GEC Launches EPEAT Photovoltaic Modules & Inverters Category An

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

GEC Launches EPEAT Photovoltaic Modules & Inverters Category An GEC Launches EPEAT Photovoltaic Modules & Inverters Category An Overview of GEC and EPEAT October 2020 INTRODUCTION Nancy Gillis CEO Green Electronics Council [email protected] 2 October 2020 Green Electronics Council (GEC) is a mission driven not-for-profit that collaborates to achieve a world of only sustainable electronic products and services. We embrace the benefits of technology but not at the price of People or Planet. We advocate for sustainable electronics by helping both manufacturers and large-scale purchasers to: the challenges facing to address those to change design, operational, sustainable IT challenges manufacturing and sourcing behaviors 3 October 2020 GEC SUPPORTS INSTITUTIONAL PURCHASERS GEC seeks to fulfill our mission by supporting large-scale purchasers to buy sustainable electronic products and services as a way to incentivize producers to make sustainable electronic products and services. GEC Freely Available Tools and Resources ✓ Sustainable Procurement Policy ✓ Webinars (2020) examples ✓ Technology and Conservation ✓ IT products contract language Series examples ✓ Public-Private Purchaser Series ✓ Purchaser Guides ✓ Sustainable Public Procurement • Labor and Human Rights (2017 course (in partnership with ERA) version being updated in 2020) ✓ EPEAT, leading global “Type 1” • Cloud Services Procurements ecolabel (launched March 2019) • EPEAT Benefits Calculators • Procurement for Circular Economy • EPEAT Purchaser Recognition and (October 2020) Awards Event 4 October 2020 GEC MANAGES THE EPEAT ECOLABEL Current EPEAT Product Categories Upcoming Categories Computers (Desktops, Laptops, Tablets) & Displays Network Infrastructure [Enterprise Switches and Routers; Customer Premises Routers] Imaging Equipment Spring 2021 Televisions Health & Wellbeing Wearables Fall 2021 Mobile Phones Products meeting EPEAT criteria listed at Servers https://epeat.net Photovoltaic Modules & Inverters 6 October 2020 HOW ARE PRODUCTS RATED BY EPEAT? • Products must meet all required criteria to be covered by EPEAT – Just by being “EPEAT” tells purchasers the product is sustainable • Products are rated bronze, silver or gold based on the number of optional criteria they meet Meets less than 50% Meets 50 to 75% Meets more than 75% Optional Criteria Optional Criteria Optional Criteria 7 October 2020 Criteria Address Lifecycle Sustainability Impacts RAW MATERIAL MATERIAL & PRODUCT PRODUCT USE END OF LIFE EXTRACTION COMPONENT ASSEMBLY MANUFACTURING Chemicals of Climate Change Corporate ESG Sustainable Use of Concern Performance Resources • Restricted • Manufacturing energy • Social performance & • Recycled content substances in efficiency audits • Design for recycling product - RoHS, • F-GHG emissions in • Worker health & • Product take back & REACH, halogenated manufacturing safety responsible recycling substances • Life cycle assessment • EMS • Disclosure of recovery • Substance inventory and disclosure of • Responsible mineral & recycling and disclosure cumulative energy sourcing achievement • Alternatives demand and global • Corporate reporting • Material recovery assessment warming potential • Hot spot targets identification & • Efficient water use in leadership compared manufacturing to industry 8 October 2020 GEC REQUIRES 3RD PARTY VALIDATION FOR EPEAT Green Electronics Council GEC • Owns and manages the EPEAT Program with focus on efficiency, credibility and large-scale sustainability impact EPEAT Program • EPEAT Establishes and maintains EPEAT program policies and implementation guidance Program • Approves, oversees, provides guidance to Conformity Assurance Bodies • Facilitates EPEAT related advisory bodies • Maintains online Registry of EPEAT conforming products Conformity Assurance Bodies (CABs) CTC Dekra GEC • Well known and reputable certification firms • Work with manufacturers to verify that products meet the EPEAT criteria TUV-R ULE VDE • Conduct ongoing monitoring investigations of product claims • Serve as technical resource for EPEAT Participating Manufacturers • Identify which criteria their product(s) claim Mfcr 1 Mfcr 2 Mfcr 3 Mfcr 4 • Work with their CAB to verify claims • Implement corrective actions, as needed March 2019 9 October 2020 BRANDS PARTICIPATING IN EPEAT* *As of October 2020 Ace Computers Google Panasonic Acer Inc Herbecon Systems SL Positivo Tecnologia S.A. Algoritmos Procesos y Disenos, S.A. Howard Technology Ricoh AOC International (Europe) B.V. Solutions Riso Kagaku Corporation Apple Inc HP Inc. Samsung ASUSTek Computer Inc Hewlett-Packard Enterprise Sharp Atrust Computer Corp Hypertechnologie-Ciara Teknoservice S.L. BenQ Hyundai IT America Corp Ticnova Quality Team SL Brother International Corporation IBM Toshiba Canon IGEL Technology GmbH Transource CEZAR Cezary Machnio I Piotr Iiyama Corporation UNOWHY Gebka Sp Zoo Inforlandia S.A. ViewSonic Corporation Cisco Systems Kodak Alaris Visioneer CTL Corporation Konica Minolta Xerox Dell Inc Kyocera Zebra Technologies DT Research Lenovo Durabook Americas Inc. Lexmark International, Inc Purchasers require EPEAT because Dynabook Americas LG Electronics Inc. • It offers more products from EIZO Corporation Login Informatica more manufacturers than any Epson Microsoft Corporation other electronics ecolabel First Solar MMD Monitors and Displays Nederland B.V. • It includes small & medium Fujitsu Limited Northern Micro Inc businesses GETAC • It highlights innovation 10 October 2020 EPEAT Products Identified on Online Registry Products meeting EPEAT criteria listed at https://epeat.net 11 October 2020 More Than a Megawatt: RE Procurement Initiative • Initiative led by Salesforce, distributed by Renewable Energy Buyers Alliance (REBA) • Looking beyond zero carbon electricity generation to evaluate lifecycle impacts of RE projects, including land use and emission offsets • Evaluates sustainable hardware using EPEAT EPEAT Scoring Matrix PV Modules Not Bronze Silver Gold registered Not 0 1.5 2 2.5 Inverters registered Bronze 1.0 2.5 3 3.5 Silver 1.5 3 3.5 4 12 https://bit.ly/3dx936M Gold October 20202.0 3.5 4 5 12 October 2020.
Recommended publications
  • Organization Sector Report Title Publication Year Report Type
    GRI Reports List 2012(Japan) last updated: April 2013 Organization Sector Report Title Publication Year Report type Application Level Status Adeka Chemicals CSR Report 2012 2012 GRI - Referenced Advantest Technology Hardware Corporate Report 2012 2012 GRI - Referenced AEON Retailers Environmental and Social Report 2012 2012 GRI - Referenced Aeon Retailers Environmental & Social Initiatives 2012 2012 Non - GRI Aishin Seiki Equipment Aisin Report 2012 2012 GRI - Referenced Ajinomoto Food and Beverage Products Sustainability Report 2012 2012 Non - GRI All Nippon Airways Coompany Limited Aviation Annual Report 2012 Non - GRI Asahi Glass Company Chemicals AGC Report 2012 2012 GRI - Referenced Asahi Group Holdings Food and Beverage Products CSR Communication Report 2012 2012 GRI - Referenced Asahi Kasei Chemicals CSR Report 2012 2012 GRI - Referenced Astellas Pharma Health Care Products Annual Report 2012 2012 GRI - G3.1 B Self-declared azbil Conglomerates azbil Report 2012 2012 Non - GRI Benesse Holdings, Inc. Other Benesse Report 2012 2012 GRI - Referenced Bridgestone Chemicals CSR Report 2012 2012 GRI - Referenced Brother Technology Hardware CSR Report 2012 2012 GRI - Referenced Canon Technology Hardware Sustainability Report 2012 2012 GRI - Referenced Casio Consumer Durables Sustainability Report 2012 2012 GRI - G3.1 B Self-declared Chiyoda Corporation Construction CSR Report 2012 2012 GRI - Referenced Chubu Electric Power Energy Annual Report 2012 2012 GRI - Referenced Citizen Holdings Conglomerates CSR Report 2012 2012 GRI - Referenced
    [Show full text]
  • The Oklahoma Computer Equipment Recovery Act: a Summary of the 2014 Manufacturer Annual Reports
    The Oklahoma Computer Equipment Recovery Act: A Summary of the 2014 Manufacturer Annual Reports 6/23/2015 Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality Melissa Adler-McKibben Submitted To: The Governor, the President Pro Tempore of the Senate, and the Speaker of the House of Representatives [1] Introduction The Oklahoma Computer Equipment Recovery Act (“Act”), 27A O.S. § 2-11-601 et seq ., was signed into law on May 12, 2008 and became effective on January 1, 2009. The Act requires manufacturers, as defined in 27A O.S. § 2-11-603, to submit annual reports to the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality (“DEQ”) no later than March 1 st of each year that include: 1. A summary of the recovery program implemented by the manufacturer during the previous calendar year, specifically describing the methods of recovery implemented by the manufacturer; 2. The weight of covered devices collected and recovered during the previous calendar year; 3. The location and dates of any electronic waste collection events during the previous calendar year, if any, and the location of collection sites if any; and 4. Certification that the collection and recovery of covered devices complies with the provisions of Section 9 of the Act. 1 The Act requires DEQ to summarize the recovery program in a report for the Governor, the President Pro Tempore of the Senate, and the Speaker of the House of Representatives. Background The Act was created as part of an ongoing, nationwide effort, embraced and supported by the computer industry, to establish convenient and environmentally sound collection, recycling, and reuse of electronics that have reached the end of their useful lives.
    [Show full text]
  • Radiforce MX194
    Clinical Review Monitor 19-inch, 1 megapixel monitor with DICOM Part 14 calibration for viewing DSA, CT, and MRI. Attain Steady Images Across the Screen Long-Term Brightness Stability The Digital Uniformity Equalizer (DUE) function helps to even EIZO guarantees 10,000 hours of use when the brightness is out fluctuations in brightness and chroma on different parts of the maintained at the recommended 180 cd/m2 (maximum 350 cd/m2). screen to provide smoother images. As the monitor is compliant with DICOM Part 14, it can faithfully reproduce medical images such as DSA, CT, and MRI, even over long-term use. ter Monitor itot U it U M Specifications Cabinet Color Black Panel Type Color (VA) Backlight LED Make the Precise Diagnosis Size 48.1 cm / 19.0” Native Resolution 1280 × 1024 (5:4 aspect ratio) EIZO carefully measures and sets each grayscale tone for Viewable Image Size (H × V) 376.3 x 301.0 mm compliance with DICOM Part 14. Furthermore, at startup or Pixel Pitch 0.294 x 0.294 mm upon wakeup, the EIZO-patented drift correction function Display Colors 10-bit colors (DisplayPort) : 1.07 billion (maximum) colors quickly stabilizes the brightness level and compensates the 8-bit colors: 16.77 million from a palette of 543 billion brightness fluctuations caused by the ambient temperature and colors Viewing Angles (H / V, typical) 178° / 178° the passage of time, allowing medical images to be faithfully 2 Brightness (typical) 350 cd/m reproduced with stable brightness and grayscale. Contrast Ratio (typical) 2000:1 Response Time (typical) 20 ms (on / off) Simplified Calibration to DICOM Part 14 Video Signals Input Terminals DVI-D x 1, DisplayPort x 1, D-Sub mini 15 pin x 1 Digital Scanning Frequency 31 - 64 kHz / 59 - 61 Hz Perform a simplified calibration compliant with DICOM Part 14 (H / V) Analog Scanning Frequency 24.8 - 80 kHz / 50 - 75 Hz using the bundled RadiCS LE quality control software.
    [Show full text]
  • Facilitation of Information Transfer on Chemicals in Products
    Facilitation of Information Transfer on Chemicals in Products The Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) developed ‘chemSHERPA’ [kémʃéərpə] as a new information transfer scheme for chemicals in products throughout their supply chains. METI hopes that the dissemination of chemSHERPA may contribute to reduce the workload of both providers and recipients of the information. From the beginning of the development of chemSHERPA, METI has been in communication with international bodies such as the IEC and the IPC, etc., with the aim of developing chemSHERPA into not only a Japanese standard but also an International standard. To make it a de-facto standard, METI has introduced this scheme to international organizations and governments of other countries for their active use. The Joint Article Management Promotion Consortium (JAMP) is a governing body for chemSHERPA from April 2016 and see a shift to chemSHERPA. We believe many companies are preparing towards implementing chemSHERPA. Based on the efforts mentioned above, the following companies and company groups have agreed with the dissemination of chemSHERPA, and METI will continue to work with JAMP and companies to spread the use of chemSHERPA to internal as well as external supply chains as needed.(Please contact us if any company or company group has interest in putting its name below.) It should be noted, the use of the provision of data entry support tools is free of charge in principle with the aim of promoting wider use of chemSHERPA. [Contact information] Chemical Management Policy Division Manufacturing Industries Bureau Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry [email protected] 03-3501-0080 (direct) 03-3501-1511 (ex.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Electronics Vision Report
    1 Vision for Sustainable Electronics Page 2 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Vision for Sustainable Electronics July 2015 NOTE: This is a discussion draft (NOT YET FOR PUBLIC RELEASE), for which we are seeking comments, edits, and feedback from experts from industry, academia, government and NGO’s. Please send us any feedback by October 1, 2015, to: [email protected] Thank-you. Barbara Kyle and Ted Smith, ETBC Electronics TakeBack Coalition 4200 Park Blvd. #228, Oakland, CA 94602 www.electronicstakeback.org Vision for Sustainable Electronics Page 3 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Contents Executive Summary Page 2 Why do we need a vision for sustainable electronics? Page 4 It’s time for new strategies for sustainability in electronics Page 7 What are the current impacts from the lifecycle of electronics Page 9 - 24 products? • Hazards and harm • Destruction of communities and resources • Wasted natural resources: energy and water. • Wasteful inputs. High resource churn of virgin materials, many of which are scarce. • Wasteful outputs. • Sweatshop working conditions. • A business model that makes problems worse (that thwarts sustainability efforts) The New Vision for Sustainable Electronics Must Offer Solutions Page 24 to Current Impacts and Problems Principles for Sustainable Electronics Page 27 The Sustainability Matrix Page 29 Detailed Vision Goals Across Product Lifecycle Conclusions Page 38 Next steps Page 41 Glossary of terms Page 47 Vision for Sustainable Electronics Page 2 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Executive summary Definitely not green. In spite of all of the hype about “Clean Tech” branding, it’s easy to see that the electronics industry has a long way to go to become a “green” industry, if that’s even possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Facilitation of Information Transfer on Chemicals in Products
    Facilitation of Information Transfer on Chemicals in Products The Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) has developed ‘chemSHERPA’ [kémʃéərpə] as a new information transfer scheme for chemicals in products throughout their supply chains. METI hopes that the dissemination of chemSHERPA may contribute to reduce the workload of both providers and recipients of the information. From the beginning of the development of chemSHERPA, METI has been in communication with international bodies such as the IEC and the IPC, etc., with the aim of developing chemSHERPA into not only a Japanese standard but also an International standard. To make it a de-facto standard, METI has introduced this scheme to international organizations and governments of other countries for their active use. The Joint Article Management Promotion Consortium (JAMP) will be a governing body for chemSHERPA from April 2016 and METI expects to see an orderly, step-by-step shift to chemSHERPA over the two years transition period. Accordingly JAMP has a plan to finish renewing the substances list in the existing JAMP scheme by the end of March of 2018. We believe many companies will begin advance preparations towards implementing chemSHERPA. Based on the efforts mentioned above, the following companies and company groups have agreed with the dissemination of chemSHERPA, and METI will continue to work with companies to spread the use of chemSHERPA to internal as well as external supply chains.(Please contact us if any company or company group has interest in putting its name below.) It should be noted, the use of the provision of data entry support tools is free of charge in principle with the aim of promoting wider use of chemSHERPA.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D - Securities Held by Funds October 18, 2017 Annual Report of Activities Pursuant to Act 44 of 2010 October 18, 2017
    Report of Activities Pursuant to Act 44 of 2010 Appendix D - Securities Held by Funds October 18, 2017 Annual Report of Activities Pursuant to Act 44 of 2010 October 18, 2017 Appendix D: Securities Held by Funds The Four Funds hold thousands of publicly and privately traded securities. Act 44 directs the Four Funds to publish “a list of all publicly traded securities held by the public fund.” For consistency in presenting the data, a list of all holdings of the Four Funds is obtained from Pennsylvania Treasury Department. The list includes privately held securities. Some privately held securities lacked certain data fields to facilitate removal from the list. To avoid incomplete removal of privately held securities or erroneous removal of publicly traded securities from the list, the Four Funds have chosen to report all publicly and privately traded securities. The list below presents the securities held by the Four Funds as of June 30, 2017. 1345 AVENUE OF THE A 1 A3 144A AAREAL BANK AG ABRY MEZZANINE PARTNERS LP 1721 N FRONT STREET HOLDINGS AARON'S INC ABRY PARTNERS V LP 1-800-FLOWERS.COM INC AASET 2017-1 TRUST 1A C 144A ABRY PARTNERS VI L P 198 INVERNESS DRIVE WEST ABACUS PROPERTY GROUP ABRY PARTNERS VII L P 1MDB GLOBAL INVESTMENTS L ABAXIS INC ABRY PARTNERS VIII LP REGS ABB CONCISE 6/16 TL ABRY SENIOR EQUITY II LP 1ST SOURCE CORP ABB LTD ABS CAPITAL PARTNERS II LP 200 INVERNESS DRIVE WEST ABBOTT LABORATORIES ABS CAPITAL PARTNERS IV LP 21ST CENTURY FOX AMERICA INC ABBOTT LABORATORIES ABS CAPITAL PARTNERS V LP 21ST CENTURY ONCOLOGY 4/15
    [Show full text]
  • Colornavigator NX User's Manual
    User’s Manual Color Management Software Ver. 1.1 Important Please read this User’s Manual carefully to familiarize yourself with safe and effective usage. • The latest software and User’s Manual are available for download from our web site: www.eizoglobal.com About This Manual This manual describes the features, installation, and usage of the Color Management Software “ColorNavigator NX”. Precautions on Use ColorNavigator NX is software suitable for use by administrators in environments where software for adjusting a monitor will not or cannot be installed on the creator’s machine such as in the video editing and post production market. When using ColorEdge for creative work such as photography or printing, please use “ColorNavigator.” No part of this manual may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of EIZO Corporation. EIZO Corporation is under no obligation to hold any submitted material or information confidential unless prior arrangements are made pursuant to EIZO Corporation’s receipt of said information. Although every effort has been made to ensure that this manual provides up-to-date information, please note that EIZO software specifications are subject to change without notice. 2 About This Manual CONTENTS About This Manual ................................................ 2 3-5. Periodic Adjustment ....................................31 Precautions on Use .................................................. 2 ● To set SelfCalibration / SelfCorrection ...........31 To set whether to display message CONTENTS ............................................................. 3 ● SelfCalibration / SelfCorrection warning ....... 34 Chapter 1 Introduction ....................................... 4 ● Setting the Timer ........................................... 35 1-1. Features ......................................................... 4 3-6. Displaying Test Patterns ............................ 35 1-2.
    [Show full text]
  • It Is Smart Only If It Sustainable
    IT IS SMART ONLY IF IT IS SUSTAINABLE Environmentally Friendly Business Strategies as a Source of Creating Bigger Value Pool and Reducing Negative Environmental Impacts By Mohammad Tashfeen Khan July 24, 2016 A Major Paper submitted to the Faculty of Environmental Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master in Environmental Studies, York University, Toronto Ontario, Canada Dr. Ellie Perkins (Superviser) __________________________________________ Mohammad Tashfeen Khan (MES Candidate) ___________________________________________ IT IS SMART ONLY IF IT IS SUSTAINABLE IT IS SMART ONLY IF IT IS SUSTAINABLE “We have met the enemy and he is us”. Walt Kelly “We cannot “Modern command technology owes Nature except ecology an by obeying her.” apology.” Francis Bacon Alan M. Eddison “Earth provides enough to satisfy every man's needs, but not every man's greed.” Mahatma Gandhi Major Paper MES 2016 Mohammad Tashfeen Khan (212984142) i IT IS SMART ONLY IF IT IS SUSTAINABLE Contents Chapter 1: Introduction: Starting with a Concluding Point ............................................................................................. 1 1.1 Environmental Sustainability ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 The Smartphone Dilemma .................................................................................................................................... 3 Chapter 2: Methodological Approach ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Smartphone Sustainability Assessment Using Multi-Criteria Analysis and Consumer Survey
    DEGREE PROJECT IN ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, SECOND CYCLE, 30 CREDITS STOCKHOLM, SWEDEN 2017 Smartphone sustainability assessment using multi-criteria analysis and consumer survey JANIS GEDUSEVS KTH ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE AND THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT DEGREE PROJECT IN THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT, SECOND CYCLE, 30 CREDITS STOCKHOLM, SWEDEN 2017 Smartphone sustainability assessment using multi-criteria analysis and consumer survey JANIS GEDUSEVS Supervisor PhD.Rajib Sinha Examiner Monika Olsson Supervisor at Tech Buddy AB Tahero Nori Degree Project in Environmental Engineering KTH Royal Institute of Technology School of Architecture and Built Environment Department of Sustainable Development, Environmental Science and Engineering SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden Acknowledgements I would like to thank Tahero Nori for hosting and supervising my graduation internship at Techbuddy AB. Also I would like to express my gratitude to PhD. Rajib Sinha and Monika Olsson for supervising and counselling my graduation internship. Finally, I would like to express my gratitude to all of my friends and family for support during my studies at KTH Royal Institute of Technology Stockholm. 1 Abstract Sustainability is a fairly new emerging business concept for manufacturing industry and this this thesis will specifically focus on smartphone sustainability. In 2015 there were 1.86 billion smartphone users and it is estimated to increase to 2.87 billion in 2020. Currently the average lifetime of a smartphone is 21 months and according to Consumer Technology Association the technical life expectancy of a smartphone is 4.7 years. The European Commission approximated that from 17–20 kg of electronic waste is produced per person per year and that smartphones are contributors for increase of electronic waste.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Electronics Roadmap
    EPA/600/R-13/285 | November 2013 www.epa.gov Sustainable Electronics Roadmap Office of Research and Development National Risk Management Research Laboratory Sustainable Technology Division Cincinnati, OH 45268 i EPA/600/R-13/285 November 2013 Sustainable Electronics Roadmap Sustainable Electronics Forum October 15-18, 2012 The Johnson Foundation at Wingspread Racine, WI by Jennifer McCulley, PhD. Scientific Consulting Group, Inc. Endalkachew Sahle-Demessie, Ph.D. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency National Risk Management Research Laboratory Cincinnati, Ohio 45268 Sustainable Technology Division National Risk Management Research Laboratory Office of Research and Development U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Cincinnati, OH 45268 Disclaimer The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), through the Office of Research and Development, in collaboration with the Green Electronics Council and The Johnson Foundation at Wingspread organized the Sustainable Electronics Forum that was facilitated by the Scientific Consulting Group, Inc. EPA Contract number EP-W-07-078. This document has been subjected to the Agency’s peer and administrative review and has been approved for publication. Any opinions expressed in this report are those of the authors and forum participants, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Agency; therefore, no official endorsement should be inferred. Any mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. iii Acknowledgement The Organizing Committee wishes to acknowledge everyone who participated in this Forum, especially our sponsoring organizations and facilitators. The committee also wishes to express its appreciation to Jennifer McCulley and Susie Warner of Scientific Consultant Group, Inc., who were Work Assignment and Project Officers for organizing the Forum through the EPA Contract number EP-W-07-078.
    [Show full text]
  • A One Year Follow up Study Final
    High Tech - No Rights? A One Year Follow Up Report on the Working Conditions in the Electronic Hardware Sector in China May 2008 High Tech - No Rights? A One Year Follow Up Report on the Working Conditions in the Electronic Hardware Sector in China By Jenny Chan, the research team from Students and Scholars Against Corporate Misbehavior (SACOM) and Chantal Peyer (Bread for All) May 2008 Address Students and Scholars Against Corporate Misbehavior (SACOM) P.O. Box No. 79583, Mongkok Post Office HONG KONG Bread for All Avenue du Grammont 9 1007 Lausanne Switzerland CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................. 1 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Research Objectives.................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Supply Chain Labor Responsibility .............................................................................. 5 1.3 Organization of Chapters............................................................................................. 5 1.4 Growing Global Personal Computer Market................................................................. 6 1.5 China’s Electronic and Information Technology Industry.............................................. 6 CHAPTER 2 ONE YEAR AFTER : FIELD RESEARCH IN COMPUTER MANUFACTURING FACTORIES ...... 8 2.1 Geography and Methodology of Research..................................................................
    [Show full text]