Safe to Come Back? As Our Workplaces Open up Again, What Is Expected of Employers to Safeguard Health?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Safe to Come Back? As Our Workplaces Open up Again, What Is Expected of Employers to Safeguard Health? Civil solicitor advocate Roberton: the lessons of Family businesses: QCs: why so few? recent events a special need for advice P.16 P.18 P.24 Journal of the Law Society of Scotland Volume 65 Number 7 – July 2020 Safe to come back? As our workplaces open up again, what is expected of employers to safeguard health? Click here to see Peter’s welcome message Publishers Editor The Law Society of Scotland Email > [email protected] Atria One, 144 Morrison Street, Read > www.lawscot.org.uk/news-and-events/blogs-opinions/ Edinburgh EH3 8EX t: 0131 226 7411 f: 0131 225 2934 Follow > twitter.com/jlsed e: [email protected] President: Amanda Millar Vice President: Ken Dalling Jury out? Chief Executive: Lorna Jack What to do about jury trials? Of all the and others affected will also suffer the Online resources issues to have faced the legal profession more if cases are left hanging. www.lawscot.org.uk due to COVID-19, this one is perhaps the Is the problem essentially COVID- www.journalonline.co.uk most intractable. related, or was there already a serious www.lawscotjobs.co.uk The essentials are by now familiar. backlog due to longer term underfunding, Subscriptions This month will see the first solemn as some allege? Either way, promises of Practising Certificate (inclusive cost) £680; trials in Scotland since March, but only extra money, if forthcoming, would not in Non-Practising Members (UK and Overseas, initial exercises to test social distancing themselves provide a solution. Logistical inclusive cost) £315; Annual subscription UK £84; safeguards, each taking up two or three issues remain. Overseas £108; Trainees Free regular courtrooms plus other facilities. A proposal currently being promoted Editorial Meanwhile Lord Carloway, in a statement is “Nightingale courts”, borrowing from Connect Publications (Scotland) Ltd which praised the courts, and court users, the name of the temporary hospitals set Editor: Peter Nicholson: 0131 561 0028 for progress on other fronts, issued a up to prevent the NHS being overrun at e: [email protected] stark warning that proposals put the height of the pandemic. Back in Advertising: Elliot Whitehead: 0131 561 0021 forward to facilitate more trials April the Scottish Government e: [email protected] amounted only to “tinkering at suggested the use of non-court Review editor: David J Dickson the margins” of a backlog that buildings was unworkable Online legal news: could reach 3,000 cases by due to practical difficulties, e: [email protected] next March. though in a paper in late May Other Connect Publications contacts, While not calling for the Society was still arguing it telephone 0141 561 0300 juryless courts, the Lord should be explored further. It is Head of design: James Cargill (0141 561 3030) President was clear that a regrettable that we appear to be [email protected] “political solution” will be required. no nearer a decision on what can be Editorial board But the legal profession, and not just achieved, let alone any action on this front, Austin Lafferty, Lafferty Law defence lawyers, appears united that the when some additional provision is almost Andrew Todd, Springfield Properties Plc jury system is sacrosanct, if possibly with certain to be needed, whatever else is done. Philip Hannay, Cloch Solicitors fewer jurors in less serious cases. “If we It may turn out that, as with the schools, David Bryson, Baillie Gifford Ayla Iridag, Clyde & Co were just safeguarding our incomes, we something like full capacity can be Kate Gillies, Harper Macleod LLP would be pushing for judge-only courts,” is achieved sooner than was being predicted the message. “But the principle of keeping only recently. But even on the best case the system is more important.” scenario for control of the virus, special At the same time we cannot overlook measures will be needed for an extended that justice delayed may end up being period to tackle trials already pending. justice denied. For accused, particularly if Unless a workable alternative is agreed, Disclaimer on remand, human rights issues will come and urgently implemented, constitutional The views expressed in the Journal of the Law Society of Scotland are those of invited contributors into play sooner or later, and Holyrood tradition may find itself in opposition to and not necessarily those of the Law Society of cannot legislate those away. Complainers practical human rights. Scotland. The Law Society of Scotland does not endorse any goods or services advertised, nor any claims or representations made in any advertisement, in the Journal and accepts no liability to any person for loss or damage suffered as a consequence of their responding to, or placing reliance upon any claim or representation made in, any advertisement appearing in the Journal. Readers should make appropriate enquiries and satisfy themselves be fore responding to any such advertisement, or placing reliance upon any such claim or representation. By so responding, Contributors or placing reliance, readers accept that they do so at their own risk. On no account may any part of this If you would like to contribute to Scotland’s most widely read and respected publication be reproduced without the written permission of the copyholder and publisher, legal publication please email: [email protected] application for which should be made to the publisher. © The Law Society of Scotland, 2020 Alison Tony Tom Ken Ruth ISSN: 0458-8711 Weatherhead Jones QC Marshall McCracken Croman Total Net Circulation: 13,689 is a partner is a partner and is solicitor is a family is a partner (issue specific May 19) with Dentons civil solicitor advocate business with Macnabs, Av. Net Circulation: 13,628 (Jul 18 - Jun 19) UK & Middle advocate with member of the consultant Perth East LLP Brodies LLP Society’s Council and teacher July 2020 \ 3 THE JOURNAL OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF SCOTLAND VOL.65 NO.7 – JULY 2020 Perspectives Features Briefings In practice 04 Journal online 12 27 Civil court 38 Professional news Our website exclusives for July A health related Q & A for Case management, and more COVID research; Innovation employers as workplaces Cup; SLAS; jury trials; policy 05 Guest view 28 Licensing reopen post-COVID-19 work; SLCC; specialists Thembe McInnes Farewell, with a retrospective 41 The Word of Gold 06 Letters 16 29 Planning How to listen to clients Life after COVID-19; Reviews Tony Jones on his path to QC Revised rules under COVID-19 as a civil solicitor advocate; 42 Anti-fraud: IT or not? 07 Offbeat 30 Insolvency and why are there so few? When old ways may be better Quirky news; Profile column New legislation, not all temporary 44 Trauma informed training 08 President 18 30 Tax New video on domestic abuse Help for members; engagement Tom Marshall revisits the HMRC action on furlough fraud with Government debate on the Roberton report 45 Creative child contact 32 Immigration in light of recent events Some Family Mediation ideas “No recourse to public funds” Regulars 46 Risk management 22 33 Discipline Tribunal Client and transaction vetting Ruth Croman’s first experience Four recent cases under COVID-19 09 People of family law arbitration 34 Property 31 Consultations 48 Appreciation The new land reform right to buy 40 Notifications 24 J Haldane Tait, solicitor, editor, 49 Archive Could you be a family business 37 Property auditor and friend to many 50 Classified adviser? Ken McCracken asks PSG: new protocols 50 Recruitment 49 Ask Ash A mum struggles to fit in work 26 The Scottish Solicitors’ Help from the Benevolent Fund offers help Scottish Solicitors' Benevolent Fund: Page 26 ONLINE INSIGHT PUBLISHED ONLY ON WWW.LAWSCOT.ORG.UK/MEMBERS/JOURNAL/ White privilege: Workplace harassment: Territorial scope, again: Copyright, charities what should we do? the third party issue Lawson revisited and creative commons The Glass Network founder Sam Middlemiss considers The latest case on the territorial Fergus Whyte offers a Drew McCusker believes that the law on liability for sexual scope of UK employment law summary of the things that white members of the profession harassment in the workplace offers an opportunity to examine charities might want to think need to take action in relation by non-employees, in the the correct approach to a 2006 about in relation to copyright to racism – by celebrating context of a Government House of Lords case on which generally and in applying diversity and actively dismantling Equalities Office consultation doubt has since been cast, Kieran creative commons licences institutional racism. on possible reforms. Buxton argues. to their intellectual property. 4 / July 2020 OPINION Thembe McInnes As Black Lives Matter raises the profile of BAME issues, in what senses should the colour of a person’s skin matter in the Scottish legal profession? Are there things we need to become more comfortable with? oes it matter that I am Black? law students to go to a school where family heritage and private As a society our first instinct is to say benefactors are not a thing. I need it to be OK for invitations to no, of course it doesn’t. We tell our children networking events to be sent regardless of faith. Presence is surely D that it doesn’t matter what colour their skin is, more important than the contents of the glass in hand. that kindness and love are all that matter. Our I need everyone to get comfortable being uncomfortable. As universities are melting pots into which students legal professionals, we need to own our lack of understanding of diverse ethnicity, race, gender and socio-economic background and experience. Because it is in this space that we listen, we learn, are welcomed in the hope that they emerge with a wealth of and we begin to empathise.
Recommended publications
  • Foi-17-02802
    Annex B Deputy First Minister’s briefing for James Wolffe meeting on 3 March 2016: Meeting with James Wolffe QC, Dean of Faculty of Advocates 14:30, 3 March 2016 Key message Support efforts to improve the societal contribution made by the courts. In particular the contribution to growing the economy Who James Wolffe QC, Dean of Faculty of Advocates What Informal meeting, principally to listen to the Dean’s views and suggestions Where Parliament When Date Thursday 3 March 2016 Time 14:30 pm Supporting Private Office indicated no officials required officials Briefing and No formal agenda agenda Annex A: Background on Faculty and biography of Mr Wolffe Annex B: Key lines Annex C: Background issues Copy to: Cabinet Secretary for Justice Minister for Community Safety and Legal Affairs DG Learning and Justice DG Enterprise, Environment and Innovation Neil Rennick, Director Justice Jan Marshall [REDACTED] Nicola Wisdahl Cameron Stewart [REDACTED] John McFarlane, Special Adviser Communications Safer & Stronger St Andrew’s House, Regent Road, Edinburgh EH1 3DG www.scotland.gov.uk MEETING WITH JAMES WOLFFE QC ANNEX A Background The Faculty of Advocates is an independent body of lawyers who have been admitted to practise as Advocates before the Courts of Scotland. The Faculty has been in existence since 1532 when the College of Justice was set up by Act of the Scots Parliament, but its origins are believed to predate that event. It is self- regulating, and the Court delegates to the Faculty the task of preparing Intrants for admission as Advocates. This task involves a process of examination and practical instruction known as devilling, during which Intrants benefit from intensive structured training in the special skills of advocacy.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Civil Procedure Rules First Report
    The New Civil Procedure Rules First Report May 2017 Contents Foreword ........................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1. Introduction .................................................................................................... 3 Background to the rules rewrite project.............................................................................. 3 The Acts ........................................................................................................................ 3 The Rules Rewrite Working Group ................................................................................. 4 The Rules Rewrite Drafting Team and implementation of the 2014 Act .......................... 5 The Rules Rewrite Project ................................................................................................. 6 The scope of the project ................................................................................................. 6 Matters out with the scope of the project ........................................................................ 8 Purpose of this report ........................................................................................................ 9 Discussion papers .......................................................................................................... 9 Engagement with the public and the professions ......................................................... 10 Chapter 2. A statement of principle .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Studying EU Law in Scotland During and After Brexit
    Studying EU Law in Scotland during and after Brexit Studying EU Law in Scotland during and after Brexit Open Access Resource First Edition First Edition Editors: Nicole Busby Rebecca Zahn In collaboration with the Scottish Universities Legal Network on Europe PUBLICATION FROM Scottish Universities Legal Network on Europe sulne.ac.uk This publication is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License First Edition – Published October 2017 Design and typesetting by Anthony Salamone Set in Source Sans Pro, used under the SIL Open Font License Studying EU Law in Scotland during and after Brexit Table of Contents Foreword Noreen Burrows and Jo Shaw Chapter 1 Introduction Nicole Busby and Rebecca Zahn Chapter 2 Study Skills Maria Fletcher, Tamara Hervey and Sarah McCloskey Chapter 3 The Vote to Leave the EU: Why Did It Happen and What Has Happened Since? Daniel Kenealy Chapter 4 Constitutional Law Aileen McHarg Chapter 5 Free Movement of Goods Andrew Farrer Chapter 6 Free Movement of Services and Freedom of Establishment Justin Borg-Barthet Chapter 7 Competition Law and Policy Arianna Andreangeli and Siobhan Kahmann Chapter 8 Free Movement of Persons and EU Citizenship Maria Fletcher and Nina Miller Westoby Chapter 9 Equality Law Nicole Busby, Muriel Robison and Michelle Weldon-Johns Chapter 10 Employment Law Rebecca Zahn Chapter 11 Environmental Protection and Law Miranda Geelhoed and Mara Ntona Chapter 12 Energy Law Aileen McHarg Table of Contents 3 Studying EU Law in Scotland during and
    [Show full text]
  • Stair Society Publications
    STAIR SOCIETY Publications Various, An Introductory Survey of the Sources and Literature of Scots Law, Stair Society, 1 (1936) Native sources. Watson, W., The statutory law. Hannay, R.K., Early records of Council and Session, 1466-1659. Mckechnie, H., Practicks, 1469-1700. Leadbetter, J.S., The printed law reports, 1540-1935. Black, A.C., The institutional writers, 1600-1829. Cooper, T.M., Regiam majestatem and the auld lawes. Dickson, W.K., Privy Council records, 1545-1707. Inglis, J.A., Financial and administrative records, 1264-1724. Robertson, D. and Wood M., Burgh court records, 1319-1834. Malcolm, C.A., Sheriff and other local court records, 1385-1935. Walton, F.P., The courts of the officials and the commissary courts, 1512-1830. Grant, Sir Francis J., Presbyterian court records, 1560-1935. Anderson, D., Custom. Non-native sources. Smith, D.B., Roman law. Smith, D.B., Canon law. Girvan, J., Feudal law. MacGillivray, E.J., The influence of English law. Gardner, J.C., French and Dutch influences. Gardner, J.C., The influence of the law of Moses. Murray, C.D., The law merchant. Wakr, J.L., The law of nature. Indirect sources. Angus, W., Charters, cartularies and deeds, 1094-1700. Cameron, A.I., Vatican Archives, 1073-1560. Munro, R., Brocards. Anbgus, W., Notorial protocol books, 1469-1700. Wedderburn, E.M. and Lawrie, A.E., Style books. Brown, J.C., Scottish legal periodicals, 1829-1935. Special subjects. McMillan, A.R.G., Admiralty and maritime law. Cameron, J., Celtic law. Philip, J.R., Constitutional law and history. Gillon, S.A., Criminal law. Learney, T.I.
    [Show full text]
  • Training the Next Generation of Lawyers: Professional Legal Education in Scotland Published in Scotland by the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body
    Published 23 September 2018 SP Paper 380 8th Report, 2018 (Session 5) Justice Committee Comataidh a’ Cheartais Training the next generation of lawyers: professional legal education in Scotland Published in Scotland by the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. All documents are available on the Scottish For information on the Scottish Parliament contact Parliament website at: Public Information on: http://www.parliament.scot/abouttheparliament/ Telephone: 0131 348 5000 91279.aspx Textphone: 0800 092 7100 Email: [email protected] © Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliament Corporate Body The Scottish Parliament's copyright policy can be found on the website — www.parliament.scot Justice Committee Training the next generation of lawyers: professional legal education in Scotland, 8th Report, 2018 (Session 5) Contents Introduction ____________________________________________________________1 Membership changes____________________________________________________1 Overview of legal education and training in Scotland __________________________2 Routes to qualification ___________________________________________________2 Solicitors____________________________________________________________2 Advocates___________________________________________________________4 Justice Committee consideration __________________________________________5 Widening access to qualifying as a solicitor in Scotland _______________________6 Aims behind the route to qualification _______________________________________6 Barriers to entry ________________________________________________________6
    [Show full text]
  • Many Members of the Scottish Legal Profession Were Surprised, Open
    I!!!I SCOTTISH LEGAL EDUCATION AND THE LEGAL PROFESSION DAvID EDWARD Many members of the Scottish legal profession were surprised, open• ing their Scotsman on January 24, 1990, to find a centre-page article by Professor William Wilson entitled The Death Sentence for Scots Law. It began: "The Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) (Scotland) Bill,pre• sently before parliament, should be titled the Scots Law (Abolition) Bill because that indicates its object and probable effect. Like all such bills, it is a cocktail:on top float a few cherries and bubbles-easier divorce, control of charities, licensing reform-which will no doubt attract most of parliaments's attention. "Under the surface, however, fulminates a toxic brew which may well prove fatal to the Scottish legal system and to the law of Scotland-the provisions which will alter the structure of the legal profession," Up to that time, Bill Wilson had not generally been seen as the doughtiest champion of the Scottish profession nor, in particular, of the Faculty of Advocates which, after completing his period of devil• ling, he decided at the last moment not to join. But there could be no doubt as to the authorship of this scathing philippic. No-one else could have written: "It seems surprising that we give an expensive education lasting several years to intending solicitors and advocates to equip them to appear in court, but, apparently, any Tom, Dick or Harry is to be able to come in off the street and give the judges the patter. It is a striking feature of the bill that it pays hardly
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins of the Edinburgh Law School: the Union of 1707 and the Regius Chair', Edinburgh Law Review, Vol
    Edinburgh Research Explorer The Origins of the Edinburgh Law School Citation for published version: Cairns, JW 2007, 'The Origins of the Edinburgh Law School: The Union of 1707 and the Regius Chair', Edinburgh Law Review, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 300-48. https://doi.org/10.3366/elr.2007.11.3.300 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3366/elr.2007.11.3.300 Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Published In: Edinburgh Law Review Publisher Rights Statement: ©Cairns, J. (2007). The Origins of the Edinburgh Law School: The Union of 1707 and the Regius Chair. Edinburgh Law Review, 11, 300-48doi: 10.3366/elr.2007.11.3.300 General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 28. Sep. 2021 EdinLR Vol 11 pp 300-348 The Origins of the Edinburgh Law School: the Union of 1707 and the Regius Chair John W Cairns* A. INTRODUCTION B. EARLIER VIEWS ON THE FOUNDING OF THE CHAIR C.
    [Show full text]
  • Career in Scots Law Faqs Final 09 Aberdeen Version
    A Career in the Legal Profession in Scotland - Frequently Asked Questions This information sheet covers some of the key questions about a career in the legal profession in Scotland. It is particularly targeted at Scots law students and people considering studying the graduate entry 2 year accelerated LLB in Scotland. Following a major review of legal education and training in Scotland by the Law Society of Scotland, it is anticipated that a new route to qualification will be in place for academic year 2011/2012. The information in this leaflet refers to the situation at the time of writing (July 09) This FAQ sheet is a starting point. Additional information and resources can be found in our law folders at the Careers Service, 2 nd floor, The Hub, or in our online virtual library at www.abdn.ac.uk/careers . Initial Legal Training Page 1 Graduate entry LLB (2 year accelerated course) Page 1 Diploma in Legal Practice (DLP) Page 2 Becoming a Solicitor Page 4 Becoming an Advocate Page 6 General Law careers questions Page 7 Initial Legal Training The current route to qualification as a solicitor (and for intending advocates), is set out below • LLB degree (NB non-law graduates complete the 2 year accelerated law degree) • 26 week Diploma in Legal Practice • 2 year traineeship with solicitors’ firm or other organisation employing solicitors. (NB – same route for both solicitors and intending advocates to this point) • Bar Exams and a period of unpaid devilling for intending advocates. Following a major review of legal education and training in Scotland by the Law Society of Scotland, the following changes are in the process of being implemented, and it is anticipated that a new route to qualification will be in place for academic year 2011/2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Advocates
    1 The more things change, the more they stay the same: Explaining stratification within the Faculty of Advocates, Scotland Angela Melville and Frank Stephen School of Law, University of Manchester Abstract Since the 1970s the legal profession has become increasingly diversified. However the inclusion of traditionally excluded social groups has not eradicated inequalities. This paper attempts to explain the contradiction between increasing diversification and persistence of inequalities by examining changes in the structure of the Faculty of Advocates in Scotland. We observe significance changes over the last 40 years, especially the increasing numbers of women entering the Faculty. Yet, women still face discrimination, and their success has largely been at the expense of working-class aspirants. We argue that existing theoretical perspectives, namely feminism and Bourdieu, as well as new insights offered by Beck, are insufficient to account for stratification within the legal profession. We call for a new theoretical perspective which accounts for both social change and persistence of inequalities, and suggest that such an approach is best offered by a feminist reworking of Bourdieu. Corresponding author: Angela Melville, Scientific Director, International Institute for Sociology of Law. Email: [email protected]. Postal address: Antigua Universidad /sn – Apdo. 28, Oñati, Gipuzkoa, Spain, 20560. Telephone: +34 943 783 064; Flinders Law School, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia. Frank Stephen, Professor of Regulation, School
    [Show full text]
  • Artificial Intelligence in English Law
    Section title 1 Artificial Intelligence in English Law Professor John Armour Brexit: India’s Revised Deal or no Deal? Insolvency and Robin Dicker QC The third instalment Framework: Too fast outline an ambitious by Mark Phillips QC from too slow? on the ongoing An update on the programme of research into Brexit saga current insolvency the potential application of regime in India, and changes brought about AI to by the Insolvency and English law Bankruptcy Code 2016 A regular review of news, cases and www.southsquare.com articles from South Square barristers SOUTH SQUARE DIGEST March 2019 www.southsquare.com In this issue 3 In this issue 06 12 21 Artificial Intelligence in English Law: Brexit: Deal or no Deal? India’s Revised Insolvency Framework: A Research Agenda Too fast from too slow? Professor John Armour and Robin Dicker The third instalment by Mark Phillips Cyril Shroff and Dhananjay Kumar of QC outline an ambitious programme of QC on the ongoing Brexit saga Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, together research into the potential application with South Square’s Mark Arnold QC and of AI to English law Matthew Abraham, provide an update on the current insolvency regime in India and the changes that have been brought about by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 ARTICLES REGULARS BVI Strengthening 28 Euroland: Creditors “Blasted 67 From the Editor 3 Brian Child and Matthew Freeman with The East Wind …” News in Brief 87 of Campbells, BVI, write on recent Gabriel Moss QC on the Mergers South Square Challenge 92 significant legal developments Directive and creditor protection Diary Dates 94 as the country and its businesses Legal Eye: return to normal following the 71 CASE DIGESTS hurricanes and mud slides of 2017 Anthropology and law Madeleine Jones explores what, Editorial 33 South Square welcomes new 32 if anything, lawyers have to Banking & Finance 34 Associate Member Professor learn from anthropologists Civil Procedure 36 Christoph G.
    [Show full text]
  • Army Legal Officer
    FIND OUT MORE ABOUT LIFE AS AN ARMY LEGAL OFFICER SEARCH ARMY LEGAL OFFICER LIVE A LIFE OF PURPOSE TRAINING ENTRY REQUIREMENTS Army Legal Services (ALS) is a specialist Whatever your role, you will be working As a Legal Officer, you will spend nine • Must be a qualified solicitor (England & branch that delivers military legal support to the same high standards as any civilian months training before going to your first Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland), to the British Army. From advising and lawyer, but will be offered opportunities legal role. During your first two weeks barrister or Scottish advocate training on operational law and giving and challenges that few regular practices you will conduct your initial training and • Barristers must have completed legal advice on international, civil and could match – including training and administration at the Directorate of Army pupillage military law, the law of armed conflict and support to develop your legal, management Legal Services, after which you will attend • Scottish Advocates must have rules of engagement to prosecuting in the and leadership skills. the Commissioning Course at the Royal completed devilling Court Martial – a legal career in the Army Military Academy Sandhurst (RMAS). stands out from the crowd. You will learn basic military skills, study • Solicitors must have completed a tactics and take on a range of tasks training contract designed to develop your ability to lead • You should be physically fit and and command. aged between 23 and 32 On completion of your initial legal training, you will spend three months on QUALIFICATIONS attachment, usually with a combat arm BENEFITS unit, such as an infantry battalion.
    [Show full text]
  • Barristers ' Clerks the Law's Middlemetr John A
    JOHN A. FLOOD Barristers ' clerks The law's middlemetr John A. Flood BARRISTERS' CLERKS THE LAW'S MIDDLEMEN Manchester University Press Copyright @John Anthony Flood 1983 Published by Manchester University Press Oxford Road. Manchester M13 9PL, UK 51 Washington Street, Dover, N.H. 03820, USA British Library cataloguing in publication data Flood. John A. Barristers' clerks. 1. Legal assistant-England I. Title 340 KD654 ISBN 0-7190-0928-6 Library of Congress utaloging in publication data Flood, John A. Barristers' clerks. Bibliography: p. Includes index. 1.Legal assistants-Great Britain. I. Title KD463.F58 1983 347.42'016 8S912 ISBN 0-7190-0928-6 344.2071 6 Printed in Great Britain by Redwood Burn Ltd, Trowbridge, Wiltshire CONTENTS Acknowledgements page vii Chapter 1 Background to the research 1 2 Career patterns and contingencies 15 3 The clerk and his barrister 34 4 Sources of work and relations with solicitors 65 5 Scheduling court cases 85 6 The social world of barristers' clerks The Barristers' Clerks' ~ssociation Conclusion Biography of a research project Solicitors' responses to requests for payment of counsel's fees BCA examination papers Bibliography Index ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS In producing this book, and the thesis from which it derives, I have incurred many debts. I would like to thank those who generously helped: William L. Twining, Anthony Bradley, Barbara Harrell-Bond, Luke C. Harris, John P. Heinz, Spencer L. Kimball, Geoffrey Wilson and David Farrier. I am also grateful to the Barristers' Clerks' Association for permission to reproduce their examination papers; and to its officers, past and present, for their assistance and permission to reproduce from their papers: they are Sydney G.
    [Show full text]