DOCSLIB.ORG

Study of Early Maps of the Fritchley Tunnel

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Study of Early Maps of the Fritchley Tunnel Butterley Gangroad Project Study of early maps of the Fritchley Tunnel January 2013 Project file 1030 Early small scale maps that show the Butterley Gangroad (Greenwood 1 26, Sanderson 1 35 and OS 1 39) suggest that there were then two road crossings of the railway in Fritchley. The northern one could have ,een a level crossing the southern one seems very short and might in fact ,e a ,ridge, as mentioned ,y Farey in 1 17. .nside the tunnel there is a definite /0in01and the alignment curves, the southernmost section loo0s to ,e of different construction. 2as this originally a ,ridge that was e3tended to the north as a cut and cover tunnel when the road layout was altered4 This e3ercise was made in order to test this possi,ility. 1 BG2B0009 1880 OS M P N.B. Simplified, only the two ,uildings near to the tunnel are shown. The ,ase map is a plan of the area made ,y tracing the first large scale OS 25 inches to 1 mile map of 1 0. The relationship of the railway and the tunnel to the road remains the same today. An important feature is that one can see that the line must curve inside the tunnel. The drive to Riverside Cottage is shown as a road and the road to the east of the line is a large area with unfenced roadways crossing it. Note also that the southern portal of the tunnel is away from the roadside, so if the south end of the tunnel was originally a ,ridge then the road would have to have moved north to its present alignment. 2 BG2B0009 1849 Tithe map 9 These areas are shown as part of the highway Orchard, Joseph Lynam :ouse and garden, Thos. Bower 9 (Detail not noted here) 9 :ouse, Samuel Leam N.B. Simplified, /Far Ruefield1 meadow, only the two /Croft1 Samuel Leam ,uildings near to the pasture, tunnel are shown. J.Leam The 1 49 Tithe map showed the old alignment. The tunnel is still in the same position ,ut the line is straight (my tracing is not perfect here=). Of interest is the fact that the Drying Ground and the drive to Riverside Cottage are shown as highway. .t shows that some time after 1 49 the railway has ,een re-aligned and the tunnel modified. 3 BG2B0009 1845 Midland Proposed Crich Railway Railway /tramway past Fritchley1 The proposed railway would /land over have used the tunnel alignment tunnel1 with the rail surface 13 feet ,eneath the road. N.B. Simplified, only one ,uilding near to the tunnel is /tramway1 shown. The plan for the proposed Crich ,ranch prepared ,y the Midland Railway shows the layout as on the Tithe Map (see inset). .t can ,e seen that the Gangroad has ta0en the route of the MR proposal later. The MR proposal would perhaps have involved the tunnel ,eing replaced ,y a ,ridge, whereas what actually happened was that the tunnel was curved so that the Gangroad could pic0 up this alignment. 4 BG2B0009 1835 Sanderson Map Map roughly superimposed on the 1 45 plan The earlier maps were all drawn to a very small scale and unli0e later maps that were reduced from large scale plans on used a rudimentary form of surveying. Only 0ey points were fi3ed and the topography ,etween was literally s0etched in ,y eye. So one cannot e3pect the positions of roads etc. to match very well at this level of detail. The early maps have ,een enlarged and then superimposed on our ,ase map. The Sanderson map (inset) if anything shows the tunnel longer than it should ,e and the road layout is a reasona,le match. 5 BG2B0009 '1839( OS Map Detail from surveyor‘s original 2 inch to 1 mile sketch Map roughly superimposed on the 1 45 plan The first one inch OS map shows the tunnel at the present length when superimposed and the position of roads is a reasona,le match. have used the surveyorAs s0etch (inset) rather than the map itself. This survey drawing was made in 1 37. So ,y enlarging the early map to this scale one can see that there is no evidence for the tunnel having ,een a ,ridge at this time. 6 BG2B0009 1826 Greenwood Map Map roughly superimposed on the 1 45 plan The 1 26 Greenwood map is much more s0etchy ,ut still shows the same layout of roads. Perhaps of most significance is the fact that he shows the southern end of the tunnel emerging clear of the road. On this ,asis the tunnel was where it is now in 1 26. .t has ,een altered, ,ut only at its southern end to ta0e up the present alignment which follows the route proposed for the MR Crich ,ranch. This happened sometime after 1 49. E3amination of the Enclosure Map and Award and local land sales and lease agreements may give evidence of the history of the tunnel prior to 1 26. 7 BG2B0009.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Land at Blacksmith's Arms
    Land off North Road, Glossop Education Impact Assessment Report v1-4 (Initial Research Feedback) for Gladman Developments 12th June 2013 Report by Oliver Nicholson EPDS Consultants Conifers House Blounts Court Road Peppard Common Henley-on-Thames RG9 5HB 0118 978 0091 www.epds-consultants.co.uk 1. Introduction 1.1.1. EPDS Consultants has been asked to consider the proposed development for its likely impact on schools in the local area. 1.2. Report Purpose & Scope 1.2.1. The purpose of this report is to act as a principle point of reference for future discussions with the relevant local authority to assist in the negotiation of potential education-specific Section 106 agreements pertaining to this site. This initial report includes an analysis of the development with regards to its likely impact on local primary and secondary school places. 1.3. Intended Audience 1.3.1. The intended audience is the client, Gladman Developments, and may be shared with other interested parties, such as the local authority(ies) and schools in the area local to the proposed development. 1.4. Research Sources 1.4.1. The contents of this initial report are based on publicly available information, including relevant data from central government and the local authority. 1.5. Further Research & Analysis 1.5.1. Further research may be conducted after this initial report, if required by the client, to include a deeper analysis of the local position regarding education provision. This activity may include negotiation with the relevant local authority and the possible submission of Freedom of Information requests if required.
    [Show full text]
  • Crich NP Final Version June 2018
    07/06/2018 (June 2018) 1 Crich Parish Neighbourhood Plan 2017-2031 Contents 1 Foreword ................................................................................................................................................ 4 2 What is the Crich Parish Neighbourhood Plan? ...................................................................................... 5 3 Why do we want a Neighbourhood Plan? .............................................................................................. 7 4 How does this Neighbourhood Plan work within the planning system? ................................................ 7 5 Consultation and the process of developing the Plan ............................................................................ 8 6 Crich Parish in Context ..........................................................................................................................10 Location ........................................................................................................................................................10 Heritage ........................................................................................................................................................10 Crich Parish Today.........................................................................................................................................18 Community Facilities and Services ................................................................................................................20 Natural Environment
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Development of Green Fields East of Bowmer Lane, Fritchley Set out in the Email of Sophie Williams, Savills Sent to the Parish Council on 20Th May 2020
    CRICH PARISH COUNCIL Glebe Field Centre Glebe Field Close Crich Derbyshire DE4 5EU Tel: 01773 853928 E-mail: [email protected] Savills Enfield Chambers 18 Low Pavement Nottingham NG1 7DG 27th May 2020 For the attention of Mr Rob Moore MRICS MRTPI - Associate Director, Planning Dear Mr Moore Land to the east of Bowmer Lane, Fritchley The Parish Council strongly objects to the proposed development of green fields east of Bowmer Lane, Fritchley set out in the email of Sophie Williams, Savills sent to the Parish Council on 20th May 2020. It is noted that following objection from Crich Parish Council and many other parties, Amber Valley Borough Council refused planning permission on the same site on 18 August 2017 in respect of a proposal for residential development (Planning Application reference AVA/2017/0023) for the following reasons: 1. The proposal fails to be sustainable by virtue of the environmental harm caused by the proposal to designated heritage assets and the countryside landscape. This is contrary to Paragraph 7 of the National Planning Policy Framework, which states that there are three dimensions to sustainable development: economic, social and environmental, which must be read together as they are mutually dependent in the interests of ensuring a sustainable form of development is provided, and contrary to Saved policy LS1 of the Local Plan, which states, amongst others, that development should protect and enhance the quality of the built and natural environment. 2. Approval of the proposal would result in a detrimental impact to the setting of the Grade II Listed Old Farm House and Fritchley Conservation Area due to the development of a greenfield site directly abutting the boundary and setting of these designated heritage assets, resulting in an inappropriate urban intrusion which erodes the Conservation Area and Listed Building's surrounding rural setting.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 CRICH to WHATSTANDWELL It Wasn't Going to Rain, It Wasn't to Cold
    Today’s Journey by Michael and Patricia Spencer CRICH to WHATSTANDWELL It wasn't going to rain, it wasn't to cold, it was a good chance to get into the old walking boots and see some more of the county. The problem was where. Crich had been put off more than once so we decided to get it under our belt and decide when we got there which direction to go. Our mate Den, a Cockney exile offered to "dump" us wherever we wanted (next time we're doing the Seychelles) and so to Crich we went. A nice steady drive out to Tansley which a few hundred years ago meant you were in Crich already, it being part of that parish becoming separate around the mid 1840's, then up to Tansley Moor a sharp turn right and on past the old farms of Plaistow Grange and Plaistow House farms. Still looking like old farms should. We come down the hill into the centre of Crich having passed the church further up the hill. The roads in the centre of Crich must be the Spaghetti Junction of Derbyshire, all roads converging from all points of the compass, and standing for all the world like! Something like the City Hall out of Back to the Future, clock and all, is the Crich Baptist Church, it's cloudy but I don't think we will get a lightening strike. With it's double-doored archway and pillars either side it holds up the names on blocks of stone above it, names which include Mr J WILLN of Cromford and Robert WILDGOOSE of Holloway.
    [Show full text]
  • Rural Discontent in Derbyshire 1830·1850
    RURAL DISCONTENT IN DERBYSHIRE 1830·1850 Alan Frank Jones Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History University of Sheffield January 2004 ii Alan Frank Jones RURAL DISCONTENT IN DERBYSlllRE 1830-1850 ABSTRACT Social protest, especially in agricultural regions, has occupie~ and caused considerable debate among, historians for many years. This thesis seeks to add to this debate, by looking at various forms of protest in Derbyshire between 1830 and 1850. This thesis examines three aspects of criminal activity: poaching, arson and animal maiming. It contends that none of these crimes can simply be categorised as acts of protest. In conjunction with an investigation of these three crimes, acts of protest such as strikes and episodes of reluctance to conform are also discussed. It argues that the motives behind various criminal activities and anti-authority behaviour were varied and complex. Arson and animal maiming were rarely co-ordinated, mostly they were individual attacks. However, on a few occasions both arson and animal maiming were directed against certain people. In the instances of poaching, there were more proven cases of gang participation than in either arson or animal maiming, with groups of men raiding game preserves. However, the great majority of raids were individual undertakings. What is more, poaching was carried out on a greater scale throughout the county than either arson or animal maiming. This thesis seeks to put these activities into the context of economic and social change in Derbyshire between 1830 and 1850. It maintains that there was a breaking down of the old social order.
    [Show full text]
  • A Presentation by Cllr James Jamieson, Chair of the Local Government Association
    10am, Friday 14th February 2020 Council Chamber, Nottinghamshire County Council, County Hall, Nottinghamshire 9.30am Political Group Meetings 10.00am General Meeting 1. Apologies 2. Declarations of Interest 3. Minutes of EMC Annual General Meeting held on 12th July 2019 * 4. EMC Chair’s Report * 5. Questions to Chair or Nominee 6. Motion(s) to East Midlands Councils 7. National Picture – update from the Local Government Association and Q&A A Presentation by Cllr James Jamieson, Chair of the Local Government Association 8. Regional Infrastructure and Growth * 9. Asylum and Refugee Resettlement in the East Midlands * 10. Regional Employers’ Board Report * *Papers attached Item 3 Minutes of the East Midlands Councils Meeting Friday 12th July 2019 (Nottinghamshire County Council) Annual General Meeting Cllr Martin Hill OBE chaired and welcomed everyone to the meeting 1. Apologies Mr Jake Atkinson, Cllr David Bill, Cllr Anthony Coultate, Cllr Chris Emmas-Williams, Cllr Ian Fleetwood, Cllr Steve Fritchley, Cllr Matthew Golby, Cllr Martin Griffiths, Cllr Rebecca Langton, Cllr Barry Lewis, Cllr Craig Leyland, Cllr Chris Millar, Cllr Steven North, Cllr Robert Parker, Cllr Gary Porter, Cllr Kevin Richards, Cllr Russell Roberts, Cllr Nick Rushton, Cllr Simon Spencer 2. Declarations of Interest 2.1 Cllr Martin Hill declared an interest in land on the edge of Melton Mowbray – this is a standing Declaration of Interest held on file since September 2015. 3. Minutes of EMC meeting held on 1st February 2019 3.1 These were agreed as a true and accurate record. 4. Presentation by Abellio East Midlands Railway – the New Franchise for the Region 4.1 Members received a presentation from Simon Pready and Edward Funnell from Abellio on the new East Midlands Rail Franchise which is due to commence on 18th August 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 3 Local Green Spaces Report Crich NP
    2017 Local Green Spaces Report CRICH NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN Introduction: The audit of local green spaces has been undertaken in accordance with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) criteria, set out in paragraph 77 which state that ‘Local Green Space’ should only be designated where the site is: . in reasonably proximity to the community it serves; . demonstrably special to a local community and holds a particular local significance, for example because of its beauty, historic significance, recreational value (including a playing field), tranquillity or richness of its wildlife; and . where the green area concerned is local in character and is not an extensive tract of land. The initial selection of sites was based on the community consultation and in particular, the household survey and school workshops. The Neighbourhood Plan seeks to designate the following areas as Local Green Spaces: 1. Crich Stand 2. Crich Recreation Ground 3. Whatstandwell Allotments 4. Fritchley Drying Ground 5. Fritchley School sports field 6. Fritchley Green 7. The Jubilees 8. The Tors 9. Crich Allotments The nine sites proposed for Local Green Space designation are identified in figure 1 and assessed against the criteria in the following tables. Landowners of the respective sites were contacted in December 2016 to advise that their land had been put forward as Local Green Space in the Draft Neighbourhood Plan. 1 | Page Site No. 1 Site Name Crich Stand Current land use Memorial site Ownership Mercian Regiment Current planning application on site? No Extant planning permission on site? No Compliance with NPPF Criteria Reasonable The site is publicly accessible and within reasonable proximity.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 4 Crich Heritage Report Crich NP
    2017 Crich Heritage Report CRICH NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN APPENDIX 4 The National Planning Policy Framework (Framework) in paragraph 126 states that ‘Local planning authorities should set out in their Local Plan a positive strategy for the conservation and enjoyment of the historic environment.’ Heritage assets are not only those designated under statutory regimes, but those that may be recognised by the planning authority as having heritage significance. The definition of heritage asset in the Framework is ‘a building, monument, site, place, area or landscape identified as having a degree of significance meriting consideration in planning decisions, because of its heritage interest. Heritage asset includes designated heritage assets and assets identified by the local planning authority (including local listing).’ Paragraph 135 of the Framework states that non-designated heritage assets can merit consideration in planning matters, with the authority taking a balanced judgement having regard to the scale of any harm or loss and the significance of the heritage asset. The following report identifies non-designated heritage assets in the Plan Area with the potential for ‘local listing’ in accordance with the Framework and the Government’s Planning Practice Guidance (paragraph 39). Amber Valley Borough Council has to date not published a criterion for local listing and as such, the non-designated heritage assets identified in this report have been assessed against a criterion, based broadly on that contained in Historic England Advice Note 7. Criterion 1. The item meets the government’s definition of a heritage asset. Demonstrate that the asset falls within the government’s definition of a heritage asset; i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Or on the “Public Participation” Initiative Please Call the Committee Team on 01629 761133 Or E-Mail: [email protected] 14 October 2020
    This information is available free of charge in electronic, audio, Braille and large print versions on request. For assistance in understanding or reading this document or specific information about this Agenda or on the “Public Participation” initiative please call the Committee Team on 01629 761133 or e-mail: [email protected] 14 October 2020 To: All Councillors As a Member or Substitute of the Governance & Resources Committee, please treat this as your summons to attend a Special meeting on Thursday, 22 October 2020 at 6.00pm via the Zoom application. (Joining details will be provided separately). Under Regulations made under the Coronavirus Act 2020, the meeting will be held virtually. As a member of the public you can view the virtual meeting via the District Council’s website at www.derbyshiredales.gov.uk or via our YouTube channel. Yours sincerely James McLaughlin Director of Corporate Services and Customer Services AGENDA 1. APOLOGIES/SUBSTITUTES Please advise the Committee Team on 01629 761133 or e-mail [email protected] of any apologies for absence and substitute arrangements. 2. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION As the Council cannot hold meetings at the Town Hall, Public Participation can only take place using the Zoom application or by written representations. Members of the public are able to comment or ask questions on the items listed in the agenda and must give notice before 12 noon on the day preceding the meeting by: Web-form: Make your submission here Email: [email protected] Post: Democratic Services, Derbyshire Dales District Council, Town Hall, Matlock DE4 3NN The Committee Team will assist any member of the public without access to electronic means by capturing their concerns over the telephone.
    [Show full text]
  • 142 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    142 bus time schedule & line map 142 Alfreton View In Website Mode The 142 bus line (Alfreton) has 5 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Alfreton: 8:49 AM - 3:11 PM (2) Belper: 11:06 AM - 2:54 PM (3) Belper: 4:15 PM (4) Crich: 7:43 AM (5) Nether Heage: 8:07 AM - 2:45 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 142 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 142 bus arriving. Direction: Alfreton 142 bus Time Schedule 74 stops Alfreton Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 8:49 AM - 3:18 PM Monday 8:49 AM - 3:11 PM Gun Lane, Nether Heage Tuesday 8:49 AM - 3:11 PM Shop Lane, Nether Heage Shop Lane, Ripley Civil Parish Wednesday 8:49 AM - 3:11 PM Gadsby Rise, Nether Heage Thursday 8:49 AM - 3:11 PM Gadsby Rise, Ripley Civil Parish Friday 8:49 AM - 3:11 PM Plastics Factory, Heage Firs Saturday 8:49 AM - 3:18 PM Spanker Lane, Ripley Civil Parish Firs Farm, Heage Firs Ridgeway on the Hill, Heage Firs 142 bus Info Direction: Alfreton Crich Lane, Belper Stops: 74 Trip Duration: 46 min The Spinney, Belper Line Summary: Gun Lane, Nether Heage, Shop Lane, Nether Heage, Gadsby Rise, Nether Heage, Plastics Coronation Avenue, Belper Factory, Heage Firs, Firs Farm, Heage Firs, Ridgeway on the Hill, Heage Firs, Crich Lane, Belper, The Marsh Lane, Belper Spinney, Belper, Coronation Avenue, Belper, Marsh Lane, Belper, Thorn Tree Inn, Belper, Osmaston Marsh Lane, Belper Grange, Belper, Church Lane, Belper, Market Place, Thorn Tree Inn, Belper Belper, New Road, Belper, King Street, Belper, The Lion Hotel, Belper, Mill, Belper,
    [Show full text]
  • Fritchley LM
    Friends Meeting House, Fritchley Chapel Street, Fritchley, Belper, DE56 2FR National Grid Reference: SK 35791 53011 Statement of Significance The purpose-built late nineteenth century meeting house has special interest for the character and appearance of the building and its grounds in the conservation area, for its historical connections with dissenting Quaker meetings, and for its largely intact furnishings. The building and site has high heritage significance. Evidential value The building incorporates evidence for historic changes, and is testament to the resources of Fritchley Quakers. Evidential value is relatively low. Historical value The meeting house has special historical interest as the premises of a dissenting meeting which did not become part of the Quaker mainstream until the 1960s, after a century of independence. It had links with similar dissenting meetings in the UK and in Canada. The Quaker community was very prominent in the village of Fritchley, playing an important part in the nineteenth and twentieth century history of the place. There is high historical value. Aesthetic value The meeting house is of relatively low key appearance, although it utilises brick as a building material in an area where stone was more usual. The interior, which retains the original partitions and furnishings, including loose furnishings, has high aesthetic value. Communal value The meeting house acts as a focus for the activities of local Friends and although there is relatively little community use of the building, it has communal value as part of the local scene, but is of relatively low communal value overall. Part 1: Core data 1.1 Area Meeting: Nottingham and Derbyshire 1.2 Property Registration Number: 0032090 1.3 Owner: Area Meeting 1.4 Local Planning Authority: Amber Valley Borough Council 1.5 Historic England locality: East Midlands 1.6 Civil parish: Crich 1.7 Listed status: Not Listed 1.8 NHLE: N/A 1.9 Conservation Area: Fritchley 1.10 Scheduled Ancient Monument: No 1.11 Heritage at Risk: No 1.12 Date(s): 1897 1.13 Architect (s): J.
    [Show full text]
  • Boundary Commission for England Proceedings at the 2018 Review of Parliamentary Constituencies in England Held at Cathedral Quar
    BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND PROCEEDINGS AT THE 2018 REVIEW OF PARLIAMENTARY CONSTITUENCIES IN ENGLAND HELD AT CATHEDRAL QUARTER HOTEL, 16 SAINT MARY’S GATE DERBY DE1 3JR ON FRIDAY 28 OCTOBER 2016 DAY TWO Before: Mr Scott Handley, The Lead Assistant Commissioner ______________________________ Transcribed from audio by W B Gurney & Sons LLP 83 Victoria Street, London SW1H 0HW Telephone Number: 0203 585 4721/22 ______________________________ Time Noted: 9.00 am THE LEAD ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER: Good morning ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to the second day of the public hearing on the Boundary Commission for England’s initial proposals for the East Midlands. My name is Scott Handley. I am an Assistant Commissioner for the Boundary Commission. I am responsible for chairing the hearing today and we plan to run from 9 am through to 5 pm. I am assisted by Gerald Tessier here from the Commission. Our first appointment booked is at 9.40, so after Gerald has spoken to you we will adjourn for a short time and then we will go through with the booked appointments as we did yesterday. MR TESSIER: Thank you Scott. Yes, my name is Gerald Tessier. I am from the Boundary Commission. I am leading the team from the Boundary Commission Secretariat here today. I just need to remind everyone here that we are filming the proceedings and if you wish to read a copy of our data protection policy, it is pinned to the board at the back there or available from the reception desk. Also a couple of items of housekeeping: toilets are downstairs and if there is a fire alarm then we do need to evacuate the building as quickly as possible.
    [Show full text]