Since January 2020 Elsevier Has Created a COVID-19 Resource Centre with Free Information in English and Mandarin on the Novel Coronavirus COVID- 19
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID- 19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. Correspondence Neutralising antibody (median age 42 years [IQR 33–52]) after dropped below 40 on their later study activity against either one dose (n=149; median time visit about 3 months after their second after first dose=30 days [IQR 23–38]) or BNT162b2 dose. Published Online SARS-CoV-2 VOCs two doses (n=159; median time after To maximise population coverage, June 3, 2021 https://doi.org/10.1016/ second dose=28 days [IQR 21–37]) of the UK extended the interval B.1.617.2 and B.1.351 by S0140-6736(21)01290-3 BNT162b2 (Pfizer–BioNTech) against between the two BNT162b2 doses. BNT162b2 vaccination five SARS-CoV-2 strains: a strain with Although this might have had a the original spike sequence (Wild- limited impact of protection against The SARS-CoV-2 B.1.617.2 Variant type); a strain with an Asp614Gly parental SARS-CoV-2 strains or the of Concern (VOC), first detected in mutation isolated during the first B.1.1.7 variant, the potential impact India, is now dominant in the UK, wave of infection in the UK, in 2020 on protection from other VOCs is having rapidly1 displaced the B.1.1.7 (D614G); and VOCs B.1.617.2, B.1.351 poorly understood. We found that strain2 that emerged in the UK with (first detected in South Africa in late neutralisation of VOCs was markedly the second COVID-19 wave in late 2020), and B.1.1.7. different after only one dose of 2020. The efficacy of currently licensed Two doses of BNT162b2 elicited BNT162b2 (appendix p 2): although COVID-19 vaccines against B.1.617.2 ELISA-detected anti-Wild-type spike 177 (95%) of 186 participants tested is unknown; although it possesses antibodies in all participants, and NAb positive for anti-spike antibodies by 12 mutations in its spike protein activity against all strains, including the ELISA and mounted a detectable NAb relative to the wildtype SARS-CoV-2 three VOCs tested, in all except six (3%) response against Wild-type (median first detected in Wuhan, China, in and nine (5%) of 159 participants who IC50=68 [IQR 42–140]) and D614G December, 2019, B.1.617.2 lacks lacked NAb activity against B.1.617.2 (median IC50=71 [IQR 46–111]), median mutations at amino acid positions 501 and B.1.351, respectively (appendix NAbTs against all VOCs were below or 484 in its ACE2 receptor-binding p 2). NAbTs of sera correlated well the quantitative limit of detection. domain, commonly associated with between Wild-type and variants Stratification of NAbTs into three VOCs (appendix p 2) or escape from (appendix p 2; RS>0·82, p<2 × 10⁻¹⁶), groups (IC50 low [<40], medium See Online for appendix neutralising antibodies (NAbs). as well as between VOCs (B.1.617.2 [40–256], high [>256]) and assessment To determine vaccine-induced NAb vs B.1.351: RS=0·85, p<2 × 10⁻¹⁶). of the significance of the shift in their escape by B.1.617.2 and compare However, NAbTs were 5·8-fold reduced distribution relative to Wild-type by activity to previous strains with against B.1.617.2 relative to Wild-type ordered logistical regression was more existing estimates for population- (95% CI 5·0–6·9), significantly more informative (appendix p 2). Whereas based vaccine efficacy, we carried reduced than against B.1.1.7 (2·6-fold only 39 (21%) of 186 samples had out an initial analysis of the Legacy vs Wild-type, 95% CI 2·2–3·1), and on a low NAbTs against Wild-type, this study, established in January, 2021, by similar order to the reduction observed proportion rose to 50% against B.1.1.7 University College London Hospital and against B.1.351 (4·9-fold vs Wild-type, (p=1·7 × 10⁻⁶) and further to 75% the Francis Crick Institute in London, 95% CI 4·2–5·7). against B.1.351 (p<3 × 10⁻¹⁶) and 68% UK, to track serological responses to Notably, across all variants, against B.1.617.2 (p<5 × 10⁻¹⁶). Notably, vaccination in prospectively recruited increased age significantly correlated the downwards shift in titres was also staff volunteers (appendix p 6). A with reduced NAbT (appendix p 2; significant when compared to B.1.1.7 detailed description of the methods, –0·33<RS<–0·27; 2·2 × 10⁻⁵<p<5·6 × 10⁻⁴), for B.1.351 (p=3·7 × 10⁻⁴) and B.1.617.2 including the clinical cohort, virus whereas no correlation was observed (p=1·2 × 10⁻⁵), confirming reduced culture conditions, genetic sequencing, for sex or body-mass index (appendix NAb activity against B.1.617.2 relative and neutralisation assays, and the p 4). NAbTs reduced over time after to the present B.1.1.7 strain after one statistical analysis are available in the administration of the second dose vaccine dose. Notably, participants appendix (p 8). The Legacy study was of BNT162b2: participants (n=14) with low NAbTs tend to be older than approved by London Camden and who attended an additional study those who produced medium or high Kings Cross Health Research Authority visit 8–16 weeks after their second responses (appendix p 2), and logistical Research and Ethics committee (IRAS BNT162b2 dose showed significantly regression analysis suggests age is a number 286469) and sponsored by reduced NAbTs against all variants significant factor in reduced NAbTs, University College London. (appendix p 2; 0·0002<p<0·0134). independent of strain in our samples Using a high-throughput live-virus While the final NAbTs against Wild- (appendix p 7; p=0.006), following a SARS-CoV-2 neutralisation assay type, D614G, and B.1.1.7 remained single dose of BNT162b2. Submissions should be (performance data are shown in the within the quantitative range of our These data, together with made via our electronic submission system at appendix p 3), we determined NAb assay (IC50>40), two participants’ NAbTs epidemiological data of B.1.617.2 http://ees.elsevier.com/ titres (NAbTs) in 250 participants against VOCs B.1.617.2 and B.1.351 growth, raise the possibility that thelancet/ www.thelancet.com Published online June 3, 2021 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01290-3 1 Correspondence this VOC presents a dual challenge result of factors aside from virus strain CSw reports grants from BMS, of reduced vaccine efficacy akin (appendix p 5), providing a basis to Ono-Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Roche-Ventana, Pfizer and Archer Dx, unrelated to to the B.1.351 VOC, and increased understand observed vaccine efficacy this Correspondence; personal fees from transmissibility beyond the B.1.1.7 failure in other combinations of vaccine Genentech, Sarah Canon Research Institute, VOC. The impact of such a change and target population.6 Medicxi, Bicycle Therapeutics, GRAIL, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Illumina, GlaxoSmithKline, MSD, is challenging to predict: it remains In the case of single-dose recipients, and Roche-Ventana, unrelated to this difficult to assess precisely to what our data show that NAbTs are Correspondence; and stock options from Apogen extent the reduction in NAbTs we significantly lower against B.1.617.2 Biotech, Epic Biosciences, GRAIL, and Achilles observe will impact vaccine efficacy and B.1.351 VOCs relative to B.1.1.7, Therapeutics, unrelated to this Correspondence. All other authors declare no competing interests. and increase disease severity in a implying that although a single dose ECW, MW, SG, and DLVB contributed equally. vaccinated population, especially given might still afford considerably more GKa, CSw, SGan, and DLVB are joint senior authors. the multiple factors that contribute protection than no vaccination, RB and DLVB are members of the Genotype-to- Phenotype UK National Virology Consortium. to this process, such as long-lived single-dose recipients are likely Funding details and acknowledgments can be humoral immunity.3 to be less protected against these found in the appendix. All data (anonymised) and Nevertheless, a recent analysis of SARS-CoV-2 variants. These data full R code to produce all figures and statistical analysis presented in this Correspondence are For data and R code see https:// available NAb and vaccine efficacy therefore suggest that the benefits available online on Github. github.com/davidlvb/Crick- data4 has attempted to establish of delaying the second dose, in terms Emma C Wall, Mary Wu, Ruth Harvey, UCLH-Legacy-VOCs-2021-05 correlates of protection against earlier of wider population coverage and Gavin Kelly, Scott Warchal, strains of SARS-CoV-2 and, in the increased individual NAbTs after the 7 Chelsea Sawyer, Rodney Daniels, context of this model, our data suggest second dose, must now be weighed Philip Hobson, Emine Hatipoglu, that most participants that received against decreased efficacy in the Yenting Ngai, Saira Hussain, two doses of BNT162b2 would be short-term, in the context of the Jerome Nicod, Robert Goldstone, protected against B.1.617.2 infection spread of B.1.617.2.