Significance of Extraluminal Abdominal Gas

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Significance of Extraluminal Abdominal Gas SIGNIFICANCE OF EXTRALUMINAL ABDOMINAL GAS: LOOKING FOR AIR IN ALL THE WRONG PLACES Richard M. Gore, MD North Shore University Health System University of Chicago Evanston, IL SCBT/MR 2012 October 26, 2011 3:00-3:10 NO DISCLOSURES [email protected] TOPICS • PNEUMOPERITONEUM • PNEUMORETROPERITONEUM • PNEUMATOSIS INTESTINALIS • PORTAL-MESENTERIC VENOUS GAS • PNEUMOBILIA PNEUMOPERITONEUM THE SPECTRUM OF PNEUMOPERITONEUM • Expected and benign finding requiring no treatment • Sensitive indicator of sudden and life- threatening perforation of the GI tract PNEUMOPERITONEUM: BENIGN CAUSES • Surgery • PSurgeryercutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy • PeritonealPercutaneous dialysis Endoscopic Gastrostomy • BiopsyPeritoneal dialysis • PercutaneousBiopsy abscess drainage • PneumothoraxPercutaneous abscess drainage • Pneumomediastinum PNEUMOPERITONEUM: LIFE-THREATENING • Perforation of benign ulcer • Diverticulitis • Appendicitis • Perforation of neoplasm • Pneumatosis • Bowel obstruction PNEUMOPERITONEUM: LIFE-THREATENING • Intestinal ischemia and infarction • Toxic megacolon • Necrotizing enterocolitis • Inflammatory bowel disease • Typhlitis • Pseudomembranous colitis PNEUMOPERITONEUM: LIFE-THREATENING • Anastomotic leak • Upper GI endoscopy • Colonoscopy RIGLER’S SIGN LIVER EDGE SIGN FALCIFORM LIGAMENT SIGN BENIGN CAUSES OF PNEUMOPERITONEUM POSTOPERATIVE PERITONEAL DIALYSIS PERCUTANEOUS GASTROSTOMY POSTOPERATIVE PNEUMOPERITONEUM POSTOPERATIVE PNEUMOPERITONEUM POSTOPERATIVE (OPEN) PNEUMOPERITONEUM ON UPRIGHT CXR • POD # 5 28.4% • POD # 6 20.0% • POD # 7 11.0% Tang Dis Colon Rectum 43: 1116-1120, 2000 FACTORS INFLUENCING DURATION OF POST OPERATIVE PNEUMOPERITONEUM • Obesity: prevalence of PP is less in fat compared to thin patients • Gender: PP more prevalent in men • Drains: greater incidence of PP • No effect: age, surgery duration, presence and location of anastomosis, time to flatus, time to first bowel movement PP IN THE ERA OF LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY • Iatrogenic GI tract perforations due to trocar insertion and thermal injury: 0.06%- 0.4% • Artificial pneumoperitoneum • Small incisions minimize room air PP IN THE ERA OF LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY • Iatrogenic GI tract perforations due to trocar insertion and thermal injury: 0.06%- 0.4% • Artificial pneumoperitoneum • Small incisions minimize room air PP IN OPEN vs LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY ON CXR-24 hrs • Open cholecystectomy: 60%, minimal to moderate 2:1 • Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: 24%, minimal to moderate 5:1 Gayer Semin Ultrasound, CT, MR 25: 1286-289, 2004 PP: CT vs RADIOGRAPH • 3 days postoperative: 87% on CT, 53% on plain radiograph • 6 days postoperative: 50% on CT, 8% on plain radiograph Earls AJR 161: 781-785, 1993 IN PATIENTS WITH COMPLICATIONS • The amount of free air should be decreasing • Any increase is very worrisome • Difficult to exactly compare quantity of gas on CT study with radiograph PERITONEAL DIALYSIS PERITONEAL DIALYSIS • Seen in 30% of patients on PD • The presence, quantity, and distribution of free air is not helpful in separating perforations from nonperforations Lee JCAT 18: 439-442, 1994 PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY PNEUMOPERITONEUM S/P PEG TUBE INSERTIONS • 8.6%-55.6% • Free air on CXR 1 to 3 days • Free air on CT 1 to 9 days • In the absence of clinical symptoms is of no clinical significance and does not need further evaluation LIFE- THREATENING CAUSES OF PNEUMOPERITONEUM GI TRACT PERFORATION PERFORATION • Emergent condition that requires prompt surgery • Spontaneous, traumatic, or iatrogenic causes • Variable clinical presentations, particularly in the early clinical course GI TRACT PERFORATION • Concentration of air bubbles next to gut • Supramesocolic vs inframesocolic space • Preponderance of abdominal vs pelvic gas • Perivisceral fat stranding • Segmental bowel wall thickening • Abscess • Extraluminal fluid • Focal defect in bowel wall GI TRACT PERFORATION • Extraluminal contrast • Focal defect in bowel wall • Segmental bowel wall thickening • Abscess-fluid GI TRACT PERFORATION • Extraluminal contrast • Focal defect in bowel wall • Segmental bowel wall thickening • Abscess-fluid GI TRACT PERFORATION • Extraluminal contrast • Focal defect in bowel wall • Segmental bowel wall thickening • Abscess-fluid GI TRACT PERFORATION • Extraluminal contrast • Focal defect in bowel wall • Segmental bowel wall thickening • Abscess-fluid GI TRACT PERFORATION • Extraluminal contrast • Focal defect in bowel wall • Segmental bowel wall thickening • Abscess-fluid GI TRACT PERFORATION • Extraluminal contrast • Focal defect in bowel wall • Segmental bowel wall thickening • Abscess-fluid GI TRACT PERFORATION • Extraluminal contrast • Focal defect in bowel wall • Segmental bowel wall thickening • Abscess-fluid GI TRACT PERFORATION • Concentration of air bubbles next to gut • Supramesocolic vs inframesocolic space • Preponderance of abdominal vs pelvic gas • Perivisceral fat stranding GI TRACT PERFORATION • Concentration of air bubbles next to gut • Supramesocolic vs inframesocolic space • Preponderance of abdominal vs pelvic gas • Perivisceral fat stranding GI TRACT PERFORATION • Concentration of air bubbles next to gut • Supramesocolic vs inframesocolic space • Preponderance of abdominal vs pelvic gas • Perivisceral fat stranding GI TRACT PERFORATION • Concentration of air bubbles next to gut • Supramesocolic vs inframesocolic space • Preponderance of abdominal vs pelvic gas • Perivisceral fat stranding GI TRACT PERFORATION • Concentration of air bubbles next to gut • Supramesocolic vs inframesocolic space • Preponderance of abdominal vs pelvic gas • Perivisceral fat stranding FISSURE LIGAMENTUM VENOSUM- FALCIFORM LIGAMENT CT FEATURES OF PNEUMOPERITONEUM PROXIMAL GI DISTAL GI PERFORATION PERFORATION FALCIFORM LIG 60% 0% POCKETS OF AIR 10% 69% WALL THICKENING 50% 100% ABSCESS 20% 53% ASCITES 90% 63% FAT STRANDING 30% 72% Yeung J Clin Imaging 28: 329-333, 2004 GI TRACT PERFORATION: LOCATION OF GAS BUBBLES IN 86 PATIENTS Stomach Inframesocolic Infra- and and liver supramesocolic Gastroduodenal 29 0 8 perforation Small bowel 1 2 6 perforation Colon 0 15 24 perforation Hainaux AJR 187: 1179-1183, 2006 CT FEATURES OF PNEUMOPERITONEUM (n=53) UPPER GI LOWER GI PERFORATION PERFORATION PERIPORTAL 93 35 FREE AIR FALCIFORM 80 43 LIGAMENT LIGAMENTUM 53 8 TERES Cho HS Eur J Radiology 2007 GASTRODUODENAL PERFORATIONS • Peptic ulcer disease • Necrotic or ulcerated malignancies • Large amount of extraluminal air • Air in lesser sac, ligamentum teres, ligamentum venosum • Ulceration, focal interruption of wall, abrupt wall thickening with adjacent increased fat density GASTRODUODENAL PERFORATIONS • Traumatic injures involve 2nd and 3rd portions of the duodenum • Blunt trauma in children and penetrating trauma in adults • Cause pneumoretroperitoneum in the anterior pararenal space GASTRODUODENAL PERFORATIONS • DUODENAL 38.3% • JUXTA-PYLORIC 35.6% • GASTRIC 19.1% • PYLORIC 6.8% Grassi Eur J Radiology 50: 30-36, 2004 PEPTIC ULCER DISEASE DIVERTICULITIS PERFORATED NSAID ULCER PERFORATED ANTRAL ULCER PEPTIC ULCER DISEASE SUPERIOR RECESS LESSER SAC SMALL BOWEL PERFORATIONS • Diverticulitis • Ischemic or bacterial enteritis • Crohn’s disease • Ingested foreign bodies • Bowel obstruction • Volvulus • Intussusception SMALL BOWEL PERFORATIONS • Abdominal trauma • Iatrogenic injury • Postoperative perforation • Anastomotic leakage • Amount of extraluminal air is small or absent in most cases unlike UGI perf • Extraluminal air seen in only 50% of CTs SMALL BOWEL PERFORATIONS • Findings often subtle- search for gas trapped in mesenteric folds • Postoperative perforation and anastomotic leakage usually occur within first week of surgery • Suggest perforation or leak with persistent or progressively increasing free air PERFORATED ILEUM BY CHICKEN BONE PERFORATED ILEUM BY CHICKEN BONE SMALL BOWEL PERFORATION COLONIC PERFORATION • Malignant neoplasm • Diverticulitis • Spontaneous perforation • Trauma • Ischemia COLONIC PERFORATION • Free air on plain radiograph 33% • Free air on MDCT 100% • Dirty fat sign 100% • Wall thickening at perf site 100% • Extraluminal fluid 100% • Dirty mass 83% • Interruption of colon wall 67% Miki JCAT 31: 169-176, 2007 COLONIC PERFORATION: LEFT SIDED • Malignant neoplasm • Diverticulitis • Spontaneous perforation • Blunt trauma • Ischemia COLONIC PERFORATION: RIGHT SIDED • Inflammatory lesions • Penetrating trauma • Cecum- LBO, toxic megacolon, ileus DIVERTICULITIS DIVERTICULITIS ANASTOMOTIC LEAKS • Leak rate 3.6% to 9% • 30% may have clinically occult leaks • High risk: low rectal anastomosis and Whipple’s procedure ANASTOMOTIC LEAKS • Peri-anastomic fluid and gas are the best indicators of anastomotic leaks A A A PNEUMORETROPERITONEUM PNEUMORETROPERITONEUM • Postoperative • Postdiagnostic procedure (ERCP) • Penetrating trauma • Blunt traumatic rupture of duodenum • Pelvic trauma with rectal perforation PNEUMORETROPERITONEUM • Spontaneous colonic perforation volvulus, obstruction, carcinoma, diverticulitis • Extension from pneumomediastinum • Gas-containing retroperitoneal abscess PERFORATION DURING ERCP PERFORATION FROM COLONOSCOPY OCCULT COLONIC PERFORATION WITH INCOMPLETE COLONOSCOPY • Optical colonoscopy perforation rate is 1/3,115 (.032%) to 1/510 (0.196%) • 2/262 (0.8%) had occult perforation • Recommend low dose CT before rectal tube insertion and gas insufflation in all patients with same day or next day CTC Hough AJR 191: 1077-1081, 2008 ACCURACY OF MDCT IN DETECTING PERFORATION SITE OF GI TRACT • Axial images only: 87.8% • Axial + MPR images: 93.9% Kim JW Abdominal Imaging 36: 503-508, 2011 (Oct) .
Recommended publications
  • Massive Pneumoperitoneum Presenting As an Incidental Finding
    Open Access Case Report DOI: 10.7759/cureus.2787 Massive Pneumoperitoneum Presenting as an Incidental Finding Harry Wang 1 , Vivek Batra 2 1. Internal Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Philadelphia, USA 2. Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, USA Corresponding author: Harry Wang, [email protected] Abstract Pneumoperitoneum is often associated with surgical complications or intra-abdominal sepsis. While commonly deemed a surgical emergency, pneumoperitoneum in a minority of cases does not involve a viscus perforation or require urgent surgical management; these cases of “spontaneous pneumoperitoneum” can stem from a variety of etiologies. We report a case of a 72-year-old African American male with a history of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma who presented with new-onset abdominal distention and an incidentally discovered massive pneumoperitoneum with no clear source of perforation on surveillance imaging. His exam was non-peritonitic, so no surgical intervention was recommended. He was treated with bowel rest, intravenous antibiotics, and hydration. He had a relatively benign clinical course with preserved gastrointestinal function and had complete resolution of his pneumoperitoneum on imaging two months after discharge. This case highlights the importance of considering non-surgical causes of pneumoperitoneum, as well as conservative management, when approaching patients with otherwise benign abdominal exams. Categories: Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology, Oncology Keywords: spontaneous pneumoperitoneum, pneumoperitoneum, pancreatic cancer, incidental finding Introduction Pneumoperitoneum is defined as the presence of free air within the peritoneal cavity. In the vast majority of cases (approximately 90%), this is a result of an intra-abdominal viscus perforation, often requiring intravenous antibiotics and acute surgical intervention [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Spontaneous Pneumoperitoneum with Duodenal
    Ueda et al. Surgical Case Reports (2020) 6:3 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40792-019-0769-4 CASE REPORT Open Access Spontaneous pneumoperitoneum with duodenal diverticulosis in an elderly patient: a case report Takeshi Ueda* , Tetsuya Tanaka, Takashi Yokoyama, Tomomi Sadamitsu, Suzuka Harada and Atsushi Yoshimura Abstract Background: Pneumoperitoneum commonly occurs as a result of a viscus perforation and usually presents with peritoneal signs requiring emergent laparotomy. Spontaneous pneumoperitoneum is a rare condition characterized by intraperitoneal gas with no clear etiology. Case presentation: We herein report a case in which conservative treatment was achieved for an 83-year-old male patient with spontaneous pneumoperitoneum that probably occurred due to duodenal diverticulosis. He had stable vital signs and slight epigastric discomfort without any other signs of peritonitis. A chest radiograph and computed tomography showed that a large amount of free gas extended into the upper abdominal cavity. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy showed duodenal diverticulosis but no perforation of the upper gastrointestinal tract. He was diagnosed with spontaneous pneumoperitoneum, and conservative treatment was selected. His medical course was uneventful, and pneumoperitoneum disappeared after 6 months. Conclusion: In the management of spontaneous pneumoperitoneum, recognition of this rare condition and an accurate diagnosis based on symptoms and clinical imaging might contribute to reducing the performance of unnecessary laparotomy. However, in uncertain cases with peritoneal signs, spontaneous pneumoperitoneum is difficult to differentiate from free air resulting from gastrointestinal perforation and emergency exploratory laparotomy should be considered for these patients. Keywords: Spontaneous pneumoperitoneum, Duodenal diverticulosis, Conservative management Background therapy. We also discuss the possible etiology and clin- Pneumoperitoneum is caused by perforation of intraperito- ical issues in the management of this rare condition.
    [Show full text]
  • Paraesophageal Hernia
    Paraesophageal Hernia a, b Dmitry Oleynikov, MD *, Jennifer M. Jolley, MD KEYWORDS Hiatal Paraesophageal Nissen fundoplication Hernia Laparoscopic KEY POINTS A paraesophageal hernia is a common diagnosis with surgery as the mainstay of treatment. Accurate arrangement of ports for triangulation of the working space is important. The key steps in paraesophageal hernia repair are reduction of the hernia sac, complete dissection of both crura and the gastroesophageal junction, reapproximation of the hiatus, and esophageal lengthening to achieve at least 3 cm of intra-abdominal esophagus. On-lay mesh with tension-free reapproximation of the hiatus. Anti-reflux procedure is appropriate to restore lower esophageal sphincter (LES) competency. INTRODUCTION Hiatal hernias were first described by Henry Ingersoll Bowditch in Boston in 1853 and then further classified into 3 types by the Swedish radiologist, Ake Akerlund, in 1926.1,2 In general, a hiatal hernia is characterized by enlargement of the space be- tween the diaphragmatic crura, allowing the stomach and other abdominal viscera to protrude into the mediastinum. The cause of hiatal defects is related to increased intra-abdominal pressure causing a transdiaphragmatic pressure gradient between the thoracic and abdominal cavities at the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ).3 This pressure gradient results in weakening of the phrenoesophageal membrane and widening of the diaphragmatic hiatus aperture. Conditions that are associated with increased intra-abdominal pressure are those linked
    [Show full text]
  • Pneumoperitoneum: an Unusual Presenting Finding of Perforated Appendicitis in Children Levent Duman
    20 Case report Pneumoperitoneum: an unusual presenting finding of perforated appendicitis in children Levent Duman Pneumoperitoneum is rarely encountered as a surgical abdominal emergencies in children. However, very radiographic finding in association with perforated young children often pose a diagnostic dilemma for the appendicitis in children, and may lead to diagnostic clinician. Pneumoperitoneum is a confusing finding in errors. In this paper, we present pneumoperitoneum as perforated appendicitis, and may lead to diagnostic errors. a presenting finding of perforated appendicitis in a However, it may be considered as a favorable sign because 2-year-old boy. it will result in the patient’s immediate surgical exploration and cure. Ann Pediatr Surg 10:20–21 c 2014 Annals of The term pneumoperitoneum frequently indicates Pediatric Surgery. perforation of an intra-abdominal hollow viscus. However, it is rarely encountered as a radiographic finding in Annals of Pediatric Surgery 2014, 10:20–21 association with perforated appendicitis. The cases Keywords: appendicitis, children, pneumoperitoneum reported in the literature are mostly adult patients, but the Department of Pediatric Surgery, Su¨leyman Demirel University Medical School, relevant data in children are limited. Here, we present a Isparta, Turkey case of a 2-year-old boy with perforated appendicitis Correspondence to Levent Duman, MD, Department of Pediatric Surgery, who presented with pneumoperitoneum. The patient was Su¨leyman Demirel University Medical School, 32260 Isparta, Turkey taken into the operation theater with an initial diagnosis Tel: + 90 246 2119249; fax: + 90 246 2371758; e-mail: [email protected] of gastrointestinal perforation. Surgical exploration Received 21 July 2013 accepted 26 October 2013 indicated a perforated appendix and an appendectomy was performed.
    [Show full text]
  • Femoral Hernia Causing Pneumoperitoneum
    Postgraduate Medical Journal (1986) 62, 675-676 Postgrad Med J: first published as 10.1136/pgmj.62.729.675 on 1 July 1986. Downloaded from Femoral hernia causing pneumoperitoneum H.A. King and P.S. Boulter St Luke's Hospital, Warren Road, Guildford, Surrey GUI 3NT, UK. Summary: Richter's hernia, in which only a portion ofthe circumference ofthe intestine lies within the sac, is a common complication offemoral hernia. This case report is ofa 39 year old female who presented with apneumoperitoneum and was found at laparotomy to have a right femoral Richter's hernia containing a knuckle of perforated small bowel. This is a previously unreported presentation of femoral hernia. Introduction Richter's hernia, in which only a portion of the circumference of the intestine lies within the sac, is a common complication of femoral hernia. The bowel can strangulate and perforate but pneumoperitoneum has never been reported as a complication. Case report A 39 year old female presented with a 10-day history of copyright. generalized abdominal discomfort associated with bile stained vomiting and gross abdominal distension. Her bowels had opened daily. There was no history of previous episodes, dyspepsia or alteration in bowel habit. She had had no previous operations and was otherwise well. On examination, she was dehydrated and febrile (37.5'C), pulse rate 90/min. The abdomen was grossly http://pmj.bmj.com/ distended and tympanitic, diffusely tender but without guarding or rebound tenderness. The hernial orifices were intact. Bowel sounds were quiet and not obstruc- tive. Rectal examination demonstrated only tender- ness anteriorly.
    [Show full text]
  • Management of Complications After Paraesophageal Hernia Repair
    10 Review Article Page 1 of 10 Management of complications after paraesophageal hernia repair Abraham J. Botha, Francesco Di Maggio Department of Upper GI Surgery, St Thomas Hospital, Guys and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom Contributions: (I) Conception and design: AJ Botha; (II) Administrative support: None; (III) Provision of study materials or patients: None; (IV) Collection and assembly of data: All authors; (V) Data analysis and interpretation: None; (VI) Manuscript writing: All authors; (VII) Final approval of manuscript: All authors. Correspondence to: Abraham J. Botha. Consultant Upper Gastro-intestinal surgeon, Department of Surgery, St Thomas Hospital. Westminster Bridge Road, SE1 7EH London, United Kingdom. Email: [email protected]. Abstract: Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia (PEH) repair can be performed safely in expert hands. However, it is a complex operation carrying significant risk of peri-operative morbidity and mortality. Careful intra-operative correctional techniques and prompt return to theatre for early post-operative complications result in a satisfactory outcome. Capnothorax and pneumothorax should be dealt with immediately by lowering insufflation pressure, aspiration and drain placement. Hemodynamic instability from cardiovascular injury or bleeding mandates an early return to theatre. Intra-operative perforation of the esophagus or stomach is best avoided, but it can be successfully repaired. Early acute dysphagia warrants a return to theatre for correction while delayed dysphagia can in some patients be treated by dilatation. Asymptomatic hiatus hernia recurrence does not require surgery, but symptomatic and complicated hernias can be re-repaired. Some life-threatening complications such as acute gastric dilatation, aortic fistula, gastric necrosis and perforation can occur months, and even years, after the procedure.
    [Show full text]
  • Spontaneous Pneumoperitoneum Due to Intra-Abdominal Drain One Week Postprocedure
    Case Report DOI: 10.7860/IJARS/2021/46874:2649 Spontaneous Pneumoperitoneum due Surgery Section to Intra-abdominal Drain- A Case Report HIMANGSU SARMA1, GAYATHRI GOPALKRISHNAN2, ASHWIN IKUMAR KUDARI3 ABSTRACT Pneumoperitoneum is most commonly caused by hollow viscus perforation which requires an emergency surgical intervention. However, this is not always the case. Pneumoperitoneum which is not due to hollow viscus perforation is called Spontaneous or “non-surgical” pneumoperitoneum. Rarely, it can present with peritonitis but non-surgical pneumoperitoneum usually follows a benign course and can be managed conservatively. A case of 53-year-old male, non-smoker, non-alcoholic, hypertensive known to have decompensated chronic liver disease, since one year with portal hypertension and ascites was presented. The patient underwent uneventful laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis and developed spontaneous pneumoperitoneum due to intra-abdominal drain one week postprocedure. Pneumoperitoneum was successfully managed conservatively. A thorough history, physical examination and imaging are crucial in identifying patients with non-surgical pneumoperitoneum and to prevent unnecessary laparotomies. In present case, pneumoperitoneum was due to intra-abdominal drain which resolved after removing the drain. So, it is of utmost importance to rule out non-surgical causes of pnemoperitoneum, especially in surgeries where drain are kept in-situ. Keywords: Computerized tomography, Decompensated liver disease, Non-surgical pneumoperitoneum, Secondary bacterial peritonitis CASE REPORT Clinically, patient was comfortable, vitally stable, and ambulatory A 53-year-old male, non-smoker, non-alcoholic, hypertensive with normal oral intake and bowel habits. The patient did known to have decompensated chronic liver disease since one year not complain of any fever and chills.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Prolonged Pneumoperitoneum on Hepatic Perfusion During Laparoscopy Lisette T
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE Effects of Prolonged Pneumoperitoneum on Hepatic Perfusion During Laparoscopy Lisette T. Hoekstra, MD,∗ Anthony T. Ruys, MD,∗ Dan M. J. Milstein, MD, PhD,† Gan van Samkar, MD,‡ Mark I. van Berge Henegouwen, MD, PhD,∗ Michal Heger, PhD,∗ Joanne Verheij, MD, PhD,§ and Thomas M. van Gulik, MD, PhD∗ toneal pressures during PP are higher (14 mm Hg) than the nor- Objective: To assess the influence of prolonged pneumoperitoneum (PP) on mal pressure in the hepatic portal system (7–10 mm Hg) and may, liver function and perfusion in a clinically relevant porcine model of laparo- therefore, cause changes in liver portal blood flow and, consequently, scopic abdominal insufflation. hepatic function. Indeed, elevations in aspartate aminotransferases Background: PP during laparoscopic surgery produces increased intra- and alanine aminotransferases levels have been reported after la- abdominal pressure, which potentially influences hepatic function and mi- paroscopic operations; however, these elevations were transient and crocirculatory perfusion. returned to normal within the first 3 postoperative days.4–6 Methods: Six pigs (49.6 ± 5.8 kg) underwent laparoscopic intra-abdominal Several studies described the effects of PP on intra-abdominal insufflation with 14 mm Hg CO gas for 6 hours, followed by a recovery period 2 blood flow and reported diminished blood flow in the portal vein and of 6 hours. Two animals were subjected to 25 mm Hg CO gas. Hemodynamic 2 the hepatic artery.1,7–10 Because these studies focused on the effects parameters were monitored, and damage parameters in the blood were mea- of blood flow after 1 hour of PP,2 interesting questions emerged: first, sured to assess liver injury.
    [Show full text]
  • Spontaneous Pneumoperitoneum and Intraperitoneal Free
    Postgrad MedJ3 1997; 73: 531 - 537 C The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine, 1997 Medical emergencies Postgrad Med J: first published as 10.1136/pgmj.73.863.531 on 1 September 1997. Downloaded from Spontaneous pneumoperitoneum and other nonsurgical causes of intraperitoneal free gas Summary NMA Williams, DFL Watkin Intraperitoneal free gas seen radi- ologically as air under the dia- phragm nearly always indicates a The term pneumoperitoneum is used to describe the presence of free gas within perforated abdominal viscus that the peritoneal cavity but outside the viscera. In the majority of cases (>90%) it is requires surgical intervention. the result of perforation of an intra-abdominal viscus. Generally, prompt Rarely, however, the presence of surgical intervention is required in these patients to reduce the degree and a pneumoperitoneum may not magnitude of enteric contamination within the peritoneal cavity. Consequently, indicate an intra-abdominal per- the presence of intraperitoneal free gas usually mandates surgical referral and foration and thus may not require often results in an emergency laparotomy. There is, however, a subgroup of laparotomy. Such a situation is patients with pneumoperitoneum in whom there are no positive findings. These termed spontaneous or nonsurgi- patients are classified as having 'spontaneous',"2 'misleading',3 or 'nonsurgi- cal pneumoperitoneum. In this cal'4'5 pneumoperitoneum. In this review we explore various aetiological review, we explore the aetiological mechanisms of the appearance of free intraperitoneal
    [Show full text]
  • Free Intestinal Perforation in Children with Crohn's Disease
    Journal of Pediatric Surgery Case Reports 32 (2018) 5–10 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Pediatric Surgery Case Reports journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/epsc Free intestinal perforation in children with Crohn's disease T ∗ Mila Kolara, , Mercedes Pilkingtona, Andrea Winthropa, Hugh MacDonalda, Christopher Justinichb, Donald Soboleskic, Lloyd Slyc, David Hurlbutd a Department of Surgery, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada b Department of Pediatrics, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada c Department of Radiology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada d Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Background: Free intestinal perforation in children with Crohn's disease (CD) is a rare, but serious complication Free intraperitoneal perforation that requires urgent surgical management. The incidence, contributing risk factors, diagnostic workup, and Pediatric Crohn's disease management strategies for these complex pediatric patients are not well established. Methods: We present a recent case of free intestinal perforation in a patient with CD. In addition, a systematic review of the literature was conducted by searching the PubMed, Embase, Ovid, Scopus and Cochrane databases. Two authors independently extracted data, reviewed the abstracts, and assessed them for inclusion in the review. Results: The literature review identified 21 pediatric patients documented in 14 publications; including our case, there are a total of 22 pediatric patients reported. The majority of patients presented with features of peritonitis. Perforation occurred early in the disease course (median 6.5 months), and was most commonly a single per- foration in the ileum with active Crohn's disease (82%).
    [Show full text]
  • Artificial Pneumoperitoneum in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Hiatus Hernia N
    Postgrad Med J: first published as 10.1136/pgmj.42.494.765 on 1 December 1966. Downloaded from POSTGRAD. MED. J. (1966), 42, 765. ARTIFICIAL PNEUMOPERITONEUM IN THE DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF HIATUS HERNIA N. GEFFEN, M.B., Ch.B., D.M.R.D.,* B. MAISEL, M.D. Departments of Radiology and Surgery, New York Hospital -Cornell Medical Center, New York THE ANATOMY and physiology of the distal oesopha- extent of herniation, but after studying 300 cases of gus is well established and the radiological boundar- hiatus hernia by cinefluorography, Campeti, Geffen, ies of hiatus hernia are well defined so that Charles and Watson (1962), believed that the uncertainty in diagnosis is now unnecessary. symptoms were related to the tone of the lower Nevertheless, correlation between the radiological oesophageal sphincter. If the sphincter was hypo- evidence of hiatus hernia and the symtomatology is tonic and overcome, oesophageal reflux would incomplete. Large hernias may exist with minimal occur and this produced symptoms. If the sphincter or no symptoms; conversely, severe symptoms often was hypertonic then dysphagia could result. Such accompany minor radiological changes. a classification, however, though functionally The true incidence of hiatus hernia is unknown, useful, presupposed that the symptoms were all and varies with the techniques employed and in the due to oesophageal reflux and this is clearly an Protected by copyright. selection of patients. The radiological incidence over-simplification. Symptoms may also result from varies from 1 % to 20% (Kirkland and Hodgson, congestive, ulcerative and inflammatory changes in 1947), to 73.3 % (Schatzki, 1932). Edmonds the oesophagus or gastric loculus, early stricture (1957) reports an incidence of 3.3%, Hafter (1958).
    [Show full text]
  • Diseases of the Peritoneum and Retroperitoneum
    gastrointestinal tract and abdomen 2 DISEASES OF THE PERITONEUM AND RETROPERITONEUM Amanda K. Arrington, MD, and Joseph Kim, MD Anatomy and Physiology: Peritoneum transverse mesocolon, on the other hand, is the mesentery of the transverse colon and suspends this structure from anatomy the posterior abdominal wall. The root of the transverse The word peritoneum is derived from the Greek terms peri mesocolon extends across the descending duodenum and (“around”) and tonos (“stretching”). The peritoneum, which the head of the pancreas and continues along the inferior lines the innermost surface of the abdominal wall and the border of the body and tail of the pancreas. The transverse majority of the abdominal organs, consists of a layer of mesocolon is continuous with the duodenocolic ligament on dense stroma covered on its inner surface by a single sheet the right and with the phrenicocolic and splenorenal liga- of mesothelial cells. In men, the peritoneum is completely ments on the left. Finally, the sigmoid mesocolon attaches enclosed, whereas in women, the peritoneum is open to the the sigmoid colon to the posterior pelvic wall. This mesen- exterior only at the ostia of the fallopian tubes. The perito- tery, which has an inverted V-shape confi guration, with its neum is divided into two components: the parietal and the apex lying anterior to the bifurcation of the left common ilia c visceral peritoneum [see Figure 1]. The parietal peritoneum artery, contains both sigmoid and hemorrhoidal vessels, covers the innermost surface of the abdominal walls, the lymph nodes, nerves, and abundant fat tissue.3 inferior surface of the diaphragm, and the pelvis.
    [Show full text]