16S Rdna Profiling to Reveal the Influence of Seed-Applied
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
molecules Article 16S rDNA Profiling to Reveal the Influence of Seed-Applied Biostimulants on the Rhizosphere of Young Maize Plants Giovanna Visioli 1,* ID , Anna Maria Sanangelantoni 1, Teofilo Vamerali 2 ID , Cristian Dal Cortivo 2 ID and Massimo Blandino 3 ID 1 Department of Chemistry, Life Sciences and Environmental Sustainability, University of Parma, Parco Area delle Scienze 11/A, 43124 Parma, Italy; [email protected] 2 Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and the Environment, University of Padua, Viale dell’ Università 16, 35020 Legnaro-Padua, Italy; teofi[email protected] (T.V.); [email protected] (C.D.C.) 3 Department of Agriculture, Forest and Food Sciences, University of Turin, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095 Grugliasco (TO), Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-0521-905692 Received: 4 May 2018; Accepted: 15 June 2018; Published: 15 June 2018 Abstract: In an open field trial on two agricultural soils in NW Italy, the impact of two seed-applied biostimulants on the rhizosphere bacterial community of young maize plants was evaluated. The 16S rDNA profiling was carried out on control and treated plant rhizosphere samples collected at the 4-leaf stage and on bulk soil. In both soils, the rhizospheres were significantly enriched in Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Bacteriodetes, while the abundances of Acidobacteria, Cloroflexi and Gemmatimonadetes decreased compared with bulk soil. Among the culturable bacteria genera that showed an increase by both biostimulants, most are known to be beneficial for nutrient uptake, such as Opitutus, Chryseolinea, Terrimonas, Rhodovastum, Cohnella, Pseudoduganella and the species Anaeromyxobacter dehalogenans; others are known to be involved in root growth, such as Niastella, Labrys, Chloroflexia and Thermomonas; or in plant defence, such as Ohtaekwangia, Quadrisphaera, Turneriella, and Actinoallomurus. Both biostimulants were also found to stimulate gen. Nannocystis, a potential biocompetitive agent against aflatoxigenic Aspergillus moulds. Under controlled conditions, both biostimulants enhanced the shoot and root biomass at the 4–5 leaf stage. We conclude that the biostimulants do not decrease the biodiversity of the microbial community rhizosphere of young maize plants, but stimulate rare bacterial taxa, some involved in plant growth and pathogen resistance, a result that may have implications in improving crop management. Keywords: biostimulants; Zea mays; rhizosphere; soil bacterial biodiversity; sustainable agriculture; 16S rDNA sequencing 1. Introduction Plant biostimulants have been defined as “material containing substance(s) and/or microorganisms whose function is to stimulate natural processes, to enhance/benefit nutrient uptake, nutrient efficiency, to increase tolerance to abiotic stresses and crop quality when applied to plants or to the rhizosphere” [1]. Many biostimulants contain simple and complex carbohydrates that, when applied to plants, improve the efficiency of plant metabolism by directly acting as a source of energy for rhizosphere microbial populations or by acting as signal molecules to activate defence reactions [2]. Biostimulants improve macro-nutrient uptake (for example, through stimulation of nitrogen metabolism), increase plant tolerance to abiotic stresses [3,4], and ameliorate crop yield and Molecules 2018, 23, 1461; doi:10.3390/molecules23061461 www.mdpi.com/journal/molecules Molecules 2018, 23, 1461 2 of 18 quality, especially under unfavourable environmental conditions [5,6]. Despite the many beneficial effects on plants, the effective use of biostimulants requires a better understanding of their function and their possible influence on endogenous rhizosphere microbial communities (plant rhizobiome) in order to improve safety, sustainability, product quality, and optimize industrial production processes [7]. The plant rhizobiome is one of the most complex, diverse, and important microbial consortiums in the biosphere and plays a significant role in plant-soil ecosystem functions by contributing to plant nutrition, hormonal control of plant growth, and disease suppression. The rhizobiome contains diverse types of plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR), which have beneficial effects on crop productivity [8–10]. Biostimulants based on the mixtures of plant growth promoting bacteria and arbuscular mycorrhizae fungi might represent an interesting tool for increasing crop tolerance to alkalinity and salinity and for helping plants withstand soil pathogen stress. However, the efficacy of bacteria and fungi applied directly to the soil, sprayed on foliar surfaces, or coated on plant seed in open field cultivations could be reduced by competition with the resident soil microbial community [11,12]. Biostimulant formulations without microorganisms have the potential to enhance the endogenous rhizosphere microbial community, selecting beneficial bacteria as PGPR, with positive effects on plant growth. To date, the only study that has investigated the effects of amended soils with biostimulants, based on protein hydrolysates, on the alteration of soil microbial community structure is by Tejada et al. [13]. The authors showed a greater soil microbial activity with faster plant establishment on degraded soils due to biostimulant application. Compared to the other application methods, seed dressing is the basic and the cheapest way to apply specific molecules to the crop at planting. In this way, the amount of product applied to the seed is modest and the effectiveness of this strategy must be carefully evaluated. Culture-dependent techniques and low-resolution culture-independent molecular methods have been extensively used to profile microbial communities in soil rhizosphere. In the last years, the introduction of high-throughput Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) technologies has greatly improved studies of bacterial diversity and the first applications to maize rhizospheres have been reported very recently [14–19]. NGS is now considered an essential tool for studying the effects of external inputs on the microbial community colonising the rhizosphere of maize plants and can also be applied for revealing the possible effects of biostimulants on the population of beneficial microorganisms in the rhizosphere. In this study, 16S rDNA profiling was used to map the composition of the bacterial communities of the maize rhizosphere in the first stages of growth. Maize plants were grown from seeds treated with two biostimulants and from untreated seeds in two sites in north-western Italy with different soil types. A preliminary pot trial in a greenhouse was performed to test the effects of both biostimulants on plant growth. The biostimulants were obtained from fermentation of plant materials of differing compositions without the addition of microorganisms. The aim of this work was to verify whether the application of two biostimulants (referred to as Bio1 and Bio2) through seed dressing could impact on the relative abundances of bacterial phyla, families and genera and influence the soil bacterial community, with possible beneficial effects on root and shoot growth. Although there has been some work done to study the effects of soil amendments to rhizosphere bacterial populations [20,21], to the best of our knowledge, no studies have yet been published on mapping by 16S rDNA profiling the possible modifications of the rhizosphere microbial community as a result of applying biostimulants to maize seeds. 2. Results 2.1. Effects of Biostimulants on Plant Growth Under controlled conditions (pots in a greenhouse), both biostimulants did not affect the SPAD (Soil Plant Analysis Development) index, as representative of the leaf chlorophyll content, at the 4–5 leaf stage, while enhanced plant growth. Bio1 significantly increased both shoot (+33%) and root Molecules 2018, 23, 1461 3 of 18 (+34%) biomass (p ≤ 0.05) as compared to controls, and Bio2 significantly improved shoot weight (+31%)Molecules (Figure2018, 23,1 x). FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 19 Figure 1.1. The leaf SPADSPAD values,values, shootshoot andand rootroot drydry biomassbiomass (mean(mean ±± S.E., n == 3) ofof pot-cultivatedpot-cultivated maize (4–5(4–5 leafleaf stage, stage, 35 35 days days after after sowing) sowing) treated treate withd with two two seed-coating seed-coating biostimulants biostimulants (Bio1 (Bio1 and Bio2) and inBio2) comparison in comparison with untreatedwith untreated controls. controls. Different Different letters letters (a,b) indicate (a,b) indicate significant no significant differences differences between samplesbetween accordingsamples according to the Student to the Newman-Keuls Student Newman-Keuls method (SNK) method(p ≤(SNK)0.05). (p ≤ 0.05). 2.2. Total BacterialBacterial Community:Community: StructureStructure andand DiversityDiversity A total of 2,066,7872,066,787 raw 16S16S rDNArDNA readsreads werewere obtainedobtained fromfrom 3232 soilsoil analysesanalyses (four(four biologicalbiological replicates, each ofof BS,BS, RhC,RhC, RhBio1,RhBio1, andand RhBio2RhBio2 fromfrom thethe ChivassoChivasso andand CarignanoCarignano fields).fields). AfterAfter filteringfiltering andand removing removing the the chimaeras, chimaeras, a total a total of 1,539,514 of 1,539,514 sequences sequences were retained were retained with mean with numbers mean ofnumbers total sequences of total sequences per sample per (average sample read (average of four read replicates) of four replicates) ranging from ranging 47,593 from to 60,212 47,593 (Table