DOCSLIB.ORG

1993 House Introduced Bill 0363

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1993 House Introduced Bill 0363 Act No. 19 Public Acts of 1993 Approved by the Governor April 14, 1993 Filed with the Secretary of State April 17, 1993 STATE OF MICHIGAN 87TH LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION OF 1993 Introduced by Senators Gast and DeGrow ENROLLED SENATE BILL No. 363 AN ACT to make appropriations for various state departments and agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1993, and for a capital outlay program for the fiscal years ending September 30, 1994, and September 30, 1995; to set forth the provisions for implementation of the capital outlay program within the budgetary process; to make appropriations for planning and construction at state agencies, community colleges, and universities; to make appropriations for state building authority rent and insurance; to make a grant for state building authority rent; to provide for the acquisition of land and buildings; to provide for the elimination of fire hazards; to provide for special maintenance, remodeling and addition, alteration, renovation, demolition, and other projects; to provide for elimination of occupational safety and health hazards; to provide for the award and implementation of contracts; to provide for the purchase of furnishings and equipment relative to occupancy of a project; to provide for certain advances from the general fund; to prescribe powers and duties of certain state officers and agencies; to require certain reports, plans, and agreements; to provide for the conveyance of certain state owned lands; to provide for leases; to provide for transfers; to prescribe standards and conditions relating to the appropriations; to prescribe the powers and duties of certain state agencies; and to provide for the expenditure of the appropriations. The People of the State of Michigan enact: Sec. 101. There is appropriated for the various state departments and agencies to supplement former appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30,1993, from the following funds: BILL SUMMARY APPROPRIATION SUMMARY: Full-time equated classified positions. .94.0 GROSS APPROPRIATION................. $ 335,993,897 Interdepartmental grant revenues: Less: Total interdepartmental grants and intradepartmentai transfers 7,071,200 ADJUSTED GROSS APPROPRIATION............................................. $ 328,922,697 Federal revenues: Total federal revenues. 209,560,000 Special revenue funds: Total local and private revenues....... 232,499,800 Total other state restricted revenues 7,154,500 State general fund/general purpose... $ (120,291,603) (14) For Fiscal Year Ending Sept. 30, 1993 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE APPROPRIATION SUMMARY: GROSS APPROPRIATION.............................................................................................................. $ 331,800 Interdepartmental grant revenues: Total interdepartmental grants and intradepartmental transfers................................................... 0 ADJUSTED GROSS APPROPRIATION........................................................ ................................ $ 331,800 Federal revenues: Total federal revenues.................................................... ................................................................... 0 Special revenue funds: Total local revenues............................................................................................................................ 0 Total private revenues....................................................................................................................... 0 Total local and private revenues......................................................................................................... 0 Total other state restricted revenues................................................................................................ 331,800 State general fund/general purpose................................................................................................... $ 0 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Financial services........................................................................ ...................................................... $ ________ 50.000 GROSS APPROPRIATION.............................................................................................................. $ 50,000 Appropriated from: Special revenue funds: Upper Peninsula state fair revenue................................................................................................... 50,000 State general fund/general purpose................................................................................................... $ 0 PESTICIDE AND PLANT PEST MANAGEMENT Agricultural products quality assurance............................................................................................ $ 73,800 Plant pest control............................................................................................................................... ............. 208.000 GROSS APPROPRIATION.............................................................................................................. $ 281,800 Appropriated from: Federal revenues: Special revenue funds: Licensing and inspection fees............................................................................................................. 281,800 State general fund/general purpose................................................................................................... $ 0 CAPITAL OUTLAY APPROPRIATION SUMMARY: GROSS APPROPRIATION.............................................................................................................. $ (1,377,903) Total interdepartmental grants and intradepartmental transfers.................................................... 0 ADJUSTED GROSS APPROPRIATION........................................................................................ $ (1,377,903) Total federal revenues........................................................................................................................ 0 Total local funds................................................................................................................................. 0 Total private....................................................................................................................................... 0 Total state restricted.......................................................................................................................... 0 State general fund/general purpose................................................................................................... $ (1,377,903) LEGISLATURE Senate acquisition of another structure adjacent to the Stoddard building (Famum building) ...... $ (1,377,903) GROSS APPROPRIATION.............................................................................................................. $ (1,377,903) Appropriated from: State general fund/general purpose................................................................................................... $ (1,377,903) DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE APPROPRIATION SUMMARY: GROSS APPROPRIATION.............................................................................................................. $ 442,000 Interdepartmental grant revenues: Total interdepartmental grants and intradepartmental transfers................................................... 0 ADJUSTED GROSS APPROPRIATION........................................................................................ $ 442,000 2 For Fiscal Year Ending Sept. 30, 1993 Federal revenues: Total federal revenues....................................................................................................................... $ 42,000 Special revenue funds: Total local revenues........................................................................................................................... 0 Total private revenues...................................................................................................................... 0 Total local and private revenues........................................................................................................ 0 Total other state restricted revenues................................................................................................ 400,000 State general fund/general purpose.................................................................................................. $ 0 PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Utility regulation and technical support........................................................................................... $ ________ 42,000 GROSS APPROPRIATION............................................................................................................. $ 42,000 Appropriated from: Federal revenues: DOT-RSPA, Gas pipeline safety........................................................................................................ 42,000 Special revenue funds: State general fund/general purpose.................................................................................................. $ 0 OCCUPATIONAL AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION Commercial services.......................................................................................................................... $ _______ 400.000 GROSS APPROPRIATION............................................................................................................. $ 400,000 Appropriated from: Special revenue funds: Construction lien fund....................................................................................................................... 400,000 State
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Senate Enrolled Bill
    Act No. 480 Public Acts of 1996 Approved by the Governor December 23, 1996 Filed with the Secretary of State December 26, 1996 STATE OF MICHIGAN 88TH LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION OF 1996 Introduced by Senator Gast ENROLLED SENATE BILL No. 328 AN ACT to make appropriations for the judicial branch for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1997; to make appropriations to various state departments for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1997; to make appropriations for a capital outlay program for fiscal years ending September 30, 1997; to implement the appropriations within the budgetary process; to make appropriations for planning and construction at state agencies, universities, and community colleges; to make appropriations for state building authority rent and insurance; to make a grant for state building authority rent; to provide for the acquisition of land and buildings; to provide for the elimination of fire hazards; to provide for special maintenance, remodeling and addition, alteration, renovation, demolition, and other projects; to provide for elimination of occupational safety and health hazards; to provide for the award and implementation of contracts; to provide for the purchase of furnishings and equipment relative to occupancy of a project; to provide for certain advances from the general fund; to require certain reports, plans, and agreements; to provide for leases; to provide for transfers; to prescribe standards and conditions relating to the appropriations; to provide for the acquisition of land and the development of public recreation facilities; to provide for the powers and duties of certain state agencies, employees, and officials; and to provide for the expenditure of the appropriations.
    [Show full text]
  • Master Plan Report
    MASTER PLAN REPORT REPORT PREPARED BY: www.meadhunt.com The preparation of this document was financed in part through an Airport Improvement Program grant from the Federal Aviation Administration (Project Number 3-19-0000-15-2009) as provided under Section 505 of the Airport and Airway Improvement Act of 1982, as amended. The contents do not necessarily reflect official views or the policy of the DOT or the FAA. Acceptance of this report by the FAA does not in any way constitute a commitment on the part of the United States to participate in any development depicted therein not does it indicate the proposed development is environmentally acceptable in accordance with appropriate public laws. REPORT PREPARED BY: 2605 Port Lansing Road Lansing, MI 48906 Phone: (517) 321-8334 www.meadhunt.com Table of Contents Page Chapter 1 – Inventory of Existing Facilities ...................................................................... 1-1 1.1 General Airport Description and Location ........................................................... 1-2 1.2 Airport History ......................................................................................................... 1-2 1.3 Existing Airport Environment ................................................................................ 1-5 1.3.1 Topography ..................................................................................................... 1-5 1.3.2 Soil ................................................................................................................... 1-5 1.3.3
    [Show full text]
  • KOD FLYGPLATS AAC Al Arish, Egypt
    KOD FLYGPLATS AAC Al Arish, Egypt – Al Arish Airport AAM Mala Mala Airport AAN Al Ain, United Arab Emirates – Al Ain Airport AAQ Anapa Airport – Russia AAT Altay, China – Altay Airport AAX Araxa, Brazil – Araxa Airport ABC Albacete, Spain – Albacete Airport ABE Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton International, PA, USA ABK Kabri Dar, Ethiopia – Kabri Dar Airport ABL Ambler, AK, USA ABM Bamaga, Queensland, Australia ABQ Albuquerque, NM, USA – Albuquerque International A ABR Aberdeen, SD, USA – Aberdeen Regional Airport ABS Abu Simbel, Egypt – Abu Simbel ABT Al-Baha, Saudi Arabia – Al Baha-Al Aqiq Airport ABV Abuja, Nigeria – Abuja International Airport ABX Albury, New South Wales, Australia – Albury ABY Albany, GA, USA – Dougherty County ABZ Aberdeen, Scotland, United Kingdom – Dyce ACA Acapulco, Guerrero, Mexico – Alvarez International ACC Accra, Ghana – Kotoka ACE Lanzarote, Canary Islands, Spain – Lanzarote ACH Altenrhein, Switzerland – Altenrhein Airport ACI Alderney, Channel Islands, United Kingdom – The Bl ACK Nantucket, MA, USA ACT Waco, TX, USA – Madison Cooper ACV Arcata, CA, USA – Arcata/Eureka Airport ACY Atlantic City /Atlantic Cty, NJ, USA – Atlantic Ci ADA Adana, Turkey – Adana ADB Izmir, Turkey – Adnan Menderes ADD Addis Ababa, Ethiopia – Bole ADE Aden, Yemen – Aden International Airport ADJ Amman, Jordan – Civil ADK Adak Island, Alaska, USA, Adak Island Airport ADL Adelaide, South Australia, Australia – Adelaide ADQ Kodiak, AK, USA ADZ San Andres Island, Colombia AED Aleneva, Alaska, USA – Aleneva Airport AEP Buenos Aires, Buenos
    [Show full text]
  • EXPLORATORY RESEARCH of the K.I. SAWYER COMMUNITY REGARDING THEIR PERCEPTIONS of POLICE SERVICE Gabriel Lee Green Northern Michigan University
    Northern Michigan University NMU Commons All NMU Master's Theses Student Works 2012 EXPLORATORY RESEARCH OF THE K.I. SAWYER COMMUNITY REGARDING THEIR PERCEPTIONS OF POLICE SERVICE Gabriel Lee Green Northern Michigan University Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.nmu.edu/theses Recommended Citation Green, Gabriel Lee, "EXPLORATORY RESEARCH OF THE K.I. SAWYER COMMUNITY REGARDING THEIR PERCEPTIONS OF POLICE SERVICE" (2012). All NMU Master's Theses. 399. https://commons.nmu.edu/theses/399 This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at NMU Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in All NMU Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of NMU Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected]. EXPLORATORY RESEARCH OF THE K.I. SAWYER COMMUNITY REGARDING THEIR PERCEPTIONS OF POLICE SERVICE By Gabriel Lee Green THESIS PROSPECTUS Submitted to Northern Michigan University In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Graduate Studies Office 2012 SIGNATURE APPROVAL FORM 7KLVWKHVLVSURSRVDOE\*DEULHO*UHHQLVUHFRPPHQGHGIRUDSSURYDOE\WKHVWXGHQW¶V7KHVLV Committee and Department Head in the Department of Criminal Justice and by the Dean of Graduate Studies. ______________________________________________________________________________ Committee Chair: Dr. Kevin Waters Date ______________________________________________________________________________ First Reader: Dr. Greg Warchol Date ______________________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Balchen/Post Award
    HISTORY OF THE BALCHEN/POST AWARD From 1976 through 1985, the airport categories were: Large Hub, Medium Hub, Small Hub, Non Hub, General Aviation Airport, and Air Force Base. In 1986, the categories were: Large Commercial(Over 75,000 schedule operations); Medium Commercial ( 10,000 to 75,000 scheduled operations); Small Commercial (up to 10,000 schedule operations); Large General Aviation (over 50,000 operations/year); Small General Aviation (less than 50,000 operations/year); and U.S. Air Force Base 1976 Salt Lake City Int'l Airport Utah 1977 Greater Buffalo Int'l Airport New York Michiana Regional Airport Inciana Chemung County Airport New York 1978 O'Hare Int'l Airport Illinois Erie Int'l Airport Pennsylvania Thompkins County Airport New York Spirit of St. Louis Airport Missouri 1979 Greater Pittsburgh Int'l Airport Pennsylvania Greater Buffalo Int'l Airport New York Billings Logan Int'l Airport Montana Auburn-Lewiston Airport Maine Teterboro Airport New Jersey 1980 Stapleton Int'l Airport Colorado Greater Cincinnati Airport Kentucky Patrick Henry Int'l Airport Virginia Rhinelander-Oneida County Airport Wisconsin Niagara Falls Int'l Airport New York Fairchild AFB 1981 Detroit Metro Wayne County Airport Michigan Syracuse Hancock Int'l Airport New York Michiana Regional Airport Indiana Muskegan County Airport Michigan Watertown Int'l Airport New York Fairchild AFB 1982 Minneapolis St. Paul Int'l Airport Minnesota Indianapolis Int'l Airport Indiana Bangor Int'l Airport Maine Natrona County Int'l Airport Wyoming Niagara Falls Int'l Airport
    [Show full text]
  • Directory ~ Aviation Security Program
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. fAFI (j FOREWORD , Aviation security is an essential ingredient of aviation safety. Every reasonable effort must be made to protect the more than 200 million passengers who travel on the u.s. airlines annually. The.Federal, state and local governments and the aviation industry ~~,>, " (', share the responsibilities for maintaining ah effective civil Directory ~ aviation security program. Fortunately, the general public and, / the courts have fully supported this combined effort. Local law enforcement officers have contributed immeasurably to the Local' Law Enf'orcement success of the civil aviation security program. Today more than 5,000 officers with specialized training in airport activities, aircraft operations and aviation security are assigned to more than Organizations 400 American airports. Their professional competence and personal i concern have played a vital role in deterring criminal threats to air safety and protecting the lives and interests of the local / citizens. Much of the success of the anti-hijacking program is due Participating in to the dedication of the local law enforcement officers. In September 1974, in response to a need for the law enforcement Aviation Security organizations participating in aviation security to know and to be able to contact their counter~lrts at air carrier airports through­ out the country, this office p~blished the first issue of the "Directory - Local Law Enforcement Organizations Participating in Aviation Security." This is the fourth revised edition of the Directory. It is hoped that this Directory will continue to be helpful to those '. law enforcement personnel involved in aviat.ion security.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Prepared by Sawyer International Airport and Telkite
    Prepared by Sawyer International Airport 2015 and Telkite Enterprises LLC Table of Contents Historical Overview (3, 4) Aviation Assets (5, 6) Industrial Park Assets (7, 8) Airport Accomplishments (9, 10, 11, 12) Industrial Park Accomplishments (13, 14) Marketing Plan—Executive Summary (15, 16, 17) Mission Statement (18) 2015 Goal (18) Air Service Competition (19) Air Service Trends (20) Industrial Park Competition (21) Industrial Park Trends (22) Sub Goals (23) Action Steps (24, 25) 2015 Marketing Budget (26) 2 Sawyer International Airport is a former Strategic Air Command Base of the US Air Force. Over 5,000 people were stationed at the base until 1995 when the facility was closed as part of the Base Realignment and Closure Act. At that time, over 2 million square feet of offices, homes, dormitories, a hospital, a water/sewer plant, warehouses and hangars were vacated by the military. As a result, government employment data shows that military employment in the county dropped from its peak of 3,600 in 1993 to 167 (all non-base personnel) by 1996. Another 800 federal civilian jobs were lost as well. Marquette County’s population followed, dropping by 7.4 percent in 1995 and K.I. Sawyer Air Force Base Guard another 3.8 percent in 1996. Total income in the county fell 3.5 percent in Station in 1950 1995. The Marquette County Board of Commissioners agreed become the local redevelopment authority for the project in an effort to rebuild the economy devastated by the loss of the base, which was estimated to be $100 million annually.
    [Show full text]
  • County Airport
    Airport Informational Summary: MOT Marquette County Airport Passengers Carried Service Supplied Marquette County Airport, with 80,530 total As of December 31, 1988, Marquette was passengers, experienced a 26.9 percent served by three carriers operated by one increase in 1988 over the previous year. airline. No change in carriers took place Historically, Marquette experienced a decline between survey dates. Marquette County in total passengers in 1986 and 1987. The Airport had nonstop service from three cities; 1988 total passenger level is the highest since down from seven the previous year. The 1979. Monthly figures exceeded 1987 levels elimination of service from Escanaba, Iron from March through December. Five year Mountain, Lansing and Traverse City monthly highs were recorded from May accounted for the decreased number of through September and in November. origins. There were 77 weekly arrivals, down Marquette ranked ninth in the state in total five from 1987. Twenty-one weekly arrivals passengers with 0.4 percent of the statewide (27.3 percent) were from a hub airport. Of total. Marquette is the busiest airport in the the 3,042 weekly arriving seats, 1,242 ( 40.8 upper peninsula, accounting for 52.3 percent percent) were by pressurized propeller and of all total passengers in this group. 1,800 (59.2 percent) were by nonpressurized propeller aircraft. ANNUAL PASSENGERS WEEKLY ARRIVALS Passengers Percent As of December 31 Year Enplaned Deplaned Total Change Carriers Weekly Arrivals 1984 35,898 36,258 72,156 9.7% Year Serving Origins Jet Press Non Total 1985 38,171 37,039 75,210 4.2% 1986 3 7 0 41 34 75 1986 35,085 34,847 69,932 -7.0% 1987 3 7 0 48 34 82 1987 32,196 31,282 63,478 -9.2% 1988 3 3 0 27 50 77 1988 40,978 39,552 80,530 26.9% WEEKLY ARRIVING SEATS L.
    [Show full text]
  • Advisory Circular
    U.S. Department Advisory of Transportation Federal Aviatlon Admlnlstration Circular Subject: FAA CERTIFICATED MAINTENANCE Date: 3 /6/g 7 AC No: 140-71 AGENCIES DIRECTORY Initiated by: AN-640 Change: 1. PURPOSE. This advisory circular (AC) transmits a consolidated directory of all certificated Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) repair stations and manufacturer’s maintenancefacilities. The repair stations and manufacturer’s maintenancefacilities were certificated as of January 2 1, 1997, under the authority of Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 145, and the directories are current as of January 21, 1997. 2. CANCELLATION. This AC cancelsAC 140-7H, FAA Certificated Maintenance Agencies Directory, dated July 24, 1995. 3. DESCRIPTION. Appendix 1 is a listing of repair stations and appendix 2 is a listing of manufacturer’s maintenancefacilities, their addresses,ratings, and codes. 4. RATING LEGENDS, CODES, AND EXPLANATIONS. a. FAA certificated repair station rating codesare describedin detail in part -l45, and are: (1) AF-Airframe l-composite construction, small aircraft 2-composite construction, large aircraft 3-all metal construction, small aircraft 4-all metal construction, large aircraft (2) PP-Powerplant l--reciprocating engines,400 hp or less 2-reciprocating engines,more than 400 hp 3-turbine engines (3) PRP-Propeller l--fixed pitch and ground adjustablepropellers - wood, metal, or composite 2-all other propellers, by make (4) RAD-Radio l-communication equipment 2-navigation equipment 3-radar equipment AC 140-71 316197 (5) INS-Instrument l-mechanical 2--electrical 3-gyroscopic 44-electronic (6) AAC-Accessory l-mechanical 2--electrical 3-electronic (7) L--Limited AAC --accessories AF --airframe EE -emergency equipment FAB -aircraft fabric FL0 -floats INS -instruments LG -landing gear NDT -nondestructive testing OT --other PP -powerplant PRP -propellers RAD -radio equipment RB --rotor blades SS ---specialized (8) Ratings may be limited to a specific model of aircraft, powerplant, propeller, radio, instrument, accessory,or parts thereof.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Impact of Aviation on Michigan Volume I - Methodology and Findings
    i j I , HE ! - 9797.5 I ; .M5 V35 i ! 1989 VALUE OF AIRPORTS TO THEIR COMMUNITIES - I 1 ECONOMIC IMPACT OF AVIATION ON MICHIGAN VOLUME I - METHODOLOGY AND FINDINGS prepared for i : MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION [ - ~ WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES i :! l . .-f r I _.: AUGUST, 1989 j : --~- ----------- --------- i-' MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ' Bureau of Transportation Planning C: Value of Airports To Their Communities­ Economic Benefits of Aviation Study August, 1989 r:, VOLUME 1 • METHODOLOGY AND FINDINGS This report represents the findings and/or professional opinions of the staffs of the Michi~an Department of Transportation and their study consultants, Wilbur : :' Smith Associates and F. Coleman and Associates. It is not an official opinion '_.) of the Michigan State Transportation Commission. STATE TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION William C. Marshall, Chairperson Rodger D. Young Shirley E. Zeller Hannes Meyers, Jr. Nansi I. Rowe Stephen F. Adamini James P. Pitz Director : l ! The preparation of this document was fmanced in part through a planning grant from the Federal Aviation Administration under Section 505 of the Airport Improvement Act of 1982. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the FAA. Acceptance of this report by the FAA does not in any way constitute a commitment on the part of the United States to participate in any development depicted therein nor does it indicate that the proposed development is environmentally acceptable in accordance with appropriate public laws. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This document was prepared by the Aviation Planning Unit of MDOT's Bureau of Transportation Planning, through study consultant Wilbur Smith Associates, in association with Fred Coleman and Associates.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Environmental Quality 3,000+ Contaminated Sites Without Funding January 31, 2018
    Department of Environmental Quality 3,000+ Contaminated Sites Without Funding January 31, 2018 Index Site ID# Site Name County 1 03000241 Lincoln (1600) Road, LLC - 00 Entire Site Allegan 2 03000163 Pullman Road at 109th Avenue - 00 Entire Site Allegan 3 03000032 Village of Douglas Contamination - 00 Entire Site Allegan 4 04000162 Alpena Hide and Leather Company - 00 Entire Site Alpena 5 04000003 Alpena LF City of - 00 Entire Site Alpena 6 04000142 Former Werth Dry Cleaners Property - 00 Entire Site Alpena 7 04000095 National Gypsum - 00 Entire Site Alpena 8 04000127 Wessel Road Quarry - 00 Entire Site Alpena 9 05000097 Portside Cleaners - 00 Entire Site Antrim 10 05000012 Tar Lake - 00 Entire Site Antrim 11 08000007 Kavco LF - 00 Entire Site Barry 12 09000350 Euclid Ave. 300 S., Bay City - 00 Entire Site Bay 13 09000384 Former Salzburg Cleaners - 00 Entire Site Bay 14 09000014 GMPT Bay City - 00 Entire Site Bay 15 09000274 Stalker Corporation - 00 Entire Site Bay 16 11000417 177 Frederick - 00 Entire Site Berrien 17 11000329 1804 - 1832 South M-139 - 00 Entire Site Berrien 18 11000002 Amerson Bowman Oil Co - 00 Entire Site Berrien 19 11000005 Bendix Corp./Allied Automotive Berrien 20 11000419 D & W Recycling - 00 Entire Site Berrien 21 11000056 Enderprize Development - 00 Entire Site Berrien 22 11000075 Harbor Plating - 00 Entire Site Berrien 23 11000179 Lakeshore Custom Cleaners - 00 Entire Site Berrien 24 11000412 M-63 (3589) Benton Harbor - 00 Entire Site Berrien 25 11000413 Main (385) Street, West, Benton Harbor - 00 Entire Site Berrien 26 11000022 Michigan Tube Div - 00 Entire Site Berrien 27 11000403 North Industrial Island - 00 Entire Site Berrien 28 11000344 North of Main Industrial Area - 00 Entire Site Berrien 29 11000420 Pri Mar Petroleum, Broad St.
    [Show full text]
  • MPART Citizen's Advisory Workgroup (CAWG) Presentation July 13 2021
    MPART Citizens Advisory Workgroup July 13, 2021 MPART Housekeeping • Please keep your mic/phone muted unless speaking • Only use the “raise hand” and/or “chat” function for questions or to request to speak • Cameras are optional • This meeting is being recorded 2 MPART Agenda • Welcome and housekeeping – 5 min • MPART Updates – 20 min • Sub-Committee Updates – 25 min – Public Notification CAWG Consensus • MPART Agency Updates – 10 min • Brainstorm Ideas for 1 Minute Videos – 15 min • Community Feedback– 15 min • August Meeting – Summer Break 3 MPART • Sounding board for process improvements • Provide solutions to identified concerns • Statewide focus for PFAS issues not site specific • Open communication that seeks to understand a variety of perspectives 4 MPART MPART MPART Update • Renae Mata – Resigned from the CAWG • Welcome 2 New Members – Rick Burns – Margaret “Mickey” Brumm • Status of Part 201 Promulgation of Groundwater Clean-up Criteria – Public comments ends August 9, 2021 6 MPART New Sites • Belding Wastewater Treatment Plant • Kavco Landfill - Plainwell • Former El DuPoint Flint • MBS International Airport Area of Interest • Many sites working through the process 7 MPART Residential Well Sampling Near Airports Airport Number of Residential Above Criteria Well Samples (at the time) Cherry Capital 18 9 Pellston 203 54 Cascade Twp/GR Ford 392 39 Kalamazoo / Battle Creek Int’l 21 1 Kincheloe Air Force Base / 31 5 Chippewa County International Airport Muskegon County Airport Area 170 9 Oscoda-Wurtsmith Airport 411 2 8 MPART Precautionary
    [Show full text]