementt to achieve zero discharge of the trade effluents,
12. The project proponent shall ensure that all the member units should treat and dispose solid waste & E-waste as per the Solid Waste Management
Rule2Ol6 as amended and E-Waste Management Rules, 2016
13. There shall be no discharge of effluent outside the lndustrial Park at any time.
14. The Developer shall mandate the member units of the lndustrial Park to install adequate APC measures/Acouttic to achieve air emissions standards within permissible limits prescribed by the CPCB. (f,1,_.__LI Chairman ? SEAC.TN f-'' 2> Agenda no: 139 - 02- lO (File No. 7l9O /2019) Proposed Rough Stone, Jelly and Gravel quarry lease over an extent of 2.43.0Ha in 5.F.Nos.490flA2 of ldaigal Part - ll village, Ambasamudram Taluk, Tirunelveli District the state of Tamil Nadu by Thiru.E. Vinoth Sankarlal - for Environment Clearance. (SlA/TN/MIN/zl4O81 /2019)
The proposal was placed in the l39th SEAC Meeting held on 23.11.2019. The projea proponent gave detailed presentation. The salient features of the projea and the environmental impact assessment as presented by the proponent are as follows:
I. Government Order / Lease details: a. The quarry lease was applied in the name of Thiru. E.Vinoth5ankarlal, Tirunelveli, Precise Area Communication was issued by the District
Collector, Tirunelveli vide Rc.No.MI/33360/2017, dated 15.O2.2O19 for a period of 5 years. lt is a fresh lease for Rough Stone, Jelly and Gravel Quarry over an Extent of 2.43.OHa in 5.F.No.490llA2at ldaigal Part-ll Village, AmbasamudramTaluk, Tirunelveli Distria. 2. Mining Plan / Scheme of Mining approved details: a. The Mining plan was prepared for the period of 5 years. The mining plan war gEt approved *3*, ,n" Deputy Director, Department of Geology and Mining, Tirunelveli District vide Rc.No.Ml/33360/2017 Dated: 28.05.2019.
3. As per the Department of Geology and Mining, Tirunelveli District. Mining Plan approval for the 5 years, the production schedule for 5 years states that the total quantity of 3,17,O62m3 of Rough Stone and 13,755m3 of gravel formation for the period of Five years. :1--> CHAIRMAN SEAC-TN (r" 2.} YEAR ROUGHSTONE (m3) GMVEL (m3)
I 63497 137s5 il 63470 llt 63460 IV s9700 66935
TOTAL 317062 13755
4. The quarry operation is proposed depth of42m (from + 99m RLto 57m RL). 5. The Quarry operation is proposed to carry out with open cast semi mechanized mining with bench height of 5.0m & 5.0m width is considered. 6. Rough stone and Gravel are to be transported by Tippers of 4Nos. (5/lOTcapacity).
7. The project is located atLatitude:08.47'33"N to 09.47,39"N and Longitude: 77"29'O2'E to 77'29'lO.E.(Toposheet Number: SB H /5,6, 9 & lO)
8. The total Manpower requirement is 20Nos. (permanent:14, Temporary: G)
9. Total cost of the proiects is Rs.69,32,000/-(lncluding operational + Fixed Asset & EMP cost). EMP cost about Rs.4,60,000/- 10. The ground water table is at a depth of 58m to 55m. ll. Applied lease area is not covered under HACA region.
12. No coastal Regulation Zone (cRZ) is located within the radius of lOkm from the lease area,
13. No lnterstate boundary & western Ghats Boundary is located within the radius of lOkm from the lease area.
western Ghats ESA boundary as per MoEF& cc draft notification dated 3rd
october 2018 is located l4.5Km from the lease area on the southwestern side. 14. No Wild Life Sanctuary is located within lOkm Radius
CHAIRMAN SEAC-TN w\ 15. No critically polluted area as notified by the central pollution control Board constituted under water (Prevention and control of Pollution) Act 1974 is located within the radius of lOkm from the lease area.
16. No Protected Area, Eco sensitive Zone & Eco Sensitive Area is located within the radius of lOkm.
17. No habitation is located within the radius of the 300m from the lease area as stated in the letter obtained from VAO, ldaigal part-ll Village, Ambasamudram Taluk, Tirunelveli District dated 15.07.2019. 18. Letter obtained from the Deputy Director, Department of Geology and Mining, Tirunelveli vide Letter Rc.No.Ml/3335o/2o17 dated 26.01.2019 informed that the details of the existing, abandoned and proposed quarries within 500m radius from the proposed Rough Stone quarry as follows.
5t. Name of the Taluk& Village 5.F.No& Distance from the Quarry No quarry owner Extent boundary of the Details proposed quarry I ExistinS Quarry NIL 2 Abandoned Quarry NIL 3 Proposed Quarry I Thiru.E.Vinoth ldaigal Part-ll 490/tA Proposed Sankarlal, Ambasamudra 2, Quarry 5/o.Ramakrishnan m 2.43.O Ayyar Street, Ha Chettikulam. AmbasamudramT aluk, Tirunelveli Dirtrict. The SEAC noted the following:
CL.-b CHAIRMAN SEAC.TN
21 l. The Proponent, Thiru.E.Vinoth Sankarlal has applied for Environment Clearance to SEIM-TN for the Rough Stone, Jelly and Gravel quarry lease over an extent of 2.43.OHa in S.F.No: 490/1A2, ldaigal Part-ll Village' Ambasamudram Taluk. Tirunelveli District, Tamil Nadu 2. The project/activity is covered under Category "B" of ltem l(a) "Mining of Mineral Proiects" of the Schedule to the EIA Notification, 2005.
After the detailed presentation and documents furnished by the proponent, SEAC observed that there is water body (Lake) in the western side of leased mining area and the proposed mining activity is likely to affect the water body and thereby there will be negative impact on agricultural activities and livelihood of the people living nearby.
Hence the SEAC decided not to recommend the proposal.
CHAIRMAN SEAC.TN U/, Agenda No. 13942-11
(File No. 7254/2019)
Proposed Coleroon River Sand quarrying over an extent of 2O.OO.O Ha at S.F. No. 32ul(Part) in Vadarangam Village, Sirkazhi raluk, Nagapaninam District. Tamil Nadu by M/s. The Executive Engineer, PWDN-/RD- For Terms of Reference.
(srA/TN/MlN/4 s87 O /2019)
The proposal was placed in this 139tr SEAC Meeting held on 23.11.2019. The project proponent gave detailed presentation. The salient features of the project and the
Environmental impact Assessment as presented by the proponent are aJ follows:
1. Government order / lease details:
The Quarry lease was applied in the name of Executive Engineer, Mining and
Monitoring Division Thanjavur, Precise area communication letter was issued by the District Collector, Nagapattinam District Vide Letter Na.Ka.zlo2lKanimam,/2018 dated O9.O2.2O19. lt is a fresh lease for sand Quarry for over an extent of 20.00.0 Ha in S.F. No: 321ll (part) in Vadarangam Village, Sirkazhi Taluk, Nagapattinam District.
2. Mining Plan approval details;
Mining Plan was prepared for the period of Eighteen Months. The mining plan was got approval from the Aisistant Director. Department
of Geology and Mining, Nagapattinam District Vide letter Rc. No.402lMines/201 8 dated 22.04.2019.
3. As per the Department of Geology and Mining, Nagapattianm Dirtrict. Mining Plan approval for the Eighteen Months, the production schedule for Eleven Months states that the total quantity of should not exceed 279364 cu.m of shoals and 200000cu.m of sand.
a -\1"--llo - /\ CHAIRMAN - SEAC.TN
2{ 4. The quarry operation is proposed upto a depth of rm below the theoreticar bed level.
5. The Quarry operation is proposed to carry out with open cast semi mechanised mining.
5. The sand is directly loaded into tippers/trucks with the capacity of 10-20 Tons. 6. Total number of excavators used for quarrying sand-4Nos
7. The project is located at il"r7'09.70"N to lr"r7'35.56-N latitude and
7 9 38' 38.47" E to 7 9"38, 46.84"E longitude.
8. The total Manpower requirement is 42 Nos.
9. Total cost of the project is Rs. 775Lakhs and EMp cost about Rs. 3.77Lakhs.
10. The water table is found to be at the depth of 6-g m below the ground level ll. Applied lease area is not covered under HACA region. 12. No coastal Regulation zone (cRZ) is located within the radius of lo m from the lease area
13. No interstate boundary &, western Ghats Boundary is located within the radius of I0 km from the lease area.
14. No National Park & wild life sanctuary is located within the radius of l0 km from the lease area
15. No critically polluted area as notified by the central pollution control board
constituted under water (prevention and control of pollution Act 1974 is located within the radius of l0 km. 16. No protected Area, Eco Sensitive Zone & Eco sensitive area is located within the radius of l0 km. 17. No habitation is located within the radius of the 300 m from the lease area as stated in the letter obtained from VAo, Vadarangam Village in sirkazhi raluk, Nagapattinam Dirtrict. SEAC Noted that
CHAIRMAN SEAC-TN \r" l. The proponent, M/s. The Executive Engineer, AX/DAX/RD, submitted application for Terms of Reference in Form-I, Pre- Feasibility report for the Coleroon river Sand Quarrying over an extent of 20.00.0 Ha at 321/l(Part), Vadarangam Village in Sirkazhi Taluk, Nagapattinam Dirtrict, Tamil Nadu 2. The project/activity is covered under Category "Bl" of ltem l(a) "Mining of Mineral Projecti' of the Schedule to the EIA Notification, 2006.
Based on the presentation made by the proponent, the SEAC decided to recommend the proposal grant of Terms of References (IoR) to SEIAA with Public Hearing, subject to the following specific conditions in addition to the normal conditions as part of ToR:
1. The details of the location to cover land use and ecologically sensitive areas.
a. Details of wells in the vicinity, ground water tables and other
surface water bodies in the vicinity.
b. Thickness of Sand and its variation covering the entire areai
similarly the width of the sand bed.
c. Agricultural land if any, surrounding the quarry site.
d. The composition of sand and other minerals preient in the river
bed.
e. Details of the river bed.
f. History of mining in the area shall be furnished.
2. Reclamation of the sand area after mining needs to be submitted.
3. Justification for usage of more porclains in individual sand mining areas to be given.
4. Adequate safety measures in the quarrying area with respect to porclains to be deployed.
(._\:. t^ (-\ CHAIRMAN SEAC.TN \/ 4 5. Adequate plan for traffic management for the loaded vehicles passing through nearby habitation.
6. The impact of dust pollution and noise on the habitations nearby. 7. The PWD has to give scientific evidence for concluding that river sand depth is
lm.may not cause any significant impact on the ground water table in the surrounding environment
8. The P^,)UD has to furnish the details regarding agricultural activities that are taking place around the project area.
9. The details of the open/bore wells in the vicinity of the project site should be furnished.
10. study the quality and quantity of ground water in 5km radius in the downstream of the proiect site.
11. Study the Impact of sand mining on the structures rocated in the nearby vicinity.
12. The route map for the Lorries for accessing the project area and for transporting mined sand should be specified. 13. The details regarding traffic volume in the vicinity of projea area should be furnished.
14' To prevent dust pollution, suitable working methodology needs to be adopted taking wind direction into consideration.
15. A detail study shall be conducted on the impact of sand mining with the habitation and cultivation in the nearby area along the river bed and its mitigation mea5ure5.
16. The mining area must be demarcated leaving at least 50m from the river embankment on either side.
CHAIRMAN SEAC.TN (^" 17. Contouring of the river bed has to be taken to ascertain the relative levels of
sand in the river and also to suggest the depth of sand mining.
18. The EIA report should be as per the Guidelines for Sustainable Sand Mining issued in 2016 w the MoEF & CC, GOl, New Delhi. 19. Wherever irrigation channels take off from the river within the boundary of
the mining proiect, the mining operation should not affect the flow of water in
the irritation channels. ln such a way a plan of action should be submitted.
20. EMP should contain break up details ruch as tools, labor and environmental
monitoring cost, cost for the ground water monitoring in the surrounding area part shall be of the EMP cost, variation of depth of ground water and quality shall
be monitored during the project period by conduaing survey once in 3 months. This cost shall also be included in EMp.
21. The recommendation for the issue of rerms of Reference is subject to the finar outcome principal of the Hon'ble N6T, Bench, New Delhi in O.A No. lg6 of (M.A.No.350/2016) 2016 and O.A.No.2O0l2015 and O.A.No.58Ol2016 (M.A.No.ll82l2016) and O.A.No.l02l20t7 and O.A.No.4O4/2016 (M'A'No.758l20r6, M.A.No.92o/zot6, M.A.No.1122/20r6, M.A.No.l 2/2o1r &. M.A.No.843l20r7) and o.A.No.405l20r6 and o.A.No.520 of 2016 (M.A.No.98ll201 6, M.A.No.9 82/2016 & M.A.No. 3841201 7). 22. The proposar for cER shal be furnished with time frame as per the office memorandum of MoEF&CC dated Ol.O5.20lg. 23. ln addition to following details to be furnished.
l. Quantity estimated to be mined through machineries with extent.
ll. Quantity estimated to be mined through manual mining with extent.
I \__>\_- >-.. CHAIRMAN - SEAC.TN \r4
,, lll. Certificate from the VAO stating the details of habitation located within
300 m radius from the boundary of the proposed site along with FMB sketch.
lV. The projea proponent has to furnish the affidavit stating that there are no
bridges, culverts, cross masonaries, water head works or any other civil
structures within 500 mts., of the proposed quarry site.
V. The RL Upstream, RL Downstream, RL Starting, RL Ending, Chainage
Starting km, Ending km details shall be furnished.
Vl. Geological sections Map should be furnished.
Vll. 500m, lkm & 5km radius of clear Google Map showing all the features like
agricultural activities, habitations, etc
Vlll. The self purification capacity of the river shall be furnished. lX. Adequate plan for traffic management for the loaded vehicles passing through nearby habitation.
CHAIRMAN SEAC.TN \,^ Agenda no:139 -02-12 (File No. @97/2017) Proposed construction of Thindivanam SIPCOT Park by IWs. State lndustries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu at S.F.No. l,2,3,4,5,6, lOpt, l3pt, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20,21pt,22/1.2.32,33,34,35,36,37,38pt, 39, 40,41.42,43/1pt,2, 45, 46,47,48/1, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 60, 61/1,2,3pt,62, $, A,ll8, l2O, 121,123,125, 126, 129 of Pelakuppam Village, 46pt, 47pt, 48pt, 50pt, 51, 52pt, 53pt of Venmaniyathoor Village, l81pt, 182, 183, 184, 194, 195, 196, 197.198, 199, 2@,2O1. 2O2, 2O3, 2O4, 2O5, 206, 2O7,2O8.2o9.21O, 212,213pt, 214, 237, 24, 245 &.246pt of Kollar Village, Thindivanam Taluk, Villupuram Dittrict - for Environmental Clearance srA/TNACP/2 03 s9 /2017) The Proponent of "M/s. State lnduttries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu" has applied for ToR for the proposed construction of Thindivanam JIPCOT Park at 5.F.No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 1Opt, l3pt, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19. 20, 21pt, 22/1, 2, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38pt, 39,40, 41,42,43/1pt,2, 45,46,47,48/1, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 60, 61/1, 2,3pt, 62,63, 64, ll8, '12O, 121,123, 125, 126, 129 of Pelakuppam Village, 46pt, 47pt,48pt, 50pt, 51, 52pt, 53pt of Venmaniyathoor Village, l81pt, 182, 183, 184, 194, 195, 196, 197,198, 199, 200,201,202,203,204,205,206,207, 208,209,210, 212,213pt,214,237,244,245 & 246pt of Kollar Village, Thindivanam Taluk, Villupuram District on 01.O2.2O18. The SEIAA-TN asked for certain particulars from the proPonent for which the proponent responded partially. The proposal was placed in the lllst SEAC Meeting held on 16.05.2018.
The Salient features of the project proposal are as follows: 1. The SIPCOT proposes to develop Thindivanm industrial Park exclusively for industries that are not covered under the EIA Notification, 2006 at the Pelakuppam, Kollar, Venmaniyathur Villages in an area of 291.60.50 ha. The Thindivanam industrial park is likely to accommodate General Engineering industries and all other
such industries which are not under the purview of EIA Notification, 2006, which do not require Environmental Clearance.
Gx Chairman -L-SEAC: N 2. Required water of 4 MLD will be sourced from treated domestic waste water from Thindivanam for the project. 3. Summary of land use pattern has been furnished which contain critical errors. The SEAC interacted with the proponent about the project proposar. The folowing are the summary of the discussion: a) The proponent has furnished the type of industries rikery to come up in the project. However' the number of industries (atreast approximatery) rikery to come up in park the has not been specified. The data regarding thir aspect i, very vital for assessing the possibre environmentar impacts and finarising the necessary environmentar management measures required for the industries. only with this data, it wi[ be possibre to foresee the type of environmentar issues that will be coming up rike air po[ution, water po[ution, sorid waste, hazardous warte etc. Therefore, the proponent was directed to furnish the complete concept about the composition of the industrial project along with appropriate management plan. b) In the rummary of land use pattern, the percentage land use for member industries' roads and storm water drains, common amenities and green bert add upto 124.35 o/o which cannot be more than 100o/o. This needs to be verified and revised. c) Similarly the green belt area totally is said to be 34.35 o/o whereas the addition of the break 0/o. up amountr to 41.7 This needs to be verified and revised. d) A layout plan showing the various features like the industrial plots. roads. drainage, and green belt should be furnished. e) The SEAC decided to direct the proponent to revise the proposar to incrude the data and information as directed above and iubmit the revised proposar to the SEAC for further course of action.
Chairman purc-m The above minutes was communicated to the project proponent vide SEIAA-TN letter dated: 21.05.2018. The proponent has furnished the reply vide their letter dated: 04.06.2018, received by the office on 05.06.2018.
The original proposal along with the reply was placed in the ll5th SEAC Meeting held on 27.06.2018.
The features of the proposed industrial park as noted in the letter are as follows: 5. The industrial park is envisaged to accommodate the following industries which do not fall under A &B category as per EIA notification 2006 and amendments thereof: 5.No. Type of Approximat Area (in lndustries e no. of Hectares) unitj 1 Engineering units such as 34 87.48 fabrication, machining. forging, castings, etc 2 Auto components 21 54.68 3 Food Processing 17 43.74 4 Packaging Units 4 10.94 5 Other non polluting industries 9 21.87 Total 85 218.70 6. The land use pattern of the park is given here under: 5l.No. Description Area (in o/o of hectare) area I Plot area 218.70 75.O 2 Road and storm water drainage 19.83 6.8 3 Common amenities 4.37 1.5 4 Commercial activities 14.58 5 5 Green belt outside plot area 29.16 10.0 6 Green belt along roadside 4.95 1.7 Total 291.60 100 7. The green belt area with direct contribution and implementation by 5lpCOT is envisaged for an extent of 34.11 Ha (outside plot area, all along the boundary and along the roadside). Further, member industries will provide green belt for 3Oo/o of the allotted area. Overall. 34.2Oo/o of total area of the industrial park will be under green belt as given below: ( _) \. ,\ Chairman -- JEAC.TN 5l.No. Description Area (Ha) I By SIPCOT, outside the plot area 29.16 2 By SlPCOT, along the road side and centre median 4.95 3 Nu member industries (30o/o of the plot area allotted 65.61 to member industries) Total 99.72 Percentage of green belt among total area of industrial 34.2Oo/o park i.e. 436.05 Ha 8. Total area for the proposed industrial park is 291.60.5 Ha which comprises of Poromboke Land (43.50 Ha) & dry land (248.10.5 Ha). ln the C.O. (Ms). No. 176 lndustries Department dated: 16.12.2010, the Government of Tamil Nadu have accorded administrative sanction for the acquisition of 291.60.5 Ha for the industrial park. However, the SIPCOT is yet to acquire the land. The SIPCOT is also yet to obtain the necessary land use certificate for the establishment of industrial park in the land identified. Based on the presentation made by the proponent, the SEAC Members interacted with the proponent about the project. The SEAC Members insisted that certain essential utilities like solid waste management, industrial effluent treatment and Storm water drainage should be the responsibility of the SlPCOT. Similarly. the SIPCOT should ensure that apart from the common green belt created by SIPCOT, the industries should create additional green belt so that the total green belt area adds up lo 33 o/o. The SEAC was also informed that source of water for the project will be Tertiary Treatment Reverse Osmosis CI-[RO) to be set up at Tindivanam by TWAD Board. The SEAC Members suSgested that an alternate source of water will be finalized in absence of the TWAD
Board source. Since the material contained in the reply furnished has not been incorporated in the prefeasibility report already submitted and the SEAC Members have made a few suggestions for consideration of SIPCOT, the SEAC directed the SIPCOT to revise the prefeasibility report and submit the same to SEAC on 28.06.2018. Accordingly, the
SIPCOT submitted the revised prefeasibility report which was perused by the SEAC.
Chairman LrEAc'rN Based on the deliberation stated above, the SEAC decided to recommend the proposal to create Thindivanam SIPCOT Park by M/s. State lndustries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu at 5.F. No. 45, 46, etc of Pelakuppam, Kollar, Venmaniyathur Villages. Thindivanam Taluk, Villupuram District. The ToR recommended will be the standard ToR applicable to projects governed under category 8(b). Township & Area Development Projects. The MoEF & cc has already issued guidelines (February 2010) for preparing the EIA report for Township & Area Development projects and the proponent should be directed to strictly follow the guidelines and modify as necessary to tuit the lndustrial park in the place of rownship & Area Development projects. This recommendation is also subject to the fulfilment of the following conditions:
l. The SIPCOT must submit land ownership document for the proposed project (291.60.5 Ha) along with the EIA report.
2. The SlPCor must submit permissible land use classification certificate obtained from competent authority for the proposed project (291.60.5 Ha) along with the EIA report.
3. The proponent should furnish the layout plan showing the green belt area with
dimensions & DGPS (Differential Global Positioning System) co-ordinates of areas allocated for green belt (33olo) and shall be provided along with the EIA report. The proposal along with the EIA report was placed in the l33d SEAC Meeting held on 25.o7.2019. The project proponent gave detaired presentation. The salient features of the project and the environmental impact asJessment as presented by the proponent are as follows: l. Project Location: SurveyNo: 1,2,3,4,5,6, lOpt. l3pt. 14, 15,16, 12,18, 19.20, 2tpt,22/1,2,32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38pt, 39, 40, 41.42,43/1pr, 2, 45, 46, 41, 4B/1, 49, 50, st, 52. 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 60, 61/1, 2,3pt, 62, 63, 64, I 18, t20, 121, 123, 125. 126. 129 or Pelakuppam Village, 46pt, 47pt, 48pt,50pt, 51, 52pt, 53pt of Venmaniyathoor Village, 18lpt, 182, 183, 184. 194, tgs, 196, tg7,1gB, 1gg,2OO,2Ot,2O2,2O3,
-V.' =F"**>'EAC.TN
t"o 2O4, 205, 206. 2O7, 2O8, 2O9, 210, 212, 213pt' 214, 237, 2M, 245 & 246pt of Kollar Village, Thindivanam Taluk, Villupuram District. 2. Land Area: 291.605 Hectares - Alienated to SIPCOT by GoTN vide G,O (Ms) No'176 dated 16/12/2010 3. Location Details: Longitude : 79o 36' 3O.92"E to 79o 37' 37.O2"E Latitude : 12o 14' 2l.9l"N to l2o 15' 28.51"N 4. Land break up details: Area 5l.No. Description (Hectares)
1 Plot area 218.70 2 Roads and Storm water dfgtlggg 19.83 Common amenities (EB, Water storage' Fire 3 4.37 Services. Administrative Office, etc.) 4 Commercial activities 14.58 5 Green Belt outside Plot area (OSR) 29.16 6 Green Belt along roadside - 4.95 Total 291.60 5.Grpen Beh ll.No. Description Area (Hectares)
1. Bv SIPCOT outside thePlqlelga 29.16 2. stecor along the Road sides and central 4.95 meridian 3. -ny area 65.61 allotted to Member lndustries) i.e. 307o of 218.70 Ha Total 99.72 Total Area of Percentage of 6reen Belt among 34.200/o lndustrial Park i.e. 291.60 hectares 6. Water requirement: 4 MLD (l MLD Potable water from TWAD and 3 MLD Non Potable water from TTRO plant)
Chairman LrEAc-TN 7. Effluent Treatment Plant: All Member units will be mandated to inrtall "Zero Liquid Discharge" based Effluent Treatment Plants to reclaim water for recycle/reuse in their utilities and green belt development. 8. Rain Water Harvesting:
RWHS will be established as per the standard practices as percolation pits and as per the guidelines of Tamilnadu Water Supply and Drainage Board IFWAD). 9. Solid Waste Management:
Solid waste generated from the member industries will be handled by respective industries and they will be managed in compliance to Hazardous solid waste Management Rules. 2O16.
10. Estimated Cost of Project - Rs.300 crores and EMp Cost: Rs.4.5 crores. The SEAC noted the following: promotion 1. The Proponent. M/s. State lndustries Corporation of Tamil Nadu has applied for Environmental clearance to sEIAA-TN for the construction of park Thindivanam slPcor in s.F No. 45. 46, etc of perakuppam. Koilar. Venmaniyathur Villages, Thindivanam Taluk, VillupuramDirtrict, Tamil Nadu. The project/activity ..Townshrp 2. is covered under category "8" of rtem g(b) and area development Proiects" of the schedure to the ErA Notification. 2006. Based presentation on the made by the proponent and the documents furnished. The SEAC decided to call for foilowing additional details from the project proponent: a) The slPCor must submit land orr.rnership document for the proposed project (291.60.5 Ha) along with the EIA report. proponent The has enclosed the copy of the G.O.N. (M, No.l76 dated 16.12.2010. The Above G.O does not rpecify the Survey No: 1,2. 3,4.5,6. lOpt, 13pt, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18. 19, 20, 2tpt, 22/1, 2, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 32, 38pt, 39, 40, 41,42,43/1pt, 2, 45, 46, 42, 48/1, 49, 50. 51, 52. 53, 54, 55, 56, 52, 60, 6t/1, 2,3pt, 62, 63, 64, 118, t2O, 121, 123, t2S, 126, t2g of petakuppam Viilage. 46pt,
47pt, 48pt,50pt, 51, 52pt, 53pt of Venmaniyathoor Village, 1glpt, 182, l83, 184,
\-- \ ChairmanG JEAC.TN it 194, 195, 196, 197, 1 98, I 99, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 21O, 212. 213pt, 214. 237, 244. 245 & 246pt of Kollar Village, Thindivanam
Taluk, Villupuram District for the proposed by the project proponent while issuing Terms of Reference. Hence. the relevant document for the ownership of the above land to SIPCOT shall be furnished. b) The SIPCOT must submit permisrible land use clarsification certificate obtained from competent authority for the proposed project (291.60.5 Ha) along with the EIA report. For this also the proponent has enclosed the copy of the 6.O.No (Ms) No.l76
dated 16.12.2010. As requested in the Terms of Reference, the proponent is requested to submit the permissible land use classification certificate from the DTCP for the Survey No: 1. 2. 3.4,5,6, lOpt, l3pt, 14, 15. 16, 17.'18, 19. 20, 21pt. 22/1. 2. 32, 33. 34, 35, 36. 37, 38pt. 39, 40, 41,42,43/1pt, 2, 45. 46, 47,
48/1, 49, 50, 51, s2. 53. 54. 55. 56. 57. 60. 61 /1, 2,3pt. 62. 63, 64, 1l 8, 120, l2l, 123.125. 126, 129 of Pelakuppam Village. 46pt, 47pt, 48pt.50pt, 51. 52pt. 53pt of Venmaniyathoor Village. 18'lpt, 182, 183, 184, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199. 2OO. 2O1, 202, 2O3, 2O4. 2O5, 206, 207. 2O8, 2O9, 21O,212, 213pt, 214' 237' 244,245 &.246pt of Kollar Village, Thindivanam Taluk' Villupuram District for the proposed SIPCOT park. c) The proponent thould fumish the layout plan rho\,ving the Sreen belt area with dimensions & DGPS (Differential Global Positioning Synem) co-ordinates of areaj allocated for green belt (33oh) and shall be prorided along with the EIA report. The proponent has furnished the green belt break up in the tabular form given below: 5l.No. Description Area (Hectares) By SIPCOT outside the plot area 29.16 2. By 5IPCOT along the Road sides and Central 4.95 meridian 3. By Member lndustries (3O o/o of the total plot area allotted to Member lndustries) i.e. 30o/o of 65.61 218.70 Ha Total 99.72
Chairman SEAC-TN Percentage of Green Belt among Total Area of 34.2Oo/o lndustrial Park i.e. 291.60 hectares Along with layout plan of the SIPCOT park in their EIA report annexure -8. It was noted from the layout plan that the Green Belt area allotted has following: i) Outside plot area (OSR) - a3.64 Ha ii) By SIPCOT along the Road sides and Central meridian - 5.69 Ha But not shown Member Industries (3O o/o of the total plot area allotted to Member lndustries) i.e 3Oo/o - 65.6'l Ha in the layout plan . The proponent is requested to revire the land break up details for the Green belt development for 33o/o of total project area (excluding the member industrial unit) and revised layout for the Green belt shall be furnished with dimentions and 6PS co- ordinates. d) Storm water management rtudy shall be carried out engaglng the seruices of reputed inctitutlons. The proponent has informed that college of Engineering, Anna University will be involved to study the storm water management and the finding will be incorporated in designing of Storm water manaSement system. The aforesaid reply was not acceptable. Since, Terms of Reference was issued requesting that "Storm water management study shall be carried out engaSing the
services of reputed institutions along with the EIA report. But, the proponent has not furnithed. Hence, request to submit the said report. e) Detailed biodiversity stud has to be canied out by the proponent enSaSing the tervicet of reputed inrtitutions. The proponent has furnished that "There is no specific biodiversity in the impact area of the proposed lP. However, SIPCOT will initiate such study before any project activity." As per the Terms of Reference, the proponent has to study the biodiversity by engaging the services of reputed inititutions and furnish the report along with the ElA. ln addition to that the project proponent is requested to furnish the following details:
f) The unit shall furnish water balance and furnish proposal for installation of STP with design adequary along with scheme for recycling the treated sewage.
e -t-Chairman "t- E9c-rN
3c- 8) The project proponent shall demark the lnlet canals to the nearby water body and shall furnish the plan and layout for the Storm Water Management. h) The project proponent shall furnish the AAQ survey stating the period of survey with photographs. i) Provisional approval for the source of water supply from competent authority shall be furnished. j) The project proponent shall furnish the details on power requirements and DG
Sets to be installed. k) The project proponent shall furnish the plan and layout for the Rainwater Harvesting. l) The project proponent shall demark the lnlet canals to the nearby water body and shall furnish the plan and layout for the Storm Water Management. m) Provisional approval for the source of water supply from competent authority shall be furnished. On receipt of the above details, SEAC will decide the further course of action on the proposal. The proponent has furnished the above said detail on20'11.2019'
The subject was placed in the 139'h SEAC Meeting held on 23.11-2019. Based on the presentation made by the proponent and the documents furnished, the SEAC decided to recommend the proposal for grant of Environmental Clearance to SEIAA subject to the following condition in addition to the normal conditions:
l. The project proponent shall ensure that the individual member units will not be allowed to carry out manufacturing of products stipulated in G.O. (Ms) No. 84 dated 25/06/2018 on banning of one time use on and throwaway plastics. 2. The proponent should strictly comply with, Tamil Nadu Government Order (Ms) No.84 Environment and forests (EC.2) Department dated 25.06.2O18 regarding ban on one time use and throwaway plastics irrespective of thickness with effect from 01.01.2019 under Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.
Chairman TJEAC-TN 3. The project proponent must submit the permissible land use classification certificate obtained from competent authority for the proposed project before obtain the CTE from TNPCB. 4. The proponent shall obtain the necessary permission/ NOC of water supply from the TWAD Board/competent Authourity. 5. The proposal for CER shall be furnished as per the office memorandum of MoEF & CC dated 01.05.2018 before placing the subject to SEIAA. 6. The allotted industrial units shall obtain consent from the TNPCB separately for their establishment & operation in this industrial estate. 7. The project proponent shall ensure that 33olo of the total area of the proiect site
should be covered with green belt . 8. The proponent shall provide Rain Water Harvesting pits so as to recharge the ground water table. 9. Discharge of treated sewage shall conform to the norms & standards prescribed by the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board. 10. lt is the sole responsibility of the proponent that the treated sewaSe disposed for green belt development/ avenue plantation should not pollute the soil/ ground water/ adjacent canals/ lakes/ ponds, etc.
I L The Developer has to ensure that all the member industries within the lndustrial Park shall make their own arrangements to achieve zero discharSe of the trade effluents.
12. The project proponent shall ensure that all the member units should treat and dispose solid waste & E-waste as per the Solid Waste Management Rule2016 as amended and E-Waste Management Rules, 2016
13. There shall be no discharge of effluent outside the lndustrial Park at any time.
14. The Developer shall mandate the member units of the lndustrial Park to install adequate APC measures/Acoustic to achieve air emissions standards within permissible limits prescribed by the CPCB.
) ai_- <-\ Lha[Tnan JEAC-TN \.-- l-\ Agenda no: 139 - 02- 13 (File No. 7171 /2019) Proposed Gravel quarry lease over an eldent of 2.15.5Ha in 5.F.Nos.l37l281.137nM. 137n82, t37n(, 137f2C, 137/34, 172/4C, 173n82 and l37lB of Jeyankondanilai village, Singampunari Taluk, Sivagangai District the state of Tamil Nadu byThiru.A.Ansar Ali - for Environment Clearance. (5lA,rn{/Mt N/43331 /2019) The proposal was placed in the l39th SEAC Meeting held on 23.11.2019. The project proponent gave detailed presentation. The salient features of the project and the environmental impact assessment as presented by the proponent are ai follows:
t. 6overnment order/ Lease details:
a. The Quarry lease was applied in the name of Thiru.A. Ansar Ali, Precise Area Communication letter was issued by the DistriA Collector,
Sivagangai District vide Rc. No. M2/691/2O17, dated 28.08.2019for a period of one year.lt is a Fresh lease for 6ravel quarry over an extent of 2.15.5Ha in S.F.Nos. 137/281, 137/2A2, 137/282, 137/1A, t3Z/2C, 137/34, 172/4C, 173/282 and 137/18 of Jeyankondanilai village, Singampunari Taluk, 5ivagangai District. 2. Mining Plan/Scheme of Mining approval details: a. Mining plan was prepared for the period of oneyear. The Mining plan was got approval from the Assirtant Director, Department of Geology and Mining, Sivagangai DinrictvideRoc. No. M2/691/2017, dated 12.O9,2019. 3. As per the Department of Geology and Mining, Sivagangai District. Mining Plan approval for the one year, the production schedule for one yearutates that the total quantity of Gravel should not exceed 24,892mr. a. For First year - 24,892m3 of Gravel
3.t 5. The Quarry operation is proposed to carry out with open cast semi mechanized mining like ex(avators (without drilling and blasting). 6. Gravelare to be transported by Tippers. (1O/2O-l capacity). 7. The project is located at 1O"O2'45.48"N to l0'02'54.65"Nlatitude and
7 8"25' 58.31.E to 7 8"26' 04.37"ELongitude. 8. The total Manpower requirement is 9 Nos. 9. Total cost of the projects is Rs. 9.53 lakhs and EMP cost about Rs. 1.50lakh.
10. The Water table is found to be at the depth of 45mbelow the ground level. ll. Lease applied area is not covered under HACA region. 12. No Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) within the radius of lOkm from the lease
area.
13. No lnterstate boundary & Western Ghats Boundary within the radius of 10km from the lease area. 14. No National Park & Wild Life Sanctuary within the radius of l0km from the
lease area.
15. No critically polluted area as notified by the Central Pollution Control Board conrtituted under Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Ad 197 4 within the radius of lOkm.
16. No Protected Area, Eco Sensitive Zone & Eco Sensitive Area within the radius of lokm.
17. No habitation within the radius of the 300m from the lease area as ttated in the letter obtained from VAO, Jeyankondanilai village, 5.5. KottaiTaluk'
Sivagangai District datedl 9 .O9.2019.
18. Letter obtained from the Assistant Director, Department of Geology and Mining, Sivagangai vide Letter Roc.No. M2/691/2O17, dated l3.09.2019informed that, the following quarries are located within 500m radius from the proposed area for clearance. CJ.:.A CHAIRMAN(-- F.'jEAc-TN Extent Distance from s. Name of the quarry Name of village 6. Survey (in this proposed No. owner Number Hect) quarry a. Existing Quarries -Nil-- b. Abandoned quarries --Nit-- c Present proposed quarries Jeyankondaniliai Village, 5ingampunariTaluk5. F. Nos. I A. Ansari Ali 137 /281, 137 /2 A2, 137 /282, 2.15.5 137 /l A, 137 /2C. 137 /3A.
17 2/ 4C. 17 3 /282 and 137 /18 Total 2.15.5
The SEAC noted the following: I. The Proponent, A. Ansari Ali has applied for Environment Clearance to SEIAA- TN for the Gravel quarry lease over an extent of 2.15.5Ha in S.F.No: 137 /281, 137/2M, 137/282, 137/1A, 137/2C, 137/3A, 172/4C, 173/282 and 137/18, Jeyankondaniliai Village, Singampunari Taluk, Sivagangai District, Tamil Nadu 2. The projea/activity ii covered under Category "8" of ltem 1(a) "Mining of Mineral Projects" of the Schedule to the EIA Notification, 2006.
Bases on the lnitial discussion with the proponent and the scrutiny of documents fumished, lt was noticed that the leaje deed is not registered yet. Hence the SEAC decided to direct the proponent to rubmit the registered lease deed, before making prerentation. On receipt of the above details,
SEAC will decide the further course of action on the proposal.
a-{.- . \ CHAIRMAN 4-- p:4c-rH
7q Agenda no: 139 - 02- 14 (File No. 7194 /2019) Proposed Rough Stone and Gravel quarry lease over an extent of 3.99.O Ha in S.F.Nos. 35/44, 35/48, 35/4C, 35/4D, 35/4E, 35/4F, 35/4G, 35/4H and 35/4lat Maruthamputhur Part-l Village. Alangulam Taluk, Tirunelveli District the state of Tamil Nadu by Thiru.G. lGruppasamy - for Terms of Reference.
(s |A/TN/M r N/4 37 6t t2O19)
The proposal was placed in the l39th SEAC Meeting held on 23.11.2019. The project proponent gave detailed presentation. The salient features of the project at presented by
the proponent are as follows:
t. Government Order / Lease details: a. The Quarry lease was applied in the name of Thiru.G.Karuppasamy, Tirunelveli, Precise Area Communication was issued by the District
Collector, Tirunelveli vide Rc.No.Ml/24418/2O17, dated 06.09.2O18 for a period of 5 years. It ii a fresh lease for Rough Stone, Jelly and Cravel Quarry over an Extent of 3.99.0Ha in 5.F.Nos.35l4A, 35/48, 35/4C, 35/4D, 35/4E, 35/4F, 35/4G, 35/4H and 35l4lat Maruthamputhur Part-l Village, Alangulam Taluk, Tirunelveli District. 2. Mining Plan / Scheme of Mining approved details: a. The Mining plan was prepared for the period of 5 years. The mining plan was got approved from the Deputy Director, Department of Geology and
Mini ng, Ti runelveli District vide Rc. No.Ml/2zl4l 8/2017 Dated: 09.1 0.201 8.
3. As per the Department of Geology and Mining, Tirunelveli Distria. Mining Plan approval for the 5 years, the production schedule for 5 years states that the total quantity of 6,77,95Om3 of Rough Stone, 1,36,500m3 of Weathered Rock and 55,932m3 of gravel formation for the period of Five years. :t. *.. CHAIRMAI\K LIEAC-TN
L WEATHERED ROCK GRAVEL (m3) YEAR RoUGHSToNE (m3) (m3)
I 1354r0 r36500 55932 il 13s800 ilt 135420 IV 135590 135630
TOTAL 677950 r36500 55932
4. The quarry operation is proposed depth of 72m (from + l25m RL to 54m RL). 5. The Quarry operation is proposed to carry out with open cart semi mechanized mining with bench height of 5.0m & 5.0m width is considered. 6. Rough stone and Gravel are to be transported by Tippers of 4Nos. (5/lOTcapacity). 7. The project is locate atlatitude:08'49'll"N to 08'49'19'N and Longitude:77"31'22"E to 77'31'3l"E.Toposheet Number: 58 H /O5,05, 09 6( 10. 8. The total Manpower requirement is l9Nos. (Permanent:14, Temporary: 5)
9. Total cost of the proiects is Rs.74,46,000/-(|ncluding Operational + Fixed Asset & EMP cost).
EMP cost about Rs.4,50,000/-
10. The ground water table is at a depth of 80m to 77m. ll. Lease applied area is not covered under HACA region.
12. No Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) within the radius of lOkm from the lease area. 13. No lnterstate boundary & Western Ghats Boundary within the radius of 10km from the lease area.
Western 6hats ESA boundary as per MoEF & CC draft notification dated 3rd
October 2018 is located 2O.0Km from the lease area on the Southwestern side. 14. Wild Life Sanctuary:(Nil within l0km Radius) Kalakad Mundanthurai Tiger Reserve l6.3Kms (5) side. I
CHAIRMAN C- S-srac-rN
It Nellai Wild Life Sanctuary 23.0Kms (NW) side.
Gangaikondan Spotted Deer Sanctuary 25.0Km (E) side. 15. No critically polluted area as notified by the Central Pollution Control Board constituted under Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act 1974 within
the radius of l0km from the lease area. 16. No Protected Area, Eco Sensitive Zone & Eco Sensitive Area within the radius of l0km.
17. No habitation within the radius of the 300m from the lease area as stated in the letter obtained from VAO, Maruthamputhur Part-l Village, Alangulam Taluk, Tirunelveli District dated 31.10.2019.
18. Letter obtained from the Deputy Director, Department of Geology and Mining, Tirunelveli vide Letter Rc.No.Ml/221418/2017 dated 06.O8.2O19 informed that the detaili of the existing, abandoned and proposed quarries within 500m radius from the proposed Rough Stone quarry as follows.
G.Karuppasamy, Alangulam Taluk, 5/o.Gurusamy, Maruthamputhur No.249, Sivanthinagar, Village, Kuthukkalvalasai, 5.F.Nos.l6216A, Tenkasi Taluk, 68,163/4,5,6 & Tirunelveli District. 7 Alangulam Taluk, R.Minnalkodi Maruthamputhur Vo.5.5.Ramasubbu, Village, Alangulam Taluk, 5.F.Nos.160/2, 5, Tirunelveli District 161/1,3,4 & s 2.Abandoned Alangulam Taluk, S.Muthaiah Maruthamputhur 5/o.5ivanu Konar, Village, Maruthamputhur, S.F.No.35,z5H Alangulam Taluk, Tirunelveli District
plEac-rN 3.Present Proposed Quarries Alangulam Taluk, Thiru.G. Karuppasamy, Maruthamputhur 5/o.Gurusamy, Part-l Village, No.249, Sivanthinagar, 5.F.Nos.35l4A, Kuthukkal Valasai, Tenkasi 3s/48,35/4C, 3.99.0Ha Taluk, 3s/4D,3s/4E, District. Tirunelveli 3s/4F,3s/4G, Pin code- 627811. 35/4H and 35/41 The total lease within the 500m radius (existing + proposed) works out to 10.71.5 ha including this lease area.
Although the individual lease area of this project is less than 5 Ha, the cluster area within 500m is more than 5 Ha, but the combined area is < 25Ha only.
Under the above circumstances, this report is prepared for issue of Terms of Reference towards obtaining environmental clearance.
The SEAC noted the following: l. The Proponent, Thiru.G.Karuppasamy has applied for Terms of reference for the Rough Stone, Jelly and Gravel Quarry over an Extent of 3.99.0Ha in 5.F.Nos.35l4A, 35/48, 3s/4C, 35/4D, 35/4E, 35/4F, 35/4G, 35/4H and 35l4lat Maruthamputhur Part-l Village, Alangulam Taluk, Tirunelveli Dirtrict, Tamil Nadu 2. The project/activity is covered under Category "B" of ltem l(a) "Mining of Mineral Projects" of the Schedule to the EIA Notification, 2006.
Based on the presentation made by the proponent and the documents furnished, the SEAC decided to recommend the proporal for the grant of Terms of Reference (IoR) to SEIAA with Public Hearing, iubiect to the following specific conditions in addition to the normal conditions as part of ToR: 1. The study shall be conducted on the combined impact of the quarries in the cluster
2. A detailed study of the lithology of the mining lease area shall be furnished.
3. Details of village map, "A- register and FMB sketch shall be furnished. t a-.-.1-. \ CHAIRMAIf- SEAC.TN
3: 4. The proposal for green belt activities shall be furnished. 5. The Socio economic studied should be carried out within lOkm buffer zone from the mines. 6. Detailed study report combined impact of the crushers. impact of the water body,
open well detail within lkm radius impact on this the project proponent shall furnish in the EIA report. 7. Detailed mining closure plan for the proposed project approved by the Geology of Mining department shall be submitted along with EIA report. 8. The spot levels and contour levels of the proposed quarry site shall be studied and the same shall be furnished to along with ElA. 9. A detailed report on the safety and health aspects of the workers and for the surroundings habitants during operation of mining for drilling and balsting shall be submitted. l0.The proponent conduct a detailed Hydrological nudy of the area towards the impact of this mining on the surface water & ground hydrology and furnish the same along with EIA report.
11. The proposal for CER shall be furnished with time frame as per Office Memorandum of MoEF&CC dated 01.05.2018.
12. Obtain a letter/Certificate from the Assistant Director of Geology and Mining standing that there ii no other Minerals/resources like sand in the quarrying area within the approved depth of mining and below depth of mining and the same
shall be furnished in the EIA report. 13.6round water quality monitoring should be conducted as Per norms and the report shall furnish in the EIA report. 14. EIA report should rtrictly follow the Environmental lmpact Assessment Guidance Manual for Mining of Minerals published February 2010.
t5. Details plan on rehabilitation and reclamation carried out for the stabilization and .
restoration of the mined areas.
16. The EIA study report shall include the surrounding mining activity, if anY. , C>1,-<--=----C- CHAIRMAN PSIAC-TN
L 17. Modelling study for Air, Water and noise shall be carried out and incremental increase in the above study shall be substantiated with mitigation measures.
18. A study on the geological resources available shall be carried out and reported. 19. A specific study on the mining impact on agriculture & Livelihood shall be carried out and reported. 20.lmpact on ponds, rivers and other waste bodies to be elaborated. 2l.lmpact of soil erosion, soil physical chemical and biological property changes may
be assumed. 22.The recommendation for the iiiue of environmental clearance is subject to the outcome of the Hon'ble NGT, Principal Bench, New Delhi in O.A No.l86 of 2016 (M.A.No.350/2016) and O.A. No.2OO/2O16 and O.A.No.S80/2016 (M.A.No.ll82l2016) and O.A.No.lO2l2017 and O.A.No.4O4/2016 (M.A.No. 7 58/2O16,M.A.No.920l2016,M.A.No.112212016, M.A.No.12l2O17 &. M.A. No. 843/2017) and O.A.No.4O5/2O16 and O.A.No.520 of 2016 (M.A.No. 981 /2016, M.A.No.98212016 & M.A.No.3 84/2017).
Agenda no: 139 - 02- 15 (File No. 71a7 nO1.9) Proposed Rough stone and Gravel quarry lease over an extent of 4.76.OHa comprising S.F.Nos. 926fi, 926n and 945 of Thimmarasanaickanur Bit-l Village,AndipattiTaluk, Theni Dinrict, Tamil Naduby Thiru. T. Sivakumar- For Environmental Clearance.
(s h,rrN/M I N/4 39 5 3 / 2019)
The proposal was placed in the l39th SEAC Meeting held on 23.11.2019. The project proponent gave detailed presentation. The salient features of the project and the environmental impact assesrment as presented by the proponent are as follows: cL. :- CHAIRMAN2 E/,EAC-TN
-?r l. Government Order / Lease details: a. The Quarry lease was applied in the name of Thiru. T. Sivakumar, Precise Area Communication was issued by the District Collector, Thenivide Rc.No. 81/Mines/2O19, dated 24.O9.2Ol9for a period of 5 years. lt is a fresh lease for Rough stone and Gravel quarry over an extent of 4.76.OHa comprising S.F.Nos. 926/1, 926/2 and 945 of Thimmarasanaickanur Bit-l Village, Andipatti Taluk, Theni District, Tamil Nadu. 2. Mining Plan / Scheme of Mining approved details: a. The Mining plan was prepared for the period of 5 years. The mining plan was got approval from the Assistant Geologist / Assistant Director (i/c), Department of Geology and Mining, Theni District vide Rc.No.
81 /Mines/2Ol9, dated 0l.l 0.201 9. 3. As per the Department of Ceology and Mining, Theni District. Mining Plan approval for the 5 years, the production schedule for 5 years states that the total quantity of Rough itone should not exceed 7,32,118m3and Gravel should not exceed 97,920m3
a. For First year - 1,32,936m3 of Rough stone and 34,830m3 of 6ravel
b. For Second year - 1,89,628m3 of Rough ttone and 27,148m3 of Gravel c. For Third year - 1,8O,254m3 of Rough stone and 24,108m3 of Gravel d. For Fourth year - 1,22,O25m1 of Rough stone
e. For Fifth year - 1,O7 ,27 5m3 of Rough stone 4. The quarry operation is proposed up to a depth of 60m(2Om above ground level + 40m below ground lwel). 5. The Quarry operation is proposed to carry out with oPen cast semi mechanized mining with 5.0m vertical bench and width. 5. Rough stone are to be transported by Tippers of 5 Nos. (20 T Capacity). 7. The project is located al O9"59'52.83"N to l0'0O'00.67"N latitude and
7 7"41'29.57"E to 77" 41'38.67" ELongitude. 8. The total Manpower requirement is 42Nos. cL-_> CHAIRMAN ,tEAc-rN 9. Total cost of the projects is Rs. 8l.23lakhs and EMP cost about Rs. 3.80lakhs
10. The Water table is found to be at the depth of 65m in summer season and 60m in
rainy season.
ll. Lease applied area is not covered under HACA region.
12. No Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) within the radius of l0km from the lease area. 13. No lnterstate boundary &, Western Ghats Boundary within the radius of lOkm from the lease area. 14. No critically polluted area as notified by the Central Pollution Control Board constituted under Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act 1974 within the radius of 1Okm from the lease area. 15. No Protected Area, Eco Sensitive Zone & Eco Sensitive Area within the radius of l0km.
15. No habitation within the radius of the 30Om from the lease area as stated in the letter obtained from VAO, Thimmarasanalckanur Bit-l Village, Andipatti Taluk, Theni District dated 28.04.2019. 17. Letter obtained from the Assistant Geologin / Arsistant Director (i/c.), Department of Geology and Mining, Thenivide Letter ROC. No. Sl,rMines/2019, dated 01.10.2019 informed that the following quarries are situated within 500 m radial distance from the proposed area for clearance.
Distance 5. Name of the quarry Name of the Village & Extent in from this No. Owners Survey Number Hectare proposed quarry a. Abandoned Quarries -Nil- b. Existing Quarries -Nit- c. Present Proposed Quarries
CHAIRMAN SEAC.TN
3q Thiru. T.Sivakumar, 5,/o.Thanikodi, Thimmarasanaickanur No.1615, Sulthan Nagar I Bit-l village 4.76.O Visalam lst Street, - 926/1,926/2 and 945 Narimedu, Madurai north, Madurai district d. Period expired quarries .NiI .
The SEAC noted the following: l. The Proponent, Thiru. T.Sivakumar has applied for Environment Clearance for the Rough Stone and Gravel quarry lease over an extent of 4.76.0Ha in S.F.No: 92611, 926/2 and 945, Thimmarasanaickanur Bit-l Village, Andipatti Taluk, Theni District, Tamil Nadu 2. The project/activity ii covered under Category "B" of ltem l(a) "Mining of Mineral Projects" of the Schedule to the EIA Notification, 2006. The project proponent Save presentation about the proposal. Based on the presentation made by the proponent and the documents furnished, the SEAC decided to recommend the proposal for grant of Environmental Clearance to SEIAA subiect to the following condition in addition to normal condition: l. Ground water quality monitoring should be conducted every Six months and the report should be submitted to TNPCB. 2. Proper barrier for reducing the Noise level shall be established like providing Green Belt along the boundary of the quarrying site, etc. and to prevent dust pollution, suitable working methodology needs to be adopted taking wind direction into consideration. 3. The operation of the quarry should no way impact the agriculture activity & water bodies near the project site. 4. Transportation of the quarried materials shall not cause any hindrance to the Village people/Existing Village road. )> -J-,^CHAIRMAN ?- lEAc-rN 5. The Project Proponent shall comply with the mining and other relevant rules and regulations where ever applicable.
6. The quarrying activity shall be stopped if the entire quantity indicated in the Mining plan is quarried even before the expiry of the quarry lease period and the same shall be monitored by the District Authorities. 7' The recommendation for the issue of environmental clearance is iubiect to the outcome of the Hon'ble NGT. principal Bench, New Delhi in O.A No.lg6 of 2016 (M.A.No.350/2016) and O.A. No.200/2016 and O.A.No.580/2016 (M.A.No.l18212016) and O.A.No.t02l2017 and O.A.No.4O4/2016 (M.A.No. 7 58/2O16,M. A.No.920l201 6,M.A.No.t I 221201 6, M.A.No.l 2/201 7 & M.A. No. 843/2017) and o.A.No.405/2or6 and o.A.No.520 of 2016 (M.A.No. g}r /2016. M.A.No.982,z2Ol6 & M.A.No.3 g4/2OtZ).
8. To ensure safety measures along the boundary of the quarry site, security guards are to be engaged during the entire period of mining operation. 9. The mine closure plan submitted by the project proponent shall be strictly followed after the laps of the mine as reported. 10. The proponent ihall furnish the cER proposal as per office memorandum of MoEF&CC dated0l.05.2Ol8. ll. The proponent shall leave safety distance of l00mt from the rererve forerts stated in the DFO letter No 4654/2O19/F dated 1O/O9/2O19
ljtEAc-rN
t,o Agenda no: 139 - 02- 16 (File No. 7212 no19) Proposed Rough stone quarry lease over an extent of 2.50.0Ha comprising S.F.Nos. 2e4(P-1) of Sigaralapalli Village, Bargur Taluk' Krishnagiri District, Tamil Nadu by Thiru.
R. Srimuthu- For Environmental Clearance.
(sh,rIN/Mr N/4 5101 /2019)
The proposal was placed in the 139,h SEAC Meeting held on 23.11.2019. The project proponent gave detailed presentation. The salient features of the Project and the environmental impact assejsment as presented by the proponent are as follows:
l. Government Order / Lease details: a.TheQuarryleasewasappliedinthenameofThiru.R.Srimuthu'Krishnagiri' Precise Area communication was issued by the District collector, KrishnagirivideRc.No.2l2l2019(G&M)Dated:t3.06.2ol9foraperiodof 5 years. lt is a fresh lease for Rough stone quarry over an Extent of 2.5O.0Ha in 5.F.Nos. 284(Part-1) at Sigaralapalli Village, Bargur Taluk' Krishnagiri District. 2. Mining Plan / Scheme of Mining approved details: a. The Mining plan was prepared for the period of 5 years. The mining plan was got approval from the DePuty Director, DePartment of Geology and Mining, Krishnagiri District vide Rc.No' 21212019 (G&M) Dated; r8.06.2019. 3. As per the Department of Geology and Mining, Krishnagiri District. Mining Plan approval for the 5 years, the production schedule for 5 years states that the total quantity of Rough stone should not exceed 58O797m3. a. For First year - 66360 m3 of Rough stone b. For Second year - 163345 m3 of Rough stone c. For Third year - 135429 m3 of Rough stone d" h- CHAIRMAN 1".- Vbc:tN d. For Fourth year _ 116564 m3 of Rough stone e. For Fifth year - 99099 m3 of Rough stone 4. The quarry operation is proposed upto a depth of43m Cl-op Soil lm + Rough none 42m) Surface Ground Lever above 22 m andsurface Ground Lever Berow 2r m. 5' The operation Quarry is proposed to carry out with open cait semi mechanized mining with 7.0m and 5.0m vertical bench and width. 6. Rough rtone are to be transported by Tippers of lNos. 0O M. T Capacity). 7. The projea is rocate at l2'30'02.r6"N to 12.3005.31,N ratitude and78.24'rg.gg,E lo 7 8"24'27.41,'E Longitude.
8. The total Manpower requirement is lg Nos. 9. Total cost of the projects is Rs. 16.g lakhs and EMp cost about Rs. 3.5 lakhs I0. The water table is found to be at the depth of 65m in summer and 60m in rainy season, ll. Lease applied area is not covered under HACA region. 12. No coastal Regulation Zone (cRZ) within the radius of lOkm from the lease area. 13' No lnterstate boundary & western Ghats Boundary within the radius of rOkm from the lease area. 14. No National Park & wild Life sanctuary within the radius of r0km from the leaie area.
15. No critically polluted area as notified by the central pollution control Board constituted under water (prevention and control of pollution) Act 1974 within the radius of lokm from the lease area.
16. No Protected Area, Eco sensitive Zone & Eco sensitive Area within the radius of l0km.
17. No habitation within the radius of the 3o0m from the lease area as stated in the letter obtained from VAo, Sigaralapalli Village, Bargur Taluk, Krishnagiri District dated 14/lO/2O19. d. h- CHAIRMAN" (SEAC.TN ,--
Jr z+, Geology and Mining' 18. Letter obtained from the Assistant Director' DePartment of informed that Krishnagiri vide Letter RC. No. 212/2019 (G&M) dated 12.10.2019 thedetailsoftheexistingandabandonedquarrieswithin500mradiusfromthe proposed Rough Stone quarry as follows' r) Exitting other quarries: Name of the lessee s. F. / Extent Remarks S. No. Village &Taluk Permit Holder No. t. Nil 2) Proposed Area:
s. Extent Remarks Name of the aPPlicant Village &Taluk 5. F. No. No. 284(Part-l) 2.50.O I Thiru.R.Srimuthu Sigaralapalli Proponent Village,Bargur D.No.2/355, Taluk,Krishnagiri ChinthagamPalli Village' Bargur Taluk, Krishnagiri. 3) Lease Expired: Name of the Lessee- / Permit Holder
Tt,e Totat extent of the Existing / Proposed quarries is 2.50.OHa The SEAC noted the following: 1. The Proponent, Thiru. R.Srimuthu has applied for Environment Clearance for the Rough Stone quarry lease over an extent of 2.50.0Ha in S.F.No: 284(P-1)' Sigaralapalli Village, Bargur Taluk, Krishnagiri District, Tamil Nadu 2. The project/activity is covered under Category "8" of ltem I (a) "Mining of Mineral Proiects" of the Schedule to the EIA Notification' 20o6. ci:.->-I CHAIRMAIf- p,rfec-rN The project proPonent gave presentation about the proposal. Based on the presentation made by the proponent and documents the furnished, the SEAC noted that there is an infrastructure/building located at 2oom. Hence the SEAC directed the proponent to furnish the following details.
l. The proponent shall furnish the modeling studies for fugitive emissions and noise level studies during mining operation and transportation. 2. The proponent shalr furnish the protective measures for fugitive emissions so as to mitigate the possible impact on the nearby infrastructure /building. on receipt of the above detairs, 5EAC wi[ decide the further course of action on the proposar.
CHAIRMAN LJEAc-TN==> 4L Agenda no: 139 -02-19 (File No. 7201 n0tg) Proposed Earth Quarry rease over an extent of 2.00.0ha in 5.F.No.27golr (p) at Thamaraikulam periyakuramTaruk, Bit-rr Vi[age, Theni District, Tamir Nadu by ws. T.T.K Construction- For Environmental Clearance. ($A/[N/MtN/4388sno1.9)
The proposar was praced in the l39th SEAC Meeting herd on 23.11.2019. The project proponent gave detailed presentation. The salient features of the project and the environmental impact assessment aj presented by the proponent are as follows:
l. Government Order / Lease details: The a. Quarry rease was appried in the name of M/s. T.T.K construction, Precise Area Communication was issued by the District coflector, Thenivide Rc.No.r67lMines/2019 Dated: 24.o9.2or9for a period of 5 years. rt is a fresh lease for Earth euarry for over an extent of 2.00.0ha in S.F.No. 278O/l (p) at Thamaraikulam Bit_ll Village, periyakulam Taluk, Theni District, Tamil Nadu.
2. Mining Plan / Scheme of Mining approved details:
a. The Mining plan was prepared for the period of 5 years. The mining plan was got approval from the Arsistant Geologist / Assistant Director (i/c), Department of 6eology and Mining, Theni Dirtrict vide Rc.No.l67lMines/2019 Dated: Ol.lO.2Ol9. 3. As per the Department of Georogy and Mining, Theni District. Mining pran
approval for only one Month, the production schedule for only one Month states that the total quantity of Earth Quarry should not exceed 10,000m3. 4. The quarry operation is proposed upto a depth of 0.5m Earth euarry 5. The Quarry operation is proposed to carry out with open cart semi mechanized mining like excavators (without drilling and blasting). GJo=+>I CHAIRMAN c fEAc-TN
)1t 6. Earthare to be transPorted by Tippers. (1O/2O T Capacity)' 7. The project i5 locate at 10"04'47.30"N to l0'04'58.l9"Nlatitude and77"3O'48.16"E
to 7 7 " 31' 02.39" ELongitude. 8. The total Manpower requirement is 9 Nos. g. Total cost of the proiects is Rs. 3.50 lakhs and EMP cost about Rs. l.l0 lakhs in rainy lO. The Water table is found to be at the depth of 20m in summer and l5m
season.
11. Lease applied area i5 not covered under HACA region' the lease area. 12. No coastal Regulation Zone (cRZ) within the radius of lokm from radius of lokm 13. No lnterrtate boundary & western 6hats Boundary within the from the lease area. 14.NocriticallyPollutedareaasnotifiedbytheCentralPollutionControlBoard within constituted under water (Prevention and control of Pollution) Act 1974 the radius of lOkm from the lease area. as stated in the 15. No habitation within the radius of the 3oom from the lease area letter obtained from VAO, Thamaraikulam Bit-ll Village, Periyakulam Taluk' Theni District dated 3O/O9/2019. I6. Letter obtained from the Assistant Geologist / Assistant Director (i/c)' Department of Geology and Mining, Theni vide Letter RC. No. 167lMines/2017, dated Ol.lO.2Ol9 informed that the following quarries are situated within 500m radial distance from the Proposed area for clearance.
Distance from 5. Name of the Owner Name of Village &S. Extent in Quarry this proposed F. No. hectare No. / quarry a) Abandoned Quarries -NIL. b) Exining Quarries -NIL. c) Present proposed Quarries
CHAIRMAN 9- SEAC-TN M/s. T.T.K Construction, Managing Partner, Thamaraikulam Bit- Thiru.T.Thanikodi, ll Village 2.00.0 ha No.5/1, Mayilagam, S. F. Nos. 2780ll Thirumukkulam South Street, (P) Madurai District - 625 OO2 d) Future Proposed guarriEi
The SEAC noted the following: I. The Proponent, M/s. T.T.K Construction has applied for Environment clearance for the Earth quarry rease over an extent of 2.00.0Ha in s.F.No: 278o/1(P), Thamaraikulam periyakuramTaruk, Bit-il Vi[age, Theni District, Tamil Nadu 2. The proiect/activity ..82,, ..Mining is covered under Category of ltem l(a) of Mineral ProjectC' of the Schedule to the EIA Notification, 2006. L The Hon'ble Madurai Bench of Madras High Court order in Wp(MD) No 2O9O3 of 2015 dated 2B/Og/2Otg ,.VU.p has quoted (MD) No 942 of 2Ot8, as report wat filled on 26/09/2019 by Deputy Director of 1eology and Mining and it is relevant to extract hereunder paragraphs...... 26. As per the rtand taken by the Department, iavudu it a mixture of 4oo/o sand, 4oo/o silt and 20o/o original Clay"
4. As per the Hon'bre Madurai Bench of Madras High court order in wp(MD) No 20903 of 2016 dated 2B/OB/2O19 wherein (i) The Dirtia corector of ail the Jouthern Dittrictt wz., 13 Dirtrictr (including Theni DisHa) coming under the jurisdiction of this court, are rettrained from granting any fresh lease/license for quarying Savudu sand in retpect of patta lands: and (iii) They are also directed to take necessary rtept to cancel the lease/license already granted to the pattadart in accordance with law at the ea ie*., Ci--+:t CHAIRMAN SEAC.TN
4,, the proposal' Based on the The projea ProPonent gave presentation about Presentationmadebytheproponentandthedocumentsfurnished,theSEACdecided torecommendtheproposalforgrantofEnvironmentalClearancetosElAAsubjectto the following condition in addition to normal condition: every Six months and the l. Ground water quality monitoring should be conducted report should be submitted to TNPCB' 2.ProperbarrierforreducingtheNoiselevelshallbeestablishedlikeproviding site' etc' and to prevent dust Green Belt along the boundary of the quarrying taking wind pollution, suitable working methodology needs to be adopted direction into consideration' the agriculture activity & water 3. The operation of the quarry should no way impact bodies near the Proiect site' any hindrance to the 4. Transportation of the quarried materials shall not cause Village people/Existing Village road' other relevant rules and 5. The Project Proponent shall comply with the mining and regulations where wer applicable' in the 6. The quarrying activity shall be nopped if the entire quantity indicated period the Mining plan is quarried even before the expiry of the quarry lease and same shall be monitored by the District Authorities' 7. The recommendation for the issue of environmental clearance is subject to the outcome of the Hon'ble NGT, Principal Bench, New Delhi in O'A No'185 of 2016 (M.A.No.350/2015) and O.A. No.200/2016 and O'A'No'580/2016 (M.A.No.ll8212016) and O.A.No.l02l2017 and O.A.No-404/2016 (M'A'No'
7 58/2O16,M.A.No.920l2016,M.A.No.112212016' M.A.No.l212017 & M'A' No' 843/2017) and O.A.No.4O5/2016 and O.A.No.520 of 2016 (M.A.No. 981 /2016, M.A.No.98212016 & M.A.No.384/2017). 8. To ensure safety measures along the boundary of the quarry site, security guards are to be engaged during the entire period of mining oPeration. 4.-}. CHAIRMAN itsAc-rN 9. All the commitment made by the project proPonent in the proposal shall be strictly followed. 10. The mine closure plan iubmitted by the project Proponent shall be strictly followed after the laps of the mine as rePorted. 11. The proponent shall submit the proposal for the CER as Per office memorandum of MoEF&CC dated 01.05.2018 before placing the subject to SEIM. 12. Report on Mineral composition analysis ascertaining the minerals available in the proiect site by the competent authorities (PWD,/DePartment of Geology and Mining / Department of Agriculture) before placing the subject to SE|AA. 13. Report on mineral composition in the proposed project site and its applicability to the Hon'ble Madurai Bench of Madras High Court order in WP(MD) No 20903 of 2016 daled 28/08/2019 from competent authorities before placing the subject to 5EIAA.
li- e 7h> CHAIRMAN-'-'?- - - - Y'5EAC.TN
h{ Agenda no: 139 - 02- 19 (File No. 7227 nO$) Proposed Rough stone quarry over an extent of 3.00.0ha in S.F.No. 395 (North Part) of Mallapuram village SankarapuramTaluk and Viluppuram District, Tamil Naduby Tmt. V. Anbarasi- For Environmental Clearane.
(s rA/TN/Mr N/4 5 67 3 / 2O1 9) l. Government Order / Lease details: a. The Quarry lease was applied in the name of Tmt. V.Anbarasi, Vilupuram, Precise Area Communication was issued by the District Collector, Viluppuramvide Rc.No. B/G&W114O/2017, dated 17.01.2018for a period of 5 years. lt is a fresh lease for Rough stone quarry over an extent of 3.00.0ha in 5.F.No. 395/1 (North Part) of Mallapuram village
SankarapuramTa lu k and Viluppuram District, Tamil Nadu. 2. Mining Plan / Scheme of Mining approved details: a. The Mining plan was prepared for the period of 5 years. The mining plan was 8ot approval from the Assistant Director, Department of Geology and Mining, VilupuramDistrict vide Rc.No.B/6&M/114O/2O17, dated 28.O3.2018. 3. As per the Department of Geology and Mining, VilupuramDistrict. Mining Plan approval for the 5 years, the production schedule for 5 years states that the total quantity of Rough stone should not exceed 1,88,155m3. a. For First year - 35,580m3 of Rough stone b. For Second year - 43,950m3 of Rough stone c. For Third year - 38,495m3 of Rough stone d. For Fourth year - 38,120m3 of Rough stone e. For Fifth year - 32.010m3 of Rough stone 4. The quarry operation is proposed up to a depth of 4om(tm Topsoil + 39m Rough stone) from the elevated portion. cL- > CHAIRMAN DJEAc-rN
4L 5. The Quarry operation is proposed to carry out with open cast semi mechanized mining with 5.0m vertical bench and width.
6. Topsoil (6,488mr) will be removed and preserved all along the boundary barriers to facilitate the afforestation.
7. Rough stone are to be transported by Tippers of 2 Nos. (1O/2OT Capacity). 8. The project is located at 1l'56'11.53'N to11'56'17.64"N latitude andlB"51,5t.64"E
to 7 8' 52' OO. 69" ELon gitude.
9. The total Manpower requirement is 23Nos.
lo' Total cost of the projects is Rs. l.0761crores and EMp cost about Rs. 3.gOlakhs 11. The water table is found to be at the depth of 55m in summer season and 5om in rainy season. ,l2. Lease applied area is not covered under HACA region.
13. No coastal Regulation Zone (cRZ) within the radius of lokm from the lease area.
14. No National Park & wild Life Sanctuary within the radius of 1Okm from the lease area. ]5. No lnterstate boundary & western Ghats Boundary within the radius of l0km from the lease area.
16. No critically polluted area as notified by the central pollution control Board con5tituted under water (Prevention and control of pollution) Act 1974 within the radius of l0km from the lease area.
17. No Protected Area, Eco Sensitive Zone & Eco sensitive Area within the radius of l0km.
18. Letter obtained from the Airistant Director, Department of Geology and Mining, Viluppuramvide Letter RC. No. B/G&M/it4o/2017, dated lg.og.2otg informed
that the details of existing and abandoned quarries located within 500 mts. radius from the proposed Rough stone quarry. l. Existing other quarries: Name of the lessee / permit holder
&-+mc-rN -_Nit- ll. 5t. Name of the lessee / Name of Taluk& vlllage S.F. Nos. Extent Remarks No. permit holder the (n Mineral hect, I Tmt.V.Anbarasi , Rough 5ankarapuram, 395/1 3.00.0 Wo. K.Velu, 5tone Mallapuram (Northern Main Road, part) Devapandalam Village, SankarapuramTaluk, Viluppuram District lll. 5t. Name of the lesrce / Name of Taluk& village s.F. Extent lease period Remarks No. permit holder the Nos. (in Mineral hects) I D. Ramachandran, Rough Sankarapuram, 395/1 3.OO.O 31.08.2009 5/o. Duraisamy, stone Mallapuram Part-ll to Thimmanandal Village, 30.08.2019 Arur post, SankarapuramTaluk
The SEAC noted the following: l. The Proponent, Tmt.V.Anbarasi has applied for Environment Clearance to SEIAA-TN on 21.08.2019 for the Rough stone quarry over an extent of 3.00.0ha in 5.F.No. 395/1 (North Part) of Mallapuram village SankarapuramTaluk and Viluppuram District, Tamil Nadu. 2. the project/activity is covered under Category "B" of ltem 1(a) "Mining of Mineral Projects" of the Schedule to the EIA Notification, 2006. The project proponent gave presentation about the proposal. Based on the presentation made by the proponent and the documenti furnished, the SEAC decided to recommend the proposal for grant of Environmental Clearance to SEIAA subiect to the following condition in addition to normal condition: l. Ground water quality monitoring should be conducted every Six months and the report should be submitted to TNPCB. c{-.l x CHAIRMAN p-srac-rN - 4t 2. Proper barrier for reducing the Noise level shall be established like providing Green Belt along the boundary of the quarrying site, etc. and to prevent dust pollution, suitable working methodology needs to be adopted taking wind direction into consideration.
3. The operation of the quarry should no way impact the agriculture activity & water
bodies near the project site.
4. Transportation of the quarried materials shall not cause any hindrance to the Village people/Existing Village road.
5. The Project Proponent shall comply with the mining and other relevant rules and regulations where ever applicable.
6. The quarrying activity shall be stopped if the entire quantity indicated in the Mining plan is quarried even before the expiry of the quarry lease period and the same shall be monitored by the District Authorities. 7. The recommendation for the issue of environmental clearance is subject to the outcome of the Hon'ble NGT, Principal Bench. New Delhi in O.A No.lg6 of 2016 (M.A.No.350/2016) and O.A. No.20012016 and O.A.No.580/2016 (M.A.No.ll82l2016) and O.A.No.l0212017 and O.A.No.40412016 (M.A.No. 7 58/2O16.M.A.No.920l2016,M.A.No.112212016, M.A.No.l2l2O11 &. M.A. No. 843/2017) and O.A.No.405/2016 and O.A.No.520 of 2016 (M.A.No. gB1 /2016, M.A.No.9821201 6 & M.A.No.384/2017).
8. The entire mining operation should be as per the guidelines for sustainable sand mining issued in 2016 by the MoEF& CC, GOt, New Delhi. 9. To ensure Jafety measures along the boundary of the quarry site, security guards are to be engaged during the entire period of mining operation. 10. The mine closure plan submitted by the project proponent shall be strictly followed after the laps of the mine as reported. ll. The proponent shall furnish the cER proposal as per office memorandum of MoEF&CC datedOl.05.2Ol 8. ct.-> S.-sac-rN t)q- r.2-\1 r37 - oz -l-, File No: 6831f2O19
Proposed Production Capacity Expansion of Methyl Ethyl Ketone and Secondary Butyl Alcohol &Proposed production of Methyl lso Butyl Carbinol, Phenyl Propyl Alcohol and Mixed Alcohols at Sathangadu Village , Chlnnalekkadu Village, Manall, Chennai W Mh. Cetex Petrochemicals Limited - For Environment Clearance.
(slA/rN/l N D/361 47 /2OO7)
The proposal was placed in this 132"d SEAC Meeting held on 25.07.2019. The project proponent gave detailed presentation. The salient features of the proiect and the environmental impact assessment ar presented by the proponent are as follows:
i. The proposal is for environmental clearance to the project "Proposed Production Capacity Expansion of Methyl Ethyl Ketone and Secondary Butyl Alcohol & Proposed production of Methyl lso Butyl Carbinol, Phenyl Propyl Alcohol and Mixed Alcohols at Sathangadu & Chinnasekkadu Village, Manali, Chennai, by M/s.
Cetex Petrochemicals Li mited". ii. Due to the absence of SEAC - TN the file was submitted to MoEFCC and standard ToR has been issued by MoEFCC vide letter No.J-ltOl1/1113/2007-tA-tt(t) dated 08.10.2018. iii. M/s Cetex Petrochemicals Limited obtained EC to their existing project from MoEF&CC vide letter no. J-ll0ll/1113 /2OO7-lA-ll(l) dated 16.09.2008. iv. Existing land area is 207320.45 m2: the proposed expansion will take place within the existing plant no additional land will be used for proposed expansion. v. Currently green belt in an area totalling l0ll7 Sq.m has been developed. During the proposed expansion additional 58315 Sq.m of green belt will be further added in order to strengthen the greenbelt inside the premises which is 33o/o of the total area.
I
ai_. L_-\ CHAIRMAN SEAC.TN \r^ 4a vi. The estimated expansion cost is Rs. 42 Crores. Total capital cost earmarked towards environmental pollution control measures is Rs.290 lakhs and the Recurring cost (operation and maintenance) will be about Rs 17.2 Lakhs per month. vii. Total Employment will be 70 persons as direct & 20 persons indirect after expansion. lndustry proposes to allocate Rs. 42 Lakhs i,e. 1.0 o/o of project cost towards Corporate Environmental Responsibility. v[t. There are no national parks, wildlife sanctuaries, Biosphere Reserves, Tiger/Elephant Reserves and Wildlife Corridors etc. within 10 km distance from the project site.
River/ water body such as Puzhal Lake, korattur Lake, Cholavaram Lake and Retteri Lake are at a distance of 8.1 km,8.3 km, 14.7 km and 5 km respectively in West, South West, North west and west directions. Ambient air quality monitoring was carried out at 8 locations during July to September 2018 and the baseline data indicates the rangei of concentrations are in
the range of PMro @2.2 - 79.6p9m3), PM:.s Q0.9 - a2.8 1tg/m3), 50, (5.63 -13.6 gglm3) and NO, (10.6 -2O.8 pg/m3). AAQ modelling study for point source emissions indicates that the maximum incremental GLCs after the proposed project
would be 86.46 1tg/m3,13.6 yglm3 and 20.8 gglm3 with respect to PM16, SO, and NO,. The resultant concentrationJ are within the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS).
xt. Total water requirement is llt5kLD of which water requirement of 1018.6 kLD will be met from CMWSSB TTRO water and 96.4 kLD will be met through recycled/condensate within the plant.
xl l. Domestic sewage of 22 kLD will be treated in the Existing STP. Effluent of tO8 kLD will be treated through Effluent Treatment Plant (UASB, Aeration, UF, RO module I, Il &lll and ME Stage I, ll, lll & lV). The plant will be based on Zero Liquid discharge rystem.
CHAIRMAN SEAC.TN tr4 xlll. Storm water drains have been provided along the facility to ensure that this is totally separated from process effluent. We have 5 No's of rain harvesting pits and has proposed to conJtruct additional 6 No's with proper storm water drain for expansion. The Roof top drains are linked with Rain water harvesting sump. xtv. Power requirement after expansion will be 1.65 MW including existing 0.95 MW and will be met from Co-Gene plant of 2 MW capacity + TANGEDCO. Existing unit has I DG set of 1500 KVA capacity (Stack Height - 30 m), additionally I DG set is proposed of 2O0O KVA Capacity which are used as standby during power failure. Stack height of 30 m will be provided as per CPCB norms to the proposed DG set. xv. Existing unit has Wood fired boiler - 4T capacity, Bio Mass fuel Boiler - gT capacity & Thermic heater 20,00,000 K.Cals and Bio Mass Boiler -22 T capacity & Thermic heater 20,00,000 K.Cals. Wet chamber, Dust collector and Electro static precipitators with adequate stack heights are provided for controlling the particulate emissions within the statutory limit. xvt. Details of Process emissions generation and its management:
Stack Details Dimension 5.No Sources of Emission APC Measures Provided Height from ( Dia. in GL (in mm) Meter)
I Multi fuel Boiler/Hot oil heaters Running only as standby 750 30 2 Relief headers , Balance headers Flare recovery rystem 600 36 3 Exhaust of 1500 KVA DG Stack 200 30 4 Wood fired boiler- 4 T capacity Wet chamber 750 30 Bio Mass fuel Boiler - 8T 5 capacity and Thermic heater Dust collector il00 30 20,00,000K.Ca1s.
,-.- { \__\-. >... CHAIRMAN--C- SEAC.TN \A /,1 Bio Mass Boiler - 22 T capacity 6 and Thermic heater Electro Static Precipitator 2500 35 20,00,000K.Ca1s. Exhaust of 2000 KVA DG - 7 Stack 200 30 proposed Control ll Fugitive/Noise Emission Type of emision meaJures ln built 7 DG set 1500 KVA Noise acourtic barrier ln built 8 DG set 2000 KVA-proposed Noise acourtic barrier
The Air Pollution control (APcs) system will be strengthened for the proposed activities like
o Adequate stack height will be provided for the proposed DC set as per CPCB o Vent condensers are incorporated in outlet of overhead condenser to control plant process emissions. o Adsorbent shall be provided along with breather valve in the storage tank in order to control VOC emission to atmosphere. . Nitrogen blanketing shall be provided for proposed ttorage tanks in EOU. xvii. Details of Solid waste/ Hazardous waste Seneration and its management. Solid Waste Generation
Nature of Solid Quantity 5.No Unit Mode of Disposal Waste Existing Proposed I STP sludge 4 4.2 Wdav Used as Manure degradable Bio Biogas Plant and fuel 2 (Food and 40 42 Kilday Waste used for canteen Garbage)
CHAIRMAN SEAC.TN \,-A Non-Bio degradable Authorized Venders / Waste (Stationary, scrap material 3 30 32 Kgrlday Scrap and Packaging collected and sold to Wane) authorized recyclers
Hazardous Waste Generation
Annual Annual Name of the Name of the Generation Generation S. No procest waste Waste Disposal Process Ttv TN (Category No) (Exlsting) (Proposed)
lndustrial operation Collection, Storage & using mineral / 5.1 Used/Spent disposal to I synthetic oil as oil 1600V Year 2000V Year lubricant in TNPCB/CPCB hydraulic Authorized recyclers tystem Petro Spent Collection, Storage Chemical I.6 & Catalyst and disposal landfill 2 Process and lT/ 5 year 2T/ 5 year as molecular TSDF, Catalytic sieves Operations Gummidipoondi Purification 35.3 Chemical Collection, Storage and Treatment sludge from & disposal as landfill 3 of exhaust air, waite water 2 T/ Year 2.5 T/ Y ear T5DF, water and treatment Gummidipoondi waste water plant xviii. Compliance report was submitted to RO (South Eastern Zone) and certified compliance was obtained from Regional office F.no. EP/12.1/727 fiN/O159 dated 3r.0r.2018. xix. No, litigation against the project xx. The details of products and capacity for existing and proposed.
Proposed Production Capacity Expansion of MEK & 5BA and Proposed production of MIBC, PPA & Mixed Alcohol
r---- I \-___-lloI . \,/\ CHAIRMAi---C" SEAC-TN \.n Co Description 5. No. Details Existing After Expansion Production Capacity I MTA 24050 460s0
Man power 2 (admin, technical & 80 90 contract workers)
Power Requirement 3 (Co- Gene plant + 0.95 MW 1.65 MW TANGEDCO )
Water(CMW55B) 845 KLD [782 KLD fresh ilr5 KLD [018.5 KLD TTRO 4 Supply/ water from CMWSSB + 63 water from cMwSsB + 96.4 rerycled/condensate Requirement KLD KLD recycled/condensate within the plantl within the plant
20 kLD with 20 hours of 22 kLD with 22 hours of 5 Sewage treatment operation at a flow rate of operation at a flow rate of 1.0 cum/hr. 1.0 cum/hr.
70 KLD Effluent treatment t08 kLD (UASB, Aeration, Zero Uquid UF. RO (UASB, Aeration, UF, RO module Discharge I & ll and ME stage I module lll & ME Stage lll & & rr) tv) Details of Raw materials (in Quantity ton, Mode 5.No Raw Materials Source of Existing lProposed Transportation 5BA & MEK
I C4 Mix (2-Butene) 26QO r8000 CPCL Manali Pipe Line lndian 2 98olo Sulphuric Acid 2270c 15500 Road Tanker manufacturer/Trader lndian 3 Caustic FIakes 250 170 Road Tanker manufacturer/Trader
CHAIRMAN SEAC.TN q.,. lndian 4 Hydrochloric acid 90 60 Road Tanker manufacturer/Trader MIBC Methyl lsobutyl Ship Road I 6000 lmport / Ketone (MIBK) Tanker Indian 2 Hydrogen 200 Road Truck manufacturerflrader
PPA
Ship Road Cinnamaldehyde 1250 lmport / I Tanker
lndian 2 Hydrogen 5o Road Truck manufacturer/Trader
MIXEDALCOHOL
Secondary Butanol I (sBA) 600 5elf Self
Methyl lsobutyl 2 Self Carbinol (MIBC) &o 5elf
Detalls of production.
s.N Capacity after Name of the product Quantity Quantity o (Existing) (Proposed) exPansion crPA) I Methyl Ethyl Ketone 10000 5000 r5000 2 Secondary Butyl Alcohol 12000 r0000 22000 3 Methyl lso Butyl Carbinol s000 5000 4 Phenyl Propyl Alcohol 1000 1000 Fine Chemicals 5 Mixed Alcohol I000 1000 6 Cinnamic Alcohol 1080 r080 7 Anisyl Alcohol 276 276 8 Styrallyl Alcohol 228 228 9 Styrallyl Acetate 150 150 r0 Oximone 20 20
I .--...-- I \ \----:{€ <___l->L- CHAIRMAN SEAC-TN trl ll Phenyl Ethyl Alcohol 96 96 12 Tertiary Butyl Cyclohexyl Acetate 200 20\ Total 24o50 22000 4.6050 The SEAC noted the following: l. The Proponent, M/s. Cetex Petrochemicals Limited has applied for Environment
Clearance to SEIM-TN on 21.05.2019 for the Production Capacity Expansion of MEK and SBA &Proposed production of MIBC, PPA & Mixed Alcohol at Sathangadu & Chinnasekkadu Village, Manali, Chennai, Tamil Nadu.
2. The project/aaivity is covered under Category "B" of ltem 5 (f) "synthetic organic chemicals lndustry Projects" of the Schedule to the EIA Notification, 2006.
3. The proponent has furnished the Health, safety and Environment Audi Report prepared by M/s Department of Civil Engineering, llT Madras , Chennai - 36 from the report it was concluded that " from the health dat, it is clear that most of the dieses are slightly more prominent in the North chennai population compared to
South chennai. This may be due to different reasons like low nutrition level, pollution, living conditions, hygienic conditions and saitation. one cannot attribute
this to air pollution and that too to a specific compound, such as MEK. Based on the study results, it is npt posible to attribute any health impact on pregnancy, particularly with respect to miscarriage and abortions recorded on the community surrounding the indurtry, M/s. Cetex Petrochemicals Limited."
4. MoEF&cc has accorded rerms of Reference CIoR) vide No.J-lloll/lll3/2oo7-t[-lt(t) dated 08.10.2018 with public consultation.
The SEAC noted that M/s. cetex Petrochemicals Limited located at sathangadu & chinnasekkadu Village, Manali, chennai, Tamil Nadu. Further, the Hon'ble National Green Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi in its order dated 10.07.2019 in original
Appl ication N o. I 03 8/201 8 that pronounced that--o--,^...,.,*r
.------{-______:{:. ., /-_ CHAIRMAN } SEAC.TN "Accordingly, We direct the CPCB in coordination with all State PCBS/PCC5 to take steps in exercise of statutory powers under the Air (prwention and Control of Pollution) AA, 1981, Water (Prevention and Control of pollution) Ad, 1974, Environment (Protection)
Act, 1986 or any other law to prohibit operation of polluting activitiei in the said CPAs and SPAs within three months and furnished a compliance report to this Tribunal. The
Central Pollution Control Board. in coordination with the State boards/PCBs may make assessment of compensation to be recovered from the said polluting units for the period of last 5 years, taking into accounts the cost of restoration and cost of damage to the public health and environment and the deterrence element. The scale of deterrence may be related to the period and the frequency of defaults. Such other factors as may be found relevant may also be taken into account. No further industrial activities or expanJion be allowed with regards to 'red' and 'Orange' category units till carrying capacity of area is assessed and new units or expansion is found viable having regard to the carrying capacity of the area and environmental norms."
Accordingly, the Manali Clamil Nadu) has CEPI score of 84.15 (CPA$.
The SEAC decided not to take further course of action until further orders from the Hon'ble National Green Tribunal/ MoEF&CC.
Further, O.M No. F.No.22-23/2018 -lA.ll (ft) MoEF&CC Dt. 31.10.2019 hai stated the following " The Hon'ble NGT in O.A.No .1038/ 2018 had passed orders regarding formulation of a mechanism for environmental management of critically and severely polluted areas and consideration of activities/projects in such areas.
The following mechanism has been finalized by the Ministry and necessary action may be taken as given below:
a) ln cases pertaining to Critically and Severely Polluted Areas, where the environmental clearance propoial is yet to be referred to the EACs/SEACs,
c----\{\"------:tc> 9 - -/ \- CHAIRA,uF SEAC-TN 9t the mechanism may be provided to the EACs/SEACs which after due diligence may prescribe additional conditions as incorporated in the mechanism for environmental protection.
b) ln cases pertaining to Critically and Severely polluted Areas, where the environmental clearance proposar has arready been recommended by the EACsAEACs, and the proposal was kept on hold, the mechanism may now be considered by the concerned sectors of the Ministry/SErMs and after due diligence the concerned sectors of the Ministry/sElAAs may prescribe additional conditions as incorporated in the mechanism for environmental
protection while issuing ECs. and enclosed the following mechanism for environmental management of critically and Severely Polluted Areas and consideration of activities/projects in such areas in compliance of directions issued by Hon'ble National Green Tribunal on 19.08.2019 (published on 23.08.2019) in O. A. No. 1038 2018.
B. consideration of proposals for grant of Environmental clearance for new and expansion activities risted in 'Red' and 'orange' categories located in Critically Polluted Areas and Severely polluted areas:
ii. Proposals located in CpAs and SpAS may be examined by the sectoral Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC) during scoping/ appraisal
based on the CEP' scores of Airnx,/ater/ Land Environment as published by CPCB from time to time. ln such proposals, appropriate mitigation measures for the environment possessing higher CEPI score may be made by EAC in the form of recommendations/ decision. These recommendations may be explicitly mentioned in the Terms of Reference/Environmental Gt- \ CHAIRMAIK SEAC-TN V- Clearance letter and to be ensured by the member secretary concerned.
Based on above decision the subject was placed in this l39th SEAC Meeting held on 23.11.2019. The project proponent gave detailed presentation on the environmental impact arsessment.
The SEAC noted that "As per O.M No. F.No. 22-23/2018 -lA.ll (Pt) MoEF&CC Dt. 31.10.2019. '8. Consideration of proposals for grant of Environmental clearance for new and expantion activities listed in 'Red' and 'Orange' Categories located in Critically Polluted Areas and
Severely Polluted areas: i. Any project or activity specified in Category 81 will be appraised at the Central Level, if located in whole or in part within 5 km from the boundary of Critically Polluted Areas or Severely Polluted Areas. However, Category 82 projects shall be considered at state level stipulating Environmental Clearance conditions as applicable for the Category 'Bl' project/activities".
Hence the SEAC decided to defer the proposal since the project is in Bl category and also located in Manali Area (Notified as CEPI - Critically polluted area as per Hon'ble NCT (PB) order Dt lO.7.2O1g for O.A No 1038/2018). Further,1.r" f.?#r*r- decided to address the MoEF & CC for further process of the proposal.
(----\ule<_=z\ / s, CHAIRMAN- SEAC.TN
t3 Agenda no: 139 -02-20 (File No. 68,gt /2019) Proposed Gravel quarry lease over an extent of 4.g0.OHa comprising S.F.Nor 930/28 (p) of 50uth Avinashipalayam viflage, Tiruppur 50uth raruk and riruppur Dirtrict the state of Tamil Nadu by Tvr' SenthirMurugan constructionr private & Trading umited, Tiruppur for Terms of Reference. - (5IA/TN/M I N/3 8s2 s /2ots)
The proposal was placed in the 139,h SEAC Meeting held on 23.11.2019. The project proponent gave detailed presentation. The salient features of the project as presented by the proponent are as follows:
l. Government order/ Lease details: a. The Quarry lease was applied in the name of Tvl. Senthil Murugan Construction & Trading private Limited, Tiruppur. precise Area Communication letter was issued by the District Collector, Tiruppur District vide Rc. No. 1265lMines/2O17, dated 25.O5.2Olgfor a period of Three years. lt is a Fresh lease for Gravel quarry lease over an extent of 4.80.0Ha comprising S.F.Nos 930/28(p) of South Avinashipalayam village, Tiruppur South Taluk and Tiruppur District. 2. Mining Plan/Scheme of Mining approval details: a. Mining plan was prepared for the period of Three years. The Mining Plan was approved by the Deputy Director, Department of Geology and Mining. Tiruppur District vide Roc. No. 1256/Mines/2OI7, dated 06,06.2018.
at- >- CHAIRMAN sEAc-TN U^n 3. As per the Department of Geology and Mining. Tiruppur District. Mining plan approval for the three years, the production schedule for Three years statej that the total quantity of Gravel should not exceed 3,17,705m3. a. For First year - 1,00,930m3 of Gravel b. For Second year - 1,00,630m3 ofGravel c. For Third year - 1,16,145m3 of Gravel 4. The quarry operation is proposed upto a depth of l0m(5m above ground level and 5m below the ground level).
5. The Quarry operation is proposed to carry out with open cajt semi mechanized mining like excavators (without drilling and blasting). 6. Gravel are to be transported by Tippers. (\O/2OT capacity).
7. The project is located at lo'52'39.72"N to 10.57'50.33"Nlatitude and 77"27' 59.77" E to 72"28'09.16,'ELongitude.
8. The total Manpower requirement is 13 Nos. 9' Total cost of the projects is Rs. r.2Tggcrore and ruR costjauout Rs. l.SOlakh.
10. The water table is found to be at the depth of 35m below ground level. 11. Applied lease area is not covered under HACA region. 12. No coastal Regulation zone (cRZ) is rocated within the radius of rOkm from the lease area. 13' No lnterstate boundary & western Ghats Boundary is rocated within the radius of lOkm from the lease area. 14. No National Park & wird Life sanctuary is rocated within the radius of rOkm from the lease area. 15. No critically polluted area as notified by the central pollution contror Board constituted under water (prevention pollution) and control of Aa 1974 is located within the radius of lokm.
CJ--.,llHil- \ \r/. 99 16. No Protected Area, Eco Sensitive Zone & Eco Sensitive Area is located within the radius of lokm.
17. No habitation is located within the radius of the 300m from the lease area as stated in the letter obtained from VAO, South Avinashipalayam Village, Tiruppur Taluk, Taluk District dated08.06.2018. 18. Letter obtained from the AiJistant Director, Department of Geology and Mining, Tiruppur vide Letter R.C. No. 1266/Mines/2O17, dated 05.1l.2Ol9informed that, the following quarries are situated within a radial distance of 500 meters from the applied fields. a. Existing Quarries S. No. Name of the Village and 5. F. Extent in Distance from thil propose Ourner No. Hect. quarry
---Nil ---
b. 5. No. Name of the Village and 5. F. Extent in Dirtance from this proPose Ourner No. Hect. quarry ---Nil --
c Present Proposed Quarries 5. No. Name of the Owner Village and 5. F. Extent in Distance from this No. Hect. proPose quarry I Tvl. Senthil Murugan South Trading Avinashipalayam Constructors and 4.80.0 Private Limited (v), 930/28 (Part)
d. Exoired Ouarries s. Name of the Village and 5. F. No. Extent in Distance from this Owner Hect. propote quarry
q--f--q---,^-\.-..-..-ts\ CHAIRMAN -- SEAC-TN \r" No. I R. Krishnamoorthi 5outh Avinashipalayam (V), il.00.0 932/2A
The SEAC noted the following:
l. The Proponent, Tvl. Senthil Murugan Constructors and Trading private Limited has applied for Terms of Reference for the Gravel quarry lease over an extent of 11.00.0Ha in S.F.No: 930/28(P),South Avinashipalayam village, Tiruppur South Taluk and Tiruppur District, Tamil Nadu ..B- 2. The project/activity is covered under Category of ltem l(a) ..Mining of Mineral Projeas" of the Schedule to the EIA Notification, 2006.
Based on the detailed presentatlon, the SEAC decided to defer the proposal for want of following additional particularr. l. As per the MoEF&cc o.M dated 24.06.2013, the depth of the mining for gravel shall be restricted upto 2m below the ground level. However it is noted that the mining plan submitted by the proponent revears that the proposed mining depth is to be lomts (5m above GL+ 5m below GL).Hence the proponent sharr revise the mining pran as per above said the MoEF&CC OM. 2. The proponent shall furnished letter as obtained from Deputy Director, Department of Geology and Mining, Tiruppur District vide Roc. No. 1266/Mines/2o17, dated 06,06'2018 stating that there is no abandoned quarry located within a radial distance of 500 meters from the project area. However in the same letter, it is shown that there is a expired quarry. Hence the projea proponent shall obtain clarification from the Department of Geology and Mining, Tiruppur District stating when the expired quarry stopped operation. on receipt of the above details, SEAC will decide the further course of action on the proposal.
I .----'-'l S- \----ll: <----1--->(- CHAIRMAN SEAC-TN trr Agenda no: 139 -02-21
(File No. 7229 /20191 Proposed Gravel quarry lease over an extent of 4.66.0ha inS.F.No.lOO (Part) of Poovali Village, lGlaiyarkovil Taluk and Sivagangai District the state of Tamil Nadu by Thiru.M.Muthukrishnan - for Environment Clearance.
(s r A/TN/M| N/41 6 6t / 20t9t The proposal was placed in the l39th SEAC Meeting held on 23.11.2019. The profect proponent gave detailed presentation. The salient features of the project and the environmental impact assessment as presented by the proponent are as follows:
l. Government order/ Lease details: a, The Quarry lease was applied in the name of Thiru.M. Muthukrishnan' Precise Area communication letterwas issued by the District Collector, Sivagangai District vide Rc' No. M2/749/2O17, dated 30'10'2018for a period of oneYear.lt is a Fresh lease for Gravel quarry over an exent of 4.66.0ha in 5.F.No.100 (Part) of Poovali Village, Kalaiyarkovil Taluk and 5ivagangai District. Mining Plan/Scheme of Mining approval details: a. Mining plan was prepared for the period of one year' The Mining Plan was the Assistant Director, Department of Geolory EC "pPror$f.3*'t and Mining, Sivagangai District vide Roc' No' M2/749/2O18' dated 23.O1.2019. 3. As per the Department of Geology and Mining, Sivagangai Dinrict' Mining year states Plan approval for the one year, the production schedule for one that the total quantity of Gravel should not exceed 74,844m3 ' a. For First year - 74,844m3 of Gravel 4. The quarry operation is proposed upto a dePth of 2m below the ground level'
s) (--\a^( . /^\ CHAIRMAN- SEAC.TN t^ 5. The Quarry operation is proposed to carry out with open cast semi mechanized mining like excavators (without drilling and blasting). 6. Gravel are to be transported by Tippers of 5 Nos. (10T capacity). 7. The project is located at 09"48'47.45"N to 09'48'56.l2"Nlatitude and 78'31'01.49'E to 78"31'12.89"E Longitude.
8. The total Manpower requirement is 34 Nos. uabout 9. Total cost of the proiects is Rs. 4l.04 lakhs and EMP cost Rs. l.34lakh.
10. The water table is found to be at the depth of 22m in summer season and 20m in rainy season, from the ground level ll. Applied lease area is not covered under HACA region. 12. No coastal Regulation Zone (cRZ) is located within the radiur of lOkm from the lease area.
13. No lnterstate boundary & western Ghats Boundary is located within the radius of lOkm from the lease area.
14. No National Park & wild Life sanctuary is located within the radius of l0km from the lease area.
15. No critically polluted area as notified by the central pollution control Board
constituted under water (Prevention and control of pollution) Acr 1914 is located within the radius of lokm. 16. No Protected Area, Eco Sensitive zone &, Eco sensitive Area ir located within the radius of 10km. 17. No habitation is located within the radius of the 300m from the lease area as stated in the letter obtained from VAO, Nadamangalam Group,
K.alayarkovi lTal uk, Sivagangai Di strict dated2 3 .Og.2}lg.
18. Letter obtained from the Aiiistant Director, Department of Geology and Mining, Sivagangai vide Lener Roc.No. M2n4g/2012. dated
I !-\-:--A^rl CHAIRMAN
\r/.'EAC.TN SL 29.O7.2O19informed that, the following quarries are located within 5O0m radius from the proposed area for clearance.
Particulars of eroposed gravel quarry site Name of the Village and 5.F. Nos. proponent Taluk Extent Poovali, M. Muthukrishnan 5.F. Nos. 100 (P) KalayarkovilTaluk 4.66.0 The details of others leases located within a radial distance of 500 meters from the
proposed gravel quarry of Thiru. M. Muthukrishnan, 5/o. Mathavan, 7C, Bose Road, Sivagangai Dirtrict are given in the table below.
Abandoned Quarry Existing Quarry Name Village Name Village of the and S.F. Nos. Extent of the 5.F.Nos. Elitent and Taluk Lessee Taluk lessee
-Nit- -Nit-
The SEAC noted the following: 1. The Proponent, Thiru.M.Muthukrishnan has applied for Environment Clearance for the Gravel quarry lease over an extent of 4.66.OHa in S.F.No: 100(Part), Poovali Village, Kalaiyarkovil Taluk and Sivagangai District, Tamil Nadu 2. The project/activity is covered under CateSory "8" of ltem l(a) "Mining of Mineral Projects" of the Schedule to the EIA Notification, 2OO6.
Based on the lnitial discussion with the proponent and the scrutiny of documents furnished, it was noticed that the lease deed is not registered yet. Hence the SEAC decided to direct the proponent to submit the registered lease deed, before making
the presentation. On receipt of the above details, SEAC will decide the further course of action on the proposal. {-_x CHAIRMAN- SEAC.TN Agenda no: 139 -02-22 (File No. 7177 /2019) Proposed Black Granite quarry lease overan extent ol 3.24.5Ha in S.F.Nos. lOlsnA, lOt5/lB' 1o15/1c, lo.l.5nL. rc15/2L.1o1.5nc, rc15/3A & tol5/38 of Burgur Vilage, Anthiyur (Formerly Bhavani)Taluk, Erode District the state of ramil Nadu by Tvl. GTp Granites Limited- for Terms of Reference. (5rM[N/MrN/43845nop)
The proposal was placed in the l39th SEAC Meeting held on 23.11.2019. The project proponent gave detailed presentation. The salient features of the project are as follows:
t. Government order/ Lease details:
The Proponent Tvl. GTP Granites has been granted quarry lease for quarrying of Black Granite quarry lease over an extent of 3.24.5Ha in s.F.Nos. rol5l1A, 1015/18, 1015/1c, tols/2\, lors/29, 1o15/2c, rots/3A & ror5l3B of Burgur Village' Anthiyur (Formerly Bhavani) Taluk, Erode District, Tamil Nadu vide G.O. (3D). No.2, rndustries (MME.2) Department dated o5.02.2014 ror a period of rwenty years. The Lease deed was executed on 17.02.2014, the quarry operation was commenced after the execution of lease deed and the lease will tet expired on 16.02.2034. 2. Mining Plan,/Scheme of Mining approval details: a. The Mining plan (2014-15 to 2018_t9) was approved by the Commission of Geology and Mining, Guindy, Chennai vide letter No. 9984/MM5/2012, dated 09.12.2013. b. The First Scheme of quarrying was prepared and submitted for the period of 2019-20 to 2O2g-24 and approved by the Director,
f---\{ \ -/\ (_- CHAIRMAN SEAC-TN
ea Department of 6eology and Mining, Guindy, Chennai vide Rc. No. 9045/MM4/2O18, dated 3O.O7.2019.
The quarrying operation and quantity of material mined are as follows.
Year Proposed Achieved ROM (m3) Production Production @ 15o/o (mz) achieved (m3) 201+15 3760 564 292.134 2015-16 3470 521 5l0.ll9 2016-17 3325 498.75 240.766 2017-18 4400 660 355.270 2018-19 3480 522 66.354
3. As per the Scheme of quarrying for the years 2O19-2O to 2023-24, production
schedule for year's stateJ that the total volume of recoverable as l5olo of Black Coloured Granite should not exceed 3.986m3.
For 2O19-2O - 812 m3
For 2O2O-21 - 780 m3 For 2021-22 - 810 m3 For 2022-23 - 870 m3 For2023-24 -714m3 4. Environmental Clearance obtained from the State Level impact Assessment Authority, Tamil Nadu vide Letter No'5EIAA-TN/F.No.
212O/EC/1(a)/988/2013, dated I 3.01.2014. 5. The waste that will be resulting in the quarrying operation for the 5 years 2019-20 to 2023-24 will be 34,285m3 (Granite Waste + Side burden) proposed to dump on western side and Topsoil - l82m3will be preserved all along the boundary barriers for afforestation.
CL. *,\ CHAIRMAN SEAC.TN \r" 6. The quarry operation is proposed upto a depth of 24m for the present scheme period (2O19-20 to 2023-24). 7. quarrying Operation will be done by Opencast Semi Mechanised method with Diamond Wire Saw cutting.
8. Granite is to be transported by tippers of 2 Nos. (20 T capacity).
9. The water table is found to be at the depth of 5Om in summer season and 45m in rainy season.
10. Applied lease area is not covered under HACA region. ll. No coastal Regulation zone (cRZ) is located within the radius of lokm from the lease area.
12' No Interstate boundary & western Ghats Boundary is located within the radius of lOkm from the lease area.
13. No National Park & wild Life sanctuary is located within the radius of lOkm from the lease area. 14. No polluted critically area as notified by the central pollution control Board conrtituted under (prevention water and control of pollution) Act 1974 is located within the radius of l0km from the lease area. 15. No Protected Area, Eco sensitive Zone & Eco sensitive Area i, Iocated within the radius of l0km. 16. No habitation is located within the radius of the 5oom from the lease area as stated in the letter obtained from VAo, Burgur Viilage, AnthiyurTaruk, Erode District dated 19.08.2019. 17. Letter obtained from the Deputy Director, Department of Geology and Mining. Erode vide Letter RC. No. 663/2or9/Mines dated o5.og.2org, informed that the fo[owing particularr with regard to the nearby existing, proposed and abandoned and other quarries situated within a radius distance of 500 mts from the subject area are furnished as below. at-> CHAIRMAN SEAC-TN
9t l. Existing other quarries: s. Name of the 5.F.Nos. Extent Lease period Remarks No. applicant (Hect) I Min.Rocks 915/1. 2.3. 1.12.5 G.O.(3D). No. 22, lnternational Pvt. l02lllB and lndustries (MME2) Ltd., 1022/2 dt 07.08.2014 4.O9.2O14 to 3.O9.2O34 20 years 2. Proposed area: s. Name of the 5.F.Nos. Extent Lease period Remarks No. applicant (Hea) l. Thiru. O. 1023/3 I.85.0 20 years Ulaganathan 3. Lease period Expired and abandoned area: s. Name of the 5.F.Nos. Extent Lease period Remarks No. applicant (Hea) (3D). period 1 Tvl. Tamil Nadu 9ll, 916, 3.08.5 G.O. No. Lease Minerals Ltd., 1023/1 and 803 dt.27.11.87 expired 1032/l 29.02.1988 to 28.O2.2008 (20 years) 2. Tvl. 5.5. Enterprises 1075, 5.O7.35 G.O.(3D), No. Lease period 1076/14, 369, industries expired 1077/34 MMB.2 dated 4.5.1998
r5.05.r998 to 14.06.2008 (10 vears) The SEAC noted the 1. The Proponent, Tvl. GTP Granites Limited has applied for Terms of Reference to SEIAA-TN on 21.08.2019 for the Black Granite quarry lease over an extent of 3.24.5Ha in 5.F.Nos. 1Ol5/lA, l0l5/lB, 1O15/1C, 1O15/2A'1015/28,1O15/2C'
l-. ci:. >= CHAIRMAN ? SEAC.TN 1015/3A & 1Ol5/38 of Burgur Village, Anthiyur (Formerly Bhavani)Taluk, Erode District, Tamil Nadu 2. The project/activity is covered under Category "8" of ltem l(a) "Mining of Mineral Projects" of the Schedule to the EIA Notification, 2006. Based on the presentation made by the proponent and the documents furnished, the
SEAC decided to recommend the proposal for the grant of Terms of Reference (l-oR) to SEIAA with Public Hearing, subject to the following specific conditions in addition to the
normal conditions as part of ToR: 1. The study shall be conducted on the combined impact of the quarries in the cluster
2. A detailed study of the lithology of the mining lease area shall be furnished. 3. Details of village map, "A" register and FMB sketch shall be furnished. 4. The proposal for green belt activitiei shall be furnished. 5. The Socio economic studies should be carried out within lokm buffer zone from the mines.
6. Detailed study report combined impact of the crushers, impact of the water body,
open well detail within I km radius impact on this the proiect proponent shall furnish in the EIA report. 7. Detailed mining closure plan for the proposed project approved by the Geology of Mining department shall be shall be submitted along with EIA report. 8. The spot levels and contour levels of the proposed quarry site shall be studied and the same shall be furnished to along with ElA. 9. A detailed report on the safety and health aspects of the workers and for the
surrounding habitants during operation of mining for drilling and blasting shall be submitted.
10. The proponent may conduct a detailed hydrogeological study to assess the impacts of mining activity on both surface and ground water availability, water levels and their quality and furnish the report along with EIA report. cJ--+ CHAIRMAN SEAC.TN \.^ 91 I l. The proposal for CER shall be furnished with time frame as per Office Memorandum of MoEF & CC dated 01.O5.2Olg. 12. Obtain a letter /certificate from the Assistant Director of Geology and Mining standing that there is no other Minerars/resources rike sand in the quarrying area within the approved depth of mining and below depth of mining and the same shall be furnished in the EIA report. 13. Ground water quality monitoring should be conducted as per norms and the report shall furnish in the EIA report. 14' EIA report shourd strictry folow the Environmentar rmpact Assessment cuidance Manual for Mining of Minerals published February 2010. 15. Detail plan on rehabiritation and recramation carried out for the stabirization and restoration of the mined areas.
16. The EIA study report shall include the surrounding mining activity, if any. l7' Modelling study for Air' water and noise sha, be carried out and incrementar increase in the above study shall be substantiated with mitigation measures. l8' A study on the georogicar resources avairabre shal be carried out and reported. 19' A specific study on agricurture & riverihood sha, be carried out and reported. 20'lmpact on ponds, rivers and other water bodies to be eraborated. 21' lmpact of soil erosion, soir physicar chemicar and biorogicar property changes may be assumed.
22.The recommendation for issue the of rerms of Reference is subject to the finar outcome of the Hon'bre principar N6T. Bench, New Derhi in o.A No. 196 of 2016 (M.A.No.350/2015) and O.A.No.200/2016 and O.A.No.580/2016 (M.A.No.ll8212016) and O.A.No.l02l2017 and O.A.No.404l2015 (M'A'No'758/2016. M.A.No.920/2016, M.A.No.r22l20r6, M.A.No.r 2/2012 &. M'A.No.843,r20r7) and o.A.No.405l20r6 and o.A.No.520 of 2o1b (M.A.No.98l12016, M.A.No.9 B2/2O16 & M.A.No.384l2Ol 7).
d.+CHAIRMAN w SEAC.TN Agenda no: 139 - 02- 23 (File No. 7265 /2019) Proposed Rough stone quarry lease over an extent of2.69.5Ha in S.F.No: 656/2A2, Killiyoor Village, VilavancodeTaluk, lGnniyakumari District, Tamil Naduby Thiru. V. Christhudhas, lGnniyakumari- For Environmental Clearance. (sIA/TN/Ml Nn 2s499 /2O1e) The proposal was placed in the l39th SEAC Meeting held on 23.11.2019. The project proponent gave detailed presentation. The salient features of the project and the environmental impact assessment as presented by the proponent are as follows:
t. Government Order / Lease details: a. The Quarry lease was applied in the name of Thiru. V. Christhudhas, Kanniyakumari, Precise Area Communication was issued by the District
Collector, Kanniyaku marivide Rc. No. I OZ / G6,M/201 5 dated 23.07 .2012. lt is a Rough stone quarry lease over an extent of 2.69.5Ha in S.F.No: 656/2A2' Killiyoor Village, VilavancodeTaluk, Kanniyakumari District. Tamil Nadu.
2. Mining Plan / Scheme of Mining approved details:
a. The Mining plan was prepared for the period of rhree year four months. The mining plan was got approvar from the Assistant Director. Department of Geology and Mining, KanniyakumariDistrict vide
Rc. No. 707lG&M/201 5, dated 22.09.2017 .
3' As per the Department of Geology and Mining, KanniyakumariDistrict. Mining years Plan approval for the Three Four Months, the production schedule for Three Years Four Monthsstates that the total quantity of Rough stone should not exceed I,36,970m3.
a. For First year - 9,465m3 of Rough stone b. For Second year - 36,738m3 of Rough stone c. For Third year - 47,314m3 of Rough stone cf,-- CHAIRMANA"-...- LtEAc-rN
6o d. For Fourth year - 43,453m3 of Rough stone 4. The quarry operation is proposed up to a depth of 2lmfrom the elevated portion.
5. The Quarry operation is proposed to carry out with open cast semi mechanized mining with 5.0m vertical bench and width. 6. Rough stone are to be transported by Tippers of I No' (10/20-t Capacity). 7. The project is located at 08"14'35.54'N to 08'14'45.89"Nlatitude and
77"12' 29.92"E to 77"12' 36.60"E Longitude. 8. The total Manpower requirement is 1lNos. 9. Total cost of the projects is Rs. 67.39lakhs and EMP cost about Rs' 6.26lakhs 'lo. The water table is found to be at the depth of 60m in summer season and 57m in
rainy season.
11. Lease applied area is not covered under HACA region.
12. No Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) within the radius of 1okm from the lease area. 13. No National Park & wild Life sanctuary within the radius of l0km from the lease
area. 14. No lnterstate boundary & Western Ghats Boundary within the radius of 10km from the lease area. 15. No critically polluted area as notified by the Central Pollution Control Board constituted under water (Prevention and control of Pollution) Act 1974 within the radius of l0km from the lease area.
16. No Protected Area. Eco Sensitive Zone & Eco Sensitive Area within the radius of
10km.
17. No habitation within the radius of the 300m from the lease area as stated in the letter obtained from VAO, Killiyoor Village, VilavancodeTaluk and Kanniyakumari District dated 25.O7.2017.
18. Letter obtained from the Assistant Director (i/c), DePartment of Geology and Mining, Kanniyakumarivide Letter RC. No. 7O7/G&M/2O15, dated 08.11.2019 informed that the details of existing and abandoned quarries located within 500mts. radius from the proposed Rough stone quarry.
CHAIRMAIK [:rlc-rn Adjacent quarry detalls (Around 5OO meter radius) l. DetailJ of the Exirtinp quarriet Exten Existing t. Name of the Village 5.F.Nos t0n Propose Remark No. Owner &Taluk Hect) d quarry The lease was granted per 61O/sA (P), as G.O.(3D) 612/128 (P), Tvl. Standard Killioor No.61 / 612/13. Match Exports Vilavanco lndustries 618/r0A1 Pvt. Ltd., de (P).618/2A. Non (MMB2) I No.5,u2-15C. (Bifurcate 1.10.9 Operatio Department 618/10A2At Sattur Road. d into n Dated: (P), 618l108 Sivakasi 626 KilioorTa - (P).618/3 23.10.2006 123. luk) period (P) & for a years 621/28 of 20 from 24.1.2006 to 23.11.2026.
The lease was V.Christhudhas granted as per District 5/o. Varuvel. Killioor Collector Tharavilai, Village, 6s6/2 Non Proceeding 2.69.5 Operatio Thickanamcod Vilavancode A2 Rc.No.707lG n e Post, Ta luk &M/ 2015 for Kanniyakumari a period of 5 District years from 17.12.2015 to 126.12.2020.
CHAIRMAoft-5 j-rrec-rN
0r The Total extent of the Existing / Proposed quarries are about (l + 3) 3.80.4ha
The SEAC noted the following: l. The Proponent, Thiru. V. Christhudhas has applied for Environment Clearance to SEIAA-TN on 21.08.2019 for the Rough stone quarry lease over an extent of2.69.SHa in 5.F.No: 656/2A2, Killiyoor Village, VilavancodeTaluk. Kanniyakumari District, Tamil Nadu
2. The project/activity is covered under Category "8" of ltem I (a) "Mining of Mineral Projecti' of the Schedule to the EIA Notification, 2006.
The project proponent gave presentation about the proposal. Based on the prerentation made by the proponent and the documents furnished. the 5EAC decided to recommend the proposal for grant of Environmental Clearance to SEIAA subject to the following condition in addition to normal condition:
1. Ground water quality monitoring should be conducted every Six months and the report should be submitted to TNPCB.
2. Proper barrier for reducing the Noise level shall be established like providing Green Belt along the boundary of the quarrying site, etc' and to prevent dust pollution, suitable working methodology needs to be adopted taking wind direction into consideration.
3. The operation of the quarry should no way imPact the agriculture activity & water bodies near the project site. 4. Transportation of the quarried materials shall not cause any hindrance to the Village people/Existing Village road.
5. The Project Proponent shall comply with the mining and other relevant rules and regulations where ever applicable.
CHAIRMAN * E-grc-rN 6. The quarrying activity shall be stopped if the entire quantity indicated in the Mining plan is quarried even before the expiry of the quarry lease period and the same shall be monitored by the District Authorities.
7. The recommendation for the issue of environmental clearance is subject to the outcome of the Hon'ble NGT, Principal Bench, New Delhi in O.A No.186 of 2016 (M.A.No.35Ol2016) and O.A. No.20012016 and O.A.No.580/2016 (M.A.No.ll82,/2016) and O.A.No.l0212017 and O.A.No.404/2016 (M.A.No. 7 58/2O16.M.A.No.92Ol20l6,M.A.No.l 122,22O16, M.A.No.l2l2O12 &. M.A. No. 843/2017) and O.A.No.405/2016 and O.A.No.520 of 2016 (M.A.No. g9t /2016, M.A.No.98212016 & M.A.No.384/2017).
8. The entire mining operation should be as per the guidelines for sustainable sand mining issued in 2016 by the MoEF& CC, GOl, New Delhi.
9. To ensure safety measures along the boundary of the quarry site, security guards are to be engaged during the entire period of mining operation. 10. The mine closure plan submitted by the project proponent shall be strictly followed after the laps of the mine as reported. 11. The proponent shall furnish the cER proposal as per office memorandum of MoEF&CC datedOl.05.2Ot 8.
-+_ ...---F- CHAIRMAN plerc-rn
Az Agenda no: 139 - 02- 24 (File No. 6768 /2019) Propored Gravel quarry lease over an extent of 9.7l.oHa in s.F.No: l6g/2c4, Goonipalayam Village, Uthukottal raluk, Tiruvallur District, Tamil Nadu by Thiru. J. Baskar - For Terms of Reference. (srMrN/MlN/34197nO].9) proposal The was placed in the r39,h SEAC Meeting herd on 23.fi.2org. The project proponent gave prerentation. detailed The salient features of the proiect and the environmental impact assessment as presented by the proponent are as fo[ows: l. Government Order / Lease details: The quarry a. lease was appried in the name of rhiru. J. Baskar, chennai, Precise Area communication was issued by the District coflector, Tiruva[ur letter vide, Rc. No. 251/2O16/Mines2, Dated: 23.O3.2O1g for a period of one year. rt is fresh a lease for Graver quarry over an Extent of 9.7r.o Ha in 5.F. Nos. r69/2C4 at Gooniparyam Vi[age, uthukottai raruk, Tiruvailur District.
2. Mining Plan / Scheme of Mining approved details: a. The Mining plan was prepared for the period of I year. The Mining plan was by !* "rpror$ the Assistant Director, Department of Geology and Mining' Tiruva[ur vide Rc. No.25r/2or6/G&Jr4-2, dated 20.06.20rg 3' As per the Department of Georogy and Mining, Tiruvalur District. Mining pran approval for the year, I the production schedule for I year states that the total quantity of Gravel should not exceed G0,000 m3 of Gravel. 4. The quarry operation is proposed up to a depth of lm below ground level. 5. The quarry operation is proposed to carry out with open cast semi mechanized mining.
6. Gravel is to be transported by Hired Tippers. (lO/2OTsCapacity).
.---=.'.\--:F I <_Z__)\ CHAIRMANC- SEAC.TN [..,t 7. The project is located at l3'17'14"N to l3'17'31"N latitude and 79'51'51"E to 79"52'04"E Longitude. 8. The total Manpower requirement is 07 Nos. 9. Total cost of the proiects is Rs. 36.87 lakhs and EMP cost about Rs. 1.55 lakhs.
10. The water table is found to be at the depth of 36m below ground level' ll. Applied lease area i5 not covered under HACA region. 12. No Coartal Regulation Zone (cRZ) is located within the radius of lOkm from the
lease area. 2.82km 13. There is TamilNadu - Andhra Pradesh lnterstate boundary located at - (N) from the project site.
14. No critically polluted area as notified by the central Pollution control Board constituted under water (Prevention and control of Pollution) Acl 197 4 is located within the radius of lOkm from the lease area. within the 15. No Protected Area, Eco Sensitive Zone & Eco Sensitive Area is located radius of lOkm. lease area as 16. No habitation is located within the radius of the 300m from the Taluk' stated in the letter obtained from VAO, Goonipalyam Village, Uthukottai Tiruvallur District. r) Existing other quarries: Name of the lessee / Permit Holder
2) Proposed Area: the 5. Name of Mllage &Taluk S. F. No. Extent Remark No. applicant Village Goonipalayam 169/2C4 9.71.O 1 Thiru. J. Baskar Uthukottai Taluk
CHAIRMAN -I->SEAC.TN 3) Lease Expired:
The Total extent of the area is 9.71.0 Ha.
The SEAC noted the following: The Proponent, l. Thiru. J. Baskar has appried for Terms of Reference to sErAA- for the Graver quarry rease over an extent of 9.7r.0Ha in i.F.No: 16g/2c4, Goonipalayam viilage, uthukottai raruk. Tiruvailur District, Tamir Nadu 2. The project/activity ..Mining is covered under category "8" of ltem r(b) of Mineral ProjectC' of the Schedule to the EIA Notification, 2006. Based on the presentation made by the proponent and the documents furnished, the SEAC decided to recommend the proposar for the grant of rerms of Reference fioR) to SEIAA with Public Hearing, subiect to the foilowing specific conditions in addition to the normal conditions as part of ToR: l' The study shafl be conducted on the combined impact of the quarries in the clurter
2' A detailed study of the rithorogy of the mining rease area shail be furnished. 3. Details of vilrage map, "A" register and FMB sketch shal be furnished.
4. The proposal for green belt activities shall be furnished. 5' The socio economic studies should be carried out within rOkm buffer zone from the mines.
6. Detailed study report combined impact of the crushers, their impacts on the water bodies, and open weus within r km radius impact on thiJ the proiect proponent shall furnish in the EIA report.
7. Detailed mining closure plan for the proposed proiect approved by the Geology ,/Mining department shall be submitted along with EIA report. t^ 1---"--\\----jL.a .--eX CHAIRMAN SEAC.TN \4 €y 8. The spot level and contour levels of the proposed quarry site shall be measured and the same shall be furnished along with ElA. g. A detailed report on the safety and health aspects of the workers and for the surrounding habitants during operation of mining for drilling and blasting shall be submitted. and to study the 10. The proponent may conduct a detailed Hydro-geological study impactsofminesbothonsurfacewaterandgroundwateravailability,waterlevels and their water quality and furnish report along with EIA report' frame as per Office 11. The proposal for CER shall be furnished with time Memorandum of MoEF & CC dated 0l'05'2018' Geology and Mining 12. Obtain a letter /certificate from the Assistant Director of in the quarrying area ,tanding that there is no other Minerals/resources like sand the same within the approved depth of mining and below depth of mining and shall be furnished in the EIA report' for one month and the 13. Ground water quality monitoring should be conducted report shall furnish in the EIA report'
14.ElAreportshouldstrictlyfollowtheEnvironmentallmpactAssessmentGuidance Manual for Mining of Minerals published February 2ol0'
l5'Detailplanonrehabilitationandreclamationcarriedoutforthestabilizationand restoration of the mined areas' l5.ModelingstudyforAir,Waterandnoiseshallbecarriedoutandincremental increaseintheabovestudyshallbesub'tantiatedwithmitisationmeasures.
lT.Astudyonthegeolosicalresourcesavailableshallbecarriedoutandreported.
lS.Aspecificstudyonagriculture&livelihoodshallbecarriedoutandreported. be elaborated' 19. Impact on ponds, rivers and other water bodies to property changes may 20.lmpact of soil erosion, soil physical chemical and biological be assumed.
cl-. >. CHAIRMAN SEAC.TN W. 21. The recommendation for the issue of Terms of Reference is subject to the final outcome of the Hon'ble NGT, Principal Bench, New Delhi in O.A No. 186 of 2016 (M.A.No.350/2016) and O.A.No.200/2016 and O.A.No.580/2016 (M.A.No.1l8212015) and O.A.No.l02l2017 and O.A.No.404l2016 (M.A.No.758l201 6, M.A.No.92O/2O16, M.A.No. I 1221201 6, M.A.No.l 2/2017 &. M.A.No.843/2017) and O.A.No.405/2016 and O.A.No.520 of 2016 (M.A.No.98ll2ol 6, M.A.No.982/2016 & M.A.No.3841201 7).
Agenda no: 139 -02-25
(File No.7rc2 nO1.9) Proposed Rough Stone & Gravel quarry lease over an Extent of 1.64.0Ha in S.F.No.l63ll at South Sankarankoil Village, Sankarankoil Taluk, Tirunelveli District, Tamil Nadu by Thiru.T. Lakhmi - For Environnment Clearance. (srA/[N/MrN/42rcsn01'9)
The proposal was placed in the 139'h SEAC Meeting held on 23.11.2019. The project proponent gave detailed preJentation. The salient features of the project and the environmental impact assessment as presented by the proponent are as follows: I. Government Order / Lease details: a. The quarry lease was applied in the name of Tmt.T.Lakshmi, Tirunelveli, Precise Area Communication was issued by the District Collector, Tirunelveli vide Rc.No.Ml/1OO42/2015, dated 21.06.2018 for a period of 5 years. It is a fresh lease for Rough Stone, Jelly and Gravel quarry over an Extent of 1.54.0Ha in S.F.No.l63ll at South Sankarankoil Village, 5ankarankoil Taluk, Tirunelveli Dinrict. 2. Mining Plan / Scheme of Mining approved details: a. The Mining plan was prepared for the period of 5 years. The mining plan was gl .pprorfl f.3& ,nu Deputy Director, Department of Geology and Mining. Tirunelveli District vide Rc.No.Ml/l 0042/2Ol 5 Dated: 30.06.201 8.
a q-)-o.^( f CHAIRMAN .------SEAC.TN Lr 3. As per the Department of Geology and Mining, TirunelveliDistrict. Mining plan approval for the 5 yearJ, the production schedule for 5 years states that the total quantity of I,15,650m3 of Rough Stone 9,632m3 of Gravel formation. YEAR ROUGHSTONE (m3) GMVEL (m3) I 23310 4773 il 23520 4859 m 23360 IV 23370 23090 TOTAL r,r6,650 9,632 4. The quarry operation is proposed depth of 26m (from + l58m RL to 142m RL).
5. The quarry operation is proposed to carry out with open cast semi mechanized mining with bench height of 5.0m & 5m width is considered. 6. Rough stone and Gravel are to be transported by Tippers of 3 Nos. (5/l0Ts capacity).
7. The project is located at 09'06'38"N to 09.06'41"N latitude and 71"3O'49,,E to 77"30'59.E Longitude.
8. The total Manpower requirement is l8 Nos. (permanent: ll, Temporary: 7) 9. Total cost of the proiects is Rs.55,01,000/-(lncluding operational + Fixed Arset + EMP cost). EMP cost is about Rs.4,45,000/- lakhs.
10. The ground water table is at a depth of 48m to 45m. Hence. I I ' The project site attracts HACA. Necessary clearance is obtained from Member Secretary, HACA,/Director of Town and Country Planning, Chennai vide letter no - 1491/2O18/HACA dated 12.04.2018.
12. No coanal Regulation Zone (cRZ) within the radius of lokm from the lease area. 13. No lnterstate boundary & western chats Boundary within the radius of lOkm from the lease area.
western Ghats ESA boundary as per MoEF & cc draft notification dated 3rd
october 2018 is located l7.3Km from the lease area on the Northwestern side.
L>d--I g- Cultnulj[[G SEAC.TN 14. No National Park & Wild Life Sanctuary within the radius of lOkm from the lease area.
Wild Life Sanctuary:
Nellai \Mld Life Sanctuary is l6.5Km (NW) side.
Kalakad Mundanthurai Tiger Reserve: 34.0Km (5W) side. 15. No critically polluted area as notified by the Central Pollution Control Board constituted under Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act 1974 within the radius of l0km from the lease area. 16. No Protected Area, Eco Sensitive Zone & Eco Sensitive Area within the radius of l0km.
17. No habitation within the radius of the 300mfrom the lease area as stated in the letter obtained from VAO, South Sankarankoil Village, Sankarankoil Tafuk, Tirunelveli District dated 23.O7.2019. 18. Letter obtained from the Deputy Director, Department of Geology and Mining, Tirunelveli vide Letter RC.No.Ml/10042/2015 dated 17.O7.2Ol9inlormed that the details of the existing and abandoned quarries within 500m radius from the proposed Rough Stone quarry as follows. fl. Name of the quarry Village & 5.F.No. Extent No owner l.Existing Quarry NIL 2.Abandoned Quarry I Thiru.Muthaiah 5ankarankovil Taluk, 2.O7.5Ha konar, South Sankarankovil Village, Tharmathoorani, 5.F.No. I04l4A. 2 S.Rajendran Sankarankovil Taluk, 1.03.0Ha South Sankarankovil Village, 5.F.No.152/26i52/s 3.Proposed QuaIry I Tmt.T.Lakshmi, 5ankarankovil Taluk, 1.64.0Ha Wo. Thirumalaisamy, South 5ankarankovil Village, 5.F.No.163/l
ct. =-.'. CHAIRMANT- SEAC.TN \fl Au The SEAC noted the following:
l. The Proponent, Tmt.T.Lakshmi has applied for Environment Clearance to SEIAA-TN for the Rough Stone & Gravel quarry lease over an extent of 1.64.0 Ha in S.F.No: 163/1, Sankarankoil Village, South Sankarankoil Taluk, Tirunelveli Distria, Tamil Nadu 2. The proiect/activity is covered under Category "B" of ltem l(a) ..Mining of Mineral ProjectC' of the Schedule to the EIA Notification, 2006.
After the detailed presentation, the SEAC directed the proponent to furnish the HACA clearance. on receipt of the this, SEAC would further deliberate on this projea and decide the further course of action.
5.No Name Desitnation Signature I Dr. 5. Mohan Chairman d 2 Thiru D. Sekar Member Secretary
3 Dr. 5. Kanmani Member
4 Dr. Velu Gomathi Member V@w- 5 Dr. L. Subbaraj Member
6 Thiru.V.Shanmugam Member
7 Dr. R.Siva coumar Member A 8 Shri B. Sugirtharaj Koilpillai Member :io\L i8t^g''5 L---'- 9 Dr. L. Elango Member \ ct-2, CHAIRMAN SEAC.TN IO Dr. R. llangovan Member ll Dr. 5. Sankar Member g. a*._, t2 Thiru. T. Murugu Subrarnonian Member
,{ .- GI-.--4=....
CHAIRMAN SEAC-TN 6r \fl