CASE REPORT

Infectious Sacroiliitis in a Patient With a History of IV Drug Use

Victor Huang, MD; Marc Olshan, MD; Bryan McCarty, MD; Zhanna Roit, MD

A 29-year-old man presented for evaluation of unabating left-sided low back pain that radiated to his left buttock and .

Case Hg; and temperature, 98.2°F. Oxygen satu- A 29-year-old man presented to the ED ration was 98% on room air. with a 3-day history of constant left-sid- The patient was a well-developed young ed low back pain that radiated to his left man in no apparent distress. Dermatologi- buttock and groin. The patient stated the cal examination showed bilateral track pain worsened with movement, making it marks in the antecubital fossa. The mus- difficult for him to walk. He reported lift- culoskeletal (MSK) examination demon- ing heavy boxes at work, but denied any strated left gluteal tenderness to trauma. The patient also denied recent fe- and decreased active and passive range vers, chills, chest pain, dyspnea, abdomi- of motion of the left , especially with nal pain, urinary or fecal incontinence, internal rotation and flexion. He had no weakness, numbness, or saddle anesthe- midline tenderness, and the lower extrem- sia. Regarding his medical history, he had ities had normal pulses and no motor or an appendectomy as a child, but reported sensory deficits. no other surgeries or medical issues. His The patient’s pain improved with IV flu- social history was significant for narcotic ids, diazepam, and ketorolac, and he was and inhalant use and daily tobacco use. able to ambulate with assistance. He was The patient also reported taking heroin in- clinically diagnosed with , and travenously (IV) 6 months prior. discharged home with prescriptions for Vital signs at presentation were: heart diazepam and . He was also in- rate (HR), 92 beats/min; respiratory rate, 15 structed to follow-up with an orthopedist breaths/min; blood pressure, 118/80 mm within 7 days from discharge.

Dr Huang is an emergency physician, department of emergency medicine, North Shore University Hospital, Hofstra Northwell School of Medi- cine, Manhasset, New York. Dr Olshan is an emergency physician, department of emergency medicine, North Shore University Hospital, Hof- stra Northwell School of Medicine, Manhasset, New York. Dr McCarty is an emergency physician, department of emergency medicine, North Shore University Hospital, Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Manhasset, New York; and Primary Care Sports Medicine, Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Hempstead, New York. Dr Roit is an emergency physician, department of emergency medicine, North Shore University Hospital, Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Manhasset, New York. Authors’ Disclosure Statement: The authors report no actual or potential conflict of interest in relation to this article. DOI: 10.12788/emed.2017.0034

264 EMERGENCY MEDICINE I JUNE 2017 www.emed-journal.com The patient returned to the ED the fol- lowing day with similar complaints of unabating left-sided pain and difficulty ambulating. His vital signs were notable for an elevated HR of 106 beats/min. Phys- ical examination findings were unchanged from his presentation the previous day, and an X-ray of the lumbar spine showed no abnormalities. After receiving IV , the pa- tient’s pain improved and his tachycardia resolved. He was discharged home with instructions to continue taking diazepam, and was also given prescriptions for pred- nisone and oxycodone/acetaminophen. He was instructed to follow-up with an orthopedist within 24 hours. Over the next 9 days, the patient was Figure. Magnetic resonance imaging of the patient’s in the axial plane demon- seen twice by an orthopedist, who ordered strating signal enhancement of the left sacroiliac joint (white arrow) and adjacent mar- imaging of the lumbar spine, including a row, with surrounding fluid and soft tissue edema, consistent with infectious sacroiliitis. repeat X-ray and contrast-enhanced mag- netic resonance imaging (MRI), both of cyte sedimentation rate (ESR), 19 mm/h; which were unremarkable. The patient C-reactive protein (CRP), 2.45 mg/L; white completed the prescribed course of di- blood cell count (WBC), 13.6 K/uL with clofenac, oxycodone/acetaminophen, and normal differential; and lactate level, 2.6 prednisone, but experienced only minimal mg/dL. The toxicology screen was posi- pain relief. The orthopedist prescribed the tive for opioids. The basic metabolic pan- diclofenac to supplement the medication el, chest X-ray, and urinalysis were all un- regimen that he was already on. remarkable. An electrocardiogram showed At the second follow-up visit, the ortho- sinus tachycardia. pedist ordered an MRI of the patient’s left The patient was admitted to the hospi- hip, which demonstrated of tal, and infectious disease services was the left sacroiliac joint (SIJ) with effusion, contacted. While awaiting transport to the and a 1-cm by 1-cm collection adjacent to inpatient floor, the patient admitted to IV the left psoas muscle; these findings were drug use 4 weeks prior to his initial pre- concerning for (Figure). sentation—not the 6 months he initially Based on the MRI study, a computed to- reported at the first ED visit. mography (CT)-guided arthrocentesis of The blood cultures grew Candida parap- the left SIJ was performed by an interven- silosis, and culture from the SIJ arthrocen- tional radiologist. tesis grew Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The Following the arthrocentesis, the ortho- infectious disease physician switched the pedist referred the patient to the ED. At patient’s antibiotic therapy to IV cefepime this presentation, the emergency physi- and fluconazole. The patient also was seen cian (EP) ordered blood cultures, blood by an orthopedist, who determined that work, urinalysis, and a urinary toxicology no surgical intervention was required. screen, and started the patient on IV cef- Follow-up laboratory studies showed triaxone and vancomycin. The laboratory inflammatory markers peaking at the fol- studies were significant for the following lowing levels: ESR, 36 mm/h; CRP, 4.84 elevated inflammatory markers: erythro- mg/L; and WBC, 32.1 K/uL with 90%

www.emed-journal.com JUNE 2017 I EMERGENCY MEDICINE 265 INFECTIOUS SACROILIITIS

neutrophils. These markers normalized disease has progressed, with a mean time throughout his hospital stay. The patient to diagnosis of 43.3 days.2 was also tested for hepatitis and human Infectious arthritis of any joint has a prev- immunodeficiency virus, both of which alence of 2 to 10 per 100,000 people. In 50% were negative. A transesophageal echo- of cases, the is the joint most common- cardiogram showed no obvious masses or ly affected, followed by the hip, shoulder, vegetations. and elbow.3 Regardless of location, infec- The patient had an uncomplicated hos- tious arthritis is associated with significant pital course, and was discharged home on morbidity and mortality due to sepsis and hospital day 6 with a 4-week prescription irreversible loss of joint function.4 of oral fluconazole and levofloxacin, and Risk factors for ISI include IV drug use, instructed to follow-up with both infec- pregnancy, trauma, endocarditis, and im- tious disease and the orthopedist. To ad- munosuppression.1 The decision to initiate dress his history of IV drug use, he also was the workup for ISI can be difficult to make given follow-up with pain management. because the condition may present with- One month later, the patient returned a out signs of an infectious etiology, such as fourth time to the ED for evaluation of bi- toxic appearance, inflammatory changes lateral lower extremity pain and swelling. surrounding the joint, or even —only He stated that he had been mostly bed- 41% of affected patients in one case series bound at home since his discharge from were febrile.2 The workup is often time- the hospital due to continued pain with consuming, invasive, and expensive. weight-bearing. Although delayed diagnosis and treat- The patient’s vital signs were normal. ment of septic arthritis is associated with The EP ordered a duplex ultrasound significant adverse effects, there is unfor- study, which showed extensive bilateral tunately no consensus to guide the workup lower extremity deep vein thrombosis. He for ISI. As opposed to Kocher’s criteria for was started on subcutaneous therapeutic the differentiation of septic hip arthritis enoxaparin and admitted to the inpatient from transient in pediatric pa- hospital. During admission, a left lower tients or well-known red-flags for further lobe pulmonary artery embolism was evaluation of low back pain, physicians found on chest CT angiography, though he are left without much guidance when con- had no cardiac or respiratory symptoms. sidering laboratory workup or imaging de- He was discharged home with a 3-month cisions to evaluate for ISI. prescription for oral rivaroxaban. At a 4-month follow-up visit, the pa- Sacroiliac Joint tient reported minimal residual disability As previously noted, the SIJ is not com- after completing the course of treatment. monly affected by infection. It is a diarthro- During the follow-up, the patient denied dial, L-shaped joint comprised of the pos- using IV heroin; he was referred to a pain terior ilium and sacrum, and is a near-rigid management specialist, who placed the structure with very limited movement that patient on methadone. provides stability to the axial skeleton.5 The SIJ is often overlooked as a secondary cause Discussion of low back pain in younger patients with Infectious sacroiliitis (ISI) is a rare form of rheumatologic conditions (eg, ankylosing infectious arthritis affecting the SIJ, with spondylitis, Reiter syndrome), pregnancy- an incidence of 1 to 2 reported cases per associated , and osteo- year.1 The literature on ISI currently con- arthritis in elderly patients. In one study, sists only of case reports and case series. 88.2% of sacroiliitis cases were inflammato- This infection is often diagnosed after the ry, 8.8% infectious, and 2.9% degenerative.6

266 EMERGENCY MEDICINE I JUNE 2017 www.emed-journal.com Signs and Symptoms ward pressure on the knee. Pain reproduced As our case illustrates, ISI often presents in the affected SI region is sensitive for joint with nonspecific symptoms and physical inflammation. findings.7 Patients typically present with fever, painful manipulation of the SIJ, and Laboratory and Imaging Studies unilateral lumbo-gluteal pain.2 The compo- Laboratory studies typically show incon- nents of the history and physical examina- sistent and nonspecific findings, such as tion suspicious for an infectious etiology the elevated ESR and CRP levels seen in include the subacute presentation; unre- our patient.2,12 Imaging studies to assess solved pain despite treatment; tenderness the SIJ for signs of infection are therefore to palpation; decreased range of motion; essential for confirming infection. and recent IV drug use, which increases the Magnetic resonance imaging is the pre- risk of infectious disease due to unsterile ferred imaging modality to assess for ISI, practices and direct inoculation of patho- since it has the highest sensitivity in vi- gens into the bloodstream8 and a further sualizing joint effusion and bone mar- predilection into the axial skeleton. 9 It is row edema compared to other modalities. important to obtain an accurate social histo- Computed tomography, however, can be ry; however, patients may not be forthright helpful in visualizing associated abscess- about disclosing sensitive information such es and guiding arthrocentesis.12 Plain X- as sexual history and illicit drug use. ray may not demonstrate early changes in bone.13 The confirmatory study for ISI is Physical Assessment synovial fluid analysis and culture.7 The SIJ is best appreciated in the seated patient by palpating one fingerbreadth me- Treatment dial to the posterior superior iliac spine as Infectious sacroiliitis secondary to P ae- he or she slowly bends forward.10 Tender- ruginosa, a gram-negative bacillus, is dif- ness elicited while in this position is sug- ficult to treat because of the glycocalyx gestive of SIJ inflammation. The area of and slime production that protects the tenderness may be lower than anticipated pathogen from antibiotics, the develop- and lateral to the gluteal cleft, as synovial ment of multiple-antimicrobial resistance, fluid is typically relegated to the lower and poor drug penetration into bones and half of the joint. abscesses.14 Antibiotic treatment should Several adjunctive physical examina- cover Staphylococcus aureus and may be tion maneuvers, such as the Gaenslen test broadened to cover gram-negative bacilli. and Flexion Abduction External Rota- The recommended duration of treatment tion test (FABER test or Patrick’s test) can is at least a 2-week course of IV antibiotics, isolate SIJ pathology or dysfunction. The followed by a 6-week course of oral antibi- Gaenslen test is performed by asking the otics.2 Therapy also includes pain control patient to lie supine and flex the affected and surgical intervention for abscesses, hip and knee, with the lumbar spine flat , and refractory cases.7 against the examination table. Hyperex- tending the contralateral downward Complications will reproduce pain in the affected SIJ. Complications and long-term sequelae are The FABER test is a simple but less spe- common in ISI, often due to late diagno- cific examination technique to assess joint sis of the condition. Our case illustrates pain in the hip, lumbar, and sacroiliac the delayed diagnosis of Pseudomonas joints.11 In this assessment, the clinician ISI with candidemia in a young man with flexes the patient’s affected knee to 90°, ex- a history of IV drug use presenting with ternally rotates the hip, and applies down- atraumatic low back pain. His clinical

www.emed-journal.com JUNE 2017 I EMERGENCY MEDICINE 267 INFECTIOUS SACROILIITIS

course was complicated by a thrombo- Published August 2010. Accessed October 28, 2016. 4. Goldenberg DL. Septic arthritis. Lancet. embolic event, likely secondary to immo- 1998;351(9097):197-202. doi:10.1016/S0140- bility and a hypercoagulable state from 6736(97)09522-6. 15 5. Vleeming A, Schuenke MD, Masi AT, Carreiro JE, infection and inflammation. Infectious Danneels L, Willard FH. The sacroiliac joint: an sacroiliitis secondary to P aeruginosa is overview of its anatomy, function and potential clinical implications. J Anat. 2012;221(6):537-567. most commonly seen in patients with im- doi:10.1111/j.1469-7580.2012.01564.x. munosuppression, hospitalization, and IV 6. Owlia MB, Danesh-Ardakani M. Frequency of sac- 2 roiliitis among patients with low back pain. Electron drug use. Physician. 2016;8(3):2094-2100. doi:10.19082/2094. 7. Zimmermann B 3rd, Mikolich DJ, Lally EV. Septic sacroiliitis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1996;26(3): Summary 592-604. Infectious sacroiliitis remains a diagnos- 8. Brtalik D, Pariyadath M. A case report of infectious sacroiliitis in an adult presenting to the emergency tic challenge for physicians due to its rare department with inability to walk. J Emerg Med. incidence and nonspecific clinical mani- 2017:52(3)e65-e68. doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2016. 10.022. festations. Our case illustrates the impor- 9. Ferraro K, Cohen MA. Acute septic sacroiliitis in an tance of maintaining a high level of clini- injection drug user. Am J Emerg Med. 2004;22(1): 60-61. cal suspicion for infectious arthritis in 10. Safran M, Botser IB. Hip anatomy and biomechanics. young patients presenting with common In: Miller MD, Thompson SR, eds. DeLee & Drez’s Orthopaedic Sports Medicine. Vol 2. 4th ed. Phila- MSK complaints in the presence of infec- delphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders; 2015:917-932.e1. tious risk factors. Emergency physicians 11. LeBlond RF, Brown DD, Suneja M, Szot JF. The spine, pelvic, and extremities. In: LeBlond RF, should consider red flags, abnormal vital Brown DD, Suneja M, Szot JF. eds. DeGowin’s signs, and patient recidivism when decid- Diagnostic Examination. 10th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2015:508-576. ing on the most appropriate workup. 12. Scott KR, Rising KL, Conlon LW. Infectious sacroili- itis. J Emerg Med. 2014;47(3):83-84. doi:10.1016/ j.jemermed.2014.05.001. References 13. Cinar M, Sanal HT, Yilmaz S, et al. Radiological fol- 1. Mancarella L, De Santis M, Magarelli N, Ierardi lowup of the evolution of inflammatory process in AM, Bonomo L, Ferraccioli G. Septic sacroiliitis: sacroiliac joint with magnetic resonance imaging: a an uncommon septic arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. case with pyogenic sacroiliitis. Case Rep Rheuma- 2009;27(6):1004-1008. tol. 2012;2012:509136. doi:10.1155/2012/509136. 2. Hermet M, Minichiello E, Flipo RM, et al. Infec- 14. Calza L, Manfredi R, Marinacci G, Fortunato L, tious sacroiliitis: a retrospective, multicentre Chiodo F. Community-acquired Pseudomonas aeru- study of 39 adults. BMC Infect Dis. 2012;12:305. ginosa sacro-iliitis in a previously healthy patient. doi:10.1186/1471-2334-12-305. J Med Microbiol. 2002;51(7):620-622. 3. Abelson A. Septic Arthritis. Cleveland Clinic. http:// 15. Levi M, Keller TT, van Gorp E, ten Cate H. Infection www.clevelandclinicmeded.com/medicalpubs/ and inflammation and the coagulation system.Car - diseasemanagement//septic-arthritis. diovasc Res. 2003;60(1):26-39.

268 EMERGENCY MEDICINE I JUNE 2017 www.emed-journal.com