DOCSLIB.ORG

Flood Insurance Rate Map Map Index

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Flood Insurance Rate Map Map Index LISTING OF COMMUNITIES MOST RECENT COMMUNITY COMMUNITY INITIAL NFIP INITIAL FIRM LOCATED ON PANEL (S) FIRM PANEL NAME NUMBER MAP DATE DATE DATE4 BOSTIC, TOWN OF 370354 1559, 1650 July 2, 2008 July 2, 2008 July 2, 2008 CHIMNEY ROCK, 370487 0622¹, 0623, 0624¹, 0632, January 10, 19753 June 1, 19873 July 2, 2008 VILLAGE OF 0633, 0634¹ BURKE COUNTY 2 ELLENBORO, TOWN OF 370561 1578¹, 1579¹ July 2, 2008 July 2, 2008 July 2, 2008 FOREST CITY, TOWN OF 370218 1538, 1539, 1547, 1548, 3710166800J ** 3710168800J * 1549, 1557, 1558, 1559, January 16, 1974 June 17, 1986 July 2, 2008 1630 LAKE LURE, TOWN OF 370488 0622¹, 0631, 0632, 0633, 0641, 0642, 0643, 0644, July 2, 2008 July 2, 2008 July 2, 2008 0651¹, 0652, 0653, 0654, 0663 MAP NUMBER RUTH, TOWN OF 370355 1610, 1620 April 1, 1977 July 2, 2008 July 2, 2008 RUTHERFORD COUNTY 370217 0579¹, 0588¹, 0589, 0597¹, January 10, 1975 June 1, 1987 January 6, 2010 (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) 0598, 0599, 0621¹, 0622¹, 0623, 0624¹, 0631, 0632, 0633, 0634¹, 0635¹, 0641, North Fork First Broad River < < Sally Queen Creek 0642, 0643, 0644, 0645, MCDOWELL COUNTY 0646, 0651¹, 0652, 0653, < 0654, 0655, 0661¹, 0662, 3710064600L 3710066600K 3710068600K 3710164600K 3710166600J 3710168600J 0663, 0664, 0665, 0666, 01/06/10 10/02/08 10/02/08 3710160600K 3710162600J ** 10/02/08 07/02/08 07/02/08 < Pot Branch 0670, 0671, 0672, 0673, 10/02/08 0674, 0675, 0680, 0681, < Somey Creek 226 Brier 0682, 0683, 0684, 0685, P Creek < 0686, 0690, 0691, 0692, Frasheur Creek North Fork First < 0693, 0694¹, 0695¹, 1506, < Broad River < < 1507, 1508, 1509, 1513¹ < Beaverdam Creek 64 Cane Creek BUNCOMBE COUNTY Taylor Creek < 1 (near SR 1733) 1514, 1515, 1516, 1517, < Cove Creek 221 Greasy Creek 1 First Broad River 1518, 1519, 1523, 1524, < Tributary 59 1525, 1526¹, 1527, 1528¹, Second Broad River < Brier Creek Rosy Branch < Taylor Creek First Broad River < 1529, 1533, 1534, 1535, < First Broad River < Stoney Creek < < < 1536, 1537, 1538, 1539, 3710064500J 3710066500J 3710067500J 3710068500J 3710160500J 3710161500K 3710164500J 3710165500J 3710166500J 3710167500J 3710168500J 3710169500J 3710065500J 1543, 1544, 1545, 1546, 3710063500J ** 07/02/08 07/02/08 07/02/08 07/02/08 3710069500J * 07/02/08 10/02/08 07/02/08 07/02/08 07/02/08 07/02/08 07/02/08 07/02/08 07/02/08 < 1547, 1548, 1549, 1553, Taylor Creek Box Creek < Tributary 1 South Creek 1554, 1555¹, 1556, 1557, Buffalo Creek Cedar Creek < (into Lake Lure) < 1558, 1559, 1563¹, 1564, Cedar Creek Tributary 3 3710162400J 07/02/08 1565, 1566, 1567, 1568, < < Catheys Creek < < 1569¹, 1573, 1574, 1575 Village of Chimney Big Camp Creek First Broad River < Buffalo Creek Crawley 1576, 1577, 1578¹, 1579¹ Rock (into Lake Lure) Tributary 1 Branch 3710062400K ** 3710064400J 3710065400J 3710066400J 3710067400J 3710068400J 3710160400J 3710164400J 3710165400J 3710169400K 1585¹, 1586, 1587, 1588, R < A 3710063400J ** 07/02/08 07/02/08 07/02/08 07/02/08 3710069400J * 07/02/08 3710161400J * I 07/02/08 07/02/08 3710166400J * 3710167400J * 3710168400J * 07/02/08 07/02/08 L 1589, 1598, 1599, 1600, R O A Little Camp Creek 1601, 1602, 1603, 1604, Piney Creek Tributary 1 Piney D < P226 Bills Creek Creek 1605, 1606, 1610, 1611, < Tributary 3 < < 1612, 1613, 1614¹, 1615, Buffalo Creek < < D Bills Creek A 1620, 1621, 1622, 1623, < (into Lake Lure) 3710069300J O Tributary 2 Mill Creek R Cove Creek L < 1624, 1626¹, 1630, 1631, I Cane Creek < Cedar < ! 07/02/08 ( (into Catheys Creek) A < Creek R Duncans Creek 1632, 1633, 1640, 1641, West Branch Y 3710062300K 3710063300J 3710064300J 3710065300J 3710067300J 3710068300J 3710160300J 3710161300J 3710162300J 3710163300J 3710164300J 3710165300J 3710166300J 3710169300K 3710066300J Mountain Creek 3710168300J 1642, 1643, 1644, 1645, T 10/02/08 07/02/08 07/02/08 07/02/08 07/02/08 07/02/08 07/02/08 07/02/08 07/02/08 07/02/08 07/02/08 07/02/08 07/02/08 3710167300J * 07/02/08 07/02/08 < 07/02/08 N Knob Creek 1646, 1650, 1651, 1652, < Cove Creek Piney Knob Big Camp 64 < C U 1 (into Broad River) Cherry Creek 1653, 1654, 1655, 1660, < 74A Creek Creek East Branch L O 1 < < Tributary 11 < Bills Creek Knob Creek 1661, 1662, 1663, 1664¹, < E Broad River LAKE LURE < Mountain Creek C Second Broad River < (into Broad River) V < 1665, 1666, 1668¹, 1670¹, !( N Bills Creek < E Knob Creek < 1671¹, 1672¹, 1673¹, 1674¹, Catheys Creek L O Broad River (into Broad River) Hunting Creek A S Pool Creek < Tributary 11 Tributary 9 < 1675, 1680, 1681¹, 1682¹, N R 3710063200J 3710064200J 3710065200J < 3710067200J < 3710068200J 3710069200J 3710160200J 3710161200J 3710162200J 3710163200J 3710164200J 3710165200J 3710166200J 3710169200K 1683, 1684¹, 1685, 1686, 3710066200J D E 3710062200J * 07/02/08 07/02/08 07/02/08 07/02/08 07/02/08 07/02/08 07/02/08 07/02/08 07/02/08 07/02/08 07/02/08 07/02/08 07/02/08 3710167200J * 3710168200J * 07/02/08 1688¹, 1690, 1691, 1692, 07/02/08 D Town of C 1693, 1694, 1695 N < O < 64 Catheys Creek Catheys Creek Hinton Creek < Second Broad River < Roberson Creek E 1 RUTHERFORDTON, 370219 1518, 1519, 1529, 1601, March 1, 1974 June 17, 1986 July 2, 2008 < 74A Rutherfordton Tributary 20 Tributary of U Cove Creek < H 1 Broad River 221 Tributary 16 N TOWN OF 1610, 1611, 1620, 1621 9 Mountain Creek 1 P Tributary 16 T ( SPINDALE, TOWN OF 370356 1528¹, 1529, 1538, 1539, July 2, 2008 July 2, 2008 July 2, 2008 ! Y Cane Creek < < Knob Creek < (into Lake Lure) < < 64 Catheys Creek 1620, 1630 (into Broad River) < 1 < < Tributary 16 Heaveners Creek Catheys Creek ¹ 3710063100J 3710064100J 3710067100J 3710068100J 3710069100J 3710160100J 3710161100J Tributary 18 3710162100J 3710163100J 3710164100J 3710165100J 3710166100J 3710169100K Panel Not Printed ! 3710062100J * 07/02/08 07/02/08 3710065100J ** 3710066100J ** 07/02/08 07/02/08 ( 07/02/08 07/02/08 07/02/08 07/02/08 07/02/08 3710167100J * 3710168100J * 07/02/08 2 07/02/08 07/02/08 < 07/02/08 < < Catheys Creek Tributary 12 Non-Floodprone Community Mountain < Catheys 3 Hollands This communtiy did not have its own FIRM prior to this countywide Town of Creek < Maple Creek Creek Tributary 15 Creek Tributary 6 < < Tributary15 Catheys Creek Tributary 13 FIS. The land area for this community was previously shown on the Lake Lure Mountain Hollands Creek < FIRM for the unincorporated areas of Rutherford County. Therefore, Creek Tributary the map history dates associated with this community were taken ! ( Town of Hollands Catheys Creek of Tributary 16 Hollands Creek < from the FIRM for Rutherford County. < Creek Town of < 4 Tributary 4 Ruth < Roberson Creek Bostic Includes Most Recent Map Index Cleghorn Creek Sandy Run 3710067000K 3710068000J 3710069000J 3710160000J 3710162000J 3710163000J 3710164000J 3710165000J 3710166000J < 3710169000J < 3710168000J 09/03/08 07/02/08 07/02/08 07/02/08 3710161000J 07/02/08 07/02/08 07/02/08 07/02/08 07/02/08 3710167000J * 07/02/08 07/02/08 07/02/08 < < Cleghorn Creek Tributary 13 Cleghorn Creek Town of Bowen Tributary 12 Branch Cleghorn Creek Tributary 10 < West Fork < < < Forest City ! Cleghorn Creek ( Sandy Run Cleghorn Creek Tributary 11 Buck Branch Tributary 9 < (into Second < Puzzle Creek Sandy Run < Broad River) Broad River Cleghorn Creek Tributary 7 < Tributary 32 Reynolds 1221 < 74 Creek 1 RAILROAD < ! 3710058900K 3710059900J 3710150900J 3710151900J 3710152900J 3710153900J ( 3710154900J 3710155900J 3710158900J 3710159900K 3710057900J ** 09/03/08 07/02/08 07/02/08 07/02/08 07/02/08 07/02/08 07/02/08 3710156900J * 3710157900J * 07/02/08 07/02/08 ( 07/02/08 ! Mountain !( West Fork Sandy < Creek Big Spring Branch Town of Run Tributary 7 < < 108 < P Bracketts Creek < Ellenboro Sandy Run Town of Tributary 8 < McMurray Town of < < Branch !( Copper Buck Branch Rutherfordton Spindale Mine (into West Fork < < West Fork Bracketts Creek Bracketts Creek Branch < 221 Webbs Branch Webbs Creek Sandy Run) Sandy Run 1 Tributary 5 < < 3710059800K 3710150800J 3710151800J 3710153800J 3710154800J 3710155800J 3710156800J 3710158800J < 3710159800K MAP INDEX 3710058800J ** 09/03/08 < 07/02/08 07/02/08 3710152800J * 07/02/08 07/02/08 07/02/08 07/02/08 3710157800J * 07/02/08 07/02/08 Broad River Floyds POLK COUNTY Broad River < BUS Creek < < Tributary 10 < Grab Branch Cleghorn Creek < 74 Tributary 1 < 1 Broad River Morrow Creek MAP REPOSITORIES Tributary 9 < Tributary 1 Broad River Tributary 8 Morrow Creek FIRM < Charles BYP AD < O R < (Maps available for reference only, not for distribution.) < Creek Grab Branch L Broad River 74A AI FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP 1 R Tributary 7 < 3710151700J 3710152700J 3710153700J 3710154700J 3710155700J 3710156700J 3710157700J 3710158700J 3710059700J ** 07/02/08 07/02/08 07/02/08 07/02/08 07/02/08 07/02/08 RUTHERFORD COUNTY, BOSTIC, TOWN OF: 3710150700K 07/02/08 07/02/08 BYP 09/03/08 Holland Creek NORTH CAROLINA Bostic Town Hall 1221A 174A 104 Pearidge Road AND INCORPORATED AREAS Bostic, North Carolina 28018 < Second Broad River < (SEE LISTING OF COMMUNITIES TABLE) < < AILROAD Grog Creek CHIMNEY ROCK, VILLAGE OF: < Floyds R Bracketts Creek Chimney Rock Village Office Grays Creek Creek 120 Hills Creek < P MAP INDEX 109 Terrace Drive NOTE TO USERS Chimney Rock, North Carolina 28720 3710150600K 3710151600K 3710153600J 3710154600J 3710155600J 3710156600J 3710157600J 3710158600K P A N E L S P R I N T E D : 0589, 0598, 09/03/08 09/03/08 3710152600J * 07/02/08 07/02/08 07/02/08 07/02/08 07/02/08 07/02/08 Future revisions to this FIRM Index will only be issued to communities that 0599, 0623, 0631,0632, 0633, 0641, 0642, 0643, < FOREST CITY, TOWN OF: D are located on FIRM panels being revised.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • History of the Broad River Development from Henderson Island to Hampton Island
    History of the Broad River Development From Henderson Island to Hampton Island Prepared For: South Carolina Electric & Gas Company 220 Operation Way Cayce, South Carolina 29033-3701 Prepared By: 521 Clemson Road Columbia, South Carolina 29229 December 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 2 DEVELOPMENTAL HISTORY 3 Early Settlement 3 The Revolutionary War 4 Civil War 5 Reconstruction – 20th Century 7 HYDROELECTRIC DEVELOPMENT 9 HISTORIC SITES 14 Parr Shoals 14 Fairfield Pumped Storage 19 Lyles Ford 22 REFERENCES 23 INTRODUCTION The existing Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) license for the Parr Hydroelectric Project (FERC Project No. 1894) expires on June 30, 2020. As a result, cultural resources investigations were conducted to assist the South Carolina Electric & Gas Company (SCE&G) in complying with the FERC relicensing process for the Parr Hydroelectric Project. The Parr Hydroelectric Project is located in central South Carolina along the Broad River in eastern Newberry County and western Fairfield County. The project includes both the Parr Shoals Development and the Fairfield Pumped Storage Facility Development. The total project area encompasses 4,400 acres on the Broad River and its tributaries between Henderson Island to the north and Hampton Island to the south, and Monticello Reservoir. As part of the FERC relicensing process, a Phase I cultural resources survey of the Parr Hydroelectric Project was completed in 2013 and 2014. Additional Phase II archaeological investigations were conducted in 2016 at two archaeological sites, 38NE8 and 38NE10. As a result of these investigations, four resources were identified as being eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP): the Parr Shoals Development, the Fairfield Pumped Storage Facility, Lyles Ford; and archaeological site 38NE8.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality
    3. Existing Conditions and WaterEnvironmental Quality Consequences 3.6 Water Quality 3.6.1 CHANGES TO THIS CHAPTER SINCE THE DEIS Since the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) the acreage of water resources in the project area have been updated to reflect the design changes resulting in the Refined Recommended Preferred Alternative (RPA); impacts resulting from the Refined RPA; and reflect the impacts to impervious and pervious surface areas of the Refined RPA. 3.6.2 HOW IS WATER QUALITY ASSESSED? The Clean Water Act (CWA) of 1972 requires that each state set water quality standards for all contaminants in surface waters. These standards are typically based on criteria recommended by the US Environmental In South Carolina, the SCDHEC Protection Agency (USEPA). The CWA also regulates the discharge of is responsible for monitoring pollutants into our state’s waters. In South Carolina, the USEPA has and regulating water quality delegated the responsibility of monitoring and regulating water quality for the USEPA. to the Department of Health and Environmental Control (SCDHEC). Many factors can affect water quality, including pesticides, heavy metals, livestock waste, litter, oils and grease, and other chemicals. Water from rain and runoff collect these pollutants and carry them into creeks and rivers. Natural resources and processes can also affect water quality. The amount of tree cover over streams and rivers can affect the temperature of the water, thereby affecting the habitat for other plants, fish, and insects. Additionally, sediment from erosion can wash downstream and impact the depth and important substrate within the stream. Existing Conditions and Environmental Consequences Water Quality FEIS May 2019 Page 3-237 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Memorandum
    Technical Memorandum To: South Carolina Department of Natural Resources (DNR) South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (DHEC) From: CDM Smith Date: January 2015 Subject: Methodology for Unimpaired Flow Development Saluda River Basin, South Carolina (Prepared as part of the South Carolina Surface Water Quantity Modeling Program) 1.0 Background and Objectives for Unimpaired Flows Unimpaired Flow (UIF) describes the natural hydrology of a river basin. UIFs quantify streamflows throughout a river basin in the absence of human intervention in the river channel, such as storage, withdrawals, discharges, and return flows. From this basis, modeling and decision making can be compared with pristine conditions. This memorandum explains the methods that will be employed to develop UIFs for South Carolina’s Saluda River basin. It describes data needs, methods for filling data gaps, and issues specific to the Saluda River basin. Once developed, UIFs will be input to the Simplified Water Allocation Model (SWAM) to evaluate surface water hydrology and operations throughout the basin. The UIFs for the Saluda Basin will extend from 1925-2013. UIFs will serve two purposes: ° UIFs will be the fundamental input to the model at headwater nodes and tributary nodes upstream of historic management activity, representing naturally occurring water in the riverways. Current and future management practices such as storage, withdrawals, and discharges will be superimposed on the UIFs. ° UIFs will provide a comparative basis for model results. The impacts of current and future management practices on flow throughout the river network can be compared to the natural conditions represented by the UIFs, and decisions about relative impacts can be well informed.
    [Show full text]
  • Predictive Modeling: an Archeolgical Assessment of Duke Power Company's Proposed Cherokee Transmission Lines Veletta Canouts
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Archaeology and Anthropology, South Carolina Research Manuscript Series Institute of 10-1981 Predictive Modeling: An Archeolgical Assessment of Duke Power Company's Proposed Cherokee Transmission Lines Veletta Canouts Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/archanth_books Part of the Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Canouts, Veletta, "Predictive Modeling: An Archeolgical Assessment of Duke Power Company's Proposed Cherokee Transmission Lines" (1981). Research Manuscript Series. 173. https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/archanth_books/173 This Book is brought to you by the Archaeology and Anthropology, South Carolina Institute of at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Research Manuscript Series by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Predictive Modeling: An Archeolgical Assessment of Duke Power Company's Proposed Cherokee Transmission Lines Keywords Excavations, Duke Power Company, Transmission lines, Cherokee County, South Carolina, Archeology Disciplines Anthropology Publisher The outhS Carolina Institute of Archeology and Anthropology--University of South Carolina Comments In USC online Library catalog at: http://www.sc.edu/library/ This book is available at Scholar Commons: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/archanth_books/173 PREDICTIVE MODELING: AN ARCHEOLOG~CAL ASSESSMENT OF DUKE POWER COMPANY'S PROPOSED CHEROKEE TRANSMISSION LINES by Veletta Canouts Research Manuscript Series 181 With Contributions by Paul E. Brockington, Jr. and Tommy Charles INSTITUTE OF ARCHEOLOGY AND ANTHROPOLOGY UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA, SOUTH CAROLINA 29208 October 1981 The University of South Carolina offers equal opportunity in its employment, admissions and educational activities, in accordance with Title IX, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and other civil rights laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper French Broad Water Quality Management Plan
    UPPER FRENCH BROAD RIVER WATERSHED (06010105) OF THE TENNESSEE RIVER BASIN WATERSHED WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION DIVISION OF WATER POLLUTION CONTROL WATERSHED MANAGEMENT SECTION UPPER FRENCH BROAD RIVER WATERSHED WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Glossary Summary Chapter 1. Watershed Approach to Water Quality Chapter 2. Description of the Upper French Broad River Watershed Chapter 3. Water Quality Assessment of the Upper French Broad River Watershed Chapter 4. Point and Nonpoint Source Characterization of the Upper French Broad River Watershed Chapter 5. Water Quality Partnerships in the Upper French Broad River Watershed Chapter 6. Restoration Strategies Appendix I Appendix II Appendix III Appendix IV Appendix V Glossary GLOSSARY 1Q20. The lowest average 1 consecutive days flow with average recurrence frequency of once every 20 years. 30Q2. The lowest average 3 consecutive days flow with average recurrence frequency of once every 2 years. 7Q10. The lowest average 7 consecutive days flow with average recurrence frequency of once every 10 years. 303(d). The section of the federal Clean Water Act that requires a listing by states, territories, and authorized tribes of impaired waters, which do not meet the water quality standards that states, territories, and authorized tribes have set for them, even after point sources of pollution have installed the minimum required levels of pollution control technology. 305(b). The section of the federal Clean Water Act that requires EPA to assemble and submit a report to Congress on the condition of all water bodies across the Country as determined by a biennial collection of data and other information by States and Tribes.
    [Show full text]
  • Broad River Basin Have Captivated Tourists T and Ecologists Alike
    RIVER BR OAD BASIN he scenery and natural heritage of the Broad River Basin have captivated tourists T and ecologists alike. Hollywood even memorialized some of these places on the big screen, including in battle scenes filmed for the 1992 movie “Last of the Mohicans” at the 404-foot Hickory Nut Falls. profile: Total miles of The Broad River originates in the mountains of streams and rivers: western North Carolina and flows south east 1,513 through the foothills and Piedmont before Total acres of lakes: entering South Carolina. Major tributaries 1,954 SC include the Green, First Broad, Second Broad and Municipalities North Pacolet rivers. There are also four major man-made within basin: 27 lakes, including the popular tourist destination Lake Lure, which was Counties built in 1926 to supply electricity. Other reservoirs include Lake Adger within basin: 8 Bog turtle and Kings Mountain Reservoir, also known as Moss Lake. Municipalities Size: 1,514 in the basin include Forest City, Kings Mountain, Chim ney Rock square miles Village, Lake Lure, Rutherfordton, Shelby and Spindale. Population: 204,803 Some of the best-known natural beauties of the basin are Hickory Nut (2010 U.S. Census) Gorge, Chimney Rock State Park and Lake Lure. Perhaps lesser known is the incredible diversity of flora and fauna within the basin. The Broad BILL LEA KEVIN ADAMS River Basin contains more than 100,000 acres of public and private lands with rare animals, plants and natural communities. These Signi - ficant Natural Heritage Areas provide habitat for more than 100 rare plant and animal spe - Big Bradley Falls (left); cies and 24 rare natural communities.
    [Show full text]
  • South Carolina Surface Water Quantity Modeling Project
    South Carolina Surface Water Kirk Westphal, PE Quantity Modeling Project John Boyer, PE, BCEE Broad Basin Meeting No. 2 – Introduction to the Draft Model May 18, 2016 Presentation Outline • Project Background and Status • Model Calibration/Verification • Calibration/Verification Philosophy and Approach • Calibration Results and Discussion • Overview and Demonstration of Broad Basin Model Project Purpose • Build surface water quantity models capable of: – Accounting for inflows and outflows from a basin – Accurately simulating streamflows and reservoir levels over the historical inflow record – Conducting “What if” scenarios to evaluate future water demands, management strategies and system performance. The Simplified Water Allocation Model is… • A water accounting tool • Calculates physically and legally available water • Traces water through a natural stream network, simulating withdrawals, discharges, storage, and hydroelectric operations • Not a precipitation-runoff model (e.g., HEC-HMS) • Not a hydraulic model (e.g. HEC-RAS) • Not a water quality model (e.g., QUAL2K) • Not an optimization model • Not a groundwater flow model (e.g., MODFLOW) Project Status – Broad Basin Data Collection Unimpaired Flow - Streamflow, M&I and ag Development withdrawals, discharges, - Daily mean UIFs precipitation, reservoir Task 1 Task operations, interconnections, facility operation dates, etc. Data Analysis - Gap filling and record extension Stakeholder Input Basin Model Baseline Model Schematic Calibration Task 2 Task - Model framework - Reproduce actual - Simulate current development conditions conditions Stakeholder Stakeholder Input Meeting Input Meeting #1 #2 Catawba Salkehatchie Savannah Overall Dee Pee Santee Saluda Edisto Broad - Project Status Wat. 1. Data Collection, Organization and Analysis 2. Model Framework Development 3. Unimpaired Flow Development 4. Model Development and Calibration 5. Baseline Model Development and Documentation 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical and Architectural Inventory
    Upper Richland County South Carolina Historical and Architectural Inventory Edwards-Pitman Environmental, Inc. June 2002 Upper Richland County, South Carolina Historical and Architectural Inventory Edwards-Pitman Environmental, Inc. Jennifer F. Martin Nicholas G. Theos Sarah A. Woodard Funded by The Richland County Conservation Commission and The South Carolina Department of Archives and History June 2002 The activity that is the subject of this report has been financed in part with Federal funds from the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, and administered by the South Carolina Department of Archives and History. However, the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior. This program receives Federal financial assistance for identification and protection of historic properties. Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, the U. S. Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, disability or age in its federally assisted programs. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility as described above, or if you desire further information please write to: Office of Equal Opportunity, National Park Service, 1849 C Street, N.W., Washington DC 20240. Acknowledgements Several individuals provided assistance without which we would not have been able to carry out this survey. Daniel J. Vivian, who served as the Survey Coordinator for the South Carolina State Historic Preservation Office during the majority of the project, offered excellent advice and technical assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Duke Energy WSL III Units 1 & 2 COLA
    William States Lee III Nuclear Station Environmental Report, Chapter 2 CHAPTER 2 ENVIRONMENTAL DESCRIPTION TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Page 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL DESCRIPTION............................................................................ 2.0-1 2.1 STATION LOCATION ................................................................................................. 2.1-1 2.1.1 REFERENCES...................................................................................................... 2.1-1 2.2 LAND........................................................................................................................... 2.2-1 2.2.1 THE SITE AND VICINITY ..................................................................................... 2.2-1 2.2.1.1 The Site........................................................................................................... 2.2-1 2.2.1.2 The Vicinity...................................................................................................... 2.2-2 2.2.2 TRANSMISSION CORRIDORS AND OFF-SITE AREAS..................................... 2.2-5 2.2.3 THE REGION........................................................................................................ 2.2-5 2.2.4 REFERENCES...................................................................................................... 2.2-6 2.3 WATER ....................................................................................................................... 2.3-1 2.3.1 HYDROLOGY ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • GIS Final Project
    Runoff and geomorphic properties of North Carolina rivers Michael Kanarek Dec. 7, 2012 CE 394K.3 Introduction Hypsometric analysis is used in a several geologic fields, including hydrology. A number of studies on the relationship between hypsometry and hydrology have found that hypsometric curve parameters have a strong relationship with basin hydrology, especially flood response. (Perez-Pena et al., 2009) GIS provides powerful tools for the study of these properties, especially through the utilization of digital elevation models. For the purposes of this study, two watersheds originating in western North Carolina will be studied: the Upper French Broad River watershed (HUC8 06010105) and the Upper Broad River watershed (HUC8 03050105). The French Broad River flows for 213 miles, starting in the Appalachian Mountains of Transylvania County, N.C., and ending in Knoxville, TN, where it joins with the Holston River to form the start of the Tennessee River. The Upper French Broad River watershed has an area of 4,868 km2. The Broad River flows for 150 miles, beginning in the Blue Ridge Mountains of Buncombe County, N.C., and eventually joining the Saluda River to form the Congaree River near the city of Columbia, S.C. The Upper Broad river watershed has an area of 6,419 km2. Watershed locations National Geographic, Esri, DeLorme, NAVTEQ, UNEP-WCMC, USGS, NASA, ESA, METI, NRCAN, GEBCO, NOAA, iPC Watersheds Upper Broad 0 5 10 20 30 40 Upper French Broad Miles ± Data gathering Data for this project was acquired primarily from the USGS’s National Map Viewer. Elevation data was downloaded in the form of nine individual 1/3 arcsecond digital elevation maps.
    [Show full text]
  • South Carolina Electric & Gas Company
    APPENDIX A-6 SALUDA HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT STURGEON PROTECTION AND ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC & GAS COMPANY COLUMBIA, SOUTH CAROLINA SALUDA HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT (FERC NO. 516) STURGEON PROTECTION AND ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FINAL JULY 2009 Prepared by: SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC & GAS COMPANY COLUMBIA, SOUTH CAROLINA SALUDA HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT (FERC NO. 516) STURGEON PROTECTION AND ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FINAL JULY 2009 Prepared by: SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC & GAS COMPANY COLUMBIA, SOUTH CAROLINA SALUDA HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT (FERC NO. 516) STURGEON PROTECTION AND ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FINAL TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................... 1 2.0 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................ 3 2.1 Shortnose Sturgeon Life History and Status ......................................................... 3 2.2 Atlantic Sturgeon Life History and Status.............................................................. 4 2.3 Project Effects on Sturgeon and Other Diadromous Species................................ 5 2.4 Relevant Studies Performed in Support of Relicensing......................................... 5 2.5 Santee River Basin Cooperative Diadromous Fish Accord................................... 6 3.0 PROTECTION AND ENHANCEMENT MEASURES ........................................................ 8 3.1 Downstream Dissolved Oxygen Enhancements
    [Show full text]
  • Cherokee County Communities
    CAROLINA THREAD TRAIL GREENWAY MASTER PLAN for cherokee county communities September 2012 1 2 3 table of contents acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................................... 6 executive summary .................................................................................................................................... 8 chapter 1: introduction What is a Greenway? ....................................................................................................................................... 15 Carolina Thread Trail ...................................................................................................................................... 15 chapter 2: greenway benefits Connecting Communities ................................................................................................................................ 17 Health Benefits ............................................................................................................................................... 18 Economic Impact ............................................................................................................................................ 19 Environmental Benefits .................................................................................................................................. 21 chapter 3: existing conditions Geography of the Study Area/Land Cover .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]