Campeche, Mexico. Plus Draft 1 Site Profile. Draft for Discussion
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Villahermosa - MEXICO Flood - Situation As of 10/11/2020 Gra Ding - Deta Il Ma P 02 N N " " 0 0 ' ' Bah’A De 9 9 5 5
92°55'20"W 92°55'0"W 92°54'40"W 92°54'20"W 92°54'0"W 92°53'40"W W " 0 4 ' 3 5 ° 2 9 W " 0 ' 4 5 ° 2 9 W " 0 ' 4 5 ° 2 9 N N " " 0 0 2 2 ' ' 9 9 5 5 ° ° 7 7 1 1 509000 510000 511000 92°53'40"W GL IDE number: N/A Activa tion ID: EMS R 479 Int. Cha rter ca ll ID: 786 Product N.: 02VIL L AHER MOS A, v2 Villahermosa - MEXICO Flood - Situation as of 10/11/2020 Gra ding - Deta il ma p 02 N N " " 0 0 ' ' Bah’a de 9 9 5 5 ° Campeche ° 7 7 1 1 S a n Pedro y S a n Pa blo Campeche United S ta tes U a s v u l ma a c rij in Mexico Gulf o f t Villa hermosa G a Mexico (! Mexico 02 Tabasco City Bah’a de ^ Campeche NORTH PACIFIC OCEAN 0 0 0 0 0 0 Chiapas 8 8 8 8 9 9 1 1 30 km Petén Carto graphic Info rmatio n 1:5000 Full color A1, 200 dpi resolution 0 0.075 0.15 0.3 N " km 0 4 ' 8 5 ° 17°58'40"N 7 Grid: W GS 1984 UT M Z one 15N ma p coordina te system 1 T ick ma rks: W GS 84 geogra phica l coordina te system ± Legend Crisis Information Hydrography Flooded Area R iver (10/11/2020 17:07 UT C) Built Up Grading L a ke Destroyed L a nd S ubject to Inunda tion Da ma ged R iver Possibly da ma ged Land Use - Land Cover Transportation Grading Fea tures a va ila ble in the vector pa cka ge R oa d, Possibly da ma ged Prima ry R oa d, No visible da ma ge S econda ry R oa d, No visible da ma ge L oca l R oa d, No visible da ma ge Ca rt T ra ck, No visible da ma ge General Information Area of Interest Centro N " 0 2 ' 8 5 ° 17°58'20"N 7 1 Map Info rmatio n Hea vy ra ins ha ve impa cted the sta tes of T a ba sco a nd Chia pa s (more tha n 200mm ra in in 0 0 24hrs) with Mexica n a uthorities reporting 19 people dea d a nd a round 20,000 homes 0 0 0 0 da ma ged, bringing the estima ted dea th toll in Mexico a nd Centra l America to a bout 200. -
Lagoons and Coastal Wetlands in the Global Change Context: Impacts and Management Issues
LAGOONS AND COASTAL WETLANDS IN THE GLOBAL CHANGE CONTEXT: IMPACTS AND MANAGEMENT ISSUES International Conference 1. Title of the Project International Conference: “Lagoons and coastal wetlands in the global change context: Impacts and management issues” Venice, July 2003 Starting date: January 2003 2. Objectives of the Project The objective of the present project is to organise and hold an international conference to respond to the challenge of integrating global change issues in wetland management. The conference will have a multidisciplinary view and will be based on high level scientific expertise. The aim is to identify gaps, problems and success in wetland knowledge and management. CORILA is an association between the University of Padua, the University of Venice, the University Institute of Architecture in Venice and the National Research Council, for coordinating and managing the research on the Venice Lagoon system. CORILA is presently managing a large multidisciplinary scientific project on the lagoon of Venice which embraces biology, chemistry, morphology, modelling, architecture and economics and is networking 70 research bodies and institutions. CORILA is in constant dialogue with the Public Administrations and promotes the dissemination of the results of the research to the policy makers. CORILA stipulated an agreement with the UNESCO, Regional Office for Science and Technology, Venice, Italy for the promotion and coordination of scientific research on Venice lagoon system and coastal wetlands. UNESCO, Regional Office for Science and Technology, Venice, Italy has large competencies in wetlands and lagoons conservation, and particularly in the safeguarding of the Venice Lagoon. It is member of MARS (European marine research stations network) and promoter of MAB (Man and the biosphere world network) which promotes and demonstrates a balanced relationship between people and nature. -
Presentación De Powerpoint
(Actualización al 19 de abril de 2021) Aguascalientes, Baja California, Baja Californi a S ur , Chihuahua, Coahuila, ¿Qué entidades Colima, Chiapas, Campeche, Estado de México, Durango, Guanajuato, Guerrero, Hidalgo, Jalisco, Michoacán, Morelos, Nayarit, OCALES federativas concluyeron L 30 la adecuación legislativa? Oaxaca, Puebla, Querétaro, Quintana Roo, San Luis Potosí, Sinaloa, Sonora, Tabasco, Tamaulipas, Veracruz . Tlaxcala, , Yucatán y Zacatecas ISTEMAS Aguascalientes, Baja California, Baja California Sur, Campeche, S VANCES EN LA A Chiapas, Chihuahua, CDMX, Coahuila, Colima, Durango, IMPLEMENTACIÓN ¿Qué entidades federativas Guanajuato, Guerrero, Hidalgo, Jalisco, Estado de México, Michoacán, ELOS ya cuentan con Comité D 32 Morelos, Nayarit, Nuevo León, Oaxaca, Puebla, Querétaro, Coordinador? Quintana Roo, San Luis Potosí, Sinaloa, Sonora, Tabasco, Tamaulipas, Tlaxcala, Veracruz, Yucatán y Zacatecas. INSTANCIA DEL SISTEMA # ENTIDADES FEDERATIVAS Entidades con Comisión de Aguascalientes, Baja California, Baja California Sur, Campeche, Chiapas, Chihuahua, CDMX, Coahuila, Colima, Durango, Guanajuato, Guerrero, Selección: Hidalgo, Jalisco, Estado de México, Michoacán, Morelos, Nayarit, Nuevo León, 32 Oaxaca, Puebla, Querétaro, Quintana Roo, San Luis Potosí, Sinaloa, Sonora, Tabasco, Tamaulipas, Tlaxcala, Veracruz, Yucatán y Zacatecas. Se considera que 31 entidades han cumplido con la conformación ya que el estado de Tlaxcala no considera la figura de este órgano Entidades que cuentan con Aguascalientes, Baja California, Baja California -
Villahermosa - MEXICO Flood - Situation As of 10/11/2020 Gra Ding - Deta Il Ma P 03
502500 503000 503500 504000 92°58'50"W 92°58'40"W 92°58'30"W 92°58'20"W 92°58'10"W 92°58'0"W 92°57'50"W 0 0 0 0 GL IDE number: N/A Activa tion ID: EMS R 479 0 0 7 7 8 8 Int. Cha rter ca ll ID: 786 Product N.: 02VIL L AHER MOS A, v2 9 9 1 1 Villahermosa - MEXICO Flood - Situation as of 10/11/2020 Gra ding - Deta il ma p 03 Bah’a de Campeche N N " " S a n Pedro y S a n Pa blo 0 0 1 1 ' ' 8 United 8 5 5 Campeche ° ° 7 S ta tes 7 1 1 U s um a c in Mexico Gulf o f t Villa hermosa a (! Mexico Grija Mexico lv 02 Tabasco City a Bah’a de ^ Campeche NORTH PACIFIC OCEAN Chiapas 30 km Petén Carto graphic Info rmatio n 1:3000 Full color A1, 200 dpi resolution 0 0.05 0.1 0.2 km 0 0 N N 0 0 " " 5 5 0 0 ' ' 6 6 8 8 5 5 8 8 Grid: W GS 1984 UT M Z one 15N ma p coordina te system ° ° 9 9 7 7 1 1 1 1 T ick ma rks: W GS 84 geogra phica l coordina te system ± Legend Crisis Information Hydrography Flooded Area R iver (09/11/2020 12:01 UT C) Built Up Grading L a ke Da ma ged R iver Possibly da ma ged Land Use - Land Cover Transportation Grading Fea tures a va ila ble in the vector pa cka ge R oa d, Possibly da ma ged Prima ry R oa d, No visible da ma ge S econda ry R oa d, No visible da ma ge L oca l R oa d, No visible da ma ge General Information Area of Interest Administrative boundaries Province Centro N N " " 0 0 5 5 ' ' 7 7 5 5 ° ° 7 7 1 1 Map Info rmatio n Hea vy ra ins ha ve impa cted the sta tes of T a ba sco a nd Chia pa s (more tha n 200mm ra in in 24hrs) with Mexica n a uthorities reporting 19 people dea d a nd a round 20,000 homes da ma ged, bringing the estima ted dea th toll in Mexico a nd Centra l America to a bout 200. -
Listado De Canales Virtuales
LISTADO CANALES VIRTUALES Nacionales 1 Canal Virtual 1 (Azteca Trece) No. POBLACIÓN ESTADO CONCESIONARIO / PERMISIONARIO DISTINTIVO CANAL VIRTUAL 1 AGUASCALIENTES AGUASCALIENTES XHJCM-TDT 1.1 2 ENSENADA XHENE-TDT 1.1 BAJA CALIFORNIA 3 SAN FELIPE XHFEC-TDT 1.1 4 CD. CONSTITUCIÓN XHCOC-TDT 1.1 5 LA PAZ BAJA CALIFORNIA SUR XHAPB-TDT 1.1 6 SAN JOSÉ DEL CABO XHJCC-TDT 1.1 7 CAMPECHE XHGE-TDT 1.1 8 CD. DEL CARMEN CAMPECHE XHGN-TDT 1.1 9 ESCÁRCEGA XHPEH-TDT 1.1 10 ARRIAGA XHOMC-TDT 1.1 11 COMITÁN DE DOMÍNGUEZ XHDZ-TDT 1.1 CHIAPAS 12 SAN CRISTÓBAL DE LAS CASAS XHAO-TDT 1.1 13 TAPACHULA XHTAP-TDT 1.1 14 CD. JIMÉNEZ XHJCH-TDT 1.1 15 CHIHUAHUA XHCH-TDT 1.1 16 CHIHUAHUA XHIT-TDT 1.1 CHIHUAHUA 17 HIDALGO DEL PARRAL XHHPC-TDT 1.1 18 NUEVO CASAS GRANDES XHCGC-TDT 1.1 19 OJINAGA XHHR-TDT 1.1 20 MÉXICO CIUDAD DE MÉXICO XHDF-TDT 1.1 21 CD. ACUÑA XHHE-TDT 1.1 22 MONCLOVA XHHC-TDT 1.1 23 PARRAS DE LA FUENTE COAHUILA XHPFC-TDT 1.1 24 SABINAS XHCJ-TDT 1.1 25 TORREÓN XHGDP-TDT 1.1 26 COLIMA XHKF-TDT 1.1 27 MANZANILLO COLIMA XHDR-TDT 1.1 28 TECOMÁN XHTCA-TDT 1.1 29 CUENCAMÉ XHVEL-TDT 1.1 30 DURANGO XHDB-TDT 1.1 DURANGO 31 GUADALUPE VICTORIA XHGVH-TDT 1.1 32 SANTIAGO PAPASQUIARO TELEVISIÓN AZTECA, S.A. DE C.V. XHPAP-TDT 1.1 33 CELAYA GUANAJUATO XHMAS-TDT 1.1 34 ACAPULCO XHIE-TDT 1.1 35 CHILPANCINGO XHCER-TDT 1.1 36 IGUALA GUERRERO XHIR-TDT 1.1 37 TAXCO DE ALARCÓN XHIB-TDT 1.1 38 ZIHUATANEJO XHDU-TDT 1.1 39 TULANCINGO HIDALGO XHTGN-TDT 1.1 40 GUADALAJARA XHJAL-TDT 1.1 JALISCO 41 PUERTO VALLARTA XHGJ-TDT 1.1 42 JOCOTITLÁN MÉXICO XHXEM-TDT 1.1 43 LÁZARO CÁRDENAS -
Ecological Characterization of Bioluminescence in Mangrove Lagoon, Salt River Bay, St. Croix, USVI
Ecological Characterization of Bioluminescence in Mangrove Lagoon, Salt River Bay, St. Croix, USVI James L. Pinckney (PI)* Dianne I. Greenfield Claudia Benitez-Nelson Richard Long Michelle Zimberlin University of South Carolina Chad S. Lane Paula Reidhaar Carmelo Tomas University of North Carolina - Wilmington Bernard Castillo Kynoch Reale-Munroe Marcia Taylor University of the Virgin Islands David Goldstein Zandy Hillis-Starr National Park Service, Salt River Bay NHP & EP 01 January 2013 – 31 December 2013 Duration: 1 year * Contact Information Marine Science Program and Department of Biological Sciences University of South Carolina Columbia, SC 29208 (803) 777-7133 phone (803) 777-4002 fax [email protected] email 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................... 4 BACKGROUND: BIOLUMINESCENT DINOFLAGELLATES IN CARIBBEAN WATERS ............................................... 9 PROJECT OBJECTIVES ..................................................................................................................................... 19 OBJECTIVE I. CONFIRM THE IDENTIY OF THE BIOLUMINESCENT DINOFLAGELLATE(S) AND DOMINANT PHYTOPLANKTON SPECIES IN MANGROVE LAGOON ........................................................................ 22 OBJECTIVE II. COLLECT MEASUREMENTS OF BASIC WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS (E.G., TEMPERATURE, SALINITY, DISSOLVED O2, TURBIDITY, PH, IRRADIANCE, DISSOLVED NUTRIENTS) FOR CORRELATION WITH PHYTOPLANKTON -
The State of Lagoon Treatment in Missouri
FEATURE Review by Phil Walsack The State Of Lagoon Treatment In Missouri Missouri has more than 900 Facts And Figures Left: Pacific’s new lagoon aeration system municipal governments, and many own was designed by Burns & McDonnell in 2019. The design flow of these 334 systems Right: Clarence’s lagoon in winter. Achieving and operate their wastewater systems. combined is 53.8 million gallons per ammonia compliance can be difficult when In addition to municipal ownership day (MGD) with actual flows of 37.3 the winter arrives. (cities, towns, and villages), public MGD. While most consider lagoon sewer districts and county governments technology a “smaller city” wastewater own an additional 124 systems. It is not solution, six cities discharge more than balance of discharging lagoons. While common knowledge, but there are more 1.0 MGD. Five of the six cities serve the number of communities is large, wastewater permits (called National more than 7,000 people. The six cities the population served is only 184,000. Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (with seven discharge permits) have a These smaller entities have a combined Permits or State Operating Permits) than combined design flow of 12.4 MGD, and design flow of 34.1 MGD and an there are communities; some entities an actual flow of 9.1 MGD. Overall, the actual flow of 23.2 MGD. Interestingly, may have more than one wastewater larger lagoon discharging communities actual flows are decreasing as the facility. represent 59,300 people. rural populations continue to move to Generally, wastewater treatment urban living environments. Permitted There are only 12 additional technologies can be divided into four actual flows are decreasing even though cities greater than 3,000 population major categories, including: mechanical; smaller systems have difficult inflow and discharging effluent from a lagoon lagoon; community septics; and non- infiltration (I&I) issues to solve. -
Estimation of Carbon Stocks from Mexico's Pantanos De Centla
Estimation of Carbon Stocks from Mexico’s Pantanos de Centla Mangroves The blue carbon ecosystems of southeastern Mexico are among the largest of any measured globally Principal investigators: Dr. Boone Kauffman (President and Lead Scientist, Illahee Sciences International, Inc.), Dr. Humberto Hernández Trejo (Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco), María del Carmen Jesús García (Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco), Chris Heider (Watershed Professionals Network LLC), and Dr. Wilfrido M. Contreras Sánchez (Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco) Important Mexican Mangrove Carbon Stocks The mangroves of southeastern Mexico’s Pantanos de Centla— the largest wetland in Mesoamerica—contain exceptionally large carbon stocks, which are among the largest of any man- grove ecosystem on Earth and among the largest of any tropical ecosystem. Clearing mangroves so that the land or shoreline can serve other uses thus comes at a high cost, because the replace- ment use may not store nearly as much carbon or in fact may allow stored carbon to be lost through greenhouse gas emissions, and it may also fail to provide other important ecosystem ser- vices that are characteristic of mangrove forests. Research has been conducted to assess carbon stocks in these ecosystems and, in particular, the differences in carbon storage between mangroves along the coastal fringe and estuarine man- groves. The project also examined the carbon stocks of cattle pastures that were established on sites previously occupied by mangrove forests, including the potential emissions that could arise from conversion of mangroves to cattle pastures. Results indicate that mangrove carbon stocks in the Pantanos de Centla are exceedingly high compared to those of the upland forests of Mexico and, moreover, that significant emissions result from the Sabalo estuarine mangrove forest, Pantanos de Centla. -
Regions and Cities at a Glance 2018 – MEXICO Economic Trends In
http://www.oecd.org/regional Regions and Cities at a Glance 2018 – MEXICO Economic trends in regions Regional gap in GDP per capita, 2003-16 Index of regional disparity in GDP per capita, 2016 GDP per capita in USD PPP Top 20 % richest over bottom 20% poorest regions 2016 2000 Ratio 140 000 Highest region 4 Small regions Large regions Campeche (TL3) (TL2) 120 000 48 980 USD 100 000 3 Second highest region 80 000 Mex ico City 39 860 USD 60 000 Mex ico 2 40 000 16 969 USD 20 000 1 Low est region 0 Chiapas 6 636 USD 2003 2010 2016 Country (number of regions considered) Mexico has high regional disparities. GDP per capita in Mexico City – the country’s second richest region after Campeche, where natural resources significantly contribute to the economy – was more than five times higher than in Chiapas in 2016. Even when resource rich regions such as Campeche or Tabasco are excluded, regional economic disparities in Mexico remain larger than in any other OECD country. However, regional disparities in terms of GDP per capita have slightly decreased in Mexico over the last sixteen years, when the richest and poorest 20% of regions are taken into account. With a productivity growth of 4.4% per year over the period 2010-16, Aguascalientes had the highest productivity growth and strongly converged towards the productivity level of Mexico City, the national frontier in terms of labour productivity (excluding Campeche). Tlaxcala recorded the lowest productivity growth of the country with -1% per year between 2010 and 2016 (excluding Campeche and Tabasco due to fluctuation of natural resource prices). -
Mexico), a Riverine Settlement in the Usumacinta Region
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE From Movement to Mobility: The Archaeology of Boca Chinikihá (Mexico), a Riverine Settlement in the Usumacinta Region A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology by Nicoletta Maestri June 2018 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Wendy Ashmore, Chairperson Dr. Scott L. Fedick Dr. Karl A. Taube Copyright by Nicoletta Maestri 2018 The Dissertation of Nicoletta Maestri is approved: Committee Chairperson University of California, Riverside ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation talks about the importance of movement and – curiously enough – it is the result of a journey that started long ago and far away. Throughout this journey, several people, in the US, Mexico and Italy, helped me grow personally and professionally and contributed to this accomplishment. First and foremost, I wish to thank the members of my dissertation committee: Wendy Ashmore, Scott Fedick and Karl Taube. Since I first met Wendy, at a conference in Mexico City in 2005, she became the major advocate of me pursuing a graduate career at UCR. I couldn’t have hoped for a warmer and more engaged and encouraging mentor. Despite the rough start and longer path of my graduate adventure, she never lost faith in me and steadily supported my decisions. Thank you, Wendy, for your guidance and for being a constant inspiration. During my graduate studies and in developing my dissertation research, Scott and Karl offered valuable advice, shared their knowledge on Mesoamerican cultures and peoples and provided a term of reference for rigorous and professional work. Aside from my committee, I especially thank Tom Patterson for his guidance and patience in our “one-to-one” core theory meetings. -
Tabasco Mexico
JURISDICTIONAL SUSTAINABILITY PROFILE TABASCO MEXICO LOW-EMISSION RURAL VILLAHERMOSA DEVELOPMENT (LED-R) FOREST NO FOREST AT A GLANCE DEFORESTATION (1985-2014) • Original forest covers 3.4% of the state; few remaining natural forest areas are located in inaccessible flood- DRIVERS OF Large-scale agriculture prone areas DEFORESTATION Sources: Large-scale cattle ranching Socio-economic: INEGI, OECD Deforestation: Hansen et al./ • 14% of state categorized as protected areas, but suffer UMD/Google/USGS/NASA; post- Small-scale cattle ranching high levels of illegal logging, hunting, & fire processing by EII AVERAGE ANNUAL 0.70 Mt CO (2012-2014) 2 Deforestation Includes above-ground biomass • Increase in mangrove areas over the past 10 years due to EMISSIONS FROM GDP & below-ground biomass DEFORESTATION Average deforestation 523,613 communities’ use of wildlife conservation management 2 AREA 24,738 km 2 units (UMAs), promoted by national Secretary of MILLIONS MXN POPULATION 2,454,295 (2018) 0.75 Environment & Natural Resources (SEMARNAT) & National HDI 74.17 (2012) 400,000 Forestry Commission (CONAFOR) GDP USD 27.02 billion 0.50 (2016, Base year 2013) • Significant production of crude petroleum derived GINI 0.46 (2014) 200,000 from mangrove ecosystems, with cases of soil & water 0.25 MAIN ECONOMIC Extraction of non-renewable contamination & ecosystem disruption HUNDREDS OF Km ACTIVITIES resources 0.2 0.00 0.13 0.25 0.45 0.13 0.39 0.19 0.26 0.13 0.14 0.21 0.33 0.32 0.38 0.65 0.91 0 • One of Mexico’s main beef providers from the Trade 03 04 05 -
Mexico: State Law on Legitimation and Distinctions Between Children Born in and out of Wedlock
Report for the Executive Office for Immigration Review LL Files Nos. 2017-014922 through 2017-014953 Mexico: State Law on Legitimation and Distinctions Between Children Born In and Out of Wedlock (Update) August 2017 The Law Library of Congress, Global Legal Research Center (202) 707-6462 (phone) • (866) 550-0442 (fax) • [email protected] • http://www.law.gov Contents Introduction .....................................................................................................................................1 Aguascalientes .................................................................................................................................2 Baja California .................................................................................................................................4 Baja California Sur ..........................................................................................................................6 Campeche .........................................................................................................................................8 Chiapas ...........................................................................................................................................10 Chihuahua ......................................................................................................................................12 Coahuila .........................................................................................................................................14 Colima ............................................................................................................................................15