DOCSLIB.ORG

Cultural Heritage Assessment of the Proposed Drilling Platforms To

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cultural Heritage Assessment of the Proposed Drilling Platforms To Cultural Heritage Assessment of the Proposed Drilling Platforms to Undertake a Surface Drilling Programme as Part of a Prospecting Right Granted to BSC Resources (Pty) Ltd, near Mount Ayliff, Eastern Cape For Umhlaba Environmental Consulting CC PO Box 731504 Fairland 2030 Tel: 011 795 3636 Fax: 011 795 3336 By Francois P Coetzee Department of Anthropology & Archaeology University of South Africa PO Box 392 Pretoria 0003 Tel: (012) 429 6297 Fax: (012) 429 6091 [email protected] July 2011 Revised: 22 July 2011 Version: Final Report Coetzee, FP Drilling Platforms at Insizwa & Tabankulu Lobes, Mount Ayliff Executive Summary This report focuses on the results from a cultural heritage investigation of the proposed drilling platforms located in the general area south of Kokstad. A total of 7 proposed drill platform sites were investigated which form part of two separate prospecting applications which are EC 37 PR and EC62 PR. Stone Age settlement No Stone Age tools, manufacturing areas, base camps or features associated with this period, were identified during the survey. Iron Age settlements No Iron Age sites, structures, features or artefact were recorded in the survey areas. Historical buildings and features No historical structures or features older than 60 years were recorded. Graves Two graves were recorded at Target site Aa at EC 62 PR which situated on the periphery of a spur. The graves are of high local importance and should be fenced off as a precautionary measure. Additionally a buffer zone of 20 metres should be maintained during any drilling operations in the area. No direct impact is envisaged on the graves and they will remain in situ. Although burial dates could be established for some of the graves (some older than 60 years), most are located outside of a formal cemetery managed by a local authority. In terms of Section 36(3) of the National Heritage Resources Act (Act no. 25 of 1999) it is assumed that these undated burials are older than 60 years and therefore protected by the act. Other legislative measures which may be pertinent include the Removal of Graves and Dead Bodies Ordinance (Ordinance no. 7 of 1925), the Human Tissues Act (Act no. 65 of 1983, as amended), the Ordinance on Excavations (Ordinance no. 12 of 1980) as well as any local and regional provisions, laws and by-laws that may be in place. However, also note the following: It should be kept in mind that archaeological deposits usually occur below ground level. Should archaeological artefacts or skeletal material be revealed in the area during prospecting and mining activities, such activities should be halted, and a university or museum notified in 2 Coetzee, FP Drilling Platforms at Insizwa & Tabankulu Lobes, Mount Ayliff order for an investigation and evaluation of the find(s) to take place (cf. NHRA (Act No. 25 of 1999), Section 36 (6)). Definitions and abbreviations Midden: Refuse that accumulates in a concentrated heap. Stone Age: An archaeological term used to define a period of stone tool use and manufacture (see Table 3) Iron Age: An archaeological term used to define a period associated with domesticated livestock and grains, metal working and ceramic manufacture (see Table 3) 3 Coetzee, FP Drilling Platforms at Insizwa & Tabankulu Lobes, Mount Ayliff Contents 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 5 2. Terms of Reference ........................................................................................................... 5 3. Nature of the Proposed Activity or Development .......................................................... 5 4. Definitions and Approach ................................................................................................ 6 5. Methodology ...................................................................................................................... 9 5.1 Maps and Other Sources .......................................................................................... 9 5.2 Fieldwork ................................................................................................................... 9 5.3 Visibility and Constraints ......................................................................................... 9 6. Description of Study Area ................................................................................................ 9 7. Archaeological Sequence ................................................................................................ 11 8. Archaeological Context .................................................................................................. 12 8.1 Stone Age Sequence ................................................................................................. 12 8.2 Iron Age Sequence ................................................................................................... 12 8.3 Historical Background................................................................................................ 13 9. Location of Sites .............................................................................................................. 14 9.1 Permit Area EC 37 PR ............................................................................................ 14 9.1.1 Target Aa & Ab ................................................................................................ 15 9.1.2 Target B ............................................................................................................ 16 9.1.3 Target Ca & Cb ................................................................................................ 18 9.1.4 Target D ............................................................................................................ 21 9.1.5 Target E ............................................................................................................ 23 9.1.6 Target Fa & Fb................................................................................................. 23 9.2 Permit Area EC 62 PR ............................................................................................ 26 9.2.1 Target Aa & Ab ................................................................................................ 26 10. Summary of Sites ........................................................................................................ 31 11. Conclusions and Recommendations .......................................................................... 31 Bibliography ........................................................................................................................... 33 4 Coetzee, FP Drilling Platforms at Insizwa & Tabankulu Lobes, Mount Ayliff 1. Introduction The aim of this cultural heritage survey is to record and document cultural heritage remains consisting of visible archaeological and historical artefacts, structures (including graves) and settlements of cultural significance (including rock art) within the defined areas of the proposed drilling platforms. A cultural heritage impact assessment was requested for the proposed prospecting at various selected locations near Mount Ayliff, Eastern Cape. The report is prepared to adhere to environmental impact requirements and for submission to gain approval to undertake a surface drilling programme within the Insizwa Lobe (EC 37 PR) and Tabankulu Lobe (EC 62 PR) in terms of prospecting rights granted to BSC Resources (Pty) Ltd which is in partnership with Vale South Africa (Pty) Ltd. The report was requested by Umhlaba Environmental CC on behalf of the clients. 2. Terms of Reference The terms of reference of this survey are as follows: * Provide a detailed description of all archaeological artefacts, structures (including graves) and settlements * Estimate the level of significance/importance of the archaeological remains within the area * Assess any possible impact on the archaeological and historical remains within the area emanating from the proposed development activities * Propose possible mitigation measures provided that such action is necessitated by the development 3. Nature of the Proposed Activity or Development In terms of prospecting rights EC 37 PR and EC 62 PR a drilling programme is envisaged at selected sites in the survey area. Each drill site will consist of the following: • A cleared area of approximately 20 X 20 m to facilitate drilling activities • A small cement slab of approximately 1.5 X 1.5 m for the drilling rig • A sump of approximately 1.5m3 for the recycling of water • A camp site within the local area for the duration of the drilling programme. 5 Coetzee, FP Drilling Platforms at Insizwa & Tabankulu Lobes, Mount Ayliff Map 1: Regional location of the two survey areas 4. Definitions and Approach - Archaeological remains can be defined as human-made objects, which reflect past ways of life, deposited on or in the ground. - Heritage resources have lasting value in their own right and provide evidence of the origins of South African society and they are valuable, finite, non-renewable and irreplaceable. - All archaeological remains, features, structures and artefacts older than 100 years and historic structures older than 60 years are protected by the relevant legislation, in this case the National Heritage Resources Act (NHRA) (Act No. 25 of 1999, Section 34 & 35). The Act makes an archaeological impact assessment as part of an EIA and EMPR mandatory (see Section 38). No archaeological artefact, assemblage or settlement (site)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report: Volume 2
    VOLUME TWO Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report The report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission was presented to President Nelson Mandela on 29 October 1998. Archbishop Desmond Tutu Ms Hlengiwe Mkhize Chairperson Dr Alex Boraine Mr Dumisa Ntsebeza Vice-Chairperson Ms Mary Burton Dr Wendy Orr Revd Bongani Finca Adv Denzil Potgieter Ms Sisi Khampepe Dr Fazel Randera Mr Richard Lyster Ms Yasmin Sooka Mr Wynand Malan* Ms Glenda Wildschut Dr Khoza Mgojo * Subject to minority position. See volume 5. Chief Executive Officer: Dr Biki Minyuku I CONTENTS Chapter 1 Chapter 6 National Overview .......................................... 1 Special Investigation The Death of President Samora Machel ................................................ 488 Chapter 2 The State outside Special Investigation South Africa (1960-1990).......................... 42 Helderberg Crash ........................................... 497 Special Investigation Chemical and Biological Warfare........ 504 Chapter 3 The State inside South Africa (1960-1990).......................... 165 Special Investigation Appendix: State Security Forces: Directory Secret State Funding................................... 518 of Organisations and Structures........................ 313 Special Investigation Exhumations....................................................... 537 Chapter 4 The Liberation Movements from 1960 to 1990 ..................................................... 325 Special Investigation Appendix: Organisational structures and The Mandela United
    [Show full text]
  • African Leafy Vegetables in South Africa
    African leafy vegetables in South Africa WS Jansen van Rensburg1*, W van Averbeke2, R Slabbert2, M Faber3, P van Jaarsveld3, I van Heerden4, F Wenhold5 and A Oelofse6 1 Agricultural Research Council – Vegetable and Ornamental Plant Institute, Private Bag X293, Pretoria 0001, South Africa 2 Centre for Organic & Smallholder Agriculture, Department of Crop Sciences, Tshwane University of Technology, Private Bag X680, Pretoria 0001, South Africa 3 Medical Research Council, Nutrition Intervention Research Unit, Private Bag X19, Parow 7925, South Africa 4 Agricultural Research Council – ANAPI, Meat Industry Centre, Private Bag X2, Irene 0062, South Africa 5 University of Pretoria – Division of Human Nutrition, Faculty of Health Sciences, PO Box 667, Pretoria 0001, South Africa 6 University of Pretoria – Centre for Nutrition, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, Pretoria 0002, South Africa Abstract In this article the term ‘African leafy vegetables’ was adopted to refer to the collective of plant species which are used as leafy vegetables and which are referred to as morogor o imifinoy b African people in South Africa. Function is central in this indigenous concept, which is subject to spatial and temporal variability in terms of plant species that are included as a result of diversity in ecology, culinary repertoire and change over time. As a result, the concept embraces indigenous, indigenised and recently introduced leafy vegetable species but this article is concerned mainly with the indigenous and indigenised species. In South Africa, the collection of these two types of leafy vegetables from the wild, or from cultivated fields where some of them grow as weeds, has a long history that has been intimately linked to women and their traditional livelihood tasks.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Eastern Cape Cape Flagstaff Sheriff Service Area Flagstaff Sheriff
    # # !C # # # ## ^ !C# ñ!.!C# # # # !C $ # # # # # # # # # # !C^ # # # # # ^ # # # # ^ # # !C # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C# # # !C!C # # # # # # # # # #!C # # # # !C # ## # # # !C# ^ # # # # # # # # ^ # # # # #!C # # # # # !C # ^ # # # # # # # ## # #!C # # # # # # # !C # # # # # # # # !C# ## # # #!C # !C # # # # # #^ # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C # # # # # # # # ñ # # # # # # # #!C # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # !C # # ## # # !C # # # # # # # # # # !C # # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C# # ^ # # # # # # !C# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #!C # # # # # #^# !C #!C# # # # # # # # # $ # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # !C# ## # # # ^ # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # !C # #!C # # # # # !C# # # # # !C # # !C# # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C # # # # # ^ # # # # ^ # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C # # # ## # ñ# # # # # !C # # !C # # #!C # # # # !C # # # # # # # # # # # !C # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ### # # # # # # # # # # # !C # # # # # # # # # # ### #!C # # !C # ## ## # # # !C # ## !C # # # !C # !. # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # !C# # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ### #^ # # # # # # # # # # # #ñ# # ^ !C# # # # # # # # !C# # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # ## # !C !C## # # # ## # !C # ## # !C# # # # # !C ## # !C # # ^$ # ## # # # !C# ^ # # !C # # !C ## # # # # # #!C # # # # # # # # # ñ ## # ## # # # # !C # # # # # # # # # #!C # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C # # # # ^ # ## # #
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL REPORT 20 Contact: 043 711 9514 HUMAN SETTLEMENTS Customer Care Line: 086 000 0039 314 13
    Eastern Cape Department of Human Settlements Steve Tshwete Building • 31-33 Phillip Frame Road Waverly Park • Chiselhurst • 5247 • East London ANNUAL REPORT 20 /20 Vote: 11 Contact: 043 711 9514 HUMAN SETTLEMENTS Customer Care Line: 086 000 0039 www.ecdhs.gov.za 13 14 ANNUAL REPORT 2013 /20 14 Vote: 11 ANNUAL REPORT FOR 2013/14 FINANCIAL YEAR VOTE 11: DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SETTLEMENTS PROVINCE OF EASTERN CAPE HUMAN SETTLEMENTS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SETTLEMENTS PROVINCE OF EASTERN CAPE VOTE NO. 11 ANNUAL REPORT 2013 /20 14 FINANCIAL YEAR 1 ANNUAL REPORT FOR 2013/14 FINANCIAL YEAR VOTE 11: DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SETTLEMENTS PROVINCE OF EASTERN CAPE CONTENTS PART A: GENERAL INFORMATION ................................................................................................................................ 5 1. DEPARTMENT GENERAL INFORMATION .......................................................................................................... 6 2. LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS/ACRONYMS .............................................................................................................. 7 3. FOREWORD BY THE MINISTER/MEC ............................................................................................................... 10 4. REPORT OF THE ACCOUNTING OFFICER ...................................................................................................... 12 5. STATEMENT OF RESPONSIBILITY AND CONFIRMATION OF ACCURACY FOR THE ANNUAL REPORT .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rock Art and the Contested Landscape of the North Eastern Cape, South Africa
    ROCK ART AND THE CONTESTED LANDSCAPE OF THE NORTH EASTERN CAPE, SOUTH AFRICA Leila Henry A dissertation for the Faculty of Humanities, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts. Johannesburg, June 2010. DECLARATION I declare that this dissertation is my own, unaided work. It is being submitted for the degree of Master of Arts in the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. It has not been submitted before for any degree or examination in any other University. _____________________ (Leila Marguerita Henry) ________ day of_______________, 2010 i ABSTRACT The north Eastern Cape is well known for its exceptional fine-line rock art. Recently, two non-fine-line traditions have been identified in the high mountains of this region. These corpora of rock art formed part of the interaction between San and non-San individuals in the creolised context of the nineteenth century. My discovery of further non-fine-line rock art, on the inland plateau, offers an opportunity to better understand the development of non-fine-line rock art and the role it played in relations between different groups. I argue that these three corpora of non-fine-line rock art are chronological variants of a single tradition, which I label the Type 2 tradition. The development of this tradition is associated with the breakdown of independent San-led bands and their loss of control of the space of painting, which became a contested landscape as multi-ethnic groups vied for political influence in the region and access to the San spirit world that would aid in their raiding prowess.
    [Show full text]
  • Lusikisiki Flagstaff and Port St Johns Sheriff Service Area
    LLuussiikkiissiikkii FFllaaggssttaaffff aanndd PPoorrtt SStt JJoohhnnss SShheerriiffff SSeerrvviiccee AArreeaa DUNDEE Mandela IZILANGWE Gubhethuka SP Alfred SP OLYMPUS E'MATYENI Gxako Ncome A Siqhingeni Sithinteni Sirhoqobeni Ngwegweni SP Mruleni SP Izilangwe SP DELHI Gangala SP Mjaja SP Thembeni SP MURCHISON PORT SHEPSTONE ^ Gxako Ntlabeni SP Mpoza SP Mqhekezweni DUNDEE REVENHILL LOT SE BETHEL PORT NGWENGWENI Manzane SP Nhlanza SP LONG VALLEY PENRITH Gxaku Matyeni A SP Mkhandlweni SP Mmangweni SP HOT VALE HIGHLANDS Mbotsha SP ñ Mgungundlovu SP Ngwekazana SP Mvubini Mnqwane Xhama SP Siphethu Mahlubini SP NEW VALLEYS BRASFORT FLATS N2 SHEPSTONE Makolonini SP Matyeni B SP Ndzongiseni SP Mshisweni SP Godloza NEW ALVON PADDOCK ^ Nyandezulu SP LK MAKAULA-KWAB Nongidi Ndunu SP ALFREDIA OSLO Mampondomiseni SP SP Qungebe Nkantolo SP Gwala SP SP Mlozane ST HELENA B Ngcozana SP Natala SP SP Ezingoleni NU Nsangwini SP DLUDLU Ndakeni Ngwetsheni SP Qanqu Ntsizwa BETSHWANA Ntamonde SP SP Madadiyela SP Bonga SP Bhadalala SP SP ENKANTOLO Mbobeni SP UMuziwabantu NU Mbeni SP ZUMMAT R61 Umzimvubu NU Natala BETSHWANA ^ LKN2 Nsimbini SP ST Singqezi SIDOI Dumsi SP Mahlubini SP ROUNDABOUT D eMabheleni SP R405 Sihlahleni SP Mhlotsheni SP Mount Ayliff Mbongweni Mdikiso SP Nqwelombaso SP IZINGOLWENI Mbeni SP Chancele SP ST Ndakeni B SP INSIZWA NESTAU GAMALAKHE ^ ROTENBERG Mlenze A SIDOI MNCEBA Mcithwa !. Ndzimakwe SP R394 Amantshangase Mount Zion SP Isisele B SP Hlomendlini SP Qukanca Malongwe SP FIKENI-MAXE SP1 ST Shobashobane SP OLDENSTADT Hibiscus Rode ñ Nositha Nkandla Sibhozweni SP Sugarbush SP A/a G SP Nikwe SP KwaShoba MARAH Coast NU LION Uvongo Mgcantsi SP RODE Ndunge SP OLDENSTADT SP Qukanca SP Njijini SP Ntsongweni SP Mzinto Dutyini SP MAXESIBENI Lundzwana SP NTSHANGASE Nomlacu Dindini A SP Mtamvuna SP SP PLEYEL VALLEY Cabazi SP SP Cingweni Goso SP Emdozingana Sigodadeni SP Sikhepheni Sp MNCEBA DUTYENI Amantshangase Ludeke (Section BIZANA IMBEZANA UPLANDS !.
    [Show full text]
  • Matatiele Road Rehabilitation Project Proposed
    MATATIELE ROAD REHABILITATION PROJECT PROPOSED REHABILITATION OF NATIONAL ROUTE R56 SECTION 8, BETWEEN MATATIELE AND THE KWAZULU-NATAL BORDER, WITHIN THE MATATIELE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY, IN THE ALFRED NZO DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY, EASTERN CAPE PROVINCE Heritage Impact Assessment Report Issue Date: 6 June 2016 Revision No.: 3 PGS Heritage PO Box 32542 Totiusdal 0134, T +27 12 332 5305 F: +27 86 675 8077 Reg No 2003/008940/07 Declaration of Independence The report has been compiled by PGS Heritage (Pty) Ltd, an appointed Heritage Specialist for Gibb (Pty) Ltd. The views stipulated in this report are purely objective and no other interests are displayed during the decision making processes discussed in the Heritage Impact Assessment. HERITAGE CONSULTANT: PGS Heritage (Pty) Ltd CONTACT PERSON: Polke Birkholtz Tel: +27 (0) 12 332 5305 Email: [email protected] SIGNATURE: ______________________________ DETAILS OF CLIENT: CLIENT: Gibb (Pty) Ltd CONTACT PERSON: Robyn Phillips Tel: +27 (0)31 267 6175 Email: [email protected] HIA – MATATIELE ROAD REHABILITATION 6 JuNe 2016 Page ii of viii Report Title Heritage Impact Assessment for the proposed rehabilitation of National Route R56 Section 8 between Matatiele and the KwaZulu-Natal Border within the Matatiele Local MunicipalitY in the Alfred Nzo District MunicipalitY, Eastern Cape Province Control Name Signature Designation Author Polke BirkholtZ Heritage Specialist & Archaeologist at PGS Heritage Co-Author Jennifer Kitto Heritage Specialist at PGS Heritage Input bY Specialists: • Dr Maria van der RYst was commissioNed as StoNe Age specialist to provide inputs on the ideNtified StoNe Age sites aNd provide aN assessmeNt of these sites aNd outline whether aNy mitigatioN measures would be required.
    [Show full text]
  • Bid Document Rendering of Security Service Kwabhaca
    INVITATION FOR SERVICE PROVIDERS TO RENDERING OF SECURITY SERVICE KWABHACA FOR ALFRED NZO DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY Enquiries: Mr S Mambafula: E-Mail [email protected] SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS DEADLINE Date: 03 March 2021 Time: 10h00 Venue: Alfred Nzo District Municipality Offices Erf 1400 Ntsizwa Street Mount Ayliff Name of Organisation Physical Address Contact Person Telephone No. Fax No. E-Mail Address Tender Price 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION PAGE NO. 1. Tender Advert 3 2. Checklist 4 3. Form of Offer and Acceptance 5 4. MBD 1 - Invitation to Bid 7 5. MBD 2 - Tax Clearance Certificate 8 6. MBD 4 - Declaration of Interest 9 7. MBD 5 - Declaration Procurement above R10 Million 11 8. MBD 6.1 - Preference Points Claim Form 12 9. MBD 8 - Past Supply Chain Practices 17 10. MBD 9 - Certificate of Independent Bid Declaration 19 11. Proof of Municipal Good Standing 22 12. Authority for Signatory 23 13. BEE Certificate 25 14. Banking Details 26 15. Joint Venture Agreement 27 16. Subcontractors Schedule 28 17. Experience of Tenderer 29 18. Assessment of Bidder 31 19. Record of Addenda Issued 32 20. Eligibility Criteria 33 21. Functionality Test 34 22. Company Profile 35 23. Central Supplier Database 36 24. Compulsory Briefing Session 37 25. Scope of Works 38 26. Pricing Structure 39 27. General Conditions of Tender 40 28. General Conditions of Contract 44 2 ALFRED NZO DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY ADVERT Alfred Nzo District Municipality (ANDM) is inviting all suitable Qualified and Experienced Professional Service Providers to submit bids for the following projects. The adjudication of the bids will be done in terms of Preferential Procurement Regulations, 2011 pertaining to Preferential Procurement Policy Framework (Act No5 of 2000) and will be based on the functionality and BBBEE points system.
    [Show full text]
  • N2-Road Mount Frere Alfred Nzo District Municipality Umzimvubu Local Municipality Eastern Cape Province
    N2-Road Mount Frere Alfred Nzo District Municipality Umzimvubu Local Municipality Eastern Cape Province September 2015 1 | P a g e Company Details (herein after referred to as Petrorex) Company Name DOTCOM TRADING 278 Trading as Petrorex Registration number CK 2008/008384/23 Members JL Pieterse Slogan “Energy in Motion” Official Logo Website www.petrorex.co.za Address 42 Bontebok crescent Theresaburg security village Thereseapark Pretoria Postal Address P O Box 52039 Dorandia 0188 Telephone number 012-542 1368 Hannes Pieterse 082 440 7969 e-mail [email protected] Dawie Pieterse 074 585 5085 e-mail [email protected] 2 | P a g e DOCUMENT DISCLAIMER This report has been prepared by Petrorex , with all reasonable skill, care and due diligence within the terms of the appointment with the client within the parameters specified in this document, incorporating our General Terms and Conditions of Business and taking account of the resources devoted to it by agreement with the client. We disclaim any responsibility to the client and others in respect of any matters outside the scope of the above. No warranty or representation are made, either expressed or implied, with respect to fitness of use and no responsibility will be accepted by Petrorex or the authors for any losses, damages or claims of any kind, including, without limitation, direct, indirect, special, incidental, consequential or any other loss or damage that may arise from the use of the document This report is confidential to the client and we accept no responsibility of whatsoever nature to third parties to whom this report, or any part thereof, is made known.
    [Show full text]
  • 260307095952.Pdf
    C o n t e n t s Introduction ......................... 4 Environmental and Disaster Management . 31 Aims of the Summit..................... 4 Aims of this document .................. 5 Comprehensive Primary Health Care...... 32 District Snapshot...................... 6 Food Security and Safety-Nets .......... 34 Economic Growth and Infrastructure . 10 Crime Management and Prevention ...... 36 Economic Growth ..................... 10 Institutional Capacity Building .......... 37 Infrastructure Development ............. 16 Provincial Infrastructure Expenditure Plans . 21 Service Delivery Mechanisms............ 38 National Government .................. 24 Conclusions ......................... 40 Unlocking Access to Land .............. 25 Glossary ........................... 41 Skills Development ................... 26 Spatial Development Planning .......... 29 Introduction A I M S O F T H E S ummi T Building on the results of the National Growth and Development The aim of the GDS is to reach broad agreement on: Summit (NGDS) in June 2003, government proposed that all • A development path and programme for the district. District and Metropolitan Municipalities hold Growth and • What each social partner (government, business, labour and Development Summits (GDS) in their area of jurisdiction. community sector) should contribute to the implementation of the programme? The summits should provide opportunities for building • Strengthening of strategic thrust of the district to ensure partnerships with social partners by bringing together planning
    [Show full text]
  • Claim for Restitution of Land Rights: Portion 11 of Farm No.92, Amathole District
    10 No. 37805 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 11 JULY 2014 GOVERNMENT NOTICES GOEWERMENTSKENNISGEWINGS DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFAIRS DEPARTEMENT VAN BINNELANDSE SAKE No. 541 11 July 2014 ALTERATION OF FORENAMES IN TERMS OF SECTION 24 OF THE BIRTHS AND DEATHS REGISTRATION ACT, 1992 (ACT NO. 51 OF 1992) The Director-General has authorized the following persons to assume the forename printed in italics: 1 Matthew Bennett - 910610 5049 080 - 10 St Helier Road, GILLITTS, 3620 - Matthew Bear 2. Godrey Motiki Nene - 720306 5373 089 - 48 Ford Street, VANDERBIJLPARK, 1911 - Kenny Godfrey Motiki 3. Thakgalang Stephina Mojapelo 741010 0249 089 - 12 Gable Estate, 93 Bosbok Street, THERESA PARK, 0001 - Labelang Stephina 4. Sithembiso Raymond Mncwabe - 710403 5334 088 - No 2 Sikhwalimanzi, Joe Slovo Park, MILNERTON, 7441 - Isaiah Raymond Wiely Nkana Boshielo - 711226 5555 082 - Pokwane, NEBO, 1059 - Willie Nkana 6. Victor Lekgoro - 650621 5272 089 - 3530 Extension 4, REFILWE, 1003 - Kin Victor 7. Shilela Aminah Ntladi - 730315 0833 086 - Phokwane, NEBO, 1059 - Llahlwa Abigail Iscaac Sekgobela - 910124 6004 086 - Private Bag X4007, TZANEEN, 0870 - Isaac Nomfesane Nomasekele - 920427 1040 080 - Ngwegweni, MOUNT AYLIFF, 4735 - Nomfesane Portia 10. Vutyisanani Magqabini - 950115 6327 080 - Hloba Area, NQAMAKWE, 4990 - Vuyisanani 11. Immaculate Thobeka Mncibi - 910709 0808 084 - 143 Old Dunbar Road, Cato Manor, MAYVILLE, 4091 - Fundiswa Immaculate 12. Phumelele Gumede - 860222 0537 083 - D1270 Sibonakaliso Mchunu, UMLAZI, 4031 - Sphumelele Dawn 13. Esther Pontsho Bopape - 950528 0465 088 - Stand No 3310, Ga-Thoka, MOTHAPO, 0727 - Mokitlane Hendrietta 14. Meriam Mokgaetjie Islam - 860819 0458 085 - 4jaipur Street, POLOKWANE, 0700 - Maryam Mokgaetjie 15. Vukani Thamsanqa Gasa - 880310 1525 086 - 24 Gilbert Road, BISLEY, 3201 - Victoria Nomathamsanqa 16.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural and Heritage Impact Assessment
    APPENDIX M Cultural and Heritage Impact Assessment eThembeni Cultural Heritage Heritage Impact Assessment Report Proposed Lanele Terminal 1. (Lot 1) Project, Ambrose Park, Bayhead Durban Harbour eThekweni Municipality Report prepared for: Report prepared by: Golder Associates Africa (Pty) Ltd. eThembeni Cultural Heritage Building 1, Golder House, Maxwell Office Park, P O Box 20057 Magwa Crescent West, Waterfall City ASHBURTON P.O. Box 6001, Halfway House, 1685 3213 Midrand, South Africa, 1685 Tel: +27 11 254 4800 | Fax: +27 86 582 1561 16 January 2019 DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE I, Leonard van Schalkwyk, declare that – I act as the independent specialist in this application. I will perform the work relating to the application in an objective manner even if this results in views and findings that are not favourable to the applicant. I declare that there are no circumstances that may compromise my objectivity in performing such work. I have no, and will not engage in, conflicting interests in the undertaking of the activity. I undertake to disclose to the applicant and the competent authority all material information in my possession that reasonably has or may have the potential of influencing any decision to be taken with respect to the application by the competent authority; and the objectivity of any report, plan or document to be prepared by myself for submission to the competent authority. All the particulars furnished by me in this form are true and correct. Signed 16 January 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION eThembeni Cultural Heritage was appointed by Golder Associates Africa (Pty) Ltd, to conduct a Phase1 Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) for the establishment of a new liquid fuel storage and handling facility, the Lanele Oil Terminal 1 (Lot 1) project, on a portion of the Kings Royal Flats No.
    [Show full text]