Housing in Multiple Occupation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Housing in Multiple Occupation Stirling Council Supplementary Guidance December 2018 Houses in Multiple Occupation www.stirling.gov.uk/planning Supplementary Guidance Houses in Multiple Occupation 1. Introduction 1.1 The purpose of this Supplementary Guidance (SG) is to expand on Local Development Plan Policy 2.3 – Particular needs housing and accommodation, part (e) of which is related to Houses in Multiple Occupation (HMO). Inparticular, this SG provides the locational criteria with which planning applications for HMO should comply, as specified in criterion (e)(iv) of Policy 2.3. This guidance also outlines Stirling Council’s Overprovision Policy in relation to the licensing of HMOs and describes the respective roles of planning and licensing in the management of such properties. 1.2 The Council recognises that Houses in Multiple Occupation (HMOs) are a key element of the private rented sector, which itself plays a significant role in meeting housing needs. This sector, including HMOs, provides a degree of flexibility not available in the owner occupied and social rented sectors. The demand for HMO accommodation is particularly high in Stirling from students, young professionals and people working away from home. However, it is also recognised that concentrations of HMOs can in some instances lead to a range of cultural, social, physical and economic changes in a community. 1 The range of potential problems associated with high concentrations of HMOs can include: • Changes in the demand for services, altering the availability of services provided; • Increased competition for private houses, consequential rises in house prices, and reduced availability for non-HMO residents; • Areas of high HMO concentrations can become unpopular with non-HMO residents, altering the community; • Potential physical deterioration caused by lack of investment by absentee landlords; • Increased population density, resulting in an increased demand on services, infrastructure and on-street parking provision; • A high number of transient residents leading to less community cohesion. 1.3 In view of the issues arising from concentrations of HMOs within certain areas of Stirling, the Council’s priorities include tightening the regulation of HMOs and reducing the number of HMOs in the town centre. The Council therefore revised SG05 in October 2015 and introduced an HMO Overprovision Policy pursuant to Section 131A of the Housing (Scotland) Act 2006. 1.4 Within the Stirling City area, the demand for accommodation within Houses in Multiple Occupation is mostly for student accommodation and, in the rural areas, to support the tourism and agricultural sector in providing staff accommodation for seasonal workers. At 22nd May 2015 there were 381 licensed Houses in Multiple Occupation purpose built for student accommodation, providing capacity for 2,405 bed units and a further 321 licensed Houses in Multiple Occupation with a further 1,346 bed units. 2 1.5 The policy on the provision of Houses in Multiple Occupation in the Stirling Council area set out in this guidance seeks to avoid concentrations of Houses in Multiple Occupation in view of the problems such concentrations can create in the areas they are arise. It is considered that number of licenced Houses in Multiple Occupation in Stirling, the ever increasing private rented sector and approved purpose built student accommodation developments that are either under construction and/or awaiting development – plus the stated exceptions to the policy – can meet the current and predicted future demand for affordable, high quality rented accommodation. It is intended that the demand and affordability of rented accommodation in the Stirling Council area, and the impact that the adoption of House in Multiple Occupation Overprovision policy may have, will be reviewed after a period of 12 months. 3 2. The role of Planning and Licencing in HMO 2.1 The Planning and HMO licensing systems are two separate regimes with distinct functions and objectives. Scottish Government Planning Circular 2/2012 Houses in Multiple Occupation: Guidance on Planning Control and Licensing1 encourages local authorities to take a coordinated approach to the planning and licensing of HMOs, with joint working between planning and licensing teams and other relevant departments. This revised SG and Overprovision Policy have been jointly developed by the Planning Service and the Housing Service and its implementation will be administered through joint working between services to ensure consistency and that information on the location of HMOs is shared. Requirement for Planning Permission 2.2 The formation of a HMO does not always require planning permission – only where use as a HMO would constitute a ‘material change of use’ is permission generally required. There is no statutory definition of ‘material change of use’; however, it is linked to the significance of a change and the resulting impact on the use of land and buildings. Whether a material change of use has taken place is a matter of fact and degree and this will be determined on the individual merits of a case. 1 http://www.gov.scot/Resource/0039/00396049.pdf 4 2.3 Circular 2/2012 states planning authorities may provide guidance as to occupancy levels for individual HMOs that would be considered to be a material change of use. With reference to the Town and Country Planning (Use Classes) (Scotland) Order 1997 and The Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (Scotland) Order 2011, the formation of an HMO in the following circumstances will be deemed to be represent a material change of use for which planning permission will be required: Formation of HMOs in Houses: The Town and Country Planning (Use Classes) (Scotland) Order 1997 defines a house (Class 9) as being the sole or main residence of a single person, or any number of persons living together as a family, or not more than 5 residents living together as a single household. By encompassing ‘households’ of less than 6 people, Class 9 includes people living together under arrangements for providing care and support within the community and other groups of people including students, not necessarily related to each other, but who choose to live on a communal basis as a single household. Where there is an increase in the number of residents, resulting in six or more residents living within a house falling within the definition of an HMO under the Housing (Scotland) Act 2006 a material change of use of the property will be deemed to have taken place and the property will no longer be considered to fall under Class 9 of the Use Classes Order. Planning permission for the formation of an HMO will therefore be required. 5 Formation of HMOs in Flats: A flat is defined in The Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (Scotland) Order 1992 as a separate and self-contained set of premises whether or not on the same floor and forming part of a building from some other part of which it is divided horizontally. Flats are distinct from houses and are classed as Sui Generis within the Use Classes Order. Where there is an increase in the number of residents, resulting in three or more residents living within a flat falling within the definition of an HMO under the Housing (Scotland) Act 2006 a material change of use of the property will be deemed to have taken place and planning permission for the formation of an HMO will be required. In determining the use of a flat as an HMO, it is a matter of fact and degree whether the nature of the use is materially different from that of a family flat. It is considered that three or more persons from three or more families in a flat is materially different from family use on account of the more independent lifestyles of occupants which, it is considered, can have an adverse impact on residential amenity. Formation of HMOs in other buildings: The conversion of hotels and hostels class (Class 7), including hotels and boarding or guest houses; residential institutions (Class 8); or buildings used for any other use to an HMO will require planning permission. 2.4 Planning permission is required for the formation of HMOs in houses or flats as defined above where properties are being proposed for HMO use for the first time only, except where it is proposed to intensify an existing HMO use (i.e. the number of rooms), in which case planning permission may be required. Properties that have in the past operated as HMOs with planning permission and/or a licence, but where the property has, in the intervening period, not operated as an HMO and/ or the licence has expired, may also require planning permission if it is deemed there has been an intervening use. 6 Planning Considerations 2.5 Where planning permission is required for the formation of an HMO, the key consideration for the planning authority is the impact the change of use would have on the residential amenity of the surrounding community. Relevant considerations include: parking and road safety; the management and storage of waste; and the maintenance of external spaces including garden ground. Concerns about the behaviour of HMO tenants, however, are not something that can be taken into account in determining a planning application. 2.6 Where concentrations of HMOs are considered to be having a negative effect on the amenity of a community, or where it is considered likely that such a situation may arise, planning authorities may adopt policies to manage HMO concentrations. This SG sets out Stirling Council’s policy for managing the concentration of HMOs, revising the policy that was adopted alongside the Local Development Plan in September 2014. Section 3 outlines the locational criteria that will be applied to the determination of planning applications for HMO within the Local Development Plan area (i.e.
Recommended publications
  • School Travel Plan?
    School Dunblane Travel Plan Nursery and Updated March 2017 Primary School January 2015 1. INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND What is a School Travel Plan? A school travel plan is a live working document which sets out how the school and community promote safer, active and sustainable travel to school, with the main emphasis being on reducing the number of children being driven to and from school. Dunblane Primary School produced its first school travel plan in December 2014. The travel plan was updated on the following months – June 2014, December 2014, April 2015, August 2015, December 2015, April 2016, August 2016 and February 2017. The JRSO citizenship group within the school are responsible for writing and updating the School Travel Plan. Some of the children from the JRSO group are part of the traffic working group. We aim to update our travel plan at least every 6 months, it will next be updated in August 2017 with the same working group. Below the pupils have stated why we are writing the plan – “To get people walking safely to school.” Katy “To encourage people to walk to school.” Georgia Our School Travel Planning Working Group Mrs Shirley Gallivan – DHT - Chair and responsible for all reviews. Contact Details: [email protected] / 01786 822351 Mrs Kelly – Parent Mrs Dobson – Parent Mr Ruskell - MSP Mrs McKay - SLA Hal Falby – Pupil Lyall Beattie- Pupil 1 Aims of the Dunblane School Travel Plan To encourage pupils and staff to walk, cycle or scoot to school. To ensure that everyone in the community is aware of safe routes to walk or cycle to school.
    [Show full text]
  • Sc414consultation: Community Council Boundaries
    THIS REPORT RELATES STIRLING COUNCIL TO ITEM ON THE AGENDA STIRLING COUNCIL CORPORATE 22 JUNE 2006 NOT EXEMPT CONSULTATION: COMMUNITY COUNCIL BOUNDARIES’ COTERMINOSITY WITH MULTI-MEMBER WARDS AND RELATED ISSUES 1 PURPOSE 1.1 To advise Council of a pre-consultation process with Stirling’s Community Councils; and 1.2 To seek approval to enter into a formal (statutory) eight-week consultation period to enable the current Community Council Scheme of Establishment to be amended to ensure that all Community Council boundaries will be coterminous with the boundaries of the new multi-member wards. 2 SUMMARY 2.1 Following confirmation of the new Stirling Council multi-member ward boundaries by the Boundary Commission and Minister for Finance and Public Service Reform, a mapping exercise was undertaken by the Community Governance and Research teams to show which community councils would have to alter their boundaries to make them coterminous with the new wards. 2.2 As a result of views expressed at the Community Conference held on October 2005, a pre-consultation has been held with community councils to ask if they considered it would be appropriate to amend their boundaries to make them coterminous with multi-member wards. Community councils were also asked their views on whether some community councils would benefit from being warded and whether area community planning boundaries should also be altered. Questions on the ongoing willingness to investigate corporate body status and whether to introduce a new Code of Conduct for Community Councillors were also asked. This pre-consultation process is a forerunner to a more formalised statutory process, which will now have to be undertaken to amend the Community Council Scheme of Establishment (Appendix 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Boundary Commission for Scotland
    THIS REPORT RELATES STIRLING COUNCIL TO ITEM 9 ON THE AGENDA STIRLING COUNCIL CORPORATE OPERATIONS 28 MAY 2015 NOT EXEMPT LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR SCOTLAND FIFTH REVIEW OF ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS 1 SUMMARY 1.1 This report updates Council on the Local Government Boundary Commission (LGBC) for Scotland’s fifth review of electoral arrangements and presents three further options for the purpose of agreeing a consultation response. 2 OFFICER RECOMMENDATION(S) The Council agrees:- 2.1 to consider the Local Government Boundary Commission’s proposal and the 3 options presented in paragraphs 3.5 to 3.17 of this report and to agree a response from the Council to the LGBC. 3 CONSIDERATIONS BACKGROUND 3.1 The Local Government Boundary Commission for Scotland is required to conduct electoral reviews for each local authority area in Scotland at intervals of between 8 and 12 years. Their fourth reviews were conducted in 2004- 2006 and these resulted in the current multi-member wards used for local government elections in 2007 and 2012. 3.2 The fifth review began in 2014 with consultation, firstly with Councils and then with the public, on the numbers of councillors for each council. This stage resulted in the proposal that Stirling Council should have 23 elected members based on population and levels of deprivation. 3.3 The current stage of the review is to determine ward boundaries. The Commission’s proposals for revised ward boundaries for the Stirling Council area are now open for consultation responses from local authorities. After considering responses from councils the LGBC will conduct a 12-week public consultation between July and October 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • STIRLING 03.Indd
    Local Government Boundary Commission for Scotland Fourth Statutory Review of Electoral Arrangements Stirling Council Area Report E06030 Report to Scottish Ministers March 2006 Local Government Boundary Commission for Scotland Fourth Statutory Review of Electoral Arrangements Stirling Council Area Constitution of the Commission Chairman: Mr John L Marjoribanks Deputy Chairman: Mr Brian Wilson OBE Commissioners: Professor Hugh M Begg Dr A Glen Mr K McDonald Mr R Millham Report Number E06030 March 2006 Stirling Council Area 1 Local Government Boundary Commission for Scotland 2 Stirling Council Area Fourth Statutory Review of Electoral Arrangements Contents Page Summary Page 7 Part 1 Background Pages 9 – 14 Paragraphs Origin of the Review 1 The Local Governance (Scotland) Act 2004 2 – 4 Commencement of the 2004 Act 5 Directions from Scottish Ministers 6 – 9 Announcement of our Review 10 – 16 General Issues 17 – 18 Defi nition of Electoral Ward Boundaries 19 – 24 Electorate Data used in the Review 25 – 26 Part 2 The Review in Stirling Council Area Pages 15 – 20 Paragraphs Meeting with the Stirling Council 1 – 3 Concluded View of the Council 4 – 5 Aggregation of Existing Wards 6 – 8 Initial Proposals 9 – 14 Informing the Council of our Initial Proposals 15 – 16 The Stirling Council Response 17 – 19 Consideration of the Council’s Reponse to the Initial Proposals 20 – 21 Provisional Proposals 22 – 26 Representations 27 Consideration of Representations 28 – 29 Part 3 Final Recommendation Pages 21 – 22 Appendices Pages 23 – 40 Appendix A Extract
    [Show full text]
  • Council Results 2007
    Aberdeen 2007 Elected Councillors Ward 1: Dyce, Bucksburn & Danestone Ron Clark (SLD) Barney Crockett (Lab) Mark McDonald (SNP) George Penny (SLD) Ward 2: Bridge of Don Muriel Jaffrey (SNP) Gordon Leslie (SLD) John Reynolds (SLD) Willie Young (Lab) Ward 3 Kingswells & Sheddocksley Len Ironside (Lab) Peter Stephen (SLD) Wendy Stuart (SNP) Ward 4 Northfield Jackie Dunbar (SNP) Gordon Graham (Lab) Kevin Stewart (SNP) Ward 5 Hilton / Stockethill George Adam (Lab) Neil Fletcher (SLD) Kirsty West (SNP) Ward 6 Tillydrone, Seatonand Old Aberdeen Norman Collie (Lab) Jim Noble (SNP) Richard Robertson (SLD) Ward 7 Midstocket & Rosemount BIll Cormie (SNP) Jenny Laing (Lab) John Porter (Con) Ward 8 George St & Harbour Andrew May (SNP) Jim Hunter (Lab) John Stewart (SLD) Ward 9 Lower Deeside Marie Boulton (Ind) Aileen Malone (SLD) Alan Milne (Con) Ward 10 Hazelhead, Ashley and Queens Cross Jim Farquharson (Con) Martin Grieg (SLD) Jennifer Stewart (SLD) John West (SNP) Ward 11 Airyhall, Broomhill and Garthdee Scott Cassie (SLD) Jill Wisely (Con) Ian Yuill (SLD) Ward 12 Torry & Ferryhill Yvonne Allan (Lab) Irene Cormack (SLD) Alan Donnelly (Con) Jim Kiddie (SNP) Ward 13 Kincorth & Loirston Neil Cooney (Lab) Katherine Dean (SLD) Callum McCaig (SNP) ELECTORATE: 160,500 2003 RESULT: SLD 20: Lab 14: SNP 6: Con 3 Aberdeenshire 2007 Elected Councillors Ward 1 Banff and District John B Cox (Ind) Ian Winton Gray (SNP) Jack Mair (SLD) Ward 2 Troup Mitchell Burnett (SNP) John Duncan (Con) Sydney Mair (Ind) Ward 3 Fraserburgh and District Andy Ritchie (SNP) Ian
    [Show full text]
  • May 3Rd 2012 New Directions for Local Councils an Action Plan for Green Councillors in Scotland Message from Patrick Harvie MSP and Alison Johnstone MSP
    The Scottish Green Party Manifesto for local elections May 3rd 2012 New Directions for local councils An action plan for Green Councillors in Scotland Message from Patrick Harvie MSP and Alison Johnstone MSP In 2012 local elections come out of the shadows. For the first time in 17 years council elections are being held in their own right. It is a chance for people to cast their votes on local issues, for the parties that present the best policies for their area, and for the candidates who can show real commitment to that area. We believe that Green candidates are worthy of those votes. Greens in local councils have already shown that they can make a difference. Examples are given throughout this manifesto. Our candidates come to you with track-record of hard work at community level, of developing constructive ideas, of listening to people; and of shaking up the status quo. The voting system also means that every Green vote counts. In 2007 the first Green councillors were elected in Scotland, in Glasgow and Edinburgh. We have Green Party members on Aberdeenshire Council as well now. We expect their numbers to swell in this election, with many more councils having a Green voice on them for the first time. But the election is about more than committed candidates. It takes place at a unique time in our politics. At a UK level the Coalition Government, unchallenged by a scarcely credible opposition, continues its slash and burn approach to public services with scant regard to the needs of the country both now and in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Index of People
    Last Name First Name Description of Article Year of Issue Page No Abel Christian Doune school prize-winner 1934 140 Abel Mary (sp Chapin) East Kilmadock Church wedding for Doune woman 1942 69 Abercrombie Catherine Dux of Strathblane School 1959 39 Abercrombie James (sp Newton) Bannockburn soldier weds in Bishop Auckland 1955 78 Abercromby Elizabeth A. (sp Macgregor) August wedding 1967 96 Abercromby Irene (sp McBryde) Ladywell Church wedding 1959 119 Abercromby John Exchange official retires 1968 17 Abercromby Moira (sp Strachan) Erskine-Marykirk wedding 1952 116 Abercromby Thomas S. (sp MacDonald St Ninians Old Parish Church wedding 1960 44 Abernethy Thomas (sp Ensell) Dunblane Hydro wedding 1939 22 Abernethy Margo J. (sp King) Dunblane Cathedral wedding 1965 49 Abernethy Walter M. (sp Yule) Kippen wedding 1968 103 Adam Douglas (Sp Campbell) Callander wedding 1930 28 Adam George BB Award winner 1934 113 Adam George China Merchant, Stirling 1916 27 Adam George Riverside School dux 1932 65 Adam Isabel Doctor weds at Holy Rude 1934 11 Adam Jack (sp Kennedy) Stirling Baptist Church wedding 1939 19 Adam James Cambusbarron minister retires 1930 108 Adam James Denny Show President 1933 163 Adam James (Reverend) Jubilee of Cambusbarron minister 1936 105 Adam James (sp Wilson) Station Hotel wedding for Stirling couple 1939 18 Adam Mary Ann (sp Muirhead) Golden Lion Hotel wedding 1939 18 Adam Thomas Local farmers at ploughing match 1933 123 Adam Thomas St Ninians School dux 1932 65 Adam Thomas Stirling High School scholarship winner 1938 124 Adam
    [Show full text]
  • As You Know I Have Previously Informed You About the Changes To
    CONFIRMATION OF ARRANGEMENTS FOR FORTH VALLEY DIVISION POLICING MODEL WITHIN STIRLING AREA COMMAND I previously informed you about the changes to our Policing model through which we aim to deploy visible resources at the most effective times to deliver on Police Scotland, Forth Valley Division and local community priorities. Our aim was to implement the new policing model as close to 1 April as possible. Following appropriate consultation with staff regarding a new shift pattern that will align Community Officers more closely with that of their Response colleagues, I can advise that arrangements are complete to implement our new policing model on Monday 12 May, 2014. The new Community Officer shift pattern will be flexible enough to recognise specific community demands and responsibilities placed on Community Officers, whilst also enhancing the resources available to address calls for service from the public at peak times of demand. This will result in more officers working together towards meeting the needs and expectations of local communities. Response and Community Officers will operate as a single team on an aligned shift pattern with the same group of supervisors delivering jointly on local priorities. The new policing model reflects our staff establishment of 625 officers. This includes all ranks and specialist officers within the Divisional Criminal and Public Protection Units, as well as 354 uniform front line operational Constables. The latter have been distributed across the Division giving Falkirk Area Command 175 officers, Stirling Area Command and the remote rural area 114 officers and Clackmannanshire Area Command 65 officers. The number of operational officers deployed in Response and Community policing is based on the specific demands of both functions, as is the structure of the Area Command, which will be split into Stirling Sub Area Command and Balfron and Callander Sub Area Command.
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Local Election
    Local authority elections in Scotland Report 3 May 2007 and Analysis The illustration on the cover of this report represents the town hall in Lerwick, Shetland, a building whose imposing features reflect the important role of local councils and local democracy. Its foundations were laid in 1884, the year that the Electoral Reform Society was established. Local authority elections in Scotland Report and 3 May 2007 Analysis Local authority elections in Scotland 3 May 2007 5 Contents Acknowledgements 7 Introduction 9 Summary 11 17 Part 1: What happened in the elections? Chapter 1: The results of 3 May 2007 17 Chapter 2: The political parties and the local elections 29 Chapter 3: Candidate strategy in multi-member wards 51 Chapter 4: Representation of women, young people and minorities 57 65 Part 2: The voters’ experience Chapter 5: More choice for voters 65 Chapter 6: Transferable voting 69 Chapter 7: Did people record valid votes? 83 91 Part 3: Election issues Chapter 8: Ballot design 91 Chapter 9: Multi-member wards 97 107 Part 4: Looking ahead Chapter 10: Looking forward 107 111 Appendix Scotland’s 32 new councils 111 Local authority elections in Scotland 3 May 2007 7 Acknowledgements and Dedication A project of this size is never a one-person job and I would like to thank Ken Ritchie, Amy Rodger and Martin Steven in particular for their constant help, guidance and support. Alasdair Stuart contributed magnificently to the sections on the results council-by-council and equalities. Other colleagues have assisted with the text and gathering data, including Christine McCartney, Gertrud Malmersjo and Hywel Nelson.
    [Show full text]
  • AGENDA Outcomes, Evidence & Performance
    AGENDA Outcomes, Evidence & Performance Board Advisory Board Meeting, 31st August, 2017, 2pm – 4pm Audit Scotland, 102 Westport, Edinburgh Agenda Time 1. Welcome and Introduction 2.00 2. Minute & Matters Arising 2.05 3. Workstrand 2: Sharing Actionable Intelligence 2.20 Update on pilot (Phil/Sarah) 4. Workstrand 3: Performance Management 2.40 Update from Geoff Huggins re review of HSC integration 5. Workstrand 4: Evidence & Evaluation 3.00 Update from Nick Watson, WWS 6. OEPB Communications Plan (IS) 3.20 7. Policy Developments 3.30 8. AOB 3.40 9. Future Items & Date of Next Meeting 3.50 10. Close 4.00 Agenda Item 2 Outcomes, Evidence & Performance Board Advisory Board Minute 10th meeting, 2pm-4pm, May 30th 2017 Attendees: Elma Murray (Chair, SOLACE); David Martin (SOLACE); Steve Grimmond (SOLACE); Mark McAteer (Scottish Fire & Rescue); Phil Couser (NSS); Fraser McKinlay (Audit Scotland); Roger Halliday (Scottish Government); David Milne (Scottish Government); Colin Mair (IS); Sarah Gadsden (IS); Gerry McLaughlin (Health Scotland). Kenny Richmond (Scottish Enterprise); Allan Johnstone (VAS); Alana Atkinson (Health Scotland); Mandy Paterson (Police Scotland) Emily Lynch (IS); Apologies: Nick Watson (What Works Scotland) Item Description Action Date No. 1 Welcome and Introduction .The Chair welcomed everyone to the tenth meeting of the Outcomes, Evidence & Performance Advisory Board. This was the first meeting for Steve Grimmond (SOLACE) and Audrey MacDougall (Chief Social Researcher, Scottish Government) 2 Minute & Matters Arising . Item 2 - OEP Board Minute 30th November.docx The Board approved the minute of the last meeting as a true and accurate record. All actions were picked up under the Agenda except: 2iii) OEPB Membership Elma and Gerry to follow up with John Burns to invite representation of territorial NHS EM/ Aug Chief Executives.
    [Show full text]
  • Stirling Strategic Park and Ride Study – Case for Change Stirling Strategic Park and Ride Study Stirling Strategic Park and Ride Study – Case for Change
    Stirling Strategic Park and Ride Study 03/02/2020 Reference number 107755 STIRLING STRATEGIC PARK AND RIDE STUDY – CASE FOR CHANGE STIRLING STRATEGIC PARK AND RIDE STUDY STIRLING STRATEGIC PARK AND RIDE STUDY – CASE FOR CHANGE IDENTIFICATION TABLE Client/Project owner Tactran Project Stirling Strategic Park and Ride Study Study Stirling Strategic Park and Ride Study – Case for Change Type of document Final Report Date 03/02/2020 Reference number 107755 Number of pages 103 APPROVAL Version Name Position Date Modifications Principal Author Claire Mackay 08/01/2019 Consultant 1st Draft (POIC 1 Approved Associate only) Iain Clement 08/01/2019 by Director Principal Author Claire Mackay 04/03/2019 Consultant 2 2nd Draft Approved Associate Iain Clement 04/03/2019 by Director Principal Author Claire Mackay 29/03/2019 Consultant 3 3rd Draft Approved Associate Iain Clement 29/03/2019 by Director Principal Author Claire Mackay 09/04/2019 Consultant Final – minor 4 Approved Associate amendments Iain Clement 09/04/2019 by Director Principal Author Claire Mackay 03/12/2019 Consultant 5 Approved Associate Iain Clement 04/12/2019 Minor by Director amendments Principal 24/1/2020 and Author Claire Mackay 03/02/2020 Consultant 03/02/2020 6 Approved Associate Iain Clement 03/02/2020 by Director TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 1. INTRODUCTION 13 1.1 OVERVIEW 13 1.2 BACKGROUND TO STUDY: 2016 DPMTAG APPRAISAL 14 2. METHODOLOGY 19 2.1 SCOTTISH TRANSPORT APPRAISAL GUIDANCE (STAG) 19 2.2 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT 19 2.3 COLLATION OF BASELINE DATA 20 2.4 PROJECT STEERING GROUP 20 3.
    [Show full text]
  • BCS Paper 2016/16 2018 Review of UK Parliament Constituencies Constituency Considerations for Clackmannanshire, Falkirk and Stir
    Boundary Commission for Scotland BCS Paper 2016/16 2018 Review of UK Parliament Constituencies Constituency considerations for Clackmannanshire, Falkirk and Stirling council areas Action required 1. The Commission is invited to consider alternative designs of constituencies for Clackmannanshire, Falkirk and Stirling council areas in furtherance of its 2018 Review of UK Parliament constituencies. Background 2. On 24 February 2016, the Commission began its 2018 Review of UK Parliament constituencies with a view to making its recommendations by October 2018 in tandem with the other UK parliamentary boundary commissions. 3. The review is being undertaken in compliance with the Parliamentary Constituencies Act 1986, as amended. The Act stipulates a UK electoral quota of 74,769.2 electors and use of the parliamentary electorate figures from the December 2015 Electoral Register. The 5% electorate limits in the Act correspond to an electorate of no less than 71,031 and no more than 78,507. 4. The Act requires the Commission to recommend the name, extent and designation of constituencies in Scotland, of which there are to be 53 in total. 2 Scottish constituencies are prescribed in the Act: Orkney and Shetland Islands constituency and Western isles constituency. 5. The Act provides some discretion in the extent of the Commission’s regard to the size, shape and accessibility of constituencies, existing constituencies and the breaking of local ties. As this review is considered to be the first following enactment of the legislation (the 6th Review was ended before completion in 2013 following enactment of the Electoral Registration and Administration Act 2013) the Commission need not have regard to the inconveniences attendant on changes to constituencies.
    [Show full text]