DOCSLIB.ORG

Intermediate Microeconomics W3211 Lecture 7

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Intermediate Microeconomics W3211 Lecture 7 3/1/2016 1 Intermediate Microeconomics W3211 Lecture 7: Introduction The Endowment Economy Columbia University, Spring 2016 Mark Dean: [email protected] 2 3 4 The Story So Far…. Today’s Aims • Remember: the course had two basic aims: We are now going to take our first stab in thinking about what happens when economic agents interact 1. Introduce you to models of how people make choices Constrained optimization In particular, we are going to think about how prices and 2. Introduce you to models of what happens when people interact income are determined in an economy Equilibrium So far we have treated these as exogenous parameters But they have to come from somewhere! We will assume that they come about through the interaction of economic agents buying and selling • We have now done a fairly thorough job of modelling the behavior of one type of economic agent – the consumer They move in order to balance supply and demand This is the study of equilibrium Set up the consumer’s problem Solved the consumer’s problem We will start with the simplest possible setting Derived demand functions Two consumers Thought about how demand changes with income and prices Two goods No firms This is the study of an endowment economy Varian Ch. 9, 15, 16 Feldman and Serrano Ch 15 6 An Endowment Economy We are going to think about the simplest possible example of an economy There are two people: 1 and 2 There are two goods: apples and bananas A Simple Endowment Each person starts off with an endowment of apples and bananas Economy , : amount of apples and bananas that person 1 has 1: Revisiting the consumer’s problem , : amount of apples and bananas that person 2 has People are allowed to buy and sell at market prices and Questions we want to answer: What should prices be in this economy? 5 Who ends up with what stuff? 1 3/1/2016 7 8 An Endowment Economy Updating the Consumer’s Problem Note: Apples and bananas only exist in the endowment of the Remember the ‘standard’ consumer problem consumers 1. CHOOSE a consumption bundle They are not produced 2. IN ORDER TO MAXIMIZE preferences There are no firms 3. SUBJECT TO the budget constraint This is a simplification, makes it easier to see what is going on The budget constraint (for consumer 1) was given by Don’t worry, firms will appear soon enough First order of business: think what the consumer’s problem looks Now, rather than getting mysterious income I, the income the consumer like in an endowment economy gets comes from their endowment Or, equivalently 0 is the net demand for good I Budget constraint says that the cost of net demand has to be less than zero 9 10 Updating the Consumer’s Problem Updating the Consumer’s Problem What happens to the budget constraint if the price of good a What happens to the budget constraint if the price of good a changes? changes? Good b implies wa, wb Could buy units of good b (increasing in ) Could buy units of good a (decreasing in ) Always feasible to consume ,) Increase in pa Budget constraint pivots round the endowment Good a 11 12 Updating the Consumer’s Problem Updating the Consumer’s Problem Another question: what happens when the prices of both Now proportionally increase prices of both a and b goods change in proportion? A quick example A quick example 2 2 3 3 4 2 2 1 Budget constraint is Budget constraint is 2∗232 2∗232 72 72 2 3/1/2016 13 14 Updating the Consumer’s Problem Updating the Consumer’s Problem The only thing that matters for the consumers problem is the We have now changed the parameters of the consumer’s ratio of the price of good a to that of good b problem This is obvious from the budget constraint Rather than the parameters being ,, they are now , , We can similarly think of the demand function in terms of these This means that we can normalize the price of good b to 1 parameters: i.e. assume that the price of good b is 1 , , ) is the demand of person 1 for good a, given prices Think only about changes in the price of good a and endowment , ) What we really mean by the price of good a is , , ) =, , ) - is the net demand of person 1 for good a This will make our life a lot easier But is quite a subtle point. Make sure you understand it! 15 16 A Worked Example A Worked Example A worked example: ,, Choose , to Maximize ,= Then take derivatives 0 Subject to 0 First set up the Lagrange Function ,, 0 Then take derivatives First two equations gives Last equation gives the 17 A Worked Example Substituting in gives which implies 1 , , 2 1 A Simple Endowment , , 2 Economy And so 2: The Edgeworth Box 1 , , 2 1 ,, 2 18 3 3/1/2016 19 20 The Edgeworth Box The Edgeworth Box For the consumer’s problem we found it handy to draw graphs First step: how can we represent all the stuff that there is in the which allowed us to see what is going on economy? It will be equally handy for us to do so for our simple 2 person, 2 With a box! good economy Width of the box is total amount of good a However, the graph we need to draw is a bit more complicated Height of the box is the total amount of good b The Edgeworth Box! 21 22 Fig 2: An Edgeworth Box The Edgeworth Box 1 2 w b+w b Second step, how do we represent a feasible allocation in the Edgeworth Box? A feasible allocation is an amount of each good for person 1 and 2 that uses up the total allocation ,,, such that += + Good b + = + Any point in the box is a feasible allocation 1 2 w a+w a Good a 23 24 A Feasible Allocation The Edgeworth Box 2 x a 1 2 w b+w b Third step, we can represent the consumer’s problem for person 1 2 x b 1 x a 1 2 w a+w a 1 x a 4 3/1/2016 25 26 Consumer 1 in the Edgeworth Box Fig 5: Consumer 1’s Optimal Bundle 1 2 1 2 w b+w b w b+w b Budget Line Good b Slope: -pa Good b Optimal 1 x b Consumption Bundle for Consumer 1’s Indifference Curves Allocation Consumer 1 Allocation 1 2 1 2 w a+w a w a+w a Good a 1 Good a x a 27 28 The Edgeworth Box Consumer 2’ Budget Set in the Edgeworth Box 1 2 w b+w b Fourth step (and this is the clever bit), we can represent the consumer’s problem for person 2 Consumer 2’s Budget Set Good b 1 2 w a+w a Good a 29 30 Consumer 2’s Preferences in the Consumer 2’s Optimal Bundle 2 Edgeworth Box x a 1 2 1 2 w b+w b w b+w b 2 x b Good b Good b Optimal Better Bundles Consumption Bundle for Consumer 2 1 2 1 2 w a+w a w a+w a Good a Good a 5 3/1/2016 32 Equilibrium We are now ready to calculate the equilibrium for our nice, simple, two person, two good exchange economy An important first step: we better define what we mean by an equilibrium A Simple Endowment Economy 3: Equilibrium 31 33 34 Equilibrium Equilibrium An equilibrium is a description of what we think will happen in So in our simple, two person two good economy, an equilibrium an economy consists of A price of good a: (remember we don’t need a price for good b) We can think of it as a prediction of where we might expect the The amount of stuff that person 1 gets: and economy to end up The amount of stuff that person 2 gets: and Consists of two types of thing Prices of the various goods Quantities of each good that each person receives. A handy tip: If I ask you, in an exam or homework, to calculate an equilibrium, you have to tell me what the prices and quantities are If you haven’t, you haven’t answered the question! 35 36 Equilibrium The Definition of an Equilibrium What properties do you think an equilibrium should have? We define an equilibrium in the following way: , , , and form an equilibrium if two things are true i.e., if I told you that , , , and were the equilibrium for the economy, what would you expect to be true? 1. Optimality: The amount that each person gets is what they want, given the prices and their endowments It may be useful to think of the equilibrium as the resting point of the economy , , ) , , ) , , ) , , ) 2. Market Clearing: Supply equals demand for each good + + + + 6 3/1/2016 37 38 Finding an Equilibrium A Worked Example So now we know what an equilibrium is Let’s work through an example How do we find one? First, we need to describe the economy Luckily we have another recipe! 1. The endowment of each agent 1. Calculate the demand for each consumer and each good =3 as a function of prices =2 i.e. calculate , , ), , , ), , , ), , , ) =1 =5 2. Find the price at which markets clear ∗ i.e. find the price such that 2.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Deflation: a Business Perspective
    Deflation: a business perspective Prepared by the Corporate Economists Advisory Group Introduction Early in 2003, ICC's Corporate Economists Advisory Group discussed the risk of deflation in some of the world's major economies, and possible consequences for business. The fear was that historically low levels of inflation and faltering economic growth could lead to deflation - a persistent decline in the general level of prices - which in turn could trigger economic depression, with widespread company and bank failures, a collapse in world trade, mass unemployment and years of shrinking economic activity. While the risk of deflation is now remote in most countries - given the increasingly unambiguous signs of global economic recovery - its potential costs are very high and would directly affect companies. This issues paper was developed to help companies better understand the phenomenon of deflation, and to give them practical guidance on possible measures to take if and when the threat of deflation turns into reality on a future occasion. What is deflation? Deflation is defined as a sustained fall in an aggregate measure of prices (such as the consumer price index). By this definition, changes in prices in one economic sector or falling prices over short periods (e.g., one or two quarters) do not qualify as deflation. Dec lining prices can be driven by an increase in supply due to technological innovation and rapid productivity gains. These supply-induced shocks are usually not problematic and can even be accompanied by robust growth, as experienced by China. A fall in prices led by a drop in demand - due to a severe economic cycle, tight economic policies or a demand-side shock - or by persistent excess capacity can be much more harmful, and is more likely to lead to persistent deflation.
    [Show full text]
  • Carbonomics Innovation, Deflation and Affordable De-Carbonization
    EQUITY RESEARCH | October 13, 2020 | 9:24PM BST Carbonomics Innovation, Deflation and Affordable De-carbonization Net zero is becoming more affordable as technological and financial innovation, supported by policy, are flattening the de-carbonization cost curve. We update our 2019 Carbonomics cost curve to reflect innovation across c.100 different technologies to de- carbonize power, mobility, buildings, agriculture and industry, and draw three key conclusions: 1) low-cost de-carbonization technologies (mostly renewable power) continue to improve consistently through scale, reducing the lower half of the cost curve by 20% on average vs. our 2019 cost curve; 2) clean hydrogen emerges as the breakthrough technology in the upper half of the cost curve, lowering the cost of de-carbonizing emissions in more difficult sectors (industry, heating, heavy transport) by 30% and increasing the proportion of abatable emissions from 75% to 85% of total emissions; and 3) financial innovation and a lower cost of capital for low-carbon activities have driven around one-third of renewables cost deflation since 2010, highlighting the importance of shareholder engagement in climate change, monetary stimulus and stable regulatory frameworks. The result of these developments is very encouraging, shaving US$1 tn pa from the cost of the path towards net zero and creating a broader connected ecosystem for de- carbonization that includes renewables, clean hydrogen (both blue and green), batteries and carbon capture. Michele Della Vigna, CFA Zoe Stavrinou Alberto Gandolfi +44 20 7552-9383 +44 20 7051-2816 +44 20 7552-2539 [email protected] [email protected] alberto.gandolfi@gs.com Goldman Sachs International Goldman Sachs International Goldman Sachs International Goldman Sachs does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports.
    [Show full text]
  • The Keynesian Model in the General Theory: a Tutorial
    The Keynesian Model in the General Theory: A Tutorial Raúl Rojas Freie Universität Berlin January 2012 This small overview of the General Theory is the kind of summary I would have liked to have read, before embarking in a comprehensive study of the General Theory at the time I was a student. As shown here, the main ideas are quite simple and easy to visualize. Unfortunately, numerous introductions to Keynesian theory are not actually based on Keynes opus magnum, but in obscure neo‐classical reinterpretations. This is completely pointless since Keynes’ book is so readable. Introduction John Maynard Keynes (1883‐1946) completed the General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money [1] in December of 1935, right in the middle of the Great Depression. At that point, millions of workers in the US and Europe had been unemployed for years, and economic orthodoxy could not account for this “anomalous” situation. Keynes’ General Theory tries to tackle exactly this problem. Keynes rejected classical theories based on the idea that production creates its own demand, that is, that the economy always recovers to full employment after a shock. Therefore, Keynes called his treatise the General Theory because he conceived classical doctrine as only a special case of a more complete approach: “The classical theorists resemble Euclidean geometers in a non‐Euclidean world who, discovering that in experience straight lines apparently parallel often meet, rebuke the lines for not keeping straight (...) Yet, in truth, there is no remedy except to throw over the axiom of parallels and to work out a non‐Euclidean geometry.
    [Show full text]
  • A Primer on Modern Monetary Theory
    2021 A Primer on Modern Monetary Theory Steven Globerman fraserinstitute.org Contents Executive Summary / i 1. Introducing Modern Monetary Theory / 1 2. Implementing MMT / 4 3. Has Canada Adopted MMT? / 10 4. Proposed Economic and Social Justifications for MMT / 17 5. MMT and Inflation / 23 Concluding Comments / 27 References / 29 About the author / 33 Acknowledgments / 33 Publishing information / 34 Supporting the Fraser Institute / 35 Purpose, funding, and independence / 35 About the Fraser Institute / 36 Editorial Advisory Board / 37 fraserinstitute.org fraserinstitute.org Executive Summary Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) is a policy model for funding govern- ment spending. While MMT is not new, it has recently received wide- spread attention, particularly as government spending has increased dramatically in response to the ongoing COVID-19 crisis and concerns grow about how to pay for this increased spending. The essential message of MMT is that there is no financial constraint on government spending as long as a country is a sovereign issuer of cur- rency and does not tie the value of its currency to another currency. Both Canada and the US are examples of countries that are sovereign issuers of currency. In principle, being a sovereign issuer of currency endows the government with the ability to borrow money from the country’s cen- tral bank. The central bank can effectively credit the government’s bank account at the central bank for an unlimited amount of money without either charging the government interest or, indeed, demanding repayment of the government bonds the central bank has acquired. In 2020, the cen- tral banks in both Canada and the US bought a disproportionately large share of government bonds compared to previous years, which has led some observers to argue that the governments of Canada and the United States are practicing MMT.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Inflation on Social Security Benefits
    RETIREMENT RESEARCH August 2021, Number 21-14 THE IMPACT OF INFLATION ON SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS By Alicia H. Munnell and Patrick Hubbard* Introduction This fall, the U.S. Social Security Administration is The third section explores how inflation affects the likely to announce that benefits will be increased by taxation of benefits. The final section concludes that, around 6 percent beginning January 1, 2022. This while the inflation adjustment in Social Security is ex- cost-of-living-adjustment (COLA), which would be tremely valuable, the rise in Medicare premiums and the largest in 40 years, is an important reminder that the extension of taxation under the personal income keeping pace with inflation is one of the attributes tax limits the ability of beneficiaries to fully maintain that makes Social Security benefits such a unique their purchasing power. source of retirement income. A spurt in inflation, however, affects two other factors that determine the net amount that retirees Social Security’s COLA receive from Social Security. The first is the Medicare premiums for Part B, which are deducted automati- Social Security benefits are subject each year to a 1 cally from Social Security benefits. To the extent that COLA. This adjustment, based on the change in the premiums rise faster than the COLA, the net benefit Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and will not keep pace with inflation. The second issue Clerical Workers (CPI-W) over the last year, protects pertains to taxation under the personal income tax. beneficiaries against the effects of inflation. Without Because taxes are levied on Social Security benefits such automatic adjustments, the government would only for households with income above certain have to make frequent changes to benefits to prevent 2 thresholds ($25,000 for single taxpayers and $32,000 retirees’ standard of living from eroding as they age.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Monetary Theory: a Marxist Critique
    Class, Race and Corporate Power Volume 7 Issue 1 Article 1 2019 Modern Monetary Theory: A Marxist Critique Michael Roberts [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/classracecorporatepower Part of the Economics Commons Recommended Citation Roberts, Michael (2019) "Modern Monetary Theory: A Marxist Critique," Class, Race and Corporate Power: Vol. 7 : Iss. 1 , Article 1. DOI: 10.25148/CRCP.7.1.008316 Available at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/classracecorporatepower/vol7/iss1/1 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts, Sciences & Education at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Class, Race and Corporate Power by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Modern Monetary Theory: A Marxist Critique Abstract Compiled from a series of blog posts which can be found at "The Next Recession." Modern monetary theory (MMT) has become flavor of the time among many leftist economic views in recent years. MMT has some traction in the left as it appears to offer theoretical support for policies of fiscal spending funded yb central bank money and running up budget deficits and public debt without earf of crises – and thus backing policies of government spending on infrastructure projects, job creation and industry in direct contrast to neoliberal mainstream policies of austerity and minimal government intervention. Here I will offer my view on the worth of MMT and its policy implications for the labor movement. First, I’ll try and give broad outline to bring out the similarities and difference with Marx’s monetary theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Firm Debt Deflation, Household Precautionary Savings, and the Amplification of Aggregate Shocks*
    Firm Debt Deflation, Household Precautionary Savings, and the Amplification of Aggregate Shocks Andrea Caggese Angelo Gutierrez Ander Pérez-Orive Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Universitat Pompeu Fabra Federal Reserve Board CREI & Barcelona GSE [PRELIMINARY AND INCOMPLETE] (This Version: February 2019) Abstract Deleveraging shocks that increase household precautionary savings, and financial and uncertainty shocks to firms, interact and amplify each other, even when these same shocks separately have moderate effects on output and employment. This result is obtained in a model in which heterogeneous households face financial frictions and unemployment risk and in which heterogeneous firms borrow funds using nominally fixed long-term debt and face costly bankruptcy. This novel amplification mechanism is based on a dynamic feedback between the precautionary behavior of households and the bankruptcy and entry decisions of firms. Our results support the view that firm financial frictions are important to understand the effect of household deleveraging on unemployment, consistent with recent empirical studies examining the 2007-2009 Great Recession. Keywords: Financial Shocks, Amplification, Precautionary Savings, Unemployment Risk, Borrowing Constraints, Firm Bankruptcy Risk JEL Classification: E21, E24, G33 * A previous version of this paper circulated with the title "The Interaction between Household and Firm Dynamics and the Amplification of Financial Shocks". We thank Chris Carroll, Wouter den Haan, Simon Gilchrist, Joao Gomes (discussant), Bob Hall, Juan Jimeno
    [Show full text]
  • The Monetary and Fiscal Nexus of Neo-Chartalism: a Friendly Critique
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ISSUES Vol. XLVII No. 1 March 2013 DOI 10.2753/JEI0021-3624470101 The Monetary and Fiscal Nexus of Neo-Chartalism: A Friendly Critique Marc Lavoie Abstract: A number of post-Keynesian authors, called the neo-chartalists, have argued that the government does not face a budget constraint similar to that of households and that government with sovereign currencies run no risk of default, even with high debt-to-GDP ratio. This stands in contrast to countries in the eurozone, where the central bank does not normally purchase sovereign debt. While these claims now seem to be accepted by some economists, neo-chartalists have also made a number of controversial claims, including that the government spends simply by crediting a private-sector-bank account at the central bank; that the government does need to borrow to deficit-spend; and that taxes do not finance government expenditures. This paper shows that these surprising statements do have some logic, once one assumes the consolidation of the government sector and the central bank into a unique entity, the state. The paper further argues, however, that these paradoxical claims end up being counter-productive since consolidation is counter-factual. Keywords: central bank, clearing and settlement system, eurozone, neo-chartalism JEL Classification Codes: B5, E5, E63 The global financial crisis has exposed the weaknesses of mainstream economics and it has given a boost to heterodox theories, in particular, Keynesian theories. The mainstream view about the irrelevance of fiscal activism has been strongly criticized by the active use of fiscal policy in the midst of the global financial crisis.
    [Show full text]
  • 13. Chartalism, Metallism, and Key Currencies
    13. Chartalism, Metallism, and Key Currencies In terms of our hierarchy of money and credit, we have so far been paying most attention to currency and everything below it, so our attention has been on two of the four prices of money, namely par and the interest rate. Today we begin a section of the course that looks into forms of money that lie above currency in the hierarchy, and hence at a third price of money, the rate of exchange. Metallism Under a gold standard, the extension of our analysis would be straightforward. Gold is the ultimate international money, an asset that is no one’s liability. Under a gold standard, each currency has its own mint par, and the exchange rate is determined by the ratio of mint pars. In this view of the world, the multiple national (state) systems relate to one another not directly (money to money) but only indirectly (credit to credit) through the international (private) system. Each national currency has an exchange rate with the international money and it is that pattern of exchange rates that sets up a pattern of exchange rates between national currencies. Dollar = x ounces of gold Pound = y ounces of gold Dollar = x/y Pounds [S(1/x)=(1/y)] Exchange Rate in a Metallic Standard World Gold X oz. Y oz. Dollar S=X/Y Pound Deposits Deposits Securities Securities From this point of view, the central bank is a banker’s bank, holding international reserves that keep the national payment system in more or less connection with the international system.
    [Show full text]
  • Deciphering the Fall and Rise in the Net Capital Share: Accumulation Or Scarcity?
    MATTHEW ROGNLIE Massachusetts Institute of Technology Deciphering the Fall and Rise in the Net Capital Share: Accumulation or Scarcity? ABSTRACT In the postwar era, developed economies have experienced two substantial trends in the net capital share of aggregate income: a rise dur- ing the last several decades, which is well known, and a fall of comparable magnitude that continued until the 1970s, which is less well known. Over- all, the net capital share has increased since 1948, but once disaggregated this increase turns out to come entirely from the housing sector: the contribution to net capital income from all other sectors has been zero or slightly negative, as the fall and rise have offset each other. Several influential accounts of the recent rise emphasize the role of increased capital accumulation, but this view is at odds with theory and evidence: it requires empirically improbable elastici- ties of substitution, and it presumes a correlation between the capital-income ratio and capital share that is not visible in the data. A more limited narra- tive that stresses scarcity and the increased cost of housing better fits the data. These results are clarified using a new, multisector model of factor shares. ow is aggregate income split between labor and capital? Ever since HDavid Ricardo (1821) pronounced it the “principal problem of Polit- ical Economy,” this question of distribution has both puzzled and inspired economists. Views differ. In one popular interpretation, the division between labor and capital remains remarkably stable over time: John Maynard Keynes (1939) called this stability “one of the most surprising, yet best-established, facts in the whole range of economic statistics” (p.
    [Show full text]
  • BIS Working Papers No 699 Deflation Expectations
    BIS Working Papers No 699 Deflation expectations by Ryan Banerjee and Aaron Mehrotra Monetary and Economic Department February 2018 JEL classification: E31, E58 Keywords: deflation; inflation expectations; forecast disagreement; monetary policy BIS Working Papers are written by members of the Monetary and Economic Department of the Bank for International Settlements, and from time to time by other economists, and are published by the Bank. The papers are on subjects of topical interest and are technical in character. The views expressed in them are those of their authors and not necessarily the views of the BIS. This publication is available on the BIS website (www.bis.org). © Bank for International Settlements 2018. All rights reserved. Brief excerpts may be reproduced or translated provided the source is stated. ISSN 1020-0959 (print) ISSN 1682-7678 (online) Deflation expectations* By Ryan Banerjee1 and Aaron Mehrotra2 Abstract We analyse the behaviour of inflation expectations during periods of deflation, using a large cross-country data set of individual professional forecasters’ expectations. We find some evidence that expectations become less well anchored during deflations. Deflations are associated with a downward shift in inflation expectations and a somewhat higher backward-lookingness of those expectations. We also find that deflations are correlated with greater forecast disagreement. Delving deeper into such disagreement, we find that deflations are associated with movements in the left- hand tail of the distribution. Econometric evidence indicates that such shifts may have consequences for real activity. JEL classification: E31; E58 Keywords: deflation; inflation expectations; forecast disagreement; monetary policy 1 Bank for International Settlements. 2 Bank for International Settlements.
    [Show full text]
  • Intermediate Macroeconomics: New Keynesian Model
    Intermediate Macroeconomics: New Keynesian Model Eric Sims University of Notre Dame Fall 2012 1 Introduction Among mainstream academic economists and policymakers, the leading alternative to the real business cycle theory is the New Keynesian model. Whereas the real business cycle model features monetary neutrality and emphasizes that there should be no active stabilization policy by govern- ments, the New Keynesian model builds in a friction that generates monetary non-neutrality and gives rise to a welfare justification for activist economic policies. New Keynesian economics is sometimes caricatured as being radically different than real business cycle theory. This caricature is unfair. The New Keynesian model is built from exactly the same core that our benchmark model is { there are optimizing households and firms, who interact in markets and whose interactions give rise to equilibrium prices and allocations. There is really only one fundamental difference in the New Keynesian model relative to the real business cycle model { nominal prices are assumed to be \sticky." By \sticky" I simply mean that there exists some friction that prevents Pt, the money price of goods, from adjusting quickly to changing conditions. This friction gives rise to monetary non-neutrality and means that the competitive equilibrium outcome of the economy will, in general, be inefficient. New Keynesian economics is to be differentiated from \old" Keynesian economics. Old Keyne- sian economics arose out of the Great Depression, adopting its name from John Maynard Keynes. Old Keynesian models were typically much more ad hoc than the optimizing models with which we work and did not feature very serious dynamics.
    [Show full text]