DOCSLIB.ORG

Shape Constancy: the Effects of Changing Shape Orientation and the Effects of Changing the Position of Focal Features

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Shape Constancy: the Effects of Changing Shape Orientation and the Effects of Changing the Position of Focal Features Perception & Psychophysics 1984.36 (f). 50·64 Shape constancy: The effects of changing shape orientation and the effects of changing the position of focal features GLYN W. HUMPHREYS Birkbeck College, University ojLondon, London, England Five experiments examined the time taken to judge that two consecutive elongated geometrical shapes had the same structure, irrespective of their orientation. Shape transformations either changed the orientation of the principal axis while maintaining the relative locations of focal features or maintained the orientation of the principal axis while changing the relative locations of focal features, or they changed both. Experiment 1 demonstrated that changes in the orien­ tation of the principal axis were more detrimental to matching than were changes in the loca­ tions of the shape's focal features. Indeed, the time taken to match same-orientation shapes was the same as that taken to match shapes that maintained the same position in the visual field. Further experiments showed that this result was not due to differential apparent motion in the transformation conditions, that it was not due to response bias, and that it generalized across shapes. However, the result was different when subjects could predict the location of the to-be-matched stimulus. In this case, performance was principally affected by the position of the focal feature of the shape and not by the shape's orientation. It is suggested that the results reflect the efficiency with which subjects can construct matching representations for the stim­ uli. When subjects cannot predict stimulus locations, they generate representations by describ­ ing shape structure relative to the shape's principal axis. When the axis of the to-be-matched shapes is constant, subjects can use the same procedure in generating this representation for both shapes, facilitating matching relative to the case in which the orientation of the axis changes. When subjects can predict the stimulus location, they selectively attend to the focal features of shapes, minimizing the effects of shape orientation. People can recognize familiar shapes when they are & Shepard, 1973, 1975; Metzler & Shepard, 1974; seen from novel viewpoints. This ability to achieve Shepard, 1975; Shepard & Metzler, 1971). In some shape constancy even when the retinal projection tasks, subjects discriminate between transformed changes is a primary characteristic required of any shapes and their reflections, knowing the structural visual processing system, and should be accounted identity ofthe shapes and the type of transformation for by any theory of shape recognition (Marr, 1980). by which they will differ. For instance, Shepard and The present paper explores some of the processes Metzler (1971) presented subjects with perspective that enable shape constancy to be achieved. line drawings of three-dimensional shapes at differ­ Studies of the efficiency with which subjects achieve ent orientations and asked them to decide whether shape constancy across a range of stimulus transfor­ the shapes were physically the same or whether one mations can inform us about the nature of the pro­ was a reflection of the other. A common finding is cesses involved. A common task in such studies is that reaction time (RT) to match forms is a linear simultaneous or successive form matching, in which function of the size of the transformation, suggesting subjects decide whether two forms have the same that shape constancy is achieved by the transforma­ identity. A number of studies have investigated the tion of an internal representation of a shape in a effects, on matching, of transformations in size (e.g., manner isomorphic with the external transformation. Bundesen & Larsen, 1975; Larsen & Bundesen, 1978; However, this is not the only, or perhaps even the Sekuler & Nash, 1972) or orientation (e.g., Cooper usual, means of achieving shape constancy. There are cases in which subjects cannot predict the trans­ formation or the internal representation appropriate This work was supported by a grant from the Social Science Research Council. I would like to thank Penny Wilcox for her to a shape. Shape constancy in this circumstance re­ help in producing the presentation programs, Philip Quinlan and quires the generation of a representation that is Jane Riddoch for their discussion of earlier drafts of this paper, viewpoint-independent from one that is viewpoint­ and an anonymous referee for helpful comments during its pro­ dependent. For instance, Rock, DiVita, and Barbeito cessing. My mailing address is: Department of Psychology, Birkbeck College, University of London, Malet Street, London, WCIE (1981) showed subjects novel two- or three-dimensional 7HX, England. wire figures, and then tested for the recognition of Copyright 1984 Psychonomic Society, Inc. 50 SHAPE CONSTANCY 51 the figures following an orientation transformation. controlled. Nevertheless, many of the transforma­ They found that altering the relative positions of the tions producing changes of the top and bottom posi­ top and bottom of the object was more detrimental tions also appear to have changed the orientation of to recognition than altering only the positions of the the principal axis (see Figures 1 and 2 in Rock et al., sides. This result led Rock et al. to argue that shapes 1981). It seems reasonable to conclude that their were represented by a description of their top and findings are consistent with these proposals. bottom features and the location of the sides between There are also other examples supporting the axis­ the top and bottom. Consequently, the most disrup­ based account. For instance, consider the shapes pre­ tive orientational transformation will alter the rela­ sented in Figure 1. Mach (1897) first noted that, de­ tive positions of the top and bottom features. spite the fact that all the individual shapes were at the A related proposal concerning the processing of same orientation, subjects reported that the isolated simple geometric shapes has been made by Braine shape was seen as a diamond whereas the shapes in (1978; Braine, Relyea, & Davidman, 1981). She, like the oblique line were seen as squares. The different Rock et aI., argues that shapes are recognized by a descriptions for these shapes appear to arise because hierarchical process of feature description; however, the shapes in the oblique line are represented relative she proposes that this process first codes only the to a coordinate system based on the elongated axis top position, and then proceeds in a top-to-bottom of the configuration; in contrast, the isolated shape direction. The top position is characterized by the is represented relative to its salient vertical axis of presence of a focal feature and by the vertical orien­ symmetry (cf. Goldmeier, 1936; Julesz, 1971; Rock tation of the main axis of the shape. Because the & Leaman, 1963).Relative to these axes, descriptions feature-description process is hierarchical, recogni­ appropriate to a square and a diamond arise. Consis­ tion will proceed most efficiently when the focal fea­ tent empirical evidence has been reported by ture is at the top of the shape. Transformations pro­ Humphreys (1983). Subjects had to decide as quickly ducing a change in the relative position of the top of as possible whether successive forms had the same or the shape willmost affect recognition. different numbers of sides. Two types of shape were The proposals of Rock et al. and Braine maintain used, those with an unambiguous, elongated prin­ that shapes are represented internally by a structural cipal axis (isosceles triangles and elongated penta­ description based on important characteristics of the gons) and those with an ambiguous principal axis shape. They differ in the importance assigned to (squares and regular hexagons). Matching shapes bottom-position features and in specifying a means could be orientational transformations of one another, by which the top position can be assigned. However, so the task demanded matches of shape identity in­ both suggest that the top-position feature provides dependent of the transformation. Humphreys found the primary reference coordinates for the representa­ that orientational transformations that changed the tion. Because the coordinate system is then based on axis aligned with the vertical disrupted the matching a feature of the object, the representation so formed of shapes with ambiguous principal axes (e.g., when is viewpoint-independent and so would enable shape a square was transformed 45 deg within-the-plane, constancy to occur. Transformations generating into a diamond). Similar transformations did not changes in viewpoint-dependent codings of the (top) disrupt the matching of shapes with an unambiguous reference feature will giverise to problems in deriving principal axis (e.g., when an isosceles triangle was shape constancy. transformed 45 deg within-the-plane). These data Work in the field of computer vision also suggests suggest that shapes were matched using a coordinate that shape constancy depends on a structural descrip­ system derived from the shape's principal axis. For tion based on an object-centered coordinate system shapes with an ambiguous principal axis, the axis (e.g., Hinton, 1981; Marr, 1979, 1980, 1982; Marr of description will be determined by alignment of the & Nishihara, 1978). However, this approach con­ trasts with the feature-based account in proposing that the coordinate system is derived from a more global property of the shape than the position of focal features. For instance, Marr and his co-workers have argued that a suitable coordinate system may be determined by the orientation of the principal axis of the shape (Marr, 1982; Marr & Nishihara, 1978). According to this account, changes in the orientation of a shape may be more disruptive to shape constancy than changes in the position of focal features. It is difficult to apply this argument directly to Rock et al. experiment becausethe effects of the trans­ o formations on the principal axis were not directly Figure 1. Mach's demonstration. 52 HUMPHREYS axis with the vertical.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Molecular Symmetry
    Molecular Symmetry Symmetry helps us understand molecular structure, some chemical properties, and characteristics of physical properties (spectroscopy) – used with group theory to predict vibrational spectra for the identification of molecular shape, and as a tool for understanding electronic structure and bonding. Symmetrical : implies the species possesses a number of indistinguishable configurations. 1 Group Theory : mathematical treatment of symmetry. symmetry operation – an operation performed on an object which leaves it in a configuration that is indistinguishable from, and superimposable on, the original configuration. symmetry elements – the points, lines, or planes to which a symmetry operation is carried out. Element Operation Symbol Identity Identity E Symmetry plane Reflection in the plane σ Inversion center Inversion of a point x,y,z to -x,-y,-z i Proper axis Rotation by (360/n)° Cn 1. Rotation by (360/n)° Improper axis S 2. Reflection in plane perpendicular to rotation axis n Proper axes of rotation (C n) Rotation with respect to a line (axis of rotation). •Cn is a rotation of (360/n)°. •C2 = 180° rotation, C 3 = 120° rotation, C 4 = 90° rotation, C 5 = 72° rotation, C 6 = 60° rotation… •Each rotation brings you to an indistinguishable state from the original. However, rotation by 90° about the same axis does not give back the identical molecule. XeF 4 is square planar. Therefore H 2O does NOT possess It has four different C 2 axes. a C 4 symmetry axis. A C 4 axis out of the page is called the principle axis because it has the largest n . By convention, the principle axis is in the z-direction 2 3 Reflection through a planes of symmetry (mirror plane) If reflection of all parts of a molecule through a plane produced an indistinguishable configuration, the symmetry element is called a mirror plane or plane of symmetry .
    [Show full text]
  • (II) I Main Topics a Rotations Using a Stereonet B
    GG303 Lecture 11 9/4/01 1 ROTATIONS (II) I Main Topics A Rotations using a stereonet B Comments on rotations using stereonets and matrices C Uses of rotation in geology (and engineering) II II Rotations using a stereonet A Best uses 1 Rotation axis is vertical 2 Rotation axis is horizontal (e.g., to restore tilted beds) B Construction technique 1 Find orientation of rotation axis 2 Find angle of rotation and rotate pole to plane (or a linear feature) along a small circle perpendicular to the rotation axis. a For a horizontal rotation axis the small circle is vertical b For a vertical rotation axis the small circle is horizontal 3 WARNING: DON'T rotate a plane by rotating its dip direction vector; this doesn't work (see handout) IIIComments on rotations using stereonets and matrices Advantages Disadvantages Stereonets Good for visualization Relatively slow Can bring into field Need good stereonets, paper Matrices Speed and flexibility Computer really required to Good for multiple rotations cut down on errors A General comments about stereonets vs. rotation matrices 1 With stereonets, an object is usually considered to be rotated and the coordinate axes are held fixed. 2 With rotation matrices, an object is usually considered to be held fixed and the coordinate axes are rotated. B To return tilted bedding to horizontal choose a rotation axis that coincides with the direction of strike. The angle of rotation is the negative of the dip of the bedding (right-hand rule! ) if the bedding is to be rotated back to horizontal and positive if the axes are to be rotated to the plane of the tilted bedding.
    [Show full text]
  • Euler Quaternions
    Four different ways to represent rotation my head is spinning... The space of rotations SO( 3) = {R ∈ R3×3 | RRT = I,det(R) = +1} Special orthogonal group(3): Why det( R ) = ± 1 ? − = − Rotations preserve distance: Rp1 Rp2 p1 p2 Rotations preserve orientation: ( ) × ( ) = ( × ) Rp1 Rp2 R p1 p2 The space of rotations SO( 3) = {R ∈ R3×3 | RRT = I,det(R) = +1} Special orthogonal group(3): Why it’s a group: • Closed under multiplication: if ∈ ( ) then ∈ ( ) R1, R2 SO 3 R1R2 SO 3 • Has an identity: ∃ ∈ ( ) = I SO 3 s.t. IR1 R1 • Has a unique inverse… • Is associative… Why orthogonal: • vectors in matrix are orthogonal Why it’s special: det( R ) = + 1 , NOT det(R) = ±1 Right hand coordinate system Possible rotation representations You need at least three numbers to represent an arbitrary rotation in SO(3) (Euler theorem). Some three-number representations: • ZYZ Euler angles • ZYX Euler angles (roll, pitch, yaw) • Axis angle One four-number representation: • quaternions ZYZ Euler Angles φ = θ rzyz ψ φ − φ cos sin 0 To get from A to B: φ = φ φ Rz ( ) sin cos 0 1. Rotate φ about z axis 0 0 1 θ θ 2. Then rotate θ about y axis cos 0 sin θ = ψ Ry ( ) 0 1 0 3. Then rotate about z axis − sinθ 0 cosθ ψ − ψ cos sin 0 ψ = ψ ψ Rz ( ) sin cos 0 0 0 1 ZYZ Euler Angles φ θ ψ Remember that R z ( ) R y ( ) R z ( ) encode the desired rotation in the pre- rotation reference frame: φ = pre−rotation Rz ( ) Rpost−rotation Therefore, the sequence of rotations is concatentated as follows: (φ θ ψ ) = φ θ ψ Rzyz , , Rz ( )Ry ( )Rz ( ) φ − φ θ θ ψ − ψ cos sin 0 cos 0 sin cos sin 0 (φ θ ψ ) = φ φ ψ ψ Rzyz , , sin cos 0 0 1 0 sin cos 0 0 0 1− sinθ 0 cosθ 0 0 1 − − − cφ cθ cψ sφ sψ cφ cθ sψ sφ cψ cφ sθ (φ θ ψ ) = + − + Rzyz , , sφ cθ cψ cφ sψ sφ cθ sψ cφ cψ sφ sθ − sθ cψ sθ sψ cθ ZYX Euler Angles (roll, pitch, yaw) φ − φ cos sin 0 To get from A to B: φ = φ φ Rz ( ) sin cos 0 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Structuring of Pattern Repeats in the Paracas Necropolis Embroideries
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Textile Society of America Symposium Proceedings Textile Society of America 1988 Orientation And Symmetry: The Structuring Of Pattern Repeats In The Paracas Necropolis Embroideries Mary Frame University of British Columbia Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/tsaconf Part of the Art and Design Commons Frame, Mary, "Orientation And Symmetry: The Structuring Of Pattern Repeats In The Paracas Necropolis Embroideries" (1988). Textile Society of America Symposium Proceedings. 637. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/tsaconf/637 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Textile Society of America at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Textile Society of America Symposium Proceedings by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. 136 RESEARCH-IN-PROGRESS REPORT ORIENTATION AND SYMMETRY: THE STRUCTURING OF PATTERN REPEATS IN THE PARACAS NECROPOLIS EMBROIDERIES MARY FRAME RESEARCH ASSOCIATE, INSTITUTE OF ANDEAN STUDIES 4611 Marine Drive West Vancouver, B.C. V7W 2P1 The most extensive Peruvian fabric remains come from the archeological site of Paracas Necropolis on the South Coast of Peru. Preserved by the dry desert conditions, this cache of 429 mummy bundles, excavated in 1926-27, provides an unparal- leled opportunity for comparing the range and nature of varia- tions in similar fabrics which are securely related in time and space. The bundles are thought to span the time period from 500-200 B.C. The most numerous and notable fabrics are embroideries: garments that have been classified as mantles, tunics, wrap- around skirts, loincloths, turbans and ponchos.
    [Show full text]
  • Rotation Matrix - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Page 1 of 22
    Rotation matrix - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Page 1 of 22 Rotation matrix From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia In linear algebra, a rotation matrix is a matrix that is used to perform a rotation in Euclidean space. For example the matrix rotates points in the xy -Cartesian plane counterclockwise through an angle θ about the origin of the Cartesian coordinate system. To perform the rotation, the position of each point must be represented by a column vector v, containing the coordinates of the point. A rotated vector is obtained by using the matrix multiplication Rv (see below for details). In two and three dimensions, rotation matrices are among the simplest algebraic descriptions of rotations, and are used extensively for computations in geometry, physics, and computer graphics. Though most applications involve rotations in two or three dimensions, rotation matrices can be defined for n-dimensional space. Rotation matrices are always square, with real entries. Algebraically, a rotation matrix in n-dimensions is a n × n special orthogonal matrix, i.e. an orthogonal matrix whose determinant is 1: . The set of all rotation matrices forms a group, known as the rotation group or the special orthogonal group. It is a subset of the orthogonal group, which includes reflections and consists of all orthogonal matrices with determinant 1 or -1, and of the special linear group, which includes all volume-preserving transformations and consists of matrices with determinant 1. Contents 1 Rotations in two dimensions 1.1 Non-standard orientation
    [Show full text]
  • The Problem of Exterior Orientation in Photogrammetry
    T he Problem of Exterior Orientation in Photogrammetry*t GEORGE H. ROSENFIELD, Data Reduction A nalyst, RCA Service Co., Air Force Missile Test Center, Patrick Air Force Base, Fla. ABSTRACT: Increased interest in Analytical Photogrammetry has focused at­ tention upon a chaotic situation which complicates research and communication between photogrammetrists. The designation of the orientation parameters in a different manner by almost every investigator has resulted in the need for a universal non-ambiguous system which depicts the actual physical orientation of the photograph. This paper presents a discussion of the basic concepts in­ volved in the various systems in use, and recommends the adoption of a standard system within the basic framework of the Stockholm resolution of July 1956, concerning the sign convention to be used in Photogrammetry. 1. INTRODUCTION CHAOTIC situation exists within the science of Photogrammetry which complicates A research and communication between photogrammetrists. When the theoretician studies a technical paper, he finds the work unnecessarily laborious until he has first become familiar with the coordinate system, definitions, and rotations employed by the writer. \i\Then the skilled instrument operator sits down to a newstereoplotting instrument he finds the orienta­ tion procedure unnecessarily difficult until he be­ comes familiar with the positive direction of the translational and rotational motions. Thus it is that almost every individual has devised his own unique system of designating the exterior orienta­ tion of the photograph. In order to alleviate these complications, the VIII International Congress for Photogrammetry at Stockholm in July 1956, accepted a resolution on the sign convention to be used in photogrammetry.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guided Tour to the Plane-Based Geometric Algebra PGA
    A Guided Tour to the Plane-Based Geometric Algebra PGA Leo Dorst University of Amsterdam Version 1.15{ July 6, 2020 Planes are the primitive elements for the constructions of objects and oper- ators in Euclidean geometry. Triangulated meshes are built from them, and reflections in multiple planes are a mathematically pure way to construct Euclidean motions. A geometric algebra based on planes is therefore a natural choice to unify objects and operators for Euclidean geometry. The usual claims of `com- pleteness' of the GA approach leads us to hope that it might contain, in a single framework, all representations ever designed for Euclidean geometry - including normal vectors, directions as points at infinity, Pl¨ucker coordinates for lines, quaternions as 3D rotations around the origin, and dual quaternions for rigid body motions; and even spinors. This text provides a guided tour to this algebra of planes PGA. It indeed shows how all such computationally efficient methods are incorporated and related. We will see how the PGA elements naturally group into blocks of four coordinates in an implementation, and how this more complete under- standing of the embedding suggests some handy choices to avoid extraneous computations. In the unified PGA framework, one never switches between efficient representations for subtasks, and this obviously saves any time spent on data conversions. Relative to other treatments of PGA, this text is rather light on the mathematics. Where you see careful derivations, they involve the aspects of orientation and magnitude. These features have been neglected by authors focussing on the mathematical beauty of the projective nature of the algebra.
    [Show full text]
  • Euclidean Space - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Page 1 of 5
    Euclidean space - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Page 1 of 5 Euclidean space From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia In mathematics, Euclidean space is the Euclidean plane and three-dimensional space of Euclidean geometry, as well as the generalizations of these notions to higher dimensions. The term “Euclidean” distinguishes these spaces from the curved spaces of non-Euclidean geometry and Einstein's general theory of relativity, and is named for the Greek mathematician Euclid of Alexandria. Classical Greek geometry defined the Euclidean plane and Euclidean three-dimensional space using certain postulates, while the other properties of these spaces were deduced as theorems. In modern mathematics, it is more common to define Euclidean space using Cartesian coordinates and the ideas of analytic geometry. This approach brings the tools of algebra and calculus to bear on questions of geometry, and Every point in three-dimensional has the advantage that it generalizes easily to Euclidean Euclidean space is determined by three spaces of more than three dimensions. coordinates. From the modern viewpoint, there is essentially only one Euclidean space of each dimension. In dimension one this is the real line; in dimension two it is the Cartesian plane; and in higher dimensions it is the real coordinate space with three or more real number coordinates. Thus a point in Euclidean space is a tuple of real numbers, and distances are defined using the Euclidean distance formula. Mathematicians often denote the n-dimensional Euclidean space by , or sometimes if they wish to emphasize its Euclidean nature. Euclidean spaces have finite dimension. Contents 1 Intuitive overview 2 Real coordinate space 3 Euclidean structure 4 Topology of Euclidean space 5 Generalizations 6 See also 7 References Intuitive overview One way to think of the Euclidean plane is as a set of points satisfying certain relationships, expressible in terms of distance and angle.
    [Show full text]
  • A Tutorial on Euler Angles and Quaternions
    A Tutorial on Euler Angles and Quaternions Moti Ben-Ari Department of Science Teaching Weizmann Institute of Science http://www.weizmann.ac.il/sci-tea/benari/ Version 2.0.1 c 2014–17 by Moti Ben-Ari. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-sa/3.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 444 Castro Street, Suite 900, Mountain View, California, 94041, USA. Chapter 1 Introduction You sitting in an airplane at night, watching a movie displayed on the screen attached to the seat in front of you. The airplane gently banks to the left. You may feel the slight acceleration, but you won’t see any change in the position of the movie screen. Both you and the screen are in the same frame of reference, so unless you stand up or make another move, the position and orientation of the screen relative to your position and orientation won’t change. The same is not true with respect to your position and orientation relative to the frame of reference of the earth. The airplane is moving forward at a very high speed and the bank changes your orientation with respect to the earth. The transformation of coordinates (position and orientation) from one frame of reference is a fundamental operation in several areas: flight control of aircraft and rockets, move- ment of manipulators in robotics, and computer graphics. This tutorial introduces the mathematics of rotations using two formalisms: (1) Euler angles are the angles of rotation of a three-dimensional coordinate frame.
    [Show full text]
  • Rigid Motion – a Transformation That Preserves Distance and Angle Measure (The Shapes Are Congruent, Angles Are Congruent)
    REVIEW OF TRANSFORMATIONS GEOMETRY Rigid motion – A transformation that preserves distance and angle measure (the shapes are congruent, angles are congruent). Isometry – A transformation that preserves distance (the shapes are congruent). Direct Isometry – A transformation that preserves orientation, the order of the lettering (ABCD) in the figure and the image are the same, either both clockwise or both counterclockwise (the shapes are congruent). Opposite Isometry – A transformation that DOES NOT preserve orientation, the order of the lettering (ABCD) is reversed, either clockwise or counterclockwise becomes clockwise (the shapes are congruent). Composition of transformations – is a combination of 2 or more transformations. In a composition, you perform each transformation on the image of the preceding transformation. Example: rRx axis O,180 , the little circle tells us that this is a composition of transformations, we also execute the transformations from right to left (backwards). If you would like a visual of this information or if you would like to quiz yourself, go to http://www.mathsisfun.com/geometry/transformations.html. Line Reflection Point Reflection Translations (Shift) Rotations (Turn) Glide Reflection Dilations (Multiply) Rigid Motion Rigid Motion Rigid Motion Rigid Motion Rigid Motion Not a rigid motion Opposite isometry Direct isometry Direct isometry Direct isometry Opposite isometry NOT an isometry Reverse orientation Same orientation Same orientation Same orientation Reverse orientation Same orientation Properties preserved: Properties preserved: Properties preserved: Properties preserved: Properties preserved: Properties preserved: 1. Distance 1. Distance 1. Distance 1. Distance 1. Distance 1. Angle measure 2. Angle measure 2. Angle measure 2. Angle measure 2. Angle measure 2. Angle measure 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Working with 3D Rotations
    Working With 3D Rotations Stan Melax Graphics Software Engineer, Intel Human Brain is wired for Spatial Computation Which shape is the same: a) b) c) “I don’t need to ask A childhood IQ test question for directions” Translations Rotations Agenda ● Rotations and Matrices (hopefully review) ● Combining Rotations ● Matrix and Axis Angle ● Challenges of deep Space (of Rotations) ● Quaternions ● Applications Terminology Clarification Preferred usages of various terms: Linear Angular Object Pose Position (point) Orientation A change in Pose Translation (vector) Rotation Rate of change Linear Velocity Spin also: Direction specifies 2 DOF, Orientation specifies all 3 angular DOF. Rotations Trickier than Translations Translations Rotations a then b == b then a x then y != y then x (non-commutative) ● Programming with rotations also more challenging! 2D Rotation θ Rotate [1 0] by θ about origin 1,1 [ cos(θ) sin(θ) ] θ θ sin cos θ 1,0 2D Rotation θ Rotate [0 1] by θ about origin -1,1 0,1 sin θ [-sin(θ) cos(θ)] θ θ cos 2D Rotation of an arbitrary point Rotate about origin by θ = cos θ + sin θ 2D Rotation of an arbitrary point 푥 Rotate 푦 about origin by θ 푥′, 푦′ 푥′ = 푥 cos θ − 푦 sin θ 푦′ = 푥 sin θ + 푦 cos θ 푦 푥 2D Rotation Matrix 푥 Rotate 푦 about origin by θ 푥′, 푦′ 푥′ = 푥 cos θ − 푦 sin θ 푦′ = 푥 sin θ + 푦 cos θ 푦 푥′ cos θ − sin θ 푥 푥 = 푦′ sin θ cos θ 푦 cos θ − sin θ Matrix is rotation by θ sin θ cos θ 2D Orientation 풚 Yellow grid placed over first grid but at angle of θ cos θ − sin θ sin θ cos θ 풙 Columns of the matrix are the directions of the axes.
    [Show full text]
  • Closed-Form Solution of Absolute Orientation Using Unit Quaternions
    Berthold K. P. Horn Vol. 4, No. 4/April 1987/J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 629 Closed-form solution of absolute orientation using unit quaternions Berthold K. P. Horn Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii 96720 Received August 6, 1986; accepted November 25, 1986 Finding the relationship between two coordinate systems using pairs of measurements of the coordinates of a number of points in both systems is a classic photogrammetric task. It finds applications in stereophotogrammetry and in robotics. I present here a closed-form solution to the least-squares problem for three or more points. Currently various empirical, graphical, and numerical iterative methods are in use. Derivation of the solution is simplified by use of unit quaternions to represent rotation. I emphasize a symmetry property that a solution to this problem ought to possess. The best translational offset is the difference between the centroid of the coordinates in one system and the rotated and scaled centroid of the coordinates in the other system. The best scale is equal to the ratio of the root-mean-square deviations of the coordinates in the two systems from their respective centroids. These exact results are to be preferred to approximate methods based on measurements of a few selected points. The unit quaternion representing the best rotation is the eigenvector associated with the most positive eigenvalue of a symmetric 4 X 4 matrix. The elements of this matrix are combinations of sums of products of corresponding coordinates of the points. 1. INTRODUCTION I present a closed-form solution to the least-squares prob- lem in Sections 2 and 4 and show in Section 5 that it simpli- Suppose that we are given the coordinates of a number of fies greatly when only three points are used.
    [Show full text]