Free Speech, Free Press, Free Society

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

NYLJ.COM | WEDNESDAY, MAY 1, 2019 | 7 Free Speech, Free Press, Free Society Independent Judiciary And Independent Press Are Crucial To Free Society Janet DiFiore Chief Judge State of New York “If freedom of speech is taken decisions. Lawyers, however, face away, then dumb and silent we no such restriction. Indeed, as the may be led, like sheep to the rule of law’s ultimate defenders, law- slaughter.” yers have a special responsibility to —George Washington speak out in defense of judicial inde- LOOMBERG /B pendence and push back resolutely his year’s Law Day theme— against those who seek to politicize OODNEY Free Speech, Free Press, Free the judiciary and foment disrespect G T Society—challenges us to consider for judges. We cannot allow the judi- RIS CH the relationship between the First ciary to become a casualty of par- Amendment and the rule of law. In tisan politics and the culture wars. only 45 words, the First Amendment Similarly, attacks on the media PHOTO ESSAY of the United States Constitution branding it the enemy of the people protects freedom of speech, press, destabilize our republican form of religion, assembly and petition. government. Just as an impartial and These cherished, uniquely American independent judiciary capable of Impact of rights are at the heart of our demo- protecting our fundamental rights cratic tradition and underscore our Free Speech in commitment to an open culture that values human expression and con- A Digital Age science. Freedom of speech and press are Americans Oppose Excerpts from the ABA’s the great enablers of democratic Hate Speech Laws ‘Law Day 2019 Planning Guide’ participation, providing the means by which our citizenry can debate But Say Hate Speech the issues of the day, evaluate the Is Morally Unacceptable. reedom of speech and free- performance of our elected repre- Fdom of the press protect sentatives, cast our votes and help journalists and other people shape the direction of our nation’s 59% Of respondents said from interference by the gov- policies and laws. As the Supreme government should allow hate speech. ernment in the dissemination Court stated: “There is practically of information. But people, universal agreement that a major 40% Believe government should LOOMBERG prevent hate speech. including the press, have a /B purpose of the First Amendment responsibility not to communi- was to protect the free discussion 79% Said hate speech is morally cate false information.[…] awson of governmental affairs.” Landmark unacceptable. D In 1997, during the early Communications v. Virginia, 435 U.S. Believe it is morally 19% IMON years of Internet usage S 829, 838 (1978). acceptable. among the public, the Supreme Furthermore, as George Wash- Court recognized in Reno v. ington suggested, the First Amend- American Civil Liberties Union The Internet, smartphones, and social media have all enabled us to share more information more quickly ment is also an important defense Source: ‘Law Day 2019 Planning that the First Amendment rights than ever before. In the top photo, customers looks at smartphones on display at a Samsung event in against secret government, authori- Guide’ of free speech and free press New York. Above, a demonstrator wears a mask depicting Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, as he stands tarianism and tyranny. Indeed, a free applied to this new communica- with demonstrators wearing angry emoji masks outside the venue of a U.K. parliamentary committee press serves as the watchdog of our tion frontier. The Court’s ruling hearing in London last year. Below, some of the Facebook and Instagram ads linked to a Russian effort democracy, reporting on important supported the ACLU’s position to disrupt the American political process and stir up tensions around divisive social issues, released by events and issues, identifying wrong- and liberties is an indispensable in the case that the Internet is a members of the U.S. House Intelligence committee, are photographed in Washington, D.C. doing and injustice and ensuring pillar of our tripartite system of “freespeech zone.” transparency and accountability government, so too is a free press. Today, important issues, in all areas of our society. As Thomas Jefferson stated in 1786: such as “fake news” and As judges and lawyers who value “Our liberty depends on the freedom cyberbullying, heighten con- the rule of law and understand the of the press, and that cannot be lim- cern over what speech should power and purpose of the First ited without [liberty] being lost.” and should not be protected Amendment, we must be vigilant in It is increasingly urgent for the under the First Amendment. responding to new challenges cre- legal profession, the press and our Most major social media ated by the rise of the Internet and schools and educators to work sites—such as Facebook, social media, and by the powerful together to improve civic knowledge YouTube, Twitter, and Insta- ways in which they are influencing and galvanize public support for an gram—have content and pri- our public discourse. The growing independent and impartial judiciary vacy policies meant to police tendency of people to consume and a free and independent press. A their sites. However, these news and information from media public lacking basic literacy about same policies, many argue, outlets which confirm their existing the roles and functions of the three have led to the suppression of viewpoints is politicizing our debate branches of government and con- activist speech that support on public issues. In this climate, we stitutional imperatives like judicial causes perceived to be unpopu- have seen public attacks on judges independence will be vulnerable to lar. And these standards are by political leaders which have propaganda and find it difficult to generally outside any review gone far beyond disagreement with distinguish between appropriate under the First Amendment the merits of judicial decisions to and inappropriate criticism of our because they are imposed by include personal invective designed courts. Judges are not immune from private companies and not by to intimidate judges and undermine criticism, of course, but the public government. What does it mean K/AP their legitimacy and authority in the needs to understand that there is that private, for-profit compa- public eye. a critical difference between dis- LSWIC nies have so much power to E As members of the only non- agreeing with a decision and say- ON control speech that is critical J political branch of government, ing a judge was wrong on the mer- to a free society? judges generally are ethically pro- its and making personal attacks or hibited from responding to criticism intimidating statements calculated or discussing the merits of their to delegitimize judicial » Page 10 Inside The Vital Relationship Between the Courts and the Press Liberty Begins at Home: New York’s Vital Role In Preserving a Free Press understanding and knowledge concerning court initiatives, pro- in contrast to many other juris- by Rolando T. Acosta .....................8 Lawrence K. Marks of the workings of the courts is grams and events, administrative dictions, New York prohibits the critical to achieving public trust appointments and other official broadcasting of witness testi- Freedom of Information Chief Administrative Judge and confidence in our justice announcements, and maintains mony from trial courtrooms (see Is Integral for a Free Press New York State system, we rely heavily on news the court system’s social media Civil Rights Law §52). Although by Alan Scheinkman .....................8 Unified Court System media to educate the public about accounts. The Office regularly several decades ago New York what we do and how we operate. fields questions about court cases, experimented with audio/visual Our Free Press: Thus, ensuring transparency in the and often assists reporters in gain- coverage, including witness testi- A Historical Perspective operation of the courts requires ing physical access to court pro- mony, of most trial court proceed- by Elizabeth A. Garry ....................8 cooperation between the courts ceedings. It also assists the press ings subject to certain limitations, and the news media. in obtaining access to court files, that legislation lapsed in 1997. Internet Is an Essential he Unified Court System is a end up serving on a jury. A much To further that goal, the court caseload data and other relevant For trial court proceedings that Conduit to Exercising Tlarge and complex government smaller number interact with system’s Public Information Office information about the courts. We do not involve witness testimo- Our Right to Assemble institution that impacts the lives courts as participants in litigation. works on a daily basis to provide fully recognize the vitally impor- ny, still photography and audio/ by Gerald J. Whalen ......................9 of New Yorkers in countless ways. Because there is such limited information about the Unified tant role of the news media, and video coverage are permitted at Despite that, relatively few New opportunity for the great majority Court System to both internal we strive to assist them in gain- the discretion of the judge. The We Must Protect ‘One of the Yorkers have direct involvement of New Yorkers to directly interact and external audiences, espe- ing access to the information they Court of Appeals and the four Greatest Bulwarks of Liberty’ with the courts or the legal pro- with our justice system, much of cially members of the press. The need. Appellate Division Departments by Michael Miller ...........................9 cess on a regular basis. Most who what they learn about the courts Office is responsible for prepar- Of course, the press is welcome are not subject to this prohibition directly interact with the court comes from the media—newspa- ing and distributing to local and and, indeed, have a constitutional because appellate proceedings system are those summoned for pers, television, radio and, increas- statewide media outlets press right to attend and report on court do not involve testimony, and so LAW DAY: Angela Turturro, Sections Editor jury service, few of whom actually ingly, social media.
Recommended publications
  • Alexander Hamilton and the Development of American Law

    Alexander Hamilton and the Development of American Law

    Alexander Hamilton and the Development of American Law Katherine Elizabeth Brown Amherst, New York Master of Arts in American History, University of Virginia, 2012 Master of Arts in American History, University at Buffalo, 2010 Bachelor of Science in Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University, 2004 A Dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Virginia in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History University of Virginia May, 2015 This dissertation is dedicated to the memory of Matthew and Theresa Mytnik, my Rana and Boppa. i ABSTRACT ―Alexander Hamilton and the Development of American Law,‖ is the first comprehensive, scholarly analysis of Alexander Hamilton‘s influence on American jurisprudence, and it provides a new approach to our understanding of the growth of federal judicial and executive power in the new republic. By exploring Hamilton's policy objectives through the lens of the law, my dissertation argues that Hamilton should be understood and evaluated as a foundational lawmaker in the early republic. He used his preferred legal toolbox, the corpus of the English common law, to make lasting legal arguments about the nature of judicial and executive power in republican governments, the boundaries of national versus state power, and the durability of individual rights. Not only did Hamilton combine American and inherited English principles to accomplish and legitimate his statecraft, but, in doing so, Hamilton had a profound influence on the substance of American law,
  • Freedom of the Press: Croswell's Case

    Freedom of the Press: Croswell's Case

    Fordham Law Review Volume 33 Issue 3 Article 3 1965 Freedom of the Press: Croswell's Case Morris D. Forkosch Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Morris D. Forkosch, Freedom of the Press: Croswell's Case, 33 Fordham L. Rev. 415 (1965). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol33/iss3/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Law Review by an authorized editor of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Freedom of the Press: Croswell's Case Cover Page Footnote The instant study was initiated by Professor Vincent C. Hopkins, S.J., of the Department of History, Fordham University, during 1963. In the spring of 1964 be died, leaving an incomplete draft; completion necessitated research, correction, and re-writing almost entirely, to the point where it became an entirly new paper, and the manuscript was ready for printing when the first olumev of Professor Goebel's, The Law Practice of Alexander Hamilton (1964), appeared. At pages 775-SO6 Goebel gives the background of the Croswell case and, because of many details and references there appearing, the present article has been slimmed down considerably. However, the point of view adopted by Goebel is to give the background so that Hamilton's participation and argument can be understood. The purpose of the present article is to disclose the place occupied by this case (and its participants) in the stream of American libertarian principles, and ezpzdally those legal concepts which prevented freedom of the press from becoming an everyday actuality until the legislatures changed the common law.
  • Open Dissertation Final.Pdf

    Open Dissertation Final.Pdf

    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of the Liberal Arts “BREAKING OVER THE BOUNDARIES OF THE PARTY:” THE ROLE OF PARTY NEWSPAPERS IN DEMOCRATIC FACTIONALISM IN THE ANTEBELLUM NORTH, 1845-1852 A Dissertation in History by Matthew Isham © 2010 Matthew Isham Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2010 The dissertation of Matthew Isham was reviewed and approved* by the following: Mark E. Neely, Jr. McCabe-Greer Professor in the American Civil War Era Dissertation Advisor Chair of Committee Anthony E. Kaye Associate Professor of History Matthew Restall Edwin Earle Sparks Professor of Colonial Latin American History, Anthropology and Women‟s Studies J. Ford Risley Associate Professor of Communications Carol Reardon Director of Graduate Studies George Winfree Professor of American History *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School. ii ABSTRACT In the first half of the nineteenth century partisan newspapers performed a crucial function in the creation and maintenance of the Democratic Party. Partisan newspapers sprang up rapidly throughout the country in large cities and small towns, coastal ports and western settlements. For many of their readers, these newspapers embodied the party itself. The papers introduced readers to the leaders of their parties, disseminated party principles and creeds, and informed them of the seemingly nefarious machinations of their foes in other parties. They provided a common set of political ideals and a common political language that linked like- minded residents of distant communities, otherwise unknown to each other, in a cohesive organization. In the North, the focus of this dissertation, these newspapers interpreted regional economic development and local political issues within the context of their partisan ideals, providing guidance to readers as they confronted the parochial issues of their community.
  • Columbia County

    Columbia County

    History of Columbia County Bench and Bar Helen E. Freedman Contents I. County Origins 2 a. General Narrative 2 b. Legal and Social Beginnings 3 c. Timeline 4 II. County Courts and Courthouses 6 III. The Bench and The Bar 10 a. Judges and Justices 10 b. Attorneys and District Attorneys 19 c. Columbia County Bar Association 24 IV. Notable Cases 25 V. County Resources and References 28 a. Bibliography 28 b. County Legal Records and their Location 28 c. County History Contacts 29 i. Town and Village Historians 30 ii. Local Historical Societies 31 iii. County, Town & Village Clerks 32 1 08/13/2019 I. County Origins a. General Narrative In September of 1609, Henry Hudson, an Englishman sailing under the auspices of the Dutch East India Company, set foot in what was to become Columbia County. When he stepped off his vessel, the Half Moon, he was the first European to arrive and was greeted by natives from the Mohican tribes who had settled in what is Stockport today.1 Starting in about 1620, Dutch immigrants settled the area along the Hudson River and extending east to the Massachusetts border, pursuant to land patents issued by the Dutch West India Company. Large manorial tracts were granted to the Van Rensselaer family, mostly in the northern part of the county and further north, starting in 1629. Kiliaen Van Rensselaer, a dia- mond and pearl merchant from Amsterdam and a director of the Dutch West India Company, founded the Manor of Rensselaerswyck in 1630, which included what is now the Capital District and Rensselaer and part of Columbia Counties.
  • The Reverend Harry Croswell and Black Episcopalians in New Haven, 1820-1860

    The Reverend Harry Croswell and Black Episcopalians in New Haven, 1820-1860

    The North Star: A Journal of African American Religious History (ISSN: 1094-902X ) Volume 7, Number 1 (Fall 2003) The Reverend Harry Croswell and Black Episcopalians in New Haven, 1820-1860 Randall K. Burkett, Emory University ©2003 Randall K. Burkett. Any archiving, redistribution, or republication of this text in any medium requires the consent of the author. We are pleased to publish this article in cooperation with The A.M.E. Church Review, which will also publish it in the September-October 2003 issue. During the first half of the nineteenth century, African co-editing, with his older brother Mackay Croswell, a Americans seeking to form independent black weekly newspaper, The Catskill Packet.2 congregations within predominately white denominations needed to secure the support of In 1801 Croswell moved to Hudson, New York, to sympathetic whites who could assist in manipulating join the retired Congregational minister, Ezra the levers of denominational and local political Sampson, and a bookseller, George Chittenden, in power. In the Protestant Episcopal Church there were publication of an independent newspaper called The a handful of bishops, clergy, and laymen who played Balance and Columbian Repository. Croswell's forte this important intermediary role. Supportive bishops on the paper was his acerbic -- one could even say included William White in Pennsylvania, Thomas C. venomous -- political commentary.3 Indeed, his Brownell in Connecticut, Alonzo Potter in intemperate columns in this paper and another, The Pennsylvania, and William R. Whittingham in Wasp (which he published briefly in 1802 to counter Maryland. Supportive laity included Benjamin Rush the pro-Democratic paper The Bee), foreshadowed and that rarity among antebellum Episcopalians -- the the end of his journalistic career.4 Croswell printed abolitionists -- William Jay and John Jay, II.
  • PEOPLE V. CROSWELL: LIBELOUS TRUTH, the COMMON LAW, and BATTLEFIELD of the BLOODLESS REVOLUTION Samuel A

    PEOPLE V. CROSWELL: LIBELOUS TRUTH, the COMMON LAW, and BATTLEFIELD of the BLOODLESS REVOLUTION Samuel A

    PEOPLE V. CROSWELL: LIBELOUS TRUTH, THE COMMON LAW, AND BATTLEFIELD OF THE BLOODLESS REVOLUTION Samuel A. Schwartz The case of People v. Croswell1 will forever stand for the spirited arguments by leading legal minds about the legality of using truth as a defense to criminal libel, establishing the common law, and determining the role of the jury. But it is the story of Harry Croswell, young firebrand Federalist editor of The Wasp, that provides an insightful view into the turbulent political scene that stormed fiercely across the United States at the turn of the nineteenth century. I. HISTORICAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND A. Political Turmoil and the Press The great unity of the American Revolution quickly gave way to partisan discord as the fragile formation of the nation was threatened by intense political strife.2 With the nature of the new nation’s governance on the line, the Federalist and Anti-Federalist political parties stood diametrically opposed.3 Led by Alexander Hamilton, the Federalists staunchly believed in strong national government and broad federal powers. Conversely, Thomas Jefferson’s Anti-Federalists, also known as Democratic-Republicans, Republicans, or Jeffersonians, steadfastly believed in state’s rights and limited national government.4 Spurred on by Jefferson, Republican editors began waging a war of words against the Federalists after Jefferson had openly complained that George Washington’s presidency was “galloping fast into monarchy” while a member of Washington’s cabinet.5 Lambasting Federalist 1 People v. Croswell, 3 Johns. Cas. 337 (1804). 2 Paul McGrath, People v. Croswell: Alexander Hamilton and the Transformation of the Common Law of Libel, 7 JUD.
  • Between 1815 and 1818 the Newspaper Connecticut Courant

    Between 1815 and 1818 the Newspaper Connecticut Courant

    THE POLITICAL IDEOLOGY OF CONNECTICUT’S STANDING ORDER A dissertation submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Chad D. Lower May, 2013 Dissertation written by Chad D. Lower B.A., The Ohio State University, 1999 M.A., Ashland Theological Seminary, 2005 Ph.D., Kent State University, 2013 Approved by Kim Gruenwald Chair, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Leonne Hudson Members, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Diane Barnes Jerry Lewis Jeffrey Wattles Accepted by Kenneth Bindas Chair, Department of History Ray Craig Dean, College of Arts and Sciences ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS……………………………………….……………………......v CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION………………………………………….……………1 The Political and Religious Landscape………………….…………..…...5 Historiography……………………………………………………...…..13 Definitions……………………………………………………….……..17 Chapter Overview……………………………………………………....19 Conclusion……………………………………………………………...21 II. CHAPTER ONE: WINDS OF CHANGE…………………..………….23 Part One: The Status Quo of the Established Church…………….…….25 Part Two: Social Changes and the Standing Order…………………….33 Part Three: The Established Church’s Response……………………....52 Part Four: The Dissenter Perspective………………………….……….67 Conclusion………………………………………………………….…..79 III. CHAPTER TWO: THE PILLARS OF THE STANDING ORDER.…..82 Part One: Timothy Dwight: The Beacon at New Haven……….………84 Part Two: David Daggett: The Persuasive Politician………………....107 Part Three: Zephaniah Swift: Judicial Power…………………………118 Conclusion……………………………………………………...……..131
  • The Sedition Act of 1798

    The Sedition Act of 1798

    The Sedition Act of 1798 Sedition Act of 1798 – a brief history of arrests, indictments, mistreatment & abuse By Gordon T. Belt First Amendment Center library manager Introduction In 1798 the Alien and Sedition Acts were signed into law by President John Adams in response to fears of an impending war with France. These acts, consisting of four laws passed by the Federalist-controlled Congress, increased the residency requirement for American citizenship from five to 14 years, authorized the president to imprison or deport aliens considered "dangerous to the peace and safety of the United States" and restricted speech critical of the government. While the Federalists, led by Alexander Hamilton and Adams, argued that these laws were passed to protect the United States from foreign invaders and propagandists, Democratic-Republicans, led by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, saw the Alien and Sedition Acts as a direct threat to individual liberty and the First Amendment by a tyrannical government. The Alien and Sedition Acts were fiercely debated in the press, which was overtly partisan at the time. Many editors of Democratic-Republican-sponsored newspapers vehemently opposed the new laws, in particular the Sedition Act, which made speaking openly against the government a crime of libel punishable by fine and even prison time. Federalists sought to quell dissent by prosecuting those who violated the Sedition Act to the fullest extent of the law. Accounts vary about the number of arrests and indictments that occurred as a result of the passage of the Sedition Act of 1798. Most scholars cite 25 arrests and at least 17 verifiable indictments – 14 under the Sedition Act and three under common law.
  • The Beginnings of the Episcopal Church in Connecticut M

    The Beginnings of the Episcopal Church in Connecticut M

    TERCENTENARY COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT COMMITTEE ON HISTORICAL PUBLICATIONS The Beginnings of the Episcopal Church in Connecticut m PUBLISHED FOR THE TERCENTENARY COMMISSION BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY PRESS •j^BPPPMI^^^gl;;' 19 3 4 D / 1 . U TER XXX HIGH SCHOOL LIBRARY Llb'f-iry Service Center 50008372! 706 South Main Street Middletown, Connecticut 06457 TERCENTENARY COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT COMMITTEE ON HISTORICAL PUBLICATIONS The Beginnings of the Episcopal Church in Connecticut ORIGEN STORRS SEYMOUR I N order to get a right perspective of the history of religious life in Connecticut, it is important to re- member that in seeking a place in which to worship God in their own way, our Puritan ancestors sought Ito escape the way of worshipping God according to the ritual and discipline of the Church of England. That the Church of England, by reason of the Toleration Act passed in 1689, had ceased to harry the Presbyterians, counted for little in Massachusetts and Connecticut. The wounds of the persecution they had fled from were still too fresh in their minds to incline them to exercise tolerance here, where the arm of English civil government was palsied. The Charter of 1662 was the broadest charter granted to any plantation, and the general court in Connecticut conveniently forgot to send home the laws they enacted for their own governance. It was in this infertile soil that the worship of the Church of England was introduced into the colony in 1702. The year previous, the Society for the Propagation of the Gos- 1 pel in Foreign Parts had been founded by members of that Church.
  • 13 T/H+I. 7 Signature of Certifying Official Date Deputy Commissioner for Historic Preservation

    13 T/H+I. 7 Signature of Certifying Official Date Deputy Commissioner for Historic Preservation

    (June 1991) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES ' ' - <- ^ MULTIPLE PROPERTY DOCUMENTATION FORM This-• form* is- for* use in• documenting* - multiple-, - n property -"-J^'.-groupB^rel-atirigj^EgE •'•4{CPwc£s one for, several historic contexts. See instructions in How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (National Register Bulletin 16B). Complete each item by entering the requested information. For additional space, use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer to complete all items. [X] New Submission [ ] Amended Submission A. Name of Multiple Property Listing____________________________________________ The Architectural and Historic Resources of the Hamlet of Claverack, Columbia County, New York B. Associated Historic Contexts___________________________________________ (Name each associated historic context, identifying theme, geographical area, and chronological period of each.) Settlement and Civic Organization, 1630-1786 Professional and Educational Development, 1786-1900 Transportation and Industrial Development, 1800-1945 Hamlet Agricultural Development, 1800-1945 C. Form Prepared by___________________________________________________ name/title Sally Bottigcri Naramore, Preservation Consultant_____________________ Edited bv; John A. Bonafide. Program Analyst, NYSOPRHP. Albany. N.Y._____ organization Clover Reach____________________________ date January, 1997 street & number P.O. Box 365_________________________
  • British Journal of American Legal Studies | Volume 7 Issue 1 American Legal Studies Volume 7 Issue 1 Spring 2018

    British Journal of American Legal Studies | Volume 7 Issue 1 American Legal Studies Volume 7 Issue 1 Spring 2018

    Birmingham City School of Law British Journal of British Journal of American Legal Studies | Volume 7 Issue 1 7 Issue Legal Studies | Volume British Journal of American American Legal Studies Volume 7 Issue 1 Spring 2018 ARTICLES Founding-Era Socialism: The Original Meaning of the Constitution’s Postal Clause Robert G. Natelson Toward Natural Born Derivative Citizenship John Vlahoplus Felix Frankfurter and the Law Thomas Halper Fundamental Rights in Early American Case Law: 1789-1859 Nicholas P. Zinos The Holmes Truth: Toward a Pragmatic, Holmes-Influenced Conceptualization of the Nature of Truth Jared Schroeder Acts of State, State Immunity, and Judicial Review in the United States Zia Akthar ISSN 2049-4092 (Print) British Journal of American Legal Studies Editor-in-Chief: Dr Anne Richardson Oakes, Birmingham City University. Associate Editors Dr. Sarah Cooper, Birmingham City University. Dr. Haydn Davies, Birmingham City University. Prof. Julian Killingley, Birmingham City University. Prof. Jon Yorke, Birmingham City University. Seth Barrett Tillman, National University of Ireland, Maynooth. Birmingham City University Student Editorial Assistants 2017-2018 Mercedes Cooling Graduate Editorial Assistants 2017-2018 Amna Nazir Alice Storey Editorial Board Hon. Joseph A. Greenaway Jr., Circuit Judge 3rd Circuit, U.S. Court of Appeals. Hon. Raymond J. McKoski, Circuit Judge (retired), 19th Judicial Circuit Court, IL. Adjunct Professor of Law, The John Marshall Law School, Chicago, IL. Prof. Antonio Aunion, University of Castille-la Mancha. Prof. Francine Banner, Phoenix School of Law, AZ. Prof. Devon W. Carbado, UCLA, CA. Dr. Damian Carney, University of Portsmouth, UK. Dr. Simon Cooper, Reader in Property Law, Oxford Brookes University. Prof.
  • JUDICIAL NOTICE Issue 7 L Summer 2011 I 7 E U S S L

    JUDICIAL NOTICE Issue 7 L Summer 2011 I 7 E U S S L

    Judicial Notice A PERIODICaL OF NEW YORK COURT HISTORy JUDICIAL NOTICE ISSUE 7 l SUMMER 2011 i s s u e 7 l s People v. Croswell Paul McGrath u m m e r 2 0 1 1 l Ballot Reform and the Election of 1891 l David Sheridan Charles David Breitel l W.B. Benkard ThE HISTORICaL SOCIETy OF ThE COURTS OF ThE STaTE OF NEW YORK TABLE CONTENTS of ISSUE 7 SUMMER 2011 pg 3 pg 5 pg 21 pg 39 FEATURED ARTICLES Pg 5 People v. Croswell by Paul McGrath Pg 21 Ballot Reform and the Election of 1891 by David Sheridan Pg 39 Charles David Breitel by James W.B. Benkard DEPARTMENTS Pg 2 From the Editor-in-Chief Pg 3 A Gala Opening Statement Pg 49 The David A. Garfinkel Essay Contest Pg 58 A Look Back Pg 61 Society Officers and Trustees Pg 61 Society Membership Pg 64 Become a Member Pg 66 Courthouse Art JUDICIAL NOTICE l 1 F ROM THE EDITOR-IN-CHIEF n 2003, on the occasion of the inaugural issue of this publication, the Society’s founders, Judith S. Kaye and Albert M. Rosenblatt, declared that our mission was to “cast the net” for Dearhistorical “riches” aboutMembers New York’s courts. I am pleased to say that the issue of Judicial Notice you now hold in your hands lives up to that standard. IIn the pages that follow, you will find original scholarship about significant moments, figures and symbols in New York history. While the riches you will read about in these pages are largely centered on scholarly history, we are privileged as well, as members of the Society, to enjoy a remarkable personal collegiality; we begin this issue with a review of our Galas, honoring three pillars of our court system: the judges, the lawyers, and the court staff.